820444_Routine_20230330

Division of Water Resources,
,]Facility uin er Fqq 0. Division of SOU and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit: P Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: I Q256 DepartureTime: County:
NU Owner Email:
Farm Name:"D KIN LHO fflfffl
me: ry Phone:
Owner Na ��t MO.
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Lvff ma n Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: Kan:u± —qv-phj
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: rnfv
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Design 'Current
Design
Current
Swhle� -Capacity''
Rop,
Wet Poultry Capacity
Pop.,
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish—.
Gilts
Boars
0,oc).. I 4cp, q 450
Other
I ILayer I
I INon-Layer I
Design Current
Dry Poultr I v Canaeltv, - PoD.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
rTother
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: Ej Structure 0 Application Field F-1 Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Region:fD--
'Opsi"g"n 'Current'.
Cattle Capacity ""Po"
rop,
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
0 Yes P No 0 NA 0 NE
0 Yes lNo 0 NA 0 NE
El Yes No 0 NA Ej NE
0 Yes . M] No E] NA ONE
0 Yes [TU'No 0 NA 0 NE
0 Yes 5 No 0 NA 0 NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - qq� FD—ate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
D Yes
No
D NA
D NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
D Yes
% No
DNA
D NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
D Yes
[5�7No
D NA
D NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
D Yes
No
D NA
D NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[:]Yes
0� No
D NA
[—] NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
Ej Yes
P"'No
D NA
Ej NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
Yes
E] No
[:] NA
NE
maintenance or improvement? vein
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
E] Yes
'P No
Ej NA
NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes F7 No [:] NA E] NE
F-1 Excessive Ponding F-1 Hydraulic Overload [:] Frozen Ground E:]Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
F-1 PAN F-1 PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. Ej Total Phosphorus [:] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
F-1 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window Ej Evidence of Wind Drift E] Application Outside of Approved Area
ro
12. Crop Type(s): �­V D
13.SoilType(s): e2inotpw
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? E] Yes ly, I No [:] NA NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? D Yes No Ej NA NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable E] Yes R No [:] NA Ej NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
F_�WUP E] Checklists [:] Design 0 Maps D Lease Agreements
Ej Yes No
[::] Yes No
El Yes No
Yes No
D Other:
D NA D NE
D NA D NE
DNA D NE
D NA D NE
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. D Yes 4 No D NA D NE
F� Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis D Soil Analysis D Waste Transfers E] Weather Code
F� Rainfall D StockingD Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections D Monthly and I " Rainfall Inspections E]Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? D Yes MNo Ej NA Ej NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? Ej Yes L_j No D NA D NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 0 Yes No Ej NA E] NE
NJ 1
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes E] No F] NA E] NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon / G C1
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? E] Yes [P No [—] NA E] NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? E] Yes 0 No E] NA 0 NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
Ej Yes
[M No
F-1 NA
E] NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
E] Yes
2] No
E] NA
r-1 NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
Yes
V11 No
[] NA
Ej NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
E] Yes
No
0 NA
El NE
F-1 Application Field E] Lagoon/Storage Pond Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
Ej Yes
No
E] NA
E] NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
Ej Yes
No
E] NA
E] NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
E] Yes
N
No
E] NA
Ej NE
9- 1"� VWC i� 1CMIA M'DT-C rV09 R-01T'0,A'P,; ujoSre i�
Mf leCIVInq Cow) q I C,
M f 1 r�
hioll gdoz ('Dj/VN
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
511212020

0
FACILITY#: FARM NAME: LAGOON I EVEL
PERMIT 0"9)
DUE EVERY 5 YEARS NUMBER OF ANIMALS (Poo � 900) 1�4 90
EXPERIATION DATE
CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
OIC CARD YES OR NO kenn,.��ffi wtrj `JUP02-8
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
1 !
SOIL TYPES 0 (C,) f1fVN, UJ00 M M
CROP TYPES C.B, 990-
- ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST YES OR NO
- Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE-11 ff - _�22- NITROGEN LEVEL 0,-71;
DATE 19-4 NITROGEN LEVEL 1. 0'7�
NITROGEN LEVEL
DATE e)
SOIL REPORT
- EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE
- P-1 (N ' 0 MORE THEN 400)
- PH (Notpif4orless)
- Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 8000) CU ZN_
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
I R R2 (#2-1)
l,' 4 1 rsfte'r P AN CROP TYPES -70
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N).o
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES 011H:D NITROGEN (N) D.
Not over PA CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN M - CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
(po t
.2--jo

CALBRIATION (#24)
EACH REEL SHOULD BE CAVLI RATED EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATION
FLOW RATES
RAIN FALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER I" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED.
SLUDGE (#21 &26)
-D U E EVERY YEAR: DATE )2_ 9-2
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE rO 64'
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE 0!7
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS— GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS' LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1st- Ends September 30th
Small Grain.Over seed. Opens October lst- Ends March 31st
Corn: Opens February 15th - Ends June 30th
Cotton: Opens March 15th - Ends August 1A
Rye: Opens September Ist- Ends March 31 A
Oats: -Opens September 1sc- Ends April 15th
Wheat: Opens September 1 st - Ends April 30th
.Soybeans: Opens April Ist- Ends September 15th
Fescue: Opens August 1st- Ends July 31st
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15th - Ends August 31st
e0*
9M 3 h � rve �f