20150437 Ver 1_401 Application_20150515

PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL INC
May 1, 2015
Ms Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 401 /Wetlands Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
Subject Pre - Construction Notification Application
Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
Approximate 24 37 Acre Site
128 Birch Creek Road
Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina
PEI Project No 1447
Dear Ms Higgins
Please find attached four copies of the Pre - Construction Notification Application for the above
referenced site The site contains two dilapidated residential structures, wooded land, recently
timbered land and overgrown fields The site is being proposed for development with a single
family residential development
In order to develop the site, a road must be constructed that will cross a pond Additionally, 0 09
acres of wetland are proposed to be impacted with lot fill Mitigation is not proposed
I am requesting that a 401 Water Quality Certification be issued to authorize the proposed
impacts There are no additional wetland or stream impacts proposed at this time Please feel
free to contact me at 336 - 708 -4620 if you have any questions concerning this request or if
additional information is required Thank you in advance for your timely consideration of this
matter
Sincerely,
Michael T Brame, PWS MAY 0 4 2015
Principal 4n�R'wATJZn -
Attachments Pre - Construction Notification Application
$240 00 Water Resources Certification Fee
PO Box 128, Kernersville, NC 27285
www pilotenviro com

20 043T
o� w A rFq
\oC, pG Office Use Only
} Corps action ID no
a DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form –Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1
Processing �A 11ro%
1a
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
N Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number NWP 29 or General Permit (GP) number
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes ❑ No
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
® 401 Water Quality Certification – Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification – Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
1f
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program
❑ Yes ® No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties If yes, answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes ® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑ Yes ® No
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Taylor's Landing
2b
County
Guilford
2c
Nearest municipality / town
Greensboro
2d
Subdivision name
Taylor's Landing
2e
NCDOT only, T I P or state
project no
_
3
Owner Information's
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Lomanaco Properties, LLC
3b
Deed Book and Page No
Book 7085, Page 1240 0 4 2 &
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
Mr Jon Ford �o tiR' V—V -
&
3d
Street address
PO Box 474 s ER116 NG
3e
City, state, zip
Summerfield, NC 27558
3f
Telephone no
3g
Fax no
3h
Email address
jford747 @msn corn
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form –Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify
4b
Name
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
4d
Street address
4e
City, state, zip
4f
Telephone no
4g
Fax no
4h
Email address
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Bradley S Luckey
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
Pilot Environmental Inc
5c
Street address
PO Box 128
5d
City, state, zip
Kernersville, NC 27285
5e
Telephone no
336 708 4997
5f
Fax no
5g
Email address
bluckey @pilotenviro com
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

B Project Information and Prior Project History
1 Property Identification
1a Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
8805455687
1b Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 36 09939 Longitude - 79 66148
(DD DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1c Property size
24 37 acres
2 Surface Waters
2a Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc ) to
Little Alamance Creek
proposed project
2b Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
WS -IV, NSW
2c River basin
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The site contains dilapidated residences, associated outbuildings, grass covered fields and wooded land The site is
located in a residential area of Greensboro
3b List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
0 48 acres
3c List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
streams =0', open waters =0 45 acres
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide access /utility infrastructure and to facilitate development of the site as a
residential sub- divison
3e Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
The overall project consists of developing the site with a 91 lot residential sub - division In order to provide safe line -of-
site access to the residential sub - division, an access road from Birch Creek Road is necessary Additionally, utilities will
be provided with the access road right -of -way To facilitate the construction of the access road and development of the
site, clearing and grading the site is necessary Graders, haulers, excavators and other heavy equipment will be used
during grading and construction of the site
4 Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments Corps and DWR site visit schduled 5/13/15-
5/15/15
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company Pilot Enviromental
Name (if known) Bradley Luckey /Michael Brame
Other
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
5 Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6 Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes, explain
The project is not part of a phased project Impacts to streams /wetlands, outside of those proposed in this application,
are not anticipated as a result of the proposed project
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
❑ DWQ
0 090
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0 090
2h Comments A total of 0 090 acres of wetland need to be filled for grading and proposed construction of the residential lots
Mitigation should not be requned due to cumulative impacts being less than 0 10 acres
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
31 Comments Stream impacts are not being proposed
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number—
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ®P ❑ T
Unnamed
Fill
Pond
0 058
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑P ❑T
4f Total open water impacts
0 058
4g Comments A total of 0 058 acres of open water (pond) will need to be filled for grading and proposed construction of an
access road and utility infrastructure
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
Stormwater
066
P2
K Total
5g Comments The pond will treat stormwater and remove at least 85% TSS The stormwater management plan is being
submitted to the City of Greensboro separate of this application
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
066
5l Size of pond watershed (acres)
237
5k Method of construction
Excavated in high ground
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
❑ Neuse E] Tar-Pamlico ®Other Jordan Lake
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
im act
required?
B1 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
61 Comments The site is located within the Cape Fear River Basin in an area that has been designated as WS -IV, NSW In
addition, the site is located within the Lake Jordan Watershed Based on our field observations, there are no intermittent or
perennial streams located immediately up or down - gradient of the pond on the site The pond dam spillway has eroded and
created a drainage feature due to the gradient However, it discharges into a linear wetland located at the base of the dam
An off -site stream originates more than 100 feet south of the pond, down - gradient of the linear wetland, based on GPS
measurements Wetlands are also located up- gradient of the pond Features with discernable beds and banks are not
located up- gradient of the pond According to the Jordan Water Supply Nutrient Strategy Protection of Existing Riparian
Buffers (15A NCAC 02B 0267), (5) Exemption Based on On -site Determination, "When a landowner or other affected party
including the Division believes that the maps have inaccurately depicted surface waters, he or she shall consult the
appropriate local government Upon request, a local government representative who has successfully completed the
Division's Surface Water Identification Training Certification course, its successor, or other equivalent training curriculum
approved by the Division, shall make an on -site determination Local governments may also accept the results of site
assessments made by other parties who have successfully completed such training Any disputes over on -site determinations
shall be referred to the Director in writing A determination of the Director as to the accuracy or application of the maps is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G S 150B Surface waters that appear on the maps shall not be subject to
this Rule if a site evaluation reveals any of the following cases (a) Man -made ponds and lakes that are not part of a natural
drainage way that is classified in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B 0100, including ponds and lakes created for animal
watering, irrigation, or other agricultural uses A pond or lake is part of a natural drainage way when it is fed by an intermittent
or perennial stream or when it has a direct discharge point to an intermittent or perennial stream" Based on our field
observations, it is our opinion that the pond located on the southern portion of the site should not be subject to the Jordan
Water Supply Nutrient Strategy Protection of Existing Riparian Buffers (15A NCAC 02B 0267)
D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
Due to the use of the site for residential development, a road must be constructed to provide access to the site The road has
been designed in a location that allows for safe line -of -sight along Birch Creek Road, while also providing interconnectivity to
an existing residential sub - division located west of the site The location of the road crossing has been designed to cross the
narrowest portion of the pond Additionaly, the location of the proposed sewer line is located beneath the proposed road right
of way, thus avoiding other potential impacts to jurisdictional features located on the site
Lot layout has been designed to maximize the number of lots, while also meeting the City of Greensboro zoning requirements
(minimum 7,000 square feet and appropriate setbacks) Additionally, the lot layout has also been designed to satisfy
developer front setback requirements for pad location The lot layout meets the above requirements and has been designed
in a manner that minimizes the impact to the wetlands /pond located on the site The proposed lots between lots 70 and 71
(view impact drawing WL 1 -2 and WL 1 -3) have been eliminated due to the presence of wetlands Additionally, the lots have
been re- designed multiple times with emphasis on avoiding impacts to wetlands /pond located on the site Proposed impacts
to lots 66, 72 and 73 have been avoided due to reduction of lot site Likewise, lots 68 to 70 have been re- designed with a
different orientation, thus reducing the amount of impact to the head of the wetland
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

The site contains a 0 45 acre pond and 0 48 acres of wetlands The remaining 0 392 acres of pond and 0 39 acres of wetland
have been avoided
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
The clearing limits will be staked and silt fence will be used Disturbance limits will be surveyed, staked and marked with high
visibility fencing The pond will be pumped to lower water elevation such that work will be conducted in the dry Following
construction, disturbed slopes will be stabilized with permanent seeding, matting and temporary slope linings Best
management practices will be implemented during construction activities to avoid sediment discharge into downgradient water
bodies
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
projects
❑ Mitigation bank
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c Comments
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
lb
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
404%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan
A 0 66 acre stormwater pond has been designed to treat stormwater runoff The stormwater pond has been designed to
treat at least 85% total suspended solids The stormwater pond has been designed to treat stormwater based on the site
being 40 4% impervious The stormwater plan is being mailed to the City of Greensboro for review and is not included in
this permit application
® Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Greensboro
® Phase II
® NSW
3b
Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HOW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other
4b Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
5
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements'
® Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

F Supplementary Information
1 Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ® No
letter )
Comments A NEPA or SEPA is not required as part of this project
2 Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3 Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered 'yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
We are not aware of additional development that will result which will impact nearby downstream water quality
4 Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
Wastewater from the residences will be disposed of by municipal sewer service provided by the City of Greensboro No
stream or wetland impacts will occur that are associated with sewage disposal and /or installation of sewage lines
Page 1 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
We consulted the Natural Heritage Program Website to determine if federally protected endangered or threatened
species inhabit the Mcleansville, NC Quadrangle (the quadrangle that contains the site) There are no federally listed
protected endangered or threatened species that have been identified on this quadrangle
6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Based on our knowledge of the site, the site is not located in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat Best
management practices and the construction of stormwater ponds will prevent sediment from entering down - gradient
waterbodies which may contain fish
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
We reviewed the SHPO Map (http / /gis ncdcr gov /hpoweb /) to identify historic and /or archaeological resources of the site
The map identified a surveyed historic property at the site However, based on our observations, the surveyed property is
a dilapidated residence A copy of the map is included as an attachment
8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA FIRM 3710880500J, dated June 18, 2007
Michael T Brame
7 /��
5/01/15
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes PEI to act as our agent in stream /wetland matters including U S Army Corps
of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Resources field verification and permitting
Property Address d, � A i Qr&&x Ad
Owner Information
Address
Telephone Number
Fax Number
E -mail Address
uC3
. / 6x cf7
yvx 3S Y
-7 47 LL r'a't S ►'� �.,c>G�t
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST
SECTION D— PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of records of the property /properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U S Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site
investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U S subject to Federal
jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and /or Section 10 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act of 1899
Jam Ftsv- � - � _ /
Property Owner (please print) Date
Pr e y Owner Signature

r
� ,1 '� " (yl�' f 1 •e %C: a......../ A- .- ._�1f � F` i w ��jy�r J �, '1�P-!
\ S ,
rti t
,
f
., � >� 1 �1 'i._'� � �'"r(('i� • �f HIV r.� •�i _
ov
'l•r .tea r t
/ fib.. -- °'., Imo% 0• -f n' �; -�` `. �l',,'
••..,. � � � �:... r�,r"; �' /,fir � . t, ' ' ! 4 � � � �..:_y � i �:� t,
,
Drawing 1 USGS Topographic Map
N
USGS Topographic Map Approximate 24.57 Acre Tract
McLeansville, NC Quadrangle 128 Birch Creek Road
•��
Scale: 1" = 2,000'
Greensboro, North Carolina '
PEI No. 1447

is
Drawing 2A
USDA Soil Survey of
Guilford County, Published 1977
Sheet Number 23
Not to Scale
USDA Soils Map
N
Approximate 24.57 Acre Tract
128 Birch Creek Road
Greensboro, North Carolina
PEI No. 1447

A z
z
LEGEND
Approximate Site Boundary
SPECIAL FLOOD FWZARD AREAS (SFMAS) SUBJECT TO
INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL GLANCE FLOOD EVENT
The t•A —m (nano A.W (WO". Moat also tuswn as ttr wm Mod, n ON WA Tut
bW A 1%CWa of hekV MOW a alcatded m"o1'IeT "W The Sdtt1Y FhAd HKW
AFta T I t 4( we)FR to ebddm0 bT the 1% A-n (Tana Moe. Aneal d SWW MW
M W m(lua Z— A, AE, All. .0, AFL A99. v, — VE. the Dale Fl d Ett+aboa N Me
watw%,fwe ekvabon oe dk 1%—W(T Aidd
ZONE A No 0 a Ftmd Ekv~ dom, -4-
ZONE At 0— Food Ek bM det". -W.
ZONE AN F" de{Nt d 1 W 1 We (ohlahP altar a Wa1m0). Nam 9m Ewlft n
detdeu(bd.
ZONE AO Tbod *I ft of 1 to 1 Im !oauahF sheet fl- ov oolmtO W—); A—V
depv. detEVmmed. Fa news or MmwM Fan fbo*v, vdKoft Ma
'1411 — ed
ZONE AN SWW Fbod /kraal NN form" p eIIA ham tM 1% M " (hN
A. by A tone ova'.' samm Out was MA..Q —W dKe ow Zone AA
eaho dwt tM f.— Aodd o>,+od triANn N b" Iettatd b "Aft
pate[hon h(m bn I"k —.M cNw. a pMt! Md1
ZONE A" k1 to be poteeaa ft n IW —V (hanA Mod by a Fe * Mod
poh(hon Iy ands( (aidnN ; no Eam paW Et Aws datmnweed.
ZONE HE C—t.1 Mod Ebl4 wdT • tloo0' M-d (vrrx anion); Sam Noad Ek.abms
de ..ed.
FLODI7WAY AREAS IN IONS AE
The fbwjV 6 the dwwW d a — pus My adw-I Aompan Areas ftaII muN W kept
Aee d TJI[FOMyalmfE . blot 0. 1% --1 :ATMs Mod (An M ( 'W "Mm N b""
+eaeasa b Mco t* St*,.
OTHER FLOOD AREAS
ZONE Y A— d 0.7% —M d.— T-d, — d ire —1 (1-- ft. weh
a.uam owft of IEts Man 1 fOp a wIN MA.na0^. areas ksa Man 1 wows
miti and meat Fr9ttCled by Ie.BAF ham 1'7b MnuM dwMe Apod.
OTHER AREAS
ZONE x Any5delpnine0 b oe o h4<dx o.7Te usa✓ v+anae r-vk .
IONS a Aroh!. N when neea MaxAi be wvANemned, hA pYa.pr.
COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) AREAS
OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS (OPAS)
CNRS aural and OFA, as nnTMh WOW warn a adW— m SP0.9 P40 H—d Ames
Fi arNUA (Mae nooa;Wn Dartla(v
C.7°F �vY d4M. <OWIdW� tWndAh
® �- — ftoednay boo. tbY
nwe4.y
................•.... CNAS and CPA aJ11MIYY
Y f.➢F -a. 9ouraiwy dnwN SPecW Feaal nati•d 1wF Za(an aN tFawtlary
V-Soe(wi Ftpt hawN Otte d alle'aw Bh< Pocd
Onrattes. elW dePIM a' Axq
^^^^ 517 ^mow• ease Ftm Ek+argn ww am .<wf, ae+xm a hw(•
,EL N87) bate Tboo Ebadm awe wnt t wwvxm .train mw: blNtma
A!a[•
• Aaryra(vea tP:na far MT%Y� Wna-ae Mn.+n d 19AA
(�- —i Go.e taTan eras
C prfW (3P'a�nM2! rtefauAE b IM nPtn Y'�CM� tltlun f!
IAAO 03)
a1:S'"' E10Pmeeb Umr+ai'v�.±ee F4nara o'O tYhl a0n! 11
SOD'EET'fOU JK .wow Iagi twWStah!F<ar <PONnw<aWwa
(. W52C IE 3TY. Sues FLne n40 81 ex()
BM55TO N1An o�xu (awbe Su..tr oe+c+ mwh (At ape
y w9t r9a,:.Plf ivecws. aid)
BMSSTO� wta.w (a.»et( 5.m Mrrn mNa 1hF mre wNmNtaw .,st
tees. r.lt +T.o0.bohEliTef
cssadfsrv(�,wyc�.tlar �uCaRrafaEStaMawd
Bmwo® M wNrnwon w
• MT.s uAd wAe
1"7
I Al.
AwAk
�.3
W y
Drawing 4 FEMA FIRM
FEMA FIRM Panel
Number 37108805001,
Dated 06/18/2007
Not to Scale
N
Approximate 24.57 Acre Tract
128 Birch Creek Road
Greensboro, North Carolina
PEI No. 1447

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site 128 Birch Creek Road - Taylors Landing City /County Greensboro /Guilford Sampling Date 4/6/15
Applicant/Owner State North Carolina Sampling Point DP -1
Investigator(s) Luckey /Brame, PEI Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) Drainage Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none) Concave
Slope ( %) 1 Lat 36 099417 Long -79661833 Datum WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name Helena - Sedgefield complex (HhB) NWI Classification None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
I
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sa piing point locations, transects, important teatures, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
Surface Sod Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al)
_
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
X High Water Table (A2)
_
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
_
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
X Water Marks (131)
_
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) X
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Other (Explain in Remarks) _
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_
Shallow Agwtard (D3)
X Water - Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_
X
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) Surface
Wetland Hydrology
Presents Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches) Surface
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point DP -1
6 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100 (A/B)
7
7
Dominance Test worksheet
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
9
10
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Liquidambar straciflua
10
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 10 (A)
2 Acer rubrum
10
Y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3 Fraxmus pennsylvanica 5 FACW
4 Quercus phellos
_ 15
Y
FACW
Species Across All Strata 10 (B)
5
Y
FAC
FAC species
X 3=
2 Acer rubrum
5
Y
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
6 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100 (A/B)
7
7
8
9
10
Prevalence Index worksheet
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 Eulaha viminea
40
= Total Cover
2 Smilax rotundifolia
Total % Cover of
Multiply by
3 Rubus betulifolius
5
Y FAC
4
5
OBL species
x 1 =
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30' )
7
FACW species
X2=
1 Liqudambar straciflua
5
Y
FAC
FAC species
X 3=
2 Acer rubrum
5
Y
FAC
25
= Total Cover
2
3
FACU species
X 4=
3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5
Y
FACW
4 Ligustrum sinense
10
Y
FAC
UPL species
X 5 =
5
Column Totals
(A) (B)
6
7
8
9
10
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 Eulaha viminea
25
10
= Total Cover
Y FAC
2 Smilax rotundifolia
10
Y FAC
3 Rubus betulifolius
5
Y FAC
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1
25
= Total Cover
2
3
4
5
6
0
= Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Test is <— 3 0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm)
or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
regardless of height
Sapling /Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
-lydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No

SOIL
Sampling Point DP -1
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
0 -3 10YR 4/2
L
3 -18 2 5Y 4/1
10YR 4/6 10 C M CL
'Type C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains
'Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matrx
Hydric Sod Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sods'
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Suface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (s4)
Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of Hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
Stripped Matrix (S6)
disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Hydric Sod Present?
Yes X No
Depth (inches)
Remarks

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site 128 Birch Creek Road - Taylors Landing City /County Greensboro /Guilford Sampling Date 4/6/15
Applicant/Owner State North Carolina Sampling Point DP -2
Investigator(s) Luckey /Brame, PEI Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) Side Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none)
Slope ( %) 2 Lat 36 099394 Long -79661481 Datum WGS 84
Sod Map Unit Name Helena- Sedgefield complex (HhB) NWI Classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X
Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
No
5UMMAKY OF FINUINUb — Attacn site map snowing sa piing point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_
True Aquatic Plants (614) _
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_
Drift Deposits (133)
Thin Muck Surface (C7) _
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
_
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
_
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches) >12"
Wetland Hydrology
Presents Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches) >12"
_
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
5 _
6
7 _
8
50 = Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 Ligwdambar styraciflua 10 Y _
2
3 _
4 _
5 _
6 _
7 _
8 _
9 _
10 _
10 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 Lonicera japonica 10 Y _
2
3
4 _
5 _
6 _
7
8 _
9 _
10 _
11 _
12
10 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 Toxicodendron radicans 10 Y
2
3
4
5
6
10 = Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
Sampling Point DP -2
ommance Test worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 71 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of Multiply by
OBL species x 1 =
i
FACW species X 2 =
FAC FAC species X 3 =
FACU species X4=
UPL species X5=
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
3 - Prevalence Test is <_ 3 0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
FAC data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm)
or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
regardless of height
Sapling /Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
FAC Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1 Liqudambar straaflua
10
Y
FAC
2 Acer rubrum
10
Y
FAC
3 Quercus alba
20
Y
FACU
4 Juniperus virginiana
10
Y
FACU
5 _
6
7 _
8
50 = Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 Ligwdambar styraciflua 10 Y _
2
3 _
4 _
5 _
6 _
7 _
8 _
9 _
10 _
10 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 Lonicera japonica 10 Y _
2
3
4 _
5 _
6 _
7
8 _
9 _
10 _
11 _
12
10 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30' )
1 Toxicodendron radicans 10 Y
2
3
4
5
6
10 = Total Cover
Remarks (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet )
Sampling Point DP -2
ommance Test worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 71 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of Multiply by
OBL species x 1 =
i
FACW species X 2 =
FAC FAC species X 3 =
FACU species X4=
UPL species X5=
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is > 50%
3 - Prevalence Test is <_ 3 0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
FAC data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
Definitions of Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm)
or more in diameter at breast height (DBH),
regardless of height
Sapling /Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
FAC Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No

SOIL
Sampling Point DP -2
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture
Remarks
0 -5 10YR 4/3
L
5 -18 2 5Y 4/2
7 5YR 4/4 30 C RM CL
'Type C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains
2Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matrx
Hydric Soil Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Suface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
Iron Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (s4)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of Hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
Stripped Matrix (S6)
disturbed or problematic
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes X No
Depth (inches)
Remarks

PA-M 11 SEGTGN� \I
Es F W-A P6 61 r97,
P8 N3, Pb AI
►qR 4��y
30' N8. ESM
x1600 (154') \
51 TE DATA:
l 51TE AREA 24311 ACRE,
PIN: 8805455681
DEED ICE: M 7085 P57.1240
PKAM 11
Pa
135 11*- EXISTING ZONING:
r13o1 Q (1 ✓l
r1>�� –� WATD:
rZ7'N
___ 621S
llm� — —
(D-R-5
LAKE MAGINT054 W5-IV
JWX-"P KUTON
IHF41M KWON
Dam Pis 366
PM 600ifii46W
40 jW
60RbM
GRlD NORTH -7
NAD 83 / N5R5 2011
k860m 6Etr r Lm DB MID Pb. Miff PM f53D5
C`� Q O
I .NMEt1E D p11Ma Qu�n 135
\D8 740x6!!4 1 /
PMeevsneD6: a �`..5;.• Y O r ?-
-a 0
� WETLAND AREA 'A'
STREAM PrJIM , 2,769 5F - 006 AG TOTAL AREA
v6 051A F6 676 N 8549969430 g K 865 5F - OA2 AL OFF SITE AREA
E 1804832J11D\ X 1!9 TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED
POND AREA 'B"
- — / COORDINATE TABLE
POINT � EA 5T
POND AREA 'B' G2 N 654suw 9b4 E X09631298
i COORDINATE TABLE a aM E4a 5aoa
POINT NORTH AST CO N6555mm E evm
81 N 6551111024 E l"Ibb M4 a N 855W`1134 E iM
�! I + YETLANO AREA "A' 82 N bZ*598 E 18 0 4114 4416 N X6152258 E 004602bi31
FEW AT&T COORDINATE TABLE NDBiX161901 E004151001 w X856550099 E004'ASbTO
EASSeff EV4 N 6552117121 E 001B45V8
POINT NORTH EAST Bs VM244DIR E1004BI.g51 G1 N85BO ID43 E0045358409
AI N 85032446 E W06525 8b N 8552H537B E W"Ji'll a2 N 85141x954 E @065337221
A2 N 85W W4 E 0/046361354 Bl Y 094%s E 180012 7W 6 W N 858(4bb59 E 18045141640
213 N 8560591456 E 0048901151 EB N 85 6310 4 815 E W046600H0 Q4 N b5754b274 E 0045.4111
A3 N 8550541" E 0048422251 DI 118553111636 E 1604b53b42 G5 NW61144444 E 0095077/45
M N 855071/44 F 00450 41542D14 810 X654203442 E 004640/339 60 X8556854325 E 1804451411
MI N 8°.554344834 E 0066326345 Gn N 8556653641 E 004500457
216 N 651p4454 E 1604852.7339 612 N 854322421 E 180467/5124 G0 N 85561L20T1 E IB045104M0
5Al N 6503142 E 1004646111 W N 855 8 4 36 93 E 1004621$751 LW N 8$5664345 E X0 4 521 01110
M N 65M138T2 E 004636x50 EM N 655321344 E 10096 463 620 N 855941366 E MDCMD44D
A4 9655055M E 0048312106 05 N 6558H6185 E 0046404150 621 N V45614887 E W45524228
A4 N 8351497900 E 0048029800 8K N 655313.1041 E 100464.14545 622 N 85514/245 E WrA516b52
1 AN N 855IbDM E 0041961X16 On N 85529633N E 0046513063 623 N 855444915 E 0045114751
Al2 0W51114105 EW0043106 W X8552563749 EW46682660 624 N855WBI70 E18045W W
A13 YW6150 � E 18046234621 ON N655nbVe E X046001244 G25 N655WDW E 004x940140
1 A14 X8551276090 E004DW9090 020 N850219BI E00041b149 626 X6564800621 E00404151
A5 7865155019 E 0046475179 822 X2770945926 E 1804116.7x73 G28 X854512182 E 0046K0
Alb N855IOID980 E009842T322 08 X850 MAI FI004723D560 629 X8554389260 E0D"TIN
All N 0550634972 E 0046313161 B24 N 85 IL4170 E 0041348537 630 N 855432.2411 E 0046205724
AX N 8560636642 E 0046121X66 825 N 8550162TI4 E 0041495614
AM 7 8503 4 2311 E004812.7764 026 N855W2461 E0 0 418 4 168
an N e5Y25B63 E 0048202486
028 N 0%125578 X04829.1236
024 N 66X456434 X04804740
830 4 851677433 EN447964441
R - WJ3 L - 4205
`y
P
z
D
N
4x1
n�
a`
1�ay
Vd
boa �eiP6
�'3 eem+66
VIGINIITY MAP
(NOT TO 56ALE)
YVETLAND5 FLAGGED IN THE FIELD Q
APRIL 3, 2015 BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, 1% AND
FIELD SURVEYED BY BORUM, WADE AND
A550, PA
Mq y
���4SS DF
C � 40 Nxe� �vATc�.
BW�n�,loccrs
•l'11� I'Ianr�l la
Pit,— W,1 enIA ,,,,.t 1 A
I1 tMl Sic 14^ ^,.arl-1 ,10.1 711
7"971 hn �l 7, 72,
n.1
NI i,a a I a6
5'ALA
n40.ffiT
D a
Q z
0
0.50
OG o oc
LU
lO Z W = OC
CL
oc
OC s Co
— o
� r =
In
Cm
CIO
/%- /CE`s' CN .D
a
WETLAND IMPAGT SUMMARY
AREA 'A' - 2,169 5F - ODD AG - NO IMPAGT PROPOSED LON7110t'A <#t11 SIMN9
i (MINU5 865 5F - 0.02 AG OFF5ITE) PO ON 414
/TOTAL 11G" - 18200 5F - 042 AC - 30123 5F - 0090 AG IMPACTED ` /W 430.41" �?1�0
TOTAL NET 20,104 5F - 046 AG - TOTAL IMPAGT 3,823 5F - 0090 AG 66MIACT XW FM
I hereby cerhiy that the survey prepared N me entitled N�TLAND IMPAGT MAP - TAYLORS LANDING L PONE) G R 0 5 51 N G SUMMARY �"" me
Has actually made upon the Tw d and that A and the informatN711 caursesGStarres PAT, Our L WO
shorn actually exist The purpose of this suvey is to show the delineated wetlands as flagged
in the Field N PILOT EN✓IRONMEWAL, ING All iwu" nlorram Is token from a POND AREA "B" - 19,183 5F - 0 45 AG - 2,544 5F - 0058 AG POND GRO55IW7
Metland survey by Boron, Node As fates, PA and doted April 8, 2015
Executed this 158 ,,4 /1111111 / + + +4,
Registration No -31 .` 4
HXW 621 Eugene 5 HadeGt 5le IO0 e = Q�o� IEss I oti�( ti9 -. SET TFRL E T L A N D
6ra&&oro, NL I (� SEAL G R A P H I G 5 G A L E I M P A G T
21420 Date MAP
L -3731
�., 0 1001 '/ 1 MR �1 PYF Na P,1<Ap1owV,lj,,,- LoMywMlDd.a
• 1,O S vc {O Yy fVNt �4 D7l/V f/llt/ _ T URN" 90A4F r . hod
+1.1.11.111 (� = 2001
WETLAND AREA 'G"
POND AREA "B• 1
18,200 5F - 042 AG TOTAL AREA
19,783 SF - 0 45 AG TOTAL AREA r
rn 3
3,423 5F - 0.090 AO TOTAL
N POND GR0 T
T- ` A
AREA IMPACTED - SEE SHEET WLI -2
r 2,544 5F - 0 058 AG TOTAL AREA �
6
�\
In /
l�
4VFZ
I 4400 OIti
n
Dd 1406 iK 00
G4 T
4 POND REMAININ6 G
PM 6805461741
41
m
ry r 2G21 , ,Js` G
� 1
N06'27gq'E
%Q3 G
m
� �JY
y'��
C`� Q O
I .NMEt1E D p11Ma Qu�n 135
\D8 740x6!!4 1 /
PMeevsneD6: a �`..5;.• Y O r ?-
-a 0
� WETLAND AREA 'A'
STREAM PrJIM , 2,769 5F - 006 AG TOTAL AREA
v6 051A F6 676 N 8549969430 g K 865 5F - OA2 AL OFF SITE AREA
E 1804832J11D\ X 1!9 TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED
POND AREA 'B"
- — / COORDINATE TABLE
POINT � EA 5T
POND AREA 'B' G2 N 654suw 9b4 E X09631298
i COORDINATE TABLE a aM E4a 5aoa
POINT NORTH AST CO N6555mm E evm
81 N 6551111024 E l"Ibb M4 a N 855W`1134 E iM
�! I + YETLANO AREA "A' 82 N bZ*598 E 18 0 4114 4416 N X6152258 E 004602bi31
FEW AT&T COORDINATE TABLE NDBiX161901 E004151001 w X856550099 E004'ASbTO
EASSeff EV4 N 6552117121 E 001B45V8
POINT NORTH EAST Bs VM244DIR E1004BI.g51 G1 N85BO ID43 E0045358409
AI N 85032446 E W06525 8b N 8552H537B E W"Ji'll a2 N 85141x954 E @065337221
A2 N 85W W4 E 0/046361354 Bl Y 094%s E 180012 7W 6 W N 858(4bb59 E 18045141640
213 N 8560591456 E 0048901151 EB N 85 6310 4 815 E W046600H0 Q4 N b5754b274 E 0045.4111
A3 N 8550541" E 0048422251 DI 118553111636 E 1604b53b42 G5 NW61144444 E 0095077/45
M N 855071/44 F 00450 41542D14 810 X654203442 E 004640/339 60 X8556854325 E 1804451411
MI N 8°.554344834 E 0066326345 Gn N 8556653641 E 004500457
216 N 651p4454 E 1604852.7339 612 N 854322421 E 180467/5124 G0 N 85561L20T1 E IB045104M0
5Al N 6503142 E 1004646111 W N 855 8 4 36 93 E 1004621$751 LW N 8$5664345 E X0 4 521 01110
M N 65M138T2 E 004636x50 EM N 655321344 E 10096 463 620 N 855941366 E MDCMD44D
A4 9655055M E 0048312106 05 N 6558H6185 E 0046404150 621 N V45614887 E W45524228
A4 N 8351497900 E 0048029800 8K N 655313.1041 E 100464.14545 622 N 85514/245 E WrA516b52
1 AN N 855IbDM E 0041961X16 On N 85529633N E 0046513063 623 N 855444915 E 0045114751
Al2 0W51114105 EW0043106 W X8552563749 EW46682660 624 N855WBI70 E18045W W
A13 YW6150 � E 18046234621 ON N655nbVe E X046001244 G25 N655WDW E 004x940140
1 A14 X8551276090 E004DW9090 020 N850219BI E00041b149 626 X6564800621 E00404151
A5 7865155019 E 0046475179 822 X2770945926 E 1804116.7x73 G28 X854512182 E 0046K0
Alb N855IOID980 E009842T322 08 X850 MAI FI004723D560 629 X8554389260 E0D"TIN
All N 0550634972 E 0046313161 B24 N 85 IL4170 E 0041348537 630 N 855432.2411 E 0046205724
AX N 8560636642 E 0046121X66 825 N 8550162TI4 E 0041495614
AM 7 8503 4 2311 E004812.7764 026 N855W2461 E0 0 418 4 168
an N e5Y25B63 E 0048202486
028 N 0%125578 X04829.1236
024 N 66X456434 X04804740
830 4 851677433 EN447964441
R - WJ3 L - 4205
`y
P
z
D
N
4x1
n�
a`
1�ay
Vd
boa �eiP6
�'3 eem+66
VIGINIITY MAP
(NOT TO 56ALE)
YVETLAND5 FLAGGED IN THE FIELD Q
APRIL 3, 2015 BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, 1% AND
FIELD SURVEYED BY BORUM, WADE AND
A550, PA
Mq y
���4SS DF
C � 40 Nxe� �vATc�.
BW�n�,loccrs
•l'11� I'Ianr�l la
Pit,— W,1 enIA ,,,,.t 1 A
I1 tMl Sic 14^ ^,.arl-1 ,10.1 711
7"971 hn �l 7, 72,
n.1
NI i,a a I a6
5'ALA
n40.ffiT
D a
Q z
0
0.50
OG o oc
LU
lO Z W = OC
CL
oc
OC s Co
— o
� r =
In
Cm
CIO
/%- /CE`s' CN .D
a
WETLAND IMPAGT SUMMARY
AREA 'A' - 2,169 5F - ODD AG - NO IMPAGT PROPOSED LON7110t'A <#t11 SIMN9
i (MINU5 865 5F - 0.02 AG OFF5ITE) PO ON 414
/TOTAL 11G" - 18200 5F - 042 AC - 30123 5F - 0090 AG IMPACTED ` /W 430.41" �?1�0
TOTAL NET 20,104 5F - 046 AG - TOTAL IMPAGT 3,823 5F - 0090 AG 66MIACT XW FM
I hereby cerhiy that the survey prepared N me entitled N�TLAND IMPAGT MAP - TAYLORS LANDING L PONE) G R 0 5 51 N G SUMMARY �"" me
Has actually made upon the Tw d and that A and the informatN711 caursesGStarres PAT, Our L WO
shorn actually exist The purpose of this suvey is to show the delineated wetlands as flagged
in the Field N PILOT EN✓IRONMEWAL, ING All iwu" nlorram Is token from a POND AREA "B" - 19,183 5F - 0 45 AG - 2,544 5F - 0058 AG POND GRO55IW7
Metland survey by Boron, Node As fates, PA and doted April 8, 2015
Executed this 158 ,,4 /1111111 / + + +4,
Registration No -31 .` 4
HXW 621 Eugene 5 HadeGt 5le IO0 e = Q�o� IEss I oti�( ti9 -. SET TFRL E T L A N D
6ra&&oro, NL I (� SEAL G R A P H I G 5 G A L E I M P A G T
21420 Date MAP
L -3731
�., 0 1001 '/ 1 MR �1 PYF Na P,1<Ap1owV,lj,,,- LoMywMlDd.a
• 1,O S vc {O Yy fVNt �4 D7l/V f/llt/ _ T URN" 90A4F r . hod
+1.1.11.111 (� = 2001
WETLAND AREA 'G"
POND AREA "B• 1
18,200 5F - 042 AG TOTAL AREA
19,783 SF - 0 45 AG TOTAL AREA r
rn 3
3,423 5F - 0.090 AO TOTAL
N POND GR0 T
T- ` A
AREA IMPACTED - SEE SHEET WLI -2
r 2,544 5F - 0 058 AG TOTAL AREA �
�' 1
14 277 E - 0UN AG TOTAL
SEE SPIFFY WLI -2 G
GIB G
G4 T
4 POND REMAININ6 G
GW C
CI3
17,239 5F - 039 AC r
ry r 2G21 , ,Js` G
Gil G12
%Q3 G
GIO 3,199 5F - 0.073 AG TOTAL AREA
6
68 G9
AF 4324, By618 O
O�r,�v Cis
- 6as'rnssr 23822621 8
IMPACT AREA "
"G-I"
R " 1
124 5F - OAI7 A
AC TOTAL AREA C
I .NMEt1E D p11Ma Qu�n 135
\D8 740x6!!4 1 /
PMeevsneD6: a �`..5;.• Y O r ?-
-a 0
� WETLAND AREA 'A'
STREAM PrJIM , 2,769 5F - 006 AG TOTAL AREA
v6 051A F6 676 N 8549969430 g K 865 5F - OA2 AL OFF SITE AREA
E 1804832J11D\ X 1!9 TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED
POND AREA 'B"
- — / COORDINATE TABLE
POINT � EA 5T
POND AREA 'B' G2 N 654suw 9b4 E X09631298
i COORDINATE TABLE a aM E4a 5aoa
POINT NORTH AST CO N6555mm E evm
81 N 6551111024 E l"Ibb M4 a N 855W`1134 E iM
�! I + YETLANO AREA "A' 82 N bZ*598 E 18 0 4114 4416 N X6152258 E 004602bi31
FEW AT&T COORDINATE TABLE NDBiX161901 E004151001 w X856550099 E004'ASbTO
EASSeff EV4 N 6552117121 E 001B45V8
POINT NORTH EAST Bs VM244DIR E1004BI.g51 G1 N85BO ID43 E0045358409
AI N 85032446 E W06525 8b N 8552H537B E W"Ji'll a2 N 85141x954 E @065337221
A2 N 85W W4 E 0/046361354 Bl Y 094%s E 180012 7W 6 W N 858(4bb59 E 18045141640
213 N 8560591456 E 0048901151 EB N 85 6310 4 815 E W046600H0 Q4 N b5754b274 E 0045.4111
A3 N 8550541" E 0048422251 DI 118553111636 E 1604b53b42 G5 NW61144444 E 0095077/45
M N 855071/44 F 00450 41542D14 810 X654203442 E 004640/339 60 X8556854325 E 1804451411
MI N 8°.554344834 E 0066326345 Gn N 8556653641 E 004500457
216 N 651p4454 E 1604852.7339 612 N 854322421 E 180467/5124 G0 N 85561L20T1 E IB045104M0
5Al N 6503142 E 1004646111 W N 855 8 4 36 93 E 1004621$751 LW N 8$5664345 E X0 4 521 01110
M N 65M138T2 E 004636x50 EM N 655321344 E 10096 463 620 N 855941366 E MDCMD44D
A4 9655055M E 0048312106 05 N 6558H6185 E 0046404150 621 N V45614887 E W45524228
A4 N 8351497900 E 0048029800 8K N 655313.1041 E 100464.14545 622 N 85514/245 E WrA516b52
1 AN N 855IbDM E 0041961X16 On N 85529633N E 0046513063 623 N 855444915 E 0045114751
Al2 0W51114105 EW0043106 W X8552563749 EW46682660 624 N855WBI70 E18045W W
A13 YW6150 � E 18046234621 ON N655nbVe E X046001244 G25 N655WDW E 004x940140
1 A14 X8551276090 E004DW9090 020 N850219BI E00041b149 626 X6564800621 E00404151
A5 7865155019 E 0046475179 822 X2770945926 E 1804116.7x73 G28 X854512182 E 0046K0
Alb N855IOID980 E009842T322 08 X850 MAI FI004723D560 629 X8554389260 E0D"TIN
All N 0550634972 E 0046313161 B24 N 85 IL4170 E 0041348537 630 N 855432.2411 E 0046205724
AX N 8560636642 E 0046121X66 825 N 8550162TI4 E 0041495614
AM 7 8503 4 2311 E004812.7764 026 N855W2461 E0 0 418 4 168
an N e5Y25B63 E 0048202486
028 N 0%125578 X04829.1236
024 N 66X456434 X04804740
830 4 851677433 EN447964441
R - WJ3 L - 4205
`y
P
z
D
N
4x1
n�
a`
1�ay
Vd
boa �eiP6
�'3 eem+66
VIGINIITY MAP
(NOT TO 56ALE)
YVETLAND5 FLAGGED IN THE FIELD Q
APRIL 3, 2015 BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, 1% AND
FIELD SURVEYED BY BORUM, WADE AND
A550, PA
Mq y
���4SS DF
C � 40 Nxe� �vATc�.
BW�n�,loccrs
•l'11� I'Ianr�l la
Pit,— W,1 enIA ,,,,.t 1 A
I1 tMl Sic 14^ ^,.arl-1 ,10.1 711
7"971 hn �l 7, 72,
n.1
NI i,a a I a6
5'ALA
n40.ffiT
D a
Q z
0
0.50
OG o oc
LU
lO Z W = OC
CL
oc
OC s Co
— o
� r =
In
Cm
CIO
/%- /CE`s' CN .D
a
WETLAND IMPAGT SUMMARY
AREA 'A' - 2,169 5F - ODD AG - NO IMPAGT PROPOSED LON7110t'A <#t11 SIMN9
i (MINU5 865 5F - 0.02 AG OFF5ITE) PO ON 414
/TOTAL 11G" - 18200 5F - 042 AC - 30123 5F - 0090 AG IMPACTED ` /W 430.41" �?1�0
TOTAL NET 20,104 5F - 046 AG - TOTAL IMPAGT 3,823 5F - 0090 AG 66MIACT XW FM
I hereby cerhiy that the survey prepared N me entitled N�TLAND IMPAGT MAP - TAYLORS LANDING L PONE) G R 0 5 51 N G SUMMARY �"" me
Has actually made upon the Tw d and that A and the informatN711 caursesGStarres PAT, Our L WO
shorn actually exist The purpose of this suvey is to show the delineated wetlands as flagged
in the Field N PILOT EN✓IRONMEWAL, ING All iwu" nlorram Is token from a POND AREA "B" - 19,183 5F - 0 45 AG - 2,544 5F - 0058 AG POND GRO55IW7
Metland survey by Boron, Node As fates, PA and doted April 8, 2015
Executed this 158 ,,4 /1111111 / + + +4,
Registration No -31 .` 4
HXW 621 Eugene 5 HadeGt 5le IO0 e = Q�o� IEss I oti�( ti9 -. SET TFRL E T L A N D
6ra&&oro, NL I (� SEAL G R A P H I G 5 G A L E I M P A G T
21420 Date MAP
L -3731
�., 0 1001 '/ 1 MR �1 PYF Na P,1<Ap1owV,lj,,,- LoMywMlDd.a
• 1,O S vc {O Yy fVNt �4 D7l/V f/llt/ _ T URN" 90A4F r . hod
+1.1.11.111 (� = 2001
R - WJ3 L - 4205
`y
P
z
D
N
4x1
n�
a`
1�ay
Vd
boa �eiP6
�'3 eem+66
VIGINIITY MAP
(NOT TO 56ALE)
YVETLAND5 FLAGGED IN THE FIELD Q
APRIL 3, 2015 BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, 1% AND
FIELD SURVEYED BY BORUM, WADE AND
A550, PA
Mq y
���4SS DF
C � 40 Nxe� �vATc�.
BW�n�,loccrs
•l'11� I'Ianr�l la
Pit,— W,1 enIA ,,,,.t 1 A
I1 tMl Sic 14^ ^,.arl-1 ,10.1 711
7"971 hn �l 7, 72,
n.1
NI i,a a I a6
5'ALA
n40.ffiT
D a
Q z
0
0.50
OG o oc
LU
lO Z W = OC
CL
oc
OC s Co
— o
� r =
In
Cm
CIO
/%- /CE`s' CN .D
a
WETLAND IMPAGT SUMMARY
AREA 'A' - 2,169 5F - ODD AG - NO IMPAGT PROPOSED LON7110t'A <#t11 SIMN9
i (MINU5 865 5F - 0.02 AG OFF5ITE) PO ON 414
/TOTAL 11G" - 18200 5F - 042 AC - 30123 5F - 0090 AG IMPACTED ` /W 430.41" �?1�0
TOTAL NET 20,104 5F - 046 AG - TOTAL IMPAGT 3,823 5F - 0090 AG 66MIACT XW FM
I hereby cerhiy that the survey prepared N me entitled N�TLAND IMPAGT MAP - TAYLORS LANDING L PONE) G R 0 5 51 N G SUMMARY �"" me
Has actually made upon the Tw d and that A and the informatN711 caursesGStarres PAT, Our L WO
shorn actually exist The purpose of this suvey is to show the delineated wetlands as flagged
in the Field N PILOT EN✓IRONMEWAL, ING All iwu" nlorram Is token from a POND AREA "B" - 19,183 5F - 0 45 AG - 2,544 5F - 0058 AG POND GRO55IW7
Metland survey by Boron, Node As fates, PA and doted April 8, 2015
Executed this 158 ,,4 /1111111 / + + +4,
Registration No -31 .` 4
HXW 621 Eugene 5 HadeGt 5le IO0 e = Q�o� IEss I oti�( ti9 -. SET TFRL E T L A N D
6ra&&oro, NL I (� SEAL G R A P H I G 5 G A L E I M P A G T
21420 Date MAP
L -3731
�., 0 1001 '/ 1 MR �1 PYF Na P,1<Ap1owV,lj,,,- LoMywMlDd.a
• 1,O S vc {O Yy fVNt �4 D7l/V f/llt/ _ T URN" 90A4F r . hod
+1.1.11.111 (� = 2001

O
0
NETIAND IMPACT MAP - TAYLOR5 LANDING
Has actually made upon the proud ad that It ad the nfrmnotlon cou ses�istances
Oom actuol4 exist The purpose of this surveyis sh.ots the deleeated wetlands as fkx�ed
,,,nt�o
n the field bg PILOT EWROWMENTAL, IX All ^"""""Y
_
PULAND
A 'G'
ii
"Istration No L -31
: Q�
<'L�
18,200 5F - 0 42
TOTAL AREA
621 Eugene Ct 6ree to 100
NL ! �!`j
QQ
j
312 5F - OOgO AG T
AL AREA IMPACTED
_
L -3731 -
14
14,2115E - 03
AC TOTAL
POND AREA 'B"
TO REMAIN UN
15R RBED
O G11 06
Iq,183 5F - 045 AG TOTAL AREA
TI
1a
GI8
— POND 6RO55%
O GIg
.rr`
2,544 5F - 0058 AG TOTAL AREAA'
POND REMAINING
G2
112341 5F - 0361 AG
G23 22
' _ ' `, `
CIO
625,_
G261 O
Gq
0
NETIAND IMPACT MAP - TAYLOR5 LANDING
Has actually made upon the proud ad that It ad the nfrmnotlon cou ses�istances
Oom actuol4 exist The purpose of this surveyis sh.ots the deleeated wetlands as fkx�ed
,,,nt�o
n the field bg PILOT EWROWMENTAL, IX All ^"""""Y
information Is taken from a
wetland survey 4 Born, Wade and As Les, PA and dated April 8, 2015
Executedth5 15t day
ii
"Istration No L -31
: Q�
<'L�
Homer 5 Wade ure
;: �� �FESS�p,1
90
621 Eugene Ct 6ree to 100
NL ! �!`j
QQ
o
SEAL
21420 Date
_
L -3731 -
=;
AX O SUR`I` ;
pM�
0
Bi3 G30:131 628 G26=
N ":
Z�X G1
�Y 1 =81
62 G
IO G4
� 62
51TE DATA:
517E AREA: 24Xt AGRE5
PIN. 8805455687
DEED RHIREZE. DB 7085 P6 1240
EX15TM ZONING CD-R -5
WAS. LAKE MACINT05H Y:i-IV
O
0
10
GI5 O
104
-<-" -"-0 6I2
GII
IMPACT AREA "6-2'
3,Igq 5F - 0 013 AG
TOTAL AREA
O
no
I hereby certify that ft survey prepared 4 me smiled
NETIAND IMPACT MAP - TAYLOR5 LANDING
Has actually made upon the proud ad that It ad the nfrmnotlon cou ses�istances
Oom actuol4 exist The purpose of this surveyis sh.ots the deleeated wetlands as fkx�ed
,,,nt�o
n the field bg PILOT EWROWMENTAL, IX All ^"""""Y
information Is taken from a
wetland survey 4 Born, Wade and As Les, PA and dated April 8, 2015
Executedth5 15t day
.uI141. "".
"Istration No L -31
: Q�
<'L�
Homer 5 Wade ure
;: �� �FESS�p,1
90
621 Eugene Ct 6ree to 100
NL ! �!`j
QQ
o
SEAL
21420 Date
_
L -3731 -
=;
AX O SUR`I` ;
pM�
BWA Fnr,ncrrs
Yl.r n; rs
hnrr�yurs
r run W,i, nel4- —I- I A
11,11, 14 r „i . 41 74 " Ins
V la n.t W
PMACT
VIGINITY MAP
� z a
(NOT TO 56ALE) o o
WETLAND5 FLA6(7ED IN THE FIELD
APRIL 3, 2015 BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, ING AND
�'Wr�7=
FIELD 5URVEYED BY BORUM, WE AND M O� o
A550, PA 4Y 4 j C� Via Z
qOR)
_xo— L�
/ '
EX
W �oX
6RID NORTH
HAD 83 N5R5 2011 N .o ' c
m z W W o
ya
WETLAND IMPACT SUMMARY avatoeyflow
AREA "A' - 2,169 5F - OOb AG - NO IMPACT PROP05ED LOHMM ors
(MINU5 865 5F - 002 AG OFF5ITE) PT)Box 414
AREA "G" - 18,20051' --O.42 AC - 3.923 5F - OOgO AG IMPACTED s IE09LED H"CARMM 77$6
t'9b149o4M
TOTAL NET 20,104 5F - 046 AG- - TOTAL IMPACT 3,0123 5F - O OqO AG OWPIcL -M FM
POND GR0551 NG 5UMMARY --
OMTE MAY 4 W15
POND AREA "B' - 14,183 5F - 0 45 AG - 2,544 5F - 0 058 AG POND GRO551NG
SHEET tIt1E,
WETLAND
GRAPHIG 5GALE IMPACT
M AP
0 251 501 ' 150' FU VA R�Y.POadTa�srf,lo�a�rtimba
i LVV URN" SUIE r . 50
to
I� =r W L I - 2

51TE DATA:
SITE AREA: 2431t AORB
PIN: &W54556,81 6RiD NORTH
WASE m tT:W Rff BOU: D5 1085 P67.1240 NAO b5 / N5R5 2011
FP" 11 W-1 DOWN CWK Rm
PEI ft M. 05 1 F36
8MCH GREEK
Pa we P6 CD-R-5
EA571N(2 ZONIW7:
Esw KATHZ%w- LAKE MAGINT0514 W:)-IV
— —]
(mN (112�
14CIMM P KEETON
i WLEN VJ KEETON
(129) vs 167keb 3b6
Pw MOM~
(124
olk 2m Fb 9*
abo dom
(D
W
4
2
- 401b9
z
A V9WPWA Oft
00 4WO Fr. 430
PIN &W500"
e/s
10*27-AT
0
15
'.1wj"
lks,mil 6 MW
m
(iAe� U10
BORtiN
AZ t-j,%
vc,'C�4
-fr
C,
'L KN���
IN
0 1-
. L "\ VIC.INITY MAP
(NOT TO 56ALE)
kETLAN06 FLA66EP IN THE FIELD
APRIL 3,2015 BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, IW, ANfn---_
jo f
FIELD SIRVEYED BY E30RLH, HADE AND
mm wo 141%
Pa 4M M R"
W042-A
Is 3�6
151 Raw)
,29 7(�
-:7
zG
0 0
veteo
0
91WORS Q3M%ilWII
I herebg cwtiN M the 5urvey prepared bg rim entitled YULAND fWA( T MAP - TAYLOR5 LAIQIW,
Am cictuaI4 mode upon ft 9-ound aid ftt it aid ft nForniationcowsesd*taxes
shomcictwNexrst Re purpose of this swveg 6 to5hom the delineatedhetb&m 11"
in ft field N PILOT EWRONMEWAL, X All bm" information is taken from a
Piet" 5wve4 N Borvin, Node and Avsoc tes, PA Ord cloted April 8, 2015
Executed thir, -ig—dog of I I 111 a "s".
CAy 01
Regstration No L-3131 9
How 5 lebode -ss 104'.1i
b2l Eugere Ct Ste 100
(femboro, NL I toll! SEAL
21420 e
L-3731
04f
A4AY 0 4 0
BWA
- I
P r um W 11 -1 A, t, I A
11 r-- —I 1 1, 7�1 17,
K, k,
�,Nr 74: I.R
FROJECT
C)
LU
c� W-
-C
C14
`�YqETLANV IMPAGT SIUMMARY
AREA 'A' - 2,lbq 5F - 0 06 AG - NO IMPAGT PROP05EO LOW011110GO 24157MM
(MINI.6 W 5F - 0 02 AG OFF-51TE) PO WX 41'141
906WILED NORTH CARaM 7rM
AREA 182W 5F - 0 42 A� - 3.q2,3 5F - 0 OqO AL IMPAGTED MW 43OA"
TOTAL NET 20)04 5F - 0 4b AG - TOTAL IMPAGT 3,q23 5F - 0 M M, CONTACT XX FM
L POND GR0551 15 5UMMARY Q"mmw No
VATE, FAY 1, 2015
POND AREA '13' - R183 5F - 0 45 AC 2,544 5F 0 OM AG POND GRO551%
5ftT TITLE
NETLAND
IMPACT
(7RAPHIG 5GALE MAP
0 200' IWI FU to
F� ORAXW SfALE I .7w
N L I - 3
(INN I
I —
olk 2m Fb 9*
abo dom
(D
W
4
2
- 401b9
z
A V9WPWA Oft
00 4WO Fr. 430
PIN &W500"
e/s
10*27-AT
0
15
'.1wj"
lks,mil 6 MW
m
(iAe� U10
BORtiN
AZ t-j,%
vc,'C�4
-fr
C,
'L KN���
IN
0 1-
. L "\ VIC.INITY MAP
(NOT TO 56ALE)
kETLAN06 FLA66EP IN THE FIELD
APRIL 3,2015 BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, IW, ANfn---_
jo f
FIELD SIRVEYED BY E30RLH, HADE AND
mm wo 141%
Pa 4M M R"
W042-A
Is 3�6
151 Raw)
,29 7(�
-:7
zG
0 0
veteo
0
91WORS Q3M%ilWII
I herebg cwtiN M the 5urvey prepared bg rim entitled YULAND fWA( T MAP - TAYLOR5 LAIQIW,
Am cictuaI4 mode upon ft 9-ound aid ftt it aid ft nForniationcowsesd*taxes
shomcictwNexrst Re purpose of this swveg 6 to5hom the delineatedhetb&m 11"
in ft field N PILOT EWRONMEWAL, X All bm" information is taken from a
Piet" 5wve4 N Borvin, Node and Avsoc tes, PA Ord cloted April 8, 2015
Executed thir, -ig—dog of I I 111 a "s".
CAy 01
Regstration No L-3131 9
How 5 lebode -ss 104'.1i
b2l Eugere Ct Ste 100
(femboro, NL I toll! SEAL
21420 e
L-3731
04f
A4AY 0 4 0
BWA
- I
P r um W 11 -1 A, t, I A
11 r-- —I 1 1, 7�1 17,
K, k,
�,Nr 74: I.R
FROJECT
C)
LU
c� W-
-C
C14
`�YqETLANV IMPAGT SIUMMARY
AREA 'A' - 2,lbq 5F - 0 06 AG - NO IMPAGT PROP05EO LOW011110GO 24157MM
(MINI.6 W 5F - 0 02 AG OFF-51TE) PO WX 41'141
906WILED NORTH CARaM 7rM
AREA 182W 5F - 0 42 A� - 3.q2,3 5F - 0 OqO AL IMPAGTED MW 43OA"
TOTAL NET 20)04 5F - 0 4b AG - TOTAL IMPAGT 3,q23 5F - 0 M M, CONTACT XX FM
L POND GR0551 15 5UMMARY Q"mmw No
VATE, FAY 1, 2015
POND AREA '13' - R183 5F - 0 45 AC 2,544 5F 0 OM AG POND GRO551%
5ftT TITLE
NETLAND
IMPACT
(7RAPHIG 5GALE MAP
0 200' IWI FU to
F� ORAXW SfALE I .7w
N L I - 3
(D
W
4
2
- 401b9
z
A V9WPWA Oft
00 4WO Fr. 430
PIN &W500"
e/s
10*27-AT
0
15
'.1wj"
lks,mil 6 MW
m
(iAe� U10
BORtiN
AZ t-j,%
vc,'C�4
-fr
C,
'L KN���
IN
0 1-
. L "\ VIC.INITY MAP
(NOT TO 56ALE)
kETLAN06 FLA66EP IN THE FIELD
APRIL 3,2015 BY PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL, IW, ANfn---_
jo f
FIELD SIRVEYED BY E30RLH, HADE AND
mm wo 141%
Pa 4M M R"
W042-A
Is 3�6
151 Raw)
,29 7(�
-:7
zG
0 0
veteo
0
91WORS Q3M%ilWII
I herebg cwtiN M the 5urvey prepared bg rim entitled YULAND fWA( T MAP - TAYLOR5 LAIQIW,
Am cictuaI4 mode upon ft 9-ound aid ftt it aid ft nForniationcowsesd*taxes
shomcictwNexrst Re purpose of this swveg 6 to5hom the delineatedhetb&m 11"
in ft field N PILOT EWRONMEWAL, X All bm" information is taken from a
Piet" 5wve4 N Borvin, Node and Avsoc tes, PA Ord cloted April 8, 2015
Executed thir, -ig—dog of I I 111 a "s".
CAy 01
Regstration No L-3131 9
How 5 lebode -ss 104'.1i
b2l Eugere Ct Ste 100
(femboro, NL I toll! SEAL
21420 e
L-3731
04f
A4AY 0 4 0
BWA
- I
P r um W 11 -1 A, t, I A
11 r-- —I 1 1, 7�1 17,
K, k,
�,Nr 74: I.R
FROJECT
C)
LU
c� W-
-C
C14
`�YqETLANV IMPAGT SIUMMARY
AREA 'A' - 2,lbq 5F - 0 06 AG - NO IMPAGT PROP05EO LOW011110GO 24157MM
(MINI.6 W 5F - 0 02 AG OFF-51TE) PO WX 41'141
906WILED NORTH CARaM 7rM
AREA 182W 5F - 0 42 A� - 3.q2,3 5F - 0 OqO AL IMPAGTED MW 43OA"
TOTAL NET 20)04 5F - 0 4b AG - TOTAL IMPAGT 3,q23 5F - 0 M M, CONTACT XX FM
L POND GR0551 15 5UMMARY Q"mmw No
VATE, FAY 1, 2015
POND AREA '13' - R183 5F - 0 45 AC 2,544 5F 0 OM AG POND GRO551%
5ftT TITLE
NETLAND
IMPACT
(7RAPHIG 5GALE MAP
0 200' IWI FU to
F� ORAXW SfALE I .7w
N L I - 3

(,itv (4 ()rccw holy j
'County
ated Areas
ZONE X
GRID NORTH
MAP SCALE 1" = 500' (1 : 6,000)
250 0 250 500 750 1,000
FEET
0 150 300
PANEL 8805J
FIRM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA
PANEL 8805
(SEE LOCATOR DIAGRAM OR MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL
LAYOUT)
CONTAINS:
COMMUNITY CID No. PANEL SUFFIX
GREENSBORO. CITY OF 375351 8805 .I
GUILFORD COUNTY 370111 6805 J
Notice to User The Map Numbx showrt below should be used
o*ren placing map orders- the Cornmunity, Numbar shown above
should be used on irmurance applications for the subed
community
EFFECTIVE DATE MAP NUMBER
JUNE 18, 2007 3710880500J
e.:4nrt,.� EeAeryp
;f J�
��++✓ GNn SfG
State of North Carolina
Fedend Emergency Management Agency
This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It
was extracted using F -MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes
or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the
title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance
Program 11 ood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at vwvw. mec fame gov