Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout090037_routine_20230331Type of Visit: W Compliance Inspection U Operation Review (_) Structure Evaluation UJ echnical Assistance Reason for Visit: )b Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: F3 _'6_1 -1-7;b Arrival Time: Departure Time: 1:5, 06 County: 6V FarmName: -Ihum Owher Email: Owner Name: INC Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: V\�,fl d I I h'J ff [I a N Title: Onsite Representative: (�oi-mn Certified Operator: Kqt Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Phone: Integrator: M f y Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: Cu Design, Current Design rren Swine, I Cap city, P0 -:'wet'Nultry Ca Pop. ,cattle --4-1 p paclty'� Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Warrow to Finish JGilts 113oars ILayer INon-Layer Desigt"i C' tirrent, DryToUlt C _ry apacity op.;'_ Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: D Structure D Application Field F-1 Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? Region: FRI) Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow D Yes No DNA D NE E] Yes \No E D NA E] NE Yes N No - [-] NA D NE d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? F-1 Yes V No Ej NA D NE Ej Yes 'E�] No D NA D NE D Yes kNo D NA F-1 NE Page I of 3 511212020 Continued IFacility Number: jDate of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Yes No D NA 0 NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? D Yes No D NA E] NE Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? El Yes N No [—] NA 0 NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a D Yes Nl� 0 NA E] NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? E] Yes J;:�No D NA D NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? 0 Yes J!R.No DNA D NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Ej Yes f&�No D NA D NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need D Yes NkNo [:] NA E] NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Ej Yes N No Ej NA Ej NE F-1 Excessive Ponding Ej Hydraulic Overload Ej Frozen Ground [:] Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) F-1 PAN F-1 PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. E] Total Phosphorus F-1 Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil F-1 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window Evidence of Wind Drift Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): wn'HaveNi unteoaj'P-\j 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? E] Yes �kNo E] NA ONE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? D Yes r9SNo D NA D NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable D Yes No D NA E] NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. FJWUP 0 Checklists Ej Design D Maps D Lease Agreements D Yes No [—] Yes XNo [—] Yes J�:J.No D Yes 4ZJ No Is EjOther: 2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. D Yes E;�No F-1 Waste Application F-1 Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis D Soil Analysis D Waste Transfers F-1 Rainfall D Stocking OCrop Yield D 120 Minute Inspections D Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? D NA D NE Ej NA D NE D NA D NE 0 NA E] NE D NA Ej NE Ej Weather Code D Sludge Survey D Yes �_,�No D NA D NE D Yes Q No E] NA D NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: 01 - j):j jDate of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? D Yes "�No 0 NA 0 NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check D Yes Ng�No 0 NA 0 NE the appropriate box(es) below. F� Failure to complete annual sludge survey F-1 Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels F-1 Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: _��No D NA 0 NE 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? D Yes 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?'. E] Yes IQ No Ej NA D NE I - Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or docurfient Ej Yes S:�qo DNA D NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? Yes t!3,No [:D NA E] NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the Ej Yes NO Ej NA [:] NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes 'E�No [:] NA E] NE F� Application Field Ej Lagoon/Storage Pond F-1 Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? D Yes '&,,No E] NA 0 NE 33. Did the Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? D Yes ��No D NA Ej NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? D Yes No 0 NA D NE TROM put- VD1091C019 for a Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 rev)-, pgoon to, v, h f I V;hfa6) coor hQ; 3ffitt-eq to .q I q- KI tie 0� Phone . Kab . �3 F 0 fl tm� Date-�- 511212020 FACILITY#: FARMNAME:9110d.lelm fulm --LAGOON LEVEL__________�_ PERMIT DUE EVERY 5 YEARS EXPERIATION DATE 9b9W NUMBER OF ANIMAL&It����� CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL OIC CARD YES OR NO WASTE,UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20j SOILTYPES '_i�OP TYPES - ODOR CONTROL CHECKLIST YES OR NO - Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO WASTE REPORT m2i) -GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER DATE NITROGEN LEVEL 0. 40 DATE NITROGEN LEVELO' ^n97 DATER-T292 NITROGEN LEVEL SOIL REPORT - EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE 011W - P-1 (NO MORE THEN 400) - P H (Note if 4 or le�) - Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 8000) CU (I F PEANUTS NO MO RE THEN 300) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES I RR2 (#21) NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES - FLOW RATES . NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) - ___ z % �_MNOWAFI' VA 0 IS I CALBRIATION (#24) EACH REEL S.HOULD BE CALIBRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR DATE OF CALIBRATION FLOW RATES RAIN FALL (#21) -INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT -LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED. LUDGE (#21 &25) -DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE i2-Z . 2� 0: P: %RAT]OOFSLUDGE �3q- 0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE 0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE 0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21) RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY *If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields VISUAL CHECK FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES WINTER CROP(qVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE Bermuda grass: Opens Ma rch 1�t- Ends September 30th Small Grain.Over seed: Opens October 1-t- Ends March 31st Corn: Opens February 15th - Ends June 30th Cotton: Opens March 15th- Ends August Ist Rye: Opens September Ist- Ends March 31st Oats: -Opens September Isf- Ends April 15th Wheat: Opens September 1 -it - Ends April 30th .Soybeans: Opens April 1st- Ends September 15th Fescue: Opens August Ist- Ends July 31st Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15th - Ends August 31st 0 d dAe d r)-e,w �vrvfj 'DId br)e tD 100 olppl� 10,te/2