Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310783_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230328 Division of Water Resources Facility Number - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation O Other Agency Type of Visit: ®Compliance Inspection Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance Reason for Visit:( V Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ' A. Departure Time: `AUK&JCounty: Region: "i,Tz'o Farm Name: Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: Integrator: Certified Operator: �,�.yl-L% Certification Number: l(�� Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Layer = I Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow Turkeys Other Turkey Poults FT_ Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑Other: ` , a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N;k ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Nil ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 471 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 511212020 Continued Facilit Number: jDate of Inspection: a� Waste Collection &Treatment 4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [—] Yes 0@ No ❑ NA N I. a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA N I Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: _ Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): _ Observed Freeboard(in): _ 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the strictures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [] Yes [Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12.Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes qNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes �d No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes B� No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? E] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code ❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes M No 0 NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: Date of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes QjNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes .4?No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes R No ❑ Nn ONE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No Nib ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes p� No ❑ N 1 ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ N E If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes j] No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 1P NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary). 0cor 4's 60V �w S I ) 424S Oct 0 Reviewer/Inspector Name: ) i r Phone: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 81m f B Page 3 of 3 511212020