820077_Routine_20230330

Division of Water Resources Kf
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
I
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (xRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: F5,_'60_� county:
Farm Name:MQI 4, . MeMjj�, N11, F I Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Wfil Title:
Onsite Representative: D q , ja n
Certified Operator:kh2th 69r�
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish -
Gilts
Boars
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: rn fv/
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Design,, Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
J40E�Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry CaDaCitV Pon.
Layefs
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
L10ther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: E] Structure E] Application Field F-1 Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Region:
Design-, -Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
E] Yes No E] NA E] NE
E] Yes No
[] Yes No
E] Yes X] No
El Yes No
E] Yes No
E] NA E] NE
E] NA Ej NE
0 NA E] NE
E] NA E] NE
F] NA E] NE
I of 3 511212020 Continued

lFacility Number: P)-], - -7-7 FD—at—eof Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? E] Yes No F-1 NA Ej NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? E] Yes No Ej NA E] NE
Structure I �tructure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 9P
, Cori
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 12-9
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? E] Yes No [] NA Ej NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a E] Yes No E] NA E] NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and -the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Ej Yes 0 No F-1 NA E] NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? E] Yes No F-1 NA E] NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) IQ
9. Does any part of the waste m anagement system other than the waste structures require El Yes 4 No [—] NA Ej NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste ADDlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need Yes No El NA NE
maintenance or improvement? KI
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes No F� NA NE
F-1 Excessive Ponding F� Hydraulic Overload [:] Frozen Ground Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
F-1 PAN F-1 PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. Ej Total Phosphorus ' E] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
F-1 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window Evidence of Wind Drift [:] Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
E] Yes 4 No
F-1 NA
E] NE
Yes E] No
Ej NA
E] NE
Yes E] No
F-1 NA
[:] NE
[—] Yes No F1 NA E] NE
E] Yes No F-1 NA E] NE
[::] Yes No F-1 NA E] NE
El Yes No F-1 NA E] NE
F-1 WUP E]Checklists E]Design E] MapsE] Lease Agreements ElOther:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. E] Yes VQ No
F-1 Waste Application 7 Weekly Freeboard E] Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis E] Waste Transfers
F� Rainfall 0 StockingE] Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and I " Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? E] Yes No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? E] Yes No
F] NA E] NE
E] Weather Code
Sludge Survey
[—] NA E] NE
E] NA E] NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

lFacility Number: IF��z FDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Ej Yes [:]No F-1 NA E] NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes No F'_j NA F-] NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
F-1 Failure to complete annual sludge survey F-1 Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
%Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 70
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? E] Yes E] No F] NA Ej NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? E] Yes E] No F] NA Ej NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document E] Yes E] No Ej NA F] NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
0 Yes
E] No
Ej NA
E] NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
[:]Yes
0 No
E] NA
Ej NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes
E] No
[:] NA
Ej NE
F� Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond F_� Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
E] Yes
Ej No
0 NA
0 NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
E] Yes
0 No
0 NA
E] NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
0 Yes
E] No
Ej NA
E] NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
1G. 9DMZ P)-��A5 bj 411- MqDori cow u�e immvem-mt hvt
-ffi�e hal comoMr ho� S�ra�e� fil&
/7r
'/1". high
t- fam U� qerUVCj-j
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 91q. bq�_ qj 15
�. �V. 111'�L
Date: 19
511212020

FACILITY#: FARM NAME: Mad I, a Vale" de 1 11 A ON LEVEL______L___
w . w
PERMIT
DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS 0 W 9S0
CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL
OIC CARD YES OR NO
Gove fe
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOILTYPESCGIMhN Uti� 1314MOR, IUD, IAEMOW�tq
CROP TYPES CG r�t 1V1 I le
ODOR CONTR6L CHECK LIST YES OR NO
Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DAT& NITROGEN LEVEL2 q(,, I. fIq,
DATE [0 NITROGEN LEVEb
__7
DATE NITROGEN LEVEL 14'
SOIL REPORT (#21)
- EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE q -:21
r-1 (N ' 0 MORE THEN 400)
PH (Noteif4orless)
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 8000) CU
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
6mj d-"� IR R2 (#21)
Not over PAN C OP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES
NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Not over PAN CROP TYPES
FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N)
Pic). P)mPj,1qj
Wt

CALBRIATION (#24)
EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR
DATE OF CALIBRATION
FLOW RATES
. . RAIN FALL p2i)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT ­_
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED.
SLUDGE (#21 &25)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE12 - 16 - 212 -
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGEC55
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUD E '2-
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUD E7
0: _P: % RATIO OF SLUDkG
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY
*If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields
I
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS ' LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE
AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO.BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE
Bermuda grass: Opens March 1 st - Ends September 30th
�tr"
Small Grain. Over seed: Opens, October 1 st- Ends March 31st d1Q I - Mir
Corn: Opens February 15th - Ends June 30th cpolpq -)&
Cotton: Opens March 15th - Ends August Ist
Rye: Opens September Ist- Ends March 31st
Oats:- Opens September I xc- Ends April 15th
Wheat: Opens September I st - Ends April 30th
Soybeans: Opens April 1 A - Ends September 1 5th
Fescue: Opens August I st - Ends July 31 st
Sorghum Hay: Opens March 1 5th - Ends August 31 st