20230490 Ver 1_permit attachments_20230330

SITE DATA TABLE
GENERAL INFORMATION
NAME OF PROJECT
AMELIA CHURCH -A TRIBUTE COMMUNITY
PARCEL ID NUMBER
165803-04-8891
PROPERTY SIZE
19.835 AC (864,012.6 SF)
PROPERTY LOCATION
CLAYTON TOWN LIMITS
ZONING
ZONING
OFFICE -INSTITUTIONAL (O-I) WITH SUP
EXISTING USE
FARMLAND, VACANT
PROPOSED USE
MULTIFAMILY APARTMENTS
DENSITY / BUILDINGS
ALLOWED DENSITY
12 UNITS/AC
PROPOSED DENSITY
9.9 UNITS/ACRE
PROPOSED DWELLING UNITS
49 BUILDINGS, 196 UNITS
BUILDING HEIGHT (35' MAX)
2 STORIES
BUILDING COVERAGE
20.7%
PERVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS
PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA
9.135 AC (397,920.6 SF) 47%
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA
10.7 AC (466,074 SF) 53%
SIDEWALK SHALL TIE IN
TO EXISTING SIDEWALK �n
TO NORTH
m
PROP. PUMP
STATION PAD m
APPROX. LOCATION OF
CAR WASH STATION
PROP. MAINTENANCE BLDG
,
10WO' SIGHT
DISTANCE TRIANGLE
O
N
PROP. CONNECTION TO
ADJOINING PARKING LOT
CONNECTION TO BE AT
TRIBUTE'S CQU
ACCE
PROP. ROW
STREET LIGHTS TO BE�
INSTALLED ALONG FRONTAGE
MONUMENT
FIBER OPT/
MARKER
PARKING
49 BLDGS X 4 UNITS/BLDG =196
REQUIRED RESIDENTIAL PARKING (2/UNIT)
196 X 2 = 392 SPACES
196/ 4 = 49 VISITOR SPACES
441 SPACES
TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING
441 SPACES
PROPOSED PARKING
472 PROPOSED SPACES
PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE
20 SPACES
REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING
1 RACK PER BUILDING
1 X 49 = 49 BIKE RACKS
PROPOSED BICYCLE PARKING
51 PROPOSED BIKE RACKS
NIF
IPP CX. LOCATION AMELIA STATION LLC
OF PpLIC SAN PIN: 1658-01-05-5425
OPEN SPACE
REQUIRED OPEN SPACE
12.5% OF SITE AREA / 2.47 AC
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AREAS
STREAM BUFFER RCA (EXCLUDES WETLANDS): 35,055 SF
WETLAND RCA: 21,952 SF
STREAM LENGTH RCA( EXCLUDES WETLANDS): 326 LF
TOTAL EXISTING RCA: 57,007 SF
RCA IMPACTS AT ROAD CROSSING:
STREAM BUFFER IMPACT: 21,563 SF
WETLAND IMPACT: 0 SF
STREAM IMPACT: 194 LF
TOTAL IMPACTED RCA: 21,563 SF
TOTAL RCA REMAINING: 35,444 SF (0.8 AC) STREAM BUFFER & WETLANDS
132 LF STREAM
UTILITY PROVIDERS
ELECTRIC
DUKE ENERGY
WATER
CLAYTON
GI AYTQN
� d0
�Ns
/60 0
RCA NOTES w - �9 N
1. RESOURCE CONSERVATION ARES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY HOA. /� TypF 4
2. NO RCA SHALL BE COUNTED TOWARD OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS. o Iq 5'6 0 26J
3. STREAM BUFFER CALCULATION EXCLUDE WETLAND AREAS. \F �o�� NDSCgp 5'7,
RICK AN PAMELA SLACKMO V ���
/N 658-01-15-2148 % / 289 758
\F B 5174, PG 497
RICHARD AND ARIA COLLAZO PS, 39 PG 527
PIN 658- 7-75-0297 WETLAND RCA 10'x70' SIGHT
B 29 8, P 47 �/ 6,990 SF u
� �� / DISTANCE TRIANGLE
HARRY AND KA HY SIESE T �
PIN 1658-OL-05-8 96 0� 2
\ \�
OB 2357 PG 78 b
NOTES
1. HOA SHALL BE CREATED FOR THIS COMMUNITY.
2. HOA SHALL OWN AND MAINTAIN OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS.
3. STREETS SHALL BE PRIVATE.
4. ALL UNITS SHALL BE MULTI -FAMILY RENTALS.
5. ALL UTILITIES PRIVATE.
6. A MINIMUM OF 5 BENCHES AND 5 WASTE/DOGWASTE RECEPTACLES
SHALL BE PLACED THROUGHOUT THE SITE. ACTUAL LOCATION TO BE
DETERMINED WITH CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS.
UTILITY NOTES
1. THE SITE WILL BE SERVED WITH A MASTER METER. EACH UNIT WILL
HAVE A PRIVATE METER THAT WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE
COMMUNITY HOA. THE MASTER METER SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE
SHORT JOHNSON ROAD ENTRANCE AS SHOWN ON SHEET C-502.
L)
J
J
W L)
Z
Z
W
W
Z
3
C W
W
J
0
moo
PS 67, PG 7 4 ZN 2 / SB
��m / +�
I
/ S7REAM
/ \ SB \
v / / // --topIF
BfWK 0/�
.VFW R/ VANHOI F DS 4093, PG 240 —L—, l l \ / S
y
APPROX. LOCATION STREAM BUFFER RCA o�
END OF P RKlN6 LOT \ �P / / / PROP. BMP I I v 35,055 SF j�
- ADDED &PARX1
J , / I I
O G 1Ro t
PROP. CONSTRUCTION S
OP. TRASH COMPACTOR EASEMENT
WOODEN FENCE 1RF — 87058�24°E 1227.42' --15' TYPE B LANDSCAPE BUFFER— = — — J \ \ / I
RRI 10' TY E B LANDSCAPE BUFFER /P 10' SE BA / cY0
0.06' r — — — — r PROP. COMM OPEN SPACE — — — —
r-----
c P I c P I c II a I b a I b I I a I b a I b a I b a I b a I b II I I III
I I c P � P I I I 1 _ __ �_ II I I b I I I I
P l c P — —— I— $ �— —� e 1 � —� c �i— I ® 1 --- �� �� d tl c� d II a30 b a
y q e q I e q 1 e q 1 1 1 c I tl I I p I c34 I c I d I I I II I I d 1 I c I d II I
q 1 e q 1 e
11 c 1 tl I 1 I I 1j 0
00
--- — —— — — — — — — -- — — —— —
—- — —— — — — — — — — — — — —
MT 7
a I b a I b I I \1I I I I m� F a II
PR P. ADA M I — _ I \ O N F
c I I �\\ I o 7RA vas PARRisH
I� PIN 1658-03-24-5257 7 I - OR 2998, PG 915
PF
C
L R
1P TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
DEAD END
SIGN
-----
---- r------ 1
— ------------1 Ilm
I I l c P I cLa I b a I b I I -- I IIo
I P I c P P // \ 1 — 3� I I a l b a l b a I b a i b i III
e q I e //� \ b \ I c� c I d 1 I —
I I e q e q I // \ 2� / \ I I I I I c d c d c d I I
q I I \ / a c I d II
I BIKE RACK (TYP) 1
CO MO I I� \ c \ /�----- _-- ---,J I 1 Iw
LL
Io
1 P 1 ° P P �0 21-
1 i q I e 4 f
q I e q e
I q e I I
LL—
�I a l OPEN SPACE I 1 1 1 I CO
/�
I — I /-1 I \ c \ / /�� ) I --- I I a 1 b a 1 b a I b a� I b i I co 3' METAL AND
I L \ / I I I _ — still ¢ WIRE FENCE
I c I d I \ // /\ 1 1 1
II
c tl c tl c I tl c I tl I I 1LU
10
------ ---- — — — — — — — — — — — — — I_— \ j \ w w I I I -- — — —— — ---- ------— — — — — —- I
r �PROP. GRILLING AREA / w w y w y w w i — — I F1
Ll
i R1 I
(r Lr PROP. BMPWETLAND RCA' 1
—-- ------I
R PROP.POOL y 10,J28 SF L — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
I I Ic I
I I _
P �2` p4K[ P P 47 -26 I
q I 1 e q e q I e
e q e
I
PROP. RETAINING WALL I I
PROP. BOARDWALKS l — — — — — — — — — —
q I WETLAND RCA — — — — — — — — — TYPE-B-LANDSCAP�_
BUFF€ 10' TYPE B LANDSCAPE BUFFER AXEL
PROP. C M N PEN SP E I - w �= __4.6.34 SF — — — _ I FOUND
_ — — 15' TYPE B LANDSCAPE BUFFER — — — — — j0' SIDE SETBACK y y y y y y y
10' TYPE B LANDSCAPE BUFFER 587�54�25��W 1434.83�
10,2 PROP. PICKLEBALL COURTS
0.26' PROP. RETAINING WALL SB SB S I SB S S Sal w I I w w I I w I I w w I I w I
SB SB K/MB Y RSON y y y y SB I I I I I y
50' SNEAM BU SB B PIN, 658-D - 93-1 9 w . . w . . . w . . w . . . w y
Sg 0B 60 , PG 3 y y y y y 'SB SB SB SB S
\F
ERWIN AND FLORENCE HOC(ADAY SB
PIN 1658-03-04-4457 SB S
08776, PC497 S8 - -- -- - ---
EXISTING STREAM y y y y y_ _ _ y
S 8S 8S 8S 8S 8 8S 8S
8S
� 8S B
S 9S
9S 8S 8S S 80 8S 9S
8S
BIKE RACK
CONCRETE
PAD
TYPICAL BIKE RACK
DIMENSIONS
SCALE: 1 "=10'
60 30 15 0 60
1 "= 60'
0
Z_
W
W W U)
Z 0� W
C� z5zWv
W C�2 C)a
Ur Z W W w 5 W
F W Q 2 W z
_J>zUW wo
(n Q Q Z_ Q
O0 0—~
UzU~mod
J U)
Q �ou)o z
U
W
U
REVISIONS
REV
DATE
COMMENT
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
1
11/18/2021
TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMENT RESPONSE
HT
KM
01/05/2022
TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMENT RESPONSE
HT
KM
�3
01/25/2022
TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMENT RESPONSE
HT
KM
4
4
02/23/2022
TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMENT RESPONSE
HT
KM
08/23/2022
PER MEETING WITH
TOWN.
KM
KM
Know what's below.
Call before you dig.
ALWAYS CALL 811
It's fast. It's free. It's the law.
FOR CONCEPT
PURPOSES ONLY
THIS DRAWING IS INTENDED FOR MUNICIPAL AND/OR AGENCY
REVIEW AND APPROVAL. IT IS NOT INTENDED AS A CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENT UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE.
PROJECT No.: NCR201084
DRAWN BY: GK, HT
CHECKED BY: GK, KM
DATE: 01 /06/2022
CAD I.D.: SITE-0
PROJECT:
SPECIAL USE
PERMIT
DOCUMENTS
FOR
TRIBUTE
COMMUNITIES
AMELIA CHURCH -
A TRIBUTE COMMUNITY
AMELIA CHURCH RD.
CLAYTON, NC 27520
JOHNSTON COUNTY
BOHLER#
BOHLER ENGINEERING NC, PLLC
NCBELS P-1132
4130 PARKLAKE AVENUE, SUITE 130
RALEIGH, NC 27612
Phone: [phone]
NC@)3ohlerEng.com
I,,./ /;.
�''
CAR01
ZO��ko �NDSCgpFq°%
* a NO.1165 a
a��
OVERALL SITE
PLAN
SHEET NUMBER:
C-301
REVISION 5 - 08/23/2022

11Wo S64031'30"E
u .. SITE ewe ;, �O r Fffo 109.10,
_ O'q0 O
0
. Isr
LOCATION MAP \ p
00
- / w
0-3 C4
o
z
N87058'24"E 1227.42' 14
- - - - - - - - a
o_ ---------- .......-. ---------
I
2 YOUNG MEWS CHRISTIAN ASS0�IA TION OF THE
TRIANGLE AREA, INC.
PIN. 1658-03-04-8891 ��
D8 5046, / PC 171
J 864,\29 SF
OR
90
o 'Cr > 19. 8J5 AC
N i
,.------------------ S87054'25"W 1434.83'
Lowe
BOHLER
BOHLER ENGINEERING NC, PLLC
NCBELS P-1132
4130 PARKLAKE AVENUE, SUITE 130
RALEIGH, NC 27612
Phone: [phone]
NC@,BohierEng.com
°39'02"W
. . .
STREAM IMPACT DRAWINGS 03/22/2023 1 DTW I NCR201084 1 Rev. 0
AMELIA CHURCH ROAD - EX. CONDITIONS ,;` 150 75 37.5 0 150
A
TOWN OF CLAYTON I REV. 0 1"=150'

r
SITE
Icy
JLOCATION MAP
TOTAL STREAM BUFFER IMPACTS
IMPACT
NUMBER
IMPACT
SPECIFICATION
ZONE 1 PERMANENT STREAM
BUFFER IMPACTS
ZONE 2 PERMANENT STREAM
BUFFER IMPACTS
(SF)
(AC)
(SF)
(AC)
11,241
0.258
8,385
0.192
TOTAL
11,241
0.258
8,385
0.192
TOTAL STREAM IMPACTS
IMPACT
NUMBER
IMPACT
SPECIFICATION
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS
PERMANENT NO -PERM LOSS
STREAM IMPACTS
(SF)
(AC)
(LF)
(CY)
(SF)
(AC)
(LF)
745
0.017
98
110
450
0.010
67
TOTAL
745
0.017
98
110
450
0.010
67
BOHLER
BOHLER ENGINEERING NC, PLLC
NCBELS P-1132
4130 PARKLAKE AVENUE, SUITE 130
RALEIGH, INC 27612
Phone: [phone]
NC@,BohierEng.com
----- --ram•. —, --rr
�--
a r
0
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS
(CY) (SF) (AC) (LF) (CY)
67 228 0.005 30 34
67 228 0.005 30 34
1� III
Ili
O
s s
4_100b tiso
I I I I I I I I I I
II I
e u
1
y 29 `
I I �
�$e 41 I'
i
�I
�s
STREAM IMPACT DRAWINGS
AMELIA CHURCH ROAD - PROP CONDITIONS
TOWN OF CLAYTON I REV. 0
03/22/2023 1 DTW I NCR201084 1 Rev. 0
150 75 37.5 0 150
1 "=150'

BOHLER
BOHLER ENGINEERING NC, PLLC
NCBELS P-1132
4130 PARKLAKE AVENUE, SUITE 130
RALEIGH, NC 27612
Phone: [phone]
NC@,BohierEng.com
STREAM IMPACT DRAWINGS
AMELIA CHURCH ROAD - CROSSING 1
TOWN OF CLAYTON I REV. 0
03/22/2023 1 DTW I NCR201084 1 Rev. 0
N
40 20 10 0 40
A
1 "= 40'

330
330
BOHLER
BOHLER ENGINEERING NC, PLLC
NCBELS P-1132
4130 PARKLAKE AVENUE, SUITE 130
RALEIGH, NC 27612
Phone: [phone]
NC@,BohierEng.com
ENTERLINE OF PROPOSE
ROADWAY
PROP. HEADWALL
PROP. ENDWALL
STREAM IMPACT DRAWINGS
AMELIA CHURCH ROAD -PROFILES
TOWN OF CLAYTON I REV. 0
03/22/2023 DTW NCR201084 Rev. 0
N
40 20 10 0 40
A
1 "= 40'

IN
91
0,
fir ✓" Q`�� `N. �..�-- , ._��� � �:.1d r� ��� l.� � `�—
R
KI
00
•-, r, ,:,:fir — v �,'� / Meadow'
- Ste,phan��:
0Project Stud Area
�
Location . extent is approximate-
1)Study Area based on Johnston County
Parcel Data. man
i.
Feet
Source 2011 National Geographic
quadrangles (Clayton, NC); Project
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this Nor,
1g— is forinformational purposes only and was
notprepared forand is not suitable for legal or
work ofregulatory agencies orotherthird parties
data or information.
�.
r
ENVIRONMENTAL Project: 70217286
SERVICES, INC. Project Location
A IEMCM COMPANY
Tribute Townhomes Site Date: Dec 2019
www.esin.cc I terracon.com Drwn/Chkd: CW/RT
Johnston County, North Carolina Figure: 1
:cts\2019WL197096\GIS\Maps\Topo.mxd Date: 12/11/20191:27:57 PM

Soil Mapping Units
NoA Norfolk loamy sand, 0-2% slopes N
NoB Norfolk loamy sand, 2-6% slopes Ob
Tin Toisant loam L
WaB Wagram loamy sand, 0-6% slopes Ilk
'r
WY, d
caIR
r T
WAD _
D8 ;-
r
rIo
Ill.' 'R
Project Study Area
Q NRCS Soil Boundaries
Location and extent is approximate-
0 300 600
Feet
Source: NRCS Soil Survey of Johnston County,
1994, Project Study Area based on Johnston
County Parcel Data.
Disclaimer: The information depicted in this file is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for
and is notsuitable forlegal orengineenng purposes.
This information presented is notforregulatory review
and is intended for use only by a Professional Land
Surveyor pnorto regulatory review.
y
I:\Projects\2019WL197096\GIS\Maps\Soils(book).mxd Date: 12/11/20191: 17:21 PM

Flagging Units
SA: 1-22
WA: 1-9
WB: 1-18
WC: 1-16
*SA may be subject to a 50-ft Neuse River Riparian Buffer
c
Project Study Area
® Potential Wetland Waters of the US
Potential Non -Wetland Waters of the US
(Stream)
Location and extent is approximate.
0 150 300
Feet
Note: Vegetation removal or alteration of soils or hydrology after initial site evaluation can
affectjurisdictional status and may require re-evaluation ofwetland boundaries.
Source Latest High Resolution INC Statewide Orthoimagery, INC OneMap
Server, Project Study Area based on Johnston County Parcel Data
Disclaimer The information depicted in this file is for informational purposes only and was not
prepared for and is not suitable for legal orengineering purposes. This information presented
is not for regulatory review and is intended for use only by a Professional Land Surveyor prior
to regulatory review.
y�
r� 1
W&*:;
ENVIRONMENTAL Potential Wetlands and Waters of the US Project: 70217286
SERVICES, INC.
A lferracon COMPANY Tribute Townhomes Site Date: Dec 2019
www.esin.cc l terracon.com Drwn/Chkd: CW/RT
Johnston County, North Carolina Figure: 3
:AProjects\2019WL197096AGIS\Maps\Aerial.mxd Date: 12/11/20191: 14:35 PM

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
March 13, 2023
Melissa McKay, RPA
Terracon
2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107
Raleigh, NC 27604
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
melissa.mckaygterracon.com
Re: Construct Tribute townhomes, Amelia Church Road, Clayton, Johnston County, ER 23-0601
Dear Ms. McKay:
Thank you for your letter of February 23, 2023, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.reviewgncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
(1� )akdL�V
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

ENT OF Tye'
rri O
,A
CH 3 A
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 3/30/23
Self -Certification Letter
Project NamcTribute Community
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
❑"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑ "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑ "may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
❑✓ "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov. If you have any
questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact Leigh Mann of
this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0054506
Project Name: Tribute update
March 10, 2023
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

03/10/2023
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186. php.

03/10/2023
3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

03/10/2023
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

03/10/2023
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2023-0054506
Project Name: Tribute update
Project Type: Clearing Land
Project Description: apartment complex
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/(a)35.630573049999995,-78.49198898020474,14z
� tart--
a;�
0
r eta
Counties: Johnston County, North Carolina

03/10/2023 3
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 8 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
NAME
STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
AMPHIBIANS
NAME
STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
FISHES
NAME
STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528

03/10/2023
4
CLAMS
NAME
STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

03/10/2023
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions Aug 31
(BCRs) in the continental USA
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.

03/10/2023
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla Breeds Mar 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions Jul 15
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
Breeds Mar 15
to Aug 25
Breeds May 10
to Sep 10
Breeds May 10
to Aug 31
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.

03/10/2023 3
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American Kestrel ++++ ++++ ++++��� ���� ���� ++++ +++++++ ++++
BCC -BCR
Bald
Non-BCCe 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1■ milli IN
.••l'i" ++++ 11++ +++++++ ++++
Vulnerable
Nuthatch eaded Ilia mill 11111111 IN 1111111111111111 +11111++ 1111
BCC - BCR
Chimney Swift � I I I I 1 I +*'� ++,"'4"'l""+ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++
(CON)
Red-headed
Woodpecker ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +++++ ++++ ++1+ —+++ ++++
BCC Rangewide MEN mmmm +ii t■��' A
(CON)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++ ++" ........ . ++++ ++++ —+++ ++++
(CON) mom moon d

03/10/2023 4
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
MIGRATORY BIRDS FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and

03/10/2023
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.

03/10/2023 6
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

03/10/2023
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency: Terracon Consultants
Name: Rhiannon Graham
Address: 2401 Brentwood Rd.
Address Line 2: Suite 107
City:
Raleigh
State:
NC
Zip:
27610
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
7607172621

Roy Cooper, Governor
0■0■0 INC DEPARTMENT OF
■■0■o NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
March 10, 2023
Rhiannon Graham
Terracon Inc.
2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107
Raleigh, NC 27603
RE. Tribute update
Dear Rhiannon Graham.
D_ Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-21227
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence, the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here.
httl2s //www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butlerLncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR71MENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
Q 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 918.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Tribute update
March 10, 2023
NCNHDE-21227
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common NameM Last '� Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group 0servation Occurrence Status tatus Rank Rank
i Date = Rank
Dragonfly or 33753 Somatochlora Coppery Emerald 2004-Pre H? 5-Very --- Significantly G3G4 S1?
Damselfly georgiana Low Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on March 10, 2023; source: NCNHP, Q4, Winter (January)
2023. Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-21227: Tribute update
to
d
,oa
GUY Rd
42
y
ati N
N�
Winston Rd
Nv�y
Fort Dr
NC p2
`a,�ey Ln
Od
0
Johnston Health
3
2
c
Clayton
42
ft
oG
�335
�y
�a
US "
°W
v`
a
m
N c'g2N01
�331 ft Leeway C[
o
u
(p
e ^
W+h
0 0.28
0.55 1.1 Miles
S
March 10, 2023
Q Buffered Project Boundary
Q Project Boundary
Sources: Esn, Airbus IDS, USGS, NCA, NASA, CGIAR, N Robinson, NCEAS,
NLS, OS, NMA, Geodatastymisen, Rijkswaterstaat, GSA, Geoland, FEMA,
Imermap and the GIS user community
Sources Esn, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NCAA, USGS, ® OpenStreetMap
contributors, and the CIS User Community
Page 3 of 3

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: USFWS Project Review for the Tribute Communities
Date: 3/29/23 Prepared by Terracon Consultants Inc
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act
Notes / Documentation
Determination
Habitat assessment by Terracon
Neuse River Waterlog
No suitable habitat present
No effect
biologists found no suitable
habitat.
Habitat assessment by Terracon
Carolina Madtom
No suitable habitat present
No effect
biologists found no suitable
habitat.
Habitat assessment by Terracon
Atlantic Pigtoe
No suitable habitat present
No effect
biologists found no suitable
habitat.
Habitat assessment by Terracon
Dwarf Wedgemussel
No suitable habitat present
No effect
biologists found no suitable
habitat.
Habitat assessment by Terracon
Yellow Lance
No suitable habitat present
No effect
biologists found no suitable
habitat.
NCNHP data indicates no Critical Habitat
Critical habitat
No critical habitat present
No effect
present in this area. The critical habitat
mapper does not depict any critical habitat
resent within the study area.
Bald Eagle
Unlikely to disturb nesting
No effect
No Eagle Act permit required
bald eagles
Any species the Service has determined is in
danger of extinction throughout all or a significant
portion of its range and the Service has proposed a
draft rule to list as endangered. Proposed
Tricolored Bat
Potential Suitable habitat
NA
endangered species are not protected by the take
(Proposed Endangered)
prohibitions of section 9 of the ESA until the rule to
list is finalized. Under section 7(a)(4) of the ESA,
Federal agencies must confer with the Service if
their action will jeopardize the continued existence
of a proposed species.

Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act
Determination
Notes / Documentation
Habitat assessment by Terracon
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
No suitable habitat present
No effect
biologists found no suitable
habitat.
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
3/30/23
Signature /Title Date

IN
91
0,
fir ✓" Q`�� `N. �..�-- , ._��� � �:.1d r� ��� l.� � `�—
R
KI
00
•-, r, ,:,:fir — v �,'� / Meadow'
- Ste,phan��:
0Project Stud Area
�
Location . extent is approximate-
1)Study Area based on Johnston County
Parcel Data. man
i.
Feet
Source 2011 National Geographic
quadrangles (Clayton, NC); Project
Disclaimer: The information depicted on this Nor,
1g— is forinformational purposes only and was
notprepared forand is not suitable for legal or
work ofregulatory agencies orotherthird parties
data or information.
�.
r
ENVIRONMENTAL Project: 70217286
SERVICES, INC. Project Location
A IEMCM COMPANY
Tribute Townhomes Site Date: Dec 2019
www.esin.cc I terracon.com Drwn/Chkd: CW/RT
Johnston County, North Carolina Figure: 1
:cts\2019WL197096\GIS\Maps\Topo.mxd Date: 12/11/20191:27:57 PM

Soil Mapping Units
NoA Norfolk loamy sand, 0-2% slopes N
NoB Norfolk loamy sand, 2-6% slopes Ob
Tin Toisant loam L
WaB Wagram loamy sand, 0-6% slopes Ilk
'r
WY, d
caIR
r T
WAD _
D8 ;-
r
rIo
Ill.' 'R
Project Study Area
Q NRCS Soil Boundaries
Location and extent is approximate-
0 300 600
Feet
Source: NRCS Soil Survey of Johnston County,
1994, Project Study Area based on Johnston
County Parcel Data.
Disclaimer: The information depicted in this file is for
informational purposes only and was not prepared for
and is notsuitable forlegal orengineenng purposes.
This information presented is notforregulatory review
and is intended for use only by a Professional Land
Surveyor pnorto regulatory review.
y
I:\Projects\2019WL197096\GIS\Maps\Soils(book).mxd Date: 12/11/20191: 17:21 PM

Flagging Units
SA: 1-22
WA: 1-9
WB: 1-18
WC: 1-16
*SA may be subject to a 50-ft Neuse River Riparian Buffer
c
Project Study Area
® Potential Wetland Waters of the US
Potential Non -Wetland Waters of the US
(Stream)
Location and extent is approximate.
0 150 300
Feet
Note: Vegetation removal or alteration of soils or hydrology after initial site evaluation can
affectjurisdictional status and may require re-evaluation ofwetland boundaries.
Source Latest High Resolution INC Statewide Orthoimagery, INC OneMap
Server, Project Study Area based on Johnston County Parcel Data
Disclaimer The information depicted in this file is for informational purposes only and was not
prepared for and is not suitable for legal orengineering purposes. This information presented
is not for regulatory review and is intended for use only by a Professional Land Surveyor prior
to regulatory review.
y�
r� 1
W&*:;
ENVIRONMENTAL Potential Wetlands and Waters of the US Project: 70217286
SERVICES, INC.
A lferracon COMPANY Tribute Townhomes Site Date: Dec 2019
www.esin.cc l terracon.com Drwn/Chkd: CW/RT
Johnston County, North Carolina Figure: 3
:AProjects\2019WL197096AGIS\Maps\Aerial.mxd Date: 12/11/20191: 14:35 PM