510024_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230329

0-bivision of Water Resources
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Al Z A 7-VIAL q 0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: OCorn Hance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 7Ro'utine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency () Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: 3'zh#,s�re Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: 6A 15gri 3:Ajv'jf L L 6 Phone:
MailingAddress: 1,09Yq t4lx fff- 5 j7 VZ
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ewk-'r/s' Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Phone- '110-385*-166 0
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
I I Laver I ::I I
I IN n-Layer I
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
300,0
2. S 5 a
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
U
Pullets
Poults
Design Current
Discharizes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field r_1 Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Daig Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
-Non-Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
E] Yes ZNo E] NA [:] NE
[]Yes [:]No [3"NA [-] NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
Yes [:] No
LJ'NA
E] NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
0 Yes F] N
[3"NA
F] NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
Yes o
E] NA
E] NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
Yes No
[:] NA
E] NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

,4 C A 2 5'/,o 2- 91
lFacilky Number: 5'J - Date of Inspection: 3-2-1-%3
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? E] Yes t�a/No El E] NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? E] Yes E] No � 7NA E] NE
Structure I
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
py
Observed Freeboard (in):
2. L
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
[:]Yes dNo E] NA E] N I,
[:]Yes EfNo [:] NA [:] NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes Ej� [:] NA [:] NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes �rNo NA Ej NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and -or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes ff"No N A N E
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Avolication
10. Are there any requ ired bu ffers, setbacks, or compi iance a Iternatives that need Yes V�'No Ej NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. []Yes Cj No E] NA NE
F-1 Excessive Ponding [] Hydraulic Overload Ej Frozen Ground [] Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
F-1 PAN M PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. Total Phosphorus E] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
F-1 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window E] Evidence of Wind Drift E] Application Outside of Approved Area
t 12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
E]WUP [:]Checklists 0 Design 0 Maps [] Lease Agreements
M Yes [D No NA E:] NE
[:]Yes FD/� NA NE
[:]Yes rNo NA NE
ID Yes NA [:] NE
E] Yes C?No E] NA EJNE
Yes NA NE
[:]Yes �(No NA NE
[]Other:
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Ej Yes Z] o F] NA E] NE
F1 Waste Application Ej Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis E] Soil Analysis E] Waste Transfers E] Weather Code
r-1 Rainfall EjStocking []Crop Yield E] 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections 0 Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:] Yes o NA NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [] Yes No NA NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

14 C A S370 7- 1/
Facility Number: St - 2.q rDiate of Inspection: ZA IX j
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 1:1 Yes 21N�o 0 NA NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes &N-o NA NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
F-1 Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Fj Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? Yes N A N E
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Yes No E] NA 0 NE
Otherissues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
if yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30� Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-appli cation)
3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
0 Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond F1 Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewertinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional �)ajzes as necessarv).
I /
for",
jO - r, I rz
t- 313 & to 'V
'Cow +,5 f t r e, e c- le- ^,r %/
Reviewer..'Inspector Name:
Reviewerilnspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
0 Yes ff'No. ONA ONE
0 Yes 0 No 0 NA 0 NE
C—] Yes 0--No 0 NA 0 NE
0 Yes [21 No 0 NA 0 NE
0 Yes Zf�
Y s ��N
e 1'4
Yes VNo
NA NE
NA NE
NA NE
LN
ft
t4
IN
to
S4
ejq_ j1j_g1,9_2.4,q1
Phone: IM - 711 - 4 7— 31
Date: -3 - 7-1 , -L,3
511212020