20050634 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20140131

0wV,, ao ()Sv (0 3�
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek)
Stream Restoration Monitoring Report
EEP Project # 276
EEP Contract # 004927
Monitoring Year 04
Submitted to:
rA "Np— 3
&Ortem
a mcnt
PRoc;ft"
DR@ ROW 9
Q
APR 1 4 --) ?5
DENR - WATER RESOUKGES
TMNSPORTATION PERMITTING UNIT
NCEEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Construction Completed: May 2010
Data Collection: June 2014
Submitted: January 2015

Monitoring Firm
KCI
ASSOCIATES OF NC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Contact: Adam Spiller
Email: adam.sailler(a)kci.com
KCI Project No: 12071067B RC12
Design Firm
EcoLogic Associates, P.C.
3808 Clifton Road
Greensboro, NC 27407
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 t 2014 — MY04 Report

Table of Contents
1.0 Executive Summary/Project Abstract .................................................................. ............................... 2
2.0 Methodology ........................................................................................................ ............................... 2
3.0 References ............................................................................................................. ..............................2
Appendix A — Proiect Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure1. Vicinity Map ................................................................................................... ..............................4
Figure2. Site Map .......................................................................................................... ..............................5
Table 1 a —Project Components ..................................................................................... ..............................6
Table lb —Component Summations .............................................................................. ..............................6
Table 2 — Project Activity and Reporting History ........................................................ ............................... 7
Table3 — Project Contacts ............................................................................................ ............................... 7
Table4 — Project Attributes .......................................................................................... ............................... 8
ADDendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3. Current Condition Plan View ...................................................................... ............................... 10
Table 5 — Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment ...................................... ............................... 12
Table 6 — Vegetation Condition Assessment .............................................................. ............................... 13
StreamStation Photos ................................................................................................. ............................... 14
ProblemArea Photos .................................................................................................. ............................... 19
VegetationPlot Photos ................................................................................................ ............................... 20
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7 — Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment ........................................................... ............................... 23
Table 8 — CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata ................................................................... ............................... 24
Table 9 — CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species ........................... ............................... 25
ADDendix D — Stream Survev Data
CrossSection Plots ..................................................................................................... ............................... 28
LongitudinalProfile Plots ........................................................................................... ............................... 34
PebbleCount Plots ...................................................................................................... ............................... 37
Table 10 — Baseline- Stream Data Summary Table ..................................................... ............................... 43
Table 11 a. Monitoring - Cross - Section Morphology Data Table ............................... ............................... 44
Table I 1 b. Monitoring - Stream Reach Morphology Data Table ............................... ............................... 45
Appendix E — Hydrology Data
Table 12 — Verification of Bankfull Events ................................................................ ............................... 47
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 11 2014 — MY04 Report

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site, completed in May 2010, restored a
total of 2,919 linear feet of stream and 167,092 square feet of buffer restoration in the Neuse River Basin.
The project is located in the USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020201 -07 -0060. This HU is within the EEP's
Neuse River Basin Local Watershed Plan and is also listed as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in
EEP's Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities 2010. The project goals and objectives are listed below.
Project Goals
• Restore a stable channel morphology and floodplain to the project stream that is capable of
moving the flows and sediment provided by its watershed.
• Improve water quality by reducing bank erosion and bed degradation.
• Provide a riparian management zone that is compatible with the surrounding uses (golf course
and electrical transmission corridor) and yet retains the ecological function of the riparian zone.
• Enhance aquatic and terrestrial habitat in the stream corridor.
Project Objectives
• Restore 2,919 linear feet of stable stream channel with the appropriate pattern, profile, and
dimension that can support efficient sediment transport.
• Plant native trees and shrubs throughout the site.
Grade a floodplain adjacent to the stream.
The vegetation monitoring success criterion for the planted stream riparian zone is a density of 320
stems /acre after the third year of monitoring and an allowance for 10% mortality in the fourth and fifth
years with a final density of 260 stems /acre. Before the start of the MY -04 growing season the site was
replanted in areas of low stem density. The fourth -year vegetation monitoring followed the Level 2 CVS-
EEP vegetation monitoring protocol. The site's average density for this monitoring period was 410
planted stems /acre, including live stakes, and 387 planted stems /acre, excluding live stakes. Including
volunteers, the site averaged 6,122 total stems /acre. Both of the vegetation monitoring plots in the
streamside planting area (Plots 1 and 6) had planted stem densities below the fourth -year success criterion
of 288 stems /acre. Of the plots in the buffer restoration area (Plots 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7), Plot 7 had a planted
stem density below the fourth -year success criterion of 288 stems /acre. There were many loblolly pine
and sweetgum volunteers throughout the easement; in certain areas these volunteers were extremely
dense. In late summer of 2013, after the vegetation monitoring, the loblolly pine density was reduced to
improve the condition of the site for the planted vegetation. Autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellate) is
scattered throughout the lower half of the site. This species appears to be a remnant left over from the pre -
restoration conditions of the site as well as new volunteer stems from the nearby wooded area. See Figure
3, Current Condition Plan View, for further information on the occurrence of invasive species within the
site.
Fourth -year monitoring found Richland Creek to be mostly stable, with only minor changes from the
baseline conditions. The stream has three areas of localized bank erosion since construction (2% of all
banks), and five areas displaying signs of mass wasting (1% of all banks). There is currently one headcut
located approximately at Station 5 +75, with one area along the stream experiencing bed deposition.
Please see Appendix B Problem Area Photos. A repair plan for these isolated areas of instability is being
prepared for implementation in 2015. The longitudinal and cross - sectional data also reflect the overall
stability in the project streams. As a part of the stream success criterion, the stream must experience at
least two bankfull events, each in separate monitoring years. The site has experienced multiple bankfull
events since construction.
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 1 2014 — MY04 Report

Summary information /data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report and in the Mitigation Plan (formerly the
Restoration Plan) documents available on the EEPs website. All raw data supporting the tables and
figures in the appendices are available from EEP upon request.
2.0 METHODOLOGY
The survey data were collected with a total station instrument.
The stationing for the longitudinal profile is based on the thalweg stationing and has been adjusted to
match grade control structures from previous longitudinal profiles.
The CVS -EEP protocol, Level 2 ( http : / /cvs.bio.unc.edu /methods.htm) was used to collect vegetation data
from the site.
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
Version 4.0 ( http : / /cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm)
NCEEP. 2010. Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities.
(http: / /portal.ncdenr.org/c /document libraa/g_et file ?uuid= 665be84c- cf93- 477b -918c-
1993778ef11 f &groupld= 60329)
USACE. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDENR -DWQ, USEPA, NCWRC.
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KC1 Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 4 276 2 2014 — MY04 Report

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 4 276 3 2014 — MY04 Report

GRANVILLE
FRANKLIN m�
ORANGE DURHAM MT
a
NASH
WAKE _.
CHATHAM
l
JOHNSTON
LEE��s'QO C
HARNETT
v
m
m
ti
qs , o
QED \
1 `aava;
g � �
CITY OF O
WAKE FOREST o�
p�NF
DIRECTIONS TO PASCHEL GOLF COURSE (RICHLAND CREEK)
FROM RALEIGH, TAKE US HIGHWAY 1 NORTH TOWARD WAKE
FOREST. THEN TAKE A RIGHT ONTO THE NC 98 NORTH EXIT
TOWARD WAKE FOREST TRAVEL APPROXIMATELY 1 MILE ON INC
HOLDI AVE 98 /DURHAM RD AND THE DOWNSTREAM END OF THE PROJECT
WILL BE ON THE LEFT
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) and is encompassed
4 by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered by land under
private ownership. Accessing the site may require traversing areas near or
aalong the easement boundary and therefore access by the general public is
not permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state and federal
agencies or their designees /contractors involved in the development,
oversight and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the
terms and timeframes of their defined roles. Any intended site visitation or
activity by any person outside of these previously sanctioned roles and
activities requires prior coordination with EEP.
Figure 1. Vicinity Map - Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek), Project No. 276
Project Location
Roads E .r
—Major Streams and Rivers 1:24,000 ftFe Municipalities 0.2 0.1 0 z m-
Municipalities
KC I Project Easementt`S

Table la. Project Components
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Project No. 276
Project
Component or
Existing
Restoration
Approach
Linear Footage
Stationing
Mitigation
Mitigation
BMP
Comment
Reach ID
Feet /Acres
Level
or Square Feet*
Ratio
Credits+
Elements
Enhancement 11
Creation
Preservation
HQ Preservation
Totals (Feet /Acres)
In- stream structures, including offset rock cross
Richland Creek
N/A
R
P2
2,919
10 +00 - 39 +80
1:1
2,766
0
vanes, riffle grade controls, and rock sills, were
3.84
0
used to stabilize restored channel. Planted a
ri arian buffer.
Buffer
R
1
1 167 092.2
1
1 1:1
1 167 092.2
IBuffer was planted with native ve etation.
*Linear footage does not include the stream length that runs under a golf cart bridge through an easement exception. Square feet of buffer are limited to the areas of the
buffer that meet the regulatory criteria for buffer restoration credit. See Figure 2 for the locations of the creditable buffer.
'The credits have been reduced to account for areas where the stream flows through vegetation management zones within the easement. These management areas are
depicted on Figure 2. They include a utility right of way and a play over area for the golf course. Under the utility right of way the buffer will be allowed to grow to a
height of 12'. Due to this restriction the 309 mitigation credits that would be generated by the stream in the right of way is reduced by 25% to 231 stream credits. The
vegetation in the play over area will be trimmed to a few feet high. Due to this restriction, the 151 mitigation credits that would be generated by the stream in the play
over area are reduced by 50% to 76 stream credits. There is 2,459 If of stream that does not have any reductions and will generate 2,459 credits.
Table lb. Component Summations
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Project No. 276
Restoration Level Stream (10
Riparian Wetland (Ac)
Non -Ri ar Ac Upland Ac Buffer Ac BMP
Riverine
Non- Riverine
Restoration
2,919
3.84
Enhancement
0 0
Enhancement 1
Enhancement 11
Creation
Preservation
HQ Preservation
Totals (Feet /Acres)
2,919
0
0
0
3.84
0
MU Totals
2,766
1 0
0
0
3.84
0
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 6 2014 — MY04 Report

Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Project No. 276
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 4 yr 7 months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 4 yr 7 months
Number of Reporting Years: 4
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
2004
June 2007
Final Design - Construction Plans
Mark Taylor, PE (336) 632 -4441
Sept 2007
Construction
May 2010
Planting
Cary, NC 27518
May 2010
Baseline Monitoring/Report
Aug 2010
Dec 2010
Year I Monitoring
Aug 2011
Dec 2011
Year 2 Monitoring
Aug 2012
Nov 2012
Year 3 Monitoring
Jun 2013
Dec 2013
Supplemental Planting
Feb 2014
Year 4 Monitoring
Jun 2014
Nov 2014
Table 3. Project Contacts
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Project No. 276
Designer
EcoLogic Associates, P.C.
3808 Clifton Road
Greensboro, NC 27407
Primary Project Design POC
Mark Taylor, PE (336) 632 -4441
Construction Contractor
River Works
8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27518
Construction Contractor POC
William Pedersen (919) 459 -9034
Planting Contractor
H + J Forest Service
Planting Contractor POC
Matt Hitch (910) 264 -1612
Monitoring Performers
KCI Associates of North Carolina
4601 Six Forks Road, Suite 220
Raleigh, NC 27609
Monitoring POC
Adam Spiller (919) 278 -2514
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 9 276 7 2014 — MY04 Report

Table 4. Project Attributes
Paschal Golf Course Richland Creek) Project No. 276
Project County
Wake County
Physiographic Region
Piedmont
Ecore ion
Northern Outer Piedmont
River Basin
Neuse
USGS HUC
03020201
CDWQ Sub -Basin
03 -04 -02
Within Extent of EEP Watershed Plan
Yes - Draft - Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities 2010
WRC Class
Warm
/o of Project Easement Demarcated
70 %, with wooden bollards
Beaver Activity Observed During Design Phase
Yes
Restoration Component Attributes
Drainage Area (sq.mi.)
7.8
Stream Order
Second
Restored Length (feet)
2,919
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Watershed Tye
Suburban
Watershed LULC Distribution
Forest/Wetland
Agricultural /Managed Herbaceous
Developed
35%
35%
30%
Watershed Impervious Cover
10%
CDWQ AU /Index Number
27 -21
CDWQ Classification
C; NSW
303d Listed
U
Upstream of 303d Listed Segment
U
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor
U
Total Acreage of Easement
8.5
Total Vegetated Acreage within Easement
1.3
Total Planted Acreage as Part of Restoration
7.2
Rosgen Classification of Pre - Existing
C4 /174
Rosgen Classification of As -Built
C4
Valley Tye
-
Valley Slope
0.002
Valley Side Slope Range
-
Va—Iley Toe Slope Range
-
Cowardin Classification
-
Trout Waters Designation
No
Species of Concern, Endangered, Etc.
None
Dominant Soil Series and Characteristics
Series
Depth
Clay%
K
T
Chewacla
Deep
-
-
-
"N /A" is for items that do not apply.
" -" is for items that are unavailable.
"U" is for items that are unknown.
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 4 176 8 2014 — HY04 Report

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates oJNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 276 9 2014 — MY04 Report

I ' 7
wa a.
co to
CO
t
i -a
4
'v
r-
00
M
a
N
Q o a. m
W
Oz
z
W y
LU
W m
Q
r z
Z W U
p FM w
U g
0
C7 of
Z o_
U
z
a
a
w ~ W LU
O0 7
O U U
a
O z
> w U)
■
Z z
O O
Z
Q z
Z < (n m Z Z Z
O w w ww �� w
U ❑ ❑ z z _� O� w
O U— w— a
w w U5 <W m�
W m m 0 In ~OU pU LU
CL — (n
O z U) (D z (D z
Q ww ww z
(n (n m > ❑ > ❑
if i�l
LWA
..
SNOISIA3W
wvaooa�
L 4
609LZ VNIlO>'JVO H1HON'H0131Mf
OVOa SAMOA XIS LOea
SISLLN310S •S.)OSSV ld •S2f33NION3
aHeos�vaossv ^
tlN1102tl� Hl2ON ' lLNfO� 3�tlM '1S320� 3�tlM
t? UV3A ONNOiINON - 9LZ# 103f'02id
b133a0 ONb�IHON) 3suno0 3-100 IVHOSdd
0 $
o y'
z'
Z Z
Owalsmoaq W
w � ;
� � z z
v O a
N
o
y
Q
w0
Z
Z
��
of
0
0
0
m
gg
i 3
W
LL
J
In u
O
U
<
cnz
Vf
p
v
w
t133ys33S
Z
W
V
�-j
a
a
3N17H
°
Lli ()
°Qz
ti
O
O
Ln
N
U
{
, -
W Q
U
LO
a
kv
0
I ' 7
wa a.
co to
CO
t
i -a
4
'v
r-
00
M
a
N
Q o a. m
W
Oz
z
W y
LU
W m
Q
r z
Z W U
p FM w
U g
0
C7 of
Z o_
U
z
a
a
w ~ W LU
O0 7
O U U
a
O z
> w U)
■
Z z
O O
Z
Q z
Z < (n m Z Z Z
O w w ww �� w
U ❑ ❑ z z _� O� w
O U— w— a
w w U5 <W m�
W m m 0 In ~OU pU LU
CL — (n
O z U) (D z (D z
Q ww ww z
(n (n m > ❑ > ❑
if i�l
LWA
..
m
w
U
J
Z
Q
w0
Z
Z
��
of
0
m
F-
Dui
W
LL
Z
O
U
<
cnz
O
p
v
w
w
Z
W
w
�-j
a
a
u)
O
Lli ()
°Qz
❑
O
O
U)
❑
U
J
W Q
U
Q
a
0

m,
I
0
I
N
tr
n
Do
m
0
0
N
F�
m -v 0 m
z 2 o PASCHAL GOLF COURSE (RICHLAND CREEK)
Z o p H PROJECT #276 - MONITORING YEAR 4
� m
o <_ i m $ g
ti � z � WAKE FOREST, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
KC I
ASSOCIATES OF NC
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS
4601 SIX FORKS ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609
co) z
1 Q 5 O
m m 0 m
O v D n
z
o rD
M
m z Q
n m
=1
Z o Z
`� v
m m
D
Z O
m Oz
Z
v
m
N
D
w r
o� cl)
V
r �j
Fil Ill lc emit
IROWIM
MATC SE
E
HCINE SHEET 1
Or x
z
mccn
r
2
D
m
0 0
0
0
z6)
U)
m
�n
0
0 me
m
m
m
Z
Z
D n
�
-
z
0
�
z�
ITI ---I
co
�
C)
m
O
Z
Z
X
Op
-0 z
C
z
Z
n
��
0
�
m
co
7<
D
z
z mm m mm m > D � �
D zG) Z0 cDn z X X
cn T) -0 T) -u (1) 7� m m O
m �O --j r- D m K m
cn �c �D _W m m C7 co
m �m �C) z O
Cn m 1 m? O z
� � O m m m � o o o n
Z
z z oo cn D Z
D o v
z
O
Z
REVISIONS

•
�E
h
� e
� J
i
t
V t
•1
Y
L o 0 O
O W Y. Y
W Z W m
iUU —
U I O Ir- 10 O l O l n l 00 I O
O I O I^OIN
b
M I O I�l00
,p n l- I v 1
y
O
T
E
v
O
R
�•._9
o
e
e
e
e
a
e
U
U
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Y
V
bd
G
C
A
Id
O
Y _Y
Y
O
E
00
O
O Y C
_G OI v
O Y Y
C
L
7 « W
O
O
�
Q
w
O Y
Eb Q
CC
OG
C
N
T
° v
z
y Q C
m a
f, C
V `
p Y itl
v
N
L of a
C toa
W
ro
�yU
c
r
OA
G
.� 0
Y O t
.Ch
0.
L O
0.
0"
y
U
t3
C Y W
.y p .0
on
cyO
z
O
s
N c 72
N
g v
A
` O 9
Y
Y c row
r
0 p
� E
7 ` C
z
V
0. W
O
u
'a
c
c
e
m
o
0
ao
`
Y
Y
U
O
E
O
N
M
N
N
M
7
Y
L
Y 'n
Y
Y
Y L
� p
O
ppp N
m
C O
N
a`+
V4 V
bD
G Y
G
U L
d w C
C
C
T
`
Y
E
C
v
`
0
0
N—
w d
N—
H—
07
N 'O
•--
N
s
o
L
Y e
eo
y e o
'`
A m
>
a
o
l✓
U U
r
P4 u
v
Y
L o 0 O
O W Y. Y
W Z W m
iUU —
U I O Ir- 10 O l O l n l 00 I O
O I O I^OIN
b
M I O I�l00
,p n l- I v 1
0
o
S
L
Z �
O C
d �
O
U
O
y
5
e
v
ai
Ln
0
O
C
v
Ln
i
U
0
V
h
b
o y
U .o
c y`
4 W
y
O
T
E
v
O
R
o
w G
0 3
O O
U
U
E
Y
V
bd
G
C
A
Id
O
Y _Y
O
E
00
O
O Y C
_G OI v
d
C
O 'LS
C O
m
Eb Q
CC
OG
C
N
T
L U 'C
y Q C
m a
bUp
p Y itl
v
N
L of a
C toa
W
ro
�yU
c
r
OA
G
.� 0
Y O t
.Ch
0.
L O
0.
0"
y
U
t3
C Y W
.y p .0
on
cyO
d
O
cN
N c 72
N
g v
A
g
Y c row
r
0 p
9
�
e
m
o
0
ao
`
fi
N
M
N
N
M
7
Y
L
Y 'n
Y
Y
Y L
� p
O
ppp N
m
C O
N
a`+
V4 V
0
o
S
L
Z �
O C
d �
O
U
O
y
5
e
v
ai
Ln
0
O
C
v
Ln
i
U
0
V
h
b
o y
U .o
c y`
4 W

� a
O
O
U `*
s
i
o
y C
d �
O
U
O
y
Q
0
O
d
0
Y
d
U
e
C
h
b
O �
C7 0
o y`
s
o W
a. W
u
yCC
L
E
9
0
0
0
C
_
A
-
n.
0
0
7
O
O
O �
U
`o
L G
T_
1!7
0
0
❑..
3.
0.
�
1
-
�
O
ca
'O
U
u
o
E
i
:1
CJ
r
r
L
J
V
c
E
O
" E
E 1�"
4
>b E
A r
•C
O y
v
V
9
.�
C
G
o.
a CL
c. CL
O
a.
�
•y
O
R L
°
=
Q
L N
.�.
�
L• O
�
E
00
O
> z
E
f" C.
� a
O
O
U `*
s
i
o
y C
d �
O
U
O
y
Q
0
O
d
0
Y
d
U
e
C
h
b
O �
C7 0
o y`
s
o W
a. W

Stream Station Photos
Photo Point #I — Looking upstream at fish ramp 8/6/2010 —
Baseline
Photo Point #2 — Looking downstream 8/6/2010— Baseline
Photo Point #2 — Looking upstream 8/6/2010— Baseline
Photo Point #I — Looking upstream at fish ramp
11 / 10/2014 MY -04
Photo Point #2 — Looking downstream 11/10/2014 MY -04
Photo Point #2 — Looking upstream 11/10/2014 MY -04
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 14 2014 — MY04 Report

Photo Point #3 — Looking downstream 8/6/2010— Baseline
Photo Point #3 — Looking upstream 8/6/2010— Baseline
Photo Point #4 — Looking downstream 8/6/2010— Baseline
Photo Point #3 —Looking downstream 11 /10/2014 MY -04
Photo Point 93 — Looking upstream 11/10/2014 MY -04
Photo Point #4 — Looking downstream 11/10/2014 MY -04
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 15 2014 — MY04 Report

Photo Point #4 — Looking upstream 8/6/2010— Baseline
Photo Point #5 — Looking upstream from bridge 8/6/2010 —
Baseline
Photo Point #6 — 8/6/2010 — Baseline
Photo Point #4 — Looking upstream 11/10/2014 MY -04
Photo Point #5 — Looking upstream from bridge
11 / 10/2014 MY -04
Photo Point #6 — 11/10/2014 MY -04
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 16 2014 — MY04 Report

Photo Point #7 — 8/6/2010 — Baseline
Photo Point #8 — 8/6/2010— Baseline
Photo Point #9 — 8/6/2010— Baseline
Photo Point #7 — 11/10/2014 MY -04
Photo Point #8 — 11/10/2014 MY -04
Photo Point #9 —11/10/2014 MY -04
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 17 2014 — MY04 Report

Photo Point #10 — 8/6/2010 —Baseline
Photo Point #11 — 8/6/2010— Baseline
Photo Point # 10 — 11 / 10/2014 MY -04
Photo Point #11 — 11/10/2014 W -04
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 18 2014 — MY04 Report

Problem Area Photos
Station 1 +00 Right Bank — 1 1/ 10/2014
Station 11+75 — 11/15/2013
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 19 2014 — MY04 Report

Station 15 +65 Right Bank — 11/15/2013
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KC/Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 20 2014 — MY04 Report

9
a.
AOR
t ' _ rl. t,,
i
Veg Plot #3 — 6/16/2014
N1.
9
a.
AOR
t ' _ rl. t,,
i

Veg Plot #7 — 6/13/2014
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 4 276 22 2014 — MY04 Report

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 23 2014 — MY04 Report

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Project No. 276
Stream Vegetation Totals (per acre)
Plot ID
'Stream Stems
2VolunteerS
'Total
Success
Criteria
Met?
1
162
162
688
No
6
283
283
5,504
Yes
Project Avg
223
223
3,177
Buffer Vegetation
Totals
( per acre)
Plot ID
°Buffer Stems
Success
Criteria
Met?
2
647
Yes
3
567
Yes
4
486
Yes
5
445
Yes
7
122
No
Project Avg
387
Stream Stems Native planted woody stems. Includes shrubs, does NOT include live stakes.
2Volunteers Native %oody stems. NOT planted.
'Total Planted + volunteer native woody stems. Includes live stakes.
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 4 276 24 2014 — MY04 Report

Table S. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Paschal Golf Course Richland Creek / Project No. 276
Report Prepared By
Dale Prihoda
Date Prepared
6/16/2014 15:52
database name
KCI- 2013 -R.mdb
database location
M:\2012 \16122606 Richland Creek Monitorin \Ve
computer name
11 2- 3ZV4FP1
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT ------------
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of
project (s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This
excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This
includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems,
missing, etc..
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent
of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by e for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and
Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot;
dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY------------------------------------
Pro'ect Code
304
project Name
Richland Creek
Description
River Basin
Neuse
length(ft)
stream-to-edge width ft
areas m
Required Plots calculated
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KC Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 4 276 25 2014 — MYOd Report

Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek ) / Project No. 276
Current Plot Data (MY4 2014)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
1304 -01 -0001
F304 -01 -0002
E304 -01 -0003
F304 -01 -0004
E304 -01 -0005
E304 -01 -0006
PnoLS
P -all
I'
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
I'
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
2
1
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
Aronia arbutifolia
Red Chokeberry
Shrub
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
3
7
2
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
107
8
Celtis
hackberry
Tree
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
1
1
1
11
1
1
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry
Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Clethra alnifolia
coastal sweetpepperbush
Shrub
1
1
1
2
2
2
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
Juniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
7
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
8
15
3
6
125
64
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
3
3
31
1
1
1
4
2
Morella cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
2
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
2
69
35
101
103
55
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
4
7
5
5
5
5
5
7
2
2
2
3
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
Quercus palustris
pin oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
4
4
11
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
3
1
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
1
3
3
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
Ulmus americans
American elm
Tree
4
1
1
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
Viburnum dentatum
Isouthern arrowwood
Shrub
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
4
41
17
161
191
117
141
14
56
121
12
243
11
12
268
7
71
136
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
21
21
61
71
8
13
7
7
11
6
6
12
7
8
17
4 4
13
162
162
688
647
769
4735
567
567
2266
4861
4861
98341
4451
4861
10846
2831
5504
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates L?f North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 _'G 2014 - MY04 Report

Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species continued
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Project No. 276
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
E3O4 -01 -0007
MY4 (2014)
MY3 (2013)
MV2 (2012)
MYl (2011)
MYO (2010)
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Celtis occidentalis
common hackberry
Tree
1
1
1
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
3
3
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
Clethra alnifolia
coastal sweetpepperbush
Shrub
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
5
7
8
S
9
9
5
11
11
9
19
19
18
54
54
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
2
2
7
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
9
9
13
6
6
8
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Juniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
7
Liquidambar sty racifIua
sweetgum
Tree
145
3
135
84
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
4
4
1
1
2
2
Morella cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
3
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
2
2
7
4
4
5
5
5
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
4
41
952
657
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
3
3
19
19
33
19
19
32
19
19
32
19
19
31
20
20
20
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus palustris
pin oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
4
4
12
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
6
6
6
Salix nigra
blackwillow
Tree
3
Salix sericea
silky willow
Shrub
1
3
3
1
4
4
1
4
8
1
20
20
1
21
21
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
1
1
1
12
12
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
2
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
12
18
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
8
101
10
28
40
40
Viburnum dentatum
southern arrowwood
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE"
31
31
222
67
711
1059
62
69
1240
67
76
877
79
111
141
114
1931
193
1
7
7
7
7
7
0.02
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
1
8
15 15
24
14 14
20
14 14
19
15 16
20
17 17
17
121
8984
410
6122
399
7169
439
5070
642
815
1116
1116
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 9 276 27 2014 - MY04 Report

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 28 2014 — MY04 Report

Cross - Section Plots
River Basin:
` nkfull Elevation:
259.4
Neuse
63.8
Bankfull Width:
(s mil:
Watershed:
Date:
�/13l2014
Richland Creek, MY -04
l'. Seelin er. U. Prihoda
3.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
XS ID
W / D Ratio:
17.2
XS - 1, Riffle
2.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.1
Drainage Area
263
- - -- ----------------------------------------------------
- - - - --
- - - - --
--,• - l s.
262
-
Station
Elevation
V
0.0
264.34
e
4.8
263.44
f
11.0
262.20
0
18.1
260.04
32.9
259.69
W
47.1
259.73
- - -
- -
51.8
258.01
53.3
257.91
255
54.6
257.09
56.2
256.86
0 10
20 30 40 50 60 70 80
90
100 110
57.6
256.69
Station (feet)
58.9
256.51
----Flood Prone Area MY -00, 8/3/10 MY -Ol, x/11/11 MY -02, 813/12
-MY-03,65M
-�- MY -04, 5/14114
60.2
256.12
61.2
256.02
62.3
256.11
63.2
255.99
64.1
255.91
64.7
256.04
65.3
255.91
66.2
256.03
67.7
255.97
68.7
255.99
69.2
256.43
69.9
256.94
70.7
257.77
72.6
258.57
74.4
258.64
78.6
258.48
80.9
259.31
83.0
259.78
88.3
259.83
94.0
260.08
98.1
262.15
102.6
263.97
110.7
263.89
110.8
264.16
SU'11�I:�R1 U� "I ":�
` nkfull Elevation:
259.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
63.8
Bankfull Width:
(s mil:
7.8
Date:
�/13l2014
Field Crew:
l'. Seelin er. U. Prihoda
SU'11�I:�R1 U� "I ":�
` nkfull Elevation:
259.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
63.8
Bankfull Width:
33.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
262.8
Flood Prone Width:
92.1
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.9
W / D Ratio:
17.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.1
Neuse River Basin, Richland Creek, MY -04, XS -1, Riffle
265
264
263
- - -- ----------------------------------------------------
- - - - --
- - - - --
262
-
261
V
260
259
0
258
W
257
- - -
- -
256
255
0 10
20 30 40 50 60 70 80
90
100 110
Station (feet)
----Flood Prone Area MY -00, 8/3/10 MY -Ol, x/11/11 MY -02, 813/12
-MY-03,65M
-�- MY -04, 5/14114

Riper Basin:
Neuse
Watershed:
Richland Creek, MY -04
XS 1D
XS - 2, Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi):
7.8
Date:
5/13/2014
Field Crew:
T. Seelin er, D. Prihoda
Sta
0.0
on
257.14
0.0
256.85
10.9
256.73
15.6
256.78
19.6
255.25
22.3
254.21
23.2
253.45
24.5
253.63
25.6
253.75
25.5
253.36
26.4
253.13
29.0
253.05
30.4
253.04
31.7
253.03
32.9
253.25
36.3
253.02
36.3
253.01
36.7
253.42
38.4
254.10
43.0
255.18
45.2
255.71
48.4
256.98
59.4
256.98
59.3
257.19
262
261
260
259
258
257
c 256
255
W 254
253
252
SUMAIARI DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
256.7
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
76.3
Bankfull Width:
31.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
260.4
Flood Prone Width:
92.1
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.4
'*N'/ D Ratio:
Entrenchment Ratio:
13.3
2.9
Bank Height Ratio: I
1.0
Neuse River Basin, Richland Creek, MY -04, XS - 2, Riffle
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)
Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY-00,8/3/10 -MY-01,7111/11 -MY-02,813/12 -MY-03,6/5/13 6 MY -04, 5/13/14

River Basin: _
Neuse
Watershed:
Richland Creek, MY -04
XS Ill
XS - 3, Pool
Drainage Area (sq mi):
7.8
Date:
5/13/2014
Field Crew:
T. Seelin er. D. Prihoda
Sudon
11 Eleva `
0.0
256.93
10.3
256.53
20.2
256.47
25.1
256.29
27.5
255.22
29.8
254.53
33.8
254.72
35.8
253.21
36.8
253.13
39.4
252.72
41.3
252.80
44.2
252.72
47.2
252.49
50.7
252.12
51.5
251.98
51.8
253.26
53.1
254.67
57.1
256.55
65.2
256.45
74.1
256.71
74.3
257.02
SUMMARY DATA
11 Eleva `
256.3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
78.9
Bankfull Width:
31.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
4.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2'5
W / D Ratio:
12.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
Neuse River Basin, Richland Creek, MY -04, XS - 3, Pool
258
257
- - -
- - - - - - - --- - - - - -- ------------------------ - - - - -- - - - -- --- - - - - --
256
255
d
5 254
- - - - -
s
0
a 253
of
252
251
- -- - -- -
250
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)
---- Bankfull MY -00, 8/4/10 MY -01, 7/11/11 MY-02, 8/3/12 MY -03, 615/13 � MY-04, 5/13/14

River Basin:
Neuse
Watershed:
Richland Creek, MY -04
XS ID
XS - 4, Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi ):
7.8
Date:
5/14/2014
Field Crew:
-I-. Seelin er, D. Prihoda
st4gon
255.40
0.0
0.1
255.16
8.2
255.33
17.7
255.46
20.5
255.40
24.2
253.71
25.9
253.39
27.3
253.40
28.3
252.83
30.3
252.80
32.0
251.98
32.4
251.78
33.7
251.77
34.5
251.67
35.8
251.58
36.8
251.69
38.0
251.69
39.0
251.69
40.5
251.69
42.0
251.75
42.4
252.17
43.7
252.24
46.6
253.00
49.5
253.47
54.2
255.06
61.3
255.25
68.1
255.58
68.2
255.76
SUNINTARl DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
254.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
67.2
Bankfull Width:
32.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
258.2
Flood Prone Width:
70.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.1
W / D Ratio:
15.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
LOU
259
258
257
256
255
0 254
253
W
252
251
250
Neuse River Basin, Richland Creek, MY -04, XS - 4, Riffle
0 10 20
• Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area
30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)
MY-00,8/4/10 -MY-01,7/13/11 -MY-03,8/3/12 -MY-03.6/10113 --.$.- MY -04, 05/14/14

River Basin:
E ation
0.0
Meuse
9.9
Watershed:
18.0
253.65
Richland Creek, MY -04
253.06
XS ID
252.62
23.9
XS - 5, Pool
27.9
Drainage Area (s mi):
28.4
7.8
28.9
Date:
31.7
249.51
5/14/2014
249.70
Field Crew:
249.34
37.2
F. Seelin er, D. Prihoda
39.1
Station
41.8
249.73
42.6
250.23
43.6
251.40
45.3
251.70
47.0
252.59
49.2
253.59
57.1
253.53
67.9
253.56
67.9
253.87
Meuse River Basin, Richland Creek, MV04, XS - 5, Pool
255
254 -
-- - - - --
------------------------- - - - - --
253 _
-----------------
-
252
-
r
251
-
d
W
250 -
-
249
248
0 10
20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (feet)
Bankfull -
MY-00, 8/4/10 MY-01, 7/13/11 MY-02, 8/3/12 MY-03, bill /13 0 MY-04, 05 /14/14
E ation
0.0
253.71
9.9
253.49
18.0
253.65
19.3
253.06
21.3
252.62
23.9
252.05
27.9
250.67
28.4
250.25
28.9
249.58
31.7
249.51
33.4
249.70
35.9
249.34
37.2
249.22
39.1
249.52
41.8
249.73
42.6
250.23
43.6
251.40
45.3
251.70
47.0
252.59
49.2
253.59
57.1
253.53
67.9
253.56
67.9
253.87
Sl'S1�L�K1 D:� "f :1
Bankfull Elevation:
253.3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
73.3
Bankfull Width:
29.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
M1fax Depth at Bankfull:
4.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.5
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
-

River Basin:
Elevation
Neuse
2;2.2
5.2
Watershed:
11.8
Richland Creek, MY -04
13.9
XS ID
T. Seelin er. D. Prihoda
\S - 6, Riffle
249.55
21.4
Drainage Area (s mi):
7.8
248.92
23.8
Date:
24.5
5/14/2014
25.2
248.96
26.0
248.86
27.2
248.97
28.7
248.98
31.0
248.96
32.6
249.00
33.4
249.29
35.8
250.16
38.8
250.55
41.9
250.65
44.5
251.53
46.6
252.27
54.0
252.43
60.9
252.31
61.0
252.47
Neuse River Basin, Richland Creek, MY04, XS - 6, Riffle
256
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
255
254 - -
253
-- ---------------------------------------
252
-O- 251
0
L4 250
249
248
0 10
20
30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
- - -- Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area
MY -00, 8/4/10
MY -01, 7/13/11 MY -02, 8/3/21012 MY -03, 6/11/13 --*-- MY -04, 5/14/14
S 'on
Elevation
0.0
2;2.2
5.2
252.26
11.8
252.54
13.9
Field Crew:
T. Seelin er. D. Prihoda
S 'on
Elevation
0.0
2;2.2
5.2
252.26
11.8
252.54
13.9
252.45
16.9
251.11
19.5
249.55
21.4
249.42
22.2
248.92
23.8
248.94
24.5
249.38
25.2
248.96
26.0
248.86
27.2
248.97
28.7
248.98
31.0
248.96
32.6
249.00
33.4
249.29
35.8
250.16
38.8
250.55
41.9
250.65
44.5
251.53
46.6
252.27
54.0
252.43
60.9
252.31
61.0
252.47
Sly \1MARY DATA
Bankfu -
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
252.2
69.7
Bankfull Width:
31.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation: .`
255.5
Flood Prone Width:
61.0
Max De th at Bankfull:
3.3
Mean De th at Qankfull ::
2.2
W' / D Ratio:
14.6
Entrenchment Ratio::
1.9
Bank Hei ht Ratio:
1.0

262
261
260
259
258
,1 257
ZO 256
F
Q 255
W
W
W 254
253
252
251
250
249
248
Longitudinal Profile
Richland Creek
EEP Project Number 304- MY-04
Stations 0 +00 - 10 +00
■
■
■
■ ■ SBKF _ - 0.0033x + 261.08
�\ -- --- - - - - -- - - - --
---".-------- S$W=- 0.0037x +258.03
- - - - - -� --------------
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
STATION (FT)
- - -- Water Surface ■ BKF Slope MY -00, 8/3/10 MY -01, 7/11 /1 1 MY -02, 8/3/12 MY -03, 6/5/13 - MY -04, 5/14/14 - - - -- WS Slope BKF Slope 7]

adolS ANN adolS SAN - - -- bi /bl /S `b0-AW —+-- £I /S /9 `£0-AW -- Zl /£/8 `ZO-AW - -- - 11/1 l/L `l0-AW Ol /£/8 00-AW Ilnjj. urg ■ aoujinS aaluM
(L3) NOI.LVIS
OOOZ 0061 0091 OOLI 0091 0051 00171 00£I 00Z 0011
8Z'LSZ + X9Z00'0- = SMS
■
■
OO +OZ - 00+01 suoilu ;S
b0-AN -b0£ jagwnN 1aafoad daa
jaa-ij punigard
alto id iL'uipnl!2uo-1
0001
Si'Z
9rz
L17Z
arZ
66Z
OW
lSZ
r
zsz m
a
H
£SZ
_z
6SZ
SSZ
9SZ
LSZ
8SZ
6SZ

256
255
253
253
252
F
W
Z251
C
F
> 250
W
w
249
248
247
246
245 4-
2000
Longitudinal Profile
Richland Creek
EEP Project Number 304- MY -04
Stations 20 +00 - 30 +00
SBKF = - 0.0033x + 261.78
■
-_ --- - - - - -- _
-- - --
\� SWS = - 0.0033x + 258.8
2100 2200 2300 2400 2500
STATION (FT)
2600
2700
2800
2900
— — — - Water Surface ■ Bankfull MY -00, 8/4/10 MY -01, 7/13/11 MY -02, 8/3/2012 MY -03, 6/11/13 -- MY -04, 5/14/14 - - - -- WS Slope BKF Slope
3000

Cross - Section 1 Riffle
- MY -04
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
MY -01 ■ MY -02 — -- MY -03
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
im
Fine
.125-.25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
6
Coarse
.50-1
D
17
Very Coarse
1 - 2
S
14
Very Fine
2 - 4
4
Fine
4-5.7
G
9
Fine
5.7-8
R
9
Medium
8 - 1 1.3
A
14
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
6
Coarse
16-22.6
E
7
Coarse
22.6-32
L
4
Coarse
32-45
S
1
—Very
Very Coarse
45-64
1
Small
64-90
C
4
Small
90-128
O
1
Large
128-180
B
Large
180-256
L
I
Small
256-362
B
Small
362-512
L
Medium
512-1024
D
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:
Pebble Count Plots
100°x°
d
m 80%
E
0
U
60%
40%
e
20%
Particle Size Distribution
4iichland Creek
XS 1 Riffle
t
f 1
�Aff
■
0%
0.01
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
0.1
1 10 100
1000 10000
Particle Size - Millimeters
MY-00
MY -01 ■ MY -02 — -- MY -03
t MY -04
im
Size Distribution
Type
silt/clay
0%
0.75 mean 3.9
1.8
dispersion 5.7
sand
37%
6
skewness -0.16
gravel
55%
9.2
cobble
8%
20
boulder
0%
83
bedrock
0%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Cross- Section 2 Riffle - MY -04
Particle
Millimeter
too
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
MY -03
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
D50
Fine
.125-.25
A
69%
Medium
.25-.50
N
10
Coarse
.50- 1
D
8
—Very Coarse
1 -2
S
3
Very Fine
2 - 4
0%
7
Fine
4-5.7
G
9
Fine
5.7-8
R
6
Medium
8- 11.3
A
16
Medium
1 1.3 - 16
V
8
Coarse
16-22.6
E
16
Coarse
22.6-32
L
6
Coarse
32-45
S
5
—Very
Very Coarse
45-64
4
Small
64-90
C
2
Small
90- 128
O
1
Large
128-180
B
2
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
Small
362-512
L
Medium
512- 1024
D
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
I0�1
Note:
100%
00 80%
E
U
a 60%
s
e 40%
e
20%
Particle Size Distribution
Richland Creek
XS 2 Riffle
i
r
0%
0.01
0.1
1
10
too
1000 10000
—= MY -00
L
—�- MY -0l
MY -02
MY -03
-- MY -04
sand
Size
D16
mm
0.45
Size Distribution
mean 3.1
Type
silt/clay
0%
D35
3.9
dispersion 9.4
sand
27%
D50
7.1
skewness -0.28
gravel
69%
D65
11
cobble
5%
D84
21
boulder
0%
D95
61
bedrock
0%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Cross-
Section 3 Pool
- MY -04
Count
15
22
15
1
14
5
12
16
4
1
1
!
1:
v
0
s
F
i�
0
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
0.01
/ ll)t�l
0.1
X11 -
Particle Size Distribution
Richland Creek
XS 3 Pool
_/
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
MY -01 a MY -02 +— MY -03
1000 10000
MY -04
Particle
Millimeter
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125-.25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
Coarse
.50- 1
D
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
Very Fine
2 - 4
Fine
4-5.7
G
Fine
5.7 - 8
R
Medium
8- 11.3
A
Medium
11.3- 16
V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
Coarse
22.6-32
L
Very Coarse
32-45
S
Very Coarse
45-64
Small
64-90
C
Small
90- 128
O
Large
128- 180
B
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
mm
0.13
0.25
1
2.6
6.6
8.5
Size Distribution
mean 0.9
dispersion 7.1
skewness -0.03
Type
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
63%
37%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium
512- 1024
D
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
106
Note:

Cross
- Section 4 Riffle
- MY -04
Particle Size Distribution
Richland Creek
XS 4 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125-.25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
100%
Coarse
.50-1
D
13
=
80%
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
20
Very Fine
2 - 4
6
E
v
60%
Fine
4-5.7
G
2
Fine
5.7-8
R
47—
Medium
8- 11.3
A
3
C
s
E-
0
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
6
Coarse
16-22.6
E
4
e
40%
20%
Coarse
22.6-32
L
3
—Very Coarse
32-45
S
9
0%
—Very Coarse
45-64
10
Small
64-90
C
7
0.01
0.1
MY -00
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
• MY -01 MY -02 t MY -03
1000 10000
t MY -04
Small
90- 128
O
6
Large
128- 180
B
3
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
0.54
1.1
8
23
46
81
Size Distribution
mean 5.0
dispersion 10.3
skexN ness -0.15
Type
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
41%
50%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium
512- 1024
D
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>1048
BDRK
Total
96
Note:

Cross
- Section 5 Pool
- MV -04
Count
3
12
20
28
12
12
7
8
3
2
l
2
e
100%
80%
60%
40%
20 °% ° -
o%
0.01
14�
0.1
_ MY -00
Particle Size Distribution
Richland Creek
XS 5 Pool
--
.-
1 10 too
Particle Size - Millimeters
MY -01 ■ MY -02 MY -03
1
i
1000 10000
t MY -04
Particle
Millimeter
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
Fine
.125-.25
A
Medium
.25-.50
N
Coarse
.50- 1
D
Very Coarse
1 -2
S
Very Fine
2-4
Fine
4-5.7
G
Fine
5.7-8
R
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
Medium
11.3 - 16
V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
Coarse
22.6-32
L
—Very Coarse
32-45
S
—Very Coarse
45-64
Small
64-90
C
Small
90- 128
O
Large
128- 180
B
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
mm
0.27
0.54
0.8
1.5
5
8.5
Size Distribution
mean 1.2
dispersion 4.6
skewness 0.14
Type
Small
362-512
L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
69%
31%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium
512- 1024
D
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
108
Note:

Cross - Section 6 Riffle - MY -04
Particle
Millimeter
0%
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
cobble
Very Fine
.062-.125
S
bedrock
Fine
.125-.25
A
wood/det
Medium
.25-.50
N
10
Coarse
.50- 1
D
18
—Very Coarse
1 -2
S
14
Very Fine
2 - 4
6
Fine
4-5.7
G
4
Fine
5.7-8
R
8
Medium
8- 11.3
A
4
Medium
11.3- 16
V
7
Coarse
16-22.6
E
16
Coarse
22.6-32
L
3
Very Coarse
32-45
S
6
—Very Coarse
45-64
1
Small
64-90
C
Small
90- 128
O
1
Large
128-180
B
Large
180-256
L
Small
256-362
B
Small
362-512
L
Medium
512- 1024
D
Lr - Very Lrg
1024-2048
R
Bedrock
X2048
BDRK
Total
103
Note:
Particle Size Distribution
Richland Creek
XS 6 Riffle
100%
F
e 80%
E
U
60%
r
F
L
40%
0
20%
0%
0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
MY -00 • MY -01 ■ MY -02 MY -iii
Size (mm)
D16 0.64
D35 1.5
D50 5.7
D65 13
D84 22
D95 97
Size Distribution
mean 3.8
dispersion 6.4
skewness -0.15
1000 10000
T MY -04
Type
silt/clay
0%
sand
41%
gravel
53%
cobble
6%
f
��Z
bedrock
0%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
r�
0%
0%
0.01
0.1 1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
MY -00 • MY -01 ■ MY -02 MY -iii
Size (mm)
D16 0.64
D35 1.5
D50 5.7
D65 13
D84 22
D95 97
Size Distribution
mean 3.8
dispersion 6.4
skewness -0.15
1000 10000
T MY -04
Type
silt/clay
0%
sand
41%
gravel
53%
cobble
6%
boulder
0%
bedrock
0%
hardpan
0%
wood/det
0%
artificial
0%

Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276
2014 - MY04 Report
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary: Richland Creek - 2,9191f
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Project No. 276
Parameter
Reuional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data (Upper Richland Creek)
DcsJ' L'n
As -built
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
I_L
l'I
I q.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SI)
n
Alin
Mean
Mccl
Max
tiU
n
Min
Med
Mai
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
22
35.0
1s.0
32.0
33.0
31.9
32.7
32.2
34.4
1.2
4
Flood prone Width (ft)
28
60
>100
100
>60
>72
>69
>90
12.8
4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1
1.4
2.8
1
? 3
2. 1
2.6
2.4
2.6
2.6
2.8
0.2
4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.4
3.8
3.7`
3.4
3.3
3.5
3.5
3.8
0.2
4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
48
72
07
7>
85.0
80.2
84.2
83.7
89,3
4.1
4
Width/Depth Ratio
12.0
13.8
12.2
1 3.3
12.1
11.4
12.7
12.5
14.5
1.3
4
Entrenchment Ratio
1.7
1.9
3.1
".o
3.0
> 1.9
>2.0
>2.0
>2.0
0.0
4
Bank Height Ratio
I .?
l . l
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
4
d50 (mm)
I'.0
12.0
-1.1
12.7
14.0
20.0
8.0
4
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
1 -1
4 S
30
17,
-42
'il
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0210
0.0370
11.001�0
0.0090
0.0056
0.0011
0.0089
0.0075
0.0212
0.0067
20
Pool Length (ft)
13
96
25
41
8
74
82
150
42
19
Pool Max Depth
1.0
4.0
5.5
4.3
5.0
5.6
0.92
2
PoolSpacing (ft)
258
1>
90
Ian
1.0
63
153
155
216
49
19
Pool Volume (ft'
Pattern
Channel Belt%%idth (ft)
„
71
1
I00
30ti
60
300
1 37
78
83
116
'>
Radius of Curvature (ft)
?
�)8
37
r i
80
100
80
90
90
100
10
Rc:Bankfull width ( ft/ft)
1.3-4
1.1
I
2.4
2.5
2.8
2.8
3.1
L14
MeanderWavelen h(ft)
110
300
11(1
20t�
220
330
259
321
312
395
3�
Meander Width Ratio
I S9
9.3
[().7
9.0
1.1
2.4
2.5
3.5
Substrate, bed and transport parameters
Ri %/Ru % /P %/G % /S%
SC% / Sa% / G%/ C%1 B%/ Be%
0%/16%/55%/27%/2%/0%
d16 /d35 /d50 /d84 /d95 / dip /disp(mm)
1.5/7.3/ 12/35/49/-/-
1.9/20/34/54/87 /120/ -/-
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb /ft'
0.35
0.40
0.40
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
20 -80
20 -90
31
titream Po\�er (transport capacity) W /m-
dditional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
7.8
4.S'
7.8
7.8
Impervious cover estimate
10%
10%
100.
Ros en Classification
F4 /1
C4
C4 /1
C'+- 1
Bankf ill Velocity s)
3.1 -7.0
3.6-5.0
5.0
Bankfull Dischar a (cfs)
305-400
260-280
425
Valley length (ft)
2.710
2,710
Channel thalweg length (ft)
2,919
Sinuosity
1.2-1
1.1
1.20
1.10
Water Surface Sloe (Channel) (ft/ft)
1).0O2R
0.0040
0.0028
0.0028
BF slope ( ft/ft)
0.0028
0.0027
Bankfull Flood lain Area (acres)
Proportion over wide ( %)
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
Incision Class (BHR Range)
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / V H% / E%
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276
2014 - MY04 Report

Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates oJNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 276 46 2014 - MY04 Report
Table l la. Monitoring - Cross - Section Morphology Data
Paschal Golf Course Richland Creek / Project No. 276
Dimension and Substrate
Cross - Section
1 (Riffle)
Cross - Section
2 (Riffle)
Cross - Section 3 (Pool)
Cross - Section
4 (Riffle)
Cross - Section 5 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline elevation
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY31
MY4
MYS
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY41
MY5
MY+
Base
MY]
MY21
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Bankfull Width (ft)
34.4
33.6
35.4
34.0
33.1
31_9
35.2
35.6
33.6
31.9
31.4
33.9
36.1
33.2
31.3
32.1
31.9
31.9
31.5
32.2
31.5
32.5
31.9
30.5
29.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
>90
>90
>90
>90
>90
>70
>70
>70
>70
>70
-
-
-
-
-
>68
>68
>68
>68
>68
-
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.4
2.4
2.2
2.1
1.9
2.8
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.4
3.3
2.9
2.7
2.6
2.5
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.1
2.1
2.9
2.8
2.7
2.4
2.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.4
3.4
3.5
3.3
3.5
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.7
5.6
5.0
5.0
4.3
4.3
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.3
4.3
4.7
4.1
4.2
4.1
Bankfull Cross- Sectional Area ft2
81.7
79.9
78.5
72.1
63.8
89.3
88.5
87.6
84.0
76.3
104.01
99.2
97.8
86.3
78.9
1
80.2
76.5
73.1
66.6
67.2
90.8
90.6
85.0
74.4
73.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.5
14.1
16.0
16.0
17.2
11.4
14.0
14.5
13.5
13.3
-
-
-
-
12.8
13.3
13.9
14.9
15.4
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.0
>2.0
>2.2
>2.2
>2.8
>2.0
>1.8
>2.0
>2.0
>2.0
-
-
-
>2.0
>2.1
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
-
-
-
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
-
-
-
Cross- Sectional Area Between End Pins ft2
477.5
478.0
477.4
460.5
.8
L47
111.4
108.6
114.4
110.9
85.4
135.7
134.2
135.6
123.3
123.0
100.1
100.6
96.2
1059
100.1
106.4
110.6
107.4
99.8
102.8
d50 (mm
2.0
19.0
20.0
20.0
0
34.0
17.0
15.0
7.9
7.1
0.4
0.8
1.7
2.2
2.0
46.0
42.0
53.0
51.0
11.0
1.7
0.4
1.3
1.1
1.6
Cross - Section
6 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline elevation
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY4
Bankfull Width (13)
32.2
32.6
33.3
32.3
31.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
>60
>60
>60
>60
>61
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.7
2.5
2.3
2.2
2.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.5
3.4
3.2
3.2
3.3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft2)
85.6
82.2
77.9
70.2
69.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
12.1
12.9
14.2
14.8
14.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>1.9
>1.8
>1.9
>1.9
>1.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross - Sectional Area Between End Pins ft`
94.3
94.1
92.1
87.1
81.2
d50 mm)
44.0
1 24.0
22.0
1 23.0
7.7
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates oJNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 276 46 2014 - MY04 Report

Paschal GoljCourse (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site
KC/ Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project f# 176 47 2014 4 - HY04 Report
Table l l b. Monitoring - Stream Reach Morphology Data Table
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Project No. 276
Richland Creek (2,919 ft.)
Parameter
M Y01 (201 1)
M Y02 (2012)
M Y03 (2013)
M Y04 (2014)
M Y05 (2015)
Dimension
Min
Mcan
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Mcd
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Mai
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
31.9
34.2
33.1
35.2
3.031
4
31.9
34.1
34.4
35.6
1.771
4
30.5
32.5
32.8
34.0
1.341
4
31.9
32.3
32.1
33.1
0.568
4
Floodprone Width (ft)
68
72
69
90
12.754
4
60
72
69
89
12.285
4
61
73
69
92
13.367
4
61
79
81
92
15.791
4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.3
2.4
2.4
2.5
0.082
4
1 2.2
2.3
2.3
2.5
0.126
4
2.1
2.3
2.3
2.6
0.214
4
1.9
2.2
2.2
2.4
0.208
4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.2
3.5
3.4
3.8
0.252
4
3.2
3.4
3.4
3.7
1 0.245
4
3.1
3.6
3.5
4.3
0.520
4
3.3
3.5
3.4
1 3.7
0.191
4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft'`)
76.5
81.8
81.1
88.6
5.102
4
73.1
79.3
78.2
87.6
6.053
4
66.6
75.6
73.3
86.3
7.860
4
63.8
69.3
68.5
76.3
5.286
4
Width/Depth Ratio
12.9
14.3
13.7
16.8
1.756
4
13.9
14.7
14.4
16.0
0.933
4
13.5
14.8
14.9
16.0
1.023
4
13.3
15.1
15.0
17.2
1.632
4
Entrenchment Ratio
1.8
1.9
1.9
2.1
0.150
4
1.8
2.1
2.1
2.6
0.340
4
1.9
2.2
2.2
2.7
0.340
4
1.9
2.5
2.5
2.9
0.480
4
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
IA
0.000
4
LO
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.000
4
1.0
1.0
LO
1.0
1.0
4
1.0
LO
1.0
1.0
0.050
4
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
37
78
83
116
25
9
Radius of Curvature (ft)
80
91.1
90
100
9
9
Rad. of Curv.: Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
2.5
2.7
2.7
2.6
Meander Wavelength (ft)
259
321
312
395
45
1 11
Meander Width Ratio
1.2
2.3
2.5
3.0
1
El�t
I
I
I
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
18
41
30
103
23
17
17
33
26
65
16
18
14
29
25
78
11
16
9
25
23
56
13
21
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.001
0.010
0.008
0.019
0.006
17
0.002
0.013
0.010
0.025
0.008
18
0.001
0.023
0.008
0.010
0.006
16
0.001
0.016
0.009
0.048
0.013
21
Pool Length (ft)
31
72
74
122
24
17
12
68
78
120
31
17
9
129
74
78
32
14
7
25
25
45
10
19
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.5
1.5
1.5
l
1.5
1.5
1.5
1
3.3
3.3
3.3
l
3.1
3.1
3.1
1
Pool Spacing (ft)
86
172
169
262
1 45
16
51
1 161
1 159
256
54
1 16
130
1 278
1 165
1 185
1 47
13
47
127
150
1 245
65
19
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
2,710
2,710
2,710
2,710
Channel ThalwegL.ength (ft)
2,919
2,919
2.919
2.919
Sinuosity
1.1
L 1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
0.0032
0.0034
0.0034
0.0034
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.0029
0.0025
0.0025
0.0025
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C5
C5
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
0.33 0/o/36 %/47 %/16 %/0.67%
0 %/29 %/54 %/I6 %/ I %
0 %/25°/d67 %/12 %/0 %/0%
0 %/39°/n/5 5 %/6 °/a/0 %/0%
d 16 / d35 / d50 / d65/ d84 / d95
1.1/10/17/65/110
4.6/ 13/ 19/31 /66/ 135
6.7/12/18/25/50/86
0.7/21/5.9/13.3/25.8/71.3
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
1%
2%
5%
3%
Paschal GoljCourse (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site
KC/ Associates ojNorth Carolina
EEP Project f# 176 47 2014 4 - HY04 Report

Appendix E
Hydrology Data
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 48 2014 — MY04 Report

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) / Project No. 276
Date of Data Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo #
5/17/2010
5/17/2010
Photographed on site
1, See Below
9/28/2011
9/16/2011
Crest gauge
None
11/5/2012
unknown
Crest gauge and indicators of storm event
None
6/10/2013
6/7/2013
Photographed on site
2, see below
11/15/2013
unknown
Photographed on site
3, see below
5/28/2014
unknown
Photographed on site
4, see below
Photo 41 - Bankfull Event, 5/17/2010
Photo #2 — Bankfull Evidence (wrack lines), 6/10/2013
Paschal Go {f Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project 4 276 49 2014 - MY04 Report

Photo #3 — Bankfull Evidence (wrack lines), 11/15/2013
Photo #4 — Bankfull Evidence (wrack lines), 5/28/2014
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 50 2014 — MY04 Report

Photo #5 — Bankfull Evidence (wrack lines), 11 / 10/2014
Paschal Golf Course (Richland Creek) Stream Restoration Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 276 51 2014 — MY04 Report