510063_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230329

JJ Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
1 0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 C Hance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: FRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ilDeparture Time: 1 SA #W491'( Region: j(K0
�County:'
FarmName: 6AV11> G. 'Ar_941_1�61 5Wj;,.jj �A'Xt,4 Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: 61 11AAPr5fl- 9,01t5Z
I
Facility Contact: &gv'S AAAWIGe Title: Phone: 1/0 -
Onsite Representative: Integrator: 1AZ3
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude:- Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
lWean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish -1q14 z-14s
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
I lGilts
I Boars
Other
I I I I
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer I I
I INon-Layer I
Non-L
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
113eef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharaes and Stream Imimets
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [:]Yes Er -No F] NA F] NE
Discharge originated at: E] Structure 0 Application Field Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? E] Yes 0 No N E
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR) Yes 0 No 'ZN A NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? z
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR) Yes [:] o ;�fNA NE
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes �No NA NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters Yes FJ/No NA NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

IFacility Number: S1 - 1, ; I jDate of Inspection:
/No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
Yes
E�
NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Yes
No rN A
N E
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 2.1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
[5 Yes
NA
J�j No Ej NA
E] NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
� /No
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed andfor managed through a
Yes
ONA
ONE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes 2NN NA NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? 0 Yes VNo 0 NA NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0 Yes No [:] NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
XNo
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
Yes r�j
NA
[:] NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes 2fZNo
NA
[:D NE
Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
PAN M PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure.. -'Sludge into Bare Soil
Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
OYes EfIN
0 NA
NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0 Yes N�O
NA
NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
0 Yes �NoO
NA
NE
acres deten-nination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Yes N
j
0 NA
0 NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Yes No
0
NA
0 NE
Reguired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
0 Yes Zk
NA
0 NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
Yes rN o
NA
0 NE
the appropriate box.
OWUP EjChecklists F] Design Cj Maps [—] Lease Agreements
DOther:
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
0 Yes E�No
0 NA
0 NE
F1 Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard E] Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis
0 Waste Transfers
0 Weather
Code
FlRainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[:)Yes e�
[:] NA
[:] NE
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[:]Yes �rNo
[:] N A
E] NE
Page 2 of 3
511212020 Continued

lFacility Number: 51 - /,3 1 FD-ate of Inspection: J - 1- 1 - V5 j
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? E] Yes 21--Ng [:3 NA NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check E:] Yes FNo [DNA NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
7 Failure to complete annual sludge survey 0 Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
Yes Ef NA Ej NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Yes rNo 0 NA E] NE
Z
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
Yes No NA [:] NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
[:]Yes M No NA NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
[:]Yes M/No NA NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes 21/No NA NE
0 Application Field [] Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review.'inspection with an on -site representative?
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Yes
Yes
Yes
NA NE
NA NE
eNo NA NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
(2-0 Z_
_114
124
e,,f I a_ �yre-e-One-denr 2e7V
Reviewer/I nspector Name:
Reviewerlinspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
1Z>
k
&11 119 -S le - -L 4� 91
Phone: 911 - 71/ - V4
Date: -3- 24 - 7­3
511212020