20181349 Ver 1_Mill Dam Creek_97136_MY03_2022_20230220

ID#* 20181349 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:
Ryan Hamilton
Initial Review Completed Date 04/05/2023
Mitigation Project Submittal - 2/20/2023
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* Yes No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: * Email Address:
Matthew Reid [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#: * 20181349 Version:* 1
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Mill Dam Creek Restoration STREAM Site
County: Yadkin
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: Mill Dam Creek_ 97136_MY03_2022.pdf 39.63MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Matthew Reid
Signature:

Annual Monitoring Report

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Yadkin River Basin - 03040101
Monitoring Year 03
DEQ Contract 6898
DMS Project Number 97136
DMS RFP No. 16-006706 (Date of Issue: October 21, 2015)

DWR #: 18-1349
USACE Action ID: 2016-01335
Yadkin County, North Carolina

Prepared for:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Data Collected: 2022
Date Submitted: January 2023
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 MY03 Monitoring Report

Monitoring and Design Firm

Prepared by:

KCI Associates of North Carolina
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]

Project Contact: Adam Spiller
Email: [e-mail]

KCI ASSOCIATES OF N ORTH C AROLINA, P.A. www.kci.com
Employee-Owned Since 1988

MEMORANDUM

Date: February 10, 2023
To: Matthew Reid, DMS Project Manager
From: Adam Spiller, Project Manager
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PA
Subject: Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site
MY-03 Monitoring Report Comments
Yadkin River Basin CU 03040101
NCDMS Project # 97136
Contract # 6898

Please find below our responses in italics to the MY-03 Monitoring Report comments from NCDMS
received on February 6, 2023, for the Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site.

 Please ensure the Monitoring Phase Performance Bond has been updated and approved by Kristie
Corson before invoicing for Task 9.
KCI Response: The Performance Bond will be updated as necessary before Task 9 is invoiced.

 Title Page: Please add DMS RFP No. 16-006706 and Date of Issue: October 21, 2015.
KCI Response: This change has been made.

 In an effort to identify and resolve property issues early during the monitoring period, please
verify that the conservation easement boundary has been walked, marking and signage is up to
spec, fencing is intact, and no encroachments have been identified.
KCI Response: The easement was inspected during the visual assessment of the site that was
completed on January 10, 2023. No issues were identified during this inspection.

 Monitoring Results: Recommend specifying XS#’s when discussing the XS entrenchment ratios
instead of saying “Both of these cross sections…”
KCI Response: This change has been made.

 Live stake supplemental planting is planned for February 2023. Please include an update in the
MY4 report for this effort. Please include species list, numbers, etc.
KCI Response: This information will be included in the MY04 report.

 Table 2 does not indicate that any invasive species work has been conducted on the site. Have any
treatments occurred? Please update table with dates if applicable. Invasives were noted on the
IRT site visit in August 2022 in areas that had not been cleared during construction.
KCI Response: Invasive treatments were conducted on the site in 2021 and 2022. The dates of
these treatments have been added to Table 2 and a brief discussion of the 2022 treatment has
been added to the narrative section of the report.

E NGINEERS  S CIENTISTS  S URVEYORS  C ONSTRUCTION M ANAGERS
4505 Falls of Neuse Road Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609 [phone] [phone] Fax
KCI ASSOCIATES OF N ORTH C AROLINA, P.A. www.kci.com
Employee-Owned Since 1988
•CCPV: Currently there are several reaches not shown on CCPV sheets. Can sheets 3 and 4 be
modified to show all project reaches? Also, the legend conceals reaches on several sheets. Can
this also be revised to clearly see the project?
KCI Response: The CCPV has been reworked to correct these errors.
•Table 5 and 6: Please include dates that assessment occurred for each table.
KCI Response: This change has been made.
•Table 5 does not indicate any structures are piping. Monitoring results section indicates no
structures have failed, but some may be piping. Several structures were identified as piping at the
IRT site visit in August 2022. Please review and revise as necessary.
KCI Response:This change has been made.
•Table 10: MY3 cross-section data was not included in the table for the draft submittal. Please
update for final.
KCI Response: This error has been corrected.
•Cross-section plots 8 and 13: Recommend adding a note that the cross-section is located in an
area that was repaired in MY1 (July 2021).
KCI Response: This change has been made.
•Hydrographs: Please verify that the yellow line and pink line are labeled correctly for wetland
gauge 1 and 2. It appears that the yellow line should be ground surface.
KCI Response: The labels on these graphs have been corrected.
•Please include the meeting minutes from the August 15, 2022 IRT site visit in the appendix. KCI
Response: These have been included in Appendix F – Additional Information.
Please contact me if you have any questions or would like clarification concerning these responses.
Sincerely,
Adam Spiller
Project Manager
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 MY03 Monitoring Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 1
SUCCESS CRITERIA .................................................................................................................................. 2
MONITORING RESULTS .......................................................................................................................... 3
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................. 4
Figure 1. Project Site Vicinity Map .............................................................................................................. 5

Appendix A – Background Tables
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits ................................................................................... 7
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History .......................................................................................... 9
Table 3. Project Contacts ............................................................................................................................ 10
Table 4. Project Information ....................................................................................................................... 11

Appendix B – Visual Assessment Data
CCPV .......................................................................................................................................................... 13
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment ........................................................................ 17
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment. ............................................................................................... 33
Photo Reference Points ............................................................................................................................... 34
Vegetation Plot Photos ................................................................................................................................ 38

Appendix C – Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Species and Quantity – 2021 Supplemental Planting ................................................................... 47
Table 8. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species ...................................................................... 48

Appendix D – Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Table 9. Baseline Stream Data Summary ................................................................................................... 54
Table 10. Cross-section Morphology Data Table ....................................................................................... 67
Cross-section Plots ...................................................................................................................................... 71

Appendix E – Hydrologic Data
30/70 Percipitation Plot ............................................................................................................................. 104
Table 11. Verification of Bankfull Events ................................................................................................ 105
Stream Level Hydrographs ....................................................................................................................... 106
Table 12. Verification of Stream Flow ..................................................................................................... 108
Table 13. Stream Flow Criteria Attainment .............................................................................................. 108
Stream Flow Hydrographs ........................................................................................................................ 109
Table 14. Wetland Hydrology Verification .............................................................................................. 112
Wetland Hydrographs ............................................................................................................................... 113

Appendix F – Additional Information
IRT 8/15/2022 Meeting Minutes............................................................................................................... 115

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 1 MY03 Monitoring Report
PROJECT SUMMARY
The Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site (MDCRS) was completed in March 2020 and restored and enhanced
a total of 13,505 linear feet of stream. The MDCRS is a riparian system in the Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River
Basin (3040101 8-digit cataloging unit) in Yadkin County, North Carolina. The site’s natural hydrologic
regime had been substantially modified through the relocation and straightening of the existing stream
channels, livestock impacts, and clearing of riparian buffer. This completed project will restore streams
impacted by pasture and agriculture to a stable headwater ecosystem with a functional riparian buffer and
floodplain access.

The MDCRS is protected by a 40.2 acre permanent conservation easement, held by the State of North
Carolina. The site is located approximately 0.5 miles north of East Bend, NC. Specifically, the site is 0.2
mile north on Shady Grove Church Road (SR-1538) from its intersection with Shoals Road (SR-1546).

The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) published the Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee
River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) in 2009. The project’s 14 digit CU (03040101110070, Grassy
Creek and Horne Creek) was identified as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in the RBRP. The goals and
priorities for the MDCRS are based on the information presented in the Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin
Restoration Priorities: maintaining and enhancing water quality, restoring hydrology, and improving fish
and wildlife habitat (NCEEP, 2009). The project will support the following basin priorities:
- Managing stormwater runoff
- Reducing fecal coliform inputs
- Improving/restoring riparian buffers
- Reducing sediment loading
- Improving stream stability
- Reducing nutrient loading
- Excluding livestock and implementing other agricultural BMP’s
- Protecting high-resource value waters, including water supply watershed designated waters

The project is also located in the Ararat River Local Watershed Plan (LWP) study area. The Ararat River
was designated a LWP Study Area due to poor water quality and aquatic habitat degradation issues, as well
as the presence of good candidate sites for stream restoration in rural catchments (NCEEP, 2009). The
stressors within the Ararat River LWP are erosion and sedimentation, missing or degraded riparian buffers,
stormwater runoff, and nutrient and fecal coliform “hot spots” (NCEEP, 2013).

The goals for the project are to:
- Restore channelized and livestock-impacted streams to stable C and B type channels.
- Restore a forested riparian buffer to provide bank stability, filtration, and shading.

The project goals will be addressed through the following objectives:
- Relocate or stabilize channelized and/or incised streams to connect to a floodplain or floodprone
area.
- Install a cross-section sized to the bankfull discharge.
- Create bedform diversity with pools, riffles, and habitat structures
- Fence out livestock to reduce nutrient, bacterial, and sediment impacts from adjacent grazing and
farming practices to the project tributaries
- Plant the site with native trees and shrubs and an herbaceous seed mix.

Project construction was completed in December 2019 and project planting was completed in March 2020.
The 13,505 linear feet of streams at MDCRS were enhanced and restored by re-meandering the stream and
by tying the bankfull elevation to the historic floodplain where feasible. The entire site was planted to
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 2 MY03 Monitoring Report
establish a forested riparian buffer. The site was constructed as designed with only minor modifications
from the design plan. These modifications generally consisted of slight adjustments in the alignment and
spacing of riffles/pools due to bedrock encountered during construction. Several areas of additional bank
stabilization were also installed. On February 6, 2020, shortly after construction was completed and before
woody stems had been planted, the site received over 6 inches of rain in a 24 hour period. This storm caused
significant damage to portions of the site and required repairs to be completed in March 2020. These repairs
mainly involved repair of bank erosion through the installation of live lifts, removal of aggradation from
the stream channel, and regrading areas of floodplain scour. Approximately 500 cubic yards of topsoil were
also brought in and placed on the floodplain in areas of severe floodplain scour. Additional heavy
precipitation events took place in the fall of 2020. These events cause isolated areas of bank erosion and
the movement of a boulder sill. In July 2021, these areas were repaired by sloping back the eroding banks,
reapplying coir matting, installing new live stakes, and repairing the damaged boulder sill on UTHC 4-1.

The monitoring components were installed in March/April 2020. Five automatically recording pressure
transducer stream gauges that take a reading every 10 minutes were installed: one each in the upper third
of T1A, T5A, and T8A to document flow within those reaches, and two on UTHC to record the occurrence
of bankfull events. Cameras were installed in the vicinity of each of the flow gauges and set to record a
short video once a day to provide additional verification of flow. Two automatically recording pressure
transducer groundwater monitoring gauges were installed within pre-existing wetlands on the site to
monitor wetland hydrology and ensure the existing wetlands on the site are not adversely affected by the
restoration project. One of these gauges is located in the vicinity of the pre-existing wetland on the left bank
of T7 and the other is located within the pre-existing wetland on the right bank of T8. To determine the
success of the planted mitigation areas, eighteen 10 m x 10 m permanent vegetation monitoring plots were
established. An additional twelve 10 m x 10 m random temporary vegetation monitoring plots are sampled
during each monitoring year as well. The locations of the planted stems relative to the origin were recorded
within the permanent plots and the species and height of each planted stem were recorded for all plots. Any
volunteers found within the plots were grouped into size categories by species, but separate from the planted
stems. Twelve permanent photo reference points were established and are taken annually. Thirty-two
permanent cross-sections (24 riffle cross-sections and 8 pool cross-sections) were also established and a
detailed longitudinal profile of the stream was taken. Wolman pebble counts were performed at all of the
riffle cross-sections. The cross-section measurements are repeated in monitoring years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7, but
the longitudinal profile will only be repeated if there are concerns about bed elevation adjustments. Reports
will be submitted to DMS each year.

SUCCESS CRITERIA

Vegetative success criteria for the stream mitigation is 260 woody stems/acre after five years, and 210
woody stems/acre after seven years. Trees in each plot must average seven feet in height at Year 5 and ten
feet in height at Year 7. Volunteer species must be present for a minimum of two growing seasons and must
be a species from the approved planting list to count toward vegetative success. A single species may not
account for more than 50% of the required number of stems within any plot.

A minimum of four bankfull events must also be recorded during the monitoring period. All project streams
must show a minimum of 30 continuous days of flow within a calendar year (assuming normal
precipitation) A “normal” year is based on NRCS climatological data for Yadkin County with the 30th and
70th percentile thresholds as the range of normal, as documented in the USACE Technical Report
“Accessing and Using Meteorological Data to Evaluate Wetland Hydrology, April 2000.”

Bank height ratios (BHR) should not exceed 1.2 and the entrenchment ratios (ER) should be 2.2 or greater.
BHR and ER at any measured riffle cross-section should not change more than 10% from the previous
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 3 MY03 Monitoring Report
condition during any given monitoring interval (e.g. no more than 10% between years 1 and 2, 2 and 3, 3
and 5, or 5 and 7). Visual assessments will also be used to identify problem areas.

MONITORING RESULTS
The MY03 vegetation monitoring was conducted between August 1 and 4, 2022. All of the 30 vegetation
monitoring plots had greater than 260 woody stems/acre. The average stem density across all the surveyed
plots is 805 planted stems/acre. Including volunteers, the site averaged 1,209 stems/acre. A supplemental
planting of the wetland located at the top of T3 was completed on October 25, 2021. Due to the prolonged
periods of saturation in this area, as well as the rapid growth of the herbaceous vegetation in MY01, the
majority of the planted woody stems in this wetland did not survive. Thirty one-gallon size containerized
trees were planted within this area. Species were chosen that could best tolerate extended periods of
saturation. Please see Appendix C – Vegetation Plot Data for a list of the species and quantities that were
planted. Invasive species were treated on the site in July 2022. This treatment focused on Chinese privet
growing in areas of existing woodline that were not cleared as part of construction.

The MY03 cross-sections survey took place between January 9 and 12, 2023. None of the 32 cross-sections
had a bank height ratio greater than 1.2. Two of the 32 cross-sections have an entrenchment ratio less than
2.2. These two cross-sections are XS6 and X12 and both are located in enhancement reaches where the
stream work that was completed consisted of cutting a floodplain bench along one bank. Neither reach
shows signs of instability and these lower than desirable entrenchment ratios are remnants of the pre-project
conditions. The heavy precipitation events that took place in 2020 have caused some cross-sections to shift
from their baseline or MY01 alignment. Two notable examples of this are XS8 and XS13. Since the repairs
that took place in MY02, these cross-sections have remained stable and not shifted any further. Further
movement within these areas is not anticipated. There are two cross-sections that have shown significant
adjustment between MY02 and MY03. These cross-sections (XS24 and 25) are both located on the lower
section of T6. The stream bed at XS24 (riffle) had aggraded by approximately 0.4’ between baseline and
MY01, but since then it has remained relatively stable while the stream banks have continued to aggrade.
XS25 downcut by approximately 0.5’ between the baseline and MY01 surveys before starting to aggrade.
Between MY01 and MY02, it aggraded by approximately 0.5’, returning to the baseline stream bed
elevation. Between MY02 and MY03 it aggraded an additional 0.5’. T6 is a small stream with an un-
stabilized section above the project reaches. Cattle have access to this un-stabilized reach and so it provides
a major source of sediment to the project streams. These fluctuations in the bed and bank elevation are part
of the natural processing of the heavy sediment load through the system. Despite the changes in elevation,
the stream alignment has remained stable and there is no evidence of bank erosion through this reach. KCI
will continue to monitor this area closely but does not believe that these changes represent a threat to project
success.

During 2022, the stream gauge on UTHC-1 recorded 9 bankfull events, while the stream gauge on UTHC-
3 recorded 5 bankfull events. All three of the reaches being monitored for flow demonstrated more than 30
consecutive days of flow during 2022. The gauge on T1A recorded a maximum of 34 consecutive days.
The gauge on T5A recorded flow for 303 consecutive days (the entire period of record for 2022) and the
gauge on T8A recorded a maximum of 217 consecutive days. The gauge data was further verified by the
cameras on site. Based on the video recordings obtained from the cameras, T1A had a maximum of 104
consecutive days of flow, T5A had a maximum of 114 consecutive days of flow, and T8A had a maximum
of 92 consecutive days of flow. The differences between the number of days of flow documented by the
cameras versus the gauges is largely due to extended periods of time during which the cameras were
obscured by vegetation during the growing season and periods of time when the stream flow was at levels
too low for the gauges to record.

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 4 MY03 Monitoring Report

On August 15, 2022, the IRT met on-site to evaluate the site conditions and see the results of the July 2021
repairs. At this meeting the IRT requested that KCI add live stakes to the outer bend areas that were repaired.
This work will be completed in February 2023. The IRT also requested that KCI keep an eye on the
structures on site and the invasives. While no areas of thick invasives were noted, there were scattered
individuals of Chinese privet, mainly in areas of the site that had existing woodlines. Similarly, none of the
structures on site had failed, but a few were seen to be potentially starting to pipe. KCI will continue to
monitor these areas to ensure they don’t become a threat to project success.

Overall the site is functioning as designed with no major problem areas or threats to project success
identified during MY03.
REFERENCES

NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2009. Upper Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin
Restoration Priorities 2009. Raleigh, NC.
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Watershed_Planning/Yadkin_River_B
asin/2009%20Upper%20Yadkin%20RBRP_Final%20Final%2C%2026feb%2709.pdf

NCDEQ, Division of Mitigation Services. June 2017. “As-built Baseline Monitoring Report
Format, Data and Content Requirement.”
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Document%20Management%20Libra
ry/Guidance%20and%20Template%20Documents/6_AB_Baseline__Rep_Templ_June
%202017.pdf

NCIRT. October 24, 2016. “Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation
Update.” https://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/PN/2016/Wilmington-District-Mitigation-
Update.pdf

USACE, Sprecher, S. W.; Warne, A. G. 2000. “Accessing and Using Meteorological Data to
Evaluate Wetland Hydrology.”
https://ntrl.ntis.gov/NTRL/dashboard/searchResults/titleDetail/ADA378910.xhtml

NC-67
Silo
a
m

R
d
Flint
H
i
l
l

R
d
F
o
r
b
u
s
h

R
d
Main St
Hauser Rd
Sho
a
l
s

R
d
Uni
o
n

H
i
l
l

R
d
S
h
o
a
l
s

R
d
Mill H
i
l
l

R
d
Mt Be
t
h
e
l

C
h

R
d
Smit
h
t
o
w
n

R
d
B
u
t
n
e
r

M
i
l
l

R
d
A
p
p
e
r
s
o
n

R
d
Pride's Rd
Indi
a
n

H
e
a
p
s

R
d
Hol
l
y

S
p
r
i
n
g
s

R
d
C
a
u
d
l
e

R
d
Stony Ridge Rd
S
h
a
d
y

G
r
o
v
e

C
h
u
r
c
h

R
d
Butner R
d
MacEd
o
n
i
a

R
d
Ba
l
t
i
m
o
r
e

R
d
Nunn Rd
Smithe
r
m
a
n

R
d
B
o
r
d
e
n

L
n
Old

M
i
l
l

R
d
M
a
r
t
i
n
s

M
i
l
l

R
d
Mo
c
c
a
s
i
n

G
a
p

R
d
J
o
h
n

S
c
o
t
t

R
d
Grassy

C
r
e
e
k

R
d
Sam S
c
o
t
t

R
d
Flin
t

H
i
l
l

R
d
Aztec Dr
Isi
a

D
r
He
n
n
i
n
g
s

R
d
NC-67EAST BEND
Yadkin River
Logan Creek
H
a
l
l

C
r
e
e
k
Miller Creek
G
r
a
s
s
y

C
r
e
e
k
Ho
r
n
e

C
r
e
e
k
Marti
n

M
i
l
l

C
r
e
e
k
Ararat Riv
e
r
H
o
g
a
n

C
r
e
e
k
Lo
n
e
y

C
r
e
e
k
Ü 0 10.5 Miles
Figure 1. Vicinity Map, Mill Dam Creek, Yadkin County, NC
Project EasementCities and Towns StreamsMajor Rivers RoadsState Highway
ÊÚ
YADKIN COUNTY
DAVIE COUNTY
SURRY COUNTY
ROWAN COUNTY
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 6 MY03 Monitoring Report

APPENDIX A

Background Tables

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 7 MY0 Monitoring Report

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Mitigation Credits

Stream Riparian
Wetland
Non-riparian
Wetland Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient
Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient
Offset
Type R RE R RE R RE R RE
Linear
Feet/Acres 7,166 6,340
Credits 7,166.000 3,124.666
TOTAL
CREDITS 10,290.666
Project Components
Project
Component
-or-
Reach ID
Stationing/
Location
Existing
Footage/
Acreage
Restoration
Footage or
Acreage
Creditable
Footage or
Acreage
Restoration
Level
Approach
(PI, PII etc.)
Mitigation
Ratio
(X:1)
Mitigation Credits Notes/Comments
UTHC1 Top 10+00-
22+81 1,333 1,281 1,249 R P2 10+00-
11+50, then P1 1 1,249.000 Crossing Exception
STA 20+51 – 20+83
UTHC1
Bottom
22+81-
27+39 541 457 438 R P1, then P2
24+50-27+39 1 438.000 Crossing Exception
STA 25+72 – 25+91
UTHC2 27+39-
42+32 1,494 1,493 1,493 EI N/A 1.5 995.333
UTHC3 42+32-
55+57 1,411 1,325 1,240 R
P1 except P2
42+32-44+00
and 53+50-
55+57
1 1,240.000
Utility Exception
STA54+07 – 54+49
Crossing Exception
STA 55+14 – 55+57
UTHC4-1 55+57-
58+53
1,840
297 297 EI N/A 1.5 198.000
UTHC4-2 58+53-
63+75 521 521 EII N/A 2.5 208.400
UTHC4-3 63+75-
68+55 481 419 EI N/A 1.5 279.333 Crossing Exception
STA 63+75 -64+37
UTHC4-4 68+55-
73+97 542 497 EII N/A 2.5 199.800 Utility Exception STA
68+55 – 69+00
T1 100+00-
107+51 764 751 734 R P2 100+00-
101+80, then P1 1 734.000 Crossing Exception
STA 104+00-104+16
T1A 150+00-
157+95 746 795 795 R P2 1 795.000
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 8 MY0 Monitoring Report

Project
Component
-or-
Reach ID
Stationing/
Location
Existing
Footage/
Acreage
Restoration
Footage or
Acreage
Creditable
Footage or
Acreage
Restoration
Level
Approach
(PI, PII etc.)
Mitigation
Ratio
(X:1)
Mitigation Credits Notes/Comments
T2-1 200+00-
204+98 499 498 498 EII N/A 2.5 199.200
T2-2 204+98-
207+63 232 265 265 R P2 1 265.000
T3 300+00-
303+69 378 369 369 R P1/P2 1 369.000
T4 400+00-
401+51 151 151 151 R P1 1 151.000
T5 1000+00-
1012+13 1,205 1,213 1,182 EII N/A 2.5 472.800
Crossing Exception
STA 1003+59-
1003+90
T5A 1200+00-
1200+65 65 65 65 EII N/A 2.5 26.000
T5B 1300+00-
1304+38 438 438 438 EII N/A 2.5 175.200
T6-1 600+00-
603+22 325 322 259 EII N/A 2.5 103.600 Crossing Exception
STA 602+59 – 603+22
T6-2 603+22-
609+80 621 658 658 R P1 1 658.000
T6A-1 650+00-
650+60 60 60 60 EII N/A 2.5 24.000
T6A-2 650+60-
651+61 97 101 101 R P1 1 101.000
T7-1 700+00-
701+65 165 165 165 EII N/A 2.5 66.000
T7-2 701+65-
705+13 335 348 348 R P1 1 348.000
T8-1 800+00-
804+45 445 445 445 EII N/A 2.5 178.000
T8-2 804+45-
808+94 486 448 426 R P1 1 426.000 Crossing Exception
STA 808+20 – 808+42
T8A 850+00-
852+63 258 263 263 R P1 1 263.000
T9 900+00-
901+29 133 129 129 R P1, then P2
900+71-901+29 1 129.000
TOTAL 14,024 13,882 13,505 10,290.666
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 9 MY03 Monitoring Report

Activity or Report Data Collection Complete Actual Completion or
Delivery
Mitigation Plan Dec. 7, 2018
Final Design - Construction Plans Jan. 14, 2019
Construction Grading Completed Dec. 12, 2019
Repairs from Storm Damage March 26, 2020
Planting Completed March 26, 2020
Baseline Monitoring/Report April 2020 May 2020
Vegetation Monitoring April 24, 2020
Stream Survey April 16, 2020
Year 1 Monitoring December 2020 December 2020
Vegetation Monitoring October 28, 2020
Stream Survey December 22, 2020
Invasive Species Treatment January 7, 2021
Repairs from Storm Damage July 23, 2021
Year 2 Monitoring November 2021 December 2021
Vegetation Monitoring July 22, 2021
Stream Survey July 22, 2021
Invasive Species Treatment July 26, 2022
Year 3 Monitoring January 2023 January 2023
Vegetation Monitoring August 4, 2022
Stream Survey January 12, 2023
Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136

Component Summation
Restoration Level Stream
(linear feet)
Riparian Wetlands
(Acres)
Non-Riparian
Wetlands
(Acres)
Buffer (square feet)
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration 7,166
Enhancement
Enhancement I 2,209
Enhancement II 4,130
Creation
Preservation
High Quality
Preservation
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 10 MY03 Monitoring Report

Table 3. Project Contacts
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Design Firm KCI Associates of North Carolina
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Construction Contractor Carolina Environmental Contracting, Inc.
PO Box 1905
Mount Airy, NC 27030
Contact: Mr. Wayne Taylor
Phone: [phone]
Planting Contractor Shenandoah Habitats
1983 Jefferson Highway
Waynesboro, VA 22980
Contact: Mr. David Coleman
Phone: [phone]
Monitoring Performers
KCI Associates of North Carolina
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 11 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 4. Project Information
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Project Name Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
County Yadkin County
Project Area 40.2 acres
Project Coordinates (lat. and long.) 36.2390 °N, 80.5201°W
Planted Acreage (acres of woody
stems planted) 29.2 acres
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Yadkin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 030401014 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 03010101110070
DWQ Sub-basin 03-07-02
Project Drainage Area (acres) 400 acres
Project Drainage Area Percentage of
Impervious Area 3%
CGIA Land Use Classification Forest (45%), Pasture/Farmland (39%), Low-density Residential Development (15%), and
Roads (1%)
Existing Reach Summary Information
Parameters All Reaches Combined
Length of reach (linear feet) 14,024
Valley confinement Partially confined to confined
Drainage area (acres) 400 acres
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral Intermittent – Perennial
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification C (Aquatic Life, Secondary Recreation)
Rosgen Stream Classification (Existing /
Proposed) F4/G4/C4/B4
Evolutionary trend (Simon) Stage III
FEMA classification Zone AE at confluence of T8 and Hall Creek, otherwise none
Existing Wetland Summary Information
Parameters WA, WB, WE, WG, WK WC WH, WI , WJ
Size of Wetland (acres) 0.23 0.10 0.10
Wetland Type Riparian Non-riverine Riparian Non-riverine Riparian Non-riverine
Mapped Soil Series Fairview Fairview Siloam
Drainage class Well drained Well drained Well drained
Soil Hydric Status Non-Hydric Non-Hydric Non-Hydric
Source of Hydrology Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater
Restoration or Enhancement Method N/A (Preservation) Areas of erosion to stabilize N/A (Preservation)
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation Applicable? Resolved? Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States – Section 404 Yes NWP 27 Preliminary JD
Waters of the United States – Section 401 Yes NWP 27 Preliminary JD
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes USFWS
Historic Preservation Act No Yes NCSHPO
Coastal Zone Management Act
(CZMA)/ Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA)
No N/A N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance No Yes N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 12 MY03 Monitoring Report

APPENDIX B

Visual Assessment Data

^_
^_
^_
^_
^_^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
UTHC 4-4
!
UTHC 4-3
UTHC 4-2
!T9!
UTHC 4-1!
T7
!
T7-2
!!
T8-1
!
T8-2
T8A!
UTHC3
T6-1
!
T5B
!
!
T6A-1
T6-2
!
T5
!
T5A!
!
T4
!
T3
T2-1
!
UTHC2
!T2-2
!
UTHC1 Bottom
UTHC1 Top
!
!T1A
!
T1
!
!
!
!
T6A-2
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Ü 0 1,000500
Feet
Current Conditions Plan ViewMill Dam Creek Restoration SiteDMS Project #97136Yadkin County, NCOverview Page Image Source: NC OneMap Orthoimagery, 2015.
Project Easement
Existing Wetland sStream Mitiga tion
R (7,165 lf / 7,165 SM C's)
EI (2,209 lf / 1,472 SM C's)
EII (4,130 lf / 1,653 SM C's)
^_Photo Points
Cross-Section s
Bankfull Gauge
Camera
Flow Gauge
Wetland Gauge
Vegetation Mon ito ring Plots
Success Criteria Met
Success Criteria Not Me t
Supplementa l Planting
Invasive Treatmen t
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
151+00
!T1A
!
T1
!
UTHC1 Top
!UTHC1 B ottom
!
T2-1!T2-2
!
T3
T4
!
T5A
!
T5
!UTHC2
33+00
32+00
31+00
30+00
29+00
28+00
27+00
26+00
25+00
24+00
23+00
22+00
21+00
20+00
19+00
18+00
17+00
16+00
15+00
14+00
13+00
12+00
11+00
10+00
149+00
401+00
400+00
157+00
156+00
155+00
154+00
153+00
152+00
151+00
150+00
303+00
302+00
301+00
300+00
207+00 206+00205+00
204+00 203+00202+00 201+00200+00
107+00106+00
105+00104+00
103+00102+00
101+00
100+00
1004+00
1003+001002+001001+001000+00
PP1
PP3
PP4
PP5
3
2
1
6
7
4
5
R5
R3
R2
R4
R1
XS 18
X
S

2
2
R6
XS 2XS 3
XS 1
XS 5XS 4
X S 1 4
XS 15
XS 16
X S 6
X
S

1
7
XS 19
X
S

2
1
X
S

2
0
Ü 0 350175
Feet
Current Conditions Plan ViewMill Dam Creek Restoration SiteDMS Project #97136Yadkin County, NC
Image Source: NC OneMap Orthoimagery, 2015.
Project Easem ent
Existing WetlandsStream M it ig at ion
R (7,165 lf / 7,165 SMC's)
EI (2,209 lf / 1,472 SMC's)
EII (4,130 lf / 1,653 SMC's)
^_Photo Points
Cross-Sections
Bankfull Gauge
Camera
Flow Gauge
Wetland Gauge
Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Success Criteria M et
Success Criteria N ot Met
Supplemental Planting
Invasive Treatm ent
Page 1
^_^_
^_
^_
606+00
T3
T4
!
T5A
!
T5
T5B
T6A-1
!T6A-2
T6-2
!
!
UTHC 3 !
T7
!
T7-2
!
UTHC4-1 55+00
54+00
53+00
52+00
51+00
50+00
49+00
48+00
47+00
46+00
45+00
44+00
43+00 42+00
41+00
40+00
39+00
38+00
37+00
36+00
35+00
34+00
33+00
32+00
31+00
30+00
29+00
401+00
400+00
705+00
704+00
703+00
702+00
701+00
700+00
651+00
650+00
609+00
608+00
607+00
605+00 604+00
603+00
602+00
601+00
600+00
302+00
301+00
300+00
1304+00
1303+00
1301+00
1300+00
1302+00
1012+001011+001010+00
1009+00
1 0 0 8 +0 0
1007+00
1006+00
1005+00
1004+00
1003+001002+001001+001000+00
PP5
PP8
PP7
9
7
8
R9
11 12
10
R8
R7
X S 7
XS 10
X
S

2
2
13
XS 8XS 9
XS 25
X S 6
XS 24
XS 26
X
S 27
XS 23
Ü 0 350175
Feet
Current Conditions Plan ViewMill Dam Creek Restoration SiteDMS Project #97136Yadkin County, NC
Image Source: NC OneMap Orthoimagery, 2015.
Project Easem ent
Existing WetlandsStream M it ig at ion
R (7,165 lf / 7,165 SMC's)
EI (2,209 lf / 1,472 SMC's)
EII (4,130 lf / 1,653 SMC's)
^_Photo Points
Cross-Sections
Bankfull Gauge
Camera
Flow Gauge
Wetland Gauge
Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Success Criteria M et
Success Criteria N ot Met
Supplemental Planting
Invasive Treatm ent
Page 2
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
62+00
61+00
T7
!
T7-2
!
UTHC4-1 !
UTHC4-2
!
T9
!
UTHC4-3 !
UTHC4-4 !
T8-2 !
T8
!
T8A
!
73+00 72+00 71+00
70+00
69+00
68+00
67+00
66+00 65+00
64+0063+00
60+0059+00
58+00
57+00
56+00
55+00
54+00
53+00
52+00
51+00
50+00
49+00
901+00900+00
852+00
851+00
850+00808+00
807+00
806+00
805+00
804+00803+00
802+00 801+00800+00
705+00
704+00
703+00
702+00
701+00
700+00
PP8
PP9
PP10
PP12
PP11
15
16
11
17
12
14
R8
R11R12 XS 1018
13
R10
XS 13
X S 1 1
XS 12
XS 28
XS 30
X S 2 9XS 32
XS 26
X
S 27
X
S

3
1
Ü 0 350175
Feet
Current Conditions Plan ViewMill Dam Creek Restoration SiteDMS Project #97136Yadkin County, NC
Image Source: NC OneMap Orthoimagery, 2015.
Project Easem ent
Existing WetlandsStream M it ig at ion
R (7,165 lf / 7,165 SMC's)
EI (2,209 lf / 1,472 SMC's)
EII (4,130 lf / 1,653 SMC's)
^_Photo Points
Cross-Sections
Bankfull Gauge
Camera
Flow Gauge
Wetland Gauge
Vegetation Monitoring Plots
Success Criteria M et
Success Criteria N ot Met
Supplemental Planting
Invasive Treatm ent
Page 3
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 17 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assessment Date: 1/10/2023
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Reach ID UTHC1
Assessed Length 1,739
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 30 30 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)29 29 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)29 29 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)29 29 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)29 29 100%
1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.22 22 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 22 22 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.22 22 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 22 22 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.22 22 100%
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Totals
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
3. Engineered
Structures
2. Bank
1. Bed
4.Thalweg Position
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 18 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assessment Date: 1/10/2023
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Reach ID UTHC2
Assessed Length 1,494
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 8 8 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)8 8 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)8 8 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)8 8 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)8 8 100%
1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.0 0
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 0 0
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.0 0
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 0 0
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.0 0
2. Bank
1. Bed
4.Thalweg Position
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
Totals
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
3. Engineered
Structures
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 19 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assessment Date: 1/10/2023
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Reach ID UTHC3
Assessed Length 1,325
1.Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2.Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1.Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 18 18 100%
1.Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)17 17 100%
2.Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)17 17 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)17 17 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)17 17 100%
1.Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.8 8 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 8 8 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.5 8 63%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 8 8 100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.8 8 100%
Totals
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
3. Engineered
Structures
1.Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4.Thalweg Position
1. Bed
2.Bank
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 20 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assessment Date: 1/10/2023
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Reach ID UTHC4-1
Assessed Length 297
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 3 3 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)3 3 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)3 3 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)3 3 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)3 3 100%
1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.2 2 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 2 2 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.2 2 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 2 2 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.2 2 100%
Totals
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4.Thalweg Position
1. Bed
2. Bank

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 21 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assessment Date: 1/10/2023
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Reach ID UTHC4-3
Assessed Length 419
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 4 4 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)3 3 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)3 3 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)3 3 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)3 3 100%
1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.1 1 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 1 1 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.1 1 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 1 1 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.1 1 100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4.Thalweg Position
1. Bed
2. Bank
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Totals
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 22 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assessment Date: 1/10/2023
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Reach ID T1
Assessed Length 751
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 16 16 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)16 16 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)16 16 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)16 16 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)16 16 100%
1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.8 8 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 8 8 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.8 8 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 8 8 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.8 8 100%
Totals
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
3. Engineered
Structures
2. Bank
4.Thalweg Position
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Bed

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 23 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assessment Date: 1/10/2023
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Reach ID T1A
Assessed Length 795
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 16 16 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)16 16 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)16 16 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)16 16 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)16 16 100%
1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.11 11 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 11 11 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.11 11 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 11 11 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.11 11 100%
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Totals
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
3. Engineered
Structures
2. Bank
4.Thalweg Position
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Bed

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 24 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assessment Date: 1/10/2023
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Reach ID T2-2
Assessed Length 265
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 8 8 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)7 7 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)7 7 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)7 7 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)7 7 100%
1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.5 5 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 5 5 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.5 5 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 5 5 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.5 5 100%
Totals
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
3. Engineered
Structures
2. Bank
4.Thalweg Position
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Bed

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 25 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assessment Date: 1/10/2023
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Reach ID T3
Assessed Length 369
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 13 13 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)12 12 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)12 12 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)12 12 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)12 12 100%
1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.14 14 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 14 14 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.14 14 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 14 14 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.14 14 100%
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
4.Thalweg Position
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
3. Engineered
Structures
2. Bank
1. Bed
Totals

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 26 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assessment Date: 1/10/2023
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Reach ID T4
Assessed Length 151
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 7 7 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)7 7 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)7 7 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)7 7 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)7 7 100%
1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.6 6 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 6 6 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.6 6 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 6 6 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.6 6 100%
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
3. Meander Pool
Condition
4.Thalweg Position
3. Engineered
Structures
2. Bank
1. Bed
Totals

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 27 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assessment Date: 1/10/2023
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Reach ID T6-2
Assessed Length 658
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 15 15 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)15 15 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)15 15 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)15 15 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)15 15 100%
1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.16 16 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 16 16 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.16 16 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 16 16 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.16 16 100%
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
4.Thalweg Position
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
3. Engineered
Structures
2. Bank
1. Bed
Totals

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 28 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assessment Date: 1/10/2023
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Reach ID T6A-2
Assessed Length 101
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 3 3 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)3 3 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)3 3 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)3 3 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)3 3 100%
1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.6 6 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 6 6 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.6 6 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 6 6 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.6 6 100%
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
4.Thalweg Position
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
3. Engineered
Structures
2. Bank
1. Bed
Totals

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 29 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assessment Date: 1/10/2023
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Reach ID T7-2
Assessed Length 348
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 6 6 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)6 6 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)6 6 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)6 6 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)6 6 100%
1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.4 4 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 4 4 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.4 4 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 4 4 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.4 4 100%
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
4.Thalweg Position
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
3. Engineered
Structures
2. Bank
1. Bed
Totals

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 30 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assessment Date: 1/10/2023
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Reach ID T8-2
Assessed Length 448
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 10 10 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)10 10 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)10 10 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)10 10 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)10 10 100%
1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.12 12 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 12 12 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.12 12 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 12 12 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.12 12 100%
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
4.Thalweg Position
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
3. Engineered
Structures
2. Bank
1. Bed
Totals

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 31 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assessment Date: 1/10/2023
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Reach ID T8A
Assessed Length 262
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 7 7 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)7 7 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)7 7 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)7 7 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)7 7 100%
1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.7 7 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 7 7 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.7 7 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 7 7 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.7 7 100%
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
3. Meander Pool
Condition
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
4.Thalweg Position
3. Engineered
Structures
2. Bank
1. Bed 1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
Totals

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 32 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 5 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Assessment Date: 1/10/2023
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Reach ID T9
Assessed Length 129
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)0 0 100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting 0 0 100%
2. Riffle Condition 1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate 4 4 100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)3 3 100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)3 3 100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)3 3 100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)3 3 100%
1. Scoured/Eroding Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion 0 0 100%
2. Undercut
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
and are providing habitat.
0 0 100%
3. Mass Wasting Bank slumping, calving, or collapse 0 0 100%
0 0 100%
1. Overall Integrity Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.4 4 100%
2. Grade Control Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill. 4 4 100%
2a. Piping Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.4 4 100%
3. Bank Protection Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document) 4 4 100%
4. Habitat Pool forming structures maintaining ~ Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base-flow.4 4 100%
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category Metric
Number Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
4.Thalweg Position
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
3. Engineered
Structures
2. Bank
1. Bed
Totals

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 33 MY03 Monitoring Report

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Assessment Date: 1/10/2023
Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 97136
Planted Acreage 29.5
Vegetation Category Definitions
Mapping
Threshold CCPV Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of Planted
Acreage
1. Bare Areas Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous
material.0.1 acres Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
2. Low Stem Density Areas Woody stem densities clearly below target levels
based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.0.1 acres Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
0 0.00 0.0%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor Areas with woody stems of a size class that are
obviously small given the monitoring year.0.25 acres Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
0 0.00 0.0%
Easement Acreage 20.6
Vegetation Category Definitions
Mapping
Threshold CCPV Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of Easement
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons
at map scale).1000 SF Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
5. Easement Encroachment Areas Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons
at map scale).none Pattern and Color 0 0.00 0.0%
Total
Cumulative Total

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 34 MY03 Monitoring Report

Photo Reference Photos
PP1 – MY00 – 4/17/20 PP1 – MY03 – 1/11/23

PP2 – MY00 – 4/17/20 PP2 – MY03 – 1/11/23

PP3 – MY00 – 4/17/20 PP3 – MY03 – 1/11/23

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 35 MY03 Monitoring Report

PP4 – MY00 – 4/17/20 PP4 – MY03 – 1/11/23

PP5 – MY00 – 4/17/20 PP5 – MY03 – 1/10/23

PP6 – MY00 – 4/16/20 PP6 – MY03 – 1/10/23

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 36 MY03 Monitoring Report

PP7 – MY00 – 4/16/20 PP7 – MY03 – 1/10/23

PP8 – MY00 – 4/16/20 PP8 – MY03 – 1/9/23

PP9 – MY00 – 4/17/20 PP9 – MY03 – 1/9/23

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 37 MY03 Monitoring Report

PP10 – MY00 – 4/17/20 PP10 – MY03 – 1/9/23

PP11 – MY00 – 4/16/20 PP11 – MY03 – 1/9/23

PP12 – MY00 – 4/16/20 PP12 – MY03 – 1/9/23

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 38 MY03 Monitoring Report

Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1 – MY00 – 4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 1 – MY03 – 8/4/22

Vegetation Plot 2 – MY00 – 4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 2 – MY03 – 8/4/22

Vegetation Plot 3 – MY00 – 4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 3 – MY03 – 8/4/22
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 39 MY03 Monitoring Report

Vegetation Plot 4 – MY00 – 4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 4 – MY03 – 8/4/22

Vegetation Plot 5 – MY00 – 4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 05 – MY03 – 8/3/22

Vegetation Plot 6 – MY00 – 4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 6 – MY03 – 8/3/22
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 40 MY03 Monitoring Report

Vegetation Plot 7 – MY00 – 4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 7 – MY03 – 8/3/22

Vegetation Plot 8 – MY00 – 4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 8 – MY03 – 8/2/22

Vegetation Plot 9 – MY00 – 4/16/20 Vegetation Plot 9 – MY03 – 8/2/22
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 41 MY03 Monitoring Report

Vegetation Plot 10 – MY00 – 4/16/20 Vegetation Plot 10 – MY03 – 8/2/22

Vegetation Plot 11 – MY00 – 4/16/20 Vegetation Plot 11 – MY03 – 8/3/22

Vegetation Plot 12 – MY00 – 4/16/20 Vegetation Plot 12 – MY03 – 8/3/22
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 42 MY03 Monitoring Report

Vegetation Plot 13 – MY00 – 4/16/20 Vegetation Plot 13 – MY03 – 8/3/22

Vegetation Plot 14 – MY00 – 4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 14 – MY03 – 8/2/22

Vegetation Plot 15 – MY00 – 4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 15 – MY03 – 8/2/22

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 43 MY03 Monitoring Report

Vegetation Plot 16 – MY00 – 4/17/20 Vegetation Plot 16 – MY03 – 8/2/22

Vegetation Plot 17 – MY00 – 4/16/20 Vegetation Plot 17 – MY03 – 8/4/22

Vegetation Plot 18 – MY00 – 4/16/20 Vegetation Plot 18 – MY03 – 8/4/22

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 44 MY03 Monitoring Report

Vegetation Plot R1 – MY03 – 8/4/22 Vegetation Plot R2 – MY03 – 8/4/22

Vegetation Plot R3 – MY03 – 8/4/22 Vegetation Plot R4 – MY03 – 8/3/22

Vegetation Plot R5 – MY03 – 8/3/22 Vegetation Plot R6 – MY03 – 8/3/22
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 45 MY03 Monitoring Report

Vegetation Plot R7 – MY03 – 8/2/22 Vegetation Plot R8 – MY03 – 8/3/22

Vegetation Plot R9 – MY03 – 8/3/22 Vegetation Plot R10 – MY03 – 8/2/22

Vegetation Plot R11 – MY03 – 8/4/22 Vegetation Plot R12 – MY03 – 8/4/22

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 46 MY03 Monitoring Report

APPENDIX C

Vegetation Plot Data

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 47 MY03 Monitoring Report

Table 7. Species and Quantity – 2021 Supplemental Planting
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Species Quantity Size
Eastern Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) 5 1 gallon
River Birch (Betula nigra) 5 1 gallon
Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis) 5 1 gallon
Black Willow (Salix nigra) 5 1 gallon
Silky Dogwood (Cornus amommum) 5 1 gallon
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos) 3 1 gallon
Pin Oak (Quercus palustris) 2 1 gallon
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 48 MY03 Monitoring Report
Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
American Holly (Ilex opaca )
American Hornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana )
American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis )2 3 5 5 2 2 6 6 2 3 5 5 1 6 3 24
Black Cherry (Prunus serotina )2
Black Walnut (Juglans nigra )3 1
Black Willow (Salix nigra )
Boxelder (Acer negundo )
Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis )1 1
Eastern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana )
Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis )1
Flowering Dogwood (Cornus florida )
Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana )
Northern Red Oak (Quercus rubra )1 1 1 1 1
Oak (Quercus sp.)
Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana )2
Pin Oak (Quercus palustris )11 11
Red Maple (Acer rubrum )2 8 1
River Birch (Betula nigra )5 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 1 1
Sassafras (Sassafras albidum )
Shortleaf Pine (Pinus echinata )
Silky Dogwood (Cornus amomum )2 2 1
Silver Willow (Salix sericea )
Southern Red Oak (Quercus falcata )
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii )1 1 1 1
Tag alder (Alnus serrulata )1
Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera )1 1 3 3 2 2 1 1 2 2 7 7
Water Oak (Quercus nigra )
Witch Hazel (Hamamelis virginiana )
White Oak (Quercus alba )1 1
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos )7 7 11 11 6 6 5 5 11 11 1 1 8 8
Unknown
15 18 20 22 12 15 19 27 18 19 10 10 21 29 19 45
4 5 3 4 4 5 5 6 4 4 4 4 8 10 4 9
607 728 809 890 486 607 769 1,093 728 769 405 405 850 1,174 769 1,821
Plot 08
1
0.025
Table 8. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Current Plot Data (MY03 2022)
Species
Plot 06 Plot 07Plot 01 Plot 02 Plot 03 Plot 04 Plot 05
Stem count
size (ares)1 1 1 1
size (ACRES)0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
Species count
Stems per ACRE
1 1 1

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 49 MY03 Monitoring Report
Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
American Holly (Ilex opaca )
American Hornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana )
American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis )1 11 6 9 1 1 2 2 7 6 12 8 31
Black Cherry (Prunus serotina )
Black Walnut (Juglans nigra )2 2 1 3
Black Willow (Salix nigra )1 2 3 4
Boxelder (Acer negundo )5
Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis )
Eastern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana )4
Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis )
Flowering Dogwood (Cornus florida )
Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana )
Northern Red Oak (Quercus rubra )
Oak (Quercus sp.)
Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana )1 2 5 1 1
Pin Oak (Quercus palustris )2 2 4 4
Red Maple (Acer rubrum )
River Birch (Betula nigra )5 6 7 7 1 1 7 7 8 8
Sassafras (Sassafras albidum )1
Shortleaf Pine (Pinus echinata )2
Silky Dogwood (Cornus amomum )
Silver Willow (Salix sericea )
Southern Red Oak (Quercus falcata )
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii )1 1 3 3 1 1
Tag alder (Alnus serrulata )2
Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera )1 1 3 3 8 10 2 2 5 5 1 3 1 1
Water Oak (Quercus nigra )3
Witch Hazel (Hamamelis virginiana )
White Oak (Quercus alba )1 1 4 4 1 1
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos )7 7 3 3 4 4 6 6 4 4 20 21 5 5 8 8
Unknown
17 29 16 19 9 10 18 34 19 30 32 47 24 52 19 19
6 7 3 3 4 4 3 9 8 9 4 7 5 6 5 5
688 1,174 647 769 364 405 728 1,376 769 1,214 1,295 1,902 971 2,104 769 769
Species count
Stems per ACRE
1 1 1111 1
size (ACRES)0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
Plot 16
1
0.025
Table 8. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Current Plot Data (MY03 2022)
Species
Plot 14 Plot 15Plot 09 Plot 10 Plot 11 Plot 12 Plot 13
Stem count
size (ares)

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 50 MY03 Monitoring Report
Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
American Holly (Ilex opaca )
American Hornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana )
American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis )3 7 11 39 3 3 5 5 3 3 7 7 11 11 2 2
Black Cherry (Prunus serotina )1
Black Walnut (Juglans nigra )1 2 2 1
Black Willow (Salix nigra )
Boxelder (Acer negundo )8 1
Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis )
Eastern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana )2
Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis )
Flowering Dogwood (Cornus florida )
Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana )8
Northern Red Oak (Quercus rubra )
Oak (Quercus sp.)
Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana )1 1
Pin Oak (Quercus palustris )
Red Maple (Acer rubrum )14 5 5
River Birch (Betula nigra )5 5 3 3
Sassafras (Sassafras albidum )
Shortleaf Pine (Pinus echinata )6
Silky Dogwood (Cornus amomum )
Silver Willow (Salix sericea )
Southern Red Oak (Quercus falcata )
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii )1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1
Tag alder (Alnus serrulata )
Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera )5 6 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 3 3
Water Oak (Quercus nigra )
Witch Hazel (Hamamelis virginiana )
White Oak (Quercus alba )
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos )4 4 14 14 7 7 2 2 4 4 6 6 5 5 11 11
Unknown
7 20 30 69 12 26 14 19 12 12 14 15 18 27 20 28
2 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 3 4 4 7 5 8
283 809 1,214 2,792 486 1,052 567 769 486 486 567 607 728 1,093 809 1,133
Plot R6
1
0.025
Table 8. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Current Plot Data (MY03 2022)
Species
Plot R4 Plot R5Plot 17 Plot 18 Plot R1 Plot R2 Plot R3
Stem count
size (ares)1
size (ACRES)0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
Species count
Stems per ACRE
1 1 1111

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 51 MY03 Monitoring Report
Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
American Holly (Ilex opaca )
American Hornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana )
American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis )28 28 2 2 9 9 7 7 7 7 15 15
Black Cherry (Prunus serotina )3
Black Walnut (Juglans nigra )1 3 3 3
Black Willow (Salix nigra )2 2 1 1 2 2
Boxelder (Acer negundo )49
Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis )
Eastern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana )
Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis )
Flowering Dogwood (Cornus florida )3
Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana )3
Northern Red Oak (Quercus rubra )
Oak (Quercus sp.)
Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana )
Pin Oak (Quercus palustris )
Red Maple (Acer rubrum )1
River Birch (Betula nigra )7 7 3 3 6 6 10 10 5 5 26 26
Sassafras (Sassafras albidum )
Shortleaf Pine (Pinus echinata )
Silky Dogwood (Cornus amomum )1 1
Silver Willow (Salix sericea )2
Southern Red Oak (Quercus falcata )
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii )1 1 1 1 1 1
Tag alder (Alnus serrulata )
Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera )6 6 2 2 4 4 10 10 3 3
Water Oak (Quercus nigra )
Witch Hazel (Hamamelis virginiana )2
White Oak (Quercus alba )
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos )5 5 3 3 2 2 4 4 4 4 5 5
Unknown
47 54 12 13 19 19 27 37 27 79 50 53
5 8 5 6 5 5 5 9 5 7 5 6
1,902 2,185 486 526 769 769 1,093 1,497 1,093 3,197 2,023 2,145
Current Plot Data (MY03 2022)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
1 1 1111
size (ACRES)0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
Table 8. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Species
Plot R12Plot R7 Plot R8 Plot R9 Plot R10 Plot R11
Stem count
size (ares)

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 52 MY03 Monitoring Report
Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
American Holly (Ilex opaca )1
American Hornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana )2
American Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis )163 272 204 232 159 207 88 88
Black Cherry (Prunus serotina )6
Black Walnut (Juglans nigra )28 13 6 4
Black Willow (Salix nigra )9 11 39 43 14 14 5 5
Boxelder (Acer negundo )63 37 20
Buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis )1 1
Eastern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana )6 1
Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis )1 1 2
Flowering Dogwood (Cornus florida )3
Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana )11
Northern Red Oak (Quercus rubra )2 3 1 1 1
Oak (Quercus sp.)206 206
Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana )4 10 1 1
Pin Oak (Quercus palustris )17 17 22 22 20 20
Red Maple (Acer rubrum )36 8
River Birch (Betula nigra )117 118 76 76 83 85 107 107
Sassafras (Sassafras albidum )1
Shortleaf Pine (Pinus echinata )8
Silky Dogwood (Cornus amomum )3 4
Silver Willow (Salix sericea )2
Southern Red Oak (Quercus falcata )1 1 5
Swamp Chestnut Oak (Quercus michauxii )16 16 14 14 15 15 20 20
Tag alder (Alnus serrulata )3
Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera )76 81 88 92 99 109 172 172
Water Oak (Quercus nigra )3
Witch Hazel (Hamamelis virginiana )2
White Oak (Quercus alba )7 7 12 13 10 12
Willow Oak (Quercus phellos )182 183 180 180 220 223 30 30
Unknown 89 89
597 896 636 725 620 731 718 723
12 26 9 13 8 17 9 11
805 1,209 858 978 836 986 969 975
Stem count
size (ares)
Table 8. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Species
MY00 (2020)MY03 (2022)MY02 (2021)MY01 (2020)
Annual Means
Species count
Stems per ACRE
30 30 3030
size (ACRES)0.741 0.741 0.741 0.741

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 53 MY03 Monitoring Report

APPENDIX D

Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 54 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 9a. UTHC-1 Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As-built

Dimension - Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width (ft) 5.8 – 10.6 9.0 – 10.0 6.5 – 9 6.0 7.6 8.9 3
Floodprone Width (ft) 9.0 – 27.3 13 – 21 50 59.1 64.6 68.3 3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.4 – 0.8 1.1 – 1.2 0.5 – 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.4 – 1.2 1.3 – 1.5 0.8 – 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 3
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 2.8 – 4.5 10.4 – 10.7 3.4 – 6.1 4.5 5.1 5.5 3
Width/Depth Ratio 7.6 – 28.2 8 – 10 12.4 – 13.4 8.2 11.6 14.4 3
Entrenchment Ratio 1.2 – 2.6 1.3 – 2.3 5.6 – 7.7 6.6 8.7 11.0 3
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 – 10.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) * 45 26 – 61 26 – 61
Radius of Curvature (ft) * 13 – 42 18 – 27 18 – 27
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) * 1.3 – 4.4 2.0 – 4.1 2.0 – 4.1
Meander Wavelength (ft) * 93 – 136 54 – 125 54 – 125
Meander Width Ratio * 4.5 – 5.0 4.0 – 7.5 4.0 – 7.5

Riffle Length (ft) * 4.2 27.2 40.9 30
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.024 – 0.033 0.013 – 0.028 0.018 – 0.046 0.011 0.024 0.059 30
Pool Length (ft) * 9.8 61.1 161.9 28
Pool Spacing (ft) * 30 – 59 48 – 70 31.3 59.3 118.6 27

SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% 2/18/51/28/0/0 1/19/51/26/0/0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) 1.3/18/37/97/130 Gravel Gravel 1.3/9.7/31/91/147

Channel length (ft) 1,874 1,739 1,739
Drainage Area (acres) 114 Variable 114 114
Rosgen Classification F4 B4c C4 C4
Sinuosity 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.021 0.013 0.025 0.026
* : no data shown due to channelization / lack of bed diversity

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 55 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 9b. UTHC3 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data (SF) Design As-built

Dimension - Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width (ft) 8.5 – 14.1 9.0 – 10.0 12 10.9 11.3 11.7 2
Floodprone Width (ft) 17.1 13 – 21 68 69.4 72.6 75.8 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8 – 1.6 1.1 – 1.2 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.1 2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.1 – 2.0 1.3 – 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.7 2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 8.5 – 12.5 10.4 – 10.7 11.4 10.6 12.0 13.3 2
Width/Depth Ratio 17 8 – 10 12.7 10.2 10.7 11.1 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.2 1.3 – 2.3 5.7 5.9 6.5 7.0 2
Bank Height Ratio 3.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) * 45 39 – 57 39 – 57
Radius of Curvature (ft) * 13 – 42 24 – 36 24 – 36
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) * 1.3 – 4.4 24 – 36 24 – 36
Meander Wavelength (ft) * 93 – 136 111 – 173 111 – 173
Meander Width Ratio * 4.5 – 5.0 3.3 – 4.8 3.3 – 4.8
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) * 18.2 46.0 85.8 18
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.015 0.013 – 0.028 0.0007 – 0.032 0.003 0.015 0.040 18
Pool Length (ft) * 15.9 26.6 49.1 17
Pool Spacing (ft) * 30 – 59 52 – 101 48.8 75.5 113.5 16
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% 3/15/57/19/0/6 0/13/48/37/1/0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) 2.7/15/26/40/92 Gravel Gravel 2.5/23/48/125/165

Channel length (ft) 1,411 1,325 1,325
Drainage Area (acres) 297 Variable 297 297
Rosgen Classification F4 B4c C4 C4
Sinuosity 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.014 0.013 0.015 0.015
* : no data shown due to channelization / lack of bed diversity

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 56 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 9c. T1 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data (SF) Design As-built

Dimension – Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft) 4.1 – 7.5 6.5 6.5
Floodprone Width (ft) 6.0 – 32.8 35 48.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.5 – 0.7 0.5 0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.8 – 1.0 0.8 1.2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 2.7 – 3.8 3.4 3.9
Width/Depth Ratio 6.2 – 14.9 12 – 18 12.4 10.9
Entrenchment Ratio 1.5 – 4.4 2.2+ 5.4 7.5
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 – 4.5 1.0 – 1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) * 23 – 41 23 – 41
Radius of Curvature (ft) * 15 – 22 15 – 22
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) * 2.2 – 3.4 2.2 – 3.4
Meander Wavelength (ft) * 60 – 83 60 – 83
Meander Width Ratio * 3.5 – 6.3 3.5 – 6.3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) * 7.8 22.0 42.2 16
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.019 – 0.028 0.015 – 0.60 0.002 0.022 0.035 16
Pool Length (ft) * 3.5 12.6 20.1 16
Pool Spacing (ft) * 25 – 63 24.4 41.3 58.4 15
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% 31/21/44/4/1/0 2/15/66/17/0/0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) 0.13/0.37/3/38/66 Gravel Gravel 1.9/8.8/22/67/94

Channel length (ft) 764 751 751
Drainage Area (acres) 43 Variable 43 43
Rosgen Classification B4, C4, G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1 – 1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.026 N/A 0.026 0.025
* : no data shown due to channelization / lack of bed diversity

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 57 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 9d. T1A Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data (SF) Design As-built

Dimension - Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width (ft) 7.1 5.5 5.4 5.6 5.8 2
Floodprone Width (ft) 7.7 35 44.5 49.4 54.4 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.4 2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 2.8 2.5 1.8 2.1 2.3 2
Width/Depth Ratio 18.2 12 – 18 12.1 14.1 15.0 15.9 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.1 2.2+ 6.4 7.7 8.9 10.1 2
Bank Height Ratio 19.6 1.0 – 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) * 20 – 28 20 – 28
Radius of Curvature (ft) * 15 – 22 15 – 22
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) * 2.3 – 3.4 2.3 – 3.4
Meander Wavelength (ft) * 72 – 84 72 – 84
Meander Width Ratio * 3.6 – 5.1 3.6 – 5.1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) 1.4 20.7 51.8 16
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.025 0.020 – 0.062 0.000 0.025 0.046 16
Pool Length (ft) 4.9 14.7 27.2 16
Pool Spacing (ft) * 32 – 58 32.8 44.7 65.8 15
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% 31/51/12/6/0/0 5/19/62/14/0/0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) 0.062/0.072/0.13/2.9/71 Gravel Gravel 0.7/5.8/20/59/99

Channel length (ft) 746 795 795
Drainage Area (acres) 29 Variable 29 29
Rosgen Classification F4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1 – 1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.022 N/A 0.030 0.030
* : no data shown due to channelization / lack of bed diversity

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 58 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 9e. T2-2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As-built

Dimension - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft) 3.1 4.5 4.7
Floodprone Width (ft) 4 22 24.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.5 0.4 0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.8 0.6 0.9
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 1.5 1.7 2.3
Width/Depth Ratio 6.3 12 – 18 12.0 9.9
Entrenchment Ratio 1.3 2.2+ 4.9 5.1
Bank Height Ratio 3.3 1.0 – 1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) * N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature (ft) * N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio * N/A N/A
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length (ft) 1.6 13.2 40.9 8
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.04 0.024-0.063 0.023 0.049 0.099 8
Pool Length (ft) 3.6 14.8 31.4 7
Pool Spacing (ft) * 21 – 34 24.1 37.8 55.6 6
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% 11/14/63/13/0/0 14/30/27/30/0/0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) 0.26/13/21/58/84 Gravel Gravel 0.1/0.7/6/87/130

Channel length (ft) 232 265 265
Drainage Area (acres) 16 Variable 16 16
Rosgen Classification G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1 – 1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.038 N/A 0.042 0.040
* : no data shown due to channelization / lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 59 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 9f. T3 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As-built

Dimension - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft) 3.5 4.5 4.7
Floodprone Width (ft) 4.2 18 19.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.3 0.4 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.4 0.6 0.7
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 1.1 1.7 1.9
Width/Depth Ratio 11.3 12 – 18 12.0 11.6
Entrenchment Ratio 1.2 2.2+ 4.0 4.1
Bank Height Ratio 3.3 1.0 – 1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) * N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature (ft) * N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio * N/A N/A
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length (ft) 2.2 13.3 25.7 13
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.058 0.051 – 0.074 0.032 0.058 0.125 13
Pool Length (ft) 3.4 9.5 20.7 12
Pool Spacing (ft) * 20 – 30 22.8 28.2 46.7 11
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% 28/5/38/27/4 6/11/71/13/0/0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) 0.062/3.1/25/130/240 Gravel Gravel 1.7/7.8/28/61/84

Channel length (ft) 378 369 369
Drainage Area (acres) 7 Variable 7 7
Rosgen Classification G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1 – 1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.059 N/A 0.059 0.057
* : no data shown due to channelization / lack of bed diversity

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 60 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 9g. T4 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As-built

Dimension - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft) 2.5 4.5 4.0
Floodprone Width (ft) 4.7 16 18.7
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.3 0.6 0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.4 0.6 0.8
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 0.7 1.7 1.9
Width/Depth Ratio 9.4 12 – 18 12.0 8.3
Entrenchment Ratio 1.9 2.2+ 3.6 4.7
Bank Height Ratio 6.9 1.0 – 1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) * N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature (ft) * N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio * N/A N/A
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length (ft) 7.9 13.4 22.2 7
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.1 0.102 – 0.103 0.039 0.11 0.23 7
Pool Length (ft) 3.2 5.4 11.0 7
Pool Spacing (ft) * 24 – 27 9.5 19.5 26.5 6
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% 12/65/13/8/2/0 0/15/77/8/0/0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) 0.11/0.16/0.21/4.3/120 Gravel Gravel 2.2/9.6/15/48/76

Channel length (ft) 151 151 151
Drainage Area (acres) 3 Variable 3 3
Rosgen Classification B4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.0 1.1 – 1.3 1.0 1.0
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.089 N/A 0.113 0.109
* : no data shown due to channelization / lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 61 MY03 Monitoring Report

Table 9h. T6-2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As-built

Dimension - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft) 4.4 5.5 5.6
Floodprone Width (ft) 5.4 24 27.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.6 0.5 0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.7 0.7 1.0
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 2.6 2.5 2.6
Width/Depth Ratio 7.5 12 – 18 12.1 11.9
Entrenchment Ratio 1.1 2.2+ 4.4 4.9
Bank Height Ratio 4.4 1.0 – 1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) * N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature (ft) * N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio * N/A N/A
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length (ft) 15.4 25.1 37.9 15
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.02 0.020 – 0.063 0.007 0.033 0.070 15
Pool Length (ft) 5.9 14.1 22.7 15
Pool Spacing (ft) * 32 – 47 28.8 42.9 50.9 14
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% 7/33/60/0/0/0 1/16/53/30/0/0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) 0.19/1.6/4.1/13/27 Gravel Gravel 1.7/16/38/93/140

Channel length (ft) 621 658 658
Drainage Area (acres) 29 Variable 29 29
Rosgen Classification G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.0 1.1 – 1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.041 N/A 0.034 0.037
* : no data shown due to channelization / lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 62 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 9i. T6A-2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As-built

Dimension - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft) ** 4.5 4.4
Floodprone Width (ft) ** 24 25.3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) ** 0.4 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) ** 0.6 0.6
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) ** 1.7 1.7
Width/Depth Ratio ** 12 – 18 12.0 11.0
Entrenchment Ratio ** 2.2+ 5.3 5.8
Bank Height Ratio ** 1.0 – 1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) ** N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature (ft) ** N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) ** N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft) ** N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio ** N/A N/A
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length (ft) ** 9.3 14.8 24.0 3
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) ** 0.087 – 0.099 0.056 0.091 0.118 3
Pool Length (ft) ** 14.2 16.7 19.5 3
Pool Spacing (ft) ** 22 – 23 29.4 30.0 30.6 2
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% ** 0/14/70/16/0/0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) ** Gravel Gravel 2.6/25/36/64/85

Channel length (ft) 97 101 101
Drainage Area (acres) 9 Variable 9 9
Rosgen Classification ** B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity ** 1.1 – 1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) ** N/A 0.091 0.095
** Existing conditions are ponded

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 63 MY03 Monitoring Report

Table 9j. T7-2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As-built

Dimension - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft) 3.2 6.5 10.1
Floodprone Width (ft) 4.6 28 47.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.8 0.5 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 1.1 0.8 1.0
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 2.4 3.4 4.3
Width/Depth Ratio 4.1 12 – 18 12.4 23.9
Entrenchment Ratio 1.4 2.2+ 4.3 4.7
Bank Height Ratio 1.7 1.0 – 1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) * 20 – 24 20 – 24
Radius of Curvature (ft) * 15 – 22 15 – 22
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) * 2.3 – 3.4 2.3 – 3.4
Meander Wavelength (ft) * 85 – 88 85 – 88
Meander Width Ratio * 3.1 – 3.7 3.1 – 3.7
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length (ft) 4.5 32.4 68.1 6
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.032 0.017 – 0.043 0.015 0.025 0.029 6
Pool Length (ft) 4.9 12.5 19.7 6
Pool Spacing (ft) * 36 – 57 45.7 54.6 86.6 5
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% 3/18/62/16/1/0 0/20/62/17/0/0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) 1.2/7.9/22/66/89 Gravel Gravel 0.8/8.5/17/67/110

Channel length (ft) 335 348 348
Drainage Area (acres) 41 Variable 41 41
Rosgen Classification G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1 – 1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.033 N/A 0.024 0.022
* : no data shown due to channelization / lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 64 MY03 Monitoring Report

Table 9k. T8-2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As-built

Dimension - Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width (ft) 3.6 5.5 5.5 5.6 5.7 2
Floodprone Width (ft) 4.1 25 34.8 39.1 43.4 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.9 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 2.4 2.5 3.2 3.3 3.4 2
Width/Depth Ratio 5.5 12 – 18 12.1 9.1 9.6 10.1 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.1 2.2+ 4.4 6.3 7.0 7.6 2
Bank Height Ratio 2.5 1.0 – 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) * N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature (ft) * N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio * N/A N/A
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) 9.3 23.3 31.9 10
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.041 0.043 – 0.050 0.033 0.048 0.063 10
Pool Length (ft) 7.9 13.4 16.6 10
Pool Spacing (ft) * 32 - 45 34.1 42.2 53.6 9
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% 18/27/40/14/0/0 4/17/52/27/0/0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) 0.13/2.2/8.5/81/140 Gravel Gravel 0.7/14/37/95/135

Channel length (ft) 486 448 448
Drainage Area (acres) 21 Variable 21 21
Rosgen Classification G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1 – 1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.044 N/A 0.045 0.048
* : no data shown due to channelization / lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 65 MY03 Monitoring Report

Table 9l. T8A Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As-built

Dimension - Riffle Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width (ft) 3.1 4.5 4.7 5.7 6.6 2
Floodprone Width (ft) 4.1 20 21.6 44.7 67.9 2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.9 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.1 2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 1.0 1.7 2.6 2.7 2.9 2
Width/Depth Ratio 5.5 12 – 18 12.0 8.6 11.9 15.2 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.1 2.2+ 4.4 4.6 7.4 10.3 2
Bank Height Ratio 2.7 1.0 – 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) * N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature (ft) * N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio * N/A N/A
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) 12.3 22.7 42.7 7
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.044 0.019 – 0.062 0.027 0.053 0.10 7
Pool Length (ft) 6.3 12.4 22.4 6
Pool Spacing (ft) * 28 – 38 27.7 40.3 66.1 5
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% 100/0/0/0/0/0 4/17/54/25/0/0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) 0.062/0.062/0.062/0.062/0.062 Gravel Gravel 1.8/23/32/84/135

Channel length (ft) 258 262 262
Drainage Area (acres) 7 Variable 7 7
Rosgen Classification G4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.1 1.1 – 1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.052 N/A 0.044 0.047
* : no data shown due to channelization / lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 66 MY03 Monitoring Report

Table 9m. T9 Baseline Stream Data Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Reference Reach(es) Data Design As-built

Dimension - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft) 2.9 5.5 4.1
Floodprone Width (ft) 5.5 22 29.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.7 0.5 0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.9 0.7 0.9
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) 2.0 2.5 2.8
Width/Depth Ratio 4.3 12 – 18 12.1 6.0
Entrenchment Ratio 1.9 2.2+ 4.0 7.2
Bank Height Ratio 1.7 1.0 – 1.1 1.0 1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) * N/A N/A
Radius of Curvature (ft) * N/A N/A
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Wavelength (ft) * N/A N/A
Meander Width Ratio * N/A N/A
Profile Min Mean Max n
Riffle Length (ft) 10.5 22.8 31.7 4
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.031 0.037 0.033 0.039 0.056 4
Pool Length (ft) 3.9 6.2 7.7 3
Pool Spacing (ft) * 34 – 36 37.02 39.1 41.1 2
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% /Be% 26/66/8/0/0/0 3/7/59/31/0/0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm) 0.062/0.13/0.15/0.23/3.7 Gravel Gravel 12/32/42/90/150

Channel length (ft) 133 129 129
Drainage Area (acres) 29 Variable 29 29
Rosgen Classification B4 B4c C4b C4b
Sinuosity 1.0 1.1 – 1.3 1.1 1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft) 0.039 N/A 0.042 0.038
* : no data shown due to channelization / lack of bed diversity
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 67 MY03 Monitoring Report
Dimension and Substrate
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation (ft) based on AB BKF area 948.8 948.8 948.9 948.9 931.0 930.9 930.7 930.9 930.3 930.1 930.0 930.2
Bankfull Width (ft)6.0 6.6 6.1 7.1 8.0 7.0 7.8 7.7 8.4 7.8 8.2 17.3
Floodprone Width (ft)66.3 66.6 67.4 67.1 68.3 70.7 69.6 68.6 ------------
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF area 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF elevation 4.5 4.4 3.8 3.8 5.3 6.1 8.3 5.9 7.4 9.5 10.1 10.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 8.2 9.6 8.3 11.4 12.1 9.2 11.6 11.4 ------------
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 11.0 10.1 11.0 9.4 8.6 10.1 8.9 8.9 ------------
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 ------------
d50 (mm)48 48 37.0 ---24 40 22.0 ---------------
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation (ft) based on AB BKF area 923.0 922.9 923.0 923.0 922.8 922.9 922.9 922.9 908.7 908.7 908.7 908.7
Bankfull Width (ft)13.1 12.1 12.0 12.5 8.9 8.6 9.6 9.0 22.6 22.8 23.0 22.8
Floodprone Width (ft)------------59.1 57.6 57.9 58.8 43.0 43.0 41.1 43.1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2.2 2.4 2.3 2.3 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.5
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF area 15.4 15.4 15.4 15.4 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 55.5 55.5 55.5 55.5
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF elevation 15.4 16.8 16.6 16.4 5.5 4.9 4.7 5.0 55.5 55.9 54.9 56.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio ------------14.4 13.2 16.5 14.6 9.2 9.3 9.5 9.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio ------------6.6 6.7 6.0 6.5 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio ------------1.0 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
d50 (mm)------------21 38 58 ---19 31 33.0 ---
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation (ft) based on AB BKF area 883.7 883.7 883.8 883.8 871.2 871.2 870.3 870.4 871.0 870.9 871.0 871.3
Bankfull Width (ft)12.9 11.8 11.6 13.5 10.4 10.4 10.9 11.3 10.9 11.2 11.9 12.5
Floodprone Width (ft)37.6 38.4 37.6 38.3 ------------75.8 76.1 76.0 72.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.3 1.4 1.4 1.2 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2.0 2.2 2.1 2.1 3.8 3.8 2.8 3.1 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.7
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF area 16.7 16.7 16.7 16.7 20.8 20.8 20.8 20.8 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF elevation 16.7 16.6 15.8 15.8 20.8 20.8 31.9 30.3 10.6 11.4 10.9 6.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 9.9 8.3 8.0 10.9 ------------11.1 11.7 13.2 14.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 2.9 3.3 3.3 2.8 ------------7.0 6.8 6.4 5.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ------------1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9
d50 (mm)19 55 66 ---------------50 64 58 ---
Cross-Section 6 (Riffle)
Station 30+20, UTHC-2
Cross-Section 7 (Riffle)
Station 38+52, UTHC-2
Cross-Section 8 (Pool)
Station 46+20, UTHC-3
Cross-Section 9 (Riffle)
Station 46+48, UTHC-3
Table 10. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Cross-Section 1 (Riffle)
Station 13+50, UTHC-1
Cross-Section 2 (Riffle)
Station 19+25, UTHC-1
Cross-Section 3 (Pool)
Station 19+50, UTHC-1
Cross-Section 4 (Pool)
Station 23+17, UTHC-1
Cross-Section 5 (Riffle)
Station 23+32, UTHC-1

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 68 MY03 Monitoring Report
Dimension and Substrate
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation (ft) based on AB BKF area 861.6 861.7 861.8 861.6 853.8 853.9 853.8 853.9 845.4 845.4 845.4 845.5
Bankfull Width (ft)11.7 14.0 11.5 12.8 11.9 12.1 12.7 12.0 17.6 19.0 20.0 18.9
Floodprone Width (ft)69.4 69.5 69.3 70.0 43.2 43.8 44.2 44.2 30.7 17.7 19.8 27.9
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.1 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.2 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.7
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF area 13.3 13.3 13.3 13.3 17.3 17.3 17.3 17.2 30.2 29.7 30.2 30.2
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF elevation 13.3 12.1 10.9 12.6 17.3 16.0 17.2 16.1 30.2 29.7 28.9 28.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.2 14.7 9.9 12.2 8.2 8.5 9.4 8.4 10.3 12.2 13.2 11.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 5.9 5.0 6.0 5.5 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.7 1.7 0.9 1.0 1.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.2 1.0 0.9 0.9
d50 (mm)45 51 47 ---19 72 52 ---20 65 39 ---
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation (ft) based on AB BKF area 847.4 847.2 847.2 847.3 943.6 943.6 943.6 943.6 938.9 939.1 939.0 939.0
Bankfull Width (ft)24.9 27.3 27.2 27.8 5.4 4.8 4.7 7.2 5.8 5.5 6.1 5.6
Floodprone Width (ft)67.7 68.1 68.8 68.3 54.4 54.3 54.7 54.6 44.5 46.4 46.4 44.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)1.6 1.4 1.4 1.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2.6 3.2 3.1 3.0 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF area 38.7 38.7 38.7 38.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF elevation 38.7 42.1 42.3 39.8 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.9 2.3 1.7 1.9 1.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 16.0 19.3 19.1 20.0 15.9 12.5 12.4 28.7 14.1 12.9 15.6 13.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.5 10.1 11.4 11.5 7.6 7.7 8.4 7.7 7.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.8 1.0 1.0
d50 (mm)21 37 47 ---24 29 32 ---16 19 48 ---
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation (ft) based on AB BKF area 929.2 929.2 929.2 929.4 928.4 928.4 928.4 928.6 923.4 923.4 923.4 923.5
Bankfull Width (ft)6.5 8.6 7.0 6.8 8.7 7.8 8.4 6.0 4.7 5.8 5.9 6.1
Floodprone Width (ft)48.4 49.6 47.7 48.8 ------------24.1 24.6 24.5 24.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.6 0.4 0.6 0.6 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.2 1.3 1.0 1.0 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.1 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF area 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF elevation 3.9 3.7 3.4 2.5 8.3 8.4 7.7 6.9 2.3 1.9 1.9 1.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 10.9 19.3 12.6 11.9 ------------9.9 14.7 15.6 16.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 7.5 5.7 6.8 7.2 ------------5.1 4.3 4.1 4.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 ------------1.0 0.8 1.0 1.0
d50 (mm)22 27 9.4 ---------------6.4 69 21 ---
Table 10. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Cross-Section 10 (Riffle)
Station 53+10, UTHC-3
Cross-Section 11 (Riffle)
Station 57+40, UTHC-4
Cross-Section 12 (Riffle)
Station 65+80, UTHC-6
Cross-Section 13 (Riffle)
Station 67+20, UTHC-6
Cross-Section 14 (Riffle)
Station 155+00, T1A
Cross-Section 15 (Riffle)
Station 156+20, T1A
Cross-Section 16 (Riffle)
Station 104+80, T1
Cross-Section 17 (Pool)
Station 105+10, T1
Cross-Section 18 (Riffle)
Station 206+60, T2

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 69 MY03 Monitoring Report
Dimension and Substrate
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation (ft) based on AB BKF area 922.6 922.6 922.7 922.6 918.0 918.1 917.9 918.0 916.6 916.6 916.6 916.7
Bankfull Width (ft)6.7 6.6 6.2 6.4 9.9 7.8 10.8 6.9 7.8 7.2 6.8 9.3
Floodprone Width (ft)------------21.8 21.1 20.7 21.5 ------------
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.1 1.1 0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.7 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF area 5.6 5.6 5.7 5.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 7.7 7.7 7.3 7.7
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF elevation 5.6 5.2 5.2 5.2 1.9 1.3 2.0 1.8 7.7 8.1 7.4 6.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio ------------27.2 16.9 32.2 13.4 ------------
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio ------------2.2 2.7 1.9 3.1 ------------
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio ------------1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 ------------
d50 (mm)------------28 26 20 ---------------
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation (ft) based on AB BKF area 906.2 906.2 906.3 906.0 894.3 894.3 894.6 894.5 877.9 878.4 878.4 878.7
Bankfull Width (ft)4.0 4.4 8.7 2.9 4.4 3.5 3.2 3.9 5.6 3.8 3.5 3.9
Floodprone Width (ft)18.7 19.2 19.3 18.1 25.3 29.8 32.0 29.7 27.4 43.8 46.5 49.8
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.5 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.8 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.6 0.9 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF area 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF elevation 1.9 1.9 0.9 2.5 1.7 1.8 1.1 1.1 2.6 0.8 0.9 0.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 8.3 10.0 38.7 4.3 11.0 7.1 5.9 8.7 11.9 5.5 4.6 5.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 4.7 4.4 2.2 6.3 5.8 8.5 10.0 7.7 4.9 11.6 13.4 12.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 0.5 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.7 0.8
d50 (mm)15 12 15 ---36 35 32 ---38 15 12 ---
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation (ft) based on AB BKF area 877.6 877.7 878.1 878.8 868.2 868.0 868.1 868.2 867.5 867.6 867.8 867.7
Bankfull Width (ft)8.4 5.1 6.3 3.8 7.2 6.0 6.2 6.2 10.1 7.3 5.7 7.2
Floodprone Width (ft)------------------------47.4 47.0 44.0 43.5
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.6 1.0 0.8 1.3 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.1 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.1
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF area 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF elevation 5.1 4.4 2.6 0.8 4.6 5.8 5.1 4.7 4.3 3.5 2.8 3.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio ------------------------23.9 12.4 7.5 12.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio ------------------------4.7 6.5 7.8 6.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio ------------------------1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0
d50 (mm)------------------------17 22 28 ---
Cross-Section 24 (Riffle)
Station 608+15, T6
Cross-Section 25 (Pool)
Station 608+40, T6
Cross-Section 26 (Pool)
Station 703+40, T7
Cross-Section 27 (Riffle)
Station 703+70, T7
Table 10. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Cross-Section 19 (Pool)
Station 206+80, T2
Cross-Section 20 (Riffle)
Station 302+80, T3
Cross-Section 21 (Pool)
Station 303+30 T3
Cross-Section 22 (Riffle)
Station 400+90, T4
Cross-Section 23 (Riffle)
Station 651+25, T6A

Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 70 MY03 Monitoring Report

Dimension and Substrate
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation (ft) based on AB BKF area 853.0 853.3 853.3 853.3 849.8 849.9 850.0 849.9 842.8 842.8 842.9 842.8
Bankfull Width (ft)4.1 4.7 5.3 8.1 5.5 5.5 5.4 6.7 5.7 5.8 7.1 8.2
Floodprone Width (ft)29.6 31.9 31.6 31.3 34.8 43.8 40.6 37.3 43.4 42.0 42.5 42.7
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)0.9 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.9
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF area 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF elevation 2.8 1.5 1.5 1.3 3.4 2.9 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.4 3.0 3.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 6.0 7.9 9.9 23.1 9.1 9.0 8.5 13.1 10.1 10.5 15.5 21.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 7.2 6.7 6.0 3.9 6.3 7.9 7.6 5.6 7.6 7.2 6.0 5.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9
d50 (mm)42 6.7 9.3 ---36 68 83 ---37 16 55 ---
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation (ft) based on AB BKF area 850.8 850.9 850.8 850.7 845.8 845.6 845.7 845.6
Bankfull Width (ft)4.7 5.2 5.7 4.6 4.8 4.1 4.5 4.2
Floodprone Width (ft)21.6 21.8 22.0 19.7 49.3 49.4 49.3 49.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)1.1 1.1 1.2 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF area 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2) based on AB BKF elevation 2.6 2.3 2.6 3.0 2.1 2.8 2.5 3.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 8.6 10.7 12.6 8.1 11.4 8.2 10.0 8.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 4.6 4.2 3.9 4.3 10.2 12.0 10.9 11.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.1
d50 (mm)54 5 6.6 ---10 54 37 ---
Table 10. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Cross-Section 28 (Riffle)
Station 900+80, T9
Cross-Section 29 (Riffle)
Station 806+10, T8
Cross-Section 30 (Riffle)
Station 807+45, T8
Cross-Section 31 (Riffle)
Station 850+60, T8A
Cross-Section 32 (Riffle)
Station 851+75, T8A

Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation Station Elevation
0.0 949.89 61.5 949.07 948.91
0.0 948.94 63.1 949.16 4.5
0.8 948.76 64.9 949.43 3.8
1.8 948.85 66.3 949.80 7.1
3.7 948.84 67.6 950.46 950.18
6.6 948.56 69.1 951.03 67.1
11.7 948.41 70.6 951.60 1.3
15.6 948.56 72.4 952.10 0.6
19.3 948.63 73.8 952.56 11.4
24.0 948.70 9.4
29.3 948.75 0.9
34.0 948.89 947.64
37.0 948.98
37.7 948.98
38.1 948.78
38.7 948.60
39.5 948.46
40.0 948.19
40.3 947.92
40.5 947.84
40.8 947.75
40.9 947.64
41.3 947.65
41.8 947.86
42.1 947.90
42.2 948.04
42.6 948.16
43.2 948.32
43.8 948.42
44.5 948.77
45.0 948.79
47.9 948.72
50.9 948.80
54.1 948.77
57.0 948.92
58.7 949.14
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS1
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.18
Date:1/11/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
W / D Ratio:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
0 10203040506070
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS1, Riffle, UTHC
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation Station Elevation
0.0 936.12 50.7 930.75 930.91
0.1 935.51 51.3 930.95 5.3
2.5 935.34 52.0 931.06 5.9
4.2 935.21 54.2 930.95 7.7
5.4 935.07 57.3 930.69 932.06
7.0 934.48 59.1 930.61 68.6
8.5 933.86 62.7 930.56 1.1
10.2 933.12 66.7 930.66 0.7
12.4 932.43 72.1 930.73 11.4
14.6 931.83 75.4 930.70 8.9
15.9 931.46 78.0 930.73 1.0
17.0 931.37 79.2 930.82 929.76
17.9 931.56 81.1 931.43
21.1 931.47 82.6 932.23
24.5 931.35 83.7 932.68
26.7 931.32 84.9 933.37
29.9 931.44 86.8 934.01
32.7 931.50 88.7 934.25
35.0 931.22 90.4 934.34
38.2 931.30 92.2 934.61
40.7 931.14 92.3 935.61
42.5 930.91
43.2 930.96
43.8 930.85
44.5 930.65
45.3 930.28
45.8 930.18
46.1 929.85
46.3 929.92
46.6 929.76
47.1 929.80
47.8 929.80
48.7 929.80
49.1 929.79
49.4 930.30
50.1 930.43
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:1/11/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.18
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS2
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
0 102030405060708090
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS2, Riffle, UTHC
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation Station Elevation
0 934.975 48.5 930.13
0.2 934.28 52.3 930.24 930.20
1.3 934.10 56.1 930.30 7.4
2.3 933.71 58.9 930.44 10.4
2.4 933.53 62.7 930.30 17.3
3.2 933.09 65.5 930.41 ---
4.5 932.60 67.6 930.33 ---
5.7 932.15 69.2 930.53 1.6
6.8 931.78 70.4 930.97 0.4
8.3 931.43 71.5 931.31 ---
9.9 931.17 73.0 931.84 ---
11.3 930.93 74.5 932.51 ---
13.9 930.77 75.7 933.40 928.64
17.3 930.57 77.0 934.01
20.6 930.51 77.8 934.38
23.3 930.39
24.0 930.39
25.0 930.18
26.0 929.64
26.5 929.20
26.8 929.04
27.1 929.00
27.6 928.82
28.0 928.75
28.6 928.64
29.1 928.69
29.5 928.80
29.9 928.97
30.5 929.46
31.0 929.74
31.8 930.00
33.1 930.26
33.9 930.34
34.8 930.49
36.7 930.27
39.3 930.32
44.4 930.03
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:1/11/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.18
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS3
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
0 1020304050607080
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS3, Pool, UTHC
Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation Station Elevation
0 927.08 41.4 923.22
0.1 926.36 45.5 923.30 922.97
2.8 926.11 50.3 923.26 15.4
4.9 926.04 54.9 923.37 16.4
5.8 925.67 57.7 923.29 12.5
6.7 925.03 60.7 923.28 ---
7.3 924.64 62.9 923.53 ---
8.1 924.31 64.8 924.12 2.3
9.3 923.74 65.9 924.70 1.2
10.2 923.42 67.4 925.42 ---
11.1 923.28 68.4 926.03 ---
14.3 923.18 69.3 926.46 ---
16.7 923.14 70.5 926.99 920.67
19.2 923.08 71.8 927.20
20.8 923.02 73.7 927.56
22.0 923.04 74.8 927.54
22.8 922.99 75.0 928.105
23.2 922.92
23.8 922.56
24.2 922.40
24.5 922.19
24.6 921.35
25.3 920.79
26.4 920.78
27.1 920.69
28.2 920.67
28.9 920.80
29.6 920.96
30.5 921.42
31.1 921.56
31.2 922.24
31.6 922.50
32.7 922.56
34.3 922.77
35.5 923.00
37.0 923.15
38.7 923.18
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:1/11/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.18
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS4
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
0 10203040506070
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS4, Pool, UTHC
Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation Station Elevation
0 926.30 55.3 923.04
0.1 925.61 58.3 922.97 922.91
2.0 925.38 61.5 923.26 5.5
3.0 925.37 63.8 923.60 5.0
4.2 924.89 65.2 924.02 9.0
5.1 924.45 66.4 924.55 923.92
6.1 923.91 67.8 925.26 58.8
7.1 923.46 69.2 925.95 1.0
8.0 923.09 70.4 926.63 0.6
8.8 922.86 71.8 927.15 14.6
9.5 922.78 6.5
11.1 922.76 0.9
14.7 922.74 921.90
18.4 922.75
22.1 922.85
25.5 922.82
27.7 922.91
28.7 922.94
29.4 922.91
30.3 922.71
31.7 922.44
32.6 922.38
33.0 922.00
33.1 921.96
33.6 921.90
34.4 921.95
35.2 921.94
35.9 921.91
36.4 922.13
36.7 922.23
37.3 922.32
38.4 922.76
39.3 922.79
41.9 922.86
45.6 922.81
49.4 922.87
52.4 922.89
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:1/11/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.18
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS5
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
0 10203040506070
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS5, Riffle, UTHC
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation Station Elevation
0 911.06 27.3 905.75
2.9 910.29 27.9 906.15 908.67
4.3 910.07 28.8 906.51 55.5
5.3 909.80 29.8 907.01 56.5
6.4 909.72 31.0 907.73 22.8
7.4 909.59 31.9 908.57 912.18
8.3 909.53 32.4 908.70 43.1
8.9 909.20 33.4 908.71 3.5
9.3 908.95 35.0 908.74 2.4
9.6 908.53 36.9 908.92 9.4
10.1 907.87 38.5 909.24 1.9
10.8 907.36 39.5 909.59 1.0
11.5 907.01 40.3 909.99 905.15
12.4 906.65 41.5 910.64
13.1 906.46 42.3 911.03
13.9 906.21 43.0 911.41
14.3 906.16 43.1 911.85
15.4 906.05
16.1 905.89
16.5 905.52
16.9 905.40
17.5 905.35
18.2 905.17
18.8 905.24
19.9 905.15
20.7 905.16
21.5 905.53
21.9 905.51
22.2 905.82
22.6 905.92
23.2 905.90
23.5 905.76
24.1 905.74
24.5 905.71
24.9 905.69
25.6 905.71
26.5 905.71
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:1/10/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.22
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS6
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS6, Riffle, UTHC
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation Station Elevation
0 889.00 30.4 883.33
0.1 888.44 31.5 883.64 883.79
2.6 888.50 32.6 883.82 16.7
3.9 888.42 34.2 884.00 15.8
4.7 888.28 36.1 883.93 13.5
5.5 888.39 38.0 884.01 885.87
7.4 888.39 40.4 884.29 38.3
8.7 888.14 43.2 884.65 2.1
9.8 887.94 46.3 885.01 1.2
10.6 887.41 48.2 885.13 10.9
11.6 886.91 49.7 885.30 2.8
12.3 886.21 50.4 885.44 1.0
12.9 885.74 51.2 885.96 881.70
13.4 885.56 51.8 886.43
13.9 885.25 52.6 887.01
14.8 884.97 53.5 887.57
16.0 884.97 54.7 887.83
17.4 884.85 56.5 888.09
18.1 884.71 58.7 888.19
18.9 883.89 60.6 888.34
19.3 882.40 62.5 888.60
19.6 882.17 64.3 889.15
19.9 882.01 66.6 889.57
20.3 881.89 69.3 890.26
20.6 881.86 71.0 890.665
21.2 881.72
21.7 881.72
22.2 881.70
22.8 881.78
23.4 881.86
23.7 881.96
24.1 882.06
24.6 882.21
25.4 882.32
26.1 882.53
27.8 882.78
29.2 883.06
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:1/10/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.22
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS7
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
0 10203040506070
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS7, Riffle, UTHC
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation Station Elevation
0 873.06 44.1 871.68
0.1 872.59 47.1 871.56 870.37
1.5 872.66 52.2 871.42 20.8
4.4 872.32 56.2 871.43 30.3
6.6 872.23 61.2 871.46 11.3
7.6 872.04 63.9 871.47 ---
8.4 871.62 68.0 871.60 ---
9.8 871.39 73.2 871.51 3.1
11.1 871.29 77.8 871.49 1.8
12.7 871.28 81.0 871.58 ---
15.1 871.34 84.1 871.58 ---
18.1 871.44 84.2 872.31 ---
20.3 871.60 867.32
22.1 871.61
22.8 871.58
23.1 871.61
23.8 871.48
24.5 871.03
25.3 870.45
25.9 870.09
26.1 869.72
26.7 868.89
27.5 868.26
28.2 867.67
29.6 867.32
31.4 867.71
32.5 868.41
33.6 869.13
34.3 869.07
34.7 869.26
35.7 869.25
36.4 869.25
36.9 870.94
37.7 871.20
38.5 871.37
39.2 871.53
41.5 871.61 *Cross-section located in an area that was repaired in MY1 (July 2021).
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:1/10/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Drainage Area (sq mi):1.07
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS8
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
0 1020304050607080
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS8, Pool, UTHC
Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0 871.46
0.1 871.15 871.32
1.3 871.06 10.6
5.0 871.01 6.8
6.6 871.01 12.5
10.9 871.02 873.03
14.7 871.10 72.6
19.7 871.21 1.7
23.0 871.24 0.9
24.8 871.22 14.6
25.9 870.98 5.8
27.0 870.92 0.9
27.9 870.55 869.62
28.1 870.20
28.4 869.98
28.7 869.98
29.1 869.69
29.5 869.62
29.8 869.62
30.6 869.66
31.1 869.64
31.7 870.02
32.5 870.27
33.6 870.80
34.9 870.57
36.4 870.97
37.3 871.31
38.2 871.29
40.2 871.26
43.4 871.31
47.2 871.31
51.1 871.42
56.1 871.37
61.2 871.32
65.1 871.30
69.7 871.52
72.6 871.44
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:1/10/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.46
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS9
869
870
871
872
873
0 10203040506070
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS9, Riffle, UTHC
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0 861.899
4.7 861.21 861.65
6.9 860.92 13.3
7.6 860.76 12.6
8.0 860.52 12.8
8.4 860.68 863.42
9.2 860.87 70.0
10.3 861.04 1.8
12.3 861.29 1.0
17.4 861.43 12.2
22.4 861.44 5.5
26.2 861.66 0.9
28.2 861.66 859.88
29.0 861.59
29.9 861.39
30.9 861.00
31.7 860.58
32.2 860.12
33.2 860.04
34.2 859.96
35.2 859.89
36.1 859.88
37.0 860.06
37.6 860.17
38.1 860.38
38.8 860.58
39.5 861.16
41.6 861.79
43.8 861.63
46.9 861.71
50.8 861.87
55.9 861.81
60.1 861.92
64.8 862.02
68.4 862.13
69.8 861.93
70.0 861.94
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:1/9/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.46
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS10
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
0 10203040506070
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS10, Riffle, UTHC
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation Station Elevation
0 859.51 52.6 854.09
0.1 859.17 54.4 854.43 853.90
1.0 859.05 56.0 854.68 17.2
2.9 858.58 57.2 855.63 16.1
4.9 858.33 58.3 856.48 12.0
6.9 857.99 59.2 857.01 856.11
9.0 857.52 60.1 857.69 44.2
10.7 856.89 60.7 858.00 2.2
12.6 856.52 62.5 858.01 1.4
14.1 855.92 65.5 858.01 8.4
16.5 855.57 67.4 858.20 3.7
19.6 855.19 69.1 858.04 1.0
23.8 854.92 72.5 858.10 851.68
27.1 855.07 75.4 858.12
30.0 855.11
31.9 855.04
32.7 854.91
33.7 854.38
35.4 854.12
37.7 853.86
39.0 853.89
39.4 853.66
40.7 853.19
41.5 852.82
42.0 851.96
42.4 851.79
43.3 851.78
44.4 851.68
45.3 851.78
46.2 851.93
47.1 851.72
47.6 851.86
48.0 852.31
48.5 852.69
49.3 852.99
50.1 853.23
51.2 853.86
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:1/9/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.46
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS11
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
0 1020304050607080
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS11, Riffle, UTHC
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation Station Elevation
0.0 847.79 48.1 845.25
0.1 847.25 49.8 845.34 845.47
1.2 847.20 51.8 845.53 30.2
2.1 847.03 53.1 845.78 28.6
4.4 847.18 54.4 846.36 18.9
5.7 847.43 55.8 847.04 848.19
7.2 847.63 57.1 847.65 27.9
9.2 847.80 58.6 848.11 2.7
11.3 847.74 61.4 848.23 1.6
13.9 847.85 64.6 848.33 11.9
17.4 847.65 66.9 848.32 1.5
18.3 847.84 0.9
19.4 848.11 842.74
22.9 848.14
24.9 848.26
26.7 848.22
27.2 848.09
28.0 847.54
29.4 846.88
30.3 846.27
31.0 845.30
31.9 844.62
33.6 843.99
35.8 843.95
38.1 843.90
39.7 843.47
40.2 843.23
40.8 843.05
42.0 842.82
42.4 842.74
43.4 842.75
44.3 842.87
45.2 843.02
45.7 843.04
46.1 843.77
46.6 843.89
46.9 844.74
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:1/9/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.61
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS12
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
0 10203040506070
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS12, Riffle, UTHC
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 849.62 55.1 847.39
0.0 848.91 59.0 846.92 847.31
3.7 848.76 61.4 847.20 38.7
8.7 848.62 63.2 847.75 39.8
13.5 848.59 65.1 848.20 27.8
16.2 848.54 66.3 848.80 850.28
16.9 848.40 67.5 849.14 68.3
17.7 848.08 68.1 849.62 3.0
19.1 847.76 68.4 850.60 1.4
21.4 847.51 69.9 850.81 20.0
23.5 847.43 71.6 851.05 2.5
24.2 847.36 76.1 850.93 1.0
24.7 846.98 80.7 851.25 844.35
24.8 846.04 84.6 851.32
25.1 845.63 87.7 851.35
25.7 845.05
26.0 844.75
26.3 844.59
27.0 844.55
27.6 844.44
28.2 844.47
29.0 844.35
29.7 844.51
30.5 844.77
31.1 844.94
31.5 845.15
32.3 845.37
34.2 845.54
35.6 845.81
37.4 846.04
40.8 846.35
43.4 846.58
45.8 846.61
47.2 846.47
49.0 846.51
50.4 847.07
52.1 847.29 *Cross-section located in an area that was repaired in MY1 (July 2021).
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:1/9/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.04
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS13
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
0 102030405060708090
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS13, Riffle, UTHC
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation Station Elevation
0.0 948.98 62.8 943.26
2.8 948.37 64.1 943.18 943.58
3.7 948.13 65.0 943.33 1.8
4.5 947.87 65.9 943.92 1.9
5.7 947.48 66.6 944.01 7.2
6.9 946.99 67.2 944.19 944.21
8.1 946.42 68.5 944.75 54.6
9.7 945.64 68.8 945.50 0.6
10.5 945.08 69.1 945.74 0.3
11.6 944.46 69.6 945.83 28.7
12.5 944.25 71.4 945.58 7.6
13.8 943.91 73.5 945.61 0.8
15.9 943.83 75.4 945.64 942.95
19.3 943.76 77.4 945.64
24.4 943.82 77.5 946.23
26.2 943.63
27.7 943.61
28.9 943.52
29.8 943.34
30.3 943.12
30.6 943.11
31.0 943.05
31.2 943.01
31.4 942.95
31.9 943.02
32.7 943.32
33.4 943.43
34.8 943.58
38.8 943.64
44.5 943.73
47.7 943.64
52.0 943.53
54.6 943.45
56.0 943.49
58.9 943.37
60.1 943.08
61.5 943.05
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:1/11/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.04
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS14
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
0 10203040506070
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS14, Riffle, T1A
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation Station Elevation
0.0 943.44 61.7 940.29
3.0 942.56 63.6 940.86 939.01
6.3 942.38 65.4 941.17 2.3
7.9 942.23 66.9 941.55 1.9
8.8 941.99 69.3 941.79 5.6
9.5 941.61 71.5 941.79 939.66
10.4 941.23 72.7 941.71 44.4
11.0 940.61 72.8 942.66 0.6
12.0 940.47 0.4
13.2 940.00 13.5
15.2 939.28 7.9
16.6 939.15 1.0
20.8 939.09 938.37
27.3 939.07
30.8 939.02
32.0 939.02
32.5 938.84
33.3 938.65
34.1 938.46
34.4 938.42
34.8 938.41
35.2 938.43
35.8 938.39
36.2 938.44
36.9 938.61
37.7 939.08
40.0 939.01
43.4 938.80
47.7 938.66
50.8 938.64
53.3 938.67
54.8 938.50
55.6 938.37
57.1 938.66
57.8 939.07
58.5 939.65
59.9 939.93
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Date:1/11/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.07
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS15
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
0 10203040506070
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS15, Riffle, T1
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation Station Elevation
0.0 933.97 59.8 930.51
0.0 933.25 61.0 931.09 929.39
1.5 932.93 62.1 931.40 3.9
3.4 932.67 63.0 931.89 2.5
4.7 932.32 64.6 932.06 6.8
5.9 931.96 65.8 932.13 930.43
7.3 931.62 66.9 932.17 48.8
8.9 930.98 67.0 933.07 1.0
10.3 930.61 0.6
11.4 930.15 11.9
12.8 929.94 7.2
14.9 929.88 0.9
18.2 929.89 928.35
21.1 929.91
25.6 929.76
29.4 929.54
32.2 929.41
33.8 929.36
35.2 928.99
36.0 928.58
37.2 928.56
37.5 928.42
37.7 928.40
38.1 928.35
38.5 928.51
38.8 928.76
39.4 928.94
40.3 929.27
40.7 929.44
42.6 929.36
45.3 929.22
48.6 928.96
51.2 929.16
53.5 929.17
55.9 929.31
57.3 929.65
58.4 929.98
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS16
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.07
Date:1/11/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Thalweg Elevation:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
0 102030405060
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS16, Riffle, T1
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation Station Elevation
0.0 931.57 48.0 931.68
0.1 930.81 49.2 932.11 928.61
1.5 930.85
51.0 932.22 8.3
3.3 930.86 52.2 932.25 6.9
4.1 930.70 52.3 932.90 6.0
5.0 930.08 ---
6.1 929.50 ---
7.1 929.07 2.1
8.1 928.75 1.4
8.9 928.69 ---
10.7 928.56 ---
12.3 928.52 ---
13.8 928.56 926.52
15.1 928.44
15.4 928.25
15.9 926.95
16.6 926.52
17.6 926.56
18.7 926.81
19.4 927.35
19.8 927.65
20.4 928.05
20.8 928.36
21.1 928.64
21.8 928.71
24.1 928.76
27.8 928.62
31.6 928.74
34.4 928.73
36.5 928.84
38.1 928.72
39.6 928.84
40.9 929.13
42.6 929.13
43.7 929.58
45.1 930.05
46.6 931.00
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS17
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.07
Date:1/11/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
0 1020304050
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS17, Pool, T1
Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation Station Elevation
0.0 927.09 41.1 926.05
0.2 926.40 42.2 925.83 923.46
3.9 926.45 44.0 925.96 2.3
6.0 926.39 46.9 925.94 1.7
7.4 926.23 48.9 925.87 6.1
8.0 925.83 49.9 925.67 924.24
8.9 925.29 50.6 925.74 24.4
9.5 924.93 50.9 926.39 0.8
10.5 924.38 0.4
12.0 923.68 16.4
13.1 923.51 4.0
15.4 923.37 1.0
17.5 923.43 922.68
18.3 923.28
19.5 923.14
20.1 923.03
20.5 922.68
20.7 922.68
21.1 922.74
21.6 922.84
21.9 922.92
22.1 923.00
22.7 923.16
23.5 923.44
24.2 923.57
25.1 923.51
27.0 923.48
30.5 923.60
32.3 923.76
34.1 923.87
34.7 924.07
35.4 924.30
36.2 924.77
37.2 925.15
38.3 925.51
39.2 925.96
39.9 925.94
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS18
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.02
Date:1/11/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
0 1020304050
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS18, Riffle, T2
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation Station Elevation
0.0 925.75 36.5 924.14
0.1 924.68 37.6 924.07 922.63
1.7 924.69 41.0 924.05 5.6
3.7 924.49 43.7 924.03 5.2
6.1 924.20 45.5 924.02 6.4
7.6 923.84 ---
8.5 923.52 ---
9.5 922.98 1.6
10.7 922.81 0.9
12.4 922.51 ---
14.0 922.68 ---
16.2 922.62 ---
18.2 922.71 921.04
19.9 922.67
20.5 922.67
21.5 922.40
22.1 922.23
22.4 921.98
22.6 921.81
22.9 921.40
23.6 921.04
24.4 921.06
25.0 921.11
25.4 921.19
26.0 921.95
26.6 922.38
27.3 922.72
27.8 922.69
29.2 922.70
30.0 922.80
31.1 922.87
31.6 922.89
32.3 923.07
33.0 923.35
33.8 923.81
34.4 924.08
35.3 924.16
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS19
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.02
Date:1/11/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS19, Pool, T2
Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation Station Elevation
0.0 921.09 47.1 920.93
0.0 920.28 918.01
3.2 920.16 3.6
6.3 920.08 1.8
9.1 919.82 6.9
11.0 919.55 918.99
15.3 919.52 21.5
18.0 919.05 1.0
18.6 918.63 0.5
19.4 918.38 13.4
20.6 918.05 3.1
22.7 918.06 0.9
23.9 918.02 917.04
25.7 917.89
27.4 917.36
28.0 917.14
28.3 917.05
28.7 917.13
29.1 917.05
29.5 917.04
29.8 917.17
30.0 917.31
30.5 917.52
31.0 917.81
31.6 917.93
32.7 917.95
34.0 917.86
35.6 917.77
36.6 917.72
37.4 917.81
38.4 918.32
39.3 918.89
40.4 919.27
41.7 919.64
43.7 919.83
45.8 920.17
47.0 920.33
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS20
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.01
Date:1/10/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS20, Riffle, T3
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 921.29
-0.1 920.11 916.74
2.8 919.95 7.7
6.7 919.47 6.8
11.0 918.83 9.3
13.9 918.57 ---
15.7 918.44 ---
17.3 918.16 1.6
18.7 917.74 0.8
19.5 917.42 ---
20.3 916.97 ---
21.4 916.85 ---
23.1 916.67 915.15
23.6 916.75
24.4 916.59
25.6 916.33
26.2 916.03
26.4 915.25
26.9 915.23
27.3 915.15
27.9 915.23
28.7 915.16
29.7 915.31
30.2 915.39
30.6 915.58
30.9 916.28
31.7 916.61
32.6 916.72
34.2 916.76
35.7 916.92
36.8 917.25
37.6 917.57
38.8 918.14
39.5 918.44
41.2 918.53
43.7 918.95
44.8 918.93
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS21
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.01
Date:1/10/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS21, Pool, T3
Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation Station Elevation
0.0 912.37 36.1 910.33
2.3 911.44 37.3 910.51 906.00
3.6 911.10 39.2 910.84 1.9
4.4 910.74 41.2 911.21 2.5
5.3 910.25 43.2 911.37 2.9
6.5 909.72 45.0 911.81 906.91
7.8 908.73 46.1 912.16 18.1
8.6 908.35 46.7 912.49 0.9
9.7 907.53 47.3 912.77 0.7
10.9 907.02 47.3 913.70 4.3
11.9 906.70 6.3
12.9 906.47 1.1
14.1 906.52 905.08
15.9 906.47
17.2 906.49
18.2 906.34
19.1 906.09
19.4 905.49
19.6 905.28
20.0 905.22
20.5 905.08
21.0 905.17
21.4 905.31
21.8 905.44
22.0 906.10
22.3 906.34
22.9 906.39
24.4 906.35
26.1 906.28
27.8 906.37
28.6 906.58
29.7 907.09
30.5 907.44
31.4 908.05
32.2 908.82
33.3 909.24
34.7 909.81
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS22
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.01
Date:1/10/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS22, Riffle, T4
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 895.96
4.5 895.18 894.53
6.4 895.13 1.7
8.4 894.75 1.1
9.6 894.79 3.9
11.4 894.80 895.43
13.4 894.59 29.7
15.5 894.72 0.9
17.3 894.71 0.4
18.5 894.63 8.7
19.1 894.50 7.7
19.6 894.34 1.1
20.0 894.28 893.63
20.3 893.63
20.6 893.70
20.8 893.72
21.0 893.71
21.3 893.69
21.5 893.81
21.7 893.85
22.1 894.27
22.5 894.44
23.0 894.58
23.8 894.53
25.0 894.36
27.3 894.19
29.3 893.99
31.2 893.79
32.6 893.81
32.7 894.07
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS23
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.01
Date:1/10/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
893
894
895
896
897
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS23, Riffle, T6A
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 879.73
3.3 879.18 878.67
5.3 879.11 2.6
7.5 879.05 0.4
8.8 879.07 3.9
10.8 878.96 879.79
11.9 878.55 49.8
12.8 878.25 1.1
15.0 878.21 0.7
17.8 878.45 5.8
20.9 878.42 12.8
22.5 878.45 0.8
23.0 878.42 877.55
23.4 878.21
23.8 877.84
24.2 877.72
24.6 877.60
25.0 877.55
25.4 877.58
25.7 878.14
26.1 878.39
26.3 878.64
27.6 878.55
29.4 878.50
32.2 878.39
34.7 878.62
37.0 878.68
39.4 878.91
42.6 879.12
45.8 879.13
48.3 879.59
50.7 879.91
50.9 880.37
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS24
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.07
Date:1/10/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
876
877
878
879
880
881
0 1020304050
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS24, Riffle, T6
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 879.17
0.1 878.78 878.82
2.2 878.70 5.1
3.9 878.52 0.8
5.1 878.33 3.8
8.0 878.20 ---
9.3 877.88 ---
11.1 877.77 1.8
13.8 877.75 1.3
17.1 877.96 ---
19.4 878.02 ---
20.7 878.10 ---
21.4 878.12 877.02
22.1 877.88
22.6 877.47
23.0 877.28
23.3 877.14
23.8 877.02
24.3 877.05
24.6 877.35
24.9 877.83
25.3 878.09
26.3 878.08
28.8 877.88
31.0 877.79
32.8 877.95
35.2 878.07
37.8 878.43
40.4 878.47
43.5 878.68
47.1 879.01
51.1 879.07
55.0 879.31
55.1 879.94
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS25
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.07
Date:1/10/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
876
877
878
879
880
0 1020304050
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS25, Pool, T6
Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 868.95
0.1 868.36 868.20
2.9 868.45 4.6
8.4 868.45 4.7
13.9 868.69 6.2
18.8 868.55 ---
21.1 868.49 ---
23.2 868.38 1.4
25.7 868.33 0.7
26.6 868.34 ---
28.1 868.16 ---
28.7 867.72 ---
29.2 866.92 866.81
29.5 866.81
30.0 866.91
30.6 867.04
31.0 867.04
31.3 867.04
31.5 867.11
31.9 867.32
32.7 867.81
33.8 868.16
35.4 868.51
36.1 868.31
37.7 868.22
41.1 867.93
44.7 868.04
47.3 867.68
48.6 867.73
48.7 867.96
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS26
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.07
Date:1/10/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
866
867
868
869
870
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS26, Pool, T7
Bankfull MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 868.07
0.1 867.56 867.74
3.5 867.48 4.3
8.1 867.60 3.1
12.7 867.76 7.2
18.1 867.71 868.79
22.5 867.78 43.5
25.9 867.73 1.1
28.4 867.78 0.6
29.2 867.70 12.1
29.5 867.55 6.1
30.3 867.22 1.0
30.6 866.89 866.68
30.9 866.75
31.5 866.72
32.0 866.68
32.7 866.72
33.2 866.69
33.5 866.85
33.8 866.85
34.4 867.41
35.2 867.64
36.0 867.70
37.3 867.59
39.8 867.54
43.5 867.55
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS27
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.07
Date:1/10/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
866
867
868
869
870
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS27, Riffle, T7
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 857.53
0.1 857.30 853.27
3.9 857.10 2.8
7.5 856.91 1.3
8.9 856.73 8.1
9.7 856.42 854.22
10.8 855.56 31.3
12.8 854.68 1.0
14.2 854.05 0.3
16.1 853.51 23.1
18.4 853.17 3.9
22.9 853.11 0.8
27.8 853.29 852.32
31.1 853.05
32.2 852.81
32.8 852.46
33.1 852.32
33.4 852.39
33.7 852.45
34.7 852.83
36.1 853.24
37.8 853.32
40.2 853.34
43.2 853.39
44.1 853.60
44.9 854.12
45.6 854.53
46.4 855.03
47.0 855.31
47.5 855.51
48.1 855.55
50.5 855.59
54.2 855.44
57.3 855.46
59.0 855.40
59.1 856.09
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS28
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.04
Date:1/9/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
0 102030405060
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS28, Riffle, T9
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 851.07
0.1 850.25 849.90
0.5 850.08 3.4
4.8 849.56 2.9
6.5 849.58 6.7
8.6 849.60 850.92
11.3 849.69 37.3
13.6 849.80 1.0
15.1 849.63 0.5
15.7 849.61 13.1
16.1 849.49 5.6
16.5 848.88 0.9
16.8 848.91 848.88
17.5 848.94
18.4 849.04
18.8 849.37
19.7 849.63
20.7 850.17
21.0 850.23
21.9 850.30
24.0 850.34
26.8 850.40
28.5 850.42
31.8 850.58
34.5 850.75
37.3 850.97
40.6 850.91
42.5 851.05
44.8 851.33
47.9 851.61
49.9 851.87
51.5 852.03
51.6 852.77
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS29
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.03
Date:1/9/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
0 1020304050
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS29, Riffle, T8
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 845.92
-0.1 844.66 842.84
3.7 844.55 3.2
5.8 844.39 3.2
7.0 844.20 8.2
8.2 843.82 843.77
9.3 843.48 42.7
11.4 843.25 0.9
15.7 843.20 0.4
19.2 842.91 21.1
21.9 842.72 5.2
22.9 842.54 0.9
23.5 842.06 841.91
23.8 841.92
24.3 841.91
24.8 841.99
25.2 842.02
25.5 842.09
25.9 842.31
26.5 842.50
27.4 842.72
28.4 842.83
30.4 842.91
32.8 842.98
37.7 842.90
43.8 842.79
47.3 842.81
48.8 842.91
50.1 843.31
51.2 843.84
51.9 844.03
53.1 844.02
53.7 844.05
53.7 844.48
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS30
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.03
Date:1/9/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
0 1020304050
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS30, Riffle, T8
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 853.85
0.1 853.10 850.72
3.2 852.94 2.6
4.1 852.90 3.0
4.8 852.82 4.6
6.0 852.86 851.57
7.3 852.87 19.7
8.2 852.74 0.9
9.1 852.31 0.6
10.1 851.85 8.1
11.3 851.28 4.3
13.4 850.97 1.1
15.0 850.87 849.87
16.9 850.87
17.5 850.96
18.1 850.94
18.9 850.74
19.8 850.21
20.1 850.01
20.6 849.92
21.1 849.92
21.6 849.87
22.1 849.87
22.3 850.03
23.0 850.48
23.6 850.78
25.3 850.70
28.6 851.04
29.4 851.22
30.5 851.60
32.2 852.10
33.3 852.39
35.0 852.56
36.6 852.59
38.0 852.43
38.2 853.32
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS31
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.01
Date:1/9/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS31, Riffle, T8A
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Cross-Section Plots
Station Elevation
0.0 846.918
0.1 846.26 845.59
1.2 846.29 2.1
3.9 846.27 3.5
7.2 846.40 4.2
9.9 846.29 846.50
11.8 845.80 49.2
14.5 845.92 0.9
17.9 845.93 0.5
20.4 845.68 8.5
21.5 845.68 11.8
22.1 845.67 1.1
22.6 845.49 844.68
23.1 845.25
23.5 844.68
23.8 844.68
24.0 844.72
24.6 844.74
24.8 844.76
25.2 845.16
25.7 845.26
26.3 845.55
26.9 845.66
27.5 845.73
28.9 845.76
31.3 845.67
34.5 845.65
36.4 845.70
38.4 845.95
41.1 845.94
43.8 846.09
45.7 846.20
47.8 846.15
49.2 846.21
49.3 846.98
River Basin:Yadkin River
Site:Mill Dam Creek
XS ID XS32
Drainage Area (sq mi):0.01
Date:1/9/2023
Field Crew:KB, JS
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-Bankfull Area
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
Total Cross-Sectional Area:
Bankfull Width:
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
Flood Prone Width:
Max Depth at Bankfull:
W / D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:
Thalweg Elevation:
844
845
846
847
848
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
e
e
t
)
Station (feet)
Mill Dam Creek, XS32, Riffle, T8A
Bankfull Flood Prone Area MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 103 MY02 Monitoring Report

APPENDIX E

Hydrologic Data

0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
No
v
-
2
1
De
c
-
2
1
Ja
n
-
2
2
Fe
b
-
2
2
Ma
r
-
2
2
Ap
r
-
2
2
Ma
y
-
2
2
Ju
n
-
2
2
Ju
l
-
2
2
Au
g
-
2
2
Se
p
-
2
2
Oc
t
-
2
2
No
v
-
2
2
De
c
-
2
2
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
)
Date
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
30-70 Percentile Graph
WETS Station Name: Yadkinville 6E, NC
2021 Rainfall 2022 Rainfall 30% Less Than 30% Greater Than
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 105 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 11. Verification of Bankfull Events
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Monitoring Year Date of Occurrence Method Reach
MY01
January 24, 2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
February 6, 2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1, UTHC3
February 11, 2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
February 13, 2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
March 24, 2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
April 13, 2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1, UTHC3
April 25, 2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
April 29, 2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1, UTHC3
May 21, 2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1, UTHC3
May 27, 2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1, UTHC3
December 16, 2020 Photos taken on-site UTHC1, UTHC3,
T1, T2, T6, T8
December 16, 2020 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
MY02
January 1, 2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1, UTHC3
January 27, 2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
February 13, 2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
February 15, 2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1, UTHC3
February 18, 2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
March 19, 2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
March 25, 2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
July 2, 2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1, UTHC3
August 16, 2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1, UTHC3
August 18, 2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1, UTHC3
September 21, 2021 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1, UTHC3
MY03
January 3, 2022 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
March 12, 2022 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
March 23, 2022 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1, UTHC3
March 31, 2022 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
April 18, 2022 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1
May 27, 2022 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1, UTHC3
July 9, 2022 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1, UTHC3
August 22, 2022 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1, UTHC3
September 5, 2022 Onsite stream gauge UTHC1, UTHC3

0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
921
922
923
924
18
-
N
o
v
-
2
1
27
-
N
o
v
-
2
1
6-
D
e
c
-
2
1
15
-
D
e
c
-
2
1
24
-
D
e
c
-
2
1
2-
J
a
n
-
2
2
11
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
20
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
29
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
7-
F
e
b
-
2
2
16
-
F
e
b
-
2
2
25
-
F
e
b
-
2
2
6-
M
a
r
-
2
2
15
-
M
a
r
-
2
2
24
-
M
a
r
-
2
2
2-
A
p
r
-
2
2
11
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
20
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
29
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
8-
M
a
y
-
2
2
17
-
M
a
y
-
2
2
26
-
M
a
y
-
2
2
4-
J
u
n
-
2
2
13
-
J
u
n
-
2
2
22
-
J
u
n
-
2
2
1-
J
u
l
-
2
2
10
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
19
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
28
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
6-
A
u
g
-
2
2
15
-
A
u
g
-
2
2
24
-
A
u
g
-
2
2
2-
S
e
p
-
2
2
11
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
20
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
29
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
8-
O
c
t
-
2
2
17
-
O
c
t
-
2
2
26
-
O
c
t
-
2
2
4-
N
o
v
-
2
2
13
-
N
o
v
-
2
2
22
-
N
o
v
-
2
2
1-
D
e
c
-
2
2
10
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
19
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
28
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
)
St
r
e
a
m

S
t
a
g
e

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Date
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
UTHC-1 Stream Gauge
Rainfall Sensor Elevation Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Bankful Elevation
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
869
870
871
872
18
-
N
o
v
-
2
1
27
-
N
o
v
-
2
1
6-
D
e
c
-
2
1
15
-
D
e
c
-
2
1
24
-
D
e
c
-
2
1
2-
J
a
n
-
2
2
11
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
20
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
29
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
7-
F
e
b
-
2
2
16
-
F
e
b
-
2
2
25
-
F
e
b
-
2
2
6-
M
a
r
-
2
2
15
-
M
a
r
-
2
2
24
-
M
a
r
-
2
2
2-
A
p
r
-
2
2
11
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
20
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
29
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
8-
M
a
y
-
2
2
17
-
M
a
y
-
2
2
26
-
M
a
y
-
2
2
4-
J
u
n
-
2
2
13
-
J
u
n
-
2
2
22
-
J
u
n
-
2
2
1-
J
u
l
-
2
2
10
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
19
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
28
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
6-
A
u
g
-
2
2
15
-
A
u
g
-
2
2
24
-
A
u
g
-
2
2
2-
S
e
p
-
2
2
11
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
20
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
29
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
8-
O
c
t
-
2
2
17
-
O
c
t
-
2
2
26
-
O
c
t
-
2
2
4-
N
o
v
-
2
2
13
-
N
o
v
-
2
2
22
-
N
o
v
-
2
2
1-
D
e
c
-
2
2
10
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
19
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
28
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
St
r
e
a
m

S
t
a
g
e

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Date
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
UTHC-3 Stream Gauge
Rainfall Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Bankfull Elevation Sensor Depth
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 108 MY03 Monitoring Report

Table 12. Verification of Stream Flow
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Gauge Camera
Reach Dates Achieving
Maximum
Consecutive
Days
Dates Achieving
Maximum
Consecutive
Days
T1A February 16 – March 21 34 January 2 – April 15 104
T5A January 1 – October 29 303 January 1 – April 24
July 1 – August 5 114
T8A
January 1 – August 5;
August 13 – September 27;
September 29 – October 30
217 January 17 – April 18 92

Table 13. Stream Flow Criteria Attainment
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Greater than 30 Days of Flow/Max Consecutive Days
Reach MY-01
2020 MY-02
2021 MY-03
2022 MY-04
2023 MY-05
2024 MY-06
2025 MY-07
2026
T1A
(Gauge) Yes/68 Yes/121 Yes/34
T1A
(Camera) Yes/44 Yes/55 Yes/104
T5A
(Gauge) Yes/152 Yes/322 Yes/303
T5A
(Camera) Yes/70 Yes/116 Yes/114
T8A
(Gauge) Yes/152 Yes/167 Yes/217
T8A
(Camera) Yes/84 Yes/180 Yes/92

0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
939
940
941
942
18
-
N
o
v
-
2
1
27
-
N
o
v
-
2
1
6-
D
e
c
-
2
1
15
-
D
e
c
-
2
1
24
-
D
e
c
-
2
1
2-
J
a
n
-
2
2
11
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
20
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
29
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
7-
F
e
b
-
2
2
16
-
F
e
b
-
2
2
25
-
F
e
b
-
2
2
6-
M
a
r
-
2
2
15
-
M
a
r
-
2
2
24
-
M
a
r
-
2
2
2-
A
p
r
-
2
2
11
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
20
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
29
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
8-
M
a
y
-
2
2
17
-
M
a
y
-
2
2
26
-
M
a
y
-
2
2
4-
J
u
n
-
2
2
13
-
J
u
n
-
2
2
22
-
J
u
n
-
2
2
1-
J
u
l
-
2
2
10
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
19
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
28
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
6-
A
u
g
-
2
2
15
-
A
u
g
-
2
2
24
-
A
u
g
-
2
2
2-
S
e
p
-
2
2
11
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
20
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
29
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
8-
O
c
t
-
2
2
17
-
O
c
t
-
2
2
26
-
O
c
t
-
2
2
4-
N
o
v
-
2
2
13
-
N
o
v
-
2
2
22
-
N
o
v
-
2
2
1-
D
e
c
-
2
2
10
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
19
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
28
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
)
St
r
e
a
m

S
t
a
g
e

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Date
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
T1A Stream Flow Gauge
Rainfall Sensor Depth Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Flow Elevation Stream Flow (Camera)
34 Days
January 1
Camera malfunction
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
920.5
921.5
18
-
N
o
v
-
2
1
27
-
N
o
v
-
2
1
6-
D
e
c
-
2
1
15
-
D
e
c
-
2
1
24
-
D
e
c
-
2
1
2-
J
a
n
-
2
2
11
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
20
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
29
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
7-
F
e
b
-
2
2
16
-
F
e
b
-
2
2
25
-
F
e
b
-
2
2
6-
M
a
r
-
2
2
15
-
M
a
r
-
2
2
24
-
M
a
r
-
2
2
2-
A
p
r
-
2
2
11
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
20
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
29
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
8-
M
a
y
-
2
2
17
-
M
a
y
-
2
2
26
-
M
a
y
-
2
2
4-
J
u
n
-
2
2
13
-
J
u
n
-
2
2
22
-
J
u
n
-
2
2
1-
J
u
l
-
2
2
10
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
19
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
28
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
6-
A
u
g
-
2
2
15
-
A
u
g
-
2
2
24
-
A
u
g
-
2
2
2-
S
e
p
-
2
2
11
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
20
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
29
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
8-
O
c
t
-
2
2
17
-
O
c
t
-
2
2
26
-
O
c
t
-
2
2
4-
N
o
v
-
2
2
13
-
N
o
v
-
2
2
22
-
N
o
v
-
2
2
1-
D
e
c
-
2
2
10
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
19
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
28
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
St
r
e
a
m

S
t
a
g
e

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Date
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
T5A Stream Flow Gauge
Rainfall Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Sensor Depth Flow Elevation Stream Flow (Camera)
303 Days
January 1
Camera malfunctionCamera obscured
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
849
850
851
852
853
18
-
N
o
v
-
2
1
27
-
N
o
v
-
2
1
6-
D
e
c
-
2
1
15
-
D
e
c
-
2
1
24
-
D
e
c
-
2
1
2-
J
a
n
-
2
2
11
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
20
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
29
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
7-
F
e
b
-
2
2
16
-
F
e
b
-
2
2
25
-
F
e
b
-
2
2
6-
M
a
r
-
2
2
15
-
M
a
r
-
2
2
24
-
M
a
r
-
2
2
2-
A
p
r
-
2
2
11
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
20
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
29
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
8-
M
a
y
-
2
2
17
-
M
a
y
-
2
2
26
-
M
a
y
-
2
2
4-
J
u
n
-
2
2
13
-
J
u
n
-
2
2
22
-
J
u
n
-
2
2
1-
J
u
l
-
2
2
10
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
19
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
28
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
6-
A
u
g
-
2
2
15
-
A
u
g
-
2
2
24
-
A
u
g
-
2
2
2-
S
e
p
-
2
2
11
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
20
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
29
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
8-
O
c
t
-
2
2
17
-
O
c
t
-
2
2
26
-
O
c
t
-
2
2
4-
N
o
v
-
2
2
13
-
N
o
v
-
2
2
22
-
N
o
v
-
2
2
1-
D
e
c
-
2
2
10
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
19
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
28
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
St
r
e
a
m

S
t
a
g
e

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Date
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
T8A Stream Flow Gauge
Rainfall Stream Stage Elevation Stream Bed Elevation Sensor Depth Flow Elevation Stream Flow (Camera)
32 Days
217 Days
January 1
Camera malfunction
44 Days
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 112 MY03 Monitoring Report
Table 14. Wetland Hydrology Verification
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site, DMS Project #97136
Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season (Percentage)
MY-01
2020 MY-02
2021 MY-03
2022 MY-04
2023 MY-05
2024 MY-06
2025 MY-07
2026
Gauge # Location Normal
Rainfall
Normal
Rainfall
Below
Average
Rainfall
Gauge 1 T7 45
(19.7%)
57
(24.8%)
5
(2.2%)
Gauge 2 T8 Gauge
malfunction
37
(15.6%)
9
(3.6%)

0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
-3
-2
-1
0
1
18
-
N
o
v
-
2
1
27
-
N
o
v
-
2
1
6-
D
e
c
-
2
1
15
-
D
e
c
-
2
1
24
-
D
e
c
-
2
1
2-
J
a
n
-
2
2
11
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
20
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
29
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
7-
F
e
b
-
2
2
16
-
F
e
b
-
2
2
25
-
F
e
b
-
2
2
6-
M
a
r
-
2
2
15
-
M
a
r
-
2
2
24
-
M
a
r
-
2
2
2-
A
p
r
-
2
2
11
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
20
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
29
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
8-
M
a
y
-
2
2
17
-
M
a
y
-
2
2
26
-
M
a
y
-
2
2
4-
J
u
n
-
2
2
13
-
J
u
n
-
2
2
22
-
J
u
n
-
2
2
1-
J
u
l
-
2
2
10
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
19
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
28
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
6-
A
u
g
-
2
2
15
-
A
u
g
-
2
2
24
-
A
u
g
-
2
2
2-
S
e
p
-
2
2
11
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
20
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
29
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
8-
O
c
t
-
2
2
17
-
O
c
t
-
2
2
26
-
O
c
t
-
2
2
4-
N
o
v
-
2
2
13
-
N
o
v
-
2
2
22
-
N
o
v
-
2
2
1-
D
e
c
-
2
2
10
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
19
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
28
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
)
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Date
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
Wetland Gauge 1, T7
Rainfall 12" Below Ground Surface Groundwater Depth Ground Surface Sensor-Depth
Begin Growing Season
March 26
End Growing Season
November 9
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
-3
-2
-1
0
1
18
-
N
o
v
-
2
1
27
-
N
o
v
-
2
1
6-
D
e
c
-
2
1
15
-
D
e
c
-
2
1
24
-
D
e
c
-
2
1
2-
J
a
n
-
2
2
11
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
20
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
29
-
J
a
n
-
2
2
7-
F
e
b
-
2
2
16
-
F
e
b
-
2
2
25
-
F
e
b
-
2
2
6-
M
a
r
-
2
2
15
-
M
a
r
-
2
2
24
-
M
a
r
-
2
2
2-
A
p
r
-
2
2
11
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
20
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
29
-
A
p
r
-
2
2
8-
M
a
y
-
2
2
17
-
M
a
y
-
2
2
26
-
M
a
y
-
2
2
4-
J
u
n
-
2
2
13
-
J
u
n
-
2
2
22
-
J
u
n
-
2
2
1-
J
u
l
-
2
2
10
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
19
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
28
-
J
u
l
-
2
2
6-
A
u
g
-
2
2
15
-
A
u
g
-
2
2
24
-
A
u
g
-
2
2
2-
S
e
p
-
2
2
11
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
20
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
29
-
S
e
p
-
2
2
8-
O
c
t
-
2
2
17
-
O
c
t
-
2
2
26
-
O
c
t
-
2
2
4-
N
o
v
-
2
2
13
-
N
o
v
-
2
2
22
-
N
o
v
-
2
2
1-
D
e
c
-
2
2
10
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
19
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
28
-
D
e
c
-
2
2
Ra
i
n
f
a
l
l

(
i
n
)
Re
l
a
t
i
v
e

G
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r

E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Date
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site
Hydrograph
Wetland Gauge 2, T8
Rainfall 12" Below Ground Surface Groundwater Depth Ground Surface Sensor-Depth
Begin Growing Season
March 26
End Growing Season
November 9
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA
DMS Project #97136 115 MY03 Monitoring Report

APPENDIX F

Additional Information

To: Matthew Reid, DMS PM
Todd Tugwell, USACE

FROM: Adam Spiller, KCI

DATE: August 15, 2022

SUBJECT: Mill Dam Creek Stream Restoration Project
IRT Site Meeting

KCI Project Number - 201601703
Yadkin River Basin - 03040101
DEQ Contract 6898
DMS Project Number 97136
DWR #: 18-1349
USACE Action ID: 2016-01335

Attendees:
Paul Wiesner, DMS Tommy Seelinger, KCI
Melonie Allen, DMS Erin Davis, DWR
Matthew Reid, DMS Kim Browning, USACE
Adam Spiller, KCI David McHenry, WRC
Kevin O’Briant, KCI

In IRT field review meeting was conducted for the above referenced project on August 15, 2022,
starting around 1:30pm. The site was damp from a previous rain and the weather was mild and
slightly overcast. The group walked most of the restoration portions of T6 and UTHC3. We also
drove to the top of the site where we walked T1A and T1. The comments from the site walk are
listed below.

- Pay attention to invasives. There were no areas of thick invasives, but there were some
scattered in the easement around the areas of the site that had not been cleared for
construction.
- In some portions of the buffer, the sycamores are the most notable tree. Watch the
diversity data from the veg plots and supplement if necessary.
- Take photos of the crossings, from the stream and include those in future monitoring
reports.
- Overall, the site is well vegetated with thick herbaceous vegetation. Some areas of
Priority 2 restoration have less vegetation on the floodplain/benches. Watch those areas
for future vegetation vigor.

- A couple of structures were found to be piping. Pay attention to those to make sure the
structures are still maintaining function and not degrading.
- Some of the previously repaired areas from flood damage were lacking in live stakes.
KCI will add live stakes to those areas during this upcoming dormant season.
- There was a previous encroachment area near the bottom of T1, where the landowner had
driven inside the easement as short cut between two gates instead of going outside of the
easement. We checked this area during the site walk and it did not appear that this was
still an issue, but we will continue to pay attention to this area and document any future
encroachments.

These comments were all discussed at the site walk and this meeting memo will be included in
the MY03 monitoring report. Generally, the site was viewed positively, with the stream and
buffers all looking healthy and functioning.

The meeting ended around 3pm.