Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820045_Routine Inspection_20230406Aims Y// ;Ua -15rFtvision of Water Resources Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency, type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: .�I outine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access Date of Visit: „ , ,�� Arrival Time: /; Departure Time: K /%7 County: Region: Farm Name: e)7cJd..:;c � _ LZ- (f Owner Email: Owner Name: -� �c�i G Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: �C%�j .Ge�� Title: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: , Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Phone: Integrator: Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: Design Current Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity . Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity; Pop. Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder Non -Layer Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish Q ,5 Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultr y Capacity Pop. Non -Dairy Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker Gilts Non -Layers Beef Feeder Boars Pullets LIBeef Brood Cow Turkeys Other. Turke PoultsRN £' `' .Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes J2114o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page I of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ._'No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): r 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 1'No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? _E3°11fes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ,.�`No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes , [D No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need 0 Yes E]'No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes _ allo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s) C �-� c � y J G��44c l� 13. Soil TYPe(s):f��-►o 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ,--EJ'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes -�No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes E�J'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes , No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes _,,�No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 13-No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes .,r] No ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes EJ-No ❑ Yes ,,❑`No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Weather Code ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number:- - " ' I Date of Inspection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ,E No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 ❑ Yes -[3-No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ,❑- No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes , ❑-No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes -No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes -[2,No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �Io ❑ Yes J2 No ❑ Yes 2/No ❑NA ❑NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑NA ❑NE Phone: Date: 511212020 FACILITY .V 70 FARM NAME: LAGOON LEVEL PERMIT (,s� - DUE EVERY 5 YEARS - EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS-615�0- - CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL - OIC CARD YES OR NO ,^ Q WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#2o) SOIL TYPES (:�,(� `Wr,-4 56 'HCL4, CROP TYPES P! ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST YES OR NO Irrigation Pfan Maps YES OR NO WASTE REPORT (#21) -GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER C DATE NITROGEN LEVEL DATE g1�� NITROGEN LEVEL / DATE �`2 NITROGEN LEVEL 1 SOIL REPORT EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE P-1 (NO MORE THEN 400) PH (Note if 4 or less) Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 8000) CU ZN (IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300) IRR2 (#21) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES qZTN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES Not over PAN FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) CROP TYPES NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES_ NITROGEN (N) CALBRIATION (#24) EACH REEL SHOULD BE CA IBRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR DATE OF CALIBRATION FLOW RATES RAIN FALL (#21) -INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT -LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED. SLUDGE (#21 &25� -DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE A)-4 0: p: U % RATIO OF SLUDGE 0: p: % RATIO OF SLUDGE 0: p: % RATIO OF SLUDGE 0: p: % RATIO OF SLUDGE OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21) RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY *If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields VISUAL CHECK FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSIGOODOHEALTHY CORPSDITCHES CORRECT WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED BINS LAGOON GARBAGE Bermuda grass: Opens March 1st- Ends September 301h Small Grain Over seed: Opens October 1st— Ends March 313t Corn: Opens February 15th - Ends June 30th Cotton: Opens March 15th - Ends August 13t Rye: Opens September 1 st - Ends March 313t Oats: -Opens September 1st- Ends April 15th Wheat: Opens September 13t - Ends April 30-th Soybeans: Opens April 1 st- Ends September 15th Fescue: Opens August 1 st- Ends July 31 st Sorghum Hay: Opens March 15th - Ends August 31 st