20140957 Ver 2_Datasheets for New Features in NC_20190614

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project Site: ACP City/County: Halifax County
Samp. Date: 6/13/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: INC
Sampling Point: WHLW001e_W
Investigator(s): C. Robertson (WPIT); N. Newberry Section, Township, Range:
N/A
Landform (hillslope,terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Concave Slope (%): 0 to 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P / MLRA Lat: 36.318947 Long:
-77.482172 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Rains fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, Southern Coastal Plain
NWI Map Unit: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Yes
Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sample point locations, transects,
important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES
Hydric Soil Present? YES Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? YES
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Remarks: All parameters are met. Area is classified as a palustrine emergent (PEM) wetland.
Observation point located in wetland "WHLW001e".
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required;
check all that apply)
X Surface Soil Cracks (BE)
Surface Water (A1)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
X High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (615)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (B1)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
X Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (65)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (67)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? YES
Depth (inches): Surface
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Saturation Present? YES
Depth (inches): Surface
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
N/A
Remarks:
At least one primary or two secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is met.
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type'
Locz Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 3 1 95
7.5YR 5 4 5 C
M, PL loam
-
��
-�� clay loam
iType: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,
MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
1cm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Hydric Soil Present? YES
Depth (inches): N/A
Remarks: Indicator F6 (Redox Dark Surface) present and soil meets NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WHLW001e W
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute Dom. Indicator
30' radius ) % Cover Sp? Status*
Dominance Test Worksheet:
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC:
# Dominants across all strata:
% Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC:
3
4
75%
(A)
(B)
(A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
OBL x 1=
FACW x 2 =
FAC x 3 =
FACU x 4 =
UPL x 5 =
Sum: (A)
Multiply By:
(B)
= Total Cover
30' radius )
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb
Stratum (Plot size: 10' radius )
1.
Juncus marginatus
2.
Rumex crispus
3.
Cynodon dactylon
4.
Juncus megacephalus
5.
Elymusvirgimcus
6.
Juncus effusus
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody
Vines (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
X Dominance Test is > 50%
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and 3in (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height
(DBH).
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft
(6m) or more in height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
= Total Cover
38 X FACW
15 X FAC
15 X FACU
15 X OBL
3 FAC
3 OBL
Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft
(1 to 6m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3ft (1m) in height.
89 = Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? YES
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator 2 (Dominance Test) present with >50% of dominant species across all vegetation strata FAC or wetter.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

Wetland Data Point Photographs
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
June 13 2018, Page 1 of 2
Photograph 1: WHLW001e_W, North
Photograph 2: WHLW001e_W, East

Wetland Data Point Photographs
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
June 13 2018, Page 2 of 2
Photograph 3: WHLW001e_W, South
Photograph 4: WHLW001e_W, West

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project Site: ACP City/County: Halifax County Samp. Date: 6/13/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: INC Sampling Point: WHLW001e_LI
Investigator(s): C. Robertson (WPIT); N. Newberry Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope,terrace, etc.): Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 3 to 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P / MLRA Lat: 36.318857 Long:-77.482172 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Emporia fine sandy loam, 0to 2 percent slopes NWI Map Unit: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Yes Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sample point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES
Hydric Soil Present? NO Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? NO
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Remarks: One or more parameters lacking. Area is not a wetland.
Observation point located in active farmfield adjacent to wetland "WHLW001e".
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (BE)
Surface Water (A1)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (615)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (65)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (67)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Saturation Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
N/A
Remarks: No primary or secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is not met.
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type'
Locz Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3 2 100
loam
clay loam
iType: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,
MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (AS)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
1cm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Hydric Soil Present? NO
Depth (inches): N/A
Remarks: No hydric soil indicators present and soil does not meet NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is not met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WHLW001e U
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute Dom. Indicator
30' radius ) % Cover Sp? Status*
Dominance Test Worksheet:
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC:
# Dominants across all strata:
% Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC:
1
1
100%
(A)
(B)
(A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
OBL x 1=
FACW x 2 =
FAC x 3 =
FACU x 4 =
UPL x 5 =
Sum: (A)
Multiply By:
(B)
= Total Cover
30' radius )
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' radius )
1. Elymusvirginicus
2. Poa annua
3. Cynodon dactylon
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vines (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
X Dominance Test is > 50%
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and 3in (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height
(DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft
(6m) or more in height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
= Total Cover
63 X FAC
15 FACU
15 FACU
Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft
(1 to 6m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3ft (1m) in height.
93 = Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? YES
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator 2 (Dominance Test) present with >50% of dominant species across all vegetation strata FAC or wetter.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

Wetland Data Point Photographs
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
June 13 2018, Page 1 of 2
Photograph 1: WHLW001e_U, North
Photograph 2: WHLW001e_U, East

Wetland Data Point Photographs
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
June 13 2018, Page 2 of 2
Photograph 3: WHLW001e_U, South
Photograph 4: WHLW001e_U, West

Open Waterbody Data Sheet
Survey Description
Project Name:
Waterbody Name:
Waterbody ID:
Date:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Unnamed Tributary to Marsh Swamp
OHLWO01
i13/2018
State: County:
Company.
rew Member Initials:
Photos:
Virginia Halifax
H13
DlR, N E N
2 Photos
Tact NumbWs):
Nearest Milepost: Associated Wetiand ID(s):
17-036
18.90 N/A
Survey Type:
(check one) ❑Centerline NRe-Route ❑Access Road ❑Other:
Ph sical Attributes
Waterbody Type:
(check one) ❑Stock Pond ❑ Natural Pond ❑ Lake ❑ Reservoir N Impoundment ❑ Oxbow ❑ Other:
Hydrologic Regime:
N Permanently Flooded ❑ Semipermanently Flooded ❑ Seasonally Flooded ❑ Temporarily Flooded
OHWM N/A OHWM Indicator: N/A
(chackall that apply) ❑ Clear line ❑Shelving ❑Wrested ❑Scouring ❑Water
Height: on bank vegetation staining
_ft
❑Bent, matted, or missing ❑Wrack ❑Litter and ❑Abrupt plant ❑Soil characteristic change
vegetation line debris community change
Depth of Water:
Bank height (average):
Bank slope (average):
>10 ft.
0.5 to 1.0 ft.
5 degrees
N/A❑
❑uaiitative Attributes
Water Appearance:
c+wck,,:,e1 ❑No water ®Clear ❑Turbid ❑Sheen ❑Surface ❑Algal ❑Other:
on surface scum mats
Substrate: ❑ Bedrock ❑ Boulder ❑ Cobble ❑ Gravel ❑ Sand N Silt/ clay ❑ Organic ❑ Other:
(check all that apply)
% of Substrate: % % % % % 100
Width of Riparian Zone:
Vegetative Layers:
(check all that apply) ® Trees: N Saplings/Shrubs: N Herbs
10 ft.
Avg. DBH of Dominants: 6 in, 3 in.
WAS
(approx.)
Dominant Bank Vegetation (list):
Cephatanthus occidentalis and Salix caroliniana
Aquatic Habitats (ex: submerged or emerged aquatic vegetation, overhanging banks/roots, leaf packs, large submerged wood, riffles, deep pools, etc:):
Emerged aquatic vegetation and submerged wood
Aquatic Organisms Observed (list):
None observed
T&E Species Observed (list):
None observed
Disturbances (ex: livestock access, manure in waterbody, waste discharge pipes):
Livestock able to access open waterbody fringe that is within the fenced pasture. Manure runoff from adjacent field.
Waterbody is:
(check one) ❑ Natural N Artificial, man-made ❑ Manipulated
Waterbody Quality :
(check one) ❑ High N Moderate ❑ Low
Form Rev. 07/09/2014

High Quality: Natural, natural bank vegetation around entire waterbody; banks stable and protected by roots; water color is clear to tea -colored; no
barriers to fish movement; many fish cover types available; diverse and stable aquatic habitat; no disturbance by livestock or man.
Moderate Quality: Altered by rip -rap; natural vegetation extends 1/3-1/2 of the active channel width on each side; filtering function or bank vegetation
only moderately compromised; banks moderately unstable; water color is cloudy, submerged objects covered with greenish film; moderate odor; minor
barriers to fish movement; fair aquatic habitat; minimum disturbance by livestock or man.
Low Quality: Rip rap and channeliradon excessive; natural vegetation less than 1/3 of the active channel width on each side; lack of regeneration;
filtering function severely compromised; banks unstable (eroding); water color is muddy and turbid; obvious pollutants (algal mats, surface scum,
surface sheen); heavy odor; severe barriers to fish movement; little to no aquatic habitat; severe disturbance from livestock or man.
Cattle can access bank of waterbody that extends beyond cattle fencing within study area.
Foam Rev. 07/09/2014

Y
.: rt. �� ��- ..Hi• � . wit : 1' � _ � �+"Y7fr �y : �17'Z. _ � '�• .L
t
_tom .,yy
M

USACE AID#
DWQ#.
Site # (indicate on attached map)
a] STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
I. Applicant's name:. F)')n1,'n;on_
3. Date of evaluation: � t l
5. Name of stream:IAT -0 ar—KQ-�— -!Swehme
7. Approximate drainage area: 15 a C
9. Length of reach evaluated: >06z�—
2. Evaluator's name:E51 Myr 2— ft C-, W r i 4r` S
4. Time of evaluation: i % OOA m
6. River basin:70'( 91'-"l 1 C U
8. Stream order: Ci
10. County: �±&„i {, FLAY.,...
3
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): N A7 I1
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): �� • �� Longitude (ex.—77.556611): --7 71 —/ 5
Method location determined (circle): PS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
L_oCnA-etd Svr.4tn O.;r- Rtr,g R.d., nor H Wr7 ¢S i n 44 I -d'*W EU.NC
14. Proposed channel work (if any): Pf�1 QOL�! O+C�C55 t'L, r
15. Recent weather conditions: '501)ny7 j C rIfP Ir
f
16. Site conditions at time of visit: rlprC{
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: —,,Iection 10 Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters _Nutrient Sensitive Waters —Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 0) If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 8 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential % Commercial % Industrial 70 % Agricultural
% Forested �D % Cleared / Logged % Other ( 1
22. Bankfull width: 3�23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream�:�FIat (0 to 2° o)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _►� Occasional bends
Gentle (2 to V o) Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (> 10%)
_Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet_ Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 3
Evaluator's Signature I' lLwl �� " V %I�%�` / Date
This channel evaluation form Is Intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-844 i x 26_

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: �- 1 [
ProjectlSite: A- G li
Latltude:,3�a � D,3
Evaluator: sT .. ��� ii►���-�, %
County:
Longitude: -77, 75,
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Sq&W Determination (circle one)
phemera Intermittent Perennial
Other
a g Quad Name:
if 2 19 or perennial if a 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = �• 4J l
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
D
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
D
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
TE
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
anindai oncnes are not rated; see uiscusswns In manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = S 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0)
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
3
C_ Bioloov (Subtotal = H-. S l
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21, Aquatic Mollusks
CO)1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26, Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75: OBL = 1.5 Other �0
"perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Ni d-il (<-e--t-- SWpna f ;-
G
4tr, 014W AA.
Sketch:
V-
� r
r
,' L V
3
C*wirn W 47fwf
af-4
6L,
qS

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
SCORE
Coastal Piedxaont
Mountain
1
Presence of now / persistent pools in stream
0 . 5
0 4
0 5
no flow or saturation = 0' strong flow = max ints
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0_ 6
0 -- 5
D 5
3
extensive alteration - 0' no alteration. .max rots
3
Riparian zone
0 - 6
0 4
D 5
-. no buffer = 0' conti o wide buffer = max points).
4
Evidence of nutrient or cbemlcalydischarges
0-5
0-4
0 4
extensive diszb - 0' no disoh es -max " is _
5
Groundwater discharge
0- 3
0 4
0 4
no disch e - 0' see wet]etc. - maxpoints),
6
Presence of adjacentfloodplain
0 -4
` 0-4
0 2
(no floc�dplain = 0; extensive flood lain =_ maxpoints)
_
Entrenchment / faodplain access
0-5
0
2
(deeply entrenched - 0' fm vent floodin - max int$
_
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-�0
2
(no wetlands - 0{ lar a ad`acent wetlands -max lute
�
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0 4.
0.
extensive cliannelization - 0- natural meander �- max rots
10
Sediment input
D - 5
0 4
0 4
3
extensive deposition-; 0Iittle or no sediment= max paints
11
*
0 4 �
W 0 5
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
fuse homo enous 0; lar a diverse sizes - max ints
0 - 5'
21
0 4
0 5
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
(deeply incised == 0, stable bed & banks = max points)
13
Presence of motor bank failures
0.- 5
SbOmm5..
0 5
J
severe erosion = 0• no erosio stable hanks = max points)
14
'Root depth and density on banks
0 - 5
0 -4 �
0 5
no visible roots = Q• dense rooks thmughout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
�i
0 - S
}
substantial 1m �' no evidence = max rots
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0 5-
0 6
CD
no riffleslri lee or. is = 0' well-develo d == max rots
--
}
1'/
habitat complexity
0- 6
Q 6
O b
e or no habitat = 0 fir u vqr cd-habitats = max ints
l
Ganopy coverage over streambed
=
0- S
0 5
0 5
no sue' v eQon.= 0• continuous can max points)�
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0 4W
0 4
(deeply ernWded ­0; loose structure - max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 - 4_
Q 5
D 5-
(no evidence = 0' comm a, numerous tnx&s - maxpoints)_
1
Presence of ampbibians
�
0-4-
r
no evidence = 0; common, numerous - max rots
�J
0
22
presence of fish
= =
0 -- 4
_
C._J
no evidence 0; common numerous max ints
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
Q 5
0 5_
no evidence = - m 0, abundant evidence axs ints _ .-
Total Points Possible 100 100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
3
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody sh1r003 facing west upstream.
Waterbody sh1r003 facing east downstream.
Photo Sheet I of 2

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody sh1r003 facing north across bank.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

USACE AID#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET S h 1 Y+rN
DWQ #,
Provide the following Information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: i C�!'1 2. Evaluator's nameEST- If, /11yCPfi iffGj,
3. Date of evaluation:-01 A S 4. Time of evaluation: ID: C eJNyl
5. Name of stream:_cAl fiy F3reeoie 5 S1N"P 6. River basin: TA (— Perr1 116 U
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order:'
9. Length of reach evaluated. 10. County= Q t I I-Q�
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer
rr in decimal degrees, 12. Subdivision name (if any): NA
� Latitude (ex 34 87231 ): 6ff Longitude (ex 77 556611): 27. 7 5 t aV
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo..GIS Other G1S Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): PQ>905-e8 ^ CCe SS Y-o _
15. Recent weather conditions: C (eA1,
16. Site conditions at time of visit:. (/I_(� � c_.S+64 r k>-e^_
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known Section 10 Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters ,Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES CO) If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 0 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES a
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential _% Commercial % Industrial �/a Agricultural
2D/4 Forested La-1. Cleared / Logged % Other ( 1
22. Bankfull width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down cen r of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) , Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): ;` 5 Comments: af2k e -,C-M) d 4-6* i W44 644w0A -
Evaluator's SignatureAfLA���Date - `' _ l f /v2e
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26_

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 5 k I Y-00:�
Date: �In O
Project/Site: A CP
Latitude:36. (9
Evaluator: s AWL
County: RaOicfox
Longitude: 77.7 5 z0
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent J L C
�i , J
Str am D termination (circle one)
1 hemeral ntermittent Perennial
Other En �lC►
e.g Quad Name:
if z 19 or erunniat if z 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank 6; ak-ck
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
�J
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
(02
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1 '
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No l7
Yes = 3
artmaiai ancnes are not rated, see aIscusswns in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 5,
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
(175
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16.Organic debris lines or piles
D
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
3
C. Bioloov iSubtotal = C-6 i
18. Fibrous roots in sireambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
IWO
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
D
1 0.5
1
1.5
26. Welland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5 Other 46
'perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: IAAj r t
-
A-
E tw
Sketch:
A-f
!� r
r
r
S� l r� U 3 cxN w ►Y1
W' d-tw.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION .POWT
RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0 5
0 4
0 5
no flow or. saturation = P�#NPJK flow = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0 6
0 5
0 5
extensive alteration = 0• no aheration = maxpoints)
Riparian zone
6
0 4
0 5
no buffer - 0• cond ou wide buffer - max points)0
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
'
0 5
0 M0
4
3
extensive disc es = 0• no disc es = max is
5�
Groundwater discharge
0 g
0
0 4
no disch e = 0• s bin se wetlan etc. =max rots
w
6
Presence of adjacent f]oodplain
0 4'1111 rO4
0 2
no flood lain = 0• extensive flood lain - max ints
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0 5 4
0 2
O
entrenched = 0• din uentdloo.= max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0 6' 04
0-2
no wetlands = 0•�1 e.ad'aceat wetlands =.max rots .-
4
Ghannel sinuosity
-
0 5.
0 3
extensive.pbannelizatioa= 0• natural meander = mm ints
�'04
10
Sediment input
o=
extensd ition= 9; Agle. or no sediment
max rots .11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
45-�
0 5
fine .homo emus 0•- a - .diverse.sizes =.max ints
ofchannel incision or widening
"04
,0 - 5
�--
12Evidence
dce 1 incised - 0 stable bed 8� banks T max rots
13
Presence of major Bank failures
severe erosion = 0• no erosio stable banks = max. ints
p 5 5
0 5
14
Root depth and density on banks
0 3 4
VO-
0 5
F,
no visible roots:-. 0• dense roots throw out.= max.points)
-
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 5
0 4
0 5
substantial impact =0• no evidence - max ints
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
ipples -
0 3
= 0 5
0 6-
j
no riffieV ot` pools 0= well -developed- maxpoints)`
17
Habitat complexity
0
0 6
0 6
tle or no habitat = 0; ftyquent, varied habitats - max ints_
18
Ganopy coverage over strcemhtd
0 5
0 5
0 5
V
no sha� vtgetation = 0- continuous canopy = max ints
19
Substrate esabedtledness
NA*
4
0 4
d 1 embedded=.0•.loose structure = max
_AW0
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 4
_
0 5
0 5
no evidence = .0• commo numerous Zym = max ints
21
Presence of amphibians
0 4
0 4
0 4
a
no.evidenee 0 cn, ommonumerous Vaies, = maxipoints)
..-
0
22
Presence of fish
0 4
0 4
0. 4
no evidence = 0• commo numerous = max points)�!
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0 6
0 5
no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = rnaxints
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams-

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody sh1r002 facing northwest upstream.
Waterbody sh1r002 facing southeast downstream.
Photo Sheet I of 2

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody sh1r002 facing northeast across bank.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Projectisite P� C.? City/County N—SamplingDate- 20 1
Applicant/Owner: pgrn-W State N C Sampling Point. W lAa r 00 f C' W
Investigator(s).E ST K- AIV (n fe%C: •W' I{ I DUYI 5_ _ Section. Township Range- 1I A
Landform (hillsiope, terrace. etc.): ce S' Un Local relief (concave, convex, nonel- 1(*f) C0�b
f- 5pe N
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: 36' 076 �G Lcng- 77• �S&OV-7 Datum:wGs
Soil }Nap Unit Name: WEirl oy—k KCL IDA(Y) ? 0--2/a Frc),aed NWI classification- P�
Are climatic ! hydrologic conditions an the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no. explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Sail cr Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Sail a Hydrology naturally problematic? (1f needed. explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY ❑F FINDINGS -- Attach site map Is hawing sampling paint locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ -No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sall Present? YeS v' Np within a Wetland7 Yes V No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes " No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Welland Hydrology Indicators-
5gac ndary Indicators (minimum of tyyp.required
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required. check all Mat aoaly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (138)
urface Water (A1) _
�
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
arsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
►i ,Miigh Water Table (A2) _
Mart Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_v Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B18)
_ Water Marks (B1) _
Oxidized Rhizaspheres along Living Roots (C3)
Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
!; Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (0I3)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain In Remarks)
Shallow Aquilard (D3)
undation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (DB) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
$
Water Table Preseni? Yes D
Depth (inches):
f
Saturation Present. Yes t/ No
Depth (inches): 9GI t e-
Wetland
Hydrotcgy Present? Yes u No
includes ca illa Hinge)
Describe Retarded Data (stream gauge, mcnito ring welt, aerial phatoa, previous ins pect:ans), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Ccastat Plain Region — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
TEee Stratum (Plat size: r `_ { ] %,Cgyer Scecies? �
�'�
2-
3-
4-
5.
6,
7.
B.
sb = Total Cover
50OA of total cover: S 20-A of total cover:
Sapliri❑La rye ratum [Plot slze::�&Fw ra�tws
2. L-tA5 (Arn 'S-knen
3
Sampling Point: weir 001 Lvj
Dominance Test vwrksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A]
Total Number of Daninant
Species Across All Strata (B]
Percent of Dominant Species o
That Are CSL, FACW, or FAC: (AIB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACLI species
x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4 I Prevalence Index = BIA =
5.
6.
7.
8.
_70 = Total Cover +
509k of total cover: �] 20% of total cover l
94
Herb Stratum (Plot size'
1. �111 �trM [C+�f4�E� _ fCl PkL
2. A { U (► f r•p�r't1_ t'1+ z1 Dn�1 �1}�w
3.
4.
5,
6.
7.
B.
10.
11.
12.
�= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: a7
Woo Vine Stratum (Plot size�� rL �s 5J
2,
3.
4
5.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: �.. �J 20"A of total cover
Remarks: (If observed, list maphclogica] ad apt all ons below)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Rapid Test fa Hydrophytic Vegetation
V 2 - dominance Test is a50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydro phytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3-25 ft tall.
Woody vine — At woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Caps of Enginears Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plaln region —Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Nytar 001 P-W
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color moi t 96
Redox Features _
Color (moist) °k Type' Loc'
Texture Remarks
O-A ,Ua423) j
GL
�2j R5 qQ
S G [{� N� S
Type: C=Concentration, D=Oe letion, RM=Reduced
Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydrlc Sall Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Sol le:
_ Histosot (At)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (SS) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (AB) (LRR a)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (SS) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outslde MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Sciis (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratif ed Layers (A5)
_ Depieled Matrix (F3)
^ Anomalous Bright Loamy Solis (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (IFS)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (Ag) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain In Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Ail)
, _ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (At2)
_ iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of h ydroph yti c vegetation and
_ Coest Prairie Redox (At6) (M LRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, Ul
wetland hydrology must be present.
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ i andyGleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
N Sandy Redox (S5)
` Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F24) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydrlc Solt Present? Yes tdo
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Environmental Field Surveys
Wetland Photo Page
Wetland data point wnar001f w facing north.
Wetland data point wnar001f w facing west.
Photo Sheet I of 2

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region �r
ProjectrSite C- P City/County 5 �\ Sampling Date-
ApplicantrOwner GVfy\( f'❑ n - _ State 1J C- Sampling Point.W far 001 - t,A
Investigatar(s) is Wr 11;0-a 5 Section Township, Ranga: N It
Landform (hillslope. terrace. etc): e l,, Local rrrcc
elieI (cncave, convex, none). J� slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P. Lat `"i D 7 Long: -77 • f5 5 q % 6P Datum.]j(a5 `
Sail Map Unit Name N W- f�O(f< I Caro SorbS10 K5NWI classification: W R Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions an the site Typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no. explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Sail , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are -Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 1,111-'Na
Are Vegetation Sail , a Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed. explain any answers in Remarks.)
bUrA ytAKY Ut- I-INUINUb - Anacn Site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes " Na Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sail Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Welland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicatorsit d
Prima ry Indicators minimum of one 1s re uired check all that a po I
_ Surface Sal Cracks (B13)
_ Surface Water (At)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits IS IS) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
r Hydrogen Sulfide Oder (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizespheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_._ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C9)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iran Deposits (85)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
� Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (97)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (05)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (DB) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
Table Present? Yes
140 Depth (incites): NA
I)
No epth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 7AOIF
I�Water
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca illa fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspect-ons), it available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants- Sampling Point: Wnar-OOLU
-* `
f
Tree Stratum (Plot size: `U) 3
Absolule Dominant Indicator
AFL species? �s$to
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
11
1. 1 -ck U vo'c
FA C
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(A)
12. P63V-5 3{ortt{ , cJ IA
U FACvt
Total Number of RominaM31
3 lT (H ��
�_ ua
Species Across All Strata:
(B}
b.
Percent of Dominant Species
C�7 0'z,
5-
That Are 0BL, FACW, or FAG:
(A!B)
B.
7.
Pre valance Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence index = BIA =
8.
n = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3V 20% of total cover: 1
5aplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3 atA ray. 4
1, E X (TO cc, FA C
2
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic VBgetaflon Indicators:
5.
_ R
2 apid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
- Dominance Test is >50%
_._ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 W
7
8
50% of trial cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot stze x'f_+ +Cedr0S}
1.-Nir'r,C Pre Se n�
2.
3.
4-
^= Total Cover r
201A of total cover: U�
5-
a.
7-
a.
9.
10.
11.
12.
5 0 % of total cover.
Woody Vna Stratum (Plat size: Jr 0 rt'� 3 }
1, ron-e P(e�fr�♦
= Total Cover
20% of total cover.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover
CJ = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
_ Prablemabc Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explaln)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree _ Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more to diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3-28 ft (1 m) tall -
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3-2a It tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3-28 ft in
height-
Hydrophytic
Vegetation l/
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps at Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

WKar 001. u
SOIL
Sampling Pclnk
Profile Description: (describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix _
Redox Features
(inches) Color moit %
Colorfmolst). 0/0-Type— Loc
Texture Remarks
0- : z )do
v r�
U
& a 0
= �—
l�—� G 6 a1c_�
SG1
TYP e: C=Conce ntration, D=De ofetIon. RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydrlc Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless othervAse noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Solls':
Histosot (At)
_ PolyvaIue Below Surface (58) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (AS) (LRR 0)
— Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mlneral (Ff) (LRR 0)
— Reduced Vertle (F1 S) (outside MLRA 150A,13)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Sails (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
r 5 cm Mucky Mineral Wr) (LRR P, T, U)
,_, Depleted Dark Surface (177)
— Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below park Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (Ff 1) (MLRA 151)
Thick park Surface (At 2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicat ors. of hydrophyhc vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (FI3) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be Present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, 5)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vedic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (85)
_ Piedmont FIoodplaIn Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (SS)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Solls (F20);MLRA 149A, 153C, 1530)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrlctive Layer (it observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

t f �g - � \ i `yy�r�,• 7-`r aid � ... r .� .
W riN
44
A N 405!
wil
car # •„ � 7�' 4�� � sue' :Y "e�= i Y' 'a..i � .' -.� -. }� .��,
r
95% ��
loft41�
•a u. �+*.,'t' S�-,f,� ,_ J �-. } ',gam 'c�t._S i

NC DWO Stream Identification Farm Version 4.11 SrtAV- 004
Date:
Project/Site: k C
Latitude.*36,0 7 W
Evaluator: .,3_ rf;�rr'��- .
County: N ash
Longitude: -7'7. -2( 5 Q
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent .2,2
Stream Determ4iakgclrcle one)
Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name: ra k6
if i 19 orperennial it? 30"
A. Geomorphology [Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate I
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
5. Active/relict t3oodplain
0
1
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
B. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes 3
artiricia3 ouches are not razed; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology {Subtotal = l9 }
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0)0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = S .ca
16. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0,75; OBL = 1.5
t er 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using outer methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
aim tz
�� rwh0ZB � D �ao}yycm at w45 SUfwVk
Sketch: � � .
`a Wna r OO
a� �St! oxoo Li =w wa r001T =0 riI �
`I snarON
'1� -
5nav, 023,
(cbnc o9`tea,. H)

Aye
'Fl
¢¢ d y
r�l ' -P •LIr
f:•

Olt
nrVV
�tr
S y�•oy 'a.` .. tag 3,

—too,,' WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
��►hbw WNAW001e_W
Project Site: Atlantic Coast Pipeline City/County: Nash
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: NC
Investigator(s): M. Molnar (PWD) & P. Bailey (WPIT) Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)
MLRA 133A in LRR P Lat: 36.073263 Long
Samp. Date: 12/3/2018
Sampling Point: WNAW001e W
N/A
None Slope (%): 0-2
-77.86241 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit: RaA - Raines fine sandy loam, 0-2% slopes. NWI Map Unit
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Upland
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sample point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES
Hydric Soil Present? YES Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? YES
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Remarks: All parameters are met. Area is classified as a palustrine emergent (PEM) wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required;
check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? NO
Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? YES
Depth (inches): surface
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Saturation Present? YES
Depth (inches): surface
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: At least one primary indicator and two or more secondary indicators of wetland hydrology are present; parameter is met.
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' LoC
Texture Remarks
0-4 7.5YR 4/1 95
7.5YR 5/6 5 C M
sandy loam
4-8 7.5YR 3 1 68
10YR 5 1 30 D M
sandy loam
7.5YR 5/8 2 C M
8-18 2.5Y 5/1 100
sandy clay loam
TType: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
1cm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: NSA
Hydric Soil Present? YES
Depth (inches):
Remarks: Indicator F3 (Depleted Matrix) present and soil meets NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. ` - Sampling Point: WNAW001e_W
vhbe
Absolute
Dom. Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30' radius )
% Cover
Sp? Status
Dominance Test Worksheet:
1.
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 2 (A)
2.
3.
# Dominants across all strata: 2 (B)
4.
5.
% Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 100% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
7.
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply By:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
30' radius )
OBL 3 x 1= 3
1.
FACW 66 x 2 = 132
2.
FAC 38 x 3 = 114
3.
FACU 15 x 4 = 60
4.
UPL x 5 =
5.
Sum: 122 (A) 309 (B)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.53
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
15' radius )
X Dominance Test is > 50%
1.
X Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
2.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
3.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
4.
Morphological Adaptations
5.
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
6.
problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
10' radius )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or more in
1. Agrostis gigantea
63
X FACW
height and 3in (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Andropogon virginicus
38
X FAC
3. Solidago altissima
15
FACU
4. Rhexia virginicus
3
FACW
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or more in
5. Carex alata
3
OBL
height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
6.
7.
8.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft (1 to 6m) in
9
height.
10.
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of
12
size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3ft (1m) in
122
= Total Cover
height.
Woody Vines (Plot size:
30' radius )
1.
2,
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
5.
Vegetation
= Total Cover
Present? YES
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator 2 (Dominance Test) present with >50% of dominant species across all vegetation strata FAC or wetter.
Prevalence index calculated for reference purposes only.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

Wetland Data Point Photographs
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
December 03, 2018, Page 1 of 1
AA
Photograph 1: WNAW001e_W, North

Wetland Data Point Photographs
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
December 21, 2018, Page 1 of 2
Photograph 1: WNAW001e_W, North
Photograph 2: WNAW001e_W, Northwest

��. of . a �' � �'r a�� , "..� � �._
1 �.�,C/ i h an
t:, 7 -y

—too,,' WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
��►hbw WNAW001_U
Project Site: Atlantic Coast Pipeline City/County: Nash
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: NC
Investigator(s): M. Molnar (PWD) & P. Bailey (WPIT) Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)
MLRA 133A in LRR P Lat: 36.073119 Long
Samp. Date: 12/3/2018
Sampling Point: WNAW001 U
N/A
None Slope (%): 0-2
-77.86275 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit: RaA - Raines fine sandy loam, 0-2% slopes. NWI Map Unit
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Upland
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sample point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES
Hydric Soil Present? NO Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? NO
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Remarks: One or more parameters lacking. Area is not a jurisdictional wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required;
check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? NO
Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? NO
Depth (inches): >18
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Saturation Present? NO
Depth (inches): >12
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: No primary or secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is not met.
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' LoC
Texture Remarks
0-2 7.5YR 3/1 98
7.5YR 4/6 2 C M
sandy loam
2-8 2.5Y 4 3 98
7.5YR 4 6 2 C M
sandy loam
8-18 2.5Y 6/3 100
loam
TType: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
1cm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: NSA
Hydric Soil Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Remarks: No hydric soil indicators present and soil does not meet NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is not met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. ` - Sampling Point: WNAW001_U
vhbe
Absolute
Dom. Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30' radius )
% Cover
Sp? Status
Dominance Test Worksheet:
1.
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 1 (A)
2.
3.
# Dominants across all strata: 1 (B)
4.
5.
% Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 100% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
7.
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply By:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
30' radius )
OBL 3 x 1= 3
1.
FACW x 2 =
2.
FAC 63 x 3 = 189
3.
FACU 18 x 4 = 72
4.
UPL x 5 =
5.
Sum: 84 (A) 264 (B)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.14
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
15' radius )
X Dominance Test is > 50%
1.
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
2.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
3.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
4.
Morphological Adaptations
5.
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
6.
problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
10' radius )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or more in
1. Andropogon virginicus
63
X FAC
height and 3in (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Solidago altissima
15
FACU
3. Allium vineale
3
FACU
4. Juncus effusus
3
OBL
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or more in
5
height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
6.
7.
8.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft (1 to 6m) in
9
height.
10.
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of
12
size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3ft (1m) in
84
= Total Cover
height.
Woody Vines (Plot size:
30' radius )
1.
2,
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
5.
Vegetation
= Total Cover
Present? YES
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator 2 (Dominance Test) present with >50% of dominant species across all vegetation strata FAC or wetter.
Prevalence index calculated for reference purposes only.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

Wetland Data Point Photographs
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
December 03, 2018, Page 1 of 1
c �1' =
LI
`��-.:�r: ` � .�•• r''��� ""...�,'.ti vim_ ?;.',
1rl I• _ �it�' ••�..�r fj •ti1t~'■STc ��pti .� �•�LK��P_
�' ��r� � :I�.� •._ '� . • � r�"�.i'ry.,��� +�� ' 'fir, ' . �'" r
.I�{���� ; � . { ` � '+ r.�'�. �!"fi •,' - ..i•: ' •,tom
Photograph 1: WNAW001_U, East

USAGE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
I. Applicant's name:��7�+r 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: Ai _ 4. Time of evaluation: a
5. Name of stream:,.��_% �� �{° 6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: ��� � �a 8. Stream orde,
9. Length of reach evaluated: — 1 10. County: k�: 4
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
r F f ,C t cl
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): ���. ff� � Longitude (ex.-77.SSG611): �� � l �� .3l 13
Method location detennined (circle): `GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streams) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):____Q-,�
15. Recent weather conditions: OV`1-k
16. Site conditions at time of visi
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: j�-Acction 10 tk i)4 'idal Waters %essential Fisheries Habitat
NLn A rout Waters utstanding Resource WatersNutrient Sensitive Waters eater Supply Watershed lV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point'? YES (1O_ 'If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YI'�' NO 20. Does chhy nnneel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ES' NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial J/ Agricultural
o Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: lat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>I0`%�)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends _XFrequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's SignatureDate= / C�
This channel evaluation for/n is fin ten de a used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

'5it)A �-/ 6 /1�5-
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
#
CHARACTERISTICS
FCOREGION
.POINT
RANGE
SCORE .
Coastal"
i Piefirion#
l�iountain"
.� , " ""
l
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
(no flow m saturation = O; strong #low =rnax points)
_
� _25
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(extensive; alteration = 0; no alteration =rnax points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0 -. 5
0 .:.. 4
0 .. 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
U
(no discharge = t); springs, seeps, wetlands, eto. =max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
(no; floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain =rnax points)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0 S
0 "4
0 ���� 3
(extensive cbannelization = 0; natural meander max points)
J
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0=4
Hhomogenous
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11�
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
0-4
0 5Oki
(fine; =; 0; lar e, diverse sizes = max oints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 5
0 - 4
0 - 5
H"
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max po nts)
.,,
i3
Presence of major bank failures
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
0-5
0-5
0-5
!�
,
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
1<mpact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0
0-4
0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
_S
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0--3
0-5
0--6
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0;' welt -developed = max points)
"
17
Habitat complexity
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
0-6
0 6
0 G
Canopy coverage over streambed
18
(no sbading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
0.5
0..5
0.._5
1
Substrate embeddedness
NA 1
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
=
0 4
0 5
0-5
-
(no evidence = 0• common numerous types maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0,
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = common, numerous types =rnax points)
"
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0T4
0-Y-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Co#al Points.;ppssible
100
IUO
100
TOTAL SCORE - (a1s0 ens er'on
,rst page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: _ % L
r
Project/Site: �'�
Latitude
4
Evaluator: �''���
County:
Longitude:?�
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
�� 3
Stream Determination (ciUjazae4,
Other Stony Creek
if 2! 19 or perennial if z 30*
,.
Ephemeral Intermitter erennia
e.g. Quad Name:
i4/'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = i )
Absent
Weak
Mod ate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3 '
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions�anual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 1 b % )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water tab
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = I ` { 5)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
CqD
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
MM

art
` % r

-
-����,
P f j
�/-

s V�a� o K
NC DW❑ Stream Identification Corm Version 4.11
Rate: /7 l f 17
ProjectJSlte: ' r
Latitude:
Evaluator: Y . ))+A r t��A r �' J01" °u
County: ' 1 G ' :-
+'
Longitude: , 91 ❑U T
Total Paints:
Stream is at least intermittent , S
Stream Determination (circle a
Other KkC s 1, (`V+
Name: NC
Ephemeral Intermlttent 1 erennial
e.g. Quad
if? Igor perennial if a 30'
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strang
1 a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
0
1
0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
6j3
5. Active/relict fioodplain
0
1
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
(27
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
{"
3
S. Headcuts
l}'
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
(A.
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes 3
clMlICAM UILU ins din FKAl ldICL, See U15 ssioris In manual
B_ Hvdrnloov [Subtotal = F , S ]
12. Presence of Basef]ow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
M
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
CO)0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris Iines or piles
0
0.5
1 ]
_ 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology f5ubtotal = l3
i B. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3}
2
1
0
20. Macrobenth as (note diverslty and abundance)
0
1
2
4)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1fV
23. Crayfish
(0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphlblans
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
`0,5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; ❑BL = 1.5 Other= 0
"perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: jEFtti OQ M- ankx CO blrr4{q
-�ltlrr,-.rq
Pet rr-SSPS vn 5%,AJI nr+ ee0 0111
Sketch: r .�. Soar00,
wn c,h o�P3
rr 1 dP
o��rA a 30

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
of
M AUP
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1.. Applicant's name: -Do rl" ' r, VD VI 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date afevaluation : V11 14
5. Name of stream: �� r.• ( Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: G 1.6
9. Length of reach evaluated: I ❑ F-
I t. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34 872312): ZrJ . R9 430
4. Time of evaluation: to 5 �
6. River basin: �� f �A `r\\ I( �
8. Stream order: 3
10. County:___
12. Subdivision name (if any): tit:!
Longitude (ex.-77.556611): ti a❑
Method location determined (circle): • OS) Topm Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
11')0' rk.. 0� cet'n%0,i dl q". Fed .
14. Proposed channel work (if any): TVJ
15. Recent weather conditions: T.A'r c -
16. Site conditions at time of visit: 1b 4 rrn
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known:Section 10 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
'Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters 'Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation paint? ES 'O If yes, estimate the water surface area,: yaf Ac
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ;YES' NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES; NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: �' % Residential % Commercial % Industrial ` �O/fl Agricultural
L45 % Forested °I° Cleared/ Logged °I° Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 3�i�- 23. Hank height (from bed to top of bank): t ! r
24. Channel slope down center of stream: `! Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends ?frequent meander Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecaregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecaregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecaregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Scare (fro rev rse): `} Comments:
r.`tI y
Evaluator's Signature "�� � Date •�
This channel evaluation farm Is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals In
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not Imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x. 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
#
ECORE(;ION POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
MountainPresence
1
of flow! persistent pools in stream
0-5 5
0 -- 4
-
0 - 5
no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0
0-5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0 6
0 4
0 S (p
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max oints
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0 4
0 4 4
extensive dischar es = 0; no dischar =es = max points)
04
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0 4
0-4
U5
(no dischar e = 0; s rin >s, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points).
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0_ 4
0_ 4
0- 2
(no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
7
Entrenchment 1 flaadplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2 t"]
(deeply entrenched = 0• freuent flooding = maxpoints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; lac a adjacent wetlands = max ints
9
Channel sinuosity
0 5
0-4
4_ 3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0- 5
0 4
0 4
(extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, divcrse sires = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
4 4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed 8: banks =max lots
,.,
1(severe
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5 �[
a
rK
erasion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
`
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5 a
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throe bout =max Dints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0 5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
i6
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0 -- 6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well -developed = maxpoints)
Q
17
habitat complexity
0 G
0-6
0-6
H
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent. varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
(no shadin vegetation = 0; continuous canopy= maxpoints)0-5
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; Ioose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 - 4
0-5
0-5 i
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0- 4
0 -- 4 Q
a
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
04
D
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
p
(no evidence = 0; commonnumerous types max oints]
,
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
no ev idence = 0; abundant evidence = max points
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)3
* Thew characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody data point snahO15 facing northwest upstream.
Waterbody data point snahO15 facing southeast downstream.
Photo Sheet I of 2

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody data point snahO15 facing southwest across bank.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -- Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region ( f
Project/Site: C P CitylCounty Sampling Date- ` ' i 1
ApplicanVOwner: W(]'lt(i t00 state NC Sampling Point .5_. W
Invesilgator(s):F-5y— t'S� M� tr P�1reti G, Ws ti 1 o�rirt S Section, Township, Range- _ N a _
Landform (hilslope, terrace, etc): NFI (6:5�0r1 Local relliief (concave, convex, none) Ca71 CA111r- Slope (%)
ocU
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Let: 35 - D'+ `t 5 S Long:'? ¢ • 013 Datum W(p5 81+
Soil Map Unit Name eot;,)S f , (\I, Sal(Idr, l 10Anli U-,l ulu SIDAcS NWl classification P55
Are climatic ! hydrologgI onditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks ►
Are Vegelation y Sail or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal C rcumstancas" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydrlc Soli Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes �No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
NCWXM : Nay Wvvb F(a*
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two re it
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply) _
_ _ Surface Sal Cracks (98)
Surface Water (At) _
Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
—h Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (910)
Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (816)
_ Water Marks (B1) r
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
... Sediment Deposits (132) _
Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (CS)
_ Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery (Cg)
Algal Mat or Crust (34) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iran Deposits (135) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (89)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
//
Surface Water Present? Yes No
,,
epth (inches): N Ar
Water Table Present? Yes o
!eplh (inches); %fit r
/
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): l r
�
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspecWns), if available:
Remarks:
llege-i +gin 1na 5
YeCen+ih lo-e en
C I eav-,e6 .
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of punts.
Absolute Dominant Ind;cator
Tree Stratum (Plotslze:3O$A '(DA 145 %Cover ySpecies? Stays
1. npne Pfleyr?x
2.
3.
4.
Sapjina1Shrub
1. -s->le)c
50% of total cover.
Stratum (Plot size,WJr- 11"Aa+94$
69ae4k
C = Total Cover
20% of total cover
— 1+0 &C
2,_(yAQQOI#ra
VitoWniQAQ
aD _Flow
3
Ma3606"ex
10 N_ L
4
5
7
8
7 Taal Cover
5011,6 of total cover: 3 s 20% of total cover.
Herb Stratum (Plot size, rOht� � f 5
re Pe^ S �v 'Ft4Cr�
2.
3.
4.
5,
li.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody
1
50% of total cover:
Vine Stratum (Plot size_: 1W t
Smi�O�iC ,yiNI1[�+4v�5
(0 = Total Cover
S 20% of total cover.
wy
2,
r +&I S
N Fy L
3
Sampling Point. W A Y PS--W
uominance iesr womsneen
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. 7-5 ,> (AB)
Total % Cover of.
Multiply b%
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = BJA =
Hydropphhytic Vegetation Indicators:
4 Repld Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test :s >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is S3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophyt.c Vegetatlon' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic_
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in_ (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
sapling/shrub — Woody plants. excluding vines. less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 R (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
Woody vine —All woody vines greater then 3 28 ft in
height.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
7 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover- 3S 20% of total cover l t`S Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
vege+a►-t-'.c1n V\O"s recenfi(,7 teen c(eatvee( 014+ 1, k1ew
sAp;,�3 -r-f c s ffmol rel .
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point A +f .Z S-vj
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix _
Redox Features
(Inches) Color (moist) %
color (moist) 96 T e Locr
Texture Remarks
G—� t R31 I OIL
_
CLr
-1
1 D r,�10 q d
lU +2� (o ra s' nn
c L
'Type: C=Concentration. D=De letion. RM=Reduced
Matrix, MS=Masked Send Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydrlc Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Sells':
Hlstosol (All
^_
_ Poiyvalue Below Surface (SB) (LRR S, T. U)
1 cm Muck (AS) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
— Thin hark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fi) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (FIB) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
y Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Z Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mad (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
Depleted Ochric (FI1) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Iron-Mangenese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 31ndicators of hydrophyl.c vegetat on and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (Al6) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochdc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
T Reduced Vertic (FIB) (MLRA 150A,150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sails (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Sois (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
ti
Depth (inches):
Hydrlc Sall Present? Yes No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

4� iv P✓�
1 p�rfflnilllpi
i A
Eli
tit
t
3�
F�
47
:FN;9. � .. -
... -.. �1
�. ail. � �. men�.�
do
SiA �,� . ,. �°•. .�. - . ��r..r n �r.�._
r ' 7

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site- A- P CitylCounty, NchSh Sampling Date
AppiicanUOwner nC)ftil41 tQ/) state Al Sampling Point: W(\ ailraZ - W
lnvestigator(s)&-<z-K,rA,A,rP(Ai4ti4o Section Township, Range
Landform (hillstope, terrace, etc): lie ;5S;rjn Local relief (concave, convex, none) CDnCCkye Slope (%): Q
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): t R f, f Lat 36. %l4957 Lcng: 7S• U 1 1-+3 / Datum Vj4jT $4
Soil Map Unit Name' f3aqnS i ICkw" Of a —;.!I• 10pe S NWI classification P Fd
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Sod or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances" presenl7 Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed. explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes V---- No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
,Sgcondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (BB)
_ Surface Water (At) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
— Jifi Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (Bi0)
_✓Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
r Moss Trim Lines (BIB)
_ Water Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CB)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
Iron Deposits (85) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
— "allow Aquitard (03)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
�I,,,,,// FAC•Neutral Test (D5)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
^ Sphagnum moss (08) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
/
Surface Water Present? Yes No
,
(inches): NA
Water Table Present? Yes a
—,_Depth
S/ Deplh (inches)' '72--6
Saturation Present) Yes No
Depth (inches), �� _
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca illa fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available:
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of p'ants.
Sampling Point. W A A f 2__JF_%_j
Tree Stratum (Plot size: �f fW A
i. T, 11? )< 0PO4M
%Cover Sbecies7 _lotus
FAk C
2. e % n u 5 4-Ae 60%
SZ n/ r-A- c
3, R C-e r 6 tofu rn
atba.
5.
6.
7.
8
70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35 20% of total cover:
SoplingMrub Stratum (Plot size- 30f+ fW i&4
1. N" 4�)(NO1.1i�K Vkfat AiAAm
2.� UPyCa
3
�C
4
5
nance
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC- (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata & (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL FACW, or FAC. i OV 9u (AB)
Prevalence Inriax worksheeC
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by-
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 = _ _
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals
(A) ($)
Prevalence Index = B!A =
6 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7 " 2 - Dominance Test Is >50%
B. _ 3 -Prevalence Index is 53.0'
�= Total Cover _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover: a U 20% of total cover.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:,&** raA C4 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 A ff.� n � r a r � a �� 4 a n A -ea 1C� y rfl eW be present, unless disturbed or problematic_
2 Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
5,
6.
7.
8,
9.
10.
11.
12.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: S 20-A of total cover.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size.3C 4- W44S)
1. 1CN aD _� r—i1cG
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: J Q 20% of total cover.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall
Woody vine - All woody vines greater then 3.28 it In
height
Hydrophytic /
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point: UJ h A e ,F_ v"
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth _ Matrix Redox Features
Inches Color moist % _ _Color (moist) % Type Loc' Texture Remarks
o- 5 1 O R 3 (F 160
I
Hydrlc Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Poiyvalue Below Surface (58) (LRR S, T, U)
_, 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodpiain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (AB) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) ___,
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
` Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
" Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (Al6) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) ILRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
j,26ndyGleyed
Type:
Depth (lnches)-
Hydric Sall Present? Yes Na
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

A v' r A I ` sty k �► �:/
Af
iiarr - M
�L
INS
kv
{Ali
MV
T
377x «�

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region /
ProjectrSile irl C e City1county. _ ! Y A!% Sampling Date l ( !
AppticanuOwner 00M If) Url State . N_C Sampling Point.WhA
Investigator(s)L5 K 11MN &rty oC, Wh i t irn 5 Section Township Range _ _N A
Landform (hillslope, terrace etc).
r 1 isi o ft _ - Local relief (concave, convex, none) Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): _ Li�c e Let: 3 5 r 149 41-5 Lcng ~ / D , (k 3 Oat" W (0 S {
Soil Map Unit Name Qd' r) S f%tne _O A'iv Sf{X*;V--S__ NWI classification IV A
Are climatic ! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are -Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed. explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes !/ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No VVV
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators-
Secondary Indicators fminimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one Is re uir d ch k all that a
_ Surface Sal Cracks (B8)
_ Surface Water (All) _
Aquatic Fauna (813)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (B19)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (82) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (94) ^
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iran Deposits (85) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (BB)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
/
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): - ) V_A - ---
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 7
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plan Region —Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -- Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Polnt. nA'C—(/il
Tree Stratum (Plotsize:39p" rA6 W
;Cover 5beciesi Status
1.
C4-rA4er< CL, S 6? � b ON
a.y LL_IFmac#'►
MA 0,
4,
5.
6.
7.
B
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:_ 20% of total cover. hQ
Sapling
/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: �Cl �fOd�rA�
2.
Lt rnrnSA-{km s:n4?n5p _
10
3
4.
5
6
7.
8
3O =Tote! Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: #V _ f?�6ifit)s
1.
,7.
r k'x
2.
3
4_
5.
6,
7_
B.
9_
10
11,
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 7. 5 20% of total cover. 3
Woody
Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30f_�'
1.
5 m (o►x �CD+und+ fv t : d,
D F:oc
2.
L Dn 1 Ce fck Ja.C-Un; c A
I C�� [�_
3.
uominance issi womsnaec
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B)
Percent of Dominant Species o
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AA3)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 = _
Column Totals
(A)
Prevatence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1- Dominance Test Is ?50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is 53.0`
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
helght.
Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants excluding vines, less
than 3 In. DBH and greater then 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size_ and woody plants less than 3,28 It tall.
Woody vine —All woody vines greater than 3 28 It in
height
4
5. Hydrophytic
Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover 20% of total cover (17 Present? yes No
list morphological adaptations
US Army Carps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Wn ai -`—�
Profile Description, (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth MaMx
Redox Features . _
(inches) Cdor moist) _ %
Color (moist) % Type ' Texture Remarks
R3 ;�- too
SL
q
R5 AA
S
'Type: C=Concentratlon. D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis°:
_ Histosoi (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ _ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
— 2 cm Muck (Al0) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (FIB) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
�. Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S,11
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
__._ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20,
_ Organic Bodles (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T. U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
^ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
— Other (Explain In Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al I)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 2indcators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbdc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
_ Della Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vedic (FIB) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_^ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S5)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Sails (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T. U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks -
US Army Carps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

s
all
.M'�i ll

c Wic'L
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: �y_ � T
Project[Site: R (-'P
Latitude:
Evaluator: r 5 L _ �Q�� �
County: j�V I 1 S�
Longitude: WS 02_9� u,/
Total Points: 7]
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (c' le -one)
Ephemeral lntermitte Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name: �' ` }� `'
I
if? 19 orperennial if=:30'
.
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =G0•' )
Absent
Weak
Mod ate
Strong
1a- Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3Q
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
(2�
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1)
2
3
8. Headcuts
CO)1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
(1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
r 5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = , S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
(_1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
j 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 9 )
1 B. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
M
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
00
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
D
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5 ther =
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: M (15+-enq,
dlfvvm Zq
fl. bEF v 3 14, bh
SJr rA-vkle_ P Vuv t�'r/tiD�CG�e
Sketch:
OW10003
0-

5w'lodf+
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map}
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET ,AQP
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: ���"^ r"r�'1 ° w tr
2. Evaluator's name: T--- SI — Sg entb h
3. Date of evaluation: �Z I l t �"
4. Time of evaluation: 10 : 3 D
5. Name of stream: lilll LI S ��2 Gre r;�C
6. River basin:'WS�
7. Approximate drainage area: o (tiU
2�2
8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: SD
10. County: W < 150 r)
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
r
12. Subdivision name (if any)::
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): �t� a o 13 N
Longitude (ex.—77.55661 ] ): [ a,_ Z �3 W
Method location determined (circle): I GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and
landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
nLocation
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: K,&]11 L+r
16. Site conditions at time of visit: LPrq 2.
5 y 5 � C nn (av✓ ra-(u an r ( ow J c oc1' f , %ekver
I I
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known:
_Section 10 Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters
Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: (1'LvTIpl e✓
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? & NO
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? rES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: Lo % Residential
5 % Commercial _% Industrial 95 °/moo Agricultural
0 % Forested
_% Cleared / Logged �% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 7i� ��
r
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): j
24. Channel slope down center of stream: K Flat (0 to 2%)
_Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>I0%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends
Frequent meander Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): (0+ nComments: 0(15�Me_ CrCeK ��/E p OIL[ Pc(C'Il/1.C,
S Hn � , S; l 1�>41, Struve 62Z e.
Evaluator's Signature 1 Date 71 z I /I L
This channel evaluation fo •iA t ed to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

swio014
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
#
�4� -+�W,iY+cr,F,�.,-f F
` GIONOINT RANGES SCORE
4: CHARACTERISTICS 1
�.
� !
� , , �.. F#
�kN,,, _ _ t• "".-
' CoaOsta
,f
P>edmont,:'
Mduntafn'
rF
v '
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
1
= moints
no flow or saturation = 0• strongEnpoints)
`
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max oints
3
Riparian zone
no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
0-6
0-4
0-5
^.
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = maxpoints)
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
5
Groundwater discharge
no discharge = 0• springs, sees wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)0-3
0-4
0-4
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0- 4
0- 4
D- 2
E f
ron;
no floodplain = 0• extensive floodplain = max points)
Entrenchment 1 floodplain access
0-5
0- 4
0-2
L
(deeply entrenched = 0• fie uent flooding = maxpoint_s
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
S
no wetlands = n. lar a adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
3
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition-- 0• little or no sediment = maxpoints)
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA* r.
0-4
0-5
N/
11
fine homogenous = 0• large, diverse sizes = max oints
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0• stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
��
13
Presencef major bank failures
o�
0-5
0-5
0-5
3 •
M4
severe erosion = 0• no erosion stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
7—
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 -4
0 - 5
15
substantial impact =0• no evidence = maxpoints)
. ;
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well -developed = maxpoints)
E �
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
L{-
little or no habitat = 0• frequent, varied habitats = max oints
lg
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
19
Substrate embeddedness
° `
"`':
0 - 4
0 - 4
f 1�I /�
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
„NA*`'
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
'?-
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = maxpoints)4
Oi.
21
Presence of amphibians
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points)
0-4
0-4
0-4
O'
22
Presence offish
0-4
0-4
0-4
L
no evidence = 0• common numerous es = max oints
-
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0 -6
D - 5
0 - 5
�j
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)1
:+5'i �1w
h t.. ToixPomisPo k` 100"X00
sable':*�tigr
.y st; .; •' F Tf 'SIN `"A {-4 -tk's }, by if'4L ! L M C �' 1 s i "•+�NlS 1'�a N+r r
t
*��€3x 4TOTAL SCOREF:(also enter onfirstpage
I r,:� r: ." .i? r4r i y °fi�w ,.r;a;.:., a r: t �: x
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
TW%o014
Date:
Pro]ectlSlte: A c P
Latitude: 3 s, 7
Evaluator: R4 d1FLikv, L, Zf a � m5z-v1
County: [A); ISO,
Longitude:
Total Points;
Stream is least intermittent
Stream Determination (circl� m
Other BA 1 l Pal.{ . NC
JJ
at
30 0
Ephemeral Intermittent- e�rennla
e.g. quad Name:
If? 19 or erennial if a 30"
A. Geomal halo Subtotal = 19 }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
,a -Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
sequence
0
0
2
3
-ripple-pool
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
5. Activefrelict floodplain
0
1
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
B. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
i
CM
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes 3
a R51 Cial Lll Vj I US dra r¢7L rdtQU' WO UNCUSSIO IS MA RIdIlUaP
B. H drolo Subtotal = /0.5
12, Presence of 13aseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Biolo Subtotal = 13. S
1 B. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants In streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes -
Skstch:
Sketch:
Swt t 00p
SMy.o
'Cvj�j'r 0 zn

I USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
s► 'lo 011+
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET y.
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name -kc Q _
3. Date of evaluation. � / Z +
5. Name of stream: M 111s-b1ne. CYOX k
7. Approximate drainage area: {$ • H t4GlI$
9. Length of reach evaluated: 3 0 Q +f
It. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3 S. i 6 6?
2. Evaluator's name: k .V I to ma V 16A a IM , L (Au W 1W Cal ill
4. Time of evaluation: S 0
6. River basin: -T;, r Pm h► i I-C a
g. Stream order:
10. County: W s n
12. Subdivision name (if any): 14 A
Longitude (ex.—77.55661 t ): " 7 ? . 0 - 3 '7 1
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) PhotoIGIS Otlier GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
,Smyiij 2 + vek v1 17a 1A d-
14. Proposed channel work (if any): -rig D
15. Recent weather conditions: '>-I r W A-^ 1° P J a ►t Z !� d y{ fr
16. Site conditions at time of visit
u n J ;r+�A r
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _ Tidal Waters ____.Esscntial Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters ____Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters ,_,_,Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 0,N if yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? n NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 5 % Residential % Commercial E5 % Industrial � 0 °/a Agricultural
22. Bankfuli width: 13 'jF4
140 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 5- -P+
24. Channel slope down center of stream: >( Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>I01/o)
25. Channel sinuosity. - Straight Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous ^Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
OHWM - 12-jpi'
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation farm Is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals In
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not Imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow 1 persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0' strong flow = maxpoints)
__
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max Dints
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0; contiguous wide buffer = max points
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-- 5
0-4
0-4
L
extensive dischar es = 0• nv discI es = maxpoints)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
3
no discharge = 0: springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0--4
0-4
0-2
Qn
no flood lain = 0; extensive floodplain =max points)
xx
7
Entrenchment 1 floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
L�
Nee ly entrenched = 0• frequent flooding = max pointsl
13
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
no wetlands = 0• large adjacent wetlands = max p❑lots
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channel ization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment Input
0-5
0-4
0-4
2—
(extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
f l
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
N
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence or channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
y+
deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 — 5
0 5
0 5
a
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
`
1
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
substantial impact 4; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well -developed = maxpoints)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
3
�
�.
{little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
(no shading ve etation = 0. continuous can py = max Dints
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
%� }
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure - max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
C7
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0- 4
0-4
Q
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max oints
"4
D
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
p
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
L�
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
t +
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

r
F
a< �
ra
I Y.

A�i - -� � ,�,3�� ��,..� �Ti :ls�' r it ��i�"•. 7' r � � # � �'I iF` •�iy
. �.:i� .7� ..�
a _.r � i w '�'•�� � �. �� / � � 'l•;� rs�� .(Rr���• 1�'yJ' `/ _�w •'M-f
J��. ��, _
.,x �� ,.
�F '�}-, r
i
� = � :� �_:
:` �
• � ,{

p� WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
!"'i Pmi0Mjgifo- l lIF' r`iftInneinfu• V�J tiSarnnlinn nnfw ��❑�j��
ApplicantlOwner: Dvv-\ f11J State. N C Sampling Point: kAiW I r 0 02, .w
Investigator(s): K . R., k rN , Sectlon, Township, Range; N/ _
Landform {hill slope, terrace. etc.]: dro I Local relief (concave, convex, none): 0 Ace- VicSlope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): R >° Let: 3 5 �' 3 to 2 Lang: " —48. 0 5 a21- Datum: w6-5 S 4
Soil Map Unit Name: WO �j M I_Q61 fM a Sdo ck_, _ �-��. 5�5 NW1 classification:
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No {If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes —X— No
Are Vegetation Soil a Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydrtc Soil Present? Yes No
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No
Remarks
NC WA M : 'R+Ut,+At SWR—p Fbve-3T
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators;
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two.Mauiredl
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)_ _-
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
�L Surface Water (At) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (Ba)
7� High Water Table (A2] _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Drainage Pallerns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cf)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (01 ] _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3]
_ Dry -Season Water fable (C2)
T Sediment Deposits (02) _
Presence of Reduced Iron tC4)
Crayfrsh Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Recent iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (Ca)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
r Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ _ Geomorphic Position (02)
Iron Deposits (85) _
Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (❑3)_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Sphagnum moss (De) (LRR T. U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): t
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): S k/r6, C-Q
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 5 Vr f01 LL
Welland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca pillary frin e
74s,
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
1 Ir+zk ♦e LJs W ;14 1,wj
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: ww 4r Mr-14
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3 Q x 90 )
Absolute Dominant Indicator
%cover Species? status
2.
t. V YL)t) P 11 VA
3.
Del Ca
� _ Y Ep,
4. i1�
S�j I V ,+16 dl
r k� �L
5.
B.
7.
B.
=Total Cover
50°% of trial ewer: 20% of total cover: � a
5aoiino/Shrub
Stratum (Plat size: 3 Q x
Y
1. I
I t j Q Q CA GCx
ti 4
Fr _(
2.
f
3. L� j
L, 1 SfY U W1 4 i tn,0- 0 5 e-
4. k;cC-v
yIIlOVVVA
1 W FI G
5.
6
7
B
t-} 0 = Total Cover
50°% of total cover: Z O 20% of total cover.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3 Q x- '-❑ - I
1. Wo0ckjLjrArr'jIGl
2. 1, Vft A 14 120 1A 1
3. 0-SMQQSJ(AS4TtrM — r.4�J
4. Vi1ic; to1hilnr3'An1itO1 1 W Ft,
5. �br+Aeocj tssu" n 111V!(] UP FAi f �, F�kGll
- v
8.
Dominance Test uwrksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are O13L, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
(a)
Percent of Dominant Species
- ',�. r
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG:
(am)
Prevalence Index work sheof:
_ Total °% Cover of:
Multiply ty:
QBL species
x i =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = WA=
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators;
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is a50°%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (ExpIaln)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DEH), regardless of
height.
SaplinglShrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 In. D 0 H and greater than 3.28 R (1 m) tall.
Herb —Alf herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
Woody vine —All woody vines greater than 3,28 1t in
height.
is = Total Cover
50% of total cover: f920°% of total cover.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ok ❑ ] ,r
1. SM4l6)( ��-MAXI (iliA Y
3,
4.
5 Hydrophytle
�y _=Total Cover Vegetation
50°% cf total cover 05 20% a Present?
of total cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Yes 4 No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -- Version 2.0

WWirO(W— ni
SOIL
Sampling Pant:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth need ad to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators,)
Depth Matrix _
Redox Features
(inches) Color lmo(st) 9L
Color molst % Type - Lac
Texture Remarks
0 (oy zl I _ 1R�
S5�
11)YF- zf ( ?oa
S —
Typ e: C=Concentration, D»De letlon, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrlx.
Hydric Soli Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Bolls':
_ Histosd (Ail
_ Pclyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) )LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
�. Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy GIcyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Ftoo dplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
„r Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (AB) )LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox park Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (AT) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
r_
^ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface ITF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (1710) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
r Depleted Below Dark Surface (Ail)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Ircn-Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR 0, P, T) 31ndicat ors of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR 0, S)
,— _ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1568)
Sandy Redox (55)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sails (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Sails (1720) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 1530)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
/
Depth (inches):
Hydric Sol] Present? Yes Na
Remarks:
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

/
♦4.�,P.L-
k
- ,� .. ' r`,.".",.. ��,�of •r ��R' '�,�
At
Fi
r'�. 1. `-mil �i .. �'?Vl � ��1 � - + • ± 1\ �.- S 'r ,�/r. _+�`�+.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Ac' P City/County: W l 15 U 0 Sampling Date- 02-II7
ApplicantrOwner: _T)QVI 1{ In I gLA State: Sampling Point: wW
Investigator(s): - t . CAA W Section, Township, Range: ti ! P[
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Sri I l l4l n pi Local retie! (concave, convex, none). C Q" VESC Slope (%): iQ
Subregion (LRR or livil L � P—E! Lat: 35' 7 (P 355 Long: ��' a 1� Datum: C� S
$oil Map Unit Name' NbI6 glrt l UA 1 0 A 41 L SG1 Nd , 4 - [v 0 ❑{.5 _ NWI cla35i5catian- NA
Are climatic! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology signiIll cantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explaln any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sall Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ZC
— A
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
,Sgggadary
Indicators (minimum of two re(uiredl
Primary Indicators [minimum of one is renuired, check all that apoly)
_ " Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (A I)
_ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (Q)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ , Drainage Patterns (616)
Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Oxidized Rhiaospheres along Living Roots (C3)
pry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CO]
_ Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Idled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (CT)
_ Geomorphic Position (a2)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (07)
FAC•Neutral Test (135)
Waler•Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (08) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No _ Depth (inches): ,
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches); 5
Saturation Present? Yes No_ depth (inches): 1$
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
iy1ch re -in r,,.►i%'^
hrg .
US Army Carps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.6

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. sampling Point: w+u'r 0 0 a _u
Tree Stratum (Plot size: .3 QX 30 ]
1- Z ��X o C3ctU1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover- ;r Status
PA&-_
Dominance Test voorkshaet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OHL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: r (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are 0BL, FACW, or FAC: _s a (A181
r {
2. S Gi55 a i"fti 5 Git h1 C3 l l UU4 _ r �I FAGS
3,
4,
5.
B.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Cover of: Multiply bV;_
dBL species x 1 =
FRCW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3=
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = BIA =
8_Total
'71 C-; --= Total Cover
50% cf total cover: 2)1_ S 20% of total cover. _Va
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plat size: S 0 K 3 0 ]
1. .S a tN1%ULV 5 Yl )k M FAGW
�
2. -Tr e rK opgGA gyp_ L
3.
4.
5-
Hydrophytle Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test Is s50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is 53.0'
problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed ar problematic.
6.
7-
8•
Total Cover
500A of total cover • r7 20% of total cover 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: '1 o R
1. U l I S YG f t� '• r �p, iBL_ _
2. S /,I 11 - VnC_ a I bill AIJ IAA
^� � �
Doft nttlons of Four Vegetation strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.8 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (❑BH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 In- DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3-25 ft tall,
Woody vine — All woodyvines greate rthan 3.2a R in
helght.
3'
4.
5.
6.
8.
g,
i0-
11.
12.
50% of total cover.
Woody- ine-6tr_atum (Plot size: 3 f] -A "� D
1- Sf.0n* (n oMirnheA
= Total Cover
Z .�7 20% of total cover.
]
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
r
2. V11-sS f01-stvllA ram_ Y EAC
3,
4-
5•
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 d 20% of total cover _
Remarks: (If observed, Ilst marphclogical adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WWI P DDT -u
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or eGnBrm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
RgdgZ FgatUtes
inches Color (molst) %
Color (moist) % Twe Loe
Texture Remarks
a- to 10VIL Z!7- 100
,, .530'f.ytAea6-l-f
— 16 1() M 1,411 M o
,J_S
Typ e: C=Concentratfon, D=Ele PIefion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lin In g. M=Matrix.
Hydrlc Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Solls :
_ Histosd (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (SS) (LRR 5, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (AS) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
^ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S. T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (Al0) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fi) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,13)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Scils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (M)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
— Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA15313)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, t U)
_,,,, Depleted [lark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depresslons (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 em Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
— Mad (F10) (LRR W
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
— Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151 )
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of Inydrophylic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (All6) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (ERR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Cchdc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless dlsturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gtoyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redax (S5)
_ Piedmont FIoodplaln Soil ls (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (SB)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark surface (W) (LRR P, 5, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

a � i� �. yr, z� , � M • r. y , •�
y � s
A "
1 �; � •x. , f 4` �, it �7j �''w: U �f �-
� •��� ' 'ia !� - f, �� '�k, ,� ', 44
V. r
y A -may'' ... _ �: �•_' ��'�y � -
Air

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Projectisite: ftC r cityicounty. s (so L4 Sampling Date:
Appiicant/Ownev Do"'r`t "' ❑ State. 1 — Sampling Point: W WT _ Vi
Investigator(s): K. t" r kV.h L • 56 Cv\ Section, Township. Range: N fi
Lan dform (hilIslope, serrate. etc ]: _ �I GI Local relief (concave, convex, none): 0 0 LA& Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L, $ Let: 3 21 Lcng: 18 . 4 q Z O 1 Datum: W G5 FS`f
Soil Map Unit Name- i"a$AS sd^d ��a"t^ . Cy - 2 9' '� Ga NWI classi5cation 7F:O
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes —X— Na
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers In Remarks.}
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yesy Na Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sal] Present? Yes ✓ Na within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two reduiredl
Prima ry Indicators minimum or one is re uised ch k a111hat a2 ply)_
Surface Soil Clacks (B6)
_ Surface Water (At)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813y
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
� Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (BID)
V"Saturalion (A3}
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim lines IS1s)
_ Water Marks (Bt)
T Oxidized Rhizospheres along laving Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table: (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Presence of Reduced Iran (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83)
_ Recent iron Reduction in idled Sails (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (021
Iran Deposits (B5)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible an Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (05)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Sphagnum mass (08) (LRR T. Uj
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No —�' Depth jinches): NA
Water Table Present? Yes
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches); r�i
No Depth (incises): S kiIrF8� f,
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes —K— No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, manhoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if ava11abia!
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Attanbc and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) —Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WVU I Poo2F—VV
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3o x 3 0 �4) % Cover Species? Status_
13,41leyflK�- 1FAC-
Z. AtGEY r j b f rl v-, i� } 7 t"' f, C.
3. VVwr A ybor u �_ FR[u
4, Qk1PVLt1S 1�ell ICO-�a �- PhLL
5.
6.
7.
a.
Saolin9lShrub_Straturn
1. Ar.Q. V V u to
�i
50% of total cover. "15
(Plot size: -4 D x 3
J' u tM --
0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover
�— - -�---
Ir6
FA C
2, by s� d_,tAnAV
U0A ra000"(LA10
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
s.
50% of total caves ��
Herb Stratum (Plot size: nO X �Q ]
1. M 1t(,in I I Ok fs'vevt i
�= Total Cover
20% of total cover
2.
j a. V LAA
N
FR cui
3. ' ?11 1V1M
A jIykL1 M
h�
�ACLk
4, ra luSSAGIQ
"�-CQ, A85a
AC.
5. 711 Q X 09M
ri
�i
f=p1 C
_ _L
7.
8.
8.
10.
11.
12.
3 Total Cover
50°% of total cover: t I ' 20% of total cover: q ,�4
WooQy Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 Y ;_n_�i )
I -AM AY ,r01U0.6 ro[;r fj FAC
2,
3.
Dominance Test vmrksheat:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AfS)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total °% Cover of: Multi p I
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 W
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (13)
Prevalence Index = EVA=
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50°%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding tines, 31n. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DSH), regardless of
height.
SaplingfShtub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 In. DBH and greater than 3.28 R (t m) tall.
Harb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 R tall.
Woody nine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in
height.
4.
5 Hydrophytic
r)7 =Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 2 1'i 20°% of total cover � Prasent7 Yes Na
Remarks: (If observed, list morph e(ogicat adaptations below},
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W VP 0 U Z
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
_
(inches) Color (moist) °k
_Colorfmoist) 5b _Tape _ Loc
Texture Remarks
0 [b `(V___3 iz_ lay
`L- L d 60
10 Ye i-I to 10 �_ 1y1 45 C
1vY� 5IZ 14���
Y F 513 qn
j o Y �- 5 ! (n I— r1 p_ Sc,
'T a: C=Concentration. D=De P1et ion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pare Llnin , M=Matrix.
Hydrlc Soil Indicators: (Appllcabia to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.}
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Solls
_ Histosd (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
_ Histic Fpipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T. U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
` Loamy Mucky Mlneral (171) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside M LRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy GI eyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Fioodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loarrry Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
VRedox Dark Surface (F6)
;MLRA 1538j
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T. U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
_ Redox ❑epresslans(F8)
^ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mad (F14) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ ❑epleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151 )
_ Thick Dark Surface (At 2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) Indicators of hydrophytic veget atlon and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (At 6) (MLRA 9 50A) _ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S I) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochdc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless dlsturbed or problematic
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15118)
_ Sandy Redox (S 5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S5)
^_
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, 5, T, U)
RastrtctIVa Layer (If obsarved):
Type:
Depth (Inches):
Hydric Sall Present? Yes 2L No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Verslan 2.0
F- W

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlanticll and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjecllSile ► ��tt 0 CitylCounty W i l 5a Sampling Bate: 5 f 17
ApplicanllOwner: 06r"in1bh State. NC Sampling Point. WWi CO2-�"
Investigatw(s): K AU1 P_6 ['r, tA.sr-; fj,� _ Section. Township. Range: Noh L
Landform (hillslope. terrace. etc): h; ill lmPr- Local relief (concave, convex, none)_ Convck Slope (°%) Q-Z
Subregion (LRR cr MLRA): Lie-Lat: 35. 713 SU Long: `78.09/79 Datum: w G5$4
Soil Map Unit Name: ", - S I �NWl classification- Ajon e-
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes `" No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal CErcumstances' present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes No within a Wettand7 Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicator (minimum of two reauired]
Primary Indicators [minimum of one is Fenuired, check all that apply] _
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (At)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) _
Mari Deposits (515) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (BID)
Saturation (A3) _
r_
Hydrogen SutFde Odor (Ci)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (B1) Y _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (1212) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (CA)
^ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
_ Drift Deposits tB3) _
Recent Iron deduction in Tilled Soils (U)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquilard (133)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (tag)
_ Sphagnum moss IDS) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
'r Depth (inches): AA
Water Table Present? Yes No
'� Depth (inches): S 2-0 +^
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches); } Z°
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca illa fringe)T
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspectons), if available:
Remarks -
US Army Corps of Engineers Attantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. sampling Point. Ww-R W2' y
Tree Stratum [Plot size 34)FZe3oFf ]
1. P+n lac a r
2. �' {fN 4+a �]lr a�?►pC • 1 �c 0.
Absdute Dominant Indicator
_ Cover •species? Status
�r70 e� /F-�f
- G0 yes F,4 C'
Dominance Test wurksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are 0BL, FACW, or FAC: -7 (A)
Total es Across
s AJI St ata:
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are GB[milL, FACW, or FAC: 6 D
3. QiaG^Cc 5 a �[pa Zo hp FALu
4. IJY551, 5 -4:1-- 2 CY es Cl/f C
5•
B.
7.
Prevalence Indexworksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
QBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FAGU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = BIA=
B
Total Cover
50% of total cover: yS 20% of total cover
5adlina/Shrub Strptum [Plot slze: 30E-.d 36r4 ]
1- �� ■ S41i..><.cp ZU VL.S f�¢G.
2.
3- deer rt-.lar5 4ca FA c
4- t"Plocn3 i.tt�or.a zC3 1• FA(_
— •�—
5-
C�a,y IWSCA'C' n��rr,..
$
no F�
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
f - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
r/ - Dominance Test is ?50%
_. 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
fi- d-/cx ° ` +zr} +4c
7.
8
�= Total Cover
50% cf total cover: 5 200A of total cover +' �
Herb Stratum {Plot size: _'0,174- x 3vu- }
1. _6!o- lkss ae. a �',bJo5e. 3U yes FAA
2.
L.f e. •LrR a In. r
21.4
S
iz o r^Ikcyl
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.6 cm} or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
helghL
Saplin g]Shrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in- DBH and greater than 318 ft [1 m) tall.
Harb —All herbaceous (non-woody}plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
Woody vine —AM woody vines greaterthan 3.2B ft in
height.
3 6%4Ekcllo, tfr,e 5 40 FI+CLA,
_
4.
5.
S•
?
8•
g,
10.
11-
12.
50°% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum jPlot size: 344 e 3 ❑ 4 ]
1. Vi t:s f-ok- 1.G
rl0 = Total Cover
ZD 20°% of total cover: 8
5 FAc
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present7 Yes No
2.
3,
4.
5•
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover- f
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling point: "r' 12002-�
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix �
Redox Features
(Inches)— Color (moist) %
Color mast % Type,- CI
Texture Remarks
a_y 2.5 y 3 !ao
PSI-
-IQ 2.Sy
ro-tc, 2 5„ coo
5�L
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De Ietion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains,
'Location: PL=Pore LlnIn , M=Matrlx.
Hydrlc Soli Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Solle:
_ Histosol (Ai)
_ PolyvaIue Below Surface (S8) SLRR S, T, Uj
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
.. Histic Epipedcn (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
r Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ De pieta d Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (PZ) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (FG)
(MLRA15313)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox ❑epressions (FB)
_ Very Shallow park Surrece (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
,_,-, Marl (1710) (LRR U)
Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
— Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (At 2)
_ Iran -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicat ors of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrdogy must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
_ Delta achric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertle (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (SB)
^_
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
park Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers AHantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Regian - Version 2.0

I'
r=
t
�
.i
r-.ram•• �_E� -
.Ka Y
H,. �I I
'a
mm
• 3
r
YV �
a�
� �
�' a'>•.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjectlSile: AC P City/County W 5 Sampling Rate'
Applicant<Owner:
'DOMI (\I State. _tj C _ Sampling Point: W W t r ❑� t{�'' W
�
investigator(s): k �drk�a v�1 L �J �+15a Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Vi 0 Vl 5tnpe (%): Q
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: 315• �3�►_ Long: Datum: WG5
Soil Map Unit Name O t$11d `i R "� O - 2 1s gID 3 NWI classification, t7
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Nor mal C rrcu mstan ces" present? Yes —4— No
-
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sall Present? Yes V No within a Wetland? Yes 1_/ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks-
r',1 AfvA , Ra"dwaDd
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
SecondaEy Indicatora' ' two r
P rimafy. Indicators minimum of one is re uired check a111hat a PP I
_ Surface Soil Cracks (BB)
Surface Water (Al) ^ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
Saturation 03) Hydrogen Sulfide Odar (C1)
Moss Trim Lines (BIB)
.__ Water Marks (Bl) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Rools (C.3)
— Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Presence of Reduced Iron tC4)
^ Crayfish Burrows (CO)
_ Drift Deposits (83) _ Recent Iron Reduction in filled Sails (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (54) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (02)
Iron Deposits (65) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
✓FAC-Neutral Test (05)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (Bg)
_ Sphagnum moss (DS) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): NP
Water Table Present? Yes x - No Depth (inches): —}S�
1/ No
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):504ar_� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes —
(I ncludes ca pilla Irin e
I]escribe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks.
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atfanbc and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Tree Stratum {Plot size:
1. firt+r YUbyQ►A —
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover ? Status
rLD FfrL,
2.
tlr.yr U5 Y►i1YA
_�10
FPt L
3.
4.
5.
6-
7.
8-
SaplinW51jiub
1.-i,A
50°% of total cover:
Stratum [Plot size:.3 D y 3 Q
VIAL? Ir)(f) +,ncFbItc.
5G =Total Cover
20°% of total cover: �D
�— �� F7AL
2.
i Y ri ! t
FA C_
3.
�.+r'lur�i,Ady t A 'Ai iP U
F ❑ �
FA[�
4-
T
NvntiG <Q1;inQ,A
Fj +1
FAC
5-
B.
7.
B.
Sampling Point: W V4 'f 54L��—VJ
uomrnanco MST WOrKBneei:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are 0BL, FACW, or FAC' [Ai
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are ❑BL. FACW, or FAC: U [AB]
Prevalence Index worksheets
Total % Cover of:
Multiply bv: —
❑BL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) [B)
Prevalence Index = B/A=
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test Is >50°%
3 - Prevalence Index Is 53.0'
50°% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: , S5 Y 256 ;- )
1- t t,VOSfPaI VLAA Yj rn1 ni ur-
96 = Total Cover
' � � ] 20% of total cover: lq
� �� � ;P7A4
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2,
F�+1'+yr-- 01 j0k5,ple0io, des
t: FPrL
Daflnitlons of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) a
more in diameter at breast height (DEH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DSH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall-
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants Iess than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3-28 ft in
height.
_
3. eV A Cy{�ndr�Ca �, �) F�rCul
��
4- C �E iir r c p1..i f air ti _ _ �� ��
5
S.
7
8.
g-
10.
11-
17
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum {Plot size: s rg� ]
1. Vtb f1�
2-
3-
4.
5-
50% of total cover'
Remarks: [If observed, Iist morphological adaptations
L = Total Cover
20 % of total cover: __Z_
Hydrophytic
Q =Total Cover Vegetation
20°% of total cover: Present?
Yesy No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coasts! Plain Ragian — Verslon 2-0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W W 1 Ir 00H W
Profile Doscrlptlon: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(Inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) OA Type' Loc'
Texture Remarks
0 LD A 21 L _SG to A1/5 1AA -
S�
1�-1� .5Y 3 tia0
5G�
'Type: C=Concentration. D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydrlc SGII Indicators: ;Applicable to all LRRs, unless othervAse noted.)
Indic ators for Problematic Hydric Solle:
_ Histosoi (Al)
_ PolyvaIua Below Surface (BE) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (AS) (LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 1511A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers =A5}
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (AB) (LRR P, T, U)
✓Redox Dark Surface (Ffi)
(MLRA1535)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑epleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mari (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151 )
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 31ndicators of Inydrophytic veget all on and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbrle Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
_ Delta Ochdc (F17) (MLRA 151 )
unless disturbed or problematic.
__.. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (55)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (BE)
^ Anomalous Bright Loamy Sops (F20) (MLRA 148A,153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydrlc Soll Present? Yes Ho
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

��� ; • -%-'-• --'-Z. ��i• fir; \y 7i ` •� � . 1. i�� e` h ,. ♦♦ � �1 '
jal
� rat L y _ � �_ ♦ "L ~ ��� � �' �_,��i\ ��
- t � � 1 �' - .r - � +wry ^► \_ �

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Projectsite pop city/county Ibj tLS ❑ Y"\ Sampling pate: t 1
ApplicantOwner ^Do rK i ^i O n State: N C Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): K i A(t�vh , L' `l `�� �' a'� Section, Township. Range:
Landform (hillslope. terrace. etc): _EI,4 f Local relief (concave, convex, none). AOYu-- Slope (%): 0' 7—
Subre9ion (LRR cr MLRA): tA2F-P _ Lat:35 .71 7-3? Lang: 7g• 01,5q I Datum: UCGS ELf
Soil Map Unit Name: I Di S not t' ate" \ 0 s1 a fie 5 NWI classification: N h
Are climatic! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 12� Na (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" presenl? Yes _\�_ Na
Are Vegetation Soil a Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site mail showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Welland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators-
Secondgry
Indicators (minimum of two Mquired}
Prima ry Indicators minimum of one is re uired check all that a pp I
Surface Soil Cracks (SO)
Surface Water (A1)
_ Aquatic Fauna (013)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
High Water Table (A2)
_,,,_ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (310)
_ saturation (A3)
— Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C9)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1 j
^ Oxidized Rhixaspheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
w Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Y Algal Mat or Crus; (84)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (02)
Iran Deposits (135)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (❑3)
T Inundation Visible an Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (Bg)
_ Sphagnum moss [Da) (LRR T. U]
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): NR
Water Table Presen17 Yes
No 7r Depth (inches): 7 �D
Saturation Present? Yes
No _X_ Depth (inches): >'LO
Watland Hydrology Present? Yes No -L
includes ca iila frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
3 crx 3 0 Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ] %Cover ,Species? Status
1- C�►iL YLJ S etl of Y FA CIA
2. U(Vfj)S jet1C.Lt+A -- �^ �� Fp,t►A
3. A(AV fAID%tttutr,
4.
5.
6.
7.
B.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: �S 20% of total cover: I
Sapling/Shrub Stratum [Plot size: 34x 30 ] PAC1. Cay' Ylibrum y
2. rAit h 6 J M 'FFjCU
3- S113LnInCU4 i�rtiyrto. try
4.
5.
s.
7.
8.
G = Total Cover
50% of total cover: �J �� 20% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: �o K - o 1 )
1. S ❑S Ir,fxr-{L)rIC. 3C] y
2- G�1�u55CC�a Cnn�pS�. r� ��
3.
4. _
5.
6.
7- _
8.
9. _
10. _
11. _
12.
t3
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test Mrksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC-. [A]
Total Number of Dominant
Speclas Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A�BI
t,revaianca tnoex worxsneat:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = BIA =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for HydrophAc Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >500A
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is s3.0'
Pro blematia Hydrophyt c Vegetation' (ExplalnI
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrdogy must
t'A be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
FAC- Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
_ 35 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: t �� 20% of total cover:
Woody Vlne St re turn (Plot size:
1. Ao CO-
2.
3.
4.
5.
Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover: _
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (❑BH), regardless of
height.
Sapling]Shrub -Woody pi ants, excluding vines, less
than 3 In- DBH and greater than 3.28 ft It m; tall.
Herb - AM herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3-28 tt tall.
Woody ulna - All woody vines greater than 3.28 fl In
helght.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes Nv
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Verslon 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WWI(0O`i—UI
Profile Description: ;Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
RedoX Fe t es
(inches) Color (moist) _ °6
Color tm_ oist] _ °% Tvae LAC
Texture Remarks
[7-13 10 f�- 31Z. }oR
5 �-
't e: C=Ccncentratlon. D=De letlon, RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Locatlon: PL=Pare Llnin , M=Matrix.
Hydrlc Sol Indicators: (Appllcable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Soils"
Histosai (At)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR ❑)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
— Thin park Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
_ _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,5)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) ILRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
— Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA1539)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions o)
^ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (AB) (LRR P, T)
— Marl (1710) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Hark Surface (Ail)
— Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 31ndicat ors of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (Al6) (MLRA 151) A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P. T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
_ Delta Ochdc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
San dyGleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (FIB) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, 5, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydrlc Soll Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

�y
14
sow
.r �1 z;' aoc# •.
IFYI 5• �, ,Iffi''
E'
�[ { ' \�k -ram .r' �-..r •t 1f�, �, � �.. ' - .�
� RR 11

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Projecvslte- A C P City/County: W I Is O VI Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner mrn'Ur State: Sampling Point: W w I t' V3 1�
Investigator(s): � � �+ L'�°�►nS�Tv� Section, Township, Range t 1
Landform (hillslope, terrace. etc): Local relief (concave, convex, none): r1 Slope (%), �' Z
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LeV-Let: I 1-7 Lcng:= f 8 . a q 1e S � datum: WETS ut
Sail Map Unit Name: TD t Sn 0+ LO G nn r - '� s `"r"� NWI classification: FO
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions an the site typical for this time of year? Yes —4— No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Sell or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are `Normal Circumstances' present? Yes —X7— No
Are Vegetation Soil cr Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks,)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes / _ No
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
Remarks:
1-6-alwoock T ka+
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators )minimum ofM4leav+red]
Primary Indicators {minimum of one is required. check all that applyI _. _
_ Surface Soil Cracks (1136)
_ Surface Water (At)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Marl deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (510)
_ Water Marks (Bi )
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment deposits (B2) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
. _ Drift deposits (53) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sails (CB)
_ _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (CO)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
r Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron deposits (B5) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (03)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
V"FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (DS) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No _ Depth Oiches)-��
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches): 7 2.0
Saturation Present? Yes No
depth (inches):_
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes Na
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available'
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain #legion — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: \N W I " 0 03 F- rq
Tree Stratum [Plot size: _ K 3 U }
1.12zintic ±agdga
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover- Seecoes? Status
ig Q y IFAC
2. A EZY r t) Io V'u tM
11.4 0 y FPy C
3. Qv Qt V a n `ctVA
AL
4.
5,
6.
7.
B.
q o = Total Cover
50% of total cover: H V3 20°% of total cover: 1'6
5aolirig=W Stratum (Plot size: () x 0 ; }
1. :� teX C)4Cd tea Y FFjL
2, A60V YithV'VVA
10 Y
3.
4.
5.
8.
7.
8.
_=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2.�7 ..._ 20°% cf total cover: to
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ; 0 y ; 0 J} )
1. AvVlad IV Ay-1V^ IA"A0 � `!I F-AW
._a
2. W008'I_IorAt n PaIAkA
_
_5 a 1.
3. 05 MvviJraG+rt_IM .10A1110Q (MA
`1• >J FRCtJ
4.
5.
s,
7.
8,
8,
10
11
12
S L =total Cover
50°% of total cover: 6o 20°% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum {Plot size: -10 $ 3a ]
1 _ V10 VW
2.
Daminance Test Work she at:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A]
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: [S]
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: t (A!B)
Prevalence Index worksheat:
Total °% Cover of:
Multiply
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = SIA =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is a50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is 53.01
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydHr soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 R [i m] tall.
Herb - Ail herbaceous [non -woody] plants, regardless
of site, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.2B ft in
height.
3.
4.
5 Hydrophytic
0 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover, 20% of total cover' Present? Yes No
emarKs: to aoserveo, lust m
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point; wwi r 003�_w
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
_(inches)__ Cot or(moist) %
Color (moist) % T'Me L '
Texture Remarks
11' Lf 10 L�L 100
C. L
A�
L— l l a Y v- Z 5 10 0[ ie �_ G �_ .mil^
'T e: C=Concentratlon, D=De letlon, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix.
Hydrlc Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Solis';
Histosol (At)
_ Polydalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
r 1 cm Muck (AS) (LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_,.,_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR D)
_ Reduced VerHc tF18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodpialn Soils (F19) (LRR P, 5, T)
_
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
✓Depleted Matrix (F3)
_
_Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (AB) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox park Surface (Fe)
(MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (Al) (LRR P. T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
— Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
^ Mad (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below park Surface (A11)
^ Depleted Ochric (F11 ) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 4, P, T) `Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation end
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A15) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric SLrface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, 5)
_ Delta Ochdc (F17) (MLRA'151)
unless disturbed or probi ematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (FIB) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (55)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (SS)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, 5, T, U)
Rastrictiva Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydrlc Sall Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

rt 1 z fi 14 {;
s �
'�. k.
r
f'jJ'Y9� Sri A ,
-. L

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: A( P City/County: W 115 Qh Sampling bate: 5 V I-1
Applicanvowner. 1�0 mr n d� State: NG_ _ Sampling Paint: W W l V' JO -U
Investigator(s): K' f ��'`p' 1 , �-' 3°�'^S_e' �_ Section. Township, Range: N I fN
Landform (hillslope, terrace, ate): Local relief (concave, convex, none): ►' 0 1n 1✓ Slope (%): Q _ J_
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Let: , 3 5 . 1 fl 5 Z Long;: 1 s 0� -7 1 Datum: WG�
Soil Map Unit Name:.. 0c+nn n 2 7o s Ia PLS NWI classification:
Are climatic! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _;�— No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes )�- No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No— Is the Sampled Area f
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Walla nd7 Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
S eco n a ry I n d icato ruired
Prima ry Indicators minimum of one is re wired check ail that ai2g I
_ Surface Soil Cracks (BS)
Surface Water (At)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (38)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen SuHide Odor (Ci)
_ Moss Trim Lines (516)
Water Marks (81)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along LhAng Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (CA)
Crayfish Burrows (CS)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C8)
Algal Mat or Crust (S4)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ _ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (133)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
FAC-Nautral Test (D5)
Waler•Stained Leaves (Bg)
_ Sphagnum moss (DS) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Y�, Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No C Depth (inches): > r7
Saturation Present? Yes � No Depth (inches): I
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Noy
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, manhoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) —Use scientific names of plants
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3 D X U }
1. P s 0us t i2 �01
Absolute
% Cwer
20
Dominant Indicator
SneC}eS7 Status
y FRc
2..�0t,V'CU5
OlhA
t
y
3. t I g1114A
tAR botV- 4f!.{V-dt■ i tv/.r
I 1_�)
a FAC
4.
d+- J
ry
N F�Gu
5.
ti.
7
8.
Sapling/Shrub Stratum
1. : e
of total cover: �'
(Plot size. 3 % 4)]
CA A
Total Cover50°%
20°% of total cover: l�
z� y Fpi
2, K3i455A
5LAIk1A+ /A _
25
y FAC
3.
nn Ae120'CUEM4
4Pk
4.
5,
6.
7.
8
Sampling Point: W W! �-"
Dominance Tost wnrkshe et:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are flBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant r�
Species Across All Strata: Q (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
O
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by
t]BL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = BIA =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test Is >50%
3 P I t ot I 53 0'
50°% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size 3 D x 0 }
1 C e "PC 0' G l PA;-„ 1 j Ck
= Total Cover '
gS
20°% of total cover.
15 __.� ��k cam]
_ - revs once n ex s
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. Q � uV��iyi� �R 0l Old►n+? a _
t- `�
�A��
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardiass of
height.
Sap I I n gfSh ru b —Woody pi ants, excludingvines, less
than 3 In. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (f m) tall.
Harb —AlI herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants tess than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody ulna — All woody vines greater than 3.28 1t In
height.
3' ' nc.'i or c- ' ���
4,
5
6.
7
8.
g,
10.
it.
12
Woo
50°% of total cover:
Vine Stratum (Plot size: 20
2 r-' = Total Cwer
I L • ."-) 20°% of total cover.
]
15
FA C
Hydrophytic
Vegetation 1 I
Present? Yes V No
2. S ILAi t A-4 a i 1i n 5 �1
SAC
3. litf S ry�Nr,d, o1�G G� �1
trpkC
4.
5
T
` = Total Cover
50°% of total cover: �'S 20% of total cover. __
3
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Array Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Sall.
Sampling Pont: W W I %r OV 3— L%
Profile Description- (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth _Matrix
Redox Featurei
(inches) Color-Lmoist] °% _
Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc`
Texture Remarks
a_ Ing
�� ��Q �u�a '�OIA
:6 I Y�513 IOU
S 1-
'Typ e: C=Cencantraton, ❑=De pietIon, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Mask ed Sand Gralns.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrlx.
Hydrlc Sell Indicators: ;Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils :
_ Histosd (All
_ Pclyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (AB) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (SS) (LRR S, T, U)
^ 2 cm Muck (A10) [LRR Sj
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fi) (LRR d)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside NILRA 15CA,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
r_
, Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floadplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
^_
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
— Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, Tj
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other [Explain In Remarks]
_ ❑epleted Below Dark Surface (A11 ]
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) [MLRA 151 j
Thick hark Surface (Al2)
r_
,_,— Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR Q, P, T) 91ndicat ors of hydrophylic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T. U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR 0, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 1511
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ San dyGieyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F19) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (NI LRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (55)
~_
— Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T. U)
RestrlctIve Layer (If absarved):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2Z

j. fjjf �
• i- �� � r', � � irk `
A
�
F s, 'F�,.

/n�WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Atlanticand Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjecUSite: A-Cl? City/County: W' Sampling Date: S IJ
Appilcant/Owner: D D rVl t ✓N t O Y-% State: N % Sampling Point:
Invesi'sgaior(s): EST- — L R0 ►7er, I Qf 1(1 fQJ t (� Section, Township, Range: 1(1-DY1
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): d rak'n0,- Local relief (concave, convex, none): GOri &`OC Slope
Subregion (LRR or ML A): L— 7CJ
Lat: 35 �D 9 Long: —, ll oCy(
S ` _ Datum: W���`
Soil Map Unit Name: Y-O 07 _Y10 Y— e-, 1 Ot-W"\ / NWI classification: _ 1
J F�
Are climatic! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Na
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
[� Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (28)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑--
_
Surface Water (Al) ❑1 Aquatic Fauna (B13)
ZHIgh
Water Table (A2)
L i Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
O rainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑
Water Marks (131)
1❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (B2)
1L--�1
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
�uT
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
I❑
u
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (132)
a
iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑5hallowAquitard (D3)
❑
I undation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)FAC-Neutral
Water
Test (D5)
-Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
j
Surface Water Present? Yes
No epth (inches): tv
Water Table Present? Yes
No �% Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
✓ No Depth (inches): n
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes J No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: ��I a w
py
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 304X cat }
1. �1 hVS -� wL
% Cover
1`J
Species?
Status
f-P"Cl
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, FAC:
2. t,e r Uhi�v+n
I D
_�
Y
F C1
or
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
4.
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
u�
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(AIB)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
2-►r7
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
Z 4 5-20% of total cover:
S
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
FAC species x 3 =
1.
FACU species x 4=
'
2.
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Column Totals: (A)
(B)
4
Prevalence Index = B/A=
5•
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7
2 Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 -Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover
�► S
El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3D-FtX 30;-Ir")
20% of total cover: 13
'indicators
(, le*hr0. 0.,1 i { i 0.
5 F }
of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1.
VN
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3'
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6•
SaplinglShrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7,
than 3 in. DSH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
rJ = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
Z 5 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3oR X 3C4 )
2.
lk); (_aria; \;
3.
4.
5.
1� = Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover: Z-
present? Yes No

SOIL Sampling Point: W wt? CIS q-W
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to documentthe indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
('snchesl Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % 7yge Loc
Texture Remarks
b-o (b\lC-'�L 1oo
st-
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
-t❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
j [
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (59) (LRR S, T, U)
LJ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
0
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
-❑
�]
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
amy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
pleted Matrix (F3)
WR,
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
dDx Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
,❑
j]
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
F]
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, '0
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
�]
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Depleted Ochric (1711) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
�] Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (1717) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
f] Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A,150B)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F119) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (86)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
II
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
/
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes v No
Remarks:

Environmental Field Surveys
Wetland Photo Page
Wetland data point wwip018f w facing south.
Photo Sheet I of 2

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - AtlanticandGulf Coastal Plain Region G
Project/Site:cy City/County: V�► t !c�]On Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: pp 'Z>O1rvh�tn,Loi1 State: Sampling Point:"Jw' S)"Enu
Investigator(s): E RX Llo 1Qr , 1-3 rYNbo k1i Section, Township, Range: VI C)"L.,
Landform (hillslope, terrace, ettr.): tLt� 2 e 3JII�DQLocal relief (concave, convex, none):W� �.ft-C&V — Slope (%): Z 51, i
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L— 1-- P Lat: , ] Q 15 _ Long: t S t t u u 3 Datum:�nl�
Soil Map Unit Name: _4 QJP VF—t VY-\ NWI classification:
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Na (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired: check all that aooly)
❑
Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (S13)
❑
High Water Table (A2)
I❑F
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
1L—JT
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
M Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑_
Water Marks (Bl)
1I----i{
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (B2)
1I----If
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
Drift Deposits (B3)
rLJr
L-1 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
II Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (CO)
IJ
Algal Mat or Crust (34)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (65)
C! Other (Explain in Remarks)
II ,Wallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
II Sphagnum moss (DB) (-RR T, U)
Field Observations:
/
Surface Water Present? Yes
No ✓ Depth (inches):
�^
ZD
Water Table Present? Yes
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
No Depth
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
(inches):
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -- Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: yjwcpot8
,
30�
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Testworksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: x-30 7 t)
1 P tnV6 $-C, a6C.
% Cover Soecies? Status
-Z� y
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, �_
�-�
or FAC: (A)
2. L�4.vi
`-�
y
r
3, O L&'- t"J�br�xvY,
Ib
_
F14
Total Number of Dominant
_
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
0-D
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AIB)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
LP = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
o 21
50 /° of total cover:
°
20 /° of total cover:
Ej
FACW species x 2 =
` -� }
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3a4 X 3p
FAC species x 3 =
1 L+ vti drx,..k� a� y rt�u f1+aa
1 C) F
FACU species x 4 =
2.
Or
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4'
Prevalence Index = B1A =
5'
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
1yf'apid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7'
t/2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
Li 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
ZC7 = Total Cover
II Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
p�
Herb Stratum (Plot size: b7 r ) 350T )
IIndicators
1. E,IL+hru. 011+01
of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. ` Ht"u- rubcul-vim.
_'�
FA-%
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4•
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5.
height.
6•
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7,
than 3 in. D B H and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8'
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9:
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Z
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: -30- -tA O-Pr )
1. F��C•
2. root vr•d t C_
3.
4.
5' Hydrophytic
Z� = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: D 20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (if

Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Tvae Lac
Texture Remarks
0 ko � O W- L13 l o o
L
O'-rl, too
-5l-
1 yo `I ( -C-
1 o `1 G L
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
.❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
r
T u 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
QHistic
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
T❑—I Red Parent Material (72)
❑
Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
�]
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soll Present? Yes No
Remarks:

Environmental Field Surveys
Wetland Photo Page
Upland data point wwip018_u facing north.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
C
$! 0
Projecvsite
citylcounty, t�5� Sampling Date!
Applicant/Owner ^" n' p')
State N C Sampkng Paint: wWtW
Investlgator(s): V 9 y V310 ' , L . . tie
f -_-- _ Section, Township. Range: )�) A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): r rc'��
Loco! relief (concave, convex, none}: C to r)CGV [ Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): R P
Lat: 3e- V59 `t4 Lcng: — z- 6, IDb"f Datum: 5 ��
Soil Map Unit Name: 'S mot,-C 1,34krr y Sa %ncf
y `3 �a 5ittrt " fa • e 4 rtpC{».4 NNII classification: ? FD
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ✓ (if no, explain in Remarks.)
"Normal
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
significantly disturbed? Are Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation . SciI or Hydrology
naturally problematic? (If needed. explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point lol~ations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sail Present? Yes Na within a Wetland? Yes 'Z No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes W No
Remarks:
„AUnOJIMO ly "Dr f ean�i��'Drty in �Tni� �+r�� rer LtS �rvr���f }JianifD�
]1cuJ A W Foams'
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauiredl
Prima ry Indicators minimum of one is re uired check all that a 1
_ Surface Soil Cracks (BB)
Surface Water (Al) _
�_
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
High V'later Table (A2) `
Marl Deposits (B15) {LRR Uj
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_Saturation (A3) r
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Mass Trim Lines (810)
_ Water Marks (81 )
Oxidized Rhixaspheres along i-veng Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (92) _
Presence of Reduced Iron;C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
Drift Deposits (B3) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tied Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat a Crust (B4) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (02)
iron Deposits (85) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
`�FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, ll)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
it Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches): �D
`
Satufation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): rnr �[�
1
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Carps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Alain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) —Use scientific names of plants
3 rt 3�
Tree Stratum [Plot skze; y
1. tAet tus "7;t"Yc
Absolute
% Cover-
�, 0
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
Y FhC_
2-
ev rfovt 1,
30
Y Fftc-
3
Li�11;dAw.�iar 5 rcari • fuq
[�i
N �1°t�
4-
5.
V'pY o(rGr��
�fiGC,�•U�ic� <1' _ , is-r:t
I ❑
li]
i4l F Fr C
—�L4]
6-
7-
8.
50% of total cover: 5
Saplin9/Shrub 5traturn (Plot size:
_
Total Cover
5 20% of total cover
2.
�1,�r- fr CUy .r,i, ;•�
�r�
rrgCuJ
3.
4
C.�r: i. S. .V0r
5.
n
li]A
B.
7-
Total Cover _
50% of tot at cover: 33,q 20% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: �{ f y n 1
1. I.ilUL:::I'": "[a i f. ri, �• f'w` � D�SL
2.
y FACW
4.
6.
7-
B.
B.
16.
11.
12.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ;s') '' 5
1. ..
2.
3-
4.
5-
50%oftotal cover
ern arks: (If observed, {ist rn orph ol ogi c al adaptatis
1 6 = Total Cover
t 20% of total cover
5
r y FA L
y >FA[.
Sampling Point:w W I
Dominance Test wnrksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are COL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata' (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are ❑i3L, FACW, or FAC: !� (A!B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total Cover of:
Multiply by:
t?BL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) [B}
Prevalence Index = BJA =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
�1/2 - Dominance Test Is s50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more to diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SapIIngfShrub — Woody plants, excluding vhes, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Harb —All herbaceous (non -woody) piants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 R tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.2B It in
height.
Hydrophytic
t� = Total Cover Vegetation
20°% of total cover Present?
Yes V No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W W f 001]p_W
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features _
(inches) _ color lmastI 96
Color (moist) % Doe Loc,
Texture Remarks
0-cv 40Y'C 312 roU
5L
f9-w Io -tle Yt 9F,
toYg 141 2 `� �
L5
ID -4D rU YR5/1 9'',
10YP-q/6 2 c
s
'T e: C=Concentraflon. D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Lvcaticn: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrlx.
Hydrlc Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Pdyvalua Below Surface (S8) (LRR 5, T, U)
_ i cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
r Thin Dark Surface (SS) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fi) (LRR 0)
r Reduced Vertic (1718) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide 04)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, Tj
_ Stratified Layers (AS)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A5) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (72)
W Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
r Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mad (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explaln in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Ircn-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 'Indicators orhydrephytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (At 6) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbde Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrdogy must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR 0, S)
_ Delta Ochdc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Fioodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (56)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 1530)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T. U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

�' ' .. - �
�
/ _ -•"�,
��
..�Y ��1� .
f,
.Lt fir-

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Ati antic and Gulf Coastal Plaint Region
ProjecVSite- {.'1' City1county VJr 5 V-) Sampling Date-
'
ApplicanViDwner: Ovr• + n O r1
l, _ State. - 5ampiing Point: W W I( f) i^Lc
lavestigator(s): ���I m Section, Township. Range: V­t
Landform (hillslope, terrace. etc): ' r a C Local relief (concave, convex, none): 'n o n e scope (gyp 0-3
Subreg!on (LRR nr MLRA): I—W 1 Lat: S-3 • wt q i5 Long: — -4S la-4D 3 Datum 7 Ut
Soil Map Unit Name: 54,4-c 10ar"T 54 md, , D - 3 ^.a 'r sIxg r4'e. �Z NWI classification
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes Na If (If no. explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Sail or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are -Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Seil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks. )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydrl: Soll Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks.
/VhnotwAltyr Dry.. tbn.dif+Cj+ns i>1 rki4 in eAq Pr (AS.'Dtat jl+.,� MDa ;pY
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology lndicatars:
Secondary
Indicator {m'inimurn of two recuir
Primary Indicators (minimum of one Is required. check all that avaly) _.
_ Surface Soil Cracks (BG)
Surface Water (At) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2) T
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Surfide Odor (Ci)
_ Moss Trim Lines (S16)
Water Marks (B1) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (02)
Presence of Reduced Iron RC4)
Crayfish Burrows (CS)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
� Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (CU)
_ Alga Mat or Crust (B4) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
r Geomorphic Position (02)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (❑3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (say)
Water -Stained Leaves (1219)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) {LRR T, U)
HOW uoservatrons: +
Surface Water Present? Yes No LSepth (inches):. N
Water Table Present? Yes No +, ❑epth (inches): 7 LD
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): ) Z. Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes caoillary frinael
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspectons), if available
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Ptain Reglon — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Tree Stratum (Plot size: �' }
1. iainv5_ �acla.-
Absolute Dominant Indicator
%Cover Species? Status
J FttC
3-
�� L:-rl r. m f i e, ("Cx r�
4.
5.
B.
7.
8.
Saylina/Shrub
1-
GS = Total Cover
50°% of total cover: 2 �a 20% of total cover. t 3
Stratum (Plat size: DSO f y 30 � ]
Xlcx r3ra� r f[7 r-] FAC-
2.
0,)f U +f-"
3-c-
4
�,
•�
rs FFL
5-
S
i]
AC-
6.
i
7.
8.
50% of total cover:
Herh Stratum (Plot size:
1- L1P_+T1r1_ f ! 0 ,
Total Cover
oZ 20% of total cover.
4.
FAC
5.
B.
7-
8.
9-
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plat sire: ]
1. tir ,r<<~i► ���. frl 1 , ��
14D =Total Cover
20% of total ccr4er
• F�tC
2.
'°
v r"
3-
4
5.
aq = Total Cover _
50% of total cover i rA ,5 20°% of total cover
(If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Sampling Point: wt`r
Dominance Test worksheets
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B]
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL. FACW, or FAC: (A113)
Prevalence Index work she et:
Total °% Cover of:
Multiply bV:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Colurrm Totals.
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = BIA=
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_Vo"2 - Dominance Test is >50°%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is s3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (ExpIaIn)
'Indicators of hydric soli and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Deflnitlons of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (013H), regardless of
height.
SaplinglShrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb — A!I herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3-28 It tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3-28 R In
height.
Hydrpphytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plaln Region — Verslon 2.0

SO] L Sampling Point: W W 1 f 0 ]} 5T- tit
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features _
(inches) Color imDisti
Color (moistl % 7we Loci
Texture Remarks
joo
_zn ia• 7 G
S
'T e: C=Concentration. D=❑e piatIon, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Locaticn: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrlx.
Hydrlc Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Soil?:
Histosol (At)
_ Polyvalua Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) ]LRR 0)
Histic Epipadon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F29)
_ Organic Bodies (A5) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dar Surface ITF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mark (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11 ]
depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick ❑ark Surface (At2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR 0, P, T) 31ndicators of hydrephAcveget ation and
Coast Prairie Redox (At 6) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetiand hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, 5)
_ Delta Ochdc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gieyed Matrix (54)
r_
_ Reduced Vertic (F19) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodpla]n Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 1530)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, 5, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydrlc Sol Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engin ears Atlantic and Guif Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

1 r �r � � RIB �' � �` .- •+•-�,
i
rl.
" r f
i I
1 >),e A , i�` "' � • �� r ' 1,
1

. orao5
NC DCVO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 J
Date: 2 q r a 014
Project/Site: ACC'
Latitude. 35 ,'P a( Q
Evaluator: �[,�A,.� i�rr&rr L 21°.71r 7 .- ;
County: Dyln-)�Ov\
Longitude:
r
�j
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Qr ONVZ
Stream is at least intermittent
if a t 9 w erennial if z 30'
Ephemera! In rmitten Perennial
_
e.g. Quad Name: lei iG
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = q
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
Q
CD
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
sequence
0
2
3
-ripple-pool
4. Particle size of stream substrate
❑
1
(2)
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
(2
3
8. Headcuts
❑
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
CV
1.5
10. Natural valley
❑
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No i" ❑
Yes = 3
anmc�Fai uruies are nvi rateu; see ui$ 550AS rrr rnarivai
B. Hvdroloov [Subtotal = 6 ,fi)}
12. Presence of Baseflow
❑
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
Q
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
5
1
0.5
❑
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
7T7
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
❑
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
F 3
C. B1010 Subtotal = 8.15
0
1 B. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Routed upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
{ 1.
25. Algae
0
tt}.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FAC �,, .
5;,OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: �', nq s -i-,d Oa f
Sketch; 1"�
�r r
5iOf a(�5
U

I IUSACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map) I
5 jar C)os
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: TDYV`tni a-,N 2. Evaluator's name: f '"'` L
3. Date of evaluation: 4 r 92-71 R 4. Time of evaluation: 05 D
5. Name of stream: U Q i c] O T 6. River basin
7. Approximate drainage area: L� ;�&M S
9. Length of reach evaluated: to U �-+'
M. U54a
S. Stream order: U
10. County: 3 o In 00-1►
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): r�
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35, `f-4-14 Longitude(ex.-77.556611). ` 7 3Q (06
Method location determined (circle): �9i V Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): I J
15. Recent weather conditions:-.- n '- V' Li - I c IDS
16. Site conditions at time of visit: e . Gl
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _ Section 10 Tidal Waters _.Essential Fisheries habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed ([-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES Co If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 9 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential �% Commercial _% industrial WOL°/o Agricultural
_% Forested
22. Bankfull width: t� C
.% Cleared 1 Logged % Other
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): ^ Ll �+
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (O to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight ✓Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
Highest quality.
Total Score from reverse): lq Comments:
DHWfr1 a P4-
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Carps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06103. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of Flow 1 persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
no #low or saturation = 0• strong flow = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
0
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0_4
0--•5
(�]
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max pints
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
{
Vno
discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
6
Presence aradjacent floodplain
0_ 4
0_ 4
0-2
I�
y,
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max pointo
F.L,•
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0_ 4
0_ 2
(deep ly entrenched = 0• freq uent fl oo d i ng = max points
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0_ 6
0-4
0-2
�}
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0--3
�]
extensive channelization -• 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
i0
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
r
extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
1 I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
fine, homogenous = 0• large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel Incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
dee ly incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks == max oints
F
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
cin
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0 5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0 — 3
0-5
0-6
(no riffles/ripples or Rools = 0- we] kdevelo ed = maxpoints)
Q
17
habitat complexity
6
0-6
0-6
{
1
�
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)0—
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
no shad in vegetation = 0; continuous can opy = max pints
19
Substrateembeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
0
f no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = maxpoints)
�}
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0 — 4
0 — 4
aJ
C
no evidence = 0- common, numerous types = maxpoints)
04
Presence of fish
0-4
0 -4
0-4
m22
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous s = maxints)
23Evidence
of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
f
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* 7'hcse characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody data point sjor005 facing southeast upstream.
Waterbody data point sjor005 facing
northwest downstream.
Photo Sheet I of 2

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody data point sjor005 facing south across bank.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

USAGE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
saUr DD�{-
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET a
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: 2. Evaluator's name
3. Date of evaluation: tO AV,-,( 2017-
5. Name of stream: UMT '+a
7. Approximate drainage area: 5-4 az
9. Length orreach evaluated: 00 P4
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3` , 43q 75
4. Time of evaluation:
r-, Nit r i- a u,n f L.Ra refi
❑250
6. River basin: 1,� e i L s e-
8. Stream order: I
10. County: ,Jy►5 4 +'!
12. Subdivision name (if any)
Longitude (ex.—77.556611)
MPr
- 4& 3�1.5,23
Method location determined (circle) GP Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location).
Acces s 2d (QO- is I AA? t] of l S4eutrn5 'SKu5,4�{ 'P-d .
14. Proposed channel work (if any): i D
15. Recent weather conditions: +nervy Rainy 4 && s 4a
16. Site conditions at time of visit: n6* mA + [ieair t "t"mr" y
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: —Section 10 ^Tidal Waters —Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _ _ Outstanding Resource Waters t%Nutrient Sensitive Waters —Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES a If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential —% Commercial —% industrial —% Agricultural
i07% Forested °/a Cleared / Logged Other (
f ❑p ,� f?R .k --- -
22. Bankfull width:
6 7'
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3
24. Channel slope dawn center of stream: !'Flat (O to 2%) —Gentle (2 to 4%) —Moderate (4 to 10%) —Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight ✓Occasional bends —Frequent meander Very sinuous —Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score om reverse): J 7
Comments:
Evaluator's Slgnatur ,­�'""—"` Datew (Vto r I I
This channel evaluation forth is Intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionais In
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26,

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow 1 persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
1' j
no flow or saturation = 0• strong flow = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
Q
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0---5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0' no discharges = maxpoints)_
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
(no discharge = 0 springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0 2
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max_points)0-4
7
Entrenchment ! floodplain access
0_ 5
0-4
0-2
rj
(deeply entrenched = 0• frequent tloodinpq- max oints
8
0-6
0-4
0-2
Presence ofadjacent►%c11ands
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
--�
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sixes - max oints
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
1
�.
(deeply incised = 0• stable bed & banks W maxpoints)
F"
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
severe erosion W 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
pL
�,,
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throw hout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
�-
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of rile-poollripple-pool complexes
0_ 3
0-5
0-6
a
{no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well -developed = maxpoints)
Q
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0 G
�
little or no habitat= 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)0-6
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 5
0 5
0-5
no shadingvegetation = 0; continuous canopy= max oints
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
dee ply embedded = 0; loose structure = max}
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
a
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
"4
G
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
r
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
a?
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0— b
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible --t-100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also eater an first page)
F, }
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

s)oroo
yr nw(-% gfrpsem iflentifiratinn Farm Version 4-11
Date: [n ft'Pr;1 20l�_
Project/Site: ftce
Latitude: 35, 1f39-�5
Evaluator: k.{I��ri��GNn'�.Ro�,r
County: -jokr\34zt \
Longitude: -qg, 3A5-d3
Total Points:
5trearn is at least intermittent 30 �j
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Four Oaks
,
Ephemeral Intermittent
e.g. Quad Name: lit_
if z 19 or perennial if � 30"
�fXetenttia
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 9.15
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a, Continuity of channel bed and bank do- a ,
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
❑
1
2
3
-Tin-channel structure; ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
❑
1
2
(3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
OD
1
2
3
B. Headcuts
[l]
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
.5
10. Natural valley
(0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No ;� 0
Yes = 3
rl •'{-I.rrirnlnnti ICE iS.lnlol � •• •••••"V •••••••• ••• 1 • ••.Y•••-Y.
12. Presence of Baseflow
❑
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
.5
1 _
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
(0.5)
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
C5
cc
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
'3
f Rininnui 1CiihFnfm1 = 11) 1
1 B. Fibrous roots In streambed
Q0
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants In streambed
(3
2
1.
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
(a)
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 i
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5-
(
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
!
1.5
24. Amphibians
{'1V
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants In streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL - 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 cf manual.
Notes: ro6r;i- (k lGrw r "e(NA�• { rru 4t i�*s� i Ic. r.
hsh dlse-d f
g�or 002, Sketch: c} y
GL
cc tss 12d. 2-0 -t7 i RRI
WA

�.:�*>:V°f'.r„d, . • 1 . - gam,— .S
... ' y:=

L1SACg AID-','
DWQ :_
Site (indicate on attached map)
1. Applicant's name:
3. Date of evaluation
gior OOP.
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Pro► id the follu►sing iitfnr'ruatiun fur the stream reach under assessment:
2. EN alualor's name: K. Ma r �k,,�
r�
. 1,3
5. name of stream: - N1z�4SE vQa
7. Approximate drainage area: 3`{�-&� Lte-
9. Length of reach evaluated: 15D f-q'
4. Time of evaluation: 1330
6. Rixerbasin- QetAu
8. Stream order: 0
1 tt. County: T o� Y15+9 r1
11. Site coordinates (if known). prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): 1G A
1.atilude(ex.34.872312): IT, Li Longitude (ex.-77.556611): >3d
11S Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GiS Other GIS Other
Nlohod location determined (circIe<:G:1
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location]:
1 y Gr olo
14. Proposed channel work (if any): T-6-0
15. Recent weather conditions: no reCP A'( rr?i rl
Ili. Site conditions at time of v isit
V10 r rn 4
17. Identify any special watenvay classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters ,Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters —\&utrient Sensitive Waters water Supply Watershed V (l-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YESQ Ifyes, estimate the water surface area:
I9. Does channel appear on USGS quad snap? YES 0 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES 'O
21. Estimated watershed land use: �% Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _°I° Agricultural
i 5 % Forested TS °'° Cleared / Logged ^% Other
22. Bankfuli width: t?-
24. Channel slope down center of stream: V'Flat (0 to 2%)
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): `t
_Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (> 10%)
25. Cltannel sinuosity: Straiglit 1,10ccasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of Horksheet (located on (rage 2): Begin by detennining the niost appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. rage 3 provides a brief description of }tow to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (frorn reverse): Sot Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date �3�«
This channel e►aluation form is intended to be used onI3 as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to male a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply 1
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -- version 06.03. Z o Comment, please call 9 i 9-876-8441 x 2;6.

4D r dd a..
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE.
#
C"I4ARACTERISTICS
SC ORE
�
Coastal
Piedmont..
1ltount-
Presence of flow 1 persistent pools in stream
0-5
0
0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0_ 5
0-5
}�
(extensive alteration = 0: no alteration = max pints
3
Riparian zone
0- 6
o- 4
0-5
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer maxpoints)t�
4
E►•idencc of nutrient or chemical discharges
0_ 5
0-4
0_ 4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
5
G roundwater discharge
0-3
0 -4
0-4
no discharge = 0; spring, s, sees wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 _ 4
0 _4
0
c„
(no flood lain = 0. extensive flood lain = maxpoints)
Entrenchment 1 flood plain access
0_ 5
0-4
0-2
i
-
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max ❑ints)
4
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0- L
5
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
.2
g
Channel sinuosity
0_ 5
o --4
.0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0_ 5
0 -4
0-4
l
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max R2rots
1 I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
fine, homogenous = 0; large. diverse sizes -= maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 ._ 5
0-4
0- 5
3
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-4
0-5)
1
(no visible roots = 0• dense roots throughout = maxpoints0-3
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0- 5
15
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0 .-. 6
(]
no riffles/Tipples or pools = 0• well -developed = maxpoints)
1
Habitat complexity
0_ G
0
0 6
1
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent. varied habitats = maxpoints)_
1 g
Canopy coverage over streambed
0_ 5
p_ 5
0_ 5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
}
20
no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
- 4
0 4
0 4
❑
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = maxpoints)0
22
Presence offish
0 4
0-4
0-4
{
p
no evidence = 0. common, numerous types = max pints
�3
Evidence of wildlife use
o _ 6
0 .- 5
0-5
�1-
(no c►idence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
1 U{l
160
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page}
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

SJpr NC DWD Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 �CJo_
Date: :5 . F;4 r-"4vy fit] f 1�
ProjectlSlte: AC P
Latitude: 35 `­Ib5�0 3
Evaluator:
County: 'Yak AT krn
Longitude: ', $ 3301 I I
Total Points:
stream Detelzriluation [circle one)
Other IFnv r Oak 5 N E
Stream Is at feast Intermittent 9 3
if a is ar erennial if z 30'
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geofno fool❑ Subtotal = 9
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
t1�j
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
i
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
B. HeadcutsQ
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
❑.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drol❑ Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
<0
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
Q.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in stream bed
3
2
1
0
20. Macmbenthos {note diversity and abundance}
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.�
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
7C�7
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW m 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other ;0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. see p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: S j o Y 0 Z
si 00 0 0
0j4 viAA i4 f4
'� w L - b-60-'tc 17 1

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody data point sjor002 facing northwest upstream.
Waterbody data point sjor002 facing southeast downstream.
Photo Sheet I of 2

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody data point sjor002 facing southwest across bank.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

5�or 003
NC DWO 5trearn Identifieation Form Version 4.11
Date: 1D rN 90(+
Pro]ect/Slte: Acp
Latitude:
Evaluator: ,Ur
County: Z'akrM+rn
Longltude:
Total Points:
Stream Is at least intermittent 3 r �
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Fu ur oaks
N e"
l�
Ephemeral Intermittent nib
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 orperennial if a 30'
A. Geoma holy Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
,a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1rn
3
Yin -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
r;1
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
❑
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvlal deposits
0
1
2
3
8. ileadcuts
,0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
aft 0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N = 0
Yes = 3
al lillUdl U111 "Uh dFU FIUL FULU 7, titltl UI5l:11SSIOR5 lil IllaliUai
B. H drolo Subtotal = f 0
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
LJ
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
CO)1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes(= 3
C. Bioloov !Subtotal = ni''S 1
18. Fibrous roots In streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
.5
23. Crayfish
(6D
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
coy
0.5
1
1.5
26, Wetland plants In streambed
FACW = 0.75; DBL = 1.5 0the _ 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: scu,L S .1 CP c 4`arr l tar rRC
-rie o- - $rut -( ri P k3 vialre tY7 w+
A0-
w o fl
for J
Sketch:
L
r. P
(y� _*L mop 03,4 S500010
CiL

USAGE AID# DWQ # Site 0 (indicate on attached map)
5jof, 003
;,a„ STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Do " r `r-q D 'r' 2. Evaluator's name: t� • War k VG rn
3. Date of evaluation: 1 fir � l a0 f �
5. Name ofstream: uN T +, QtuSe-P4V{f'
7. Approximate drainage area: a q5 ac .
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50 44
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3S, 4 3 GS `�
4. Time of evaluation: 0120
6. River basin: t Ae LAS-C
8. Stream order. 0
10. County: —30 �"'^�� r'1
12. Subdivision name (if any): NA
Longitude (ex.-77.556611): 7 S' 331 y '�
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Shcct Ortho (Aerial) PhotolGlS Othcr GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
Fj,Crfsr 'k.d (20-15,7 fral) 0;4 & r��d %,`: '�. "?T:,. 3
14. Proposed channel work (if any): T131)
15. Recent weather conditions: Z we"' ^ % H &Y S '0
16. Site conditions at time of visit: rIOV ,Q( , C ��tir �- $unrLy
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 —Tidal Waters —Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters —Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters 'Water Supply Watershed (I-lV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (INI�0)If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? NJESf NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential
r % Forested
T-or '3', � kL 3� -
22. Bankfull width:_
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES ND
% Commercial % Industrial —% Agricultural
�% Cleared 1 Logged ^ ,% Other (
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): + 4
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) _,_, ,,Gentle (2 to 4%) ____Moderate (4 to 10%) _,-__Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequent meander _--_Very sinuous ,,.,Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located an page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based an
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to cacti characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:f"'�'^'
alo:�sl��re�r+� �'rErn `jrst:� t
4HWM:
Evaluator's Signature `' - Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USAGE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06103. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORECoastal
Piedmont
]Mountain
I
Presence or now 1 persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
j
no flow or saturation = 0;- strong flow = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
[p
no buffer = D; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence or nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
7rr
extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = maxpoints)
5
Groundwater discharge
D 3
D— 4
0— 4
J
no discharge = 0; springs, seces, wetlands, etc. = max points)
Presence of adjacent iloodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
(no flood lain — 0; extensive flood lain = max Eo1
Entrenchment/ floodplain access
0— 5
0— 4
0— 2
(deeply entrenched = 0• frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0_ 6
0-4
0 2
°
no wetlands = 0; lar a adjacent wetlands max oints
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channcIization = 0; natural meander = max points
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max points}
11
Size & diversity orchannel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sixes = max pints
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
�+
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
E
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 5
0-5
severe erosion W 0; no erosion, stable banks == max pointsy
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 — 4
0 5
substantial impact =D; no evidence = max points
16
Presence or riffle-poollripple-pool complexes
0 — 3
0-5
0-6
F
(no riMeslri [es or pools = 0; well -developed = maxpoints)
17
Habitat complexity
6
0-6
0-6
I f
"t
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)0
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
4
no sh ad i ng ve etatian = 0; continuous can opy = max oints
14
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0 — 4
0-4
(dee2ly embedded = 0• loose structure =max
20
Presence or stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0; common, numerous!Xpes = maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
Q
no evidence = 0• common, numerous es = maxpoints)0-4
04
22
Presence of fish
0 - 4
0-4
0-4
r y
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0--6
0-5
0-5
15
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence � max points
Total Points Possible
100
I00
too
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on f rst page)
. These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

(� WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjectlSlte: 11 c P CitylCounty SUh A 54 C)n Sampling Date:
AppilcantrOwner: (>7n1 i n Of) State: W (y C Sampling Paint: 1°fT� w
Investigator(s): P Sl" R.TA(n ix.1 t i/ Kr MCA( ('C�j _ Section, Township, Range: A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ❑f0rf—&5t G t'\ _ Loral relief (concave, convex, none): 1�_ ` J`Q slope (%):C�` 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): r pLai: 3 J5 ,4 �37 1 Leng: • J l I 1 Datum: W (05 'c6 '-+
Soil Map Unit Name If.W0.CIO, Sly 5 NWI classification. PFC7
Are climatic! hydrDlogic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes NoHyd Is the Sampled Area
Weiland
doll Present? Yes �No within a W tland7 Yes No
Wetland Hydrology present? Yes y/ ND
Remarks:
�CWkM: �-�-t�`�1��� ���►[�•�Ydc�c�
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Wetland Hydrology indicators:
5econdary
Indicatorsit
Primary Indicators (minimum cr one Is reeuired, check all that a0ply)
Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Surface Water (At) _
Aquatic Fauna (813) _
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR u)
_ Drainage Patterns (BID)
�5aturalion (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01)
_ Moss Trim Lines (018)
— Water Marks (81) �
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) ^
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (93) W
Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6) _
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (CO)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aqultard (D3)
_ jnundation V'jsible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (R5)
f Water•Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
N
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
'� Depth (inches): cc
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): a G
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data Istream gauge, monitoring well, aerlaI photos, previous Inspections). if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Caastal Plain Region —Version 2.4

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
w vp4�5F.W
Tree Stratum (Plot size: X?0fv- ] Species? Stptus
Z. AC-le
3. �_ 1 AL,",4e1rAk)ML' 9LrC0C;fgeAA V —flL j I►�
4. �I S 0,�C rAen4-dl, 5
5.
6.
7.
8.
(05 = Total Cover
50°% of total cover. 20°% of total cover:
Sapl�t�al�hsub_Stratum (Plot size:�'(�
1. L U i (�ornb �+r 5t� �Qt r U f❑ `L P.,i C
3,
4,
5-
B-
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: T 5 20% of total cover- �
Herb Stratum {Plot size: ':�:J:4-
(A N k
2.
3.
4..
5.
E.
7-
8.
9-
10.
11.
12.
i = Total Cover
50°% of total cover: -7 1 20°% of total cover:
Woody Vine 5traturMr (Plat size:
1. Sn'%,16-.,!' Ifc]trt.n�i,Ft���.A
2.
3.
Dominance Test wnrksheet:
Number of Dominant Species 7 57
J
That Are DBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AtB)
Prevalence inoexworrcsneet:
Ta1e1 C% Cover of:
Multiply bY:. _
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) csl
Prevalence Index = WA=
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ } "Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetaticn
2 - Dominance Test is a50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric sail and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Deflnitlons of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 In- D B H and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 128 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.2B 11 In
height.
4-
5 Hydrophytic
Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20°% of total cover: � _ Present?
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below},
Z
Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2-0

° Sr-'
SOIL
Sampling Point: l
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
RedoX Features
(inches) Color (mast) %
Caor (moist) OA Tvae Lvc
Texture Remarks
o-o
Icy c N.
L.
'Typ e: C=Concentration, D=❑e pletlon, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand GralnS.
'Location: PL=Pore Llnin , M=Matrix.
Hydrlc Sall Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Solle:
— Histosd (Al)
_ PolyvaIue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR S)
_ slack Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
_ Reduced Vertic (FIB) (outside IWILRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ L y Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodglain Soils (Fi9) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
^_
_ Redox park Surface (Fs)
(MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
r_
,—,_, Redox Depressions (F8)
^ Very 5halIow Dark 5urrace (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ MM (1710) (LRR U)
_ Other (Ex pialn in Remarks)
_._ ❑epletc d Below park Surface (Ali)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thlck Dark Surfacc IAll 2)
^_
_ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR b, P, T) Indicators of hydrophAc vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (Al6) (M LRA 150A) ,_, Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydre(ogy must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) (LRR 0, S)
_ Delta Ochrlc (1717) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix tS4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1505)
Sandy Redox (85)
_ Pled monI Floodplain Sails (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (SS)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type;
Depth (inches):
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes No
R emarks:
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plaln Region —Version 2.0

Environmental Field Surveys
Wetland Photo Page
Wetland data point wjop045f w facing south.
Wetland data point wjop045f w facing east.
Photo Sheet I of 2

�W7ETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region r
ProjectlSite: A Cr City/County- Sampling Cale:
AppllcanVOwner: �! n idn State: NC.- Sampling Point: w o��t^
Investigator(s): E S-1 LAAt AI11 K -MV "e Sectisn, Township, Range: N�
Landform (hillslop% terrace, etc.): '► �7 4 Local relief (concave, convex, none): CC1 ny �k Slope (%): �Z —
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): I__e p Tl Lat:35. 4:!M �f Long: 746 . �t I I Lf Catum:jLJ C& 5 `4 if
Soil Map lJni! Name C�A W LIi 1�Dt — oi"++ �O�S NWI classification:. �2
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions an the site typlcal For this time of year? Yes NO (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Sail , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal C rrcum stances" present? Yes VNo
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ' Is the Sampled Area
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes No �� within a Wot[and7 Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No =
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Watland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicatorsit
Prune ry Indicators minimum of one is re uired check all That apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Surface Water (At) _
Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
High Water Table (A2) _
futon Deposits (1315) (LRR tf)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (816)
Water Marks (81)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82) _
Presence of Reduced Fran (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (84) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
— Iron Deposits (65) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aqultard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (05)
Water -Stained Leaves (Bg)
_ Sphagnum moss (08) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
'�
JN
Surface Water present? Yes No
Water Table Present? Yss No
"Depth (inches): —
,Depth (inches): 70
I
Saturation Present? Yes No
V Depth (inches): �0V
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No V
includes ca illa fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region —Version 2-0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -- Use scientific names of plants.
w
Q o 045 to
Sampling Point: I
•)t)(
Tree Stratum (Plot size: �J ]
1. 9:(\tot�4 JgAem,
Absolute Dominant Indicator
%Cover_ Soacies? Status
5❑ y �PCC
_
2. CbLf�it1uS CAf0itn,cLnoN
FAC
3. `a���l ti�O�+r S'rrrjt'CtCifyo.
4.
1-5FCC
5.
6.
7-
a.
= Total Cover
50°% of total cover: S 5 20-A or total cover. �5
SafllinalShrub Stratum Plot size: �F.A, }
1. L4c��clnmi��y Ff�L
L
2.
3.
4.
5.
B.
7-
B-
tiU = Total Cover
50% of total cover: S 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: "t • � "�]
1- M A
2.
3,
4,
5.
B.
7.
8.
s.
1 a.
11-
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20°% of total cover.
Woo Vine Stratum (Plot size: r r
2.. Sm�I oI)C�,�crk�,nrt i FIA 6l s"t n1 r l�C
3.
Dominance Test workshaat:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across Al Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL. FACW. a FAC
1--IF (B)
(A.IB)
ere vaianea jnoax worKsneet:
T, gtal % Cover &
Multiply hy.
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = WA =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Rapld Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test Is >50°%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53-0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (lain)
'indicators of hydric soll and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
DeTiniitons of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.5 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 328 ft tall.
Woody vine —All woody tines greaterthon 3.28 ft in
height.
4.
5• Hydrophytic
t = Total Cover Vegetation
50°% of total cover: C, 20% of total cover. L + Present?
Remarks: tlf observed, Ist morphological ad apt all ons below)
'cI
Yes No
US Arrny Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2-0

SOIL Sampling Point: w�u
Profile Description: (describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indlcators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color moist %
Color (mast) % Tvae Lvc�
Texture Remarks
f7` tV 2. 94 R} �) r�y�
CL.
'T e: C=Concentratlon, ❑=❑e pIet Ion, RM-Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Gralns.
21-ocatlon: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix.
Hydrlc Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Solis
Histosa (Al)
_ Poiyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S. T, U)
i cm Muck (A9) (LRR b)
Histic Eplpedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F24)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P. T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA1538)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T. U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
^ Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shall ew Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mad (1710) (LRR U)
_ Other(F_xplain In Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ ❑epleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151 j
_ Thick Dark Surface (Aix)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicat ors of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (h1 LRA 150A)
,_,,, Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must he present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox ($5)
_ Piedmont FloodplBin Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (36)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) )LRR P, S, T, U)
RastrictIve Layer (Ef observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydrlc Sail Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Reglon —Version 2.0

Environmental Field Surveys
Wetland Photo Page
Wetland data point wjop045_u facing northwest.
Wetland data point wjop045_u facing north.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project Site: ACP City/County: Johnston County Samp. Date: 6/29/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: NC Sampling Point: WJOW002f W
Investigator(s): C. Senfield (PWS, PWD); C. Skinner (WPIT) Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0 to 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P / MLRA 133A Lat: 35.41399635 Long:-78.3569648 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Leaf silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No
Yes
NWI Map Unit: None
(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Normal Circumstances? Yes
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sample point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES
Hydric Soil Present? YES Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? YES
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Remarks: All parameters are met. Area is classified as a palustrine forested (PFO) wetland.
Sample point located in wetland "WJOW002f", near flag WJOW002f-5.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
X Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (615)
Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (61)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (65)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (67)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Saturation Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
N/A
Remarks:
At least one primary or two secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is met.
SOIL
Profile Description: Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' LoC
Texture Remarks
0-10 2.5Y 4 2 95
10YR 5 6 5 C M
loamy sand Dry
TITT
Hardpan
TType: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
1cm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
X Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Hardpan
Hydric Soil Present? YES
Depth (inches): 10
Remarks: Indicator S5 (Sandy Redox) present and soil meets NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10'X30' )
1. Salix nigra
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 10'X30' )
1. Salix nigra
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10'X30' )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius )
1. Persicaria hydropiper
2. Carex lurida
3. Carex tribuloides
4. Murdannia keisak
5. Solidago altissima
6. Typha latifolia
7. Rubus pensilvanicus
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vines (Plot size: 10'X30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sampling Point: WJOW002f W
Absolute
Dom.
Indicator
Cover
Sp?
Status*
Dominance Test Worksheet:
15
X
OBL
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 5 (A)
15
X
FAC
# Dominants across all strata: 5 (B)
Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 100% (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
30
= Total
Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply By:
OBL x 1=
38
X
OBL
FACW x 2 =
FAC x 3 =
FACU x 4 =
UPL x 5 =
Sum: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
38
= Total
Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
X Dominance Test is > 50%
15
X
FAC
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
lIndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
15
= Total
Cover
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
63
X
OBL
more in height and 3in (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height
(DBH).
15
OBL
3
FACW
3
OBL
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft
3
FACU
(6m) or more in height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
3
OBL
3
FAC
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft
(1 to 6m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3ft (1m) in height.
93 = Total Cover
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? YES
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator 2 (Dominance Test) present with >50% of dominant species across all vegetation strata FAC or wetter.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

i-..- 4k� - .. of t �'�x t !t i } sA >r �� r �.,� •'�,'
,• * � 4,.. M1 f' ss t , a v'- ,
• a v „T
ef-
�-
:yc
. �
n V�Y
Y
1

Wetland Data Point Photographs
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
June 29, 2018, Page 2 of 2
Photograph 3: WJOW002f_W, South
Photograph 4: WJOW002f_W, West

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project Site: ACP City/County: Johnston County
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy
Investigator(s): C. Senfield (PWS, PWD); C. Skinner (WPIT)
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hlllslope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P / MLRA Lat: _
Soil Map Unit: Leaf silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No
State: NC Sampling Point
Section, Township, Range: N/A
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex
35.4138588 Long:-78.3569648
Yes
Samp. Date: 6/29/2018
WJOW002_U
Slope (%):
0 to 2
Datum:
WGS 1984
_
NWI Map Unit:
None
(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Normal Circumstances? Yes
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sample point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES
Hydric Soil Present? NO Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? NO
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Remarks: One or more parameters lacking. Area is not a wetland.
Sample point located east of wetland "WJOW002f" in upland mixed hardwoods along access road.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (615)
Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (61)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (65)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (67)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Saturation Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
N/A
Remarks: No primary or secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is not met.
SOIL
Profile Description: Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' LoC
Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3 2 100
loamy sand Very Dry
-
loamy sanVery Dry
TType: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
1cm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Hydric Soil Present? NO
Depth (inches): N/A
Remarks: No hydric soil indicators present and soil does not meet NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is not met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WJOW002 U
Absolute
Dom. Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10'X30' )
% Cover
Sp? Status*
Dominance Test Worksheet:
1.
Quercus phellos
38
X FACW
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 3
(A)
2.
Pinus taeda
38
X FAC
3.
Acer rubrum
15
FAC
# Dominants across all strata: 4
(B)
4.
5.
% Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 75%
(A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
7.
91
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply By:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 10'X30' )
OBL x 1=
1.
FACW x 2 =
2.
FAC x 3 =
3.
FACU x 4 =
4.
UPL x 5 =
5.
Sum: (A)
(B)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10'X30' )
X Dominance Test is > 50%
1.
Ilex opaca
15
X FAC
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
2.
Acer rubrum
3
FAC
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
3.
Lyonia ligustrina
3
FACW
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
4.
Vaccinium fuscatum
3
FACW
Morphological Adaptations
5.
Liquidambar styraciflua
3
FAC
lIndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
6.
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7.
27
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' radius )
1. Gaylussacia baccata
15
X FACU
2. Quercus stellata
3
UPL
3. Mitchella repens
3
FACU
4. Acer rubrum
3
FAC
5. Gelsemium sempervirens
3
FAC
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody Vines (Plot size: 10'X30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
27 = Total Cover
= Total Cover
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and 3in (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height
(DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft
(6m) or more in height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft
(1 to 6m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3ft (1m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? YES
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator 2 (Dominance Test) present with >50% of dominant species across all vegetation strata FAC or wetter.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

USACE AIDS DWQ , Site K (indicate on attached map)
INK
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the folilowing information for the stream reach under assessment:
. Applicant's name: D oYv� y r1 t o n
3. Date ofevaluation:
S. Name of stream: VtJZ -b nlIt 1 C'e-t6
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated: Z- t
2. Evaluator's name: 56'L
4. Time of evaluation: o�►'h
6.Riverbasin: NGVtse'
8. Stream order: 0
10. County: 30h n6 +0 n
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): V1 0n(?L,
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3 5 . 3 W LA? -Longitude (ex.-77.556611): 7 S.`i to 50
Method location determined (circle): PS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluattoo (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
a
15. Recent weather conditions: WO ryyA *'C,1
16. Site conditions at tirne of visit: 'PDrt' 5t"
a CA -+vim fR e- A ne,wr b
17. identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
%
Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters ✓ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (]-1V)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 19if yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES Q-1 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: 5 % Residential �% Commercial _% Industrial 45 % Agricultural
LIV % Forested % Cleared I Logged —% Other
22. Bankfull width: s 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): '
24. Channel slope down 7cenr ofstream: Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity:traight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander Very sinuous _Braided channel
instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by detennining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification. etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief, description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring boa and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows f•otn a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate fonn used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must rangc between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality,
Total Score (from reverse): Comme
Evaluator's Signature Date_ 5/2-1 /
This channel evaluation endedto beused on as guide to assist lando�� nets and�ettvit on Rental professionals in
gathering the data reqUnited States Arn C rps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form sukiect to change -- version 06:03. To Comment_ please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
'I
Presence of flow 1'pe- sistent Oools in stream
0-5 0-4 0 - 5. 3
no flow or saturation =-0; strop flow max points)
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6 0 — 5 0-5
2 ..
(extensive alteration - 0; no.alteration = max Dints) ,
..
3 ; Ripariah zone ' `
`opus,
0 6 ' 0 4 ..' 0 5 } ,
(no buffer, 0, contj wide buffer = max points
4
Evidence 0nutrient or chemical.disc►arges : 4 5:; 0 4
. (extensive clischar' es....b; no disahar es,=max' 'Dints) - .
5
Groundwater discharge ;
0 3 0 4 0 4`
(no dischar e 0 s •rip §,:see s, y' etlands, "eta , 71 riid oints)
4
Presence of adjacent flo0dplain. ;:
, 0 4 0 4 b 2
(no floodplam. , 0; extensive #lgod lam ='max points - '
' Entrenchx6enf 1 fl66dplain access
�.
2
(dee 1 entrenched = 0- k cent flooding.maxpoints)"Y
-
Pres`cnce of �adlacent N etiaoids -
0= 6 0— 4 0 2
8.
(no wetlands = 0 lar a adiacent wetlands.= max points)
. J
Channel sinuosity ' '
0 = 5 0 — 4 0
(extensive ghaimelizativn = 0; natural ineander_— max Dints
10
Sediment input .,
0 5 ` 4 0 4,
a'
(extensive de osition= 0' little or no sediment.; max punts)
l
= size &diversity of channel bed substrate 0 5
I
(pine, hoino enous_. 0 large', diverse sizes = max points)
a ' 12
EAdence of channel mcis nn or widening
0 = 5 0-4 0-5
(deeply incised - 0 stable bed &. banks = max points).
`. Presence,of major bank failures - :0-5
13
(severe erosion = D; no erosion, stable banks maxpoints)
Root depth'aiid density on banks
0-3 0-4 0--5,
14
'
(no visible roots = 0, devise roots tlirou houi max points)
Impact by agriculture, Livestock; or timber production
0-5 0 —4 0-5
15
(substantial impact'0; no evidence = -max oiiits)
.
Presence of riffle=poollripple-pool 66mpleges_
0 — 3 0 — 5 ' 0—, 6 J
16
(no riffles/rip les. or pools = 0; well -developed max points).
L
17
Habitat complexity
0-6 0-6 0-6
+`
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, Varied habitats = max points)
I8
Canopy coverage over streambed.
o—s 0—.5 b=s
(no shadingve ' ciation = 0; continuous can = max oints) .
✓
Substrate embeddednm
tN 0-4. 0-4
19
(deeply embedded - 0; loose structure — max);
4
. • .
Presence of st `ream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-5 0=5 ,
20
N
(no evidence =_0; common, numerous types = max pints)
.0-4
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4 0-4 0 -4
(no evidence 0; common, numerous types = max points):,�!
22
Presence of fish
0-4 0-4 0 4
(no evidence 0; common, numerous es max points)
r
23
Evidence ofIi°ildlife use
0— 6 = 0 .5 0 5
(na evidence 0, abundant evidence max paints}
{ ": + Totaloiiits Possible }
100 t $ l00 ' :r
,r3.
r
�• 3r SG � 4� Sit' i`y � 3��41i xE+a `t � ;'.t: 5 F - 5 i+ }1 A v � � �' �'!' J ' Sh f y4 t � 5t� 143-3 Yy �-�3it.1Y
-�
++�x " . .. .r .�`�.c• � =rr--. '�{��,. " .�.
_.ter x , E. --, +, ' y
These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 J o �# D 17
Date: 5 f Z 5[[}}
Project/Site: PC?
Latitude: 35 301
Evaluator. rj L F o?e -'I TQ rnWul
County: 'Sohn 6+0 V-N
Longitude: 78q
Total Points:
Stream is of least intermittent 1 � ,
Stream Deter patio circle one)
Ephemeral tie Perennial
Other Teacackx
e.g. Quad Name: Cxo55 OCLAS
if? 13 orerennial rf>_
ifa 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =ko )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Activetrelictfloodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrofo9y (Subtotal = 7 ,5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
[7�
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
Q
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16.Organic debris fines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soikbased evidence of high water table?
No = p
es = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
t;3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
Q0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
(02
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0,75; OBL =1.5 ter = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
INS
"6o,,rny,-Fvll
0 fl w IM W ,_6�h `f �

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody sjop017 facing northwest upstream.
Waterbody sjop017 facing southeast downstream.
Photo Sheet I of 2

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody sjop017 facing southwest across bank.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

I - r � gyp,,, • e...F'. � `r \ - ��`:.

,-� - •J J� 45 ;t, ¢ {, ' Y - - � yet -
ik 7;
r
L I. - ' .-
it . • ; , , -[ ,,� �F �
y l
� y �
Y'

Jog'.'r
Ike
Aw
.i� .tip' • ��% '{:f � i
ri
�� '';.sue � �� �• 1� � �. f('.`.:
ML
�, " � ♦ gar � �` _ - f ' r � -

iYi ,� ,, .,r ,`� ai • .*+/1��,, ' 1 rR'a�..` ry •^ar'1.'. / ,�.e . T70�
Ik: IF
144
N— vex
fl.
�,K-v
�� Ate' - R
_. P: . -y

%l 1_ WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region WHNW001e
Project Site: Atlantic Coast Pipeline City/County: Harnett County Samp. Date: 7/20/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: Vorth Carolina Sampling Point: WHNW001e_W
Investigator(s): C. Robertson (WPIT), C. Cyrus (WPIT) Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillslope,terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope 1%): 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLR P/MLRA133A Lat: 35.29695 Long:-77.482172 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Lynchburg sandy loam, Oto 2 percent slopes NWI Map Unit: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sample point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES
Hydric Soil Present? YES Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? YES
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Remarks: All parameters are met. Area is classified as a palustrine emergent (PEM) wetland.
USACE wetland data point located in low area of fallow farm field.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required;
check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (BE)
Surface Water (A1)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (B15)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (B7)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Depth (inches): > 18
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Saturation Present?
Depth (inches): 15
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology present. Parameter is met.
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type'
Locz Texture Remarks
0-9 10YR 3 2 90
7.5YR 5 6 10 CM
loam
+
SYR 4/4 ry- _17IyT
loam
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,
MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (A1)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
1cm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? YES
Depth (inches):
Remarks: Indicator F6 (Redox Dark Surface) present and soil meets NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is met.
Some mixing of soils from past landuse evident.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
4kUb Sampling Point: WHNW001e_W
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute Dom. Indicator
30' radius ) % Cover Sp? Status*
Dominance Test Worksheet:
It Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC:
It Dominants across all strata:
Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC:
3
3
100%
(A)
(B)
(A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
OBL x 1 =
FACW x 2 =
FAC x 3 =
FACU x 4 =
UPL x5=
Sum: (A)
Multiply By:
(B)
= Total Cover
30' radius )
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb
Stratum (Plot size: 10' radius )
1.
Juncus effusus
2.
Juncus acuminatus
3.
Solidago rugosa
4.
Senna obtusifolia
5.
Conyza canadensis
6.
Saccharum giganteum
7.
Persicaria pensylvanica
8.
Betula nigra
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody
Vines (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
X Dominance Test is > 50%
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woodyvines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and Sin (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height
(DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woodyvines, approximately 20ft
(6m) or more in height and less than Sin (7.6cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woodyvines, approximately3 to 20ft
(1 to 6m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately aft (1m) in height.
= Total Cover
83 X OBL
38 X OBL
38 X FAC
15 FACU
3 UPL
3 FACW
3 FACW
1 FACW
184 = Total Cover
Woody vine - All woodyvines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? YES
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator 2 (Dominance Test) present with >50% of dominant species across all vegetation strata FAC or wetter.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

- - � - j �� Vr �ti �7�����,,,'�„ �� :• � S � •err
x / I
j {

*7q
f
r�
\ � r
n
't i _

�� WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region WHNW001
Project Site: Atlantic Coast Pipeline City/County: Harnett County Samp. Date: 7/20/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: Vorth Carolina Sampling Point: WHNW001_U
Investigator(s): C. Robertson (WPIT), C. Cyrus (WPIT) Section, Township, Range: NA
Landform (hillslope,terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Flat Slope 1%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLR P/MLRA133A Lat: 35.297815 Long:-77.482172 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Orangeburg loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWI Map Unit: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
')UIVIIVIHKr ut- t-w4u IVI>> - Hiiacn sne map snowing sample poini locations, iransecis, Imporiami Teaiures, eic
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? NO
Hydric Soil Present? NO Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? NO
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Remarks: One or more parameters lacking. Area is not a jurisdictional wetland.
USACE upland data point located in fallow farm field upslope of WHNW001e.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (BE)
Surface Water (A1)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (B15)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (B7)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? NO
Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? NO
Depth (inches): >20
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Saturation Present? NO
Depth (inches): >20
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: No primary or secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is not met.
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 5 4 100
loamy sand
14-20+ 60
SYR 4 40 CM
loamy sand
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,
MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (A1)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
1cm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Remarks: No hydric soil indicators present
and soil does not meet NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is not met.
Some mixing of soils from past landuse evident.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
VbLSampling Point: WHNW001 U
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' radius )
1.
Conyza canadensis
2.
Digitaria ciliaris
3.
Allium vineale
4.
Ipomoea purpurea
5.
Senna obtusifolia
6.
Amaranthus palmeri
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woody
Vines (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
4bsolute
Cover
Dom. Indicator
Sp? Status*
Dominance Test Worksheet:
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: O (A)
# Dominants across all strata: 3 (B)
Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: O (A/B)
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply By:
OBL x 1 =
FACW x 2 =
FAC x 3 =
FACU 36 x 4 = 144
UPL 18 x5= 90
Sum: 54 (A) 234 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.33
= Total Cover
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Dominance Test is > 50%
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woodyvines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
more in height and Sin (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height
(DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woodyvines, approximately 20ft
(6m) or more in heightand lessthan Sin (7.6cm) DBH.
= Total Cover
15 X UPL
15 X FACU
15 X FACU
3 UPL
3 FACU
3 FACU
54 = Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
No hydrophytic vegetation indicators present; parameter is not met.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Shrub -Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft
(1 to 6m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woodyvines, less than
approximately aft (1m) in height.
Woody vine -All woodyvines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? NO
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

Wetland Data Point Photographs
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
July 20, 2018, Page 1 of 2
Photograph 1: WHNW001_U, North
Photograph 2: WHNW001_U, East

�kl � vfl
1
J d _
y"ti►� + �w r _
r

\�a�
Vrhb.
Project Site: ACP
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
City/County: Sampson Samp. Date: 11/19/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: NC Sampling Point: WSAW002e_W
Investigator(s): C. Robertson & P. Bailey Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0 to 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLR P/ MLRA 133A Lat: 35.232345 Long:-78.604754 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Bibb and Johnston soils, frequently flooded NWI Map Unit: PEM1Ad
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sample point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
YES
Hydric Soil Present? YES I Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Remarks: All parameters are met. Area is classified as a palustrine emergent (PEM) wetland.
Observation point located in wetland depression near wetland flag WSAW002e-6.
HYDROLOGY
YES
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
X Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? YES
Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? YES
Depth (inches): Surface
Wetland
Hydrology Present? YES
Saturation Present? YES
Depth (inches): Surface
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: At least one primary or two secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is met.
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type'
LoC Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 2/1 98
2.5YR 4/4 2 C
M fine sandy loam
4-18 10YR 2 1 100
sandy loam
TType: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
1cm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: NSA
Hydric Soil Present? YES
Depth (inches):
Remarks: Indicator F6 (Redox Dark Surface) present and soil meets NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. ` d- Sampling Point: WSAW002e_W
,Vhb.
Absolute
Dom. Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30' radius )
% Cover
Sp? Status*
Dominance Test Worksheet:
1.
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 2 (A)
2.
3.
# Dominants across all strata: 2 (B)
4.
5.
% Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 100% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
7.
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply By:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
30' radius )
OBL 94 x 1= 94
1.
FACW 3 x 2 = 6
2.
FAC 3 x 3 = 9
3.
FACU x 4 =
4.
UPL x 5 =
5.
Sum: 100 (A) 109 (B)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.09
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
15' radius )
X Dominance Test is > 50%
1.
X Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
2.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
3.
X Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
4.
Morphological Adaptations
5.
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
6.
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
10' radius )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
1. Carex lurida
38
X OBL
more in height and 3in (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Eleocharis obtusa
38
X OBL
3. Juncus effusus
15
OBL
4. Schedonorus arundinaceus
3
FAC
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
5. Ludwigia palustris
3
OBL
more in height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
6. Cinna arundinacea
3
FACW
7.
8.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft (1 to
9
6m) in height.
10.
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
12
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3ft (1m) in height.
100
= Total Cover
Woody Vines (Plot size:
30' radius )
1.
2,
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
5.
Vegetation
= Total Cover
Present? YES
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator 1(Rapid Test) present due to dominance of FACW or OBL species.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

Wetland Data Point Photographs
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
November 19, 2018, Page 1 of 2
Photograph 1: WSAW002e_W, East
Photograph 2: WSAW002e_W, West

Wetland Data Point Photographs
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
November 19, 2018, Page 2 of 2
.,k
Y
�°`ry��.1 � i �' �` �ka�'., x. v u I � Yn'. YL 1►YLi -Fi
Photograph 3: WSAW002e_W, South
Photograph 4: WSAW002e_W, North

\�a�
Vrhb.
Project Site: ACP
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
City/County: Sampson Samp. Date: 11/19/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: NC Sampling Point: WSAW002_U
Investigator(s): C. Robertson & P. Bailey Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0 to 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLR P/ MLRA 133A Lat: 35.23219513 Long:-78.60472272 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Bibb and Johnston soils, frequently flooded NWI Map Unit: Upland
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sample point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
YES
Hydric Soil Present? NO I Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Remarks: One or more parameters lacking. Area is not a jurisdictional wetland.
Observation point located in upland field near wetland flag WSAW002e-11.
HYDROLOGY
NO
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? NO
Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? NO
Depth (inches): N/A
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Saturation Present? NO
Depth (inches): N/A
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: No primary or secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is not met.
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type'
LoC Texture Remarks
0-3 2.5YR 3/1 98
2.5YR 4/4 2 C
M sandy clay loam
3-18 10YR 2 1 100
loamy sand
TType: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
1cm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Hydric Soil Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Remarks: No hydric soil indicators present and soil does not meet NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is not met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. ` d- Sampling Point: WSAW002_U
,Vhb.
Absolute
Dom. Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30' radius )
% Cover
Sp? Status*
Dominance Test Worksheet:
1.
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 1 (A)
2.
3.
# Dominants across all strata: 1 (B)
4.
5.
% Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 100% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
7.
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply By:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
30' radius )
OBL x 1=
1.
FACW 3 x 2 = 6
2.
FAC 85 x 3 = 255
3.
FACU 15 x 4 =
4.
UPL 6 x 5 = 30
5.
Sum: 109 (A) 291 (B)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.67
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
15' radius )
X Dominance Test is > 50%
1.
X Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
2.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
3.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
4.
Morphological Adaptations
5.
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
6.
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
10' radius )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
1. Schedonorus arundinaceus
85
X FAC
more in height and 3in (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Cardamine hirsuta
15
FACU
3. Coreopsis lanceolata
3
UPL
4. Cerastium fontanum
3
UPL
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
5. Juncus marginatus
3
FACW
more in height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
6.
7.
8.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft (1 to
9
6m) in height.
10.
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
12
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3ft (1m) in height.
109
= Total Cover
Woody Vines (Plot size:
30' radius )
1.
2,
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
5.
Vegetation
= Total Cover
Present? YES
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
No hydrophytic vegetation indicators present; parameter is not met.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

A-
• �iT.if ' I
�3 �.'�'
'
•',YS�
a' - •�kr'-'r��. M-t : ' .'era ;�.i: �.� � .
.. _} 4'r��.��^y.'3' r.��'F'h-.:Y�R•�. Via:_.,_
•
�l
•' Tom_
.�''
'
Y.T. �S1�YL� .. • .. '"' •' 1 ;�� �:-. •.:.:.� •' `y-', 'I
.

Wetland Data Point Photographs
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
November 19, 2018, Page 2 of 2
Photograph 3: WSAW002_U, South
Photograph 4: WSAW002_U, North

\�a�
Vrhb.
Project Site: ACP
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
City/County: Sampson Samp. Date: 11/19/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: NC Sampling Point: WSAW001e_W
Investigator(s): C. Robertson & P. Bailey Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2 to 4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLR P/ MLRA 133A Lat: 35.23211367 Long:-78.60533586 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Bibb and Johnston soils, frequently flooded NWI Map Unit: R4SBC
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sample point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
YES
Hydric Soil Present? YES I Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland?
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Remarks: All parameters are met. Area is classified as a palustrine emergent (PEM) wetland.
Observation point located in drainage ditch near wetland flag WSAW001e-6.
HYDROLOGY
YES
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? YES
Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? YES
Depth (inches): Surface
Wetland
Hydrology Present? YES
Saturation Present? YES
Depth (inches): Surface
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: At least one primary or two secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is met.
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type'
LoC Texture Remarks
0-6 2.5Y 4/2 97
5YR 4/6 3 C
M sandy clay loam
6-8 2.5Y 4 2 97
5YR 4 6 3 C
M gravelly clay loam Mixed gravel in soil sample.
TType: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
1cm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: Gravel
Hydric Soil Present? YES
Depth (inches): 8
Remarks: Indicator F3 (Depleted Matrix) present and soil meets NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is met.
Auger refusal at 8 inches due to gravel layer
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. ` d- Sampling Point: WSAWOO1e_W
,Vhb.
Absolute
Dom. Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30' radius )
% Cover
Sp? Status*
Dominance Test Worksheet:
1.
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 2 (A)
2.
3.
# Dominants across all strata: 2 (B)
4.
5.
% Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 100% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
7.
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply By:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
30' radius )
OBL 76 x 1= 76
1.
FACW x 2 =
2.
FAC 3 x 3 = 9
3.
FACU 3 x 4 =
4.
UPL x 5 =
5.
Sum: 82 (A) 85 (B)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.04
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
15' radius )
X Dominance Test is > 50%
1.
X Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
2.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
3.
X Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
4.
Morphological Adaptations
5.
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
6.
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
10' radius )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
1. Juncus effusus
38
X OBL
more in height and 3in (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Carex lurida
38
X OBL
3. Phleum pratense
3
FACU
4. Polygonum aviculare
3
FAC
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
5
more in height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
6.
7.
8.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft (1 to
9
6m) in height.
10.
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
12
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3ft (1m) in height.
82
= Total Cover
Woody Vines (Plot size:
30' radius )
1.
2,
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
5.
Vegetation
= Total Cover
Present? YES
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator 1(Rapid Test) present due to dominance of FACW or OBL species.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

Wetland Data Point Photographs
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
November 19, 2018, Page 1 of 2
Photograph 1: WSAW001e_W, East
Photograph 2: WSAW001e_W, West

Wetland Data Point Photographs
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
November 19, 2018, Page 2 of 2
fir• - Y�''it;% K ��
Photograph 3: WSAW001e_W, South
Photograph 4: WSAW001e_W, North

\�a�
Vrhb.
Project Site: ACP
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
City/County: Sampson Samp. Date: 11/19/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: NC Sampling Point: WSAW001_U
Investigator(s): C. Robertson & P. Bailey Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0 to 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLR P/ MLRA 133A Lat: 35.23211787 Long:-78.60522772 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit: Bibb and Johnston soils, frequently flooded NWI Map Unit: Upland
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sample point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
YES
Hydric Soil Present? NO
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Remarks: One or more parameters lacking. Area is not a jurisdictional wetland.
Observation point located in upland field near wetland flag WSAW001e-6.
HYDROLOGY
Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? NO
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? NO
Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? NO
Depth (inches): N/A
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Saturation Present? NO
Depth (inches): N/A
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: No primary or secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is not met.
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type'
LoC Texture Remarks
0-3 2.5YR 3/1 98
2.5YR 4/4 2 C
M sandy clay loam
3-18 10YR 2 1 100
loamy sand
TType: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies (A6)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
1cm Muck (A9)
Redox Depressions (F8)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Umbric Surface (F13)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Hydric Soil Present? NO
Depth (inches):
Remarks: No hydric soil indicators present and soil does not meet NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is not met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. ` d- Sampling Point: WSAW001_U
,Vhb.
Absolute
Dom. Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30' radius )
% Cover
Sp? Status*
Dominance Test Worksheet:
1.
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 1 (A)
2.
3.
# Dominants across all strata: 1 (B)
4.
5.
% Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 100% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
7.
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply By:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
30' radius )
OBL x 1=
1.
FACW 3 x 2 = 6
2.
FAC 85 x 3 = 255
3.
FACU 15 x 4 =
4.
UPL 6 x 5 = 30
5.
Sum: 109 (A) 291 (B)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.67
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
15' radius )
X Dominance Test is > 50%
1.
X Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
2.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
3.
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
4.
Morphological Adaptations
5.
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless
6.
disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
7.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
10' radius )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
1. Schedonorus arundinaceus
85
X FAC
more in height and 3in (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Cardamine hirsuta
15
FACU
3. Coreopsis lanceolata
3
UPL
4. Cerastium fontanum
3
UPL
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20ft (6m) or
5. Juncus marginatus
3
FACW
more in height and less than 3in (7.6cm) DBH.
6.
7.
8.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20ft (1 to
9
6m) in height.
10.
11.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines,
12
regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than
approximately 3ft (1m) in height.
109
= Total Cover
Woody Vines (Plot size:
30' radius )
1.
2,
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
5.
Vegetation
= Total Cover
Present? YES
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
No hydrophytic vegetation indicators present; parameter is not met.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

Wetland Data Point Photographs
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
November 19, 2018, Page 1 of 2
_ _ . JrY'F►.r
Photograph 1: WSAW001_U, East
010
Photograph 2: WSAW001_U, West

4
olv
:. j

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjectrSite c City/County: :5 (?V C G0V,1 Sampling Date: 3 t
r P_V1d�
Applfcan3lOwner. ���; � � Y5 _ State: �_ Sampling Paint: t�5A0
tt t�
lnvestigator(sy�,.:.`.1<t<� a r r i I'}{�y lj :i _ __ Section, Township, Range•
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ): ��' E ` " Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%). Q
Subregion (LRR ar ivILRA): Lat: 5 • Lang. Datum.
Soil Map Unit dame: L��n � ' 'I 1--oc, I NWI classification:
Are climatic! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No rZ (if no, explain in Remarks.)
„ Are Vegetation Seil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Norma l Circumstances" present? Yes No
"fe Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site trap showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes " r" No Is the Sampled Area �
Hydric Soil Present? Yes V �__ No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all; that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (BG)
— Surface Water (A1)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
arsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
High Water TaNe (A2)
^_
— Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
J Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_,— Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131)
� Oxidized Rhizospheres along Livinc Roots (C3)
,_,_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
Drift Deposits (133)
—_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
maturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_/ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
llow Aquitard (03)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
FAC-Neutral Test (DS)
Water -Stained Leaves (89)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No ..__Depth (inches):
!Eater Table Present? Yes
No �� Depth (inches):
�No
Saturation Present? Yes
�No Depth (inches): (�
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available,
Remarks: € fr t •`. E< ; �� ,'
r���r �.-
``w�, ..
�
I
1
i
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gult Coastal Plain Region — Verson 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: VJ5" 006?F-Vj
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: �`�` ' ) % Cover Species? Status
ofBL,FAntSpecies
1 (- LA AM10ay- 5 Ci:C; t"� :C) F�
That
That Are 4BL, FACW, or FAC' (A)
2. QkyS5 S t f ':
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5•
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ( (AIS)
S.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multioly bY:____
8.
'60 = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: t - 20% of total cover
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ' 1
FAC species x 3 =
1. L. t i CnS (cA n"� � t �i t' 5 4 J � �
FACtJ species x 4 =
2. �Cucot(yp c c 1? avg �C.yAj
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3.
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5•
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is �53.0'
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
�
50% of total cover. ' 20% of total cover. 1
_Problematic
Herb Stratum (Plot size: " " )
.,(f 0 E 10 `
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. Qd Aw om 6 - 0, 6eZ-10 A ���
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. AAI--)Vt/ r A rn 11i 1e tea le S _ I/ tV r A C
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Sce "ir (ck' Uu v 1 I ike 0)n-�(A alt `ram
Tree -- Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7 6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DSH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
SaplingfShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DEH and greater than 3.28 ft ('I m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non woody) plants, regardless
8•
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10,
Woody vine -AII woody vines greater than 3.28 it in
11.
height.
12.
I� =Total Cover
500/6 of total cover: 20% of total cover: ',A J-A
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
g, 1
2
3.
4.
5•
Hydrophytic
Vegetation l�
= Total Cover
50%of total cover' 200A of total cover: �
present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Caps of Engineers Ail antic and Gulf Coastal Pla:m Region - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point WSR0 ©O(Oe- )
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)___ Cdor (moist)
Color fmoisil % . Type Loc'
Texture Remarks
v :M;c
`T pe: C=Concentra€ion, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
`Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Boll Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls':
Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (LRR 5, T, U)
_ I cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fl) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (FIB) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
1f"Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TFI2)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 161)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (1717) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (FIB) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, 5, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastai Plain Region -Version 2.0 ,

Environmental Field Surveys
Wetland Photo Page
Wetland data point wsao006f w facing southwest.
Photo Sheet I of 2

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -- Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/&W A G ? City/County:. i s e n Sampling Date: ! / `
ApplicanVOwner: 1/Ucn"n-'On State: Aj C® Sampling Point WS01000�-�
Investigator(s)• E` K. V�•M Section, Township, Range -
La ndform (hiilslope, terrace, etc)-. (`(tac> fl"'-' � je Local relief (concave, convex, none): COS+ Slope (%)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L La1:`75 0 5Long. � � a Datum: WEBS
Soil Map Unit Name: L(AfyioeCF � NW€ classification:
Are climatic! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes = No (If no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Norma$ Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (It needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
H drlc Soil Present? Yes ✓ No t
y within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
&'Aa C--" be-kV-2-'n F0 OVA we-fi aR�r!
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
aecondaa Indicators minimum of two re uired
Primary Indicators minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Surface lhrater (At)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
— High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Recent iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (Cb)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ lion Deposits (B5)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (DS)
Water -Stained Leaves {B9)
_ Sphagnum moss (08) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No � Depth (inches): N ik
Water Table Present? Yes
4E
No �i Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
a
No Depth (inches): t
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes ca ills fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge. monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), it available -
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gull Coastal Plain Region - Verson 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Ws Do 0 Wo - �A
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20,
wj , ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species y
1. nOyw a`r S That Are 08L, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2,
3.
4.
5,
6.
7.
a.
0 =Total Cover
50°% of total cover: 20°% of total cover. _
SaplinolShrub Stratum (Plot size: 7�
1. V1 C n2-
2.
3.
4.
5.
B.
7.
8.
y
=Total Cover
50°% of total cover:
200A
of total cover.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ` )
1.lax',:,t�`;-JieviyO�Lh�✓o
1+
\ FA
2. F-e S+- r c, ''f (A !Q h
y
_ � FN (JA
3.<. 1irl .....
4. �� 11c., 11',-O P 5 La rOf ] flfA RCA <�,-
)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
91 = Total Cover
50°% of total cover: 20°% of total cover. t
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: I 0 )
1. ,-, or, e ,Gy e 3 e
2.
3,
4.
5.
50°% of total cover,
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations
0 = Total Cover
20°% of total cover.
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 5( 1 alV
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: V (AIS)
Prevalence Indexworl<sheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAG species 50
x 3 = (SD
FACU species
x 4 = i(a
UPL species
x 5 =
Cotumn Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3_
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -- Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greaterthan 3.28 g in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point w5C"d OU("o —U
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Cdorlmoistl °!°
Color (moist) °6 TYpe Loc1
Texture Remarks
4
OG `,, VC ( V Lyn
c
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
`Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
Hydric Boll Indicators: (Applicable to all
LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrfc Bolls$
Histosol (Al)
J Po[yvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ I cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ZDep[eted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
Organic Bodies (A5) (LRR P, T, U)
^_
_,_, Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ _ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
— Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (AS) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al I)
_ Depleted Ochdc (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) _ Umbrtc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (51) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84)
_ Reduced Vertic (FIB) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Fioodplain Soils (FI9) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (SG)
^_
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (57) (LRR P, S. T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Sall Present? Yes v No
Remarks:
GlJ�gef Y�€[
rat GrGiVC�VUC�
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Open Waterbodv Data Sheet
Survey Description
Project Name:
Waterbody Name- Waterbody ID:
Date:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline
Unnamed Pond OCMWO02
11/2/2018
State:
County:
Company:
Crew Member Initials:
Photos:
North Carolina
Cumberland
VHB
SM, CC
3; North, East, South
Tract Number(s):
Nearest Milepost-
Associated Wetland ID(s):
22-085-A003.AR
134.0
N/A
Survey Type:
(check one) ❑Centerline El Re -Route ❑Access Road ®Other: Hydrostatic Testing
Physical Attributes
Waterbody Type:
(check one) ❑Stock Pond ❑ Natural Pond ❑ Lake ❑ Reservoir ❑ Impoundment ❑ Oxbow N Other: Man-made pond
Hydrologic Regime:
N Permanently Flooded ❑ Semipermanently Flooded ❑ Seasonally Flooded ❑ Temporarily Flooded
OHWM OHWM Indicator:
(check all that apply) ❑ Clear line ❑Shelving ❑Wrested ❑Scouring ❑Water
Height: on bank vegetation staining
1 ft.
®Bent, matted, or missing NWrack El Litter and ❑Abrupt plant ❑Soil characteristic change
vegetation line debris community change
Depth of Water:
Bank height (average):
Bank slope (average):
5 ft.
0.5 ft.
5 to 15 degrees
N/A❑
Qualitative Attributes
_
Water Appearance:
(check one) El No water NClear ❑Turbid ❑Sheen ❑Surface ❑Algal ❑Other:
on surface scum mats
Substrate: ❑ Bedrock ❑ Boulder ❑ Cobble N Gravel N Sand N Silt/ clay ❑ Organic ❑ Other:
(check all that apply)
% of Substrate: % % % 15 % 80 % 5
Width of Riparian Zone:
Vegetative Layers:
(check all that apply) ®Trees: ❑ Saplings/Shrubs: N Herbs
1 ft.
Avg. DBH of Dominants: 4 in. N/A in.
NIA:.1
lepGv<.,
Dominant Bank Vegetation (list):
Scirpus cyperinus, Lespedeza cuneata, Liquidambar styraciflua, Andropogon virginicus
Aquatic Habitats lax: submerged or emerged aquatic vegetation, overhanging banks/roots, leaf packs, large submerged wood, riffles, deep pools, etc.):
Submerged aquatic vegetation, large submerged wood
Aquatic Organisms Observed (list):
None
T&E Species Observed (list):
None
Disturbances (ex: livestock access, manure in waterbody, waste discharge pipes):
None
Waterbody is:
(check one) ❑ Natural N Artificial, man-made ❑ Manipulated
Waterbody Quality a:
(check one) ❑ High N Moderate ❑ Low
Form Rev. 07/09/2014

Waterbody ID:
CMWO02
High Quality: Natural, natural bank vegetation around entire waterbody; banks stable and protected by roots; water color is clear to tea -colored; no
barriers to fish movement; many fish cover types available; diverse and stable aquatic habitat; no disturbance by livestock or man.
Moderate Quality: Altered by rip -rap; natural vegetation extends 1/3-1/2 of the active channel width on each side; filtering function or bank vegetation
only moderately compromised; banks moderately unstable; water color is cloudy, submerged objects covered with greenish film; moderate odor; minor
barriers to fish movement; fair aquatic habitat; minimum disturbance by livestock or man.
Low Quality: Rip rap and channelization excessive; natural vegetation less than 1/3 of the active channel width on each side; lack of regeneration;
filtering function severely compromised: banks unstable (erodinal- water color is mudriv anri hwhiri• nhvin,m nnllntantc ininal mate ciirrnro —im
surface sheen); heavy odor; severe barriers to fish movement; little to no aquatic habitat; severe disturbance from livestock or man.
Notes:
Few loblollies lining edge of man-made pond. Utricularia sp. observed submerged along pond edges. Water visibility
own to 6-8ft. Gerridae observed on water surface, but no aquatic species seen.
Waterbody Sketch (Include north arrow, centerlinq distance from centerline, data point locations, survey boundary, and IDs of associated features)
1.
r
�daA
"a tab O[.'7 bar k,
Form Rev. 07/09/2014

Open Waterbody Data Point Photographs
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
November 2"', 2018, Page 1 of 2
Photograph 1: OCMW002, East
Photograph 2: OCMW002, North

Open Waterbody Data Point Photographs
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
November 2°d, 2018, Page 2 of 2
Photograph 3: OCMW002, South

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Q +Q r
ProjectlSite: _ I `rr��C P _ City/County `U m ue r le. � Sampling Date
ApplicanVOwner: DOMIr)State f4 C Sampling Point: WC"'r Wic—L%)
Investigater(s}: E. SS; (S. M MT K!nam I<,, ML4101 `? Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hilislope, terrace. etc(): �_ _�� r Z 0 N + `Local relief (concave, convex, none): e64N .CCy� Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): r Lat: I `t� S7 Lcng: ` `1 T _ Datum: �►`� ` 5 $�
Soil Map Unit Name' C)06 t 60(\ (Qf'M, sor%6 NWI classification -
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks.
WWV FcNeSt-
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of tNo rea i P
Prima Indicators minimum of one Is required, ch ck all that ap pty
Surface Soil Cracks (138)
_ Surface Water (At) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface t138)
High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) tLRR U)
` Drainage Patterns (1310)
_
Saturation (A3)
�_
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1 }
Oxidized Rhizospheres along laving Roots (0)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (02) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (94) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aauitard (11)3}
1 ndation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
yFAC•Neutral Test (05)
V Water -Stained Leaves (Bg)
Sphagnum moss (08) (LRR T. Lli
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes �tlo
Depth {inches}: r
Water Table Present? Yes tf 4No
Depth (inches): 14
—No
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 3
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -- Use scientific names of plants
Absolute Dominant Indicator
TreeStratum(Plot,5 Cover Species Status
1. t• (�A b (-1 (0 0 Z FL C
3. ei fk S -ypq_-6D► !� rft L
4. bl le S n' fir t.l IP7A C
5.
6.
7-
8.
�}- Total Covers
50°% of total cover. 1 } 20% of total cover: 1
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:?C*{X�"j
1. -Mel
](� VI t giMoIrk. 5 p�CW
2, rn f oi'o C+C) ! i c* 5 C
3- 5 (A Q3 ro. � 7
4-
5,
15
7.
8.
1 5 = Total Cover 2
50% of total cover: 2, 20% of total cover
Herb Stratum {Plot size:30�X
1. AliWf1 t�b1� A on4-ea, s V FPrcw
2, W'06t IA V'rl i' a, a rfQl o,+& / Q JRl_
3. 10k&l rirl 5 N Em-
4. .
5.
s.
7.
B.
9.
is
11
12.
6 = Total Cover
500A of total cover: a 20% of total cover: [0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: a
1. + f D Y rU-i Gtp t 'J: � �
2. i 4 S (04-1AAArFe) I1 � ! V �C
Sampling Point:WCVnr40q-q_ul
Dominance Test vwrksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBI., FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species I1 17 0rG
That Are OBL. FACW, or FAC: L1y ( (AG)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
_„ Total ab Cover of:
Multi P I
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) ($)
Prevalence Index = SIA =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test Is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is 53-0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in- (7,8 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m)tall.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
Woody vine —All woody vines greater than 3.28 fl in
height.
4.
5 Hydrophytic
_ 5 = Total Cover _ Vegetation
50% cf total cover: - S 20% of total cover 7 Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If abserved, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:
Vic 04f 00g4_W
Profile Description. (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox features
Inches) Color(mcist) _ °%
Color (moist) °Io Type _ Loc
Texture Remarks
1 I - U 10CIR 10L)
qq trlr.t�
�I�t ��!�
5;�� L
t(0 -ao lot A9�5
SC L
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrlx.
Hydrlc Sol Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Soils"
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (58) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (AS) (LRR 0)
_ Histic Fpipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
_ Reduced Verde (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
�Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ _ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck presence (AB) (LRR U(
Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mari (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151 )
_ Thick Hark Surface (At 2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 31ndicat ors of Inydrephytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redo% (At 6) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbdc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1) (LRR 0, S)
,_,_, Delta Ochdc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Verde (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
_ Sandy Redox (SS)
_ Piedmont Floodpfain Soils (N9) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S5)
^_
_,- Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
park Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (tf observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydrlc Sall Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

• r[� r 9�
r ,
+. -
i',�,F �;,. _
� .► ,� _ f J; -.. ate. \'V ,'.' e
IF A
N N t
,-d ' '` `�"
'' '
.� �/ .,yam -
;krr•.. _.
_.a..

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjectlSile ce CitylCounty ,� 1 r Sampling Date: 1+( 1-7
ApplicanVOwner: nmt n rCJ n State: - Sampling Poir ^nt;w C r 00-u�
Investigator(s): 51— (�, ffioICKJAd'nn i�r ltrlGtf�t�lf Section, Township, Range: '4 k
Landform (hillslope, terrace. etc PC Local relief (concave, convex, none): C[Jn Slope (%)-
Subregion (LRR ar MLRA}: Lat- 3 1 "i l Long Zi • 74.8 0 �7 Datum: w 10S 154-
Soil Map Unit Name: W 0 06 ,
r, CrWrN r Ck NWI classification- r4A
Are climatic r hydrologic conditions an the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no. explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are -Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V' No
Are Vegetation , Sail , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site reap showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yesy No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sol[ Present? Yes No within a Welland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks. -
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Seco
nda ry I ndica r 5 fmi ninn urn of Mg re gu ired
Primary Indicators iminImum of one is renuired. check aft that apply] _
Surface Soil Cracks (BO)
Surface Water (At)
_ _ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Merl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
� Drainage Patterns (810)
Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci)
_ Moss Trim Lines (516)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roofs (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (S3)
_ Recent Iran Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (54)
_ _ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow AquRerd (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
! _ PAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum muss (D8) (LRR T. u)
Field Observations:
N0�
Surface Water Present? Yes
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth jinchesj:
No (inches); 7 P 4
Saturation Present? Yes
_Depth
No Depth (inches): ­7p0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and GuIt Coastal Plain Region—Verslon 2 0

VEGETATi0N (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
sampling Point: WcmV- U 0 k
Tree Stratum (Plot size.
1, GL Ie T Ce4 S r) I ay-O
2, -{ll!�j S 5 a. 5.1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status_
7C] V_ FA C
V FA C
Dominance Test warksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are CBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across A11 Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species :.
That Are C EL, FACW, or FAC: i L (AIB)
3,
41
5•
6.
Prevalence Index worksheets
Total % Cover of: Multiply by
CBL species x i =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = BlA =
8
Q = Total Cover
50°% of total cover: 20°% of total cover: � �
Saolino S.Iltub Stratum [Plot size:
1- M"ss&, 561(VA{ aC 3� FjtC
_- _
2• 7A rA APO C P S 4 ,, ++C4 Of 1 0. j S YI A C
3.
4-
5
Hydrpphytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ ]rRapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50°%
3 -Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ Problematic HydrophyticVegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydrlc soil and wetland hydrology must
he present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5
7.
Total Cover'
50°% of total cover: n �� 20% of totel cover, q
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1- -TOY , (j6er,6cu rl Can � a j �1 Ff� C
2.
T
Definitlons of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.8 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height [DBH], regardless of
height,
SaplinglShrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28It tail.
Woody vine —Al woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
3.
4-
5•
s-
e
g,
10.
11-
12-
�� = Total Cover
50e% of total ewer: �� • ] 200A of total cover:
L�4�k 11C
Woody Vine Stratum [Plot size: +
1. S r (�+ TU4 �n & I..,. 1 A C_
Hydrophytle
Vegetation
Prncnnt? Yes No
2. ki ia., d-4 la - Gh Y�
3. `I FAC
4.
5•
a Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2-0

SOIL Sampling Point: W Crn.[ 60rl _U
Profile description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence at Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Cdor(molst) °% TYpe Lyc�
Remarks
0-10 � I ou
+Texture
L - S
i u -16, rf4 7-. ( Uu
L S
( M 5 �tl 101,1
L 5
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letlon, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
=Location: PL=Pore Lin In g. M= Mat rix.
Hydrlc Sol Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Solls
Histoscl (Al)
_ Pclyvalua Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (AS) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic(F18) (outslda MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplaln Soils (1719) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loa my Boils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox park Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (FS)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
r Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Depleted Ochdc (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iran -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P. T, U)
wetland hydrdogy must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR 0, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy GI eyed Mairtx (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (Sfi)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 14SA, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydrlc Soll Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

i y
c
_72
j P Y -gip !✓i-. �X.. - � - - r/��' + v ,

5c"r DIPL
NC D`VG Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: �� tg
ProjectrSite: A >°
Latitude: 35 , 13 o 0 q
Evaluator: - `
f�- MLA(�-+ Yf
County: e u n< f %
Longitude: - � � ' _ �3 [ ��
Total Points:
Stream is at least ifermrttent �j 1
'19 or Perennial if 2 30'
rf aIgor
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent rennial_
Other
a-g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a, Continuity of channel iced and bank d.
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
7
3
3. ln-channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
�'�
L=
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
❑
1
2
(3 )
5. Activefrelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
10
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
d'. )
10. Natural valley
55
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No o)
Yes = 3
411UH M wLUIUS vies nve idWO, 56v UI5bU554u1+5 u+nmiivai
B_ Hvdroloav t5ubtotal = lt7 5 ]
Vj1.1'
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
J)
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
❑
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
(0.5]
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biolo❑v (Subtotal = t) ]
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrab enthas (note diversity and abundance)
0
(11)
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
0 j
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
10.5)
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
28. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW m ❑.75; OBL = 1.5 Qfher = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: Nt7 _m c
SC we- 0 l
Scf ro4 z ofl\.� rA" 8k+-
rz�lb : W

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map) _
- 5Cw'nr ..J�
E-211
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WURKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: l rYrm,(<-Vo-r e,
1. Applicant's name: �i] n"1 n 2. Evaluator's name: . � t-C
3. Date of evaluation: Wit 1f-4 4.Time ofevaluation: 1440
5. Name of stream:1ANTJr L,�n t-D Q 6. River basin: C�
7. Approximate draii S nage area: 4{ S. Stream order: 0
9. Length of reach evaluated: Isb �{ 10. County: �CAr-
11. Site coordinates (if known.)::/(preter in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): 0 A
Latitude (ex. 33.872312): 35 • i 360-7 Longitude (ex.-77-556611): —2 { D
Method location determined (circle): 10 TTopo Sheet Onho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GI5 Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streams) location):
L C)C6i e d oV, uf� G o lc[S bbfL1
14. Proposed channel work (if any): 7-SD
15. Recent weather conditions: 'za'r, Ye74lfh G`
16. Site conditions at time of visit: I'J DY r^a I
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES -) 70. Does channel appear on USDA Sail Survey? YES Q0
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential °/a Commercial % Industrial 60 % Agricultural
-'r:) 6 �O% Forested �% Cleared 1 Logged _% Other ( '
22. Bankfull width: I f i r -. 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): �f
24. Channel slope down center of stream: L." Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) ­_Ntoderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: —"Straight _Occasional bends Frequent meander ^Very sinuous ,_,_,Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g„ the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score ❑f 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
0 A W nn fi e
r a#
Evaluator's Signature Ll�C.uI.1+WAbywk� _ Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to he used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not Imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION PAINT RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
I
Presence of flaw 1 persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 -- 4
0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = marpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0--5
0-5
(extensive alteration = 0: no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0_6
0-4
0-5
0
no buffer = 0: contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0--4
l
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges m max pints)
$
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0 4
0-4
(no discharge = 0; s rin >s, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max pints)
U
G
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 4
0-4
0 -2
0
(no flood lain = 0: extensive flood lain = max points)
7
Entrenchment 1 floodpfain access
0— 5
0- 4
0- 2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding= max oints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0--4
0-2
Q
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
04
0--3
�]
extensive ebannelization = 0; natural meander = max oinis)0-4
10
Sediment input
0-5
0 4
0 4
(extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max oints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
_
(fine, hnmo =enous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
l2
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 — 4
0 5
y�
(deeply cinised = 0: stable bed &- banks = maxpoints)0-5
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 — 5
0 - 5
0 5
a
0-0
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks maxpoints)
Q
14
Root depth and density on banks
0' 3
0-4
0-5
Ey
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
1$
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-4
0-5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)0-5
_
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0_ 3
0_ 5
0-6
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well -developed = maxpoints)
Q
1
Habitat complexity
0 - G
0-6
0 — G
little or no habitat = 0: frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
$
0-5
0-5
no shading ve etation = 0; continuous cano = maxpoints)0
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0---4
`
(deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
0
�4
(no evidence = 0; common numerous types = max ints
0
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0 -- 4
G
(no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = max po tits)
4
D
2?
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0 - 4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max points)
?3
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0--5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
'P.
* T'hese characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody data point scmr012 facing northeast upstream.
EW
Waterbody data point scmr012 facing southwest downstream.
Photo Sheet I of 2

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody data point scmr012 facing southeast across bank.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

Scvr,r 011
N(" 1]W(1 CtrPnm irlentif ention Form Veminn 4.11
Date: L411$ J I?
Project/Slte: A C I'
Latitude: ts, i ;L9;0
Evaluator: �s� 1'S' MPrfKLoM
14,pvicA62tiv"eLi
County:
Longitude: --g,-43035-
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent � C
Stream Determination �circl�n
fdL
tither d�� ►
' J
Ephemeral Intermittent . ere.nni 1)
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if 2 30"
A. Geomo hold Subtotal = -t, �3
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strang
18. Continuity of channel bed and bank i-6-K
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
(M
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
n
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
('3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
co
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
(1.5
1
1.
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Nor 0
Yes = 3
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
f
3
14. Leaf litter
1-�)
1
❑.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
❑.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1.5
17. Sail -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes ; 3
I Rinlrnnv (Riih+n+al = it .h 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
rr1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22, Fish
0
0.5
1
1.
23. Crayfish
n
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.
25. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75: GSL = 1.5 Other,= i
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
-
r
S
C' Lr

USACE AID# ❑WQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
SCrnr�j
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WURKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: }..rY►e�r►tt�-,ar+�
I. Applicant's name: ACP 2. Evaluator's name: ESQ k-r w,(42, -e:"
3. Date of evaluation. LA( *111 _ 4. Time of evaluation: 1400
5. Name of stream: �vl 4 &-'m Lt7 C:z�,at 6. River basin: Ca Ftor
7. Approximate drainage area: A-3 GC+e 5 8. Stream order:y
9. Length of reach evaluated: 15 0 F4 • 10. County: Cu m)el' 4A rj
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34-872312): 35, 129�4
12. Subdivision name (if any)
Longitude (ex.—77.556611)
0�!
Method location determined (circle); P Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) PhotolGIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
L o CW­f � Nc>rt-t., c+ C-�LkSWW F�, � -ed tm a�• NC
14. Proposed channel work (if any)
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit
7 ?5D
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 Tidal Waters ___,_Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters ,Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation paint? CYEiS 'O If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES � 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey?^YES 0IO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential % Commercial % Industrial 400/o Agricultural
c Forested _% Cleared 1 Logged _% Other ( }
22. Bankfull width: } �+ f " 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank); S-�'
24. Channel slope down center of stream: v'� Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) --Moderate (4 to 101/6) ^Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight -,"Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of haw to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
r7rf(Ai M S"
Evaluators Signatur Date
This channel evaluation form Is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total scare resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Farm subject to change -- version 06103. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow! persistent pools in stream
0-5
0--4
0 _.5
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = mar ints)
F
Evidence of past human alteration
0-5
0-5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max hints)0-6
Riparian none
0 " �'
0 4
0-5
no buffer = 0; coati uous wide buffer = max Dints
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0 5
0-4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = max o€nts)
5
Groundwater discharge
3
0 4
0 - 4
(no discharge = 0; s rip >s, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max-points)0
f'
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0 — 2
yam,
no flood lain = 0, extensive flood lain = maxpoints)
Entrenchment 1 iloadplaln access
0-5
0-4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max aints
S
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0_ 6
0-4
0-2
no wetlands = 0; lar a adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max oints)
10
Sediment Input
0-5
0--4
0-4
')
(extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max ints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 -- 5
fine. homogenous = 0- large, diverse sixes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
>4
(deeply incised = 0• stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
E''
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 _ g
0-5
3
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density an banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
F
no visible roots = 0: dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
rn
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of r€flle-pooltripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pooIs = 0• well -developed = maxpoints)
4
1
Habitat complexity
0 — 6
0-6
0 G
v
1-4
little or no habitat = 0 frequent, varied habitats =maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
l
no shadingve etat€on = 0; continuous cano = maxpoints)0-5
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA"
0-4
0 — 4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 — 4
0-5
0-5
y r
no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = maxpoints)
{�
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0--4
a
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points
04
D
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0--4
(no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points
Total Points Possible
100
1-100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

r 4
7
' - • „ �ev A r1 a t�
Y �
t b
+:K 1
c _a "
' r � -
112,,n
MIA ..
.`�-.•'z fir' � �'��'- rn .y.�`� '�.'" r• a° ^, ,Rlr / �...�
Of
�,_-�S .•d'`1F rYr y a hµl,,,� 1i...vw

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody data point scmr011 facing north across bank.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region r
ProjectlSite: tk C P CitylCounty Cum b e r, [a lj Sampling Date: � � —7
Applicant(Owner: [ 0A ." aOn State: N L Sampling Point.wc y r UQ$3-w
investigator(s)f Si145,AM1AfI44"1 l�.rn�,rP fe Section, Township, Range: tjA
"0 Local relief [concave, convex, none): Cv 4C� slope
l andform (hillslope, terrace, etc): OC �
Subregion {LRR or MLRA}: tat:357 _5 Lcng:--1617atl`� ❑atumW S
Soil Map Unit Name:y�'n 5 }U n a± 6&rn NWI classification- P5 5
Are climatic I hydrologic ccnditiorts on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology si g n i FIC2ntl y disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes `' - No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Na Lam"
within a Wetland? Yes Na
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Saco n a ry I indicatormi imu rn of two reg t4it
Primary Indicators [minimum of one is required. check all That apply]
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (At)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (58)
_{ Hi ater Table [A2]
_ 1,Aar1 Deposits (B15) {LRR L!]
_Drainage Patterns (B10)
►�5aturraWtion (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C-1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (fat)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
^ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
T Algal Mat or Crust (S4)
Thin Muck Surface (C.7)
_ Geomorphlc Position [D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ _ ,Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
"ater•Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (DB) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No epth (inches): Iy A
Water Tabh3 Present? Yes
Ho Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
Ho Depth(inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca illa fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available,
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (plot Size:. JiJd � ] `
1. N 3 n-r-i-
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Comer . Species Status
z.
3.
4,
5.
6.
7.
a.
Saolina/Shrub
1.
= Total Cover
;a% of total cover: 20°% of total cover:
Stratum (Plot size:.76*
AC -eV 'ru b,roirn F A C
2.
?Q t1 Q � + a et_{ M
r- AA C-
_ _
4.
5.
i3.
7.
8.
3� = Total Cover
50% of total cover: I C 20°% of total cover. C n
Herb Stratum {Plot size: •ftX "
1. SC' rPGf Cc��r+ nceS -�- aBL
2. a N
3.
nCCAS tA
C]6L
4,
5.
rni �ri]SteUi uYN �l r�_i�UEV'1,U
�f4 C
tn(crnr Sampling Paint: 0093, 1
Dominance Test vmrksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across A31 Strata.
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
0 a 41
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(AfB)
Prevalence Index worksheat'
Tpfal % Cover of:
Muftly by
OBL species
x i =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = WA=
HydrophyUc Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test Is a50°%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is 93.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 31n. (7.6 cm) or
more to diameter at breast height (08H), regardless of
height.
s• 5apIIng]Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7 than 3 In. DBH and greater than 3.26 ft (1 m) tall.
e Herb --All herbaceous (nan-woody) plants, regardless
g. of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
10. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 tt in
11. height.
12.
7 S = Total Cover
50°% of total cover: �:;7 5 20°% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: %Qd�
1 _ N L.A1 k P ("4
z.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
500A of total cover: 20°% of total cover'
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adapt allens below].
Hydrophytic
Vegetation t
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region-Verslan 2.0

501E sampling Pant:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) _ Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Twe Lac`
Texture Remarks
kI
7
'T e: C=Concentratlon, D=De let Ion. RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Mask ed Sand Grains.
=Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydrlc Sol] Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Soils :
_ Histosd (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (SS) {LRR S, T, Ul
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin park Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_, 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (FIB) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodpiain Soils (F19) (LRR P. 5, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F24)
_ organic Bodies (AG) (LRR P, T, U)
— Redox Dark Surface (FB)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm uck (Ag) (LRR P, T)
Mad (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain In Remarks)
pleted Below Dark Surface (All) i]
^ Depleted Ochric (Fi 1) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR D, P, T) 9indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P. T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
r Sandy Mucky Mineral (S 1) (LRR O, 5)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or probematic.
Sandy GI eyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F16) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S5)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F24) MMLRA 149A, 153C, 15313)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, 5, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (Inches):
Hydrlc Solt Present? Yes Ho
Remarks:
U5 Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

Environmental Field Surveys
Wetland Photo Page
Wetland data point wcmr008s w facing northwest.
Wetland data point wcmr008s w facing east.
Photo Sheet I of 2

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plaln Region
Project/Site: C City1Counly �� m be y �4- Sampling [later// -is r
ApplicantliDwner: VJrn-'(-\' 0 K-\ State. N L Sampling Paint: W CNV' OD$ -`A
Investigator(s): -E51`K,MOW1C%10 I K . 4NL4C re Section, Township, Range: N
Landform (hillslope, terrace. etc.): � 1 r t� �d� Local relief (concave, convex, Hans}; � ^� Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat:35+ P, Lcng 7� •7A pS Datum:^VV -- {�
Soil Map Unit Name: U�1�� Ga I00'm NWI classification:
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions an the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil cr Hydrology significantly dislurbed7 Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Sail or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yesy No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No � wlihln a Wetland? Yes Na
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Watiand Hydrology Indicators:
�Cggfldanr
Indicators [minimum of twoseguired
Primary Indical ors (minimum or one is required. check all that auoly)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (At)
_ Aquatic Fauna (313)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (38)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U) .
_ Drainage Patterns (310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
Mosa Trim Lines (BIB)
Water Marks (B1 }
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0) .T
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Uk d Soils (CB)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (CO)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (02)
Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
FAC-Neutrat Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss (08) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
A
Surface Water present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
Noy
pth (inches):
V
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches): 7�
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspectons), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
r .r ,
Tree Stratum (Plot size: •�[] y
,. None ern
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species i - Status-
2.
3.
4,
5.
6.
7.
8.
55% of totalcover:
Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:,,
1. ;r.:rt.�uCrt 111As'o�
2. C""
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
1CJ FACW
F&C
3.
', 4 u. amt;a✓ � Lot t<� LID,
FAC
_L
4.
5.
s.
7.
8.
5t}°,6 of tot t cover: I U
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
U = Total Cover
20% of total cover. �}
2.
L. (A-Pt710,f i[A
VA Cc,1
3.
�1 � 6ft.!)6Z t^! 4� r 55 ry-. t7. - -
- 7 y f rt c LA
4.
Lrx t'ere­ "rchpdn; C�
ir, i� Actn
5.
6.
7,
B.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vne Stratum (Plot size:rW41k_•X)6_+ ]
1.
S5 = Total Cover
20% of total cover. � 1
2.
3.
4.
5.
50 % of total cover:
�(} = Total Cover
20% of total cover.
Remarks: (if observed, hst morphological adapt allcns below).
Sampling Point: CM1( W-t4
Dominance Test wvrksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are ❑BL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of ❑ominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species [�� D+❑
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:y f (AM)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total °% Cover of;
Multiply
QBL species
x, =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = BIA=
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 apid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
72 - ❑ominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is 53d7'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
DOnitie ns of Four Vegetation Strata:
Traa - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 tn. (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (❑BH), regardless of
height.
5 ap I In g/Sh ru b - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. ❑BH and greater than 3.28 ft (, m) tall.
Herb -AII herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft In
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Polnt:�Ct`r1'_ ()O? u
Profile Description: [Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
inches Color [mash %
Color (mast) % 7vne��
Texture Remarks
v- 12 «r�R3la ICf�
SL-
ta-�.i
'Type: C=Concentration, D=❑e letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lin In g. M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwisa noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Soils .
_ Histesd (Al)
_ Poiyvalue Below Surface (58) (LRR 5, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (AD) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Hark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR 5)
Black Histic (A3)
^_
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Pledman t Ftoodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P. T. U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
, Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
f cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Depleted Ochric (F1 f) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (At 2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (Ff 2) (LRR O, P, T) 91ndicat ors of hydrephytic vegetation and
r Coast Pral0e Redox (At 61(MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR Pr T. U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
,_,,, Delta Ochdc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) JMLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (FiB) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (SB)
— Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 1530)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, Sr T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (Inches):
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Ccrps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Environmental Field Surveys
Wetland Photo Page
4
'.0
1 f
J,
T
AP
IVA
�� #��r .1 ��y
.�"� ir; _
1A�-N41&♦�Y ;,� Y
1d',. pl
Upland data point wcmr008_u facing southeast.
Upland data point wcmr008_u facing northeast.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

NC` 17WC1StrPnm friontifrntinn Form Vprsinn 4.11
Se mr 0 14
Date: ZIr/ $l J 7
ProjectlSite: NG P
Latitude: 35.12 Z n Y
Evaluator: I `, MA,/K%-&y--
County: CurnLerla nj
Lon itude:-7g►2gQ{,
9
Total Points:
Stream Determination {cirl-vugj_
Other � 013 Q_'1 NG
Stream is at least intermittent 3
Ephemeral Intermittent erennia
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if a 30"
���
A. Georror hold {Subtotal = 1-6. }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I" Continuity of channei bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
M
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
sequence
0
D
2
3
-ripple-pool
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
!M
3
8. Neadcuts
❑
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
❑ =
Yes = 3
R' Wurirninme ''� Mi6fMni = -7. C5 ) • 1Y11 VY 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
OS
1
1.5
16.Organic debris sines or piles
1 ❑
1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es 8
U' RininnV (Ri ihtntmi = f . ( ] 1
18. Fibrous roots in stream bed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants In stream bed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
M
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; CBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: 'SC_�"�+r�01�
U4
CL-.1 u
Q�F

USACE AID' DWQ 4 _ Site # (indicate on attached map
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the folloNing information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: 1 IY1 r+1 Un 2. Evaluator's name: 0M ►�. Mw Ir ff'�7
3. Date of evaluation:! I is I "� _ _ 4. Time of evaluation: Id 0 b P VIAL
5. Name of stream: b1�M �G �9— 6. River basin: C, A
7. Approximate drainage area: C 8. Stream order: S+» r r,
9. Length of reach evaluated: 0 0 f 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): NA
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): —in 5 . i Z 1 0 � Longitude (ex.—77.556611): r'1g • -) 113 D (0 _
Method location determined (circle): Q Topo Shcet Ortho (Aerial) PhotolGIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
o Vr F ( 3
14. Proposed channel work (if any): ( Q
15. Recent weather conditions: I h4 1 LA RYf V', 0 Us L4
16. Site conditions at time of visit: L4 n
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 Tidal Waters -!.Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters ____,Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? 0 NO If yes, estimate the water surface areaO. � 61CVC 5
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES qO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial (2�L% Agricultural
22. Bankfull width: to -P+
r O % Forested % Cleared 1 Logged _% Other
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2A-i
24. Channel slope down center of stream: 4171al (0 to 21/6) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _hloderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10°/a)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight 4Occasional bends _Frequent meander Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (Iocated on page 2): Begin by determining the mast appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scared using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scaring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total scare assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 11 � Comments:
Evaluator's Signature — r �a�t7 i/ Date ` I �i' �
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners andenvironmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form Is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06103. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
#
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
Coastal
Piedmont
CHARACTERISTICS
Mountain SCORE
I
Presence of flow 1 persistent pools in stream
0 5
0-4
0 5 11
(no flow or saturation = 0: strop , flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0--5
0-5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0 -• 5 3
n❑ buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max pokl4l
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0— 4 3
U(no
discharge = 0; s rings, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max vines)
r�
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
o--4
0-4
o--2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive flood lain =max vines
Entrenchment/ floodplain access
0-5
0 4
0 2
`l
g"
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands =maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0--3 3
extensive channelir_ation =- 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
i0
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive do osition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0 —4
0-5
{fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
l2
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0--5 �}
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max vines
L
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
3
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
E�
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
u02
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 — 5
0-4
0-5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool. complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6 {
E
(no rifficsfripples or pools = 0; we] kdevelo d = maxpoints)
1
Habitat complexity
0 — �'
0-6
0 — G
little or no habitat = 0; fre uent, varied habitats = max oints
1$
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 5
0-5
no shadingvegetation = 0; continuous canopy=max points
19
Substrateembeddedness
NA*
0--4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; Ioose structure = max)N
0
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4]
0--4
tl-s
0-5 6
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max ints
�}
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
o -- 4
G
no evidence = 0- common, numerous types = max oints
Presence of fish
0 4
0 4
no evidence = 0; common, numerous t es = mart vints)0-4
:2±3
Evidence of wildlife use
0 6
0-5
0 5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
L�
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page) [4
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

�' a -tip' � - , ''� • �. i'
r

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody data point scmr014 facing south across bank.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

❑nen Waterhadv Data Sheet
Survey Description
Project Name:
AC P
Waterbody Name: rr
Va�
raterbody 117:
ocirnr 00`
Date:
g11sf q
L�r1�]Rm J
State:
County:
Company:
Craw Member Initials:
Photos:
Nk
c[.t.m" Ia v\d
u} �v^ r'��
_
NC, 5t
Tract Humber(s):
Nearest Milepost: etland ID(s):
4-DBS- Ao 3
76�1�n
5 ..() r C
Survey Type:
(checkane) ®Centerline ❑Re -Route ❑Access Road ❑Other:
Physical Attributes
Waterbody Type:
(checkcnel �6tock Pond ❑ Natural Pond ❑ Lake ❑ Reservoir C1 Impoundment ❑ Oxbow ❑ Other_
Hydrologic Regime:
permanently Flooded ❑ Semipermanently Flooded ❑ Seasonally Flooded ❑ Temporarily Flooded
OHWM
(check
OHWM Indicator:
aA lnar apply) '�J,6ear line ❑ Shelving ❑ W rested ❑ Scouring NZWater
Height: A
ft.
on hank vegetation sta ping
❑bent, matted, or missing ❑Wrack ❑Litter and ❑Abrupt plant []Soil characteristic change
vegetation line debris community change
Depth of Water:
Bank height (average):
Bank slope (average):
ft.
ft, Cat
degrees
IA❑
Qualitative Attributes
Water Appearance:
(check One) ❑No water ❑Clear ❑Turbid ❑Sheen ❑Surface ;Algal ❑Other:
on surface scum mats
Substrate: ❑ Bedrock C1 Boulder ❑ Cobble ❑ Gravel ❑ Sand J7 Silt! clay M-Organic ❑ Other:
(Check arl lfw apply)
% of Substrate: % % % % c ❑ % 5 o� %
Width of Riparian zone:
Vegetative Layers:
(check all rhalapply) Trees: ❑ Saplings/Shnibs: )J-Herbs
Avg. DSH of Dominants: in. in. In.
IA❑
[ar�pvx l
Dominant Bank Vegetation (list):
-�[�r ��-h��+rv, LDr+lc.e•.a SaPgvtisFez , SafiX �+sue
Aq uatic Habitats (ex ubmerged or emerged agl3adc vffegeurkn, avwh"ng berWoob, IeW pack3, lwpe "melted wood, nTlles, deep pods_ etc.):
r
Aquatic Organisms Observed (list):
T&E Species Observed (Irstj:
J 1'` f
Disturbances (ex: livestock access, manure in waterbody, waste discharge pipes):
IA . C
Waterbody Is:
(check one) ❑ Natural Artificial, man-made ❑ Manipulated
Waterbody Quality':
(check one) ❑ High ❑ Moderate �53 Low
Form Rev. 04 3U;•2013

Waterbody ID:
Hlgh QuaIIty. Natural, natural bank vegetation around entire waterbody; banks stable and protected by roots; water color is clear to tea -colored; no
harriers to fish movement; many fish cover types available; diverse and stable aquatic habitat; no disturbance by livestock or man.
Moderate Quality: Altered by rip -rap; natural vegetation extends 113-112 of the active channel width on each side; filtering function or bank vegetation
only moderately compromised; banks moderately unstable; water color is cloudy, submerged objects covered with greenish film; moderate odor; minor
barriers to fish movement; fair aquatic habitat; minimum disturbance by livestock or man.
Low Quality: Rip rap and channelization excessive; natural vegetation less than 113 of the active channel width on each side; lack of regeneration;
filtering function severely compromised; banks unstable (eroding); water color is muddy and turbid; obvious pollutants (algal mats, surface scum,
surface sheen); heavy odor, severe harriers to fish movement; little to no aquatic habitat; severe disturbance from livestock or mart.
Notes'
Waterbody 5ketch (include north arrow, centerline distance from centerfine, data point locations, survey boundary, and 1Ds of associated features)
064
CL
l
Furor Re . 8 3=013

Environmental Field Surveys
Water Point Photo Page
Water point ocmr004 facing northeast.
Water point ocmr004 facing southeast
Photo Sheet I of I

scmr 0 U7
1LTr' i7WC1 Cfrpnm It1pnfifi"finn IRnrm Vrrcinn A-11
Date: ���i'${
ProjectlSite: PNC P
Latitude:
Evaluator: �� - { ~' r�
County:
Longitude:
11. n 1 G-1 C P-&-%'(e T
Total Points:
Stream determination circle one)
C
Other j�q Q AM an., N L.
Stream is at least Intermittent l
if z 'lg or erennial if �: 30'
Ephemeral !nt re mitten Perennial
L
e.g. Quad Name:
A, Geomorphology Subtotal = 5
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank t'
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
[ 1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex, riffle -pool, step -pool,
sequence
0
2
3
-ripple-pool
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
(2)
3
5- Active/relict floodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
S. Neadcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
(1-]
1.5
10. Natural valley
/0)
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0')
Yes 3
R 1,N��rirnlnn�� !�i ihtntal a •• V`� ,�y.••'.V 1 ",.y..y..
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
L2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1.
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5
1
_ 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
r' Rinlnrnr tCnhtnfal= =`,.r1 1
01
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
i
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
9
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
{0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
,Oj
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
(0.5)
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
(Q
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
(1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants In streambed
t
FACW = 0.75; 013L = 1.5 Other 0')
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
t
Sketch:
I ,
I
Gl_
C 0C 1
-1'

FUSACE AID# _L
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WQRKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: ic, rn'Arl•v.o,n"
1. Applicant's name: Ill f) i 2. Evaluator's name: —
`d 'C �k► � + ��
3. Date of evaluation: (,6 f --74. Time of evaluation: 09;L0
5. Name of stream: 0141 16 S SW�mP 6. River basin; C-- P Q r
7. Approximate drainage area: C 10 A 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 150 �410. County.
DWQ#
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (ems 33.872312): 35' 11 RqZ
12. Subdivision name (if any): t414 _
Longitude (ex.-77,556611 ): 1 t1 • 7 2 z 5`1
Method location determined (circle): , ,GPS Topo ShLet. Ortho (Aerial) PhotolGIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
L0CCkttS E 0,S+ cg &014000'fo RCk (NcExe- sl-eArn'-N, `4C
14. Proposed channel work (if any): 761)
15. Recent weather conditions:_
Vd,r •..117%)C-0
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters ^Outstanding Resource Waters _Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
1 S. is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? (YIS>10 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
I9. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES No 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential % Commercial % Industrial 20"/o Agricultural
)0 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other (
22. Bankfull width:
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: 'f Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4°/6) _Nluderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight '-"Occasional bends _Frequent meander Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion• Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse), Comments:
Evaluator's Signature -'`-��1 • Date V18114
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form Is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change- version 06103. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flaw 1 persistent pools In stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strop flaw = max oints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0--6
0-5
0--5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
Q
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max hints
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0 -- 5
0-4
0 -- 4
�]
extensive discharge s = 0; no dischar *es = max po1nts)
$
Groundwater discharge
0 3
0 - 4
0-4
r
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
6
Presence of adjacent flood plain
0_4
0 4
0-2
(no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max pDints
7
Entrenchment I floodplain access
0--5
0--4
0--2
(deep ly entrenched = 0• frequent fl ood ing = max points
S
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0 --4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander - maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0--4
0--4
extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0 - 4
0-5
(fine, homo >enous = 0; large. diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel Incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed &banks =max Dints
Presence of major hank failures
0 5
0 5
0-5
1-013
severe erosion = 0; no erasion, stable banks = max Dints]
Q
14
Root depth and density on hanks
0-3
0-4
0-5
,..
i
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max oints
M
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0 -• 5
r]
substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
H
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well -developed = maxpoints)
17
Habitat complexity
Q-G
0-6
0-6
F
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 5
0-5
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
19
Substrate ernbeddedness
NA*
0 --• 4
o -- 4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
{}
? 1
Presence of amphibians
0--4
0-4
0 -- 4
❑
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
0
22
Presence of fish
0 4
0-4
0 4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous tyEs = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
Q - 6
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody data point scmr007 facing southeast upstream.
s
9
7 `
i,
Waterbody data point scmr007 facing west downstream.
Photo Sheet I of 2

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody data point scmr007 facing south across bank.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

5Crrr 0 1 D
Nir 17WO Cfrrnm IdIsnfifirsatinn Fnrm Vrrcinn 4_11
Data:
Project/Site: A C
Latitude: 35,1 I S I ,
Evaluator: T - re
County: Cu nnbe a vL�
Longitude: - 7
Total Points:
Stream is at least lntermiden!
Stream Determination (clrcle.,anej�
Peres
Ephemeral Intermittent,
Other ed +k a., NL
e.g. Quad Nama:
if a 19 or erenniai if? 30" `-�
A. Geomorphology Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
M
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0)
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1)
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
(6)
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
[ If)
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1 '
1.5
10. Natural valley
4
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No -,-0)
Yes = 3
12, Presence of Sasetlow
0
1
2
�3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
D
05
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1 0
1 0.5
(i)
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
I No = ❑
Yes
P Rirdlnnil (Ci ihrn+al - 1 1 . � 1
�b)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
Q3 ]
21. Aquatic Mollusks
(0)
1._
2
3
22, Fish
0
Lfl.5,
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0)
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
(0-)
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
.5 ]
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; ❑BL -'1.5-) Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
(Votes:
Sketch:
1
I
f� SC Mf
CL

USAGE AID#
DWQ#
„ STREAM QUALITY
Site # (indicate on attached map)
-S cr"'
ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET _Jftm
Provide the Following information for the stream reach under assessment: Imo, f f c h0,r,-,
1. Applicant's name: -D0'"1r' ni aV-N 2. Evaluator's name: S1— K -M..1tfa-t c
3. Date of evaluation: `r l rr 4. Time of evaluation: Iry
5. Name of stream: IA�4T I 4? RL-5 Cre-ZK 6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: (Ilia 6` C `�� S. Stream order:
9 L nth f h 1 t d' 1 -D � in trounty• C� n^ 6., (C-r d
. end a rv eac ea
M P�
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.87"5313): 315. 1 195 1 a
Longitude (t-x.-77.556611 ): ! 1 `-n q.?'�7 3 3
Method location determined (circle): � Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial)1'hotn'GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streams) location):
&a dl b(: c�#
F c ` , F'1 C� �
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: rQ i y tcl 0,7
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. identify any special waterway classifications known: __Section
10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters __, _,Outstanding Resource Waters _
Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (MV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation paint? YES hIG If yes, estimate the water surface area.
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 00
20. Does channel appear on USDA Sail Survey? YES LNQ
21. Estimated watershed land use: °/o Residential
_% Commercial _% industrial I�/o Agricultural
�] % Forested
% Cleared / Logged °/o Other
22. Bankfull width:
23. bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: + Flat (0 to 2%)
Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) __Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _I.,,:Occasional. bends
_-__Frequent meander _Very sinuous ___Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate farm used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
QrfWM 4 _
Evaluator's Signature --L— Date
This channel evaluation form is Intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not Imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 914-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
CORE
Coastal Pledmont Mountain
1
Presence or now 1 persistent pools In stream
0-5
0-4 0 - 5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past Truman alteration
0-6
0-5 0--5 i
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0--4 0-5?j
no buffer = 0; contiguous, widc buffer = max points
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4 0-4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
,.4
5
Groundwater discharge
0--3
0--4 0-4 ;-
e (no dischar = 0, s rin6,s, seeps. wetlands, etc. = max Dints}
U
6
Presence or adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4 0-2 Q
(no floodplain = 0; extensive flood lain = max pints)
x
7
Entrenchment 1 tloodplain access
0-5
0-4 0-2
�+((deeply
entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = maxpoints)
$
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0 -- 6
0-4 0-2 �
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4 0--3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment Input
0-5
0--4 0--4
(extensive de oshion= 0; little or no sediment = max oints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4 0-5
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence or channel Incision or widening
0-5
0 --4 0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max hints
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5 0-5
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4 0-5 i
E�
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
1S
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 —4 0—$
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
l6
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0— 3
0 5 0 6
(no riffleslri les or ools = 0; well -developed -- max points)
Q
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6 0— 6
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 5
0-5 0-5
(no shadin ve etation = 0; continuous cans = max pints)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA
0-4 0 - 4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream Invertebrates (see page 4]
0 5 0-5 -,
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)0-4
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0 — 4 0 — 4
C
es = max oin
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous point)
4
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4 0--4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
�3
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5 0-5 -
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These cliaracteristics are not assessed in coastal streams,

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody data point scmr010 facing north upstream.
Waterbody data point scmr010 facing south downstream.
Photo Sheet I of 2

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody data point scmr010 facing east across bank.
Culvert on scmr010 facing north upstream
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

Scmr Dog
NC UWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.1I
Cate: yl f 1 j7
Projectl5lte: ftce
Latitude: 3S■ 1 lS 3L'
Evaluator:
County: l
Cu�b� ay.
Longitude: 2g,5
Total Points:
Stream Ceterrrtilnatio�circle one)
e.d VYt A nl
other /
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermltten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: fy
if a Igor perennial if a 30"
A. Geomorphology ( Subtotal = LD )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a' Continuity of channel bed and bank • I-
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
sequence
0
3
-ripple-pool
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
i 0)
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
W
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
19
2
3
B. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
Cl)
1.5
10. Natural valley
(0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Noy= 0
Yes = 3
artifidal ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrolo❑v [Subtotal = 7, ]
B
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
(I'
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
(0-9
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1 0
(0-n
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
I No = 0 `
Yes
C. Biolo❑v [Subtotal = `T ]
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
(3)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
(0)
1
2
3
22. Fish
( 0)
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
i._0 '
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
(-0)
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
(0.5")
-1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75: OBL =(1.5) Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
1
1
W C m�

{ USACE AID# DWQ # site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: 1S.i��o�
1. Applicant's name. DU{hi 14 C) sJ 2. Evaluator's name: E5si K • mL4 r 4'-E
3. Date of evaluation: ` 1(s I aq 4. Time of evaluation: 10 0D
5. Name of stream: (A10- -1 J 4S S��mP 6. River basin: C�
7. Approximate drainage area: ) 0 0' C �� S 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: -Cl 10. County: t*'{mow• �" �°1 i"d
11. Site coordinates (if known): prererin decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any)): N PA �j(
Latitude (ex. 33.872312): S , ,1 F S D- Longitude (ex-—77.556611): — 14IN- 7A "
9-5
Method location determined (circle): .0 Topo Sheet Ortlio (Aerial) PhotoIGIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
56&" cr 6o?-L4-qwi�) rd n-Lar St-edry, an, N c
14. Proposed channel work (if any): 7-1�D
15. Recent weather conditions: 1 Gi i^ ,.ie slr --day
16. Site conditions at time of visit: uk O" ^'"A 1
1.7. Identify any special waterway classifications known: section l0 Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters ,_,_Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES � If yes, estimate the water surface area.
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES / 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential % Commercial % Industrial %O6/o Agricultural
n� �
�! �/o Forested _% Cleared I Logged _% Other (
22. Bankfull width: { 23. Sank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: 'f Flat (O to 2%) -Gentle (2 to 4%) _,,,Moderate (4 to 10%) ! 5teep (>10%)
'25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of wotksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign paints
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the wotksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g„ the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signature ��"J Date L41 !K't -7
This channel evaluation form Is intended to he used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals In
gathering the data required by the United States Army Carps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form Is subject to USACE Approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal Piedmont Mountain
1
Presence of flow/ persistent pools in stream
0—$
0 4 0 —5 i
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
1
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5 0-5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max poin
3
Riparian zone
0--6
0--4 0-5
no buffer= 0: contiguous, wide bufi'er= max points'
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4 0-4 �—
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
Groundwater discharge
0 3
0-4 0-4
U5
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max pints)
U
6
Presence of adjacent tloodplain
0-4
0- 4 0-2 [�
no floodplain = 0; extensive flood lain = max Dints
Entrenchment 1 flnndplain access
0-5
0 4 0 2
deg I entrenched = 0: fre went flood ing = max oints
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0_ 6
0-4 0_ 2
(no wetlands = 0;1ar a adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0_ 4 0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0 5
0-4 0-4
(extensive do osition= 0; little or no sediment= max pints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4 0-5 `—
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 5
0 4 0-5 {
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 5 0-5 1
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
d
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4 0-5
F
(no visible roots = 0; dense rents throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 4 0 S b
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max oin€s)
16
Presence of riffle-pooUripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5 0-6 4
no rtffl s/ripples or pools = 0; well -developed = maxpoints)
d
17
habitat complexity
0-6
0 6 0 6 2
£
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 5 0 5
no shadingvegetation = 0; continuous cano = maxpoints)0-5
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0 4 0 4
(deeply embedded = 0• Ioose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 -- 4
0-5 0-5
>1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
0
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4 0-4
G
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
04
C
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0--4 0-4
q
{no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5 0 — 5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100 100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody data point scmr008 facing southeast upstream.
Waterbody data point scmr008 facing northwest downstream.
Photo Sheet I of 3

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody data point scmr008 facing southwest across bank.
Culvert on scmr008 facing south upstream
Photo Sheet 2 of 3

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Culvert on access road crossing scmr008 facing southeast upstream
Photo Sheet 3 of 3

-5c m r 00 7
Nr T1Wr1 Ctrnnm lirinntifirntinn Fnrm Vrrcinn Q_11
Date: 4t10-1
Project/Site: Ace
Latitude: 35.1IR60
Evaluator: C-�- �' IYtAY irM
County: omas-r�
Cr{a�G�
Longitude:
y 1�C. iAr f
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 30
Stream Determination (circa
Other S�@d�Yri�fi NC_
Ephemeral Intermittent erennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if a r9 or perennial if z 30•
A. Geomor hold Subtotal = (0rz)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strang
18- Continuity of channel bed and bank 6_11CI.
0
1
2
3
2. sinuosity of channel along thalweg
Q
1'
2
3
-Tin-channel structure. ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
sequence
0
/'r7
Ly
2
3
-ripple-pool
4, Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
{3)
5. Activelrelict floodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
B. Headcuts
o'
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0'
0.5
1
1 1.5
10. Natural valley
❑
cot
1
1 1.5
11. second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
R ' Hvrirnlnn� !S� ihtnfal aV V M.YI;) �5 . r 1, .,,r.,rr.
12. Presence of Baseflow
❑
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
{1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
Q
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris fines or piles
o
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = Q ==Yes
3
f'. Rinlnrry Mi ihfnfal n I77.5 1
►1
18, Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
M1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
no
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
❑
❑.
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL 41.5] Other =
Q
•perennlal streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: rlckevel Ar�j oljs
mU5 Gi ifiSti.
C��4Si`�y lAflf�%. � ir[]noMi�fS
Sketch:
C�
n1 4
iV I
1%
q
Iwm . 6 �J�

LUSACE AID# — DWQ # � Site # (indicate on attached map)
Sc mr{,�t:7
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
M1
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: I<, mov +ONO.�►
I. Applicant's name: D M'$ ni OY% 2. Evaluator's name: � ` I . 8M r Q'Lt ere t
3. Date of evaluation: I l 4. Time of evaluation: it ; D
5. Name of stream: L'kNZ filj kGr� SW� l 6. River basin: Cr pit Fe —a f
7. Approximate drainage area: O-C- _ S. Stream order: L)
9. Length of reach evaluated: I 5-0 F-� • 10. County: ( (A,-, oe Jce rd
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees
Latitude (ex. 34.B72312): 35 ' 1 l a
12. Subdivision name (if any): M h
Longitude (cx--77-556611):
Method location determined (circle): S Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) PhotolGiS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluati (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streams) Iocation):
Lo C a} try !;(� o
1.1. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: r.+''^
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Gov VN" ai
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _-Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES /d p If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 65) 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential % Commercial % Industrial �Q/o Agricultural
202°/o Forested T% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( _ )
22. Bankfull width: 'i �'1 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3 �{
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ti' Flat (0 to 2°/6) Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 100/6) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: 'Straight _Occasional bends Frequent meander _Very sinuous ^Braided channel
Instructions for completion of workshect (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scared using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach most range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
04wm G Ff -
Evaluator's Signature _ ' (^ _ -�—' Date f � .
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form Is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
SCORE
1
Presence of flow 1 persistent pools In stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
L
no flow or saturation = 0• strong,flow = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0_ 6
0-5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0--6
0-..4
0--5
7J
no buffer = 0; conti uous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
4 4
o -- 4
extensive dischar es = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
5
Groundwater discharge
0 3
0-4
0 4
U
no discbE = 0• s rip s, seeps, wetlands. etc. = max oints
e
6
Presencearadjacent lloodplaia
0-
0�4
0-2
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
0"
7
Entrenchment 1 floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
3
(deeply entrenched = 0• frequent flooding = maxpoints)
$
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0 6
0_ 4
0 Z
T
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0--5
0--4
0-3
extensive channelixation = 0; natural meander = max ❑ints
10
Sediment Input
0-5
0-4
0 -- 4
3
(extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
(fine, homogenous = 0• large. diverse sixes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks -= maxpoints)
13
Presence ormajor bank failures
0 - S
0-5
►�
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max ❑ints)0-5
C4
d
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
a-
E
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots tbrou hout = max oints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 4
0-5
'1
-T
substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-poollripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
H
(no riffles/tipples or pools - 0; well -developed = max oints)
4
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0- 6
0-6
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 - $
0-5
0-5
no shadingve etation = 0• continuous cans = max oints
19
Substrate embeddeduess
0-4
0 - 4
(deeply embedded = 0• Ioose structure = max)NA
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (seepage 4)
0-5
0-5
3
no evidence = 0; common numerous types = maxpoints)0-4
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0 - 4
O
(no evidence = 0• common, numerous es = maxpoints)0-4
14
C
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
172-
�
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous es =max Dints
23
Evidence ofwildlifeuse
0-6
0--5
0-5
15
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
bi
Or
7 •� 9��i 1S" <.1 F
Waterbody data point scmr009 facing east upstream.
IN t4
Waterbody data point scmr009 facing west downstream.
Photo Sheet I of 2

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
i
Waterbody data point scmr009 facing south across bank.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site,�GP City(County. CL"Mber4CVn4 Sampling Date i+ I
ApplicanVOwner: (DOM t I1 tCXr State N C Sampling Point. WC '(01 J _ V4
Investigator(s), —I�+mGr r tf• Wr it rTiTMS Section, Township, Range A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): P rJ tUn Local relief (concave, convex, none)
CUn CAVV— Slope (%)-
©`— 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LR Lat:35. U � 139 Lcng: ~ ! D JS& Datum- W" 1rJ+
Soil Map Unit Name Naha lapxn NWI classification- P Fd
Are climatic ( hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks )
_
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetalion , Sail or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
�urrunnrc r yr rtnunwJ — rntta4n arty tirak anuvnnry aantNurry trurrr► IUGauuns, U921MI LAB, Impandn[ Iediures, eiG,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area ' `
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes V No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Pine FI>a+
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauiredt
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required. check all thai_aRR!Y)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B$)
Surface Water (At) —
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface {B8)
J;Wh Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (615) {LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
2Saturalion (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1516)
_ Water Marks (131) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CB)
_ Drift Deposits (83) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Sods (CS)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorph c Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits {85) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
—,b�haltow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss IDS) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
V11" Depth (inches) o"
t
'1v
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 7'
� %
Saturation Present? Yes No_
Depth (inches):
Wetland hydrology Present? Yes V No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspecuorrs) if available:
Remarks -
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -- Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point. W C nn r 01$4 t 4
posouze uommanr rnoicator uominance iesr womsneez:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 50f-;' % Cw-r --Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Pn�-F6i��tT T FAr� That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across All Strata 7 (B)
4. Percent of Dominant Species
5. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 10y IJ (AB)
6
7 Prevalence Index worksheat:
8
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: !4; 20% of total cover,
SanlinalShrub Stratum (Plot size ,,%� «tc—Is
1 e 4xi -S .geco,
(5
FACL
2. flCe',r- (ZAbC( rn
—LA—FkGW
PK-
3 (f X' 10 V'dh
_alla
4,
5.
6
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total carer. r'!i
Herb Stratum (Plot size: f
-4-Is
1. P ncA(Ocbo) sn V,'! ;n
30
Y �A L
2.
S��
-�-� rACW
3.
4.
5.
Total % Cover of:
Multi
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Dominance Test is s509A
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is 63.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Deflnitions of Four Vegetation Strata,
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
6 Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7 than 3 in DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tail
8 Herb — All herbaceous (non woody) plants, regardless
g_ of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft talk.
10. ---- Woody ulna — All woody vines greater than 3 28 it in
11, height
12_
Total Cover Q
50% of total cover: ol. 20% of total cover. �l
WoodvMine Stratum (Plot s1ze:SOS - rOq-Ari;-t ,
1 21 REIAM rnperv,n r 5 FI�
2.
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
'S = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover a • 20% of total corer. �_ Present? Yes No
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2 0

SOIL
or
Sampling Print: W C M ro0-1�
Depth Matrix Redox Features_
��(in]]ches�)�r f(�Cdar mr^dst(/� 96 Color `
mdst % Type]
j��
lO k(0 l I V
• 5 �C�
Texture Remarks
CC
C
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Send Grains
'Location PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Solls':
— Histasd (Al)
_ _, Pdyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,0)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Wamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loa" Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mari (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Iran -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicatars of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (1 17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720) (MLRA 149A,153C, 1530)
_ Dark Surface IV) (LRR P. s, T. U)
Type:
Depth (Inches)
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes V No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Verston 2 0

MW
Ilk
Ai
k
'M
34
- � r}� ��' � �•'1� � ��' � N 4 �s �'�* 'r �7 �`� Hsu a q
V.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site- _ kc— ` City/County CUMj4Crl lN� Sampling Date '-1 Ita /
AppllcantlOwner��1-J�u1� gio (J/1 Staten Opt i C Sampling Point. W C MV- U1U—VV
Investigator(s): E9 L - K, r t ct rPA 6 • r l ( r'& Aection, Township, Range: N A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc);
1` c�); xwvn _Local relief (concave, convex, none)) McNCAV'C Slope (%): U
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): { Lat: 35. 0 5 07 Long: 7 D . U Datum ln/6 S cI't
Soil Map Unit Name: NaInr t A fX (dAff-) NWI classification- PE M
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ Teo (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are -Normal Orcumslances" present? Yes �No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes �No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks-
4-E VCA the 9h +h s s area+
NCA : 'Q
WPrI tne F10 Vr d+ShAregd, i- �5 S+;lI Cor616eW o, Pin
uvnranr nr•_v
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two reouiredl
Primary Indicators (minimum or one is required. chfck all that apoty)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (BB)
_ Syrface Water (At) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
t/_ ijagh Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saluration (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (Bt)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Titled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible an Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (04) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (135) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Apuilard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (B7)
_,,, FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
— Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes "I
Depth
Water Table Present? Yes o
(inches):
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
_ Depth (inches): d1Ce
Wetland Hydrology
Prasent7 Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos previous inspections), if available:
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:WCO oe—W
Tree Stre(ym (Plot size: 96 Cover Species? Status
i. (nn e efeSeryP
2.
3.
4.
5,
6.
7.
B
d = Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover:
Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size.3QR-X&.)i� ) _
1 MrX-el f e fer;Fetral t"71kc
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
B.
J = Total Cover
50% of total cover aZ_ 20% of total cover,
Herb Stratum (Plot size- 39�X &2L)
1. f�nCt�[�?1 Y� rrjt'n�crt 40 �f�C
3. .kA f) &A C e-F&I S �
4. : f• Lt ati3 4'H ei k/n 10
5.
Dominance Test worksheets
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (BI
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1) (A(B)
Total % Cover of.
Multiply b r
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACUI species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals.
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = BIA =
nyaropnytic vegetation maicators:
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 7. Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
6
SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines. less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vino -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
7
8
g.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover: 3 5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1
2.
= Total Cover
20% of total cover.
lot Y-FAC
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ZNo
3
4.
5
(0 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover
Remarks: (If observed. I,st morohotoaical adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point W cen 'r� �"
Profile Description: (Dascribe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Fealures
(inches) Color (mdst) % Color mcist % T pe Loc Texture Remarks
1Z
14-61
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
'Location PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydrlc Sall Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless other Mse noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hyd0c Solls :
_ Histosd (Al)
_ Pdyvalue Below Surface (SB) (LRR S, T. U)
_ 1 cm Muck (AS) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic 03)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (Fi) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (FIB) (outside MLRA 150A B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Jedaamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_/Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20}
_ Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T. U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mari (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetat;on and
Coast Prairie Redox (Al6) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
welland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochrlc (FI7) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (FIB) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (SS)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C, 1530)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
4
Depth (inches)
Hyddc Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks -
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

Environmental Field Surveys
Wetland Photo Page
Wetland data point wcmrOlOe w facing south.
Wetland data point wcmrOlOe_w facing north.
Photo Sheet I of 2

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProlectlSite- N C P CitylCounty L!!1 Mio4Q t'LO`n +� Sampling Date L+ air 2
Applicanl/Owner: _(-0 03 i (1 QC\ Slate �_�Sampling Point. r V - &I
investigator(s): I I rO�M Section. Township. Range 4A ,, J r�
Landform (hillslope, terrace,, etc) W k li )094- 2 Local relief (concave, convex, none) �C�n'��J` Slope (%) 0— 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lt� K P Lat- J 5. 5 i 5 / 7Lcng — �• % 3 & Y 7Q Datum � 154
Soil Map Unit Name: n JUA NWI classification rJA
Are climatic I hydroiogic conditions on the site typical for this lime of year? Yes No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are -Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMAKT OF FiNDiNGS - Attach si map Snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important Teature5, eLc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes - No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators Iminimum of one is required.
check all that apply)
_,_ Surface Soil Cracks (BB)
_ Surface Water (At)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (BID}
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (BIB)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
` Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Titled Sails (CB)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Thin Muck Surface (CT)
_ Geomorphlc Position (02)
_ iron Deposits (85)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
✓FAC-Neutral Test (05)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (89)
_ Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
-/
No =depth (inches):^
Water Table Present? Yes
No �3epth (inches): 70�
Saturation Present? Yes
No ✓Depth (inches): 7OW
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca illa Erin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available-
Remarks'
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2,0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Samplmg Point CM1r v1(C-- C,
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 32 roles -Is
r%UbL UM LAA 111110111 111UMUM
%Cover 5occies7 Status
1.
P " n U-5 •t eel a
SU /y t=k C
2. L,*(41,&AM(oarIV
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
1^0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover. C� 20% of total cover. I *-;t,
Saoling/Shrub
Stratum (Plot size:30s"
1. P�
n cn. S 4-ox- ct o.
304— ES
2.
rS-e o• 104-)rb011' a
10Fr44w
3. moreri'&
ecriF�cr-o+
10 N Fit
4. 19C'M01A.S
!;7er4*%Aex
S _rho
5.
6.
7.
8.
5 S = Total Cover
50% of total cover: P-7, S 20% of total cover. j
Herb
Stratum (Plot size�'f ►CD�d S
1.Ans�QoN%Ln
2. tii�
ChAn-ws.+�t rrem SCUQrslir�nrl
FPrGw
3.
4.
5,
6
7.
8
9
10.
11.
12,
=Total Cover
50% cf total cover. 20% of total cover S
Woody
Vine Stratum (Pict size:
f
2,
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: IC70 !o (AB)
Total % Cover of.
Multi2ly by,
oBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = Br'A =
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic,
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
5aplinglShrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in
height
3.
4,
5. Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover t 20% of total cover. Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed. list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Reg:on — Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Pdnt:W tM Ir a I _ [
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color moist 96 Type' Loc'
Texture Remarks
c VX SC
'Type: C--Concentratlon, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS -Masked Send Grains.
'Location: PL=Pare Lining. M=Matrix
Hyddc soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc Solle:
_ Histosd (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Hlstic Epipedon (A21
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
_ Reduced Vedic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,51
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mari (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (M LRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iran -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (Al6) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (1713) (LRR P, T, Ul
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks
US Army Carps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2 0

rye #�r�s �,� - "w-•,.F�
i.
I Il
46,
1 ii r j
P 1fff4f. �
4 WWI
Al
nW
— � _. P• . '.. a �'.aC� 5= 1 f{' _ _ 'L -

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Atlantic Coast Pipeline City/County: Cumberland County Sampling Date: 12/18/2015
Applicant/Owner: DOMINION State: NC Sampling Point: wcuc051e_w
Investigator(s): Team C Section, Township, Range: No PLSS in this area
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slight depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 35.04275284 Long:-78.8220692 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name: Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ✓ , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Area located within a slight depression in a soybean agricultural field. The agricultural field has been harvested and the vegetation is significantly
disturbed.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
✓ Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓ High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓ Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131) ✓
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Wetland hydrology indicators present
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:wcuc051e_w
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size. 30 )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A/B)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
0 = Total Cover
OBL species 5 x 1= 5
50% of total cover:
0 20% of total cover: 0
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
0 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
1
UPL species 0 x 5= 0
2
Column Totals: 10 (A) 25 (B)
3
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.5
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
✓ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
0 = Total Cover
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover:
0 20% of total cover: 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 Glycine max
40 Yes
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 Ludwigia altemifolia
5 No OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3 Senna obtusifolia
5 No FACU
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
0 = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0 Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks: (If observed. list morpholoaical adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:wcuc051e_w
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-6 2.5 Y 3/2 100 LS
6-18 10 YR 4/1 98 10 YR 3/2 2 C PL SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes `� No
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators presenr
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Photo 1
Wetland data point WCUC051 e_w facing northwest
0A
Photo 2
Wetland data point WCUC051 e_w facing southeast

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Atlantic Coast Pipeline City/County: Cumberland County Sampling Date: 12/18/2015
Applicant/Owner: DOMINION State: NC Sampling Point: wcuc051_u
Investigator(s): Team C Section, Township, Range: No PLSS in this area
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slight slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 35.04285086 Long:-78.8216827 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name: Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ✓ , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓
within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
Area located within a harvested agricultural field. Vegetation is significantly disturbed
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:wcuc051_u
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size. 30 )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: 1 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A/B)
6.
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
0
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
0 20% of total cover: 0
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FAC species x 3 =
1
FACU species x 4 =
2
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
0
= Total Cover
_
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1 Glycine max 60 Yes
2 Lamium amplexicaule 5 No
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 32.5 20% of total cover: 13
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
9
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No `,
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:wcuc051_u
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-8 10YR 4/3 100
S
8-18 10YR 4/2 100
S
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Photo 1
Upland data point WCUC051_u facing south
Photo 2
Upland data point WCUC051_u facing north

USACE .AID'r ❑WQ Site (indicate on attached map)
5GMD 040
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSI4EET MP
Pro► ide tite follo►%ing in for the stream reach under assessment:
I. Applicant's name: D6 04 1 Vk 100 2. Evaluator's name: L. , �• 166is a,,^ - -
3. Dale of evaluation: -1
�2.21 ( c., _ 4. Time of evaluation: —� ' 3 ] M
5. Naltte of stream: U 07 �z Co-ec Fir T?;I/ `y 6. River basin: .A P:L V, ,.
7. Approximate drainage area: 2-0 8. Stream order: I
9. Length of reach evaluated: 2 0 F t 10. County: C IJ M �)t.V' SGl U1 d
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex.34.87231y): 39 - $-7- 5Z-
Longitude(ex.-77.556611): " -1. 83 11 Z
Method location detennined (circle): (: � 'ropo Sheet Ortho {Aerial} Photo,1GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach tinder evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
E� k of M f-In RJ 5tao+h o (-tries-tom 5t.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): -rsrp
S. Recent weather conditions: 5 C, A cJ- 44,A U V LV '' 12Jv NL Ll I V q8 V0 Vv-5
10. Site conditions at lime ofvisit: 1,4r Y d, trnpd
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters ,Water Supply Watershed ty (1-IV}
1S. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? SNO If yes, estimate the water surface area: 1 ac
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map:' aNO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Sail SurveyNO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 10 % Residential _% Commercial �% Industrial 20% Agricultural
70 °,o Forested �4 o Cleared 1 Logged _% Other f )
22. Bankfull width: L4 H -- . -- — 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: 1FIat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) _h4oderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>109o)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight loccasional bends _Frequent meander Very sinuousBraided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shaven for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream fiovas from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach trust range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Seure (f -oin reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signature date 7Z 2 2114
This channel evaluation foyfa is Intended to be use l� a guide to assist landowners a d environmental professionals in
' gathering the data req ed by the United States rot orps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not impl►• a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06:03. To Comment, please call 919-876-844 l x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
1ltauntain.
1
Presence of flow t persistent pools in streant
0-5
0 4
0_ 5
C
(no flow or saturation = 0. stron g flmv = max points)
Evidenec of past human alteration
0 G
0 - S
0-5
�y
(extensive alteration = 0. no alteration = maxpoints)
O�
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0_.4
0-5
a
(no buffer = 0, contiguous, wide buffer = max hints
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discliarges
0-5
0-4
0-4
a
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxoints)
,.4
$(no
Groundwater discharge ..
0-3
0-4
0-4
d
discharge = 0- springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max hints)
_
Entrenchment 1 floodplain access
0_ 5
0-4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0. frequent flooding = maxpoints)
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0 - 6
0-4
0-2
D
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
Channel sinuosity
0 ._. 5
0 -.. 4
0-3
3
extensive channelixntion = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0 5
0-4
0-4
3
(extensive de osition= 0• little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
r
(fine, homogenous 0; large, diverse sixes = maxpoints)
f
1
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 4
0- 5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points)
'-
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
severe erosion = 0• no erosion. stable banks = maxpoints)
G4
d`
14
hoot depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
3
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
l5
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points
16
Presence of riffle-pooVripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools= 0: well-develo ed = maxpoints)
d
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
F
(little or no habitat = 0, fre uent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 ._ 5
0-5
r l
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
19
Substrate embeddedness
�'`�*
0 4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max]
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 - 4
0-5
0-5
C)
:>
(no evidence = 0; common. numerous types = maxpoints)_____
U'
1
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
C
-
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = maxpoints)
C
??
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
M
(no evidence = 0. common, numerous es = maxpoints)
Ld
Evidence of wildlife use
0 - 6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
t00
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
�g
. These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

sc my 040
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 'j r �2' (y
Projecti5ite: ACF
Latitude: 3 y $ T7 j z
Evaluator: 1 0?ef ', _J_C1 11 In S G L,1
County: �VWlbe V4 a w Cf
Longitude: _'� S . S3 1)2
Total Points:
Stream is at feastinlermitlerrt}
ircle one)
Stream Aete�Itttenr,Perennlal
Other M.
,�G
if a 19 at perennial if ? 30' `''
E=phemera Inte
e.g. QvadNam e:
A. Geomorphology Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
` 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
❑
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1}
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0' ,
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. HVdrology {Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
CD
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
� 1.
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = 7
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
❑
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
dwo
1 0.5
1
1.5
25. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 r = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: 6u i y -'Er EO 12 C"
Sketch:
r
� aV1 � wry[ - 1� I -A-

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody data point scm040 facing southeast upstream.
A
As -
Waterbody data point scmo040 facing northwest downstream.
Photo Sheet I of 2

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
w t�
/�Y!�' "a
4�
for, 0
je
r �
i
R or
All
L,
Waterbody data point sctno04O facing southwest across bank.
•w-
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

VVETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjecUSite. � _ City/County: - iv G Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: 1 G'G
Investigalor(s): __`( ti_ Section, Township, Range: t-
Landform (hillsiope. terrace, etc.): _i_�'r2�:�k P &'a
�-�--� ��� �al relief (concave, convex, none) OUe�Lt VC Slope (%):
L�
Subregion (LRR or MLRA). zr �� c r
��� � aL`�!`f Long;) m J I Datum: y
Soil Map Unit Name _; v� classification: r
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" presen(? Yes'____ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach Site map Showing samalina point locaYionp;_ 7rgn,-QA-rfc_ Imnorfmint Faafrrrme aft,
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yeses — Is the Sampled Area _ No _
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
e�,c pce5e n
r r ur1v1.-UUl Y
Wetland
Primary
Hydrology Indicators: y
Indicators (minimum of one is reguirednncheck all that a)niv)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑
Surface Water (Al)
High Water 'I'able
h1 Aquatic Fauna (B13)
I11��tt
I❑� Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
(A2)
Saturatior (A3)
Marl Deposits (1315) (L.RR U)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
lJ
Water Marks (B1)
L_! Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along living Roots (C3)
Q Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table
Sediment Deposits (132)
1L�Ji
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
}(j (C2)
L Crayfish Burrows
Drift Deposits (133)
iL1r
tff�--J�I Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
(C8)
Q Saturation Visible Aerial
Q
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Lw.1 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
on Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Q
Iron Deposits (135)
n Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Q
Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (137)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Q
Water -Stained Leaves (89)
Q Sphagnum moss (D8) (l RR 7, U)
Field Observations:
-- -
Surface Water Present?
Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Yes No Depth (inches).
Saturation Present?
includes ca illary fringe)
Yeses_ No Depth (inches): _ )
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yea J No
Describe Recorded Data (stream
gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks
I.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tres ratum (Plot size: ` � � )
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
A4,_
fi roc
2. iv_'_._—
3.
4.
5.
7.
Total Cover
50% of total ver �_S
20% of total cover.
SaplinglShrub_,lralum (Plot size: (3 )
_
1. P ik_ �i=.t::l £'eve _ —
F0C
z --. - l.JO r V Ydl_—
_ZC)
A_ V�AC --
3. e c '8 V n�CY\G1iJb0t_1Lx
4.
5.
6.
—
= Total Cover
50°� f total cover ��
7.G% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size,
__ _
2. U
3
J
5.
8.
10
12 .._._..----------------------------
-L.q=Total Cover
50% of lo(41' over:
Vi Woody ne Stratum (Plot size.
20% of total cover
--` C4__.&_—_.)
t _UiA
yy
2. Gylic,45
i� C
3.
4.
50% of total cover: _
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
_
Remarks (If observed. list morphological adaptations below). _ —
�11 A CC+ 41 . c
e t o, i s )-\ i
Sampling Point: W C M kCow, W
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species i._ x 3 =
FACU species _ x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: _ (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
E] 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present. unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameler at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SapiinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL (�
Sampling Point: IvCvnUL' {+ k
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators,)
Depth Matrix __ Redox Features
inches __ ._ Color moist w ° —�`
----—�—.-_. _- �° —_ Color rnoisl /o� Tom;•,' Loc Texture Remarks
0- 1 6C yk zll l C?U
i &IU, )c_j1, /C(
_'T e. C=ConC(mtration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location, PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all
LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ tiydrogen Sulfide (A4)
l
li Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
-i---tt Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) P, T,
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
LJ Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
LJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
(LRR U)
5 cm Mucky
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
❑
Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑ Marl (Flo) (LRR U)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
^❑
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
a Umbric Sur(�ace (Fi3) (LRR P, T, U)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix
Delta Ochric (F17) (NILRA 151)
present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
(S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (Fl8) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Matrix (S6)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: ---
Depth (inches).
H dric Soil Present? Yes No
y
Remarks------
---- _._...-------
------------- _---------
----------
V14s; C Se � �S Y�,�seo7
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

0
7.1
fly .• � ..
}�... .gy � '. .; �. n: pad. ~•� —y � '��•� ' .
'
.. _ •.';
mod'^: : " '

wcmh004f w soil
wcmh004f w soil

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site. � � � --
ffly
-- ---- City/County; �,us✓�, ,�< Sampling Daie:'
Applicant/Owner:a
State: 4 E—Sampling Point:
Investigator(s) Section, Township, Range: --- — q/
tandiorm (hillslope. terrace, etc.) — Local relief (concave. convex, none) Slope (%)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA). — Lal: ) t 1 r / C1 -- " G
r� tong 1��.5� .5 � � �� Dafum:
Soil Map Unit Narrre NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (if no, explain in Remarks.) / Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrologysignificantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes x\ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -- Attach site map showing sampling point locations. transects. important featrirac- Ptr
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No _
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No wlthln a Wetland? Yes No
Remar{<s:
-- _
n r vMUL_Ula Y
Wetland Hydrology Indicators;
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
17 ❑ Surface Water (All)
Water Table
❑ Aquatic Fauna (813)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
(A2)
Saturation
YQ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
r�High
(A3)
LnJ Water Marks (Bi)
t�l Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
70xidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (82)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
T
tJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Iron Deposits (85)
(C7)
f❑--tt
Lam! Other (Explain in Remarks)
' Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
� AC -Neutral Test (D5)
Q Water -Stained Leaves (Bg) _
Field Observations:
--
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? Yes __
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches).
No Depth
ncludes ca illary fringe)
(inches): Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks
/ ( `
C
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1. — _
2.
3.
4.
5.
6
7.
8.
fe7al
Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shru) Stratum (Plot size: _ 30 `) /
r
1 .ram=_� FAC
--
_ FAC
70_3 V_L t FAC
_.
a. FAC
.5.
7.
=Total Cover t
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover
Herb Stratu (Plot size. 10 _) //
2- r FAG
3 FAC
�.. z s VZ c� ) —FAG
5 tom FAO
(\P
iL rt',uv`? .FACV
_SAC_
g.—fir t �� FAC_1L
10. v
11
12
�_1 - __ = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 2—�
Wood Vine Stratum Plot size
2. None -- — _- �-
3.
4.
5 ^�
= Total Cover
50% of total cover. —,__ 20% of total cover: _
Remarks (If obsewed. list morphological adaptations below).
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC
(B)
100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
_ x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species —i
x 4 =
UPl_ species
x 5 =
Column Totals
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators;
2 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 5,3,0'
0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3,28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation �y{
Present? Yes Jam_ No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
C-�' C/;V1 y () 0, e'
Samnlinn Pnint
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators,)
Depth Matrix _ Redox Features
°
'(inches) .-_Color (moist) _ /o Color (moist % T_ 1e L.oc Texture Remarks
j_pe C=Concentration, D=Demotion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all
_
LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ Histosol (A1)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
❑ Hislic, Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Muck
l_1 2 crrn Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (Aa)
❑
Mineral F1 LRR 0
y ( � ( )
loarny Gleyed Matrix (F2)
-n Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,8)
Piedmont
(� Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Tu1
LJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
lr�J
(A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ 5 cm Muci<y
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Muck Presence
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (177)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
(A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ (Explain in Remarks)
❑ther
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al(A11)
❑Depleted
Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Umbric
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
❑ Sand GI,
Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
wetland hydrology must be present.
unless disturbed or problematic.
(.d M y Eyatrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layor (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches).
Remarks
Hydric Soil Present? Yes' \- No
^11'1/
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

wcmh004s w
Wetland data point wcmh004s_w facing east
Wetland data point wcmh004s_w facing south

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site. `
City/County: _! v� Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:���
State: �_:.�-.— Sampling Point:" �7n�
Investigalor(s): Section, Township, Range: _ NA
Landform (hillslope. terrace, etc.):
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): / Lat�:f(� S / r Lon G t, / tk
Soil Map Unit Name: Fes_ NWI classification: _None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No ___ (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation _ Sod or Hydrology significantly dislurbed? Are "Normal Circumslances" present? Yes Xy No
Are Vegetation Soil _, or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ._. Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects. imoortanp fAafuras. r4tr"
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No —❑zy Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
n f vrC\J L.0 l9 Y
wetland
Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Prriimary
iyndicate) s (minimum of one is required check ail that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water
S
(Al)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
rS
High Water Table (A2)
77❑��tt
11h�T1 Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
� Drainage Patterns (1310)
(J
Saturatior. (A3)
i�1 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
h�=ttt1
Water Marks (81)
Sediment Deposits (132)
11L�J Oxidized Rhizospheres along living Roots (C3)
t�l Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
}I� Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows
_
Drift Deposits (133)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
(C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Iron Deposits
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
(135)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
Other (Explain in Remarks)
(137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (69) _
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No (inches).
Water Table Present? Yes
N ', Depth (inches). _
'it
Saturation Present? Yes T_
(includes ca illa y fringe}
No- Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recor(ied Data (strearn gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks" --
Z7 /i��e
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -.. Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Free Stratum (Plot size: (j ) % Cover Species? Status
2.
3.
4.
5,
6
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total ver: 20% of total cover:
Sa tin /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: _ )
—25 - Y_ FAC
2,
s _ 10 N FAC
s. 15 Y FAC
—60-- =Total Cover
^�— 20% of total cover: 12
FACU
FAC
FACVi
FACU
FACU
- -...---_ FACU
8.
11 `
12
— = Total Cover
50° tota ver: _ 20% of total cover:
Wood Vin Strf3tum (Plot size
/ /i �i
__ IDS � .'J c r� U2.
3
4
5
Total Cover _> c = ^(
50% of total cover: (
20% of total cove
__
f2emarks iif observed__. list morphological adaptations below).
vegitation is hydrophytic
0-1(m/
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species 4
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant 6
Species Across All Strata (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW. or FAC: _ 67 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
_ x 5 =
Column Totals-
(A) (e)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Lam.! 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation` (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 it (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Anny Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sarnnlinn Pnint
Profile Description: (Describo to the depth Hooded to document
dicator or confirm the absence of indicators,)
Depth __Matrix _ _ _ Redox Features
nches -_ Color (moisE_ % Color moist % TyLF o
_.
Texture Remarks
_ Type: C=Concentration, D=DeDletion, RM=Reduced Matrix_MS_=Masked Sand Grains,
—— --- -- --
ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted,)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ Histosoi (Al)
❑
P01yvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)❑-t
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
❑ Hislic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky
l_1 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
1t�51i
❑
Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2)
-❑--tt fReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
t.�] Piedmont
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Fioodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Ej Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
(A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
❑
Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depietec Below Dark Surface (At 1)
L]
❑
Mari (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
❑]
Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (L.RR O, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) P, T, U)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
❑
(LRR
Delta
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sand GI> >d 'A
Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic,
y cy(. atrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layrr (If observed)
Type: ----
Depth (inches). Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ No
Remarks___.—_. __________..----------------------------- -----
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

. rL r •^:
i
0
IA: 1��.: S• ���,.:;�; �. ' ''spy.;--, _ — ��`,. ," 1 .
; Y

wcmh004 soils
Wetland/upland soils

Oaen Waterbodv Data Sheet
Survey Description
Project Name: IWaterbody
Name:
lWaterbody 10:
Date:
Southeastern Reliability
unnamed pond
_ — 1-%
11
State:
County.
Company.
Cre Member Initials:
Photos:
0 �_-
� �
� s
im
� : C� a
2---
/
Tract Number(s):
Nearest Milepost:
Associated Wetland ID(s):
_ � rj
(�
Ce
Survey Type:
(check one) ®Centerline -]Re-Route IIAccess Road --]Other:
Physical Attributes
Waterbody Type:
Wti�
(check one) =:Stock Pond i. �� Natural Pond Cl Lake i_'Reservoir ❑ Impoundment
E] Oxbow .Other.
Hydrologic Regime: ,,
i Permanently Flooded ; Semipermanently Flooded ❑ Seasonally Flooded Temporarily Flooded
OHWM
OHWM Indicator:
(cheek all that apply) ,1(zClear line
—"Shelving OWrested ❑Scouring OWater
Height: R j �
%nn bank
vegetation staining
❑Bent, matted, or missing -Wrack
;JLitter and -'Abrupt plant ❑Soil characteristic change
vegetation line
debris community change
Depth of Water:
Bank height (average):
Bank slope (average):
ft.
ft.
degrees
N/AO
Qualitative Attributes
Water Appearance:
(check one) El No water OClear Turbid ❑Sheen
'i.JSurface %Algal ❑Other:
on surface
scum mats
Substrate: ❑ Bedrock O Boulder ❑ Cobble D Gravel
.Sand Silt/ clay ❑ Organic ❑ Other:
(check all that apply)
% of Substrate: % % % %
% .so % % %
Width of Riparian Zone: Vegetative Layers:
(check all that apply) J' Trees:
ft
Saplings/Shrubs: J Herbs
Avg. DSH of Dominants: in.
) in. in.
NIA❑
(approx.)
Dominant Bank Vegetation (list):
Aquatic Habita, (ex: submerged or ernerged aquatic vegetation, overhanging bankstroots, leaf packs, large submerged wood, riffles, deep pools.. etc.):
Aquatic Organisms Observed (list):
T&E Species Observed (list):
Disturbances (ex: livestock access, manure in waterbody, waste discharge pipes):
,r%"�l �l.tJ7'3
Waterbody is:
(check one) ❑ Natural Artifleial, man-made O Manipulated
Waterbody Quality':
check one) High ❑ Moderate Low
Form It— ov.>>rzo l3

Waterbody ID:
Oro L) C 'T
High Quality. Natural, natural bank vegetation around entire waterbody; banks stable and protected by roots; water color is clear to tea -colored; no
barriers to fish movement; many fish cover types available; diverse and stable aquatic habitat; no disturbance by livestock or man.
Moderate Quality. Altered by rip -rap; natural vegetation extends 1/3-1/2 of the active channel width on each side; filtering function or bank vegetation
only moderately compromised; banks moderately unstable; water color is cloudy, submerged objects covered with greenish film; moderate odor; minor
barriers to fish movement; fair aquatic habitat; minimum disturbance by livestock or man.
Low Quality. Rip rap and channelization excessive; natural vegetation less than 1/3 of the active channel width on each side; lack of regeneration;
filtering function severely compromised; banks unstable (eroding); water color is muddy and turbid; obvious pollutants (algal mats, surface scum,
surface sheen); heavy odor; severe barriers to fish movement; little to no aquatic habitat; severe disturbance from livestock or man.
Notes:
irrigation pond excavated in high ground
Waterbody sketch (Include north arrow, centerline distance from centerline, data point locations, survey boundary, and IDs of associated features)
k �
fff111
0o
7
t
l
tt
t
l
i
z:
I
E
i
I! E
t
E(
I

oroh001
Open water data point oroh001 facing north
Az,
Open water data point oroh001 facing east

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Atlantic Coast Pipeline City/County: Northampton Sampling Date: 3/2412015
Applicant/Owner: Dominion State: NC Sampling Point:wnrb102f w
Investigator(s): TP. AS Section, Township, Range: No PLSS in this area
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) drainageway Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%):2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 36.53481498 Long.-77.33566785 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name: Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PFO/SS1A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
PFO wetland located in a drainage way. Dominated by cherry bark oak, sweet -gum, river birch, and red maple. Depicted on NWI maps
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouire�
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aooly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (All)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
✓ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓ Saturation (A3)
✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): 8 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:,,,n,b 102f_w
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% QQYQL
Species? Status
NwulJei of Uominanl Species
1 • Acer rubrum
20
Yes
_
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
q
(A)
2 Betula nigra
15
Yes
FACW
3 Quercus pagoda
10
No
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
4
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
q Liquidambar styraciflua
10
No
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
5'
-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
100
(A/B)
—
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
55
= Total Cover
Total ° Cover f _ Multiply
by:
50% of total cover:
27.5 20% of
total cover:
I I
OBL species 0 x 1 =
0
Sanlina1$hrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 45 x 2 =
90
1 Acer rubrum
15
Yes
FAC
FAC species 45 x 3 =
135
2.
FACU species 0 x 4 =
0
3,
UPL species 0 x 5 =
0
4,
Column Totals: 90 (A)
225
(B)
7
Herb Sti4lum (Plot size.
1 Arundinaria gigantea
2.
3.
4.
7
1c
11
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7•5 20% of total cover: 3
5 )
50% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: _ 30 )
1-
2.
4
50% of total cover: 0
20 Yes FACW
Prevalence Index = B/A - z•o
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
✓ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
- — be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 It (1
m) tall.
20 Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
= Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall.
20% of total cover: 4
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
-height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
0 = Total Cover Present? Yes ✓ No
20% of total cover: 0
Kemarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:wnrbl02f w
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Marx Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist} % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-12 10 YR 3/2 96 10 YR 4/6 4 C PL SCL
`Type: C=Conce ntration_D=_Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol(Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
✓ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes '/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Photo 1
Wetland data point wnrb102f w facing north
Photo 2
Wetland data point wnrb102f w facing west

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
P"J"VSlte: , A GF CItyiCounty- ND0 Sampling Fate : 6 11 3
wn Applfcant)Oer: 1>1) D r-N _ State' r) tf Sampting Point: W r W O L e �0
investigalor(s) rs r _ �- U 1 190,n On Section, Tovmship. Range. n on e—
Landform (hillsfope, terrace, etc.) tl . i' Local relief (concave, convex, none): n o rs C - Slope (%) u 3 1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L Lat. -7, 5 3 kD Q Long — `7-1 , Z Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NV I classification: E
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _L` No (If no, explain In Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil— r Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are'Piormal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soll -/ . or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks,)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ l No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Na within a Welland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ��_' No
Remalka
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secoadant In I r r m f r egUiredi
Primary n i r m of ne;%
ranull-C4- check all 1W acolylSurface
Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (At)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
WalerMarks (81)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
rift Deposits (B3)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Sails (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
II Geomorphic Position (D2)
--I Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
0
I
12 Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain In Remarks)
Q§Pallow Aqultard (03)
u Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(B7)
AC -Neutral Test (DS)
[IWater-Stained Leaves (Bg)
Sphagnum moss (08) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations —
Yes
No / Depth (Inches): I�
Surface Water Present?
WaterTable Present? Yes
No 117*�]epth Qnches): �1 L
No
Saturation Present? Yes
►/ D
No epth (inches): �
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes—
includes ca plila a rrin e
Describe Recorded Dala (stream gauge, monitoring well, aertai photos, previous inspections), If available:
Remarks: Co4id nu} aurae
below t� �ckc5 due 40 lop below svr �Kc­r
US Amry Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region— Version 2,0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 304 Y,i7 ) %Cover ,Species? Status
1 "0 niL
2
3 _
4
5
6
7
6
anl1rrg?
�hn lh Slratnnl
50% of total cover,
(Plot size. �3 CR X urr7
O = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
2.
3.
4.
5,
6.
7_
e.
50% of total cover:
ft rb5tMtum (Plot size: U4 X-3U4 )
I. rC,
O -Total Cover
20% of total cover:
v _ 56�
2.
f
�L
3.
4.
5.
Eu L7t{ +rw
['r�(fx
Fh U.S
- u ryN 4:e1 is-rv.
Sr5
{ �? — ���}L__i_1�
_ru _
6.
7.
8.
g.
10
11.
12.
Waodv
1.
Vine Stratum
VA VNI.
Total Cover
50% of total cover. 20% of total cover. _LS
(Plot size: saf4 x 666 f)
2.
3.
4
Sampling Point: 'A ►1 di 4 021,1
Dominance Test workshent:
Number of Dominant Species
7
That Are OBL, FAM. or FAG:
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(A'B)
Prevalence Index workshent:
Talal % Cover of!
Multiply by:
OBL specles
x 1 = .___._.r_.
FACW species
x 2 a
FAC species
x 3 a
FACU species
x 4 -
UPL species
x5,
Column TolaW
(A) (8)
Prevalence Index = BlA a
Hydrophytta Vegetation Indicators:
�epid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test Is ;-50°h
a 3 - Prevalence Index Is s3 0'
L1 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
❑ofnitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
True — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DSH), regardless of
height.
SaplingiShrub —Woody planls, excluding vines, less
than 3 rn ❑BH and grealer Man 3.28 R (1 m) tall.
Herb —Ali herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 R tail.
Woody vine —AII woody vines greater than 3.28 It In
height.
5 Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover. I Present?
Remar
hological adaptations
Yes.;/ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2,0

SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Oescrlption: (Describe to the depth noodod to document the Indicator or confirm tho absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Rerlox fEaluS
°
tinchesl Coterjrr igi� Color I re
% Tv-: JLOCI
b �a 2•S`I � z �D "1, 5 � �� � �_ 1�I
Texture Remarks
CL
'Type. C=ConcentraTic n, D-De pletion. R&t=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Gralns.
kocallon: PL=Pare Unin 1. M-NaIex.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis':
Hydric Sall Indicators: (Appllcalrlo to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
�]
Hislosol (At)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR s, T. U)
❑
1 cm Muck (Ag) (LRR 0)
HHistic
Epipedon (A2)
a
Thin Dark Surface (Sg) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vedic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,8)
Black Hlstic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fig) (LRR P, S, T)
StraUSed Layers (A5)
-6Qp1eleJ Matrix (F3)
J Anomalous Bright Loamy Sails (F20)
(MLRA 1538)
Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (FB)
®5
cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P. T. U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Depressions
Red Parent Material (rF2)
D Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (Ag) (LRR P, T)
❑
Redox (FB)
Marl (FiO) (LRR U)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑
Depleted Ochdc (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR O, P. T)
'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and
Prairie Redox (A1B) (MLRA 150A)
❑
Umbdc Surface (F13) (LRR P. T. U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
eCoast
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1I ILRR O S)
❑
Delta Ochrlc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (FIB) (MLRA 150A,1509)
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Sells (Fig) (MLRA 149A)
Strlpped Matrix (S8) Anomalous Bright Loamy Sails (1720) (MLRA 149A,153C,153D)
❑ Dark_Surface (87) (LRR P, S, T, Li)
Restrictivo Layer (if observod):
Type: -- —
Depth Qnchea):
I?ernarks.
G ri ?_
(SU
Hydric Sell Present? Yea ZMa
li-L �% +0 bs'dow
�J
Grp r� b I d Ala. r
U5 Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region— Version 2.0

Environmental Field Surveys
Wetland Photo Page
Wetland data point wnrb102e w facing northwest.
Wetland data point wnrbl02e w facing southeast.
Photo Sheet I of 1

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Atlantic Coast Pipeline City/County: Northampton Sampling Date: 3/24/2015
Applicant/Owner: Dominion State: NC Sampling Point:wnTbl02—u
Investigator(s): TP, AS Section, Township, Range: No PLSS in this area
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hill slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%):3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 36.53497309 Long:-77.33551342 Datum: WGS 1984
Soil Map Unit Name: Wehadkee loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: None
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary
Indicators (minimum of two rNuirgd)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
check all that anplV)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
No hydrology present.
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
30
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Pent si7P )
° v r
Soccica4 [atus
1 Quercus nigra
15
Yes FAC
2 Quercus falcata
10
Yes FACIJ
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Yes FAC
4 Quercus alba
10
Yes FACU
Sampling Point: wnrb102 u
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 42A5714285 (A/B'
7,
rrevatence Index worksheet:
45 = Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply bw
50% of total cover:
22.5 20% of total cover: 9
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
lin )Shr b Straty (Plot size:_ 15
1
FACW species 0 x 2= 0
1 Ilex opaca
10 Yes FACU
FAC species 30 x 3 = 90
2 Vaccinium stamineum
5 Yes FACU
FACU species 35 x 4 = 140
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 65 (A) 230 (B)
5.
6,
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.53
7.
-
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
s.
— 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
15
— 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
50% of total cover:
= Total Cover
7.5 20% of total cover: 3
Morphological
— 4 - p ological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Her Slra m (Plot size: L )
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
1
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2-
3-
4-
5.
T
8,
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 0
Woody Vine Siraturn (Plot size: 30 I
I. Vitis rotundifolia
4.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall-
0 Herb-AII herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
= Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20% of total cover: 0
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
5 Yes FAC height,
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
5 = Total Cover Present?
50% of total cover. 2•5 20% of total cover: 1
rks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Yes No '/
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:wnrb102_u
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color f moist] % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10 YR 3/2 100 SL
4-14 10 YR 4/4 100
SL
C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced [sat{ix. MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric
Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project Site: Atlantic Coast Pipeline City/County: Northampton
Samp. Date: 6/9/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: NC
Sampling Point: WNRW001s W
Investigator(s): C. Robertson and A. Weaver Section, Township, Range:
N/A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Concave Slope 0 to 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLR P / MLRA 133A Lat: 36.540761 Long:
-77.3244109 Datum: WGS-84
Soil Map Unit: Tomotley fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
NWI Map Unit: PFO/EM1C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No
Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sample point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? YES
Hydric Soil Present? YES
Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? YES
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Remarks: All parameters are met. Area is classified as a palustrine scrub -shrub (PSS) wetland.
Observation point located in wetland "WNRW001s".
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
X High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (Bl) X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test IDS)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
X Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? NO Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? YES Depth (inches): 6
Wetland Hydrology Present? YES
Saturation Present? YES Depth (inches): 6
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
N/A
Remarks:
At least one primary or two secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is met.
SOIL
Profile Description: Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 3 2 90 7.5YR 5 6 10 C M
loamy sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al) Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (AS) Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies AS) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7) Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
lcm Muck (AS) Redox Depressions (F8)
' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Umbric Surface (F13)
problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
X Sandy Redox (S5) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Hydric Soil Present? YES
Depth (inches): N/A
Remarks: Indicator SS (Sandy Redox) present and soil meets NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WNRW0015_W
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
Absolute
% Cover
Dom. Indicator
Sp? Status*
Dominance Test Worksheet:
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 3 (A)
# Dominants across all strata: 4 (B)
% Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 75% (A/B)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total %Cover of: Multiply By:
OBL x 1=
FACN x 2 =
FAC x 3 =
FACU x 4 =
UPL x5=
Sum: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1. Lespedeza bicolor
38
= Total Cover
X UPL
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
X Dominance Test is> 50%
_ Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
Rapid Testfor Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
2. Pinus taeda 15 X FAC
3. Acer rubrum 3 FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 2DFt (6m) or more in height
and 3in (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 2DFt(6m) or more in
height and less than 3in(7.6cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 2DFt (1 to 6m) in
height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of
size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3ft (1m) in
height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
56 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' radius )
1. Juncus effusus 38 X OBL
2. Juncus marginatus 38 X FACW
3. Dichanthelium dichotomum 15 FAC
4. Juncus tenuis 3 FAC
5. Lespedeza cuneata 3 FACU
6. Rumex crispus 3 FAC
7. Eragrostis pilosa 3 FACU
8.
9
10.
11.
12
103 =Total Cover
Woody Vines (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? YES
5.
= Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Indicator 2 (Dominance Test) present with >50% of dominant species across all vegetation strata FAC or wetter.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

Wetland Data Point Photographs
W N RW001s_W
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
June 2018, Page 1 of 2
4im
Photograph 1: WNRW001s_W, West
Photograph 2: WNRW001s_W, North

Wetland Data Point Photographs
W N RW001s_W
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
June 2018, Page 2 of 2
Photograph 3: WNRW001s_W, East
Photograph 4: WNRW001s_W, South

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project Site: Atlantic Coast Pipeline City/County: Northampton
Samp. Date: 6/9/2018
Applicant/Owner: Dominion Energy State: NC
Sampling Point: WNRW001s U
Investigator(s): C. Robertson and A. Weaver Section, Township, Range:
N/A
La ndform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Convex Slope 3 to 5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LLR P / MLRA 133A Lat: 36.541198 Long:
-77.3242966 Datum: WGS-84
Soil Map Unit: Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
NWI Map Unit: PFO/EM1C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No
Normal Circumstances? Yes
Are Vegetation, Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sample point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? NO
Hydric Soil Present? NO
Is This Sample Area Within a Wetland? NO
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Remarks: One or more parameters lacking. Area is not a wetland.
Observation point located in upland between wetland "WNRWOOls" and open
water "ONRW001".
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (Bl) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial (137)
FAC-Neutral Test IDS)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? NO Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? NO Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? NO
Saturation Present? NO Depth (inches):
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
N/A
Remarks: No primary or secondary indicators of wetland hydrology present; parameter is not met.
SOIL
Profile Description: Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(in) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz
Texture Remarks
0-20 10YR 5 8 100
sand
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al) Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (A10)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Red Parent Material (F21)
Stratified Layers (AS) Depleted Matrix (F3)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Organic Bodies AS) Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
5cm Mucky Mineral (A7) Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
lcm Muck (A9) Redox Depressions (F8)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12)
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Umbric Surface (F13)
problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Sandy Redox (S5) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Hydric Soil Present? NO
Depth (inches): N/A
Remarks: No hydric soil indicators present and soil does not meet NTCHS definition of hydric soil; parameter is not met.
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WNRW0015_u
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
Absolute
% Cover
Dom. Indicator
Sp? Status*
Dominance Test Worksheet:
# Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 1 (A)
# Dominants across all strata: 4 (B)
% Dominants OBL, FACW, FAC: 25% (A/B)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total %Cover of: Multiply By:
OBL x 1=
FACN x 2 =
FAC 44 x 3 = 132
FACU 30 x 4 = 120
UPL 15 x5= 75
Sum: 89 (A) 327 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.67
= Total Cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' radius )
1.
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Dominance Test is> 50%
Prevalence Index is <= 3.0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (explain)
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Morphological Adaptations
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 2DFt (6m) or more in height
and 3in (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 2DFt(6m) or more in
height and less than 3in(7.6cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 2DFt (1 to 6m) in
height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of
size. Includes woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3ft (1m) in
height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 10' radius )
1. Andropogon virginicus 38 X FAC
2. Pseudognaphalium obtusifolium 15 X UPL
3. Eragrostis pilosa 15 X FACU
4. Eupatorium capillifolium 15 X FACU
5. Dichanthelium dichotomum 3 FAC
6. Rumex crispus 3 FAC
7.
8.
9
10.
11.
12
89 =Total Cover
Woody Vines (Plot size: 30' radius )
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? NO
5.
= Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
No hydrophytic vegetation indicators present; parameter is not met.
* Indicator status utilizes 2016 NWPL
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
(Adapted By: Douglas A. De Berry, PhD, PWS, PWD)

Wetland Data Point Photographs
WNRW001s_U
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
June 2018, Page 1 of 2
Photograph 1: WNRW001s_U, West
Photograph 2: WNRW001s_U, East

Wetland Data Point Photographs
WNRW001s_U
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
June 2018, Page 2 of 2
Photograph 3: WNRW001s_U, North
Photograph 4: WNRW001s_U, South

Open Waterbodv Data Sheet
Survey Description
Project Name:
Waterbody Name:
Waterbody ID:
Date:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline
N/A
ONRWO01
06/09/2018
State:
County:
Company.
Crew Member Initials:
Photos:
NC
Northampton
VHB
DCR & ARW
4
Tract Number(s):
Nearest Milepost:
Associated Wetland ID(s):
16-089.AR, 16-089, 16-090, 16-090.AR
11.00
N/A
Survey Type:
(check one) OCenterline ❑Re -Route ❑Access Road ❑Other:
Physical Attributes
Waterbody Type:
(check one) ❑Stock Pond ❑ Natural Pond IN Lake ❑ Reservoir ❑ Impoundment ❑ Oxbow ❑ Other:
Hydrologic Regime:
® Permanently Flooded ❑ Semipermanently Flooded ❑ Seasonally Flooded ❑ Temporarily Flooded
OHWM
OHWM Indicator:
(check
all that apply) El Clear line ❑Shelving ❑Wrested ❑Scouring ❑Water
Height:
on bank vegetation staining
NA ft.
❑Bent, matted, or missing ❑Wrack El Litter and ❑Abrupt plant ❑Soil characteristic change
vegetation line debris community change
Depth of Water:
Bank height (average):
Bank slope (average):
>10 ft.
N/A ft.
N/A degrees
N/A ❑
Qualitative Attributes
Water Appearance:
(check one) El No water ®Clear ❑Turbid ❑Sheen ❑Surface ❑Algal ❑Other:
on surface scum mats
Substrate: ❑ Bedrock ❑ Boulder ❑ Cobble ❑ Gravel ® Sand ❑ Silt/ clay ❑ Organic ❑ Other:
(check all that apply)
% of Substrate: % % % 100 % %
Width of Riparian Zone:
Vegetative Layers:
0
(check all that apply) El Trees: ElSaplings/Shrubs: ElHerbs
ft.
Avg. DBH of Dominants: in. in. in.
N/A ❑
(approx.)
Dominant Bank Vegetation (list):
Lespedeza cuneata, Paspalum spp., turf grasses (Dactylon cynodon, etc.)
Aquatic Habitats (ex: submerged or emerged aquatic vegetation, overhanging bankstroots, leaf packs, large submerged wood, riffles, deep pools, etc.):
N/A
Aquatic Organisms Observed (list):
Fish, Leopard Frog
T&E Species Observed (list):
N/A
Disturbances (ex: livestock access, manure in waterbody, waste discharge pipes):
N/A
Waterbody is:
(check one) ❑ Natural ❑ Artificial, man-made ® Manipulated
Waterbody Quality a:
(check one) ❑ High IR Moderate ❑ Low
Form Rev. 04/30/2013

Waterbody ID:
ONRW001
a High Quality: Natural, natural bank vegetation around entire waterbody; banks stable and protected by roots; water color is clear to tea -colored; no
barriers to fish movement; many fish cover types available; diverse and stable aquatic habitat; no disturbance by livestock or man.
Moderate Quality: Altered by rip -rap; natural vegetation extends 1/3-1/2 of the active channel width on each side; filtering function or bank vegetation
only moderately compromised; banks moderately unstable; water color is cloudy, submerged objects covered with greenish film; moderate odor; minor
barriers to fish movement; fair aquatic habitat; minimum disturbance by livestock or man.
Low Quality: Rip rap and channelization excessive; natural vegetation less than 1/3 of the active channel width on each side; lack of regeneration;
filtering function severely compromised; banks unstable (eroding); water color is muddy and turbid; obvious pollutants (algal mats, surface scum,
surface sheen); heavy odor; severe barriers to fish movement; little to no aquatic habitat; severe disturbance from livestock or man.
Notes:
Manipulated lake, clearly exacavated
Waterbody Sketch (Include north arrow, centerline distance from centerline, data point locations, survey boundary, and IDs of associated features)
D NowoG
VIW
su
ZA
•t,F
i r{2v
Form Rev. 04/30/2013

Open Waterbody Point Photographs
ONRWO01
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
June 2018, Page 1 of 2
Photograph 1: ONRW001, West
Photograph 2: ONRW001, East

Open Waterbody Point Photographs
ONRWO01
Atlantic Coast Pipeline Wetland Delineation
June 2018, Page 2 of 2
Photograph 3: ONRW001, North
Photograph 4: ONRW001, South

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: City/County: C R eA-1S t Sampling Date:
A licant/Owner: _� �'1_ _
Applicant/Owner: � -- � �t F - State., Vi Sampling Point: V1111' 0 N
Investigator(s): es C Zo i9 _,e T 1r n o 6 �) Section, Township, Range: for l J
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): x i r o Local relief (concave, convex, none): _l.n 0(_ IV9,� Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: R tom. t Long: `7a _ Datum: v �
t
Soil Map Unit Name; Ea(i..n kS Ict.rv-1, 0-Z'L i Q P `r'isr NWlclassifcation:
Are climatic f hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this I! me of year? Yes Na (If no, explain in Remarks.) `
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling Point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland
Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouireM
❑, Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑1 SS arsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Primary
Indicators (min€mum of one is reou€red: check all that apply)
urface Water (At) t❑- Aquatic Fauna (1313)
L�
Hi Water Table (A2)
ration (A3)
1L--1f Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
II Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
LSE' Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑. Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
(1316)
Q Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
II_II
Sediment Deposits (B2)
1t--JI
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Q Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_
Drift Deposits (133)
1L—J�
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ SfrallowAquitard (D3)
2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
E�rFAC-Neutral Test (D5)
later-Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
/
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes —7 No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
✓ No Depth ('inches): ,,ur -A
Wettand Hydrology
Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:)a�jq' W 'w
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: t � )
1. T&AU 1) C
_% Cover_
2-0
_Species? Status
� 06
Number of Dominant Species
-M(V o m
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _ (A)
2,
3. k M
1
Total Number of Dominant
C'
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4 i 3 Z
1
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
�
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A16)
6.
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: k
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ,k�`� �" )
FAC species x 3 =
1 t
0
FACU species x 4=
2
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4'
Prevalence Index = BIA=
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6'
II jtapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7'Lld
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
1: 3 -Prevalence Index is 53.0'
10
=Total Cover
Q Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'
50% of total cover:
5 20% of total cover: Z—
(Explain)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
'Indicators
C&rol�!A
_
of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. ,x. / l
Jr-
— +r
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
—
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.13 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5,
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine —All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11,
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total co
Zd 5— 20% of total cove r:
Woody
{{��ver:
Vine, Stratum (Plot size: )t o°l* )
I.
Y"ti A
2.
3.
4.
5'
Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
50% of total cover.
5 20% of total cover: Z
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point'
- _ i
............................
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth _ Matrix
Redox Features
_(inches)� _ Color (moist) °1°
Color ( moist) _ % Tie Lnc
Texture Remarks
to
-'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all
LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
T❑
D 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
11
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
epleted Matrix (F3)
TD
u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
T❑
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
nIJ
1:3 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑�-Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_]
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
E] Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
II
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
�]
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
II
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
%
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

Environmental Field Surveys
Wetland Photo Page
��. . ��, � ►.ram r ry r.
Wetland data point wgrp001f w facing east.
Photo Sheet I of 2

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: A41Y __ City/County: A-la1 i
�� / Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: oyn I, n 1 n State: t1_ Sampling Point: °ff�r.
Investigator(s): ,, T {f It Section, Township, Range: , . 6-�ct' , _
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 6 V�ntfl rk,. , Qs _ Local relief (concave, convex, none): L 0 n Slope (%}:
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: t . _(NRI Long:_'l 0 -7 � � � Datum:W. "i
i'
Soil Map Unit Name: ��o- �� Jz t r a NWI classification:
} Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? YUes Vol No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetal€on Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophyt€c Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ Na Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Boil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicatorsof one €s reawired
m check all that apply)
❑Surfa
eWater((Al)(A1)❑: ,_,
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
17
High Water Table (A2)
1--f
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
TL—tt
LJ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C11)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
II Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (32)
T❑T
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
r❑
Ll
Drift Deposits (133)
Tl_lr
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
LJ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
El
Iron Deposits (B5)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquilard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (89)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No ✓ Depth (inches): ,
✓
Water Table Present? Yes
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
No Depth (inches): >Z0
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No I
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Soecies? Status
2.
3. -1-J:E iC M (M
ELL
4. .__ram i t lie Lty%i (x 61
L
5.
6.
7.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2:7x
3 20% of total cover:
Saplli�igng/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ]SA- X3 Gf-)
I.
ear
2. CCkA kM_1S c c rn�1YAt-&06�
Liz
rt{-�
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: -1 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: K )
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Pint size::c {3 )
4�4
2.
3.
4,
5' Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: a 20% of total cover: Present?
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: �_ (B)
Percent of Dominant Species t
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ! O-D (A1B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
013L species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators:
13 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
�J. 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Q 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3,28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb- Ail herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Yes !� No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
Description: (Describe to the depth
Sampling PointNA
or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
inches Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Lo_c Texture Remarks
0 -
�e !q1
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
U Histosol(Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
HStratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
H5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
El 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
[� Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Palyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
LJ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
U 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Tj Reduced Verlic (F'18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
-t❑--� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
LJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)❑-I
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
I Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
1:3 Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No V
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Environmental Field Surveys
Wetland Photo Page
•�,•� .r- •1 1
� • + ° . m : 4 ` 1. � �E ` �+
i r \t4. If
aw
Av
Upland data point wgrp001_u facing west.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2