The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About820358_Routine_20230330Division of Water Resources 16 1 M9 Lf Facility Nimber Division of'Soil and Water Conservation zjo�) 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: '10 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason fo VisiJ 14Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access DateofVisit: ArrivalTime: Departure Time: �� County: P A Farm Name KtH n [ff) S Owner Email: Owner Name: Mailing Address: Phone: Physical Address: Facility Contact: 0 n Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: na Integrator: M f V Certified Operator: _knr,�Jlffi Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Design Current Swine,, Capacity Pop.�, Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Warrow to Feeder Farrow to inish Gilts Boars 11 Other lt6u FT_ - I Certification Number: Latitude: Design Current Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Layer I INon-Layer I Design Current Dry Poultry Canacitv Poo. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults MOther DischarlZes and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the. operation? Discharge originated at: Ej Structure D Application Field F-1 Other: Longitude: Region: Design Current Cattle Capacity, Pop.--". Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow .Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow D Yes EXNo D NA ONE x a. Was the conveyance man-made? D Yes A No [:] NA [:] NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) 0 Yes 0 No DNA Ej NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) [:] Yes A No [:] NA [—] NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? [:]Yes EJ No Ej NA E] NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters D Yes. eNo E] NA Ej NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: jDate of inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? D Yes No DNA D NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural fteeboard? 0 Yes No D NA 0 NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): W9 f (Dr) t 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? D Yes No D NA E] NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a DYes No [:] NA Ej NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [:]Yes q No DNA [:] NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? E] Yes E� No DNA Ej NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes No [:] NA NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need Yes No DNA NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. E] Yes NJ No [:] NA Ej NE F-1 Excessive Ponding Hydraulic Overload [:] Frozen Ground Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) PAN PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. D Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil F-1 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window E] Evidence of Wind Drift [:] Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): C�. go D 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. [:]Yes No D NA D NE Ej Yes No [:] NA Ej NE D Yes [N No E] NA Ej NE [:]Yes ['N No [:] NA D NE [—]Yes [K] No Ej NA E] NE F-1 Yes q No [:] NA [:] NE Ej Yes tQ No E] NA D NE F_JWUP [:]Checklists [:]Design Ej Maps [:]Lease Agreements D Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. D Yes N] No F-1 Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard E] Waste Analysis D Soil Analysis Ej Waste Transfers F� Rainfall 0 StockingEj Crop Yield [:] 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? D Yes NJ No 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? D Yes NJ No D NA E] NE D Weather Code D Sludge Survey 0 NA D NE Ej NA Ej NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: FD—ate of Inspection: 1 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes No D NA Ej NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Ej Yes No E] NA ONE the appropriate box(es) below. F-1 Failure to complete annual sludge survey F-1 Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels F-1 Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below F_� Application Field Ej Lagoon/Storage Pond F� Other: [:] Yes N No E] NA D NE Ej Yes 'N No DNA [—] NE [:] Yes �Q No Ej NA Ej NE Yes No E] NA Ej NE Yes No [:] NA E] NE Ej Yes No Ej NA D NE 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? Yes lf� No Ej NA Ej NE IN 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? [:]Yes E��No Ej NA Ej NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Ej Yes E�j No [:] NA NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). 9-DO AMPI-e- f5 te R T Nq� oVer IDD Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Phone: el 4-N. Date-t- '-Ju 511212020 gqu old im. W411111,011 LAGOON LEVEL PERMIT(iris) DUE EVERY 5 YEARS B(PERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL OIC CARD YES OR No. _f� TIM WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#�O) SOILTYPES CROP TYPES ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST YES OR NO Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO WASTE REPORT (#21) -GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER DATE10' 1-7'22- NITROGEN LEVEL 0' 11 1 q, 7" DATE 1*2' �'Z NITROGEN LEVEL DATE9'N' NITROGEN LEVELf?�-6, 011) V-11 SOIL REPORT (#zi) - EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE 6* IZ1- - P-1 (N ' 0 MORE THEN 400) - PH (Noteif4orle�) - Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 8000) CU (IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300) bw� IRR2 (#21) Not over PAQV__ CROP TYPES f FLOW RATES c�NOD . . NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN 0 CROP TYPES - r). 91 FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) t Not over PAN I Li CROP TYPES GR_ doe FLOW RATES N ITROGEN (N) 0 Not ove . r PANg' CROP TYPES Gb FLOW RATESCI 5�) NITROGEN (N) GQMK e; — (P P?�bT - - a V ql(p k CALBRIATION (#24) EA CH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR DATE OF CALIBRATION FLOW RATES -1 NITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT RAIN FALL (#21) -LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED. lln- SLUDGE (#21 &25) -DUE EVERY YEAR; DATE �99 0: P: %RATIO OF SLUDGE 0: P: _% RATIO OF SLUDGE 0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE 0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21) RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY, *If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields I . VISUAL CHECK FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS i GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE Bermuda grass: Opens Ma rch 1 Ends September 30th Small Grain -Over seed: Opens October 1st- Ends March 31st Corn: Opens February 1 5th - Ends June 30th Cotton: Opens March 15th - Ends August Ist Rye: Opens September Ist- Ends March 31st Oats: -Opens September ls�- Ends April 15th Wheat: Opens September 1 st - Ends April 30th .Soybeans: Opens April Ist- Ends September 15th Fescue: Opens August Ist- Ends July 31 st Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15th - Ends August 31 st