510040_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230329

rj y 5
IJ5 t"ivision of Water Resources
Facility 4umber 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: OC liance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 7Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: IT iq � T71 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: 'E"Aos-r" Region: A 'R C,
Farm Name: _"� L M 6*ArA 5 L L C- Owner Email -
Owner Name:
Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: 2,34
10 sle'o — RL K 6A IK-5
Facility Contact: Zit '4 R_'W 1'e-X Title: Pho ne: .38 00 a
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean Z 0,0,0
Warrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
I I I I
Certification Number:
L2titude:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canacitv Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
I
10ther
I
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Be f Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Dischar2es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Ej Yes M/No
F] NA
F] NE
Discharge originated at: F-1 Structure Application Field Ej Other:
1,-,
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
El Yes e�
E!fNA
Ej NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
Ej Yes Xo
EINA
0 NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
I-,
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
E] Yes [:]No
Ef3� A
NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
[::] Yes E(�
[:] NA
NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
[:] Yes �rNo
[:] NA
N E
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

lFacility Number: -9/p Date of Inspection: 3 - 2
7. 7
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
[:]Yes
Cj`No E] NA
Ej NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
0 Yes
[:] No OINA
NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: :r $v
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 4(y _q 7—
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
OYes
;7z�NA
16 No
NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed andior managed through a
OYes
E]rNo NA
0 NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? E:] Yes dNo 0 NA NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes 0"No NA N E
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:]Yes d"No NA N E
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need Yes Ef No E] NA 0 NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes [� rNo ONA 0 NE
Ej Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground OHeavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
0 PAN M PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. E] Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate ManurelSludge into Bare Soil
0 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window OEvidence of Wind Drift OApplication Outside of Approved Area
k1 2, Crop Type(s):
13, Soil Type(s): 1-11,
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? F No 0 NA 0 NE
Yes
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Yes N NA M NE
Irq
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable Yes No NA ONE
acres determination?
No NA ONE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? Yes E5�'
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Yes No NA 0 NE
Required Records & Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? Yes NA NE
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check Yes g�No NA NE
the appropriate box.
OWUP ElChecklists 0 Design 0 Maps 0 Lease Agreements E]Other:
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes [?�No MNA ONE
M Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers 0 Weather Code
M Rainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? Yes Z rlN�, 0 NA 0 NE
N
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes � Zo 0 NA 0 NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: S/ - A14 I jDate of Inspection: I - -j--3
1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
Yes N 0 NA E] NE
g�No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
Yes F] NA F] NE
the appropriate box(es) below,
Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
Yes 0 E] NA NE
gNo
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
0 Yes E] NA NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
E] Yes E]'N�o NA NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
Yes Zf No NA NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
[:]Yes O(No NA NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-appi i cation)
3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
C] Yes Zj'/No E] NA E] NE
E] Application Field E] Lagoon/Storage Pond M Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the pen -nit or CAWMP?
Yes No NA F] NE
g
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
Yes N9, NA MNE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
E] Yes VN o E] NA [:] NE
Comments (refer to question #); Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facHity to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
') .3 2, 7- cyo
Y(,.,,,
-5-tAYE 31
%h
J< /2_oj2-) 01
tl V 64,4 15 S
4*1 - 2- - I - L
q A
k Pz- 5
'e. r hx'. -ty r ce_g) ii ckn ir. 4�,t. V
Rcviewer� Inspector Name:
ReviewerAnspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Jill
Phone: Y/1-71/-
Date: -7- 2.1- 7-3
511212020
L