20210589 Ver 2_Scientific Street Bridge Replacement_20230331

I Iighway North Carolina Department of Transportation
Storrrvvvater Highway Stormwater Program
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN��
(Version 2.08; Released April 2018) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 17BP.7.R.114 TIP No.: SF-400052 Count ies : Guilford Page 1 of 1
General Project Information
WBS Element:
17BP.7.R.114 ITIP Number: SF-400052 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 3/16/2021
NCDOT Contact:
Galen Cail, PE
Contractor / Desi ner:
Kyle Stoffer
Address:
NCDOT Hydraulics Unit
Address:
HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
1590 Mail Services Unit
555 Fayetteville Street, Suite 900
Raleigh, NC 27560
Raleigh, NC 27601
Phone:
919 707-6711
Phone:
919 900-1632
Email:
[e-mail]
Email:
I [e-mail]
City/Town:
Greensboro
Count ies :
Guilford
River Basin(s):
Cape Fear
CAMA County?
No
Wetlands within Project Limits?
No
Project Description
Project Length (lin. miles or feet):
0.258 miles Surrounding Land Use: ILow Residential, Wooded
Proposed Project
Existing Site
Project Built -Upon Area ac.
0.9 ac.
0.8 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description:
Scientific Street (SR 1332): 2 paved lanes (total 24' wide), 6' shoulder on each side (9'
Scientific Street (SR 1332): 2 paved lanes (total 22' wide), 2' shoulder on each side.
with guardrail).
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):
Design/Future: 5600 Year: 2025
Existing: 2800 Year: 2011
General Project Narrative:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) has proposed to replace Guilford County Bridge #52 on Scientific Street (SR 1332) over UT to Deep River. The
(Description of Minimization of Water
existing structure is a single span bridge (1 @32'-8") steel plank deck on I -beams. The proposed structure is a 2@ 12'x10' RCBC with top edge bevel and wing walls. This
Quality Impacts)
structure has been designed to have as little environmental and surface water impacts as possible. 2:1 roadway fill slope will be used to minimize impacts. Channel
improvements were made for the proposed RCBC design. Excavation was kept to a minimum to produce as little impact as possible. Where excavation is necessary, geotextile
and rip -rap were utilized for bank stabilization in an attempt to reduce stream bank erosion. Floodplain benches with coir fiber matting will be installed upstream of the culvert. A
low flow barrel on the south side of the culvert was designed to match the stream width to maintain the normal flow width, depth and velocity of the stream. This will maintain
sediment transport to provide a stable stream during bankfull discharge. The barrel invert will be a minimum of 1' below the stream bed to consider fish passage. 1' high sills will
be installed at upstream and downstream face of the low flow barrel. A high flow barrel on the north side of the culvert will provide flood conveyance during high flow storm
events. This will reduce shear stress on the stream bottom. 2' high sills will be installed at upstream and downstream face of the high flow barrel. The SW quadrant has a
buffered jurisdictional feature that outfalls into UT to Deep River at 14+55 LT at the face of the existing bridge. A rip rap pad is proposed at the existing 24" RCP outlet at -L-
10+35 LT. The rip rap pad will reduce the outlet velocity and provide a non -erosive velocity and reduce future erosion at the outlet area. In the SE quadrant there is buffered
jurisdictional feature at the outlet of the storm drain system. The channel outlets just downstream of the project area into UT to Deep River. The NE quadrant a proposed Class
B line `V' ditch will outfall at 14+25 RT onto the downstream channel improvements Class II rip rap that will dissipate energy and provide a diffused flow (non -erosive) into the
stream. Due to the nature of this bridge replacement, the increases in stormwater discharges (post vs pre condition) are insignificant and the existing ditches do not need to be
modified. Therefore, additional stormwater measures are not required.
Waterbody Information
Surface Water Body (1): UT to D ep River
NCDWR Stream Index No.:
17 3.3
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body
Primary Classification:
Water Supply IV (WS-IV)
Supplemental Classification:
None
Other Stream Classification:
None
Impairments:
None
Aquatic T&E Species?
No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID:
Buffer Rules in Effect: Randleman Lake
Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body?
No
Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? INo Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? INo
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?
INo
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
General Project Narrative)
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)

0
0.
17BP.7.R.114
PROJECT
LIMITS
T-
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
OFF -SITE DETOUR
*DESIGN EXCEPTION:
SAG VERTICAL CURVE K
CREST VERTICAL CURVE K
VERTICAL SSD
prim
STATE OF tl ORTn-TIARDLITTA-
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GUILFORD CO UNTY
LOCATION: BRIDGE NO. 52 OVER UT TO DEEP RIVER ON SR 1332 (SCIENTIFIC STREET)
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE AND CULVERT
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
NAD 83VNA 2011
Z
0
BEGIN PROJECT 17BP.7.RJ14
~ o
-L- POT Sta. 10+OO 00
O
BEGIN CULVERT
ti
—L— Sta. I4+2262
---- -
F
-
J
TO WEST
- - - --MAIN STRE
SR 1332
END CULVERT
END CONSTRUCTION
—L— Sta.14+5158
PROJECT l4
-L
�. -22+00DO
DESIGN DATA
ADT 2011 = 2800
ADT 2025 = 5600
V = 40 MPH
SUB REGIONAL TIER
MAJOR ARTERIAL
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT = 0.253 MILES
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT = 0.005 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT = 0.258 MILES
Prepared In the Office of Mott MacDonald for
DIVISION 7
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
TIM JORDAN, PE
LETTING DATE: k PRGIECT ENGINEER
HS'DRAULICS ENGINEER
NCDOT CONTACT. TIM POWERS, PE
DIIIISION BRIDGE
PROGRAM MANAGER
ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER
IGNATURE:
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
PLANS PREPARED BY:
M 7621 Purfoy Road, Saife 115
Fuqua)-Varina, NC 27526
[phone]
MOTT [phone] (Fax)
MACDONALD www.mottmac.comamericas
LICENSE NO. F-0669
FN HDR N. FayettevilleEngineering,
License NumberaF-016 8

' 1.25',PL 21
L7
IZZ,
SITE 2
SEE ENLARGED
AREA ON
SHEET 4b
"' RCP
FAIR COND.
CLASS B RIP RAP
EST. 5 TONS
EST. 14 SY GEOTEXTILE
/ �, EROSION OBSERVED,
/ CHANNEL BANK UNDERMINING
D \
m SPECIAL CUT DITCH - WOODS -
3 SEE DETAIL B
EXISUNE
Q G
DITCH
DITCH
a
PECIAL
SEE DET
V
DITCH
L E
E
EST. 20
(D
O NS RIP R
EST. 35
Y GEOTEX
D MARK L BRAUNSTEIN
D
a
OT
C
ro TOE PROTE
SEE DETAIL
TION
C —�
EST. 35 SY
PSRM
ro
\
C
N
O
TERESA A WI
O
LIAMS
EXISTING DITCH
SITE 3
SEE ENLARGED
AREA ON
SHEET 4c
U
z
EXISTING DITCH
OUTFALL STABLE
010=0.9 cfs
VIo=1.1 fps
(NON -EROSIVE)
O
JAMESTOWN MANOR APARTMENTS LLC
REMOVE EXISTING
RETAINING WALL
G
y�y CLASS II RIP RAP ON
p� FLOOD BENCH BORDER
9•� LS DUTFALL
.xGyT wElp RAP
0 11
�99�\Q•R G+�9
S
em�c���\
BST a^ RC�—
-.' IzFAIR COND.
12=10' RCBC\�„
�1
010-1.5 cfs
Vlo=1.o fps
PROJECT REFERENCE SHEET NO.
DETAIL B DETAIL C DETAIL D DETAIL E 178P.7.R.114 - GUILFORD s2 a
SPECIAL CUT DITCH TOE PROTECTION LATERAL 'V' DITCH SPECIAL CUT DITCH
(Not 10 Scale) 2.7 (Nor ro Scale) (Nor ro Scale] (N°1 io Scale)
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
A;/1So6 °<So e b ENGINEER ENGINEER
!e 1�Fp Norurol Fdl
Narural S.\ °e Fill GroundI '�j`TI'p\ t•hr_ Slope Narural pA ° Fill
Ground 2/ F c Slope d J Ground �:/ F\o"°r Slope
D PSRM 6 D
Georenile
d= 1 R. MJ, D= 1 Ft. GeoredBe� Min. D= 1 Ft.
Mi, D= 1 FF Type of Liner= PSRM M... d= 1 Ft. M... d= 1 Ft.
-L- STA. 10+25 TO 12+00 RT -Y- STA. 11+12 TO 11+60 RT IType of Liner= Class B Rip Rap I Type of Liner= Class B Rip Rap
-L- STA. 14+25 TO 16+40 RT -L- STA. 21+03 TO 21+85 LT
-L- STA. 17+00 TO 18+70 RT -Y- STA. 10+23 TO 10+86 RT
MOTE MACDONALLICENSE NOOF 6Y LLC LICENSEHDR GINNEER 16
NAD $3�yq 2` DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
{� 95 LF OF OUTLET
� CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS
225 TONS RIP RAP
EST. 270 SY GEOTEXTILE
\
PROPOS
/�EST.
AREA IS
,Tq e5a' `ems' "�T P9CLASS B RIP RAP . EST.2 To
as EXISTING DITCH ?k C9. ESIT 7 SY GEOTEXTILE
UTFALL STABLE
10=1.7 ds Tq_
-1.3 Ips `Y BMI
( N-EROSIVE) �-� e C
a EXISTING
DIT
OUTFACE STABLE `\
OOtl � XISTING DITCH \ L\
0 1 TFALL STABLE \ L\ \
WOODS ExI ING DITCH \�O+
O ALL STABLE \
\ V4 1.1 fps
1]" RCP N-UOSIVE)
71
�.fl Wf�3
SR OM SOU M SCIFA AIIC Sr
WOODS
DDE
OF BAN \
CLASS B RIP RAP
EST.B TONS 5o'UTILTIY EASEMENT
EST. 21 SY GEOTEXTILE we se Pc se
STING DITCH ABANB-B Ep ACCMD)lNG TO
OUTFACE AND EXISTING pB 6769 PG 68)
CHANNEL ARE,— BLE
EROSON OBSERVED
4 BANK UNDERMINING CLASS II RIP RAP ON
ERNEST D COOLEY & FLOOD BENCH BORDER SITE 1
MARY A COOLEY O SEE ENLARGED
BOBBY R GLOVER 40 LF OF OUTLET AREA ON
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS
ST. 125 TONS RIP RAP SHEET 4a
EST. 155 SY GEOTEXTILE
CLASS II RIP RAP COIR FIBER
2' THICK W/ MATTING (TYP.)
GEOTEXTILE (TYP.)
4- \ /
EXISTING DITCH
-/ LATERAL V DITCH `W
SEE DETAIL D \
EST. 55 TONS RIP RAP
EST. 30 SY GEOTEXTILE
EST. 30 CY DDE
CLASS B RIP RAP
EST., TONS
EST.7 SY GEOTEXTILE
O
PROPERTY 101, LLC
PIPP i�TVIEW
LSJL E 1, by 3
CLASS II RIP RAP W/
GEOTEXTILE ON FLOOD
M BENCH BORDER W/
2:1 SLOPE (TYP.)
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared it, the
Office of: m
M7621 Pu Aoy Rood, Sulle 115
MOTT Fuqu°7rV°Hn°, NC 3]526
=I MAIN°NAEo �roorl�ac.�„
555
Q I 1 HDR Engineering, I11O. °t the Car°Iinas
I �J� IN,B.E.L.IN SSLSulleoloRb,,.G3115
N.C.B.E.L.C. License Number. F-0116
2
a $ PERMIT DRAWING
GLEASON SHEET 2 OF 11
OGLI INVESTMENTS INC
7
ANTONIO S PEREZ I
I 3ff l l
W/LTId ,
I� I
\
SPECIAL CUT DITCH WOODS SEE DETAIL E
EST. 25 TONS RIP RAP
/ EST. 55 SY GEOTEXTILE
T R/
WOOS EXISTING DITCH
IST '
Sr
BM2 ---rxTg:m
W WOODS EXISTING DITCH
ICE •
\ f Po
RCP�V �Zr�
CLASS B RIP RAP KENNETH THOMAS IRVIN
EST, 5 TONS
NG EST. 14 SY GEOTEXTILE vo
2
CM06S/MG I.OL722-35PA
,k MITE POSr MAIN 2?576
2'SILLS BACKFILL WITH�741q,�,
CLASS B RIP RAP AND
NATIVE MATERIAL
1' SILL
PER SPEC.
CULVERT BURIED 1'
NOTE: FOR CUT CONDITION, USE
0'-12'
12' 14'
BACKFILL WITH NATIVE
CLASS II RIP RAP FLOOD BENCH
MATERIAL PER SPEC. (TYP.)
BORDER WITH NATURAL GROUND
COVERED WITH COIR FIBER MAT
NOTE:
INSIDE BORDER, IN FILL CONDITION,
SILLS TO BE LOCATED AT
USE CLASS II RIP RAP FILL THROUGHOUT
THE INLET AND OUTLET ONLY
EXCAVATIO35CYN=3
WITH NATIVE BED MATERIAL FILLING
THE VOIDS ON TOP.
INLET CHANNEL
LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
(SCALE I- =10')
LEGEND
®DENOTES PERMANENT
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
®DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
100 0
50 100
SCALE: 111= 100' HORIZ.
CLASS II RIP RAP W/GEOTEXTILE
ON FLOOD BENCH
PROP. TOP OF BANK
CLASS II RIP RAP W/
ELEV. 766
GEOTEXTILE ON FLOOD
BENCH BORDER W/
2:1 SLOPE (TYPT
27�
CLASS 11 RIP RAP
N"- 2'THICKW/
GEOTEXTILE (TYP.)
CLASS II RIP RAP FILL
\ 1' SILL
W/GEOTEXTILE
O'-12' 12'-13' CULVERT BURIED 1'
BACKFILL WITH NATIVE
2' SILLS BACKFILL WITH
MATERIAL PER SPEC. (TYP.)
CLASS B RIP RAP AND
NATIVE MATERIAL
PER SPEC.
EXCAVATION=45 CY
OUTLET CHANNEL
(LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
(SCALE 1" =10')

z
w
w
z
�z
Nw
�o
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ — — — — — — / PROJECT REFERENCE SHEET NO.
�- i /' / DETAIL B DETAIL C DETAIL D DETAIL E
SPECIAL CUT DITCH TOE PROTECTION LATERAL 'V' DITCH SPECIAL CUT DITCH 178P.7.R.11a - GUILFORD 52
— _ (NI 1. stole) zx I Norm se.Iel IN.rm Ecolel (N.1 t. Stole) ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
\ \ \ \ \\\\\ \ \ \ \\\\'\\ \ \ �9S- / �/ // - / g„'Fo <Fl pe b ENGINEER ENGINEER
NI
N.rur.l R.l a Fill Ground p .\ 1"hr. SIoPe Natural J A\°list SIoPe F ryl t Slope d d Ground
d= 1F1. Georenile W,D= 1Ft. Geotexlile Min. D= 1Ft.
Min. D= 1Ft. TYPe of Liner= PSRM M... d= 1Ft. Mox.d= 1Ft.
-L- YPe P P YPe P p
STA. 10+25 TO 12+00 RT -Y-STA. 11+12 TO 11+60 RT T of liner= ClassB kip Ra T of Liner= Classe Ri Ra
-
L-STA. 14,25 TO 16+40 RT -L-STA 21+03 TO 21+85 LT
-L- STA. 17+00 TO 18+70 RT
-Y- STA. 10+23 TO 10+86 RT
MOTT MACDONALD Is E,LLC H R ENGweewNG
_
_' _ ' \� \ A � 11 1 LICENSE No. F-05E9 LICENSE No. F-0ne
_ _ — — _ _ — — — \ \ I \ \ ' I / / / / / — DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
— _ — — — _ 775 \ \ \ \ \ \ / J / / / UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
1 I 1 \ \ \ 77�r---
------ __ —__� � \ \ \_/ \ \ \ \ ` — � / / J I J / / / ' Prepared in the
\I 1 1 I ` \ ` ` — — — — -- _ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / /--' Office°f: M
/ ^ / i ' Moir Fuq.o Vonn°,N
\ ---- --- _ YI'll
SITE` 2 \ \ \ _ - \ \ \ _ - /
1 1 1 I \ \ \ / /.w,.� ns
1 / I SEE �NLARGE`p`� �
1 1 I I AREA ON
\ I 1 I I T \ J MESTOWN`NANO ,APAR-(MENTS LLC
vV I l I I SHE�Z 4b \ V A •� 1 �V ��)�VA \ VAvv l l �®® 000 _—' ' / /' ' / / / —---�Ai6 r N.C.B.E'L.ssLsEilO esoa b,,F-0ll5
N.C.B.E.L.S. License Number. F-0110
\ \ \ n\ \ / \\\ \ \\ \ - ,' ' .' /r - \-- PERMIT DRAWING
\ \ I REM9VE EXISTING'' \ 1 \ / \ _ \ /
\t RCP \ \ \ — — R�TAIMN WALL \ \ I 1 1 \ \ \ /' $ /
— __ ,'' */ / / //� �l a---pgQ;— SHEET 3 OF 11 GLI
1 AIR CON❑ — \
1.2�' PL \ \ \ — _ — \ \ \ 1 r\ \ I_ 1 / \ \ \ �$ / — _ _ _ ' ' ' �.�L / /' / //'SRi81'' _ IV / jar/ 1NV�$T.NIENTY ING—
CLASS B RIP RAP \ \ \ \ \ \ \ r y / / / \ \ l — — _ _ — _ ' i' T / / / fVVP"""
�GgbD coND. APIs EST�5 TONS `` \ I I / 1 \ — — / ' / / _ _
D n -so% snTE EST. 1d SY GEOTEXII E \- 1 \ /� — — — /' / I 5- — —_
' \ CLASS II RIP RAP ON ` /\f" i11 / / \ / / 1 I / i / //'' / ' i/�'
\ \ E SION G65ERVED� \\ La.,
FLOOD BENCH \BORDER ` 11 / r ( S\ 95• Ik/ OUTLET \\ / ��� OUTLET / 1 I I 1 I I / —' — — — — — —' ' /' /' AN{Ms'S PoREZ/
J CP \ ( 1 I ( CHANNEL BANE uNDERMIWNG 9 Ls ouTFAu ` AM9EL IMPROVEME
° q I I2 n `\\ \ \ 91�'y\-s2s ronls I xn\
F' r
1 1 a' ` \ GPT \ / \ I / / /
\.r I r / T.''1 SY EXTILE I / / / / ' AREA 1S ST E /
— _
1�CCA5SB RI��2AP—�'/ v/ //// / — _ ✓/fr—,
r'� \ I _q/i/ - crITONs< / // Yf_ 1/l j / 6+ G i\``/DITEH / / / // // �// /// —/ i — -
- srrlsL /° "/ ' 1 r,GeoTExrIL i /� _DITCH
V 1 r�-cr�r/ \\�c\� i ' / I ' / / r / /' y� ll r . \ sP act cut -
�p e(s \ \ 1 l \ \\\ \\\C� \\ / �sY. n �PdS
3 _ m ' \
1 f e \ \ / u I ��
II-Lko�wEl 1 r /' />) ` I \ \ I / — 3 / / \
\ I 1\� \ \\ �M1 J 'r'EST. Ybe6g>rNLt —
\ ExlspN��/o11\I_ 1 ' /
_ \ \ 1� a l�'l a.-. a e.,a3 .a _ / \• I v OUT�Ly svAB \ \\\VA\A I \ G\ 1 B / / /' 4XISTIV DITC4 11 /
xl9nl1��5D,
TFALLILE
01412SR am sdflw /sr
py
�/ /w004 \ \ \\ / / ExlsnN¢ DnFI-
I / ry,\
/ D/ate / / / 1 \ \ \ \15'• I / I 1 1 I r -\`\
i ��IAr ,(�T D17cH r J /) f 1 I 1 �� \ r fl l I / \ `/ R 1 m I \I t6 I 1 I \\ 1 IKEYNE�TFYiH 11kS 1f�VIN \\ \
/ / E DET L E / / / / / 1 :-•• \ / \ \\ LI , I os \
2/ / / / 5T'20 ONS (11P RA / —� _ -. 1 / \ \ \ \ / r� 1 \ \I.LASS B f11P �PI\—.pq / ' I m IL l / \ \a\ `
/ I EST, 35 Y G OTEX ICE J / f / -\ -- \\ ` E4, FI \ \ ( T. 5 TONS / \ \ \ S;
R \ \ T \ ao _ / - _ I / 1 8 C IK� \ r -E4L14 SY GFOTE)(Tr / , _ ti \
I MARK B AUN�TIN I ao 1 \ \ ~\ \�,.., \
y'
\ �-
I I \\ \ \ \o>-aTl r 1
l-TOE�IT TIOF` \\ \ \ \ 1' �\ \ \\ \\ \ \ \\\\\ \\\ \ 1 \---`-
1 . r .io' RCP \ _ r. / \-\ \ \ \ , \ \ I > \ ` \ ` \ \ ` \\\\\`\ \ \ \ \
\ \ _-SEED, A+IC \ / r/— '�/\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \�. \ \
\ — \\\\\ \ l \\\ \\ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\
�cQ \ \ \ \ \ 1 LATppRAy V DITCH / \ \\ \ e \ \\\\ \ \ \
\ \ ''� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` \ 1 BEETDF�TAIL D \ \\�9 \ \ \ `\ e\\ \ \\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
— — ——TfRESA A NAMS� \ \\ .\' ` �J ``� \ PRoaosE ouTFALL \ \ \ \ 1 \ 1 \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ NT.155 TONS RIP RAP \ \ \\\\ \\ \ \ \ \ \
— — — — — — — — — — — — _ \ a0 \ f \ I •( \\ \ \ R� \ \ \ \ \EST. 0 CY DDOTEXTILE
s�EeiDI \ \ S\\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \� \ \ \\ ` LEGEND
--------_ L�� ��\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ (NON se'EI \ SS. O S RIP RAP \ �\ \ \\` ` ` \ \ \``\\ c\ \ \\
\ \ \ GECIT�XTIL \
----- __--- \\ \ < `\\`\\ \\\ `\\ I ' PR0��6 \ \ET. oC ODE \ \\" ` ` \\ `
— — — — — — — \ ST. TONS \\ \ \ — _ / \ ® DENOTES PERMANENT
\ 7\SY\GTROT\ENjr6E\ IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
\ \ \ \ \ ` \ ) / / \� \ \ ® DENOTES TEMPORARY
Zzz
w \ \ \ \ \ \ \ --
_$Y\C>\EQT1F� GII f♦ I a \ \ \ 1 IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
�uuTYMEL 11.Np EXl E \c \,pJ \ \ / \\ AB \BBN6l$9 P�6B STA\ \'\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ `�� ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / `\ s \ \
— —' — `EXISTNG DIT \ ` \ BHA L@RE TA L \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 I ��
\ Gl\ /\ \/ / \ \ \ \ 4 Rbs1.IV 1�yEQ\Eb \I^\ 1 \ \ \ \ ` \ \ \ @ ` ` \ \ 1 \ I I PRO\Et TY 101, LLB \ ` \ \\ S \ \ / I �.o / `\ \ \
wyD�RrvGiyl�k \\ \ 1 CLASS II RIP RAP ON \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` ` \ \ I ` ` \ `� \ \
\ \\ \ 1 FLOOD BENCH BORDER \ 'SITE 1\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ �S \` ` ` \ \ I _ - / \ 100 0
�RINEST\D\CbyL \\� \I11\\\ \`\ \ \ 1 1 R /\\\\ \E \��I��` \\\ \ \ \\\\\1\ II II \I II I \\\\ \\� \\ \\\\\ \\ I �/ \\\�\ 1
\ \ \ \ \ \MkRY 10. o K\ \\\ \\ \ \ \ \ 1 I\ / F
\�\\``\\\I \ Jp ,�,\Ll\ 1 ab LFGF OUTLET '\ \\ ____—�� \\\\
----- SITE ` \ \ Fx15nNG\DITc1,l \ \ \ 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ \`` \ \ 11 ` `I� \`- `' `UI'�\ 1 CIjAIaMIEL IMPROVEMENT91 R C'rV \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ 7-� A7 / 'VIEW
`
\ \ ou ALL STABLE\ \ \ \ I I 1 m 1 \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ 111 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ �\ \ \ \ tyi 1V ( \V JC1L3 Ytl \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ _ 5 O 10 0
ST 125 TONS RIP RAP L
— — — — — — — r+EE\ EI�ARG�p e Qlo-o.9 cf} I I I Q- 1 \ 1 1 e�- \ \\ \ \ \ \ EST! 155 SY GEOTEXTILE \ NI E 4C) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ \ I
- BAR Oiv ` \ \ � NO$-EFOSIVFl I I I I III 1 111 \ \ \ \ \ �\ \ \\ \\ \\ \S'S \ 1 \ \ `\ \\ `\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \S \ \ \ \ \ 2� qg \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \ III I11 1\1\\\ \ \\\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\\\\\\ \ \ S E\ b ¢1
4C\ \ v_ v— SCALE: 111= 100' HORIZ.
`\ \ \\ -
- CLASS II RIP RAP CLASS
EXTILE OAP ROOD
2' THICK W/ MOAIR TTINIGBR E (TYP-) M BENCH BORDER W/
GEOTEXTILE (TYP.) 2:1 SLOPE (TYP.)
2' SILLS WITH
CLASS BBRIPKFILL RAP AND
PER SPEC. MATERIAL ('SILL
\Lq \ \ CULVERT BURIED 1'
NOTE: FOR CUT CONDITNATIVE
0 US
CLASS II RIP RAP FLLOODIB NCH, BACKFILL0'-12' 12'-1 a' MATERIAL PERHS EC. (TYP.)
\ \\ \\\\ \\ \\\\ \\\\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \\\�\\ \\\\\\ \ `\ `\`� \w•\\\\\`\ \\ `\\` `\\` \ \\`\\ \ \\\\\\`\\\\\\` BORDER WITH NATURAL R GROUND ER MAT NOTE:
\ INSIDE BORDER,
I TLL CONDITION,
T THROUGHOUT THEINLET AND OUTLET
SILLS
TO BE LOCATED AONLY
USE CLASS 11 RIPRAPFILL EXCAVATION=335 CY
WITH NATIVE BED MATERIAL FILLING
\\\ THE VOIDS ON TOP.
\` \\ \\\`\\\ \ \ \\\\\\` \ \\\\�\ INLET CHANNEL
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \e! m \ \\ LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
\\\` \\\I (SCALE 1"
\
SPECIAL CUT DITCHI
.SRF� DETAIL B I '�
R
' � a
__�,_2 @ V12' x 1D( RCBCI _ l -
CLASS II RIP RAP W/GEOTE)CTILE
FLOOD BENCH
PROP. TOP OF BANK
rON
CLASS II RIP RAP W/
ELEV. 766
GEOTEXTILE ON FLOOD
BENCH BORDER W/
2:1 SLOPE (TYPT
27/
CLASS 11 RIP RAP
N"- THICK
G EOTEXTILELE (TYP.)
CLASS II RIP RAP FILL
1' SILL
W/GEOTEXTILE
0'-12' 12'-13' CULVERT BURIED 1'
BACKFILL WITH NATIVE
2' SILLS BACKFILL WITH
MATERIAL PER SPEC. (TYP.)
CLASS B RIP RAP AND
NATIVE MATERIAL
PER SPEC.
EXCAVATION-aS CY
OUTLET CHANNEL
(LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
(SCALE 1" =10')

PROJECT REFERENCE SHEET NO.
17BP,TR.114 — GUILFORD 52
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
JS OUTFALL AND
CHANNEL ARE STAB
40 0
20 40
SCALE: III= 40' HORIZ.
L E1--I v —ly— QIU=1.J cis
BANK UNDERMINING V10=1.0 fps
(NON —EROSIVE)
DETAIL SHEET FOR
SITE I
bftftft'
NAD 83/ A 2011
EXISTING DITCH
OUTFALL STABLE
Q10 =1.6 cfs
V10 =1.3 fps
(NON —EROSIVE)
On N.nCDONILD 18 E, LLC I HDR ENGINEERING
LICENSE NO. _69 LICENSE NO. E 116
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared in the
orrice or: M
M J6]1 PuHoV Road, Suit 115
Moii ay�Va.i�a, NC 1J5]6
1 M NPID www.mo maccom
FJ� CRBE.L.SeLkenseNmhbeDF-0116
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 4 OF 11 I -ice
LEGEND
®DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
®DENOTES PERMANENT
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER

PROJECT REFERENCE SHEET NO.
17BP,TR.114 — GUILFORD 52
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
JS OUTFALL AND
CHANNEL ARE STABLE
40 0
20 40
SCALE: III= 40' HORIZ.
JS OUTFALL
WiRI P RAP
PROPOSED OUTFALL
EROSION OBSERVED Q10=1.5 cfs
BANK UNDERMINING V10=1.0 fps
(NON —EROSIVE)
DETAIL SHEET FOR
SITE I
bftftft'
NAD 83/ A 2011
EXISTING DITCH
OUTFALL STABLE
Q10 =1.6 cfs
V10 =1.3 fps
(NON —EROSIVE)
On N.nCDONILD 18 E, LLC I HDR ENGINEERING
LICENSE NO. _69 LICENSE NO. E 116
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared in the
orrice or: M
M Jd]1 PuHoV Road, Suit 115
I. ay�Va.i�a,NC 1J5]6
1 MAWONPID www.mo maccom
FJ� CFBEE.i.SeLkenseN—ber.F-0116
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 5 OF 11 I -ice
LEGEND
®DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
®DENOTES PERMANENT
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER

E PROJECT REFERENC
SHEET NO.
17BP.7.R.114 — GUILFORD 52
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
GLI
MOTE LICENgSE NOOF-0659 LLC
LICEN EGINNEEWNG6
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared in the
Orrice or: M
MJ69 Pull, Rood, 5ulle ➢5
Fuquo7rVonna,NC .....
MnpaNnLo www.mo mo�.mm
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 6 OF 11
F)� N B.E.L.S Ue�e- N R'b,, F-0115
FT
It
ISTA
14
3 7
—L
SK
W
1240
GP
ELEV.
778.82
780
2:1
(NORMAL)
2:1
(NORMAL)
780
EXISTIN3
LEFT
REMOVE
EXI
TIN
10r,
Or
BANK
EX
STI
G
RIG
T
770
ft
770
'�—
J
—
—
760
NORMAL
WS
—
—
760
E
-EV.
= 7
3.5
2'
ILL
IN
LEF1
BARREI.,
VISILL
IN
RIG
T
BARREL,
SILLS
ARE
INSET
1
FROM
END
C
F
750
(TY
)
CL
EL
V.
761.39
750
Swri:=1.
1
o
NATIVE MATERIAL CONSISTS OF MATERIAL THAT IS EXCAVATED FROM THE
STREAM BED AT THE PROJECT SITE DURING CULVERT CONSTRUCTION.
NATIVE MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER AND MAY
BE SUBJECT TO PERMIT CONDITIONS.
250 200 150 100 50 0 50 100 150

oos
G
FFE-i3
61
J
�/LT
/ WOODS
i
�O
BST
is
,WOODS' '
M ���\ J L
ss
M H
O � \
DETAIL SHEET FOR
SITE 2
50 0
25 50
SCALE: I"= 50' HORIZ.
bftwft'
NAD 83/ A 2011
LEGEND
®DENOTES PERMANENT
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER

s■
0 =
11
50 0
25 50
SCALE: I"= 50' HORIZ.
�Q ) ss
/ ♦ j �FEBKAPT r
--------0��\ A SIGN (DGE)
r -
WOODS
JL
MH
W,00Ds `
DETAIL SHEET FOR
SITE 2
bftwft'
NAD 83/ A 2011
LEGEND
®DENOTES PERMANENT
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER

w
z�
PROJECT REFERENCE SHEET NO.
17BP.7.R.114 — GUILFORD 52 ec
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
NAD 83/ A 2011
bftb
MOTE l"Oi E NOOF 1 LLC LICEN EGINO,EENNE16
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared in the
Orrice of: M
IVI76]t cudoy koad, SuOe n5
Moir Fuquo7rVo "C 21116
Mn�paNnLo www.mo mo�.mm
Fr1)�555 RBEE Li5lli5Li 9eseNurtber. lrlogiF01�1E o
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 9 OF 11 GLI
/3 EXR%WN
2 /
11-A00 u, l W00
TOP-777o
INV-774.+ O CB
A / 15
1414 o10 / RCP N E
CD
UE
l/ Up
Q �
110'
Q / �
EXISTING DITCH
DETAIL., SHEET FOR OUTFALL STABLE
Q10=0.9 cfs
SIT] 3 V10=1.1 fps
(NON —EROSIVE)
LEGEND
50 0
®DENOTES PERMANENT
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
25 50
SCALE: I"= 50' HORIZe

s■
0 m
11
50 0
25 50
SCALE: I"= 50' HORIZ.
EX1 IN
3 t,' ! \ J /
774e�0 CB
.10, �5 v
UE
10"
wcTuir nTru
DETAIL SHEET FOR
SITE 3
OUTFALL STABLE
Q10=0.9 cfs
Vlo=1.1 fps
(NON —EROSIVE)
bftwft'
NAD 83/ A 2011
LEGEND
®DENOTES PERMANENT
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Site
No.
Station
(From/To)
Structure
Size / Type
Permanent
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Temp.
Fill In
Wetlands
(ac)
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac)
Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp.
SW
impacts
(ac)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft)
Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp.
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1
-L- 14+22 to 14+58
2 @ 12' x 10' RCBC
0.02
84
1
-L- 13+88 TO 14+95
BANK STABILIZATION
0.03
121
1
-L- 13+85 TO 15+35
GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS
0.01
53
2
-L- 10+29 TO 10+40
EXISTING 24"RCP OUTLET
PROTECTION
< 0.01
8
3
-Y- 11+90 TO 12+02
30" RCP -IV OUTLET
PROTECTION
< 0.01
25
TOTALS*:
0.06
0.01
238
53
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES: General Improvements include all Temporary Stream impacts for Bank Stabilization installation and removal of the retaining wall in the
northwest quadrant. The concrete footer of the retaining wall will be retained.
Revised September 2014

17BP.7.R.114
PROJECT
LIMITS
T-
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
OFF —SITE DETOUR
*DESIGN EXCEPTION:
SAG VERTICAL CURVE K
CREST VERTICAL CURVE K
VERTICAL SSD
prim
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GUILFORD COUNTY
LOCATION: BRIDGE NO. 52 OVER UT TO DEEP RIVER ON SR 1332 (SCIENTIFIC STREET)
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE AND CULVERT
BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT
�e7rer{s'i
1V , .
�ar�Fe7nja�eaaiecrgsmj�r��a¶ce
ALA RDP,A .R.114
I
STAra Paolaar m
r.n Mm.m
aBgC90'ria3l
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 10
NAD 8' NA 2011 Z
0
BEGIN PROJECT 17BP.7.RJI4 ~ o
-L- POT S/a.10f00.00
<1 BEGIN CULVERT 0 I
\� —L— Sta.14+22.62
_ WEST
---�—` ----L—------------- MAIN SIRE
SR 1332
END CULVERT
��VV L Sta.14+5158
-r CONSTRUCTION ELD �JESta.
CTP-2B+00PJ.l4
DESIGN DATA
ADT 2011 = 2800
ADT 2025 = 5600
V = 40 MPH
SUB REGIONAL TIER
MAJOR ARTERIAL
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT = 0.253 MILES
LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT = 0.005 MILES
TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT = 0.258 MILES
Prepared In the Office of Mott MacDonald for
DIVISION 7
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
TIM JORDAN, PE
LETTING DATE: I PROJECT ENGINEER
HS'DRAULICS ENGTUEER
NCDOT CONTACT. TIM POWERS, PE
DITUSION BRIDGE
PROGRAM MANAGER
ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER
P.E.
IGNATURE:
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
GLI
PLANS PREPARED BY:
M 7621 Purfoy Road, Saife 115
Fuqua)-Varina, NC 27526
[phone]
MOTT [phone] (Fax)
MACDONALD www.mottmac.comamericas
LICENSE NO. F-0669
HDR Engineering, 6.ir�FN N.BE..S.LirenseNumbeF-018

L25'\PL 20
L7
SITE 2
SEE ENLARGED
AREA ON
SHEET 4b
` RCP
FAIR COND.
CLASS B RIP RAP
EST. 5 TONS
EST. 14 SY GEOTEXTILE
/ —,, EROSION OBSERVED,
/ CHANNEL BANK UNDERMINING
♦Ii
� L:�J Py
i���.
c '
� a �r
O PECIAL UT DITCH
2 SEE DET IL E
EST. 20 ONS RIP RAP
EST. 35 Y GEOTEXTILE
MARK L BRAUNSTEIN
TL
INV=
TOE PROTE TIOt
SEE DETAIL C
EST. 35 SY PSRM
0
TERESA A Wil LIAMS
7
EXISTING DITCH
SITE 3 EXISTING DITCH
DUTFALL STABLE
SEE ENLARGED
QUAFALL cfs
AREA ON (NON -EROSIVE)
SHEET 4c
0
JAMESTOWN MANOR APARTMENTS LLC
REMOVE EXISTING
RETAINING WALL
G
y�y CLASS II RIP RAP ON
p� FLOOD BENCH BORDER
LS DUTFALL
.zGyT wn, RAP
V9
6, ��
�99�\
BST I2a" �
-�� FAIR
R COND.
J
12' z 10' RCBC
LCLASS B RIP RAP
EST.8 TONS
EST. 21 SY GEOTEXTILE
STING DITCH DUTFALL AND EXISTING
CHANNEL ARE STABLE
EROSION OBSERVED
Q BANK UNDERMINING
ERNEST D COOLEY & 0
MARY A COOLEY
BOBBY R GLOVER
PROJECT REFERENCE SHEET NO.
DETAIL B DETAIL C DETAIL D DETAIL E 178P.7.R.11a - GUILFORD 52 a
SPECIAL CUT DITCH TOE PROTECTION LATERAL 'V' DITCH SPECIAL CUT DITCH
(Not 10 Scale) 2.J (No��o Scale) INo��o Scolel IN—. Scale)
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
A;/LSD6 °<So e b ENGINEER ENGINEER
!e 1�Fp NoNrol Fdl
Narural R.� °e Fill Ground p \ t"hl SIoPe Natural �. A, jX SIoPe
Ground 7L F� r SlopedGround
D RM d D
it
Geo�enile
d= 1 R. Mi, D= 1 Ft. Geotexlile Min. D= 1 Ft.
Mi, D= 1 Ft. Type of Liner= PSRM M... d= 1 Ft. M... d= 1 Ft.
-L- STA. 10+25 TO 12+00 RT -Y- STA. 11+12 TO 11+60 RT I
Type of liner= Class B Rip Rap Type of Liner= Class B Rip Rap
-L- STA. 14+25 TO 16+a0 RT -L- STA. 21+03 TO 21+85 LT
-L- STA. 17+00 TO 18+70 RT -Y- STA. 10+23 TO 10+86 RT
N
fto
95 LF OF OUTLET \ \
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS
ST. 225 TONS RIP RAP
EST. 270 SY GEOTEXTILE PROPOSE OUTFA
AREA IS STA L$ E
'�Ak�
I.
CLASS B RIP RAP
•l Pq • EST. 2 TONS —
EXISTING DITCHEST.7 SY GEOTEXTILE
ALL STABLE
•• � 1A=1.J ds
=1.3 IPs BMI
j ( N-EROSIVE)
EXISTING DIT $ e 4
� OUTFACE STABLE `\
XISTING DITCH \ L\
\ 1 TFALL STABLE
! \ 1 WDDDS 0
O ALL STABLE \
1 \ V4 ITfPs'
CX l2" RCP NI
IFS'
S!t AT.32 Sd/!M FJl7 lC 57
2YPNFD O
1 1 4- \ /
vlo=1.5 cf
V10=1.0 fps
(NON-EROSWE)
PROPOSED
L TOP
OF BANK
IlI
`CLASS II RIP RAP ON
FLOOD BENCH BORDER
40 LF OF OUTLET
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS
EST. 125 TONS RIP RAP
EST. 155 SY GEOTEXTILE
WOODS
\ EST. 30 CY DDE
LTIr EASE,113"
B 98 PC 0
BED ACCOORDTO
SITE 1
SEE ENLARGED
AREA ON
SHEET 4a
FTHK
AP —
VP.)
EXISTING DITCH
LATERAL V DITCH\
1 SEE DETAIL D \�,
EST, 55 TONS RIP RAP "C�C�C�TTT
a� EST. 95 SY GEOTEXTILE
Q EST. 30 CY DDE
CLASS B RIP RAP
ES .2 TONS
EST.7 SY GEOTEXTILE
O
PROPERTY 101, LLC
'VIE
tlV
+9 v9 3
CLASS II RIP RAP W/
Cm FIBER GEOTEXTILE ON FLOOD
MATTING (TYP.J M BENCH BORDER W/
2:1 SLOPE (TYP.)
2' SILLS BACKFILL WITH
CLASS B RIP RAP AND
NATIVE MATERIAL
PER SPEC.
NOTE: FOR CUT CONDITION, USE
CLASS II RIP RAP FLOOD BENCH
0 -12 12 -l4
BORDER WITH NATURAL GROUND
COVERED WITH COIR FIBER MAT
NOTE:
INSIDE BORDER, IN FILL CONDITION,
SILLS TO BE LOCATED AT
USE CLASS II RIP RAP FILL THROUGHOUT
THE INLET AND OUTLET ONLY
WITH NATIVE BED MATERIAL FILLING
THE VOIDS ON TOP.
INLET CHANNEL
LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
(SCALE I- =10')
MOTT MACDONALD 18 E, LLC I NOR ENGINEERING
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared in the
Orrice OF M
MJ62, P d°X Ro.d, °Be ,I5
Moir Fuquo7rVo N„C 27526
=I MAIN°NAEo �roo���.c.�
Q I 1 HDRY'LAIN S1 Wil B,c. RLIAg Carolinas
I FJ� Sss=alslle,Ak Sl. sidle olo Rala9,. N.GEIcn
N.G.B.E.L.S. License Number. F-A115
$ BUFFER DRAWING
I IGLEASONNVESTMENTS
SHEET 2 OF 10 GLI
O� INVESTMENTS INC
ANTONIO S PEREZ
I
Iffll
/
W/LTI I� I
SPECIAL CUT DITCH
SE ,\ WOODS LEST. 555TSY GEOTEXTILE
AIL E
EST. 25 To
RIP RAP
— V SILL
`CULVERT BURIED 1'
BACKFILL WITH NATIVE
MATERIAL PER SPEC. (TYP.)
WOODS
15„
\J( CLASS B RIP RAP
EST. S TONS
x EST. 14 SY GEOTEXTILE
Cfl065ING WL•722-35P.A
MHE POST MAIN 2ZM
® EXCAVATION=335 CYI
- EXISTING DITCH
_— —
I
�c ICI
EXISTING DITCH
KENNETH THOMAS IRVIN
—BZ 1—
RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZONE 1 1301)
—gZ 2—
RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZONE 2 (20')
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
®
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
®
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
ETF — EXISTING TRANSPORTATION FACILITY
100
0
50
100
SCALE:
I"= 100' HORIZ.
CLASS II RIP RAP W/GEOTEXTILE
ON FLOOD BENCH
PROP. TOP OF BANK
CLASS II RIP RAP W/
ELEV. 766
GEOTEXTILE ON FLOOD
BENCH BORDER W/
2:1 SLOPE (TYPT
/
CLASS 11 RIP RAP
N"-
THICK
1'
GEOTEXTILELE (TYP.)
G
CLASS II RIP RAP FILL
1' SILL
WNGEOTEXTILE
0'-12' 12'-13'
CULVERT BURIED 1'
BACKFILL WITH NATIVE
2' SILLS BACKFILL WITH
MATERIAL PER SPEC. (TYP.)
CLASS B RIP RAP AND
NATIVE MATERIAL
PER SPEC.
® EXCAVATION -
OUTLET CHANNEL
(LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
(SCALE 1" =10')

\\ / i / / / DETAIL B DETAIL C DETAIL D DETAIL E
\ SPECINof oLJTa DITCH TOE IPROTEOTION LATERAL o srDIITCH SPECIAL NLI o sTa DITCH
I 1 z7 I 1 e°\,\ I I I 1
9E2
d<<e` Fill
oPe
d F oro°�a d D ,-hf. s`ioPe °o��e a °.,.e' Fill
D F FPSRM d D SI
d= 1 R. MJ, D= 1 FGeofex,ile Min. D= 1 Ff.
L
Min.D= 1Ff. TYPe of Liner= PSRM MPx.d= 1Ft.f. Mox.d= 1Ff.
/ ` Type of Liner= Class B Rip Rep Type of Liner= Class 8 Rip Rap
\\� \ �` �� / / /- �``��_ -L-STA. 10+25 TO 12+00 RT -Y-STA. 11+12 TO 11+60 RT
-L- STA. 14+25 TO 16+40 RT -L- STA. 21+03 TO 21+85 LT
-L-STA. 17+00 TO 18+70 RT
-Y- STA. 10+23 TO 10+86 RT
\/FAD 81q '2tl„`\l \ /1
\I 1 1 I SITE\2 \ ` \ - '--- - - - - --
PROJECT REFERENCE SHEET NO.
178P.7.R.114 - GUILFORD 52 4
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
MOTE MACDONALU 18 E, LLC I HDR ENGINEERING
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
Prepared in the
Office of: IM
J621 PuT.y Road, S..N 115
1 \ 1 I \ \ \ \ \ - - - - - - - - - - - - _ M Fu.u.7rv.dna, NC 3]526
1 / I SEE �NLARGE`P \ \ \ \ 1 �/ ------ \/---\ \\ \\\\\ I I \ \ _ /� /// //////////// - / MACNaNAVD...,,•,,.morr�...�„
1 1 I I AREA ON \ \ \ / /-- ---_ --- /'� IT -
I T\ESTON AN AR{MENTS LLC / / - - _ \\,\`-_//////S1WilMAI.C.2701SHE04b M � �A A v '//gL555 =ryella,ils sl. Sulla elo RelTe,. N.¢ xrn / �'REMilVEEXISTING\ \./\\ - -�__ BUFFER DRAWING
IInfRRcoND ` ' J �TAININq wnu pg"
�SQPY\ _ \ I \ I 1 \ \ \\--e� /h yc SHEET 3 OF 10 \ /CLASS B RIP RAP "'s -_''-I--
D coND. '>I'li EST\5 TONS ` \ / \ / ---% snTE EST. 1d SY GEOTEXTI E ' - _ ' / / / / - CLASS II RIP RAP ON / / / \ )I� / / I /E SIGN 065ERVED (��f: FLOOD BENCH "BORDE \ 111 _ sl \ 95• t�/01= OUTLET 1 I /'-//'/� ? i / I/ / / _ _ _- - / '' - _' �08
J CPS \\ �T 1 I ( Z \ CHANNEL BANK UIT RMINING \ .9 \ JS OUTFACE \ // __rlll� klAIyIDQEL IMPROVEME 1 1 1 I I / / � // ' ' /i / ' / I^// � � - � / � - _
° q I 1 ✓`a n ` \ \\ 9l�<'y\ w,wP RAP \ /' -s2s TONS I xa, 1 1 I I I / / // /
\ 1 .`�� TONS �@ ExTLLE ujF�iL
I
IF
_' RI��2AP- T-
,S�
ez z ,�0+" \ E ` - - / \ \ I \\ \ EZISTlNG oIT /H / / / / /i/ // /�/ SONS <
1/ \ \ y� \ I \/ / / / //Y,OEOTEXTIL
TEAu
a
a2
Toads' IP�'
ll
v
AA
-
r _
''�"-�a.� IFS ."
I _, - a �� � _..�' _ :f., ■�
SPECIAL CUT DITCH 2 \12' z 1D� RCBC
$ DETAIL EI -
` \Y B� % / -
DITCH;
r�
,UT DITCH r ,1 R , r$ �'r
/ �// I / ( / l / ' / 1 I \ l \. \\ \ \,• I I 1 I Im 1,\ \ I 1 \ 11 1 KENNQTFY RI IA\S. VINI
DET L E / / \ \ > / , Lj- \ / ��-`d-''\ 1 , I 1 6• I , , �
2/ / SV. 20 ONS r11P RA / / / / ` / / \ \ 1 `` / / 1 f @@I� �p \
EST, 35 Y GlOTEXTICE /� \ \ \ \\ /CLASS B a P PI / ( W , / c \ `Y' \`
(MARK IL B AUNT IN I { , \ \ \ \g \ \ ST 1 Tows o
I I 7 R l \\ \\ \ \ \ \` 8�C IP1U`J*ta sY �co\graE
1 I1 II l \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \\ltl\T`o�TT`a. ES1ID •--JrTH A2T- ffi-7_6 -�\ �\ \�\ \\-\ • \\\``��\ -
\\ \ \\!o \ \L\ EGEN\DCE-MA\ /
\
TI�M\\ \ 1 _.i0 / \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \�\\!\�� \� \- `'�- \� �1 \y�� ` \\ \\\\ \\\\\ \ \ RIPARIAN BUFFER
SEE DE Ai1C \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �\ \11\ \�+ \ \\ 1 \ \ \ \ \\\ \\ \\ —BZ1— ( )
EsT.35S RM` \ \ \ \ .\\ �\ \ \ \ \ \ M ZONE 1 30'
/ \ \ \ \ \ \ —8Z 2— RIPARIAN BUFFER
v v v v v v ZONE z (20')
\ \ \ \ c LAT�RAI/ V DITCH / \ \ \ \
1 BEEID TAIL D / \ \ \J\ \ \
- - --TfRESA A HAMS\ \ \ s+ \\� \�q - I - _ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ 55T. 55 TONS RIP RAP \ \ 9 \ \ \ ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
\ \ \ \\ \ \ \1 \ PRoaosE ouT- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ "JJ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ E5T. 951 SY GEOTEXTILE
__-___ -- \ \ \ \ ! L / 1 0,o-,�d \ \ La\TB D CM \ \ \{, / _ \\ \ \
\ \ \ \ \ S d D\ \ Q \ \ \ \ \ \ E$T.\30\CY DDE _ _ - \ \ \ \
S.� ON StRIP RAP\ `t \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / \ - \\ \ \
--- \ Y Pb \ \� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ '00 / \\ \\ ` \\ \ ® ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
GE T�XTIL \ \ \ \ \
< \\\ \\\\\\\ I \ ETvocDDE�\aa5s\RIAt�a\
'< ropH•oseD \\ \ \ \\\$\\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\ sT.2 nY\
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 I VOF/BANK/ \, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - _ / \ / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ . 7 S G CNL61 E\ /
----____---- \\ \ \ \ \ \\\c A5 kI A P\1\\ I \\S \\� \
T\ \ \ \ \ \ / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \ \ \ BS . T(\iNs \ \ \ \ I sv nr i \ \ \ \ 1
\ \ \ i9 ae ® MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
Xis IEA 1 I \ T
TkA\L xs `ry \ \ / \ ��B P �
EXISTING DIT \ \ \ \ r \ N1DA L\' R TA y \ \ \ r ols eT eel \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
N \ 9 ETF - EXISTING TRANSPORTATION FACILITY
\ / \/� \ \ \ \vY'4 I�s oIV 1�yEQ Eb \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 I \ I .o / \ ! I -
--\ A\KwyDIw7At \" \1 CLASS II RIP RAP ON \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I Q'
\ 1 \ \ \ \ \ 1 PROP TY I LLB \ \ \ \ \ \ I
\ \ �R�NEST\D Cb L R\ ��\ 111 \ \ 1 1 FLOOD, BENCH BORDER
\ __CC �\ \\\11 \ \ \ \\\\\\\ \ \ I 1\\\\\ / \�/ \\\\\ 100 0
\ MkRY 10• 0 E7(\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ 1 1 1 I / \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ I 1 I \ \ \ \ \ \ l \ \ \
----- �� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ F F \ 1 \ 1 \ SfE EN�LARGL� \ \\ \ \ I / \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ -----, \ \
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ 1,\ \ I a CE /F OUTLET \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \
------' S E \\ \ \ \ \ \ 14� \ Jp �nbgE� N' k4Rip 0%1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ P�.` �%��% \ \ ---- \ \ \ \ \
Ex15TING DITc)I , \ \ \ \ 1 ` \ \ t C A EL IMPROVE. E� \ \ \ \ \ \
__-____ \ ouTTALL sq E\ \\ \ I I 1 1\\\\\1\\1'i 1\\�\\\\\\\\\\ Sl, 125 TONS RIP RAP S'H\EC�4C)\ \ \\\\\\\�\\\\\ \ / -\ \\ \\ \\ \\ - \\ I I \\ CO I0
0
SE EIS ARG�D 9O10- .9 cJ ) \\\ \ EST 155 SY GEOTEXTILE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ - _ J
�vto�t.t rP. 1 1 I 1 1 nl\1111111\I \\\tr-\\\\\\\\\\JS\ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\\s\\\\ \ \ �+TF \ y yqq \ \ `\ \\ \ \--___-_-----
- ^ ARE�A,, O'N \ uNory1-ERoslvEl I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I \ 1 \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ s7JL 1�� V \ \ \ \ _ _ - - - _ - - _
EN
\ \\111\\\\\ \\\\\ \\ \\ \\`\\\\:�\\\\ --- \\ `�: :::----_____ = SCALE: III= 100' HORIZ.
\CLASS 11
CLASS II RIP RAP GEO EXTILE ONP FLOOD
2' THICK W/ MOATTINIGE (NP.J M `BENCH 8UE .11 W/
GEOTEXTILE [TYP.) / 2:1 SLOPE (TYP.)
\\ \\ \ \\ \ \\ 1 \ 111 1 11 11 1, 11 I\ \\ \ \\\\\ \\\ \\\\ \\ \\ \ \ \\\` \`\\ \\ \\ \\
\\\�,p \\ 0\\
\\ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ 00
1 , 1 1 \ \ \ \\\\ \ \\ \\ \ \\\ \ �\ `\ \ \\ \ \\ \ H\\ \\\\ \\\ \\ CLASS BBACKFILL
RAP AND
ERTSPEC.ATERIAL
\set \\\\\ \\ A \ \\\\\ \\ \\ \ \ \\\ \\\� � \\ \\\\�\\!\ \\\\ \\ CLASS II RIP RAP FLLOODNOTE: FOR CUT IB BENCH
\ \\ \\\\ \\ \\ \\ \\\\ \\ \\ \ \\ BORDER WITH NATURAL GROUND
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ COVERED WITH COIR FIBER MAT
\ IDE BORDER,
RIPRAP I TLL FILL CONDITION USE CLASS THROUGHOUT
WITH NATIVE BED MATERIAL FILLING
\\\\\\\\\`\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\`\\\\\\\\\\� \\\\ \ \\�\\\\\\\\\\\\\ THE VOIDS ON TOP.
NOTE:
SILLS TO BE LOCATED AT
THE INLET AND OUTLET ONLY
INLET CHANNEL
LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
(SCALE I- =10')
1' SILL
CULVERT BURIED 1'
BACKFILL WITH NATIVE
MATERIAL PER SPEC. (TYP.)
® EXCAVA1ION=335 CY
CLASS II RIP RAP W/GEOTEXTILE
ON FLOOD BENCH
PROP. TOP OF BANK
CLASS II RIP RAP W/
ELEV. 766
GEOTEXTILE ON FLOOD
BENCH BORDER W/
2:1 SLOPE (TYPT
/
CLASS 11 RIP RAP
N"-
THICK
1'
GEOTEXTILELE (TYP.)
G
CLASS II RIP RAP FILL
,' SILL
W/GEOTEXTILE
CULVERT BURIED 1'
BACKFILL WITH NATIVE
2' SILLS BACKFILL WITH
MATERIAL PER SPEC. (TYP.)
CLASS B RIP RAP AND
NATIVE MATERIAL
PER SPEC.
®EXCAVATION-45 CY
OUTLET CHANNEL
(LOOKING DOWNSTREAM)
(SCALE 1" =10')

TOE OF EXISTING ROADWAY FILL
BUFFERS STOP AT THIS LINE
JS OUTFALL AND
CHANNEL ARE STAE
40 0
20 40
SCALE: I"= 40' HORIZ.
—1--1 vu.a—ly— QIU=1.J Cis
BANK UNDERMINING V10=1.0 fps
(NON —EROSIVE)
DETAIL SHEET FOR
SITE I
uft
NAD 83/ A 2011
TOE OF EXISTING ROADWAY FILL
BUFFERS STOP AT THIS LINE
EXISTING DITCH
OUTFALL STABLE
Q10 =1.6 cfs
V10 =1.3 fps
(NON —EROSIVE)
LEGEND
BZ 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZONE 1 (30')
BZ 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZONE 2 (20')
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
ETF — EXISTING TRANSPORTATION FACILITY

TOE OF EXISTING ROADWAY FILL
BUFFERS STOP AT THIS LINE
JS OUTFALL AND
CHANNEL ARE STABLE
40 0
20 40
SCALE: I"= 40' HORIZ.
JS OUTFALL
W/RI P RAP
PROPOSED OUTFALL
EROSION OBSERVED Q10=1.5 cfs
BANK UNDERMINING V10=1.0 fps
(NON —EROSIVE)
DETAIL SHEET FOR
SITE I
MMON
NAD 83 A �2011
TOE OF EXISTING ROADWAY FILL
BUFFERS STOP AT THIS LINE
EXISTING DITCH
OUTFALL STABLE
Q10 =1.6 cfs
V10 =1.3 fps
(NON —EROSIVE)
LEGEND
BZ 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZONE 1 (30')
BZ 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZONE 2 (20')
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
ETF - EXISTING TRANSPORTATION FACILITY

FFE-i3
I BZ 2 \
� OST
Z�
SIGN O
/ WOODS
R�
DETAIL SHEET FOR
SITE 2
50 0
25 50
SCALE: I"= 50' HORIZ.
�O
2-",
bftwft'
NAD 83/ A 2011
LEGEND
BZ 1
RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZONE 1 (30')
BZ 2
RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZONE 2 (20')
®
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2

bftwft'
NAD 83/ A 2011
cu
�Q ss
/ ♦ j �FEBKAPT r
--------- A SIGN OGD
' B
/L��:.
r - 2
WOODS'
Ott- - ;
v
MH
W,00Ds
i
DETAIL SHEET FOR
SITE 2
LEGEND
BZ 1 RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZONE 1 (30')
BZ 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZONE 2 (20')
50 0 ® ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
25 50
SCALE: I"= 50' HORIZ.

bftwft'
NAD 83/ A 2011
LEGEND
DETAIL., SHEET FOR OUTFALL STABLE
gZ 1
RIPARIAN (30OF' ) ER
ZONE 1
0.
Q100.9 cfs
SITE 3 V10=1.1 fps
BZ 2
RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZONE 2 (20')
(NON —EROSIVE)
®
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
50 0
25 50
SCALE: I"= 50' HORIZ.

QQ \
\ co
774'+ CB
.�
CD
3 Q
, r
3
bftwft'
NAD 83/ A 2011
LEGEND
DETAIL., SHEET FOR OUTFALL STABLE
gZ 1
RIPARIAN (30OF' ) ER
ZONE 1
0.
Q100.9 cfs
SITE 3 V10=1.1 fps
BZ 2
RIPARIAN BUFFER
ZONE 2 (20')
(NON —EROSIVE)
®
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
\\\
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
50 0
25 50
SCALE: I"= 50' HORIZ.

BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACT
BUFFER
REPLACEMENT
SITE NO.
STRUCTURE SIZE /
TYPE
STATION (FROM/TO)
TYPE
ALLOWABLE
MITIGABLE
ROAD
CROSSING
CULVERT
UTILITIES
I ZONE 1
(ft)
ZONE 2
(ft2)
TOTAL
(ft)
ZONE 1
(ft)
ZONE 2
(ft2)
TOTAL
(ft2)
ZONE 1
(ft)
ZONE 2
(ft)
1
2 @ 12' x 10' RCBC
-L- FROM STA. 13+23 TO 15+70
X
1
10350
6148
16498
2
EX. 24" RCP OUTLET
PROTECTION
-L- FROM STA. 10+ TO 14+04
X
3111
581
3692
3
30" RCP -IV
-Y- FROM STA. 10+39 TO 11+46
X
3464
2054
5518
TOTAL:
I
I
1
6575
1 2635
1 9210
1 10350
1 6148
1 16498
Rev. May 2006

Project Tracking No.:
16-12-0014
oa NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is note
ti-9 'a valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the6
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: Structure 400052
WBS No: 17BP.7.R.114
F.A. No: N/A
Federal Permit Required?
County: Guilford
Document: State MCC
Funding: ® State ❑ Federal
® Yes ❑ No Permit Type: NWP
Project Description: NCDOT's Division 7 proposes to replace Bridge No. 52 on SR 1332 (South
Scientific Street) over an Unnamed Tributary of Deep River in Guilford County. Bridge No. 52 was built
in 1957, and is considered to be structurally deficient and functionally obsolete; therefore, it has been
scheduled to be replaced. The Study Area for the project will be centered on the bridge and measure
about 150 feet wide (i.e. 75 feet from centerline) and about 300 feet from either end of the bridge.
Overall, the Study Area will encompass about 94,096 square feet (2.16 acres), inclusive of the existing
roadway and structure to be replaced.
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
This project was accepted on Monday, December 5, 2016. A map review and site file search was
conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on Thursday, December 8, 2016. No archaeological
surveys have been conducted within the vicinity of Bridge No. 52, and no archaeological sites have been
recorded within one-half (1/2) mile of the proposed project. Digital copies of HPO's maps (High Point
East Quadrangle) as well as the HPOWEB GIS Service (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) were last reviewed
on Monday, December 19, 2016. There are no known historic architectural resources located within or
adjacent to the Study Area for which intact archaeological deposits would be anticipated within the
footprint of the proposed project. In addition, topographic maps, historic maps (NCMaps website),
USDA soil survey maps, and aerial photographs were utilized and inspected to gauge environmental
factors that may have contributed to historic or prehistoric settlement within the project limits, and to
assess the level of modern, slope, agricultural, hydrological, and other erosive -type disturbances within
and surrounding the archaeological APE.
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE.
Although this is a State -funded project, a Federal permit will be required. Permanent and/or temporary
utility and/or drainage easements will not be necessary; however, additional ROW may be needed. The
size and shape of the Study Area have been drawn in a way to capture any possible impacts beyond the
NCDOT's existing 62-foot ROW. At this time, we are in compliance with NC GS 121-12a, since there
are no eligible (i.e. National Register -listed) archaeological resources located within the project's Study
Area that would require our attention. Based on the description of the proposed project, activities may
take place beyond the NCDOT's existing 62-foot ROW along SR 1332 (South Scientific Street). From an
environmental perspective, the Study Area falls within a residential/industrial environmental setting in the
`7Vo ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED"form forMinor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 200712015 Programmatic Agreement.
1 of 3

Project Tracking No.:
16-12-0014
north -central part of North Carolina within the Piedmont physiographic province. The Study Area is
composed of three (3) soil types (North to South): Enon fine sandy loam, 6-10% slopes (EnC), Wehadkee
silt loam (Wh), and Mecklenburg sandy clay loam, 6-10% slopes, eroded (MhC2). The Study Area
consists of poorly drained soils (i.e. Wh) within the drainage itself as well as moderately sloping and
eroded topography (i.e. MhC2 and EnC) to either side. Preservation of intact archaeological resources
would not be anticipated under such environmental conditions. Based on the developed nature of the
surrounding area (post-1982 apartment complex and the Southern Railroad corridor), archaeological
resources have not been recorded within the vicinity of Bridge No. 52. In addition, a review of current
LiDAR data shows no noticeable landscape features within the Study Area that would be compatible with
favorable landforms (i.e. upland settings). Remnants of previous roadbeds or crossings of this Unnamed
Tributary are not anticipated, but, if present, would not be considered historically significant. The 1920
Soil Map of Guilford County does not depict a road or crossing at this location; however, by 1930, a
Class "C" road had been built. The Office of State Archaeology (OSA) has reviewed several projects
within the vicinity of Bridge No. 52 for environmental compliance, including housing projects (ER 83-
0716, ER 94-0261), greenway projects (ER 87-0513, ER 91-0175), and stream mitigation work (ER 00-
8658). No archaeological surveys were recommended for any of these projects, stating that the presence
of significant archaeological sites was unlikely. In fact, the High Point Stream Mitigation Project ran
through the Study Area and was not subjected to an archaeological survey. Within 5 miles of the project
area, NCDOT's Archaeology Group has reviewed numerous transportation -related projects for
environmental compliance under the Programmatic Agreement (PA) with the State Historic Preservation
Office (NC-HPO), all of which were not recommended for survey, primarily based on the disturbed
and/or eroded nature of the project areas. As mentioned before, soil conditions (poorly drained and
eroded) and overall topography (moderately sloping, non -upland settings) within the Study Area would
suggest a low probability for significant prehistoric and/or historic archaeological materials to be present.
Therefore, it is believed that the current Study Area, as depicted, is unlikely to contain intact and
significant archaeological resources. No archaeological survey is required for this project. If design
plans change or are made available prior to construction, then additional consultation regarding
archaeology will be required. At this time, no further archaeological work is recommended. If
archaeological materials are uncovered during project activities, then such resources will be dealt with
according to the procedures set forth for "unanticipated discoveries," to include notification of NCDOT's
Archaeology Group.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info ❑ Photos
❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes Other:
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED
OA
NCDOT ARCH
❑Correspondence
December 19, 2016
Date
`7Vo ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED"form forMinor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 200712015 Programmatic Agreement.
2 of 3

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use
16-12-0014
t HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
R NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
County:
Guilford
WBS No.:
17BP.7.R.114
Document
Type:
MCC
Fed. Aid No:
Funding:
® State ❑ Federal
Federal
Permits :
® Yes ❑ No
Permit
Type(s):
NWP
Proiect Description:
Replace Bridge No. 52 on SR 1332 (S. Scientific St) over branch.
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
Description of review activities, results, and conclusions:
Review of HPO quad maps, relevant background reports, historic designations roster, and
indexes was undertaken on December 15, 2016. Based on this review there are no NR, DE, LL,
SL, or SS in the Area of Potential Effects (APE). There are no standing structures in the APE
which are greater than 50 years of age. Guilford County Bridge No. 52, built in 1957, does not
exemplify any distinctive engineering or aesthetic type and is not eligible for the National
Register of Historic Places. No survey is required.
Why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that there
are no unidentified significant historic architectural or landscape resources in the project
area:
Using HPO GIS website and county tax data provides reliable information regarding the structures in the
APE. These combined utilities are considered valid for the purposes of determining the likelihood of
historic resources being present.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
®Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ®Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED
NCDOT Architectural Historian
Date
l�
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEY REQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
Page I of 2

2�`a. An '� +}: �- E i 'S +gS � ��� FY � � . A�l .�•fa _ :,6
•' Yr;.
07 k
7 ` t Tvc F .
o .: e ta=� ` � <. 4 '><fAya� -s� t � i' r tj •y ; �Ff � F 't
�" ♦�'�'% '� �'4z �' . • .fir � F�.. �. i. �y.
k.
� hy�", : ,• `.`
i .qi {� _{}� .._.fir. Ii• � .». � �� w\ � � -�r�'pYs !'u
?..
♦♦s - 6 kid$ ,4 .'.
aS t.
yy f
i`
V.
4�" .,
f +S
"N I'
� t
"� : ;i .tl� '•fir
_ f
s

Pr taw Dr _
1- 1 -
A fli
Y
td h�a
ANON=04
CL
p 1S tlro�0
t or
LL
i 1 l;) IracMBoQ no _uan+tbn� ,' I
zi
a
T�
n
a v �
J
Jjo Oa -
17alv6Ul� �
4t$e or
ro alvp�sora E 10
Nfr
'ricoJyriklg -
V
Q V
N s
M p IS aP'%XOA1
1M-I •` v o
N e a
1E
Iy �p G
Ln
p u
O 'a `t av
iW y,Dt ; ;S 6 Y
w. c ,a-� s
z�; ,`; �,'S'ArbroO* A
S54 r(M 2 y
L n �F�--Yj• AtD aeA'1
co {Y Out fy cY
N I
1 4c*
'� hi (3 Jlr Sj ftjlq
Co h£f
-
c-I
G lU 13 LAJIMiDpy
L �
Ch n L•Fi c7 l� m a
y Z
Off- C;:rf
�1�ba9� V qW,
trV Q
) n , air• MI
yap tr,j!
CL

ID#* 20210589
Version* 1
Regional Office * Winston-Salem Regional Office - [phone]
Reviewer List* Dave Wanucha
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 3/19/2021
Contact Name* Jerry Parker
Contact Email Address* [e-mail]
Project Name* Scientific Street Bridge Replacement
Project Owner* NCDOT
Project County* Guilford
Owner Address: Street Address
1584 Yanceyville Street
Address Line 2
P.O. Box 14996
aty
State / Province / Region
Greensboro
NC
Postal / Zip axle
Country
27415-4996
USA
Is this a transportation project?* r Yes r No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
* 401 Water Quality Certification - F 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
* Individual Permit F Modification
F Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
(-- Yes C No
Please list all existing project ID's associated with this projects.*
17BP.7.R.114
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Dave Wanucha
Please give a brief project description below.*

Project will involve replacing a structurally deficient bridge with a new
bridge in the same alignment. An offsite detour will be utilized during
construction. The project has been designed to have as little
environmental impacts as practically possible. Best Management
Practices will be used throughout all phases of construction.
Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
3/25/2021
3/30/2021
3/31 /2021
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
Scientific Street Permit Drawings.pdf 5.39MB
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
1 understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
1 also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Submittal Date 3/19/2021

Mayhew, Aileen
From: Amy James <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 8:54 AM
To: Mayhew, Aileen
Subject: RE: Sunflower Question for Division 7 Bridge Projects
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Hi Aileen,
Bridge 52: No suitable habitat exists for the Schweinitz's sunflower in the project area. Open areas in the corridor are
too maintained to support this species. In addition, the NCNHP does not show occurrences of this species within one
mile of the project area.
Bridge 224: There is a large powerline ROW transecting the project area that might provide habitat for the Schweinitz's
sunflower; however, it was determined that the level of maintenance within the ROW in upland areas is too high to
support this species. In addition, the NCNHP does not show occurrences of this species within one mile of the project
area.
We were at these bridges in July to survey for pogonia, which is outside the flowering window for the sunflower, but
close enough that we would likely notice it if it was occurring in the project area. Plus, habitat, if it exists, is very
marginal.
Let me know if you need anything else!
Amy
ECOSYSTEM
PLANNING 8r
R ESTORATfON
Amy James, PWS
Environmental Scientist
919-388-0787 (office)
919-623-5411 (cell)
aiames(@eorusa.net
www.eparuussa. net
From: Mayhew, Aileen <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 11:39 AM
To: Amy James <[e-mail]>
Subject: Sunflower Question for Division 7 Bridge Projects
Hi Amy,
As a follow up to our phone call, I'm working on the MCDC for several of the Division 7 bridge replacement projects and I
believe the Sunflower is now listed for Guilford County. I spoke with Nikki in Division 7 and she said the sunflower is

found in a corner of the County; but since there wasn't mention of it in the tech memo, she wasn't concerned. However,
I would prefer an email or something similar to this effect.
The outstanding bridges in Guilford County for which I have not prepared the environmental documents yet are:
17BP.7.R.114— Bridge No. 52 on South Scientific Street
17BP.7.R.116 —Bridge 224 on McConnell Road
Thank you,
Aileen
Aileen S. Mayhew, PE
Project Manager / NEPA
Phone [phone] Direct [phone]
[e-mail]
Mott MacDonald
7621 Purfoy Road
Suite 115
OTT Fuquay-Varina NC 27526
MACDONALD United States of America
Website I Twitter I Linkedln I Facebook I YouTube
2

17BP.7.R.114
40 -- GUILFORD Br# 400052
SR1332 S Scientific St.
BRANCH
The project consists of replacing 33-foot-long Structurally Deficient Bridge that has a Sufficiency Rating
of 17 in Guilford County. The current structure was metal deck on 1-beams setting on concrete
abutments. The Deck, Superstructure and Substructure all have a grade of 4. This makes every
component of the bridge Deficient; therefore, the immediate need for replacement.
The proposed structure consists of a 2 @ 12' X 10' Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert. This structure
meets the hydrological requirements of the drainage area and matches or reduces upstream backwater
in all events analyzed including the 100 Year event for FEMA compliance. The proposed culvert will
function similarly to that of the existing bridge, which consists of concrete vertical abutments and long
wingwalls. The existing stream also approaches the upstream side of the bridge at a sharp skew with
some locations of bank erosion. The culvert option proposes to better align the stream and allow the
banks to stabilize. Smaller streams in the Piedmont area are often best suited for culverts to minimize
raising the roadway grade.
Justification for bridge to culvert:
• The basin drainage area and estimated discharges are compatible with a culvert structure. And
as mentioned, typically prefer culverts due to longer service life and reduced maintenance vs a
bridge.
The proposed culvert and existing bridge (with vertical concrete abutments) have similar
hydraulic type openings and properties. Hydraulic function including backwater, outlet
velocities, etc will remain similar.
The outlet channel looks stable. The upstream, inlet channel has some erosion on the south
bank. We would anticipate the culvert will allow the outlet channel to remain stable as well as
improve upstream bank stability.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 9lA82F6C-24DB-4AB6-8D16-E15E6C70ABF1
ROY COOPER
Governor
JOHN NICHOLSON
Interim Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
June 18, 2021
Guilford County
NCDWR Project No. 20210589
Bridge 52 to Culvert
WBS No. 1713P.7.R.114
APPROVAL of 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Mr. Jerry Parker, Environmental Officer
NCDOT, Division 7
1584 Yanceyville Street
Greensboro, NC 27415
Dear Mr. Parker:
You have our approval, in accordance with the conditions listed below, for the following impacts to replace Bridge
52 on Scientific Street (SR 1332) with a Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert (RCBC) in a UT to Deep River in
Guilford County.
Stream Impacts in the Cape Fear River Basin
Permanent Fill in
Temporary Fill in in
Stream
Perennial Stream
Perennial Stream
Total Stream
Impacts
Site
(linear ft)
(linear ft)
Impact
Requiring
Bank
(linear ft)
Mitigation
Stabilization
Culvert
Dewatering
(linear ft)
1
121
84
53
258
-
2
8
-
-
8
-
3
25
-
-
25
-
Totals
154
84
53
291
-
Total Stream Impacts: 291 linear feet
The project shall be constructed in accordance with your application dated received April 23, 2021. After reviewing
your application, we have decided that these impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number
4135. This certification corresponds to the Corps Nationwide Permit 14. In addition, you should acquire any other
federal, state or local permits before you proceed with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and
Erosion Control, Non -Discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations. This approval will expire with the
accompanying 404 permit.
This approval is valid solely for the purpose and design described in your application (unless modified below).
Should your project change, you must notify the NCDWR and submit a new application. If the property is sold, the
D E Q�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center � Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTHCpROLiNA
Fxwrm oei.om.,n,i o�.nir 919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: 91A82F6C-24DB-4AB6-8D16-E15E6C70ABF1
new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying
with all the conditions. If total wetland fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total
impacts to perennial streams (now or in the future) exceed 300 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required
as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h) (6) and (7). For this approval to remain valid, you must adhere to the
conditions listed in the attached certification(s) and any additional conditions listed below.
Condition(s) of Certification:
Project Specific Conditions
The post -construction removal of any temporary bridge structures must return the project site to its
preconstruction contours and elevations. The impacted areas shall be revegetated with appropriate native species.
15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)
2. As a condition of this 401 Water Quality Certification, bridge demolition and construction must be accomplished
in strict compliance with the most recent version of NCDOT's Best Management Practices for Construction and
Maintenance Activities. [15A NCAC 02H .0507(d)(2) and 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(5)]
Placement of culverts and other structures in open waters and streams shall be placed below the elevation of the
streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and 20 percent of the culvert
diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life.
Design and placement of culverts and other structures including temporary erosion control measures shall not be
conducted in a manner that may result in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or streambeds or banks, adjacent to or
upstream and downstream of the above structures. If this condition is unable to be met due to bedrock or other
limiting features encountered during construction, please contact NCDWR for guidance on how to proceed and to
determine whether a permit modification will be required. [I 5A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
General Conditions
1. If concrete is used during construction, a dry work area shall be maintained to prevent direct contact between curing
concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete shall not be discharged to surface
waters due to the potential for elevated pH and possible aquatic life and fish kills. [15A NCAC 0213.0200]
2. During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in waters of the U.S., or
protected riparian buffers. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
3. The dimension, pattern and profile of the stream above and below the crossing shall not be modified. Disturbed
floodplains and streams shall be restored to natural geomorphic conditions. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
4. The use of rip -rap above the Normal High Water Mark shall be minimized. Any rip -rap placed for stream
stabilization shall be placed in stream channels in such a manner that it does not impede aquatic life passage. [I 5A
NCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
5. The Permittee shall ensure that the final design drawings adhere to the permit and to the permit drawings submitted
for approval. [15A NCAC 02H .0507(c) and 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(2) and (c)(2)]
6. All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted in a dry work area. Approved BMP measures from the
most current version of NCDOT Construction and Maintenance Activities manual such as sandbags, rock berms,
cofferdams and other diversion structures shall be used to prevent excavation in flowing water. [15A NCAC
02H.0506(b)(3) and (c)(3)]
7. Heavy equipment shall be operated from the banks rather than in the stream channel in order to minimize
sedimentation and reduce the introduction of other pollutants into the stream. [I 5A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)]
8. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and maintained to prevent
contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials. [15A NCAC
02H.0506(b)(3)]
D ��� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTH CAROLINA 919.707.9000
pepa,hny,�p! EmlmnmmMl puallry

DocuSign Envelope ID: 91A82F6C-24DB-4AB6-8D16-E15E6C70ABF1
9. No rock, sand or other materials shall be dredged from the stream channel except where authorized by this certification.
[I 5A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)]
10. Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment in or adjacent to surface waters is
prohibited. [I 5A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)]
11. The permittee and its authorized agents shall conduct its activities in a manner consistent with State water quality
standards (including any requirements resulting from compliance with §303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other
appropriate requirements of State and Federal law. If the NCDWR determines that such standards or laws are not being
met (including the failure to sustain a designated or achieved use) or that State or federal law is being violated, or that
further conditions are necessary to assure compliance, the NCDWR may reevaluate and modify this certification. [15A
NCAC 0213.0200]
12. All fill slopes located in jurisdictional wetlands shall be placed at slopes no flatter than 3:1, unless otherwise authorized
by this certification. [I5ANCAC 02H.0506(b)(2)]
13. A copy of this Water Quality Certification shall be maintained on the construction site at all times. In addition the
Water Quality Certification and all subsequent modifications, if any, shall be maintained with the Division Engineer and
the on -site project manager. [15A NCAC 02H .0507(c) and 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(2) and (c)(2)]
14. The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary located within the construction corridor approved by this authorization
shall be clearly marked by highly visible fencing prior to any land disturbing activities. Impacts to areas within the
fencing are prohibited unless otherwise authorized by this certification. [15A NCAC 02H.0501 and .0502]
15. The issuance of this certification does not exempt the Permittee from complying with any and all statutes, rules,
regulations, or ordinances that may be imposed by other government agencies (i.e. local, state, and federal) having
jurisdiction, including but not limited to applicable buffer rules, stormwater management rules, soil erosion and
sedimentation control requirements, etc.
16. The Permittee shall report any violations of this certification to the Division of Water Resources within 24 hours of
discovery. [I 5A NCAC 02B.0506(b)(2)]
17. Upon completion of the project (including any impacts at associated borrow or waste sites), NCDOT project engineer
(or appointee) shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of Completion Form" to notify the NCDWR when
all work included in the 401 Certification has been completed. [I 5A NCAC 02H.0502(f)]
18. There shall be no excavation from, or waste disposal into, jurisdictional wetlands or waters associated with this permit
without appropriate modification. Should waste or borrow sites, or access roads to waste or borrow sites, be located in
wetlands or streams, compensatory mitigation will be required since that is a direct impact from road construction
activities. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3) and (c)(3)]
19. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing the proper design,
installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface waters
standards [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3) and (c)(3]):
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed, operated, and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion
Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control measures must
be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most recent version of the North
Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction
sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor -owned or leased borrow pits
associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be designed, installed, operated,
and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining
Manual.
D ��� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTH CAROLINA 919.707.9000
pepa,hny,�p! EmlmnmmMl puallry

DocuSign Envelope ID: 91A82F6C-24DB-4AB6-8D16-E15E6C70ABF1
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the reclamation in accordance with the
requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act.
20. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters unless otherwise approved by this
Certification. [15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3) and (c)(3)]
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached Certification you must file a petition for an administrative
hearing. You may obtain the petition form from the office of Administrative hearings. You must file the petition
with the office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60) days of receipt of this notice. A petition is considered
filed when it is received in the office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of
Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00am and 5:00pm, except
for official state holidays. The original and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings.
The petition may be faxed -provided the original and one copy of the document is received by the Office of
Administrative Hearings within five (5) business days following the faxed transmission.
The mailing address for the Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:
Mr. Bill F. Lane, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Resources under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please contact Dave Wanucha at [phone] or dave.wanucha&cdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
9C9886312DCD474...
S. Daniel Smith, Director
Division of Water Resources
Electronic copy only distribution:
David Bailey, US Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Field Office
Gary Jordan, US Fish and Wildlife Service
Travis Wilson, NC Wildlife Resources Commission
File Copy
D ��� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTH CAROLINA 919.707.9000
pepa,hny,�p! EmlmnmmMl puallry

DocuSign Envelope ID: 9lA82F6C-24DB-4AB6-8D16-E15E6C70ABF1
ROY COOPER
Governor
JOHN NICHOLSON
Interim Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NCDWR Project No.:
Applicant:
Project Name:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
County:
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification:
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and
any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401 Transportation Permitting
Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Resources, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1617. This form
may be returned to NCDWR by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not
necessary to send certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence
was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Agent's Certification
Date:
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence
was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature:
Engineer's Certification
Partial Final
Date:
I, , as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North
Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time) the construction of the project for the
Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the
construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and intent of the 401
Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature
Date
Registration No.
D E Q� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center � Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTH CAROL1Nh
a�wun oriAm.wi ousinv 919.707.9000

NC llreani itten _
Bate, f(I} L ProjectlSite� � -_T '_ Latitude:
Evaluator:' , County: 1"., Longitude:
Ti
Total Points: Stream Deter u iltian4(zirc€e one) Other 91• :E
Stream is at least intermittent I Ephemeral f Qterm!tterjtlPerennial e.g. Qua&--�ame.
1f ? 19 or erennial if z 30' G 1a -�
A. Geomor ho!2 y (Subtotal =�1� w 'aY ?
Absent__
- Weak
Moderate--
Strong _
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
(]
1
2
2.0 of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool.
0
1
2
3
ri le- oof sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate - ,' . 41
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict Floodplain
0"_
1" .
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches �
T '
1
2 �
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
77- d
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
R.
1.
2
3
8. Grade control -r »_---
0.5
`
- 1
1.5 -
1.5
10. Natural valley
o
0.51
11. Second or greater order channel
" R6 = 0 ?
Yes = 3
12. Presence of Basefiow
0
1
2
13. iron oxidizing bacteria
f
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15, Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
_
16. Organic debris lines or piles
_ D
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil based evidence of high water table?
No = 0,
Yes = 3
18, Fibrous roots in streambed
-'3 '
2
0
19. Booted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20, Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
?
3
-
21. Aquatic MallUsks
, `
1 _
2 -
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
24, Amphibians
`
0.5
1
1.5
25, Algae
0.5
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75: OBL = 1.5
th`e� =�
__
`perennial streams may also be identi ied using other methods. See p. 35 of mpnuat.
Notes
Sketch
L
Sl
I
r
A) • j 'A'i

USACF ATD#
(indicate on attached map)
10D
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT W®RKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: J f
1. Applicant's name: . , 2. Evaluator's name: ' - <
3. Date of evaluation:__. 1 4. Time of evaluation:_ /O-
5. Name of stream: r' .; �' 4, 6. River basins 1G r
r i `
7. Approximate drainage area:—,- 8. Stream order:,`�;�.�
9. Length of reach evaluated: 10. County: L �� F
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):_/-l1
Lon itade ex.-77.556611si
Latitude (°x. 34.872312): � 7 . 1 '� ���',
-d" I - -- g ( ):
Method location determined (circlet' GPS Tapo Sfteei Ortho (Aerial) PhotoIGIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note ne rby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):-
7 f a .. FxH.'i �1��r.'"a,F .,. 1 I'�G•�J 1), i_ / 4 �� ! ! h-
DWQI
14. Proposed channel work (if any): --fe kf-
-3 �
IS. Recent weather conditions: = r �•' '' '"
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
ko
Site #,
1.7. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ____Section 10 Tidal Waters _Esse fiat Fisieries Habitat
_Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters XWater Supply atei-sh 1 Q-M
18. Is there a pond or lake 1 cated upstream of the evaluation point? YESf yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear ori�rC7SGS quad map? �� NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES(&.
21. Estimated watershed land use: '� © % Residential r.%.Commercial _°/a Industrial _% Agricultural
_LF,>% Forested % Cleared / Logged -% Other
22. )3ankfnll width: �{ �' 23. Sank height (from bed to top of bank):_ "
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) ,__Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) ___Stecp (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: y Straight .,Occasional bonds Frequent meander Tery sinuous ____Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc, Every characteristic must be scored using the saute ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e,g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
Evaluator's Signatureh4
'' w Date
e,...:.
This channel evaluation form is rote ded to he used only as a guide to assist landowners and nvironmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WO SHEET
* These characteristics are not assesscu,n cvnbiai a- 0-0.

USACE AID# DWQ #_
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: t_ —
r
3. Date or evaluation: r t
5. Name of stream:_- --
7. Approximate drainage area: g a �^
9. Length of reach evaluated:_ —
2. Evaluator's name. ee
4. Time of evaluation:
6. River basin:
8. Stream order: y -
10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any}:
Latitude (ex. 39.872312): Longitude (ex.-77.556611):
'? %
Method location determined (circle): < G Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13, Location of reach under evaluation (note n arby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) localinn}:
14. proposed channel work if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: T e�,4
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Ly",
17: Identify any special waterway classifications known: —Section 10 Tidal Waters _BSk> l Fisheries Habitat
--.• Y
_Ir
Trout Waters �4utstanding Resource Waters ,—_ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed
18. ]s there a pond orjjl ke 144(sjated (upstream of the evaluation point? YES T] If yes, estimate the water surface area:
( ,d f\ r `E
i9. Does channel appo on USGS quad map7SN0 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21, Estimated watershed land use: rra% Residential _% Commercial % Industrial %Agricultural
' I)% Forested % Cleared / Logged —% Other )
22. Bankfull width:
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 20/4) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) ^steep N 0%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends Frequcnt meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. if a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and too, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
} Date �I��_ t
Evaluator's Signature~
This channel evaluation form is intended to he used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -- version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not asscNNUU ALI �— a �• ��•

NC Division of dater Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identlficat10n Form Version 4.11
Projectisite: f e % • Latitude:
Date:
Longitude:°I,,
Evaluator: A" S, 2n County: I �r�� {mac
Total Points: StreampetermlMito clrcleone) other
i t' termlttenf i= h mera /�ermittent erenniat e.g. Quad Name:
Stream IS at eas rn
p e
r
A. Genmar holy (.Subtotal= }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
2
19, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalwag
0
1
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step pool,
0
1
2
ripple -pool se uence
0
1
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
2
5. Activelrelict fioodplain
0
1
1.
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
1
2
Headcuts
0
0,
0.5
1
Grdde control
�9.
0
0.5
1
Natural valley
o=0
Yes=3
11. Second or greater order channel
_ w
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
1,
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
l
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
0 5
14, Leaf litter
1'
15, Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
Organic debris lines or piles
{bc
No
= 0
i 1'esM=
±W.Soli -based evidenco of (high table?
C. Biol I Subtotal =
3
2
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
219
EF�
Rooted upland plants In streambed
3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
0,5
1
22. Fish
0.5
1
23. Crayfish
1
0
0.5
1
24, Amphibians
0
0.5
1
25. Algae
FACW = 0.75'. bt3L = 1.5ther = 0�
26, Wetland plants in streambed
'nprenniai streams may also be identified using otiner methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Sketch:
41
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.5
1,5
3
3
0
1'5
1.5
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1,5

USACE AID#_
DWQ
Site # (indicate on attached map)
Is
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT W®RKSHE T
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: %r� .µ.' 1
2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation; "' f.�., a `' 4. Time of evaluation:,
$. Name of stream; 6. River basin: /=
7. Approximate drainage area: e- " 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: — 1 r 10. County: 6� t I ?. -J
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): `
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):'� ^ 7 e Longitude [ex.—77.5565 t t):
Method location determined (circle): S Topo Shect Ortho (Aerial) t'hoto/GIS Other GIS Other
G`P
13. Location o reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. proposed channel work (if .
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of v
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known:
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters
Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential fisheries Habitat
Nutrient Sensitive Waters ,,Water Supply Watershed -.z�/ (I-N)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YFSj-NOlf yes, estimate the water surface area:!,
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE&;`NO­ -'-�) 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES:; NOS_
21. Estimated watershed land use: `l'% Residential % Commercial % Industrial � % Agricultural
/o Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other )
22. Bankfull width: ter" 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep 0 00/0)
24. Channel slope down center of stream: flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight __
Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an. explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the characterof a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
:. Date ��w i j
Evaluator's Signature_ Y, 'ref
This channel evaluation form is intefided to be used only as a guide to assist landowners aad envrronmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -- version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT W®RKSHEET
* 'These characteristics are not assesseu III cudaial Dkj........

--
NC. J)NVQ Stream identification Forrtt '4rersialr 4.11
Project/Site: toy' ' t atitude: F- Y � ,Y M1W
Date.
_�- County 1 f Longitude:
Evaluator �✓ � �="��r ��_----.�.__
Total Points: Stream Determination (circip-stg��
stream is ai least internifttent £ hemeral Intermitteijt- erennia€`) e.g. Quad%me:
if a 1g or perennial if z 30'
A, Geot'f'gT ology {Subtotal = �_i__
-__
At,ssnt
_.Weak
1
Moderate
2---
�tr ng
1' Continuity of channel tied and bank
0
_
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
--
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pant, step poo€,
0
1
ri le- ool se uence ____ -_
3 -
4. Particle size of stream substrate
- -
1
5, Actiyelfelict ftoodplain-_-
0
-
6. ©bars or benches
0epositional
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
-�
- _r__0
1
2 -
3
8. Hsadcuts
9. Grade control �
_
�
v10. Natural valley
0 0.5
No = 0
11. Second or greater order channel __�
artificial Mches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drola (Subtotal = qt } _
2
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
_ 1
-
2
3
3
__
13. lron oxidizing bacteria
CAI
�
-
0.5
0
14. Leaf litter _
15. Sediment on plants or debris_mm�___-�,.
__ ��
-
-
___,
0.5
-
1
- - 1
1.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5
Yes = 3
17, Soil -based evidence of high water table?
C. Biola y Subtotal
in strearnbed -�
-
2--
s�
18. Fibrous roots
.::.'
2
1
0 --
19. Rooted upland plants in strearnbed
_
--
3
20, Macrobenthos {note diversity and abundance}
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks _
c0>
0
1
---
0.5
--
1.5 _
22. Fish -----
__
_
W, __
0.5
-
1
1.5
23 Crayfish..-
�`1.5
_
24. Amphibians _- -
7A__
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed�
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Older = b
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
._..y--
Sketch:

USACE AID#.
DWQ#
i f
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: ✓ t 2. Evaluator's name: ; rf r
1 �x 4. Time of evaluation:
3. Date of evaluation, / I f
5. Name of stream: ��� I �' ✓ 6. River basin: _
7. Approximate drainage area: Stream order: f
9. Length of reach evaluated: ' r<; { 10. County:.
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees, 12. Subdivision name (if any): Ar _—
`> s °; Longitude (ex.—77,556611): 2
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of cacb under cvalu tion (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach crap identifying stream(s) location):
jrr
.r 7t
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15, Recent weather conditions: �'�
16. Site conditions at time of visit: ti %� �r ��"� ✓ FA �' gF 1r�
r
17. identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 Tidal Waters EssTittial Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _Nutrient Sensitive Waters 1C Water Sup"p` y Watershed �V
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO if yes, estimate the water surface area:
10. Does channel appear on USGS quad map?-- 0 20. floes channel appear on USDA Soil SurveyQ X�_ �NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: , " 4 Residential LO % Commercial _% Industrial _, /u Agricultural
io % Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other ( )
22. Bankfull width:_ fi 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) _—Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight ,,..Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion .of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
I;
Evaluator's Signatttre _" �� ._.:.:w Date
This channel evaluation form is s ended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

1�' 4a 4 `• / :2:. v�
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
`
��AIACTERISTI�SCQRE
ECO�tEGI(DN PUNT
;ANC,E
Cuii¢tal
Predgltt
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / per. sastent pools in stream
_:;..
.. ..• ;
no..tlow:;or "saturation; string flaw.-anax oints) .....:'
2 "
Evidence of past human'alteraton
0 ^ 6
0
..'.
..
�_...(extensivnalteration ..0,=noaiteration .iziax points
Riparian zonefA
"
0 5
no buffer 0, eonti ous wide buffer- rhax
points)F
4
Endeiace ai riutrEent or chemical discharges''
0"-4
extensive dischar es , 0; no discharges :max points
5
Groundwater discharge
0- 3
0 4
0 4
no dischar e" 0, s rin s ss s wetlands, etc max p0jilts "
6
Presence of adjacent floodplalp
0_ 4
0 4
0 2
no iloodpiain —" 0 extensive #load lash -Hoax paints
Entrenchment l:floodptain access
0 5
0 -:4
0 2
deepl entrenched 0 fie' cent Hooding = max"points}
8"`
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0 b
0 4
0 2
nowetlands 0,"lar a adjacent wetlands ="max oin#s
si
9
Channel smnosty
`
0= 5
0 `4
0 3
(extensive cfiannelizaton ...0 rjatural.tmeandeK "tnax onts}"
10
' Sed�men# input
0= 5
0 4
0 4
(extensive de osition 0;:;little or no sediment max points}
11
Size;& diversety of channel bed snl'strate,
0 —"4
0 S
fine l�oxna enous;=.0; lar a diverse saes.= max o�nts}.
12 ;'
Evidence ofchannet mcislon or widening
0 5
0 4
0 5
dee 1 incised Q stable bed 8c banks max ajnis
13
Presence Al major bauc failures
"
0 - 5
0 5
0 S .
(severe "erasion 0, `no erosion, stable banks max oi46
"
14
Root depth and;density on;.an.
0
0 :4
0 5 "
'
na vxstble roots 0; dense roots throe out'= max oints
,
lS
impact by agriculture, lives#ock, or #mbeir produchop
0 - $
substantial impact -O ::no evidence P.o�nts
16
Presence of,riffle»POOUlexes
`oois
0— 3
0 .:5
0 b
no rifflesJra 1es or. Q well develo ed max ants
17."
Habitat comp)
777777
0-6
0-6
0 6
-
(little or no habitat :U ire ueni, vaned habitats max: oints
", Canopy;coverage over strea tubed
0 i 5
0 S
0 5
18
(n0 Sha 119 yegetah0i7 0, eontvniouS GanA y max " oints
19 '
Substrate. einbeddedness
NA*
0 4
0 4
(deep1X embedded = 0. , base stricture _.max
20
Presence of stream©vertebrates (see page 4)`
0 = 4
0 =:5
0 $
1
no ev;dance - 0 common) numerous cs";��nax onnts
-
21
Presence of arnph'bin'
0q
0-4
0 4
"
"'
(no evideince 0 common numerous ty0cs.=max oints
O
22
Presence offish ?
0= 4
0- 4
0 4
,
(no evzdcncc 0 common,.nimcrous es =max points
23
Evidence of rvitdl%fe use
07- 6
( enoe.."-; no avid 0abund ant evidence � max points
][ otal Paints Possible "-
100
100
IOD,
;TiTAL Co (also enter on itt pa"ge)
-
These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2

USACE AID# DWQ # Site #f (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT W®RKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
f
1. Applicant's name: /I/, A0r 2. Evaluator's name: ! 6
3. Date of evaluation: f� `a , 1) 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: 6e-- 6. River basin: Z. Mrn d�
7. Approximate drainage area:8. Stream order: " k^
9. Length of reach evaluated: 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): y /i� Latitude (ex. 34.872312): �,. � -) � '3 2 Longitude (ex.—77.556611): " f ,3 .
Method location determined (circle): al'� Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) PhoWGlS Other 618 Other
13. Location of teach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
'•w-t..'-_'. I F ;.n. Ii; i e`aa. k�.:. ?t�.�✓-3,_'. 1-'� f i e,Ji lr. f"5 I `.lam J �a' %
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather
16. Site conditions;
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidat Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Suppl + alershed ) V (I-Iy)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? "IES, .NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: r-74 . f.
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map7eYES= NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey?4;VES) NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: &% Residential / % Commercial _% Industrial % Agricultural.
f 0% Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: _ In : �� �f4 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends _Frequent meander Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of workshect (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page. 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the workshect Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation, If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
1.iRt�ncf rnalifv
Evaluator's Signature � ./t_-- _ Date Pt f j
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject. to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to changeµ version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-W I x 26.

v
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECt)ItEGiON PINT
KAI+IGI�
# '
CI ARACTERI�TICS
..
Coastal
ll'iedoiit
Mvun""lain
i..`
Presence of"flow !persistent pools in:'stream
'
0- 5
0=4
0 's
na "tiory `or saturat�an = 0; strop "' fiovy =;tuax Dints}
2
Evidence of past huenarr:alteraton
"Dints
0 6
4
t� 1
extensive al#eration - 0, no "alferatron = max
3
Riparian zone_'
0= 6
0 =;4
0 5
ria buffer 0 Cann ous 'wide buffer max" oin#s'
4
Evdence of nutrient "or the ieai discharges ;
0 :S
0�4
1
exten& drscliar` es "0 no-dtsch":m ar es -ax owis}
S
Groundwater discharge
0� 3
0
0 4
na dischar e` 0 s rip s see s wetlands .etc mast` ousts
b
Presece of adjacent Aoodplain
04
0 4
0 2
(n flaodplatn 0, extensive flood lain pa %naxinls
7
Entrenchment !. floodplam access
2
!<
idea ly.entCenohed 0, frequenYflaadrn =:max"points
Presence of adacent wetland i
b 2.
no wetlandsad`accnt,wetiands � rnax points _ _ ;�
Channel sinuosty
in
exterisrye.ahanr►elizatran ®E} naturalmearidei max:pots}.';
sediment intigt
0 `5
Q 4
0 4
e�.tensive de ositian 0•aAtle or na�sed-- max: ornts)
size & diversity of channel °bed substrate
Q 4
0 5
fiiie"htirn6 emus 0, iar a diver- 0 sizes- max points).
12 :'
Evidence of channel ineislon ar w14 Irdng
dee 1 incised U stable bed &banks max Dints
1."
;Presence of major bank failures
Points}
_
0 5
0
(severe erosion 0; no erosion stable banks: max
14
Root depth and-deirsity;on banks
03
04
0 S
1-0
(navisi. a roots 0; dense"roats thron lraut=max pints?
.
" I S
Impact by1." agricu[teire, ]ivestack, Qr 6 bar produc#ion14
0° S
U
0 S
substaatial_im act 0' na evsdeae-max- otnts),
16 "
Presence ofriffle-pogUrlpplo-pool complexes:
0=3
0 S
0 6
no rifileslripples-or.` ools d, we devela ed mart oxnts .
17 :
Habitat complexity
06
lrttle':or no habitat ,0 fre gent, vaned habitats mart Dints)
l$
Canopycoverage over streambed
0 5
0 S
0 S
no shad�n$ vegetation 0 c011. uOus canary max
19:
Substrate enbeddedness
�U'
l`1A�'
0..4
0 d
dee l :d - added ' looses cture = max)
i
20
Presence of Aream invertebrates (see page 4.)
no evidence 0 common -numerous es,F max Dints
Presence of am hlhians.
0. 4
A. 4
0 .4
w
int
evidence — 0 common, numerous t es =max Ds
G_
22
Presence offish
0 :4
0. 4
0 4
(nn::evrdence Q comrrian numerous. es —wax Dan#s}
23
Evidence Qf wildlife use
0=6
'.
0 "S
0 S.
no. evidence . 0 :abundant evidence . 2max ousts .
..
:..
ON
Total Poin#s Passible
1QQ
10©
# 077
0.
TUTAL SCORE" {also eater �n first page}
� %�
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2

ROY COOPER
Governor
JOHN NICHOLSON
Interim Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
June 7, 2021
Mr. Jerry Parker
NCDOT Division 7 Environmental Supervisor
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Post Office Box 14996
Greensboro, North Carolina 27415-4996
Dear Mr. Parker:
Subject: DMS Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
Division 7 Project — Replace Bridge 52 over UT to Deep River on SR 1332
(Scientific Street), Guilford County, WBS Number 1713P.7.R.114
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services
(NCDEQ DMS) will provide the stream and buffer mitigation for the subject project. Based on the
information supplied by you on April 22, 2021, the impacts are located in CU 03030003 of the Cape Fear
River basin (Randleman) in the Central Piedmont (CP) Eco-Region, and are as follows:
Cape Fear
Stream
Wetlands
Buffer (Sq. Ft.)
03030003
Non-
Coastal
Randleman
Cold
Cool
Warm
Riparian
Ri arian
Marsh
Zone 1
Zone 2
Impacts
0
0
230.0
0
0
0
10,350.0
6,148.0
feet/acres
All buffer mitigation requests and approvals are administrated through the Riparian
Restoration Buffer Fund. The NCDOT will be responsible to ensure that appropriate compensation
for the buffer mitigation will be provided in the agreed upon method of fund transfer. Upon receipt
of the NCDWR's Buffer Authorization Certification, DMS will transfer funds from the NCDOT 2984
Fund into the Riparian Restoration Buffer Fund. Upon completion of transfer payment, NCDOT will
have completed its riparian buffer mitigation responsibility for this project.
This mitigation acceptance letter replaces the mitigation acceptance letter issued on
April 21 and April 22, 2021. The impacts and associated mitigation needs were not projected by
the NCDOT in the 2021 impact projection data. DMS commits to implementing sufficient stream
mitigation credits to offset the impacts associated with this project as determined by the regulatory
agencies in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If the above
referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be
valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from DMS.
Noah, 0A 11LINAD Q
�i�
o.P.ro..mm e.n'...m.ma..idy
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

Mr. Parker
SR 1332 - Bridge 52
June 7, 2021
Page Two
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Beth Harmon at 919-
707-8420.
Sincerely,
?2� L �Clit. '0Z'
James B. Stanfill
DMS Asset Management Supervisor
cc: Mr. Dave Wanucha, NCDWR - Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT - PDEA
File: SR 1332 - Bridge 52 - Division 7 Revised 2
D E Q713217 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
West Jones Street 11601 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Noan,cnaauNn �
oepnrunem or enwwnmenm wank 919.707.8600

GUILFUHU UC)UN I Y, NORR-)HI
3$ —
Ma(,McB McC2 Joins sheet 32) CcB Mac En EnD
N Ch -N .` MaE
Hiyl, EnC I 1
ShcnB ` r
Portz(
water f ^ MuB Lake
EnC HhB WkD
EnC_ HeG. .:
E� �
�0 e\�CZ. 3 MI,C2 Oc�2% 1pt31e 9owtt f \ Ft,O a, D
vac -:
ff HeC
VUB `
Mht;2 EoD2' � I �6� MhC2 HaC
G Mug MW2 "��•$ '
HY,B s� EnC EuB' WkE
o MuB EnC EnD
0 29A
1 el 'L
a Inn ` Chi tP Cr ��'. � � HhB. � HeC
' HeC
MhB2 4 Hh
JJ
-..•'�". MIX2 h�J `r\ MhC2 HhB tJaB
Mu13 \ Ch EnD
MhB2 EnD I
Ch
1.3 WI(L) /
/ G
1N EnC WkC
E+ WkEr
nC
WkD
MuB MhB2 Wic HeC
• l EnB EBB,,.,
Mn \ MhC2 J W}cD WkC- WItE-
„ \ EnC
McD2 EnC
44
00 - ^t EaC� EnC MfiC2' --- EuB-A V C
MhC2 -
O _ EnB - Wk;E
EnB. N MhC2 WkC
0 oti �ti EnD., EnC WIiD o
m 4-
I(E EnD
m .Gry MlIJ32 tAhC2 EnD vlac
MhC2 WkC J //,
O EnB Mh02 kD EnB -
MuB Mh82
EnC F �G'
Ch EnC Eu6 EnC vy",1 MhC2 En WkC'. / WkC
Mh62 _ / f!
o m (1. Er 6 a "� / W J tlhC2
N EnB .,� ar .[- .� F
EnA 14 �u3FnC
Mh62,n I
� � _ �. ".'•'. %G E7, D. II � 'API
M c4 EnC •. EnC Di+a �...� Eog2 - w- ` 0% 711
EnB
o - ,MuB WkE WItD :ErtC2 \ d
NIIc D
0
v EuB // En EnB
�9 EnB. Fes'. - �i�;-,�
�En13 Ei kE 4 J�IaC
^"-�--�.
o t
Eug
N11,62 Mill �a7 < VykE li i
EnD STJf�
MOB
Enc
o+" .1 �413` � i_ En❑ S �,�1 70 ' � I ` n�_ �rr i EnC 1. .•.I' -�y f
d yn,n: j ' Cn6EFI
r EnB r' R4ffB F J 1
if r
i 'EnR
(r
{loins sheet 44) 1 1 720U'7[, r CoB7 h

ulln
1
all
J
.As 1600.0 40
, r/A-/ AVA
A , S
yfI