NC0021873_Pretreatment Compliance Inspection_20150413

AVA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
April 13, 2015
Mr. Michael Brandt,Town Manager
Town of Mayodan
210 West Main Street
Mayodan,NC 27028
SUBJECT: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection(PCI) RECEIVEDIDENRIDWR
Town of Mayodan APR 17 2015
NPDES#NC0021873
Rockingham County Water Quality
Permitting Sectior
Dear Mr. Brandt:
The Division of Water Resources performeda Pretreatment Compliance Inspection on April 10, 2015. George Smith, of
this office, conducted the inspection. Ms.Nadine Blackwell and Mr.Jamie Whitten both of United Water were present for
the inspection. The purpose of this inspection was to determine the effectiveness of the Town's pretreatment program,
which includes, reviewing the files, POTW plant performance, industry monitoring data, and adherence to the
enforcement response plan(ERP).
Background
The Town currently has three(3) Significant Industrial Users(SIUs).
The Town of Mayodan assumed pretreatment responsibilities from all significant industrial users in the Towns of
Madison and Stoneville.
The Town has one industry designated as a Federal categorical CFR 433, Sturm, Ruger&Company.
POTW Interview
The pretreatment program is administered in an excellent manner.
Pretreatment Program Elements Review
Headworks Analysis (HWA)was approved January 24,2012. The next HWA is due September 30, 2015.
Industrial Waste Survey(IWS)was approved November 22,2013. The next IWS due date is October 1, 2018.
Sewer Use Ordinance(SUO)was approved February 21,2013.
Enforcement Response Plan(ERP)was approved on December 27, 2012.
Long Term Monitoring Plan(LTMP)was approved April 7, 2008.
450 W.Hanes Mill Road,Winston-Salem,North Carolina 27105
Phone:[phone] Internet:www.ncdenr,gov
An Equal Opportunity I Affirmative Action Employer—Made in part by recycled paper

PCI
April 13,2015
Page 2 of 2
Industrial User Permit(IUP)File Review
A review of the pretreatment files for Sans Tech (#0108) shows that the Town is performing compliance judgment
satisfactorily.In addition,the records are in excellent order.
A review of the pretreatment files for Unifi (#0105) shows that the Town is performing compliance judgment
satisfactorily.In addition,the records are in excellent order.
A review of the pretreatment files for Sturm, Ruger & Co. (#0109) shows that the Town is performing compliance
judgment satisfactorily.In addition,the records are in excellent order.
The slug control plan for all SIUs was kept on file.
In conclusion, the Town is implementing the Pretreatment Program in an outstanding manner. Should you have any
questions concerning this report please do not hesitate to contact George Smith or me at(336)776-9700.
Sincerely,
' ,4111711""Pe.441"----..
W. Corey Basinger,Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources,NCDENR
cc: Ms.Nadine Blackwell—United Water,P.O.Box 1279,Clemmons NC 27012
PERCS Unit - Ar; hit sist
WSRO Files

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION(PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION[Complete Prior To PCI;Review Sheet(s)1.
Info Database Sheet(s)
1. Control Authority(POTW)Name: !owe) c o.i�c l ✓)
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Mai ri- 8l'ck we-/f J&Mit Wi),'r Z c,)
3. Title(s): Cr►t sa trot r Oke, Pt s n% tip^.
4. Last Inspection Date: JO -17-- l 3 Inspection Type(Check One): 0CI ❑ Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? [ ES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑YES E:1'1V0
Order Type,Number, Parameters: N Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO
PCS CODING
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac.Type
NI 1 NICI0 10 et 70i I Li /01 P I J S l 1 1 l
(DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users(SIUs)? 3 SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users(CIUs)? / CNS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year? C7
10.Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year? 0
11.Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10 C7 NO1N
12.Number of S1Us With No IUP,or With an Expired IUP 0 NOCM
13.Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 0 PSNC
Semi-Annual Periods(Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
14.Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi-Annual Periods O MSNC
15.Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi-Annual Periods O SNPS
16.Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI,has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations? ['YES d NO
If Yes,What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed? reek - not P,^evrrr1'4'
18. Since the Last PCI,has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial ❑ YES !©'(YO
Discharge(Interference,Pass-Through,Blockage,Citizens'Complaints,Increased
Sludge Production,Etc.)? �' /
If Yes,How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during SNC for Limits:
either of the Last 2 Semi-Annual Periods?Not Been Published for SNC for Reporting: NO11
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC) Not Published:
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders?For all SIUs on an 11 /
Order,Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division? /L ont,
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication?If Yes,Which ❑ YES O
Ones?
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ['YES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? [ YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? [ 1'ES 0 NO Is Table Adequate? S 0 NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? [laciTS ❑ NO DWQ Inspector, please verify
yourself!
26. If NO to 23 -26, list violations ,V///^ //
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? 1=1 YES EKO
If yes,which ones?Eliminated: Added: N /4-
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection(PCI)Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1

•
28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program
Element in their files,complete with supporting documents and copy of PERCS Approval Letter,and dates consistent with Program Info:
Program Element Last Submittal Last Approval Date Next Due,
Date In file? Date In file If Applicable
Headworks Analysis(HWA) ❑Yes❑ No I / 1 y/r). m- es❑ No 2 /2o /s-
Industrial Waste Survey(IWS) ❑ Yes ❑ No // /�1 /I; la-Yes❑ No J ' /i
Sewer Use Ordinance(SUO) ❑ Yes ❑ No 2 /.4.i 1,3 II es❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan(ERP) El Yes ❑ No a/17 /I Z ❑Yes El No
Long Term Monitoring Plan(LTMP) ❑ Yes ❑ No y / /o F ❑Yes El No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT(IUP)FILE REVIEW(3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
29. User Name 1. ;.t'n /n C. 2' SA,AL5 r iIci, 3. Star/1 Aril' .i-Cc.
30. IUP Number 0/05- ow? city
31. Does File Contain Current Permit? DYes ❑ No Dl es ❑ No [t 'Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date IMMEMMI A19 ?/) ;/0/6 /- rq 3/ .le lrn
33. Categorical Standard Applied(LE.40 CFR,Etc.)Or N/A r' /J/I L/33
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior [((nes ❑ No ®des ❑ No ❑'ices ❑ No
to Permit Issue Date?
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year? ales ❑ No La'Yes ❑ No rales ❑ No
36. a.Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan? a. aP es ONo a. [y es ONo a. IDPKes ONo
b. If No,is One Needed?(See Inspection Form from POTW) b$Ycs OM b.-BYES-ONO b.-$Yes-9No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification,Does File Contain a To}�is ❑Yes❑NoI/WA ❑Yes❑Nol N' ❑Yes(+,�N DN/A
Organic Management Plan(TOMP)? DcSzs 7- rn c'& c'ra+m y/`4/4Jt
38. a.Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division? a. E'(es ONo a. p' es ONo�/ a. Laces ONo
b.All Issues Resolved? b.❑Yes❑NoE2b.❑Yes❑Noo b.❑Y ❑No
39. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Did the POTW Complete f1, es ■ No [ Yes ❑ No ❑Yes ❑ No
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain-Of-Custody Forms? L Yes ❑ No [lyes ❑ No EKs ❑ No 1
41. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Did the SIU Complete its u ■ ■ ■ ' ■ ■ ll ❑No❑N/A
Sampling as Required by IUP,including flow? _��f
41b. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports ie ' ■ ■ ■ ■ C9'Yes❑No❑N/A
on time?
42a. For categorical lUs with Combined Wastestream Formula(CWF),does OYesCINoragrA ❑Yes❑NoI N7A 13Yes❑Nolia3G/A
file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP? �
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits,does file include ❑Yes❑NoON1 ❑Yes❑NoI1A OYesONolilleT.
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP? _
43a. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Did the POTW Identify ❑ fl, No ❑ No s ❑ No
All Limits Non-Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling? ti/4- At/
43b. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify ' ❑Yes❑No /A OYesCINo06 ❑Yes❑No /A
All Reportine Non-Compliance from SIU Sampling?
44. a.Was the POTW Notified by SIU(Within 24 Hours)of All Self- a.❑Yes❑Not4A a.❑Yes❑NowNfA a.i ❑No❑N/A
Monitoring Violations?
b.Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days? b.❑Yes❑Not7A b.❑Yes❑No A b.tt s❑No❑N/A
c. If applicable,Did POTW resample within 30 days of becoming aware c.❑Yes❑ /A No
of SIU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of the SIU? c.❑Yes❑No IIA c. es❑No❑NIA
46. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Was the SIU in SNC? ❑Yes [E],No El Yes 111'14o ❑Y,
47. During the Most Recent Semi-Annual Period,Was Enforcement Taken 1:1Yes0No131WA Effes0NoraNTA 1113Cs❑NoCSN/A
as Specified in the POTW's ERP(NOVs,Penalties,timing,etc.)?
48. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices? ❑Yes❑Noi /A 13Yes0NoLz711 A ❑Yes❑NodNrig
49. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection? ❑Yes❑NoL /A ❑Yes❑NoCaNTA I ElYesEINoEtilIA]
50. a.Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders? a.❑Yes❑Not a.0Yes❑Not7A a.❑Yes❑NotA
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order? b.❑Yes❑No /A b.❑Yes❑Nolla b.❑Yes❑NorAW
51. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This ❑YesNo ❑YesNo El Yes io
Requested Information For You?
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection(PCI)Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 2

•
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING:
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac.Type
NI 1. I I 't I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 S I 2 1
(DTIA) (TYPI) (FACC)
1.Industry Inspected:
2.Industry Address:
3.Type of Industry/Product:
4.Industry Contact: Title:
Phone: — Fax:
5.Does the POTW Use the Division Model InspectiMTorm or Equivalen : • YES ❑ NO
6.Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspectio. Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview ❑-YES ❑ NO
B. Plant Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO
C. Pretreatment Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO
D. Sampling Review ❑ YES ❑ NO
E. Exit Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO
Industrial Inspection Comments:
(..
OVERALL SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments:
Requirements:
Recommendations:
NOD: ❑ YES 11K0
NOV: ❑ YES :KO
QNCR: ❑ YES Ly'NO
POTW Rating: /
Satisfactory C/ Marginal UnSatisfactory
PCI COMPLETED BY: DATE: y //D //C-
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection(PCI)Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 3

a
t