20071394 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_20150414 (2)

UT BEAR CREEK (Weaver /McLeod) Stream Restoration Site
EEP #92347 - Chatham County - Cape Fear HUC# 03030003 - 070050
MY -5 (2014) ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT (Final)
NC Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCDENR -EEP)
DENR Contract # D08042S SCO -ID # 07- 07130 -01
Data Collected: Jan -Oct 2014 Final Report: 12 Mar 2015
NC-DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center,
OS Stem -------------- - - - - -- Raleigh, NC 27699- 1652--------------- - - - - --
ar"Hicht EEP Project Manager: Kristie Corson
PROGRAM
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc.
1221 Corporation Parkway, suite 100
Raleigh NC 27610 - -- 919- 872 -1174
Project Manager: Gerald Pottern
GPottern @RJGAcarolina.com

Table of Contents
1.0 Project Summary ................................................................... ............................... 1
1.1 Goals & Objectives ................................................................... ............................... 1
1.2 Success Criteria ......................................................................... ............................... 1
1.3 Project Setting & Pre - Restoration Conditions .......................... ............................... 2
1.4 Project Components & Mitigation Assets ................................. ............................... 3
1.5 Project Design Approach .......................................................... ............................... 3
1.6 Current Conditions & Performance Summary .......................... ............................... 4
1.6.1 Vegetation Condition ......................................................... ............................... 4
1.6.2 Stream Channel Condition ................................................. ............................... 5
1.6.3 Stream & Wetland Hydrology ........................................... ............................... 6
2.0 Monitoring Methods .............................................................. ............................... 6
2.1 Stream Survey Methods ....................................................... ............................... 6
2.2 Vegetation Sampling Methods ............................................. ............................... 7
2.3 Hydrology Methods ............................................................. ............................... 7
3.0 References ................................................................................ ..............................8
FinalAssets Table ................................................... ............................... 9
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Appendix A. Project Background Tables
Table 1.1 -1.2 Project Restoration Components
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2.0 -2.8 Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV)
Table 5.1 -5.2 Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
e -Table Stream & Vegetation Problem Area Inventory Table
e- Photos Stream & Vegetation Problem Area Photos
Figures 3.1 -3.9 Stream Station Photo Points
Figures 4.1 -4.6 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Monitoring Data
Table 7. CVS Vegetation Plot Success Summary by Asset
Table 8. CVS Stem Counts Total & Planted by Plot
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 MY -5 Annual Monitoring Report, Feb 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

e- Tables
Appendix D.
Figures 5.1 -5.9
e- Tables
Figures 6.1 -6.5
e- Tables
Figures 7.1 -7.9
e- Tables
Table 9.1 -9.2
Table 10.1 -10.2
Table 11.1 -11.2
Appendix E.
Raw CVS vegetation data sheets
Stream Survey Data
Cross sections with Annual Overlays
Raw cross - section survey data spreadsheets
Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Raw longitudinal profile survey data spreadsheets
Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Raw pebble count data spreadsheets
Baseline Stream Data & Design Summary Table
Monitoring Data: Cross - Section Morphology Table
Monitoring Data: Stream Reach Profile Morphology Table
Hydrologic Data
Table 12. Verification of Bankf ill Events
Figure 8. Monthly Average Rainfall Data, 2014
Figure 9.1 -9.2 Wetland Monitoring Well & Precipitation Plots
e- Tables Raw Data: Daily Precipitation and Monitoring Wells
Table 13 Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
UT Bear Creek (Weaver/McLeod) #92347 MY -5 Annual Monitoring Report, Feb 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

1.0 Project Summary
1.1 Goals & Objectives
The UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 Stream Restoration Project is in southwestern
Chatham County NC, south of NC -902 and east of Bonlee- Carbonton Rd (Figure 1). The project
includes 4,561 feet of Priority -I and Priority -Il restoration of two unnamed tributaries of Bear
Creek, 0.39 acre of wetland enhancement, 16.91 acres of riparian buffer restoration, and 9.36
additional acres of riparian buffer preservation at lower ends of the two tributaries and along the
adjacent main channel of Bear Creek (Appendix A: Tables 1 to 4). The project goals as stated in
the Restoration Plan (Ko & Associates, 2007) are to improve water quality, reduce excess
sedimentation input from channel banks, attenuate floodwater flows, and restore aquatic and
riparian habitat. To achieve these goals, the project has the following objectives:
• Reduce nutrient loading from the on -site cattle operation by fencing out cattle and re-
vegetating the riparian buffer;
• Restore stable channel dimension, pattern, and profile so that on -site streams will
transport watershed flows and sediment loads without aggradation or erosion;
• Improve aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed variability, providing shaded areas
within the channel, and introducing woody debris in the form of rootwads, log vanes, and
log sills;
• Enhance wildlife habitat by re- vegetating the riparian buffers with native plants, helping
to create a wildlife corridor through existing agricultural lands.
1.2 Success Criteria
Stream Morphology Criteria: To achieve success in dimensional stability, the restored
channels should maintain a fairly stable cross - sectional area and bankfull floodplain access over
the course of the monitoring period. Minor dimensional changes are natural and expected, and
may indicate that the design was successful and appropriate for the site's hydrologic and
sediment regime. Moderate decreases in the width -to -depth ratio or cross - sectional area, as well
as floodplain or bank deposition, will indicate functional performance.
While some geomorphic adjustments will occur, the relative lengths and distribution of bedform
features should be appropriate for the C -type design stream for both tributaries, and maintained
over the monitoring period. Pools should be lower in grade and deeper, while riffles steeper and
shallower in keeping with design ratios. Pattern features should show little adjustment over the
standard five -year monitoring period.
Riffles and pools should maintain or achieve their target particle size distributions, which is
gravel throughout the restoration except in bedrock areas. As the monitoring period progresses,
riffles and pools should exhibit coarser and finer sediment types, respectively. The net effect
should result in effective sediment transport without significant net aggradation or erosion.
UT Bear Creek (Weaver/McLeod) #92347
MY -5 (2014) -- Chatham County NC
Page 1
MY -5 Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Vegetation Criteria: Seeding with annual grasses and immediate planting of native trees and
shrubs was completed on April 16, 2009, within a week after completion of channel re-
construction and grading along the tributaries. Vegetation data were collected annually near the
end of each growing season from seven CVS monitoring plots (each 10 meters square) along the
north tributary and five along the south tributary following the EEP /CVS vegetation monitoring
protocol (Lee et al 2006). Visual assessment of vegetation within the remainder of the planted
areas and preserved areas was used to identify problem areas beyond the CVS plots.
Vegetation success for stream and wetland mitigation credits are based on the corresponding
applicable USACE Mitigation Guidelines for restoring streams and wetlands. USACE requires
an average density of 320 native woody stems /acre at the end of MY -3, 288 stems /acre at the end
of MY -4, and 260 stems /acre at the end of MY -5 (USACE 2003). Vegetation success for
NCDENR riparian buffer mitigation credits are based on 15A NCAC 02B .0295 Mitigation
Program Requirements for Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers (Temporary Rule,
October 2014). The required vegetation density for riparian buffer mitigation credit is 260
stems /acre at the completion of monitoring, including planted and volunteer native trees and
shrubs. The 2014 consolidated buffer rule revises the woody density requirements that were in
effect when the project was built (Cape Fear /Randleman Buffer Rule), which required 320
stems /acre and did not count volunteer species for meeting success criteria.
Photos taken at each monitoring plot should indicate adequate growth of the riparian vegetation.
Beyond the CVS plots, areas of low woody stem density (native trees and shrubs) and areas with
invasive exotic weeds were identified and located according to EEP monitoring thresholds for
invasive species.
Stream & Wetland Hydrology Criteria: A PVC crest gage was installed on the lower portion
of the northern tributary. A minimum of two bankfull events in two different monitoring years
must be documented within the five -year monitoring period to meet the stream hydrology
success criterion. Two RDS Ecotone groundwater recording gages were installed in the wetland
along the northern tributary. Wetland hydrologic success requires that saturated soil conditions
occur within 12 inches of the ground surface for at least 12.5 percent of the growing season
during a typical or normal year (USACE 1987). The average growing season in Chatham
County is 216 days, based on 28 F minimum air temperature and a frequency of 5 in 10 years
(MRCS 2006). Hydrologic success for the enhanced wetland requires that the soils be saturated
for at least 27 days during the growing season.
1.3 Project Setting & Pre - Restoration Conditions
The project is located on private farmland in southwestern Chatham County in the Bear Creek
community, on the southeast side of NC -902 across the road from Chatham Central High School.
It is in the Carolina Slate Belt region of the Piedmont province, in Cape Fear River HUC
03030003 - 070050 (NC -DWQ sub -basin 03- 06 -12). Bear Creek flows into Rocky River, which
in turn flows into Deep River south of Pittsboro NC. The two restored stream reaches extend
from the NC -902 right -of -way downstream (southeastward) to their respective confluences with
Bear Creek. The northern tributary was approximately 2,900 feet long and the southern tributary
UT Bear Creek (Weaver/McLeod) #92347
MY -5 (2014) -- Chatham County NC
Page 2
MY -5 Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

was approximately 1,700 feet long prior to restoration. Both streams were incised and eroding,
with active cattle pasture extended to the creek banks and few remaining trees along the banks.
An additional 7,800 feet of protected riparian easement along the north (left) bank of Bear Creek
extends from Bonlee - Carbonton Rd (SR 113 9) downstream to a point approximately 700 feet
northeast of the northern tributary confluence. Most of this reach had existing forest along the
creek bank, but the buffer was narrow in many areas due to pasture encroachment, and required
reforestation. The project was constructed and planted during early 2009 and the first year of
post - construction monitoring (MY -1) was 2010.
1.4 Project Components & Mitigation Assets
The UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 Stream Restoration Project includes 2,918 feet of
Priority -I and Priority -II stream restoration on the Northern UT, and 1,643 feet of Priority -I and
Priority -II stream restoration on the Southern UT (Table 1.1 -1.2). A 50 -ft wide right -of -way for
farm vehicle and livestock crossing on each tributary is excluded, although the actual crossing
widths (fence to fence) are 20 feet or less. The applicable mitigation ratio for these restored
streams is 1:1, except for a 20 -ft wide powerline crossing on the southern tributary, counted at
2:1 because larger trees in this right -of -way will need to be cut periodically. The total stream
mitigation value is thus 2918 + 1643 — (20 x 0.5) = 4551 stream mitigation units.
A riparian wetland along the right bank of the northern tributary was enhanced by planting native
trees and shrubs in the non - forested portion, which had been grazed and trampled by cattle and
had sparse woody vegetation. This 0.39 acre of wetland enhancement area provides 0.20
wetland mitigation units, at 2:1 mitigation ratio.
The project also includes 16.91 acres of riparian buffer restoration planting (13.75 acres along
the two tributaries plus 3.16 acres along Bear Creek) and 9.36 acres of forested buffer
preservation along Bear Creek and the lower ends of the two tributaries. At 1:1 mitigation ratio
for restoration and 10:1 mitigation ratio for preservation, these 26.27 acres of restored and
preserved buffers provides a total 777,361 riparian buffer mitigation units.
1.5 Project Design Approach
Prior to restoration the two tributaries were unstable and partially straightened E4 -type channels
transitioning to G4 -type channels (Rosgen Level II classification) running through cattle pasture.
The eroding and slumping banks with sparse woody vegetation resulted in degraded water
quality and habitat quality, poor nutrient and sediment retention, and loss of bedform diversity.
The wetland area in the pasture adjacent to the Northern UT was dominated by Juncus effusus
and Carex spp., with little woody vegetation (Ko & Associates, 2007).
Both tributaries were designed as C4 -type channels with moderately low width -to -depth ratios
and both include sections of Priority I restoration (reconnect bankfull discharge to the historic
floodplain) and Priority II restoration (construct a floodplain bench at the bankfull elevation,
lower than the historic floodplain elevation). The upstream portion of each reach begins as a
UT Bear Creek (Weaver/McLeod) #92347
MY -5 (2014) -- Chatham County NC
Page 3
MY -5 Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Priority II restoration and becomes a Priority I restoration as the channel falls through the valley.
Primary activities that took place during channel restoration included: 1) placement of permanent
fencing along the easement boundary; 2) channel and floodplain bench excavation; 3) installation
of channel plugs; 4) backfilling of some of the abandoned channel; and 5) installation of in-
stream structures. By reconstructing a natural meandering pattern on each tributary, the
restoration work increased the length of the Northern UT from 2,832 feet to 2,918 feet, and
increased the length of the Southern UT from 1,605 feet to 1,643 feet.
The non - wooded portion of the riparian wetland was enhanced (0.39 acre) and riparian buffers
were restored (16.91 acres) by planting with 15 species of native trees and shrubs, and herbicide
treatment to suppress invasive exotic weeds. Areas with existing native woody stem density
(forest canopy or sapling /scrub) were preserved as -is. The total protected land area within the
project conservation easement (excluding stream channels) is approximately 26.7 acres, of
which 14.2 acres is along the two tributaries and 12.5 acres is along Bear Creek.
1.6 Current Conditions & Performance Summary
1.6.1 Vegetation Condition
CVS vegetation monitoring plot data were collected in October 2014. The average density for
all plots is 11 planted native trees and shrubs per 100 m2 plot, or 449 stems per acre (Table 7).
Seven trees per plot is the minimum number to meet the stream/wetland mitigation criterion of
260 stems per acre. Ten of the 12 plots had sufficient planted tree and shrub density to meet this
criterion. Plot 1 had 6 trees and Plot 9 had 4 trees, and were thus below the wetland/stream
success criteria. All of the 11 plots applicable for riparian buffer credit had sufficient planted
plus volunteer native tree and shrub density to meet the current (Oct 2014) riparian buffer
mitigation criteria. Plots 5 is within the enhanced wetland and is therefore excluded from
riparian buffer credit determination. Native volunteer tree seedlings (mostly green ash,
sycamore, elm and sweetgum) are abundant in all plots, and the total density of native trees and
shrubs (planted plus volunteers) in non - wetland buffer plots ranges from 1,012 to 3,076 stems
per acre.
Chinese privet, the only non - native woody plant recorded in the CVS plots, was present in plots
2, 3, and 4, where it comprised 4 to 11% of total woody stems in those plots. Privet patches in
the restored buffers along the two tributaries (approximately 16.5 acres), were treated with
herbicide in January 2015 and will be re- treated in spring 2015. No invasive treatment was
conducted along the main stem of Bear Creek, where most of the privet is beneath a tall
hardwood canopy and poses little threat to trees. A few patches of Ailanthus were also noted
along the Bear Creek buffer.
Stunted tree growth is evident in several CVS plots and areas outside of the plots, especially in
the upper segments along both tributaries where soil is dense and clayey. Outside of the CVS
plots, most of the problem areas previously mapped as "low planted stem density" in 2011 -2012
were removed from "problem areas" on the CCPV maps (Figures 2.0 to 2.8) due to abundant
colonization by volunteer native trees and supplementary planting conducted in November 2013
UT Bear Creek (Weaver/McLeod) #92347
MY -5 (2014) -- Chatham County NC
Page 4
MY -5 Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

(1500 trees /11.8 acres = 127 added trees /ac). In 2014 many of those areas are continuing to fill
in with volunteer native trees. One area along the Northern UT (0.15 acre) and another area
along Bear Creek (0.29 acre) are currently mapped as "low woody stem density" on the latest
CCPV figures.
Trees in the riparian forest near Bear Creek south of the Northern UT and near both cattle
crossings have fallen on the easement fence and broken the wires and connectors, as reported in
2013. There are currently no livestock held on the adjacent pastures, and no livestock damage
was observed, but fence repair should be completed prior to releasing any livestock in the
adjacent pasture. Landowner Oscar Guarin reported to RJG &A in 2013 that the site is being
used only for growing hay for sale, and he has no plans to graze livestock on -site.
1.6.2 Stream Channel Condition
RJG &A and MMI staff collected cross - sectional and longitudinal stream survey data using a
Trimble survey -grade GPS unit during October 12 -14, 2014. The Southern UT was completely
dry, and the Northern UT was at base -flow condition during the survey. Terrestrial vegetation
has invaded much of the Southern UT channel and some areas within the Northern UT channel.
Overall the project appears to have met its morphological goals, and its profile parameters
closely mirror the design criteria. The Southern UT has no channel instability problem areas.
The four segments of stream -bank erosion along the Northern UT noted in the 2010 to 2012
reports are stabilizing as the density of non -woody and woody plants on these banks continues to
increase. Two of these segments near stations 34 +50 and 37 +00 have mostly weak - rooted
annual vegetation and are still identified as problem areas (total 80 lin.ft), although neither
appears to have eroded further during the past two years. The other two segments near stations
20 +80 and 23 +00 now have dense growths of Juncus and other sturdy plants that appear
adequate to halt further erosion, and were removed from the "problem area" list and mapping in
2012 -2013. No new area of erosion was noted in 2013. One rock vane structure near station
36 +60 on the Northern UT appears to have collapsed. This presumably occurred during the
project's first year, but the loose rocks were not recognized as a collapsed structure until this
year. All other rock and log structures on both streams appear to be stable and performing as
intended.
The 2014 survey of Cross Section #3 (Northern UT) appears to have widened substantially
relative to previous years (Figure 5.3) but this is apparently due to error in satellite signals or the
GPS recording device. Note that the right end pin appears to have moved over 15 feet. The pin ;
clearly did not move, and field observations and photos at this cross - section showed no apparent
erosion. The error became apparent only when the data were plotted.
Three small beaver dams were noted along the lower portion of the Northern UT, apparently
constructed during the past year. EEP is actively managing this situation by setting beaver traps
and removing the dams.
UT Bear Creek (Weaver/McLeod) #92347
MY -5 (2014) -- Chatham County NC
Page 5
MY -5 Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

1.6.3 Stream & Wetland Hydrology
A PVC crest gage is installed along the Northern UT near station 32 +50, with the bottom of the
gage (inside of pipe) 1.5 ft below bankfull. The gage was inspected and maintained in April and
October 2014. Cork granules on the rod inside the gage revealed peak stages at bankfull or
higher had occurred prior to both the April and October 2014 visits. Matted grass and wrack
lines beyond the streams banks were evident during both inspections. Precipitation records at the
Siler City Airport (SILR gage, 10 miles NW of the project site) and NCCH -04 gage (4 miles NE
of the project site) during 2014 indicate multiple storms of 2 inches or more that likely caused
bankfull flow events. Hydrologic data from the on -site wells and NCCH -04 rain gage are
summarized in Appendix E.
The hydrologic success criteria for restored wetlands requires that soils be saturated within 12
inches of the surface for at least 12.5% of the growing season (27 consecutive days in Chatham
County, April through October). Data downloaded from the two RDS Ecotone groundwater
gages in the wetland along the Northern UT showed the water table depth within the upper 12
inches continuously at both gages for periods of 41 and 63 days respectively, well beyond the 27
days required to meet the hydrologic success criteria.
2.0 Monitoring Methods
Monitoring and reporting methods follow the current EEP- provided templates and guidelines
(Lee et al 2008; NC -EEP 2012). Photographs were taken with an Olympus digital camera. A
Trimble Geo XT handheld mapping -grade GPS unit was used to collect cross section endpoints,
vegetation plot corners, stream photo points, and problem area locations. All problem areas
identified in the fall 2012 and spring 2013 versions of the CCPV map were re- evaluated in
October 2013.
2.1 Stream Survey Methods
Longitudinal stationing along each UT was assigned in ArcMap using the as -built centerline data
collected in May 2009, beginning with 10 +00 at the upper end of each restored stream. Nine
permanent cross sections (six along the Northern UT and three along the Southern UT) were
selected and staked during April 2010. Geomorphology data for monitoring year 3 were
collected during September to October 2012 using a South Total Station for the longitudinal
profiles and a Nikon automatic level for the cross sections. Data collection methods employed
were a combination of those specified in the project Mitigation Plan and standard regulatory
guidance and procedures documents including the USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines, US
Forest Service's Stream Channel Reference Sites, and Applied River Morphology ( USACE,
2003; Harrelson et al., 1994; Rosgen, 1996). Photographs facing downstream were taken at each
cross section. Stream bed particle distribution was assessed using the Wolman pebble count
method.
UT Bear Creek (Weaver/McLeod) #92347
MY -5 (2014) -- Chatham County NC
Page 6
MY -5 Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

2.2 Vegetation Sampling Methods
Twelve representative vegetation survey plots (seven along the Northern UT and five along the
Southern UT) were selected and installed in April 2010. The four corners of each 10 x 10 meter
plot are marked with metal conduit pipe, and the side closest to the stream was designated as the
x- axis.. Vegetation data for monitoring year 4 were collected between October 17 and October
29, 2013. Level 1 (planted woody stems) and Level 2 (volunteer woody stems) data collection
was performed in all plots, following the most recent CVS -EEP protocol (Lee et al 2008). Each
planted woody stem location within a plot was recorded (x and y coordinates), along with stem
height, diameter at breast height of live stems greater than 137 cm tall, species name, and
qualitative vigor rating. Planted stems were marked with survey flagging to facilitate relocation
next year and to distinguish them from volunteer trees. Planted and volunteer woody species
were identified using Radford et al. (1968) and Weakley (2010). A photo of each vegetation plot
was taken, usually from the 0,0 corner unless dense vegetation made it necessary to photograph
froma different corner.
2.3 Hydrology Methods
Wetlands: Daily groundwater level data were collected from two Remote Data Systems
automated groundwater monitoring gages installed in the enhanced riparian wetland adjacent to
the Northern UT in April 2010 in accordance with USACE guidance ( USACE 2000). These
gage data were plotted against precipitation data from the Siler City Airport ECONet station
(SILR), located 10 miles northwest of the monitored wetland. In 2014 the available data at the
SILR gage were incomplete, and Station NCCH -04 located 4 miles northeast of the project site
was used instead. Wetland gage and precipitation data and graphs are provided in Appendix E of
this monitoring report.
Streams: One PVC crest gage was installed in 2010 at Station 3280 along the Northern UT to
verify the on -site occurrence of bankfull events. The bottom of the gage is approximately 0.4 ft
above the thalweg and 1.5 ft below bankfull (right bank). The crest gage was evaluated during
the spring and fall data collection visits, and the site was assessed for evidence of bankfull
events. Dates of potential bankfull events were inferred using precipitation data from the Siler
City Airport ECONet station (SILR), Station NCCH -04, and/or the Tick Creek stream gage near
Mt. Vernon Springs (USGS# 02102800), located 3.5 miles north of the crest gage. Data are
provided in Appendix E.
UT Bear Creek (Weaver/McLeod) #92347
MY -5 (2014) -- Chatham County NC
Page 7
MY -5 Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

3.0 References
Harrelson, Cheryl, C. L. Rawlins, and John Potyondy. (1994). Stream Channel Reference Sites:
An Illustrated Guide to Field Technique. USDA, Forest Service. General Technical Report RM-
245.
Ko & Associates, Consulting Engineers (2007). UT to Bear Creek Stream Restoration Project —
Restoration Plan. NCEEP, Raleigh, NC.
Ko & Associates Consulting Engineers (2009). As -Built Plans, UT to Bear Creek Stream
Restoration. NCEEP, Raleigh, NC.
Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Roberts, Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. (2008). CVS -EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation version 4.2, October 2008. Retrieved September 2011, from:
htlp://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm
NRCS (2006). Natural Resources Conservation Service. Soil Survey of Chatham County, North
Carolina. Retrieved from: http://soils.usda.gov/survey/printed–surveys/
NC -DENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program. (2012). NC -EEP Monitoring Report Template
and Guidance version 1. 5, June 2012. http: / /portal.ncdenr.org/web /eep /dbb- resources
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles, and C.R. Bell (1968). Manual of the Vascular Flora of the
Carolinas. University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill, NC.
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc. (2010). Baseline Monitoring Document and As -built
Baseline Report UT to Bear Creek( #92347). August 2010.
Rosgen, David L. (1996) Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa
Springs, CO.
Rosgen, D.L. (1997). "A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers. In
Proceedings of the Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision,
ed. S.Y. Wang, E.J. Langendoen, F.B. Shields, Jr. University of Mississippi Press, Oxford, MS.
US Army Corps of Engineers (2003) Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACOE, USEPA,
NCWRC, and NCDENR -DWQ.
Weakley, Alan (2010). Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas.
Website: http: // www.herbarium.unc.edu /flora.htm.
UT Bear Creek (Weaver/McLeod) #92347
MY -5 (2014) -- Chatham County NC
Page 8
MY -5 Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Final Assets
Table: UT Bear Creek (Weaver McLeod) #92347 — Closeout Mar 2015
Mitigation
Ratio
Restoration
Segment/ Reach
Pre —
Construction
(acre / lin.ft)
Mitigation
Approach
Watershed
Acreage
As -Built
(If /ac.)
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation
Units
(SMU /WMU)
STREAM
176,374
176,374
Buffer Restoration along Bear Creek (30' -200')
1:1
137,574
137,574
Northern UT
2832 ft
R
2.36
2918
1:1
2,918*
Southern UT
1605 ft
R
0.34
1643
1:1
1,633*
WETLAND
N -Trib wetland
0.49 ac
E
0.39
2:1
0.20
*50 -foot ford crossing excised from each tributary asset; 50% credit for 20 -foot wide utility crossing on Southern UT.
Riparian Buffer Mitigation Unit
Component Summation
Buffer Restoration (0 -200 feet)
*This is a grandfathered buffer project.
Mitigation
Ratio
Buffer
(square feet)
Buffer Mitigation Units
(square feet)
Buffer Restoration on North Tributary (30' -200')
1:1
422,619
422,619
Buffer Restoration on South Tributary (30' -200')
1:1
176,374
176,374
Buffer Restoration along Bear Creek (30' -200')
1:1
137,574
137,574
Buffer Preservation (0 -100 feet)
4,551
0.20
0
Rural Subject Streams with 0 -100 foot Buffer from TOB
10:1
407,939
40,794
Total
NOTES: 1) Conservation easement along Bear Creek is only on left bank.
2) No buffer credit calculated on segments where buffer is less than 30' wide.
1,144,506
square feet
777,361
buffer mitigation units
MITIGATION UNIT TOTALS
Stream
Riparian
Non - riparian
Total
Riparian
Nutrient
Mitigation
Wetland Units
Wetland Units
Wetland
Buffer
Offset
Units (SMU)
(WMU)
4,551
0.20
0
0.20
777,361
0
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347
MY -5 (2014) -- Chatham County NC
Page 9
MY -5 Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Directions to the Site:
From US -64 just west of Pittsboro, take NC -902 West (southwest) for
15 miles toward Bear Creek. Cross US -421 and then Old US -421 and
a railroad track. Access to the Northern UT is via a gravel road on your
left, 0.3 mile past Old 421, across from Chatham Central High School.
Access to the Southern UT is via another gravel road 0.8 mile farther
west along NC -902, also on your left. The property owner keeps the
gates locked at both access roads.
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the
NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered
by land under private ownership. Accessing the site may require
traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and therefore
access by the general public is not permitted. Access by authorized
personnel of state and federal agencies or their designees /contractors
involved in the development, oversight and stewardship of the
restoration site is permitted within the terms and time frames of their
defined roles. Any intended site visitation or activity by any person
outside of these previously sanctioned roles and activities
requires prior coordination with EEP.
r
I �~
Southern UT
A;11 y �
KI
1
N 4 x
i
I Ir"`11.
{,
I II
Al at — 1
f I't -Jf
-�
421 2
{
—
'1 Northern UT ~'
� ~
� -
_ � I
Yr,I .50
f
f
f ;rte=` •� .�
Bear Creek
r ti
�Y
421 2
{
—
�Y
Figure 1.0. General Vicinity Map and Directions. UT to Bear
Creek ( #92347). Chatham County, NC.
Project Conservation
Easement N
USGS Streams
hIl I,II AICI -I 111 'Ilt
Feet r�9G
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 •
•
7.5 Minute USGS Topographic Quad: Bear Creek
pa..
G
—
I
-
it
,I�
Figure 1.0. General Vicinity Map and Directions. UT to Bear
Creek ( #92347). Chatham County, NC.
Project Conservation
Easement N
USGS Streams
hIl I,II AICI -I 111 'Ilt
Feet r�9G
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 •
•
7.5 Minute USGS Topographic Quad: Bear Creek
pa..

APPENDIX A.
PROJECT BACKGROUND TABLES
Table 1.1 -1.2 Project Restoration Components
Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 Project Contacts Table
Table 4 Project Attributes Table
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #3030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Table 1.1. Project Components & Mitigation Credits
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) Stream Restoration - Project #92347
Project
Component or
Reach ID
W
°'
p
°'
BUFFER Northern
UT to Bear Creek
9.702
9.702
acre
Rest
acre
--
1:1
1
422619
BUFFER Southern
UT to Bear Creek
4.049
4.049
acre
Rest
acre
--
1:1
1
176374
BUFFER Bear
Creek Main Stem
3.158
3.158
acre
Rest
acre
--
1:1
1
137574
BUFFER Bear
Creek Main Stem
9.365
9.365 acre
Pres
acre
--
10:1
1
40794
10+07 -
PI
543 ft
15 +50
1:1
1
543
15+50 -
PII
125 ft
16 +75
1:1
1
125
STREAM Northern
16+75 -
UT to Bear Creek
PI
225 ft
19 +00
1:1
1
225
(w/ 50 -ft vehicle
19+50 -
crossing)
PH
350 ft
23 +00
1:1
1
350
23+00 -
PI
1675 ft
39 +75
1:1
1
1,675
2832
2918 ft
Restored Channel Length
feet
10+07 -
PI
398 ft
14 +05
1:1
1
398
14+05 -
STREAM Southern
PI
20 ft
14 +25
2:1
0.5
10
14+25 -
UT to Bear Creek
(w/ 20 -ft powerline
PI
242 ft
16 +67
1:1
1
242
17+17 -
crossing and 50 -ft
vehicle crossing)
PI
633 ft
23 +50
1:1
1
633
23+50 -
PII
350 ft.
27 +00
1:1
1
350
1605
1643 ft
Restored Channel Length
feet
RIPARIAN
WETLAND along
0.39
Northern UT
acre
E
0.39 ac.
--
2:1
0.5
0.20
NOTE: Sta 10 +00 in 2009 As -Built Plan Survey by Contractor begins at NC -902 culvert outlet on each
tributary. Project easement begins at ROW fence, at Sta 10 +07 on each tributary.
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #3030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

LIT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #3030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants
Table 1.2. Restoration Component Summation
UT Bear Creek (Weaver/McLeod) Stream Restoration - Project #92347
Restoration
Stream
Riparian
Non -Ripar
Upland
Buffer
Level
(lin.ft)
Wetland (acre)
(acre)
(acre)
(acre)
BMP
Riverine
Non -
Riverine
Restoration
4,561
16.91
Enhancement
0.39
Enhancement I
Enhancement 11
Creation
Preservation
9.36
HQ Preservation
Totals
Feet /Acres
4,561
0.39
0
0
26.27
0
MU Totals
4,551
0.20
0
0
777,361
0
LIT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #3030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) Stream Restoration - Project #92347
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 5 yrs 10 months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 5 yrs 10 months
Number of Reporting Years': 5
Data Collection
Completion or
Activity or Deliverable
Complete
Delivery
Restoration Plan
2007
Jul -07
Final Design — Construction Plans
2007
Jan -08
Stream Construction & As -Built Survey
Apr -09
Planting stream banks, wetland and buffer
restoration (bare root and potted)
Apr -09
Year 0 (As- Built) Baseline Report
Apr -10
Aug -10
Year 1 Monitoring Report
Nov -10
Dec -10
Year 2 Monitoring Report
Aug- Sep -I I
Sep -I 1
Year 3 Monitoring Report
Sep- Oct -12
Dec -12
Year 4 Monitoring Report
Oct - Dec -13
Jan -14
Year 4 Supplemental Planting
Nov -13
Year 5 Monitoring Report
Oct -14
Feb -15
Invasives Treatment in Restored Buffers
Jan -15
Final Closeout Report
Feb -15
Mar -15
Invasives Treatment (Planned)
Apr -15
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #3030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) Stream Restoration - Project #92347
Designer
Ko & Associates, P.C.
1011 Schaub Drive, Suite 202
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
R. Kevin Williams, PE, (919) 851 -6066
Construction Contractor
Land Mechanics Designs, Inc.
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Spring, NC 27592 -9671
(919) 639 -6132
Survey Contractor
Stewart Proctor
319 Chapanoke Road, Suite 106
Raleigh NC 27603
(919) 779 -1855
Planting & Invasive Weed Treatment
Habitat Assessment and Restoration Program
Contractor
301 McCullough Drive, 4th Floor
Charlotte, NC 28262
(704) 841 -2841
Seeding Contractor
Land Mechanics Designs, Inc.
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Spring, NC 27592 -9671
(919) 639 -6132
Supplemental Planting (2014) Contractor
Carolina Silvics, Inc.
908 Indian Trail Rd, Edenton, NC 27932
Mary Margaret McKinney
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Arborgen aka South Carolina Super Tree Nursery
Cure Nursery
Foggy Mountain Nursery
Virginia Department of Forestry
Monitoring Performers
Robert J. Goldstein & Associates
1221 Corporation Parkway, Ste. 100
Raleigh NC 27610
Gerald Pottern, (919) 872 -1174
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #3030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Table 4. Project Attribute Table: UT Bear Creek Weaver- McLeod (NCEEP #92347)
Project County
Chatham
Physiographic Region
Piedmont
Ecoregion
Carolina Slate Belt
Project River Basin
Cape Fear (Deep River below Randleman dam)
USGS HUC for Project (14 digit)
03030003 070050
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project
03 -06 -12 (Deep River)
Within extent of EEP Watershed Plan?
Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities (2009) and Upper and Middle;
Rocky River Watershed Plan (2005)
WRC Hab Class (Warm, Cool, Cold)
Warm
% of project easement fenced or demarcated
100%
Beaver activity observed during design phase?
No
Restoration Component Attribute Table
Bear Creek
Northern UT to
Bear Cr
Southern UT
to Bear Cr
Northern UT Wetland
Drainage area
25.0 sq mi
2.36 sq mi
0.34 sq mi
NA
Stream order
4th
2nd
1st
NA
Restored Stream length (ft) or Wetland (ac)
--
2,918
1,643
0.39 acres
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Perennial
Intermittent
NA
Watershed type (Rural, Urban, Developing)
Rural
Rural
Rural
NA
Watershed LULC Distribution (e.g.)
Residential
3%
7%
6%
NA
Commercial
1%
1%
0%
NA
Ag -Row Crop
3%
1%
2%
NA
Ag- Livestock
30%
28%
51%
NA
Forested
52%
54%
35%
NA
Shrub /Scrub /Early Successional
11%
9%
6%
NA
Watershed impervious cover ( %)
2%
3%
2%
NA
NCDWQ AU /Index number
17 -43 -16
17 -43 -16
17 -43 -16
NA
NCDWQ classification
C
C
C
NA
303d listed?
No
No
No
NA
Upstream of a 303d listed segment?
No
No
No
NA
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total acreage of easement (includes water)
15.48
11.75
4.65
NA
Vegetated acreage (not planted) in easement
8.92
0.45
0.00
NA
Planted acreage (as restoration) in easement
3.16
10.09
4.05
0.39
Rosgen classification of pre- existing channel
NA
E4 /174
E4 /174
NA
Rosgen Classification of As -Built
NA
C4 /C5
C4 /C5
NA
Valley type
VIII
VIII
VIIl
NA
Valley slope
0.1%
0.4%
1%
NA
Valley side slope range (e.g. 2 -3. %)
3 -15%
1 34%
1 3 -11%
1 NA
Valley toe slope range (e.g. 2 -3. %)
1 -20%
1 7 -8%
1 3 -5%
1 NA
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #3030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #3030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants
Bear Creek
Northern UT to
Bear Cr
Southern UT
to Bear Cr
Northern UT Wetland
Cowardin classification
R3UBH
R3UBH
R3UBH
PSS1B
Trout waters designation
No
No
No
No
Species of concern, endangered etc.? (Y /N)
No
No
No
No
Dominant soil series and characteristics
Series
Georgeville
Chewacla
Cid- Lignum
Chewacla
Depth
0 -80
0 -80
0 -80
0 -80
Clay %
5 -40
5 -40
10 -50
5 -40
K
0.17 -0.37
0.24 -0.37
0.24 -.043
0.24 -0.37
T
5
5
2
5
Use N/A for items that may not apply. Use " -" for items that are unavailable and "U" for items that are unknown.
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #3030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

APPENDIX B.
Figure 3.1 -3.9 Stream Station Photo - Points
Figure 4.1 -4.6 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #3030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figure 2.0 -2.8
Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV)
Table 5
Visual Stream Stability Assessment Table
Table 6
Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
e -Table
Stream & Vegetation Problem Inventory Table
e- Photos
Stream & Vegetation Problem Area Photos
Figure 3.1 -3.9 Stream Station Photo - Points
Figure 4.1 -4.6 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #3030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

s S
Jul
t' _
` Y19
1A.
i fB _
it
N
Y
.
2.2
i
r
?55t «° J
r71
ig 2.8
Fib .7
Bear reek to
it I
r
Figure 2.0. Current Conditions Plan 'view,
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod #92347)
Chatham Co, NC. KEY TO INSET MAPS
Yo . M f'
F W
jp
�
�
JP -�.L
7F 1. 4, 0
.1 Olt
f Awe s L
lit
9`
` Fig 213
Y
` Y19
1A.
i fB _
it
N
Y
.
2.2
i
r
?55t «° J
r71
ig 2.8
Fib .7
Bear reek to
it I
r
Figure 2.0. Current Conditions Plan 'view,
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod #92347)
Chatham Co, NC. KEY TO INSET MAPS
Yo . M f'

l • 0,
t w ,Cq
1p
C rest ca uge
pp?'A � 4-
40
-�
T _ R
Y# '• 4
I
t r
N.
t
' 11 M 11'Will
1[}]
l P �
,,
GVV Gage
9BEA457 GtiV Gage
138B€7BQ7
N
I
Y.
ZJ �° di
S
' s -
�k
fail
AA
C T l s -
i i J• A
1
' 4
10 `
Figure 2.2. Current Conditions Plan View, UT
Bear Creek (Weaver- McLeod #92347) Lower
Half of Northern Tributary, October 2014, MYS.
Photopoints Groundwater Gauge
Cross- Sections Flood Crest gauge
Vegetation nionnonng plea
Thalweg MY4 jNov -Der 2013'1
As-Buda Thalwveg (May 20090
u +�, In- Stream Structures
Conservation Easement
Trap € f Bank Restored wetland
Stream Problem, Areas � Beaver dam
Stream bark • • • + « 'Washout of new
erosion planted trees
Vegetation Problem Areas Fence Broken
Low planted stem: den sjtyr
ifa f,_
Invasive Weeds Treated 2015
Invasive Weeds Not Treated
0 50 100 200 300
Feet
I inch = "60 feeC

.mow
-0,
O90 2 r l�
D
X,. J,
f
N.--
>a
r hCe'
P_
Q�
Q
� w
°a
4i
r7 _
I
1
Figure 2.3. Current Conditions Plan View,
UT Bear Creek (Weaver- McLeod #92347)
Southern Tributary, October 2014, MYS.
#; Photopoints
–I—H Gross - Sections
Vegetation monitoring plot
Thalweg MY4 (Nov 2013)
As- Built Thalweg (May 2009)
In- Stream Structures
------ Conservation Easement
Tap of Bank t, 'Broken Fence
Vegetation Problem Areas
Low woody stem density
p'►� Invasive Weeds Treated 2015
Invasive Weeds Not Treated
r 00 40 80 160 2'0
4Feet
1 inch = IGO feet
s
Q�
i
2600
FI

Pholo Points
w�'`�fjC't�it+t�f1 t11(�r16t�f�} (�[1t
Thctlweg MYS (Oct 2014}
As -,Bu* Tha (May )
tn.Stie
r nsmimb 4 dement
Top of EIank
Stfcam Rotytem Ateas
bank Ei9glgn .� �. Floodplain
Erosion
# i Try on le f1
VeWration Problem Areas
Low woody stem density
Invasive greeds (Not Treated)
u _ a1W
wr y Y B
.1
}
a
W .r-4'
�f

N-
JI "ten
tIM I-Cement
Google Earth Feb 2007
00 FEET
}' ' !
l` •4
' e f
1W7. ,,,
0 02-
Y
y i r fi!
It - i - Jpt-
'w A 3:
10 Aq
r4
F � !
lr
I run
f a
!
s it
f! '
SO
%st
k
s a> +w A
Figure 2.5. Current Conditions Plan View, UT
agar Creek (Weaver /McLeod 092347). Bear Creel
Main Stem, Segment 2. October 2014_ MY -5.
Photo Points
'I
— Cross-Seettons
Veoetabw rnonitonr P40t
,rte Thralweq MY (Oct 014)
As-Butt Tha1we9 ,(May 2 )
Aft In-Stream Structures
Conservation Easement
Top of Bank
Stream Ptoblem Areas
Bank Erosion '� � � � lFloodPlain
Erosion
Trees on fence
Vegetation Piroblem Areas
�i Low woody stem density
Invasive weeds (Not Treaters)
a

oogle Earth 2007
300 feet
1k _
1
� s
Fco,
,Vem
Rj
NV
;J,
1:� Y
� r
� � n
1 Il
k f�
4
E.
Ar
ti 1
1r4 v � Y
L Y
� r�ager, Qate: j
P,
Figure 2.6. Current Conditions Plan View, UT
Bear Creek (WeaverlMcLeod #923471. Bear Creek
Main Stem, Segment 3, October 2014, MY -5,
Photo Pointe
rose -Sectk s
V"etation mnstonnig plot
Thalweg MY5 (Oct 2014)
-�' As -Ouiti Thatweg (May O09)
In- Stream Structures
Conservaluon Easement
Top of Bank
Stream Problem Areas
Bank Erosion Floodplain
Erosion
Treed on leix*
Veloetation Problem Areas
Low woody stern denatty
Invasive Weeds (Not Treated)
W1

0
r4l
300 feet
<%
0
if
q4� z
I -T
L- —_
Google Earth 2007
I,?
41
.4
-4
North Tributary
Buffer Restoration
imp M'M� PZ
2-7- Current Conditions Plan View, UT
Creek (Weaver/McLeod #92347), Bear Crack rM�10a9ailn"Sto lift. Segment 4p October 2014. MY-5.
Ph o to Points
-t--t-- 4ro=-S*dkM3 I-A
%"elaOon monilorsm p%I r Ik 0
Thalwag MYS (Oro 2014)
As-Built th*A" (May 2W9) L
I n In-Strearn Structures
Consmaton Easement
Top ad Bank
Stream Problem Areas
[144nk &*11111013 Fhm4plaln
Erosion
M Tres on ferom
VegetstJon Probkm Areas
Low wo-ody stem density Invasive Weeds (Treated 015 a
Invasive Weeds (Not Treated)
�'/22-,CDL-17 119.t' 35.16071561�-' 10ii" -75:58
1,;O.l -
10
:o
ii

le Earth 2007
117 tia
,Emsv,stern
J
4 3
•igt,re 2 -8- Currant Conditions Ran View, UT
dear Creek (Weave r1McE.eod #92347), Bear Creel
Agin Slam Segment 5., October 2014, MY -S.
7"X� Z__
Photo Points
cirass- ectio s
%tWtatton numtkKft plot
Thoiweg MYS (Oct 2014)
As- Built. Thal g (May 20M) I off ,
in- stream Structures
Rivr�r ..r .
C onservauo n. En se meal
Top of Bank
p Stream Problem Areas
Floodplairt
N Bank Erosion
t Erc s ion
Trees on feni;e
m
Veoeuknon Problem Areas 1 I
�:.
Low woody stem density 0 Weeds Not Treated
Invasive VVeeds Treated 2015
r-

UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) — EEP Project #92347 - 2014 (MY -5)
Table 5.1 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Northern UT Assessed Length = 2,918 feet
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants
Number Stable
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Major Channel
Channel
Performing as
Total Number
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Cate o
Sub-Cateqory
Metric
Intended
in As -built
Se ments
Foota a
Intended
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
23
25
92%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.5)
—
29
31
94%
2. Length appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
31
31
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
31
31
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
31
31
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover due to active scour and erosion.
2
150
95%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are stabilized by roots and
0
0
100%
are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
Totals
2
150
95%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
21
22
o
95 /e
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill.
10
10
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or
arms.
10
10
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15 %. (See guidance exhibit describing bank influenced by vane arms)
21
22
95%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.5 Rootwads /logs providing some cover at low flow.
20
22
91%
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) — EEP Project #92347 - 2014 (MY -5)
Table 5.2 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Southern UT Assessed Length = 1,643 feet
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants
Number
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Major Channel
Channel
Stable,
Total Number
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Cate o
Sub-Cateaory
Metric
Performin as
in As -built
Se ments
Foota a
Intended
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aqqradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
1 0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
24
27
89%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.5)
—
44
48
92%
2. Length appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
48
48
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
48
48
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
48
48
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover due to active scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are stabilized by roots and are
0
0
100%
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
Totals
0
1 0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
32
32
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
28
28
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or
arms.
28
28
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15 %. (See guidance exhibit describing bank influenced by vane arms)
32
32
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.5 Rootwads /logs providing some cover at low flow.
32
32
100%
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Table 6
Planted Acreage'
Vegetation Condition Assessment. UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) EEP# 92347- 2014 (MY -5)
17.3
Easement Acreage
32.0
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
% of Planted
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
0.1 acre
Pattern and
0
0.00
0.0%
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1000 SF
Color
15
3.70
11.6%
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
2. Low Stem Density Areas
15
0.1 acre
Gold stipple
2
0.44
2.5%
Color
MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.
Total
2
0.44
2.5%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
Pattern and
025 acre
.
0
0.00
0.0%
Vigor
given the monitoring year.
Color
Cumulative Total
1 2
1 0.44
1 2.5%
Easement Acreage
32.0
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the
understory, the channel acreage, crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table
and is the result of encroachment, the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern /interest are listed below. The
list of high concern spcies are those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure
for existing, more established tree /shrub stands over timeframes that are slightly longer (e.g. 1 -2 decades). The low /moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity
over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing
the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage,
distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control, but
potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not Ilkley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree /shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential
impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any
frequency. Those in red italics are of particular interest given their extreme risk /threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history.
However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for
situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or polygon /area feature can be symbolized to describe things
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants
% of
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Easement
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1000 SF
Blue hatched
15
3.70
11.6%
0
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
Pattern and
15
0.00
0.0%
Color
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the
understory, the channel acreage, crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table
and is the result of encroachment, the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern /interest are listed below. The
list of high concern spcies are those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure
for existing, more established tree /shrub stands over timeframes that are slightly longer (e.g. 1 -2 decades). The low /moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity
over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing
the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage,
distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control, but
potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not Ilkley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree /shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential
impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any
frequency. Those in red italics are of particular interest given their extreme risk /threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history.
However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for
situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or polygon /area feature can be symbolized to describe things
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Problem Areas Inventory Tables: UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 - MY5 (2014)
Stream Problem Areas - Northern UT
Problem
North UT Station
Suspected Cause
Photo #
Bank erosion, LB
3435 -3490 LB
Coir and live stakes washed out in 2010 -11;
poor root density on bank.
1,2
Bank erosion, LB
3680 -3705 LB
Coir and live stakes washed out in 2010 -11;
I poor root density on bank.
3,4
Low woody stem density and /or poor
1750 LB, 1900 RB
Trees fallen on fence
11
Stream Problem Areas - Southern UT
Problem South UT Station Suspected Cause Photo #
None on Southern UT
Vegetation & Easement Problem Areas - Northern UT
Problem
North UT Station
Suspected Cause
Photo #
Ligustrum sinense invading upper reach
1000 -1100 RB 1000
Ligustrum abundant in roadside scrub along
along NC -902 (RB +LB)
1170 LB
NC -902
5
Low woody stem density and /or poor
1750 LB, 1900 RB
Trees fallen on fence
11
vigor (RB)
1180 -1310 RB
Soil dense /clayey, poor root growth
6
Low woody stem density and /or poor
vigor (LB)
1350 -1550 LB
Soil dense /clayey, poor root growth
Ligustrum sinense 4 small patches (.02
1450 RB, 1750 RB,
Stump /root sprouts and seedlings from
to .06 acr each) in middle reach
1800 LB, 2300 RB
Ligustrum outside easement fence
Low woody stem density and /or poor
vigor (LB)
1820 -1900 LB
Soil dense /clayey, Fescue dominant
7
Broken fence wires at cattle crossing
1930 LB
Tree fallen on fence
9
Low woody stem density and /or poor
vigor (LB)
1950 -2100 LB
Soil dense /clayey, poor root growth
8
Low woody stem density and /or poor
vigor (RB)
2020 -2150 RB
Soil dense /clayey, poor root growth
Broken fence wires (RB) in forest near
Large trees fallen on fence in Bear Creek
Bear Creek confluence
3100 -4000 RB
Iriparian buffer
Vegetation & Easement Problem Areas - Southern UT
Problem
South UT Station
Suspected Cause
Photo #
Ligustrum sinense invading upper reach
along NC -902 (RB +LB)
1000 -1050 RB -LB
Ligustrum abundant in roadside scrub along
NC -902
Low woody stem density and poor vigor
(LB)
1160 -1340 LB
Soil dense /clayey, Fescue dominant
10
Broken fence wires (RB + LB)
1750 LB, 1900 RB
Trees fallen on fence
11
Low woody stem density, poor vigor (LB)
2300 -2550 LB
Soil dense /clayey, Fescue dominant
12
NOTE: Low Woody Stem Density areas along both tributaries were replanted in Nov 2013. These areas currently have
adequate seedlings to meet density requirements, but were retained in the Problem Area Table for now due to uncertainty
about the potential survival rates of the new trees. Most of the replanted problem areas have dense clayey soils that may
depress survival and growth.
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Stream Problem Area Photos - UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 - MY5(2014)
1. N- sta- 3450113 Erosion.Oct 2014. Thin veg cover, no woody.
2. N- sta- 3450113 Erosion.Oct 2014. Thin veg cover, no woody.
3. N- sta- 3700113 Erosion.Oct 2014. Thin veg cover, no woody.
4. N- sta- 3700113 Erosion.Apr 2014. Thin veg cover, no woody.
(South Tributary Has No Stream Problem Areas)
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Vegetation & Easement Problem Photos - UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 - MY5 (2014)
5. N- sta- 1000113. Apr.2014. Ligustrum invading from roadside
6. N- sta- 1 200.RB. Face Dnstr. Oct.2014. Low woody density
7. N- sta- 19001B. Face Upstr. Apr.2014. Fescue + Low woody
8. N- sta- 1980.LB. Face Dnstr. Oct.2014. Low woody density
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Vegetation & Easement Problem Photos - UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 - MY4 (2013)
9. N- sta- 1930.1-6. Oct.2014. Fence collapse at cattle crossing
10. S- sta- 12801B. Face Upstr. Oct.2014. Fescue + Low woody
11. S-sta-1 750. LB. Apr.2014. Tree fallen on fence
12. S- sta- 2400.1-13. Face Dnstr. Apr.2014. Fescue + Low woody
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 3.1 Stream Photo -Point Stations - UT Bear Creek Project #92347- MY5 (2014) - North Trib
Photo -Point 1: Northern UT facing Downstream from NC 902 (Sta. 10 +00)
PhotoPoint -1: 3/25/2010
PhotoPoint -1: 10/14/2014
Photo -Point 2: Northern UT facing Downstream (Sta. 13 +60)
PhotoPoi nt -2: 3/24/2010
PhotoPoi nt -2: 10/12/2014
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 3.2 Stream Photo -Point Stations - UT Bear Creek Project #92347- MY5 (2014) - North Trib
Photo -Point 3: Northern UT facing Upstream from easement fence corner (Sta. 15 +30)
PhotoPoi nt -3: 3/24/2010
PhotoPoint -3: 10/12/2014
Photo -Point 4: Northern UT facing South across stream toward floodplain swale outlet (Sta. 17 +55)
PhotoPoi nt -4: 3/24/2010
PhotoPoint -4: 10/12/2014
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 3.3 Stream Photo -Point Stations - UT Bear Creek Project #92347- MY5 (2014) - North Trib
Photo -Point 5: Northern UT facing Downstream at Cattle Crossing (Sta. 19 +30)
rL
PhotoPoi nt -5: 3/24/2010
# Y,I
ni
t
PhotoPoi nt -5: 10/12/2014
Photo -Point 6: Northern UT facing Upstream (Sta. 22 +95)
PhotoPoi nt -6: 3/24/2010
1 .. W.
PhotoPoint -6: 10/13/2014
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 3.4 Stream Photo -Point Stations - UT Bear Creek Project #92347- MY5 (2014) - North Trib
Photo -Point 7: Northern UT fac
PhotoPoi nt -7: 3/24/2010
PhotoPoint -7: 10/13/2014
Photo -Point 8: Northern UT facing Upstream (Sta. 33 +30)
PhotoPoi nt -8: 3/24/2010
PhotoPoint -8: 10/13/2014
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 3.5 Stream Photo -Point Stations - UT Bear Creek Project #92347- MY5 (2014) - North Trib
Photo -Point 9: Northern UT fe
PhotoPoi nt -9: 3/24/2010
Photo -Point 10: Northern UT
"Ak
3/24/2010
PhotoPoint -9: 10/13/2014
PhotoPoint -10: 10/13/2014
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 3.6 Stream Photo -Point Stations - UT Bear Creek Project #92347- MY5 (2014) - South Trib
Photo -Point 11: Southern UT facing D(
PhotoPoint -11: 3/25/2010
Photo -Point 12: Southern UT fa(
PhotoPoint -11: 10/14/2014
PhotoPoint -12: 3/25/2010
r �
PhotoPoint -12: 10/14/2014
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 3.7 Stream Photo -Point Stations - UT Bear Creek Project #92347- MY5 (2014) - South Trib
Photo -Point 13: Southern UT f
PhotoPoint -13: 3/25/2010
PhotoPoint -13: 10/14/2014
PhotoPoint -14: 3/25/2010 PhotoPoint -14: 10/14/2014
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 3.8 Stream Photo -Point Stations - UT Bear Creek Project #92347- MY5 (2014) - South Trib
PhotoPoint -15: 3/25/2010 PhotoPoint -15: 10/12/2014
Photo -Point 16: Southern UT fa
P h oto Po i n t -16: 3/25/2010
PhotoPoint -16: 10/12/2014
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 3.9 Stream Photo -Point Stations - UT Bear Creek Project #92347- MY5 (2014) - South Trib
Photo -Point 17: Southern UT facing Upstream from easement fence corner (Sta. 24 +25)
PhotoPoint -17: 3/25/2010
PhotoPoint -17: 10/12/2014
Photo -Point 18: Southern UT facing Upstream from Bear Creek confluence (Sta. 27 +00)
Photo Po i n t -18: 3/25/2010
PhotoPoint -18: 10/12/2014
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 4.1 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos - UT Bear Creek Stream Restoration - MY5 (2014) - Project #92347
VegPlot 1 (Northern UT Sta. 12 +20)
VegPlot -1: 4/14/2010
VegPlot 2 (Northern UT Sta. 18 +15)
VegPlot -1: 10/12/2014
VegPlot -2: 4/14/2010
VegPlot-2: 10/12/2014
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 4.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos - UT Bear Creek Stream Restoration - MY5 (2014) - Project #92347
VegPlot 3 (Northern UT Sta. 24 +35)
VegPlot -3: 4/14/2010
hern UT Sta. 27 +75)
Ve g P I of -3 : 10/13/2014
VegPlot -4: 4/14/2010
Veg Plot -4: 10/13/2014
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 4.3 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos - UT Bear Creek Stream Restoration - MY5 (2014) - Project #92347
VegPlot 5 (Northers
VegPlot -5: 4/14/2010
VegPlot 6 (Northern UT Sta. 31 +10)
VegPlot-5: 10/13/2014
VegPlot -6: 4/14/2010
VegPlot-6: 10/13/2014
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 4.4 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos - UT Bear Creek Stream Restoration - MY5 (2014) - Project #92347
VegPlot 7 (Northern UT Sta. 33 +75)
VegPlot -7: 4/14/2010
hern UT Sta. 12 +00)
Veg Plot -7: 10/13/2014
VegPlot -8: 4/15/2010
Veg Plot -8: 10/12/2014
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 4.5 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos - UT Bear Creek Stream Restoration - MY5 (2014) - Project #92347
VegPlot 9 (Southern UT Sta. 14 +45)
VegPlot -9: 4/15/2010
VegPlot 10 (Southern UT Sta. 1
VegPlot-9: 10/12/2014
VegPlot -10: 4/15/2010
VegPlot-10: 10/12/2014
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 4.6 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos - UT Bear Creek Stream Restoration - MY5 (2014) - Project #92347
thern UT Sta. 23 +25)
Veg P I of -11: 4/15/2010
thern UT Sta. 24 +55)
Veg P I of -11: 10/12/2014
Veg P I of -12: 4/15/2010
Veg P I of -12: 10/12/2014
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

APPENDIX C.
VEGETATION PLOT MONITORING DATA
Table 7 Vegetation Plot Success Summary
Table 8 CVS Stem Counts Total and Planted by Plot
e -Table Raw CVS vegetation data sheets
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) # 92347 MY- 5 (Oct 2014)
Kiparian Stream/ Unknown
Buffer Wetland Live Growth
Plot # Stems' Stemsl Stakes Invasives Volunteer Tota14 Form
0001
64
6
1
0
58
65
0
0002
48
7
0
3
41
48
0
0003
52
12
0
6
40
52
0
0004
47
9
0
2
38
47
0
0005
na
31
0
0
116
147
0
0006
37
10
0
0
27
37
0
0007
25
8
0
0
17
25
0
0008
34
9
0
0
25
34
0
0009
53
4
0
0
49
53
0
0010
51
9
0
0
42
51
0
0011
43
13
0
0
30
43
0
0012
76
15
0
0
61
76
0
Wetland /Stream Vegetation Totals (per acre)
Stream/ Success
Wetland Volunteers Criteria
Plot # Stemsz 3 Tota14 Met?
0001
243
2347
2590
No, close
0002
284
1658
1942
Yes, close
0003
486
1618
2104
Yes
0004
364
1538
1902
Yes
0005
1255
3804
5059
Yes
0006
405
1092
1497
Yes
0007
324
688
1012
Yes
0008
364
1012
1376
Yes
0009
162
1983
2145
No
0010
364
1700
2064
Yes
0011
526
1214
1740
Yes
0012
607
2469
3076
Yes
Project Avg
449
1760
2209
Yes
Stem Class Categories
1Buffer Stems
2Stream/ Wetland
3Volunteers
4Total
Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals
Riparian Success
Buffer Criteria
Plot # Stems' Met?
wetland
0001
2590
Yes
0002
1942
Yes
0003
2104
Yes
0004
1902
Yes
0005
na
na
0006
1497
Yes
0007
1012
Yes
0008
1376
Yes
0009
2145
Yes
0010
2064
Yes
0011
1740
Yes
0012
3076
Yes
Project Avg
2209
Yes
Native planted and volunteer hardwood trees and shrubs.
Native planted hardwood trees and shrubs excluding live stakes.
Non - planted (volunteer) native trees and shrubs.
Planted + volunteer native trees, native shrubs, and live stakes.
Color Code for Density Success Criteria
Exceeds crierion by 10% or more
Exceeds criterion by less than 10%
Fails to meet crierion by less than 10%
Fails to meet crierion by more than 10%
286+
260 -285
234 -259
< 234
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Table 8. CVS Stem Counts Total & Planted by Plot and Species.
UT to Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) EEP # 92347 MY- 5 (Oct 2014)
Color Codes for Density Success (stems /acre)
Exceeds requirements by 10% 286+
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% 260 -285
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% 234 -259
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% < 234
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
Stream /Wetland success: use PnoLS column (planted trees + shrubs)
Riparian Buffer success: use T column (total native trees +shrubs)
= volunteer native species
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants
Current Plot Data (MYS 2014)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Growth
Form
E92347 -01 -0001
E92347 -01 -0002
E92347 -01 -0003
E92347 -01 -0004
E92347 -01 -0005
E92347 -01 -0006
E92347 -01 -0007
E92347 -01 -0008
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
2
Aesculus sylvatica
painted buckeye
Shrub
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
21
6
3
4
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
Celtislaevigata
sugarberry
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
10
10
10
Corpus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
25
2
2
29
3
3
36
1
1
34
18
18
39
2
2
20
1
1
1
2
2
23
Gleditsia triacanthos
honeylocust
Tree
2
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
3
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
3
43
3
10
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
6
2
2
2
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus velutina
black oak
Tree
1
1
1
Rubusargutus
sawtooth blackberry
Shrub
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree /Shr
1
2
7
2
1
Symphoricarpos orbiculatus
coralberry
Shrub
3
6
2
3
3
Ulmus
elm
Tree
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
4
3
1
1
1
Ulmus amencana
American elm
Tree
1
1
1
18
5
4
Native Tree /Shrub Stem count
Plot size (ares)
Plot size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
6
7
64
7
71
48
12
12
52
9
9
47
31
31
125
10
10
37
8
8
25
9
9
34
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
0.0247
1 61
61
101
51
51
81
81
81
111
81
81
101
41
41
101
41
41
71
51
51
81
7
1 2431
2831
25901
2831
2831
19421
4861
4861
21041
3641
3641
19021
12551
12551
50591
4051
4051
14971
3241
3241
10321
3641
3641
1376
Color Codes for Density Success (stems /acre)
Exceeds requirements by 10% 286+
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% 260 -285
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% 234 -259
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% < 234
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
Stream /Wetland success: use PnoLS column (planted trees + shrubs)
Riparian Buffer success: use T column (total native trees +shrubs)
= volunteer native species
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Table 8, continued. CVS Stem Counts Total & Planted by Plot and Species.
UT to Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) EEP # 92347 MY- 5 (Oct 2014)
Color Codes for Density Success (stems /acre)
Exceeds requirements by 10% 286+
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% 260 -285
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% 234 -259
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% < 234
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
Stream /Wetland success: use PnoLS column (planted trees + shrubs)
Riparian Buffer success: use T column (total native trees + shrubs)
volunteer native species
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants
Current Plot Data (MYS 2014)
Annual Means, Total All Plots
Scientific
E92347 -01 -0009
E92347 -01 -0010
E92347 -01 -0011
E92347 -01 -0012
MYS (2014)
MY4 (2013)
MY3 (2012)
MY2 (2011)
MY1 (2010)
MYO (2010)
Name
Pnol-S
[P-all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Ace rub
2
3
7
1
2
4
Aes syl
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Aln ser
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Bac hal
2
3
4
43
38
38
18
15
2
Bet nig
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
19
19
19
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
20
20
20
21
21
22
Cellae
5
5
5
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
6
2
2
2
3
3
3
Cep occ
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
12
12
12
Cor amo
1
Dio virg
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
7
Fra pen
1
1
32
3
3
35
15
8
8
48
41
41
337
39
39
388
41
41
388
41
41
506
40
40
194
35
35
341
Gle tria
2
2
1
8
2
2
2
3
3
5
Jugl nig
3
3
1
Liq sty
8
1
67
74
35
5
5
4
Nys syl
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
5
5
5
Pin tae
I
1
2
2
Plat occ
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
19
19
19
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
15
15
15
16
16
16
Quercus
1
1
1
2
2
2
Que fal
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Que lyr
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quer mic
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
10
9
9
9
10
10
10
9
9
9
8
8
8
5
5
5
Quer nig
1
Que phe
5
5
5
2
2
2
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
11
9
9
9
9
9
9
Que vel
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Rub arg
16
16
Sali nig
1
2
10
1
2
9
1
2
7
1
2
6
1
2
2
17
Sym orb
4
8
17
46
44
39
35
1
1
21
1
1
51
Ulmus
19
11
7
Ulm ala
1
1
8
1
1
9
1
1
21
9
4
4
4
4
4
4
Ulm ame
4
7
3
4
1
1
46
46
38
14
#stems
4
4
53
91
91
51
131
13
43
151
lql
76
1331
1341
655
122
123
699
125
1261
656
1261
1271
695
122
123
347
121
121
545
ares
1
1
1
1
12
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
acres
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.30
0.2965
0.2965
0.2965
0.2965
0.2965
#spp
2
2
6
51
51
7
6
61
10
71
71
9
17
17
24
15
15
231
141
141
201
151
151
231
14
141
201
151
151
23
stems /ac
1 1621
1621
2145
3641
3641
2064
5261
5261
1740
6071
6071
3076
4491
452
2209
4111
4151
23571
4221
4251
22121
4251
4281
23441
4111
4151
11701
4081
4081
1838
Color Codes for Density Success (stems /acre)
Exceeds requirements by 10% 286+
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% 260 -285
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% 234 -259
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10% < 234
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
Stream /Wetland success: use PnoLS column (planted trees + shrubs)
Riparian Buffer success: use T column (total native trees + shrubs)
volunteer native species
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Vegelation Monitoring Data (VMD) lbbisheet
Plot E92347 -01 -0001
VM1) Year 0 -5): 5 1 Date: 1'7_ / ocr/ l /
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N: 1883879 Datum: NAD83 /W
(dec.deg. or in) r:ue� -.
Longitude or U'I'M -E: 677625 UTM lie
Coordinate Accuracy (in): X -Axis bearing ((leg): I )50
Please fill III :Illy missing data and correct ally errol-s.
Role: I me last planted:
!O ffv -kI New )lancing date m /yy'? 1 Zbl,
inChcck box il' plot was not
Notes: sampled, speeil'y reason below
1 11
I'lot Dimensions: X: 10 Y If! [f Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 911 degrces to the right of X
Last Year's Data I Z 'I'I IIS YEARS DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBI -1 Height D1311 Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Natnc char 0.I111 0.1111 Icm* I em Icm* I cm sprout
987 Betula nigra Q R 0.1 0.2 142.0 0.3 Lj 120 - 2-
988 Plalanus occidentalis 0 R 6.9 4.1 280.0 1.61- j 390 2 -5
989 Quercus velutina Q R 8.3 0.4 23.0 (-1 if
1280 Salix nigra @ R 9.5 7.0 240.0 1.5 f 1 50o 2
1281 Salix nigra (b L 0.1 1.5 300.0 2.7 [] 35th J,.15� F q
384 Quercus michauxii O R 3.0 3.8 151.0 0.6 C 1 I r7 ! . .3 El
385 Quercus lyrala R 4.4 6.4 205.0 1.0 ❑ 2614 bg
li .sfems: 7 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted- If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Steins) form..
X Y Height D1311
SpCCICS NatnC Source* (aro) (lit) 1 c111* I cm Vigor* Damage* Notts
hnhe�
*Notes by ID: 4.87-;it 0,0 corner - -
1384 -yr2: I yr4: fungus
I'xplanafion p( cul-{L
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species ZI& subsonrpline*'*':
+I rlitCUt-) f�f (All steins shorter than thisarc ignored. If>10an,explain why to the right.): :. II)CM 1_.1511CM CI 100cm H 137cm
Species Name
x'
r6
e
SEEDLINGS
- HLIGH'I'
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
- DBI I
TREB - DIM
Su b-
Seed
-
n
50 cm-
100 em
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0 -1 cm
1 -2.�
2.5-
5-
=t0
(write Dim)
c- c- Ion,
--
3
7
--
5
2
Sa�'i x m l r
--
1
�2
s Ab
rAx mkk
19
10
** 11equiredifcutoff >10cmorsubsample ?100 %. rl
:2
:1
:4
N5
h
::7
t 8
)
10 FonnWS2,ver9.1
*VIGOR: 4--excellent, 3 =good, 2 =Fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M = missing- Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
"HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS -EEP linuy tool ver, 2.3.1

Vegetation MoniU)ring Daly (VIVID) Dataslieel
Plot E92347 -01 -0002
VMD Win- (1 -5): 1 5 Dalc: (Z / OC-r
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard I)A'1'1i:
Latitude or UTM -N:
Species Name
1884205
Datum: NAD83 /W
(dec.dcg. or in)
Longitude or UTM -I :
SAPLINGS
677197
UTM Zone: tic
Coordinate Accuracy (in):
Sub-
Seed
X -Axis bearing (deg):
I 275
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errm:s.
Role: I ) :1te last planted:
o 7yo v Ncw laming date m /yy? 20 17
r! rar'19C tr rjCheck box il' plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: Itl �_ -J Plot has reverse orientation I'or X and Y axis Y is 91) de gru,s to the right of X
� c _� z,
fast Ycar's Data 7— `I 11Is YEAR'S DATA
J
Map Source* X Y Ileiglit DBI -1 : height 1)131I Re. Vigor" t)tunttbu' Notes
ID Species Name chat 0.1111 0.1111 lctn" I cin lcm, ' 1 cm sprout
996 13ewla nigrt �e� It 9.9 0.1 68.0 D 7
998 Fraxinus pennsylvanica U R 2.0 4.6 Missing ❑ 2
1001 Fraxinus pennsylvanica (a) R 1.0 9.5 98.0 F I )2-1 El 2
1297 Celtis laevigata (0 R 2.5 0.1 65.0
1444 Guercus lyraia (b) 1.8 4.3 67.0 I 2
u steins: 5 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. II' nwre space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Dorm:
X Y Ilcight 01311
Species Name Source* (ni) (m) I cm* I cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
s 2013 2e HLL-
e a ' 201 P–e (a( "t
Explanation 9-1: eut -of l
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &Sub6an, )ling••:
Hf,lilIILL7ttt--O]T(Allsiciiisslioitertli,uitliisarei,giitired.11'>IOLiil,CXplaihwllytoLlieriglit.):L)IOCM Cl 5Uctn Ll IOIXnl ❑ 137cm
Species Name
©
C
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBII
TREKS — DBH
Sub-
Seed
-
1
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0 -1 cm
1 -2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBII)
P aL
--
Z
a c c Lahv^
- --
1
-
"Required it'cutoff >IOcmorsubsample ?100 %. 01
•2
•
•3
••
:*4
!•
NS
••
rti
•
� "�? ��;
fin
�1
�10 Fo ml W S2, v er 9.1
i
*SOURCE: Tr-Transplant, L--Live stake I3 =13 ll and urla P =Potted Tu= "rublin R =bare Root Mt=MeehgBjgRyj— UnRnowgrt 0.3
'VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing, Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-/:7:P l:nuy 7'ooi ver. 23.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VIVID) Datasheet
Plot E92347 -01 -0003
VIVID Year (1 -5): 1 5 Date: '1?j ocr/ ) / !
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N: 1884743 Datum: NAD83 /W
(dec.deg. or in) Zi77040 UTM Zone: inc
Longitude or UTM -E:
Coordinate Accuracv (m): X -Axis bcarinl; (des;): 100
Please till in any missing data aid correct any errors.
Role: I )ate last planted:
aohl�E New lanting dale m /yy? f 101 3
//Ar 'rrc�i,I Check box if plot was not
Notes; sampled, specify reason below
Plot utmensions rUl x: I '� U_Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 911 degrees to the rigof X
Last Year's Data z '1'I [IS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height 1)1311 Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1111 0.1m Icm* 1 cm Icm* I cm sprout
1007 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 1.1 1.1 Missing ❑ So a.
1008 Quercus phellos O R 2.9 1.4 90.0 ❑ 99 3
1009 Quercus michauxii ® R 5.5 0.2 197.0 0.8 0 0? 30 -S
1010 Betula nigra 0 R 9.5 0.6 126.0 DBH? � 1® I..o
1011 Quercus michauxii ® R 6.6 2.5 Missing ❑
1012 b1vsm1 4ylvatica ��USp O R 0.4 3.1 49.0 ❑
ja
1013 Betula nigra r ® R 3.9 4.1 104.0 DBH? ❑ 6 E
1014 Fraxinus pennsylvanica R 8.7 4.2 119.0 DBII? ❑ NO 0 -11 El 1 3
1015 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Q R 8.0 5.4 107.0 DB11? Q 105 3
1016 Ccltis laevigata O f R 5.2 7.0 W� 3
Missing
1019 Diospyros virginiana ® R 3.2 8.7 41.0 2 36 2
N .stems: 11 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form
X Y Height DBI -I
Species Name Source* {mj (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
1Gt 2013 i ft
*Notes by ID: 1009- fungus
1 1010 - leader died
11015 -top died
111016- broken
1 1019 -top died
HISOU ;CE.Tr =TranspLnt, L =Live stake 6 -hull and burlap, P= Ported, Tu= Tubling, R -bare Root, M= Mechanic ally, U =Unknow_n P_
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
]=unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS -EEP Levy Tool ver 2.3 1

Plot (continued): E92347 -01 -0003
map source X Y
ID Species char (in) (in)
Last Year's Data
ddh Height D1311
(inn) (cot) (cm)
c TI [IS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height D 131 1 Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(min) (cm) (cm) sprout
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species ll�ng!0: r
•lei * Cut_Off S All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, exlikiiii why to the right.): 1 -1 m LI 5[k:m [l 500c in o 137c:m
Species Name
D
c
SEEDLINGS
—HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBl I
TREES — DBH
Su
seed
5 t<
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
5th_
sapl
0 -1 cm
1 -2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write 1) 1311)
set 11
kJ
" *Required if cut-off >10cm or subsample? 100 %. •t
62
• 3
00
♦4 1** + •r
0 so
*;
10 I omi WS2, vcr 9 1
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =17air, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50em if >4m. Printed in the CVS -EEP 8nuy Tool ver. 23.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Dalasbeel
Plot E92347 -01 -0004
VMD Year (1 -5): Date: 1Z1 O(T/ 201
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N: 1884972 Datum: NAD83 /W
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM -E: 1 676808 UTM Zone: ne
('nnrrlinate Accuracv (ml X -Axis bearine (dea): 310
Please fill in any missing; data anti correct any errors.
ratty.
Kole.
+If1'h
14ovet(Se -+t
Date last planted:
New flanging date m /yy?
MChcck box if plot was 1101
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
-- 2013 Iii' fgalf
2013 Ott vt
qs — Or1 jalcc(
*Notes by ID: 127- fungus _ I
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & Sun�nm ° "1 g
-lei Ul C,lrl -f) (All stuns shorter than thisarc ignored. If >10an, explain why to the right.): CI 10LM CI 50cm f-t 100crn u 13 ]Cllr
Plot Dimensions: X:
lu Y:
I- 1uj
D plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right ol' X
SAPLINGS
NEW/
yI
mom
c
501he
Last Year's Data
z
Tl IIS YEAR'S DATA
rll.
0
a®
5-
=10
(write DBI -0
all Vt
0
Map
Source*
X
Y
height
DBI1
*
Height D1311 Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID
Species Name
char
0.1m 0.1111
lcm*
1 cm
1cm* 1 an sprout
1025
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R 8.5 0.0
260.0
1.3 L7 _' y
1026
Celtislaevigata
©
R 7.4 3.0
143.0
0.2 175-W-3 3
1027
Quercusmichauxii
O
R 4.2 2.5
176.0
0.8(]
1028
Nyssa sylvatica
®
R 1.0 3.6
85.0
f 3
1029
Platanus occidentalis
O
R 9.8 3.6
270.0
2.1 �� 3 �0 , I I 11
1030
Belula nigra
0
R 7.2 5.8
220.0
1.2 [] . 100 *5
11 sterns:
0 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted.
If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Fonn:
X Y
Height D1311
Species Name
Source*
(111 (m)
1 cm* 1 cm
Vigor* Damage* Notes
-- 2013 Iii' fgalf
2013 Ott vt
qs — Or1 jalcc(
*Notes by ID: 127- fungus _ I
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & Sun�nm ° "1 g
-lei Ul C,lrl -f) (All stuns shorter than thisarc ignored. If >10an, explain why to the right.): CI 10LM CI 50cm f-t 100crn u 13 ]Cllr
Species Name
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT CLASSIS
SAPLINGS
NEW/
yI
mom
c
501he
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
sub-
saps
rll.
0
a®
5-
-- 2013 Iii' fgalf
2013 Ott vt
qs — Or1 jalcc(
*Notes by ID: 127- fungus _ I
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & Sun�nm ° "1 g
-lei Ul C,lrl -f) (All stuns shorter than thisarc ignored. If >10an, explain why to the right.): CI 10LM CI 50cm f-t 100crn u 13 ]Cllr
Species Name
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT CLASSIS
SAPLINGS
— DBIJ
TREES — D13H
Sub-
seed
c
501he
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
sub-
saps
0 -1 cm
1 -2,5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBI -0
all Vt
Sa
* *Required ifcu -off >10cmorsubsample ?100 % - •1
•2
•
• 3
••
:4
•
N5
••
#'#6
0
8
:
10 Fonn WS2,ver9.1
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CuS- EEPEntry Ibol ver. 2.,7.1

Vegetation Monitoring; Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot E92347 -01 -0005
VMD Year (1-5): 5 Date: 12 / ocrl2ol - l l
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N: 1885064 Datum: NAD83 /W I
(dec.deg. or m) I
Longitude or UTM -E: 67665? UTM Zone: 11,
Coordinate Accuracy (m): X -Axis bearing (deg): "'
1)ate last planted:
New lanting date m /yy?
New
box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
i
Plot Dimensions: X: 11 Y: tl) ,
U Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is )U degrees to the right of X ,
Last Year's Data o '1'1 IIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y I]eight D131-1 * Ileight D1311 Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.Im 0.Im Icm* I cm Icm* I cm sprout
1037
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
1.9
1.5
230.0
0.9
1038
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Q
R
2.2
1.0
�NMI
1039
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
@
R
3.2
0.4
225.0
0.8 n
1040
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
4.6
0.9
300.0
1.8
1041
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
5.5
1.0
300.0
3.2
1042
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
7.9
1.1
300.0
3.3 E]
1043
Platanus occidentalis
�Q�1
R
9.5
0.1
300.0
4.1 E]
1044
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
9.8
0.4
300.0
3.4
1045
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
8.2
2.5
300.0
2.7 ❑
1046
Cephalanthus occidentalis
0
R
6.9
2.2
135.0
DBH? ]
1048
Cephalanthus occidentalis
O
R
5.1
2.5
88.0
❑
1049
Cephalanthus occidentalis
®
R
3.5
3.8
120.0
DBH? ]
1050
Cephalanthus occidentalis
R
2.9
3.7
135.0
DBH? ]
1051
Cephalanthus occidentalis
(D
R
6.1
4.0
110.0
DBH? ❑
1052
Cephalanthus occidentalis
O
R
7'.8
4.0
148.0
0.4 E]
1053
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
9.0
4.2
300.0
3.0 E]
1054
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
©
R
9.0
5.3
300.0
2.7 ❑
1055
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Q
R
5.9
4.6
155.0
0.3 ❑
1056
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
©
R
6.0
5.1
300.0
2.8 E]
1057
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
0.3
5.6
300.0
2.7
1058
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
1.9
5.2
290.0
1.5 ]
1059
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
3.1
5.4
280.0
1.90
1060
Cephalanthus occidentalis
®
R
8.5
6.2
130.0
DBH? O
1061
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Q
R
8.0
6.6
151.0
0.40
1062
Cephalanthus occidentalis
®
R
4.2
6.9
140.0
0.3 ]
1063
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
3.0
6.6
300.0
2.8
1065
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
1.7
7.5
300.0
2.4
1067
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
7.2
8.5
300.0
3.5 ]
1068
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
9.5
7.3
300.0
2.30
1071
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
(D
R
3.6
8.2
300.0
2.0 ]
1072
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
5.4
9.6
290.0
1.9 ❑
"SOURCE: Tr= Trtp�planl, L=Live stake B=Ba11 anti barl0r) P= Polled. Tu =Tubling, R =bare Root, M= Meehitnic rl UUitl:MIWP _ _ p. M
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CAS -EEP Entry Tool ver 2 3.1
m_�
■,-
mm
�NMI
rnm
•
=_�
t�L'iI
�Q�1
■
�
--
1 '
r
■
_�
W,MM�
r
mmmm�
mm_�
/
clmumm�
"SOURCE: Tr= Trtp�planl, L=Live stake B=Ba11 anti barl0r) P= Polled. Tu =Tubling, R =bare Root, M= Meehitnic rl UUitl:MIWP _ _ p. M
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CAS -EEP Entry Tool ver 2 3.1

Plot (continued): E92347 -01 -0005 Last Year's Dala I I IIS YI?AWS DATA
map source a Y J ddh I [eight I III N ddh I [eight Dlil I Re= Vigor* Damage'" Notes
ID Species char (m) (m)I (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cni) sprout
1073 Hetula nigia (h) R 1.3 1.7 290.0 1.81 1 I_,t-r V � - G I u I J ' I I
# stems: .32 New Stems, not included last year, bul are obviously planted. II' nwre space needed, use Wall[, PWS (Planted Woody Sleets) Dorm:
X Y I]eight 1)1311
Species Name Source* (tn) ('at) 1 cm* I cm Vigo[* Damage* Notes
�
r
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species )�:� t}l tin li gn s� r -0 !.L =[l>timAiau * *=
g 1 ut- Off( Allslen ,sshor(crthanthisareignored. If >l0an,[xp'lain why tolher6glu.). L110cm r:]5(km II I110cm 1I 137e111
Species Name
�—
ID
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGIIT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBI I
TREES — DB1-1
Sub-
Seed
l e
_
1
100 cm-
137 crn
Sub-
sap,
0 -1 cm
1 -2.
2.5-
5-
=10
(mile D111 I)
F�ax eenm
- --
'
o r 1' ,.
- --
�z
- - - --
l
P Get s
-
II
--
s cry J7 Ml
---
3
- -
*Recr [ired cut-off >10kmorsubsam le?I(X)%. •1
• 2
•3
•
••
••••
�a.'
I�
1 Form WS2, vei 9.1
*SUURCE: Tr =Trans taut L=Live staka B=Ball and burls P =Potted Tu =Tublin R =bare Root, M= Mechanicall U= Unknown P. 1
"VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =Fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects. GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
I = unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROULlit, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to I0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Prinled in the C:KS -1,11 hia y'l'ool [per. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring; Data (VIVID) Dutusl►eet
Plot E92347 -01 -0006
VM D Year (1-5): f 5 Date. (7-/OCr /7{j/ /
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N: 1885215 Datum: NAD83 /W
(dec.deg. or in) . '1
Longitude or UTM -E: 676777 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy (m): X -Axis bearing (deg): 1Ej
Please rill in any missing; data and correct any errors.
I )ate last planted:
New ranting date m /yy?
Check box if plot was not
saiupicu, spucuy reason ocmw
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 119 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Map Source* X Y
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m
Last Year's Data Z
0
Height DBI -1 y
Icm* 1 cm "
1078
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
0.4
0.4
64.0
11
1079
Platanus occidentalis
R
3.4
0.3
117.0
DBH? ❑
1080
Diospyros virginiana
©
R
6.4
0.4
141.0
0.4 E]
1081
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
9.4
0.4
270.0
1.5 ❑
1082
Celtis laevigata
®
R
8.7
3.5
27.0
1083
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.6
3.5
99.0
❑
1085
Platanus occidentalis
R
9.5
6.6
210.0
1.0
1086
hraxinus pennsylvanica
R
7.1
9.2
256.0
1.6 ❑
1088
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
0.6
9.6
86.0
11
1090
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
3.1
6.0
134.0
DBH? ❑
Height D131
Icm* 1 cn
T] IIS YEAR'S DATA
1 Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
i sprout
a stems: 10 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Foci
X Y Height DBI -I
Species Name Source* {m) [nO 1 cm* I cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
0 A
*Notes by lD: I WM- rusprout
'SOURCE: Tr =Transplant, L, Live stake, 13 =Ball and huriap, P= Potted, Tu= Tubling, R =hare Root, M =Mechanically, U =Unkilown p. 13
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CuS -EEP Entry Tool ver 2.3 1

Plot (continued): E92347 -01 -0006
map mmrce X Y
ID Species char (III (III
Last Year's I)ata
ddh Ileighl 1)1311
(nun) (cut) (cut)
o -1'I IIS YEAR'S DATA
* ! ddh Ileight D131I Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(nnn) (cut) (cm) sprout
Explanation Qf �T
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species y�j,subsIIIIIIAI11g":
-lei +Il i'tt - UI�'( Allstemsshorterth anthisareignored. If >IOcu, explain wily to the right.): II 10C Ill 1_I Ile Ill I1 100Lnl (.-j I37crll
Species Name
21
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBI I
TREES — DIM
sub_
Seed
501tv
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
suli
saps
0 -1 cm
1 -2.5
2.5-
5-
= 0
(write DIIII)
CMX
1-2
1 -J i
--
** Rec plircdifcu- olY >1(kmorsubsample ?I(X)%. 101
:2
•
:3
••
+ *4
•
NS
••
r6
i
##
ii
j�)
�i
I {} Form W S2, vcr 9.1
*VIGOR:4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CuS -EEP Entry Tool ver. 23.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VIVID) Datasheet
Plot E92347 -01 -0007
VMD Year (1-5): 5 –I Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N: 1885476 Datum: NAD83 /W
(dec.deg. or rat)
Longitude or UTM -E: 676785 UTM 'Lone: tic
Coordinate Accuracv (m): X -Axis bearing (dea): 290
Please till in any missing data and correct any errors.
Role: 1 fate last planted:
/120 Mem New lanting date m /yy? ) f
A41)0alicv11 MChcck box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot Dimensions: A: iai Y• I !tt �� Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axt's, (Y is 9U degrees to the right of X
Last Year's Data z I'I IIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Y Height D131 -1 N Ileight 1)1311 Ito- Vigor* Damage* Notes
Map Source* X
ID Species Name char 0.I111 0.Im Icm* I cm ,cm* 1 cm sprout
1094 Platanus occidentalis © 11 0.9 1.0 118.0 DBH? []
1095 Betula nigra It 4.4 0.9 100.0 (�
1096 Betula nigra b It 1.6 4.6 172.0 0.4 ❑
1097 Quercus phellos `b R 9.2 6.9 62.0 I -J
1098 Quercus phellos U R 3.0 8.4 185.0 0.5 �]
1298 Quercus michauxii O It 6.6 4.0 123.0 DBH? CI
1299 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0 R 2.7 0.9 103.0 DBH? ❑
N ,steins: 7 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank MS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height 1)131 -1
Species Name Source* (111) (ill) I cm* I cm Vigor* 1)amage* Notes
•�C! t't Iii S r �f3 c
I VII nation 2 cut-of
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsiunplfng * *:
iell;Itl(,Ul-nf1'(All steins shorter than thisareil inured. If >10c7n, cxplan wiry to the righl.): 17 Men) D 50cm t-1 II Ocill I 137Cr11
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
seed
C-
50 cm-
'100 cm
100 cm-
137r cm
Sub
sap,
0 -1 cm
1-2>
2.5-
5-
=10
(write 1) 1311)
I
I
—Required if cutoff >I0cm or subsample? 100 %. 01
:2 I*
3
#4
N5
6
�t3
1
11) Form WS2, ver 9.1
*SUIJRCE: Tr =Tran,s»ian_t, L- -Live stake 8--Ball and hurt P= Potted Tut= Tubling R=bbare Root, M=Machanieally. U= Unknown P. 16
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects. GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
I= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CKS -EEP Entry Tool ver. 2..3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please rill in any missing; data and correct any errors.
Plot E92347 -01 -0008 Partv: Role: Hate last planted:
VMI) Year (1-5): 5 Date: / QGT/ / / I l Ncw llanling dale m /yy? Wig(.
_. "Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: ' Notes: sarnpled. specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N: 1882340 Datum: NAD83 /W
(dec.deg. or m) `...i-
Longitude or Ul'M -E: 675887 UTM "Lone: Ine'
Coordinate Accuracy (m): X -Axis bearing (deg): l ltl
Plot Dimensions: X: IO Y: ltl [ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Last Year's Data z '1'I IIS YEAIZ'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height D131-1 * Height 1)1311
'to- Vigot* Damage* Notes
ID Species Nanlc char 0.1m 0.1m Icm* I cut Icm* I cm sprout
1 103
Betula nigra
D
C
It
9.3
0.2
93.0
[
1104
Betula nigra
0
R
9.9
9.0
300.0
2.7 ❑
1 105
Betula nigra
O
R
1.4
9.6
400.0
3.5 � l
1 107
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Q
R
4.7
2.0
215.0
0.6
388
Diospyros virginiana
O
R
5.5
7.5
135.0
DR11?
389
Celtis laevigata
R
7.0
2.0
240.0
0.5 [j
564
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
It
R
9.9
2.5
300.0
1.8E]
565
Ouercus michauxii
Q
R
2.8
LO
260.0
1.0 []
566
Ulmus alata
1>
It
2.0
2.5
220.0
0.40
4 .,•runs- 9 New Steals, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Steals) Fornl.
X Y Ilcight 1)1311
SpCCICS Name Source* Oil (m] I cm* I cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
EKPIanation Q cut-o
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsamiline * *:
lei Us Itt Q1I- ) IT( AII sterns shorter than Ill isare ignored. If >10an, explain why to the right.): [I I0Lrn U 50cm IJ 100cm t.:1 137cIll
Species Name
D
C
SEEDLINGS
-HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS
- DB11
TREES - DBH
Sub-
Seed
c
]
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sapl
0 -1 cm
1 -2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write D131 -1)
ff /%
M
no
4 .,•runs- 9 New Steals, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Steals) Fornl.
X Y Ilcight 1)1311
SpCCICS Name Source* Oil (m] I cm* I cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
EKPIanation Q cut-o
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsamiline * *:
lei Us Itt Q1I- ) IT( AII sterns shorter than Ill isare ignored. If >10an, explain why to the right.): [I I0Lrn U 50cm IJ 100cm t.:1 137cIll
Species Name
D
C
SEEDLINGS
-HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS
- DB11
TREES - DBH
Sub-
Seed
c
]
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
Sapl
0 -1 cm
1 -2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write D131 -1)
"Required ifcu toff >IOcmorsubsample ?700 %. 01
•2
03
�,4
4 5
-411(i 7 8 1
X0 Form W S2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr =Trap lank L -Live stake B�Bnli and burls P =Potted Tu= Tublin R =bare Root M= Mechanically, U-ilnknown P. 18
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
]=unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Primed in the Cos -PLSP 1,fa y Tool ver, 2.3,1

Vegetation Monitoring; Data (VMD) Datasheel
Plot E92347 -01 -0009
VMI) Year (1 -5): _5 Date: /o(r /2.0f
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N: 1882512 Dalton: NAD83 /W
(dec.deg. or nl) . P.A '
Longitude or UTM -E:
675739 UTM Zone: Ill'
Coordinate Accuracy (m): I I X-Axis hearing (deg): 1 3251
Plot Dimensions: X: I I
Please fill in any missing; data and correct any errors.
Party: Role: Hale last planted:
O rr7 I New lanling dale m /yy? ZQ i
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
T.' I `t'I LJ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 cl�to the right of X
ave': Iff] - I
l 11 alion.Q[sut -u (1
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species A ;tIhsmrt ing ":
IC .111E :1(fl' {All stems shorterlh.mthisareignored. If>10cm,explainwhytotheright.): I110Cm ❑50cn1 F.I IllUem L1 I -s7em
Species Name
c
SEEDLINGS
—HEIGHT
CLASSES
Last Year's Data
Z
TREES — DBH
T IIS YEAR'S DA'T'A
c
71
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 em
sub-
sap,
0 -1 cm
1 -2.5
2.5-
5-
0
e
ID
Species Name
Map
Source* X
0.1111
Y
0.1111
Height
lcm*
DBI-I
1
N
Height
Icm*
D1311 Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
char
cm
J t
1 cm sprout
1112
Betula nigra
Q
R
1.7
3.9
180.0
0.4 F]
50
3.0
1 113
Betula nigra
d
R
5.7
6.1
300.0
2.0 F]
1114
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
(
R
4.0
8.5
160.0
0.4
1 1 15
Betula nigra
b
R
2,0
8.5
300.0
1.81--]
•F
: U
** Recptiredifcuol f>IOcmorsuhsample ?100 %. •l •2
•
•3 ••
N sterns:
4 New Stems,
not included
last
year, but
are obviously
planted.
If more space
needed, use blanI, PWS (Planted
Woody Stems) Form;
X
Y
Height DBI1
SpCCICS Name
Source*
(ara)
(m)
I cm* I cm
Vigor*
Damage*
Notes
ave': Iff] - I
l 11 alion.Q[sut -u (1
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species A ;tIhsmrt ing ":
IC .111E :1(fl' {All stems shorterlh.mthisareignored. If>10cm,explainwhytotheright.): I110Cm ❑50cn1 F.I IllUem L1 I -s7em
Species Name
c
SEEDLINGS
—HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DB11
TREES — DBH
soh-
Seed
c
71
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 em
sub-
sap,
0 -1 cm
1 -2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DISH)
e
/0
15-_
--
J t
GCcc
** Recptiredifcuol f>IOcmorsuhsample ?100 %. •l •2
•
•3 ••
• *4
• •
NS
••
iz 7
•
T' I
10 FonnWS2,ver9.l
*SOURCE: Tr- I'rans cant L - -Live stake 13 =12101 and burlap, P= Potter) Tu= Tublin R =bare Root M =Mechanical) , U =Unt• noon p. 20
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, 1NSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in die Cu,S -EET Entry Too! ver. 23.1

Vegetation Monitoring; Data (VIVID) Datasheet Please till in any missing; data and correct any errors.
Plot E92347 -01 -0010
VMI) Year (1-5): S J Date: 12/ OC - / ul
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N: 1882875 Datum: NAULn4c
(dec.deg. or m) ""
Longitude or UTM -E: t 1 U T M Zonc: 1
Coordinate Accuracy (m): X -Axis bearing (deg): 290
kite last planted:
New Planting date m /yy? t j
Check box if plot was not
reason below
Plot Dimensions: X: 110Y : PI ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 9 I degrees to the right of X
Last Year's Data TI IIS YEARS DATA
Map Source* X Y 1lcight DBIi Height DBII Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm 1 cm 1cm 1 cm s rout
1119
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
9.4
1.7
400.0
9.0 ❑
1 120
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
@
R
5.9
1.7
265.0
1.2 ❑
1121
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
0
R
3.0
1.8
300.0
2.37./
1122
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
6.2
3.6
245.0
1.5 ❑
1124
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
2.6
4.8
300.0
3.5 ❑
1 125
Quercus michauxii
©
R
3.9
6.8
205.0
0.6 ❑
1126
Quercus michauxii
®
R
8.0
6.7
245.0
1.7 ❑
1 127
Alnus serrulata
O
R
1.1
8.2
156.0
0.4 ❑
1128
Betula nigra
(D
R
9.5
9.5
300.0
3.5 ❑
®®
■
m®�
4 stems: 9 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBI -1
Species Name Source* (lit) (m) 1 cm* I cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
YI C.
*Notes by ID: 11121- resprow - -
*SOURCE: Tr-Tmns lant L=Live stick B=Ball and burla P =POa Tu= Tabling, R =bare Root, M= Mechanically, U =Unkn+ wn
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to l Ocm if >2.5m and 50em if >4m. Printed in the CVS -EEP Eniq fool ver. 2.3. /

Plot (continued): E92347 -01 -0010
map source X Y
ID Species chat (m) (m)
list Year's Data
dill) Height D1311
(mm) (cm) (cm)
o
N
(mm)
Ti IIS YFAR:S DATA
(1(111 Ileighl D1311 Re- Vigor* Damage" Notes
(cm) (cni) sprout
ISKfll ttrlilli,rlt f�l1�i �43Q
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species y sulnmrr Itrt "�:
leig 1: UL-_) f'( A11stems shorter than Ihis are ignored. 11 >10cm,expfiin why toIheright.): II 10ctn I1Silent II I0 Oc m II 137cnl
Species Name
®
c
SEEDLINCS
— Maca T
CLAssB
SAPLINGS
— D111
TREPS — D1311
So I)-
Seed
c
n
r
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
tiapl
0 -1 cm
1 -2.�
2.5-
5-
=10
(write D1311)
facc
* *Re(plirod ifcrl {>ff >10t:m or subsample? 100 %. •I
•2
•
• 3
••
�4
••
�i5
••
[ 7 fi
Form WS2,vet 9.1
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects. GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUsht, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to I0cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m, Printed in the CVS -EEP Toot ver. 2J.I

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VIVID) Datasheet
Plot E92347 -01 -0011
VIVID Year (1 -5): 5 I Dale: 7- /OCT' /201
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N: 1883130 Datum: NAD83 /W
(dec.deg, or m)
Longitude or UTM -E: 67x'87 UTM Zone: -no
Coordinate Accuracy (m): X -Axis bearing (des;). C 315
Please fill in any missing; data and correct any errors.
•,tom '.
Sell
I )atc last planted:
Now lanting date m /yy? 2013
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Plot utmensions: A: L-�i Y: "LU Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (1' is 90 degrees to the right of X
Last Year's Data 'z 'I'I [IS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height 1)131 -1 « Height D1311 Ise- Vigor* Damage* Notes
I1) Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m Icm* 1 cm * 1 cm sprout
1 138
Quercus phellos
b
R
0.6
0.4
70.0
El
1139
Betula nigra
Q
R
2.9
0.4
400.0
4.7 ❑
1 140
Alnus serrulata
It
R
5.6
0.7
75.0
El
1141
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
9.0
0.3
132.0
DBH?
1 142
Ouercus phellos
O
R
2.5
1.8
96.0
1143
Alnus serrulata
0
R
6.8
5.1
98.0
❑
1 144
Quercus phellos
Oj
R
9.1
6.5
57.0
❑
1145
Platanus occidentalis
Q
R
6.6
7.6
55.0
1 146
Quercus phellos
©
R
4.3
6.3
97.0
❑
1147
Quercus phellos
®
R
4.4
9.4
210.0
0.6 ❑
1315
Quercus michauxii
O
R
0.1
2.8
115.0
DIiH? 0
390
Diospyros virginiana
®
R
2.5
4.4
162.0
0.6
N stems: 12 New Stems, not included last year, but arc obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) form:
X Y Height DBtI
SpCCICS Name Source* (m) [m) 1 cm* I cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Se C:;Z P 13 w1m ct --
*Notes by ID: 11145 -top dead
111315 -yrl ,}r•l Imigus
*SOURCE: Tr- -TransplanyL _Live stake, B =Batt and burlap, P= Polled. Tu =Tubling, R =bare Root, M= Mcchanicatly; U= Unknown p. 25
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, L[VESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10em if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Primed in the CKS -E-EP Entry Tool ver 2.3 1
■
M•=
ffiwmmmm�
N stems: 12 New Stems, not included last year, but arc obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) form:
X Y Height DBtI
SpCCICS Name Source* (m) [m) 1 cm* I cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Se C:;Z P 13 w1m ct --
*Notes by ID: 11145 -top dead
111315 -yrl ,}r•l Imigus
*SOURCE: Tr- -TransplanyL _Live stake, B =Batt and burlap, P= Polled. Tu =Tubling, R =bare Root, M= Mcchanicatly; U= Unknown p. 25
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, L[VESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10em if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Primed in the CKS -E-EP Entry Tool ver 2.3 1

Plot (continued): 1.92347 -01 -0011
map source X Y
ID Species chat (m) (m)
Last Year's Dala
ddh Ilcighl 01311
(nun) (cm) (cm)
o 11 IS YEARNS DATA
N ddh Height Dlill Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(nun) (cm) (cm) sprout
i,Mpiumllion X1111 -01r
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species y4 5Itr1ou 1118..;
[kill IClI►- IT (All stems shorter than ill isare [gonred. 11' >IOun,cxplain why tolherigh[.): II feat II_Ocnt II 10Ocin II 137crn
Species Name
ID
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBI I
TREES — DIM
snb_
Seed
c
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
so['-
saps
0 -1 cm
1 -2..'
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DIIII)
} , rem ki
/0
.3
�n 6 rb i
6
64(c 11a6w
Y I.T 5 i�lrti 1r
I
** 12e (pdr- edifcuoll'>IOcmorsubsample ?100 %. rl
:2
•. •4
NS
r6
:18
�1 10 FonnWS2,ve19.1
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSecls, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
]=unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Primed in the CVS -E"ET Envy Tool mr.. 2 3 1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot E92347 -01 -0012
VMD Year (1-5): 5 Date: JAI 0er 12oif / /
Taxonomic Standard
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM -N: 1883256 1 Datum: NAilx:
rw
t
Please till in any missing data in id correct any errois.
Role: I )ate last planted:
New laming date m /yy'' [
AMO "meI3 I Check box if plot was not
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM -E: 675 1t)r, _` UTM Zonc.
Coordinate Accuracy (in): X -Axis bearing (dcg): 100
Plot Dimensions: X: It) Y; 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right ol' X
Last Year's Data Z I'I I I S YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height D131 -1 # Height DBII Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m m 0.l lcm* 1 cm Icm* I cm sprou[
1148
Bet ula nigra
O
R
0.3
0.2
300.0
2.8 ❑
1149
Aesculus sylvatica
®
R
9.7
0.7
52.0
❑
1 150
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
4.5
2.1
400.0
6.5 ❑
1151
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
9.8
3.9
300.0
2.2 ❑
1 152
Quercus phellos
O
R
9.6
4.8
150.0
0.3 ❑
1153
Diospyros virginiann
Q
R
6.0
5.1
300.0
2.5 ❑
1 154
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
1.0
5.3
300.0
2.1 ❑
1155
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
0.6
2.1
250.0
1.6 ❑
1316
Quercus michauxii
O
R
1.4
2.3
190.0
0.7
1317
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
2.5
1.3
300.0
2.9 ❑
1318
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
(g
R
4.0
1.0
225.0
1.0 ❑
1319
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
01
R
9.0
0.5
300.0
2.5 ❑
1320
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
3.5
3.6
300.0
1.7 ❑
1321
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
4.0
8.0
172.0
0.8 ❑
429
Quercus phellos
O
R
8.0
8.0
210.0
1.0 ❑
4 .siems: 15 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) form:
X Y Height DBI -I
Species Name Source* {tat} {trt} I cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
vol e-
*Notes by ID: 113 16 -yrl: I yk rungud
*SOURCE_Tr= Transplant. 1=Live stake B =Ptah and burls P= Patted Tu= Tuhlin R =17are Root, M= Mechunically,LU =Unkn a n _p. ?S
"VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CKS -EEP Entry Tool vet 23 1
mm�
4 .siems: 15 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) form:
X Y Height DBI -I
Species Name Source* {tat} {trt} I cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
vol e-
*Notes by ID: 113 16 -yrl: I yk rungud
*SOURCE_Tr= Transplant. 1=Live stake B =Ptah and burls P= Patted Tu= Tuhlin R =17are Root, M= Mechunically,LU =Unkn a n _p. ?S
"VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =good, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CKS -EEP Entry Tool vet 23 1

Plot (continued): E92347 -01 -0012
ntap source X 1'
ID Species chat (in) in
Last Year's Data o
ddh Ilcight D1311 „
(Hint) (cm) (cnt) (nun)
H EIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Ilcight D1311 Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cnt) (cm) sprout
Ex0anadon qf tu I -o
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species I sti Want ijing* *:
L0 LI 'pt- )If(All stems shorter than Ili is are ig ,cured. II'>10cin, explain why to the tgln.l; I IUciii 11 50cin 1.1 100cttt t , 137cin
Species Name
®
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGI-i,r
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DI311
TREES — DBH
Sul).
seers
IQ c
5 0 c m-
100 cm
100 c m-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0 -1 cm
1 -2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write Dlllq
eily
/5-
10
v ame
.
—
* *Respired ifctt- oft' >1(knt or subsantple ? 100%. OT 2
3
* *4
NS
Ct
7
H
7
10 I onn W S2, v ei ),I
`SOUI {C'E:'i *r =Trap lant I--Uve stake B =B ll and hurls P= Potted. Tu= Tuhlitig, R =bare Root, M= Mechanically, U= Unknown p. 29
*VIGOR: 4= excellent, 3 =goad, 2 =fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects. GAME, LIVESTock, Other /Unknown
1= unlikely to survive year, 0 =dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DlSeased, VINE
M= missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CAS -EEP Limy Tool ver. 23.1

APPENDIX A
STREAM MORPHOLOGY SURVEY DATA
Figures 5.1 -5.9 Cross sections with Annual Overlays
e- Tables
Figures 6.1 -6.5
e- Tables
Figures 7.1 -7.9
e- Tables
Table 9.1 -9.2
Table 10.1 -10.2
Table 11.1 -11.2
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
Raw cross - section survey data spreadsheets
Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Raw longitudinal profile survey spreadsheet
Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Raw pebble count data spreadsheets
Baseline Stream Geomorph Data Summary
Cross - Section Geomorph Monitoring Data
Stream Reach Geomorph Monitoring Data
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 5.1 Cross - Sectional Profile, Annual Overlays
UT To Bear Creek #92347 -- North UT, X- Section 1
October 2014 -- Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Station J Elevation j Notes
101
100.5
too
99.5
w
99
98.5
98
97.5
97
96.5
96
XS -l: Upstream
UT to Bear Creek Cross Section 1 - Riffle
XS -l: Downstream
0 10 20 Station (ft)
30
40
50
60
—MY5 Bankroll - MY5 (10/2014) MY4 (11/2013)
MY3 (9/2012)
MY2 (8/2011)
MY1 (11/2010)
o.�
0 10 20 Station (ft)
30
40
50
60
—MY5 Bankroll - MY5 (10/2014) MY4 (11/2013)
MY3 (9/2012)
MY2 (8/2011)
MY1 (11/2010)
MYO- AsBuilt(4/2010)
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 5.2 Cross - Sectional Profile, Annual Overlays
UT To Bear Creek #92347 -- North UT, X- Section 2
October 2014 -- Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
UT to Bear Creek
EEP Project Number
92347
Cross- Section ID
XS -2, Riffle
Survey Date
10/2014
SUMMARY
DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
98.742
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area ft2
27.30
Bankfull Width (ft)
19.01
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
100.87
Flood Prone Width ft
100.00
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.10
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.13
W/D Ratio
17.28
Entrenchment Ratio
5.26
Bank Hei ht Ratio
1.00
Station I Elevations Notes
XS -2: Upstream
XS -2: Downstream
UT to Bear Creek Cross Section 2 -Riffle
101
100.5
100
99.5
c 99
"
o
o
W
AWL — — — — — —
98.5
98
97.5
97
96.5
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
96
0 10 20 Station (ft) 30 40 50
MY5 Bankfull --m—MY5 (10/2014) MY4 (11/2013) —MY3 (9/2012)
MY5 Water Surface —MY2 (8/2011) MYl (11/2010) MY0- AsBUilt(4 /2010)
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 5.2 Cross - Sectional Profile, Annual Overlays
UT To Bear Creek #92347 -- North UT, X- Section 2
October 2014 -- Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
UT to Bear Creek
EEP Project Number
92347
Cross- Section ID
110/2014
XS -3, Pool
Survey Date
—
SUMMARY
DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
99.092
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area ft2
69.33
Bankfull Width (ft)
32.65
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
102.91
Flood Prone Width ft
100.00
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.07
Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.82
W/D Ratio
15.79
Entrenchment Ratio
3.06
Bank Hei ht Ratio
1.00
I Station I Elevation I Notes I
XS -3: Upstream
* J
1 �i �.�t _
j
XS -3: Downstream
UT to Bear Creek Cross Section 3 - Pool
lot
100
99
—
c
0
F
R
98
Fj
97
96
"Pv V
95
0 10 20 30 40 Station (ft) 50 60 70 80 90 100
MY5 Bankroll - MY5 (10/2014) MY4 (11/2013) MY3 (9/2012) — — MY5 Water Surface MY2 (8/2011) - °MYI (11 /2010) MYO- AsBuilt(4 /2010)
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 5.4 Cross - Sectional Profile, Annual Overlays
UT To Bear Creek #92347 -- North UT, X- Section 4
October 2014 -- Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name I UT to Bear Creek
EEP Project Number 92347
Cross- Section ID I XS -4, Riffle
Survev Date 10/2014
Bankfull Elevation ft
99.58
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area ft2
31.56
Bankfull Width (ft)
19.11
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
102.14
Flood Prone Width ft
100.00
Rankfnll Mean Ilrnth MI
1.40
5.23
1.00
Station 0 1 Elevation I Notes
T60l I LH
101
100.5
100
99.5
w
F 99
0
F
0
d
W 98.5
98
97.5
97
96.5
96
XS -4:
UT to Bear Creek Cross Section 4 - Riffle
Downstream
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Station (ft)
�MY5 Bankroll = MY5 (10/2014) -MY4 (11/2013) MY3 (9/2012) -MY2 (8/2011) MYI (11/2010) _NI
YO- AeBuilt (4 /2010)
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 5.5 Cross - Sectional Profile, Annual Overlays
UT To Bear Creek #92347 -- North UT, X- Section 5
October 2014 -- Monitoring Year 5 of 5
I Proiect Name I UT to Bear Creek I
Cross- Section ID I XS -5, Pool
Survev Date 10/2014
Elevation ft
98.76
Cross - Sectional Area ft2
28.22
Width (ft)
22.78
Ine Area Elevation ft
101.87
Ine Width ft
220.00
Mean Depth ft
1.59
Max Depth ft
3.11
io
14.36
ment Ratio
9.66
vht Ratio
1.01
Station n I Elevation Notes
�7S7STiT� d
XS -5:
101
100
99
c
0
a
u
w 98
97
96
UT to Bear Creek Cross Section 5 - Pool
XS -5: Downstream
95 1 1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (ft)
�MY5 Ban16ull --6—MYS (10/2014) MY4 (11/2013) MY3 (9/2012)
MY5 Water Surface MY2 (8/2011) MYI (11/2010) MYO- Mftilt(4 /2010)
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 5.6 Cross - Sectional Profile, Annual Overlays
UT To Bear Creek #92347 -- North UT, X- Section 6
October 2014 -- Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
UT to Bear Creek
EEP Project Number
92347
Cross- Section ID
110/2014
XS -6, Riffle
Survey Date
99.5
c
0
F
R
99
SUMMARY
DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
99.58
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area ft2
23.89
Bankfull Width (ft)
20.58
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
101.48
Flood Prone Width ft
220.00
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.11
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.89
W/D Ratio
18.47
Entrenchment Ratio
10.69
Bank Hei ht Ratio
1.00
Station n I Elevation Notes
XS -6: Upstream
s
XS -6: Downstream
UT to Bear Creek Cross Section 6 - Riffle
101
100.5
100
— — — — — — —
99.5
c
0
F
R
99
�j
98.5
98
97.5
97
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (1't)
MY5 Bankfull MYS (10/2014) MY4 (11/2013) -MY3 (9/2012) -MY2 (8/2011) MYl (11/2010) MYO- AsBuilt(4 /2010)
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 5.7 Cross - Sectional Profile, Annual Overlays
UT To Bear Creek #92347 -- South UT, X- Section 7
October 2014 -- Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
UT to Bear Creek
EEP Project Number
92347
Cross - Section ID
XS -7, Riffle
110/2014
Survey Date
99
SUMMARY
DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
99.98
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft2
8.86
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.76
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
101.45
Flood Prone Width ft
100.00
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.60
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.46
W/D Ratio
14.59
Entrenchment Ratio
11.42
Bank Hei ht Ratio
1.00
I Station I Elevation Notes I
XS
XS
XS
XS
XS -7: Upstream
XS -7: Downstream
UT to Bear Creek Cross Section 7 - Riffle
101
100.5
100
c
0
F
w
W 99.5
99
98.5
IAU
98
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station (ft)
�MY5 Banidu0 mm*�MY5 (10/2014) MY4 (11/2013) -MY3 (9/2012) MY2 (8/2011) MYl (11/2010) MYO- AsBUitt(4 /2010)
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 5.8 Cross - Sectional Profile, Annual Overlays
UT To Bear Creek #92347 -- South UT, X- Section 8
October 2014 -- Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
UT to Bear Creek
EEP Project Number
92347
Cross - Section ID
XS-8, Riffle
110/2014
Survey Date
99.5
SUMMARY
DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
98.37
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft2
9.79
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.78
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
99.89
Flood Prone Width ft
50.00
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.80
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.52
W/D Ratio
12.23
Entrenchment Ratio
5.11
Bank Hei ht Ratio
1.00
I Station I Elevation Notes I
XS -8: Upstream
XS -8: Downstream
UT to Bear Creek Cross Section 8 - Riffle
101
100.5
100
99.5
w
°0 99
'L
R
i
j 98.5
98
97.5
97
96.5
96
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Station (ft)
�MY5 Bankfull MY5 (10/2014) MY4 (11/2013) MY3 (9/2012) MY2 (8/2011) -MY1 (11/2010) MYO- AsBuilt(4 /2010)
LIT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 5.9 Cross - Sectional Profile, Annual Overlays
UT To Bear Creek #92347 -- South UT, X- Section 9
October 2014 -- Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
UT to Bear Creek
EEP Project Number
92347
Cross- Section ID
110/2014
XS -9, Pool
Survey Date
r 98
R
i
d
fs7
97
SUMMARY
DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
96.96
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
14.72
Bankfull Width (ft)
20.41
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
99.50
Flood Prone Width ft
50.00
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.10
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.54
W/D Ratio
18.56
Entrenchment Ratio
2.45
Bank Hei ht Ratio
1.01
I Station I Elevation I Notes I
XS -9: Upstream
XS -9: Downstream
UT to Bear Creek Cross Section 9 - Pool
101
100
99
w
a
r 98
R
i
d
fs7
97
96
95
94
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (ft)
�MY5 BankfuH �MY5 (10/2014) -MY4 (11/2013) -MY3 (9/2012) -MY2 (8/2011) -MY1 (11/2010) MYO- AsBuilt(4/2010)
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Appendix D -- eTable
Cross - Sectional Profile Survey Data: 2010 -2014
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 -- XSEC -1
MYO- AsBuilt (4/2010)
MY1 (11/2010)
MY2 (8/2011)
MY3 (9/2012)
MY4 (11/2013)
MY5 (10/2014) - XSEC -1
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Rel.Elev
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
416.97
TLP
100.00
0.00
99.95
BLP
0.00
99.95
BLP
0.00
99.94
BLP
0.00
99.92
BLP
0.00
99.92
BLP
0.10
416.90
BLP
99.93
3.80
99.18
0.70
99.65
3.80
99.20
3.50
99.26
3.11
99.33
2.66
416.34
99.36
8.70
99.01
3.70
99.20
8.90
99.00
6.50
99.10
11.96
99.02
TLB
6.30
416.05
99.08
11.801
99.08
TLB
1 7.30
99.06
1 12.00
99.05
1
10.00
99.05
1
15.321
97.85
9.59
415.97
98.99
14.30
98.29
10.40
99.04
14.10
98.35
12.40
98.94
16.81
96.95
11.67
416.03
TLB
99.06
16.00
97.81
11.70
99.07
TLB
15.30
97.79
14.30
98.29
19.50
96.99
13.08
415.58
98.60
16.60
97.06
13.90
98.41
16.00
97.76
16.00
97.81
23.45
96.94
14.76
415.13
98.16
18.50
96.84
THW
15.40
97.80
16.80
97.02
16.60
97.24
25.38
97.49
16.15
414.70
97.73
20.20
97.08
16.00
97.68
18.501
96.87
18.00
96.96
29.83
98.85
TRB
17.33
413.92
96.95
21.501
96.87
1 16.30
97.081
19.90
97.08
19.001
97.08
1 37.52
99.09
19.02
413.76
ITHW
96.78
22.70
96.89
17.70
96.83
21.00
97.04
20.50
97.29
49.481
98.85
1
20.13
414.00
97.03
24.20
97.06
19.00
96.91
22.30
96.93
22.30
97.19
58.6SI
99.92
ITRP
22.57
413.97
97.00
25.40
97.20
20.80
97.08
24.80
25.80
27.80
29.10
31.30
32.40
34.90
36.70
40.301
43.00
48.00
52.50
58.90
58.90
97.23
97.45
98.23
98.72
99.25
99.03
98.93
98.69
99.02
98.84
98.88
99.17
99.75
99.88
BRP
JTRP
24.00
25.50
26.60
28.50
30.201
33.00
35.50
38.50
42.30
45.40
48.501
52.00
55.50
58.90
58.90
97.30
97.51
97.98
98.52
99.08
99.07
98.88
99.06
98.91
98.90
98.95
99.13
99.24
99.76
99.88
BRP
TRP
1
1
24.47
26.49
28.80
31.34
34.11
38.15
43.57
48.551
52.99
59.35
59.79
414.06
414.83
415.46
416.05
415.99
416.06
415.75
415.84
416.07
416.75
416.84
TRB
BRP
TRP
97.09
97.86
98.49
99.07
99.02
99.08
98.78
98.86
99.10
99.78
99.86
27.40
98.18
22.40
96.96
30.30
99.09
1 23.80
97.00
31.80
99.20
TRB
24.90
97.23
33.60
99.08
25.70
97.50
36.20
98.73
27.00
98.16
37.70
98.98
27.90
98.24
42.60
98.89
30.90
99.28
48.90
98.93
32.10
99.05
BKF
52.50
99.20
35.00
98.90
57.00
99.51
36.50
98.67
58.90
99.78
BRP
37.60
98.91
58.90
99.91
JTRP
40.70
98.971
44.00
98.81
48.10
98.87
52.40
99.19
56.00
99.22
58.90
99.79
BRP
58.901
99.88
TRP
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Appendix D -- eTable
Cross - Sectional Profile Survey Data: 2010 -2014
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 -- XSEC -2
MYO- AsBuilt (4 /2010)
MY1 (11/2010)
MY2 (8/2011)
MY3 (9/2012)
MY4 (11/2013)
MY5 (10/2014) -- XSEC -2
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Rel.Elev
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
415.77
TLP
100.00
0.00
99.94
BLP
0.00
99.91
BLP
0.00
99.91
BLP
0.00
99.92
BLP
0.00
99.92
BLP
1.11
415.57
99.79
4.60
99.10
2.90
99.22
3.90
99.12
2.00
99.46
5.73
98.85
3.58
414.83
99.06
8.60
98.62
6.20
98.91
7.00
98.87
5.00
99.07
11.98
98.46
6.01
414.64
98.87
12.30
98.46
8.70
98.59
9.10
98.56
9.00
98.60
16.26
98.84
9.15
414.31
98.53
14.70
98.73
12.70
98.34
12.80
98.37
13.00
98.51
20.79
97.47
TLB
12.30
414.19
98.42
16.10
98.91
TLB
16.00
98.90
TLB
14.80
98.75
TLB
14.50
98.88
22.50
96.85
14.74
414.57
98.80
17.80
98.68
17.90
98.59
17.50
98.72
16.60
98.91
25.83
96.70
16.47
414.66
TLB
98.89
19.00
98.14
20.20
97.52
18.90
98.17
19.00
98.02
30.50
97.31
TRB
19.16
413.77
98.00
20.30
97.49
21.70
97.12
20.20
97.54
21.00
97.42
35.26
98.73
21.17
413.19
97.42
21.40
97.31
22.80
96.98
21.60
97.15
22.50
97.12
45.48
98.81
22.96
412.47
96.69
22.00
97.15
rock
23.60
96.76
22.20
96.96
25.00
96.99
45.63
98.77
25.04
412.48
96.71
22.70
96.86
24.90
96.71
24.00
96.77
26.50
96.99
53.13
100.33
TRP
26.85
412.62
96.84
24.20
96.77
26.50
96.77
25.60
96.71
28.50
96.88
28.42
412.45
LEW
96.67
25.30
96.69
THW
27.90
96.81
27.50
96.81
30.20
97.09
29.14
412.38
THW
96.61
26.30
96.77
29.90
96.74
29.80
96.70
32.00
97.90
30.41
412.51
REW
96.73
27.60
96.81
31.20
97.64
30.50
97.64
34.50
98.62
31.80
413.24
97.47
29.30
96.74
34.10
98.49
32.20
98.04
38.00
98.76
33.45
413.89
98.12
30.10
96.71
35.60
98.75
TRB
33.90
98.48
42.00
98.65
34.63
414.28
98.51
31.30
97.66
38.90
98.73
35.40
98.74
46.00
98.84
35.48
414.51
TRB
98.74
33.60
98.38
42.80
98.71
37.80
98.74
49.00
99.43
38.80
414.42
98.65
35.50
98.76
TRB
45.80
98.81
42.00
98.68
53.10
100.30
BRP
41.78
414.44
98.67
37.20
98.72
47.60
99.19
46.30
98.78
53.10
100.35
TRP
45.26
414.57
98.80
41.90
98.66
50.70
99.81
50.10
99.65
48.99
414.73
98.96
45.60
98.86
53.00
100.26
BRP
53.10
100.26
BRP
51.49
415.49
99.72
49.70
99.56
53.00
100.35
TRP
53.10
100.33
TRP
53.74
416.01
100.23
53.00
100.29
BRP
53.89
416.10
TRP
100.33
53.00
100.35
TRP
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Appendix D -- eTable
Cross - Sectional Profile Survey Data: 2010 -2014
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 -- XSEC -3
MYO- AsBuilt (4/2010)
MY1 (11/2010)
MY2 (8/2011)
MY3 (9/2012)
MY4 (11/2013)
MY5 (10/2014) -- XSEC -3
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Rel.Elev
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
413.86
TLP
100.00
0.00
99.88
BLP
0.00
99.88
BLP
0.00
99.90
BLP
0.00
99.90
BLP
0.00
99.90
BLP
0.51
413.78
99.92
4.80
99.53
1.90
99.66
2.20
99.69
6.90
99.53
7.16
99.37
3.62
413.58
99.72
9.20
99.30
5.60
99.59
4.80
99.62
10.70
99.30
14.13
99.43
7.21
413.29
99.43
12.50
99.24
8.80
99.38
8.00
99.46
15.40
99.34
20.92
99.03
TLB
10.69
413.12
99.26
17.50
99.28
12.40
99.29
13.00
99.34
18.90
99.33
24.79
97.97
13.93
413.18
99.32
20.00
99.33
TLB
16.10
99.31
17.00
99.30
20.80
99.36
25.43
95.91
17.72
412.99
99.13
22.00
98.76
18.80
99.31
19.40
99.31
22.20
98.76
30.58
95.96
21.22
412.95
TLB
99.09
24.10
98.12
20.20
99.26
TLB
21.00
99.30
24.60
98.11
34.43
96.08
23.08
412.55
98.69
25.10
96.20
21.90
98.73
22.50
98.71
25.10
96.18
37.11
98.57
25.14
411.95
98.09
27.80
95.83
23.50
98.21
23.90
98.31
28.10
95.60
40.25
99.34
TRB
26.35
411.74
97.87
28.90
95.70
24.00
98.14
24.30
98.17
30.00
95.40
53.43
99.48
29.06
409.17
95.31
29.80
95.62
24.40
96.37
25.10
97.97
32.50
95.56
65.31
99.42
32.32
409.56
95.69
31.70
95.44
THW
27.20
96.01
25.50
96.18
34.20
95.96
78.96
100.72
TRP
34.21
409.57
95.71
32.90
95.59
29.70
95.54
27.00
96.02
36.20
96.39
40.69
410.84
LEW
96.98
33.70
95.95
31.00
95.50
28.20
95.86
36.80
98.58
43.50
409.13
THW
95.27
35.50
96.40
31.80
95.61
29.70
95.68
39.50
99.34
46.82
410.85
REW
96.99
36.30
98.50
33.10
95.68
31.00
95.46
41.80
99.42
48.00
412.33
98.46
37.00
98.66
33.70
96.06
32.70
95.62
47.90
99.48
49.92
411.94
98.08
40.30
99.39
TRB
34.60
96.22
34.30
96.10
53.70
99.50
51.54
412.25
98.39
44.40
99.41
36.00
96.42
35.90
96.37
58.20
99.56
53.87
413.13
TRB
99.27
46.30
99.40
36.50
98.57
36.20
98.09
61.80
99.39
57.97
412.89
99.03
49.00
99.45
37.10
98.71
36.60
98.52
70.70
99.72
59.55
413.34
99.47
53.10
99.39
39.30
99.23
37.60
98.74
78.80
100.48
BRP
64.30
414.03
100.17
57.30
99.48
40.70
99.44
TRB
39.00
99.19
78.80
100.60
TRP
67.81
413.34
99.47
61.30
99.32
44.10
99.48
40.20
99.33
71.21
413.45
99.58
63.40
99.49
46.50
99.49
42.00
99.35
73.66
413.19
99.32
66.00
99.36
49.70
99.55
48.00
99.49
78.19
413.18
99.32
72.00
99.85
53.00
99.40
54.00
99.53
82.64
413.20
99.34
74.70
100.16
57.80
99.48
59.00
99.63
87.49
413.44
99.57
78.60
100.48
BRP
61.10
99.29
63.00
99.59
90.79
413.67
99.81
78.60
100.61
TRP
66.50
99.38
66.70
99.37
95.42
413.98
100.12
71.60
99.78
70.00
99.69
97.75
414.18
TRP
100.31
78.60
100.49
BRP
74.00
100.09
78.60
100.61
TRP
78.80
100.47
BRP
78.80
100.61
TRP
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Appendix D -- eTable
Cross - Sectional Profile Survey Data: 2010 -2014
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 -- XSEC -4
MYO- AsBuilt (4 /2010)
MY1 (11/2010)
MY2 (8/2011)
MY3 (9/2012)
MY4 (11/2013)
MY5 (10/2014)--XS C-4
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Stationj
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Rel.elev
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
0.00
2.40
6.30
10.90
15.00
18.30
22.70
23.90
25.90
28.50
30.50
31.60
32.30
33.40
34.20
35.40
36.70
37.70
38.50
39.80
41.20
43.00
43.90
47.00
50.70
54.80
60.00
69.00
69.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
413.34
TLP
100.00
0.00
99.88
BLP
99.87
BLP
0.00
99.86
BLP
0.00
99.89
BLP
0.00
99.89
BLP
0.12
413.28
BLP
99.94
3.20
99.74
99.77
6.20
99.79
2.50
99.75
11.73
99.67
3.98
413.16
99.82
6.40
99.81
99.82
12.80
99.60
7.00
99.79
21.81
99.32
7.96
413.11
99.76
9.10
99.65
99.44
18.50
99.49
12.00
99.76
23.54
99.53
TLB
11.91
413.02
99.67
10.70
99.46
99.60
22.50
99.43
16.00
99.48
26.96
98.32
17.41
412.73
99.38
11.60
99.71
99.42
23.90
99.66
TLB
20.00
99.37
28.62
97.52
21.84
412.80
99.46
14.00
99.69
99.44
25.90
99.12
22.50
99.55
32.72
97.23
24.40
412.95
99.60
16.30
99.51
99.66
27.90
98.15
24.00
99.64
37.13
97.18
24.42
412.92
TLB
99.58
18.20
99.43
99.12
28.90
97.69
25.50
99.11
38.37
98.03
1 26.05
412.47
99.13
20.20
99.34
97.67
30.90
97.39
27.40
98.28
42.93
99.37
TRB
27.40
411.78
98.44
22.00
99.36
97.47
32.10
97.32
28.50
97.70
52.35
99.47
28.71
410.80
97.46
23.50
99.66
TLB
97.33
34.10
97.40
30.10
97.52
61.80
99.38
30.51
410.63
97.28
24.70
99.48
97.32
35.70
97.52
31.80
97.45
68.63
100.11
TRP
32.19
410.70
97.36
27.40
98.33
97.61
37.20
97.41
33.30
97.51
34.50
410.66
97.32
28.20
97.79
97.53
37.80
97.48
35.00
97.70
36.75
410.35
THW
97.01
28.80
97.58
97.45
40.00
98.58
36.80
97.59
38.49
411.07
97.72
30.50
97.40
97.30
42.20
99.35
TRB
38.00
98.18
40.43
411.89
98.54
31.60
97.36
97.38
44.90
99.67
40.00
98.79
43.53
412.92
TRB
99.58
33.00
97.44
98.10
49.00
99.78
42.50
99.55
46.36
413.07
99.73
34.20
97.41
98.57
52.30
99.67
45.00
99.75
50.37
412.91
99.57
34.90
97.37
99.10
58.10
99.82
49.00
99.78
55.20
412.87
99.52
35.60
97.48
99.58
TRB
62.70
99.90
53.00
99.59
60.01
413.01
99.67
36.90
97.31
THW
99.65
69.00
100.11
BRP
57.00
99.77
65.09
413.23
99.89
37.80
97.36
99.73
69.00
100.19
TRP
61.00
99.76
69.40
413.44
100.10
38.60
98.22
99.70
69.00
69.00
100.13
BRP
69.94
413.53
TRP
100.19
39.90
98.61
99.49
100.19
TRP
42.00
99.37
99.67
43.80
99.66
100.09
BRP
45.60
99.69
TRB
100.18
TRP
47.60
99.73
50.90
99.87
54.00
99.60
56.20
99.51
59.30
99.68
63.10
99.91
67.60
100.07
69.00
100.18
TRP
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Appendix D -- eTable
Cross - Sectional Profile Survey Data: 2010 -2014
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 -- XSEC -5
MYO- AsBuilt (4/2010)
MY1 (11/2010)
MY2 (8/2011)
MY3 (9/2012)
MY4 (11/2013)
MY5 (10/2014) -- XSEC -5
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notesi
Rel.Elev
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
410.87
TLP
100.00
0.00
99.92
BLP
0.00
99.90
BLP
0.00
99.95
BLP
0.00
99.98
BLP
0.00
99.98
BLP
0.22
410.72
BLP
99.85
2.70
99.42
2.60
99.42
2.30
99.56
2.70
99.52
6.98
99.72
3.00
410.36
99.49
4.60
99.27
4.60
99.20
4.50
99.50
7.90
99.63
19.66
98.66
TLB
6.84
410.50
99.63
5.70
99.43
7.10
99.60
7.00
99.67
1
12.50
1 99.47
22.86
1 98.02
1 10.27
410.26
99.38
7.10
99.64
10.10
99.25
10.10
99.27
17.10
99.00
23.53
96.09
14.63
410.17
99.30
9.20
99.38
12.80
99.43
12.00
99.37
19.60
98.79
26.55
95.70
17.53
409.77
98.89
9.90
99.22
15.60
99.12
14.60
99.37
21.50
97.94
31.31
96.23
19.98
409.32
TLB
98.45
11.60
99.26
18.80
98.82
TLB
17.20
99.00
23.20
97.56
32.49
98.19
20.60
409.05
98.18
13.80
99.36
20.50
98.28
19.80
98.75
23.50
96.19
35.74
98.74
TRB
22.43
408.69
97.82
16.00
99.04
21.50
97.99
20.90
98.14
26.10
95.72
53.29
100.09
TRP
22.81
407.41
96.54
18.30
98.84
22.60
97.77
21.60
98.01
27.30
95.49
23.94
406.79
LEW
95.92
19.00
98.82
TLB
23.00
96.79
22.90
97.82
29.90
96.09
25.47
406.78
95.91
20.10
98.54
23.20
96.28
23.20
96.39
31.10
97.98
26.35
406.53
95.66
21.40
98.15
24.80
95.85
24.50
96.05
34.20
98.60
28.19
406.58
THW
95.71
21.70
97.80
26.60
95.32
25.90
95.82
37.20
99.01
29.73
406.92
96.05
22.50
97.50
28.40
95.59
26.70
95.53
40.50
99.19
31.16
407.52
96.65
23.40
97.51
29.30
95.80
27.90
95.56
46.60
99.38
31.33
408.86
REW
97.99
23.70
96.14
29.80
96.09
29.00
95.82
53.00
99.80
BRP
33.56
409.17
98.30
25.20
95.80
30.80
96.24
29.60
96.03
53.00
99.91
TRP
35.74
409.64
98.76
26.60
95.35
THW
31.30
97.91
30.70
96.55
38.68
409.92
TRB
99.05
28.10
95.58
34.70
98.62
31.40
97.95
42.10
410.32
99.45
28.90
95.59
38.00
99.10
32.60
98.09
46.56
410.22
99.35
29.50
95.94
42.40
99.23
34.00
98.55
52.21
410.54
99.67
30.20
97.71
47.10
99.50
36.00
98.82
53.47
410.90
TRP
100.03
32.30
97.83
49.70
99.60
38.20
99.15
35.40
98.78
53.10
99.77
BRP
41.00
99.22
38.30
99.12
TRB
53.10
99.87
TRP
43.60
99.41
40.30
99.18
46.10
99.49
43.10
99.28
48.50
99.69
46.90
99.52
53.10
99.80
BRP
51.10
99.71
53.10
99.91
TRP
53.10
99.73
BRP
53.10
99.87
1 TRP
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Appendix D -- eTable
Cross - Sectional Profile Survey Data: 2010 -2014
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 -- XSEC -6
MYO- AsBuilt (4/2010)
MY1 (11/2010)
MY2 (8/2011)
MY3 (9/2012)
MY4 (11/2013)
MY5 (10/2014) -- XSEC -6
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Rel.Elev
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
409.73
TLP
100.00
0.00
99.88
BLP
0.00
99.87
BLP
0.00
99.89
BLP
0.00
99.87
BLP
0.00
99.87
BLP
0.20
409.47
BLP
99.74
2.80
100.13
2.80
100.12
7.60
99.66
5.00
100.08
13.17
99.64
3.53
409.63
99.90
6.00
99.93
7.00
99.84
12.90
99.71
10.00
99.78
22.20
99.49
TLB
8.62
409.26
99.53
8.00
99.57
8.90
99.71
16.10
99.73
15.00
99.73
25.17
98.54
14.10
409.46
99.73
9.40
99.80
13.00
99.69
18.20
99.82
20.00
99.67
26.39
98.15
18.99
409.44
99.71
12.80
99.82
15.40
99.70
20.60
99.59
23.00
99.33
29.20
97.66
21.51
409.32
TLB
99.58
13.10
99.68
17.70
99.82
21.90
99.69
24.70
98.64
36.11
97.85
22.93
408.84
99.10
16.40
99.77
20.80
99.57
TLB
24.50
98.61
26.00
98.23
37.85
98.35
24.92
407.99
98.26
17.90
99.80
22.50
99.53
26.00
98.00
27.70
97.93
38.24
98.53
TRB
26.75
407.73
98.00
20.20
99.56
24.40
98.67
27.30
97.79
28.60
97.78
43.14
99.82
29.09
407.42
THW
97.69
21.30
99.62
TLB
26.10
97.99
28.00
97.77
30.40
98.09
44.91
99.75
30.80
407.27
97.54
22.50
99.43
27.00
97.84
30.10
98.11
32.50
98.04
60.46
100.49
TRP
32.54
407.74
98.01
24.30
98.62
28.30
97.72
31.30
98.07
33.80
98.15
34.32
407.96
98.23
25.00
98.53
29.90
97.87
33.00
98.10
35.00
98.35
36.39
407.69
97.96
25.60
98.02
31.90
98.14
34.20
98.37
36.30
98.22
37.61
408.44
98.70
27.60
97.81
33.20
98.05
35.80
98.16
37.50
98.48
39.40
409.07
99.34
28.30
97.69
34.30
98.33
37.10
98.45
39.20
99.29
42.09
409.66
TRB
99.93
29.90
97.88
35.50
98.23
39.90
99.57
41.60
99.93
44.07
409.71
99.98
31.30
98.10
36.50
98.26
41.60
99.95
44.50
100.04
47.02
409.56
99.83
33.40
98.02
THW
37.70
98.65
45.00
100.10
48.00
99.95
50.54
409.59
99.86
35.00
98.26
39.50
99.50
50.90
99.77
52.00
99.89
53.24
409.81
100.08
36.60
98.21
41.50
99.90
55.50
100.05
60.40
100.42
BRP
56.83
409.84
100.11
37.70
98.63
43.30
100.03
TRB
60.40
100.36
BRP
60.40
100.54
TRP
60.83
409.91
BRP
100.18
39.30
99.31
46.00
100.18
60.40
100.55
TRP
61.31
410.24
TRP
100.51
40.50
99.71
49.60
99.74
42.40
100.00
TRB
52.60
100.14
46.90
100.11
54.90
99.89
48.50
100.19
58.30
100.30
52.70
100.08
60.50
100.44
BRP
53.60
99.88
60.50
100.55
TRP
55.90
100.15
59.00
100.30
60.50
100.39
BRP
60.50
100.54
TRP
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Appendix D -- eTable
Cross - Sectional Profile Survey Data: 2010 -2014
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 -- XSEC -7
MYO- AsBuilt (4/2010)
MY1 (11/2010)
MY2 (8/2011)
MY3 (9/2012)
MY4 (11/2013)
MY5 (10/2014) -- XSEC -7
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Rel.Elev
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
422.41
TLP
100.00
0.00
99.84
BLP
0.00
99.87
BLP
0.00
99.86
BLP
0.00
99.87
BLP
0.00
99.97
BLP
3.46
422.18
99.77
3.50
99.77
3.00
99.82
4.00
99.81
4.00
99.90
4.96
99.96
8.76
422.28
99.86
6.20
99.80
5.80
99.68
7.50
99.87
11.00
99.74
11.87
99.53
13.73
422.40
99.99
9.90
99.73
9.80
99.71
11.00
99.76
14.00
99.82
18.03
99.43
TLB
15.77
422.26
99.85
12.70
99.75
13.00
99.78
14.20
99.80
16.70
99.79
19.15
99.03
17.70
422.40
99.99
15.00
99.79
15.40
99.78
TLB
17.20
99.76
17.70
99.81
20.08
98.16
18.02
422.39
TLB
99.98
16.90
99.74
17.30
99.76
17.60
99.74
18.85
99.48
21.05
98.17
19.61
422.01
99.60
17.50
99.76
TLB
18.10
99.69
18.50
99.53
19.85
99.09
21.88
98.47
20.50
421.27
98.86
18.60
99.46
20.00
98.95
19.80
99.09
20.80
98.41
23.13
99.13
22.07
420.93
THW
98.52
19.80
98.94
20.40
98.59
20.40
98.58
21.60
98.34
26.13
99.78
TRB
23.23
421.05
98.64
20.20
98.49
20.80
98.55
21.00
98.35
22.40
98.38
33.06
99.68
24.22
421.85
99.44
20.80
98.54
21.20
98.39
21.70
98.29
23.10
99.00
38.43
99.75
26.46
422.46
TRB
100.05
21.50
98.51
21.90
98.28
22.50
98.35
24.70
99.39
42.54
99.92
30.61
422.21
99.80
22.00
98.48
THW
22.30
98.38
22.80
98.57
26.20
99.77
45.12
100.39
TRP
35.88
422.29
99.87
22.60
98.57
22.60
98.55
23.40
99.07
29.00
99.86
41.12
422.59
100.18
23.10
98.95
22.80
98.57
24.90
99.40
34.00
99.73
45.69
422.78
100.37
25.20
99.59
23.40
99.08
26.00
99.73
38.00
99.74
46.26
423.02
TRP
100.60
25.70
99.69
TRB
24.90
99.41
28.30
99.76
41.00
99.99
27.10
99.70
26.20
99.73
32.00
99.72
45.50
100.24
BRP
31.30
99.76
29.60
99.75
35.70
99.78
45.50
100.35
TRP
34.70
99.73
32.50
99.69
39.30
99.72
37.50
99.62
36.00
99.74
42.20
99.88
39.50
99.77
39.70
99.78
45.50
100.17
BRP
41.30
99.96
41.60
99.90
45.50
100.35
TRP
41.90
99.86
43.90
100.07
42.70
99.81
45.50
100.29
BRP
43.50
100.07
1 45.50
100.35
1 TRP
45.40
100.26
BRP
45.40
100.34
TRP
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Appendix D -- eTable
Cross - Sectional Profile Survey Data: 2010 -2014
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 -- XSEC -8
MYO- AsBuilt (4/2010)
MY1 (11/2010)
MY2 (8/2011)
MY3 (9/2012)
MY4 (11/2013)
MY5 (10/2014) -- XSEC -8
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Rel.Elev
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
413.94
TLP
100.00
0.00
99.80
BLP
0.00
99.78
BLP
0.00
99.83
BLP
0.00
99.87
BLP
0.00
99.92
BLP
0.13
413.83
BLP
99.89
2.40
99.67
3.50
99.45
4.00
99.28
4.10
99.38
5.29
98.79
3.66
413.35
99.41
5.00
99.18
8.10
98.67
8.70
98.55
7.50
98.70
9.56
98.26
9.33
412.62
98.68
8.60
98.68
11.40
98.44
11.10
98.29
11.60
98.37
12.50
98.29
TLB
11.92
412.38
98.44
10.70
98.50
12.90
98.28
13.40
98.06
13.00
98.31
14.53
97.40
13.13
412.47
TLB
98.54
11.70
98.46
TLB
13.80
97.98
15.60
96.90
15.10
97.49
15.13
96.80
14.22
412.14
98.20
13.20
98.22
14.50
97.71
16.90
96.89
15.90
96.90
16.85
96.61
15.35
411.43
97.49
14.10
97.92
14.90
97.51
18.10
97.07
17.00
96.89
18.71
96.91
15.91
410.66
96.72
14.90
97.48
15.50
97.20
19.00
97.45
18.40
97.08
19.36
97.40
17.33
410.79
THW
96.85
15.60
97.10
16.00
96.91
19.50
97.54
19.60
97.57
21.62
98.02
TRB
18.60
411.32
97.38
16.00
97.02
TWG
16.60
96.93
20.90
98.09
21.50
98.30
27.48
98.11
19.82
411.32
97.38
16.80
97.08
17.70
97.00
23.20
98.27
23.00
98.34
33.51
98.57
22.91
412.31
TRB
98.37
17.70
97.10
18.50
97.17
26.70
98.37
28.90
98.54
41.48
98.79
25.16
412.44
98.50
18.60
97.16
19.10
97.50
31.40
98.42
31.00
98.50
28.70
412.40
98.46
19.10
97.49
20.10
97.78
34.60
98.55
34.00
98.74
32.34
412.77
98.83
20.30
97.90
21.70
98.32
41.40
98.81
BRP
37.00
98.77
35.46
413.07
99.14
21.70
98.35
25.20
98.38
41.40
99.02
TRP
41.60
98.84
BRP
39.40
412.79
98.85
22.70
98.40
TRB
28.70
98.41
TRB
41.60
99.03
TRP
43.11
412.79
BRP
98.85
25.40
98.43
31.40
98.44
43.59
413.17
TRP
99.23
28.60
98.45
35.00
98.65
31.10
98.47
39.60
98.67
33.80
98.75
41.50
98.79
BRP
36.50
98.70
41.50
99.01
TRP
39.20
98.65
41.50
98.81
BRP
41.50
99.02
TRP
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Appendix D -- eTable
Cross - Sectional Profile Survey Data: 2010 -2014
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347 -- XSEC -9
MYO- AsBuilt (4/2010)
MY1 (11/2010)
MY2 (8/2011)
MY3 (9/2012)
MY4 (11/2013)
MY5 (10/2014) -- XSEC -9
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Station
Elevation
Notes
Rel.Elev
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
100.00
TLP
0.00
414.26
TLP
100.00
0.00
99.83
BLP
0.00
99.84
BLP
0.00
99.83
BLP
0.00
99.88
BLP
0.00
99.88
BLP
0.06
414.02
BLP
99.76
4.80
98.91
4.70
98.92
3.60
99.05
2.50
99.36
4.97
98.67
3.11
413.41
99.15
9.00
98.42
8.60
98.82
8.20
98.51
5.50
98.83
10.01
98.30
6.92
412.93
98.67
13.70
98.07
TLB
12.50
98.11
14.10
98.06
8.00
98.68
13.81
97.84
TLB
10.56
412.62
98.36
15.30
97.61
14.50
97.78
15.90
97.35
11.00
98.38
16.12
96.92
14.27
412.05
TLB
97.79
16.60
97.06
15.90
97.36
17.00
96.52
14.00
98.10
16.80
95.23
14.35
412.10
97.84
17.30
96.49
17.00
96.56
17.80
95.55
16.00
97.59
20.61
94.79
15.62
411.50
97.24
17.90
95.62
17.40
95.83
19.40
94.98
THW
17.00
96.75
21.02
95.81
16.94
411.07
96.81
19.20
95.18
TWG
18.20
95.20
21.70
95.38
17.90
95.39
23.80
96.24
17.91
409.52
95.26
19.90
95.16
18.80
94.94
23.40
96.37
19.30
94.91
24.52
97.11
TRB
20.01
408.67
THW
94.41
21.00
95.25
19.80
94.93
27.10
97.33
21.30
95.30
26.71
97.55
21.03
409.08
94.82
21.90
95.62
20.70
95.06
32.80
97.75
23.20
95.78
32.81
97.84
23.45
409.91
95.65
22.80
95.77
21.70
95.50
38.10
97.90
27.00
97.33
38.79
98.19
24.82
410.33
96.07
23.30
95.95
22.40
95.72
44.10
98.04
30.00
97.56
48.44
98.41
27.64
411.22
96.96
23.70
96.38
23.00
95.86
53.60
98.25
33.80
97.75
55.89
98.84
30.48
411.48
97.22
24.90
96.50
23.60
96.41
59.60
98.43
37.60
97.88
34.68
411.95
TRB
97.69
25.80
96.99
24.40
96.44
63.30
98.61
BRP
43.60
98.06
40.08
411.97
97.71
26.80
97.35
26.70
97.40
63.30
98.74
TRP
48.80
98.35
45.59
412.51
98.25
28.70
97.54
28.90
97.48
53.10
98.30
51.13
412.51
98.25
33.10
97.82
TRB
31.70
97.68
59.20
98.46
56.18
412.71
98.45
39.70
97.98
35.00
97.86
TRB
63.30
98.70
BRP
63.33
412.93
98.67
44.50
98.08
38.30
97.89
63.30
98.76
TRP
64.23
412.94
TRP
98.68
48.80
98.35
43.70
98.04
53.40
98.31
48.90
98.34
58.50
98.40
51.50
98.40
62.00
98.54
53.50
98.31
63.20
98.67
BRP
56.70
98.45
63.20
98.78
TRP
61.10
98.49
63.10
98.67
BRP
63.10
98.78
TRP
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Appendix D
Figure 6.1 Longitudinal Profile & Annual Overlays
UT Bear Creek #92347 -- Northern UT, Sta 1000 to 2000
October 2014 -- Monitoring Year 5 of 5
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants
UT Bear Creek Longitudinal Profile - Northern UT (Sta. 1000 -2000)
THW MYO: (5/2009)
THW MY5: (10/2014)
420
THW MY4: (11/2013)
THW MY3: (9/2012)
419
THW MY2: (8/2011)
N
THW MYI: (12/2010)
418 •
• Bankfull MY5: (2014)
417
•
.1 Grade Control Structures
• •
• •
+ Rootwads
C
U
416
0
Cattle / Road Crossing
Q?
vii
•
W
O
L
•
i
415
+
a
• O
FL-
414
1 1
413
1 1
412
I I
411
410
1000.00
1100.00 1200.00 1300.00 1400.00 1500.00 1600.00 1700.00
1800.00 1900.00 2000.00
Station (ft)
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Appendix D
Figure 6.2 Longitudinal Profile & Annual Overlays
UT Bear Creek #92347 -- Northern UT, Sta 2000 to 3000
October 2014 -- Monitoring Year 5 of 5
415
•
414
413
w
O
'w
412
W
s,
411
it
410
409
N
rd
N
N
L
0
4-1
U
a,
N
UT Bear Creek Longitudinal Profile - Northern UT (Sta. 2000 -3000)
•
C
•
M
N N
f6
c 0
O
4 U
U U
aJ 41
N
N N
N
0 0
c� U
THW MYO: (5/2009)
--*—THW MY5: (10/2014)
THW MY4: (11/2013)
THW MY3: (9/2012)
THW MY2: (8/2011)
THW MY 1: (12/2010)
• Bankfull MY5: (2014)
0 -1 Grade Control Structures
+ Rootwads
•
0
408
2000.00 2100.00 2200.00 2300.00 2400.00 2500.00 2600.00 2700.00 2800.00 2900.00 3000.00
Station (ft)
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Appendix D
Figure 6.3 Longitudinal Profile & Annual Overlays
UT Bear Creek #92347 -- Northern UT, Sta 3000 to 4000
October 2014 -- Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Station (ft)
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants
UT Bear Creek Longitudinal Profile - Northern UT (Sta. 3000 -4000)
THW MYO: (5/2009)
412
THW MY5: (10/2014)
THW MY4: (11/2013)
•
411
THW MY3: (9/2012)
•
O • to
• • m rn
THW MY2: (8/2011)
+� N
THW MY 1: (12/2010)
410
c
c
• Bankfull MY5: (2014)
i~
•2
0
"
"
A Grade Control Structures
0
cv
409
N
V)
W
v
U
s,
408
a
E*
407
VV
406
405
404
3000.00
3100.00 3200.00 3300.00 3400.00 3500.00 3600.00 3700.00 3800.00 3900.00 4000.00
Station (ft)
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Appendix D
Figure 6.4 Longitudinal Profile & Annual Overlays
UT Bear Creek #92347 -- Southern UT, Sta 1000 to 1900
October 2014 -- Monitoring Year 5 of 5
UT Bear Creek Longitudinal Profile - Southern UT (Sta. 1000 -1900)
•• •
•
•
1100.00 1200.00 1300.00 1400.00 1500.00
Station (ft)
n
Un
Ln
Ln
r-
CZ
0
U
Q)
—Ln
•0
0
L
U
TRW MYO: (5/2009)
—IIt —THW MY5: (10/2014)
THW MY4: (11/2013)
THW MY3: (9/2012)
THW MY2: (8/2011)
THW MY 1: (12/2010)
• Bankfull MY5: 2014
A Grade Control Structures
+ Rootwads
— Cattle Crossing
0
1600.00 1700.00 1800.00
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants
427 —
426 —
425 —
424
w
c
423
W
422
s,
c�
F
421 —
420 —
419 —
418
417
1000.00
UT Bear Creek Longitudinal Profile - Southern UT (Sta. 1000 -1900)
•• •
•
•
1100.00 1200.00 1300.00 1400.00 1500.00
Station (ft)
n
Un
Ln
Ln
r-
CZ
0
U
Q)
—Ln
•0
0
L
U
TRW MYO: (5/2009)
—IIt —THW MY5: (10/2014)
THW MY4: (11/2013)
THW MY3: (9/2012)
THW MY2: (8/2011)
THW MY 1: (12/2010)
• Bankfull MY5: 2014
A Grade Control Structures
+ Rootwads
— Cattle Crossing
0
1600.00 1700.00 1800.00
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Appendix D
Figure 6.5 Longitudinal Profile & Annual Overlays
UT Bear Creek #92347 -- Southern UT, Sta 1900 to 2800
October 2014 -- Monitoring Year 5 of 5
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants
UT Bear Creek Longitudinal Profile - Southern UT (Sta. 1900 -2800)
THW vMYO: (5/2009)
E—THW MY5: (10/2014)
'THW MY4: (11/2013)
419
•
THW MY3: (9/2012)
•
•
THW MY2: (8/2011)
417
Ln
THW MYl: (12/2010)
Ln
• • •
N
• Bankfull MY5: 2014
L
0
.1 Grade Control Structures
415
0
U °
+ Rootwads
• N v
N
W
V
• V)
o 0
413
U
F�
,1
411
409
407
1900.00
2000.00 2100.00 2200.00 2300.00 2400.00 2500.00 2600.00
2700.00 2800.00
Station (ft)
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Appendix D -- eTable
Longitudinal Profile Survey Data: 2009 -2014, Northern UT
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347
rHW MYO: (5/2009)
Station Elevation
1000.00 414.04
1017.12 414.57
1050.74 415.32
1054.73 415.65
1080.79 414.66
1109.58 415.39
1136.87 415.25
1168.98 414.89
1173.95 414.96
1210.50 415.07
1229.06 413.44
1238.57 413.63
1256.73
1297.01
1332.46
1359.46
1403.74
1443.43
1473.80
1493.82
1536.55
1563.92
1600.72
1641.48
1677.54
1702.43
1731.65
1775.68
1801.29
1807.80
1833.96
1867.16
1907.71
1920.06
1934.63
1967.96
1975.14
414.93
414.97
414.87
414.30
414.69
414.62
413.72
414.19
414.06
413.23
413.98
413.96
413.85
414.01
412.61
413.61
413.39
412.44
413.01
413.22
413.09
413.19
412.92
412.75
412.46
THW MY1: (12/2010)
tation Elevation
1009.00 414.16
1016.00 413.84
1022.50 414.36
1028.00 415.32
1032.50 415.58
1040.00 415.55
1048.00 415.59
1053.50 415.46
1059.00 415.24
1061.50 415.39
1062.00 414.67
1072.00 413.79
1080.50
1095.50
1104.50
1109.00
1129.50
1142.00
1150.00
1154.00
1158.00
1162.50
1168.00
1177.00
1184.00
1193.00
1204.00
1215.00
1221.00
1224.50
1227.00
1230.00
1242.50
1253.50
1255.00
1270.50
1279.00
414.24
415.55
415.50
415.49
415.26
415.15
415.09
414.88
414.04
414.03
414.33
414.68
415.02
415.27
415.21
415.19
415.06
413.73
413.65
413.43
413.53
414.96
414.64
415.14
414.94
THW MY2: (8/2011)
tation Elevation
1006.00 41725
1014.00 413.92
1025.00 415.41
1030.50 415.45
1042.50 415.47
1059.00 415.25
1060.00 414.39
1072.50 413.82
1080.00 414.28
1092.50 415.55
1110.00 415.51
1134.00 415.27
1149.50
1155.00
1160.00
1170.00
1174.00
1189.00
1218.00
1219.00
1237.00
1252.00
1266.50
1270.00
1275.00
1287.00
1296.00
1310.00
1328.00
1338.00
1342.00
1354.50
1364.00
1367.00
1369.00
1374.50
1380.00
414.97
414.22
414.09
414.36
414.75
415.15
414.88
414.18
413.35
414.23
414.73
414.83
414.92
414.62
414.54
414.67
414.65
414.70
414.44
413.96
414.07
414.27
414.33
414.36
414.26
THW MY3: (9/2012)
Station Elevation
1011.00 41721
1024.00 414.85
1034.00 415.47
1059.00 415.56
1061.00 415.57
1062.00 414.37
1071.00 413.67
1087.00 414.61
1098.00 415.33
1115.00 415.19
1128.00 415.27
1135.00 415.17
1150.00
1157.00
1160.00
1173.00
1187.00
1217.00
1218.00
1235.00
1255.00
1271.00
1313.00
1342.00
1343.00
1347.00
1358.00
1369.00
1395.00
1459.00
1463.00
1470.00
1480.00
1511.00
1521.00
1542.00
1552.00
415.09
413.95
414.03
414.62
415.00
414.88
414.12
413.16
414.43
414.77
414.60
414.53
414.16
413.89
413.81
414.27
414.47
414.08
414.13
413.75
413.59
414.11
414.13
413.94
413.24
THW MY4: (11/2013)
Station Elevation
1000.02 41706
1012.25 413.43
1022.28 415.07
1032.25 415.35
1041.34 415.35
1044.51 415.21
1055.32 415.53
1055.95 415.47
1057.76 414.02
1059.75 413.66
1061.14 413.72
1069.36 413.72
1091.08
1091.60
1116.33
1145.09
1146.97
1148.48
1154.51
1154.53
1154.64
1187.36
1214.83
1218.99
1245.73
1245.85
1268.05
1294.35
1321.25
1340.08
1343.24
1359.63
1387.54
1427.10
1451.93
1455.80
1466.78
415.28
415.12
415.05
414.84
414.79
414.42
413.87
413.84
413.94
415.12
415.01
413.45
413.70
413.72
414.85
414.54
414.46
414.69
413.84
413.85
414.50
414.38
414.20
414.10
413.60
THW MY5: (10/2014)
Station
Elevation
1000.00
414.57
1045.66
415.71
1076.14
414.06
1081.78
414.01
1106.54
415.38
1128.44
415.46
1168.70
414.08
1184.00
415.00
1241.29
413.35
1265.13
414.43
1327.44
414.72
1364.98
413.88
1400.50
1437.78
1493.00
1495.18
1495.77
1523.93
1568.03
1602.44
1642.30
1700.00
1739.25
1790.47
1817.20
1851.14
1945.54
1959.31
1990.82
1972.00
2067.86
2113.25
2147.31
2186.33
2205.00
2249.02
2265.32
414.62
414.48
413.80
413.88
413.69
414.16
413.34
413.76
413.20
413.50
412.59
413.29
411.94
413.20
412.82
412.90
412.70
412.52
411.92
412.31
411.49
412.38
411.00
412.00
411.27
Water Surf MY5 (2014)
Station Elevation
1000.00 415.91
1394.25 414.53
1485.59 414.83
1645.43 415.39
1966.07 414.16
2060.29 413.92
2113.51 413.93
2200.68 413.67
2543.58 412.26
2660.63 412.86
2720.53 413.22
2906.90 412.23
2985.66
3110.73
3166.79
3239.25
3375.69
3472.91
3570.07
3653.58
3723.30
3826.89
3898.86
3997.60
4105.10
4162.66
4260.78
4364.35
4446.31
4509.58
4682.97
412.16
411.82
411.11
411.28
410.73
410.42
410.17
409.84
409.32
409.36
409.16
408.97
408.94
408.65
408.02
407.42
406.95
405.34
405.17
Bankfull MY5: (2014)
�tation Elevation
1000.00 417.79
1085.82 417.15
1165.79 417.12
1204.29 416.24
1272.08 416.46
1312.76 416.23
1374.89 416.82
1441.45 415.75
1510.01 416.42
1590.85 415.68
1682.55 415.14
1771.15 415.49
1892.78 414.58
1989.15 414.57
2047.29 414.71
2075.71 415.15
2146.16 413.93
2171.76 414.40
2206.76 413.00
2295.52 413.87
2366.23 413.08
2428.35 412.31
2499.32 413.32
2611.16 412.87
2764.30 412.87
2880.27 411.28
2898.89 410.12
2948.84 412.01
3023.16 410.82
3098.06 410.60
3161.40 411.29
3288.92 410.89
3367.63 410.87
3497.81 410.62
3569.96 410.40
3720.03 409.11
3814.71 408.66
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

THW MYO: (5/2009)
Station Elevation
THW MY1: (12/2010)
Station Elevation
THW MY2: (8/2011)
Station Elevation
THW MY3: (912012)
Station Elevation
THW MY4: (11/2013)
Station Elevation
THW MY5: (10/2014)
Station Elevation
1998.42
412.94
1287.00
415.07
1385.00
414.47
1565.00
413.07
1482.17
413.42
2278.07
411.08
2002.19
412.75
1302.00
414.90
1393.00
414.63
1580.00
413.86
1505.06
413.88
2282.33
411.03
2030.79
412.87
1317.00
414.80
1402.50
414.53
1618.00
413.64
1525.11
413.97
2313.29
411.66
2048.85
412.85
1327.00
414.85
1413.00
414.55
1631.00
413.06
1539.56
413.73
2364.16
411.44
2054.30
412.26
1337.50
414.86
1425.00
414.47
1640.00
413.45
1547.18
413.03
2393.23
411.96
2080.41
412.29
1344.00
414.90
1437.00
414.48
1653.00
413.51
1555.33
413.21
2435.19
410.99
2081.97
412.12
1346.00
414.16
1449.00
414.33
1664.00
413.33
1567.95
413.30
2478.00
411.40
2120.28
412.28
1352.50
414.12
1456.00
414.35
1673.00
413.68
1585.78
413.83
2507.22
410.44
2138.37
412.16
1362.00
414.16
1465.00
414.07
1714.00
413.38
1589.34
413.76
2581.56
411.15
2158.71
411.77
1373.00
414.61
1470.00
413.86
1715.00
412.91
1608.80
413.75
2625.59
409.15
2191.80
411.96
1389.50
414.69
1476.50
413.86
1721.00
412.45
1626.19
413.18
2631.23
410.47
2210.39
411.30
1396.00
414.59
1482.50
413.63
1730.00
412.43
1630.97
412.98
2677.70
411.04
2263.15
411.90
1407.00
414.56
1491.00
413.66
1744.00
412.35
1649.08
413.60
2723.52
411.00
2291.58
411.70
1419.50
414.48
1500.50
414.13
1764.00
413.24
1664.63
413.39
2753.71
409.13
2292.41
411.66
1430.00
414.58
1506.00
414.15
1810.00
413.38
1674.49
413.93
2774.64
408.18
2333.93
411.88
1439.00
414.53
1517.00
414.10
1810.00
412.06
1684.69
413.46
2795.70
410.16
2380.34
411.59
1447.00
414.55
1534.50
414.08
1820.00
411.67
1698.03
413.43
2820.62
410.35
2391.03
411.59
1449.00
414.47
1547.00
413.75
1840.00
412.78
1705.72
413.62
2849.97
410.62
2422.28
411.24
1470.00
413.52
1553.00
413.32
1854.00
412.91
1709.67
413.02
2882.84
408.65
2463.32
411.59
1476.00
413.78
1558.00
413.33
1913.00
412.70
1711.42
413.39
2929.40
410.22
2489.12
411.23
1482.00
413.60
1565.50
413.14
1941.00
412.97
1714.62
412.68
2962.84
410.32
2519.51
410.40
1492.00
413.70
1574.50
413.53
1959.00
412.82
1720.15
412.53
2970.74
408.95
2551.14
411.38
1500.00
414.16
1580.00
413.77
1985.00
412.40
1730.39
412.13
3009.40
410.34
2577.37
411.19
1509.50
414.13
1586.00
413.95
1993.00
412.24
1734.37
412.05
3034.62
408.95
2606.58
410.97
1519.50
414.24
1598.50
413.81
2003.00
412.70
1757.47
413.23
3077.01
409.50
2638.79
410.70
1534.00
414.05
1609.00
413.80
2024.00
412.94
1777.70
413.05
3118.76
408.61
2641.02
410.79
1540.00
414.13
1620.00
413.81
2045.00
412.94
1782.94
412.99
3161.96
409.72
2681.29
410.81
1546.00
413.99
1628.00
413.45
2062.00
412.50
1794.09
413.13
3200.89
408.07
2728.93
410.81
1550.00
413.44
1634.00
413.13
2074.00
411.30
1806.91
413.20
3237.72
409.47
2730.29
410.67
1553.00
413.32
1639.00
413.45
2082.00
411.71
1809.54
411.80
3263.39
407.91
2753.45
410.33
1559.00
413.39
1643.00
413.64
2090.00
412.03
1811.89
411.52
3277.37
408.97
2790.04
410.20
1567.50
413.23
1650.00
413.71
2114.00
412.63
1816.81
411.46
3313.00
407.30
2821.57
410.41
1577.50
413.59
1661.00
413.73
2135.00
412.14
1822.59
411.77
3348.00
408.77
2857.26
410.23
1583.50
413.97
1665.00
413.54
2152.00
411.70
1836.08
412.77
3402.45
407.54
2893.22
409.31
1594.00
413.86
1672.00
413.86
2162.00
411.46
1875.17
413.06
3435.59
408.60
2916.62
410.31
1605.00
413.86
1680.00
413.70
2170.00
412.00
1896.96
412.81
3465.09
407.54
2946.49
410.30
1615.00
413.67
1689.00
413.72
2190.00
411.76
1905.79
412.75
3472.20
407.19
2958.89
409.43
1628.00
413.62
1695.00
413.71
2204.00
411.47
1913.60
413.00
3557.98
408.01
3001.88
409.92
1633.00
413.19
1701.00
413.81
2216.00
411.09
1927.85
412.94
3577.28
407.47
3015.78
409.65
1639.00
413.38
1708.00
413.68
2227.00
411.40
1939.96
412.37
3594.56
407.71
3031.71
408.89
1648.00
413.70
1714.00
413.40
2243.00
411.89
1979.52
412.21
3647.30
407.92
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
Water Surf MY5 (2014) Bankfull MY5: (2014)
Station Elevation jElevation
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

THW MYO: (5/2009)
THW MY1: (12/2010)
THW MY2: (8/2011)
THW MY3: (912012)
THW MY4: (11/2013)
THW MY5: (10/2014)
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station
Elevation
Station Elevation
3088.23
409.45
1660.00
413.61
1716.00
412.93
2271.00
412.16
2002.69
412.69
3671.16 406.24
3120.59
408.78
1666.00
413.53
1728.00
412.59
2283.00
411.98
2018.95
412.76
3717.52 407.49
3147.77
409.39
1674.00
413.76
1739.00
412.27
2288.00
411.44
2038.00
412.73
3748.73 406.53
3174.21
409.25
1682.00
413.65
1746.00
412.56
2294.00
411.85
2051.20
412.44
3754.37 405.47
3189.15
408.54
1693.00
413.58
1751.00
412.95
2305.00
411.58
2051.16
412.46
3775.19 406.92
3233.30
408.90
1699.00
413.81
1755.50
413.14
2328.00
411.88
2060.25
411.53
3834.79 404.54
3269.66
409.02
1712.50
413.58
1763.00
413.41
2347.00
411.73
2068.99
411.12
3879.43 405.74
3300.05
408.94
1714.00
413.33
1775.00
413.33
2368.00
411.34
2081.83
411.52
3919.32 405.33
3330.98
408.60
1716.00
413.23
1788.00
413.24
2375.00
410.65
2108.19
412.46
3926.01 404.87
3338.21
408.97
1725.00
412.56
1800.00
413.30
2381.00
411.27
2120.25
412.34
3353.72
408.61
1730.00
412.52
1811.00
413.38
2394.00
411.65
2128.90
411.98
3373.60
407.99
1735.00
412.33
1811.50
412.24
2429.00
411.36
2155.90
411.23
3400.74
408.24
1744.00
412.40
1819.00
411.66
2443.00
410.50
2167.42
411.98
3420.39
408.79
1751.50
412.93
1830.50
412.12
2453.00
410.88
2173.71
411.55
3433.03
408.41
1759.00
413.16
1837.00
412.55
2469.00
411.23
2195.29
411.68
3472.25
407.92
1767.00
413.30
1841.00
412.92
2476.00
411.53
2208.62
410.94
3501.07
407.84
1776.00
413.22
1846.00
412.85
2500.00
411.25
2220.94
411.17
3533.21
408.28
1786.50
413.16
1852.50
413.09
2515.00
410.24
2242.35
411.58
3571.37
407.85
1798.00
413.24
1864.00
413.15
2531.00
410.83
2260.29
411.93
3574.27
407.99
1807.00
413.30
1877.00
413.18
2548.00
411.53
2269.52
411.50
3606.40
408.21
1812.00
412.87
1890.50
413.01
2573.00
411.20
2280.00
411.01
3646.13
407.78
1813.00
413.34
1902.00
413.01
2593.00
411.31
2289.86
411.35
3650.80
406.69
1814.00
412.11
1914.50
412.94
2617.00
411.07
2298.94
411.13
3670.30
406.93
1815.50
411.69
1925.50
413.13
2622.00
409.30
2314.76
411.79
3693.10
407.39
1820.00
411.54
1940.00
412.78
2641.00
409.76
2335.49
411.57
3729.40
407.14
1830.00
412.03
1944.00
412.65
2648.00
410.79
2343.09
411.53
3734.50
405.68
1838.00
412.61
1955.00
412.80
2692.00
411.08
2352.94
411.21
3758.09
406.80
1844.00
412.89
1966.00
412.76
2724.00
410.73
2364.64
410.69
3790.81
406.72
1854.50
413.05
1976.50
412.59
2759.00
410.74
2369.88
410.23
3812.63
406.49
1869.00
413.17
1981.00
412.42
2765.00
410.62
2389.06
411.63
3815.75
405.51
1882.50
413.14
1990.50
412.15
2765.00
409.53
2409.07
411.37
3832.86
404.57
1894.00
413.14
1999.00
412.47
2773.00
408.86
2426.97
410.94
3860.59
405.15
1904.00
412.99
2004.50
412.77
2780.00
409.24
2433.91
410.43
3880.90
405.83
1915.00
412.93
2011.00
412.65
2801.00
410.32
2448.56
410.73
3947.91
404.70
1926.50
1940.00
413.22
412.94
2024.50
2040.00
412.75
412.84
2830.00
2875.00
410.41
410.21
2468.23
2468.66
411.41
411.28
1944.50
412.63
2057.00
412.50
2884.00
409.20
2492.10
411.10
1949.50
412.93
2064.00
411.93
2892.00
408.84
2495.44
411.22
1957.00
412.83
2073.00
411.23
2901.00
409.11
2501.21
410.39
1966.00
412.81
2079.00
411.62
2918.00
410.10
2510.53
410.04
1975.50
412.48
2085.00
411.89
2927.00
410.35
2520.46
410.54
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
Water Surf MY5 (2014) Bankfull MY5: (2014)
Station Elevation jElevation
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

THW MYO: (5/2009)
Station Elevation
THW MY1: (12/2010)
Station Elevation
THW MY2: (8/2011)
Station Elevation
THW MY3: (912012)
Station Elevation
THW MY4: (11/2013)
Station Elevation
THW MY5: (10/2014)
Station Elevation
1984.00 412.16
2093.00 411.86
2957.00 410.30
2536.12 411.34
1992.00 412.12
2101.00 412.24
2973.00 408.81
2562.18 411.11
2000.00 412.74
2124.50 412.32
2982.00 409.52
2587.76 411.01
2002.50 413.04
2135.00 411.81
2993.00 409.87
2597.85 410.49
2005.50 412.87
2142.50 412.15
3025.00 409.40
2604.47 410.69
2008.00 412.61
2150.50 411.78
3036.00 408.92
2608.84 410.83
2011.00 412.73
2156.50 411.58
3061.00 409.68
2611.82 409.21
2017.50 412.76
2160.00 411.41
3085.00 409.30
2622.45 409.50
2023.50 412.73
2167.00 411.79
3101.00 409.24
2632.32 409.26
2032.50 412.75
2171.00 412.07
3113.00 407.89
2639.40 410.52
2039.00 412.79
2175.50 411.79
3122.00 407.47
2653.05 410.78
2047.50 412.76
2182.00 411.96
3124.00 408.09
2661.58 409.77
2060.00 412.59
2186.50 411.73
3149.00 409.27
2673.24 410.47
2066.00 411.64
2194.00 411.89
3177.00 409.36
2706.15 410.51
2078.00 411.37
2197.00 411.78
3183.00 409.07
2729.93 410.55
2082.00 411.94
2212.50 411.17
3196.00 407.67
2748.20 410.28
2090.00 412.07
2219.00 411.30
3202.00 408.52
2756.55 410.15
2099.00 412.27
2225.50 411.50
3210.00 409.05
2759.68 409.06
2115.00 412.62
2226.50 411.97
3241.00 408.83
2765.73 408.58
2125.00 412.44
2247.00 411.96
3260.00 408.03
2776.40 408.80
2135.00 412.12
2261.00 412.08
3277.00 409.21
2796.70 410.35
2135.50 411.93
2268.00 412.18
3308.00 408.95
2818.71 410.18
2140.50 412.37
2272.00 412.17
3309.00 407.91
2842.61 410.28
2143.50 412.33
2277.00 412.10
3312.00 407.34
2842.68 410.28
2150.00 411.77
2282.50 412.00
3316.00 407.19
2865.91 410.55
2157.50 411.67
2283.50 411.73
3340.00 408.82
2871.45 409.69
2160.00 411.52
2286.00 411.76
3363.00 408.46
2884.69 408.75
2171.00 412.32
2292.50 411.85
3382.00 407.19
2891.55 409.23
2175.00 411.94
2298.00 411.65
3403.00 407.40
2893.13 409.31
2182.00 412.13
2307.00 411.51
3414.00 408.45
2901.06 409.18
2189.00 411.95
2313.00 411.83
3425.00 408.81
2915.03 410.37
2195.50 411.98
2319.50 411.95
3456.00 408.32
2947.03 410.12
2202.00 411.57
2330.50 412.02
3474.00 407.39
2961.72 409.14
2206.00 411.42
2339.00 411.75
3497.00 406.99
2963.99 408.72
2212.00 411.19
2349.00 411.69
3510.00 407.40
2978.44 410.09
2218.00 411.28
2355.00 411.38
3539.00 408.44
3006.20 409.67
2224.00 411.38
2360.00 411.68
3583.00 407.61
3017.67 409.65
2227.00 412.09
2368.00 411.07
3595.00 406.95
3028.80 408.79
2235.50 411.81
2372.00 410.60
3614.00 407.94
3052.14 409.51
2246.00 411.92
2378.00 411.02
3658.00 407.99
3074.39 409.26
2256.00 411.98
2382.00 411.33
3658.00 406.57
3093.51 409.09
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
Water Surf MY5 (2014) 1 Bankfull MY5: (2014)
Station Elevation Station Elevation
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

THW MYO: (5/2009)
Station Elevation
THW MY1: (12/2010)
Station Elevation
THW MY2: (8/2011)
Station Elevation
THW MY3: (912012)
Station Elevation
THW MY4: (11/2013)
Station Elevation
THW MY5: (10/2014)
Station Elevation
2269.00 412.21
2389.00 411.71
3663.00 406.24
3100.11 408.34
2274.00 412.14
2400.00 411.46
3675.00 406.25
3107.47 407.68
2279.00 412.00
2413.00 411.56
3694.00 407.44
3123.77 408.41
2281.00 412.11
2424.00 411.60
3707.00 406.85
3141.56 409.17
2284.50 411.71
2432.00 411.04
3710.00 407.31
3170.60 409.39
2285.00 411.77
2436.00 410.84
3742.00 407.31
3174.69 409.14
2293.00 411.85
2438.50 410.55
3743.00 405.45
3187.49 408.04
2299.00 411.56
2441.00 410.41
3749.00 405.08
3203.66 408.99
2308.00 411.49
2445.00 410.68
3775.00 406.57
3226.85 409.01
2317.00 411.97
2454.00 410.96
3823.00 406.04
3238.00 408.85
2325.00 412.03
2462.00 411.01
3823.00 405.11
3253.61 407.91
2335.00 411.93
2473.00 411.50
3827.00 404.64
3272.11 409.19
2344.00 411.89
2482.00 411.28
3834.00 405.47
3290.36 408.93
2352.00 411.62
2489.00 411.44
3842.00 404.23
3301.52 408.88
2357.00 411.50
2493.50 411.45
3859.00 404.83
3306.66 407.30
2362.00 411.66
2498.00 411.32
3877.00 405.39
3319.26 407.88
2365.00 411.29
2505.00 410.60
3911.00 404.99
3334.61 408.83
2373.00 410.51
2513.00 410.51
3918.00 404.37
3349.56 408.84
2380.50 411.39
2522.00 410.63
3934.00 404.20
3368.15 407.99
2389.00 411.85
2530.00 410.92
3960.00 403.81
3374.36 407.44
2399.00 411.37
2534.00 411.16
3395.51 407.21
2409.00 411.64
2539.00 411.46
3408.57 408.49
2423.00 411.47
2548.00 411.34
3432.82 408.46
2429.00 411.28
2563.50 411.08
3452.44 407.88
2438.00 410.59
2572.00 411.07
3463.19 407.54
2440.50 410.48
2592.00 411.12
3469.80 407.20
2448.50 410.90
2602.00 410.87
3479.84 407.40
2461.00 411.04
2612.50 411.27
3487.11 407.08
2471.00 411.41
2614.50 410.91
3492.63 406.91
2478.50 411.20
2615.00 409.79
3503.74 407.30
2488.00 411.38
2620.00 409.30
3515.84 407.23
2495.00 411.31
2630.50 409.29
3531.03 408.15
2498.00 411.23
2644.00 410.72
3555.98 408.35
2506.00 410.46
2651.00 410.81
3571.28 407.85
2511.50 410.29
2660.00 410.62
3573.27 408.07
2518.00 410.43
2665.00 410.29
3573.79 408.02
2527.00 410.73
2669.00 410.13
3574.03 408.13
2531.50 410.86
2677.50 410.94
3585.27 407.05
2535.00 410.68
2686.50 410.99
3590.04 406.76
2540.00 411.50
2704.00 410.81
3605.76 408.12
2542.00 411.40
2720.00 410.81
3627.95 407.99
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
Water Surf MY5 (2014) 1 Bankfull MY5: (2014)
Station Elevation Station Elevation
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

THW MYO: (5/2009)
Station Elevation
THW MY1: (12/2010)
Station Elevation
THW MY2: (8/2011)
Station Elevation
THW MY3: (912012)
Station Elevation
THW MY4: (11/2013)
Station Elevation
THW MY5: (10/2014)
Station Elevation
2552.50
411.46
2734.00
410.86
3650.91
407.95
2569.00
411.28
2747.00
410.72
3653.21
406.36
2586.50
411.35
2759.00
410.51
3668.94
406.19
2597.50
411.09
2760.50
410.60
3687.18
407.33
2607.00
410.98
2762.00
409.31
3712.53
407.23
2615.00
411.11
2769.00
408.83
3719.09
407.15
2615.50
409.83
2778.00
409.08
3734.59
407.41
2626.00
409.20
2788.00
409.71
3739.50
405.41
2637.50
409.47
2793.50
410.35
3757.22
405.64
2645.00
410.77
2814.00
410.35
3769.65
406.95
2650.00
410.77
2828.00
410.39
3791.35
406.94
2664.00
410.64
2840.50
410.32
3815.20
406.49
2668.00
410.24
2847.50
410.40
3815.67
405.51
2679.00
411.00
2869.00
410.31
3818.41
405.03
2697.00
410.85
2874.50
409.29
3826.89
405.81
2705.00
410.78
2887.50
408.78
3835.04
403.97
2709.00
410.71
2897.50
409.03
3860.26
405.26
2718.00
410.78
2906.00
409.23
2726.00
410.86
2912.50
410.02
2736.50
410.82
2918.00
410.31
2748.00
410.74
2927.50
410.29
2764.00
410.65
2935.00
410.18
2764.50
409.61
2941.00
410.26
2770.00
408.96
2947.00
410.35
2777.00
408.89
2953.00
410.25
2784.00
409.47
2953.00
410.27
2784.00
409.40
2968.00
409.06
2794.00
410.16
2974.00
409.29
2800.00
410.43
2982.00
410.13
2819.50
410.26
2985.00
410.17
2835.00
410.46
2995.00
409.75
2848.00
410.43
2998.00
409.23
2861.00
410.34
3002.50
409.67
2870.50
410.35
3010.00
409.71
2874.00
410.27
3021.00
409.58
2890.00
408.88
3024.50
409.43
2899.00
409.30
3024.75
409.16
2907.00
409.42
3032.00
408.85
2917.00
410.24
3038.00
409.26
2928.00
410.34
3042.00
408.81
2940.00
410.28
3044.50
408.62
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
Water Surf MY5 (2014) 1 Bankfull MY5: (2014)
Station Elevation Station Elevation
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

THW MYO: (5/2009)
Station Elevation
THW MY1: (12/2010)
Station Elevation
THW MY2: (8/2011)
Station Elevation
THW MY3: (912012)
Station Elevation
THW MY4: (11/2013)
Station Elevation
THW MY5: (10/2014)
Station Elevation
2955.00 410.25
3052.00 409.47
2964.00 409.28
3056.50 409.62
2973.00 408.83
3066.00 409.53
2977.00 409.22
3077.00 409.28
2987.50 410.01
3088.00 409.20
2999.00 409.50
3097.50 409.08
3009.00 409.86
3103.50 408.69
3020.00 409.71
3108.00 407.85
3024.00 409.54
3119.00 407.40
3034.50 409.19
3126.00 407.86
3034.50 409.15
3135.50 408.91
3044.50 408.78
3146.00 409.26
3054.00 409.75
3162.00 409.23
3077.00 409.42
3172.00 409.16
3089.00 409.48
3175.00 409.25
3100.00 409.34
3181.00 409.10
3104.00 409.04
3186.00 408.44
3112.00 407.75
3196.00 407.81
3119.00 407.56
3201.00 408.15
3127.00 408.02
3208.00 408.93
3132.00 408.95
3217.00 408.93
3144.00 409.32
3225.00 409.07
3155.00 409.25
3235.50 408.95
3176.00 409.24
3250.50 408.81
3185.00 409.25
3257.00 408.13
3192.00 408.34
3260.50 408.04
3200.00 407.86
3274.50 409.05
3207.00 408.51
3287.00 409.05
3212.00 409.07
3306.00 408.70
3220.00 408.98
3306.50 408.88
3234.50 408.96
3307.00 408.93
3249.00 408.91
3307.00 407.64
3264.00 408.16
3312.50 407.34
3268.50 408.48
3323.50 407.76
3276.00 409.13
3338.00 409.00
3282.50 408.95
3351.00 408.42
3297.50 408.88
3363.00 408.50
3310.50 408.87
3371.00 407.88
3311.50 407.63
3375.00 408.19
3315.00 407.30
3378.00 407.42
3319.00 407.14
3383.00 406.95
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
Water Surf MY5 (2014) 1 Bankfull MY5: (2014)
Station Elevation Station I Elevation
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

THW MYO: (5/2009)
Station Elevation
THW MY1: (12/2010)
Station Elevation
THW MY2: (8/2011)
Station Elevation
THW MY3: (912012)
Station Elevation
THW MY4: (11/2013)
Station Elevation
THW MY5: (10/2014)
Station Elevation
3332.00 407.97
3395.00 407.56
3340.00 408.60
3402.50 407.42
3353.00 408.38
3410.50 408.26
3363.00 408.42
3418.00 408.36
3368.50 408.13
3420.00 408.56
3374.00 407.85
3438.00 408.56
3377.50 408.16
3454.00 408.30
3378.00 407.43
3464.00 407.77
3380.00 407.22
3466.00 407.99
3384.00 406.77
3470.50 407.47
3392.50 407.35
3479.00 407.35
3404.00 407.11
3486.50 407.49
3404.00 407.16
3490.25 407.93
3408.50 408.02
3494.50 407.05
3421.00 408.42
3504.50 407.47
3437.00 408.35
3506.00 407.71
3455.00 408.06
3510.50 407.32
3458.00 407.91
3520.00 407.40
3463.00 407.53
3529.00 407.51
3472.50 407.52
3534.00 407.86
3481.00 407.28
3535.00 408.16
3486.00 407.52
3540.50 408.09
3494.00 406.93
3556.00 408.15
3497.50 406.87
3580.00 407.82
3508.50 407.41
3588.00 407.32
3535.00 407.44
3594.00 406.97
3539.00 407.97
3598.00 407.07
3548.50 408.02
3602.50 407.30
3560.00 408.10
3610.00 408.00
3582.00 407.85
3622.50 407.85
3582.00 407.77
3649.50 407.65
3592.50 407.00
3655.50 408.06
3597.50 406.91
3656.00 406.58
3609.50 407.42
3660.00 406.12
3612.50 407.93
3671.50 406.25
3627.50 407.70
3690.00 407.38
3640.00 407.71
3700.00 407.00
3657.00 407.31
3707.00 407.32
3658.00 406.63
3724.00 407.08
3661.50 406.01
3738.00 407.39
3671.00 406.10
3739.00 407.51
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
Water Surf MY5 (2014) 1 Bankfull MY5: (2014)
Station Elevation Station I Elevation
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

MYO: (5/2009) THW MY1: (12/2010) THW MY2: (8/2011) THW MY3: (912012) THW MY4: (11/2013) THW MY5: (10/2014) 1 Water Surf MY5 (2014) 1 Bankfull MY5: (2014)
n Elevation Station Elevation IStation Elevation IStation Elevation IStation Elevation Station Elevation IStation Elevation I Istation I Elevation
3677.00 406.35 3739.50 405.57
3684.00 406.53 3747.00 405.28
3692.00 407.33 3758.00 405.88
3729.00 407.01 3770.50 406.73
3742.00 407.11 3787.00 406.55
3742.50 405.45 3798.00 406.26
3747.50 405.28 3819.00 406.11
3755.00 405.44 3820.00 405.12
3761.00 405.86 3825.50 404.81
3769.00 406.10 3830.00 405.54
3772.00 406.79 3834.50 404.69
3786.00 406.60 3839.00 404.42
3804.00 406.14 3848.50 404.99
3809.00 405.79 3848.50 405.04
3817.00 406.38 3860.50 405.11
3822.00 406.24 3873.50 405.48
3822.50 405.14 3894.00 405.45
3827.00 404.59 3908.50 405.26
3832.50 405.43 3910.00 404.91
3834.00 404.60 3940.50 404.18
3836.00 404.45 3962.00 404.06
3840.00 404.30
3845.00 404.48
3853.00 404.96
3860.00 405.05
3864.00 404.99
3869.00 405.27
3877.00 405.34
3889.00 405.60
3901.00 405.27
3908.00 404.96
3910.00 404.77
3928.50 404.38
3940.50 404.07
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

N -Trib Cross Sections
Number Station Y -axis Line
1.00 1592.00 411.00
1.00 1592.00 419.00
2.00 2130.00 409.00
2.00 2130.00 414.00
3.00 2632.00 409.00
3.00 2632.00 414.00
4.00 2713.00 409.00
4.00 2713.00 414.50
5.00 3663.00 404.50
5.00 3663.00 411.50
6.00 3719.00 404.50
6.00 3719.00 411.50
Grade Control Structures
Type Station Elevation
cross vane
1063.00
415.65
single log
1150.00
415.24
cross vane
1215.00
415.25
single log
1345.00
415.04
single log
1545.00
414.23
single log
1714.00
413.96
log x -vane
1814.00
413.39
single log
2270.00
412.18
single log
2498.00
411.37
log vane
2615.00
411.27
log vane
2763.00
411.05
single log
2870.00
410.55
single log
3100.00
409.80
log sill
3210.00
409.35
log vane
3307.00
409.19
single log
3375.00
408.66
single log
3457.00
408.54
left vane
3655.00
407.78
left vane
3740.00
407.14
cross vane
3823.00
406.49
Rootwads Cattle / Road Crossing
Station elevation Cattle Crossing start Cattle Crossing end
1455.00 414.75 Elevation Station Elevation Station
2060.00 413.00 411.50 1900.00 411.50 1950.00
414.00 1900.00 414.00 1950.00
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Appendix D -- eTable
Longitudinal Profile Survey Data: 2009 -2014, Southern UT
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) #92347
THW MYO: (5/2009)
Station Elevation
1000.00 424.33
1053.64 424.23
1062.81 425.16
1062.89 423.66
1081.66 424.61
1095.56 424.65
1115.93 424.66
1136.88 424.11
1156.45 424.51
1163.55 423.74
1183.23 424.40
1208.11 423.94
1229.08 424.10
1254.33 423.94
1278.73 423.96
1301.97 423.37
1321.74 423.92
1334.79 423.74
1361.95 423.40
1378.20 423.27
1394.72 423.36
1397.00 423.65
1418.14 422.96
1430.65 422.76
1443.00 423.34
1450.25 422.40
1478.85 422.57
1480.63 422.29
1492.97 422.17
1505.43 422.75
1512.82 421.85
1535.62 421.61
THW MY1: (12/2010)
Station Elevation
1000.00 423.62
1005.00 422.42
1040.50 423.19
1049.00 423.89
1061.00 425.16
1062.50 424.00
1067.50 423.64
1074.00 424.50
1084.00 424.68
1105.00 424.38
1112.50 424.57
1118.00 424.56
1120.00 424.70
1125.00 424.51
1128.00 424.23
1136.00 424.04
1145.00 424.48
1148.00 424.45
1154.00 424.48
1158.50 424.35
1161.00 424.03
1163.00 423.84
1170.00 424.18
1173.00 424.33
1176.50 424.35
1187.00 424.31
1190.00 424.09
1195.00 424.35
1197.50 424.26
1200.50 424.27
1207.00 423.89
1210.00 423.84
THW MY2: (8/2011)
Station Elevation
1000.00 423.28
1012.50 422.62
1012.50 421.66
1024.00 422.16
1032.50 422.15
1044.00 423.27
1052.00 423.91
1060.00 424.74
1060.50 424.92
1061.00 424.98
1061.50 423.84
1067.00 423.51
1072.00 423.99
1078.00 424.50
1080.50 424.74
1089.50 424.58
1095.50 424.49
1105.00 424.55
1109.50 424.51
1112.00 424.59
1121.00 424.84
1128.00 424.35
1134.50 424.27
1141.00 424.37
1150.00 424.60
1155.00 424.59
1162.50 424.05
1168.50 424.33
1173.00 424.35
1178.00 424.35
1182.00 424.40
1185.00 424.42
THW MY3: (9/2012)
Station Elevation
1064.00 423.89
1070.00 423.71
1083.00 424.84
1084.00 424.85
1110.00 424.62
1137.00 424.27
1163.00 424.13
1180.00 424.33
1202.00 424.48
1218.00 424.36
1237.00 424.36
1242.00 423.96
1253.00 423.93
1263.00 424.03
1295.00 424.02
1306.00 423.80
1320.00 423.84
1337.00 423.76
1347.00 423.77
1353.00 423.81
1360.00 423.71
1378.00 423.25
1387.00 423.10
1393.00 423.28
1398.00 423.63
1398.00 422.29
1400.00 422.24
1407.00 423.05
1422.00 422.89
1438.00 422.76
1445.00 423.21
1445.00 422.01
THW MY4: (11/2013)
Station Elevation
1000.32 423.94
1024.57 422.03
1036.81 422.26
1042.81 422.85
1046.22 423.22
1060.76 424.70
1061.35 425.09
1061.47 425.24
1064.43 424.11
1068.73 423.38
1085.46 424.88
1097.02 424.08
1100.69 424.35
1107.17 424.24
1117.86 424.47
1127.95 424.42
1132.48 424.00
1135.86 423.91
1142.53 424.10
1158.03 424.22
1159.12 424.30
1163.16 424.00
1169.43 423.63
1170.77 424.05
1170.17 424.46
1171.10 424.07
1172.87 424.20
1174.07 423.93
1187.75 424.35
1191.36 424.06
1197.20 424.14
1201.26 423.94
THW MY5: (10/2014)
Station Elevation
1055.00 424.51
1060.21 425.32
1067.14 424.05
1087.34 424.56
1109.63 424.44
1123.53 424.42
1132.91 424.28
1139.53 424.04
1153.55 424.24
1156.45 424.21
1157.88 424.37
1169.30 423.45
1178.33 424.23
1197.27 424.19
1203.23 423.72
1217.60 423.83
1223.81 424.00
1236.20 423.85
1247.04 423.94
1261.90 423.93
1270.02 424.00
1301.84 423.31
1310.02 423.65
1321.18 423.77
1332.59 423.60
1370.77 423.11
1397.36 423.39
1438.72 422.16
1461.66 422.22
1478.17 422.69
1493.51 422.25
1501.04 422.77
Water Surf MY5: 2014
Station Elevation
DRY DRY
Bankfull MY5: 2014
Station
jElevation
1050.00
426.28
1094.18
426.06
1139.17
425.92
1187.61
425.92
1222.05
425.53
1234.31
425.44
1254.75
425.37
1308.74
424.67
1401.94
424.40
1456.66
424.12
1547.60
422.83
1600.63
422.31
1639.47
421.47
1750.94
420.20
1852.92
420.06
1920.29
418.67
2008.74
418.17
2099.88
417.71
2166.91
417.54
2223.87
416.60
2262.66
416.70
2302.88
416.45
2424.23
414.29
2462.84
413.61
2520.12
412.38
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

THW MYO: (5/2009)
Station Elevation
1548.05 421.72
1556.70 421.74
1563.00 421.98
1589.58 421.15
1592.00 421.46
1619.15 420.30
1629.00 420.77
1635.05 419.57
1644.71 420.08
1658.23 419.83
1663.07 419.56
1691.53 419.92
1704.50 419.33
1713.61 419.87
1714.13 418.43
1733.33 419.18
1758.36 419.12
1772.33 419.12
1774.00 419.47
1791.50 418.95
1809.39 418.41
1813.18 418.54
1818.00 419.06
1842.24 418.44
1851.17 418.18
1870.33 418.46
1874.38 418.57
1874.97 417.72
1889.23 418.02
1898.24 417.84
1905.00 418.18
1926.56 417.62
1938.78 417.28
1951.16 417.23
1958.00 417.70
1967.68 417.07
THW MY1: (12/2010)
Station Elevation
1212.50 424.00
1220.00 424.33
1223.00 424.31
1230.00 424.12
1232.50 423.96
1236.50 424.17
1244.00 424.09
1248.00 423.93
1253.00 423.83
1257.50 423.66
1263.00 423.90
1266.00 423.96
1277.00 424.07
1287.00 423.92
1295.00 424.01
1297.00 423.76
1302.00 423.54
1307.00 423.76
1312.00 423.96
1324.00 423.85
1336.00 423.80
1338.00 423.63
1343.00 423.76
1349.50 423.79
1353.00 423.82
1360.00 423.75
1366.00 423.47
1371.00 423.48
1375.50 423.49
1380.00 423.39
1382.00 423.50
1384.50 423.08
1386.50 423.14
1392.00 423.45
1395.50 423.33
1396.50 423.69
THW MY2: (8/2011)
Station Elevation
1190.50 424.16
1191.00 424.12
1195.00 424.45
1204.00 424.27
1208.50 423.94
1216.00 424.32
1225.00 424.28
1232.00 424.19
1237.00 424.28
1242.00 423.90
1245.00 424.14
1250.00 423.94
1253.00 423.89
1258.00 423.74
1262.00 423.84
1265.00 424.03
1270.00 424.06
1278.00 424.04
1285.00 424.02
1293.50 423.91
1296.00 423.92
1301.00 423.56
1304.00 423.61
1306.50 423.75
1312.50 423.83
1316.50 423.74
1324.00 423.80
1328.00 423.78
1332.00 423.78
1339.50 423.57
1345.00 423.68
1351.00 423.73
1357.00 423.67
1361.00 423.67
1367.00 423.28
1370.50 423.32
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
THW MY3: (9/2012)
Station Elevation
1452.00 422.48
1485.00 422.58
1492.00 422.07
1497.00 422.17
1504.00 422.07
1506.00 422.66
1507.00 422.68
1508.00 421.02
1509.00 421.08
1519.00 421.99
1530.00 421.27
1535.00 421.62
1540.00 421.41
1544.00 421.48
1548.00 421.25
1558.00 421.03
1560.00 421.98
1561.00 420.78
1564.00 419.87
1565.00 421.88
1566.00 420.72
1573.00 421.14
1578.00 421.36
1588.00 420.96
1593.00 421.42
1593.00 420.30
1595.00 419.98
1604.00 420.48
1612.00 420.85
1622.00 420.05
1629.00 420.68
1629.00 419.36
1643.00 419.87
1649.00 419.83
1657.00 420.27
1658.00 419.68
THW MY4: (11/2013)
Station Elevation
1208.29 423.76
1209.76 423.93
1214.37 424.07
1224.71 424.17
1232.67 423.95
1251.04 423.87
1256.79 423.78
1262.08 423.97
1264.06 424.11
1268.57 424.13
1283.55 424.01
1295.52 423.74
1300.64 423.84
1303.31 423.84
1319.49 423.80
1332.27 423.77
1337.31 423.66
1349.04 423.79
1350.08 423.62
1358.11 423.85
1360.92 423.21
1367.82 423.32
1372.35 423.39
1384.36 423.13
1388.74 423.17
1393.33 422.90
1395.18 423.78
1397.04 422.38
1411.10 423.12
1412.94 422.59
1414.05 422.92
1427.20 422.25
1440.55 422.70
1443.34 423.43
1446.80 422.43
1451.67 422.54
THW MYS: (10/2014)
Station Elevation
1513.03 421.09
1520.38 421.88
1536.67 421.16
1552.49 420.75
1553.96 421.62
1569.30 420.93
1572.97 420.60
1584.87 420.53
1593.79 421.29
1597.70 420.01
1601.02 420.33
1621.78 420.02
1631.97 420.59
1632.46 419.38
1653.23 420.08
1659.46 420.27
1673.69 419.10
1686.68 419.83
1704.72 419.27
1714.85 419.56
1715.36 418.40
1738.25 418.71
1754.66 419.08
1770.13 418.70
1776.85 419.24
1777.41 417.71
1791.10 418.61
1806.20 418.12
1818.67 419.10
1838.36 418.26
1861.18 418.49
1873.26 417.95
1875.05 417.75
1891.33 418.21
1922.55 417.50
1941.01 417.20
Water Surf MY5: 2014 Bankfull MY5: 2014
Station Elevation Station Elevation
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

THW MYO: (5/2009)
Station Elevation
2001.62 416.93
2019.17 416.47
2046.36 416.86
2070.10 416.36
2070.41 416.32
2085.80 416.57
2108.98 416.36
2114.23 416.40
2120.26 416.79
2120.49 415.69
2129.35 416.23
2159.81 416.11
2163.00 416.41
2170.04 415.58
2199.29 415.52
2214.96 415.72
2230.59 415.17
2239.98 415.49
2240.00 415.73
2247.10 414.94
2263.59 415.00
2270.51 415.40
2270.93 414.71
2275.92 414.71
2299.45 414.65
2313.51 414.82
2316.00 414.94
2322.83 413.75
2332.08 414.20
2348.14 414.20
2350.34 414.49
2350.99 413.28
2358.04 413.87
2388.19 413.33
2393.80 413.49
2397.00 413.62
THW MY1: (12/2010)
Station Elevation
1397.00 423.38
1399.00 423.12
1405.00 423.47
1407.50 423.40
1413.00 423.27
1418.50 423.30
1425.00 423.15
1427.00 422.93
1428.00 422.90
1430.50 422.67
1432.00 422.63
1435.00 422.76
1442.00 422.99
1443.00 423.22
1444.00 423.36
1445.00 422.13
1447.50 422.07
1451.50 422.57
1457.00 422.86
1464.00 422.77
1467.50 422.81
1469.00 422.58
1472.00 422.40
1477.00 422.38
1478.00 422.55
1481.00 422.66
1483.50 422.86
1486.00 422.60
1490.00 422.25
1491.00 422.10
1492.50 422.30
1498.00 422.35
1503.50 422.31
1504.00 422.78
1505.50 422.71
1506.00 421.26
THW MY2: (8/2011)
Station Elevation
1376.00 423.30
1380.50 423.25
1386.50 422.96
1392.00 423.33
1397.00 423.18
1397.50 423.55
1398.50 422.32
1403.50 422.75
1405.00 422.97
1406.00 422.96
1408.00 423.05
1413.50 422.96
1415.00 422.72
1423.50 422.86
1430.00 422.46
1435.00 422.50
1437.50 422.73
1442.00 422.84
1444.00 423.12
1445.00 421.97
1445.50 422.36
1450.00 422.26
1454.50 422.45
1460.50 422.51
1465.00 422.48
1467.00 422.63
1474.00 422.17
1475.50 422.23
1477.00 422.14
1481.50 422.43
1485.00 422.45
1485.50 422.40
1489.00 422.27
1494.50 422.28
1498.50 422.17
1501.00 422.17
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
THW MY3: (9/2012)
Station Elevation
1664.00 419.19
1670.00 419.24
1681.00 419.50
1703.00 419.59
1713.00 419.72
1713.00 418.81
1722.00 418.50
1729.00 418.90
1747.00 419.31
1755.00 419.24
1767.00 419.03
1775.00 419.34
1775.00 417.75
1778.00 417.94
1785.00 418.67
1799.00 418.61
1806.00 418.14
1818.00 418.83
1818.00 417.80
1828.00 418.24
1842.00 418.38
1858.00 418.22
1875.00 418.34
1875.00 417.79
1880.00 417.50
1884.00 417.87
1894.00 417.65
1901.00 417.54
1905.00 418.28
1905.00 417.48
1910.00 417.71
1913.00 417.53
1925.00 417.61
1930.00 417.96
1946.00 417.76
1960.00 417.81
THW MY4: (11/2013)
Station Elevation
1453.21 422.79
1470.44 422.37
1483.47 422.53
1489.50 422.16
1493.61 422.32
1501.74 422.17
1505.63 422.82
1508.36 421.44
1520.06 421.77
1522.39 421.33
1523.75 421.59
1529.18 421.28
1529.84 421.52
1534.54 421.65
1535.48 421.47
1536.10 421.62
1541.55 421.50
1544.28 421.55
1544.69 421.50
1547.76 421.59
1549.57 421.23
1555.23 421.11
1555.74 420.95
1559.70 420.65
1561.72 421.83
1563.45 420.50
1564.91 420.49
1566.66 421.50
1568.33 420.36
1569.13 420.38
1581.71 420.40
1588.87 421.23
1589.75 421.26
1590.29 420.07
1590.33 420.05
1591.40 420.15
THW MYS: (10/2014)
Station Elevation
1954.49 417.05
1992.22 416.57
2007.79 416.83
2027.01 416.48
2034.42 416.41
2050.04 416.30
2058.14 416.12
2062.45 416.37
2082.30 416.70
2087.59 416.39
2111.65 416.67
2120.12 415.60
2148.35 415.96
2150.29 416.47
2151.09 415.56
2177.15 415.26
2190.51 415.50
2203.52 414.98
2218.98 415.20
2228.84 415.39
2230.11 414.62
2245.87 414.66
2257.11 415.15
2259.25 414.52
2270.37 414.87
2289.09 414.63
2306.62 414.38
2322.29 414.11
2333.87 414.02
2339.03 414.23
2339.48 412.88
2348.73 414.06
2369.42 413.36
2379.83 413.18
2385.44 413.41
2386.53 413.48
Water Surf MY5: 2014 Bankfull MY5: 2014
Station Elevation Station Elevation
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

'HW MYO: (5/2009)
station Elevation
2402.19 412.59
2428.75 412.48
2435.00 413.18
2440.96 412.92
2454.00 412.58
2460.90 412.09
2484.00 411.97
2491.72 411.25
2505.00 411.69
2511.76 410.67
2521.86 410.83
2525.00 411.12
2548.00 410.80
2548.27 411.16
2563.03 409.25
2573.48 410.39
2573.70 410.38
2591.00 410.27
2595.26 408.95
2623.00 410.01
2626.33 408.70
2633.54 408.70
2647.00 409.47
2654.14 408.60
2683.88 408.79
2690.00 408.79
2699.15 408.24
THW MY1: (12/2010)
Station Elevation
1507.50 421.28
1512.00 421.29
1515.00 421.72
1515.00 421.57
1519.00 421.77
1534.00 421.47
1535.50 421.29
1538.00 421.23
1542.00 421.14
1547.50 421.06
1552.00 421.41
1555.00 421.72
1559.00 421.40
1560.00 421.78
1560.50 420.58
1562.50 419.81
1564.00 419.50
1565.00 421.65
1566.00 420.34
1568.00 420.36
1570.00 420.79
1573.00 420.95
1578.50 421.02
1584.50 420.76
1590.00 420.86
1590.50 421.19
1592.50 421.25
1593.00 420.03
1595.00 419.81
1596.00 419.65
1597.50 419.66
1600.00 420.25
1604.50 420.25
1612.00 420.65
1616.00 420.58
1618.50 420.48
THW MY2: (8/2011)
Station Elevation
1503.50 422.58
1506.00 422.68
1506.50 421.14
1509.00 421.26
1513.50 421.38
1519.00 421.87
1528.00 421.25
1535.00 421.63
1536.50 421.43
1540.00 421.35
1545.50 421.47
1549.50 421.41
1555.00 421.78
1559.00 421.24
1560.00 421.96
1560.50 420.62
1564.00 419.77
1565.00 421.82
1565.50 420.60
1573.00 421.08
1581.00 421.20
1585.00 420.95
1590.00 421.21
1592.00 421.44
1592.50 420.28
1597.00 419.89
1600.50 420.35
1613.00 420.79
1620.50 420.04
1626.00 420.06
1629.00 420.37
1629.50 420.72
1630.00 419.46
1632.50 419.31
1635.50 419.40
1640.50 419.80
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
THW MY3: (9/2012)
Station Elevation
1960.00 416.63
1970.00 417.22
1975.00 417.20
1994.00 417.10
2008.00 417.04
2015.00 417.01
2020.00 416.90
2022.00 416.95
2029.00 416.91
2039.00 416.90
2045.00 416.71
2050.00 416.93
2063.00 416.73
2068.00 416.50
2076.00 416.40
2085.00 416.48
2090.00 416.81
2095.00 416.79
2097.00 416.49
2103.00 416.00
2107.00 416.52
2110.00 416.62
2117.00 416.58
2120.00 416.79
2120.00 415.97
2122.00 415.84
2125.00 416.04
2134.00 415.95
2139.00 416.14
2149.00 416.09
2164.00 416.02
2164.00 416.58
2165.00 415.48
2171.00 415.67
2179.00 415.72
2184.00 415.45
THW MY4: (11/2013)
Station Elevation
1594.50 419.82
1599.24 420.11
1608.33 420.62
1618.08 420.09
1625.96 420.18
1627.38 420.50
1629.78 419.31
1639.80 419.46
1648.44 419.62
1653.18 419.79
1655.39 420.08
1667.21 419.19
1679.77 419.42
1684.09 419.47
1685.80 419.53
1688.30 419.89
1695.33 420.05
1702.36 419.98
1704.72 419.83
1707.08 419.51
1708.93 419.24
1715.08 419.61
1716.39 419.81
1717.85 418.58
1724.87 418.47
1730.21 418.70
1738.68 419.15
1748.66 419.22
1752.64 419.34
1763.57 418.83
1765.47 418.98
1768.22 418.78
1772.11 418.60
1773.17 419.17
1774.58 418.53
1777.47 417.74
THW MYS: (10/2014)
Station Elevation
2396.60 412.80
2401.33 412.63
2430.38 412.48
2436.30 413.31
2450.59 412.25
2468.35 411.77
2483.18 411.24
2493.72 411.31
2505.81 411.62
2507.96 410.99
2518.54 410.96
2529.75 411.20
2553.69 411.05
2554.88 410.03
2561.36 409.56
2572.22 410.29
2594.41 409.99
2600.46 408.91
2620.58 409.83
2629.50 408.69
2647.40 409.44
2662.00 408.49
2691.95 408.87
2701.20 407.95
Water Surf MY5: 2014 Bankfull MY5: 2014
Station Elevation Station Elevation
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

MYO: (5/2009) THW MY3: (12/2010) THW MY2: (8/2011) THW MY3: (9/2012) THW MY4: (11/2013) THW MYS: (10/2014) Water Surf MY5: 2014 Bankfull MY5: 2014
n Elevation Station Elevation IStation Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation IStation Elevation I Station jElevation
1620.00 420.26 1644.00 420.04 2187.00 415.22 1791.09 418.61
1623.00 420.47 1648.00 419.85 2192.00 415.37 1792.14 418.97
1627.50 420.45 1648.00 420.00 2196.00 415.55 1793.84 418.29
1629.00 420.61 1655.00 420.17 2200.00 415.47 1806.16 418.12
1629.50 420.95 1657.50 420.38 2207.00 415.64 1810.08 417.91
1630.00 419.65 1658.00 419.54 2211.00 415.23 1818.09 418.37
1633.50 419.63 1666.50 419.22 2216.00 415.29 1819.24 418.88
1637.00 419.73 1671.00 419.24 2224.00 415.34 1820.37 417.72
1641.00 420.04 1677.50 419.26 2231.00 415.40 1835.67 418.51
1642.50 420.25 1680.50 419.33 2241.00 415.89 1845.08 418.37
1645.00 420.27 1681.00 419.38 2242.00 415.02 1849.34 418.00
1647.50 420.07 1692.00 419.95 2250.00 415.19 1853.06 418.02
1648.50 420.07 1702.00 419.71 2254.00 415.39 1857.42 418.26
1652.50 420.28 1705.50 419.32 2260.00 414.83 1867.13 418.50
1655.00 420.49 1712.50 419.72 2269.00 415.46 1869.32 418.55
1657.00 420.65 1713.00 418.74 2271.00 415.42 1870.91 417.98
1657.50 419.67 1715.00 418.90 2271.00 414.97 1877.77 417.84
1661.00 419.60 1722.50 418.55 2275.00 414.52 1887.50 418.00
1664.50 419.48 1725.00 418.72 2278.00 414.75 1892.97 417.84
1667.00 419.40 1730.00 418.99 2282.00 415.11 1894.16 418.10
1672.50 419.62 1734.50 419.24 2298.00 414.49 1895.64 417.55
1678.00 419.46 1741.00 419.29 2304.00 414.89 1913.62 417.41
1680.50 419.49 1745.00 419.28 2316.00 415.20 1915.17 417.58
1684.50 420.09 1750.00 419.30 2317.00 414.10 1925.21 417.47
1687.00 420.30 1752.50 419.25 2320.00 414.88 1925.87 417.54
1697.50 420.30 1757.50 419.22 2322.00 413.85 1930.06 417.63
1702.00 420.11 1762.50 419.13 2327.00 414.38 1944.75 417.52
1702.50 419.93 1766.00 419.16 2339.00 413.90 1946.05 417.76
1707.50 419.57 1771.50 418.98 2349.00 414.39 1947.86 416.58
1711.00 419.81 1775.00 419.40 2350.00 414.70 1975.28 416.87
1712.50 419.95 1776.00 417.72 2353.00 413.30 1996.88 416.84
1713.00 418.96 1779.00 418.18 2360.00 414.00 2009.78 416.59
1719.00 418.74 1784.00 418.55 2365.00 414.16 2021.67 416.65
1724.00 418.83 1789.00 418.78 2380.00 413.74 2061.08 416.11
1730.00 419.24 1792.00 418.78 2383.00 413.18 2062.89 416.15
1735.00 419.49 1796.00 418.81 2390.00 413.39 2074.07 416.64
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

MYO: (5/2009) THW MY3: (12/2010) THW MY2: (8/2011) THW MY3: (9/2012) THW MY4: (11/2013) THW MYS: (10/2014) Water Surf MY5: 2014 Bankfull MY5: 2014
n Elevation Station Elevation IStation Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation IStation Elevation I Station jElevation
1744.00 419.44 1799.50 418.71 2396.00 413.55 2098.06 416.57
1752.50 419.46 1806.00 418.25 2397.00 412.36 2107.19 416.57
1760.00 419.35 1810.00 418.34 2400.00 413.38 2108.92 416.86
1763.00 419.46 1814.00 418.63 2402.00 412.66 2111.74 415.70
1768.00 419.52 1817.50 418.70 2410.00 413.00 2143.07 415.96
1770.50 419.17 1818.00 418.99 2415.00 413.07 2153.79 416.38
1773.00 419.35 1818.50 418.03 2424.00 412.47 2156.89 415.51
1774.00 419.66 1824.00 418.07 2430.00 412.40 2175.78 415.06
1775.50 418.02 1830.50 418.54 2438.00 413.52 2191.01 415.31
1778.00 418.39 1837.50 418.50 2443.00 412.90 2210.83 415.14
1782.00 418.55 1842.00 418.58 2452.00 411.96 2221.86 414.97
1788.00 419.12 1848.00 418.30 2455.00 412.38 2228.46 415.31
1798.00 418.99 1854.50 418.35 2458.00 411.40 2229.70 415.74
1803.50 418.31 1858.00 418.41 2467.00 412.19 2231.44 414.75
1807.50 418.29 1863.00 418.54 2485.00 411.82 2246.18 414.85
1815.00 418.83 1870.00 418.43 2486.00 410.79 2256.38 415.22
1817.50 418.89 1875.50 418.48 2496.00 411.59 2259.20 415.45
1817.50 419.13 1875.75 417.91 2506.00 411.53 2261.25 414.55
1818.50 418.34 1879.00 417.70 2511.00 410.49 2293.33 414.72
1823.00 418.25 1886.50 417.95 2526.00 411.19 2305.13 414.37
1827.50 418.49 1889.00 417.93 2526.00 410.40 2305.99 415.01
1832.00 418.78 1890.50 418.09 2545.00 410.08 2307.28 414.08
1838.00 418.68 1897.50 417.21 2550.00 410.76 2308.44 414.02
1847.50 418.56 1902.00 417.66 2550.00 409.88 2309.83 414.60
1852.50 418.49 1905.00 418.10 2565.00 409.29 2310.94 413.82
1856.50 418.48 1905.50 417.73 2580.00 411.12 2322.89 414.22
1867.50 418.83 1908.50 417.67 2590.00 410.37 2326.82 414.06
1870.00 418.56 1913.00 417.70 2592.00 409.36 2333.50 413.94
1873.00 418.74 1919.00 417.82 2595.00 410.08 2339.78 414.51
1874.00 418.70 1925.50 417.83 2595.00 408.90 2342.48 413.24
1875.00 418.23 1929.50 418.05 2601.00 408.72 2349.95 414.19
1877.50 417.84 1940.50 417.93 2605.00 409.24 2362.78 413.91
1885.00 418.49 1943.50 417.76 2611.00 409.65 2372.66 412.95
1888.50 418.29 1944.00 417.55 2620.00 409.12 2378.45 413.31
1892.50 418.30 1948.00 417.41 2625.00 409.82 2382.28 412.96
1896.50 417.60 1954.00 417.37 2625.00 408.53 2387.21 413.58
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

MYO: (5/2009)
n Elevation
THW MY1: (12/2010)
Station Elevation
1902.50 417.87
1905.00 418.13
1905.50 418.46
1906.50 417.72
1910.00 417.49
1913.00 417.61
1916.00 417.70
1920.00 417.76
1925.00 417.77
1927.50 417.95
1931.50 418.00
1941.50 417.93
1944.50 417.75
1946.50 417.57
1950.50 417.66
1953.00 417.53
1957.50 417.68
1958.00 417.73
1958.50 417.91
1960.00 416.64
1964.00 416.97
1965.50 417.16
1972.00 417.32
1975.00 417.13
1977.00 416.99
1982.00 416.99
1990.00 417.09
1997.50 417.06
2007.50 417.18
2013.50 417.03
2017.50 416.97
2023.50 416.96
2033.00 416.92
2044.00 416.92
2051.50 416.88
2056.50 416.63
THW MY2: (8/2011)
Station Elevation
1957.00 417.54
1960.00 417.77
1960.50 416.48
1964.00 416.83
1969.00 417.13
1976.00 417.08
1981.00 416.87
1987.50 416.98
1995.00 417.01
2001.00 417.02
2008.00 417.04
2013.00 416.99
2020.00 416.94
2025.50 417.04
2033.50 416.90
2038.00 416.98
2043.50 416.75
2044.00 416.75
2050.50 416.94
2059.00 416.73
2064.50 416.72
2070.00 416.37
2074.00 416.27
2078.00 416.50
2083.00 416.50
2089.00 416.59
2095.50 416.70
2099.00 416.25
2102.00 415.99
2107.00 416.44
2110.00 416.46
2117.00 416.69
2119.00 416.82
2119.50 415.81
2121.00 415.75
2122.50 416.15
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
THW MY3: (9/2012)
tation Elevation
2632.00 408.55
2640.00 409.05
2643.00 410.36
2649.00 409.33
2649.00 407.89
2657.00 408.51
2663.00 408.87
2674.00 408.71
2680.00 408.36
2686.00 408.84
2686.00 409.40
2690.00 408.14
2702.00 407.38
THW MY4: (11/2013)
Station Elevation
2390.85 412.31
2402.05 413.00
2421.50 412.26
2427.53 413.02
2439.21 411.75
2449.10 412.42
2450.45 412.47
2452.17 412.04
2467.32 411.52
2474.50 411.96
2476.01 411.19
2488.60 411.37
2490.17 411.65
2496.79 410.72
2513.20 410.83
2515.30 411.29
2517.63 410.54
2537.28 410.28
2539.68 411.11
2541.53 409.92
2554.22 409.57
2560.44 410.04
2566.75 410.48
2568.60 409.57
2569.70 409.78
2576.37 410.20
2588.29 409.17
2594.01 409.90
2614.79 409.40
2616.56 410.09
2618.13 408.91
2639.85 409.72
2640.56 409.36
2642.78 407.77
2659.50 409.00
2680.73 408.19
THW MYS: (10/2014) Water Surf MY5: 2014 Bankfull MY5: 2014
Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

MYO: (5/2009)
n Elevation
THW MY1: (12/2010)
Station Elevation
2062.00 416.64
2066.00 416.64
2068.00 416.38
2072.00 416.16
2075.00 416.16
2079.00 416.36
2081.50 416.38
2089.50 416.65
2097.00 416.37
2100.50 416.09
2104.50 415.96
2107.50 416.35
2111.00 416.49
2118.00 416.50
2119.00 416.80
2120.50 416.83
2121.00 415.75
2123.00 415.69
2124.50 416.20
2129.00 416.02
2136.00 415.95
2141.00 416.21
2147.00 416.26
2151.00 415.87
2155.50 415.78
2158.00 415.94
2161.50 416.24
2164.50 416.46
2165.00 415.17
2169.00 415.25
2172.50 415.65
2180.00 415.49
2184.00 415.51
2187.00 415.29
2190.00 415.31
2192.50 415.40
THW MY2: (8/2011)
Station Elevation
2128.00 416.01
2133.50 415.90
2140.00 416.41
2144.50 416.30
2149.50 415.82
2158.50 416.07
2162.50 416.20
2163.00 415.74
2163.25 416.48
2164.00 415.27
2169.00 415.39
2172.50 415.50
2181.00 415.40
2186.00 415.19
2188.50 415.06
2196.00 415.39
2199.50 415.34
2205.00 415.40
2207.50 415.52
2212.00 415.15
2215.00 415.30
2217.50 415.23
2221.00 415.16
2225.00 415.23
2227.00 415.15
2230.00 415.30
2232.00 415.30
2236.50 415.25
2240.00 415.59
2240.50 415.80
2241.50 414.83
2244.00 414.94
2247.00 415.09
2257.00 415.04
2259.00 414.81
2261.00 415.02
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
THW MY3: (9/2012) THW MY4: (11/2013) THW MYS: (10/2014) Water Surf MY5: 2014 Bankfull MY5: 2014
ation Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
2682.95 408.60
2684.66 408.08
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

MYO: (5/2009)
n Elevation
THW MY1: (12/2010)
Station Elevation
2197.00 415.50
2202.00 415.53
2207.50 415.66
2211.00 415.37
2217.50 415.41
2225.50 415.31
2232.50 415.29
2237.00 415.31
2240.00 415.63
2241.00 415.91
2242.00 414.90
2244.50 414.93
2250.00 415.15
2257.50 415.07
2260.50 415.03
2268.00 415.33
2269.50 415.42
2270.00 415.41
2270.50 414.81
2276.50 414.58
2282.50 415.03
2289.00 414.88
2292.00 414.74
2296.00 414.45
2298.50 414.43
2302.00 414.70
2305.00 414.88
2310.00 414.67
2315.00 415.05
2315.50 413.65
2318.50 413.60
2320.00 414.83
2322.50 413.75
2327.50 414.43
2333.00 414.33
2338.00 414.02
THW MY2: (8/2011)
Station Elevation
2265.00 415.23
2268.00 415.33
2270.00 415.37
2274.00 414.38
2278.00 414.86
2282.00 415.02
2285.50 414.93
2294.00 414.63
2300.00 414.64
2302.00 414.73
2314.00 414.80
2315.00 414.99
2315.50 413.74
2317.50 414.04
2318.00 414.74
2319.50 413.75
2322.50 413.65
2326.00 414.25
2333.00 414.32
2340.00 413.91
2344.50 414.08
2349.50 414.34
2350.50 414.49
2351.00 413.11
2354.00 413.16
2358.00 413.76
2363.00 414.19
2371.00 414.09
2378.00 413.78
2382.00 413.37
2385.50 413.52
2390.00 413.54
2394.50 413.47
2395.00 413.71
2398.00 412.11
2399.50 413.58
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
THW MY3: (9/2012) THW MY4: (11/2013) THW MYS: (10/2014) Water Surf MY5: 2014 Bankfull MY5: 2014
ation Elevation IStation Elevation Station Elevation I IStatio n Elevation I Station jElevation
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

MYO: (5/2009)
n Elevation
THW MY1: (12/2010)
Station Elevation
2344.00 414.10
2350.00 414.47
2350.50 414.58
2352.50 413.18
2355.00 413.17
2359.50 414.06
2362.00 414.34
2372.00 414.13
2378.50 413.88
2382.00 413.52
2387.50 413.57
2394.50 413.59
2396.00 413.87
2397.00 412.72
2398.50 412.23
2400.00 413.69
2401.00 412.97
2403.50 413.01
2406.50 413.27
2410.50 413.28
2414.00 413.32
2415.50 413.23
2419.50 413.05
2423.50 412.71
2427.50 412.73
2431.00 412.65
2433.00 412.83
2438.00 413.39
2446.00 412.69
2450.00 412.53
2453.00 412.24
2456.00 412.54
2456.50 412.71
2457.00 411.86
2458.50 411.63
2463.50 411.94
THW MY2: (8/2011)
Station Elevation
2400.00 412.82
2406.50 413.07
2415.00 413.05
2420.00 412.74
2424.00 412.65
2428.00 412.62
2431.00 412.57
2440.00 413.28
2445.00 412.65
2452.50 412.08
2455.00 412.52
2455.50 411.67
2459.00 411.58
2465.00 411.66
2469.00 411.70
2475.00 411.69
2480.00 411.50
2483.00 411.47
2485.50 411.83
2486.00 410.97
2491.50 410.78
2495.00 411.31
2499.00 411.45
2505.50 411.56
2506.00 410.78
2512.00 410.56
2516.00 410.91
2520.00 410.76
2523.00 410.56
2525.50 411.23
2526.00 410.69
2530.00 410.35
2533.50 410.58
2536.00 410.59
2538.00 410.36
2541.00 410.47
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
THW MY3: (9/2012) THW MY4: (11/2013) THW MYS: (10/2014) Water Surf MY5: 2014 Bankfull MY5: 2014
ation Elevation IStation Elevation Station Elevation I IStatio n Elevation I Station Elevation
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

MYO: (5/2009)
n Elevation
THW MY1: (12/2010)
Station Elevation
2465.50 411.98
2468.50 411.62
2474.00 411.44
2478.00 411.40
2485.50 411.53
2486.00 411.55
2486.50 410.93
2488.00 410.78
2492.00 410.71
2496.50 411.44
2505.50 411.30
2506.50 411.53
2507.00 410.72
2510.50 410.39
2514.00 410.87
2517.00 411.05
2522.00 410.86
2524.00 411.22
2526.00 410.65
2528.00 411.34
2530.00 410.52
2538.50 410.31
2543.00 410.35
2547.00 410.70
2547.50 411.08
2549.00 410.89
2549.50 409.96
2552.00 409.87
2559.00 409.67
2564.00 409.33
2568.00 409.75
2573.00 410.19
2579.00 410.42
2588.00 410.04
2589.00 410.47
2590.00 409.47
THW MY2: (8/2011)
,tation Elevation
2545.50 410.34
2548.50 410.82
2550.00 411.05
2550.50 410.11
2553.00 409.90
2563.00 409.66
2568.00 409.71
2573.50 410.30
2583.00 410.45
2590.00 410.18
2590.50 410.49
2591.50 409.48
2593.00 409.82
2594.50 409.79
2595.00 410.40
2595.50 409.04
2600.50 409.06
2608.00 409.76
2620.00 409.32
2623.50 409.67
2624.00 410.04
2624.50 408.75
2631.00 408.81
2639.00 409.11
2643.50 409.34
2648.50 409.57
2649.50 408.18
2653.00 408.15
2655.50 408.66
2661.50 409.08
2674.00 408.97
2683.00 408.68
2688.00 408.53
2699.00 407.90
2699.50 407.89
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
THW MY3: (9/2012) THW MY4: (11/2013) THW MYS: (10/2014) Water Surf MY5: 2014 Bankfull MY5: 2014
ation Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

MYO: (5/2009) THW MY3: (12/2010) THW MY2: (8/2011) THW MY3: (9/2012) THW MY4: (11/2013) THW MYS: (10/2014) Water Surf MY5: 2014 Bankfull MY5: 2014
n Elevation Station Elevation IStation Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation Station Elevation IStation Elevation I Station jElevation
2592.00 409.46
2593.00 410.21
2594.00 408.87
2598.00 408.83
2606.00 409.62
2611.50 409.36
2616.00 409.12
2622.00 409.58
2622.50 409.90
2623.50 408.70
2628.50 408.74
2635.00 408.86
2643.00 409.24
2647.00 409.22
2647.50 409.45
2648.00 408.07
2652.00 407.98
2658.00 408.84
2664.00 408.85
2671.00 408.98
2679.00 408.59
2687.00 408.74
2687.50 408.97
2688.00 409.01
2689.00 408.35
2696.00 407.51
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Cross Sections
Number Station Y -axis
7
1577
418
7
1577
426
8
2501
409
8
2501
418
9
2562
409
9
2562
418
Grade Control Structures
Type Station Elevation
CV
1063.00
425.16
logsill
1397.50
423.65
logsill
1443.82
423.34
root wad
1506.00
422.75
log step
1563.08
421.98
root wad
1592.41
421.46
logsill
1629.81
420.77
step rock
1658.23
420.65
step rock
1714.00
419.87
logsill
1774.56
419.47
logsill
1818.37
419.06
step rock
1873.98
418.57
logsill
1905.15
418.18
logsill
1958.14
417.70
step rock
2120.00
416.79
logsill
2163.43
416.41
logsill
2240.71
415.73
step rock
2269.97
415.40
logsill
2316.53
414.94
step rock
2350.00
414.49
logsill
2397.65
413.62
logsill
2435.53
413.18
logsill
2454.81
412.58
logsill
2484.98
411.97
logsill
2505.46
411.69
step rock
2525.00
411.12
j -hook
2548.00
411.16
logsill
2591.55
410.27
logsill
2623.25
410.01
logsill
2647.83
409.47
step rock
2690.00
408.79
Rootwads
Station elevation
1485
423.00
1535
421.98
1805
419.06
1895
418.18
1940
417.70
2075
416.79
Cattle Crossing
Cattle Crossing start Cattle Crossing end
elevation Station elevation Station
418 1670.00 418 1720.00
421 1670.00 421 1720.00
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 7.1 Pebble Count Plot: X -Sec 1 -- MY5 -2014 -- UT to Bear Creek Stream Restoration (EEP Project #92347)
Cross Section One - Northern UT
2014
Descript.
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Class %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
Silt/Clay
.062
32
32
32
Sand
Very Fine Sand
.125
2
2
34
Fine Sand
.25
0
0
34
Medium Sand
0.5
14
14
48
Coarse Sand
1.0
7
7
55
Very Course Sand
2
4
4
59
Gravel
Very Fine Gravel
4.0
5
5
64
Fine Gravel
5.7
8
8
72
Fine Gravel
8
2
2
74
Medium Gravel
13
4
4
78
Medium Gravel
16
5
5
83
Coarse Gravel
22.6
1
1
84
Coarse Gravel
32
2
2
86
Very Course Gravel
45
2
2
88
Very Course Gravel
64
7
7
95
Cobble
Small Cobble
90
1
1
96
Small Cobble
128
3
3
99
Medium Cobble
180
1
1
100
Large Cobble
256
0
0
100
Boulder
Small Boulders
362
0
0
100
Small Boulders
512
0
0
100
Medium Boulders
1024
0
0
100
Large Boulders
2048
0
0
100
Bedrock
Bedrock
40096
0
0
100
Total 100
Summary Data
D50 1
D84 22.3
D95 64
Cross - Section 1
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
c
m
L
d
a
3
E
U
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
80
70
c
60
L
Q
a 50
N
m 40
U
30
20
c 10
0
Cumulative Percent
•o > •,3 O '� c3 7i s cP > > � P 77 rn 9 > > c� cP s � � )7
o� cs S S p p > cP 6 c� 6 Q o co CPO S6 Oc� c� oi� Q o0
Q o 00
Particle Size Class (mm)
MY1 (11/22/10) MY2 (8/15/11) MY3 (9/15/12)
MY4 (10/25/13) ,MY5 (10/13/2014)
Individual Class Percent
•o •'� o � 'P Q
o� cs cS c
S s p o > > v > o > o 3 V-
0- cop L& oco
a
w s6,
Particle Size Class (mm)
■ MY1 (11/22/10) ■ MY 2 (8/15/11) MY 3 (9/15/12) ■ MY4 (10/25/13) _ MY5 (10/13/2014)
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 7.2 Pebble Count Plot: X -Sec 2 -- MY5 -2014 -- UT to Bear Creek Stream Restoration (EEP Project #92347)
Cross Section Two - Northern UT
2014
Descript.
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Class %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
Silt /Clay
.062
69
69
69
Sand
Very Fine Sand
.125
0
0
69
Fine Sand
.25
0
0
69
Medium Sand
0.5
2
2
71
Coarse Sand
1.0
0
0
71
Very Course Sand
2
1
1
72
Gravel
Very Fine Gravel
4.0
4
4
76
Fine Gravel
5.7
2
2
78
Fine Gravel
8
1
1
79
Medium Gravel
13
2
2
81
Medium Gravel
16
0
0
81
Coarse Gravel
22.6
1
1
82
Coarse Gravel
32
1
1
83
Very Course Gravel
45
6
6
89
Very Course Gravel
64
5
5
94
Cobble
Small Cobble
90
4
4
98
Small Cobble
128
2
2
100
Medium Cobble
180
0
0
100
Large Cobble
256
0
0
100
Boulder
Small Boulders
362
0
0
100
Small Boulders
512
0
0
100
Medium Boulders
1024
0
0
100
Large Boulders
2048
0
0
100
Bedrock
Bedrock
40096
0
0
100
I otai
Summary Data
D50 0.062
D84 45
D95 90
Cross - Section 2
1UU
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
11 ----- - - - - --
., IIIIIIIIIIIIIIn111111 !! ■_'': ■��������������III
., 1111111111111111 /.::i��:::�111111111111111111n
• 1111_ 11IIIII�iii��� !:i;illlllllllllllllllllllllll
�' - .�Illlllllllllllllllllllllllln
I.I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■���� ►111/
•; 1111, iiii�l��lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllln
, f111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111n
Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllln
, Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllln
Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllln
, nllllnllllnllllnllnnllnnllllnllnnlln
1 • 1 1
Individual Class Percent
70
60
c
d
50
m
a
y 40
R
U 30
R
20
=a
c
10
o
Q o 00
Particle Size Class (mm)
■ M1 (11/22/10) ■ MY2 (8/15/11) MY3 (9/15/12) ■ MY4 (10/25/13) MY5 (10/13/14)
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 7.3 Pebble Count Plot: X -Sec 3 -- MY5 -2014 -- UT to Bear Creek Stream Restoration (EEP Project #92347)
Cross Section Three - Northern UT
2014
Descript.
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Class %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
Silt /Clay
.062
26
26
26
Sand
Very Fine Sand
.125
0
0
26
Fine Sand
.25
0
0
26
Medium Sand
0.5
5
5
31
Coarse Sand
1.0
0
0
31
Very Course Sand
2
0
0
31
Gravel
Very Fine Gravel
4.0
3
3
34
Fine Gravel
5.7
13
13
47
Fine Gravel
8
11
11
58
Medium Gravel
13
7
7
65
Medium Gravel
16
7
7
72
Coarse Gravel
22.6
4
4
76
Coarse Gravel
32
5
5
81
Very Course Gravel
45
6
6
87
Very Course Gravel
64
11
11
98
Cobble
Small Cobble
90
2
2
100
Small Cobble
128
0
0
100
Medium Cobble
180
0
0
100
Large Cobble
256
0
0
100
Boulder
Small Boulders
362
0
0
100
Small Boulders
512
0
0
100
Medium Boulders
1024
0
0
100
Large Boulders
2048
0
0
100
Bedrock
Bedrock
40096
0
0
100
i otai
Summary Data
D50 8
D84 45
D95 64
Cross - Section 3
1UU
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants
F111R, ROW-
M11
.• 111111111111
•
'1,11„■■■
�111���i� ■
■ /��i
/11111111111111111111
•
I���1 "1/,�;i/1„11,1'111"11'1„11„1
'1'%/',
��ri�■ �:; �� /i�1111111111111111111111111111
.•
���
.�/,1�,;11i
�
11"1,11„11,11'11"11'1'111„1
•
11�1111�I1_111
//♦
1111111111111111111111111111111
•
��/!/
1/ 111/
i�/
1111111111111111111111111111111111
� ■ ■■
■/'11„1'111'
11„1,11„1111„11„11'1'111„1
•
,1'11„11„1'11"
11„1,11„11,1„11"11'1„11"1
• ,1,11,111,11,111,
11,11,111,11,1,111„11'1„11„1
• • '- IDII
•
I
•
• I
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 7.4 Pebble Count Plot: X -Sec 4 -- MY5 -2014 -- UT to Bear Creek Stream Restoration (EEP Project #92347)
Cross Section Four - Northern UT
2014
Descript.
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Class %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
Silt /Clay
.062
18
18
18
Sand
Very Fine Sand
.125
0
0
18
Fine Sand
.25
2
2
20
Medium Sand
0.5
30
30
50
Coarse Sand
1.0
5
5
55
Very Course Sand
2
3
3
58
Gravel
Very Fine Gravel
4.0
5
5
63
Fine Gravel
5.7
3
3
66
Fine Gravel
8
4
4
70
Medium Gravel
13
1
1
71
Medium Gravel
16
2
2
73
Coarse Gravel
22.6
6
6
79
Coarse Gravel
32
1
1
80
Very Course Gravel
45
6
6
86
Very Course Gravel
64
13
13
99
Cobble
Small Cobble
90
0
0
99
Small Cobble
128
0
0
99
Medium Cobble
180
1
1
100
Large Cobble
256
0
0
100
Boulder
Small Boulders
362
0
0
100
Small Boulders
512
0
0
100
Medium Boulders
1024
0
0
100
Large Boulders
2048
0
0
100
Bedrock
Bedrock
40096
0
0
100
Total 100
Summary Data
D50 0.5
D84 45
D95 64
Cross - Section 4
c
d
L
d
a
m
co
3
E
U
Cumulative Percent
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
O � c' cP Q S rn > cP c9 130 5- � c? 1
Particle Size Class (mm)
MY1 (11/22/10) MY2 (8/15/11) MY3 (9/16/12) -MY4 (10/25/13) -MY5 (10/13/14
Individual Class Percent
40
., 35
c
m
30
m
a
y 25
R
U 20
R
3a 15
c 10
61•
0 n ■nn nn n■ non ■ nnn� nnnn �n ■n� n■ n ■ ■ ■
Particle Size Class (mm)
MY1 (11/22/10) ■ MY2 (8/15/11) MY3 (9/16/12) ■ MY4 (10/25/13) MY5 (10/13/14)
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 7.5 Pebble Count Plot: X -Sec 5 -- MY5 -2014 -- UT to Bear Creek Stream Restoration (EEP Project #92347)
Cross Section Five - Northern UT
2014
Descript.
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Class %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
Silt/Clay
.062
0
0
0
Sand
Very Fine Sand
.125
0
0
0
Fine Sand
.25
0
0
0
Medium Sand
0.5
0
0
0
Coarse Sand
1.0
0
0
0
Very Course Sand
2
0
0
0
Gravel
Very Fine Gravel
4.0
15
15
15
Fine Gravel
5.7
5
5
20
Fine Gravel
8
10
10
30
Medium Gravel
13
12
12
42
Medium Gravel
16
7
7
49
Coarse Gravel
22.6
3
3
52
Coarse Gravel
32
4
4
56
Very Course Gravel
45
1
1
57
Very Course Gravel
64
3
3
60
Cobble
Small Cobble
90
1
1
61
Small Cobble
128
19
19
80
Medium Cobble
180
0
0
80
Large Cobble
256
0
0
80
Boulder
Small Boulders
362
11
11
91
Small Boulders
512
9
9
100
Medium Boulders
1024
0
0
100
Large Boulders
2048
1 0
1 0
100
Bedrock
Bedrock
40096
0
0
100
Total 100 100
Summary Data
D50 22.3
D84 362
D95 512
Cross - Section 5
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
., 111111111111111111111111111111 %� /..:i /��1111111
. 1111111111111111111111 .�■�__.��_..�� /1, /111111111
', 1111111111111111111 %�i111�i1111!��IIIIIIIIIIIIII
1111111111111111�� /.!::ii�lll.!ii /1111111111111111
'; Illllllllllll�i %! 111111 _�i:i�11111111111111111111
111111111111�.� /�111��II ..111111111111111111111111
1��■■■■■■ ��/ 11/ II�I�i111111111111111111111111111
1111111111/ �: i•: iillllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
1=_=_=_=_=_=_ �% i/_ �"/, i1111111111111111111111111111111111
i:::::: 1111►, IIIIIIIIIIIIIIYIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Individual Class Percent
40
35
m
m
30
a.
a 25
U 20
R
15
2
10
5
0 111411MILL6.1i A . I . I i
pS O - S •> O > > S c � c� Q 0t) .O 0
Q O X90
Particle Size Class (mm)
■ MY1 (11/22/10) ■ MY2 (9/21/11) MY3 (9/16/12) ■ MY4 (10/25/13) MY5 (10/13/14)
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 7.6 Pebble Count Plot: X -Sec 6 -- MY5 -2014 -- UT to Bear Creek Stream Restoration (EEP Project #92347)
Cross Section Six - Northern UT
Descript.
Material
Size (mi
Silt /Clay
Silt /Clay
.062
Sand
Very Fine Sand
.125
Fine Sand
.25
Medium Sand
0.5
Coarse Sand
1.0
Very Course Sand
2
Gravel
Very Fine Gravel
4.0
Fine Gravel
5.7
Fine Gravel
8
Medium Gravel
13
Medium Gravel
16
Coarse Gravel
22.6
Coarse Gravel
32
Very Course Gravel
45
Very Course Gravel
64
Cobble
Small Cobble
90
Small Cobble
128
Medium Cobble
180
Large Cobble
256
Boulder
Small Boulders
362
Small Boulders
512
Medium Boulders
1024
Large Boulders
2048
Bedrock
JBedrock
40096
Total
Summary Data
D50 5.7
D84 64
D95 128
Cross - Section 6
2014
Total #
Class %
Cum %
20
20
20
0
0
20
11
11
31
0
0
31
12
12
43
2
2
45
4
4
49
8
8
57
6
6
63
5
5
68
5
5
73
0
0
73
2
2
75
5
5
80
4
4
84
5
5
89
6
6
95
4
4
99
0
0
99
0
0
99
1
1
100
0
0
100
0
0
100
0
0
100
100
70
c 60
d
m 50
a
y
40
U
R 30
> 20
�a
10
0
Individual Class Percent
'0 6 c� r 'mss ° O a F W o ° � 9 o Q °o
otr c 0
Particle Size Class (mm)
MY1 (11/22/10) ■ MY2 (9/21/11) MY3 (9/16/12) ■ MY4 (10/25/13) MY5 (10/13/14)
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants
1110 HE"
:;
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIA!!!!::
:������11111111
:
■1111�r /:,.�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
111111111111���11��
,,
i■■■..•--••■■■■!!_
.���111111111111111111111111111
i� %■i��������
■�i/ X111111111111111111111111111111
i■■
�1��11!:.
�11111111111111111111111111111111111
,,
11111
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111
.
111►, 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
,
,
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
,
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
70
c 60
d
m 50
a
y
40
U
R 30
> 20
�a
10
0
Individual Class Percent
'0 6 c� r 'mss ° O a F W o ° � 9 o Q °o
otr c 0
Particle Size Class (mm)
MY1 (11/22/10) ■ MY2 (9/21/11) MY3 (9/16/12) ■ MY4 (10/25/13) MY5 (10/13/14)
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 7.7 Pebble Count Plot: X -Sec 7 -- MY5 -2014 -- UT to Bear Creek Stream Restoration (EEP Project #92347)
Cross Section Seven - Southern UT
2014
Descript.
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Class %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
Silt /Clay
.062
0
0
0
Sand
Very Fine Sand
.125
0
0
0
Fine Sand
.25
0
0
0
Medium Sand
0.5
0
0
0
Coarse Sand
1.0
6
6
6
Very Course Sand
2
10
10
16
Gravel
Very Fine Gravel
4.0
8
8
24
Fine Gravel
5.7
12
12
36
Fine Gravel
8
13
13
49
Medium Gravel
13
13
13
62
Medium Gravel
16
6
6
68
Coarse Gravel
22.6
8
8
76
Coarse Gravel
32
10
10
86
Very Course Gravel
45
9
9
95
Very Course Gravel
64
3
1 3
98
Cobble
Small Cobble
90
1
1
99
Small Cobble
128
0
0
99
Medium Cobble
180
1
1
100
Large Cobble
256
0
0
100
Boulder
Small Boulders
362
0
0
100
Small Boulders
512
0
0
100
Medium Boulders
1024
0
0
100
Large Boulders
2048
0
0
100
Bedrock
JBedrock
40096
0
0
100
Total 100
Summary Data
D50 11.3
D84 32
D95 45
Cross - Section 7
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
�, IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIID !== .=.��!!i,ii■■���IIIIIIIIIIII
. 1111111111111111_ ��/ ,1111,����111111111111111111111
111111111111►. i111/ /1_:�!�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
11111111111�111�!! „■ /11111111111111111111111111
, II����ii�����::�1 /111111111111111111111111111111
1::::.: iir,:: �IIII11111111111111111111111111111111
; 1!!1111/ 11111►. 111111111111111111111111111111111
1111111/ 1111��1111111111111111111111111111111111
111111�111��111111111111111111111111111111111111
IIII�111. i111111111111111111111111111111111111111
1 • • . 1 1
Individual Class Percent
40
35
m
30
m
a
w 25
R
V 20
R
15
2 10
5
0 A,J1,AJ11 L 1 .1 i
O •> •a O Q S d > >
i9 O > O > 00 c c0 A Q O•s O
Q O 00
Particle Size Class (mm)
■ MY1 (11/23/10) ■ MY2 (9/21/11) MY3 (9/16/12) ■ MY4 (10/25/13) MY5 (10/13/14)
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 7.8 Pebble Count Plot: X -Sec 8 -- MY5 -2014 -- UT to Bear Creek Stream Restoration (EEP Project #92347)
Cross Section Eight- Southern UT
2014
Descript.
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Class %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
Silt/Clay
.062
1
1
1
Sand
Very Fine Sand
.125
0
0
1
Fine Sand
.25
1
1
2
Medium Sand
0.5
0
0
2
Coarse Sand
1.0
4
4
6
Very Course Sand
2
2
2
8
Gravel
Very Fine Gravel
4.0
4
4
12
Fine Gravel
5.7
12
12
24
Fine Gravel
8
10
10
34
Medium Gravel
13
7
7
41
Medium Gravel
16
10
10
51
Coarse Gravel
22.6
14
14
65
Coarse Gravel
32
9
9
74
Very Course Gravel
45
5
5
79
Very Course Gravel
64
6
6
85
Cobble
Small Cobble
90
9
9
94
Small Cobble
128
1
1
95
Medium Cobble
180
4
4
99
Large Cobble
256
0
0
99
Boulder
Small Boulders
362
1
1
100
Small Boulders
512
0
0
100
Medium Boulders
1024
0
0
100
Large Boulders
2048
0
0
100
Bedrock
Bedrock
40096
0
0
100
Total 100
Summary Data
D50 16
D84 64
D95 128
Cross - Section 8
c
m
L
d
a
d
R
E
U
c
m
L
d
a
N
y
lC
U
7
'v
c
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Cumulative Percent
°rn s ``°'P s
s s o o o > a > > ° > � t -1 � � 0- co °°
°o
Q ° 06
Particle Size Class (mm)
MY1 (11/23/10) MY2 (8/24/11) MY3 (9/15/12) —MY4 (10/25/13) MY5 (10/13/14)
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Individual Class Percent
OS� �S O cD Q �
S •S ° p c� Q S O O -"& > S Q SO S S' c' °Q °
c� Q O O
�p
Particle Size Class (mm)
■ MY1 (11/23/10) ■ MY2 (8/24/11) MY3 (9/15/12) ■ MY4 (10/25/13) MY5 (10/13/14)
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 7.9 Pebble Count Plot: X -Sec 9 -- MY5 -2014 -- UT to Bear Creek Stream Restoration (EEP Project #92347)
Cross Section Nine - Southern UT
2014
Descript.
Material
Size (mm)
Total #
Class %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
Silt /Clay
.062
0
0
0
Sand
Very Fine Sand
.125
0
0
0
Fine Sand
.25
7
7
7
Medium Sand
0.5
5
5
12
Coarse Sand
1.0
2
2
14
Very Course Sand
2
3
3
17
Gravel
Very Fine Gravel
4.0
8
8
25
Fine Gravel
5.7
8
8
33
Fine Gravel
8
17
17
50
Medium Gravel
13
15
15
65
Medium Gravel
16
4
4
69
Coarse Gravel
22.6
9
9
78
Coarse Gravel
32
5
5
83
Very Course Gravel
45
5
5
88
Very Course Gravel
64
3
3
91
Cobble
Small Cobble
90
3
3
94
Small Cobble
128
4
4
98
Medium Cobble
180
1
1
99
Large Cobble
256
0
0
99
Boulder
Small Boulders
362
0
0
99
Small Boulders
512
1
1
100
Medium Boulders
1024
0
0
100
Large Boulders
2048
0
0
100
Bedrock
Bedrock
40096
0
0
100
Total 100
Summary Data
D50 8
D84 45
D95 128
Cross - Section 9
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
c
m
`m
a
d
R
E
M
U
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Cumulative Percent
•°
•'D o � � Q cS cP
s •o o � v s rn o > , > � t S � - r
q& oo
00
Q o 06,
Particle Size Class (mm)
MY1 (11/23/10) MY2 (8/24/11) MY3 (9/15/12) MY4 (10/25/13) -MY5 (10/13/14)
90
80
c
v 70
L
Q
a 60
N
a 50
U
40
2
30
20
10
0
Individual Class Percent
• ° 0 5 c3 S c > ' c� 4 z T A O > � c> ° cS � S � a °O V 66 °Q 6 , cv 3 o O
sQ
Particle Size Class (mm)
■ MY1 (11/23/10) ■ MY2 (8/24/11) MY3 (9/15/12) ■ MY4 (10/25/13) MY5 (10/13/14)
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

e- Table. Raw Pebble Count Survey Data Sheets
Cross Section: 1 Feature: Riffle
Year: Baseline MY1
Date: NA 11/23/2010
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
9/15/2012 10/25/2013
100 100 100 105 100
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Cross Section: 2 Feature: Riffle
Year: Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Date: NA 11/23/2010 9/15/2012 10/25/2013
Size
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
.062
50
63
89
58
69
.125
0
3
0
.25
7
1
0
0.5
0
2
1.0
2
0
2
0
1
6
1
4.0
2
13
4
5.7
0
2
16
2
8
1
1
2
1
13
6
2
1
7
2
16
4
4
2
0
22.6
5
9
3
1
32
7
2
2
3
1
45
0
6
2
6
64
8
3
2
1
5
90
6
1
5
1
4
128
2
1
3
2
180
2
0
256
0
362
0
512
0
1024
0
2048
0
40096
2
0
100 100 100 119 100
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Cross Section: 3 Feature: Pool
Year: Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Date: NA 11/23/2010 9/16/2012 10/25/2013
Size
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
.062
28
61
35
38
26
.125
0
0
15
0
.25
1
13
8
0
0.5
6
0
6
10
5
1.0
5
7
27
0
2
2
0
1
21
0
4.0
11
2
2
21
3
5.7
3
1
4
13
8
4
2
1
11
13
6
2
3
7
16
3
2
2
1
7
22.6
6
1
5
3
4
32
6
3
6
1
5
45
4
2
5
6
64
11
2
2
1
11
90
0
3
5
2
2
128
4
1
3
0
180
1
0
256
2
0
362
0
512
1
0
1024
0
2048
0
40096
0
100 105
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
100 129
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Cross Section: 4 Feature: Riffle
Year: Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Date: 4/20/2010 11/23/2010 9/16/2012 10/25/2013
Size
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
.062
37
36
63
67
20
18
.125
1
0
1
24
0
.25
2
8
6
2
0.5
12
13
2
5
30
1.0
5
4
1
10
5
2
5
0
13
3
4.0
6.0
3
20
5
5.7
3
1
3
1
20
3
8
0
0
1
12
4
13
2
1
7
1
16
2
6
2
4
2
22.6
3
8
1
2
6
32
5
3
3
2
1
45
2
6
11
1
6
64
7
5
2
2
13
90
4
4
3
1
6
0
128
3
2
2
2
12
0
180
1
3
1
256
2
0
362
6
0
512
0
1024
0
2048
0
40096
1
0
100 100 100
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
100 144
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Cross Section: 5 Feature: Pool
Year: Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Date: NA 11/23/2010 9/16/2012 10/25/2013
Size
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
.062
7
35
17
17
0
.125
0
2
0
.25
0
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
1.0
1
0
1
0
2
4
2
3
17
0
4.0
9
6
4
38
15
5.7
20
3
1
8
5
8
12
8
11
10
13
10
7
5
9
12
16
9
1
5
13
7
22.6
5
2
7
10
3
32
5
3
8
4
45
1
6
9
2
1
64
4
5
5
3
90
4
2
3
1
128
4
3
5
6
19
180
2
3
11
4
0
256
2
6
16
0
362
1
4
6
11
512
1
9
1024
1
0
2048
0
40096
0
100 100
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
100 141
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Cross Section: 6 Feature: Riffle
Year: Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Date: NA 11/23/2010 9/16/2012 10/25/2013
Size
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
.062
47
54
67
73
20
.125
0
0
6
0
.25
4
0
4
11
0.5
10
0
4
0
1.0
0
0
5
12
2
0
0
4
2
4.0
0
2
1
8
4
5.7
1
0
1
8
8
8
3
5
3
9
6
13
5
3
1
6
5
16
6
10
1
3
5
22.6
4
6
4
1
0
32
1
5
4
1
2
45
7
10
4
2
5
64
5
5
3
1
4
90
2
1
2
3
5
128
5
2
3
6
180
2
6
1
4
256
1
1
1
0
362
0
512
1
1024
0
2048
0
40096
0
100 106
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
101 140
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Cross Section: 7 Feature: Riffle
Year: Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Date: NA 11/23/2010 9/16/2012 10/25/2013
Size
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
.062
35
0
44
60
0
.125
0
0
1
3
0
.25
14
1
1
0
0.5
3
21
6
0
1.0
1
29
3
6
2
0
19
10
4.0
6
15
7
8
5.7
8
4
1
12
8
9
5
7
3
13
13
19
4
9
4
13
16
12
5
5
2
6
22.6
1
3
9
10
8
32
1
3
7
13
10
45
1
1
4
5
9
64
0
0
4
7
3
90
1
0
3
1
128
1
1
1
0
180
1
256
2
0
362
0
512
0
1024
0
2048
0
40096
0
111 111
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
100 122
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Cross Section: 8 Feature: Riffle
Year: Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Date: NA 11/23/2010 9/15/2012 10/25/2013
Size
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
.062
31
37
18
8
1
.125
0
10
0
.25
7
1
1
0.5
1
8
0
1.0
5
3
1
10
4
2
0
3
2
4.0
5
3
3
16
4
5.7
2
7
13
12
8
4
2
5
4
10
13
5
3
6
4
7
16
8
2
5
4
10
22.6
9
5
2
6
14
32
2
8
6
7
9
45
3
12
1
4
5
64
4
5
4
4
6
90
5
6
10
4
9
128
5
7
7
5
1
180
0
4
7
3
4
256
4
2
2
9
0
362
2
2
8
1
512
1
0
1024
0
2048
0
40096
0
100 101
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
90 128
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Cross Section: 9 Feature: Pool
Year: Baseline MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Date: NA 11/23/2010 9/15/2012 10/25/2013
Size
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
.062
57
83
88
46
0
.125
0
0
.25
6
1
7
0.5
5
5
1.0
1
3
2
2
0
3
4.0
5
18
8
5.7
3
13
8
8
4
3
4
6
17
13
7
7
8
15
16
6
2
7
5
4
22.6
2
2
2
6
9
32
1
5
5
45
1
1
4
5
64
0
1
3
90
0
1
1
3
3
128
0
4
180
1
1
256
1
2
1
0
362
1
0
512
1
1024
1
0
2048
0
40096
0
11
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
100 111 114
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be tilled in.
I = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project each (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser /slope. 4 - Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
* Mean, not median, provided for design numbers.
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants
Table 9.1 Baseline Stream Data Summary
UT to Bear Creek NCEEP# 92347 - Northern UT (2,975 feet)
Parameter
GaugeZ
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SID
n
Min
Med*
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
NA
--
15.2
-
-
--
--
-
20.2
--
--
--
-
--
19.0
-
18.3
19.0
18.7
20.3
0.9
4
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
40.0
-
-
-
-
-
140.0
-
-
-
-
-
100.0
-
100.0
130.0
100.0
220.0
60.0
4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
NA
--
1.4
-
-
-
-
-
1.4
--
-
-
-
-
1.4
-
1.2
1.4
1.4
1.5
0.1
4
lBankfull Max Depth (ft)
NA
--
1.7
--
-
--
--
--
1.9
--
--
--
--
--
1.9
--
1.9
2.1
2.2
2.4
0.2
4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
NA
--
20.8
-
-
--
--
-
28.2
--
--
-
-
--
25.8
-
23.0
25.7
25.2
29.5
2.9
4
Width /Depth Ratio
NA
--
11.0
-
-
-
-
-
14.5
-
-
-
-
-
14.0
-
13.0
14.1
13.9
15.6
1.1
4
Entrenchment Ratio
NA
--
2.6
-
-
-
-
-
6.9
--
-
-
-
-
5.3
-
4.9
6.9
5.4
11.6
3.2
4
'Bank Height Ratio
NA
I
I
--
1.4
1
--
--
--
--
1.0
--
--
--
--
--
1.0
--
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
4
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-
-
--
--
-
13.9
33.8
35.7
67.0
12.0
21
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.002
0.008
0.006
0.024
0.006
21
Pool Length (ft)
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
28.7
58.2
58.7
112.8
18.9
23
Pool Max depth (ft)
-
2.0
-
-
-
-
-
2.7
-
-
-
-
-
2.7
-
1.8
2.6
2.6
3.7
0.5
23
Pool Spacing (ft)l
I
I
1
1 25.5
1 --
-
127.0
1
25.0
--
--
104.0
1
1
1 22.8
114.0
1 42.6
131.1
1 103.2
309.1
75.8
22
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
41.0
-
-
116.0
-
-
20.0
--
-
77.0
-
-
38.0
-
114.0
28.9
62.5
61.4
112.3
19.4
20
Radius of Curvature (ft)
21.0
--
--
75.0
-
--
10.2
--
--
13.3
--
--
38.0
--
76.0
31.6
57.5
53.6
98.2
17.5
22
Rc:Bankfull width (ft /ft)
1.4
--
--
4.9
--
--
0.5
--
--
0.7
--
--
2.0
--
4.0
1.6
2.9
2.7
5.0
0.9
22
Meander Wavelength (ft)
125.0
--
--
250.0
--
--
94.0
--
--
100.0
--
-
95.0
--
228.0
166.0
227.1
225.8
310.3
34.6
21
Meander Width Ratiol
I
I
1
1 2.7
1
7.7
1 --
--
1.0
-
--
3.8
1
1 2.0
1 --
1 6.0
1 1.5
3.2
1 3.1
5.7
1 1.0
20
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
0.53
0.22
0.28
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
145
50
80
Stream Power (transport capacity) W /m2
3.8
1.15
1.23
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
NA
Degraded E4 /F4
C4
C4
C4
Mean Bankfull Velocity (fps)
NA
4.8
6.2
3.5
3.0
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
NA
100
173.7
100
77.0
Valley length (ft)
2697
--
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
2832
--
3132
2975
Sinuosity (ft)
1.05
1.12
1.13
1.10
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
NA
0.0062
0.0077
0.0028
--
BF slope (ft /ft)
NA
--
-
--
0.003
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
--
--
--
8.19
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
--
--
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
--
--
Biological or Other
--
--
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be tilled in.
I = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project each (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser /slope. 4 - Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
* Mean, not median, provided for design numbers.
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Table 9.2 Baseline Stream Data Summary
UT to Bear Creek (NCEEP# 92347) - Southern UT (1,700 feet)
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Med*
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
--
5.0
--
--
--
--
--
20.2
--
--
--
--
--
8.5
--
7.9
10.7
10.7
13.5
NA
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
--
14.3
--
--
-
--
--
140.0
--
--
--
--
--
50.0
--
50.0
75.0
75.0
100.0
NA
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
-
1.1
--
-
--
--
--
1.4
-
--
--
--
--
0.7
--
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
NA
2
' Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
-
1.3
--
-
-
--
--
1.9
--
--
--
--
-
1.1
--
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.4
NA
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
--
5.2
--
--
--
--
--
28.2
-
--
--
--
--
6.0
--
5.3
6.5
6.5
7.8
NA
2
Width /Depth Ratio
-
4.7
--
-
-
--
--
14.5
-
--
--
-
-
12.0
--
12.0
17.7
17.7
23.3
NA
2
Entrenchment Ratiol
2.9
--
--
--
--
--
6.9
-
--
--
--
--
5.9
--
3.7
8.1
8.1
12.6
NA
2
B
'ank Height Ratio
-
1.4
--
-
-
--
--
1.0
--
--
--
-
-
1.0
--
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
NA
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
--
-
9.0
20.9
17.6
40.2
8.9
13
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
-
--
--
-
-
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
--
--
-
0.004
0.021
0.019
0.046
0.011
13
Pool Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7.7
30.9
29.5
53.0
12.8
30
Pool Max depth (ft)
--
1.7
-
-
--
--
-
2.7
-
-
-
-
--
1.4
-
0.5
1.7
1.7
3.0
0.5
30
Pool Spacing (ft)
1
6.8
--
1
21.5
-
-
25.0
1 --
-
104.0
-
-
10.2
1
51.0
15.9
49.1
41.8
169.3
34.3
29
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
25.0
-
-
36.0
-
-
20.0
-
-
77.0
-
--
34.0
--
51.0
16.1
31.1
28.4
96.7
16.0
26
Radius of Curvature (ft)
5.0
--
--
30.0
--
--
10.2
--
--
13.3
--
--
17.0
--
34.0
15.4
24.7
23.8
35.6
5.5
28
Rc:Bankfull width (ft /ft)
1.0
--
--
6.1
--
--
0.5
--
-
0.7
--
--
2.0
--
4.0
1.4
2.3
2.2
3.3
0.5
28
Meander Wavelength (ft)
40.0
--
--
53.0
--
--
94.0
--
--
100.0
--
--
42.5
--
102.0
58.2
99.5
98.9
176.5
22.2
27
Meander Width Ratiol
I
I
1
1 5.0
1
7.3
-
--
1.0
-
-
3.8
--
1 4.0
--
6.0
1.5
2.9
2.6
9.0
1.5
26
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
0.76
0.161
0.39
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
185
36
100
Stream Power (transport capacity) W /m2
4.75
0.94
2.07
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Degraded E4 /F4
C4
C4
C4
Mean Bankfull Velocity (fps)
4.2
6.2
3.9
3.6
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
22
173.7
23.4
23.4
Valley length (ft)
1542
-
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1635
-
1.745
1,700
Sinuosity (ft)
1.06
1.12
1.14
1.10
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
0.0145
0.0077
0.0041
-
BF slope (ft /ft)
-
-
-
0.01
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
-
-
--
3.33
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
90
--
Channel Stability or Habitat Metrici
I
--
--
Biological or Otherl
I
--
--
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
I = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile. 2 = For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing survey data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top of bank to the toe of the terrace riser /slope. 4 - Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Of value/needed only if the n exceeds 3
* Mean, not median, provided for design numbers.
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Table 10.1 Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
UT to Bear Creek NCEEP# 92347 - Northern UT 2,975 feet
Cross Section 1 (N: Riffle)
Cross Section 2 (N: Riffle)
Cross Section 3 (N: Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Bankfull Width (ft)
18.5
18.4
18.5
20.1
212
19.68
18.3
18.6
17.9
20.7
20.8
19.01
20.0
21.0
19.0
20.1
20.3
32.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.1
1.2
1.1
2.2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.2
2.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.2
2.21
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.31
2.1
2.01
2.1
1.8
2.01
2.1
3.9
3.8
3.91
4.0
3.71
3.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
26.3
25.8
25.5
23.3
23.4
28.41
24.0
23.9
23.3
21.7
22.5
27.30
44.2
44.8
42.0
45.9
43.9
69.3
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
13.0
13.2
13.4
17.4
17.3
16.4
13.9
14.4
13.8
19.8
17.3
17.3
9.1
9.9
8.6
8.8
9.0
15.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.0
5.0
5.1
5.5
5.4
5.6
4.8
4.8
5.3
5.0
4.8
5.3
5.0
5.1
3.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.01
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2)
75.3
76.9
75.7
71.1
72.8
71.1
96.9
96.5
91.4
76.9
78.3
76.9
119.5
115.9
105.0
84.2
86.2
84.2
d50 (mm)
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.06
1.01
0.061
0.051
0.041
0.91
3.5
1 0.051
1.1
8
Cross Section 4 (N: Riffle)
Cross Section 5 (N: Pool)
Cross Section 6 (N: Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
100
100
100
100
100
100
1 100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Bankfull Width (ft)
20.3
19.1
20.9
19.6
20.8
19.1
22.9
22.2
24.7
25.3
25.4
22.8
18.9
19.1
22.8
20.6
21.3
20.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
220.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.6
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.4
2.31
2.3
2.21
2.41
2.6
3.8
3.81
3.71
3.7
3.61
3.1
1.91
1.9
2.11
1.9
2.01
1.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
29.5
28.0
29.6
26.9
27.9
31.6
33.3
34.9
35.6
34.0
34.6
28.2
23.0
21.4
26.2
22.9
24.0
23.9
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
14.0
13.1
14.8
14.3
13.9
13.6
1 15.7
14.1
17.1
18.8
18.9
14.4
15.6
17.0
19.9
18.6
17.8
18.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.9
5.2
4.8
5.1
4.9
5.2
9.6
9.9
8.9
8.7
8.7
9.7
11.6
11.6
9.6
10.7
10.3
10.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft2)1
115.9
105.0
84.2
50.4
55.8
50.4
66.5
59.5
66.6
61.9
63.0
61.9
55.9
56.5
51.8
33.2
38.7
33.2
d50 (mm)l
1 0.371
0.371
0.051
4.21
0.5
1 7.421
6.271
30.831
3.95
22.3
0.22
0.06
0.05
0.08
5.7
1 = Widths and depths for monitoring resurvey will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional /depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum
established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that
states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values. Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a
future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Table 10.2 Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
UT to Bear Creek NCEEP# 92347 - Southern UT 1,700 feet
Cross Section 7 (S: Riffle)
Cross Section 8 (S: Riffle)
Cross Section 9 (S: Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record elevation (datum) used
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.7
12.2
11.1
10.4
17.4
8.8
13.5
17.0
16.3
8.5
16.0
9.8
18.5
21.0
23.6
22.7
22.5
20.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
115.9
105.0
84.2
100.0
100.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.41
0.5
0.61
0.61
0.7
0.61
0.6
0.51
0.51
0.8
0.91
0.8
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.4
1..6
1.5
2.71
2.91
2.9
3.01
3.01
2.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
6.1
6.0
6.2
6.2
6.9
8.9
7.8
8.2
8.9
7.0
9.4
9.8
20.7
22.9
23.2
23.8
23.0
14.7
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
31.1
24.9
19.9
17.7
24.8
14.6
23.3
35.5
30.2
10.3
17.8
12.2
16.6
19.3
24.0
21.8
20.5
18.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
7.3
8.2
9.0
9.6
9.6
11.4
3.7
2.9
3.1
5.9
3.1
5.1
6.1
5.0
3.6
4.2
4.3
2.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (fe)
23.7
24.2
23.1
13.5
21.5
13.5
42.6
44.2
46.4
26.2
43.8
26.2
95.8
93.9
97.2
59.3
59.3
59.3
d50 (mm)
2.8
1.2
3.1
0.1
11.3
4.9
16.7
12.2
5.2
16
0.051
0.041
0.041
3.21
8
1 = Widths and depths for monitoring resurvey will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional /depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline
datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be
included that states: "it is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values. Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be
recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants
Table 11.1 Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Morphology Data Summary 2010 -2014
UT to Bear Creek NCEEP# 92347 - Northern UT 2,975 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY- 3
MY- 4
MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SID
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
18.3
19.0
18.7
20.3
0.9
4
18.4
18.8
18.8
19.1
0.3
4
17.9
20.0
19.7
22.8
2.3
4
19.6
20.3
20.4
20.7
0.5
4
19.6
20.3
20.4
20.7
0.5
4
19.0
19.6
19.4
20.6
0.7
4.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
100
130
100
220
60
4
100
130
100
220
60
4
100
130
100
220
60
4
100
130
100
220
60
4
100
130
100
220
60
4
100.0
130.0
100.0
220.0
60.0
4.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
1.4
1.4
1.5
0.1
4
1.1
1.3
1.3
1.5
0.1
4
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.4
0.1
4
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.4
0.1
4
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.4
0.1
4
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.4
0.1
4.0
' Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.9
2.1
1 2.2
2.4
1 0.2
4
1.9
2.1
2.1
2.3
0.2
4
2.1
2.2
2.1
2.3
0.1
4
1.8
2.0
2.0
2.2
0.2
4
1.8
2.0
2.0
2.2
0.2
4
1.9
2.2
2.2
2.6
0.3
4.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
23.0
25.7
25.2
29.5
2.9
4
21.4
24.8
24.9
28.0
2.8
4
23.3
26.1
25.9
29.6
2.6
4
21.7
23.7
23.1
26.9
2.2
4
1 21.7
1 23.7
23.1
26.9
2.2
4
23.9
1 27.8
1 27.9
31.6
1 3.2
4.0
Width /Depth Ratio
13.0
14.1
13.9
15.6
1.1
4
13.1
14.4
13.8
17.0
1.8
4
13.4
15.5
14.3
19.9
3.0
4
14.3
17.5
18.0
19.8
2.4
4
14.3
17.5
18.0
19.8
2.4
4
13.6
16.4
16.8
18.5
2.0
4.0
Entrenchment Ratio
4.9
6.9
5.4
11.6
3.2
4
5.2
6.9
5.4
11.6
3.1
4
4.8
6.4
5.5
9.6
2.2
4
4.8
6.4
5.0
10.7
2.9
4
4.8
6.4
5.1
10.7
2.9
4
5.1
6.6
5.2
10.7
2.8
4.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
0.0
4
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
0.0
4
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
0.0
4
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
4
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
4
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
4.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
13.9
33.8
35.7
67.0
12.0
21
10
30.3
30.0
54.5
12.1
21
9
31.14
28.5
81.5
14.0
25
20
39.6
34.5
73
18.0
22
14.01
45.5
42.8
117.2
20.5
31
24.56
51.85
148.34
108.2
19.72
24
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.002
0.008
0.006
0.024
0.006
21
0.006
0.013
0.009
0.040
0.006
21
0.005
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.01
25
0.003
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
22
0.004
0.01
0.01
0.025
0.006
31
0.004
0.284
0.191
1.459
0.361
24
Pool Length (ft)
28.7
58.2
58.7
112.8
18.9
23
22
35.1
32.5
80
15.5
31
22
36.37
34.5
80
16.3
31
26
45.1
38
83
22.5
31
22.9
45.3
41.8
94.6
15.0
32
15.21
34.96
33.13
73.97
12.28
24
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.8
2.6
2.6
3.7
0.5
23
2.3
3.3
3.3
4.1
0.5
31
1.9
3.1
3.1
3.9
0.5
31
2.15
3.2
3.29
4.05
0.51
29
0.41
1.19
1.29
1.92
0.4
32
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
24
Pool Spacing (ft)l
42.6
1 131
1 103
1 309
1 75.8
22
52
92.3
85.5
172
41.7
30
52
91.4
82.8
174
40.7
31
4
99.0
87.5
179
1 47.3
1 28
47.5
91.1
83.8
162.7
30.6
31
10.14
50.71
38.63
177.5
39.72
24
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) 28.86 62.54 61.35 112.3 19.41 20
Radius of Curvature (ft) 31.6 57.53 53.58 98.16 17.48 22
Pattern data will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
significant shifts from baseline
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) 1.6 2.9 2.7 4.96 0.88 22
Meander Wavelength (ft) 166 227.1 225.8 310.3 34.59 21
Meander Width Ratiol 1.46 13.16 1 3.1 1 5.67 10.98 1 20
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C5
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
2975
3041
3036
3064
2960
2926
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.13
1.13
1.14
1.14
1.14
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.003
0.004
0.004
0.003
0.003
BF slope ( ft/ft)
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
29
14
56
1
0
21
16
37
1 9
0
31
16
9
0
29.7
11
47.7
11.5
0
30
11
48
12
0
30
11
43
12
0
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
56
W1383
6
1
62.22
9.667
17.3
10.65
0.167
0
62
10
17
11
0
0
28
17
45
9
1
0
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
0.022
]0]0]42]
36.62
196.181
0.025
2.537
5.188
42.24
196.041
0
3
5
42
96
1
3.1
6.3
97.2
153.7
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
3
2
2
1
1
1
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
-
--
-
-
Biological or Other
-
-
-
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
meters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
chibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
.ep; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants
Table 11.2 Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Morphology Data Summary 2010 -2014
UT to Bear Creek NCEEP# 92347 - Southern UT 1,700 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY- 3
MY- 4
MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SID
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SID
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.5
13.6
13.6
13.7
-
2
12.2
14.6
14.6
17.0
-
2
11.1
13.7
13.7
16.3
-
2
4.0
7.2
7.2
10.4
-
2
8.5
9.5
9.5
10.4
1.3
2
8.8
9.3
9.3
9.8
0.7
2.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
75.0
75.0
100.0
-
2
50.0
75.0
75.0
100.0
-
2
50.0
75.0
75.0
100.0
-
2
50.0
75.0
75.0
100.0
-
2
50.0
75.0
75.0
100.0
35.4
2
50.0
75.0
75.0
100.0
35.4
2.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
-
2
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
-
2
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
2
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.1
2
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.1
2.0
' Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.3
1.3
1 1.3
1.4
2
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
-
2
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
-
2
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5
-
2
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.5
0.1
2
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
0.0
2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
6.1
6.9
6.9
7.8
2
6.0
7.1
7.1
8.2
-
2
6.2
7.5
7.5
8.9
-
2
6.2
6.6
6.6
7.0
-
2
6.2
1 6.6
6.6
7.0
0.6
2
8.9
9.3
1 9.3
9.8
1 0.7
2.0
Width /Depth Ratio
23.3
27.2
27.2
31.1
2
24.9
30.2
30.2
35.5
-
2
19.9
25.0
25.0
30.2
-
2
10.3
14.0
14.0
17.7
-
2
10.3
14.0
14.0
17.7
5.2
2
12.2
13.4
13.4
14.6
1.7
2.0
Entrenchment Ratio
3.7
5.5
5.5
7.3
2
2.9
5.6
5.6
8.2
-
2
3.1
6.0
6.0
9.0
-
2
5.9
7.7
7.7
9.6
2
5.9
7.8
7.8
9.6
2.6
2
5.1
8.3
8.3
11.4
4.5
2.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2
1 1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
-
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
-
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
2.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
9.0
20.9
17.6
40.2
8.9
13
3.5
10.67
10
24
4.4
27
3.5
11.45
9.75
29
4.85
28
5
15.87
16
31
6.8771
23
12.71
48.7
30.9
222.3
51.4
19
11.9
119.86
120.29
130.05
6.398
9
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.004
0.021
0.019
0.046
0.011
13
0.010
0.033
0.037
0.078
0.014
27
0.002
0.03
0.02
0.13
0.018
28
0.004
0.077
0.022
1.006
0.091
23
0.00
0.08
0.02
1.01
0.09
19
0.071
0.456
0.477
0.88
0.267
9
Pool Length (ft)
7.7
30.9
29.5
53.0
12.8
30
7.0
14.7
14.5
25.0
6.9
48
4
14.73
13
34.5
7.398
49
7
19.54
19
40
10.29
39
3.84
20.7
20.0
44.9
9.1
34
0.022 11.46 7.75 30.88 11.06
NA NA NA NA NA
9
Pool Max depth (ft)
0.5
1.7
1.7
3.0
0.5
30
1.4
1.9
1.9
2.9
0.4
47
1.32
2.1
2.07
3.18
0.396
48
0.911
2.191
2.117
4.037
0.536
39
0.1
0.671
0.581
3.21
0.41
33
9
Pool Spacing (ft)
15.9
49.1
41.8
169.3
34.3
29
9.5
33.71
32
112
18.12
47
6.5
33.04
29.25
113.5
17.83
48
4
42.95
33
183
27.78
38
2.5
50.6
41.9
227.6
43.8
33
3.132
106.5
49.06
415.5
127.3
9
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft) 16.1 31.1 28.4 96.7 16.0 26
Radius of Curvature (ft) 15.4 24.7 23.8 35.6 5.5 28
rPatternta will not typically be collected unless visual data, dimensional data or profile data indicate
significant shifts from baseline
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft) 1.4 2.3 2.2 3.3 0.5 28
Meander Wavelength (ft) 58.2 99.5 98.9 176.5 22.2 27
Meander Width Ratio 1.5 1 2.9 1 2.6 9.0 1 1.5 1 26
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1700
1741
1737
1724
1694
1701
Sinuosity (ft)
1.10
1.13
1.13
1.12
1.12
1.12
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
-
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.009
0.01
0.01
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
16
12
55
0
0
17
16
42
6
0
22
17
50
11
0
23
21
49
7
0
23
21
49
7
0
23
21
49
7
0
3SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
40
23
28
8
1
0
48
3
1 38
11
1
0
45
12
33
9
1
0
1
13
77
8
1
0
3d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 /
0.163
0.3
6.0
30.96
78
0.027
1.8
1 5.1
46.9
78.96
0.027
1.8071
6.3
46.91
78.96
3.2
8.3
111.8
47
100
2% of Reach with Eroding Banks
1
0
0
0
0
0
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
--
Biological or Other
-
--
-
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
meters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
chibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
.ep; Silt/Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

APPENDIX E.
HYDROLOGIC DATA
Table 12 Verification of Bankfull Events
Figure 8 Monthly Rainfall Data at SILR Station
Figure 9.1 -9.2 Daily Precipitation and Monitoring Well Graphs
Table 13.0 Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
e- Tables Raw data: Precipitation and Monitoring Wells
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Flow Events
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) - EEP# 92347 - 2014 (MY -5)
Date of Data
Photo #
Collection
Rain Gage Date of Occurrence
Evaluation Method
(if available)
8- Apr -14
Jan 11 -12, 2014: 2.1" precip
Rain gage data plus Apr 8 on-
next page
at NCCH -04 gage.
site observation of crest gage
below Table
and matted vegetation.
13
8- Apr -14
Mar 7 -8, 2014: 2.8" precip
Rain gage data plus Apr 8 on-
next page
at NCCH -04 gage.
site observation of crest gage
below Table
and matted vegetation.
13
28- Oct -14
May 16, 2014: 3.8" precip
Rain gage data plus Oct 28 on-
NA
at NCCH -04 gage.
site observation of crest gage
and matted vegetation.
28- Oct -14
July 21 -22, 2014: 3.5"
Rain gage data plus Oct 28 on-
NA
precip at NCCH -04 gage.
site observation of crest gage
and matted vegetation.
28- Oct -14
Aug 9 -12, 2014: 4.7" precip
Rain gage data plus Oct 28 on-
NA
at NCCH -04 gage.
site observation of crest gage
and matted vegetation.
8 Apr 2014: Crest gage cork granules = 2.5 ft above gage bottom = 1.1 ft above bankfull
28 Oct 2014: Crest gage cork granules = 2.8 ft above gage bottom = 1.4 ft above bankfull
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Table 13. Wetland Groundwater Gauge Attainment Data
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) EEP# 92347 - 2014 (MY -5)
Success Criteria Achieved /Max Consecutive Days during Growing Season
Groundwater
(Percent of 216 -day Growing Season in Chatham Co (Apr 1 - Nov 3)
Gauge ID
Year 1 (2010)
Year 2 (2011)
Year 3 (2012)
Year 4 (2013)
Year 5 (2014)
09BEA457
No: 21 days
Yes: 37 days
Yes: 28 days
Yes: 82 days
Yes: 41 days
(9.7 %)
(17.1 %)
(13.0 %)
(38.0 %)
(19.0 %)
138BDBD7
No: 20 days
Yes: 43 days
Yes: 30 days
Yes: 80 days
Yes: 63 days
(9.2 %)
(19.9 %)
(13.8 %)
(37.0 %)
(29.2 %)
a *f
t
North Trib - Matted vegetation and wrack deposit, Sta 19 +50, 08 Apr 2014
1 7F !
South Trib - Matted vegetation and wrack deposit, Sta 21 +00, 08 Apr 2014
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

UT to Bear Creek Percentile Graph for Rainfall 2014
5
N
d
s
c 4
c
0
m
Q. 3
Z
L
a
2
1
0
Jan -14 Feb -14 Mar -14 Apr -14 May -14 Jun -14 Jul -14 Aug -14 Sep -14 Oct -14 Nov -14 Dec -14
Date
Rainfall 2014 30th Percentile 70th Percentile
Figure 8. Monthly average rainfall during 2014 at NCCH -04 gage (4 miles NE of project site) with 30th and 70th percentile climate normals based
on the 30 -year period from 1981 to 2010 at the Siler City Airport.
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 9.1. Daily depth to groundwater table, wetland monitoring gage #1 (RDS #09BEA457) and corresponding daily precipitation recorded at
NCCH -04 rain gage located 4 miles NE of the UT Bear Creek project site.
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants
UT to Bear Creek Groundwater Gauge l - MY5 (2014)
50
4
40_"
M
3.5
a
�
�
E
30
o
a
z
3
_
VI
m
W
a
N
77
20
C
m
C
N
W
2.5
m
L
10
ba
2
c
CL
d
O
.2
W
+
p
1.5
3
0
`
°
-10
--
— — — — —
— — — —
— — — °
— - - — — — —
-- — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — —
W-
a
°
C
-20
c7
0.5
-30
4
-40
I -41 Days ---I
-50
-0.5
Dec -13
Jan -14 Feb -14 Mar 14 Apr 14 May 14 Jun -14 Jul -14 Aug -14 Sep -14
Oct 14
Nov -14
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation (in)
Figure 9.1. Daily depth to groundwater table, wetland monitoring gage #1 (RDS #09BEA457) and corresponding daily precipitation recorded at
NCCH -04 rain gage located 4 miles NE of the UT Bear Creek project site.
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Figure 9.1. Daily depth to groundwater table, wetland monitoring gage #2 (RDS #138BDBD7) and corresponding daily precipitation recorded at
NCCH -04 rain gage located 4 miles NE of the UT Bear Creek project site.
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants
UT to Bear Creek Groundwater Gauge 2 - MY5 (2014)
50
4
40
3.5
a
a
a
E
30
0
'0
3
?
N
M
�+
m
m
t
20
_
�
2.5
c
–
–
10
v
o
m
c
m
2
p
0
0
«_
W
1.5
L
�
N
0
`
3
a–
-10
–
– – – – –
– – – –
– – – –
– – – – – – –
– – – – – – – – – –
– – – – – – – – – – – – –
– – – – –w
–
a
p
°
p
l7
-20
0.5
30
0
-40
1 —63 Days--- - - - - -I
-50
-0.5
Dec -13
Jan -14 Feb -14 Mar -14 Apr -14 M2y -14 Jun -14 Jul-14 Aug -14 Sep -14
Oct -14
Nov -14
Groundwater Depth (in) – – – 12 Inches Below Surface Precipitation (in)
Figure 9.1. Daily depth to groundwater table, wetland monitoring gage #2 (RDS #138BDBD7) and corresponding daily precipitation recorded at
NCCH -04 rain gage located 4 miles NE of the UT Bear Creek project site.
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

NOAA Rain Gage ID: US1- NCCH -04 (Goldston 3.8 N)
Lat: 35.649 Lon: - 79.336 (4 mi NE of Bear Cr site)
Precipitation (inches)
Date 2014 Daily Month
Groundwater Wells (in)
09BEA457 138BDBD7
GW depth (in) GW depth (in)
1/1/2014
0
3.6
2.9
1/2/2014
0
3.7
1.8
1/3/2014
0.31
4.2
1.4
1/4/2014
0
3.1
2.5
1/5/2014
0
3.3
3.9
1/6/2014
0.29
4.1
0.9
1/7/2014
0.08
2.9
0.7
1/8/2014
0
2.6
1.2
1/9/2014
0
2.7
3.2
1/10/2014
0.02
3.2
3.9
1/11/2014
1.43
5.4
2.8
1/12/2014
0.6
4.2
2.6
1/13/2014
0
3.9
3.8
1/14/2014
0.05
4.2
2.7
1/15/2014
0.4
3.7
2.5
1/16/2014
0.06
3.7
2.1
1/17/2014
0
3.5
2.1
1/18/2014
0
3.6
2.1
1/19/2014
0
3.3
1.9
1/20/2014
0
3.3
1.9
1/21/2014
0
3.2
1.7
1/22/2014
0.11
3.3
1.2
1/23/2014
0
2.9
1
1/24/2014
0
2.9
1.3
1/25/2014
0
2.6
1.6
1/26/2014
0
3.1
3.1
1/27/2014
0
3.1
1.8
1/28/2014
0
3.2
1.5
1/29/2014
0.15
2.9
1.1
1/30/2014
0
2.6
1.3
JAN 1/31/2014
0 3.50
2.4
1.4
2/1/2014
0
2.9
2.7
2/2/2014
0
3.5
2.7
2/3/2014
0
3.6
2.3
2/4/2014
0.37
4
2.8
2/5/2014
0.43
3.9
1.9
2/6/2014
0.02
3.6
1.8
2/7/2014
0
3.5
1.9
2/8/2014
0
3.2
1.6
2/9/2014
0
3.1
1.9
2/10/2014
0
3.4
2
2/11/2014
0.04
3.5
1.4
2/12/2014
0
3.2
2
2/13/2014
1.38
3.4
2
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Date 2014
Daily Month
GW depth (in)
GW depth (in)
2/14/2014
0.15
3.3
2.5
2/15/2014
0.21
3.5
2.5
2/16/2014
0.12
3.9
2.5
2/17/2014
0
3.7
3.4
2/18/2014
0
3.7
3.3
2/19/2014
0.53
3.6
3.4
2/20/2014
0
4.6
2.9
2/21/2014
0
4.2
2.7
2/22/2014
0.41
4
2.6
2/23/2014
0
3.8
2.4
2/24/2014
0
3.8
2
2/25/2014
0
3.6
1.9
2/26/2014
0
3.6
1.8
2/27/2014
0
3.5
1.6
FEB 2/28/2014
0 3.66
3.3
1.7
3/1/2014
0
3.4
1.8
3/2/2014
0
3.4
2.5
3/3/2014
0
3.7
1.8
3/4/2014
0.46
3.4
2.3
3/5/2014
0
3.3
2.5
3/6/2014
0
3.2
2.7
3/7/2014
1.56
3.5
3.3
3/8/2014
1.31
4.3
3.5
3/9/2014
0
4.2
3.3
3/10/2014
0
4.1
3.2
3/11/2014
0
4.1
2.4
3/12/2014
0
4.2
2.3
3/13/2014
0.15
4
2.1
3/14/2014
0
3.7
2.4
3/15/2014
0
3.7
2.3
3/16/2014
0
3.8
2.5
3/17/2014
0.48
4.3
2.5
3/18/2014
0.47
3.8
2.8
3/19/2014
0.04
4
3.7
3/20/2014
0
3.8
2.6
3/21/2014
0
3.7
2.4
3/22/2014
0
3.8
2.4
3/23/2014
0
3.9
2.5
3/24/2014
0.13
3.7
2.4
3/25/2014
0
3.6
2.5
3/26/2014
0.07
3.5
2.4
3/27/2014
0
3.4
3.1
3/28/2014
0
3.5
2.8
3/29/2014
0.73
4.7
2.4
3/30/2014
0.19
4.2
2.4
MAR 3/31/2014
0 5.59
3.7
2.3
4/1/2014
0 Grow Seas
3.7
2.4
4/2/2014
0 Grow Seas
3.8
2.2
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

APR
Date 2014
4/3/2014
4/4/2014
4/5/2014
4/6/2014
4/7/2014
4/8/2014
4/9/2014
4/10/2014
4/11/2014
4/12/2014
4/13/2014
4/14/2014
4/15/2014
4/16/2014
4/17/2014
4/18/2014
4/19/2014
4/20/2014
4/21/2014
4/22/2014
4/23/2014
4/24/2014
4/25/2014
4/26/2014
4/27/2014
4/28/2014
4/29/2014
4/30/2014
5/1/2014
5/2/2014
5/3/2014
5/4/2014
5/5/2014
5/6/2014
5/7/2014
5/8/2014
5/9/2014
5/10/2014
5/11/2014
5/12/2014
5/13/2014
5/14/2014
5/15/2014
5/16/2014
5/17/2014
5/18/2014
5/19/2014
5/20/2014
Daily Month
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.22
Grow Seas
0.97
Grow Seas
0.03
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.70
Grow Seas
0.29
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.80
Grow Seas
0.14
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.46
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.01
Grow Seas
0.36
3.98 Grow Seas
0.03
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
3.81
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
GW depth (in) GW depth (in)
4
2.3
4.1
2.4
4.3
1.9
4
2.7
4.7
2.7
4.2
2.5
4.3
2.4
4.2
2.2
4
2
4.2
1.8
4.2
1.6
4.4
1.8
4.6
3.1
4.6
2.4
4.3
2
4.2
1.8
4.9
3.2
4.3
2.5
4.3
2
4.3
1.8
3.9
1
4.3
0.6
4.7
2.6
4.3
2.2
4.3
0.9
4.4
0.6
4.7
1.3
4.6
1.7
4.3
0.3
4.4
-0.1
4
-1.4
3.3
-3
2.2
-4.4
0.5
-5.7
0
-6.1
-1
-7.5
-4.4
-8.7
-8.8
-8.8
-11.5
-9.5
-13.8
-10.6
-15.9
-11.1
-16.7
-8.4
5.3
3.8
4.9
3
4.9
2.6
4.7
2.5
4.4
1.4
4.2
0.6
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

WJA /_\'1
JUN
Date 2014
5/21/2014
5/22/2014
5/23/2014
5/24/2014
5/25/2014
5/26/2014
5/27/2014
5/28/2014
5/29/2014
5/30/2014
5/31/2014
6/1/2014
6/2/2014
6/3/2014
6/4/2014
6/5/2014
6/6/2014
6/7/2014
6/8/2014
6/9/2014
6/10/2014
6/11/2014
6/12/2014
6/13/2014
6/14/2014
6/15/2014
6/16/2014
6/17/2014
6/18/2014
6/19/2014
6/20/2014
6/21/2014
6/22/2014
6/23/2014
6/24/2014
6/25/2014
6/26/2014
6/27/2014
6/28/2014
6/29/2014
6/30/2014
7/1/2014
7/2/2014
7/3/2014
7/4/2014
7/5/2014
7/6/2014
7/7/2014
Daily Month
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.08
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.02
3.94 Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.40
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.06
Grow Seas
0.16
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.58
Grow Seas
0.08
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.08
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.23
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.04
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
1.63 Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.4
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
GW depth (in)
GW depth (in)
3.9
-0.3
3.7
-1.9
3.6
-3.6
3.6
-5.5
3.6
-6.5
3.5
-8
3.1
-8.5
3
-8.5
2.6
-9
1.6
-8.5
0
-9.6
-4
-10.9
-10.3
-11.5
-13.1
-12.4
-14
-10.6
-16.1
-13.1
-18.5
-13.9
-20.7
-14.5
-22.3
-14.8
-23.7
-14.6
-24.8
-12.9
-25.7
-5.7
-26.6
-7.7
-27.3
-11.1
-28
-15
-28.8
-17.1
-29.5
-19.1
-30.1
-20.8
-30.7
-21.6
-31.3
-22.6
-31.9
-23.7
-32.5
-25
-33.2
-26.6
-34.2
-27.8
-34.3
-29
-34.4
-29.6
-34.4
-29.6
-34.5
-29.7
-34.5
-29.7
-34.5
-29.8
-34.4
-29.7
-34.3
-29.8
-34.3
-29.8
-34.2
-29.4
-34.2
-29.6
-34.4
-29.6
-34.4
-29.6
-34.4
-29.7
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

JUL
Date 2014
7/8/2014
7/9/2014
7/10/2014
7/11/2014
7/12/2014
7/13/2014
7/14/2014
7/15/2014
7/16/2014
7/17/2014
7/18/2014
7/19/2014
7/20/2014
7/21/2014
7/22/2014
7/23/2014
7/24/2014
7/25/2014
7/26/2014
7/27/2014
7/28/2014
7/29/2014
7/30/2014
7/31/2014
8/1/2014
8/2/2014
8/3/2014
8/4/2014
8/5/2014
8/6/2014
8/7/2014
8/8/2014
8/9/2014
8/10/2014
8/11/2014
8/12/2014
8/13/2014
8/14/2014
8/15/2014
8/16/2014
8/17/2014
8/18/2014
8/19/2014
8/20/2014
8/21/2014
8/22/2014
8/23/2014
8/24/2014
Daily Month
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.06
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.90
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
2.86
Grow Seas
0.68
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.15
Grow Seas
0.1
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.06
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
5.21 Grow Seas
0.33
Grow Seas
0.58
Grow Seas
0.18
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.37
Grow Seas
1.11
Grow Seas
0.02
Grow Seas
3.26
Grow Seas
0.11
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.05
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.05
Grow Seas
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
GW depth (in)
GW depth (in)
-34.4
-29.8
-34.3
-29.8
-34.2
-29.8
-33.8
-29.6
-34
-29.7
-34.2
-29.7
-34.2
-29.8
-33.9
-29.4
-34
-29.5
-34.1
-29.6
-34.2
-29.6
-34.2
-29.7
-34
-29.4
-33.8
-29.4
-34.4
-29.5
-34.5
-29.5
-34.6
-29.6
-34.5
-29.7
-34.3
-29.6
-34.4
-29.6
-34.4
-29.7
-34.2
-29.7
-34.2
-29.6
-34.2
-29.7
-33.9
-29.3
-34
-29.4
-34.1
-29.5
-34.2
-29.6
-34.2
-29.7
-34.2
-29.7
-34.2
-29.7
-34.2
-29.7
-33.8
-29.7
-33.8
-29.4
-33.9
-29.6
-0.8
-0.7
-14.2
-13.3
-21
-26.5
-25.5
-29.8
-28.1
-29.8
-30.2
-29.8
-31.8
-29.8
-33.3
-29.7
-34.4
-29.8
-34.7
-29.8
-34.7
-29.8
-34.5
-29.7
-34.6
-29.8
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

AUG
SEP
Date 2014
8/25/2014
8/26/2014
8/27/2014
8/28/2014
8/29/2014
8/30/2014
8/31/2014
9/1/2014
9/2/2014
9/3/2014
9/4/2014
9/5/2014
9/6/2014
9/7/2014
9/8/2014
9/9/2014
9/10/2014
9/11/2014
9/12/2014
9/13/2014
9/14/2014
9/15/2014
9/16/2014
9/17/2014
9/18/2014
9/19/2014
9/20/2014
9/21/2014
9/22/2014
9/23/2014
9/24/2014
9/25/2014
9/26/2014
9/27/2014
9/28/2014
9/29/2014
9/30/2014
10/1/2014
10/2/2014
10/3/2014
10/4/2014
10/5/2014
10/6/2014
10/7/2014
10/8/2014
10/9/2014
10/10/2014
10/11/2014
Daily Month
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
6.06 Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.07
Grow Seas
0.03
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.04
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.05
Grow Seas
0.58
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.11
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.01
Grow Seas
0.78
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.29
Grow Seas
0.70
Grow Seas
0.05
Grow Seas
0.02
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.03
Grow Seas
0.27
3.03 Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0.06
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
0
Grow Seas
GW depth (in)
GW depth (in)
-34.6
-29.8
-34.7
-29.8
-34.7
-29.8
-34.7
-29.8
-34.6
-29.8
-34.6
-29.9
-34.6
-30
-34.6
-30
-34.5
-29.9
-34.5
-29.8
-34.2
-29.8
-34.2
-29.8
-34.2
-29.8
-34.3
-29.8
-34.2
-29.4
-34.2
-29.5
-34.3
-29.7
-34.3
-29.8
-34.3
-29.9
-34
-29.5
-34.2
-29.7
-34.3
-29.8
-34.3
-29.8
-34.3
-29.8
-34.4
-29.8
-34.4
-29.8
-34.4
-29.8
-34.4
-29.8
-34.4
-29.8
-34.4
-29.9
-34.1
-29.5
-34.2
-29.6
-34.3
-29.7
-34.4
-29.8
-34.4
-29.8
-34.3
-29.5
-34.4
-29.6
-34.5
-29.7
-34.5
-29.8
-34.6
-29.9
-34.7
-29.9
-34.8
-29.8
-34.8
-29.8
-34.8
-29.9
-34.8
-30
-34.8
-30
-34.8
-30
-34.5
-30
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Date 2014
Daily
Month
10/12/2014
0.04
Grow
Seas
10/13/2014
0.07
Grow
Seas
10/14/2014
0.02
Grow
Seas
10/15/2014
0.77
Grow
Seas
10/16/2014
0.26
Grow
Seas
10/17/2014
0
Grow
Seas
10/18/2014
0
Grow
Seas
10/19/2014
0
Grow
Seas
10/20/2014
0
Grow
Seas
10/21/2014
0
Grow
Seas
10/22/2014
0
Grow
Seas
10/23/2014
0
Grow
Seas
10/24/2014
0
Grow
Seas
10/25/2014
0
Grow
Seas
10/26/2014
0
Grow
Seas
10/27/2014
0
Grow
Seas
10/28/2014
0
Grow
Seas
10/29/2014
0
Grow
Seas
10/30/2014
0.05
Grow
Seas
OCT 10/31/2014
0
1.27 Grow
Seas
11/1/2014
0.67
Grow
Seas
11/2/2014
0.17
Grow
Seas
11/3/2014
0
Grow
Seas
11/4/2014
0
11/5/2014
0
11/6/2014
0.01
11/7/2014
0.12
11/8/2014
0
11/9/2014
0
11/10/2014
0
11/11/2014
0
11/12/2014
0
11/13/2014
0
11/14/2014
0
11/15/2014
0
11/16/2014
0
11/17/2014
0.11
11/18/2014
0.33
11/19/2014
0
11/20/2014
0
11/21/2014
0
11/22/2014
0
11/23/2014
0
11/24/2014
0.74
11/25/2014
0.03
11/26/2014
1.34
11/27/2014
0.25
11/28/2014
0.05
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003
GW depth (in) GW depth (in)
-34.6 -29.9
MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Date 2014
Daily Month
11/29/2014
0
NOV 11/30/2014
0 3.82
12/1/2014
0
12/2/2014
0
12/3/2014
0.02
12/4/2014
0
12/5/2014
0
12/6/2014
0
12/7/2014
0.15
12/8/2014
0
12/9/2014
0.24
12/10/2014
0.03
12/11/2014
0
12/12/2014
0
12/13/2014
0
12/14/2014
0
12/15/2014
0
12/16/2014
0
12/17/2014
0.43
12/18/2014
0
12/19/2014
0
12/20/2014
0
12/21/2014
0.08
12/22/2014
0.46
12/23/2014
0.06
12/24/2014
1.17
12/25/2014
0.82
12/26/2014
0
12/27/2014
0
12/28/2014
0.03
12/29/2014
0.7
12/30/2014
0.31
DEC 12/31/2014
0.03 4.53
Annual Total 2014 46.22 46.22
GW depth (in) GW depth (in)
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Grow Season = Apr 1 to Nov 3 = 217 days
12.5% of 217 =
27 days (Siler City)
Monthly Climate Normals, 1981 -2010
2014 precip
SILR station
30 -yr ave month precip, inches
@ NCCH -04
1981 -2010 data average 30%
exc
70% exc
month total
January
4.61
3.23
5.47
3.50
February
3.72
2.55
4.43
3.66
March
4.55
3.17
5.40
5.59
April
3.35
2.14
4.03
3.98
May
4.64
3.27
5.50
3.94
June
3.97
2.23
4.83
1.63
July
4.67
2.98
5.63
5.21
August
4.05
2.79
4.82
6.06
September
4.26
1.72
5.18
3.03
October
3.82
1.83
4.67
1.27
November
3.33
2.13
4.01
3.82
December
3.24
2.15
3.89
4.53
Total Annual
48.21
46.22
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants

Table 13. Wetland Groundwater Gauge Attainment Data
UT Bear Creek (Weaver /McLeod) EEP# 92347 - 2014 (MY -5)
Success Criteria Achieved /Max Consecutive Days during Growing Season
Groundwater
(Percent of 216 -day Growing Season in Chatham Co (Apr 1 - Nov 3)
Gauge ID
Year 1 (2010)
Year 2 (2011)
Year 3 (2012)
Year 4 (2013)
Year 5 (2014)
09BEA457
No: 21 days
Yes: 37 days
Yes: 28 days
Yes: 82 days
Yes: 41 days
(9.7 %)
(17.1 %)
(13.0 %)
(38.0 %)
(19.0 %)
138BDBD7
No: 20 days
Yes: 43 days
Yes: 30 days
Yes: 80 days
Yes: 63 days
(9.2 %)
(19.9 %)
(13.8 %)
(37.0 %)
(29.2 %)
a *f
t
North Trib - Matted vegetation and wrack deposit, Sta 19 +50, 08 Apr 2014
1 7F !
South Trib - Matted vegetation and wrack deposit, Sta 21 +00, 08 Apr 2014
UT Bear Cr (Weaver McLeod) #92347 MY -5 (2014) Final Monitoring Report, Mar 2015
Chatham County, Cape Fear HUC #03030003 RJG &A Environmental Consultants