20230473 Ver 1_682 Ocean Blvd West Attachments_20230329

682 Ocean Blvd West
Holden Beach, NC
Brunswick County
PCN Attachments
Table of Contents
1.0 AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
2.0 PRE -FILE REQUEST
3.0 SITE MAPS
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Topographic Map
Figure 3. Soils Map
Figure 4. Aerial Photograph
Figure 5. LiDAR Map
Figure 6. Site Plan Showing Proposed Wetland Impacts
4.0 WETLAND INFORMATION
Property Access Authorization Form
Preliminary Wetlands Map
Data Forms
Antecedent Precipitation Tool Graph
5.0 RARE SPECIES INFORMATION
NC Natural Heritage Program Letter
USFWS IPaC List
6.0 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK CREDIT ACCEPTANCE LETTER

1.0 AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM

DAVEY#-.
Resource Group
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
I/we, the undersigned, hereby authorize Davey Resource Group, Inc. to act as our agent in the
preparation and representation of information related to the Section 404/401 permit application
for 682 Ocean Blvd West located in Holden Beach, NC. All questions regarding this project
should be directed to Davey Resource Group.
Sincerely,
Amanda T. Gabrie )
Applicant
Print Name
3.2 cD • 2023
Date
Phone: [phone] • Fax: 910.452,0060
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15 • Wilmington, NC 28403

2.0 PRE -FILE REQUEST

3/23/23, 2:03 PM The Davey Tree Expert Company Mail - 682 Ocean Blvd West; Pre -File Request
DAVEYS Williams, Kim <[e-mail]>
682 Ocean Blvd West; Pre -File Request
1 message
Williams, Kim <[e-mail]>
To: 401 [e-mail]
Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 6:51 AM
Hello -
I am working with Amanda Gabriel on the residential development of her lot at 682 Ocean Blvd West in Holden Beach and
wetland impacts are anticipated. A site plan is currently being developed.
Client: Amanda Gabriel; [e-mail]
Site: 682 Ocean Blvd West, Holden Beach, NC (Brunswick County)
This email serves as our pre -filing meeting request.
Thanks so much!
Kim
Kim Williams I Section Manager
Davey Resource Group, Inc.
Direct: 910-452-0001 x 1908 1 Cell: 910.471.5035 1 Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15 1 Wilmington, NC 28403
DAVEY
JS
Resource Group
Visit our local office page
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=5f499cdl a1 &view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-3202995781719047913%7Cmsg-a: r52870440684358598... 1 /1

3.0 SITE MAPS
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Topographic Map
Figure 3. Soils Map
Figure 4. Aerial Photograph
Figure 5. LiDAR Map
Figure 6. Site Plan Showing Proposed Wetland Impacts

-
�.W11�w
4 --
RA
-
+n° sou°+• 4r
\
-_
_ -
SlVcy Tnwn
_
�nn
L�
y
\lKC
ix
4 �nnxtxl _
t l
- - _ -
R
NC 130 r.n�
- I T L.�H so-.eLswehwe„ '�
Sece+s�i•�•
a F �
.enenwenx v+.esr 3 vmnsnu"'sjA1` y{" _- __ p5 '�
NC 1 id
-
-_ Prof ect - ; oIden eeaen_
Area
_ p1Yr t
- - - - -- - - - - - r
Holden
Beach
.s.n eeasn .
L:\Wetlands\2022 Wetlands Files\DRGNCW22.456\Maps
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: OpenStreetMap
682 Ocean Blvd W, Holden Beach
Brunswick County, NC
DAVEY#
Resource Group
N 0 1,000 2,000 4,000
ft
Scale applies to 11X17" print.
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
Map Date- August 2022
DRGNCW22.456
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]

W fie- j - 4 q
` —Ag-�e— t
r !LE;1�1
LyndS81V-� - P 's
NF•-�
—11% ----I I--
-
L:\Wetlands\2022 Wetlands Files\DRGNCW22.456\Maps
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: USGS Topographic 7.5 Minute Holden Beach
682 Ocean Blvd W, Holden Beach
Brunswick County, NC
Map Date: August 2022
DRGNCW22.456
DAVEY#
Resource Group
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
N 0 250 500 1,000
ft
Scale applies to 11 X17" print.
Figure 2
Topographic Map

CA
i
Af
It
I
r
O
■ ,
L:\Wetlands\2022 Wetlands Files\DRGNCW22.456\Maps
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: GIS Soils Data Brunswick County
682 Ocean Blvd W, Holden Beach
Brunswick County, NC
DAVEY#.
Resource Group
Map Date: August 2022
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
DRGNCW22.456
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
i
a +
A
W 4'
i"
I
�I
[.W
Soils
CA: Carteret loamy fine sand
NeE: Newhan fine sand, 2 to 30 percent slopes
N 0 25 50 100
ft
Scale applies to 11 X17" print.
Figure 3
Soils Map

L:\Wetlands\2022 Wetlands Files\DRGNCW22.456\Maps N 0 10 20 40
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute. ft
Map Source: OpenStreetMap
Scale applies to 11 X17" print.
682 Ocean Blvd W, Holden Beach
Brunswick County, NC
Map Date: August 2022
DRGNCW22.456
DAVEY#
Resource Group
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
Figure 4
Aerial Photo

y �r or
■
r4
UDAR
High : 10.45
Low: 2.55
*ri
Y
�4 r'
rN
r
MAL
r =y
4r o�WN
M
7': o �
:7j-
od M
ILur or
d ille
i so � � �' g
Al �.
L
■ p� ■ u
l „
L:\Wetlands\2022 Wetlands Files\DRGNCW22.456\Maps
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: NC Floodplain Mapping Program 2014 QL2
LiDAR Data
682 Ocean Blvd W, Holden Beach
Brunswick County, NC
Map Date: August 2022
DRGNCW22.456
N 0 10 20 40
ft
Scale applies to 11 X17" print.
DAVEY#.
Figure 5
Resource Group L i DA R Map
3805 Wrightsville Avenue p
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]

Revisions:
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY i I
0
0
r
0
A
SITE
ATLANTIC OCEAN
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
I CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY
MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION (DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN BOOK 4617, PAGE 367; THAT
THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM INFORMATION IN BOOK
__, PAGE ; THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION IS 1:10,000; AND THAT THIS SURVEY IS
OF AN EXISTING PARCEL OF LAND; AND THAT THIS MAP MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN NORTH CAROLINA (21 NCAC 56. 1600).
THIS 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023.
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR RECORDING, SALES OR CONVEYANCE
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ADJOINING DEED REFERENCES BASED ON CURRENT INFORMATION FOUND IN
THE BRUNSWICK COUNTY TAX OFFICE.
2. ACCORDING TO CURRENT FEMA FLOOD MAP # 37202000500K, THIS PARCEL
APPEARS TO BE LOCATED IN THE FOLLOWING ZONE: "AE", 12.0' BASE FLOOD
ELEVATION.
3. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ANY AND ALL EASEMENTS, COVENANTS,
RESTRICTIONS, RIGHT—OF—WAYS OF RECORD, GOVERNMENTAL ORDINANCES
AND/OR REQUIREMENTS WHICH MAY LIMIT THE USE OF THIS PROPERTY;
WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY MAP.
4. BUILDING SETBACK LINES SHOWN ARE BASED ON SECTION 157.060 OF THE
TOWN OF HOLDEN BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES FOR ZONING CODE R-1 AND
ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. ALL SETBACKS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE
APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY BY THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION.
5. THIS SURVEY PERFORMED AND MAP PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A
TITLE REPORT AND IS THEREBY SUBJECT TO ANY FACTS WHICH MAY BE
DISCLOSED BY A FULL AND ACCURATE TITLE SEARCH. USERS OF THIS PLAT
SHOULD OBTAIN AN ACCURATE LEGAL OPINION AS TO OWNERSHIP WITHIN THE
BOUNDARIES OF THIS PLAT.
6. ALL BEARINGS ARE BASED ON NC GRID NORTH (NAD83—NSRS 2011); ALL
DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES. US SURVEY FEET.
7. COMBINED GRID FACTOR= 1.000149468
8. AREA BY COORDINATE METHOD.
9. TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 246CE095
10. CURRENT ZONING: R-1
11. PROPERTY STREET ADDRESS: 682 OCEAN BOULEVARD WEST,
HOLDEN BEACH, NC 28462
SUB —SURFACE UTILITY DISCLAIMER:
THERE HAS BEEN NO ATTEMPT BY THE CERTIFYING SURVEYOR TO LOCATE,
MARK OR IDENTIFY ANY SUB —SURFACE UTILITY LINES ON THE PROPERTIES
SHOWN ON THIS MAP. THE EXISTENCE OF SUB —SURFACE UTILITIES, IF ANY,
MAY AFFECT THE USE OF THESE PROPERTIES BEYOND THE CONTROL OF THE
SURVEYOR. USERS OF THIS MAP, AND THEIR ASSIGNS, ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED
AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT ANY DAMAGE RESULTING FROM ANY UTILITY SHOWN
OR NOT SHOWN ON THIS MAP IS NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
SURVEYOR OR COASTAL GEOMATICS, PLLC.
I BRUCE & ERIN HAWKS
DEED BOOK 4238, PAGE 781
I TAX PARCEL #246CE081
I LOT 412
ADJACENT BUILDING
ISLAB ELEV.=10.1'
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROPOSED
PORCH
TRANSFORMER
OCEAN LEV gOUARp WEST 60' PU BLIC RIGHT—OF—WAY
N86' 40' 131 51.70'
COASTAL
404WETLANDS
WETLANDS
20=REAR B.S.L.
0 1 l`
r I I
.., I r �
38.0'
PROPOSED
BUILDING
o
23.0' '
5' FRONT
SETBACK
LOT 411
5,459 SQ.FT.
0.13 ACRES
_RPRISES, INC.
TAX PARCEL #246CE071
BACON ISLAND HARBOR / I
I
JASON & �DARYL BOWEN
DEED BOOK 3173, PAGE 1136
TAX PARCEL #246CE07140
LOT 41OR
ELEVATED
POOL DECK
ADJACENT BUILDING
SLAB ELEV.=7.8'
-(D--I
Wetland Impact #1:
404
0.013 ac (586 sf)
— WETLANDS
CD i
Ln
0,
0 Ld 7 00
N
CDo
51 18 W
S82
S8 6 53"w
52.11'
CONCRETE SIDS
S23° 36' 08"W
45.53' (TIE)
ASPHALT ROA� � �
PROJECT BENCHMARK
MAG NAIL SET
ELEV.= 7.5'
(NAVD 1988)
Figure 6. Site Plan Showing Proposed Wetland Impacts
92.01'
0 0
Z N
or)
E00
cD o
U Q
Z �
LEGEND
LABEL
SYM.
DESCRIPTION
IPF/IRF
0
IRON PIPE /ROD FOUND
IRS
O
1/2" REBAR SET
MNS
0
MAG NAIL SET
FFE
FINISHED FLOOR ELEV.
CAN
®
CABLE TV PEDESTAL
TPED
El
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
TMH
O
TELEPHONE MANHOLE
WM
NO
WATER METER
W / WA
X
WETLAND FLAG (404)
CW
COASTAL WETLAND FLAG
GS
x235
SPOT ELEVATION
BSL
BUILDING SETBACK LINE
AEC
AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL
CONCERN
CAMA
COASTAL AREA
MANAGEMENT AGRENCY
R/W
RIGHT OF WAY
SCALE: 1" = 20'
0 10 20
40
60
O
Li
z
0
J
a_
r- =
co
U
ro LaLJ
w m
Q Z
� W
O
�o
co =
z
Y O
ON
O�>
mo
om
w =)
w cn
a
zo
m
Cn Of
w Q
Cn
U Z
o�
U
wm
F_
Li
O �
J
J O
Q J
�z
o�
Uz
0000o
z
N N U
Z Z
J
D
Qa
0
0 _0
0,
C
G cD
D
—
� D
0
Oz
a
0
a
W
U")�
a
(;J
c 0 z
�m
V
a� o
•
U 00
(D
T
az
o (.0-
CD C)
Leo
�
w
�>�
a_o
C-
U)
a
CT 0-
O
,U
T = �
z
Q
J
L D
Cn 00
C�
aU CV
J U"
J 1� d �
J
LZ
C Li
N Y
CD CDU Ln
N I p
U-) C� U CD
Y Z N O U
�NOfU_II = J�vn
NOJmZ - Q L. NF-
m m
LLJLijCDLLJ
w �
O Q O O� U Of Co Q Of
a_DU(n (n U Li�O
CC 2023 This drawing shall not be reproduced in whole or in PROJECT NO. 2301-23
part without written permission of Coastal Geomatics, PLLC.

4.0 WETLAND INFORMATION
Property Access Authorization Form
Preliminary Wetlands Map
Data Forms
Antecedent Precipitation Tool Graph

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION1,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Anny Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional detennination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean. Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1999. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
AtrnandaT. C,abriel
Print Name
Capacity: ❑✓ Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
3.2cy - a 0 A 3
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all j urisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓0 I intend to construct/develop a project or perfonn activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
H
A Corps JDis required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owncr(s).
Version: Mav 2017 Page 3

L:\Wetlands\2022 Wetlands Files\DRGNCW22.456\Maps N
0 15 30 60
Boundaries are approximate and not meant to be absolute.
ft
Map Source: 2020 NC OneMap
682 Ocean Blvd W
Brunswick County, NC
Map Date: 9-7-2022
DRGNCW22.456
DAVEY#
Resource Group
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone]
Preliminary
Resource Boundary
Delineation Sketch

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 682 Ocean Blvd West City/County: Holden Beach/Brunswick Sampling Date: 9/2/22
Applicant/Owner: Amanda Gabriel State: NC Sampling Point: DP1-UP
Investigator(s): Mark Westendorff - DRG Section, Township, Range: Holden Beach
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153B Lat: 33.910059 Long:-78.316492 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Newhan fine sand NWI classification: Uplands
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
According to Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network, normal conditions were
present at the time of the field work.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
—Surface
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
—Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1-UP
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. None
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: _
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1. Baccharis halimifolia
2. Juniperus virginiana
3. Morella cerifera
4. Ilex vomitoria
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 38
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Baccharis halimifolia
2.
Juniperus virginiana
3.
Borrichia frutescens
4.
Spartina patens
5.
Iva frutescens
6.
Asclepias spp
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 53
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Parthenocissus quinquefolia
2. Mikania scandens
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
_=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
30 Yes
FAC
10 No
FACU
30 Yes
FAC
5 No
FAC
75 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 15
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is !2.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50 Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
20 Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
10 No
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
15 No
FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5 No
FACW
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5 No
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
105 =Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
20% of total cover: 21 height.
15 Yes FACU
5 Yes FACW
20 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP1-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-12 7.5YR 6/2 100 Sandy
12-24 7.5YR 6/8 100 Sandy
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol (Al) _Thin
Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) —Barrier
Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) —Loamy
Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
—Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _
Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) —Marl
(F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Depleted
Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) —Delta
Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6) —Piedmont
Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) _Anomalous
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U) _Very
Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 682 Ocean Blvd West City/County: Holden Beach/Brunswick Sampling Date: 9/2/22
Applicant/Owner: Amanda Gabriel State: NC Sampling Point: DP1-WET
Investigator(s): Mark Westendorff - DRG Section, Township, Range: Holden Beach
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Marsh Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T, MLRA 153B Lat: 33.910155 Long:-78.316474 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Newhan fine sand NWI classification: E2EM1 Pd
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
According to Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network, normal conditions were
present at the time of the field work.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
—Surface
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
—Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3)
X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 5
Saturation Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 5
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1-WET
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. None
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
B.
50% of total cover: _
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius
1. Baccharis halimifolia
2. Juniperus virginiana
3. Morelia cerifera
4. Iva frutescens
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 28
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Juncus roemerianus
2. Limonium carolinianum
3. Borrichia frutescens
4. Iva frutescens
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 43
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' radius )
1. Parthenocissus quinquefolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
_=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
10 No
FAC
10 No
FACU
30 Yes
FAC
5 No
FACW
55 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 11
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is !2.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50 Yes OBL 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
20 Yes OBL present, unless disturbed or problematic.
10 No OBL Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5 No FACW Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
85 =Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
20% of total cover: 17 height.
5 Yes FACU
5 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP1-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks
0-1 10YR 2/2 100 Mucky Sand
1-14 10YR 4/1 80 10YR 5/4 20 C M Sandy
14-24 10YR 5/1 Sandy
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol (Al) _Thin
Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) —Barrier
Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
X Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Loamy
—Stratified Layers (A5) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
—Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _
Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 153B)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) —Marl
(F10) (LRR U)
_ Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _Depleted
Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) —Delta
Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 153B, 153D)
X Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6) —Piedmont
Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_Dark _Anomalous
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U) _Very
Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain - Version 2.0

Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network
10
8
V)
V
CZ 6
4
2
E022 2022
Apr May
2022 2022
Coordinates
33.910155,-78.316474
Observation Date
2022-09-02
Elevation (ft)
1.897
Drought Index (PDSI)
Moderate drought
Figure and tables made by the
Antecedent Precipitation Tool
Version 1.0
Written by Jason Deters
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
2022-07-04
Jun Jul
2022 2022
202P-09-02
AXIN �
Aug Sep
2022 2022
Oct Nov
2022 2022
Daily Total
30-Day Rolling Total
30 Year Normal Range
Dec Jan
2022 2023
30 Days Ending
301%ile (in)
701%ile (in)
Observed (in)
Wetness Condition
Condition Value
Month Weight
Product
2022-09-02
5.226378
8.183465
8.409449
Wet
3
3
9
2022-08-03
4.074803
6.325591
3.751969
Dry
1
2
2
2022-07-04
3.241339
5.473229
4.307087
Normal
2
1
2
Result
I Normal Conditions - 13
Weather Station Name
Coordinates
Elevation (ft)
Distance (mi)
Elevation A
Weighted A
Days Normal
Days Antecedent
SHALLOTTE AG
33.9283,-78.3894
20.013
4.365
18.116
2.043
5882
90
HOLDEN BEACH 2.2 W
33.9076,-78.3507
8.858
2.64
11.155
1.217
1
0
HOLDEN BEACH 0.6 E
33.9107,-78.3025
7.874
5.129
12.139
2.37
1
0
SUNSET BEACH 2.5 NE
33.9027,-78.4821
25.919
5.602
5.906
2.554
2
0
HOLDEN BEACH 1.7 ENE
33.914,-78.2844
7.874
6.101
12.139
2.82
6
0
SUNSET BEACH 3.4 N
33.9234,-78.5128
57.087
7.083
37.074
3.45
9
0
SUNSET BEACH 1.7 WNW
33.8841,-78.5377
16.076
9.036
3.937
4.102
4
0
CALABASH 1.9 NNE
33.9247,-78.5696
43.963
10.334
23.95
4.898
1
0
LONGWOOD
34.0106,-78.5464
40.026
10.643
20.013
5.002
5362
0
N MYRTLE BEACH
33.8161,-78.7206
28.871
20.521
8.858
9.416
64
0
SOUTHPORT 5 N
33.9947,-78.0078
20.013
22.344
0.0
10.055
21
0

5.0 RARE SPECIES INFORMATION
USFWS IPaC List
NC Natural Heritage Program Letter

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0054670
Project Name: 682 Ocean Blvd West
e x
hSai k 4YYFJiYJft
+cfln7i�
i�
March 10, 2023
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

03/10/2023
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186. php.

03/10/2023
3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds
• Marine Mammals

03/10/2023
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

03/10/2023
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2023-0054670
Project Name: 682 Ocean Blvd West
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: residential lot
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/(a)33.9100113,-78.3164640684937,14z
13
Counties: Brunswick County, North Carolina
tint, Ff i

03/10/2023 3
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 16 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
This species is also protected by the Marine Mammal Protection Aci, and may have additional
consultation requirements.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469
STATUS
Threatened
Proposed
Endangered
Threatened

03/10/2023
4
BIRDS
NAME
STATUS
Piping Plover Charadrius melodus
Threatened
Population: [Atlantic Coast and Northern Great Plains populations] - Wherever found, except
those areas where listed as endangered.
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039
Red Knot Calidris canutus ru fa
Threatened
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1864
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
REPTILES
NAME
STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
Similarity of
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Appearance
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
(Threatened)
Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas
Threatened
Population: North Atlantic DPS
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6199
Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Lepidochelys kempii
Endangered
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5523
Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea
Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493
Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta
Threatened
Population: Northwest Atlantic Ocean DPS
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1110
SNAILS
NAME STATUS
Magnificent Ramshorn Planorbella magni fica Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical Endangered
habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6216

03/10/2023
5
INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME STATUS
Cooley's Meadowrue Thalictrum cooleyi Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3281
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Seabeach Amaranth Amaranthus pumilus Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8549
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

03/10/2023
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions Aug 31
(BCRs) in the continental USA
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
American Oystercatcher Haematopus palliates Breeds Apr 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8935

03/10/2023
VA
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Black Skimmer Rynchops niger Breeds May 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Sep 15
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/523
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla Breeds Mar 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions Jul 15
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA t0 Aug 25
and Alaska.
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus voci ferns Breeds May 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Aug 20
and Alaska.
Gull -billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica Breeds May 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9501
Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA elsewhere
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9679
Marbled Godwit Limosa fedoa Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA elsewhere
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9481
Painted Bunting Passerina ciris
Breeds Apr 25
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions
to Aug 15
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
Breeds May 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
Jul 31
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
t0 Sep 10
and Alaska.

03/10/2023
3
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Ruddy Turnstone Arenaria interpres morinella Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions elsewhere
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Short -billed Dowitcher Limnodromus griseus Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA elsewhere
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9480
Willet Tringa semipalmata Breeds Apr 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 5
and Alaska.
Wilson's Plover Charadrius wilsonia Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Aug 20
and Alaska.
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.

03/10/2023 4
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American Kestrel 11+1 solo+ 0+++ iiii jig j�++ tti� tt++ ++I+ 1O1$1+11 ++1+
BCC -BCR No
American
Oystercatcher 1111 1111 IN +111 mill 1111 1111 +1,
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Bald E
Non -BCC e 11+111+2 1111111+ 11 1 1 I++ +++� ++++ ++1+ 111111++ +1+1
Vulnerable
Black Skimmer
BCC Rangewide 1+2+ +1+2 11+1 +111 mill 1+1+ 111+ 1+11111111111+111+++
(CON) -- ----
Brown-headed ��� ���� ���� �'
Nuthatch ++++ I I I I Ti++ RF W7 F4 +++ ++11 1111 1+++ ++++ ++'m
BCC -BCR
Chimney Swift
BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++
(CON) y Eastern Whip -Poor- ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ +++y ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
Will

03/10/2023 5
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Gull -billed Tern ���� ���+
BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++ +1mp +*++ +1++1+ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
(CON)
Lesser Yellowlegs y
BCC Rangewide ml■+ ,+" ++ ++++ ++ **1T 1+11 I1++ +mm+ ++++ +1++
(CON)
Marbled Godwit
BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++ ++0 0+++ ++++ 0+++ ++0+'+++ ++++ ++++ ++++
(CON)
Bcce BCRtrng ++++ +++ ++++ ++II IRT I. Jill Jill 111111110+++ ++++ ++++
Prairie Warbler I
a BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ +++m VA I � � � I � � � I 10+111+1 +0++ ++++ ++++
(CON)
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
ary
Warbler
++++ ++++ ++++ Im wi wi Al
++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
+� I I I I '++m +11111++ +++r I I I I
0111 ++++ +++0 AN
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Ruddy Turnstone 1++0 0002 QII IW III' 111+ 0+111111 "+1 mill "" 1+++
BCC -BCR
Short -billed Dowitcher 11+0 00+1 mill mill ill+ ++m+ 111* 0111111+ loll 1+11 +++1
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
C BC Rangewide 1111 I1111111 III NO 1111 In 11111111111111111111
BCC
(CON) — ---- ---
son's Plover
BC1C Rangewide
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoidins7-and-minimizins7-incidental-take-mis7ratorv-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf

03/10/2023
MIGRATORY BIRDS FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding.
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL)Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point

03/10/2023
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. 'BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. 'BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no

03/10/2023
E3
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

03/10/2023
MARINE MAMMALS
Marine mammals are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Some are also
protected under the Endangered Species Act! and the Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
The responsibilities for the protection, conservation, and management of marine mammals are
shared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [responsible for otters, walruses, polar bears,
manatees, and dugongs] and NOAA Fisheries3 [responsible for seals, sea lions, whales, dolphins,
and porpoises]. Marine mammals under the responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on
this list; for additional information on those species please visit the Marine Mammals page of the
NOAA Fisheries website.
The Marine Mammal Protection Act prohibits the take of marine mammals and further
coordination may be necessary for project evaluation. Please contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service Field Office shown.
1. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973.
2. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
(CITES) is a treaty to ensure that international trade in plants and animals does not
threaten their survival in the wild.
3. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
NAME
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469

03/10/2023
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency:
Davey Resource Group
Name:
Kim Williams
Address:
3805 Wrightsville Avenue; Suite 15
City:
Wilmington
State:
NC
Zip:
28403
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
9104520001

Ray Cooper, Governor
+■E■N INC DEPARTMENT OF
a■k■je NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
March 10, 2023
Kim Williams
Davey Resource Group, Inc.
3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
RE. 682 Ocean Blvd West
Dear Kim Williams.
13. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-21232
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence, the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here.
httl2s //www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butlerLncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTt1ENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
4] 121 W JONES STREET, RALEI01_ NC 27603 - 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 2761*
OFC !Dig 707.9120 • FAX 919.707.412,

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
682 Ocean Blvd West
March 10, 2023
NCNHDE-21232
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name K
ommon Name Last � Element
Group servation Occurrence
DatAn Rank
Bird 11355 Charadrius melodus Piping Plover - Atlantic 2021-06-30 E
melodus Coast subspecies
Bird 27194 Charadrius wilsonia Wilson's Plover 2007-05-11 E
Bird 2061 Charadrius wilsonia Wilson's Plover 2019-05-23 E
Bird 27219 Haematopus palliatus American 2019-05-22 E
Oystercatcher
Bird 4417 Passerina ciris Painted Bunting 2017-07-25 B
Dragonfly or 33738 Somatochlora Coppery Emerald 2004-Pre H?
Damselfly georgiana
Freshwater Fish38937 Acipenser oxyrinchus Atlantic Sturgeon 2018-09 E
oxyrinchus
Reptile 7051 Caretta caretta Loggerhead Seaturtle 2017-08-07 B
Reptile 16855 Chelonia mydas Green Seaturtle 2010-07-15 E
Reptile 31879 Dermochelys coriacea Leatherback Seaturtle 2010-06-01 E
Vascular Plant 15559 Amaranthus pumilus Seabeach Amaranth 2019-09-05
Vascular Plant 2764 Sporobolus virginicus Saltmarsh Dropseed 1930-08
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
F?
H
Accuracy
Federal
State
Global
State
Status
tatus
Rank
Rank
3-Medium
MI
Threatened
Threatened
G3T3
I
S1B,S1
N
4-Low
---
Special
G5
S2B
Concern
3-Medium
---
Special
G5
S2B
Concern
3-Medium
---
Special
G5
S2S3B,
Concern
S3N
3-Medium
---
Special
G5
S2B
Concern
5-Very
---
Significantly
G3G4
S1?
Low
Ra re
4-Low
Endangered
Endangered
G3T3
S2
3-Medium
Threatened
Threatened
G3
S2B
4-Low
Threatened
Threatened
G3
SIB
3-Medium
Endangered
Endangered
G2
S1B,SU
N
3-Medium
Threatened
Threatened
G2
S1
4-Low
---
Threatened
G5
S1
Managed Area Name wner Owner Type
North Carolina Agricultural Foundation Preserve The North Carolina Agricultural Foundation, Private
I nc.
North Carolina Agricultural Foundation Preserve The North Carolina Agricultural Foundation, Private
I nc.
Page 2 of 4

Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type -
North Carolina Agricultural Foundation Preserve The North Carolina Agricultural Foundation, Private
I nc.
Town of Holden Beach Open Space Town of Holden Beach Local Government
Town of Holden Beach Open Space Town of Holden Beach Local Government
Town of Holden Beach Open Space Town of Holden Beach Local Government
Town of Holden Beach Open Space Town of Holden Beach Local Government
USFWS Critical Habitat - Loggerhead Seaturtle US Fish and Wildlife Service Federal
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on March 10, 2023; source: NCNHP, Q4, Winter (January)
2023. Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

NCNHDE-21232: 682 Ocean Blvd West
n w
a w
n.
Roone v
Neck 43ff m b
a
w Seashore Rd SW A ^
N
N
Ocean 61
0 v
W
March 10. 2023
Managed Area (MARFA)
Q Buffered Project Boundary
Q Project Boundary
Sources: Esn, Arr6us OS, 115G5, NGA NASA, CGIAR, N R.bn—, NCEAS,
NLS, 05. NMA, Geodalasly-I-n, Rgkswaferstaal. GSA Gealand FEMA,
Inlermap and the GIS uw C mmnity
Saurc Esn, HERE, Garmin. FAO, NOAA, VSGS, ® OpmSlreeMMap
a Iributars. and the GIS Vser Cemmumty
Page 4 of 4

6.0 STONE FARM MITIGATION BANK CREDIT ACCEPTANCE LETTER

STONE FARM REGIONAL MITIGATION BANK
CREDIT REQUEST ACCEPTANCE
Date: 3/28/2023
Amanda Gabriel
311 Grandin Rd
Charlotte, NC 28208
Project Name: 682 Ocean Blvd. West
Expiration of Acceptance: 09/28/2023
SFMB Number: TBA
Dear Amanda Gabriel:
Stone Farm Mitigation Bank, LLC
2618 New Village Way
Wilmington, NC 28405
[phone]
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Stone Farm Regional Mitigation Bank (Bank) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision
does not assure that the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project
impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the
Bank will be approved. It is also the responsibility of the applicant to determine the appropriate credit ratios
that will be required for the corresponding wetland and/or stream impacts. You must also comply with all
other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with the proposed
activity.
This acceptance is valid for six (6) months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received payment for the accepted credits of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit
within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. Predicated on the total payment due to the Bank, as
set forth herein, a ten (10) percent non-refundable deposit is due at the time of acceptance by the Bank. It is
the applicant's responsibility to send copies of their permits to the Bank. Once the Bank receives a copy of
the permit(s), an invoice will be issued based on the information identified below. Payment must be made
prior to conducting the authorized work. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the credit types and
amounts identified below are consistent with the compensatory mitigation requirements of the permit(s)
issued. The Bank and/or its agents are not responsible for determining the applicant's mitigation
requirements.
Based on the information supplied by the applicant, the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation
are summarized in the following table:
CU Location
Stream (ft.)
Wetlands (ac.)
Nonri arian
Riparian
Impact
03040208
.013
Credits
.1
Note that the impact and credit totals above were provided by the applicant. It is the applicant's
responsibility to provide accurate information (including the requested mitigation credits). The Bank and/or
its agents are not responsible for determining the required credit amounts. The Bank's decision to accept

credits is based upon the information provided by the applicant. The Bank is not liable for any credit
shortage should the applicant's required mitigation credits exceed the amount specified in the above table.
Based upon the type and amounts of credits requested above, the following payment must be provided to
the Bank prior to issuance of credits:
Credit Type
Unit
Per Unit Credit Fee
Sub -Total
Stream
0
$646.12
$0.00
Nonriparian Wetland
0.1
$70,939.17
$7,093.92
Riparian Wetland
0
$70,939.17
$0.00
Total Payment Due
$7,093.92
Non-refundable Deposit
$709.39
Balance Due Upon Invoice
$6,384.53
Upon receipt of full payment, the Bank will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If
the regulatory agencies require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and should the applicant
want the Bank to provide such credits, it is the applicant's responsibility to submit an additional credit
request form to the Bank.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Jordan Cline at 910-251-8543 or
[e-mail]
Sincerely,
CzGv t J , 66i-V
Za)n'C
line
Stone Farm Mitigation Bank, LLC
cc: NCDWQ-Raleigh
USACE
NCDWQ-Local
Agent