The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About510028_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230327r: 0 0 oA "J 5 W Division of Water Resources Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 1 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: (;�'Compliance Inspection C-) Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: eRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: �Ads-ry FarmName: �iM *i� i"AR—M Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: $1/0 5-1_AieX1,4pj,& eoeo.�$AVA6.sr A,p yx Facility Contact: ')"t /zl-;s 'ghewl'Cie Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: Integrator: 3o"'i 741 Ktc:- Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: Design Current Swine Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Oilts Boars Other I I I I I Design Current Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Layer I I INon-Layer I Design Current Dry Poultry Canacitv Pon. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults [Other Region: R A o Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy 0 Stocker tBeof B Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Discharees and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [:]Yes 2�(o E] NA [:] NE Discharge originated at: 0 Structure Application Field Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? [:] Yes E� No E] NA F] NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR) E] Yes E/No Ej NA 0 NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) Yes o [:] NA NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes 'fNo EINA NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters Yes WNo 0 NA NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of 3 511212020 Continued lFacility Number: 5'/ - 2 Date of Inspection: I - 2,7 - 7, 1 Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? E] Yes 2rNo 0 NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? E] Yes [:]No rNA NE Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): .40 Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Yes EJ'No ONA ONE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed andior managed through a [3 Yes EfNo [:] NA 0 NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0 Yes 0"No [] NA 0 NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the pen -nit? 0 Yes []rNo 0 NA 0 NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require E] Yes ErNo 0 NA E] N E maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need Yes Z:fNo [j NA [:] NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes ZNo [::] NA 0 NE Excessive Ponding E] Hydraulic Overload 0 Frozen Ground E] Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) PAN [:] PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. Total Phosphorus 0 Fallure to Incorporate Manure. -Sludge into Bare Soil Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ED Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area *'12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? E Yes [�No 0 NA 0 NE 15. Does the receiving crop and.ior land application site need improvement? El Ye vj� [—] NA [—] NE t6. Did the facility fait to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design or wettable s El Yes �FNo 0 NA 0 NE acres determination? 17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? Yes NA NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Yes eNo NA NE Reuuired Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? Yes NA NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [:]Yes 90 NA NE the appropriate box. OWUP E]Checklists [:] Design 0 Maps E] Lease Agreements 00ther: 2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below, 0 Yes E4"N o 0 NA NE F-1 Waste Application Weekly Freeboard [] Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers 0 Weather Code Fj Rainfall 0 Stocking Crop Yield [:1120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections [:]Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes ��No [:] NA ONE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes El"No 0 NA [:] NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: 2 J? FiFfute of Inspection: 3 — 2_7 - 1-3 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes 2j"No NA NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes 2 <No NA NE the appropriate box(es) below. Failure to complete annual sludge survey EjFailure to develop a POA for sludge levels Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structurc(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? Yes EfNo NA NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Yes ETN--o F] NA Ej NE Other Issues -No 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document Yes El NA C:] NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? E:] Yes El -No NA [:] NE If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the E] Yes No E] NA Ej NE permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes C24o NA N E El Application Field E] Lagoon/Storage Pond Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? E3 Yes No 21�0 /tq NA NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with an on -site representative? Yes Ff o NA NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Yes WNo NA NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). .1, - / — -U) A , f "'F.5 r -'. A V 'j S (7Z 2. Z�) 2- A L iA4 �11 � I '51-e.fiSz 1'14- 7-3 d % Z . Lq 2--Z— Al Reviewer/Inspector Name: ZLZ) / jr / YeAz-c ReviewedInspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 t4)tj'4_1< 6CII 1 /1 , S /'o - 7-/, 1/ Phone: Date: - VT - 2- 3 511212020