20071739 Ver 1_401 Application_20071007

LITTLE & LITTLE ~~ o ~ - I ~ 3q
23 October 2007
TRANSMITTAL ~~
~~
TO: Lia Myott ~
Express Review Program 0 ~'~ -~~ D
NCDENR -DWQ ~ • pQ?
1650 Mail Service Center QC-~ 2 3 ~-
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 ~NR.WAT~•~1
Y
FROM: Amy Mackintosh
SUBJECT: Centennial Campus Golf Course Complex
We are sending to you via: Courier
1 Application Fee - $2000 For Express Review -
Buffer Impact Authorization
5 22 Oct 2007 Cover letter
5 22 Oct 2007 PCN form
5 Vicinity Map
5 USGS Map
5 Soils Map
5 Wetland Delineation Map w/DWQ signature
(4 sheets)
5 (11x17) Site Plan
5 (11x17) Crossings Plans -Exhibits 1-8
5 27 Apr 2006 NRB Determination letter (DWQ #06-0694)
5 3 Jul 2001 Previous approval (DWQ #01-0600)
5 Minimization and Avoidance description
5 26 Sept 2000 EA/ FONSI Letter
5 22 Jun 2007 NCSU Stormwater Plan Approval letter
2 (full size) Site Plan
1 PCN form addendum
1 11 Apr. 2001 Previous PCN and associated documents
1 Stormwater Management Plans SW-O1 thru
SW-06 (for reference )
For approval
Copies to: Robert Fraser, Centennial Development LLC
Mark Ashness, CE Group
L&L Project Number (ncs1p.01)
Landscape Architecture /Planning PO Box 1448 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 919/821-5645 Fax [phone]

~x.p o'~ -1'138
LrrTZE ~ zlTrzE
22 October 2007
Ms. Lia Myott
Express Review Program '~
NCDENR -DWQ
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
~pA1H
Q~c~~a~~D
Of.i 2 3 200J
DENS - yY~1ft~ i:ii;,;LITY
~9 Ate AT~lAA~hl'F/!
Dear Lia:
The attached PCN form and Riparian Buffer Authorization application is for a modification of
the work authorized by the Buffer Authorization permit DWQ 01-0600 Wake Co. for NCSU
Centennial Campus Golf Course. This prior authorization was for NRB impacts associated
with 7 cart path crossings at 10 ft. width. These have not been constructed. We are now
requesting approval of NRB impacts for 6 cart path crossings at 20 ft. maximum width (total
buffer impact of 16,540 SF max.) instead of the original crossings. The cart paths are 8 ft.
wide with 12' width bridges across streams and/or wetlands. There will be no wetland/waters
impacts. The 20 ft. clearing width is needed to construct and maintain the trails.
The attached documents include a site plan showing the proposed grading and drainage and 1
set of the stormwater management plans. These stormwater management plans have been
reviewed by NCSU under the authority delegated to them by the State to review stormwater
plans for the campus. The stormwater approval letter from Gwyn Rowland is also attached.
NCSU was granted authority by the State to discharge stormwater in accordance with the
discharge limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth in Permit
Number NCS000376, effective May 1, 2005. All projects on NC State campuses meet or
exceed federal, state and local stormwater requirements.
All SW BMPs associated with the CC Golf Course project were designed in accordance with
the NCDENR SW BMP Manual (July 2007), the NCSU Stormwater and Nutrient
Management Guidelines and meet the requirements of 15A NCAC 2B .0232 (5) Diffuse Flow.
Please contact me if you have any further questions about this project.
Sincerely,
J. Mack Little, RLA, FASLA
cc: Robert Fraser
/.f1;1'D.SC.'I Pfi AKC7II"1{,C T('Kh; PLf1,1SV!V'G P.O. liO,l / t f8 IZALElC,71, ;1"OKTII Gil KU/./,tiA ??Ci0? 9!),'821-~Ci•1 ~ l~flX 919 ~Sj l-Z iZ9

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No. ~ X p D ~ -' ~ ~ 3
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
~.,I D
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:.
^ Section 404 Permit X^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: None
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Centennial Development, LLC, contact: Bob Fraser (Associate Vice Chancellor
Centennial Campus Development Office and manager of LLC)
Mailing Address: PO Box 7408, NCSU Campus
Raleigh, NC 27695-7408
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: RWFRASER(a~GW.FIS.NCSU.EDU
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mack Little
Company Affiliation: Little & Little Landscape Architects PLLC
Mailing Address: PO Box 1448
Raleigh, NC 27602
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: mack.l(a~lal-la.com
III. Project Information
Page 5 of 13

Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed. on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: NCSU Centennial Campus Golf Course Complex
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 0793-53-4198
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Site is in the
southeastern portion of NCSU's Centennial Campus. From I-40 take Lake Wheeler
Rd. exit heading towards downtown. Turn onto Centennial Parkway from Lake
Wheeler Road (towards State Farmers Market). Take first left onto Achievement
Drive. Turn left on Main Campus Drive. Project area is south of the end of the drive.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.75821 °N 78.68188 °W
(730,870 N, 2,096,000E NC Grid NAD 83)
6. Property size (acres): 226
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Walnut Creek: 27-34-(4), C. NSW
8. River Basin: Neuse (NEU02)
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Undeveloped -cleared uplands. Land use in project
vicinity is university campus
Page 6 of 13

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Golf
course construction, using typical large earthmovin~ equipment
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Golf course
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. Prior permits:
DWQ #O1-0600 Wake Co. Neuse River Buffer Authorization .for 7 cart crossings. Not
used. The current application is a modification to the work approved in this permit.
DWQ #06-0694, Wake Co. On-site determination of NRB (South Creek and Walnut Creek
tributaries on Golf Course site)
Permits have also been received for road crossings adiacent to this project (Main Campus
Drive and Alumni Center access drive.) These are separate from the golf course project.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
There may be a permit request in future for the road connection to I40 shown on the site
plan. This road is not definite and in any case is not scheduled to be designed or
constructed in the near future.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: No wetland impacts are proposed.
Page 7 of 13

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 7.6 Ac.
wetlands and streams
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on map)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Impact Impact
Length
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0 0
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Page 8 of 13

Open Water Impact

Site Number
(indicate on map)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact
(acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): (previous permits) 0 LF
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes X No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. All site development except
for the cart oath connections is laid out to avoid impacts to wetlands, creeks and riparian
buffers. Crossings are approximately perpendicular to the channels and bridges are used to
Page 9 of 13

avoid impacts to wetlands and streams. Proposed clearing width is the minimum needed to
install and maintain the bridges and cart paths. The number and locations of crossings are
needed to provide access between the golf holes and other course facilities and allow safe
and orderly progression from hole to hole. Also see attached sheet for justification of each
crossing
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm~ide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
No wetland or stream impacts are proposed so no mitigation is required or proposed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine mailability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application .process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
Page 10 of 13

website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes X^ No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes X No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes X No ^
EA/FONSI has been obtained for the project
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes X No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 9276 3 (2 for Catawba)
Page 11 of 13

* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendiculaz from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer ,Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. No buffer mitigation is required or
proposed.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
Total impervious surface will be +/- 13.25 Ac which is 5.86% of total site area. Many of
the golf holes have no Stormwater collection systems; rainfall will sheet flow into the buffer
from these holes. In areas where concentrated Stormwater is planned, all runoff will be
directed into grass depressions adiacent to the fairway and released through a level
spreader prior to entering the buffer. The Stormwater. plans have been submitted to NC
State and approved under their general permit.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
There will be in future 2 on-course restrooms and a future golf clubhouse and maintenance
building. These facilities will connect to existing gravity sewer lines on the property. The
existing sewer is maintained by the City of Raleigh. All wastewater will be treated at the
City of Raleigh WWTP.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No X
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No X
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No X
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
Page 12 of 13

XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. .However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applicant/Agent's Signature ~ Yjate
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13

~ ~ i- Centennial Campus Develapmen! ONice
12 October 2007
Ms. Lia Myott
Express Review Program
NCDENR - DWQ
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
Dear Ms. Myott:
NC Star- ~;,;~,;as~ry
Czmrus Ax 7-;~~8
°:i`h`C r$ E~JC _!I~ I, '. I. ._ i?~, ail)
10'7 ~~:~,idt 1.8f`~;1.;5 Gi `1i`

J. Mack Little of Little & Little Landscape Architects PLLC has been retained as
Centennial Development LLC's agent for work on and coordination of the wetland and
NRB delineation and permitting at the Centennial Campus Golf Course site. Please
accept this letter as verification that Mack will be acting as our agent.
Please call me with any questions.
Sincerely,
Robert Fraser
Centennial Development LLC
pc: Mack Little, Little & Little

USGS Topographic Map
From Raleigh West, NC 7.5 Minute Quadrangle
Scale: 1:24,000
Dated 1993
NCSU Centennial Campus Golf Course Complex
Centennial Development, LLC
1 2 3
4 5
6 7 8
1 Southeast Durham
2 Bayleaf
3 Walce Forest
4 Cary
5 Raleigh East
6 Apex
7 Lalte Wheeler
8 Gamer
ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLE NAMES
Interstate Route ~ U.S. Route O State Route
RALEIGH WEST, NC
1993
NIMA 5255 I SW-SERIES V842
m
m =
o
~ .
1 =
Z
O] ~
vl -_
H
r~~~tt -- - ~ /tS"3/3U"'
:Z't OOO INTEflIOR-GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, RESTON, VIRGINIA-1988
GOAD CLASSIFICATION
0 KILDMETERS 1 2
0 METERS 1000 2000 Primary highway Light-duty road, hard or
hard surface ........ im roved surface ......
N C ' ,D P
Secondary highway
hard surface........ Unimproved road...... _________
QUADRANGLE LOCATION -

Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
Survey
NCSU Centennial Campus Golf Course Complex
Centennial Development, LLC
N Meters Natural Resources Conservation Service
A 0 300 600 1,200 1,800
0 1.000 2,000 a,ooo 6,000et (Web Soil Survey)

-~pP~,yPv
P~~~F~''
~~2
2
y,~. ~ PKWY
Q~P~
O ~
3~
~~ ~-4~ O
Q2
~~~
~~
~~
LOCATION SKETCH
NOT TO SCALE
/\
NORTH
Site Location Map
NCSU Centennial Campus Golf Course Complex
Wake County, NC
Centennial Development, LLC

~Yn n~_11~~
DNlSI0~1 OF WATER WALlIY CEF~ICATE
"THIS CERTIFlES THAT THIS. COPY OF THIS MAP
ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF STREAM
- -r
ENVIRONMENTAL/DELINEATION
LITTLE ~ LITTL
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE /PLANNING
~ 127 W. HARGETT STREET, SURE 104
~ RALEIGH, NC 27602
RIL 27, 2006 FOR DWQ X06-0694, oAL.rom /~" y~~ ~ o~~ \ [phone]
THIS ON-SITE DETERMINATION SHALL EXPIRE FlVE "tm°~"7° ~''"~~ AEDIDff111LBiff o~ O
,,,,E ~~ ~ r~„~„L~~ ~~~°,'~;~ '~'~,b\ FAX [phone]
(5) YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE DETERMINATION ~ ~ o I v ~ ~ "nD~ ~"\ ~ '~,~
LETTER "
RAE 6110IN GYMAN RSIFI' ._ .
FEATURES SUBJECT TO NEUSE RIVER BUFFER RULE "D°""uK.ffro o _ .
(15A NCAC 2B.0233) AS DETERMINED BY ON-SITE ApEffIONGAWL "`°'°""
w artE ff x awuuu
ON APRIL 26, 2006, PER DWQ DETERMINATION ~ ~,a i ~'
LETTER OF AP A°IEff~+~ ~ ~'A ~
NAME: ~ 1~`~
TiTLE: ~ f
DATE: • O
NOTES. LIE L R~ AR
~
.,... rM
°
o-
%
n
o
a
mA
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. AREAS COMPUTED BY COORDINATE COMPUTATION METHOD.

3. THE FlELDWORK DID NOT INCLUDE A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE ~
SUBJECT TRACT. THE DEPICTED BOUNDARY IS BASED ON THE
QAE ff YN LMOMA ` ~
~AOE O~'11pp 449 ~wA~ //~j'~
RAE ff IOM OLMAM ~ ~ ` ~ •~ ~"4n''Q~,~\`Y ~ _~ \
4b AAA ~; _~'~- I ~ `` 0 ' `'y~`'A'~4 % ~E I~Y~~eM~IM~ 1
.AIO lLRQT MaM. ~~ '~ ~b /' OIAIroAL
~/ ~ AN}1HQ
LAM All ~ll~ ~I I ~JR~QIM%F4a ~; ~\~ // /
M OIF•1{-17q I
~ mo Iii I I 1 ~ I dot,/
I J "' ~ ~,/~~f"//
DIM MIS~OO ~ ~ ~LL L LIM ~ ! r rol! 3ME ff MLM
ne 11an~i-sA w ~nm~~ ~ ~ u~On>4 ro uI eE,Mio s
rok RIFbMM I IAIRAS ff lE
RAE 6 MOO GRIN BLAMOf ro0 6
MA01 YAAM I a ~MEro0A~r0 ~ ~ RAE 11Y•x11 vAE ~ '~ AOO CIDMA RM[
qA OID-E-W AIk RIYIA-ARl ,K~~,~jM RAE ff MOIAI CNOMA M tlM/> R ~
~~ ~ M67M ff ROL BIAF ~ !Ik RIY1A-M9
ALR JINRM ~ '
~~ -~.i `~ ~~ 1 L l."` ARM-~A' J
ImLro E ALWD _
SURVEY BY AL PRINCE AND EXHIBIT MAPS PREPARED BY BALLENi1NE ~AMRo->~M« ~~"- .~.~
ASSOCIATES (SEE LIST OF REFERENCES BELOW). _ ~ ~ ~l~A~MffaaM°101ffIF~AA9NE ~~ ~
/ J ~°NORLwMn
4. OWNER'S ADDRESS:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
STATE PROPERTY OFFlCE
116 WEST JONES ST.
RALEIGH, NC 27603
SITE ADDRESSES:
1100 LAKE RALEIGH RD
RALEIGH, NC
624 MAIN CAMPUS DR.
RALEIGH, NC
OR 612 MAIN CAMPUS DR.
RALEIGH, NC
OR 684 MAIN CAMPUS DR.
RALEIGH, NC
5. ALL ROAD PLANIMETRICS AND STREAMS NOT. INCLUDED IN THIS
DELINIATION ARE BASED ON THE APPROVED WETLAND DELINEATION
DATED FEBRUARY 29, 2000.
6. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS, BUFFERS AND
RESTRICTIONS SHOWN HEREON AND ALL OTHERS OF RECORD NOT
SHOWN HEREON.
7, WETLANDS AND US WATERS DEllNEAiION PERFORMED BY LITTLE AND
uTTLE.
6. SEE SHEET 2 FOR INSETS AND 11ELINE TABLES. SEE SHEETS 3 & 4
FOR THE TABULATION OF US WATERS & WETLANDS COORDINATES
REFERENCES:
DB 10522 PG 842 DB 10522 PG 851
DB 2609 PG 83 DB 9501 PG 1973
DB 7305 PG 572
UNRECORDED MAP ENTITLED "CENTENNIAL
CAMPUS" PREPARED BY AL PRINCE &
ASSOCIATES, PA, WITH SURVEY DATE MARCH &
APRIL 1995.
EXHIBIT MAPS ENTITLED "CENTENNIAL CAMPUS
LAND EXCHANGE" OF LOT 4 (OR N4 CLUSTER) &
LOT 6 SIGNED AND SEALED JULY 6, 2004 AND
OF LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4 do 6 `9GNED AND SEALED
JUNE 1, 2004, ALL PREPARED BY BALLENTINE
AssogArES, Pa
EXHIBIT MAP OF THE NORTH SHORE TRACT
ENTITLED "NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
CENTENNIAL CAMPUS" PREPARED BY BALLENi1NE
ASSOCATES, PA DATED AUGUST 11, 2000.
I 6w1A~ff~000MME ~ '
N10 ff D RISINWIY
M uic ro MA NORTH CAigI.NA B~AiE
~M A ~ I /~ cro 7~rA1E rROr911Y
ne Ru~M-aNe I IK Ru-«-I = ~~ 17~F~'~
i a7o-
GRAPHIC SCALE
~~_ \~ 1 1000 p 500 1000
ILIUL t ALD Rq1 RIl7lID~
~M vA7a9•Rf~
_-Jil (IN FEET )
J EILOI L MIkTR MLLW
„mp ~jL}pl ~ (~ y I 1 inch = 1000 ft.
OLY L ! iAODA A EOMI I
i N~
n°e o aim
__ o
uI ALm iso ro xs J ~ ga~ ~ y OGG yKIG 1 L
rM m4A ~ I ~ / oau~mN~ oE1rF,AnaN ~ S~ 2
i
l1FE:ff L L Y]E A1p OR6L l /S'EE NSET 1 ~' ~ \ ~ "~ ~.''°,'~"-~,~.
I ~ ~ ON SFEET 2 ~ ~ „ ~ ~
GAO. { ALAnI LNE- / 1 ~ `~
M,~~~ / ~
~EONf 1 AMf I ~ ~
m~roM~ ~ ~~
rx RLta-ma tm aF AtEA I ~ - .WAms aF y
- - ~ OLL9 E.KM ~ ~Maam sauw ~ eANC
M RR-,FiIX I.PPER WT ff NAIFKS ~F CIE I ,~~ -' ~~
OELEA7ED NNB ¢
/ ~ ~ s~ IRPE1t WT ar aA U y~j ~ ~ NID NIiB , ~ - ~ ~
//\ ~ ~ A`ILA m~v-II~M ~ ~iLaeAl~i• aA~ / a~ ~ urrs aF u~i1
// / \ ~ AE ALlAM LAL ALNA$/ I roA~mo-w ~a ~ CPAiED BY 7tK ~
~^~ ~ ~ ~~~ :~A I r ~ ,, ~,,,~ NAP ~
__ ~ DO GAOIN RAE
~5 ~~ ~mws~~A/ ' y ` ~ Y°i%ro>~r °va NCCS YpMeti 7t1EY1FR'
"~ ~~, o~Aim °~°°~~ ~' ~ ~ ~`~ ~ sous ~
/ ~
m IIA ~R MO~• '` NEn.Alos / ,,,,iii'
~ Rc~A-MD M~7ER5 ~ ~ b
us - ~partra+r I
~~ uaaEn urt av ~ ~ saw
roA WO-ipiOA GIM1N iME
~"~ Y"
'~"ONAL xas Nam
WA7EI6 A!D NRB ~~ 010 ~ NC qD N
xo~mM ~ SIAFIy ~ MarovN E 779,YIX
8ao4.e
~ ~/ ~ , ,
~i mAS~ ~ '
OfA ff AA18M ~ /
r '~ ~~~
~~i ~~
~~i
// `AAAAAIAII
~~ CqR ~,
~ ~ ON
~~~ ~OFESSI pNq~ (/2
'" Q SEAL ";~
.c -
L-3919 =
~ e-.'
C2~ • •... • ~, ~
.~
N C. P~ ~`
'IAA~~AAA'
SURVEYOR'S CERTiFlCAT10N
I, KEVIN C. PIVER, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS
PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL
FlELD SURVEY AND THAT TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE AND BEUEF IT IS CORRECT IN ITS
REPRESENTATION OF THE EXISTING SITE CONDI110NS.
`~ vJ L-3919
KEVIN C. IVER, pLS REGISTRATION NO.
"~ die
..r ~
L 7 ~ ~ .ter
L N
~"'Zg
z (n js
J W~'
J ~~
~<
m U~~
Qo~
r^pN
~ Q
dayy ,~
~Nv
a
0
~ ~ N
a ~_ `~
a °
Z
O
a ~ Z
W N J
Z
'~ Z ~
Q O Q
U
Z Q
J U ~
t- ~ Z
Z 0
r
F.
N
JOB ~ 104411.51
DAZE: JUNE 16, 2006
SCALE: 1` =1000.
DRAWN BY: AIRBD
REVIEWED BY: KCP
REVISIONS:
Sheet 1 of 4

440
ACHIEVEMENT
THE DR
SITE
440 ~ G
VICINITY MAP o
NOT TO SCALE. ~
UPPER OMIT OF
DELINEATED NRB
STREAM
RIPARIAN
`385 `~\ UPPER UMIT OF 404
~ '~ JURISDICTIONAL

`~ WAIERS
\384 38
\382 `. RCP 24"
`
`380
37 78 • INV.IN=315.43'
'
373 376 INV:OUT=315.02
~ !369 I2 371
_ 370
355365
1 6 ~`
357
363
1 56 361
~ 1 351 362
- 7
8 Ci44 s~._~. 349
~40 a '~; ~, TOP OF
~ 341 337 334 `STREAM BANK
~~-~.~ •N
UPPER LIMIT OF 404 331 I
JURISDICTIONAL ~C129 ~1\ WAIMPRO
WATERS AND NRB ~N326 _ ~7~`. STREAM
STREAM ! .L~zaa~`~
DMS10N OF WATER QUAIJTY CERTIRCATE
"THIS CERTIFlES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS MAP
ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF STREAM
FEATURES SUBJECT TO NEUSE RIVER BUFFER RULE
(15A NCAC 28.0233) AS DETERMINED BY ON-SITE
ON APRIL 26, 2006, PER DWQ DETERMINATION
LETTER OF APRIL 27, 2006 FOR DWO #06-0694.
THIS ON-SITE DETERMINATION SHALL EXPIRE FlVE
(5) YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE DETERMINATION
LETTER."
NAME: Il J]!~_~1~
TITLE: ~s r>JT
DA1E: q ' ~
INSET 1
GRAPHIC SCALE
250 0 125 250
( IN FEET )
RCP 24" 1 inch = 250 {L
INV.IN=297.04'

INV.OUT=296.95' WATERS OF THE US
-IMPORTANT-~
RCP 24° STREAM
INV.=297.SD'
`END NOT
FOUND
108
• ~' --'y
.- 179181
175177 ~+{~B2
161162
RCP 24" 160 T
INV.IN=297.51' 154 116
INV.OUT=296,06' 141 X151
148 )(, ~ ~'
~~ 1 89 3 ~ \\/ `~. 318 ~
iJ f~ ~ `\\ 316 ~l
~~ 984 1 \ ~~. 315 3141
/ ~ "°°' ~ 198gS~~ \ ~` 131`•.
/~:'~ 1987 \ 11312 3~ `
L990 I \ ~\ 311 309 ~
. ~6g 95 '19921 / \ ~ ~ 308 9
` _ \ '.
1 y/ \/" J 1993 ~ \ ~'~ 297
4l6 ; 1994 / \ '.
I: 416~!!!~~~~III~~""~,~~_ 1997~ \ ~i
4167 1998 ~ 1
/ '~.41~~999 / \ ~
:.`/ 4166 ~l165~ / ~\128
~ ~ ~ ~ 1 : f2s
"~~ INSET 3
120 124 i 123
~ ~ 122 i /n
I~ ~~\ 118 i
~ 119
0 50 100 ~ ~ ~;
~~LIS
~ i ll3 ~ ~`~
( IN FEET)
i inch = 100 k. \ ,? ~ llo ~ ~~ u7i'~
~~0 mo
1~ 1' E
c
=295.
139
304 i )
298 \~•-.1381.
136306
~ 134
30 29 ' GR~E~
127 V~
S~ NSET 3
~/
DELINEATED
1a41os
UPPER OF G.S.
SDICiIONAL MON~WAK87"
W\
TIELINE TABLE
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1 2719.06' N48'S6'08"E
L2 2501.38' N50'41'27"E
L3 257.07 N7T4T 23"W
L4 1776.92' N6D'50'44"W
L5 318.49' N49'04'38"W
229
224
RIPRAP,~
217
206 zl
'• ~ 207
.i ~ i
200 ~~ !'
ENVIRONMENTAL/DELINEATION
LITTLE ~ LITTLE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE /PLANNING
127 W. HARGETT STREET, SUITE 104
RALEIGH, NC 27602 ,
[phone]
FAX [phone]
SOUTH SEEK , 2~ 296
'- --.-% 282
~ ~ 274 276 278 280 285 21
'S1 '272 83 -
Q~~ ~~' 2680 27375277 279 ~ ~ '~
266 '~~
~ _ 264 267 2n ~ ~-•-~ END OF~
' DELJNEATION
~ ~ i~ 260 262 ~ 65~ x'269
~ 1f2~' 9 261 263 ~ TOP OF
~,• 255 57 _- ~ STREAM BANK
250252 ~ •--
i
49 i X553 ~
" 1 247
0
.~µ SS, So,~7
..238240 43,~~_50' RIPARIAN
~~~~421 BUFFER
1
5237 241 ~
233 ,.-?~:
r'
2 214
~~~ d6 ° ~ , 190
~ 68 74 ~^ ~ 185 189 ~ 191
+ 167,i'173
',( 5g 180 I87
/~ ~ ' 163 166 186
~~~I51 IX1S11NG SEDIMENT POND -
149 142 NOT JURISDICTIONAL
.4334 ~ \
4337 4338 ~'
4339 403
4336 4330 /POND ..I
~ 329
~ L..._.
..,... .,. _405
4279 4284 4333 "'c 4322 ~•??~/~~~~i,
~, ,
4276 4290 4281 ~'~ 4310 ~~43g 4323 ~432~~
4282 4286 4312 ~
4277 4267 4321 ~ i
427 4283 43Q9 ~ 8 4y~19 j.
4275 -%, 314 ~%i317
4274 ~ 4308
4273 4272 ~~ ~• ~i~ 4288 ~~ 4304 , ~ ~~ 4315
4271 4289 2~1 4293 4301 ~~~~„ /,
4282 - 295 i • ~ ~}297~f ~
4270 42664265 ~ii~/~~~~ _ - % ~ ~~
4269 263 4259~i~4(/~!. ~ p7514%
42687 42904261 4258 ~ ~7~/~
i
4260 425~~54 k !507 50
4253 ~ . •, SC6
4 1.~~,~j~22~~'`\- 4340
~`~~3 42421
`~~~ 49/!/! ~-~- 4245
.~ 424648
•(\~~ 4247
NOT
INCLUDED IN
`11111111rr~''
_~~ ~OF~SSI ONRC ~~,,':
• ¢ l~~ ~J~
-~~ ~~919~; -
~'f~GN~SURV6~~"~ ~:
~~ ~ •...r'~r~
CC p~ ,
''/rrll 11 lll~`,
~L.~'©~
END OF
DEIJNEARON
RCP 24"
•wl w1;L iNV.0UT=251.72'
LOC u '
~M~r DF D~N
~n~
ARC ~ 71
5
RCP 24" ~'S69 ~
DELINEATED INV.IN=252.09' ,565 56~

WETLANDS i
WETLANDS FLAG i ~ 561 562 ~i
4231 ~ ~
.
9

4236 i
4235 64 560 i
~
~7 DELINEATED
i% ~
'
~
5 ~
WETLANDS 5
SOUTH
~ ~ .
407 408 409 ~ ~ SILT FENCE ~~ ~

~~i ~ 1~~ ~ _
~f~~//i,{ •5;33' S0' ~
- rr ~ • ~ /' 3~ 554
~ ~~~~~1~1
4'~ i ~50' RIPARIAN
,
~ / ~~ ~~ ~ /~ ' f
„
i BUFFER
49
~
X5,2} ~ ~ ~
40
544 547
~ 542 ~
523
529 -_ -•- .--'--'°'--•--~- ~
_
2f i'~ Si?5 ~
4 WATERS OF THE US
238 IMPORTA
N
T STREAM
-
TOP OF STREAM
4239 ~1
/
~
BANK INSET 2
uPPER u Mir aF
~~ IMPORTANT STREAM
GRAPHIC SCALE
250 0 125 250
UPPER OMIT OF 404
JURISDICTIONAL
WATERS AND NRB (IN FEET )
STREAM 1 inch = 250 {L
W to
Z ~ «+
I- ~ ~~
Z gy=p
W Wd~
J Q~
°<
~ p~~
~I
~/~pN
~ A
a,~
~~
/~
~ a
~ ~ N
a ~_ ~
Q O
Z M~
W
O
Q r Z
Z N J
J Z ~
Q O Q
U
Z Q
U ~
~L.
Z ~
/~~
N
°a JOB ~: 104011.51
Z DATE: JUNE 16
2006
,
SCALE: 1" =250''
DRAWN BY: JRBD
REVIEWED BY: KCP
I z REVISIONS:

Sheet 2 of 4

WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
(NC GRID NAD83 COORDINATES)
TOP OF
BANK
POINT N0 NORTHING
(US FEET)
. FASTING
(US FEET)
100 729959.73 2094628.43
101 729954.90 2094631.99
102 729985.23 2094645.09
103 729988.80 2094641.59
104 729993.61 2094661.68
105 729997.13 2094658.65
107 729876.35 2094488.91
108 729884.67 2094508.59
109 729910.91 2094529.79
110 729963.90 2094531.09
111 729958.22 2094514.01
112 730008.41 2094538.28
113 730007.05 2094525.35
114 730069.83 2094568.83
115 730071.92 2094548.94
116 730044.24 2094633.49
117 730046.83 2094636.54
118 730095.20 2094606.87
119 730093,71 2094604.02
120 730135.07 2094573.58
121 730139.05 2094581.66
122 730128.22 2094559.68
123 730216.03 2094576.38
124 730214.67 2094587.30
125 730272.70 2094594.34
126 730270.66 2094603.10
127 730349.05 2094617.22
128 730354.57 2094599.04
129 730391.98 2094611.71
130 730400.76 2094598.33
131 730458.96 2094639.33
132 730465.84 2094635.24
133 730532.60 2094657.45
134 730527.35 2094638:15
135 730577.27 2094666.31
136 730577.29 2094652.31
137 730643.90 2094682.31
138' 730645.24 2094665.36
139 730705.16 2094680.08
140 730700.17 2094699.97
141 730772.37 2094695.81
142 730767.53 2094714.18
147 730745.74 2094705.39
148 730751.26 2094691.45
149 730756.03 209471249
150 730763.21 2094693.83
151 730781.20 2094715.89
152 730784.66 2094706.51
153 730796.68 2094728.41
154 730800.39 2094718.05
155 730815.49 2094752.59
156 730820.29 2094739.43
157 730864.81 2094744.84
158 730869.46 209473270
159 730904.97 2094745.75
160 730912.46 2094733.92
161 730921.22 2094746.56
162 730929.75 2094735.46
163 730904.86 2094738.84
164 730902.53 2094720.54
165 730946.56 2094733.60
166 730910.21 2094739.81
167 730927.25 2094760.78
168 730949.18 2094764.75
169 730969.71 2094745.72
170 730986.76 2094753.61
171 731003.87 2094749.72
172 730986.86 2094768.27
173 730996.39 2094770.91
174 731006.56. 2094785.80
175 731021.22 2094771.59
176 731038.31 2094610.52
177 731040.23 2094794.64
178 731072.88 2094831.56
179 731075.37 2094818.80
180 731082.09 2094850.44
181 731104.76 2094846.40
182 731098.13 2094882.39
183 731086.05 2094878.52
184 731099.45 2094900.98
185 731095.72 2094911.33
186 731114.05 2094919.76
187 731109.62 2094933.04
188 731126.39 2094928.65
189 731124.24 2094941.47
190 731135.75 2094932.49
191 731133.60 2094945.32
192 731165.25 2094940.72
193 731163.48 2094955.61
194 731188.96 2094938.38
195 731187.09 2094952.26
196 731213.94 2094942.83
197 731212.07 2094957.71
198 731234.92 2094947.61
199 731232.45 2094967.45
200 731251.52 2094960.64
201 731249.65 2094975.53
202 731291.26 2094977.16
203 731290.24 2094990.12
204 731330.71 2094988.60
205 73132222 2095014.22
206 731374.22 2095005.24
207 731368.99 2095019.30
208 731432.20 2095030.86
209 731437.12 2095003.30
210 731447.15 2095043.87
211 731450.49 2095026.18
212 731471.17 2095048.09
213 731467.17 2095068.70
214 731482.06 2095048.79
215 731478.26 2095069.44
216 731470.82 2095019.58
217 731475.04 2094996.97
218 731510.77 209507294
219 731508.94 2095016.97
220 731508.22 2094994.98
221 731521.81 ,2094991.93
222 731522.34 2095006.92
223 731539.16 2094977.57
224 731538.27 2094987.88
229 731567.37 2094990.76
230 731570.50 2095000.55
231 731584.32 2094999.05
232 731585.63 2095039.95
233 731572.22 2095046.51
234 731597.98 2095057.01
235 731584.20 2095067.00
236 731640.20 2095083.76
237 731632.84 2095096.92
236 731675.63 2095119.53
239 731655.64 2095127.66
240 731678.58 2095149.17
241 731653.72 2095146.53
242 731676.97 2095164.13
243 731721.13 2095112.40
244 731717.98 2095089.18
245 731733.34 2095092.91
246 731823.70 2095138.17
247 731818.74 2095149.10
248 731874.01 209511286
249 731886.58 2095084:52
250 731913.69 2095095.75
251 731902.66 2095122.58
252 731914.13 2095107.83
253 731907.29 2095124.48
254 731959.25 2095145.37
255 731964.16 2095132.26
256 731987.53 2095111.71
257 731987.00 2095125.63
258 732040.76 2095128.50
259 732036.10 2095139.56
260 732075.29 2095163.83
261 732066.95 2095176.65
262 73212255 2095210.57
263 732114.12 2095225.33
264 732169.21 2095195.88
265 732161.69 2095210.01
266 732214.73 2095218.17
267 732209.73 2095227.97
268 732257.36 2095252.09
269 732251.91 2095262.79
270 732272.10 2095261.65
271 732265.31 2095275.02
272 732285.79 2095267.01
273 732280.42 2095277.74
274 732328.84 2095279.67
275 732323.58 2095290.45
276 732371.07 2095318.07
277 732365.27 2095329.71
278 732393.70 2095352.08
279 732387.24 2095360.99
280 73242204 2095391.93
281 732413.36 2095398.90
282 732466:20 2095419.45
283 732454.86 2095430.73
284 732513.03 2095440.61
285 732498.78 2095454.65
286 732562.32 2095485.20
287 732547.82 2095498.97
288 732570.51 2095535.81
289 732555.67 209553285
290 732572.92 2095596.54
291 732556.85 2095604.47
294 730471.73 2094494.51
295 730461.65 2094496.03
296 730474.20 2094549.82
297 730462.90 2094545.78
298 730476.34 2094570.77
299 730473.29 2094575.70
300 730510.34 2094585.63
301 730514.62 2094577.01
302 730525.47 2094601.41
303 730532.07 2094596.79
304 730561.67 2094619.30
305 730568.86 2094&13.57
306 730584.51 2094652.10
307 730582.61 2094645.29
308 730463.75 209445213
309 730474.52 2094446.65
310 730470.83 2094407.26
DNISIDN OF WATER DUALITY CER'TfACATE
311 730461.05 2094409.32
312 730462.05 2094374.99
313 730471.91 2094373.30
314 730515.83 2094308.44
315 730505.84 2094308.00
316 730503.22 2094244.02
317 730522.16 2094234.20
318 730523.89 2094180.68
319 730537.80 2094172.77
320 730512.16 2094134.26
321 730524.28 2094129.55
322 730527.17 2094101.36
323 730521.20 2094101.92
324 730500.60 2094053.15
325 730503.66 2094057.10
326 730531.32 2094038.21
327 730534.99 2094042.96
328 730548.96 2094010.36
329 730545.91 2094005.19
330 730577.99 2093999.23
331 730574.30 2093995.72
332 730561.29 2093972.24
333 730573.60 2093976.92
334 730588.05 2093962.97
335 730580.31 2093960.97
336 730602.54 2093910.15
337 730594.61 2093909.09
338 730595.38 2093880.16
339 730601.15 2093878.52
340 730559.64 2093844.32
341 730563.65 2093850.06
342 730610.31 2093848.34
343 730618.07 2093850.29
344 730602.88 2093806.50
345 730607.19 2093813.23
346 730639.71 2093795.98
347 730643.72 2093802.90
348 730641.12 2093764.86
349 730646.83 2093766.69
350 730667.14 2093752.23
351 730662.27 2093748x73-
352 730668.77 2093749:88
353 730656.16 .2093746.25
354 730650.45 2093724.18
355 730659.43 2093718.77
356 730622.18 2093689.49
357 730630.21 2093682.55
358 730597.61 2093626.41
359 730594.10 2093627.92
361 730684.39 2093780.45
362 730685.65 2093787.34
363 730694.38 2093724.56
364 730699.64 2093729.17
365 730692.85 2093700.02
366 730700.29 2093698.92
367 730699.94 2093690.86
368 730715.89 2093685.1 B
369 730713.89 2093680.40
370 730717.67 2093696.50
371 730736.37 2093700.35
372 730745.76 2093687.92
373 730737.17 2093672.22
376 730755.83 2093690.14
377 730754.67 2093684.25
378. 730769.55 2093689.75
380 730769.40 2093682.65
381 730778.42 2093690.58
382 730773.23 2093684.53
°THIS CERiIFlES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS MAP
ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF STREAM
FEATURES SUBJECT TO NEUSE RIVER BUFFER RULE
(15A NCAC 26.0233) AS DETERMINED BY ON-SITE
ON APRIL 26, 2006, PER DWO DETERMINATION
LETTER OF APRIL 27, 2006 FOR DWQ X06-0694.
THIS ON-SITE DETERMINATION SHALL EXPIRE FlVE
(5) YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE DETERMINATION
LETTER." _
NAME: ~ ' " ~- ~
TITLE: ~ S
DATE; ~ ~ ~ ~
ENVIRONMENTAL/DELINEATION
LITTLE ~ LITTLE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE /PLANNING
127 W. HARGETT STREET, SUITE 104
RALEIGH, NC 27602
(919 821-5645
FAX [phone]
~''' ~~A''~,
'~~ ,.... Rod'-,
~~s
_ ; ~,~~.
~~'1•~~'4p SURV :y0~~ `:
~'~-~~
TABLE
FOR
INSET 1
WATERS OF THE
UNITED STATES
COORDINATES
383 730794.80 2093596.33
384 730791.48 2093595.53
385 730802.47 2093476.77
386 730797.99 2093478.30
387 730793.06 2093356.20
388 730796.38 2093355.30
389 730769:73 2093327.51
390 730766.19 2093331.44
W ~°o
Z Q «'
~ ~ j~
Z ~=p
L.LI W ~"
J Q~
Q <
m U~~
O~~
//~pN
Kp
a ,~
Q~°:
~ a
O ~ N
a ~' o
cQ Z r
m
a ~ z
W N J
Z Q O
J Z ~
0 O Q
U
Z Q
J U ~
F- ~ Z
Z ~
r
JOB ~: 104011.51
DATE: JUNE 16, 2006
SCALE: 1" =1000'
DRAWN BY: JRBD
REVIEWED BY: KCP
REVISIONS:
3tleet 3 of 4

TABLE FOR
INSET 2
WETLANDS FLAGS COORDINATES
WETLANDS FLOGS
(NC GRID NAD.83 COORDINATES)
POINT N0. NORTHING
US FEET FASTING
US FEET
4327 732055.35 2096781.28
4328 732062.12 2096767.06
4329 732074.74 2096740.29
4330 732082.03 2096718.08
4331 732075.88 2096698.05
4339 732087.25 2096708.03
4338 732089:85 2096693.52
4332 732084.31 2096686.11
4337 732109.24 2096648.09
4326 732008.33 2096797.54
4325 731972.32 2096805.15
4324 731967.32 2096785.89
4320 731961.59 2096787.85
4319 731955.62 2096801.90
4321 731965.91 2096767.90
4323 731973.62 2096763.63
4322 731972.13 2096741.24
4318 731946.53 2096812.32
4317 731915.84 2096817.94
4315 731876.28 2096773.97
4316 731888.21 2096816.38
4314 731877.47 2096744.10
4298 731807.78 2096801.91
4299 731840.91 2096810.41
4300 731857.65 2096779.51
4301 731875.97 2096724.24
4302 731883.98 2096708.23
4303 731894.88 2096692.57
4313 731903.21 2096696.99
4304 731886.69 2096687.24
4312 731911.68 2096669.83
4311 731909.77 2096656.47
4305 731901.07 2096637.87
4310 731916.37 2096632.58
4297 731814.82 2096766.52
4296 731810.65 2096749.51
4295 731824.20 2096720.28
4294 731824.24 2096688.60
4293 731819.44 2096665.36
4262 731794.17 2096645.61
4261 731788.24 2096664.78
4259 731784.06 2096691.69
4260 731775.40 2096676.72
4258 731772.59 2096724.95
4257 731759.92 2096756.38
4256 731730.41 2096791.33
4255 731704.17 2096833.71
4254 731676.43 2096853.73
4253 731647.13 2096883.55
4252 731634.49 2096696.29
4251 731618.07 2096893.24
4306 731899.00 2096603.42
4308 731910.11 2096600.67
4309 731913.64 2096569.08
4292 731825.68 2096628.64
4291 731827.32 2096592.23
4263 731802.44 2096611.44
4264 731811.56 2096577.65
4265 731826.86 2096541.15
4290 731834.79 2096539.08
4289 731837.76 2096506.21
4266 731838.74 209647265
4288 731852.52 2096459.67
4287 731859.62 2096449.97
4286 731869.69 2096450.67
4285 731879.42 2096428.92
4284 731884.42 2096413.48
4267 731856.31 2096412.13
4268 731877.86 2096397.05
4269 731883.74 2096366.94
4283 731893.54 2096358.12
4270 731874.51 2096335.00
4282 731901.36 2096340.70
4282 731876.93 2096315.45
4271 731876.93 2096315.46
4281 731905.71 2096308.85
4272 731880.72 2096291.87
4280 731907.66 2096278.69
4273 731899.00 2096278.38
4279 731919.69 2096258.85
4274 731896.55 2096240.73
4278 731927.37 2096231.18
4275 731910.52 2096212.13
4277 731929.54 2096210.80
4276 731919.79 2096198.28
4250 731587.41 2096878.66
4245 73156225 2096867.55
4249 731553.91 2096853.79
4248 731528.50 2096835.73
4246 731511.06 2096834.36
4247 731485.17 2096818.65
4244 731605.20 2096901.08
4243 731629.59 2096909.88
4242 731659.71 2096923.87
4340 731663.03 2096922.46
4341 731663.03 209692245
4240 731763.08 2096989.93
4239 731813.42 2097023.15
4238 731874.55 2097057.34
4237 732022.85 2097337.51
4236 732015.28 2097340.91
4235 732003.51 2097348.46
4234 731986.20 , 2097368.51
4233 73197273 2097404.65
4232 732000.70 2097400.97
4231 732150.20 2097884.71
4333 732086.76 2096660.89
4334 732086.41 2096651.08
4336 732072.61 2096621.55
640 731962.51 2097369.85
641 731964.51 2097405.12
642 732028.38 2097401.06
643 732027.63 2097650.74
644 732039.86 2097730.87
645 732137.27 2097832.03
646 732170.85 2097857.65
522 731.877.22 2097045.43
523 731937.99 2097125.44
524 731942.31 209712291
525 731940.32 2097167.12
526 731945.07 2097165.56
527 731950.61 2097216.26
528 731947.66 2097216.81
529 731950.08 2097271.49
530 731953.04 2097271.01
531 731959.21 2097311.75
539 731965.34 2097419.76
543 731973.23 2097505.73
545 731978.05 2097584.33
546. 731981.24 2097673.64
548 731978.17 2097724.12
553 732021.98 2097791.26
557 732086.64 2097852.77
559 732147.07 2097893:20
TABLE
FOR
INSET 3
WETLANDS FLAGS
COORDINATES
WETLANDS FLAGS
(NC GRID NAD.83 COORDINATES)
POINT N0. NORTHING
US FEET EASTiNG
US FEET
4167 730115.43 2094631.22
4168 730128.96 209463248
4169 730150.39 2094605.91
4166 730109.16 2094642.59
4165 730112.88 2094649.28
4163 730128.92 2094639.39
4164 730124.32 2094657.46
2000 730135.64 2094643.99
1999 730134.03 2094652.81
1995 730186.98 2094645.96
1998 730151.62 2094675.29
1997 730160.56 2094674.38
1996 730171.73 2094641.90
1994 730178.09 2094662.76
1:993 730191.23 2094672.30
1992 730205.79 2094660.67
1991 730217.46 2094661.18
1990 730224.35 2094659.33
1989 730223.78 2094650.49
1985 730256.60 2094664.66
1986 730250.33 2094671.33
1987 730242.50 2094671.59
1988 730240.36 2094654.17
1983 730254.66 .2094618.31
1984 730257.91 2094652.36
TABLE
FOR
INSET 2
WATERS OF THE
UNITED STATES
COORDINATES
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY C~iTiRCATF
'THIS CERTIFlES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS MAP
ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF STREAM
FEATURES SUBJECT TO NEUSE RIVER BUFFER RULE
(15A NCAC 28.0233) AS DETERMINED BY ON-SITE
ON APRIL 26, 2006, PER DWO DETERMINATION
LETTER OF APRIL 27, 2006 FOR DWO X06-0694.
THIS ON-SITE DETERMINATION SHALL EXPIRE FlVE
(5) YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE DETERMINATION
LETTER."
WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
(NC GRID NAD83 COORDINATESI
POBNT NO.I ( SR FEIET) I (USSFEET)
509 731714.49 2096955.72
510 731741.31 2096972.61
511 731742.63 2096969.92
513 731764.15 2096987.67
514 731765.01 2096985.86
515 731807.31 2097005.27
516 731806.03 2097007.99
518 731816.39 2097020.53
519 731818.03 2097010.44
521 731875.06 2097055.04
522 731877.22 2097045.43
523 731937.99 2097125.44
524 731942.31 2097122.91
525 731940.32 2097167.12
526 731945.07 2097165.56
527 731950.61 2097216.26
528 731947.66 2097216.81
529 731950.08 2097271.49
530 731953.04 2097271.01
531 731959.21 2097311.75
532 731955.26 2097312.38
539 731965.34 2097419.78
540 731960.43 2097418.81
542 731964.54 2097503.76
543 731973.23 2097505.73
544 731970.59 2097587.19
545 731978,05 2097584.33
546 731981.24 2097673.64
547 731966.72 2097677.42
548 731978.17 2097724.12
549 731966.35 209772207
553 732021.98 2097791.26
554 732013.49 2097794.26
556 732085.46 2097859.70
557 732086.64 209785277
559 732147.07 2097893.20
560 732144.40 2097899.64
561 732232.03 2097979.07
562 732229.25 2097981.96
565 73228292 2098022.92
566 732278.64 2098027.05
568 732304.50 2098048.86
569 732303.76 2098038.80
570 732317.94 2098059.71
571 732324.90 2098052.53
NAME:
TITLE: ~,~~
DATE: ' ~
ENVIRONMENTAL/DELINEATION
LITTLE ~ LITTLE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE /PLANNING
127 W. HARGETT STREET, SUITE 104
RAU7GH, NC 27602
[phone]
FAX [phone]
~` ~
0 '~
0 . FgSSIp .•~/ .
• S ~~~
•: ~/
r :~
~ o~
~,
•• ~~ SURVEy •• ;:
~~G~N C. P~J~`~
~' ~ -~
W
Z ~~
~"~
_ ~
i~°
Z (n j
W W ~..
~
J Q
Q
m i
U~
~
g
g
Odd

r^pN
V'a'a
a ,~
Q
`~::
i i
a

~ N
~ N
'
a ~ o
Q "
c z ~

m

o

Q ~ Z
W ~
J
Z

J Z
Q

Q O U

Z U

Q
~3'
Z
Z
0
r
I-
JOB ~: 104011.51
DATE:JUNE 16, 2006
SCALE: 1' =1000'
DRAWN BY: ~2BD
REVIEWED BY: KCP
REVISIONS:
Shut 4 of 4

G D'1 - 1 13`~
/l ~-,-_
r ,
m. ~
• '
l
-.. ., ,
Lake Raleigh ?: , ~ .`~\~l 71~%1 ~i~~=_: D v ~;~` ~~~~~ ~ ~~,
~~~ i •~
,,J ~ < i~ I ij ~ ~ ~,
` j ~ m ~ ~~ N
~, ~, •;~~ ~~ „ z \, 1/ ~,' I; ~ Limits of Disturbance (Typ)(±~140ac)
' -.
~.. '. r ~%' I ~ 100 Year Floodplain
,.~ ~ ~', ,
- ~ f ~ f ,-~
--- ~~~~~'" ~ ~ ~ * i ~ ;r ~ 1 f
~. / to f
,.
~- v ~' ~ L ~~ ~, v, ~ e '-~~~
~, - Property Boundary ~tYP) ~„•ir,;~~ ~' ~ ~ , • ~ t ~ -fly ~ Z
=, :.
r r walne ~ f'S
:; >f
'; . ,•
' ,11~~11 ~~~~ ~ ~~' f~ r Wetlands ~< Pond #15B
• . ~'
. ~,;-~
rll~lr~ii~n~i~~ ..,i ,~ o 'rte. Delineation ~ _
F '~ ,~/ r~. t Z Z n
- ~ ~• - s=~~j~ ~Clu6house t ~ f„ t Z '.
~ ~ (By Others) ~ ' t 1 t ~ , ~.
,~ '°~ r ~ ~~ r (~ ~~,~~
~,---- ~• ~ ; ~~ r _- Pond #14A~ ~. ~+ d Z N `~
;°~ • FutureRoad B Others) ~- '1 1 m
~,, -- -d __ - 14 ... ~ rt~/r~;1"- ~ .~: ~ ' i 1 ~• ~`r. / rot I ~ ZJ~~"y
"
~~, s' /E,', f 'F~t~re : Q WQ #9A ',pn~~9 ~ ~ .Pond #146-- " ~ ~z ' ~ ~ Q ~ Q ~~
• •• >~, ~~, MsYOinenSj t aN9e POnd #16 ~'~, -- I I ~sl,;.~ ~
~ ,.
. ~ -
' i ~ •~ ~. t ,~ ' i ~a. ~~t ~ji
q r ~ ~ fr ee Sheei 7 of 8 ~
.` ,
'' ~ C _
E _,WQ#8 t~ ~u~ ~, I ~~
i~ ~ ~ / ~ l' i ~ ~ ~ I ~ - r ~ y i / ~ ~ ~ a '~t... S,r9
,ice,; ` ~ r' ~ I Existing 20 Public. s}~' ,, ,/T. { :: a` i Sri ~ ~ ,, ' ~/~i' b ~~r
i :Utility Easement - ~ '~ _~ i t ~. ~ ~ _ 1' '~ ,~+ / ;` ~ ~ ''~~• ~.
,oc',~f ~ ~'1~ ~ p ,' ~ ,Ay ,' /t
>r ; Q,~'i; a ~ „tossing #1•' ~ ~ , i ° ,~ ~ ~ ~ tt~~~'r f'
.See Sh ~ ~ ,~ -
,~;f". ~~F~~' ~ .~ - ~.:' '~ _ ~',i eet2of8- t~ ° /~I i ~ ry;~~t~ _ .~
t .
~~ r ,- - _ Crossing #4 ~ ~ ,,~ ,_~' ~^- ~% 1 ~;~; ~:r ; c
.~.
', ,~
~, ~; , ;; ~ See Sheet 5 of 8 - ' , r I ~1/Q #9B t I , '•,t, ' ~ _ - -
r `.,, ,~
~ ; - Crossing #3 ., ,°~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~- ~ •c o
~,-.~ ~ ~ d °~ ~ • SeeSheet4of8 _ ~ ~ I •;. ~ ~ ~~ ~~ t ~i/ -~ ~ ~ ~
_ ~ ~ ~ ~~
..A "~ _
~~ ~ O ~ U
r
/; ~~ _ ~ ,~~^ ~ •~ ~ Crossin ~#2". `~..` ._-~'- ~_~~- U ;o Z U
_,) ,.
~,' - _ i~-_ .' See Sheet 3 ot8 ,~.,,~~,N w _
_ m
`1 %",
..:L
~.
Existing 20' PubGc~,• Q #3 ,` x > "; ii ~ '' . _ _ ~~~~ ~ - J<' - ~ V ~ C
~ ~.
Utlly Easement ~ ,., r~,' . 'a l ' _ - Z O z
a
- L~m ~ ~'s ~- ° ._ ~ . N
~ ~"'' ; /~~~ It . m ~ , - ~. ~~ , , i ` ~,, ~,; ~-.~_ i ~//! is of turbance~~-~ f ~ - ° ,, _ ~, ~ o
.~ \,
~ ~; ~
' ,~ ~-^' ° , fi;°' ,°:-.•~...~ Q #5A ~ ~ ~, ~ ~~ ~ , xistmg3o Pubic• //f `~~/, ;,1 • YP)~- acj~, r . '` ~`~~ o a ~ V c
!"~, - .. ~- Future - -- -- • •---
~ ~ i till ase nt ~ ~; .r _ d ~ N O
. '' `% ~.
,/'~ `' - - ..v - ~ ~ Area _ `,., T..~ ~~ ~ _ - O
r- ,
/. y/tjp
P ndary (typ)
, •
~~ ( ti ~~2,U ~ - - - C ~
. P -~
,. ,
.
°~ ~. L• ~ -~.~: ~ I. tossing #5 - ~~, e ~~~~- ~ ,, . ~ ` a
't ~ ~ - SeeSheet6of8 ___ r$tat U
---
~'~ Le end PRELIMINARY
. ~ ~'",
~ .. ~~
•" FOR REVIEW ONLY
~ ~O ~~~ ------------------ Limits of Disturbance NOT RELEASED
~ ° --- ~_~_ Q ' ~~ Eg'(BOUN9 ~~ :~ ' ' Wq ~0 ~ Water Quality Basin with Level Spreader FOR CONSTRUCTION
S.t8pUN0 .y . ~_,.--- " J POND #00 0000°0°0°00000 Dry Pond
too' ~ I' _ 11r0 ~ _ .--" II
/%~ _~= -' " m ~ D ~T~, Wet Pond
_._ POND #00 ~LU~ '/
-- -~_
- ~~ a ~ Neuse Buffer
o»e:
October 75, 2007
ewk
As Shown
oawo:
CSL
cnecmx
MPA
aria No.
127.79
crh»y. Nam
rzr.rnc,mn~acorer,a m zmrap
-~`~ ~ ® Voluntary Buffer NORTH
Sheet No:
20p 100' D 200' 100'
-- 50 Proposed Siorm Drainage •1
es Existing Sanitary Sewer scA~.1.=200' I ~~
S ~~ L~~

~, xp o ~ - t ~ 3q
~~
r
.~
~~~ viY
P;
-~,~~',
~~
~~' ~1
y ~ ~~
o'y~
~ ::,
\. elf ``~
._ ___
r~ _ _~_
~, ~ ,.--
__ __-
500' 250' 0 500' 1000'
SCALE: 1" = 500'
U
C I^
U
n ~ ~ ~ N
~ Z~}=
WWrm
0
~, Z
Z) o
a~~~~
Z
N~
O~p~~
Z-Z@
~
Q
U

~i+
~*
yy

= ~~
0~ ~
,y V Z C

0
~
L
= ~
`OR y
~IR~ '!
+
v
=

~
3
~~Q' 0
Z

w
m p0~
~ c
~ a
~ ~

~
N
~ ~
~~ = yy
i
3
0*
~C

v
~ 10/01 /2007 ~
1 of 8

' .' .. •:a~ fl
R` ~ ~ ~ s a
Delineated
,~ ~ ry ~ Channel~~(TYP)
.~~ ~~
~. °° ~
~~
,'~
x
}
i.

"'~ >
~~
~`'~ ~ ~,~
,,~ ~ ~,~-
,r'` ~~°
~~` ~~.
~ ~, ~.
~ ~~
~,,
h A~
.~~ t a ~ ~
f
i ~ ~;
~ ~
5 s r ~ t ~ ~ F
tr ." g
d d~ j ~ ~~
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER ~~-~ ~°`~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~
,~ ® ~' ~ ~
(TYPICAL EACH. SIDE,) ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ s~
(ZONE 2 - 20 FT) ° ~ ~ ~~ ~ aF ~~~ ,~ °~
r a ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER~`~ .~~ ~'~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~,~` ~~ ~~~ ~°~~~~ ~~~
(,TYPICAL EACH SIDE) ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~,
(ZONE 1 - 30 FT )~~~ ~,~ ~ °` `. ~~, ~ ~ ~, ~ ~°~ ~~
>°~ .~ ~' ~
~ o ~ ~~ ~ ,~
4'
6'
w
c~
0
m
0
w
J
Crossing #1 Plan
Not to Scale
ring
:S
1,455 Sq Ft of Clearing Impact Zone 1
1,407 Sq Ft of Clearing Impact Zone 2
NORTH
U
C ~ ,n
u
^
~ 7
L ~
~
cN-
~ ~/
`
ZLLr=4
W m
W~
0
~ ZW
~
Qz~°o
~ aZ~~m
~+ OW~~~
~
Z
Zoi
JUJo>

~I+
H ~~
~, yy
R
H *+ ~
a ~ p~ __
'0
~=~Z ~
~ ~ ~~
O~ L
o~~~Z
`~~~~~
~=p~~
yak o
mo ~ ~
~~~~.
~ ~'C = ~
~~3
h ~C
v
10/01 /2007
50' 25' 0 50' 100'
2of8
SCALE: 1" = 50'
,~~ ~ n~

~,,^r~ ~ is f''; ~$_~ ~~ ~~~~.
L O ~ E~ J
x f ~. ~.>~.. %P a.'~
~j, ~` ~ ~
? g
._'' NEUSE RIPARIAN E
(TYPICAL EACH SI
(ZONE2-20 FT)'~
NEUSE RIPARIAN B
;~` r~`( TYPICAL EACH S,I
~ . 2 p ~,
,,~'
~.~~ ..w~~. ~ ~,
~~
... ~„ } a
~~~
{= i'~
r ~
~~~\ ~ t~~
a r 1
I ~ t,:.
~~~ i~~
s ~ } 7
.~
Delineated .~~`
~~~TChannel (TYP) ~ ` <"
~~ ~.,n ~._ ¢~ ,
,~ ,~~' ,a~~ ~ ~
~~
~,~F
rossing #2 Plane p ~ ~ y ~~~{*
~g~° .a
~~
,~ ~~'
s ~ g~,
e~
s
ry
~.
~~
4'
6'
w
0
m
0
J
Crossing #2 Plan
Not to Scale
ring
:S
1,979 Sq Ft of Clearing Impact Zone 1
1,081 Sq Ft of Clearing Impact Zone 2
NORTH
50' 25' 0 50' 100'
SCALE: 1" = 50'
C f~ ~ (I~
^^~
~I ZZZm
; Z~}=W
W `W
~ m
0t~
t
"1 Z
\/
~ Z N y LL
~
rr
`J J(~]a°
d z ;~
OJ~~~
Z-z~>
QUA=

H ~~
~ ~y
L ~ ~
H *+ ~
o~ o~ c
'o
~=~Z R
~, ~ ~
O~ L
o~~~'z
w
d~~~C
yak o
°° C ~ m
~ ~ ~~_ ~
L ~C3
~ 0*
~ J~
~ 10/01 /2007 ~
3of8
20'
1 ~' I d'

.V' ~ ~ \\\\\ f ~
~,~~ ~~ ~ ~~~: ~.~~~ ~~j~~ ~~~ CrOSSIn #2
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~r, .~ $~ ~~~ See Sheet 3 of~ 8
ha
~ ~ ~ ~
~` ~,
u.
,y ,
r
,,~, f
~. ~~ ~
~~ . ~ „<
r_
:. _ ~, ~E~
~ ~° '' ~
...
~. ~ , ~
..
~.
r ....
5
..._. a p ....... .
.. ~ ,_ ~ _ .e ~ .,~ ,;° ~
~~ ~~~
.,~ ~- ,~
~~ M
'15 Y, ~. ~.RV ~_ ~ d
"'~ ~ ~,
~. ;~ X,,
®°¢~~., Delineated
~~`~~ Channel (TYP)
~~~
,, : ,
~~ a ~ .,
_~
`~~~~,~~ NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER
~~`~~,~ ~ ~~~~~ ~'( TYPICAL. EACH SIDE) `~
e (ZONE2-20FT)
{ ' ~
~ NEUSE,RIPARIAN BUFFER,
~, `( TYPICAL EACH SIDE,) ~~,
,~ ~~, ,'( ZONE 1 - 30 FT~) g= ~' ~~. ,
~ ~~ ,
~~
,, r~ !
0
o~
~~1
r t~
4'
6'
O
J
M
Crossing #3 Plan
Not to Scale
nth
tearing
ICT11tS
ath
1,424 Sq Ft of Clearing Impact Zone 1
873 Sq Ft of Clearing Impact Zone 2
NORTH
U
C /^
V
I1 /
;~ ~ Z ~ O
~ m
~ LL
Z }_~
WWrm
Z
W) om
Q
~]~m
°
~ Z '
~~Q~m
~~~~~
~~~
W
~*
_~ yy
`'R
h *+ ~
c ~ ~~ ,__
~=~Z ~
:~~
~3 L
o~~az
w
~CO~ c
yak o
°° 0 ~ m
~ ~ ~ ~C ~
L ==3
~' 0*
H ~C
~ 10/01 /2007 ~
50' 25' 0 50' 100'
4of8
SCALE; 1" = 50'
20'
~7~ I ~~

~4
~- ~°
..~a
~ u
I
~~~ ~~m„q
~ ° ,~
~.. ~ ~~°
~~ ~~ ~~
~ `~~.~
~~~
a ~~ .~ ~.. °~..
~,
~,
..~
'~ Delineated)
~~n
~'°~Ghannel (TYP)M m~.
~.w w
~~~~
~~,
',„,~
~,
~.n~..
~~- Existing San. ve~ ~_~
tt~
,~..°
~~ ~°~Sewer Outfall~
w-~azo (TYP) ~ ,r ~ ,-
~,
4~
-~.,
,Crossing #4 Plan -M~. ~ ~~
~ w ..
( TYPICAL EACH SIDE) ~'~ ~ ~ ~ °°~
~~~~~(ZONE 2 - 20 FT) ~~~~. `
~.n,_,~a ~,~~
~~°~~b nn.. .
`~ ~A`NEUSE RIPARIAN B_UFFER~~°~~ ~ °..n~~
m;~~,~
~~. (TYPICAL EACH SIDE) ~~ ~~°~~ °~%~
,,.~ ~°
~.,~w
( ZONE 1- 30 FT )~ ~ ~ -~
a
~"~•~~~~ ~ ~q
a~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ -
2.% ~ eye ~~

4'
6'
w
0
m
0
w
J
Crossing #4 Plan
Not to Scale
nth
tearing
imits
ath
1,400 Sq Ft of Clearing Impact Zone 1
2,094 Sq Ft of Clearing Impact Zone 2
NORTH
U 'n
u
^
~ ZZZm
~~
~
ZWw~m
0
~ QZ~yLL
~ a~~Tm
Z
N~
O~~V~
Q~Qg
~~~

AA,, R
W*
m ~ti
L,
Hf+3
C ~ O~ ~

C
~=VZ

~~ ~ ~
t
vd,/R~
-~ Q 0
Z
w
O ~
yap Y
o
m ~ AA++~
' d
=
C R
3
~~
~' 0*
~ ~C

~ ~~~ 1 /2007
50' 25' 0 50' 100'
5of8
SCALE: 1" = 50'
~~~ ~ d~

20'
~~ ~ ~ r
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER `~~ ~;:;
,~( TYPICAL EACH SIDE)
(ZONE2-20 FT) '' ", j
,~ 20
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFFER
(TYPICAL EACH. SIDE,) ~ ,/~
(ZONE 1 - 30 FT) `~ "~ `~~ ~;
F~
~`
~~
a~ ~
~ ~` .
~ ~;
~~ ~ '
~ ~ ~_
R
~~u ~~a ~'~~ ~ S
~p ~ ~ . ~
;~ ~° ~`

.°
iI^..1
~~

y ~~

3

U ~ ~~
,~

t

f

a t
~ ~ a
£
,•
+
,
'
~ }
s
{ ;
`~ ` s
r j ~
Crossing #5 Plan
Not to Scale
ith
Baring
mits
nth
U
C ~ I^
U
ZZZ°
WWrm
0 ZZ~o~
rr
`.J ~U~rm
aZ m
N ~m
! ,'~
i~ ~ W ~ m
0
~
Z
Z~>
QUQ=

~+
H ~~
m y~
c ~ ~ ~
H=~~
0.-
~s~Z°
~a
= w
~ pys
_N~ao
o~~~z
~`COR c
~~ ~~ o
moa~a~
~ ~ ~~C ~
=C3
~' 0~
h ~t
'~
V
~ 0/0 ~ /2007
50' 25' 0 50' 100'
6of8
SCALE; 1" = 50'
' /` 6'
;o ,
(1.J
~; .
~:
~~~ ~ ~~

c_ \ \
NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFF
(TYPICAL EACH SIDE )
ti (ZONE2-20 FT)
-~ ~'~-~\
Delineated Wetlands (TYP) NEUSE RIPARIAN BUFF
R
.~ y 1:~
(TYPICAL EACH SIDE ~~ -
(ZONE 1- 30 FT )'~ / _
~ 4:, ,~1
a
rosin #6 Plan ~-~64 ~~~~
g ,_
~~
z~~ ~~ ~~
a
~,,.'...
~~~
r
s ' g'
I ''~ ~ ~
:~ ~ %~
~ ~ ,~ , p:
~~~ \\
~~~~ ~~ r
~~ ~~
{^(~
l~, ` ~~i
~~/
r-
aw ~
j Delineated
~' Channel (TYP)
i ~~ M'
~~
~, ~
~n F ~~
~ ~~ ~
~° }
,~ ~>
~~~
.~+~ /
,~ ~ ~~ ,~.
(^ D
F
V~ f
~ P ~ ~;
,~
c °- ~ ¢:
~ ~~,
~~ A z
~ .b ~ fo ~~
5
~,F ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~
a ° ~ ~~ '~, '~~
~' ~ ,/
/ 3
d `°,
~r r' ¢ ; ,I
of
~~
~,
4'
m
0
J
+~
Crossing #6 Plan
Not to Scale
1,520 Sq Ft of Clearing Impact Zone 1
1,010 Sq Ft of Clearing Impact Zone 2
NORTH
~~
ZZZN

o ~Z~o
C.~ ~~~°
N
~
W
`
OJT"s
z ~_~
~
Q
U

ng ~+
Ly
~~
H ~+
0 ~
~~1
~V
~
~= ~Z R
w
O

o~ ~
~a L
Z
~~ ~~ ~

y O
~
m
~~ a_
~

~~ ~
C ~

L C

0~
y ~C

110/01 /2007 ~
50' 25' 0 50' 100'
~ 7of8
SCALE: 1" = 50'
2a
~~~ I m

8' WIDE
CART PATH SECTION
NTS
12' WIDE
10'
CRETE OR ASPHALT
=ACE
TREATED TIMBERS
8'-0" O.C. (TYP)
WOODEN BRIDGE /CART CROSSING
SECTION @ WETLAND CROSSING
NTS
~~~
ZZZm
W~m
W
0
~-1 Z
\
Q Z N y,~
~
V ~~~r.m
z ;~
OJ~~s
Z-Zg>
~
~
U
~+
~*
~y
~ ' c_0
m 0~
_ .-
'N ~ Z R
o ~ ~~
~ Oy=
Ly~3o
~* ~~z
m~'~~
~ ~ O~ 3
~ d~ ~
d
~ ~~
H ~_ = 3
0*
•IC
10/01 /2007
8of8

O~O~ WAT ~9QG
~ ~
~ ~ . -i
~ `~ ~
April 27, 2006
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ # 06-0694
Wake County
Mr. J. Mack Little, FASLA
Little & Little Landscape Architecture/Planning
PO Box 1448 '
Raleigh, NC 27602
Subject Property: NCSU Centennial Campus
Raleigh, NC
F .-
,~ R 1 i
s ~ ~,
~~~ ~ r

~~~~~:'.a.~ ~~iyt~~~
On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A NCAC
2B .0233)
Dear Mr. Little:
On Apri126, 2006, at the request of Amy Mackintosh of your company, Rob Ridings and Amy Chapman
conducted an on-site determination to review stream features located on the subject property for
applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233). The features are flagged in the field and
labeled as "A", "B", and °`C" on the attached maps initialed by Amy Chapman on April 26, 2006. The
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) has determined that the features labeled as "A", "B" and "C" on
the attached maps are subject to the Neuse Buffer Rule. This on-site determination shall expire five (5)
years from the date of this letter. You contested none of the stream origins in the field during this
determination.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ that a surface water exists
and that it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A request for a
determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Cyndi Karoly, DWQ 401
Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. You must act
within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day
statutory appeal time does not start until the affected party (including downstream and adjacent
landowners) is notified of this decision. This determination is final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing within 60 days.
401 Oversight /Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] /Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands
~s~1 ~ ~ ~~ ~~` ~~'
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
NonrthCarolina
~atura!!r~
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

Little & Little
Page 2 of 2
April 27, 2006
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the
buffers. Nor does this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the
State. If you have any questions, please contact Amy Chapman at 919.715.6823.
` Sincerely, ,
v~
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWK/asc
Attachments: Wake County Soil Survey Map
cc: Eric Kulz, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
File: 060694NCSUCentenn ialCampus(Wake)DET
NorthCarolina
401 Oversight /Express Review Permitting Unit ~atll!'Q~~I,J
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] /FAX [phone] /Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

O~O~ W A T ~9QG
~ .~ i ` -i
Q ~ `C
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
July 3, 2001
DWQ # 01-0600
Wake County
Page 1 of 2
North Carolina State University
c/o George Worsley
Campus Box 8007
Raleigh, NC 27695
Cc: North Carolina State University -Environmental Affairs
attn: Mr. Marc Recktenwald
Campus Box 8007
Raleigh, NC 27695-8007
Re: NCSU Centennial Campus Golf Course Complex, Raleigh, Wake County, NC
South Creek, Walnut Creek, Lake Raleigh [03-04-02: 27-34-(3.5) & (4); B & C NSW]
APPROVAL of Neuse River Buffer Rules AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE
Dear Mr. Worsley,
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to impact the protected riparian buffers for the
purpose of constructing the proposed seven golf cart crossings as described within your applicatin and proposed site plans
dated 4/12/01. hi addition, you should get any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your
project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in applicatin and proposed site plans dated
4/12/01. If you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this authorization and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed below as well as any
other conditions identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233.
1. All stream channel crossings shall be bridged (not piped).
2. No rip-rap or other streambank stabilization shall occur without notification and written approval from this office.
3. Cleared construction corridors shall be limited to 10-feet wide through the protected riparian buffers.
4. All stormwater associated with this project must be directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities prior to entering the
protected riparian buffers.
5. All stream channel crossings shall be placed perpendicular (75° to 105°) to the stream channel and located at straight
stream channel reaches (not at bends in the stream channel).
6. Protective orange-fencing shall be placed along the construction corridor in the location of the proposed crossings to
ensure compliance with this approval and 15A NCAC 2B .0233.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must
act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh,
N.C. 276 1 1-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality "No Practical Alternatives" determination under
15A NCAC 2B .0233(8). If you have any questions or would like a copy of the buffer rules, please call Mr. Bob Zarzecki,
DWQ 401/Wetlands Certification Unit at 919-733-9726.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/

Page 2 of 2
Sincerely,
Cc: Steve Mitchell / DWQ Raleigh
File Copy
Central Files
~ ,e .Steve s
it ctor, DWQ
Regional fice
010600

R
NCSU Golf Course Complex
PCN Section VII: Minimization & Avoidance
The golf course has been routed to minimize environmental impacts to the greatest extent
practicable. No Section 404 or 401 jurisdictional areas will be directly impacted by golf
course construction. However, the cart paths necessary for access to the course will need
to cross South Creek and unnamed tributaries of South Creek and Walnut Creek at six
locations (one fewer than on the plan approved under DWQ #01-0600).
We understand these crossings are subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Protection
Rule (15A NCAC 2B.0233) involving protection of vegetated 50-foot zones on each side
of all streams or water bodies in the Neuse River Basin. It is also understood that
proposed cart paths may be considered greenway crossings and hiking trails as referenced
in the regulations. These features are allowable through buffer areas, provided there are
no practical alternatives.
Golf course designers have indicated that each proposed crossing is imperative and
necessary for course access and player safety. As a general matter, it should be noted that
the need for these specific cart path crossings results in part from the extensive efforts to
design the course so as to avoid wetland and buffer impacts from the course layout.
Specific information regarding each crossing is summarized as follows (please see
Exhibit 1 for locations):
Crossing 1 (#6 on 2001 plan). This crossing allows access from the 17th green to the 18th
tee. This is no practical way to access the final hole. This crossing will also provide
access to the golf course from the maintenance facility.
Crossing 2. This crossing is from the 10th green to the 11th tee. No other practical route
is available without crossing the stream.
Crossing 3 (#5 on 2001 plan). This crossing allows access to the 17th tee from the 16th
green. Over 4,000 feet of cart path would be needed if this crossing was eliminated.
Golfers would be required to cross two golf holes, thereby compromising their safety and
disrupting play of other golfers.
Crossing 4. Access from the 13th green to the 14th tee represents the fourth crossing.
This crossing is the safest and most direct route to the next hole. Without this crossing,
golfers would be required to proceed into oncoming golf traffic. An additiona1930 feet
of cart path would be necessary for access if this crossing were eliminated.
Crossing 5 (#7 on 2001 plan). This crossing provides access to the school's team
practice area. No other practicable accessway has been identified.
Crossing 6 (#1 on 2001 plan). This crossing extends from the 8th green to the 9th tee and
is imperative for the safety of the golfers. Without this crossing, the cart path must

continue westward around existing wetlands resulting in an additional 3,200 feet of cart
path and subjecting golfers to errant golf balls.
The seventh crossing on the 2001 plan does not impact any NRB or wetlands.
In addition, a number of strategies have been employed in an effort to reduce buffer
disturbances attributed to the cart paths. Bridging will be utilized at each channel
crossing, thereby avoiding direct encroachment into streams and wetlands. Cleared
corridor width through buffer areas will be limited to a 20 foot wide pathway to protect
the integrity of the buffer. This width is required to construct the pathways and bridges
and for continuing safety and maintenance. The cart paths are designed to ensure that
storm water will be directed away from streams and buffer areas.

1~ •
v ~.
North ~ Caxolina
Department of Acministration
James H. Hunt,lr., Governor Katie G. Dorsett, Secretary
September 26, 2000 ~ _
Mr. Duane Knudson
N.C. Stntc University
Env. Health & Safety Center
Campus Box 8007
}3aleigh, NC 27695-8007
Dear Mr. Knudson:
Re: SCH File # 01-E-6030-OI 1S; Environmental AsaessmentlFinding ofNo Significant Impact
Proposed Centennial Campus Southcm Phase, Including golf Course and Conference Center
?hc above reFcrcaced environmcntai impact information has betrt reviewed through the Stag
Clearinghouse under the provisioru of the North Carolina Ft=vizontnental Policy-Act.
Attached to this letter ue commeucs made by agencies is the course of thin review. Because of :he
nature of the comments, it has been determined that no further Stara Clearinghouse review action on
your part is needed for compliance with the North Carolina Envirotunetttel policy Act. The attached
comments should betaken into consideration in project developtneAt.
Sect regards.
Sincerely.
"~-~ ~~~ ~
Ms. Chrys Haggett
Environments! Policy Act Coordinator
AttaChmtnt~
cc: Kegion J

North Carolina State University is a land- Office of Finance and Business
grant university and a constituent institution Environmental Health and
of The University of North Carolina Public Safety Division
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
http://vrww2.ncsu.ed u/n cs u/ehs
Date: June 22, 2007
To: Robert Fraser, Associate Vice Chancellor
Centennial Campus Development
][tE: Centennial Campus Golf Course
Bob,
Environmental Health and Safety Center
Campus Box 8007
Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8007
Associate Vice Chancellor 919.515.4238
Environmental Affairs 919.515.6859
Industrial Hygiene 919.515.6860
Health and Safety 919.515.6858
Radiation Protection 919.515.2894
(Fax) 919.515.6307
After review of the stormwater plan for the above-referenced project, the subject plan has been
approved with the following condition(s):
^ The existing cart crossing permit conditions must be incorporated into the design and
construction of the golf course. NC DENR Division of Water Quality must approve any
modifications to the existing permit. Please provide copies of correspondences, if
applicable.
^ An approved Sediment and Erosion Control Plan must be obtained prior to beginning any
phase of construction. Environmental Affairs will conduct monthly site evaluations. If
you have any questions regarding the inspections, please contact Ellen Buchner at 515-
6850.
^ The Nutrient and Integrated Pest Management Plan should become part of the
contractual agreement between the University and Golf Course Management Company.
The Plan must be incorporated into the daily operations of the golf course.
^ Permanent Best Management Practices (stormwater devices) must be constructed per the
approved Plan and may not be removed, filled in or otherwise rendered useless. BMPs
must be maintained in accordance with the NC DENR Stormwater BMP Manual, July
2007.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Gwyn Ann Rowland
Stormwater Program Manager
attachment(s)

~~P o ~1- t ~ 39 0
Addendum to the Pre-Construction Notification and "Buffer Rules" Application Require
Projects Submitted Under the p
"Express Review Program" c~~P ~a ~~
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Version 5.0 ~~-y~, ~
October 1, 2006 '~ Fy ~O~
Email Address: 401 [e-mail] ~ ~
~~~,-
`~,.
Purpose: To provide a detailed explanation of the information required by the Division of Water Ejuality
in order to expedite the review of applications for 401 Gerieral Water Quality Certifications, Isolated
Wetland Permits, Stream and Wetland Mitigation Plans and Riparian Buffer Approvals (Please Note: do
not leave any questions unanswered or use terms such as "N/A" without an explanation).
Fees:
401 Water Quality Certifications:
Riparian Buffer Authorization:
Riparian Buffer Minor Variance:
Coastal General "Major Variance"
Isolated Wetland Permit:
Major (>/= 150' stream or >/= 1 acre wetlands) $2,000.00
Minor (< 150' stream or < 1 acre wetlands) $1,000.00
.(exclusively or "in addition" to) $2,000.00
$1,000.00
$1,500.00
General $1,000.00
Please read the entire document before attempting to determine the proper fee. Fees are additive for
particular projects.
Things to keep in mind when filling out the application:
A specific answer must be provided for each question. For instance, if a numerical answer is requested
then a numerical answer must be provided along with the supporting information necessary for DWQ staff
to verify that the number is accurate. Likewise, if explanations are presented to justify certain responses,
the explanations must be completely supported by documentation. DWQ staff cannot assume that
unsupported or undocumented information is accurate. "N/A" is not an acceptable answer for any
question since the DWQ Staff reviewing the application must have an opportunity to determine whether or
not any requested information is pertinent.
All forms, guidance, worksheets, applications, etc. used must be the current versions as posted on our
web site at http:l/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. The Express Review Program website can be found at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/express_review.htm. Please note that it will be responsibility of the
applicant or the applicant's consultant to verify that the current versions are used. The versions posted
on our web site will be considered to be the current versions..
You are a very important part of the success of this program, if you have suggestions or clarifications
please send your comments to the Wetlands/401 Unit of the DWQ (via email at
401 [e-mail]).
Filling Out the Pre-Construction Notification Application:
The Corps of Engineers (USAGE)/DWQ official, joint Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application
must be used as a basis for the expedited review process. The completed application should be
presented first and the supporting information tabbed and collated in the same order. Using a custom
format is not recommended. The open squares (~ are checklist items. The following items correspond to
the numbering system on the Pre-Construction Notification Form (PCN):
IMPORTANT: USE CHECK BOXES TO TRACK PROJECT INFORMATION!!

z
SECTION I. PROCESSING
^ 1 8~ 2.The USACE determines which Nationwide, Regional, or General Permit is
required. If you have verified with the USACE which permit they intend to use for
your project or if you already have written approval from the USACE, please
indicate by adding "verified" or "verified, attached", respectively, in the blank next
to the Permit number requested.
^ Attach the USACE Approval if you have it. NOI~~ Y"~ ~
^ 3. It is not anticipated that the expedited process will be requested for this situation.
^ 4. If you propose to impact 150 feet or more of perennial stream or 1 acre or more
of wetland and onsite mitigation is not proposed, it is recommended that you
either locate an acceptable private bank with available credits (with
documentation to show that the bank can and shall provide the credits needed)
or obtain approval from the EEP for the entire amount of stream and or wetland
as DWQ will make the final determination as to whether or not mitigation applies.
A complete Express application is not considered received unless an EEP
approval letter is attached if mitigation is requested through EEP. Please note
that the USACE may have different mitigation requirements and thresholds.
^ 5. State whether your project will require a CAMA Minor, Major or General Permit
and give the status of the permit. ~/~~,~~/t,~~,~~
SECTION II - APPLICATION INFORMATION
1. 75 NCAC 2H .502(fl reads as follows: "Who Must Sign Applications. The application
shall be considered a "valid application" only if the application bears the signature of a
responsible officer of the company, municipal official, partner or owner. This signature
certifies that the applicant has title to the property, has been authorized by the owner to
apply for certification or is a public entity and has the power of eminent domain. Said
official in signing the application shall also certify that all information contained therein
or in support thereof is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge."
Please indicate how the applicant meets the Bove definition and provide
supporting documentation. L L~tf~ ~o+~. ~~ fi^.~s~-e~ Jv~st~ tefE-~l.,~t'
~ Please provide all of the requested contact information including a fax
number and email address.
2. 6~ If the application is not signed by the applicant, please attach the agent authorization
letter. The applicant must sign the agent authorization letter. The applicant's name
and position must also be spelled out as many signatures are difficult to read.
3. i~ Please provide all of the requested contact information including a fax number and
email address.
SECTION III -PROJECT INFORMATION
The following is the most critical of all the information that you must provide. The quality and detail of the
information will often determine the expeditiousness of the review. The following is a checklist of the
types of pertinent information required at a minimum:

Maps and Plans:
Q/' The most recent version of the 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map- Please cleanly
delineate the site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures any of the
features, it is recommended that a clean copy be provided. Please indicate the
quadrangle name. You can go to the USES web site (http://mac.usgs.gov/maplists/) to
verify the most recent version,
~ The most recent version of the NRCS Soil Survey Map - (required for projects within
the Neuse River Basin, Tar-Pamlico River Basin, Randleman Lake Watershed and the
Catawba River Basin, also recommended for all projects) -Please cleanly delineate the
site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures any of the features, it is
recommended that a clean copy be provided. Please indicate the page or map number
from which the copy of the map was made. Copies of the current soil survey and/or soil
survey map sheets can be obtained from the local NRCS County Office
(http://www.nc.nres.usda.gov/). GIS soil layers are not acceptable.
~' Vicinity map -Please clearly mark the location and approximate boundaries of the
property and project on the map. Please indicate north and scale. Please include
applicable road names or State Road numbers.
~" The Site Plan -The most critical map to be provided is the site plan. You must provide
full sized plans. The following is the minimum list of plans that are typically needed.
'ICY Pre-construction/Pre-existing conditions -This sheet must be scaled and
include all jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features,
State regulated buffers, topographic contours with elevations, approximate extent
and nature of forest, field, landscaping, or other cover. Any existing structures and
impervious area must be shown. Existing utility lines and easements must be
shown. Existing roads, culverts, and other pertinent features must be shown. North
arrow and the scale must be shown. Please note that the impact boundaries on the
ma s sho Id correspond to the flagged impact boundaries in the field.
N ~ L~ ~' n.eo~-zp-,... ~r~nu-~~ p rr~ v~ d~.,! , ©~c.~, ~,~a {-u:P ~-~t(~ ~,, 5 ~L~ ~., ~ ~
[3~' Proposed conditions -These sheets must be scaled and show all existing ~'~"" '
jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, and State
regulated buffers (delineated into Zone 1 and Zone 2) must be underlain on the site
plan(s). The plans must show all built-out structures and impervious cover. The
plans must include the final grading contours with elevations. The plans must
indicate all utilities and easements. It is likely that several versions of the final built-
outsite plans will be necessary.
C~ Drainage Plans -Final drainage plans must be included. The plans should include
the locations and pertinent elevations and sizes of the collection system and
drainage ways. All inlets and outlets must also be shown with pertinent elevations.
Scaled stormwater BMPs must also be indicated as required by DWQ rules and
policies. In certain cases, final stormwater management tans must also be
pr vided, but that will be addressed later in this ocument. ~ ~ r I?.c,.a~
Plats -The plans must show the location and layout of all sub-divided parcels wit ~~,,~,a.a ,
lot identifications. Platted parcels must be developable without further impacts to
jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional wetlands, streams, water features, and State
regulated buffers. ~~ g; ~, ~,(,,,,,,~,- p~A~~ ~~,~,,,~,~'
C~ Proposed Impacts -All impacts to jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetland,
stream, water features, and State regulated buffers must be shown and labeled on
the site plans. All excavation, fill, flooding, stabilization, and other impacts that will
be conducted in or near jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetland, stream, water
features, and State regulated buffers must be indicated.

4
Wetland Impacts (on the site plan): I v0~~
^ Precise grading and final elevation contours must be provided. Existing vegetation and
any clearing must be specified.
^ All subsurface utility lines must indicate the location of anti-seep collars. Construction
detail for anti-seep collars must be provided.
^ Roadway or other crossings of riparian wetlands may require floodway culverts to
maintain existing hydrological conditions.
^ When surface drainage features or groundwater recharge areas that feed or would
reasonably feed wetlands that are not to be filled are made impervious, it may be
necessary to direct some stormwater runoff to those areas in order to maintain hydrology.
You must identify these areas and address them. Supporting explanations and discharge
information must be provided to show that the wetland would not be eroded or receive
too much or too little hydrology. In many cases this could help satisfy part of a
stormwater management plan.
^ Flooding
^ Draining
Stream Impacts: ~T~.~
^ Stream impacts must be clearly shown on the plans. The centerline as well as the banks
of the stream must be surveyed or located by GPS for the portion of the stream to be
impacted.
Culverting: ~~,,,
^ The inlet and the outlet of the culvert should be aligned with the stream as much as
possible. Inlet and outlet elevations and streambed elevations should be indicated.
^ Any widening of the stream must be shown with elevations.
^ The extent of and plan details for all dissipation or grade control devices should be shown
with pertinent elevations.
^ For shorter culvert sections, such as for road crossings, a longitudinal cross section that
shows the stream bed invert at the inlet and outlet, the existing stream bank elevations
and the invert of the inlet and outlet of the pipe(s) must be provided.
~ For shorter culvert sections, such as for road crossings, a vertical cross section must be
provided that shows the stream cross section at the inlet and outlet overlain with the
culvert and fill cross section.
^ For bottomless culverts or other spans, a vertical cross section should be provided that
shows the minimum distance from each span to each stream bank, the stream cross
section, the height of the span above the stream and the minimum distance from the
edge of each footer to each stream bank.
^ For bottomless culverts or other spans, a plan view must be provided that shows the
location of the spans and the stream banks.
^ For longer culverts or culverts that will pass beneath substantial impervious cover, it will
be necessary to provide adequate plan detail to show that discharge velocitylenergy will
be adequately dissipated.

5
^ Cross section details must be provided showing the provisions for aquatic life passage.
Aquatic life passage through culverts is typically achieved by placing the invert of the
culvert below the existing bed of the stream per the USACE or North Carolina .Wildlife
Resource Commission guidelines. Other methods such as baffles may also be used.
Please be aware that such placement may require the use of grade/velocity control
measures up or down stream of culverts on steeper streams to prevent head-cuts or
streambed erosion. The culvert placement relative to the streambed can be indicated on
the longitudinal profile. Grade and velocity control measures must be indicated on the
plan view and typical designs should be provided.
^ Multiple culverts, wide culverts or sectioned box culverts typically require the use of sills,
off-setting or other means to match the cross section of the existing stream (in order to
maintain stream stability and provide aquatic life passage). A vertical cross section of the
culverts should be shown overlain with the up and downstream stream cross section
including the stream flood-prone area.
^ Impacts associated with dam construction must indicate and enumerate all fill associated
with the dam footprint, spillway and any bank stream bank stabilization. The length of
stream impounded must also be indicated and enumerated.
Stream Relocations: ~~ h 2..
^ Stream relocations must be conducted as specified in General Certification numbers
3402 and 3404 (available on the Wetlands Unit web site). Stream relocation plans must
include:
^ Morphological measurements (see Appendix B of the Internal Technical Guide for Stream
Work in North Carolina available on the Wetlands Unit web site) -not all of the
measurements are applicable in every instance.
^ Typical stream cross sections - Typically, a riffle cross section and a pool cross section
that includes the entire flood prone area. The bankfull and flood prone area elevations
should be indicated. Similarly, a riffle cross section of the reference stream(s) should be
provided.
^ Plan view -Provide scaled plans that show the location of the proposed (preferably with
stationing) and the existing stream. In most instances, the bankfull contours and flood
prone area contours, in stream structures, bank revetments/stabilization, channel plugs,
planting plan, vegetation conditions, stormwater outlets, grade controls, bridges, culverts,
sewer lines, roads, fencing, and easement lines should also be provided.
^ Longitudinal Stream Profile - A scaled profile that indicates the thalweg, bankfull, and top
of bank elevations should be provided for the design and reference streams. In many
cases, it will also be necessary to show the existing land elevations for the design
.stream.
^ Planting Plan - A planting and/or vegetation management plan should also be provided
that makes use of appropriate native vegetation. The plan should indicate the extent,
density, and species of plants to be provided.
^ In-stream structure, bank revetment/stabilization, and stormwater outlet typicals -
Detailed, typical plans should be provided for all in stream structures, bank revetments or
stabilization, and stormwater outlets. The typicals should include materials and
specifications as well as relative lengths, positions, and angles.
^ Sediment transport analysis - A sediment transport analysis should be provided based
on the current, relevant, accepted practices. The sediment transport analysis should be
relevant to the streambed load type and should predict bed load transport equilibrium.

6
^ Permanent conservation easement or similar means of protection must also be provided.
Other Information:
1. The project should always be referred to by this name in all correspondence as well
as the DWQ # once it is provided.
~ 2. This only applies to DOT projects, which are not expected to utilize the Express
Review Program.
Cg°` 3. This should be the size of the project as identified by the USACE for 404 Permits or
by the Division of Water Quality for Buffer Approvals and Isolated Wetland Permits.
~ 4. Please provide the name (as depicted on the USGS topographic map and DWQ
Stream Classification Lists) of the nearest water body(ies) to which your project is a
tributary to (e.g. "Neuse River (Falls Lake below normal pool elevation)"). (Do not
simple state "stream", "river", "ocean", "sound" or "lake''.) Please provide the "stream
index number" of the named water body or water body section (e.g. "27-(1)"). Also,
please provide the full water quality classification (e.g. "WS-IV NSW CA") of the water
body. This information can be obtained from the DWQ web site
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/reportsWB. html.
~ 5. Please state which river basin and sub-basin that your project is in (e.g. "Neuse River
Basin, NEU01"). This information can be obtained from the DWQ web site
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/bims/Reports/reportsWB. html.
^ 6. Conditions should also be indicated on the existing site plan where applicable.
Photos (including aerial photos) can be helpful in describing the existing conditions.
^ 7. You must provide an attachment that explicitly describes what the proposed project
will entail from the planning stage to final construction.
[~°°" 8. This can be a simple explanation, but it is critically important because the purpose
dictates how the no practical alternatives are reviewed.
SECTION IV -PRIOR PROJECT HISTORY
[~ Please include copies of all 401 Water Quality Certifications, Isolated Wetland
Permits, Buffer Approvals, USACE Permits, CAMA Permits for the site as well as a
copy of the final approved, site plan
SECTION V -FUTURE PROJECT PLANS
f~ For projects utilizing the express review process, all impacts both present and
potential future must be indicated. For instance, the location or configuration of
platted lots sometimes suggests that future impacts will be necessary to build,
access, or otherwise develop such lots. Failure to account for such potential impacts
could delay or disqualify a project from the rapid review process. If you believe that
the lot can be developed without impacts, but you anticipate that your assertion may
be questioned, it is recommended that you provide a potential building foot print
and/or grading plan to show that future impacts could be avoided.
SECTION VI -PROPOSED IMPACTS TO WATER OF THE US ~~
^ 1. It is recommended that the individual impacts be described if there are special things
to note about the impacts. Typically the most important thing is to have detailed
accurate site plans as described above. Please make sure they are clearly labeled.
^ Please include all proposed temporary impacts.

7
~AISO, a current, signed delineation map from the USACE should be provided (if
available) and a map locating the stream origins signed by the,appropriate DWQ
Staff, must be provided if applicably. (-vim ~ ~rrv~r~(, ~,75/t-C~
~ 2. Each impact to a wetland must be clearly labeled and identified on the site plan. The Tp u~
type of impact must be clearly stated. If the impact is temporary, a specific plan must
be described or shown as to how the wetland will be restored. Keep in mind that the
USACE delineates some features as wetlands that DWQ calls streams. Please list
any impacts in this table that DWQ would identify as a stream. If there is any doubt,
it is recommended that the impacts be listed as streams. Please follow current DWQ
policy with respect to whether a stream is perennial or not. It is recommended that
you assume that a stream is perennial (unless you are positive that it is not) so if
mitigation is required then the appropriate amount of mitigation would be anticipated
or requested from the EEP or private bank. If the EEP or private bank has pre-
approved too short of an amount of stream or if inadequate .mitigation is proposed,
then that situation will result in delays. ~~ (,~c,~ ~.~ ~ ~-~,~`~~~, ~ ~o p<a~~a~,
~ 3. Sometimes it is difficult to determine whether a feature is a modified natural channel
or a ditch, especially in the eastern part of the State. Soils, drainage features,
topography, macroinvertebrates, and similar factors, all are important for making that
determination.
^ 4. Other items to address not specifically requested in the application include
downstream sediment starvation, thermal pollution, low flow releases from dams, and
aquatic life passage. Other important considerations are buffer reestablishment or
mitigation around ponds on buffered streams. The site plan should include the
precise elevation contour of the normal pool as well as the dam footprint. Mitigation
is required for wetland flooding of an acre or greater and for stream fill (if over the
150 foot threshold) under the dam footprint and any outlet stabilization.
SECTION VII -AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION
Avoidance and minimization are critical aspects of an application particularly if you desire the application
to be processed expeditiously. The following is a checklist of avoidance and minimization questions that
DWQ Staff often look for in applications.
^ Are there any stream crossings at angles less than 75° or greater than 105°?
^ Are there any stream crossings that cross two streams above or at the confluence of those
streams?
^ Are there any stream, wetland, water, and/or buffer impacts other than perpendicular road
crossing near the edges of the property?
^ Can the stream be relocated as a natural channel design as opposed to culverted or
otherwise filled?
Y Is any single stream crossed more than once?
^ Can property access routes be moved or reduced to avoid stream, wetland, water, and
buffer impacts?
^ Can a building, parking lot, etc. be realigned to avoid impacts?
^ Can the site layout be reconfigured to avoid impacts?
^ Can headwalls or steeper side slopes be used to avoid/minimize impacts?

8
^ Can a retaining wall be used to avoid/minimize impacts?
^ Can cul de sacs be used in place of a crossing?
^ Can lots be reshaped or have shared driveways to avoid impacts?
If based solely on the practicable physical possibility, the answer is "yes" to any of the above questions
then you must have to provide substantial and convincing justification as to why the impacts are
necessary. If the impacts are required by a local government or other agency, the claim must be
supported with appropriate written documentation from the local government or other agency. Most
projects typically involve the need to justify avoidance and minimization. If this information is not readily
available, then the express review process may not be the appropriate venue to use. Providing
alternative plans (such as plans that avoid the impact, minimize the impact and the preferred plan, similar
to those used in environmental assessments) and explanations as to why the preferred plan is needed
and why the alternative plans won't work are many times helpful in the no practical alternatives review.
SECTION VIII -MITIGATION
Mitigation for the Express Review Program, final mitigation plans must be presented up front. The final
plans (except for plans that propose payment into the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP), Riparian
Buffer Restoration Fund, private mitigation banks, or similar banking instruments) must contain detailed
plans, specifications, calculations and other supporting data that show that the appropriate mitigation will
be achieved at the ratios required. The design plans must be developed to at least the "90%" level.
Monitoring plans must be final and specific. Any means of permanent protection, such as a permanent
conservation easement must be provided. If you elect to use the EEP or a private mitigation bank, it is
recommended that you request the maximum possible mitigation amount that DWQ may require so that
you will not have to get further approval from them on short notice. The EEP and private banks are not
part of the expedited review process and cannot be expected to meet any such deadlines. There will be
no conditional expedited approvals that require final plans at a later date. It is not recommended that
innovative mitigation techniques or greater than 10% preservation be requested as part of an expedited
process.
SECTION IX
If your project requires the preparation of an environmental document under NEPA or SEPA and an
approval letter has not been issued by the State Clearinghouse, then you cannot apply under the
expedited review process. It is your responsibility to find out if such documentation is required.
SECTION X
There are many aspects of the Buffer Rules that must be addressed in every application, if applicable.
The first and most important thing to keep in mind is that allowable activities that require written Approval
from DWQ triggers a review of the entire project for compliance with the Buffer Rules.
Diffuse Flow 8~ stormwater Management:
C~° The most common issues that arise involve the requirement for diffuse flow of stormwater
through riparian buffers. Basically one of three things must be indicated in regards to all
"new" stormwater that is collected and subsequently discharged. First, provisions for
diffuse flow through the protected buffer must be made. This usually involves the use of
level spreading devices designed to the latest DWQ guidance on level spreader design,
which is available on our web site. Please keep in mind that it does not matter how far a
discharge point is from a buffer. The stormwater must be flowing in a diffuse manner at
whatever point it eventually reaches the buffer. If the stormwater will not be flowing in a
diffuse manner through the protected buffer at the point it reaches the buffer, then one of
the following options may be allowed:
^ You may provide a nitrogen removing measure such as a forested filter strip,
grassed swale, stormwater wetland, etc. The measure employed should be

9
designed according to the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices
Manual or other DWQ Guidance available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/regcert.html. After the nitrogen is treated, the
stormwater can be directly conveyed through the buffer with written DWQ approval.
^ You may discharge the stormwater to an existing man-made conveyance that
currently conveys stormwater through the protected buffer (assuming the
conveyance was not constructed in violation of the Rules) as long as that
conveyance does not need to be altered to convey the flow. Please remember that
there are no other choices. The following checklist is intended to help insure that
your application will not be deemed incomplete as a result of improper stormwater
design.
Stormwater Management (for Buffer Rule compliance only -Also see Sectio XI):
^ All stormwater out-falls must be clearly shown and labeled on the site plan for projects in
Buffered watersheds. List each out-fall as labeled:
r^,~° Option 1: Level spreading devices designed to the latest DWQ Guidance, and
devices that merely control velocity but do not provide diffuse flow such as rip rap
dissipators are not proposed. List each of these out-falls as labeled on the site
plan and provide a DWQ worksheet available at
http://h2o.enr.state. nc. us/ncwetlands/regcert. html:
^ Option 2: Nitrogen removing measures designed to DWQ Standards are
proposed for discharges for which diffuse flow through a protected Buffer cannot be
met. List each of these out-falls as labeled on the site plan and provide a DWQ
worksheet available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/regcert.html
^ Option 3: The stormwater will be discharged to an existing man-made (not
including modified natural channels) conveyance that carries the stormwater
through the Buffer. The conveyance was not constructed in violation of the Buffer
Rules. List each out-fall as labeled:
^ All stormwater out-fall must meet one of the options above. (Note: if you cannot check this
box your application will likely not be accepted into the express review process.)
Site Plans:
i~ All applications on properties with DWQ protected buffers must clearly depict the buffers
and any impacts to the buffers on the site plans. The impact maps should clearly depict
both zones of the protected buffers and the proposed impact areas (provided in square
feet).
Surface Water 8~ Buffer Delineations:
~'" Any surface waters subject to DWQ protected buffers must be field located and accurately
depicted on the site plans and impact maps. The width, dimensions and pattern of the
surface water must be delineated. The surface water location must not be taken simply
from a USGS map, soil survey or local municipality's map. The buffers must be measured
from the surface water as required within the applicable buffer protection rule (e.g., all
buffers along streams subject to the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico Buffer Rules must be
measured from the "top-of-bank" of the stream and not the centerline of the stream). All
streams must be surveyed or located by GPS and shown precisely on the site plans.
~~~,
5}~,~,,, wa,t
~...~~~
~~ .
Impact Table:

10
C~7/'' Please provide additional impact tables that clearly state the area of impact for each
corresponding impact site. ~~,~„ ,~,~ ~ ~`~
Variances:
^ Projects that require a Major and/or "General" Variance will not be eligible for the use of the
Express Review Program (with the exception of the Coastal General "Major" Variance.
Mitigation:
^ As opposed to applications that are submitted under our regular process, final mitigation
plans must be presented up front (see requirements for Section VIII above). The mitigation
plans must comply with the applicable buffer mitigation rule. ~~. y~.~,1,,~,~,a,~ ,
SECTION XI - STORMWATER
Please provide the following information in regards to potential stormwater requirements:
^ The total acreage of the site. ~ ~~ (acres)
^ The total built-out impervious acreage ~ 3 ~ 2~ (acres)
^ The total area that will be disturbed ~ 4'D (acres)
^ If the total area exceeds 20% imperviousness, the development on the site is uniform in
density, and you claim that the total impervious area is less than 30%, you must provide a
complete, detailed breakdown of the assumed built-out conditions. The breakdown must
be detailed enough to show that all potential impervious areas are accounted for.
^ If there are concentrated areas of development such as multi-family, commercial, cluster,
club houses, etc. that exceed 30% imperviousness and the total imperviousness for the site
does not exceed 30%, a stormwater management plan will likely be required for those
areas that exceed 30% imperviousness.
^ stormwater management plans must be complete with a final design and an executed
Operation and Maintenance Agreement. There will be no conditional stormwater approvals
for the express review process that allow for approval of the final plans at a later date.
Worksheets must be provided that are available, at
http://h2o.ehnr.state. nc.us/ncwetlands/mitresto. html.
SECTION XII -SEWAGE DISPOSAL
Cef Response must be clear and detailed. Any disposal method that suggests further impacts
may be required other than those shown must be clearly addressed on the site plans.
SECTION XIII
^ Answering yes to either of these responses automatically precludes you from the express
review process.
SECTION XIV -SIGNATURE
C-~ The name, position and/or title of the applicant must be in type or long hand script here with
the signature. It should be the same person as described in Part II.
If you have any questions about these requirements, please email the Express Review Program at
401 [e-mail] and include your question and phone number and the appropriate staff will
respond as soon as possible.

. ~ . ~ ~xP o ~l - 1'13 ~j
North Carolina State University is a land- Office of Finance and Business
'- grant university and a constituent institution Vice Chancellor
of The University of North Carolina Campus Box 7201 / B Holladay Hall
Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7201
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 919.515.2155 (phone)
919.515.5121 (fax)
A ril 11 2001 ~~~!' V ~.1G G~a~
P
~~,~..-_-...~~...~ ~ __..___-c.-.-..,
N.C. Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Attn: Mr. Bob Zarzecki
~~~p~o~~
~~/a col-~~~
Re: North Carolina State University, Centennial Campus, Proposed Golf Cart Crossings
Neuse River Buffer Impacts
Dear Mr. Zarzecki:
North Carolina State University is proposing continuing development of its Centennial
Campus, Southern Phase, to include the construction of a conference center/hotel and golf
course complex. The Southern Phase comprises approximately 483 acres south of, and adjacent
to, Lake Raleigh (Exhibit 1). The conference center/hotel is proposed on a promontory
overlooking the southern shores of Lake Raleigh immediately south of the new spillway. The
18-hole golf course will occupy 190 acres of land located between Walnut Creek to the east,
Main Campus Drive to the north and west, and I-40lI-440 to the south (Exhibit 2).
The golf course is being designed by Palmer Course Design Company as an 18-hole,
championship caliber research and education course. In addition to the course, a 14,000 square-
foot club house, a golf course maintenance facility, parking, and other amenities will be
included in the design. The club house is located on an upland ridge which divides the course
into two halves. The eastern half will contain the first nine holes of golf while the western half
will contain the second nine holes (Exhibit 3). The ridge south of the club house will contain a
practice range, and a short game practice area for NC State golf teams will be constructed in the
northwest quadrant of the junction of South Creek and I-440.
The golf course has been routed to minimize environmental impacts to the greatest extent
practicable. No Section 404 or 401 jurisdictional areas will be directly impacted by golf course
construction (expansion of Main Campus Drive with access to the course maintenance facility
requires a crossing of South Creek which has been approved under a Nationwide Permit).
However, the cart paths necessary for access to the course will need to cross South Creek and
unnamed tributaries of South Creek and Walnut Creek at seven locations (see Exhibit 4 for
sample alternative design specifications).

Mr. Bob Zarzecki
April 11, 2001
Page 2
We understand these crossings are subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Protection Rule
(15A NCAC 2B.0233) involving protection of vegetated 50-foot zones on each side of all
streams or water bodies in the Neuse River Basin. It is also understood that proposed cart paths
maybe considered greenway crossings and hiking trails as referenced in the regulations. These
features are allowable through buffer areas, provided there are no practical alternatives.
Golf course designers have indicated that each proposed crossing is imperative and necessary
for course access and player safety (See 1/31/00 letter from Palmer Course Design Company,
Exhibit 5). As a general matter, it should be noted that the need for these specific cart path
crossings results in part from the extensive efforts to design the course so as to avoid wetland
and buffer impacts from the course layout. Specific information regardin_ g each crossing is
summarized as follows (please see Exhibit 3 for locations):
Crossing 1. This crossing extends from the 8`h green to the 9`h tee and is imperative for
the safety of the golfers. Without this crossing, the cart path must continue westward
around existing wetlands resulting in an additiona13,200 feet of cart path and subjecting
golfers to errant. golf balls.
Crossing 2. This crossing is from the 10"' green to the 11"'tee. No other practical route
is available without crossing the stream.
Crossing 3. Between the 12"' hole fairway and the 12`'' hole green is the third cart
crossing. Without this crossing, golfers would be required to access the green via Main
Campus Drive. Another 235 feet of cart path would be required if this crossing was
eliminated.
Crossing 4. Access from the 13`'' green to the 14`'' tee represents the fourth crossing.
This crossing is the safest and most direct route to the next hole. Without this crossing,
golfers would be required to proceed into oncoming golf traffic. An additional 930 feet
of cart path would be necessary for access if this crossing were eliminated.
Crossing 5. This crossing allows access to the 17`'' tee from the 16`'' green. Over 4,000
feet of cart path would be needed if this crossing was eliminated. Golfers would be
required to cross two golf holes, thereby compromising their safety and disrupting play
of other golfers.
Crossing 6. The sixth crossing allows access from the 17"' green to the 18`" tee. This is
no practical way to access the final hole. This crossing will also provide access to the
golf course from the maintenance facility.

Mr. Bob Zarzecki
April 11, 2001
Page 3
Crossing 7. The seventh and final crossing provides access to the school's team
practice area. No other practicable accessway has been identified.
In addition, a number of strategies have been employed in an effort to reduce buffer
disturbances attributed to the cart paths. Bridging will be utilized at each channel crossing,
thereby avoiding direct encroachment into streams and wetlands. Cleared corridor width
through buffer areas will be limited to a 10-foot wide pathway to protect the integrity of the
buffer. The cart paths will be designed to ensure that storm water will be directed away from
streams and buffer areas.
We appreciate your review of this information and request concurrence that the proposed cart
crossings through buffers are allowable by regulation. Although Section 404 permitting is not
required, we are also providing notification to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding our
intent to pursue construction of the golf cart pathways as described above.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Marc Recktenwald, NCSU Environmental Affairs
Specialist, at 515-6850. We look forward to your response.
Very truly yours,
Cy"
George Worsely
Vice Chancellor for Finance and Business
Enclosure

DEM ID:
*NEUSE RIVER BUFFER
REQUEST*
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUESTED (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #): NA
PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORM TO THE APPROPRIATE
FIELD OFFICE OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET). SEVEN
(7) COPIES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE N.C. DVISION OF WATER QUALITY (SEE AGENCY
ADDRESSES SHEET). PLEASE PRINT
1. OWNERS NAME: North Carolina State University c/o Mr. George Worsley
2. MAILING ADDRESS: Campus Box 8007
SUBDIVISION NAME: NA
CITY: Raleigh STATE: North Carolina ZIP CODE: 27695
PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM
MAILING ADDRESS ABOVE):
Centennial Campus, Southern Phase
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME:) NA
WORK: 919-515-6850
4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENTS NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICIAL,
ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER:
Mr. George Worsley
NCSU (see address above) 919-515-6850
5. LOCATION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF USGS
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OR AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Wake
NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Raleigh

SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.):
Golf cart crossings of South Creek/Walnut Creek tributaries. Golf course to be located
on Southern Phase of Centennial Campus and south of proposed Conference and
Alumni Center.
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: South Creek/Walnut Creek
RIVER BASIN: Neuse
7a. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL
(SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW),
WATER SUPPLY (WS-I OR WS II)? YES NO X
IF YES, EXPLAIN:
7b. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL
MANAGEMENT AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)? YES NO X
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR
LIST OF COASTAL COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION?
NA "

8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED .FOR USE ON
THIS PROPERTY? YES X NO IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. #
OF PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY
OF 401 CERTIFICATION): DWQ Project #: 000060
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE
FUTURE? YES X NO IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
Additional permits may be needed with future phases of development which have not
been identified at this time.

9a. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES ON TRACT OF LAND: 493 acres -
Southern Phase
9b. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT
SITE: 20.83
10a. NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT
BY: FILLING: None EXCAVATION: None
FLOODING: None OTHER:
DRAINAGE: None
TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED: None
10b. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (/F
RELOCATED, PROVIDE DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOCATION): NA
LENGTH BEFORE: FT AFTER: FT
WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours): FT
WIDTH AFTER: FT
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: FT AFTER: FT
(2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WILL RESULT FROM: CHECK ALL THAT APPLY:
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL
CHANNEL EXCAVATION: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING:
OTHER: No Stream Impacts
1 1 . IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE
WATERSHED DRAINING TO THE POND? NA
12. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8 %" X 1 1 " DRAWINGS
ONLY): Construction of seven aolf rart r.rncsinnc nvcr•Cniith f`rool. ., .,,~ c,...~w n___i_~
Walnut Creek tributaries. Project will involve complete bridging of stream channel
segments. Pathways through buffer areas will be less that 10-foot wide.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Golf course• access

14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED
OUT IN WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND
IMPACTS): No wetlands to be impacted
-. ; ,.
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
(USFWS) AND/OR NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) (SEE AGENCY
ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR
PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES OR CRITICAL
HABITAT IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED
PROJECT. DATE CONTACTED: USFWS List of June 16, 2000 - No T&E impacts
(ATTACH RESPONSES FROM THESE AGENCIES.)
16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION
OFFICER (SHPO-SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF
HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE PERMIT AREA WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE
PROPOSED PROJECT. DATE CONTACTED: SHPO indicated no cultural resources
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR THE USE
OF PUBLIC (STATE} LAND? YES X NO (IF N0, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH
CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT?
YES X NO
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE. NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE?
YES X NO
IF ANSWER TO 1.7b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM
THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
ACT. See attached clearance
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE
DIRECTED TO MS, CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, 1 16 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH
NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE [phone].
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF
PROPOSED ACTIVITY INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL
INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS,
LAKES, AND PONDS ON THE PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14,
18 ,21, 26, 29, AND 38). ALL STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE
PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP. MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH
EQUALS 100 FEET OF THEIR EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE
IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
c. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL
DATA SHEETS RELEVANT TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF
REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Currently
undeveloped. Proposed future activities will include mixed residential, institutional, and
recreational.
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL?
NA
--

g. SIGNED AND DATED AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER, IP APPLICABLE.
NOTE.• WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR T0:
1) ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT,
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR A WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION, AND
3) (IN THE TWENTY COASTAL COUNTIES ONLY), A LETTER FROM THE
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT STATING THE PROPOSED
ACTIVITY •IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM.
-~~a-~/
OWNER' ENTS SIGNAI:. E DATE
AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM THE OWNER
IS PROVIDED (18g.)

-
'~:~=.
,~,
...
North ~ Caxolina
Department of ~,~n2nistration
James H. Hunt, Jr., Governor Katie G. Dorsett, Secretary
September 26, 2000 ~ -
Mr. Duane Knudson
N.C. State University
Env. Health & Safety Center
Campus Box 8009 -
Raleigh, NC 27b95-8007
Dear Mr. Knudson:
Re: SCH File # 0l-fi-6030-0115; Environmental Asaessmcnt/Finding ofNo Significant Impact
Proposed Centerutial Campus Southcm Phase, Ittcludiug QolfCourse and Coaf'ereace Center
The above referenced environmental impact information has beta reviewed through the State
Clearinghouse under the provisions of the North Carolina: Ettviromnenta! policy-Act.
Attached to this letter are comments made by agencies is the course of this review. 8ccausc of the
nature of the comments, it has been determined that no fiuther State Clearin.ghvuse review action on
yourpart is needed for compliance with the North Carolina Eavirotunenta! polity Act. The attached
comments should betaken into consideration s'n project development.
Best regards. -
Sincerely.
"~-~ ~~
Ms. Chrys Haggett
Environmenta! Policy Act Coordinator
Attachments
Cc: Region 1

95/03/2000 -09:34 9195154;'
_ State of North-Car
Department of Enviro
and Natural Resourcf
Division of Water Quality
' FPD
~} ~~q .
n ~ ~ ~ t1 U t5
APR 27iC:~:
f~t:iLIT1ES PE~
AND DESi~'i ..,
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govemgr
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Dlrectgr _
PFatac bL :/9~'
'~_ ~~~~:
` r
s^
DEWiR
. Noftr-t Cnr~ouNA D~AR'rMErrr of
~N~IRONMZ;NT AND N~uRat_ RESOURCES
Mr. Greg Worsley X12, 2000
NC State Universiry DWQ Pr #: QQQ060
APPROVAL OF 401QuaIity Certification and ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS sad Meuse Rivex $trffer Rules
Enviror,~mcntal Health & Ssfery
Campus Box 800
Raleigh, NC 27695
Dear Mr. Worsley:

Yon have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill material in 0.25 acres
of wetlands. 460 linear feet of strcatns for the purpose of constructing the Main~Campus Drive and Smith Eut Ferrante Drive at
Central Campus, as you descn'bed in your application dated JAauary 18.2000. After rcviewittg your application. we have decided
that this fill !s covered by tieneral Watu Quality Certification Number:3102 and 3108. Zhese certifccatians allow you to use
Nationwide Permit Numbers 14 and Z6 whoa the Corps of Eagiueets issues them. 'This approval is also valid for the Neese River
buffer Hilts (15A NCAC ZB .033). In addition, you should get trey other federal, state or local permits before you ~o ahead with
your projxt lncludin~ (but not limited ta) Sedittseat and Erosion Control, Coastal 5tormwatcr, Nott-Dlschuge and Watet Supply
Watershed regulations. 'arts approval will expire when the accompat~rirt$ 404 or LAMA permit expires unless otherwise
specified in the Central Certification.
This approval is acily valid for the purpose And dssigtr that yore rksecib.d rn your application except as triodlfied below. If
you change your protect, you must notify us and you msy be required to sessd us n new application.. If the property is sold. the
nee owner must be given a copy of thfs Certifcatlon and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditlotu. If total wetland flIls for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mltigatian may be required
sa describes in ! SA NCAC 2H .0506 ~ (6) sad CT). This tpproval shall expire when the correspondin$ Nationwide Prnnit
expires or as otherwise provided Us the General Certification. For chit Approval to ba valid, you must follow the conditions listai
in the attached certificadoa And anyAdditianal eoadltians listed below.
1. Deed notificadoas or:ltailar mechanisms shall be pLeed oa al! remalninA jurisdlctiotu) wetlands and waters ar areas within 50
feet of~all streatas sad ponds to notify the siato in order to sssttre compliance for futura wetland and(or water imput. Thasc
mechanisms :hail be put fn place within 30 days of the due of this letter or the Issuance of the 404 Permit (whichever is later).
2 Stormwater shall be directed to flow at eon-erosive velocities across the cntka protected stream buffers.
3. DWQ shall be copied oa a buffer sad stream mitiYatian plea for these impacts within 60 days of the issuance of Wls approval.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this t.artifitxtioa. you tray as1c for an adjudlcatory besring. You must act within 60
days of the date that yvu roeeive this letter. To axle for a hesrlag, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 1508 of the North
Carolina (3cnaal S-refute to the Office of Adiainlsuative Heuings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611.7447. Thi; ct~tifceasioa and
its conditions ue final and bfading tutIeu you:sic for s boating.
Ibis letter completes the review of the Divlsioa o! Water Quality trade Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you have
any.questioas, please telephone John borney at 919-733.9~16~ ,,,~r"~ _
Attachment
cc: Cotes of Engineers Raleigh Field OfIIce ~ '~
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office ~ ~ • '~ ``
Rlc copy ~~R ~ N HQ~
j f t~`~^:"~ ~`
Central Files r j.„ 3.r.;_;±:at ~ r-
Raleigh Division of Land Resources 4, ;,.._ '• ~' " ^;t,.• ~ or R~~~4~~
Mach Little; tittle & Little '•`,, i:r FraG~ . ~ 11109 Ch8S1C•
:~, 1 A
1 Jy =' L ~ 1• ~ ~ ~.4
~~~Cw~~
Division of Watt3r Quality •Non-Discharge' Branch '
1821 Matt Service CenterRaletgh NC 27669.1621 Telephana 819.733.1786 i°AX # 733=9959
An Equal oppottunlty'A~rmative Action Employer
509'a renvcled/il]°~ Host consumer Honer

~ • ~:~~•
fi~
t. '
"`.L ,I ~~ll r~~~ ~
o"so
r`
"~
r3
'
~!
~
n
~\ -
r ~
i
.i~••
,•,~j i'li; ;!'~~ hEi• t d °~~t7C'~"-;=: .j~~ 7~.~E! 1!?_':~ . rA.
i'~
-
i
_
//, //// s ,. 6 f t~j: vv vK (Jr1~
~'' • Fr ,~ ~l '.y. _-'~-~`_} Y ; `,
~ - .. tie ~~\ •~ i;•..-,.~~4.~~±,-~ . ~./ a ' - ,~~~Wi!3 / y~ ~1a~'~='f I~`t-i.:
\...... .4~_ '. :~... ?~' '`~3a~~jnyve: a--,,.r Qe., ~.;',k ~ ~- -''''4. ~:;n~..~;..4i'- ~s~!.JJ,
~' - 1 '•~ ~ ~:.:J ~ : l"{~.;,$ub tar / ,..1` _~ 1 r, y,- r .1; S~ioppsn&._~~•. J •• -.
`ti
r~'
'r r:
;
~'~
:~"
n [
~<
m
~
_
t ~
.Q ,",, ,/
;
e
~. k•
~
ti
v h
n
c~
t
~
•
~~ ~
'
' `
8
?
~
,i,
i
=1 ' -t
~ 1~
41
`.'.; -'-"" 6 i .
~~ " ~ i
~ rJ ~~{-.._ ~.r'~1
a Y '•er;~f ~~° y,,J!".\~~;,t: ~ _
Il ~ ~'' ~.. -- ~ Wi
...;:\' :'- :.~ +~ ~ • r bi•.~ . , rs j~• ~ .A ,~::. ~€y:`~~ •~ -a`'=-;,
i
4j
'
:
; , ~ ''~.~
Q,
N `L'
r~~
ti,~~ti._....Y
i•••~
:\-..
'`" o~u~7r_.. . R
. •
~`C •- ~;. 2;L -'7~C~
3
I
'r
.
~
,
_
=
', ~
~
:
~
~
.
~JL
:8~ ~.` • 1
`~~`~
.~ iH . _ =,~r r--- • i ~,a38 Gt . ~ \ " .., ~~. ,~~ ~. l ~ ~ }~ ,~~1. r~,~.. . ' ~I,~ re_~Z.
1 • ~ `~ c ~ ~ t ~ i ~. is ~, ~/~ ~ \ t I" : ~ t di
-~'~• ~~ v'=.'-
- ~w
.
~~~
/
'i'
't
'
~
`
i
~
`
•
e
.~~
... .
~ . ~
,
:
~
er~-_ 4
~rv
•- ~
').eTT
f ~ t
Tr'
~- ._.~ .q. _ ,.-.
~,
J.r'r` ~':[~~y..~_• +. .! lY~_ ~...• }4` ~,,~:~~.. ~ .7'~,`--.. :1;~Y.:-:TJ• ~' ~'_
~..% •~ r. .1F ~f
l
t
~
~
i
t • : ~ '-.i,-.: , ~ ~~"~; ='
_ ~ '-\ ±~~•L--1}
`. ~ art
\~ ~. `~• ~.~'~~ •'~
~ t , pa~., T'~.1•~ ~ ~d: C~ ~tf. ~~ :~. ;'~-- .`~. ~' `p!d=.; ~; •t!~1 - f r} ~ ~
~ ~' fg C 1 r.. /~ I ~,. ~.~ •:: } ,, •.,•, </fir?.. ~.1 ~ -~, ~. Ir.. ~~ , . ~
a.
'\~.;•'
~ .~...--~~. `...~...;.)- ~ n
' ~ i .'jam
~:' 411 ~. ~.c ~.~
'.
r
~~'
~ ~~~•~ \
~
~
~
•
I
S
.
.
:
T
..,?•~. F:i •` .:.;gyp! Z~,
i ~F ',g~ t~,q•p.'•i '~~ , t.' ! :r a.... r ~ . •~ti `' . ~'•~:-• . ~''•eUIJ,~.
_ ~) ~`_C•: ~ - ?
1
~ i~j`' ^!. ~ t:•~Y T. ~ ~ :J'.r. ~. 'ate ~~. _~ ; ~~ ~•1,l~ ~~-...:~ ~It .1 ~.
-. \ ..tom: •~.~t_,-_ 1` •~.. `.~Y: [`r. \.!~.,~Y,~'-
? ".\1-I ~_.. ~ ~{ I' 1 -$'~•
~ ~~ ~• ;~~.. '.tr':' 4i;.'~1' ~ ~tl ,. ~~ ,. J;~ r` ~.: - ' i(-::i1., ~ ~ .'!~'."''"' =i ' g+~• • ~ :7 _ __.:j c~ - J.''• ` - ~ - -r' l~~' i ~
,
(fxl ,
`°~:
"-
,;I~ ~ ,
- '`
ItiyA:Al
,,r
;
~
~ C
-~
'
j~i
--
l
'_; ~'':
~
~
~
^
`
~
,
f
ti.
~
13g
;
t
. ~•\•:•.\ ~i
t •~
-
~ ,l}f;~
t_~
~i. .
..
-
~`=
•, , , ryee ~ . -~, , . ~ ~ - --- ~ - ~ s ~~ r , ' ,: - 31t
_i?xi
~~J frit •yli iF 1 ~ '~ ~,ri!{ f ~ nJ ~ ~;~, i~' •" 4 •: _ c ~~ -.~ .-~~.. ~'. :~ J
• ~~. ~
'~` ~~i ~ +'~`- .~, ~ ''+( i ~4;n I ~ ~'~•..i~%-'') ~Orp113Yl~gE •~• t3G' y .,: ~•r ,+,-.'~ '~~...1~...~ l
'
•
rr ~•i,_ ~.r, ~; ~\;
• 44 {l~pn ~..
7 ;:;;~' Par CENTENNIAL ~<r; , -~~,,:f ... ;
~
i ~ •
-
,~
~
~•~-::~~
'; ~
'
'~_
: , '
,.^
,
_ 1
l ,
• ~: ~ ~ ~ ;
t~
,~~ CAM P U 5
1
-~• ~':~~. \~':i.r - ;;l r. %~ `~ rt_ _ -;S li,' .`~7: -'~ ~ f/}`'r
..y. ~ ~:i,.'.`:'.~ "~' ~ Wit:::
\~~ -•~ '~i: ~, !z,I1 ji \ ~.,.•, .f i ===`• .nr:' ~ Zi 't~ rr `'" jr• 1:?..~~;,,e
~;.,,
;~~' .t 1 !;`, l~M1j •~'ti>li1 V,:~- ..a-~'"~'~~i"` ~rjj r /r '~ ` t r~ _~'. •~ `~~
~'i. +'~'~~.., '. t ~ ,F r=,~.•.' I'' ) 4~F ~, ~ ~ ~ .~ r . ,r~ SQUTHERN ~%~ '~
:_ r ;: i ~., :_~. 7 j~+t•; b"-_ ,. r~• ,
'.` ;i; i i I `` t,~;K'~L~`~~) tGr'` ,~n
~ =
T"
t
f
~•~"
` ,
i
e
~!
,
a
~- , Y~~ c ,- P ~•~; f ~ ~~~. ~; ` ~ ~, ~~ (~<< PHASE r~~~~~ ._.

~`
. :-F
~"
x~,
:;~. ~-``:- ;~~ l "r1 •
y '4
e
Qr'
:,:~' '~~
.
~
~
~`
.1
~
.=
'
, _
,
~
; ,~
-
*
ti
~
J Lake ,~"+A
?.'•~`. i L Ralei It ~ :, ~', • ' ~,l.~j~.,: rl. ':r - '~ ;:~
1:•~I •:~ l ~. Ifs'.' ~,,a,t• - ... t.

~
•.
~ •
~
~
+;,:^~~~
Radio Tdr,g•.
; ~- ~ - ' "
~~ -"~
t F. ?si
~.'~' llr~
..~~:~`:i., ,~.' °±i~r',.~i ~a~ <-~ r.%°.%J~7:;l;•-. :t.:`••,` ~`;''' ~r ~~`':. ,~,1}C~-' {wu_Ej;

~•~.
i 1_ ;? ;..its ;
-'
!' '
~
~~ :;~
: _
.
:r
_
~

/ - •,~~.- i•• V~, :'~1'•' -~~'r. 0 2000 ft. 4000 ft.
;c : s
~~~ _ - \`~ _ !:'. ; ~.' ._ •-`..•~ a.• .,•~ 1•Z 000
~~ ±_,
-
•
~~
~~ i
{
~
Source: USGS 7.5 M(nute Quadrangle (Raleigh West)

. ,
1
'Y
"'~
~ ~~;:'
~' `~
''`
. ..
...
. r .' ..
.~. 'f ~~
.
. • `~,

NORTH raRoLiNA

STATEITNIVERSITY
PROJECT LOCATION

Main Campus Drive Extension Dwn. bJ:
nnaF
Ckd by:
Date: APS
EXHIBIT

1
Raleigh, North Carolina Wake County, North Carolina NOV 2000
Project: 00-024

o, 4
~ ~ p o
o^
~~yyQ 6
V- Llo Po
C>'~°•Q~ ~ ~~'
~ ~~
p d
3 ~ ° 4
d ,
~ ~~adPa °
Q°
o d O B
_~ ~ ~
~ - P
06 •~ la
°o
0
5-12
.~
i~

PLAN VIEW
NO SI;IILE
P ='
0 00 .
0
\~
6
~~
EcoScience
Corporation
~g~p~
F~ma 919 BBB 3518
NORTH
CAROLINA
STATE
UNIVERSITY
p CENTENNIAL
CAMPUS
WAKE COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
Tta.~
LAND USE
>~ •~ new
NAF OCT 2000
ad ry, sin
APS As Shown
cst Pro,~ect xo,
00-024
5
EXHIBIT
2

~~
a~
__I an
w
ll~ ~
ilk Q
a R`
C7
I.
11- ~ ~
r-,
o ~'
_ ~ ~
Ill e -
l ~ s~ 1~
E
~~ ~ ~
- '~ _:'~ ~
_ ~;~ ~ ~ ..
. ~'=,~ o ~
Illi ~ ~~
~~
I t ~~~~ ~
II ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ tr
Y -III
~ (l
fl- ~
I
~~
~~
~~ ~
0
Asa .
~~
_ I ~ ~ ~ ~~
~-~ b ~ ~ ~
l~ ~ ~~~
a
°~~
~~
~~~ ~~
III N
~~
_~
Dwn. by:
MULTI-SPAN BRIDGE ckdby: MAF EXHIBIT
EcoScience GRM
Corporation NCSU CENTENNIAL CAMPUS Date: /t
Wake County, North Carolina FEB 2001 L-f1
® Raleigh, North Carolina
Project:
00-024

•~~. vtr :. ~..•vt 1V.av J1 JJl J~°1iG71. S`iL~.=•iJ, `CL+i_ t~lr.l~ i r~-~iL:~ ~1~~hJ
d~ ~ ~~~ ~'l1~9~~~
POST uf~l~e oCiX iaia a!Z rVR C Y'cD°rv~ &~ULcJ..AD
PONTE VEDR4 BFJiCx, FLORIDA 32CW PONTE YEDM t3EACH, FLORtOA 32002 T'€L;"PE'+vriC"i .~Za+i-~v'0
TELEFAk FO~L~2e0-$1 t9
AAMObD PALM~R, P~eale~nt ~
_
cir~aZi% Et(dCUilvB YIC6 Pr$,7iaenl
CAI;; 3paraprtp CiPkar
ba~R»~M ~N~~ ~,~. PraslGanL
[qiK LdRBEf~, YICe ProalCant
?+lcT9AtA E!AFiT2, Y+si pr.el4enr

.EXHIBIT 5 ~ ~ ~~
"11 ~II
., hf~f}
•` r'r"1~
HI(~1~5 ltd~E~~BT
ueiroit~fl»n Gay
October 31, 2000
Eric Corti
Hints C~cmpar~
200,~_a-naissanca Center. Suite 'i4C0
Detroit ;till 4'8243
Rte: r~arth Carolina State t3niversity Cen4er~nial Ca,-~pus half Cc~~arse
Dear Eric,
The first cart crossing is from the $`" green #c the 9th #ee. This crossing i$
imperati+~e for the s-afQty~ of the goifiers. ~!-litheut this cressing the cart path mould
have to extend :vest around the existing ~rretiand adding 3,200 feet of cart path
and sub~ectin~ the golfers to arran# goif bails.
The second cart crossing is from the 10~' green to the 91 `h tee. There is no other
practical route without crossing the stream.
From the 12`h angle turn to the.12`".graen is the third cart crossing. To eliminate
this crossing would .put .golfers in direct danger from the main campus drive, and
would add 235 legit to tha length of the cart'path.
1"he .fa_u-r#h cart crossing is from tine ~3`" grpert to xhe 14`" #eP.• This crossing is
again the safest, and most direct saute #o the next hole. 'J`,lithout this crossirg,
golfers would have to go against the grain and face oncoming goif shots. ay
having the crossing also decreases the length of cart path by 9."s0 -feet.
To get to the 17`" tea from the 1$"' green it is imperative th8t the fifth cart
crossing is used. Ovar 4,000 feet of cart .path vrould be needed to eliminate this
crossin.a. The golfers would also have to crass two other golf holes
compromising their safety if the crossing is not installed.
tfiLD:Jlq'rr~• pglm0n7asSfln.CO+~+ • ~~++0~+: p~h*a>caunsOpalmGitl9etpn.oom
P, ©. ®ea S? • Yeun~atoen, PsAAOyNC~1~5 14;99 • 724/337.7751
0c~1o ®ey Hm Rp~+edcro • Onondo. Fx~e 528';0 • stiii9y8-5~a
L3aa EasrCi, 9::~s. ;;.:r.: Loo • C:rvsar:.. (,~~ a.;s. • 2~a=22-125a
a~ So~.mi
~7 W+c: a

~:_i vii :. c.~u.e. 1u. iu ?17J1 ~~O ~::o 717 I`it~"~J .CHL C~~ I i-i I L i'Fil7~. b-J/ YJ.~
EXHIBIT 5
Eric Corti
PUye 2
October 3 ~ .2000
1'F~e sixth cart crossing is from the 17"' green to the 18`~ tee. There is no other
practical way to get to the finishing hole. This crossing will aiso~provide access
to the golf course from the maintenance facility.
The seventh and final cart crossing gives accQss to the school's team practice
area. There is no other way to get to this area other than the crossing.
IF there are any questions or concerns, _ptease do not hesitate to .give me a call.
sincerely,
Jesse Wilson
Pnima~ (:,>VTr9 Uoaign Cnmpony

I
' i
1 I
I ~ ~ ~.
-
~ ~ r r y
~
~
~ '
~ r
~
~
` ~'
1, -
~
~ ~ ~ ~
` ~
t E
' ~ ~ -
~
' i
~j ~' '- __.
'3x
27
iC __
.
~
_
~ L3+K'.521{~

- 12,43 AC r -!
(5F]
------

~.

- ---

,
i ~
i
M~~i~ sc~o0~. `~
~~
1a>rdacs tee
-~~~
~~
1
f ..,
S-+,~ .
~~.--~-~:- s ti'.
t . ~~ ~ .~ --- ~_ -'~ ~. 7~
• _ '`, ~,.
7 ~
-2 ( 5,3~,
+tt, ~c`
~.~ t
,~,,

r
l

6
I ~ / / ~
'~ l~ - ..
_~-~~-
~
'
~ , ,
~r

r
! ~~

~
( ~-~.~ ~ a~
~
a>u
~~
' ~ ~.
.k~

~ ~~~~~~
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
~ O~OLJR~ RP AN ~F
Dasc JuIR t5, 2000
Efnired Drat hJ7 31, 2tlOG
$Ci1C ~`
~ GOLF CART STREAM CROSSINGS
Client.
NORTH CAROLINA
STATE
UNIVERSITY
Project.
CENTENNIAL
CAMPUS
WAKE COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
Ttle.
GOLF COURSE
ROUTING PLAN
including
GOLF CART
STREAM
CROSSINGS
Dwn By: Date:
MAF FEB2001
Ckd By Scale.
GRM No Sca'~~-
ESC Project No: 00-024
3
I EXHIBIT I