20140041 Ver 1_LittlePineIII_94903_MY7_2022_20230224

ID#* 20140041 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:
Ryan Hamilton
Initial Review Completed Date 04/17/2023
Mitigation Project Submittal - 2/24/2023
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* Yes No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: * Email Address:
Harry Tsomides [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#: * 20140041 Version:* 1
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Little Pine Creek III Stream & Wetland
Restoration
County: Alleghany
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: LittlePinelll_94903_MY7_2022.pdf 59.34MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
...........................................
Print Name:* Harry Tsomides
Signature: *
`r`f� t tf �Jdi/r�ltt'J

MONITORING YEAR 7
ANNUAL/CLOSEOUT
REPORT
Final

LITTLE PINE III STREAM AND WETLAND
RESTORATION PROJECT
Alleghany County, NC
NCDEQ Contract 6844
DMS Project Number 94903
DWR # 14-0041
USACE Action ID 2012-01299
Data Collection Period: August - December 2022
Draft Submission Date: January 26, 2023
Final Submission Date: February 23, 2023

PREPARED FOR:

NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

PREPARED BY:

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.  phone [phone]  fax [phone]  1430 S. Mint Street, # 104  Charlotte, NC 28203

February 23, 2023

Mr. Harry Tsomides
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
Asheville Regional Office
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778-8211

RE: Draft Monitoring Year 7 / Closeout Report
Little Pine III Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project Number 94903
Contract Number 6844
New River Basin - CU# 05050001 - Alleghany County, North Carolina

Dear Mr. Tsomides:

Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) has reviewed the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS)
comments from the Draft Monitoring Year 7 / Closeout report for the Little Pine III Stream and Wetland
Restoration Project. DMS’ comments are noted below in bold. Wildlands’ responses to those comments
are noted in italics.

DMS comment: Please indicate that per the approved mitigation plan, the project is a 5-year stream /
7-year wetland project that has been monitored for both stream and wetlands in MY6/7 due to
stream repair work.

Wildlands response: Text has been added to Section 1.

DMS comment: Please indicate that the Phase III repair plan and maps implemented in 2022 can be
found in the MY6/2021 report appendix.

Wildlands response: Text has been added to Section 1.2.4.

DMS comment: Please indicate that the beaver dam on UT-1 has been removed and beaver trapped
by Aphis in January 2023.

Wildlands response: Text has been added to Section 1.2.4.

DMS comment: Please include GWG results for all years.

Wildlands response: The GWG plots have been added to Appendix 5.

Wildlands Engineering, Inc.  phone [phone]  fax [phone]  1430 S. Mint Street, # 104  Charlotte, NC 28203

Enclosed please find two (2) hard copies (one spiral bound, one binder clipped) and one (1) electronic
copy on USB of the Final Monitoring Report and all digital support files. Please contact me at 704-941-
9093 if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Kirsten Y. Gimbert
Project Manager
[e-mail]

Little Pine Creek III Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 Annual/Closeout Report – FINAL i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) completed design and construction management for the North
Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) as part of a design-bid-build contract at the Little Pine III
Stream and Wetland Restoration Project (Site). The Site is in Alleghany County approximately eight miles
east of the Town of Sparta, NC and approximately four miles south of the Virginia border. The Site lies
within the New River Basin; eight-digit Cataloging Unit (CU) 05050001 and the 14-digit Hydrologic Unit
Code (HUC) 05050001030030 (Figure 1). Site streams consist of Little Pine Creek, a third order stream,
as well as an unnamed second order tributary to Little Pine Creek (UT2), an unnamed first order
tributary to Little Pine Creek (UT2a), four unnamed zero order tributaries to Little Pine Creek (UT1,
UT2b, UT3, and UT4), and 2.9 acres of wetlands (Figure 2). The project design and construction restored,
enhanced, and preserved a total of 13,112 linear feet (LF) of perennial and intermittent stream, and
enhanced and preserved 2.9 acres of wetlands. The Site is expected to generate 6,973.4 stream
mitigation units (SMUs), and 1.393 wetland mitigation units (WMUs) for the New River Basin (Table 1).
The Site is within a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) identified in the New River Basin Restoration
Priority (RBRP) plan (NCDENR, 2009). The Site is also located within the Little River & Brush Creek Local
Watershed Plan (LWP). The project goals from the mitigation plan (Wildlands, 2014) were established
with careful consideration of RBRP goals and objectives to address stressors identified in the LWP. The
established project goals include:
• Restore unforested buffers;
• Remove livestock from buffers;
• Remove livestock from streams;
• Repair heavily eroded stream banks and improve stream bank stability;
• Reforest steep landscape around streams; and
• Enhance wetland vegetation.
Site construction and as-built survey were completed in 2016 with planting and baseline monitoring
activities occurring between December 2015 and May 2016. Annual monitoring has been completed for
seven years since as-built/construction. This following report summarizes the Monitoring Year (MY) 7
status of the Site.
Assessments completed over the past seven years illustrate that the Site has met the success criteria as
defined in the mitigation plan (Wildlands, 2014) for vegetation, stream morphology, and stream and
wetland hydrology, with the exception of a segment of UT1 as it enters Wetland FF where sediment
deposition has resulted in a loss of stream function. The MY7 visual assessment revealed that invasive
treatments have been successful in reducing areas of invasive species and no easement encroachments
currently exist on the Site. DMS implemented three phases of stream repairs in 2019, 2020, and 2022
along Little Pine Creek, UT1, UT2, UT2a, and UT2b. The repairs appear stable and have benefited the
long-term ecological function of the Site.
The as-built planted stem density averaged 549 stems per acre with the MY6 vegetation assessment
resulting in an average of 383 stems per acre. This exceeds the final success criteria of 260 stems per
acre and demonstrates that the Site has established a healthy riparian buffer. Stream morphology
surveys throughout MY0 – MY6 along Little Pine Creek, UT2, and UT2b demonstrate that the channels
are functioning as designed, with minor to moderate deviations in bankfull dimensions compared to as-
built. MY7 stream morphology surveys and visual assessments reveal that repair areas are functioning as
designed. The performance standard of two recorded bankfull events in separate monitoring years was
met for all project reaches in MY3. No target performance standard was established for wetland
hydrology success; however, for the past five monitoring years (MY2 – MY6), the groundwater gage in
Wetland FF recorded 169 consecutive days of the groundwater levels at or within 12 inches of the
ground surface, consisting of 100% of the growing season.

Little Pine Creek III Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 Annual/Closeout Report – FINAL ii
LITTLE PINE III STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION PROJECT
Monitoring Year 7/Closeout Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW .....................................................................................................1-1
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................................... 1-1
1.2 Monitoring Year 7 Data Assessment .......................................................................................... 1-2
1.2.1 Vegetation Assessment ...................................................................................................... 1-2
1.2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern and Management Activity .................................................. 1-3
1.2.3 Stream Assessment ............................................................................................................ 1-3
1.2.4 Stream Areas of Concern and Management Activity ......................................................... 1-3
1.2.5 Hydrology Assessment ....................................................................................................... 1-4
1.2.6 Wetland Assessment .......................................................................................................... 1-4
1.2.7 Conservation Easement Boundary Assessment ................................................................. 1-4
1.3 Monitoring Year 7 Summary ...................................................................................................... 1-5
Section 2: METHODOLOGY............................................................................................................2-1
Section 3: REFERENCES .................................................................................................................3-1

APPENDICES
Appendix 1 General Tables and Figures
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Project Component/Asset Map
Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contact Table
Table 4 Project Information and Attributes
Table 5 Monitoring Component Summary
Appendix 2 Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3.0 – 3.2 Current Condition Plan View Maps
Table 6a – g Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 7 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Repair Photographs
Conservation Easement Photographs
Areas of Concern Photographs
Vegetation Transect Photograph
Appendix 3 Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8 Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 9 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 10a-b Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Table 10c Vegetation Transect Data
Table 10d Stems Per Plot Across All Years
Appendix 4 Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Table 11a-b Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 12a-b Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters – Cross-Section)
Table 13a-f Monitoring Data – Stream Reach Data Summary
Longitudinal Profile Plots (MY0 – MY6)
Cross-Section Plots (MY0 – MY6)
Table 14 Dimensional Parameters – Cross-Sections (Repair Areas)

Little Pine Creek III Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 Annual/Closeout Report – FINAL iii
Cross-Section Plots (Repair Areas)
Longitudinal Profile Plots (Repair Areas)
Appendix 5 Hydrology Summary Data and Plots
Table 15 Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 16 Wetland Gage Attainment Summary
Groundwater Gage Plots (MY1 – MY6)
Monthly Rainfall Data

Little Pine Creek III Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 Annual/Closeout Report – FINAL 1-1
Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Site is a DMS design-bid-build project in Alleghany County, NC, located in the New River Basin;
eight-digit CU 05050001 and the 14-digit HUC 05050001030030 (Figure 1). Located in the Blue Ridge belt
of the Blue Ridge province (USGS, 1998), the project watershed includes primarily managed herbaceous,
mixed upland hardwoods, and other forested land. The drainage area for the Site is 2,784 acres. Little
Pine Creek flows into Brush Creek several hundred feet downstream of the Site boundary. The land
adjacent to the streams and wetlands is primarily maintained cattle pasture and forest.
The project streams consist of Little Pine Creek, a third order stream, as well as an unnamed second
order tributary to Little Pine Creek (UT2), an unnamed first order tributary to Little Pine Creek (UT2a)
and four unnamed zero order tributaries to Little Pine Creek (UT1, UT2b, UT3, and UT4) (Figure 2).
Mitigation work within the Site included restoring and enhancing 9,888 linear feet (LF) and preserving
3,224 LF of perennial stream, enhancing 2.71 acres of wetlands and preserving a 0.19 acres existing
wetland. The Site is expected to provide 6,973.4 SMUs, and 1.393 WMUs.
A conservation easement protecting 57.3 acres in perpetuity was purchased by the State of North
Carolina and recorded with Alleghany County Register of Deeds in 2012. The final mitigation plan was
submitted and accepted by DMS in March 2014. Construction activities were completed in September
2015 by North State Environmental, Inc. Planting was completed in December 2015 by Bruton
Environmental, Inc. Kee Surveying, Inc. completed the as-built survey in April 2016. Repairs were
completed in March and December 2016. Wildlands completed the baseline monitoring activities in May
2016 and subsequent monitoring has been conducted annually with closeout expected in 2023. Per the
approved final mitigation plan, the site was to be monitored for a minimum of five years post-
construction. An additional two years of monitoring (MY6 and MY7) occurred in 2021 and 2022 to
further assess stream repairs. Appendix 1 includes detailed project activity, history, contact information,
and background information. Directions and a map of the Site are provided in Figure 1. Site components
are discussed in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 2.
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
Prior to construction activities, livestock had full access to most of the Site streams and used them as a
water source. The riparian buffers in areas proposed for restoration were primarily herbaceous with a
few sparse trees. Deposition of fine sediment, severe bank erosion, and trampling of banks impacted the
in-stream habitat. Channel widening and incision indicated instability. Table 4 in Appendix 1 and Table
11 in Appendix 4 provide pre-restoration condition details.
The Site is intended to provide numerous ecological benefits within the New River Basin. While many of
these benefits are limited to the Site area, others, such as pollutant removal, reduced sediment loading,
and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have farther-reaching effects. Expected improvements to
water quality and ecological processes are outlined below as secondary goals and objectives. These
project goals were established with careful consideration of goals and objectives that were described in
the RBRP and to address stressors identified in the LWP.
The project specific goals of the Site address stressors identified in the Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2014)
include the following:
• Restore unforested buffers;
• Remove livestock from buffers;
• Remove livestock from streams;
• Repair heavily eroded stream banks and improve stream bank stability;
• Reforest steep landscape around streams; and

Little Pine Creek III Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 Annual/Closeout Report – FINAL 1-2
• Enhance wetland vegetation.
Secondary goals include the following:
• Remove harmful nutrients from creek flow;
• Reduce pollution of creek by excess sediment;
• Improve in-stream habitat; and
• Improve aesthetics.
The project objectives have been defined as follows:
• Restore 27.8 acres of forested riparian buffer;
• Fence off livestock from 57.3 acres of buffer and 14,736 LF of existing streams;
• Stream bank erosion which contributes sediment load to the creek will be greatly reduced, if not
eliminated, in the project area. Eroding stream banks will be stabilized by increased woody root
mass in banks, reducing channel incision, and by using natural channel design techniques,
grading, and planting to reduce bank angles and bank height;
• Steep, unforested landscape within the conservation easement will be reforested;
• Eight of the nine onsite wetlands will be enhanced with supplemental plantings;
• Flood flows will be filtered through restored floodplain areas, where flood flow will spread
through native vegetation. Vegetation takes up excess nutrients;
• Storm flow containing grit and fine sediment will be filtered through restored floodplain areas,
where flow will spread through native vegetation. The spreading of flood flows will reduce
velocity allowing sediment to settle out;
• In-stream structures will promote aeration of water;
• In-stream structures will be constructed to improve habitat diversity and trap detritus. Wood
structures will be incorporated into the stream as part of the restoration design. Such structures
may include log drops and rock structures that incorporate woody debris; and
• Site aesthetics will be enhanced by planting native plant species, treating invasive species, and
stabilizing eroding and unstable areas throughout the project.
1.2 Monitoring Year 7 Data Assessment
Annual monitoring was conducted during MY7 (August to December 2022) to assess the condition of the
project. The stream restoration success criteria for the Site follows the approved performance standards
presented in the Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project Final Mitigation Plan (Wildlands,
2014).
1.2.1 Vegetation Assessment
MY7 is a reduced monitoring year that does not require detailed vegetation inventory and analysis. One
vegetation transect was performed along the right floodplain of Little Pine Creek Reach 1 in the haul
road for the Phase II repair area that was replanted with woody stems as shown in Figure 3.2. This
transect resulted in a planted stem density of 486 stems per acre. Please refer to Appendix 2 for the
vegetation transect photograph and Table 10c in Appendix 3 for vegetation transect data.
In MY6, a full detailed vegetation assessment took place in September 2021 and resulted in an average
planted stem density of 383 stems per acre. The Site met the final MY5 requirement of 260 planted
stems per acre, with 18 of the 21 plots (86%) individually meeting this requirement. Visual assessments
in MY7 indicate that planted stems continue to appear healthy in areas where vegetation plots
previously met criteria. Please refer Appendix 3 for vegetation data tables summarizing data for all
monitoring years.

Little Pine Creek III Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 Annual/Closeout Report – FINAL 1-3
1.2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern and Management Activity
Invasive treatments have been successful in reducing previously noted areas of invasive species; MY7
visual assessments reveal that over 99% of the conservation easement is unaffected by invasive plant
populations. When present, invasive species found on the Site include Japanese barberry (Berberis
thunvergii) and multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), which are found in small, isolated pockets within the
floodplain and the fence line. Invasive treatments occurred in fall 2022 and will continue as necessary
through closeout. Please refer to the current condition plan view (CCPV) Figures 3.0-3.2 in Appendix 2
for locations vegetation areas of concern.
1.2.3 Stream Assessment
MY7 is a reduced monitoring year that only requires cross-sections to be surveyed in stream repair
areas. The locations of the eight repair area cross-sections (XS-R) are shown on Figures 3.0-3.2 in
Appendix 2. Results indicate that repairs are stable and bankfull dimensions are appropriate with stream
reach design parameters. Cross-section 5/R5 is located where bank repair work was completed in 2020
and although the cross-sectional area is larger than at baseline, the stream conditions appear stable and
show little change compared to MY5 (2020). A longitudinal profile survey was also conducted upstream
and downstream of repaired two internal crossings along UT2 Reach 1. The deposition that was
previously observed upstream of the crossings has been repaired and the channel thalweg has returned
to a similar elevation compared to the as-built. Repair areas are discussed further in section 1.2.4.
Please refer to Appendix 4 for the repair areas Morphological Summary Table 14 and plots.
In MY6, a full detailed morphological survey was conducted between June and November 2021. The
results of that survey revealed that overall, channels were stable and functioning as designed, with the
exception of some cross-sections experiencing minor to moderate deviations in bankfull dimensions
compared to baseline survey. Refer to Appendix 4 for the MY0-MY6 morphological summary data tables
11 – 13 and plots.
1.2.4 Stream Areas of Concern and Management Activity
Three phases of stream repairs that were completed in the fall 2019, fall 2020, and summer 2022 have
significantly reduced major areas of concern and improved the overall stability of project streams. In the
fall 2019, DMS completed a plan to complete repairs along UT2 Reach 2 (STA 332+25 to 339+15) and
UT2a (STA 427+00 to 432+00) which included spot bank grading, geolift, grade control installation, and
structure repairs. Along Little Pine Creek, DMS completed a repair plan in fall 2020 for Reach 1 (STA
100+43 to 101+75) and Reach 2a (STA 121+25 to 122+50) to address areas of stream instability. Repair
activities included installing constructed riffles, geolifts, and repairing rock vane structures. The 2020
repair plan also addressed the formation of headcuts and bank erosion along UT1 (STA 10+00 to 12+28)
by regrading banks and installing structures to improve grade control in the stream. The third phase of
repairs completed in summer 2022 addressed previously identified areas of instability along Little Pine
Creek, UT1, UT2, UT2a, and UT2b which included multiple instances of bank scour, structure piping,
headcutting, and sediment clogged culverts. Repairs consisted of installing geolifts with toe wood,
regrading banks, repairing existing structures, and adding log or rock cross-vanes structures and
constructed riffles. To repair the internal crossings along UT2 Reach 1, a larger culvert was installed
within the upper crossing (STA 308+50) and a ford crossing was installed to replace the lower culvert
crossing (STA 326+75). Stream and visual assessments reveal that all three phases of repairs appear to
be stable and functioning as designed with herbaceous cover and live stakes becoming well established
along banks and engineered structures maintaining vertical stability. Please refer to Appendix 2 for the
stream repair photographs. Please refer to Appendix 6 in the MY6 (2021) annual monitoring report for
Phase III repair plans and maps.

Little Pine Creek III Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 Annual/Closeout Report – FINAL 1-4
Outside of the repaired areas, there remain a few isolated instances of bank scour, sediment deposition,
and structure piping. In MY7, sediment aggradation continues to be observed on approximately 192
linear feet of UT1 downstream of the culvert crossing (STA 200+36) and beyond the two installed
boulder sills (STA 202+28). Currently, a defined baseflow channel is still present downstream of the two
installed boulder sills and woody vegetation established along the banks is helping shade out the
herbaceous cover, thus transporting more accumulated fine sediment in the reach. A small beaver dam
was identified on UT1 (STA 204+40) in December 2022. DMS has contracted with APHIS to address the
beaver. The dam was removed, and the beaver was trapped by APHIS in January 2023. A few areas of
bank scour and sediment deposition persist along UT2 Reach 2 but are isolated and 97% of the reach
remains stable and performing as intended. Please refer to Appendix 2 for stream stability tables and
CCPV Figures 3.0-3.2.
1.2.5 Hydrology Assessment
At least one bankfull event occurred on Little Pine Creek, UT2, and UT2b reaches during the MY7 data
collection, which was recorded using crest gages and visual indicators. Two bankfull flow events
occurring in separate years must be documented on the restoration reaches within the five year
monitoring period. The performance standard was met in MY3 for Little Pine, UT2, and UT2b.
The Site does not contain a rainfall gage; therefore, the daily precipitation data was collected from the
closest NC CRONOS Station, Sparta 3.5 SSW. Monthly rainfall data in 2022 indicated higher than normal
rainfall amounts occurred during the months of February, May, July, August, and November. Lower than
normal rainfall amounts occurred during June, and normal rainfall was recorded during the remainder of
the year.
At the end of MY3, a stream gage using a pressure transducer was installed to monitor flow on UT1,
approximately 50 LF downstream of the two installed boulder sills. Since MY7 is a reduced monitoring
year, the hydrologic data was not assessed. Previously, a total of 270 consecutive days of flow were
documented in MY6. Please refer to Appendix 5 for hydrologic data and monthly rainfall graph.
1.2.6 Wetland Assessment
One groundwater monitoring gage (GWG 1) was established during the baseline monitoring within the
Wetland FF area using logging hydrology pressure transducers. The gage was installed at an appropriate
location so that the data collected will provide an indication of groundwater levels throughout the
wetland enhancement area. No target performance standard for wetland hydrology success was
established within the mitigation plan (Wildlands, 2014). Wetland hydrology attainment typically
consists of recorded groundwater levels within 12 inches of the ground surface for a consecutive period
consisting of a pre-defined percentage of the growing season. Under typical precipitation conditions,
Alleghany County’s growing season extends 169 days from April 26th to October 11th.
MY7 is a reduced monitoring year that does not require hydrologic monitoring; therefore, the gage data
was not collected. For the previous five monitoring years (MY2 – MY6), GWG 1 recorded 169
consecutive days of the groundwater level at or within 12 inches of the ground surface, consisting of
100% of the growing season. Please refer to Appendix 2 for the groundwater gage location and
Appendix 5 for MY0 – MY6 groundwater hydrology data.
1.2.7 Conservation Easement Boundary Assessment
In December 2022, the entire conservation easement boundary was walked as part of the MY7 (2022)
monitoring effort and no conservation easement encroachments currently exist on the Site. However,
minor fence issues were noted where trees have fallen on the fence line along the easement. DMS is
taking action with the landowner to resolve the damage to the fence. Please refer to Appendix 2 for
representative photos of the conservation boundary and the minor fence issues.

Little Pine Creek III Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 Annual/Closeout Report – FINAL 1-5
1.3 Monitoring Year 7 Summary
Assessments completed over the past seven years illustrate that the Site has met the success criteria as
defined in the mitigation plan (Wildlands, 2014) for vegetation, stream morphology, and stream and
wetland hydrology, with the exception of a segment of UT1 as it enters Wetland FF where sediment
deposition has resulted in a loss of stream function. The MY7 visual assessment revealed that invasive
treatments have been successful in reducing areas of invasive species and no easement encroachments
currently exist on the Site. DMS implemented three phases of stream repairs in 2019, 2020, and 2022
along Little Pine Creek, UT1, UT2, UT2a, and UT2b and repairs appear stable and have benefited the
long-term ecological function of the Site.
The as-built planted stem density averaged 549 stems per acre with the MY6 vegetation assessment
resulting in an average of 383 stems per acre. This exceeds the final success criteria of 260 stems per
acre and demonstrates that the Site has established a healthy riparian buffer. Stream morphology
surveys throughout MY0 – MY6 along Little Pine Creek, UT2, and UT2b demonstrate that the channels
are functioning as designed, with minor to moderate deviations in bankfull dimensions compared to as-
built. MY7 stream morphology surveys and visual assessments reveal that previously described repair
areas are functioning as designed. The performance standard of two recorded bankfull events in
separate monitoring years was met for all project reaches in MY3. No target performance standard was
established for wetland hydrology success; however, for the past five monitoring years (MY2 – MY6), the
groundwater gage in Wetland FF recorded 169 consecutive days of the groundwater levels at or within
12 inches of the ground surface, consisting of 100% of the growing season.
Summary information and data related to the performance of various project and monitoring elements
can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these annual monitoring reports can be found in the mitigation plan
documents available on the DMS website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the
Appendices are available from DMS upon request.

Little Pine Creek III Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 Annual/Closeout Report – FINAL 2-1
Section 2: METHODOLOGY
Geomorphic data was collected following the standards outlined in The Stream Channel Reference Site:
An Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et al., 1994) and in the Stream Restoration: A Natural
Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al., 2003). Longitudinal and cross-sectional data were collected using
a total station and were georeferenced. All Current Condition Plan View mapping was recorded using a
Trimble handheld GPS with sub-meter accuracy and processed using was Pathfinder and ArcView. Crest
gages were installed in surveyed riffle cross-sections and monitored annually. Hydrology attainment
installation and monitoring methods are in accordance with the standards published in the United
States Army Corps of Engineers Stream Mitigation Guidelines (2003). Vegetation monitoring protocols
followed the Carolina Vegetation Survey-NCEEP Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al., 2008).

Little Pine Creek III Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 Annual/Closeout Report – FINAL 3-1
Section 3: REFERENCES
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, Cheryl C; Rawlins, C.L.; Potyondy, John P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated
Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p.
Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Version 4.2. Retrieved from: http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-
2.pdf
North Carolina Climate Retrieval and Observations Network of the Southeast Database (NCCRONOS).
2021. State Climate Office of North Carolina. Version 2.7.2. Station ID Sparta 3.5 SSW. Accessed
December 2022.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services and Interagency Review Team Technical Workgroup. 2018.
Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter. Raleigh, NC.
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). 2016. Surface Water Classifications. Retrieved
from http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/classification-
standards/classifications
NCDENR. 2009. New River Basin Restoration Priorities. Retrieved from
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/mitigation-services/dms-planning/watershed-planning-
documents/new-river-basin
NCDENR. 2007. Little River & Brush Creek Local Watershed Plan (LWP) Project Atlas. Retrieved from
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/mitigation-services/dms-planning/watershed-planning-
documents/new-river-basin
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDENR-
DWQ, USEPA, NCWRC.
United States Geological Survey (USGS), 1998. North Carolina Geology.
https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/north-carolina-geological-
survey/
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2014. Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project Final Mitigation
Plan. NCEEP, Raleigh, NC.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2016. Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project As-Built Baseline
Monitoring Report. NCDEQ-DMS, Raleigh, NC.

APPENDIX 1. General Tables and Figures
05050001030020
05050001030030
03040101080010
03040101060030
03040101090010
03040101080030
05050001030015
03040101080020
05050001040040
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Monitoring Year 7 ‐ 2022
Alleghany County, NC
0 0.5 1 Mile
Hydrologic Unit Code (14)
DMS Targeted Local Watershed
Project Location
¹
Directions to Site:
From Charlotte: Head north on Interstate 77 north of Elkin, NC,
take exit 83 to merge onto US‐21 Bypass N toward Roaring
Gap/Sparta. Continue to travel on US‐21 for approximately
22 miles, and then turn right onto Stoker Road. Travel
approximately 1 mile and take a slight right onto Glade Valley
Road. Travel approximately 4.5 miles and turn left onto Big Oak
Road. Travel approximately 1 mile and cross Little Pine Creek.
The project site is located upstream of the Big Oak Road stream
crossing. Farm gates on the right hand side of the road
provide access to the site.
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of
the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ)
Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is encompassed
by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered
by land under private ownership. Accessing the site
may require traversing areas near or along the easement
boundary and therefore access by the general public is not
permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state and
federal agencies or their designees/contractors involved in
the development, oversight,and stewardship of the restoration
site is permitted within the terms and timeframes of their
defined roles. Any intended site visitation or activity by
any person outside of these previously sanctioned roles
and activities requires prior coordination with DMS.
UT2

R
e
a
c
h

2
UT2

R
e
a
c
h

1
UT
2
a
UT
1
UT
4
UT
3
Litt
l
e

P
i
n
e
Rea
c
h

1
UT2b
Little Pine
Reach 2b
Litt
l
e

P
i
n
e
Rea
c
h

2
a
Wetland FF
Wetland HH
Wetland AA
Wetland GG
Wetland EE
Wetland CC
Wetland JJ
Wetland BB
Wetland DD
Figure 2 Project Component/Asset Map
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Alleghany County, NC
2018 Aerial Photography
0 700 Feet
Conservation Easement
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Non-Project/Not for Credit Stream
Reach Break
Water Line
Wetland Enhancement
Wetland Preservation
Overhead Electric Easement
Internal Easement Crossing
Waterers
Well
¹
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Buffer Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
Type R RE R RE R RE
Totals 6,328.6 644.8 N/A 1.393 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Existing
Footage/
Acreage
As-Built Stationing/
Location
As-Built
Footage/
Acreage
Restoration
Footage/
Acreage1
Mitigation Ratio2 Credits1
(SMU/WMU)Notes1
100+00 to 114+44 1,444 1,417 1:1 1,417.0 Excludes one 27 foot wide ford
crossing.
114+44 to 125+27 1,083 1,058 1:1 1,058.0 Excludes one 25 foot wide ford
crossing.
125+27 to 130+20 493 493 1:1 493.0
130+20 to 135+60 540 509 2.5:1 197.0
Excludes one 31 foot wide ford
crossing, Includes 50% reduction for
33 ft overhead electric easement
crossing.
197+26 to 202+24 498 463 2.5:1 185.2
Excludes one 35 foot wide culvert
crossing. 192 LF of excessive
aggradation.
202+24 to 206+26 402 402 2.5:1 160.8
401+78 to 403+34 &
403+75 to 404+34 2153 2153 n/a n/a Easement Break 403+34 - 403+75
405+15 to 426+58 2,143 2,143 5:1 428.6
426+58 to 432+09 551 519 2.5:1 207.6 Excludes one 32 foot wide
constructed culvert crossing.
500+00 to 503+00 300 300 2.5:1 120.0
503+00 to 505+53 253 253 1:1 253.0
400 602+44 to 606+44 400 384 5:1 76.8 Excludes one 16 foot wide
constructed ford crossing.
1,036 701+26 to 708+23 697 697 5:1 139.4
0.38 UT2 floodplain 2:1 0.190
0.16 UT2 floodplain 2:1 0.080
0.26 UT2b headwaters 2:1 0.130
0.12 North of UT2/UT2a 2:1 0.060
0.28 UT2 floodplain 2:1 0.140
0.76 North of UT1/Little
Pine 2:1 0.380
0.33 Little Pine 2:1 0.165
0.42 South of UT4/ Little
Pine 2:1 0.210
0.19 UT4 floodplain 5:1 0.038
Riparian Wetland
(acres)
Non-Riparian
Wetland (acres)
Upland
(acres)
2.71
0.19
2Unique ratio for UT2 was discussed in field with IRT members and recorded 8/15/2012 in meeting notes.
3 Length not included in component summation since no credit is sought
Excludes four constructed culvert
crossings; 32, 24, 32, and 38 feet
wide respectively.
Mitigation Credits
Component Summation
Planting, fencing
Preservation
Planting, fencing
P1/P2/P4, preservation
Planting, fencing, channel creation
Planting, fencing
Planting, fencing
P1/P2
P1
Restoration 3221
Wetland JJ Preservation (RE)0.19
Wetland FF Enhancement (RE) 0.76
Wetland CC
Preservation 3224
1Restoration footage based off of the surveyed as-built thalweg alignment is greater than design centerline alignment, resulting in credited length greater than that reported in the Mitigation Plan.
Enhancement II 2193
Enhancement I 4474
WETLANDS
Restoration Level Stream (LF)Buffer (square feet)
Wetland GG Enhancement (RE) 0.33
Wetland HH Enhancement (RE) 0.42
Preservation
Planting, grade control
Planting, fencing
Wetland EE Enhancement (RE) 0.28
Enhancement (RE) 0.26
Planting, fencing
Grade control, planting, fencing
Outlet stabilization, planting, fencing
Planting fencing
Wetland DD Enhancement (RE) 0.12
Wetland AA Enhancement (RE) 0.38
Wetland BB Enhancement (RE) 0.16Planting, fencing
Planting, fencing
Preservation (RE)
UT2b 553 Enhancement II (R)
Restoration (R)
Preservation
Preservation
P2
Planting, fencing
Little Pine Reach 1
4,016
Restoration (R)
Little Pine Reach 2a Restoration (R)
Little Pine Reach 2b
Restoration (R)
Enhancement II (R)
P1/P2
STREAMS
Project Components
Reach ID Restoration (R) or Restoration
Equivalent (RE)
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Stream Riparian Wetland Non-Riparian Wetland
N/A
Nitrogen Nutrient Offset
Approach
UT1 540 Enhancement II (R)
Enhancement II (R)
2,237.0
UT2 Reach 2
Enhancement
UT2a 2,921
Enhancement II (R)3
Preservation (RE)
Enhancement II (R)
5,270 Enhancement I (R) 2:1UT2 Reach 1 297+18-343+18 4,600 4,474
UT3 Preservation (RE)
UT4
DMS Project No. 94903
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
DMS Project No.94903
Bare Roots
Live Stakes
Plugs
Monitoring Performers Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Monitoring, POC Kirsten Gimbert
704.941.9093
Planting Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
P.O. Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
Seeding Contractor
North State Environmental, Inc.
2889 Lowery Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Seed Mix Sources Green Resource, LLC
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
Foggy Mountain Nursery
Mellow Marsh Farms
January 2021
1Seed and mulch was added as each section of construction was completed.
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Construction Contractor
North State Environmental, Inc.
2889 Lowery Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Designer
Aaron Early, PE, CFM
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint Street, Ste 104
Charlotte, NC 28205
704.332.7754
Year 5 Monitoring
Stream Repair N/A November 2020
Year 6 Monitoring Vegetation Survey September 2021 November 2021Stream Survey June, September, & November 2021
Stream SurveyBaseline Monitoring Document (Year 0)
Vegetation SurveyYear 1 Monitoring Stream Survey
Year 2 Monitoring
September 2019
December 2020
August 2020
Vegetation Survey
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
Stream Survey
Vegetation Survey
Stream Survey
Year 3 Monitoring
Invasive Treatment
Year 4 Monitoring
Invasive Treatment
Stream Repair
N/A
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Activity or Report Data Collection Complete Completion or Scheduled Delivery
Final Design - Construction Plans N/A September 2014
Construction N/A September 2015
December 2016
April 2016
October 2016
May 2017
July 2016
September 2017
May 2016
October 2016
Mitigation Plan March 2013 March 2014
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area1 N/A July - September 2015
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments1 N/A July - September 2015
Bare root and live stake plantings for reach/segments N/A December 2015
Repair Work N/A March 2016 / December 2016
Vegetation Survey
July 2018
December 2019
November 2018June 2018
April, May, & December 2019
September 2018
July, Aug, Sept, & Oct 2019
September 2019
November 2017
N/A
N/A
Year 7 Monitoring
Invasive Treatment N/A Fall 2022
Stream Repair N/A July 2022
Vegetation Survey August 2022 January 2023Stream Survey August 2022
DMS Project No. 94903
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
LP
Reach 1
LP
Reach 2a
LP
Reach 2b UT1 UT2
Reach 1
UT2
Reach 2
UT2
Reach 3 UT2a UT2b UT3 UT4
1,444 1,083 1,033 900 2,909 553 400 697
2,496 2,752 2,784 28 75 185 196 89 19 23 33
45.5 45.5 45.5 22.25 36 36 41.5 42 28/37.5 38.5 31.5
C4 C/E4 C4 N/A A4 E4b E4 C4b F4b N/A N/A
IV/V III/IV IV/V N/A2 N/A4 N/A4 N/A4 V N/A4 N/A2 N/A2
0.0043 0.0059 0.0087 N/A2 0.047 0.036 0.028 0.044 0.064 N/A2 N/A2
Essential Fisheries Habitat
1: Length includes internal easment crossings.
2: UT1 is enhancement II only, and UT3 and UT4 are preservation only. Geomorphic surveys were not performed for these streams in existing conditions.
3: The downstream 400 LF of Little Pine Creek near Big Oak Road is within a FEMA Zone AE floodplain on Firm panel 4010. The Zone AE floodplain is due to the backwater of Brush Creek;
Little Pine Creek is not a FEMA studied stream.
4: Streams do not fit into Simon Evolutionary Sequence.
Yes Yes
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No
Yes3
N/A
No impact application was
prepared for local review.
No post-project activities
required.
Endangered Species Act
Historic Preservation Act Yes Yes
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA)
Yes Yes
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Waters of the United States - Section 401
Division of Land Quality (Dam Safety)
Applicable?
Yes
Yes
N/A
Resolved?
Yes
Yes
N/A
Percent Composition Exotic Invasive Vegetation -Post-0%
Underlying Mapped Soils
Alluvial land, wet (Nikwasi); Ashe stony fine sandy loam (25-45% slopes); Chester loam (10-25% slopes);
Chester clay loam (25-45% slopes), eroded (Evard); Codorus complex (Arkaqua); Tate loam (6-10% slopes);
Watauga loam (6-45% slopes).
Drainage Class Well-drainedSoil Hydric Status A/D (Nikwasi); B (Ashe stony fine sandy loam, Chester loam, Tate loam, Watauga loam); B/D (Codorus Slope - Pre-Restoration
FEMA Classification AE3
Native Vegetation Community Piedmont/Mountain Bottomland Forest, Rich Cove
Evolutionary Trend (Simon's Model) - Pre-Restoration
CGIA Land Use Classification Managed Herbaceous (74%), Mixed Upland Hardwoods (20%), Mixed
Hardwoods/Conifers (5%), Southern Yellow Pine (<1%), Mountain Conifers (<1%)
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Length of Reach (linear feet) - Post-Restoration1 4,600
Drainage Area (acres)
NCDWR Stream Identification Score - Pre-Restoration
NCDWR Water Quality Classification C, TrMorphological Desription (stream type) - Pre-Restoration
DWR Sub-basin 05-07-03
Project Drainiage Area (acres)2,784
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area <1%
River Basin New
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 05050001
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 05050001030030
Physiographic Province Blue Ridge Belt of the Blue Ridge Province
Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Project Information
Project Name Little Pine Creek III Stream & Wetland Restoration
County Alleghany County
Project Area (acres)57.32
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)36° 30’ 29.16’’ N, 81° 0’ 6.12’’W
Project Watershed Summary Information
N/A
LPIII Final Mitigation Plan (3/4/2014) and LPIII CE
Approved 7/6/2012
LPIII Final Mitigation Plan (3/4/2014) and LPIII CE
Approved 7/6/2012
USACE Nationwide Permit No.27 and DWQ 401 Water
Quality Certification No. 3885. Action ID# 14-0041
Supporting Documentation
N/A
LPIII Categorical Exclusion (CE) Approved 7/6/2012
No historic resources were found to be impacted (letter
from SHPO dated 5/3/2012)
Table 5. Monitoring Component Summary
DMS Project No. 94903
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Little Pine
Reach 1
Little Pine
Reach 2a
Little Pine
Reach 2b UT1 UT2 UT2a UT2b UT3 UT4 Wetlands
Riffle Cross Section 2 2 2 N/A 4 N/A 1 N/A N/A N/A
Pool Cross Section 1 1 1 N/A 3 N/A 1 N/A N/A N/A
Pattern Pattern N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Profile Longitudinal Profile N/A Y N/A Y N/A N/A N/A Annual
Substrate Reach Wide (RW) / Riffle (RF)
100 Pebble Count RW-1, RF-1 RW-1, RF-1 RW-1, RF-1 N/A RW-1, RF-3 N/A RW-1, RF-1 N/A N/A N/A Annual
Stream Hydrology Crest Gage N/A 1 N/A 1 N/A N/A N/A Annual
Wetland Hydrology Groundwater Gages N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 Annual
Vegetation1 CVS Level 2 Annual
Visual Assessment All Streams Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Annual
Exotic and nuisance
vegetation
Project Boundary
Reference Photos Photographs Annual
1A deviation from the vegetation plot quantity indicated in the Mitigation Plan is due to a smaller than expected planted area.
21
42
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Parameter Monitoring Feature
Quantity/ Length by Reach
Frequency
Dimension Annual
Y
1
APPENDIX 2. Visual Assessment Data
##
##
##
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
UT
2

R
e
a
c
h

2
Little Pine Creek Reach 1
LIt
t
l
e

P
i
n
e

C
r
e
e
k
Rea
c
h

2
a
Little Pine Creek
Reach 2b
UT 2b
UT

3
U
T

2
a
UT
4
UT

1
Wetland AA
Wetland BB
Wetland CC
Wetland DD
Wetland EE
Wetland FF
Wetland GG
Wetland HH
U T 2 R e a c h 1
Wetland JJ
Sheet 1
Sh
e
e
t

2
Overhead Electric Easement
Internal Easement Crossing
Wetland Enhancement
Wetland Preservation
Conservation Easement
Water Line
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Non-Project/Not for Credit Stream
Reach Break
Repair Area Cross-Sections (XS-R)
Cross-Section (XS)
Waterers
Well
!A Barotroll
!A Crest Gage (CG)
!A Stream Gage (SG)
!A Groundwater Gage (GWG)
Vegetation Transect - MY7
Criteria Met
Permanent Vegetation Plot (VP) - MY6
Criteria Met
Criteria Not Met
Vegetation Areas of Concern - MY7
Barberry
Multiflora Rose
Bare/Poor Herbaceous Cover
##Fence Issue
Stream Areas of Concern - MY7
Bank instability
Sediment deposition
Structure piping
Beaverdam
2018 Aerial Photograph
Figure 3.0 Current Condition Plan View Map (Key)
Little Pine Creek III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Alleghany County, NC
0 400200 Feet ¹
5
0
2
+
0
0
338+50
338
+
0
0
337+50
337+00
3
3
6
+
5
0
336+0
0
335
+
5
0
335+00
33
4
+
5
0
3
3
4
+
0
0
333+50
432
+
1
0
43
2
+
0
0
3
3
3
+
0
0
431+50
3
3
2
+
5
0
3
3
2
+
0
0
3
3
1
+
5
0
3
3
0
+
5
0
330+00
50
5
+
4
1
3
2
9
+
5
0
50
5
+
0
0
329
+
0
0
5
0
4
+
5
0
5
0
4
+
0
0
503+
5
0
503+0
0
50
1
+
5
0
501+
0
0
5
0
0
+
5
0
5
0
0
+
0
0
3
2
8
+
5
0
328+00
327
+
5
0
327
+
0
0
326+5
0
326+00
325+
5
0
32
5
+
0
0
324+50
324
+
0
0
32
3
+
5
0
323+00
322+50
322+00
32
1
+
5
0
3
2
1
+
0
0
320+50
320+
0
0
31
9
+
5
0
3
1
9
+
0
0
3
1
8
+
5
0
3
1
8
+
0
0
317+50
3
1
7
+
0
0
316+
5
0
316+
0
0
31
5
+
5
0
3
1
5
+
0
0
31
4
+
5
0
31
4
+
0
0
3
1
3
+
5
0
3
1
3
+
0
0
3
1
2
+
5
0
3
1
2
+
0
0
31
1
+
5
0
3
1
1
+
0
0
310+
5
0
310
+
0
0
3
0
9
+
5
0
3
0
9
+
0
0
30
8
+
5
0
30
8
+
0
0
307+
5
0
307
+
0
0
3
0
6
+
5
0
3
0
6
+
0
0
305+50305+
0
0
304+50
304+
0
0
3
0
3
+
5
0
3
0
3
+
0
0
302+50
3
0
2
+
0
0
301
+
5
0
301+00
300+50
300+00
425+58
426+0
0
426+5
0
427+00
427+50
4
2
9
+
0
0
42
9
+
5
0
430+00
430+5
0
431+00
50
2
+
5
0
428+50
428+00
33
1
+
0
0
!A!A
GF
GF
GF
GFGFGF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
UT2 Reach 1
UT 2b
UT

3
U
T

2
a
Wetland AA
Wetland BB
Wetland CC
Wetland
DD
Wetland EE
U T 2 R e a c h 2
Bank erosion
504+20
Bank scour
STA 336+40, 337+50, 338+00 & 338+30
XS
1
2
XS1
3
X
S
1
0
XS15
X
S
1
1
XS16
X
S
1
4
41
40
39
38
37
36
33 32
42
20
21
22
35
34
31
25
24
23
CG3
Bank scour
STA 334+10 & 334+40
VP16
VP14
VP19
VP20
VP15
VP21
XS-R8
XS-R7
##
Internal Easement Crossing
Wetland Enhancement
Conservation Easement
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Non-Project/Not for Credit Stream
Water Lines
Reach Break
Cross-Section (XS)
Repair Area Cross-Sections (XS-R)
Bankfull
Waterers
!A Crest Gage (CG)
!A Groundwater Gage (GWG)
GF Photo Point
Permanent Vegetation Plot (VP) - MY6
Criteria Met
Vegetation Areas of Concern - MY7
Bare/Poor Herbaceous Cover
##Fence Issue
Stream Areas of Concern - MY7
Bank instability
Sediment deposition
Structure piping
2018 Aerial Photograph
Figure 3.1 Current Condition Plan View Map (Sheet 1)
Little Pine Creek III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Alleghany County, NC
0 200100 Feet ¹
197+
2
6
198
+
0
0
198+
5
0
199+00
199+
5
0
200+50
201+00
201+50
202+0
0
202+5
0
203+
0
0
203+50
204+00
204+5
0
205
+
0
0
205
+
5
0
206
+
0
0
206
+
4
2
122+00
12
2
+
5
0
1
2
3
+
0
0
12
3
+
5
0
121+00
120
+
5
0
1
2
0
+
0
0
11
9
+
5
0
119+00
118+50
124
+
0
0
124+50
125
+
0
0
1
2
5
+
5
0
1
2
6
+
0
0
1
2
6
+
5
0
1
2
7
+
0
0
1
2
7
+
5
0
1
2
8
+
0
0
1
2
8
+
5
0
1
2
9
+
0
0
1
2
9
+
5
0
1
3
0
+
0
0
1
3
1
+
5
0
1
3
1
+
0
0
1
3
0
+
5
0
13
2
+
0
0
1
3
2
+
5
0
1
3
3
+
0
0
13
3
+
5
0
1
3
4
+
0
0
118+00
117+50
11
7
+
0
0
1
1
6
+
5
0
11
6
+
0
0
11
5
+
5
0
1
1
5
+
0
0
1
1
4
+
5
0
11
4
+
0
0
1
1
2
+
5
0
11
2
+
0
0
111+50
111+
0
0
1
1
0
+
5
0
11
0
+
0
0
109
+
5
0
109
+
0
0
1
0
8
+
5
0
1
0
8
+
0
0
10
7
+
5
0
10
7
+
0
0
106
+
5
0
106
+
0
0
10
5
+
5
0
1
0
5
+
0
0
1
0
4
+
5
0
10
4
+
0
0
1
0
3
+
5
0
1
0
3
+
0
0
10
1
+
0
0
10
0
+
5
0
1
0
0
+
0
0
3
4
2
+
6
1
3
4
2
+
5
0
342+00
341+
5
0
3
4
1
+
0
0
340+50
340+
0
0
3
3
9
+
5
0
339+00
338+5
0
338+00337
+
5
0
337+00
336
+
5
0
336
+
0
0
335+50
335+0
0
197+5
0
1
0
2
+
5
0
1
0
2
+
0
0
10
1
+
5
0
121+
5
0
13
4
+
3
7
.
5
7
11
3
+
5
0
11
3
+
0
0
200+0
0
GF
GF
GF GF
GF GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GF
GFGFGFGFGF
!A !A
!A
!A
!A
!A
##
##
##
UT
2

R
e
a
c
h

2
L i tt l e P i n e C r e e k R e a c h 1
LI
t
t
l
e

P
i
n
e

C
r
e
e
k
Re
a
c
h

2
a
Littl
e

P
i
n
e

C
r
e
e
k
Reach

2
b
UT

4
U
T

1
Wetland EE
Wetland FF
Wetland GG
Wetland HH
Bank scour
STA 108+00
Sediment deposition
STA 112+50
Sediment deposition
STA 100+00
Wetland JJ
Bank scour
STA 336+40, 337+50,
338+00 & 338+30
XS4
X
S
7
X
S
8
X
S
9
XS3
XS
2
XS
6
XS
1
XS1
8
XS5
X
S
1
7
XS1
5
XS1
6
VP4
VP2
VP6
VP7
VP5
VP1
VP9
VP8
VP17
VP16
VP12
VP18
VP15
VP13
VP11
VP3
VP10
XS
-
R
1
XS-R
5
X
S
-
R
2
X
S
-
R
3
XS-R4
X
S
-
R
6
Sediment deposition
STA 131+90
Sediment deposition
STA 200+50
SG
Barotroll
GWG1
CG2
CG1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
26
30
29
28
27
10
11
12
13
14
15
1617
18
19
Overhead Electric Easement
Internal Easement Crossing
Wetland Enhancement
Wetland Preservation
Conservation Easement
Water Lines
Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement II
Stream Preservation
Non-Project/Not for Credit Stream
Reach Break
Bankfull
Repair Area Cross-Sections (XS-R)
Cross-Section (XS)
Waterers
!A Barotroll
!A Crest Gage (CG)
!A Stream Gage (SG)
!A Groundwater Gage (GWG)
GF Photo Point
Vegetation Transect - MY7
Criteria Met
Permanent Vegetation Plot (VP) - MY6
Criteria Met
Criteria Not Met
Vegetation Areas of Concern - MY7
Barberry
Multiflora Rose
Bare/Poor Herbaceous Cover
##Fence Issue
Stream Areas of Concern - MY7
Bank instability
Sediment deposition
Beaverdam
2018 Aerial Photograph
Figure 3.2 Current Condition Plan View Map (Sheet 2)
Little Pine Creek III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Alleghany County, NC
0 200100 Feet ¹
Table 6a. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Date of Visual Assessment: December 7, 2022
Major Channel
Category Channel Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Aggradation 2 47 97%
Degradation 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition Texture/Substrate 10 10 100%
Depth Sufficient 7 7 100%
Length Appropriate 7 7 100%
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)9 9 100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)9 9 100%
1. Scoured/Eroded
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
1 23 99%n/a n/a n/a
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
1 23 99%n/a n/a n/a
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.3 3 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill 3 3 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.3 3 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 3 3 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining
~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth ≥ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
baseflow.
3 3 100%
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
Little Pine Reach 1 (STA 100+00 - 114+44) 1,444 LF assessed
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4. Thalweg Position
1Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.
2. Bank
Totals
3. Engineered
Structures1
Table 6b. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Date of Visual Assessment: December 7, 2022
Major Channel
Category Channel Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Aggradation 0 0 100%
Degradation 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition Texture/Substrate 7 7 100%
Depth Sufficient 6 6 100%
Length Appropriate 6 6 100%
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)7 7 100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)7 7 100%
1. Scoured/Eroded
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.5 5 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill 5 5 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.5 5 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 5 5 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining
~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth ≥ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
baseflow.
5 5 100%
1Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.
2. Bank
Totals
3. Engineered
Structures1
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4. Thalweg Position
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Little Pine Reach 2a (114+44-125+27) 1,083 LF assessed
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
Table 6c. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Date of Visual Assessment: December 7, 2022
Major Channel
Category Channel Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Aggradation 0 0 100%
Degradation 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition Texture/Substrate 4 4 100%
Depth Sufficient 4 4 100%
Length Appropriate 4 4 100%
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)4 4 100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)4 4 100%
1. Scoured/Eroded
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.5 5 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill 5 5 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.5 5 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 5 5 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining
~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth ≥ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
baseflow.
5 5 100%
1Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.
2. Bank
Totals
3. Engineered
Structures1
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4. Thalweg Position
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Little Pine Reach 2b (125+27-130+20) 493 LF assessed
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
Table 6d. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Date of Visual Assessment: December 7, 2022
Major Channel
Category Channel Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Aggradation 0 0 100%
Degradation 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition Texture/Substrate 10 10 100%
Depth Sufficient n/a n/a n/a
Length Appropriate n/a n/a n/a
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)n/a n/a n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)n/a n/a n/a
1. Scoured/Eroded
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.21 21 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill 21 21 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.21 21 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 21 21 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining
~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth ≥ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
baseflow.
21 21 100%
1Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.
2. Bank
Totals
3. Engineered
Structures1
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4. Thalweg Position
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
UT2 Reach 1 Upper (STA 297+18 - 310+50) 1,332 LF assessed
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
Table 6e. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Date of Visual Assessment: December 7, 2022
Major Channel
Category Channel Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Aggradation 0 0 100%
Degradation 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition Texture/Substrate 12 12 100%
Depth Sufficient n/a n/a n/a
Length Appropriate n/a n/a n/a
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)n/a n/a n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)n/a n/a n/a
1. Scoured/Eroded
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.20 20 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill 20 20 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.20 20 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 20 20 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining
~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth ≥ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
baseflow.
16 20 80%
1Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.
2. Bank
Totals
3. Engineered
Structures1
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4. Thalweg Position
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
UT2 Reach 1 Lower (STA 325+67 - 330+00) 433 LF assessed
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
Table 6f. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Date of Visual Assessment: December 7, 2022
Major Channel
Category Channel Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Aggradation 1 15 99%
Degradation 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition Texture/Substrate 14 15 93%
Depth Sufficient 4 5 80%
Length Appropriate 4 5 80%
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)4 5 80%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)4 5 80%
1. Scoured/Eroded
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
6 67 97%n/a n/a n/a
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
6 67 97%n/a n/a n/a
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.19 19 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill 19 19 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.19 19 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 19 19 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining
~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth ≥ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
baseflow.
18 19 95%
1Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.
2. Bank
Totals
3. Engineered
Structures1
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4. Thalweg Position
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
UT2 Reach 2 (STA 330+00 - 343+18) 1,318 LF assessed
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
Table 6g. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Date of Visual Assessment: December 7, 2022
Major Channel
Category Channel Sub-Category Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust % for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Aggradation 0 0 100%
Degradation 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition Texture/Substrate 9 9 100%
Depth Sufficient n/a n/a n/a
Length Appropriate n/a n/a n/a
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)n/a n/a n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)n/a n/a n/a
1. Scoured/Eroded
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
1 10 98%n/a n/a n/a
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
Does NOT include undercuts that are
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%n/a n/a n/a
1 10 98%n/a n/a n/a
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs.22 23 96%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill 22 23 96%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.22 23 96%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%. 23 23 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining
~Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth ≥ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
baseflow.
23 23 100%
1Excludes constructed riffles since they are evaluated in section 1.
2. Bank
Totals
3. Engineered
Structures1
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4. Thalweg Position
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
UT2b (STA 503+00 - 505+53) 253 LF assessed
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
Table 7. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Date of Visual Assessment: December 7, 2022
Planted Acreage 27.8
Vegetation Category Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
(acres)
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of Planted
Acreage
Bare Areas Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material 0.1 2 0.06 0.22%
Low Stem Density Areas1 Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count
criteria.0.1 3 0.07 0.27%
5 0.13 0.48%
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring
year.0.1 0 0.0 0.0%
5 0.13 0.48%
Easement Acreage 57.3
Vegetation Category Definitions Mapping
Threshold (SF)
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).1000 3 0.22 0.38%
Easement Encroachment Areas Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).none 0 0 0.0%
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
1Acreage calculated from permanent vegetation monitoring plots.
Total
Cumulative Total

Stream Repair Photographs

MY7

LPC Reach 1 STA 100+50 – Phase II left bank repaired with geolift and toe
wood added, looking downstream (12/7/2022)
LPC Reach 2a STA 118+00 – Phase III right bank repaired with geolift and
toe wood, looking downstream (12/7/2022)

LPC Reach 2a STA 120+25 – Phase III J-hook repaired, looking upstream
(12/7/2022)
LPC Reach 2a STA 121+50 – Phase II constructed riffle and right bank
repaired, looking upstream (12/7/2022)

LPC Reach 2a STA 123+00 – Phase III lunker log removed, and left bank
repaired, looking downstream (12/7/2022)
LPC Reach 2b STA 124+50 – Phase III roller log repaired and right bank
geolift with toe wood, looking upstream (12/7/2022)

LPC Reach 2b STA 125+50 – Phase III wetland GG outlet repaired with step
pool outlets, looking downstream (12/7/2022)
LPC Reach 2b STA 125+75 – Phase III wetland GG outlet repaired with step
pool outlets, looking at left bank (12/7/2022)

LPC Reach 2b STA 132+00 – Phase III ford crossing bar removal (still
present), looking upstream (12/7/2022)
LPC Reach 2b STA 133+00 – Phase III left bank repaired, looking
downstream (12/7/2022)

LPC Reach 2b STA 133+50 – Phase III right bank repaired, looking
downstream (12/7/2022)
UT1 STA 198+00 – 198+30 – Phase III headcut repaired by installing rock
step pools, looking upstream (12/7/2022)

UT1 STA 198+30 – 199+00 – Phase III filter fabric added to repair piping,
looking upstream (12/7/2022)
UT1 STA 199+50 – Phase III channel thalweg recentered, looking upstream
(12/7/2022)

UT2 Reach 1 (Upper) STA 303+16 – Phase III filter fabric installed to repair
piping log roller, looking upstream (12/7/2022)
UT2 Reach 1 (Upper) STA 303+80 – 304+20 – Phase III rock cross vanes
installed and right bank repaired, looking upstream (12/7/2022)

UT2 Reach 1 (Upper) STA 308+50 – Phase III repaired crossing inlet by
replacing with 48” culvert, looking downstream (12/7/2022)
UT2 Reach 1 (Upper) STA 308+75 – Phase III repaired culvert outlet, stone
added to plunge pool, looking upstream (12/7/2022)

UT2 Reach 1 (Upper) STA 309+50 – 310+50 – Phase III rock cross vanes
added, structures and left bank repaired, looking upstream (12/7/2022)
UT2 Reach 1 (Lower) STA 325+50 – 326+00 – Phase III buried channel
rebuilt, rock cross vanes and riffles added, looking upstream (12/7/2022)

UT2 Reach 1 (Lower) STA 326+00 – 326+50 – Phase III buried channel
rebuilt, rock cross vanes and riffles added, looking upstream (12/7/2022)
UT2 Reach 1 (Lower) STA 326+75 – Phase III culvert crossing replaced with
ford crossing, fencing repaired, looking upstream (12/7/2022)

UT2 Reach 1 (Lower) STA 327+00 – Phase III rock cross vane added, looking
upstream (12/7/2022)
UT2 Reach 1 (Lower) STA 328+25 – Phase III left bank repaired, looking
upstream (12/7/2022)

UT2 Reach 2 STA 330+00 – Phase III rock cross vane added, looking
upstream (12/7/2022)
UT2 Reach 2 STA 331+60 – Phase III right bank repaired, looking upstream
(12/7/2022)

UT2A STA 426+50 – Phase III right and left banks repaired, looking
downstream (12/7/2022)
UT2A STA 430+50 – Phase I repair area stone and log step pool added,
looking downstream (12/7/2022)

UT2A STA 431+25 – Phase I right bank repair area, looking downstream
(12/7/2022)
UT2A STA 431+60 – Phase I right bank repair area, looking downstream
(12/7/2022)

UT2B STA 505+20 – Phase III constructed riffle material added and headcut repaired, looking upstream (12/7/2022)

Conservation Easement Photographs

MY7

Conservation Easement Corner – Located south of Wetland HH, logging
well outside of easement, looking northwest (12/7/2022)
Conservation Easement Corner– Located south of UT4, representative of
no encroachment, looking southeast (12/7/2022)

Conservation Easement Boundary – Located at the start of Little Pine
Creek, fencing down across the stream, looking east (12/7/2022)
Conservation Easement Boundary – Located north of XS1 on Little Pine
Creek, tree down on fence line, looking north (12/7/2022)

Conservation Easement Boundary – Located south of PP31 on UT2B, tree
down on fence line, looking southwest (12/7/2022)
Conservation Easement Boundary – Located at corner east of UT2B,
representative of intact fence line, looking south (12/7/2022)

Conservation Easement Boundary– Located at corner east of UT2B,
representative of intact fence line, looking northwest (12/7/2022)
Conservation Easement Boundary – Located at corner north of UT2,
representative of intact fence line, looking southeast (12/7/2022)

Conservation Easement Corner – Located north of UT2A, representative of
intact fence line, looking south (12/7/2022)
Conservation Easement Corner – Located south of UT2A/UT3 confluence,
fenced to avoid tree down at corner, looking west (12/7/2022)

Conservation Easement Corner – Located west of UT2A, previously logged
area outside of CE no encroachment, looking south (12/7/2022)
Conservation Easement Corner – Located west of UT2A, previously logged
area outside of CE no encroachment, looking north (12/7/2022)

Conservation Easement Corner – Located west of UT3 at ford crossing,
gates intact, looking north (12/7/2022)
Conservation Easement Corner – Located west of UT3 project start,
representative of no encroachment, looking south (12/7/2022)

Areas of Concern Photographs

MY7

LPC Reach 1 STA 100+00 – Mid channel sediment bar at the start of
project, looking downstream (12/7/2022)
LPC Reach 1 STA 108+00 – Right bank scour, looking downstream
(12/7/2022)

LPC Reach 1 STA 112+50 – Mid channel sediment bar, looking downstream
(12/7/2022)
UT1 STA 204+40 – Small beaver dam on UT1, looking upstream
(12/7/2022)

UT2 Reach 2 STA 333+50 – Mid channel sediment bar, looking downstream
(12/7/2022)
UT2 Reach 2 STA 334+10 – Right bank scour, looking upstream (12/7/2022)

UT2 Reach 2 STA 334+40 – Left bank scour, looking upstream (12/7/2022) UT2 Reach 2 STA 336+40 – Left bank scour, looking upstream (12/7/2022)

UT2 Reach 2 STA 337+50 – Right bank scour around rock vane structure,
looking upstream (12/7/2022)
UT2 Reach 2 STA 338+00 – Left bank scour, looking at left bank
(12/7/2022)

UT2 Reach 2 STA 338+30 – Right bank scour, looking at right bank
(12/7/2022)
UT2B STA 504+20 – Right bank scour, looking at right bank (12/7/2022)

Vegetation Transect Photograph

MY7

Vegetation Transect – Located in the right floodplain of Little Pine Creek Reach 1, looking west (8/9/2022)

APPENDIX 3. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Table 9. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
21
21
21
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
cvs-eep-entrytool-v2.5.0 LP III MY6.mdb
L:\ActiveProjects\005-02160 Little Pine III Monitoring\Monitoring\Monitoring Year 6\Vegetation Assessment
MIMI-PC
53932032
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------------
Metadata
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
Sampled Plots
PROJECT SUMMARY-------------------------------------
Project Code
Project Name
Description
94903
Little Pine Creek III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Little Pine Creek III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
Damage
Damage by Spp
Damage by Plot
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
Database Name
Database Location
Computer Name
File Size
Proj, planted
Proj, total stems
Plots
Vigor
Vigor by Spp
20 Y
17 Y
18 Y
19 Y
10 Y
11 N
21 Y
12 Y
13 N
14 Y
15 Y
16 Y
7 Y
8 Y
9 Y
MY6 Plot Data MY5 Success Criteria Met
(Y/N)Tract Mean
1 N
86%
2 Y
3 Y
4 Y
5 Y
6 Y
Table 10a. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree 40 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 9 1 1 1
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder Shrub Tree
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 1 1 1
Cercis canadensis Redbud Shrub Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1
Cornus Dogwood Shrub Tree
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood Shrub Tree
Cornus florida Flowering Dogwood Shrub Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 2 2 2 8 8 8
Juglans nigra Black Walnut Tree
Lindera benzoin Northern Spicebush Shrub Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree
Pinus taeda Loblolly Pine Tree
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 4
Salix nigra Black Willow Tree 25 2
Salix sericea Silky Willow Shrub Tree
Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry Shrub Tree
Ulmus americana American Elm Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 8 8 8 2 2 2
6 6 46 9 9 34 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 18 7 7 9 14 14 15
5 5 6 5 5 6 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 3 5 5 5
242.8 243 1862 364 364 1376 526 526 526 526 526 526 526 526 728 283 283 364 567 567 607
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 5
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder Shrub Tree
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2
Cercis canadensis Redbud Shrub Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2
Cornus Dogwood Shrub Tree
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood Shrub Tree
Cornus florida Flowering Dogwood Shrub Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Tree 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 7 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2
Juglans nigra Black Walnut Tree
Lindera benzoin Northern Spicebush Shrub Tree 1
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree
Pinus taeda Loblolly Pine Tree
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2
Salix nigra Black Willow Tree
Salix sericea Silky Willow Shrub Tree
Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry Shrub Tree
Ulmus americana American Elm Tree 4 4 4 3 3 3
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 13 3 3 3 8 8 9 0 0 0 11 11 17
4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 4 4 4 0 0 0 5 5 7
405 405 405 405 405 405 405 405 526 121 121 121 324 324 364 0 0 0 445 445 688
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%PnoLS: Number of planted stems excluding live stakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%T: Total stems
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
MY6 Plot Data (2021)
MY6 Plot Data (2021)
94903-WEI-0006
0.02471
1
0.02471
1
0.02471
1
0.02471 0.02471size (ACRES)0.024710.02471
Stem count
size (ares)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
1
94903-WEI-0010 94903-WEI-0011 94903-WEI-0012 94903-WEI-0013
1 1 1
size (ACRES)0.02471 0.02471 0.02471 0.02471 0.02471 0.02471 0.02471
size (ares)1 1 1
94903-WEI-0014
Stem count
Species count
Stems per ACRE
94903-WEI-0008 94903-WEI-0009
1 111
94903-WEI-000794903-WEI-0001 94903-WEI-0002 94903-WEI-0003 94903-WEI-0004 94903-WEI-0005
Table 10b. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree 150 3 3 3 1 1 26 200 1 1 201
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder Shrub Tree
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3
Cercis canadensis Redbud Shrub Tree 5 5 5 2 2 2 3 3 3
Cornus Dogwood Shrub Tree
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood Shrub Tree
Cornus florida Flowering Dogwood Shrub Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Tree 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 2 3 3 3
Juglans nigra Black Walnut Tree
Lindera benzoin Northern Spicebush Shrub Tree 2
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree 4
Pinus taeda Loblolly Pine Tree
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 8 8 8 1 1 1 5 5 5 2 2 2
Salix nigra Black Willow Tree
Salix sericea Silky Willow Shrub Tree
Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry Shrub Tree
Ulmus americana American Elm Tree 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2
12 12 162 8 8 8 11 11 11 16 16 16 9 9 34 7 7 211 9 9 211
3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 5 4 4 5
486 486 6556 324 324 324 445 445 445 647 647 647 364 364 1376 283.3 283 8539 364 364 8539
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree 23 23 648 26 26 168 35 35 144 34 34 99 41 41 45 45 45 45 50 50 50
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder Shrub Tree 2 1 3 1 1
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 33 33 33 34 34 37 37 37 38 39 39 39 39 39 41 41 41 41 49 49 49
Cercis canadensis Redbud Shrub Tree 24 24 24 25 25 25 26 26 27 35 35 35 35 35 37 44 44 44 46 46 46
Cornus Dogwood Shrub Tree 1
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood Shrub Tree 5
Cornus florida Flowering Dogwood Shrub Tree 1 5
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash Tree 60 60 63 60 60 63 63 63 68 67 67 68 61 61 67 58 58 58 58 58 58
Juglans nigra Black Walnut Tree 2
Lindera benzoin Northern Spicebush Shrub Tree 3 3
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree 4 3 2 4 1
Pinus taeda Loblolly Pine Tree 1
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 31 31 33 32 32 33 33 33 35 33 33 35 33 33 33 33 33 33 30 30 30
Salix nigra Black Willow Tree 27
Salix sericea Silky Willow Shrub Tree 5 2
Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry Shrub Tree 4
Ulmus americana American Elm Tree 28 28 28 35 35 37 38 38 38 44 44 44 47 47 47 50 50 50 52 52 52
199 199 863 212 212 380 232 232 360 252 252 337 256 256 272 271 271 272 285 285 285
6 6 9 6 6 13 6 6 11 6 6 10 6 6 8 6 6 7 6 6 6
383 383 1663 409 409 732 447 447 694 486 486 649 493 493 524 522 522 524 549 549 549
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%PnoLS: Number of planted stems excluding live stakes
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%P-all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%T: Total stems
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
0.5189
MY1 (10/2016)MY0 (05/2016)
21
0.5189
MY3 (9/2018)
0.5189
MY2 (9/2017)
21 21
Species count
Stems per ACRE
Stem count
size (ares)21
size (ACRES)0.51890.5189
21
0.5189
2121
0.5189
MY4 (9/2019)
0.02471
Species count
Stems per ACRE
size (ACRES)0.02471 0.02471
MY5 (8/2020)MY6 (9/2021)
Annual Means
1
0.02471 0.024710.02471 0.02471
1 1 1
Stem count
size (ares)1 1 1
94903-WEI-0020 94903-WEI-0021
MY6 Plot Data (2021)
94903-WEI-0015 94903-WEI-0016 94903-WEI-0017 94903-WEI-0018 94903-WEI-0019
Table 10c. Vegetation Transect Data
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type Transect 1
T
Acer rubrum Red Maple Tree 4
Betula nigra River Birch Tree 2
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar Tree 1
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore Tree 5
12
1
0.02471
4
486
Color for Density
T: Total stems
Stems per ACRE
Current Plot Data (MY7 2022)
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
Table 10d. Stems Per Plot Across All Years
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Planted
Stems
Total
Stems
Total
Stems/Ac
Planted
Stems
Total
Stems
Total
Stems/Ac
Planted
Stems
Total
Stems
Total
Stems/Ac
Planted
Stems
Total
Stems
Total
Stems/Ac
Planted
Stems
Total
Stems
Total
Stems/Ac
Planted
Stems
Total
Stems
Total
Stems/Ac
Planted
Stems
Total
Stems
Total
Stems/Ac
6 46 1,862 7 17 688 7 22 890 13 10 405 13 13 526 15 15 607 15 15 607
9 34 1,376 9 12 486 9 11 445 10 21 850 10 10 405 12 12 486 14 14 567
13 13 526 14 14 567 15 15 607 15 15 607 15 15 607 16 16 648 17 17 688
13 13 526 13 14 567 16 18 728 16 16 648 14 17 688 14 14 567 15 15 607
13 18 728 13 16 648 14 14 567 14 14 567 15 15 607 15 15 607 14 14 567
7 9 364 7 12 486 8 9 364 8 10 405 11 12 486 12 13 526 14 14 567
14 15 607 15 18 728 15 20 809 16 19 769 13 16 648 16 16 648 15 15 607
10 10 405 11 12 486 15 15 607 15 15 607 14 14 567 15 15 607 15 15 607
10 10 405 12 13 526 13 16 648 11 11 445 12 13 526 13 13 526 13 13 526
10 13 526 10 12 486 10 14 567 11 12 486 11 15 607 11 11 445 12 12 486
3 3 121 2 2 81 3 3 121 9 9 364 12 12 486 14 14 567 14 14 567
8 9 364 11 15 607 14 17 688 15 17 688 15 15 607 12 12 486 13 13 526
0 0 0 1 1 40 2 2 81 5 5 202 6 6 243 5 5 202 10 10 405
11 17 688 9 11 445 12 13 526 12 16 648 12 12 486 13 13 526 14 14 567
12 162 6,556 13 43 1,740 13 28 1,133 13 23 931 13 13 526 13 13 526 14 14 567
8 8 324 8 11 445 10 10 405 10 15 607 10 10 405 11 11 445 12 12 486
11 11 445 11 11 445 10 10 405 10 10 405 10 10 405 10 10 405 13 13 526
16 16 648 16 16 648 16 16 648 16 16 648 16 16 648 16 16 648 13 13 526
9 34 1,376 9 37 1,497 9 44 1,781 11 16 648 10 10 405 10 10 405 9 9 364
7 211 8,539 11 62 2,509 11 32 1,295 11 23 931 11 13 526 14 14 567 15 15 607
9 211 8,539 10 31 1,255 10 31 1,255 11 26 1,052 13 15 607 14 14 567 14 14 567
Permanent Plot 11
MY0 (2016)
Permanent Plot 1
Permanent Plot 2
Permanent Plot 3
Permanent Plot 4
Permanent Plot 5
Plot
MY6 (2021)MY5 (2020)MY3 (2018)MY2 (2017)MY1 (2016)
Permanent Plot 18
Permanent Plot 19
Permanent Plot 20
Permanent Plot 21
MY4 (2019)
Permanent Plot 12
Permanent Plot 13
Permanent Plot 14
Permanent Plot 15
Permanent Plot 16
Permanent Plot 17
Permanent Plot 6
Permanent Plot 7
Permanent Plot 8
Permanent Plot 9
Permanent Plot 10
APPENDIX 4. Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Little Pine Reach 1, Reach 2a, Reach 2b
Parameter Gage
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Bankfull Width (ft)25.8 33.4 30.3 33.5 29.1 30.7 28.7 31.9
Floodprone Width (ft)133 >200
Bankfull Mean Depth 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.8 1.6 1.9 2.0 2.1
Bankfull Max Depth 3.3 3.3 2.7 3.2 2.6 3.9 3.1 3.4
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft2)45.5 47.5 52.2 53.5 46.6 56.9 58.8 64.2
Width/Depth Ratio 1.4 23.9 17.1 21.4 16.6 18.1 14.0 15.9
Entrenchment Ratio 4.4 >6.0 >6.5 >6.9 >6.3 >7
Bank Height Ratio 1.2 1.4 0.8 1.0
D50 (mm)
Riffle Length (ft)28.4 80.5 37.8 68.3 30.44 132.29
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.012 0.019 0.0095 0.031 0.028 0.045 0.007 0.0125 0.0098 0.0175 0.0155 0.0278 0.0040 0.0275 0.0101 0.0274 0.0055 0.0236
Pool Length (ft)44.5 96.5 38.7 108.9 40.92 99.41
Pool Max Depth (ft)3.5 5.8 4.7 5.8 2.6 5.4
Pool Spacing (ft)38 85 55 227 65 229 75 270 75 270 78 279 71 191 132 206 88 190
Pool Volume (ft3)
Channel Beltwidth (ft)63 82 77 94 45 210 45 210 47 217 45 154 48 108
Radius of Curvature (ft)25 59 39 58 34 70 60 210 60 120 62 124 60 96 63 77 82 124
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)1.0 1.8 1.6 2.3 1.3 2.4 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 2.9 2.2 2.5 2.9 3.9
Meander Length (ft)86 140 110 186 100 134 210 360 210 360 217 372 207 313 288 337 334 329
Meander Width Ratio 2.4 2.5 3.1 3.8 1.5 7.0 1.5 7.0 1.5 7.0 1.5 4.6 1.6 3.5
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2 0.46 0.51 0.69 0.74 1.21 1.23
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W/m2
Drainage Area (SM)
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
Rosgen Classification
Bankfull Velocity (fps)4.2 4.6 3.6 3.8 4.1 4.3 3.6 3.7
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Q-NFF regression (2-yr)
Q- NC Mountain Regional Curve (cfs)
Q-USGS extrapolation (1.2-yr)
Q-Mannings 199 211 188 204 199 231 219 232
Valley Length (ft)
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)0.0048 0.0058 0.0033 0.0057 0.0049 0.0058
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
SC: Silt/Clay <0.062 mm diameter particles
(---): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
1 Little Pine Reach 2b: Calculations only include reaches with a P1 or P2 approach
0.0057 0.0087 0.0089 ---0.0057 0.0082
1.04
0.0100 0.0050 0.0070 0.0111 0.0049 0.0072 0.0118
0.0089 0.0051 0.0074 0.0101
1.2 1.7 1.1 ---1.14 1.17 1.01 1.22 1.24
476
4,016 ---1,3501 1,0251 4812 1,444
------------------
1,083 493
213 235 ---------
---1,184 876
177 191 193
284 306 308
205 215 225
---------
4.4
<1%<1%<1%<1%<1%
C4 C4 C4
<1%<1%<1%<1%<1%
E/C5 C4 E4 C4 C5 C4C4
Additional Reach Parameters
N/A
3.9 4.3 4.4 4.4 3.9 4.3 4.4 3.9 4.3
4.0 4.4 5.1 3.8 4.0 4.1
205 215 225 224 205 215 225
134 122 289 99 123 174
0.22/1.0/37.9/111.8/160.7/256 0.38/21.6/47.4/122.3/208.8/362
0.85 0.66 2.43 0.56 0.75 1.20
0.22/0.48/2.0/88.2/146.7/362
---
2.0 ---3.1
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
N/A SC/4.5/10.2/61.2/143.4/>2048 SC/0.4/1.3/77.8/180.0/362 SC/0.5/18.4/79.2/143.4/256 ---
Pattern
N/A
57 ---89
---
---
------------
0.0239
------------
1.0 1.0
10.2 1.3 18.4 ------------50.7 87.6 47.4
>2.2 >2.2 >2.2 >2.2 >2.2 >2.2
---
---
---
------------------N/A
53.3 53.3 44.0 54.5 53.0 54.9
2.5
>2.2
1.6 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0
>200 >200
2.1 1.8 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.8
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
>200
N/A
3.7 2.2 3.1
31.0
11.6 16.1 10.2 16.5 17.0 17.5
2.5 2.5
>200 >200 >200 >200 >200 >200
24.9 29.0 21.4 30.0 30.0
Table 11a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Pre-Restoration Condition Reference Reach Data Design As-Built/Baseline
Little Pine Reach 2b Little Pine Reach 1 Little Pine Reach 2a Little Pine Reach 2b1Little Pine Reach 1 Little Pine Reach 2a Little Pine Reach 2b Meadow Fork Little Pine Reach 1 Little Pine Reach 2a
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
UT2, UT2b
Parameter Gage
Min Max Reach 2 Reach 3 Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Bankfull Width (ft)4.9 9.7 6.1 7.0 8.9 12.8
Floodprone Width (ft)5.4 29.9 49.3 41.0 17 195 15 30 21.5 >200
Bankfull Mean Depth 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.2 0.5 0.9
Bankfull Max Depth 2.3 1.9 1.10 2.10
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft2)5.9 8.6 8.7 8.5 4.2 12.0
Width/Depth Ratio 4.1 11.0 4.2 5.7 13.6 20.1
Entrenchment Ratio 1.1 3.1 8.1 5.9 1.5 16.8 2.5 5.1 2.0 >22.4
Bank Height Ratio 2.6 3.2 1.0 1.2
D50 (mm)44 53
Riffle Length (ft)10.7 25.0 16.8 29.3 4.4 23.0
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.012 0.083 0.0327-0.063 0.0092-0.068 0.0178 0.081 0.0404 0.0517 0.0512 0.0681 0.026 0.046 0.0436 0.0750 0.0360 0.0853 0.0262 0.0575 0.0448 0.0659
Pool Length (ft)5.0 22.3 13.3 46.3 3.1 14.3
Pool Max Depth (ft)2.2 2.5 1.9 5.0 1.6 3.2 0.6 2.1
Pool Spacing (ft)11.6 40.5 14-68 22-63 8 34 6.5 41.5 19 95 5 21 7 34 24 98 3 33
Pool Volume (ft3)
Channel Beltwidth (ft)49-52 120 45 68 61 66
Radius of Curvature (ft)10-48 8-27 29 39 19 63
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)1.6-7.9 1.1-3.9 2.5 3.4 2.1 4.9
Meander Length (ft)64-188 43-141 88 135 105 135
Meander Width Ratio 8.0-8.5 17.1 3.9 5.9 7 5
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2 0.83 1.69
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W/m2
Drainage Area (SM)0.29 0.31
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
Rosgen Classification E4b E4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)2.3 3.4 4.0 4.1 2.7 4.3
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Q-NFF regression (2-yr)
Q- NC Mountain Regional Curve (cfs)
Q-USGS extrapolation (1.2-yr)
Q-Mannings 11.2 51.0
Valley Length (ft)
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity 1.3 2.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)2 0.0290 0.0136
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)0.0363 0.028
SC: Silt/Clay <0.062 mm diameter particles
FS: Fine Sand 0.125-0.250mm diameter particles
(---): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
1entire length of UT2
2 UT2b: Calculations only include reach with a P2 approach
1.05 1.2 1.1
0.0536
0.0231 0.0616
0.0476 0.0667 ---0.0525 0.0280 0.0667 0.0563 0.0237
0.0436 0.0406 0.0433 0.0501 0.0239 0.0639 0.0560
231
1.1 ---1.05 1.20 1.04
52701 553 ---241
1.1
---------------------3,988
433 13184331264 253
35 43 8 ---------21 18.7
10 21 3
21 44 7
35 10
---------
20 35 10 20 20 35 10 20
C4b
0.31
B4a
3.2 ---4.5 4.6 4.7 4.1 5.1
<1%<1%
0.03
<1%<1%<1%<1%<1%<1%<1%<1%
Additional Reach Parameters
N/A
0.12 0.030 0.12 0.12 0.31 0.03 0.12
A4 F4b A/B4/1 B4a C4b B4a B4a
208 121 123 208 148 193
1.53 0.73 0.75 1.49 0.96 1.38 1.95 1.98
SC/5.9/10.7/21.5/36.7/90.0 SC/8.0/15/55.6/84.6/180.0 SC/11/16/52.6/128/180 ---0.25/11.0/27.6/96.0/143.4/256.0 0.78/28.5/41.6/85.0/123.3/180.0
---
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
N/A
---N/A ------------
N/A ---------
---N/A ---------------
---N/A ------
------
---N/A ---------------
---N/A ---------
Pattern
78
---
Profile
N/A
---------
------------------
---
------------
10.7 15 16.0 ------------56.9 43
1.3 2.4 10.9 3.5 2.4
5.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
3.7
22.6 8.7 18.5 17.7 16.8 13.0 12.2
3.1 18.1 4.4 7.6 2.1 5.1
2.0 0.7 0.95 0.55 1.0 0.9
0.4 1.4 0.49 0.65 0.35 0.6
10.6 31.0 98 28.4 15.9
UT2b2 UT2 Reach 1 Lower UT2 Reach 2 UT2b2
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
N/A
8.3 12.6 9.0 11.6
UT2 Reach 1 UT2 Reach 2/3 UT2b UT2a Reference UT2 Reach 1 Lower UT2 Reach 2
0.5
1.4 0.6
Table 11b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Pre-Restoration Condition Reference Reach Data Design As-Built/Baseline
5.9 8.1 6.7
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Dimension1,2 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6
Bankfull Elevation (ft)2,535.4 2,535.4 2,535.4 2,535.7 2535.8 2536.1 2536.2 2,533.2 2,533.2 2,533.2 2,533.5 2,534.0 2,534.4 2534.6 2,532.9 2,532.9 2,532.9 2,533.2 2,533.4 2,533.5 2533.0
Low Bank Elevation (ft)2,535.4 2,535.4 2,535.5 2,535.7 2535.9 2536.1 2535.8 2,533.2 2,533.2 2,533.1 2,533.5 2,534.0 2,534.4 2534.6 2,532.4 2,532.2 2,532.5 2,533.2 2,533.5 2,533.9 2533.7
Bankfull Width (ft)30.3 29.9 30.8 29.5 29.1 25.3 25.0 30.6 30.9 30.9 29.8 29.5 29.8 24.6 33.5 32.9 32.3 29.5 23.7 25.5 22.5
Floodprone Width (ft)132.9 135.1 135.1 >106 >106 >106 >106 --------------------->200 >200 >200 >215 >215 >214 >214
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.8 1.7 1.7 1.9 1.9 2.1 1.8 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.6 3.3 4.2 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.3 2.4 3.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2.7 2.8 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.7 3.5 4.3 3.9 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 6.3 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.5 3.5 4.4 4.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)53.5 49.8 52.8 55.9 55.6 54.2 44.3 68.0 65.9 66.9 69.4 76.0 97.0 103.2 52.2 51.8 52.2 53.6 54.7 61.8 67.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 17.1 18.0 18.0 15.6 15.3 11.8 14.1 ---------------------21.4 20.9 20.0 16.3 10.3 10.5 7.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 4.4 4.5 4.4 >3.6 >3.6 >4.2 >4.2 --------------------->6.0 >6.1 >6.2 >7.3 >9.1 >8.4 >9.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0 ---------------------<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2
Dimension1,2 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6
Bankfull Elevation (ft)2,527.4 2,527.4 2,527.4 2,527.3 2,527.1 2526.6 2,526.7 2,525.4 2,525.4 2,525.4 2,525.2 2,524.9 2,524.4 2524.5 2,524.8 2,524.8 2,524.8 2,524.4 2,525.2 2,524.8 2524.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft)2,527.4 2,527.5 2,527.5 2,527.7 2,527.8 2527.6 2,527.5 2,525.4 2,525.3 2,525.4 2,525.4 2,525.8 2,524.9 2525.1 2,524.8 2,524.5 2,524.7 2,524.4 2,525.2 2,524.8 2524.7
Bankfull Width (ft)29.1 29.3 28.5 31.0 27.9 25.4 24.4 30.7 31.3 31.0 31.4 31.5 29.2 31.2 35.4 35.5 35.4 27.7 32.7 26.9 26.2
Floodprone Width (ft)>200 >200 >200 >189 >189 >189 >189 >200 >200 >200 >90 >79.5 >93 >93 ---------------------
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.6 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.8 2.7 1.9 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.4 3.0 3.6 3.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2.6 2.6 2.9 3.9 4.1 4.4 4.3 3.9 3.6 3.5 3.6 5.4 3.6 3.6 5.7 5.1 5.3 4.6 5.5 6.2 6.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)46.6 46.4 49.8 57.8 62.6 71.1 66.8 56.9 56.7 58.2 63.1 82.3 72.2 73.1 93.4 83.6 86.5 67.4 98.7 97.4 86.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 18.1 18.5 16.2 16.6 12.5 9.1 8.9 16.6 17.2 16.5 15.6 12.0 11.8 13.3 ---------------------
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >6.9 >6.8 >7.0 >6.1 >6.8 >7.4 >7.7 >6.5 >6.4 >6.5 >2.9 >2.5 >3.2 >3.0 ---------------------
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 ---------------------
Dimension1,2 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6
Bankfull Elevation (ft)2,522.0 2,522.0 2,522.0 2,522.2 2,522.5 2,522.4 2522.3 2,520.1 2,520.1 2,520.1 2,519.9 2,519.7 2,519.5 2519.6 2,519.5 2,519.5 2,519.5 2,519.3 2,519.3 2,519.0 2519.0
Low Bank Elevation (ft)2,522.0 2,522.0 2,522.2 2,522.2 2,522.5 2,522.4 2522.3 2,520.1 2,520.1 2,520.2 2,520.3 2,520.4 2,520.3 2520.4 2,519.5 2,519.5 2,519.4 2,519.5 2,519.6 2,519.4 2519.4
Bankfull Width (ft)35.3 35.5 35.2 39.4 40.3 38.1 29.5 28.7 29.8 29.4 30.3 31.8 29.8 26.8 31.9 30.7 29.3 31.2 32.7 28.8 29.2
Floodprone Width (ft)--------------------->200 >200 >200 >121 >121 >121 >121 >200 >200 >200 >110 >110 >110 >110
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)2.9 2.8 2.8 2.5 2.6 2.6 3.2 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.7 2.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)5.4 5.6 5.4 5.4 5.5 5.5 5.5 3.4 3.6 3.4 4.2 4.5 4.7 4.6 3.1 3.2 3.0 3.7 3.9 4.2 4.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)103.7 100.0 97.2 96.9 104.8 98.1 94.0 58.8 61.2 59.8 68.3 77.5 77.4 77.7 64.2 62.3 60.2 67.4 74.3 76.6 73.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio ---------------------14.0 14.5 14.4 13.5 13.1 11.5 9.3 15.9 15.2 14.2 14.4 14.3 10.9 11.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio --------------------->7.0 >6.7 >6.8 >4.0 >3.8 >4.1 >4.5 >6.3 >6.5 >6.9 >3.5 >3.4 >3.8 >3.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio ---------------------1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1
---: not applicable1Prior to MY3, bankfull dimensions were calculated using a fixed bankfull elevation.
Cross-Section 9, Little Pine Reach 2b (Riffle)
2MY3-MY5 Bank Height Ratio is calculated based on the As-built (MY0) cross-sectional area as described in the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter document provided by NCIRT and NCDMS (9/2018). The remainder of the
bankfull dimensions are calculated based on the current year's low bank height. MY3 dimensions were updated in MY4.
Cross-Section 6, Little Pine Reach 2a (Pool)
Cross-Section 7, Little Pine Reach 2b (Pool)Cross-Section 8, Little Pine Reach 2b (Riffle)
Table 12a. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross-Section)
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Cross-Section 3, Little Pine Reach 1 (Riffle)Cross-Section 1, Little Pine Reach 1 (Riffle)Cross-Section 2, Little Pine Reach 1 (Pool)
Cross-Section 5, Little Pine Reach 2a (Riffle)Cross-Section 4, Little Pine Reach 2a (Riffle)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Dimension1,2 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6
Bankfull Elevation (ft)2,570.0 2,570.0 2,570.0 2,570.1 2,570.2 2,570.0 2,570.0 2,566.4 2,566.4 2,566.4 2,566.4 2,566.5 2,566.7 2,567.0 2,573.8 2,573.8 2,573.8 2,573.8 2,573.9 2,574.0 2,573.9
Low Bank Elevation (ft)2,570.0 2,569.7 2,570.0 2,570.1 2,570.2 2,570.0 2,570.0 2,566.4 2,566.4 2,566.2 2,566.3 2,566.3 2,566.4 2,566.3 2,573.8 2,573.7 2,573.7 2,573.9 2,573.8 2,573.9 2,574.0
Bankfull Width (ft)5.9 6.0 6.1 7.3 7.6 6.4 7.4 6.7 6.3 6.6 6.3 6.4 3.2 3.4 8.1 8.4 8.6 8.9 7.1 4.9 5.8
Floodprone Width (ft)---------------------15.9 17.7 17.9 14.3 14.1 14.9 14.2 28.4 30.0 30.0 31.4 29.5 32.7 34.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.0 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 1.0 0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.7 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.3 2.9 3.0 0.9 1.1 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.5 1.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)5.7 14.0 14.9 16.6 17.3 14.9 15.6 3.7 4.3 4.5 3.0 2.3 1.5 1.4 5.1 5.7 5.4 5.9 4.4 4.9 5.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio ---------------------12.2 9.1 9.6 13.2 17.9 6.7 7.8 13.0 12.5 13.9 13.4 11.5 4.8 6.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio ---------------------2.4 2.8 2.7 2.3 2.2 4.7 4.2 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.5 4.2 6.7 5.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio ---------------------1.0 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.1 <1.0 1.0 1.0
Dimension1,2 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6
Bankfull Elevation (ft)2,573.3 2,573.3 2,573.3 2,573.4 2,573.3 2,573.4 2,573.4 2,547.2 2,547.2 2,547.2 2,547.5 2,547.6 2,546.8 2,546.0 2,539.1 2,539.1 2,539.1 2,539.1 2,539.2 2,539.2 2,539.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft)2,573.3 2,573.3 2,573.3 2,573.4 2,573.3 2,573.4 2,573.4 2,547.2 2,547.2 2,547.1 2,547.4 2,547.7 2,547.4 2,547.8 2,539.1 2,539.0 2,539.2 2,539.1 2,539.2 2,539.2 2,539.3
Bankfull Width (ft)9.8 10.1 10.4 10.2 10.0 9.9 9.4 10.8 8.0 9.2 6.9 7.6 5.9 7.8 12.2 11.6 12.0 11.4 11.4 9.7 10.3
Floodprone Width (ft)---------------------21.5 23.2 23.5 25.0 25.0 26.0 26.0 ---------------------
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.3 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.7 1.6 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.5 2.3 1.5 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.9 2.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2.2 1.9 2.5 3.0 2.8 2.9 2.6 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 2.6 3.4 3.1 1.7 2.2 1.9 1.7 2.7 3.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)12.8 12.5 15.0 16.6 15.0 17.3 15.4 5.9 6.6 6.6 4.6 6.3 8.8 17.6 18.7 11.9 14.4 13.9 11.4 18.8 21.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio ---------------------20.1 9.7 13.0 10.5 9.3 3.9 3.5 ---------------------
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio ---------------------2.0 2.9 2.5 3.6 3.3 4.4 3.3 ---------------------
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio ---------------------1.0 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.0 1.3 2.1 ---------------------
Dimension1,2 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6
Bankfull Elevation (ft)2,535.0 2,535.0 2,535.0 2,535.4 2,535.5 2,535.3 2,535.6 2,531.2 2,531.2 2,531.2 2,531.2 2,531.3 2,532.0 2,531.9 2,530.4 2,530.4 2,530.4 2,530.0 2,530.4 2,530.5 2,530.6
Low Bank Elevation (ft)2,535.0 2,535.0 2,535.1 2,535.5 2,535.6 2,535.7 2,535.7 2,531.2 2,531.2 2,531.2 2,531.2 2,531.3 2,531.7 2,531.6 2,530.4 2,579.7 2,530.1 2,530.0 2,530.4 2,530.5 2,530.6
Bankfull Width (ft)8.9 10.0 6.9 8.7 6.4 7.1 6.9 12.8 12.9 13.6 12.6 11.2 10.4 10.9 19.3 19.5 21.4 8.5 8.8 7.3 9.6
Floodprone Width (ft)>200 >200 >200 >39.5 >40.6 >42 >41 >200 >200 >200 >71.0 >71.0 >71.0 >71 ---------------------
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.5 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.1 0.8 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.1 2.1 1.8 1.9 2.1 1.9 1.2 1.3 2.0 2.3 2.1 2.4 2.0 1.5 1.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)4.2 5.0 2.8 4.9 4.8 6.7 4.6 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 11.4 8.3 8.8 15.8 16.3 16.9 8.9 8.5 8.4 9.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 19.2 19.9 17.1 15.6 8.5 7.4 10.5 13.6 13.8 15.4 13.2 11.0 13.0 13.5 ---------------------
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >22.4 >20.0 >28.9 >4.5 >6.3 >6.0 >5.9 >15.7 >15.5 >14.7 >5.6 >6.3 >6.8 >6.5 ---------------------
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 ---------------------
---: not applicable1Prior to MY3, bankfull dimensions were calculated using a fixed bankfull elevation.
2MY3-MY5 Bank Height Ratio is calculated based on the As-built (MY0) cross-sectional area as described in the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter document provided by NCIRT and NCDMS (9/2018). The remainder of the
bankfull dimensions are calculated based on the current year's low bank height. MY3 dimensions were updated in MY4.
Cross-Section 16, UT2 Reach 2 (Riffle)Cross-Section 17, UT2 Reach 2 (Riffle)
Cross-Section 15, UT2 Reach 2 (Pool)
Table 12b. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross-Section)
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Cross-Section 12, UT2 Reach 1 Lower (Riffle)
Cross-Section 18, UT2 Reach 2 (Pool)
Cross-Section 14, UT2 Reach 2 (Riffle)Cross-Section 13, UT2 Reach 1 Lower (Pool)
Cross-Section 10, UT2b (Pool)Cross-Section 11, UT2b (Riffle)
Table 13a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Little Pine Reach 1
Parameter
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Bankfull Width (ft)30.3 33.5 29.9 32.9 30.8 32.3 29.5 29.5 23.7 29.1 25.3 25.5 22.5 25.0
Floodprone Width (ft)133 >200 135 >200 135 >200 >106 >215 >106 >215 >106 >215 >106 >215
Bankfull Mean Depth 1.6 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.3 2.1 2.4 1.8 3.0
Bankfull Max Depth 2.7 3.2 2.8 3.1 3.0 3.2 3.1 3.5 3.1 3.5 3.7 4.4 3.5 4.5
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft2)52.2 53.5 49.8 51.8 52.2 52.8 53.6 55.9 54.7 55.6 54.2 61.8 44.3 67.0
Width/Depth Ratio 17.1 21.4 18 20.9 18 20 15.6 16.3 10.3 15.3 10.5 11.8 7.6 14.1
Entrenchment Ratio 4.4 >6.0 4.5 >6.1 4.4 >6.2 >3.6 >6.9 >3.6 >9.1 >4.2 >8.4 >4.2 >9.5
Bank Height Ratio 0.8 1.0 0.8 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 <1.0 1.2
D50 (mm)
Riffle Length (ft)28 81 21 47 32 76 12 50 20 96 33 70 28 65
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.0040 0.0275 0.0064 0.0283 0.0052 0.0183 0.0029 0.0191 0.0067 0.0280 0.0013 0.0205 0.0032 0.0248
Pool Length (ft)44 96 66 176 49 177 58 176 63 166 36 182 42 216
Pool Max Depth (ft)3.5 5.8 3.0 4.7 3.9 6.2 4.2 5.8 4.1 6.4 3.9 6.5 3.6 6.5
Pool Spacing (ft)71 191 77 224 94 210 81 225 73 223 83 213 82 226
Pool Volume (ft3)
Channel Beltwidth (ft)45 154
Radius of Curvature (ft)60 96
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)2.0 2.9
Meander Wave Length (ft)207 313
Meander Width Ratio 1.5 4.6
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0.9/6.6/19.0/90.6/152.4/512
2%
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Profile
Pattern
Additional Reach Parameters
0.0057
0.00440.0059 0.0054
2%
MY6
42.5
C4
1,444
6%
0.1/0.2/8.7/77.7/113.6/180 0.4/1.8/23.8/87.8/151.8/1024
3%0%0%1%
0.0054
1.22
0.35/7.45/16/90/128/180
0.0051 0.0043 0.0045 0.0048
0.22/0.48/2.0/88/147/362 0.22/3.4/22/81/123/362 0.13/0.38/11/789/180/1024
0.0049 0.0049 0.0050 0.0049 0.0060
45.0
C4 C4
48.5 26.9 45.0
1,444 1,444
C4 C4
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
50.7 56.9
MY3 MY4 MY5MY1MY2As-Built/Baseline
1.0 1.0
C4
1,444
C4
1,4441,444 1,444
Table 13b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Little Pine Reach 2a
Parameter
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Bankfull Width (ft)29.1 30.7 29.3 31.3 28.5 31.0 31.0 31.4 27.9 31.5 25.4 29.2 24.4 31.2
Floodprone Width (ft)>90 >189 >79.5 >189 >93 >189 >93 >189
Bankfull Mean Depth 1.6 1.9 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.6 2.5 2.8 2.3 2.7
Bankfull Max Depth 2.6 3.9 2.6 3.6 2.9 3.5 3.6 3.9 4.1 5.4 3.6 4.4 3.6 4.3
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft2)46.6 56.9 46.4 56.7 49.8 58.2 57.8 63.1 62.6 82.3 71.1 72.2 66.8 73.1
Width/Depth Ratio 16.6 18.1 17.2 18.5 16.2 16.5 15.6 16.6 12.0 12.5 9.1 11.8 8.9 13.3
Entrenchment Ratio >6.5 >6.9 >6.4 >6.8 >6.5 >7.0 >2.9 >6.1 >2.5 >6.8 >3.2 >7.4 >3.0 >7.0
Bank Height Ratio 1.2 1.3
D50 (mm)
Riffle Length (ft)38 68 19 49 27 55 26 54 29 60 22 55 14 62
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.0101 0.0274 0.0112 0.0471 0.0143 0.0280 0.0139 0.0300 0.0065 0.0316 0.0015 0.0247 0.0177 0.0238
Pool Length (ft)39 109 39 145 66 186 84 178 77 218 69 185 87 214
Pool Max Depth (ft)4.7 5.8 4.3 6.6 4.0 6.7 4.3 6.0 4.2 6.7 4.7 7.5 4.3 8.5
Pool Spacing (ft)132 206 78 206 121 279 57 263 96 268 74 252 89 303
Pool Volume (ft3)
Channel Beltwidth (ft)48 108
Radius of Curvature (ft)63 77
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)2.2 2.5
Meander Wave Length (ft)288 337
Meander Width Ratio 1.6 3.5
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
% of Reach with Eroding Banks 3%
Profile
Pattern
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Additional Reach Parameters
1.2
0.0082
0.0073
0.4/8.2/24.2/116.6/203.6/512
74.8
C4
1,083
3%
0.22/1.0/38/112/161/256 0.29/11/36/90/157/1024 0.21/12.5/523/121/168/1024 0.32/6.7/49.8/136/274/512 0.2/0.6/24.7/103.6/161.1/256 0.3/12.8/45/153.5/227.6/362
0%0%2%3%5%
0.0073
0.0072 0.0073 0.0075 0.0074 0.0076 0.0076
0.0074 0.0059 0.0067 0.0070 0.0070
1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083 1,083
1.24
1.0 1.0
87.6
C4 C4 C4 C4 C4 C4
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
MY4 MY5MY2MY3As-Built/Baseline MY1 MY6
64.0
>200 >200 >200
1.2
72.172.4 75.9
1.0 1.1
85.0
Table 13c. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Little Pine Reach 2b
Parameter
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Bankfull Width (ft)28.7 31.9 29.8 30.7 29.3 29.4 30.3 31.2 31.8 32.7 28.8 29.8 26.8 29.2
Floodprone Width (ft)>110 >121 >110 >121 >110 >121 >110 >121
Bankfull Mean Depth 2.0 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.9
Bankfull Max Depth 3.1 3.4 3.2 3.6 3.0 3.4 3.7 4.2 3.9 4.5 4.2 4.7 4.0 4.6
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft2)58.8 64.2 61.2 62.3 59.8 60.2 67.4 68.3 74.3 77.5 76.6 77.4 73.9 77.7
Width/Depth Ratio 14.0 15.9 14.5 15.2 14.2 14.4 13.5 14.4 13.1 14.3 10.9 11.5 9.3 11.5
Entrenchment Ratio >6.3 >7 >6.5 >6.7 >6.8 >6.9 >3.5 >4.0 >3.4 >3.8 >3.8 >4.1 >3.8 >4.5
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2
D50 (mm)
Riffle Length (ft)30 132 26 102 26 44 35 59 28 85 20 52 49 55
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.0055 0.0236 0.0169 0.0254 0.0116 0.0177 0.0040 0.0133 0.0070 0.0242 0.0062 0.0218 0.0024 0.0227
Pool Length (ft)41 99 55 153 26 149 24 152 76 140 55 152 71 151
Pool Max Depth (ft)2.6 5.4 3.8 6.3 3.7 5.0 3.6 5.5 4.3 6.8 4.4 6.6 5.1 5.9
Pool Spacing (ft)88 190 12 129 8 175 69 162 80 287 52 191 51 196
Pool Volume (ft3)
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)82 124
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)2.9 3.9
Meander Wave Length (ft)334 329
Meander Width Ratio
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
% of Reach with Eroding Banks 10%
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Profile
Pattern
Additional Reach Parameters
0.0123
0.0114
1.3/6.4/14.4/132.1/208.8/362
47.7
C4
493
7%
0.4/2.0/22.6/107.3/168.1/362
0%0%0%3%6%
0.38/22/47/122/209/362 0.22/10/29/111/171/362 0.3/8.0/29.0/107.3/180/362 0.71/5.6/28/93/152/512 0.2/1.0/8.9/94.5/136.1/256
0.0096
0.0118 0.0101 0.0082 0.0105 0.0121 0.0118
0.0101 0.0107 0.0103 0.0102 0.0101
493 493 493 493 493 493
1.04
C4 C4 C4 C4 C4 C4
89
3.1
1.0 1.0
47.4 72.0 70.2
1.0
62.1 65.7 56.1
>200 >200
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
MY4 MY5MY2MY3As-Built/Baseline MY1
>200
MY6
Table 13d. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
UT2 Reach 1 Lower
Parameter
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfull Max Depth
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft2)
Width/Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Bank Height Ratio
D50 (mm)
Riffle Length (ft)11 25 13 39 5 24 6 20 10 22 6 38 7 53
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.0360 0.0853 0.0136 0.0730 0.0253 0.0793 0.0109 0.0624 0.0234 0.0884 0.0255 0.1066 0.0081 0.1588
Pool Length (ft)5 22 2 15 4 17 5 21 2 25 3 18 5 37
Pool Max Depth (ft)1.9 5.0 1.0 2.9 2.0 3.8 1.1 3.5 1.4 2.6 0.9 2.5 1.1 3.2
Pool Spacing (ft)7 34 8 52 6 53 6 34 7 140 5 69 5 117
Pool Volume (ft3)
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
6.3/17.7/29.8/131.7/180/256
8%
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Profile
Pattern
Additional Reach Parameters
MY6
35.6
B4a
433
0.0455
0.0461
1.2
5.4
13.9
3.5
0.9
6%
0.0484
B4a B4a B4a B4a B4a B4a
---
---
---
---
433 433 433 433 433 433
1.05
---
0.25/11/28/96/143/256 6.1/14/23/75/153/256 0.7/11/28/76/118/256 1.2/18/37/113/180/362 1.6/23.8/35.1/94.3/122.1/256 17.7/34.1/47.3/123/175/362
0%6%2%1%6%
0.0560 0.0477 0.0481 0.0475 0.0502 0.0509
0.0563 0.0483 0.0485 0.0455 0.0451
1.0 1.3
39.8
3.5 3.6
56.9
5.1
13.0
1.0 1.0
5.7
12.5
38.7 43.8
1.4
5.9
13.4
3.5
1.1
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
MY4 MY5
0.6
As-Built/Baseline MY1
8.1 8.4 8.9
31.4
0.7
MY2 MY3
30.0
0.7
28.4
8.6
30.0
0.6
7.1
29.5
0.6
42.9
4.9
32.7
1.0
1.5
4.9
4.8
6.7
1.0
26.3
5.8
34.1
0.9
1.8
5.4
6.2
5.9
1.0
1.2
4.4
11.5
4.2
<1.0
Table 13e. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
UT2 Reach 2
Parameter
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Bankfull Width (ft)8.9 12.8 8.0 12.9 6.9 13.6 6.9 12.6 6.4 11.2 5.9 10.4 6.9 10.9
Floodprone Width (ft)22 >200 23 >200 24 >200 25 >71 25 >71 26 >71 26 26
Bankfull Mean Depth 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.4 0.9 0.6 1.0 0.8 1.0 0.8 1.5 0.7 2.3
Bankfull Max Depth 1.1 2.1 0.8 1.8 0.6 1.9 0.9 2.1 1.2 1.9 1.2 2.6 1.1 3.4
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft2)4.2 12.0 5.0 12.0 2.8 12.0 4.6 12.0 4.8 11.4 6.7 8.8 4.6 17.6
Width/Depth Ratio 13.6 20.1 9.7 19.9 13.0 17.1 10.5 15.6 8.5 11.0 3.9 13.0 3.5 13.5
Entrenchment Ratio 2.0 >22.4 2.9 >20.0 2.5 >28.9 3.6 >5.6 3.3 >6.3 4.4 >6.8 3.3 >6.5
Bank Height Ratio 0.9 1.2 <1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.4 <1.0 2.1
D50 (mm)44 53 15 90 34.5 34.8 45.0 48.2 32.0 39.3 29.8 36.4 22.0 27.9
Riffle Length (ft)17 29 10 36 5 62 4 68 6 36 6 56 4 31
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.0262 0.0575 0.0141 0.0658 0.0093 0.0773 0.0122 0.1161 0.0111 0.0725 0.0046 0.0811 0.0063 0.0895
Pool Length (ft)13 46 4 40 6 35 4 39 6 67 6 41 4 52
Pool Max Depth (ft)1.6 3.2 1.5 3.8 1.1 4.6 1.9 4.8 1.5 3.2 1.6 3.7 1.5 3.7
Pool Spacing (ft)24 98 8 113 10 207 7 156 3 162 15 160 4 156
Pool Volume (ft3)
Channel Beltwidth (ft)61 66
Radius of Curvature (ft)19 63
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)2.1 4.9
Meander Wave Length (ft)105 135
Meander Width Ratio 7 5
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
% of Reach with Eroding Banks 5%
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Profile
Pattern
Additional Reach Parameters
0.0248
0.0235
6.3/17.7/29.8/131.7/180/256
C4b
1,318
4%
17.7/34.1/47.3/123/175/362
0%0%4%7%2%
0.25/11/28/96/143/256 6.1/14/23/75/153/256 0.7/11/28/76/118/256 1.2/18/37/113/180/362 1.6/23.8/35.1/94.3/122.1/256
0.0232
0.0231 0.0225 0.0235 0.0240 0.0249
0.0237 0.0214 0.0245 0.0241
0.0237
0.0247
1,318 1,318 1,318 1,318 1,318 1,318
1.2
C4bC4bC4bC4bC4bC4b
1.0 1.0
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
MY5MY2MY3As-Built/Baseline MY1 MY4 MY6
Table 13f. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
UT2b
Parameter
Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max Min Max
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth
Bankfull Max Depth
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft2)
Width/Depth Ratio
Entrenchment Ratio
Bank Height Ratio
D50 (mm)
Riffle Length (ft)4 23 7 24 7 25 6 32 5 21 4 45 5 46
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)0.0448 0.0659 0.0276 0.0451 0.0127 0.0702 0.0125 0.0494 0.0117 0.0394 0.0160 0.0499 0.0007 0.0422
Pool Length (ft)3 14 3 8 4 15 3 11 3 9 3 12 4 11
Pool Max Depth (ft)0.6 2.1 2.0 3.9 0.8 3.8 0.9 4.0 0.7 3.5 1.0 3.3 1.0 3.2
Pool Spacing (ft)3 33 4 30 3 30 2 32 3 30 2 30 5 52
Pool Volume (ft3)
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Rosgen Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
11/11.6/18.2/76.6/135.9/180
4%
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Profile
Pattern
Additional Reach Parameters
MY6
20.7
B4a
253
0.0621
0.0604
4%
0.78/29/42/85/123/180 0.28/7.4/23/82/128/362 0.5/13/26/87/143/256 0.50/6.7/14/100/161/256 8.9/20.6/29.8/81.3/119.3/180 5.3/17.5/32.4/101.8/158.7/256
0%0%0%0%0%
0.0599
0.0616 0.0614 0.0557 0.0608 0.0610 0.0591
0.0536 0.0608 0.0612 0.0612 0.0602
B4a B4a B4a B4a B4a
253 253 253 253 253 253
1.10
B4a
---
---
---
---
---
43.0 35.9 32.0 24.423.5 10.5
MY2 MY3
6.6
17.9
0.7
1.1
6.3
14.3
0.5
0.8
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
2.4 2.8
As-Built/Baseline MY1
6.7
15.9
3.7
12.2
6.3
17.7
0.7
1.1
4.3
9.1
4.5
9.6
2.7
MY4 MY5
0.5
0.9
3.4
14.2
0.4
0.8
1.4
7.8
4.2
<1.0
3.2
14.9
0.5
0.8
1.5
6.7
4.7
<1.01.0 1.0
3.0
13.2
2.3
<1.00.9
6.4
14.1
0.4
0.8
2.3
17.9
<1.0
2.2
DMS Project No. 94903
1 Profile stationing derived from as-built thalweg alignment.
2 Stream repairs completed in fall 2020 on Little Pine Creek Reach 1 (STA 100+43 to 101+75) and Reach 2a (STA 121+25 to 122+50).
Longitudinal Profile Plots (MY0 - MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Little Pine Reach 1 (STA 100+00 - 114+44)
XS
1
2527
2532
2537
2542
10000 10050 10100 10150 10200 10250 10300 10350 10400 10450 10500 10550 10600 10650 10700 10750
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)1
TW (MY0-4/2016)TW (MY1-10/2016)TW (MY2-5/2017)TW (MY3-6/2018)TW (MY4-5/2019)TW (MY5-12/2020)TW (MY6-11/2021)WSF (MY6-11/2021)BKF (MY6-11/2021)STRUCTURE (MY6-11/2021)
XS
2
XS
3
End Little Pine Reach 1
Begin Little Pine Reach 2a
2522
2527
2532
2537
10750 10800 10850 10900 10950 11000 11050 11100 11150 11200 11250 11300 11350 11400 11450 11500
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)1
TW (MY0-4/2016)TW (MY1-10/2016)TW (MY2-5/2017)TW (MY3-6/2018)TW (MY4-5/2019)TW (MY5-12/2020)TW (MY6-11/2021)WSF (MY6-11/2021)BKF (MY6-11/2021)STRUCTURE (MY6-11/2021)
DMS Project No. 94903
1 Profile stationing derived from as-built thalweg alignment.
2 Stream repairs completed in fall 2020 on Little Pine Creek Reach 1 (STA 100+43 to 101+75) and Reach 2a (STA 121+25 to 122+50).
Longitudinal Profile Plots (MY0 - MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Little Pine Reach 2a (114+44-125+27) and Reach 2b (125+27-130+20)
End Reach 1
Begin Reach 2a
XS
4
2519
2524
2529
2534
11400 11450 11500 11550 11600 11650 11700 11750 11800 11850 11900 11950 12000 12050 12100 12150 12200 12250
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)1
TW (MY0-4/2016)TW (MY1-10/2016)TW (MY2-5/2017)TW (MY3-6/2018)TW (MY4-5/2019)TW (MY5-12/2020)TW (MY6-11/2021)WSF (MY6-11/2021)BKF (MY6-11/2021)STRUCTURE (MY6-11/2021)
XS
7
XS
9
XS
5
End Reach 2a
Begin Reach 2b
End Reach 2b Restoration
Begin Reach 2b Enhancement II
XS
6
XS
8
2512
2517
2522
2527
12250 12300 12350 12400 12450 12500 12550 12600 12650 12700 12750 12800 12850 12900 12950 13000 13050
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)1
TW (MY0-4/2016)TW (MY1-10/2016)TW (MY2-5/2017)TW (MY3-6/2018)TW (MY4-5/2019)TW (MY5-12/2020)TW (MY6-11/2021)WSF (MY6-11/2021)BKF (MY6-11/2021)STRUCTURE (MY6-11/2021)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
1 Profile stationing derived from as-built thalweg alignment.
Longitudinal Profile Plots (MY0 - MY6)
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
UT2 Reach 1 Upper (STA 297+18 - 325+67)
2705
2710
2715
2720
30220 30235 30250 30265 30280 30295 30310 30325 30340 30355 30370 30385 30400
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)1
TW (MY0-4/2016)TW (MY1-10/2016)TW (MY2-5/2017)TW (MY3-6/2018)TW (MY4-5/2019)TW (MY5-12/2020)TW (MY6-11/2021)WSF (MY6-11/2021)BKF (MY6-11/2021)STRUCTURE (MY6-11/2021)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
1 Profile stationing derived from as-built thalweg alignment.
Longitudinal Profile Plots (MY0 - MY6)
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
UT2 Reach 1 Upper (STA 297+18 - 325+67)
End UT2 Reach 1 Upper
2678
2680
2682
2684
2686
2688
2690
30915 30930 30945 30960 30975 30990 31005 31020 31035 31050 31065
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)1
TW (MY0-4/2016)TW (MY1-10/2016)TW (MY2-5/2017)TW (MY3-6/2018)TW (MY4-5/2019)TW (MY5-12/2020)TW (MY6-11/2021)WSF (MY6-11/2021)BKF (MY6-11/2021)STRUCTURE (MY6-11/2021)
Culvert inlet Culvert outlet
2685
2687
2689
2691
2693
2695
2697
30765 30780 30795 30810 30825 30840 30855 30870 30885 30900 30915
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)1
TW (MY0-4/2016)TW (MY1-10/2016)TW (MY2-5/2017)TW (MY3-6/2018)TW (MY4-5/2019)TW (MY5-12/2020)TW (MY6-11/2021)WSF (MY6-11/2021)BKF (MY6-11/2021)STRUCTURE (MY6-11/2021)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
1 Profile stationing derived from as-built thalweg alignment.
Longitudinal Profile Plots (MY0 - MY6)
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
UT2 Reach 1 Lower (STA 325+67 - 330+00)
Begin UT2 Reach 1 Lower
Culvert inlet Culvert outlet
2571
2576
2581
2586
32550 32565 32580 32595 32610 32625 32640 32655 32670 32685 32700 32715 32730 32745
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)1
TW (MY0-4/2016)TW (MY1-10/2016)TW (MY2-5/2017)TW (MY3-6/2018)TW (MY4-12/2019)TW (MY5-12/2020)TW (MY6-11/2021)WSF (MY6-11/2021)BKF (MY6-11/2021)STRUCTURE (MY6-11/2021)
XS
1
2
XS
1
3
2560
2565
2570
2575
32745 32760 32775 32790 32805 32820 32835 32850 32865 32880 32895 32910 32925 32940
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)1
TW (MY0-4/2016)TW (MY1-10/2016)TW (MY2-5/2017)TW (MY3-6/2018)TW (MY4-12/2019)TW (MY5-12/2020)TW (MY6-11/2021)WSF (MY6-11/2021)BKF (MY6-11/2021)STRUCTURE (MY6-11/2021)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
1 Profile stationing derived from as-built thalweg alignment.
2 Stream repairs completed in September 2019 on UT2 Reach 2 STA 332+25 to 339+15.
Longitudinal Profile Plots (MY0 - MY6)
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
UT2 Reach 2 (STA 330+00 - 343+18)
XS
1
4
2540
2545
2550
2555
33350 33365 33380 33395 33410 33425 33440 33455 33470 33485 33500 33515 33530 33545
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)1,2
TW (MY0-4/2016)TW (MY1-10/2016)TW (MY2-5/2017)TW (MY3-6/2018)TW (MY4-12/2019)TW (MY5-12/2020)TW (MY6-11/2021)WSF (MY6-11/2021)BKF (MY6-11/2021)STRUCTURE (MY6-11/2021)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
1 Profile stationing derived from as-built thalweg alignment.
2 Stream repairs completed in September 2019 on UT2 Reach 2 STA 332+25 to 339+15.
Longitudinal Profile Plots (MY0 - MY6)
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
UT2 Reach 2 (STA 330+00 - 343+18)
XS
1
5
XS
1
6
2530
2535
2540
2545
33600 33630 33660 33690 33720 33750 33780 33810 33840 33870 33900 33930 33960 33990
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)1,2
TW (MY0-4/2016)TW (MY1-10/2016)TW (MY2-5/2017)TW (MY3-6/2018)TW (MY4-12/2019)TW (MY5-12/2020)TW (MY6-11/2021)WSF (MY6-11/2021)BKF (MY6-11/2021)STRUCTURE (MY6-11/2021)
XS
1
7
XS
1
8
Culvert inlet Culvert outlet
2520
2525
2530
2535
33990 34020 34050 34080 34110 34140 34170 34200 34230 34260 34290 34320 34350 34380
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)1,2
TW (MY0-4/2016)TW (MY1-10/2016)TW (MY2-5/2017)TW (MY3-6/2018)TW (MY4-12/2019)TW (MY5-12/2020)TW (MY6-11/2021)WSF (MY6-11/2021)BKF (MY6-11/2021)STRUCTURE (MY6-11/2021)
DMS Project No. 94903
1 Profile stationing derived from as-built thalweg alignment.
UT2b (STA 503+00 - 505+53)
Longitudinal Profile Plots (MY0 - MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Begin UT2b Restoration
2565
2570
2575
2580
50300 50310 50320 50330 50340 50350 50360 50370 50380 50390 50400 50410 50420 50430
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)1
TW (MY0-4/2016)TW (MY1-10/2016)TW (MY2-5/2017)TW (MY3-6/2018)TW (MY4-5/2019)TW (MY5-12/2020)TW (MY6-11/2021)WSF (MY6-11/2021)BKF (MY6-11/2021)STRUCTURE (MY6-11/2021)
XS
1
0
XS
1
1
2562
2564
2566
2568
2570
2572
50430 50440 50450 50460 50470 50480 50490 50500 50510 50520 50530 50540 50550 50560
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)1
TW (MY0-4/2016)TW (MY1-10/2016)TW (MY2-5/2017)TW (MY3-6/2018)TW (MY4-5/2019)TW (MY5-12/2020)TW (MY6-11/2021)WSF (MY6-11/2021)BKF (MY6-11/2021)STRUCTURE (MY6-11/2021)
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section 1- Little Pine Reach 1
Bankfull Dimensions
44.3 x-section area (ft.sq.)
25.0 width (ft)
1.8 mean depth (ft)
3.5 max depth (ft)
29.5 wetted perimeter (ft)
1.5 hydraulic radius (ft)
14.1 width-depth ratio
105.5 W flood prone area (ft)
4.2 entrenchment ratio
0.9 low bank height ratio
Survey Date:11/2021
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
Cross-Section Plots (MY0 - MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
View Downstream
2530
2532
2534
2536
2538
2540
2542
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
103+99 Riffle
MY0 (5/2016)MY1 (10/2016)MY2 (5/2017)MY3 (6/2018)
MY4 (5/2019)MY5 (12/2020)MY6 (11/2021)Bankfull
Floodprone Area MY0 BKF XS Area Elevation
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section 2- Little Pine Reach 1
Bankfull Dimensions
103.2 x-section area (ft.sq.)
24.6 width (ft)
4.2 mean depth (ft)
6.3 max depth (ft)
30.2 wetted perimeter (ft)
3.4 hydraulic radius (ft)
5.8 width-depth ratio
Survey Date:11/2021
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
Cross-Section Plots (MY0 - MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
View Downstream
2527
2529
2531
2533
2535
2537
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
108+73 Pool
MY0 (5/2016)MY1 (10/2016)MY2 (5/2017)MY3 (6/2018)MY4 (5/2019)MY5 (12/2020)MY6 (11/2021)Bankfull
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section 3- Little Pine Reach 1
Bankfull Dimensions
67.0 x-section area (ft.sq.)
22.5 width (ft)
3.0 mean depth (ft)
4.5 max depth (ft)
26.7 wetted perimeter (ft)
2.5 hydraulic radius (ft)
7.6 width-depth ratio
214.1 W flood prone area (ft)
9.5 entrenchment ratio
1.2 low bank height ratio
Survey Date:11/2021
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Cross-Section Plots (MY0 - MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
2529
2531
2533
2535
2537
2539
80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
109+26 Riffle
MY0 (5/2016)MY1 (10/2016)MY2 (5/2017)MY3 (6/2018)
MY4 (5/2019)MY5 (12/2020)MY6 (11/2021)Bankfull
Floodprone Area MY0 BKF XS Area Elevation
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section 4 - Little Pine Reach 2a
Bankfull Dimensions
66.8 x-section area (ft.sq.)
24.4 width (ft)
2.7 mean depth (ft)
4.3 max depth (ft)
28.7 wetted perimeter (ft)
2.3 hydraulic radius (ft)
8.9 width-depth ratio
188.7 W flood prone area (ft)
7.7 entrenchment ratio
1.2 low bank height ratio
Survey Date:11/2021
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
Cross-Section Plots (MY0 - MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
2522
2524
2526
2528
2530
2532
2534
50 60 70 80 90 100 110
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
118+14 Riffle
MY0 (5/2016)MY1 (10/2016)MY2 (5/2017)MY3 (6/2018)
MY4 (5/2019)MY5 (12/2020)MY6 (11/2021)Bankfull
Floodprone Area MY0 BKF XS Area Elevation
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section 5- Little Pine Reach 2a
Bankfull Dimensions
73.1 x-section area (ft.sq.)
31.2 width (ft)
2.3 mean depth (ft)
3.6 max depth (ft)
32.7 wetted perimeter (ft)
2.2 hydraulic radius (ft)
13.3 width-depth ratio
93.1 W flood prone area (ft)
3.0 entrenchment ratio
1.2 low bank height ratio
Survey Date:11/2021
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
Cross-Section Plots (MY0 - MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
View Downstream
2519
2521
2523
2525
2527
2529
2531
30 40 50 60 70 80 90
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
121+50 Riffle
MY0 (5/2016)MY1 (10/2016)MY2 (5/2017)MY3 (6/2018)
MY4 (5/2019)MY5 (12/2020)MY6 (11/2021)Bankfull
Floodprone Area MY0 BKF XS Area Elevation
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section 6- Little Pine Reach 2a
Bankfull Dimensions
86.8 x-section area (ft.sq.)
26.2 width (ft)
3.3 mean depth (ft)
6.6 max depth (ft)
31.2 wetted perimeter (ft)
2.8 hydraulic radius (ft)
7.9 width-depth ratio
Survey Date:11/2021
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
Cross-Section Plots (MY0 - MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
2517
2519
2521
2523
2525
2527
2529
2531
2533
50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
122+32 Pool
MY0 (5/2016)MY1 (10/2016)MY2 (5/2017)MY3 (6/2018)MY4 (5/2019)MY5 (12/2020)MY6 (11/2021)Bankfull
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section 7 - Little Pine Reach 2b
Bankfull Dimensions
94.0 x-section area (ft.sq.)
29.5 width (ft)
3.2 mean depth (ft)
5.5 max depth (ft)
33.6 wetted perimeter (ft)
2.8 hydraulic radius (ft)
9.3 width-depth ratio
Survey Date:6/2021
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
Cross-Section Plots (MY0 - MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
View Downstream
2515
2517
2519
2521
2523
2525
2527
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
125+35 Pool
MY0 (5/2016)MY1 (10/2016)MY2 (5/2017)MY3 (6/2018)MY4 (5/2019)MY5 (12/2020)MY6 (6/2021)Bankfull
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section 8 - Little Pine Reach 2b
Bankfull Dimensions
77.7 x-section area (ft.sq.)
26.8 width (ft)
2.9 mean depth (ft)
4.6 max depth (ft)
30.2 wetted perimeter (ft)
2.6 hydraulic radius (ft)
9.3 width-depth ratio
121.4 W flood prone area (ft)
4.5 entrenchment ratio
1.2 low bank height ratio
Survey Date:6/2021
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
Cross-Section Plots (MY0 - MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
View Downstream
2514
2516
2518
2520
2522
2524
2526
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
126+94 Riffle
MY0 (5/2016)MY1 (10/2016)MY2 (5/2017)MY3 (6/2018)
MY4 (5/2019)MY5 (12/2020)MY6 (6/2021)Bankfull
Floodprone Area MY0 BKF XS Area Elevation
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section 9 - Little Pine Reach 2b
Bankfull Dimensions
73.9 x-section area (ft.sq.)
29.2 width (ft)
2.5 mean depth (ft)
4.0 max depth (ft)
32.1 wetted perimeter (ft)
2.3 hydraulic radius (ft)
11.5 width-depth ratio
110.0 W flood prone area (ft)
3.8 entrenchment ratio
1.1 low bank height ratio
Survey Date:6/2021
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Cross-Section Plots (MY0 - MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
2512
2514
2516
2518
2520
2522
2524
2526
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
127+80 Riffle
MY0 (5/2016)MY1 (10/2016)MY2 (5/2017)MY3 (6/2018)
MY4 (5/2019)MY5 (12/2020)MY6 (6/2021)Bankfull
Floodprone Area MY0 BKF XS Area Elevation
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section 10 - UT2b
Bankfull Dimensions
15.6 x-section area (ft.sq.)
7.4 width (ft)
2.1 mean depth (ft)
3.0 max depth (ft)
10.1 wetted perimeter (ft)
1.5 hydraulic radius (ft)
3.5 width-depth ratio
Survey Date:6/2021
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
Cross-Section Plots (MY0 - MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
2566
2568
2570
2572
2574
2576
0 10 20 30
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
504+23 Pool
MY0 (5/2016)MY1 (10/2016)MY2 (5/2017)MY3 (6/2018)MY4 (5/2019)MY5 (12/2020)MY6 (6/2021)Bankfull
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section 11 - UT2b
Bankfull Dimensions
1.4 x-section area (ft.sq.)
3.4 width (ft)
0.4 mean depth (ft)
0.8 max depth (ft)
4.0 wetted perimeter (ft)
0.4 hydraulic radius (ft)
7.8 width-depth ratio
14.2 W flood prone area (ft)
4.2 entrenchment ratio
0.5 low bank height ratio
Survey Date:6/2021
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
Cross-Section Plots (MY0 - MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
2565
2566
2567
2568
2569
5 15 25 35
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
504+89 Riffle
MY0 (5/2016)MY1 (10/2016)MY2 (5/2017)MY3 (6/2018)
MY4 (5/2019)MY5 (12/2020)MY6 (6/2021)Bankfull
Floodprone Area MY0 BKF XS Area Elevation
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section 12 - UT2
Bankfull Dimensions
5.4 x-section area (ft.sq.)
5.8 width (ft)
0.9 mean depth (ft)
1.8 max depth (ft)
7.3 wetted perimeter (ft)
0.7 hydraulic radius (ft)
6.2 width-depth ratio
34.1 W flood prone area (ft)
5.9 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date:9/2021
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
Cross-Section Plots (MY0-MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
View Downstream
2571
2572
2573
2574
2575
2576
2577
25 35 45 55
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
327+46 Riffle
MY0 (5/2016)MY1 (10/2016)MY2 (5/2017)MY3 (6/2018)
MY4 (5/2019)MY5 (12/2020)MY6 (9/2021)Bankfull
Floodprone Area MY0 BKF XS Area Elevation
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section 13 - UT2
Bankfull Dimensions
15.4 x-section area (ft.sq.)
9.4 width (ft)
1.6 mean depth (ft)
2.6 max depth (ft)
11.7 wetted perimeter (ft)
1.3 hydraulic radius (ft)
5.8 width-depth ratio
Survey Date:9/2021
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
Cross-Section Plots (MY0-MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
View Downstream
2570
2572
2574
2576
25 35 45 55
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
327+59 Pool
MY0 (5/2016)MY1 (10/2016)MY2 (5/2017)MY3 (6/2018)MY4 (5/2019)MY5 (12/2020)MY6 (9/2021)Bankfull
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section 14 - UT2
Bankfull Dimensions
17.6 x-section area (ft.sq.)
7.8 width (ft)
2.3 mean depth (ft)
3.4 max depth (ft)
11.7 wetted perimeter (ft)
1.5 hydraulic radius (ft)
3.5 width-depth ratio
26.0 W flood prone area (ft)
3.3 entrenchment ratio
2.1 low bank height ratio
Survey Date:9/2021
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Cross-Section Plots (MY0-MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
2544
2546
2548
2550
2552
2554
0 10 20 30
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
334+33 Riffle
MY0 (5/2016)MY1 (10/2016)MY2 (5/2017)MY3 (6/2018)
MY4 (12/2019)MY5 (12/2020)MY6 (9/2021)Bankfull
Floodprone Area MY0 BKF XS Area Elevation
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section 15 - UT2
Bankfull Dimensions
21.6 x-section area (ft.sq.)
10.3 width (ft)
2.1 mean depth (ft)
3.5 max depth (ft)
13.7 wetted perimeter (ft)
1.6 hydraulic radius (ft)
4.9 width-depth ratio
Survey Date:9/2021
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
Cross-Section Plots (MY0-MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
View Downstream
2535
2536
2537
2538
2539
2540
2541
0 10 20 30 40 50
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
337+54 Pool
MY0 (5/2016)MY1 (10/2016)MY2 (5/2017)MY3 (6/2018)MY4 (12/2019)MY5 (12/2020)MY6 (9/2021)Bankfull
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section 16 - UT2
Bankfull Dimensions
4.6 x-section area (ft.sq.)
6.9 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.1 max depth (ft)
7.8 wetted perimeter (ft)
0.6 hydraulic radius (ft)
10.5 width-depth ratio
40.6 W flood prone area (ft)
5.9 entrenchment ratio
1.1 low bank height ratio
Survey Date:11/2021
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
Cross-Section Plots (MY0-MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
View Downstream
2533
2534
2535
2536
2537
2538
2539
0 10 20 30 40
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
338+73 Riffle
MY0 (5/2016)MY1 (10/2016)MY2 (5/2017)MY3 (6/2018)
MY4 (12/2019)MY5 (12/2020)MY6 (11/2021)Bankfull
Floodprone Area MY0 BKF XS Area Elevation
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section 17 - UT2
Bankfull Dimensions
8.8 x-section area (ft.sq.)
10.9 width (ft)
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.3 max depth (ft)
11.4 wetted perimeter (ft)
0.8 hydraulic radius (ft)
13.5 width-depth ratio
71.0 W flood prone area (ft)
6.5 entrenchment ratio
0.8 low bank height ratio
Survey Date:11/2021
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
Cross-Section Plots (MY0-MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
View Downstream
2528
2529
2530
2531
2532
2533
2534
20 30 40 50
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
341+08 Riffle
MY0 (5/2016)MY1 (10/2016)MY2 (5/2017)MY3 (6/2018)
MY4 (12/2019)MY5 (12/2020)MY6 (11/2021)Bankfull
Floodprone Area MY0 BKF XS Area Elevation
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section 18 - UT2
Bankfull Dimensions
9.5 x-section area (ft.sq.)
9.6 width (ft)
1.0 mean depth (ft)
1.6 max depth (ft)
10.4 wetted perimeter (ft)
0.9 hydraulic radius (ft)
9.8 width-depth ratio
Survey Date:11/2021
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
Cross-Section Plots (MY0-MY6)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
View Downstream
2527
2528
2529
2530
2531
2532
30 40 50 60
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
341+51 Pool
MY0 (5/2016)MY1 (10/2016)MY2 (5/2017)MY3 (6/2018)MY4 (12/2019)MY5 (12/2020)MY6 (11/2021)Bankfull
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Dimension1,2 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)2,538.3 2,525.8 2,524.1
Low Bank Elevation (ft)2,538.3 2,525.8 2,524.1
Bankfull Width (ft)29.2 24.6 33.8
Floodprone Width (ft)>91 >80 >89
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)2.4 2.3 2.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)3.8 3.5 4.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)69.3 57.0 88.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 12.3 10.6 13.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >3.1 >3.3 >2.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0
Dimension1,2 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)2,522.0 2,525.4 2,525.4 2,525.4 2,525.2 2,524.9 2,524.4 2524.5 2524.5 2,517.1
Low Bank Elevation (ft)2,522.0 2,525.4 2,525.3 2,525.4 2,525.4 2,525.8 2,524.9 2525.1 2525.0 2,517.1
Bankfull Width (ft)25.5 30.7 31.3 31.0 31.4 31.5 29.2 31.2 31.3 37.7
Floodprone Width (ft)>87 >200 >200 >200 >90 >79.5 >93 >93 >72 >92
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)2.2 1.9 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.3 3.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)3.3 3.9 3.6 3.5 3.6 5.4 3.6 3.6 3.7 5.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)55.3 56.9 56.7 58.2 63.1 82.3 72.2 73.1 71.8 114.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 11.7 16.6 17.2 16.5 15.6 12.0 11.8 13.3 13.6 12.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >3.4 >6.5 >6.4 >6.5 >2.9 >2.5 >3.2 >3.0 >2.3 2.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.0
Dimension1,2 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 MY0 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation (ft)2,694.2 2,579.9
Low Bank Elevation (ft)2,694.2 2,579.9
Bankfull Width (ft)3.5 9.1
Floodprone Width (ft)27.9 62.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.7 0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.9 1.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2.4 8.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 5.4 9.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 7.9 6.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0
N/A: not applicable
1Prior to MY3, bankfull dimensions were calculated using a fixed bankfull elevation.
2MY3-MY5 Bank Height Ratio is calculated based on the As-built (MY0) cross-sectional area as described in the Standard Measurement of the BHR Monitoring Parameter document provided by NCIRT and NCDMS (9/2018). The remainder of the bankfull dimensions are calculated based on the current year's
low bank height. MY3 dimensions were updated in MY4.
Cross-Section 5/R5, Little Pine Creek Reach 2a (Riffle)
Cross-Section R1, Little Pine Creek Reach 1 (Riffle)Cross-Section R2, Little Pine Creek Reach 2a (Riffle)Cross-Section R3, Little Pine Creek Reach 2a (Riffle)
Cross-Section R4, Little Pine Creek Reach 2b (Riffle)Cross-Section R6, Little Pine Creek Reach 2b (Riffle)
Cross-Section R7, UT2 Reach 1 Upper (Riffle)Cross-Section R8, UT2 Reach 1 Lower (Riffle)
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
Table 14. Dimensional Parameters - Cross-Sections (Repair Areas)
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
N/A N/A
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section R1 - Little Pine Reach 1
Bankfull Dimensions
69.3 x-section area (ft.sq.)
29.2 width (ft)
2.4 mean depth (ft)
3.8 max depth (ft)
32.9 wetted perimeter (ft)
2.1 hydraulic radius (ft)
12.3 width-depth ratio
91.3 W flood prone area (ft)
3.1 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date:8/2022
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Cross-Section Plots (Repair Areas)
2532
2534
2536
2538
2540
2542
2544
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
101+32 Riffle
MY7 (8/2022)Bankfull Floodprone Area
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section R2 - Little Pine Reach 2a
Bankfull Dimensions
57.0 x-section area (ft.sq.)
24.6 width (ft)
2.3 mean depth (ft)
3.5 max depth (ft)
27.2 wetted perimeter (ft)
2.1 hydraulic radius (ft)
10.6 width-depth ratio
80.6 W flood prone area (ft)
3.3 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date:8/2022
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Cross-Section Plots (Repair Areas)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
2521
2523
2525
2527
2529
2531
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
121+26 Riffle
MY7 (8/2022)Bankfull Floodprone Area
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section R3 - Little Pine Reach 2a
Bankfull Dimensions
88.0 x-section area (ft.sq.)
33.8 width (ft)
2.6 mean depth (ft)
4.4 max depth (ft)
36.9 wetted perimeter (ft)
2.4 hydraulic radius (ft)
13.0 width-depth ratio
88.9 W flood prone area (ft)
2.6 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date:8/2022
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Cross-Section Plots (Repair Areas)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
2518
2520
2522
2524
2526
2528
2530
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
124+34 Riffle
MY7 (8/2022)Bankfull Floodprone Area
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section R4 - Little Pine Reach 2b
Bankfull Dimensions
55.3 x-section area (ft.sq.)
25.5 width (ft)
2.2 mean depth (ft)
3.3 max depth (ft)
27.5 wetted perimeter (ft)
2.0 hydraulic radius (ft)
11.7 width-depth ratio
86.9 W flood prone area (ft)
3.4 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date:8/2022
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Cross-Section Plots (Repair Areas)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
2517
2519
2521
2523
2525
2527
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
125+98 Riffle
MY7 (8/2022)Bankfull Floodprone Area
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section 5- Little Pine Reach 2a
Bankfull Dimensions
71.8 x-section area (ft.sq.)
31.3 width (ft)
2.3 mean depth (ft)
3.7 max depth (ft)
33.4 wetted perimeter (ft)
2.2 hydraulic radius (ft)
13.6 width-depth ratio
71.5 W flood prone area (ft)
2.3 entrenchment ratio
1.2 low bank height ratio
Survey Date:8/2022
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
Cross-Section Plots (Repair Areas)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
View Downstream
2519
2521
2523
2525
2527
2529
2531
30 40 50 60 70 80 90
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
121+50 Riffle
MY0 (5/2016)MY1 (10/2016)MY2 (5/2017)MY3 (6/2018)
MY4 (5/2019)MY5 (12/2020)MY6 (11/2021)MY7 (8/2022)
Bankfull Floodprone Area MY0 BKF XS Area Elevation
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section R6 - Little Pine Reach 2b
Bankfull Dimensions
114.2 x-section area (ft.sq.)
37.7 width (ft)
3.0 mean depth (ft)
5.1 max depth (ft)
39.5 wetted perimeter (ft)
2.9 hydraulic radius (ft)
12.5 width-depth ratio
91.7 W flood prone area (ft)
2.4 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date:8/2022
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Cross-Section Plots (Repair Areas)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
2510
2512
2514
2516
2518
2520
2522
2524
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
134+85 Riffle
MY7 (8/2022)Bankfull Floodprone Area
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section R7 - UT2 Reach 1 Upper
Bankfull Dimensions
2.4 x-section area (ft.sq.)
3.5 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
0.9 max depth (ft)
4.3 wetted perimeter (ft)
0.5 hydraulic radius (ft)
5.4 width-depth ratio
27.9 W flood prone area (ft)
7.9 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date:8/2022
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Cross-Section Plots (Repair Areas)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
2693
2694
2695
2696
2697
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
308+14 Riffle
MY7 (8/2022)Bankfull Floodprone Area
DMS Project No. 94903
Cross Section R8 - UT2 Reach 1 Lower
Bankfull Dimensions
8.3 x-section area (ft.sq.)
9.1 width (ft)
0.9 mean depth (ft)
1.9 max depth (ft)
10.3 wetted perimeter (ft)
0.8 hydraulic radius (ft)
9.9 width-depth ratio
62.4 W flood prone area (ft)
6.9 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date:8/2022
Field Crew:Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Cross-Section Plots (Repair Areas)
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
2577
2579
2581
2583
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Width (ft)
326+58 Riffle
MY7 (8/2022)Bankfull Floodprone Area
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
1 Profile stationing derived from as-built thalweg alignment.
Longitudinal Profile Plot (Repair Areas)
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
UT2 Reach 1 Upper and Lower Internal Crossings
Culvert inlet Culvert outlet
2685
2687
2689
2691
2693
2695
2697
30775 30800 30825 30850 30875 30900 30925
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)1
TW (MY0-4/2016)TW (MY1-10/2016)TW (MY2-5/2017)TW (MY3-6/2018)TW (MY4-5/2019)TW (MY5-12/2020)
TW (MY6-11/2021)TW (MY7-8/2022)WSF (MY7-8/2022)RTB (MY7-8/2022)LTB (MY7-8/2022)STRUCTURE (MY7-8/2022)
Ford Crossing
2570
2572
2574
2576
2578
2580
2582
2584
32625 32650 32675 32700 32725 32750 32775
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)1
TW (MY0-4/2016)TW (MY1-10/2016)TW (MY2-5/2017)TW (MY3-6/2018)TW (MY4-12/2019)TW (MY5-12/2020)
TW (MY6-11/2021)TW (MY7-8/2022)WSF (MY7-8/2022)RTB (MY7-8/2022)LTB (MY7-8/2022)STRUCTURE (MY7-8/2022)
APPENDIX 5. Hydrology Summary Data and Plots

Table 15. Verification of Bankfull Events
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Reach Year of
Occurrence
Date of Data
Collection
Date of
Occurrence
MY1 9/25/2016 unknown
MY2 5/23/2017 unknown
MY3 4/2/2018 unknown
MY4 9/18/2019 unknown
MY5 8/20/2020 unknown
MY6 9/13/2021 unknown
MY7 12/7/2022 unknown
MY1 10/5/2016 unknown
MY2 5/23/2017 unknown
MY3 4/2/2018 unknown
MY4 12/3/2019 unknown
MY5 8/20/2020 unknown
MY6 6/7/2021 unknown
MY7 12/7/2022 unknown
MY1 9/27/2016 unknown
MY3 4/2/2018 unknown
MY4 9/18/2019 unknown
MY5 8/20/2020 unknown
MY6 6/7/2021 unknown
MY7 12/7/2022 unknown
Table 16. Wetland Gage Attainment Summary
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Year 1 (2016)Year 2 (2017)Year 3 (2018)Year 4 (2019)Year 5 (2020)Year 6 (2021)
Wetland FF Yes/112 Days
(66.6%)
Yes/169 Days
(100%)
Yes/169 Days
(100%)
Yes/169 Days
(100%)
Yes/169 Days
(100%)
Yes/169 Days
(100%)
No wetland success criteria established
1Growing season starts April 26 and ends October 11.
Method
Crest Gage
Wrack Lines and alluvial sediment deposit
Crest Gage
Wrack Lines and alluvial sediment deposit
Wrack Lines and alluvial sediment deposit
Crest Gage
Crest Gage
Wrack Lines and alluvial sediment deposit
Wrack Lines and alluvial sediment deposit
Wrack Lines and alluvial sediment deposit
Wrack Lines and alluvial sediment deposit
Wrack Lines and alluvial sediment deposit
Wrack Lines and alluvial sediment deposit
Little Pine Creek
Wrack Lines and alluvial sediment deposit
UT2
Summary of Groundwater Gage Results for MY6
Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season1 (%)Gage
Wrack Lines and alluvial sediment deposit
Crest Gage
Crest Gage
Crest Gage
Crest GageUT2BCrest Gage
Groundwater Gage Plots (MY1 - MY6)
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Wetland FF
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 94903
St
a
r
t

o
f

G
r
o
w
i
n
g

S
e
a
s
o
n
4/
2
6
/
2
0
1
6
En
d

o
f

G
r
o
w
i
n
g

S
e
a
s
o
n
10
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
6
112 days
Ja
n
Fe
b
Ma
r
Ap
r
Ma
y
Ju
n
Ju
l
Au
g
Se
p
Oc
t
No
v
De
c
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
)
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
i
n
)
Monitoring Year 1 -2016
Rainfall Gage #1 Criteria Level
Little Pine III Groundwater Gage #1
Groundwater Gage Plots (MY1 - MY6)
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Wetland FF
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 94903
St
a
r
t

o
f

G
r
o
w
i
n
g

S
e
a
s
o
n
4/
2
6
/
2
0
1
7
En
d

o
f

G
r
o
w
i
n
g

S
e
a
s
o
n
10
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
7
169 days
Ja
n
Fe
b
Ma
r
Ap
r
Ma
y
Ju
n
Ju
l
Au
g
Se
p
Oc
t
No
v
De
c
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
)
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
i
n
)
Monitoring Year 2 -2017
Rainfall Gage #1 Criteria Level
Little Pine III Groundwater Gage #1
Groundwater Gage Plots (MY1 - MY6)
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Wetland FF
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 94903
St
a
r
t

o
f

G
r
o
w
i
n
g

S
e
a
s
o
n
4/
2
6
/
2
0
1
8
En
d

o
f

G
r
o
w
i
n
g

S
e
a
s
o
n
10
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
8
169 days
Ja
n
Fe
b
Ma
r
Ap
r
Ma
y
Ju
n
Ju
l
Au
g
Se
p
Oc
t
No
v
De
c
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
)
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
i
n
)
Monitoring Year 3 -2018
Rainfall Gage #1 Criteria Level
Little Pine III Groundwater Gage #1
Groundwater Gage Plots (MY1 - MY6)
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Wetland FF
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 94903
St
a
r
t

o
f

G
r
o
w
i
n
g

S
e
a
s
o
n
4/
2
6
/
2
0
1
9
En
d

o
f

G
r
o
w
i
n
g

S
e
a
s
o
n
10
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
9
169 days
Ja
n
Fe
b
Ma
r
Ap
r
Ma
y
Ju
n
Ju
l
Au
g
Se
p
Oc
t
No
v
De
c
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
)
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
i
n
)
Monitoring Year 4 -2019
Rainfall Gage #1 Criteria Level
Little Pine III Groundwater Gage #1
Groundwater Gage Plots (MY1 - MY6)
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Wetland FF
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 94903
St
a
r
t

o
f

G
r
o
w
i
n
g

S
e
a
s
o
n
4/
2
6
/
2
0
2
0
En
d

o
f

G
r
o
w
i
n
g

S
e
a
s
o
n
10
/
1
1
/
2
0
2
0
Ja
n
Fe
b
Ma
r
Ap
r
Ma
y
Ju
n
Ju
l
Au
g
Se
p
Oc
t
No
v
De
c
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
)
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
i
n
)
Monitoring Year 5 -2020
Rainfall Gage #1 Criteria Level
Little Pine III Groundwater Gage #1
169 days
Groundwater Gage Plots (MY1 - MY6)
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Wetland FF
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 94903
St
a
r
t

o
f

G
r
o
w
i
n
g

S
e
a
s
o
n
4/
2
6
/
2
0
2
1
En
d

o
f

G
r
o
w
i
n
g

S
e
a
s
o
n
10
/
1
1
/
2
0
2
1
Ja
n
Fe
b
Ma
r
Ap
r
Ma
y
Ju
n
Ju
l
Au
g
Se
p
Oc
t
No
v
De
c
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
)
Wa
t
e
r

L
e
v
e
l

(
i
n
)
Monitoring Year 6 -2021
Rainfall Gage #1 Criteria Level
Little Pine III Groundwater Gage #1
169 days
Monthly Rainfall Data
Little Pine III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project
DMS Project No. 94903
Monitoring Year 7 - 2022
Table 16. Wetland Gage Attainment Summary
1 2022 rainfall collected from NC CRONOS Station Name: Sparta 3.5 SSW (NCSU, 2022)
2 30th and 70th percentile rainfall data collected from weather station Sparta, NC8158 (USDA, 2022)
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
Jan-22 Feb-22 Mar-22 Apr-22 May-22 Jun-22 Jul-22 Aug-22 Sep-22 Oct-22 Nov-22 Dec-22
Pr
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
o
n

(
i
n
)
Date
Little Pine Creek III 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall in 2022 Alleghany County, NC 1,2
NC CRONOS Sparta 3.5 SSW 30th percentile 70th percentile