The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About820210_Routine Inspection_20230328i ype oi visit: --t:7 %-,ompiiance inspection uuperationKeview u structure Lvaluation UTechnical Assistance ReasonforVisit: --O'Routine OComplaint OFollow-up OReferral OEmergency 00ther 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: 13k)- Arrival Time: Departure Time: ""'s E 7W_)"] County.,,,��-�-O� Farm Name: Owner Email: Owner Name: x", Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Title: Latitude: Phone: Integrator: Certification Number: Certification Number: Longitude: t-. Region: '�e� Current '11�,111'11:�l 1111IR-1, Design, ' 1 ?, , -W I p. rre CU t Design Cur rent Swi ne:, C W, opacity Pop. et PoUltry Po p� C attle C PA .1 Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder Non -Layer Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish S--,S0 Dairy Heifer Farrow to Wean Curren, Dry Cow Farrow to Feeder _D ry Poti! tr ry a ity C 04d P, op.; Non -Dairy Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker Gilts Non -Layers Beef Feeder Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow Turkeys Other Turkey Poults Other �F7 Dischar$!es and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: E] Structure E] Application Field F-1 Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? E] Yes E3-<o F-1 NA F] NE 0 Yes E] No F_j NA F-1 NE E] Yes E] No F-1 NA E] NE E] Yes E] No F-1 NA E] NE F] Yes _FjNo F-1 NA 0 NE E] Yes ,Fjf�o F-1 NA E] NE Page I of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: jDate of Inspectionk.2 Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Yes --ff No NA NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Yes Ej No NA NE Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: I Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 0 Yes 0 No F-1 NA ONE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a Yes E3No 0 NA F-1 NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 2rYes F-1 No F-1 NA ONE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes [;�No NA NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [__j Yes [ErNo E] NA NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need Yes F-1 NA Ej NE maintenance or improvement? 'L;�No 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Ej Yes �TNo F-1 NA E] NE F� Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload Ej Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) F-1 PAN F-1 PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. Ej Total Phosphorus [:] Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil r-1 Outside of Acceptable Crop Window F-1 Evidence of Wind Drift Fj Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): f 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 0 Yes E] No 0 NA ONE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? E] Yes E�I-No 0 NA F-1 NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable Yesj�]-No F-1 N A [:] NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Reouired Records & Documents 0 Yes 4ErNo 0 NA 0 NE 0 Yes allo F-1 NA Ej NE 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? Yes EE�No F� NA [:] NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check 0 Yes Jallo F-1 NA ONE the appropriate box. F-1 Vv'UP [:1 Checklists E] Design 0 Maps [:] Lease Agreements Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes fTNo E] NA ONE F-1 Waste Application Ej Weekly Freeboard Ej Waste Analysis Ej Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers E]Weather Code F� Rainfall r-1 StockingE] Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I " Rainfall Inspections E] Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 Yes ETNo NA 0 NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on HiTigation equipment? 0 Yes,,B No NA 0 NE Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued Facility Number: Date of Inspection: �)- 3 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? E] Yes E]-No 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes J��o the appropriate box(es) below. F-1 Failure to complete annual sludge survey F-1 Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels E] Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? Ej Yes Q -No 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Yes_-L;]-No 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. F-1 Application Field [:] Lagoon/Storage Pond F� Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? cqc� e�rh _e� � &�,k Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 F-1 NA F] NE F-1 NA F] NE F-1 NA NE F-] NA NE F] Yes �;�o F-1 NA F] NE E] Yes E�-No F'� NA E] NE F] Yes__QNo F-1 NA 0 NE E] Yes -Efl-No F-1 NA E] NE E] Yes ffNo F-1 NA Ej NE Ej Yes _[D-No F-1 NA Ej NE E] Yes _LD-No F-1 NA E] NE Phone: Date: 9 511212020 FAC I LITY #: FARM NAM E: Td177 LAGOON LEVEL PERMIT - DUE EVERY 5 YEARS - EXPERIATION DATE - CURRENT NUMBER OF ANIMAL - OIC CARD YES OR NO NUMBER OF ANIMALS WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20) SOILTYPES CROP TYPES - ODOR CONTROL CHECK LISfYES'0'R NO - Irrigation Plan Maps YES OR NO WASTE REPORT (#21) -GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER DATE— lql?-3 NITROGEN LEVEL 1611,� 1 �, DATE— , I NITROGEN LEVEL DATE NITROGEN LEVEL— 3., SOIL REPORT - EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE - P-1 (N - 0 MORE THEN 400) - PH (Note if 4 or less) 4VV - Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU 02 ZN (IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300) I RR2 (#21) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES Not over PAN FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) CROP TYPES NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) Not over PAN CROP TYPES FLOW RATES NITROGEN (N) CALBRIATION (#24) EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED EVERY OTHER YEAR DATE OF CALIBRATION FLOW RATES RAIN FALL (#2,) -INITIAL AFTER I" RAIN EVENT_ -LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS L SS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED POA NEEDED. SLUDGE (#21 &2s) -DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE /j /,-9 1 - ) 0: Q P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE S 0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE 0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE 0: P -. % RATIO OF SLUDGE OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21) RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YEILDS MORTALITY *If fields are grazed there will be no crop yields VISUAL CHECK FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS- LAGOON SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES - WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) HARVESTED FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEEDBINS LAGOON GARBAGE - Bermuda grass: Opens March 1 st - Ends September 301h Small Grain Over seed. Opens October 1 st - Ends March 313t Corn: Opens February I 5th - Ends June 301h Cotton: Opens March 15th - Ends August 13t Rye: Opens September I st- Ends March 313t Oats: -Opens September 1-5t— Ends April 15t" Wheat: Opens September 1,3t - Ends April 30th Soybeans: Opens April 13t- Ends September 151h Fescue: Opens August I-,t- Ends July 31 s' Sorghum Hay: Opens March I 5th - Ends August 31 st