NC0024210_Wasteload Allocation_19920820

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NCO024210
FACILITY NAME:
City of High Point
East Side WWTP
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major -4 Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 16.0 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow): 84 %
Industrial (% of Flow): 16** %
Comments:
**at 100% of permitted flow, per region
Imo Go6,r r rP4 Cvadlrvl� .
RECEIVING STREAM:Richland Creek
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 03-06-08
Reference USGS Quad: D 19 NW (please attach)
County- Guilford
Regional Office: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 8/31/92 Treatment Plant Class: IV
Classification changes within three miles:
No chance PLOTTED
Requested by: Charles M. Lowe Date:.
Prepared by: n" Date:
Reviewed by: Dare:
1�OD,
WQ�O-L_
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
Ab
JtL
9z
Drainage Area (mi2 ) 16 Avg. Streamflow (cfs): f 5-
7Q10 (cfs) / 0 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 2. 6 30Q2 (cfs) 2 .2
Toxicity Limits: IWC %0 % Acute hronic
Instream Monitoring:
Parameters7-7'LONI�. T%Q
Upstreamki ,4/� r^1rd Location 05D 10r.
Downstream,:✓✓ Location a'%
B Wasteflow (MGD):
— BOD5 (mg/1):
N NH3N (mg/1):
— DO (mg/1):
B TSS (mg/1):
_ Fecal Col. (1100 ml):
T pH (SU):
_ Temperature (°C):
TP (mg/1):
F IN (mg/1):
Total Chromium (µg/1):
I Cadmium (µg/1):
Lead (µg/1):
Nickel (µg/1):
Copper (µg/1):
Zinc (µft
Cyanide W):
Silver (µg/1):
Residual Chlorine (pg/1):
Comments:
oNILY
Monthly Average;
Summer Winter
16
16
8.0
16.0
3.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
30.0
30.0
200.0
200.0
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
50
50
2.0
2.0
25.0
25.0
monitor
monitor
mon 'tor
monitor
5.0
UrK
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
);r,ceA(%),9eoga7nnl nF77/15 cuuTAflt�sNef.+1��7�✓4 7dE
pO-7W UctiFc7Z-> nJ7NE Z- A[ AlrNs.
K

I'M
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
RECEIVED
i" - F" ! : " N.C. Dept. FACT SHEET FOR WASTEL(5All ALLO(',ATION of EH N R
Request #
City of High Point/East Side W WTP
NCO024210
Domestic - 84%/Industrial - 16%
Existing
Renewal
Richland Creek
C
030608
6876 J U L 2 8 1992
b inston-Salern
Regional Office
Guilford
Stream Characteristic:
Winston-Salem
USGS #
0209948250
Lowe
Date:
1983
4/14/92
Drainage Area:
16
D19NW
Summer 7Q10:
1.0
Winter 7Q10:
2.6
Average Flow:
15
30Q2:
2.9
% IWQ
96
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Vogt did the last WLA in 1987. Permit should be reissij d writ _ i sane. Wits and monitoring
requirements with the addition of monitoring for silver4Zc Cyamde should be
limited at the standard. Silver and cyanide requirements were taken from the headworks analysis.
Copper was found in the PPA at concentrations which warrant continued monitoring. Lead should
be sampled at all major municipalities. Toxicity testing should be done at 90%.
If the Randleman Lake Project is completed, this facility will be discharging directly to a small
(probably shallow) cove in the headwaters of the lake. From past experiences (Falls of the Neuse
Reservoir, Jordan Lake, Kerr Reservoir, Lake Wylie, High Rock Lake, etc.) this discharge would
contribute to accelerated eutrophication without appropriate reduction of nutrients. It is therefore
recommended that the facility be warned that the completion of the lake would necessitate limits on
TP and TN. No requirements will be given now because the fate of the reservoir is still uncertain
and the lake will not be built for at least another five years.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional commailts from Reviewers:
CuYctmtde e�ni, rn�hAwkQA'-fe>r. Q$J2n* mma Ci�yoan �0 a��lmtMinq
Date: 7, /�
Reviewed by
Instream Assessment: Date: � '
Regional Supervisor: Date:s�1—
Permits & Engineering: ate:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: AUG 2 : 1992
Recommended by:
lwc- CIA"
s// 7
J

2
PARAMETERS
Existing Limits:
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
Wasteflow (MGD):
16
16
BODS (mg/1):
8.0
16.0
NH3N (mg/1):
3.0
6.0
DO (mg/1):
6.0
6.0
TSS (mg/1):
30.0
30.0
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
1000.0
1000.0
pH (Si):
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
Temperature (°C):
monitor
monitor
TP (mg/1):
monitor
monitor
TN (mg/1):
monitor
monitor
Total Chromium (µgill):
50
50
Cadmium (µg/1):
2.0
2.0
Lead (µgill):
25.0
25.0
Nickel (µgill):
50
50
Copper (µgill):
monitor
monitor
Zinc (µg/l):
monitor
monitor
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
monitor
monitor
Chronic Toxicity:
P/F @96% (Jan,Apr,Jul,Oct)
Recommended Limits:
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
Wasteflow (MGD):
16
16
✓
BODS (mg/1):
8.0
16.0
NH3N (mg/1):
3.0
6.0
DO (mg/1):
6.0
6.0
✓
TSS (mg/1):
30.0
30.0
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
200.0
200.0
pH (Si):
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
Temperature (°C):
monitor
monitor v
TP (mg/1):
monitor
monitor
TN (mg/1):
monitor
monitor
Total Chromium (µgill):
50
50 ✓~
Cadmium (µg/l):
2.0
2.0 t/
Lead (pg/1):
Nickel (µgill):
25.0
'5 �g
25.0
� �G1
Copper (µgill):
monitor
monitor
Zinc (µg/1):
monitor
monitor
Cyanide (µgill):
5.0
5.0
Silver (µgill):
monitor
monitor
Residual Chlorine (µgill):
monitor
monitor
Chronic Toxicity:
P/F @90% (Jan,Apr,Jul,Oct)
sa ,2eo* 616t5&)
Limits Changes Due To:metor() Affected
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures x Fecal, Tox. test
New facility information (Headworks) x Cyanide, Silver
x Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate
receiving water will be consumed This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional
dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: Richland Creek approximately 50-100 feet upstream of outfall
Downstream Location: Richland Creek at SR 1129 above Coltrane Mill Dam (Hwy 62 if dam inacces
Parameters: BODS, Temperature, Fecal, Conductivity, Dissolved Oxygen
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
Note the requirement to sample for BODS upstream and downstream of the discharge.
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
AAd quacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated_ the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
( facilities? Yes No /
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes VNo
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
,V151
If no, why not?
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? V (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.
/�/eTES�.scHeay-17C,7'VxfCs /KCOCc I'

Facility Nunc TO/ !% 6'K/,G renxnt �Z�� Pipe #
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform
erly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
perf rm er thi,ry days from the effective date of this permit during the months of
. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permitted Tinil effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT 1(original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy (meek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 .. d cfs
Permitted ow MGD
IWC CA& %
Basin & Sub -basin e%FC608
Receiving Stream's
County G l% �
Recommended by:
r
Date Z
QCL P/F Version 9191

�IcnoZ�2/U
S�� Z
. �'D/!/I �S�SG�� L r '%� <��tP�' !�/ off- ,r ✓. 7&s
�aa/z- 'o
716
!f
d'("rdll Z, Ac�
rC?f� / S�%�G��f �C.S . i'v L`GG�I(C1�G•
77
i
kC
lam , / �: f 7� 7 G �,Jr• ,y ��r s= -J J-�• ,.i'J� /A •l;t �l, / •[�
e CCSS1/
_ GI�YIG��-c.���'�G�I/Yl�i1� - __-_-`� -G - -- ��j�TG�/_ �`r,�f-Zvi/•��'T1QYI ��'rci:
All l/.� 12aw �-/--����- --. _ �/-,
�i�__.
I _
--- - --------
l77i
r�lS �Zwjr�
15 Poe-?-r nw
-
r`o Zbxn,�- GV/ � Gt L, e` i"%t f.:"' lil/G�� lz e; 1. ,td

mfs�--
c --
cirabA'I d
T 9l c /S ©`
a7Lfrl-(lllJ ��,�� /Pe
-
/p-,q
14
VX NC/l! 7 �fA7,d4L
J �
T�i5�7cf�hl G%7�? ��/03�/ CcrlSfs �/1lc/ /Wwol
�e ✓Fy clr� Sir cm�yo� ��ie _ /1�l/Gf%Tf? ( � bZeTl
1i 4 el /YT/✓f f�Gllye S //1/i /C5 f T�'i%Y�<< .D
y�c�Y/�//.�i�/c� j �-�� %� fr'c��f o� ��iti��• .,Th rtzhy
Nl Awe -A(en r"OlohQ' dior%9 7%e
C �/M%&4IP14�-/rf .O/>ca + [✓j� l c �� �.�/� �. 79c
awl

SonIr
�1/C�cZs�Z�b *44 //Il /V 7z �J z
SXrc��Ts CcTv/ceYY/ .p is rwrt lf. �Atrrcfrck�me�/�
hr�c�o�-PCs u�a�si� 1;iolcrfCs Ak
71S& We ,t jlez ohicG/
/lTl(f%6�5 /��.. _ �X• .C�� h��iv/� �SCiJ1f!>'' �
Oi
irebnG617, Wirt//�i �jiv�
., 1
�Z _fH _ 'e�,k' j4j. So`f

06/03/92 vor 3.1
Facility:
NPDES Permit No.:
Status (E, P, or M) :
Permitted Flow:
Actual Average Flow:
Subbasln:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
7Q10:
IWC:
Stn'd / Bkg
Pollutant AL Cone.
WWI) (ug/1)
--------- -- --------
Cadmium S 2.0
Chromium S 50.0
Copper AL 7.0
Nickel S 88.0
Lead S 25.0
Zinc AL 50.0
Cyanide S 5.0
Mercury S 0.012
Silver AL 0.06
Selenium S 5.00
Arsenic S 50.00
Phenols S NA
NH3-N C
T.R.Chlor.AL 17.0
Pollutant
Cadmium S
Chromium S I
Copper AL
Nickel S I
Lead S I
Zinc AL I
Cyanide S
Mercury S
Silver AL
Selenium S
Arsenic S I
Phenols S I
NH3-N C I
T.R.Chlor.AL I
I
Allowable
Load
(#/d)
0.18
5.47
0.64
8.08
2.30
4.59
1.12
0.00
0.09
0.46
4.59
T O% I C S R E V I E W
High Point
East WWTP
NC0024210
e
16.0
mgd
10.4
mgd
'030608
RICHLAND CK
I---------
PRETREATMENT DATA -------------- I ---- EFLLUENT DATA---- I
C
I
ACTUAL
PERMITTEDI
I
1.0
cis
I
Ind. +
Ind. + I
FREQUENCY 1
96.12
t
I
Domestic
PERMITTED
Domestic I
OBSERVED
of Chronicl
I Removal
Domestic
Act.Ind.
Total
Industrial
Total I
Effluent
Criteria I
I Eff.
Load
Load
Load
Load
Load I
Cone.
Violations)
#
(#/d)
(#/d)
(#/d)
(#/d)
(#/d) I
(ug/1)
(#vio/#sam)1
1 --------
1
--------
--------
0.1310
--------
0.1310
---------
0.8717
-------- I
0.8717 1
-------
--------- 1
I
1 16%
1.5100
0.4620
1.9720
6.6403
8.1503
I I
1
1.8840
1.8840
4.0949
4.0949
I N
I
0.5320
0.5320
4.7884
4.7884
I P
1.1220
1.1220
1.3734
1.3734 1
I U
1
1.8070
1.8070
5.6941
5.6941
1 T
59%
0.7600
0.2860
1.0460
0.9554
1.7154
1
1
0.0000
0.0000
I S
1 94%
0.3800
0.5880
0.9680
2.9890
3.3690
I E
1
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000 1
I C
1
0.0000
0.0000
I T
I I
I O
I
I
1 N
I
I
I
- ALLOWABLE
PRDCT'D
PRDCT'D
PRDCT'D
I
I
--------- MONITOR/LIMIT ---------
I
I
1--ADTN'L REcmmQTN'S-- I
Effluent
Effluent
Effluent
Instream
I Recomm'd 1
Cone.
using
using
Cone.
Based on
Based on
Based on
I FREQUENCY INSTREAM 1
CHRONIC
ACTUAL
PERMIT
using
ACTUAL
PERMITTED
OBSERVED
I Eff. Mon. Monitor. 1
Criteria
Influent
Influent
OBSERVED
Influent
Influent
Effluent
I based on Recomm'd 7 I
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
(ug/1)
Loading
Loading
Data
I OBSERVED (YES/NO) I
--------
2.081
---------
1.515
--------
10.083
--------
0.00
--------
Limit
-------
Limit
---------I
----------------- I
I A
52.016
19.160
79.189
0.00
Limit
Limit
I N
7.282
21.792
47.365
0.00
Monitor
Monitor
I A
91.540
6.154
55.387
0.00
Monitor
Limit
L
26.008
12.978
15.386
0.00
Limit
Limit
I I Y
52.016
20.901
65.863
0.00
Monitor
Monitor
I I S
5.202
4.961
8.135
0.00
Limit
Limit'
I I I
0.012
0.000
0.000
0.00
I 1 S
0.062
0.672
2.338
0.00
Monitor
Monitor
I I
5.202
0.000
0.000
0.00
I R
52.016
0.000
0.000
0.00
I E.
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.00
I S
0.000
0.00
I U
17.685
0.00
1 L
T
S
I I
s7z,,/'lam° IVY wz-,4

• ��C�'I 7 / � Ott f �''1'�% � :� /'1 �v'���%.G/'���
�L`� s✓�T � ��p,N3'
5���.(jr1� C('Dl•U11
�f tit • •"�:,, s4
�ynn-iL✓' r �G.�
� NI�.�' MCIbi11 '�
/Y� sC4 L

HIGH POINT EASTSIDE WWTP - Allowable Waste Concentrations
SUMMER
Residual Chlorine
Ammonia as NH3
7010 CFS
1 . 7010 CFS
1
DESIGN FLOW MGD
16 DESIGN FLOW MGD
16
DESIGN FLOW CFS
24.8 DESIGN FLOW CFS
24.8
STREAM STD UG/L
17.0 STREAM STD (MG/L
1.0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL UG/L
0 UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL MG/L
0.22
IWC %
96.124031 IWC %
96.12403
Allowable Concentration ug/1)
17.685484. � Allowable Concentration(mg/1)
1.031452
WINTER
Ammonia as NH3
7010 CFS
2.6
DESIGN FLOW MGD
16
DESIGN FLOW CFS
24.8
STREAM STD MG/L
1.8
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
0.22
IWC %
90.51095
Allowable Concentration m /1
1.965645
NCO028118 DAG 5/29/92

r
i c
I N DU S T R I A L U S E R DA T A Page 5
PRELIM 4.0: DATA SHEET 4
POTW Name: EAST NEW (continues-�-
Concentration POTW selected
Pollutant Industry Name (mg/1) Removal Rate(%)
CYANIDE ALDERMAN STUDIOS N/A N/A
CUSTOM DRUM SERVICES 0.1500000 NIA
DIVERSIFIED TECHNOLOGIES 0.0100000 N/A
FIBER DYNAMICS N/A N/A
GREENSBORO METAL PARTS 0.0100000 N/A
HARRIS COVINGTON N/A N/A
HUNTER JERSEY FARMS N/A N/A
INDUSTRIAL ANODIZING 0.0100000 NIA
INFLUENTIAL 0.0050000 N/A
IZOD LACOSTA N/A MIA
LANDFILL 0.1100000 N/A'
M6e PLATING 0.2000000 N,,+A
MARLOWE 'VAN LOAN 0.0050000 NIA
MARO HOSIERY NIA N/A
METAFAS 0.2000000 N/A
METAL CREATIONS 0.2000000 N/A
OAKDALE COTTON MILL NIA. N/A
P6M ELECTROPLATING 0.2000000 N/A
ROYAL DEVELOPMENT 0.0100000 N/A
G S ' SEDGEFIELD SPECIALTIES 0.0050000 MIA
1 SILVER KNIT N/A NIA
yYW `S SLANE HOSIERY NIA N;'A
THOMAS BUILT BUS 0.0100000 N/A
LEAD ALDERMAN STUDIOS 0.1200000 N/A
CUSTOM DRUM SERVICES 0.7000000 4/A
DIVERSIFIED TECHNOLOGIES O.0800000 NIA
FIBER DYNAMICS O.I000O00 N/A
GREENSBORO METAL PARTS 0.0300000 N/A
HARRIS COVINGTON 0.0900000 N/A
HUNTER JERSEY FARMS N/A N/A
INDUSTRIAL ANODIZING 0.0500000 NIA
INFLUENTIAL 0.0750000 N/A
IZOD LACOSTA 0.2544000 N/A
LANDFILL 0.0500000 N/A
MSB PLATING 0/3356000 N/A
MARLOWE VAN LOAN 0.0025000 N/A
MARO HOSIERY 0.100900D N/A
METAFAB 0.2007500 MIA
METAL CREATIONS 0.4300000 NIA
OAKDALE COTTON MILL 0.1584400 N/A
PdM ELECTROPLATING 0.3000000 N/A
ROYAL DEVELOPMENT 0.1163400 H/A
SEDGEFIELD SPECIALTIES 0.0140200 N/A

INDUSTRIAL USER DATA
Page 1
PRELIM 4.0: DATA SHEET 4
POTW Name: EAST NEW
Pollutant Industry Name
Concentration
(mg/1)
POTW selected
Removal Rate(%) j
-Flow(MGD) ALDERMAN STUDIOS
0.1150000 M
N/A
CUSTOM DRUM SERVICES
0.0150000
NiA
DIVERSIFIED TECHNOLOGIES
0.0180000
N/A
FIBER DYNAMICS
0.1240000
N/A
GREENSBORO METAL PARTS
0.0050000
N/A
HARRIS COVINGTON
0.1970000
N/A
HUNTER JERSEY FARMS
0.1930000
N/A
INDUSTRIAL ANODIZING
0.0030000
N/A
INFLUENTIAL
0.1200000
N/A
IZOO LACOSTA
0.6500000
N/A
LANDFILL
0.0'.00000
N/A
M3B PLATING
0.0130000
N/A
MARLOWE VAN LOAN
0.0422100
MIA
HARD HOSIERY
0.0675000
NIA
METAFAB
0.020000
N/A
METAL CREATIONS
0.0400000
N/A
OAKDALE COTTON MILL
0.1360000
N/A
P&M ELECTROPLATING
-0.1356200
N/A
ROYAL DEVELOPMENT
0.0173270
N/A
SEDGEFIELD SPECIALTIES
0.:800000
N/A
SILVER KNIT
0.40571CO
N,'A
SLANE HOSIERY
0.1240000
N/A
-_------- --� - THOMAS BUILT BUS
0.1450000
N/A
AMMONIA ALDERMAN STUDIOS
625.0000000
N,A
CUSTOM DRUM SERVICES
250.0000000
N/A
DIVERSIFIED TECHNOLOGIES
300.000O000
N/A
FIBER DYNAMICS
150.0000000
NIA
GREENSBORO METAL PARTS
N/A
N/A .
HARRIS COVINGTON
40.0000000
N/A
HUNTER JERSEY FARMS
.0.0000000
N/A
INDUSTRIAL ANODIZING
N/A
N/A
INFLUENTIAL
20,0000000
N/A
IZOD LACOSTA
15.0000000
N/A
LANDFILL
10C.0000000
N/A
M&B PLATING
40.0000000
M/A
MARLOWE VAN LOAN
15.0000000
N/A
HARD HOSIERY
15.0000000
N/A
METAFAB
40.0000000
M/A
METAL CREATIONS
15.0000000
N/A
OAKDALE COTTON MILL
15.0000000
N/A
P&M ELECTROPLATING
15.0000000
N/A
ROYAL DEVELOPMENT
i5.0000000
N/A
SEDGEFIELD SPECIALTIES
15.0000000
N/A

r �
j
POTW Name: EAST NEW
MASS 8ALANCE CSul ECK
Page 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•------------------------
CALCULATED FROM FIELD SAMPLING DATA
''-------------------------------- ----
;UNCONTROLLABLE; CONTROLLABLE ; TOTAL ; POTW ;
POLLUTANT ;(Nonindustrial; (Industrial) ; SOURCES ; INFLUENT ; DIFFERENCE ;
SOURCES ; SOURCES ; (cols. 2 & 3); LOAD ; (cols. 4 & 5) ;
(lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (percent)
'------------------------------'---------------------------- '-------------- '-------------- '-----------------'
;AMMONIA ; 1145.8560 ; 1194.8222 ; 2340.6762 ; 2075.5291 -11.3279 ;
;80D 8509.4881 ; 13296.6805 ; 21806.1687 ; 12880.2960 ;-40.9328 ;
;CADMIUM ; 0.4297 0.5655 ; 0.9952 ; 0.2252 ; -'7.3742 ;
,CHROMIUM 0.8292 ; 1.9142 ; 2.7434 ; 3.4137 ; 24.4339 ;
,COD ; 35280.3017 ; 37761.4100 ; 73041.7117 ; 37019.5920 ;-49.3172 ;
;COPPER 1.8846 ; 6.188.8 ; 8.07 5 ; 6.5212 ;-19.2266 ;
;CYANIDE ; 0.3769 ; 0.3976 ; 0.1745 5 1.1709 ; 51.1899
;LEAD ; 1.1082 ; 3.3486 ; 4.4568 ; 4.6657
,NICKEL 0.4712 ; 3.6962 ; 4.1673 ; W.2426 ; -22.1900
;SILVER ; 1.8846 ; 1.2310 ; 3.1157 0.0000 ; -100.0000 ;
TSS ; 6030.8208 ; 11E68.0653 ; 118019.1863 ; 12850.2960 ; -28.0422 ;
IiNC ; 7.8401 8.0170 ; 15.8571 13.16n ; -16.9550
---------------------- ---------------- ------------------ ------------------------------------------------------
1'6 -T1-,/ A va- R Ft
�Gn
i

CA�-4j ��Q up
LA-
�kw� e

NPDES PREIREATT4EtqT INFORMATION REQUEST FORM
FACILITY NAME: p� �- ,� '�h/ NPDES NO. NC00
r
j REQ=STER : 611�e- t,,l DATE: L/�/� REGION:
r �
r
■
This facility has no SIU >and should not have pretreatment lan a '
gu age. ' y This facility should axe/or is developing
a '
following conditions:Pretreatment program, j
r
Program Development
r
JAN 3 0 1992 Phase I due
' Phase II dM�dfft/l—or/IT-
TbCft(& SU'T NAMAdditional
(attached)
s facility is currents inplenenting a pretr nt program.
Please .x�-thyolow.ng conditions:
r i PrOgra Implementation
Additional Conditions
(attached)
r
r
r
SIGNIFICANT IMUSTRIAL USERS' (SIUs) rrwm BUTIONS
r i
SIU FLAW - TOTAL: MGD
r ( �
r
- ODMPOSITION: TE]Cr=: © �p M®
' FINISHING : MGD i
r r
r n CC? MM '
MGM r
� r
MGD
f #WL 0,0,
r MGD r
r r
C
r
HEADWOWS REVIEW
r YASS
PARA1,JETERiTHROUGH
' r
fit, �✓ Cd
Cr 3�
ICU
Pb
Zn
/ CN
Phen 1
.Other
DAILY LOAD IN LBS/DAY AC
TUAL
DOMESTIC
-* A.14 Loop {ems
INDUS
D" DID - Dill- 1 J
,r
REMOVAL
•L�

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Water Quality Section
February 25, 1992
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Gregory Thorpe
Classification and Standards Unit
FROM: Steve Mauney
Water Quality Supervisor
SUBJECT: Deep River Reclassification Study
Proposed Randleman Dam
Randolph County
At the request of Dr. William Farabow (Hearing Officer),
WSRO collected additional samples from the Deep River area on
October 16, 1991. A summary of the results and the actual
laboratory forms are attached for your information.
It is relevant to note that the water quality standard for
Lindane was exceeded in Richland Creek below the Eastside High
Point WWTP (NC0024210). Since the NPDES permit for the Eastside
plant is presently up for renewal, it is recommended that their
Annual Priority Pollutant Analysis results (required by Part III
Condition J) be reviewed to see if Lindane or other pesticides
are of a concern.
Although the EMC just gave the Piedmont Triad Regional Water
Authority the power to condemn land for the proposed reservoir,
the sampling data collected by this office has shown that the
Deep River cannot consistently meet the water quality standards
for a "WS" stream classification.
Please advise if you need WSRO to perform any further
samplings prior to the stream reclassification hearings.
MMM/vm
cc: Charles Lowe t%',Nee%. rN
WSRO

� TT
RANDLEMAN DAM PROJECT
STREAM SAMPLE DATA
OCTOBER 16, 1991
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
Deep River
Deep River
High Point
Richland
Deep River
Kivett Dr.
I-85 Above
Eastside
Creek at
Groomtown
Parameters
Uustream
Richland Cr
Effluent
Riverdale
Road
BOD
1.2
1.4
3.0
1.3
3.1
Total R.•
110
130
610
560
470
TSS
8
9
5
11
9
Turb (NTU)
3
5.1
1.9
2.6
4.0
Chloride
8
14
83
76
78
Color ADMI
28
31
74
64
52
Hardness
57
57
53
57
59
Sulfate
7
6
130
150
84
NH3 as N
.03
.27
.10
.12
.40
TKN
0.2
0.6
2.4
3.2
2.3
NO2 + NO3
.02
.08
14
12
12
Total P.
.03
.04
2.9
3.3
2.5
Cd (ug/1)
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
Cr (ug/1)
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
Cu (ug/1)
<2
2.4
20
18
11
Ni (ug/1)
<10
<10
30
26
34
Pb (ug/1)
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
Zn (ug/1)
<10
<10
42
36
31
Al (ug/1)
120
180
57
140
130
Fe (ug/1)
450
710
160
350
340
Ma
4.7
5.4
4.0
4.4
4.5
Note: All units are in mg/1 unless specified otherwise.
#1 sample point was upstream of the landfill, Seaboard Chemical
and the Eastside High Point WWTP.
#2 sample point was downstream of the landfill and Seaboard but
upstream of Richland Creek and the Eastside effluent.
#3 grab sample collected at the end of the cascade aeration.
#4 sample collected at the culvert under Riverdale Drive.
#5 sample collected below the dam at Freeman Mill Road.

r
s •*
.Q
a
• STREAM SAMPLE DATE
RANDLEMAN DAM PROJECT
PESTICIDES/HERBICIDES/ORGANICS DETECTED
OCTOBER 16, 1991
Pesticides Semivolatile Volatile
Location Herbicides Organics OK anics
Deep River Diazinon None Detected Chloroform
Kivett Dr.
Deep River Diazinon
at I-85 Propazine
Eastside Lindane
Effluent Pentachlorophenol
Chlorpyrifos
Diazinon
Propazine
Richland Cr.
at Riverdale
Lindane*
Pentachlorophenol
Chlorpyrifos
Diazinon
Propazine
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
Deep River at Lindane* None Detected
Groomtown Rd. Pentachlorophenol
Chloropyrifos
Diazinon
Propazine
*Exceeded Water Quality Standard of 0.01 ug/1
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Bromodichloromethane
1,3-Dichloropropene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
Bromodichloromethane
Chloroform
Dibromomethane
1,1-Dichloroethene

...- 1 � rJJi r/ //�i��� �J: � t?Cr\\` . _ i /, ,n 'G1.�.% \. • ' "}' ' -`- C s I •-." 1 _ � • , � �
- , �+;� °ram �/ %' ` ' �� � ' /L i�'�� �, j •. rJ t ,�� , � ` ��' , ^; � � ; �l 7��,� : -:. . .
- � 1 iliri ' � �'••� : l tt t '1T'� . •.4 0 � \ ��%i c C)
:: r • a '�- -•a• �u '• -•I,I •'' / /' / / 47 - ,..� / J f.� •..� : yx ; li• ► C',..
' : i S ..! • `�♦ •♦O t • p r i A. ,lam _ / :;E ` i .� / �:\ ' .•
_, : z,r.-,: • Deep River t ��; t�� r- _ - ;- ;� Ft
• . ' �•' ��'f' ;'„' • '� � "��' \. XJ Ki vet -�.�_= � �t �` �-•-..�--
826
3� •1 I io -/.� �-� /' \` ,' , • r.r� �C. ` r/ .%�'4 . :� r.'����/'�� �Qmai3 • i
r is •♦ r' , �/�+ f� • . 1 t !' � �j ) • r• r �.1 j� -,r • i. 'rat• , : • ` •'.
Al
Iq
• �` I 1
'~��,♦ `~♦\/�ln• y^1•. 1\, •\�' •� � i' `;♦\\ ♦,)f� ! �. 4�\� ��i•���^.J • �� ��r �I i% r �p�'ViJ� � �'.
� � j `\ v }�`.1 ;� ,L' �� � , '�•• V�1J^ ' 1 �i t. ' �t: �,! /� y a.-� • 1•, i��` tllVs • + / i_'•� •t i \
kre
{.'Lr��\\� •.Gi•01�\ ••. �'�Y �% ..I. �- tI �' `` � � .%I r ' \;� • � :l�r r,r� �- ,. 4\�%.�• ���` %, - •;.. ♦
.f fll+-�•• /,� �i1>1' ��• .... 'ram.' ' !, --� ;, 1`; I . _ ;\-
rc__ .•''f- ' ', •;� J} t • . r-� .�".�+� /+-....�•' � , �t -/• r'/ l � O o ♦ �+ �• j, � 1. ' � •`�L:. '♦ •� - � �, ^l \ - .
1''
►�'J,p '`;\y i t r 11��,',,1,,''� • ��`! �.\`,- '%�/�� AGO •'� 4: tr / ��\�/I f; w 39
= ' e` -4 ` /• �j �lS� ` ` , ��� 7� • ��' 1 !� .
• • i �s �V„/*% `f1 �' fr r'.�-�i^.'�•, •cam •'L. _ `�� •. r •� •�'� r/ ��r% lo' .•••Ll% � �
t \ . i1 .1 • � ,.,,-•• T fir_ :. ,`. �. � .�, - f � .. 1 �/ i �i � \� �
71
•, �,c� s , -� - Y- i , �-, > �, 1Deep River - - T-
' I V;;;•;� :1 ••. •• �1, -f` • •- ,,•- ��;.�~�y �ti,. _ -• 1-85 %�f( �''t�•f •r.
ro
��! -, - ( •., 'ram •j! 4- •�' —.1
39
1 1 /j '`ram •/ /�-.. �.�i� / O ! ., ,/ -^,�. �.. �- ( `• •.
Eastside High .� �• ::;: ,rr==
Point WWTP #3 �� 1 �"�1 f .f / `- . 1.I' �` - •-all
oa
-' i
. � ;i\\�\1 -� / J �-i 1�,` • ',�•,7`ii�;, I '- .`O•• �:• 1 U',.�!% � --.\ '-/ I � ' { , �V' ,tom . � \—•��— \`l �.
01
'♦. • r � i �' .►•I i �,� I 1 v j � \� • _ i' � ' � � �. • , ! �, jai' • �."�, ; 7/:. - �%^ .: • - '� •.� �� " - / , j1
^`••,h •! . •. ♦ � I � `` �I I•�• i � \\ '! a `� • ` y � (�'�\ J , Icy �I •� � 4�� \\ � ��� ' �� �! • , •' r. ;�,, � ds • }}{�' r/�� . ' rI
.J , _. � ��•r/ • � :� . - _ � �;.� � ` . •� a .. -- -- \\ ��, �`%, �
Abisp al- _.:� r`��s— (� ;' n
�S:. --, �• Sri _, --� � ,.., � �� i � � j --- ��( � �` ' �.'`/._-_•,•� ' --.� �; '`tz�>~ 1 `'•---, /.
1 ;y' �_ +`,/', J•• -/' .,✓� '-%-. ,��\ `\ j� ♦ , i � e Vp��•.( s -r/✓J� ✓/�, ��' �'{ fg>< \t` � � 11.�� �-r_ � • � � \ I_ /' �. r ' I O ? � . / ,i
�'^•--��5V /i/. �j•' •' �. `�\ VV, ` _•'"f, i \� �,`• •�� •`.. '• .1 ter.'' • .`•.✓ ^ - 1 : `'•� r
IZ
0' •(',_ %� 3'..,•,, : r/i � -''r � a/^ �1p r � ' 1 ' 11 �'� . ^ � 2 �Q . i� : y, �• . �c
Ile
IN
_C� .1 �•r '. // i' lj,4�!`, ! N'
• •%/ s.:,• �11 ;jr+ - r �/� +' r•�• •
j1• s ••
�� ^�� �•' `;/' `'1� s t !.,' �/ `�, li��{I 1 {/ •• ���1�, ��I l.'%i5 J 1 f . - �1 • •�\ \ _^ ✓'-7�6/ 39
,-:' Richland Cr "j/ ^, ,?�y : , /� �, •� .
Riverdale #4 r!
CIA
'PI OV
� .rr LIN «-�_ •.-• �•� o Deep River j
q • .. ; ,.--.•� i' Groomtown Rd #5 �`�
I
�• ••• } './ \`J I I•, •1 ►� I \\ / . 1 -. -•`CIF

L Facility Information:
Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Requirement
Reporting Form A
(Revised June 1990)
NPDES Permit No: N00024210
Facility Name- Eastside
Discharge (Pipe) No: 001 Year: 1991
Class: IV County: Guilford
Person(s) Collecting Samples: Willaim D. Frazier
Status of facility wastewater treatment operation on day of sampling: typical: of Yes No
If no, explain briefly:
Analytical Laboratory- Aqua Tech -Environmental Consultants
IL Sampling:
TAM
24 hr composite for main sample / grab sample for purgeable fraction
Page 1 of 9
Date Sampled: (composite sample) Corresponding sample taken for toxicity testing:
Sampling begun (date, time)! Z -ZS 5-8A1 v-' Yes
Sampling finished (date, time): 5 - i - 9J 5AA1 No
Date and time sampled (grab sample)_ 3 -1 - 11 9: ao
Instructions
The purpose of this document and the accompanying memo is to standardize the sampling, analysis and reporting procedures to be used
for the Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring (APAM) Requirement as described In the permit.
SamplIng
1 - Take a 24-hour composite sample from the final effluent during mid -week (Wednesday through Friday). Collect a grab sample for the volatile
organic fraction when collection of the 24hourcomp6site sample•is completed. Follow any other sampling Instructions provided by the laboratory
performing the analysis.
2 - Indicate in the space provided at the top of this page whether a corresponding sample for toxicity testing was taken.-
3 - Make note of any unusual wastewater treatment operating conditions occurring on the day of sampling In the space provided on the form.
Analysis
4 - Analyze the effluent for pollutants listed on the APAM form, Including those to be identified and approximately quantified under the 10
significant peaks rule, using appropriate EPA -approved methods for each of the analytic fractions. Other analytical methods can be substituted
only with prior, written approval of the Director of the Division of Environmental Management (OEM). Read and distribute to the laboratory
performing the analysis the accompanying memo (Tedder, October 1990) clarifying analytical requirements.
S - Identify chemicals to be analyzed for according to the 10 significant peaks rule (as described In Item 2 of the Annual Pollutant Analysis
Monitoring Requirement in the permit) using a GCfMS library search. Tentative identification Is all that is required; confirmation by standard
Injection is not necessary. Estimate the concentration of each based on an internal standard having the closest retention time.
Reporting
6 - Quantitation Umit Targets that should be met are listed on this Revised APAM Reporting Form A. Report the use of any higher quantita-
tion limit and an explanation as to why the listed quantitation limit target could not be met. Examples of acceptable reasons for not meeting
a quandtation limit target could be high background concentrations in a sample, or the necessity for sample fraction dilution to bring a chemical
to within a quantifiable concentration. Ust any quantitation limit differtent (whether higher or lower) from the target in the column provided
for this purpose.
7 - If a chemical is found to be below the quantitation limit, report the concentration detected as less than (or 4< I the quantitation limit
In the appropriate space. Provide a concentration estimate for chemicals detected In concentrations greater than the detection limit and less
than the quantitation limit. Enter the detection limit in parentheses beside the estimate. Chemicals detected In concentrations above the quan-
titation limits must be quantified. Quantitation limit and detection limit are defined in the accompanying memo (Tedder, October 1990). Enter
the total number of peaks detected in each analytic fraction In the appropriate space on this Revised APAM Form A. Report all concentrations
In units of micrograms per liter (ug/1) and metals as total recoverable metal. If no peaks to be Identified under the 10 significant peaks rule
are observed. enter "none" in the space provided for "other" compounds In each appropriate analytic fraction section. Provide the concentra-
tion estimate and retention time for "unknowns" as well as for "significant peaks" for which a structural assignment can be made.
8 - If "significant peaks" are found, provide probable molecular weight, library match probability, retention time, Identification basis, and
MS scan number for each. In addition, list internal standards and their retention times.
9 - In the section labeled "Organic Analytical Information" (p. 9), Include for each organic fraction the method, extraction technique, GC
operating conditions, and surrogate recovery. Report the size of the GC1MS library being utilized in the appropriate space.
10 - Use copies of this Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Revised Form A to report the results of the analysis. Both the analytical laboratory
representative and the facility operator in responsible charge should sign completed forms (last page).
11 - Mail two completed copies of the form (and the laboratory report, if submitted to the facility on a different forth) to: ATTN: Central Files,
Division of Environmental Management, NC OEHNR, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611. Mail the APAM form separately from Discharge Monitoring
Reports.

A Purgeble (Volatile Organic)fraction, EPA method 8240, page 2 of 9
Number of chemicals detected n Fraction : 0
i
Fraction STORET Number 84085
STORET COMPOUND
Number
1-Pollutants to be analyzed for:
34210 Acrolein
34215 Acr lonitrile
34030 Benzene
32101 Bromodichloromethane
32104 Bromoform
34413 Bromomethane
32102 Carbon tetrachloride
34301 Chlorobenzene
34311 Chloroethane
34576 2-Chlorovin 1 ether
32106 Chloroform
34418 Chloromethane
32105 Dibromochloromethane
34496 1 1-Dichloroethane
34531 l 2-Dichloroethane
34501 1 1-Dichloroeth lene
34546 trans-1 2-Dichloroeth lene
34541 1 2-Dichloro ro ane
34704 cis-1 3-Dichloro ro ene
34699 trans-1 3-Dichloro ro ene
34371 Eth lbenzene
34423 Methylene chloride
34516 1 1 2 2-Tetrachloroethane
34475 Tetrachloroeth lene
34010 Toluene
34506 l 1 1-Trichloroethane
34511 1 1 2-Trichloroethane
39180 Trichloroeth lene
34488 Trichlorofluoromethane
39175 Vinyl Chloride
k Tf Ai fferer.� �v..�„. 4-1—..a.._i_i: _—
Quantitation
Limit Target
u l
100
100
5-
5
5
10
5
6
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
6
5
5
8
5
7
5
6
5
5
5
10
10
� !.A- �_____ '-
Quantitation
Limit
u l
Concentration
Detected
u l
< 100
< 100
< 5
< 5
< 5
< 10
< 5
< 5
< 10
< 10
< 5
< 10
< 5
< 5
< 5
< 5
< 5
< 6
< 5
< 5
< 8
< 5
< 7
< 5
< 6
< 5
< 5
< 5
< 10
< 10
GC/MS
Confirmaton
?
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
------------� ����•• .���... v1•.aKaavivrK4ivii i.Lit{.L4 4QJ.yC.:.•
a
A:

2 . Other purgeables (up to 10 highest peaks) page 3 of 9
Identifction Basis
Probable Estimated Library Retention Check all that apply)
Compound Molecular Concentration Probability Time (RT.) Library Manual Scan
None detected. Wei ht u 1 Min Match Interpretation RT Number
Complete only if non -targeted compounds are present:
Internal Standard Retention

B. Acid Extractable Fraction , US EPA Method 8270 , page 4 of 9
Number of compounds detected in Fraction: 0
Fraction STORET Number 45582
STORET Compound
1.Pollutants to be analyzed for:
Quantitation
Limit Target
u l
Quantitation
Limit *
u l
Concentration
Detected
u l
GC/MS
Confirmation ?
34452
34586
34601
34606
34616
34657
34591
34646
39032
34694
34621
4-Chloro-3-meth 1 henol
2-Chloro henol
2 4-Dichloro henol
2 4-Dimeth 1 henol
2 4-Dinitro henol
2-Meth 1-4 6-dinitro henol
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachloro henol
Phenol
2 4 6-Trichloro henol
10
10
10 -
10
50
50
10
50
50
10
10
< 10
< 10
< 10
< 10
< 50
< 50
< 10
< 50
< 50
< 10
< 10
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
w it airrerent from quantitation limit target
A.

2. Other acid extractables (up to 10 hiahest neaksl
Compound
None detected.
Probable
Molecular
Wei ht
-
Estimated
Concentration
u 1
-
Library
Probability
$
Retention
Time (RT)
Min
t+... V %_ -P V A. 7
Identification Basis
Check all that apply)
Scan
Number
Library
Match
Manual
Inter retation
RT
Complete only if non -targeted compounds are present:
Internal Standard I Retention
, � i

R_ I -- ..,.. - • ---- - - - - -
3450
34200
34220
39120
34526
34247
34230
34521
34242
34278
34273
34283
- ----- - �- _-�••..+�+•• ....�
Pollutants to -be analyzed
Acenaphthene
Acenaodhith lene
Anthracene
Benz i di ne
Benzo a) anthracene
Benzo a rene
Benzo b f tuorenthene
Benzo (ahO peryLene
Benzo k f luoranthene
Bis(2-chloroethox methane
Bis(2-chloroeth t) ether
Bis 2-chloroiso ro l ether
Lt[M Yl=%-lavu 06 / V I paqC 0 Vt
Quntitation Target Limit
u
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
y a LEdCLlOn
Quntitation
u
bEUKL'T 4W)U:33
Concentration
< 10
< 10
< 10
< 50
< 10
< 10
Number
GC/MSStoret
Confirmation.
round:
NO
No
No
No
No
NO
< 10
No
< 10
NO
< 10
< 10
< 10
No
NO
No
< 10
< 10
< 10
< 10
< 10
NO
No
39100
34636
34292
34581
34641
34320
34556
34536
Bis 2-eth lhex l thlate
4-Bromophenyt PhenyL ether
MY( ben l phthatate
2-Chloronaphthatene
4-ChLorophenyt phenyL ether
Chr sene
Dibenzo a h anthracene
1 2-D i ch l orobenzene
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
NO
No
No
< 50
NO
< 10
< 10
< 10
< 10
No
No
NO
NO
34566
34571
34631
34336
34341
39110
34611
34626
34596
34346 --1.2-Diphenythydrazine
34376
34381
39700
34391
34386
34396
34403
34408
34696
34447
34438
34433
34461
34469
.34551 1
1 3-D i ch lorobenzene
1 4-D i ch t orobenzene
3 3-Dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl Dhthalate
Dimeth t Dhthatate
Di-n-butt phthaLate
2 4-Dinitrotoluene
2 6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-oct l phthatate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
HexachLorocyc(opentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno 1 2 3-cd rene
Isophorone
Na thalene
Nitrobenzene
Ninitroso-di-n-propytemine
N i t rosodi en lamine
Phenanthracene
P rene
2 4-Trichlorobenzene
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
< 10
NO
< 20
< 10
NO
NO
< 10
No
< 10
< 10
< 10
NO
NO
NO
< 10
< 10
< 10
No
NO
No
< 10
< 10
< 10
< 10
No
NO
NO
No
< 10
< 10
No
No
< 10
NO
< 10
< 10
No
No
< 10
< 10
< 10
< 10
NO
NO
NO
No
< 10
NO

2. Other base /neutrals (up to 10 highest peaks)
name 7 of A
Compound
Probable
Molecular
Weight
Estimated
Concentration
u 1
Library
Probability
Retention
Time (RT)
Min
Identification Basis
Check all that apply)
Scan
Number
Library
Match
Manual
Interpretation
RT
UNKNOWN
Complete only if non -targeted compounds are present:
Internal Standard I Retention
� �
A
v

D.Organochlorine/Organophosphorous Pesticides and PCBs Page 8 of 9
Number of chemicals detected in fraction 0
Frant i nn .S'TnRFFT nni a n
STORET Compound Quantitation
Number Limit Target (ug/1)
Quantitation
Limit (ug/1)*
Concentration
detected (ug/1)
Confirmation
281
GC/MS
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
mn
Or anochlorine Pesticides PCBs: EPA Method 608
Yes No
Yes No
39330
39337
39338
34259
34259gamma-BHC
39350
39310
39320
39300
39380
34361
34351
34351
39390
34366
39410
39420
39480
39755
39400
34671
39488
39492
39496
39500
39504
39508
Or ano
Aidrin
at a-BHC
beta-BHC
Detta-BHC
L-.K1anc-
Ch t ordane
4 4-DDD
4 4-DDE
4 4 -DDT
Dietdrin
Endosut fan I WOO ha
Endosut fan 11 beta
Endosut fan sut fate
Endrin
Endrin atdeh de
He tachtor
He tachtor a xide
Methox ch t or
Mirex
Toxaphene
PCB 1016
PCB 1221
PCB 1232
PCB 1242
PCB 1248
Pce 1254 1
PCB 1260 1
hos horous Pesticides: EPA Method
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.1
0.05
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.02
-0.1
0.1
0.7
0.06
0.2
0.05
0.8
0.5
0.2
2.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
608
< 0.05
< 0.05
< 0.05
< 0.1
< 0.05
< 0.2
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.02
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.7
< 0.06
< 0.2
< 0.05
< 0.8
< 0.5
< 0.2
< 2.4
< 0.5
< 0.5
< 0.5
< 0.5
< 0.5
< 0.5
< 1.0
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
NO
NO
No
NO
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
NO
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
39560 IDemeton
39540 1
Parathion eth t
2.5
0.6
< 2.5
< 0.6
j
No
No
No
No
B . Herb is ides , EPA Method 615, Number of chemicals detected in fraction: 0 F*sampled y 8-9, 1991
ra ni- i nn grrn1?FT n n i o 0 ATt,�„1-nor
STORET Compound Quantitation
Number Limit Target (ug/1)
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
Or anochlorine Pesticides PCBs: EPA Method 608
Quantitation
Limit (ug/l)*
Concentration
detected (ug/1)
Confirmation
Bo?tt
Yes No
GC/MS
Yes
No
4 3 8 1
•3970 0
3439 1
T f A i
2 4-D
sitvex
z 4 5-T
f -Fnrov%f- dram,., +-L,34�- -. 4�-
12
2
2
i 2 ._ _ L
< 12
< 2
< 2
No
No
No
No
NO
No

(lrrrani t- final Ikr+-i n=l
T%___ A -L` n
Organic Fraction
Method
Extraction
GC Operating ~Conditions
Surrogate (Spikes)
Column Description
Compound
covery
Batch
Continuous
i lm.Thi kne s,
w halr6arrier as
a �th, ID,4omm.
ratute
Purgeable
8240
Om o5005j2 min ;o ug 2
'CCm'n), o t ��0 6C108 ��
rCIthiI) esn stay at 116 C
4-BFB
102
1 2-DCA
97
Tol-d8
88
Acid Extractable
8270
3510 w
3 m x o.25m�n 2.5.um RTX-5,
u t - r fly imtl6l te�e
?5 Miin?,go 16.W Ctat 6�CC
r minute.
Phenol-d6
17
3540 s
2-FP
29
2 4 6-TMP
59
Base/Neutral
Extractable
8270
3510 w)
30m x o.25m�� 2inii16,111-5,
too C
PIXR,goe6 OR at C
NBZ-d5
46
3540 sm�fi�
2-FBP
54
—Ter-d14
17
GC MS Library size number of reference spectra): 60 000
r.wA_. __ �.
-
r - "&&%A V%.11G1 \.11Citt1VCi1.7
Number of Metals and Other Chemicals (as listed belw ) detected in Sample 8
Fraction STORFT Numhpr 797dn
STORET Compound
Number
1.Pollutants to be analyzed for:
Quantitation
Limit Target
u l
Quantitation
Limit *
u l
Concentration
Detected
u l
01104
Aluminum
50
100
01097
Antimony
50
< 10
01002
Arsenic
10
< 5
01012
Beryllium
25
< 5
01027
Cadmium
2
< 1
01034
Chromium
5
7
01042 --Copper
2
13
01051
Lead
10
14
71900
Mercury
0.2
< 0.2
01067
Nickel
10
32
01147
Selenium
5
< 5
01077
Silver
5
< 1
01092
Zinc
10
80
01007
Barium
500
<50
00940
Chloride
ICvanide
1000
110000
00720
20
<10
00951 IFluoride
100
1010
If different from quantitation limit tarctet
Analytical L orato y r pre entative lmac�, 0
Gi
gDate:tt
.Facility Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC):
I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge
,signed: Date:

cc: Permits and Engineering
Technical Support Branch
Guilford County Emergency Management
Central Files
WSRO
r8261992
�/11,,,,�,wY
Date February 20, 1992
Page Page 1 of 4
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
County Guilford
NPDES Permit No. NCO024210
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address:
City of High Point's Eastside Pollution Control Plant, 5898
Riverdale Road, Jamestown, N.C. Mailing Address: Mr.
Linwood O'Neal, Director of Water and Sewer Utilities, City
of High Point, High Point, North Carolina 27261
2. Date of Investigation: July 9th and loth and October 25th,
1991, February 14, 1992, and February 17, 1992 (files)
3. Report Prepared by: Arthur R. Hagstrom, Environmental
Engineer, DEM, WSRO, and WQ
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number:
Mr. Randall Jarrall, Plant Supervisor [phone]
Mr. Jerry Patton, Land Application
Mr. Jim Gwyn, Industrial Waste Control [phone]
5. Directions to Site:. From the junction of Kivette Drive and
Riverdale Drive, go South to the Plant located at 5898
Riverdale Road.
6. Discharge Point(s) - List for all discharge points
Latitude: 350 56' 24" 685' +/-
Longitude: 790 54' 24"
Attach a USGS Map Extract and indicated treatment
plant site and discharge point on map.
USGS Quad No. D19NW or USGS Quad Name High Point East
7. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading):
Adequate for expansion. Adjoining land owned by the City is
available to the current facility.

Page 2 of 4
NPDES Permit No. NCO024210
February 20, 1992
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): The site
has multiple levels achieved by grading. The slope varies
from approximately 2 to 10%. The system, except for the
lowest portion of the discharge spillway, is not in areas
subject to flooding.,
9. Location of nearest dwelling: The nearest dwelling observed
was over 1000' from the WWTP. There are some businesses
within 1000' of the WWTP.
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters:
a. Classification: Richland Creek (Class "C") and Deep
River (Class "C")
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Deep River, Richland
Creek (Cape Fear), 03 06 08
c. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses: The general downstream is rural.
There is a proposed Randleman Dam on Deep River. The
Deep River above and below the junction with Richland
Creek is used by some people for recreational purposes.
A "WS" classification is pending for the DEM Deep
River's Randleman Reservoir.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. Type of wastewater: 84% Domestic
16% Industrial (with 100% of permitted
f 1 ow )
a. Volume of Wastewater: 16.0 MGD Permitted; twelve month
average ending 12/91 was 10.0898 MGD.
b. Types and quantities of industrial wastewater:
Approx. flows of listed industries.
Textile and Textile Dyeing .866 MGD
Electroplating .157 MGD
Chemical Mfg.g .181 MGD
Dairy Products .122 MGD
At present flow levels TOTAL 1.326 MGD
C. Prevalent toxic constituents in wastewater:
(Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn), textile treatment and dye
wastes.
d. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
in development approved X
should be required not needed

f ,
i
Page 3 of 4
NPDES Permit No. NC0024210
February 20, 1992
2. Production rates (industrial discharges only) in
pounds per day:
a. Highest month in the last 12 months: N/A
b. highest year in last 5 years: N/A
3. Description of industrial process (for industries only)
and applicable CFR Part and Subpart: N/A
4. Type of treatment (specify whether proposed or
existing):
Existing components form an integrated system having
mechanical screen, grit removal, primary sedimentation,
using clarifiers, followed by trickling filters, activated
sludge, secondary sedimentation, sand filters, chlorination,
and flow measurement and recording. The plant includes a
4.0 MG equalization tank, a pumping station - 4 - 5.0 MGD
variable speed pumps, control valve manholes, Parshall
Flume, and aeration basin influent box weirs.
5.
RIF
Existing Facilities
New Side No. 1 Train) Old Side (No. 2 Train)
pH adjustment Uses 2 of new primary
clarifiers
2 mechanical bar screens 2 Trickling Filters
Flow measurement 4 aeration basins
2 Aerated grit chambers
4 Primary clarifiers
2 Aeration basins -
one used as aerated
2 Secondary clarifiers
Final Filters
Chlorine contact tank
3 secondary clarifiers
Effluent pumped to final
filters
2 Wash water storage
basins - pumped to
2 Sludge thickeners
Belt press; 2 anaerobic
digesters
Sludge Lagoon
Plus
A shared 4.0 MG equalization tank and distribution system.
Sludge handling and disposal scheme: Storage lagoon, plus
extensive land application program, with DEM Permit.
Treatment plant classification: (attach completed rating
sheet) Class IV

Page 4 of 4
NPDES Permit No. NCO024210
February 20, 1992
7. SIC Code(s) 4952
Wastewater Code(s) Primary 01, 55, 56, 53, 31, 32
Secondary
Main Treatment Unit Code: 01 and 04; 1; X ; 3
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction
Grants Funds (municipals only)? N/A
2. Special monitoring requests: None
3. Additional effluent limits requests: None
4. Other: Plant appears to be satisfactorily run and was
compliant per its July 1991, CSI and the February 1992, CEA.
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The WSRO Recommends that the permit be re -issued.
s-E-
Signature of report pr rer
Water Quality Regional'Supervisor

NEW
EQUALIZATION
.BASIN
• -A
PRELIMINARY-71
18E1111MI NI
-- ---- NEW
EQUALIZATION
PUMIPING
�- — SiI�nON
i
w� M 1
a�
K V(X
46
ANAEROBIC
DIGESTERs
TO SAM
LAGOONS
PRIIMARY SLUDGE
MISTED
OAF
SUPERNATANT
FILTER
THICKENED SLUDGE
PRESS ^
AERATION
��' aSPasAL
PRIMARY
BASIN
SECONDARY
SETTLING
SETTLING
BASINS
DIGESTED SLUDGE
BASINS 3 dt 4
AERATION
-.
BASIN
7
'
RETURN ACTIVATED SLUDGE
T
FILTERS
TO SLEEK
laom
SCREW
WASTE ACTIVATED
BASH
SLUDGE (WAS)
PUMPS
PRtMARY
i
SETTLING
(RAS)
;
BASINS 1 &2
TRICKLING
(•'�
...�
s
SECONDARY
BASINS
RECIRCULATION BASINS
RECOVERED WASH WATER lli� wAS41 wA
RECOVERY
BASINS
EASTSIDE WWTP FLOW SCHEMATIC (Nl-S�
___ Ll^T Tn C'f%AI C

t
!2
O(LIIMING FACII-ITIES INDEX `)
A AVIATION BASM NO.1 U PRIMARY CLAMFIER N062
9 AERATION BASH 000.2 V PRIMA" CLARMER NO.3
• C FINAL CLARIFIER NO.1 W PRIMARY CLAWER NO.4
0 FINAL CU69FM NO.2 X HEADWORKS STRUCTURE
E EFFLUENT FLIERS Y SLUDGE THICKENER NOJ
F CHLORINE CONTACT BASINS Z SLUOGE 7HKXENER NO.2
G EFFLUENT PUMPING STATION AA THRXING FL70 PUMMG STATION
IN WASH WATER STORAGE RESERVOIR 0 TRKXJNG FILTER
i Sam No BL= CC TRICKLING FLIM
K Owl DD BLOWER KM
L OKEM EE AERATION BA' MS
M CHLORINE BLDG. Ff MAINTENANCE BLM
" WASH WATER RECOVERY BASIN NO 2 00 OPERATIONS KDQ
0 WASH WATER RECOVERY BASIN NOJ MIN VEHKLE STORAGE N.M
P FINAL CLAMMIER JJ SEPTIC UNL0AOtNG STATION
0 FINAL CLARIFIER KK SAME LAGOON
R FINAL CLARIFIER LL EFFLUENT CHANNEL
III POWER CO. SUBSTATION UM STORM WATER BYPASS CHANNEL
T PRIMARY CLARIFIER NOJ M NON -POTABLE WATER
10
i+\ o 0
o�- Is
SITE PLAN
• NOT TO SCALE
z
30 15 0 I 30

R..• � v .. � , .. . ' • .$� ; 'fir —+-''' � �'` '� ' ' _ — •�•' , � � 1
�. .� .. sdelr
• •� " ♦� Sri= • �/•^r � � �' '� ' � '' S fs�11* / �, �I • `J�!'� �.:K•/
CPI
x� �-.,�; • � � (( � • , • .ems— �. �j ; � , ::. �, ,• ���
.• l� rf • •..� ,� .ice ,, �- ., ; r •- C� ,, ... •t
•` -. : V' � � � � � � � �/ ! �_ ; ;•' .. )ice •
46
NJ
MOW
do
Jj(� • J7� \ .'•'• • • te{�t` � .� l t 'lt 7 ^ 1 � •U • ` ,1 /j �� •, .f ��, � �r �' • , •� • .li I.1
•�� N ; t • • ) • ,: % `. V �� rM \ ram. ti \ ' .. J • r 1 j%l, . • fir. �+ •�'
i • �' s -/ = x r•.•,,. ' ` a 1 • ` (l f' r / = \ice ' 1 ifoe
CITY
for
70
CP
Mu
v 19 VJ /01QA &O-r 46AST
Nor&sRRmrrgo. qcoaob'
�2 tro c n t •�,,f J� .
C'
f..• •t ,. C �1 �•
16
�� •