BPDP for PN

ID#* 20220819 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:
Blake Hartshorn
Initial Review Completed Date 03/30/2023
Mitigation Project Submittal - 3/30/2023
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* Yes No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: * Email Address:
Michael Beinenson [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#: * 20220819 Version:* 2
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Joshua Creek Buffer Mitigation Site
County: Lenoir
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: 2023.03.31 Joshua Creek BPDP.pdf 58.7MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Cameron Jernigan
Signature:

�� MCADAMS
March 31, 2023
Katie Merritt and Blake Hartshorn
NCDEQ, DWR
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS > ECT22002.00
RE: Joshua Creek BPDP
Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
NCDWR Project #2022-0819v2
Response to Review Comments
The following are the response comments for the above -mentioned project. Our response comments are in bold.
NCDWR
Reviewer: Blake Hartshorn
Comment Page
# Label
Review Comments and Response
1
20
please talk about square foot (sf) credit deduction amount and reference corresponding
credit table
Text in 7.1 paragraph one was edited to say: A standard non -diffused flow deduction of
4,350 sf was applied to both D2 and D4 (total deducted area is 8,700 sf) and subtracted
from Joshua Creek's nutrient offset credit area (see deducted area in Table 10). The
deducted areas along D2 and D4 are represented by 60-degree angles on either side of the
ditches, 50 feet from where the ditches enter Joshua Creek's 200-foot buffer line.
add a line item for showing diffused flow deductions since those areas are still being planted
and still represent "Total Area" of the site.
Credit Type = Buffer
Feature Name = Diffused Flow deductions
Total Area = how much area is deducted
Total Creditable Area for Buffer Mitigation=0
2
21
then check No in both boxes for the credits.
If the diffuse flow deductions were calculated in another way, please correct the error and
address as requested above.
This is to ensure a transparent representation of where the deductions are occurring and to
ensure DWR knows they have been applied correctly.
A Diffuse Flow Deduction feature was added to the table as requested. 4,350 sf was
deducted from both D2 and D4 for a total deducted area of 8,700 sf.
Please refer to the first draft of the credit table on what is convertible to riparian buffer and
3
21
nutrient offest because DWR did not require changes. The current version of this table is no
longer compliant with the MBI, the Rule, or the viability letter. Fix accordingly.
creating experiences through experience 621 Hillsborough Street, Suite 500, Raleigh, NC 27603 / 919. 361. 5000

�� MCADAMS
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS > ECT22001.00
All Nutrient Credit type features now show "No" in the "Convertible to Riparian Buffer?"
column.
Please refer to the first draft of the credit table on what is convertible to riparian buffer and
nutrient offest because DWR did not require changes. The current version of this table is no
4
21
longer compliant with the MBI, the Rule, or the viability letter. Fix accordingly.
All Nutrient Credit type features now show "No" in the "Convertible to Riparian Buffer?"
column.
5
32
Please put sf in the call out box that applies to the deduction that will also be entered into
the credit table.
Deducted area callouts were revised to include 4,350 sf of deducted area.
When easement boundaries change from what they are proposed in the viability letter, it can
change the credit potential and viability for features (refer to approved viability letter where
it speaks to alterations in easement boundaries and impacts to feature viability). Additionally
6
32
DWR expects easement boundaries to not change between the 1st draft and the final. When
this happens it can result in DWR staff having to start over the initial review of the entire
BPDP, thus further delaying the timeline for the Provide to implement their plan.
Noted
7
32
This preservation area does not appear to be delineated appropriately. A portion of the
restoration seems to be forested according to this aerial imagery. Please explain.
The tree line was surveyed so it is a correct area. The GIS aerial and surveyed lines don't
match up exactly. Also, the trees cast a shadow that create the appearance of a larger
wooded area.
When DWR provides an initial review of the 1st draft of the BPDP, we expect the Provider to
only change what is required in order to adequately address DWR comments. When the
Provider makes other changes, like changing the colors representing NOC and RBC off
8
32
Feature 2 and feature 1, when DWR only requested changes to feature 3, it makes it more
difficult to compare the Revised Draft to the Initial draft. As a result, DWR staff have to
spend more time reviewing the BPDP for accuracy and compliance, which then further delays
our review and the Provider's planting timeline. Please refrain from making changes to the
BPDP that are not directly a result of DWR comments.
Noted
Consideration of this response is greatly appreciated. If you should have any questions or require additional
information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 919. 287. 0812.
Sincerely,
MCADAMS
Rebecca Stubbs, PE
Practice Lead, Stream Restoration
creating experiences through experience 2 of 2

Bank Parcel Development Package
Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer
Mitigation Site
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020204
Lenoir County, NC
NCDWR Project ID#: 2022-0819v2
I
SPONSORED BY: PREPARED BY: PREPARED FOR:
eco terra
WA DA M S +111tigation Services
117 Centrewest Court 621 Hillsborough Rd NCDEQ - DWR
Cary, NC 27513 Suite 500 1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27603 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
MARCH 2O23

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................ 3
2.0 MITIGATION PROJECT SUMMARY.................................................................................................................4
2.1 PROJECT GOALS..............................................................................................................................................4
2.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS.....................................................................................................................................5
2.3 PARCEL VIABILITY............................................................................................................................................7
2.4 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION......................................................................................................................8
2.5 SOILS AND GEOLOGY.......................................................................................................................................8
2.6 VEGETATION................................................................................................................................................10
2.7 THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES..........................................................................................................10
2.8 CULTURAL RESOURCES...................................................................................................................................11
2.9 FEMA FLOODPLAIN AND PERMITTING COMPLIANCE...........................................................................................11
2.10 PARCEL CONSTRAINTS AND ACCESS..................................................................................................................12
2.11 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS.............................................................................................................12
3.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT AND LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT............................................................12
4.0 MITIGATION WORK PLAN...........................................................................................................................13
4.1 PARCEL PREPARATION...................................................................................................................................13
4.2 RESTORATION ACTIVITIES...............................................................................................................................14
4.3 NCDWR AS -BUILT EVALUATION.....................................................................................................................15
5.0 MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING PLAN...................................................................................................15
5.1 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS............................................................................................................................15
5.2 MONITORING...............................................................................................................................................15
5.3 PARCEL MAINTENANCE..................................................................................................................................16
5.4 PARCEL BOUNDARY MAINTENANCE.................................................................................................................17
6.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES............................................................................................................................17
6.1 PERFORMANCE AND MAINTENANCE BONDS......................................................................................................17
7.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS AND CREDIT RELEASE...................................................................................17
7.1 CREDIT POTENTIAL........................................................................................................................................17
7.2 CREDIT RELEASE............................................................................................................................................18
8.0 REFERENCES...............................................................................................................................................
20
Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 1
eCOlerra, HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Tables
Table 1:
Water Quality and Ecological Goals and Objectives
Table 2:
Project Attributes
Table 3:
Project Features and Viability
Table 4:
Drainage Area and Land Use
Table 5:
Soil Series
Table 6:
Federally Listed Species
Table 7:
Landowner and Long-term Protection
Table 8:
Proposed Planting Plan
Table 9:
Monitoring Plan Components
Table 10:
Project Credit Table
Figures
Figure 1.
Vicinity Map
Figure 2.
Credit Service Area Map
Figure 3.
Existing Conditions Map
Figure 4.
USGS Topographic Map
Figure 5.
Drainage Area Map
Figure 6.
NRCS Soil Survey Map
Figure 7.
Vegetation Monitoring Map
Figure 8.
Credit Generation Map
Figure 9.
Riparian Buffer Zones Map
Appendices
Appendix A.
Site Photographs — November 3, 2022
Appendix B.
Historical Aerial Photographs
Appendix C.
NCDWR Applicability to the Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules Letter — June 28, 2022
NCDWR Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Letter — October 26, 2022
Appendix D.
Request for USFWS Consultation Package Review Letter —August 3, 2022
USFWS List of Threatened and Endangered Species Letter —August 3, 2022
USFWS Self -Certification Letter —August 3, 2022
USFWS Species Conclusions Table —August 3, 2022
NCNHP Natural Heritage Resources Letter —July 19, 2022
Request for Cultural Resource Review to SHPO — July 19, 2022
SHPO Cultural Resource Review Letter —August 9, 2022
Appendix E.
Effective FIRM Map # 3720452000J
Appendix F.
EDR Report - July 26, 2022
Appendix G.
Southern Conservation Trust, Inc. Long -Term Steward Letter of Intent — March 6, 2023
Southern Conservation Trust, Inc. Long -Term Endowment Estimate — March 6, 2023
Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 2
eCOlerra, HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
1.0 Introduction
The Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (Parcel) is located near
Kinston, NC, in the Upper Trent River watershed of the Neuse River Basin. The project site is
approximately 9.5 miles south of the Town of Kinston in Lenoir County. To reach the site from
Kinston, travel 9.1 miles along US Highway 58 South and turn onto Elm Grove Road for 2.5 miles.
The Parcel is located 2.9 miles southwest of US Highway 58 along Elm Grove Road (Figure 1). The
Bank Parcel Development Package (BPDP) is being submitted for review under the proposed
Joshua Creek Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) between the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources (NCDWR) and Eco Terra, LLC, the Bank Sponsor (Eco Terra or Sponsor). The proposed
Parcel has been planned and designed according to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 for buffer mitigation,
15A NCAC 02B .0703 for nutrient offset, and the proposed MBI. Rule .0703 does not specifically
address riparian restoration for generating nutrient offsets, therefore nutrient offset credits will
be generated in accordance with the proposed MBI.
The project is located within the Neuse River Basin hydrological unit code (HUC) 030202040104.
The Parcel is approximately 29.2 acres (ac) or 1,270,354 square feet (sf) of three tracts of land that
encompasses unnamed tributaries to Joshua Creek and agricultural land. The Parcel contains a
2,850 feet (approximate) section of Joshua Creek. Of the three unnamed tributaries that flow
directly into Joshua Creek, there is one jurisdictional stream feature (F3). The remaining features
are not subject to Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Regulations, Title 15A NCAC 02B 0.714 (Neuse
Buffer Rules), these include one ephemeral feature (F2) and one feature acting as an intermittent
channel (F1). The Site also contains sections of two lateral ditches to Joshua Creek that are both
approximately 145 feet in length (D2 and D4). The ditches are located within Joshua Creek's
riparian buffer and adjacent riparian area, however, the ditch sections have no hydrological
connection to Joshua Creek, are not subject to Neuse Buffer Rules, and are not viable for buffer
mitigation or nutrient offset. Therefore, the ditches are not included as project features, and the
ditched areas are excluded from credit calculations and appropriate credit area deductions have
been incorporated to account for their non -diffuse flow through Joshua Creek's riparian areas (see
Section 7.1 for more details).
The BPDP is being submitted for riparian buffer and nutrient offset credit in the service area
designated by Neuse River Basin HUC 03020204 (Figure 2). The proposed project will generate
648,469.804 riparian buffer credits (RBC) and 27,422.284 pounds (Ibs) of nitrogen nutrient offset
credits (NOC). The final project area will be delineated and depicted in the As -Built Survey and
submitted with the As -Built Survey. Therefore, credit totals may change slightly depending on the
As -Built Survey.
The Parcel will address agricultural runoff by reducing sediment and nutrient loading into the
unnamed tributaries, Joshua Creek, and the Trent River. Approximately 4.4 miles downstream of
the project area Joshua Creek flows into the Trent River, and subsequently into the Neuse River.
Joshua Creek and the Trent River are classified as Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) by NCDWR.
The project area is primarily made up of open agricultural land farmed for row crop production,
Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 3
eCOlerra, HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
with some forested area. Surrounding the project area is open agricultural land and forested area.
The proposed project will improve terrestrial habitats along the Parcel'sjurisdictionaI streams and
non jurisdictional intermittent, ephemeral, and ditch features by establishing and preserving the
riparian buffers and adjacent riparian areas and allowing the land to undergo a natural succession
to a forested community. The project will restore forested riparian buffers and adjacent riparian
areas to a minimum width of 50 feet from tops of banks and extend out a maximum of
approximately 200 feet from the project features (streams, ephemeral and intermittent channels)
and will remove rotating crops and fertilizer inputs. The restored riparian buffer and adjacent
riparian areas will filter agricultural runoff from the surrounding farm fields and provide shading
to reduce stream temperatures and improve aquatic habitat. Invasive vegetation will be managed
as needed within the project area to promote native vegetation.
The proposed project will provide riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset in the Neuse River
Basin. The project involves the restoration and preservation of riparian areas along Joshua Creek
and three unnamed tributaries that flow to Joshua Creek. Land disturbing activities will be minimal,
consisting of minor bank stabilization and planting preparation of the site's riparian areas (see
Section 4.1). Minor bank stabilization and debris removal will be necessary in some areas to ensure
diffuse flow and bank stability. The project area is open agricultural land, primarily farmed for row
crops, and surrounding the project area is open agricultural land and forested area. Historical land
use has been agriculture for over 70 years according to historical USGS aerials (Appendix B). The
project site will be permanently protected and preserved with a conservation easement that will
ultimately be transferred to a DWR-approved land trust for long-term stewardship according to
the MBI.
2.0 Mitigation Project Summary
2.1 Project Goals
The primary goal of the proposed buffer and adjacent riparian area restoration is to improve water
quality within the Neuse River Basin through ecological enhancements. This will be accomplished
with specific goals to address agricultural runoff, containing nutrients and sediment, restore
terrestrial habitat and protect the project parcel in perpetuity. Specific goals and objectives are
outlined in Table 1.
Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 4
eCOlerra, HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Table 7: Water Quaury ana �uvEogical uoais ana oojecrives
Goal
Objective
Establish and restore riparian buffers and adjacent
riparian areas to filter runoff and subsurface flows from
Reduce nutrient loading
adjacent agricultural fields. Remove fertilizer input
through conversion of agricultural field to forested
ri arian buffer.
Establish and restore riparian buffers and adjacent
Reduce sediment loading
riparian areas to filter runoff from adjacent agricultural
fields. Provide vegetative bank stabilization to decrease
sediment input.
Establish a wide riparian corridor with canopy closure to
Decrease water temperature and
filter nutrients and provide stream shading, reducing
increase dissolved oxygen
water temperature and increasing concentration of
dissolved oxygen.
Restore terrestrial habitat
Plant riparian corridor with native vegetation and manage
i nvasives.
Protect project in perpetuity
Implement and record a conservation easement on the
Parcel.
2.2 Existing Conditions
The Parcel will convert approximately 27.1 acres of agricultural row crop fields to forested buffers
and riparian areas along Joshua Creek, one stream feature (F3), one non jurisdictional feature
acting as an intermittent stream (F1), and one non -jurisdictional ephemeral channel (F2).
Additionally, this project will preserve approximately 0.4 acres of existing forested riparian area
along F3. Refer to Figure 3 and Appendix A for the Existing Conditions Map and site photographs
collected on November 3, 2022, respectively. The site has been revisited several times since the
site photographs were collected and the NCDWR staff visit on September 8, 2022, to conduct the
site viability assessment (see Section 2.3). There have been no changes in land use nor site
conditions since the viability assessment or the date the photos were collected.
The headwaters of Joshua Creek are located northwest of the proposed Parcel along US Highway
258. The headwater reaches of Joshua Creek are extensively ditched and straightened, providing
surface drainage for agricultural fields and logging operations. Joshua Creek enters the project
area from the northwest and flows south to the project terminus. The intermittent stream, F3,
emerges from the forested area northeast of the project area and flows west until it's confluence
with Joshua Creek. F2 is an ephemeral channel that emerges from the forested property directly
east of the project area and flows west into Joshua Creek. F1 is located on the southern boundary
of the Parcel. F1 acts as an intermittent feature that originates east of the project area and flows
west through a road crossing at Elm Grove Road and continues until its confluence with Joshua
Creek. Both Joshua Creek and F3 are shown as water features on the 1977 Lenoir County Soil
Survey; however F3 is not depicted on the 2022 US Geological Survey's (USGS) Comfort NC 7.5-
Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 5
eCOlerra, HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
minute Topographic Quadrangle as a stream channel (Figure 4). The other project area features,
F1 and F2, are not depicted on USGS Quadrangle or Lenoir County Soil Survey maps.
The Parcel also contains sections of two agricultural ditches (D2 and D4) that are lateral to Joshua
Creek. D2 and D4 are not included as project features and their areas are not included in the
Parcel's proposed riparian areas. Sections of D2 and D4 are located within Joshua Creek's riparian
buffer and adjacent riparian areas that are being restored for this project. The ditch sections have
no hydrological connection to Joshua Creek and instead, the ditches convey flow east out of the
conservation easement and into the forested property to the east. These ditches are not depicted
on the 2022 US Geological Survey's (USGS) Comfort NC 7.5-minute Topographic Quadrangle or
Lenoir County Soil Survey maps as stream channels.
The Parcel is composed of agricultural fields, one small (0.4 acres) forested riparian area along F3,
and existing trees and vegetation that are to be preserved along Joshua Creek, F1, and F3.
Historical aerials denote that land use, including configuration of the channels, at the project site
has been consistent since 1961 (see Appendix B).
Project attributes associated with the proposed Parcel are outlined in Table 2.
Table 2: Project Attributes
Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer
Mitigation Site
• - - -
030202040104
Neuse
Neuse 03020204
-
35.121089,-77.579258
Conservation Easement — to be recorded
•
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset
648,469.804 (RBC')
27,422.284 Ibs N (NOCZ)
•
March 2023
April 2023
• •
May 2023
• •
December 2023
• •
December 2024
• •
December 2025
i11:4 • •
December 2026
- i
December 2027
'Riparian Buffer Credits (RBQ
2Nutrient Offset Credits (NOQ
Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 6
eCOlerra, HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
2.3 Parcel Viability
NCDWR staff visited the project Parcel on June 20, 2022 to review features and determine
applicability to the Neuse River Basin Riparian Area Protection Rules, Title 15A NCAC 02B .0714.
NCDWR issued the official Stream Call Determination letter on June 28, 2022. On September 8,
2022, NCDWR staff re -visited the site to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and
nutrient offset within the proposed easement boundary per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and 15A NCAC
02B .0703, respectively. NCDWR issued the official Site Viability letter on October 26, 2022. A copy
of both the "Applicability to the Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules" and "Site Viability for Buffer
Mitigation and Nutrient Offset" letters issued by NCDWR are provided in Appendix C and
summarized in Table 3.
During NCDWR staff visits to the project area, four additional features were assessed for
applicability to Neuse River Basin Riparian Area Protection Rules. The four features were classified
as ditches (D1, D2, D3, and D4). D1 and D3 are located west of the project area and flow east into
Joshua Creek. D2 and D4 are located east of Joshua Creek and are not hydrologically connected
to Joshua Creek. Before NCDWR staff assessed the proposed Parcel's viability for buffer mitigation
and nutrient offset, areas encompassing D1 and D3 were removed from the Parcel so D1 and D3
were not assessed for buffer mitigation and nutrient offset viability. Additionally, during the
NCDWR staff visit it was determined that D2 and D4 are not viable for buffer mitigation or nutrient
offset. Therefore, the four ditch features are not included in proposed credit calculations and their
extents are not included in the proposed Parcel. However, sections of D2 and D4 are located within
the proposed riparian areas of Joshua Creek. Therefore, their areas are not included in credit
generating riparian areas of Joshua Creek and non -diffused flow deductions were also applied to
the proposed riparian areas (see Section 7.1 for methods of non -diffused flow deduction). The
NCDWR classifications and determinations for the ditches are also included in Appendix C.
Table 3: Project Features and Viability
L Narne�,
Joshua Creek
Ah
Stream
Buffer Rules
Yes
RiparianOffset
Credit Viable
Yes
Viable
Yes
F1
Stream*
No
Yes
Yes
F2
Ephemeral
No
Yes
Yes
F3
Stream
Yes
Yes
Yes
D1','
Ditch
No
No
No
D2'
Ditch
No
No
No
D3''
Ditch
No
No
No
D4'
Ditch
No
No
No
'Features are not included in the project parcel.
'Feature viability for buffer mitigation and nutrient offset were not assessed by NCDWR.
*Unmapped feature acting as on intermittent stream not subject to buffer regulations as determined
in the NCDWR Stream Determination Letter (Appendix Q.
Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 7
eCOlerra, HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
2.4 Watershed Characterization
The Parcel is located within the Upper Trent River Subwatershed (HUC 030202040104) and Neuse
River Basin (HUC 03020204). All water features at the site drain to Joshua Creek which flows to the
Trent River. The Trent River is approximately 4.4 miles downstream of the project area. Joshua
Creek and the Trent River are classified as Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) by NCDWR. They are
protected for Class C uses which include aquatic life propagation, survival and maintenance of
biological integrity, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture. The NSW designation is for
waters needing nutrient management due to excessive growth of microscopic or macroscopic
vegetation.
Drainage areas were delineated for the project area's streams (Joshua Creek, F1, F2, and F3)
utilizing Lenoir County's 2-foot Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data (Figure 5). According to
the 2019 USGS National Land Cover Database (NLCD), the drainage area has limited urban
development and is primarily forested and used for agricultural, with remaining land use being
wetland areas and herbaceous vegetation. Table 4 summarizes the drainage areas and current
land use.
Table . ainage Area and Land Use
2.5 Soils and Geology
The project area's soils, as mapped by the 1977 Soil Survey of Lenoir County, are sandy loam, and
consist of the Bibb soil series, Norfolk loamy sands, and Kalmia loamy sands (Figure 6). The Bibb
(BB) soils comprise the majority of the soils underlying the Parcel at 41 percent of the project area.
Joshua Creek and F3 are depicted as streams on the 1977 USDA Soil Survey map number 29. A
description of the site's soils is provided in Table 5.
Table 5: Soil Series
7bbsoils,requently
Very deep, poorly drained, moderately
permeable soils on floodplains of streams in
BB
the Coastal Plain. Formed in stratified loamy
flooded
and sandy alluvium that are frequently flooded.
Very slow runoff potential. Depth to seasonal
high water table Is 0-12 inches.
Goldsboro loamy
Go
Very deep, moderately well drained and
sand, 0 to 2 percent
permeable soils found in the Coastal Plain.
Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 8
eCOlerra, HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
slopes, Atlantic
Formed in loamy sand and sandy clay loam.
Flatwoods
Surface runoff is negligible to medium and
there is little to no flooding or ponding
frequency. Depth to seasonal high water table
is 24-36 inches.
Very deep, very poorly drained soils with
moderately rapid permeability found on
floodplains and swamps in the Coastal Plain.
Johnston soils
JS
Formed in sandy and loamy alluvium. Soils are
generally saturated, frequently flooded, and
frequently ponded. Depth to seasonal high
water table is 0-12 inches.
Very deep, well drained, moderately permeable
soils on stream terraces in the Coastal Plain.
Kalmia loamy sand, 2
Kb
Formed in loamy sand and sandy clay loams.
to 6 percent slopes
Low runoff potential, very rare frequency of
flooding, and no frequency of ponding. Depth
to seasonal high water table is 40 to 72 inches.
Very deep, very poorly and poorly drained,
moderately rapid to moderately slowly
permeable soils on upland flats, depressions,
Leon sand
Lo
stream terraces and tidal areas. Formed in
sandy marine sediments of the Coastal Plain.
Very high runoff potential with no frequency of
flooding or ponding. Depth to season high
water table is 0-12 inches.
Very deep, somewhat poorly drained, and
moderately permeable soils found in flats and
Lynchburg sandy
broad interstream divides of marine terraces.
loam, 0 to 2 percent
Ly
Formed in loamy marine deposits of the
slopes
Coastal Plain. Surface runoff is negligible and
there is no frequency of flooding or ponding.
Depth to the seasonal high water table is 6-18
inches.
Very deep, well drained, and moderately
permeable soils found in flats and broad
interstream divides of marine terraces. Formed
Norfolk loamy sand,
Nb
in loamy marine deposits of the Coastal Plain.
2 to 6 percent slopes
Surface runoff is negligible to medium, and
there is no flooding or ponding frequency.
Depth to the seasonal high water table is 40-72
inches.
Stallings loamy sand
St
Deep, somewhat poorly drained, moderately
rapidly ermeable soils that formed in loam
Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 9
eCOlerrC, HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
and sandy marine deposits. Found in flats and
broad interstream divides of marine terraces in
the Coastal Plain. Surface runoff is very low and
there is no frequency of flooding or ponding.
Depth to the seasonal high water table is 12-30
inches.
The Parcel is located within the Carolina Flatwoods ecoregion of the Middle Coastal Plains. Broad,
flat terraces, adjacent to low gradient stream channels characterize the Middle Coastal Plains.
2.6 Vegetation
Vegetative communities within the project area consist of active row crops of cotton and early
successional, herbaceous and woody vegetation along the streams and ditches that are mowed
and maintained.
2.7 Threatened and Endangered Species
The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC)
database and NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database were utilized to identify federally
threatened and endangered species in the project area. In a letter dated August 3, 2022, the
USFWS identified four federally threatened, endangered, and candidate species under the
Endangered Species Act as potentially occurring in the project vicinity, no species under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act were identified. However, according to the USFWS, there are no critical
habitats within the defined project area. A review of the NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP)
data dated July 19, 2022 did not identify any listed species within the project area but did identify
one known occurrence of the federally listed Red -cockaded Woodpecker within one mile of the
project area dated 1979. The NCNHP database did not identify any managed areas within one
mile of the project site. Multiple site visits have occurred over the past 6 months observing site
conditions, habitat, and potential presence of species. No listed species were observed within the
project boundaries resulting in a "no effect" determination for subject species and a "may affect,
not likely to adversely affect" for others due to potential suitable habitat adjacent to the project
area. Additionally, no eagles or eagle nests were observed, and construction activities will not
impact migrating birds within the agricultural fields. The USFWS Self -Certification Letter, dated
August 3, 2022, has been submitted to the Raleigh Field Office requesting comment from USFWS.
A response was not received from the USFWS within the 45-day response period. All USFWS and
NCNHP letters and responses have been included in the Appendix D. Table 6 summarizes the
threatened and endangered species evaluation.
Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 10
eCOlerra, HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Table 6: Federally usrea Species
NaLfic Name
Common Name
Federal Status
— Suitable HabitatAN;
Alligator
American Alligator
Threatened
Adjacent suitable habitat
mississippiensis
Necturus lewisi
Neuse River Waterdog
Threatened
Adjacent suitable habitat
Noturus furiosus
Carolina Madtom
Endangered
Adjacent suitable habitat
Danaus plexippus
Monarch Butterfly
Candidate
No
2.8 Cultural Resources
The National Historic Preservation Act declares a national policy of historic preservation to protect,
rehabilitate, restore, and reuse districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects significant in
American architecture, history, archaeology, and culture. Section 106 mandates that federal
agencies consider the effect that a project may have on a property that is included in or is eligible
for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places.
The NC State Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) online mapping resource was reviewed to
determine the presence of known historic resources at or near the project site. According to the
database, there are no known historical resources within the project site. There are three historical
resources within one mile of the project site: The Sam B. Taylor House (LR1071), the Preston
Gooding House (LR1072), and the Leroy & Elizabeth Reynolds House (LR1070) are located 0.17,
0.46, and 0.60 miles, respectively, from the project site. These three historical resources are
classified as "Survey Only" sites and will not be disturbed for the proposed project. A letter was
submitted to SHPO on July 19, 2022, requesting review and comment. SHPO responded on August
9, 2022 indicating that they were not aware of any historic resources that would be affected by
the project. Both letters are included in the Appendix D.
2.9 FEMA Floodplain and Permitting Compliance
There is FEMA regulated 100-year floodplain and floodway located within the Parcel along Joshua
Creek (FIRM Map # 3720452000J, Appendix E). Downstream portions of the Parcel's unnamed
tributaries to Joshua Creek are located within the floodplain and designated floodway. There are
no planned grading activities that will alter the existing stream features and unnamed tributaries
and their floodplains or have impacts to their hydraulic performance. Only activities aside from
soil preparation for planting the riparian buffers will consist of minimal bank stabilization
treatments (see Section 4.1). Therefore, FEMA coordination nor hydraulic modeling are proposed
for the project. The project will not encroach on the NCDOT right-of-way along Elm Grove Road.
There are no other known easements at or near the project site that would prevent project
implementation.
Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 11
eCOlerra, HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
2.10 Parcel Constraints and Access
The Parcel can be accessed via a driveway off Elm Grove Road and a farm field path for long-term
access and site maintenance and monitoring. There are no known constraints on the proposed
project Parcel.
2.11 Other Environmental Conditions
A site assessment was conducted by Environmental Data Resources (EDR) to comply with
standards set forth by EPA, ASTM and other environmental due diligence requests to evaluate
environmental risk for the Parcel. The EDR report, July 26, 2022, determined the site was not
located in any Federal, State or Tribal environmental databases and there were no known,
potentially hazardous, waste sites within or immediately adjacent to the project site. The EDR
report is provided in the Appendix F.
3.0 Site Protection Instrument and Long-term
Management
The land required to plant and restore the riparian areas, access the conservation easement, and
manage the mitigation project includes 29.2 acres of the Parcel listed in Table 7. The Parcel will
be transferred to an approved NCDWR long-term stewardship entity prior to the submittal of the
Year 4 Monitoring Report. It will remain in private ownership, protected in its entirety by the long-
term stewardship entity, and will be managed under the terms detailed in an approved NCDWR
conservation easement. The long-term trustee and manager will be responsible for the periodic
inspection of the Parcel to ensure the conservation easement is upheld and the land is protected
in perpetuity. Eco Terra, LLC has selected Southern Conservation Trust, Inc. to serve as the long-
term steward and holder of the Parcel's conservation easement. The Southern Conservation Trust,
Inc. submitted a letter to Eco Terra, LLC on March 6, 2023 stating its intent to assume responsibility
for holding the easement as soon as it is ready to be recorded. The letter of intent is included in
Appendix G.
Table 7: Landowner and Long-term Protection
Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 12
eCOlerra, HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
4.0 Mitigation Work Plan
The proposed project will restore high quality riparian areas along Joshua Creek, one stream
feature (F3), one non -jurisdictional intermittent feature (F1), and one ephemeral channel (F2) that
all flow to Joshua Creek. The Parcel will provide riparian buffer mitigation credits by protecting
the riparian area from top of bank to a minimum 30-foot width and maximum 100-foot width
along the Joshua Creek, F1, F2, and F3. Buffer mitigation credits are also proposed through
preservation of a riparian area adjacent to F3 for a minimum width of 30-foot and a maximum
width of 200-ft. The Parcel will provide nutrient offset credits by protecting the riparian area from
a minimum offset of 50-ft from the top of banks to a maximum offset of 200-ft along the project
features. Ditches D2 and D4 are subject to the Buffer Interpretation/Clarification Memo #2008-
019 where maintenance of diffuse flow through the conservation easement cannot be attained.
Where the ditches enter the 200-ft offset, a 50 feet long 120-degree wedge has been drafted to
represent the deduction in buffer credit. The project will not have any adverse impacts to existing
stream and water conveyances.
4.1 Parcel Preparation
The land proposed for riparian restoration is currently in agricultural row crop production,
therefore the site preparation will require minimal soil disturbance. Planting will occur using
mechanical and manual methods. Soil ripping will occur in the mechanically planted rows to break
up plow pans and compacted soils. Additional site preparation such as ripping and disking will
occur within farm paths proposed for planting.
Appropriate pre -emergent and aquatic -safe herbicide will be applied by a licensed NC pesticide
applicator in the tree rows to control potential herbaceous weed competition. Additional
herbicide will be applied within the planting rows during the post -planting phase for at least the
first three years as needed and approved by NCDWR. Any invasive plants will be controlled
mechanically (e.g. bushhogging) and chemically (e.g. herbicidal spray application) in restoration
and preservation areas. The fields within the project area contain limited number of invasive plants
and herbicide will only be sprayed in areas where there is an existing population of non-native
invasive plant species.
Areas immediately adjacent to the top of banks will not be ripped to prevent soil erosion and
runoff from entering the surface water. Non-native invasive species are present and will be
removed during planting to minimize potential for competition with target vegetative
communities. Planting rows will be approximately aligned to follow the existing contours to
impede overland flow and prevent erosion. Sediment and erosion control measures may be
utilized, if necessary, in all areas with existing rills and unstable banks, as well as areas prone to
erosion, to prevent stormwater runoff from entering surface waters during planting. Minor
bank/riparian stabilization and grading will be provided where erosional rills, sink holes and gullies
are observed. Stabilization will include minor grading, erosion control matting, seeding and/or
live stakes planted as necessary for soil stabilization. No DEMLR nor local County permits are
anticipated for stabilizing compromised areas. An appropriate temporary seed mix will be applied,
Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 13
eCOlerrC, HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
as necessary, to provide temporary ground cover for soil stabilization and reduction of sediment
loss during rain events in areas without existing herbaceous cover.
4.2 Restoration Activities
The planting plan for the riparian restoration area includes restoring native tree species with bare
root seedlings and seeding to convert the active farming area to a vegetated riparian corridor.
Trees will be planted with a density sufficient to meet the performance standards outlined in the
Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and the MBI of 260 stems per acre at the end of five years. Initial
planting densities will be approximately 726 stems per acre (6-foot by 10-foot spacing). All species
will be well mixed in bags, prior to planting activities, to ensure adequate species distribution
across the planting areas. The Parcel's riparian areas will be re -vegetated with species consistent
of those identified during the reference survey and additional species suggested by Schafale
(2012) for the Mesic Mixed Forest and Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp (blackwater subtype)
Forest communities. Target community tree species are shown in Table 8, which includes 10
species and ensures that that no one tree species will be greater than 50% as noted in the
aforementioned rule. An appropriate permanent seed mixture will be planted that may include
species beneficial to pollinators or species that act as larval hosts for pollinators such as butterflies
(e.g. big bluestem). Seeding will not be applied to areas with an existing native herbaceous layer.
Planting will occur in the dormant season between November 15 and March 15. Eco Terra will
observe the planting crews and their efforts to ensure adequate stem placement and species
distribution across the entire proposed planting area, including riparian areas up to the top of
banks. Planting observation will also include site walks during the planting efforts to identify any
areas that are insufficiently planted or void of stems.
able d: Nropusecd N1anting N1an
MW
'IMMr
Common Name
Planting Zone
I
"Forest
Approximat
I
Betu(a nigra
River Birch
- SSS
Subcanopy
Lpercent-9-1
2%
Carya aquatica
Water Hickory
SSS
Canopy
16%
Diospyros virginiona
Persimmon
MMF/SSS
Subcanopy/7%
Canopy
Froxinus
Green Ash
SSS
Canopy
2%
enns (vanica
Nyssa syfvatica
Balckgum Tupelo
MMF
Canopy
5%
Quercus michaxii
Swamp Chestnut
MMF/SSS
Canopy
14%
Oak
Quercus fyrato
Overcup Oak
SSS
Canopy
14%
Quercus shumardii
Shumard Oak
MMF
Canopy
12%
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
MMF/SSS
Canopy
12%
Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 14
eCOlerra, HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
MMF/SSS
Canopy
16%
Panicum virgatum
Switchgrass
Permanent
Seed Mix
Andropogon gerardi
Big bluestem
Permanent
Seed Mix
Sorghostrum nutans
Indiangrass
Permanent
Seed Mix
*SSS-small stream swamp; MMF-mesic hardwood forest
4.3 NCDWR As -Built Evaluation
Within 30 calendar days after completing the establishment of the buffer and nutrient offset areas,
the Sponsor will submit written notification to NCDWR documenting that all buffer mitigation and
nutrient offset activities have been completed. Failure to submit written notification within 30 days
may result in a modified credit release schedule or a delay in the issuance of credit releases. An
as -built report will be submitted to NCDWR, following the restoration planting, to document the
mitigation work plan to date.
5.0 Maintenance and Monitoring Plan
The maintenance and monitoring plan has been developed to demonstrate required performance
standards and success criteria are met and project goals and objectives are achieved.
5.1 Performance Standards
The performance standards for the proposed project follow approved criteria presented in the
MBI. Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will be conducted to assess the condition of
the finished project. Performance standards will be evaluated throughout the five-year post -
construction monitoring period and summarized annually in a monitoring report. This annual
report shall provide project data and chronicle issues that arise during the five-year monitoring
period. The Sponsor shall submit annual monitoring reports to NCDWR by December 31st of each
year for at least 5 consecutive years until project close-out and will follow the terms and conditions
of the Joshua Creek MBI.
5.2 Monitoring
Permanent vegetation monitoring plots will be established and assessed within the riparian
restoration areas to document the survival and vigor of the planted trees. Vegetation monitoring
plots will be located across the site to provide a random sampling of all the vegetation community
types re-established on the site. The monitoring plots shall make up a minimum of two percent
of the total planted portion of the site. A total of 22 plots, each 100 square meters and rectangular
or square in nature, will be randomly established within the planted restoration areas to document
tree survival (Figure 7). The number of plots represent two percent of the total mitigation area
and is calculated as follows:
Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 15
eCOlerra, HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
2% x 1,182,148 sf = 23,643 sf = 2,197 square meters
2,197 square meters - 100 square meters plot = 22 plots
The Buffer Mitigation Rule (15A NCAC 02B .0295) and the corresponding MBI requires survival of
at least 260 stems per acre at the end of the five-year monitoring period. Measures will be taken
to ensure that plots are diverse, where a minimum of four native hardwood tree species are
represented and where no one species represents 50% of the plot. Vegetation monitoring will
follow the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) — NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level 1 (2008).
The vegetation plots will be photographed each year with an additional six photographs (32 total)
taken to document project condition and easement integrity. All photos will be taken at the same
location and orientation each year. Plots will be demarcated with durable PVC or metal markers
and flagging during the monitoring period.
Visual assessments will be performed twice a year during the five-year monitoring period. Areas
of concern, low stem density, invasive species, or easement encroachment, will be mapped,
photographed, and described in the monitoring report. Problem areas will be re-evaluated during
subsequent site visits. Table 9 summarizes the proposed monitoring plan components associated
with this project.
Table 9: Monitoring Pfan Components
Success Criteria J Monitoring Protocol Reach 1�
Vegetation CVS Level I/Photos All
Frequerm
22 Annual
Reference Stations Photos All
6 Annual
Visual Assessments Visual Assessment/Photos All
As needed Semi-annual
The first growing period will be documented in the first annual report to be completed at least 5
months after planting has occurred and no earlier than the fall season. In order to meet
performance standards and determine stem health, species composition, height, planting date
and or volunteer status, and vigor will be assessed for each monitoring plot and included in the
annual report. Upon NCDWR approval, desirable native volunteer species may be included in the
overall tree density for the Parcel to meet performance standards and success criteria.
5.3 Parcel Maintenance
Actions will be taken to correct issues identified in the annual monitoring reports thatjeopardize
the success of the project such as tree survival and easement encroachment. If there are areas
with insufficient tree survival or vigor, soils may be amended with appropriate fertilizer to support
plant growth in addition to supplemental planting. Parcel maintenance activities will be included
in annual reports. As noted in the Parcel Preparation section, effective herbicide application is
critical to success of restoration areas, primarily historical agricultural land. Herbicides approved
for aquatic environments will be applied as necessary and in accordance with the NCDA rules and
regulations by a qualified NC licensed pesticide/herbicide applicator. Prior approval from NCDWR
is required if mowing within Zones 1 and 2 of the Neuse River basin buffers is deemed necessary.
Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 16
eCOlerrC, HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
5.4 Parcel Boundary Maintenance
Conservation easement boundaries will be clearly marked with fencing, posts, paint or other
permanent material and will include appropriate contact information on the boundaries.
Established boundaries between the easement and the remaining parcel in agriculture will ensure
project protection and prevent encroachment. Boundary installation will occur immediately after
planting is completed and prior to the as -built survey. Boundary installation will also occur prior
to the post -construction site visit by NCDWR as described in the Task 2 project milestone of the
MBI. Boundary markers incidentally destroyed, damaged or disturbed will be repaired and/or
replaced as needed during the monitoring period and in the future under the long-term trustee
management. All easement boundaries will be visually assessed twice per year as part of the
monitoring protocol. Any easement encroachment or performed maintenance will be
documented in the annual monitoring reports.
6.0 Financial Assurances
6.1 Performance and Maintenance Bonds
Following approval of the Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan, the Sponsor shall provide
a Performance Bond from a surety that is rated no less than an "A-" as rated by A.M. Best. The
Performance Bond amount shall be 100 percent of the estimated cost for implementation of the
project, but not less than $150,000 to comply with the MBI. In lieu of posting the performance
bond, the Sponsor may elect to construct the project prior to the first credit release. Under the
latter option, a performance bond is not necessary.
After completion of the restoration/construction, a separate Performance/Maintenance Bond will
be secured for 100 percent of the estimated cost, but not less than $100,000 to comply with the
MBI. Upon NCDWR approval, this may be lowered each year based on the adjusted cost to
complete the monitoring. Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed at least annually
to coverthe nextyear's monitoring period, with confirmation of renewal provided to NCDWRwith
each annual monitoring report (when applicable). NCDWR reserves the right to alter the credit
release schedule if monitoring reports are submitted without proof of bond renewals. The long-
term steward selected to hold the conservation easement, Southern Conservation Trust, LLC, has
provided an endowment estimate that covers expected annual stewardship costs and potential
easement violations. The estimate is included in Appendix G.
7.0 Determination of Credits and Credit Release
7.1 Credit Potential
The potential project credits are based on the top of bank of Joshua Creek, the unnamed stream
feature (H), the non -jurisdictional feature acting as an intermittent channel (F1), and the non -
jurisdictional ephemeral channel (F2). The entire conservation easement will be planted from top
of bank landward to the conservation easement boundary. All areas from top of bank landward
Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 17
eCOlerra, HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
out to 200 feet will be accounted as either riparian buffer credit or nutrient offset credit with the
exception of the areas where diffuse flow cannot be attained from the ditches D2 and D4. A
standard non -diffused flow deduction of 4,350 sf was applied to both D2 and D4 (total deducted
area is 8,700 sf) and subtracted from Joshua Creek's nutrient offset credit area (see deducted area
in Table 10). The deducted areas along D2 and D4 are represented by 60-degree angles on either
side of the ditches, 50 feet from where the ditches enter Joshua Creek's 200-foot buffer line.
Additionally, the ditched areas within their top of bank are not included in credit area calculations.
Refer to Figures 8 and 9 for a depiction of the proposed Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credit
areas proposed for the Parcel. Refer to Figure 8 for a depiction of the proposed credit areas and
Figure 9 for an illustration of the corresponding riparian zones for the Parcel.
Riparian restoration adjacent to the project features is primarily intended to be used to generate
RBC out to 100 feet and to generate NOC beyond 100 feet in width. RBC's generated from the
preservation area is capped at 25% of the total area. The preservation area for the proposed Parcel
represents 1.9% of the total area. Similarly, RBC's generated for ephemeral channels is capped at
25% of the total area. Buffer restoration of ephemeral channels for the proposed Parcel is 24.5%
of the total buffer credit area. The total riparian buffer and nutrient offset credits generated by
the project will be finalized and calculated based on the as -built survey of the Site. Therefore,
credit total may change slightly on the As -Built Survey. The project's credit potential is
summarized in the Project Credit Table (Table 10).
In accordance with the MBI, any credit conversions will be calculated using the guidance provided
in the Clarified Procedures for Calculating Buffer Mitigation Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits letter
issued by the NCDWR.
7.2 Credit Release
Upon submittal of the appropriate documentation by the Sponsor and subsequent approval by
NCDWR, the riparian buffer and nutrient credits associated with the Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset
and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel will be released as described in the approved MBI.
Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 18
eCOlerrC, HUC 03020204 March 2023

Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Table 10. Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site, NCDWR Project #2022-0819v2, Project Credits
Neuse 03020204
Project Area
N Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
P Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
19.16394
N/A
Credit Type
Location
Subject? (enter
NO if
ephemeral or
ditch �)
Feature Type
Mitigation Activity
Min -Max Buffer
Width (ft)
Feature Name
Total Area (ft')
Total (Creditable)
Area of Buffer
i
Mitigation [ft)
Initial Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Ratio
%Full Credit
Final Credit
Ratio (x:l)
Convertible to
Riparian
Riparian Buffer
Credits
Convertible to
Nutrient Offset?
Delivered
Nutrient Offset:
N jibs)
Delivered
Nutrient Offset
P (Ibs)
Buffer
Rural
Yes
I/P
Restoration
0-100
Joshua Creek/1`3
383,246
383,246
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
383,246.000
Yes
19,998.288
—
Nutrient Offset
Rural
Yes
I/P
Restoration
101-200
Joshua Creek/F3
314,171
314,171
1
33%
3.03030
No
—
Yes
16,393.863
—
Buffer
Rural
No
I / P
Restoration
0-100
Fl
100,007
100,007
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
100,007.000
Yes
5,218.499
—
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
I/P
Restoration
101-200
Fl
92,280
82,280
1
33%
3.03030
No
—
Yes
4,293.480
—
Buffer
Rural
No
Ephemeral
I Restoration
0-100
F2
164,676
164,676
1
100%
1.00000
Yes
164,676.000
Yes
8,593,014
—
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ephemeral
Restoration
101-200
F2
129,068
129,068
1
33%
3.03030
No
—
Yes
6,734.941
—
Buffer
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
101-200
Diffuse Flow
Deductio ns
8,700
0
1
33%
No
—
No
—
—
Totals (ft2):
Total Buffer (fft2):
Total Nutrient Offset (ft2):
1,182,148
1,173,448
647,929.000 61,232.085 0.000
656,629
647,929
525,519
N/A
Total Ephemeral Area (ft) for Credit:
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area [ft'):
Enter Preservation Credits Below Total Elietble for Preservation (ft):
Credit Type Location Subject? Feature Type I Mitigation Activity Min -Max Buffer
Width (ft) Feature Name
Rural I Yes I I / P
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Restoration:
647,929
647,929.000
Enhancement:
0
0.000
Preservation:
16,388
540.804
Total Riparian Buffer:
664,317
648,469.804
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals
Square Feet
Credits
Nutrient Offset:
Nitrogen:
525,519
27,422.2.84
Phosphorus:1
0.000
101-200 1 F3
Preservation Area Subtotals (ft'):
154,675
164,576
169,254
24.5%
218,876
2.9%
Total Area (sf)
Total (Creditable)
Area for Buffer
Mitigation (fte)
16,388
16,388
16,388
16,388
Ephemeral Reaches as%TABM
Preservation as %TABM
Initial Credit %Full Credit Final Credit Riparian
Ratio (x:1) Ratio (x:l) Buffer Credits
10 33% 30.30303 540,804
Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 19
eC0,1erra, HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
8.0 References
15A NCAC 02B .0295 Mitigation Program Requirements for Protection and Maintenance of
Riparian Buffers. 2015.
15A NCAC 02B .0703 Nutrient Offset Credit Trading. 2020.
15A NCAC 02B .0714 Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy:
Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Buffers. 2020
Lee, M.T., Peet, R.K., Roberts, S.D., & Wentworth, T.R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Version 4.2. Available at: http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-
2.pdf
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality. Division of Mitigation Services. 2018. Neuse River Basin
Restoration Priorities.
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources. N.C. State Historic Preservation
Office. [web mapping application]. Available at:
https:Hnc.maps.arcgis.com/home/group.html?id=d56ec9c8aa77423b931 f4d359f103ae6&view=l
ist&categories=%5B%22%2FCategories%2FHPOWEB%22%5D#content. (Accessed July 2022)
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program. Flood Insurance Rate Map. Map Number
3720452000J. 2004.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2022. Natural Heritage Data Explorer [web
application]. NCDNCR, Raleigh, NC. Available at: https://ncnhde.natureserve.org (Accessed July
2022)
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Fourth. North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDENR. Raleigh, North Carolina.
217 pp.
United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1977. Soil
Survey of Lenoir County, North Carolina.
United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2019. Web
Soil Survey [web mapping application]. Available at: https://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/alp/.
(Accessed July 2022)
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal
Species of Concern and Candidate Species, Lenoir County, NC. Available at:
CCOlCrrQ Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 20
HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
https:Hipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/?state=wC6sc65YLNAOFQvWg2MR5NmErSVrwH (Accessed July
2022)
United State Department of Interior. United States Geological Survey. Comfort, NC Quadrangle
Topographical Map. Scale 1:24000. 2019.
United State Department of Interior. United States Geological Survey. Rivermont, NC
Quadrangle Topographical Map. Scale 1:24000. 2019.
Lenoir County Tax Department. Online Geographic Information System Maps. Available at:
https:Hlenoir2.connectgis.com/Map.aspx. (Accessed July 2022)
CCOlCrrQ Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan 21
HUC 03020204 March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
FIGURES
�` � Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan
eCO, erra® HUC 03020204 March 2023

r'47,
Goldsboro i
I F
W8.�n
,
Lur
Kinston
Lenoir
Project Site
gLenoirCounty One `
I
N
A
m
a e�
FQ
0` F
.r
�a
a
ti
qaA Branca. /
/
/
3
B earwell Branch
�i
0
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Legend
Feet 0 Conservation Easement
Prepared For: JOSHUA CREEK NUTRIENT OFFSET AND FIGURE
J Drawn By
`�� RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE Date:3/1/2023
023
VICINITY MAP Project No.: ECT22002
Scale: 1 in = 2,000 feet
WADAMS CCO tarras Neuse 03020204
Lenoir County, NC

Williamslon
1Bethel—
lover` C net —_�
L
�
ti
me4
G'
�-
r 4
Greenville
j
f.-rni .Ill- 157 If =
r
Q
,ashnrllnn
silo.
IIIII
Nees ``
La Grange
-
Project Site
Kinston
\9q
F
al - .Plymouth N
P11111grw
StWeVirk
Phelps Lake
Fbc o sin
Pungo Lakss National
Lake YYAdlde Refuge
ff
Belhaven
Hc�uf o�1
M anamu slat
National
Wildlife
Refuge
Swanquarier
v+iBerness
a -1
o
Na
Wit Id.
Refuge
LOWER NEUSE
03020204
Create.
National �Ke
Forest L�_
Pocosin
- WRderness
74 ff
LrF gin: Ills
Morehead
CRY Beaufort
-,:.���: Atlantic
.nteret Beach
Emerald Isle
Marine Corps
Air Station
New River
Marine Corps
Baee Camp
Lepune
Sneads
"f
Ferry
Suit i.ib;
Legend
08-Digit HUC 03020204
0
6 12
24
OConservation Easement
MIIeS
Prepared For:
JOSHUA CREEK NUTRIENT OFFSET AND
Drawn By
FIGURE
J
`��
RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
023
Date:3/1/2023
Project No.: 02
� �
CREDIT SERVICE AREA MAP
12 mile
Scale: 1 in - 12 miles
2
WADAMS
CCO terras
Neuse 03020204
Lenoir County, NC

•
�1
Legend vp�- FEAT�R
Existing Tree Line
QConservation Easement
Subject to Neuse Buffer Rules
li-
- Streams
DITCH 1r''',
y1
Not Subject to Neuse Buffer Rules
Intermittent Feature
`'�`:`
�175
Ephemeral Feature
350
700
Ditches
Feet
Prepared For:
JOSHUA CREEK NUTRIENT OFFSET AND
Drawn
FIGURE
�
RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
/31 202
Date:3/31/2023
Project No.: ECT22002
3
MC/�DAMS
�colerra.
EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP
Neuse 03020204
Scale:1 inch 350 feet
Lenoir County, NC

Z'
4
I
4 f
Legend
QConservation Easement (} 0 300 600.L. 1,200
Rivermont/Comfort USGS 7.5 Minute Topographi:Quadrangle Feet
Prepared For: JOSHUA CREEK NUTRIENT OFFSET AND FIGURE
J Drawn /1/ 023
A RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE Date: o.: E
Project No.: ECT22002
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Scale: 1 inch = 600 feet
WADAMS eCO,lerras Neuse 03020204
Lenoir County, NC
ti

Ly N
0
POP
Kb
. a;r
St
"
•��
f
Legend
Conservation Easement
NRCS 1977 Lenoir County
1
.
0
300 600
1,200
Soil Survey Map Sheet 29
,
Feet
Prepared For:
JOSHUA CREEK NUTRIENT OFFSET AND
RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
Drawn By MIGH
Date:3/1/2023023
FIGURE
`'
Project No.: ECT22002
`+
NRCS SOIL SURVEY MAP
Scale: 1 in = 600 ft
V
WADAMS
CCO terra
Neuse 03020204
Lenoir County, NC

01W
; Plot 2
j• Plot 4
' � FEATURE 3
Yy
PS1
Plot 5
S2- `Plot
3
Plot 1
_
n Plot 6
7 Plot 7
Plot 9
r_
Plot 8
r
o Plot 10 Plot-13
c
Plot 12
Plot 11 c. Plot 14
PS3
❑ �FEP�URE 2 PS4
0
�,•� .,"'
Plot 15'
49
J,__,
Plot 16
�p
Plot 17
G
Plot 18
w
m
Plot
21
�
''.
Plot 19
Plot 20 P -
F�P.�uFtE 1
,• s"t a"
Legend
O Conservation Easement
I• Additional Photo Station Locations (6)
0 Ve Plot Locations 22
9 ( )
K
Preservation Buffer Credits'
Nutrient Offset Credits
M Riparian Buffer Credits
;
— Ephemeral Feature
Intermittent Feature
'+ 0
250 500
1,000
— Streams
Feet
WPrepared
For:
JOSHUA CREEK NUTRIENT OFFSET AND
RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
Drawn By: MGH
Date:3/1/2023
FIGURE
`�
Project No.: ECT22002
f `
VEGETATION MONITORING MAP
Scale: 1 inch = 500 feet
WADAMS
eCO,lerra
Neuse 03020204
Lenoir County, NC

FEA�uRE 3
Epp'
Epp'
0
4.
O
n
Legend
— Streams
— Ephemeral Feature o�
Intermittent Feature
Existing Tree Line
QConservation Easement
0 Joshua Creek & Feature 3 Riparian Restoration for RBC (0-100 ft)
0 Joshua Creek & Feature 3 Riparian Restoration for NOC (101-200 ft)
0 Subject Feature 3 Riparian Preservation for RBC (101-200 ft)
0 Feature 2 Riparian Restoration for RBC (0-100 ft)
0 Feature 2 Riparian Restoration for NOC (101-200 ft)
® Feature 1 Riparian Restoration for RBC (0-100 ft)
0 Feature 1 Riparian Restoration for NOC (101-200 ft)
Non -Diffuse Flow Deduction Area
0 Non -Credit Area
°
50' Long 60-degree Angles for
Non -Diffuse Flow Deduction Area
(4,350 sf)
50' Long 60-degree Angles for
Non -Diffuse Flow Deduction Area
(4,350 sf)
1pp
5p,
J
0 175 350 700
Feet
Prepared For: JOSHUA CREEK NUTRIENT OFFSET AND
RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
CREDIT GENERATION MAP
WADAMS eCO,lerra9 Neuse 03020204
Lenoir County, NC
z
Drawn By: CHJ
Date: 3/31 /2023
Project No.: ECT22002
Scale:1 inch = 350 feet

Legend
Streams
Ephemeral Feature
Intermittent Feature
Existing Tree Line
30' from Top of Bank
50' from Top of Bank
0 100' from Top of Bank
200' from Top of Bank
Nutrient Offset Credits
0 Riparian Buffer Credits
0 Subject Preservation Buffer Credits
0 Conservation Easement
0 Planted Area
Non -Diffuse Flow Deduction Area
0 Non -Credit Area
Prepared For:
acolarras
MCADAwis
a
50' Long 60-degree Angles for
Non -Diffuse Flow Deduction Area
(4,350 sf)
f r <i
a
:........... 50' Long 60-degree Angles for ,
+..
\ Non -Diffuse Flow Deduction Area
(4,350 sf)
I'
: :i
0 200 400 800
Feet
JOSHUA CREEK NUTRIENT OFFSET AND Drawn By: CHJ FIGURE
RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE Date:3/31/2023
RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONES MAP Project No.: = 400f 9
Scale:1 inch 400 feet et
Neuse 03020204
Lenoir County, NC

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
APPENDIX A
�` � Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan
eCO, erra® HUC 03020204 March 2023

Existing Site Photography - November 3, 2022
Feature 1 (1) Top of F1 looking East
Joshua Creek (1) Looking South
Feature 2 (1) F2 connection
s,.
(2) Bottom of F1 looking East
(2) Looking North
(2) Bottom of F2 looking East
-..A
iE!i,.y�,4 a �•` ��''� �?Y
(3) F1 connection to Joshua Creek
(3) Midsection looking South
i� z
(3) Top of F2 looking West

Existing Site Photography - November 3, 2022
/ 4 � . � •. sf � h YJriA i.
s �
Joshua Creek (1-3) North end of Joshua Creek looking South
{�
0, fA
r
w
Ditch 4 (1) D4 connection
(2) Joshua Creek
NE corner (1) Looking East at back (2) Upper F3 looking East at back
-01111OW
(3) Top of D4 looking West
e,.
(3) Ditch to F3

Existing Site Photography - November 3, 2022
Feature 3 (1) Top of F3 looking West (2) Mid F3 looking West
(3) Bottom of F3 looking East

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
APPENDIX B
�` � Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan
eCO, erra® HUC 03020204 March 2023

Joshua Creek Buffer Mitigation Site
Across from 4077 Elm Grove Rd
Woodington, NC 28504
Inquiry Number: 7066190.6
July 29, 2022
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
CEDR � Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com

EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 07/29/22
Site Name: Client Name:
Joshua Creek Buffer Mitigation
Across from 4077 Elm Grove R
Woodington, NC 28504
EDR Inquiry # 7066190.6
The John R. McAdams Co., Inc
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
Contact: Cameron Jernigan
CEDRO
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's
professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo
per decade.
Search Results:
Year
Scale
Details
Source
2016
1"=500'
Flight Year: 2016
USDA/NAIP
2012
1"=500'
Flight Year: 2012
USDA/NAIP
2009
1"=500'
Flight Year: 2009
USDA/NAIP
2006
1"=500'
Flight Year: 2006
USDA/NAIP
1998
1"=500'
Acquisition Date: January 01, 1998
USGS/DOQQ
1993
1"=500'
Acquisition Date: January 01, 1993
USGS/DOQQ
1982
1"=500'
Flight Date: March 09, 1982
USGS
1974
1"=500'
Flight Date: April 01, 1974
USGS
1964
1"=500'
Flight Date: April 01, 1964
USGS
1961
1"=500'
Flight Date: September22, 1961
USGS
1950
1"=500'
Flight Date: November21, 1950
USGS
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE
ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more
information contact your EDR Account Executive.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2022 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are
the property of their respective owners.
7066190 - 6 page 2

Lao
lip
INQUIRY#: 7066190.6
YEAR: 2016 N
= 500' (rEDR"

�l4
�s✓�f�'�
- tl'1��';�• ram')• �b ,��r
t�
Il•

a
1 ,
11• � r i� - ,

I abk-L
16
. / 'I'm

s .a
�.3
'_ : jf. -- - 4� Jw
lq
INQUIRY #: 7066190.6 N
YEAR: 1998
= 500' CEDR'
.'wit r
dp
�'* "• .h . r--'}1t_ !,`,, ,. _ � 'tea �•. _ � � J,•1 �1 - Y ti i
do
Y�' _ . - •, �Li fig:

f
t1b
?�. , At
AI
A .6.
jj
INQUIRY #: 7066190.6 N
YEAR: 1982 M
500' CEDR'
ubject boundary not shown because it
Kceeds image extent or image is not
aoreferenced.

IA-
4r.
-
A14 po
.1b
t,�
: L

I
it,

\� \.� \\/m
K,L.-- A

", ■
goo

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
APPENDIX C
�` � Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan
eCO, erra® HUC 03020204 March 2023

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHAM E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
Milton Roscoe Williams II
3142 Highway 58 South
Kinston, NC 28504
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
June 28th, 2022
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0714)
Subject Property/Project Name: Joshua Creek Buffer Mitigation Site
Address / Location: 35.121089,-77.579258
Responsible Party: Milton Roscoe Williams II
Feature(s) Evaluated: (8) —Joshua Creek, Feature(F)1-3, Ditch(D)1-4
Staff: Allen Stewart
Determination Date: June 20th, 2022
Project # 20220819 V.1
Lenoir County
Determination Type: Applicability to Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0714)
Buffer:
Stream:
X - Neuse (15A NCAC 02B .0714)
X —Ephemeral/ Intermittent/Perennial Determination
Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 02B .0734)
Catawba (15A NCAC 02B .0614)
Jordan (15A NCAC 02B .0267) (governmental and/or
interjurisdictional projects)
Randleman (15A NCAC 02B .0724)
Goose Creek (15A NCAC 02B .0605-.0608)
Feature
E/I/P/D/NP*
Not
Subject
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
Survey
USGS
Topo
Joshua Creek
P
X
35.124624,-77.581004
35.116928,-77.578584
X
X
F 1
1*
X
35.118082,-77.574357
Joshua Creek
F 2
E
X
35.121085,-77.576474
Joshua Creek
F 3
1
X
35.124713,-77.576710
Joshua Creek
X
D 1
D
X
35.116757,-77.580901
Joshua Creek
D 2
D
X
35.119021,-77.576127
Joshua Creek
D 3
D
X
35.118475,-77.581920
Joshua Creek
D 4
D
X
35.122853,-77.577383
Joshua Creek
*Ephemeral / Intermittent / Perennial / Ditch / Not Present
*F 1— unmapped feature acting as an intermittent stream not subject to the buffer regulations.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
NOR1H CAROL Na 919.707.9000

Mr. Williams,
The Division of Water Resources has determined that the streams listed as "subject' above and included on the attached map have been
located on the most recent published (1977) NRCS Soil Survey of Lenoir County, North Carolina and/or the web based Digital USGS National
Topographic Map https://apps.nationalmap.gov/viewer/ and evaluated for applicability to the Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Rules (15A
NCAC 02B .0714). For each stream that is checked "Not Subject' it has been determined to not be at least intermittent, not present on the
property, a wetland area or not represented on the most recent published (1977) NRCS Soil Survey of Lenoir County, North Carolina and/or the
Digital USGS National Topographic Map at a scale of 1:24,000 or less. There may be other streams or features located on the property that were
not assessed and/or that do not appear on the maps referenced above but may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of
Engineers and subject to the Clean Water Act.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that dispute a
determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar
days of date of this letter to the Director in writing.
If sending via US Postal Service:
c/o Paul Wojoski
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.):
clo Paul Wojoski
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
This determination is final and binding as detailed above unless an appeal is requested within sixty (60) days.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity within the buffers or
waters. The project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries regarding applicability to the
Clean Water Act should be directed to the US Army Corps of Engineers Washington Regulatory Field Office at 2407 W 5th St,
Washington, NC 27889, (252) 975- 1616.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Allen Stewart at [phone].
Sincerely,
14" Tow.."
Robert Tankard, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
cc: WaRO DWR File Copy/LASERFICHE
Randal Jones, NCDEQ Land Resources, randall.iones(@ncdenr.gov
Emily Thompson, US Army Corps of Engineers Washington Regulatory Field Office, [e-mail]
Katie Merritt, NCDEQ Nutrient Offset & Buffer Banking Coordinator, [e-mail]
Jordan Burbage, Eco Terra Consultant, iordan(@ecoterra.com
D � ��� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
NOR1H CAROL Na 919.707.9000

D � ��� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
NOR1H CARou Na 919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: F4AEC6A9-ABBA-4A8E-BO26-OE3184BC5DEC
ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RJCHARD E. ROGERS, ]R.
Director
Jordan Burbage
Eco Terra, LLC
(via electronic mail
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
October 26, 2022
jordangecoterra.com )
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset — Joshua Creek Site
Near 35.121089,-77.579258 located across 4077 Elm Grove Rd in Woodington, NC
Neuse 03020204
Lenoir County
Dear Mr. Burbage,
On July 13, 2022, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a request
from you on behalf of Eco Terra, LLC (Eco Terra) for a site visit near the above -referenced site in
the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020204. The site visit was to
determine the potential for nutrient offset and buffer mitigation within a proposed conservation
easement boundary, which is more accurately depicted in the attached map labeled "Figure 1"
prepared by Eco Terra. The proposed easement boundary in Figure 1, includes all riparian areas
intended to be proposed as part of the buffer mitigation and nutrient offset site. On September 8,
2022, Ms. Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject site. Staff with RS were also present.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and for
nutrient offset pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703 and using 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to define the
mitigation type determinations.
D E Q �J North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
NORTH C of Envi A a 919.707.9000
Deparlmem of Envlronmenml Duali�

DocuSign Envelope ID: F4AEC6A9-ABBA-4A8E-BO26-OE3184BC5DEC
Joshua Creek Site
Eco Terra
October 26, 2022
Feature
Classification
'Subiect
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
3Nutrient
4'Mitigation Tyne Determination w/in
onsite
to
adiacent to Feature
Credit
Offset Viable
riparian areas
At 2,273.02
Buffer
0( 200')
Viable
Rule
lbs/acre
Joshua
Stream
Yes
Combination of non-
zYes
Yes (non-
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site
Creek
forested agricultural fields
forested ag
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
and forested areas
fields only)
Forested areas — Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
F1
Stream
No
Combination of non-
zYes
Yes (non-
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields
forested ag
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)
and forested areas
fields only)
Forested areas — Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4)
F2
Ephemeral
No
Non -forested agricultural
'Yes
Yes
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
fields
.0295 (o)(7)
F3
Stream
Yes
Combination of non-
zYes
Yes (non-
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields
forested ag
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
and forested areas
fields only)
Forested areas — Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
Ditches
Ditch
No
Non -forested agricultural
No
No
no direct hydrologic connection to Joshua
2 & 4
fields.
Creek (see Figure 2)
Ditches
Ditches
No
not assessed
N/A
N/A
not assessed
1&3
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondences dated January 20, 2022 (DWR# 2021-00200) and
April 1, 2022 (DWR# 2021-0020v4) using the 1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent
printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS .
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
4 Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
5 All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a planted conservation easement established that includes the
tops of channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even if no credit is viable within that riparian
area.
'The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
7The area described as an Enhancement Site was assessed and determined to comply with all of 15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(6). Cattle
exclusion fencing is required to be installed around the mitigation area to get buffer credit under this part of the rule.
Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas and features shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2. The maps representing the
proposal for the site are attached to this letter and initialed by Ms. Merritt on October 26, 2022.
Substantial changes to the proposed easement boundary as well as any site constraints identified in
this letter, could affect the Site's potential to generate buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credits.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer mitigation and nutrient offset
credits. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be
submitted to
Page 2 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: F4AEC6A9-ABBA-4A8E-BO26-OE3184BC5DEC
Joshua Creek Site
Eco Terra
October 26, 2022
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load -reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
This viability assessment will expire on October 26, 2024 or upon approval of a mitigation plan
by the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
PW/kym
Attachments: Figure 1, Figure 2
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
DocuSigned by:
.Ij W10 I
949D91BA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
Page 3 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: F4AEC6A9-ABBA-4A8E-B026-OE3184BC5DEC
Joshua Creek Buffer Mitigation Site
Project # 20220819 v.1
Blue lines indicatemapped streams shown onthe must recent
published NRCS Soil Survey (1977) of Lenoir County, NC
and/or the USGS National Map online at
ht-tps://aps.nationaImap.gov/viewer
Blue line mapped streams have been determined to be at
least intermittent in nature on the DWR Stream Identification
Form version 4.11. Therefore blue line mapped streams are
subject to the Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Regulations
( 15A NCAC 028.0714)
a =
Red lines indicate unmapped features and /or mapped
features determined to be ephemeral in nature on the DWR
stream identification form. Red lines may also indicate man
made features such as agricultural ditches and are not subject
to the Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Regulations.
A
ecfft6rra,
Legend
FIGURE 1 WEE
Proposed Conservation Easement 0 235 470 940
Feet

DocuSign Envelope ID: F4AEC6A9-ABBA-4A8E-B026-OE3184BC5DEC
Figure 2'r
Joshua Creek
i .
_TV
1922
Legend
4077 Elm Grove Rd
�� ti ;?half ` ''. .; -t _�. ..,�:.',�.•. _ xpj 'rh A �J.[�-� .
af, J. ,.. �-. .�. :� LT-. - .- �' "•y_.,�+;C•.i. t.7. ;.YS�r'ti•,,�
• it-..- "''C�`Y� - :'wNyy- w
-' F� y6 _•�^y. 'r.f-.� _ �:. .s .x _1 ��`4�_'f_
.�.}9T�r.•Y!•L fir'. ,5•,�.. '.'w�X:'. �*l iF^Y�•e .�. _
Res. ^� Y; '.�f�'; y .� . .+_ ti � - - . ,2.4:?.:n�,;1r.•. - _- ' a

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
APPENDIX D
�` � Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan
eCO, erra® HUC 03020204 March 2023

ecolerra..
August 03, 2022
Ms. Kathy Matthews
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Raleigh ES Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Re: ESA Project Review — Self Certification
Joshua Creek Mitigation Site, Lenoir County, NC
Dear Ms. Matthews:
Eco Terra is requesting a project review with respect to a wetland restoration site and the
project's impact (if any) on Federally threatened, endangered, proposed, or candidate
species. The project information is summarized below.
Project Name: Joshua Creek Mitigation Site
Project Location: Elm Grove Road
Woodington, NC 28504
Lenoir County
35.121453,-77.578183
Project Contact: Scott J. Frederick
Eco Terra, LLC
117 Centrewest Court
Cary, NC 27513
919.368.2029
[e-mail]
Project Description:
The Joshua Creek Buffer Mitigation Site is located near the Township of Woodington,
NC, in the Upper Trent River watershed of the Neuse River Basin (HUC 030202040104).
The proposed project will provide riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation in the
Neuse River Basin. The project Involves the restoration and preservation of riparian
buffers along Joshua Creek, one unnamed tributary to Joshua Creek, and five ditches that
flow to Joshua Creek. Land disturbing activities include site preparation for planting trees
to enhance the vegetative buffer up to 200 feet from the streams and ditches within the
approximate 49.9-acre project easement. The project area and surrounding areas are
open agricultural land, primarily farmed for row crops. Historical land use has been
117 Centrewest Court, Cary, NC 27513 1 EcoTerra.com

ecolerra..
agriculture for the past 50 years according to historical USDA aerials. The project site will
be permanently protected and preserved with a conservation easement that will
ultimately be transferred to a land trust for long-term stewardship. Construction is
planned for the winter 2023.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation
(IPaQ database was utilized to identify federally threatened and endangered species in
the project area. In a letter dated August 3, 2022, the USFWS identified four federally
threatened and endangered species and one candidate species under the Endangered
Species Act. According to the USFWS, there are no critical habitats within the project
area. Multiple site visits have occurred over the past 3 months observing site conditions,
habitat, and potential presence of species. No listed species were observed within the
project boundaries resulting in a "no effect" determination for some subject species and
a "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" for others due to potential suitable habitat
adjacent to the project area. Stringent sediment and erosion control measures will be
implemented if necessary to protect adjacent suitable habitat areas.
Additionally, no eagles nor eagle nests were observed, and construction activities will not
impact migrating birds within the agricultural fields. Please see the attached species
conclusion table. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program results in no species
within the project area and one occurrence within 1 mile of the project area (attached
correspondence).
We are requesting that you review the self -certification and species conclusion table
relating to any Federally threatened, endangered, proposed or candidate species. A
vicinity map and site map are enclosed for your reference (see Figures 1 and 2). If you
should have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to
contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Scott J. Frederick
Enclosures: Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Site Map
FWS Official Species List
Self -Certification Letter
Species Conclusion Table
117 Centrewest Court, Cary, NC 27513 1 EcoTerra.com

�. 11
Legend
Project Area
- _ - - — -
Bearrve�l � � f � w
y%466-
�° i
yy. I alf•
1� co
ILI
.L-bit
-Yf
� � �
�
-
... 41�
r J3r-
4F -�
'6
�u
o � t
_ A.
-� ��Nkrth Ca li Esri, Ht6'E, Garmin, •eoTechnolo ies, Pfic.,
USGS, M TI/ 1 SA, A,i SD
Figure 1: USGS Map N
%0O
Owner(s): Milton Williams, Donald Brainard, w�E
— Floyd Taylor, & Offspring Farms, LLC s
Lenoir County, NC
ec terra. 350 7'15.92"N 77034'45.33"W 0 500 1,000 2,000
USGS 2016 Topographic Quadrangles: US Feet
comfort & Rivermont

Lenoir County
1 7 )r
-0
UT1
Goldsboro
II
I
I70
2Kinston
Len
ject'
Site
i
NMI
DITCH 5
Legend
Streams
Ditches
0 250 500 1,000 Conservation Easement
Feet et r- Q Property Line
!J,
Prepared For: JOSHUA CREEK BUFFER MITIGATION SITE Drawn By: CHJ FIGURE
Date: 7/15/2022
EC
�,%� VICINITY MAP &SITE MAP Project No.: ECT22002
'� -" Neuse 03020201 Scale: 1 in = 0.11 miles
WADAM� scoff errs Lenoir County, NC

ecolerra.
Joshua Creek
1328 DekaIb Avenue NE, Atlanta, GA 30307 I EcoTerra.com

ecolerra.
Unnamed Tributary 1 (UT1)
1328 DekaIb Avenue NE, Atlanta, GA 30307 I EcoTerra.com

��_ Y —._ --- _ ��
- •� :�._
.r=s _� �
�yi� 5��,[{ ^� rti l• � - FEE: =-ti - ��..- ,. � .. '
c••� _
ti i'-,- ��d .� CJ •! •N�F�. Lr . '� �F_y�aYY .. _sue M1 � a, � i __ _ I .
v� fir. ��' � _ u =;y.��;.°• �,� :: c's:r..� �.'� .'F :. �
.fir _ •.11• � — �'•f `�;�; -:�. Z -� :,. ; _ �, . �,�.., - � '�

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2022-0070806
Project Name: Joshua Creek Mitigation Site
August 03, 2022
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

08/03/2022
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186. php.

08/03/2022
3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

08/03/2022
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

08/03/2022
Project Summary
Project Code: 2022-0070806
Project Name: Joshua Creek Mitigation Site
Project Type: Mitigation Development/Review - Mitigation or Conservation Bank
Project Description: The Joshua Creek Buffer Mitigation Site is located near the Township of
Woodington, NC, in the Upper Trent River watershed of the Neuse River
Basin (HUC 030202040104). The proposed project will provide riparian
buffer and nutrient offset mitigation in the Neuse River Basin. The project
Involves the restoration and preservation of riparian buffers along Joshua
Creek, one unnamed tributary to Joshua Creek, and five ditches that flow
to Joshua Creek. Land disturbing activities include site preparation for
planting trees to enhance the vegetative buffer up to 200 feet from the
streams and ditches within the approximate 49.9-acre project easement.
The project area and surrounding areas are open agricultural land,
primarily farmed for row crops. Historical land use has been agriculture
for the past 50 years according to historical USDA aerials. The project site
will be permanently protected and preserved with a conservation
easement that will ultimately be transferred to a land trust for long-term
stewardship. Construction is planned for the fall/winter 2022.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/Q35.1208738,-77.57800510932753,14z
Counties: Lenoir County, North Carolina

08/03/2022 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Reptiles
NAME STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
Similarity of
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Appearance
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
(Threatened)
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME
STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
STATUS
Candidate

08/03/2022
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

08/03/2022
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
THERE ARE NO FWS MIGRATORY BIRDS OF CONCERN WITHIN THE VICINITY OF YOUR PROJECT
AREA.
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list

08/03/2022
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical

08/03/2022 3
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

08/03/2022
4
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency: Soil, Water, and Environment Group, PLLC
Name: Scott Frederick
Address:
3216 Byers Drive
City:
Raleigh
State:
NC
Zip:
27607
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
9198311234

ENT OF Tye'
rri O
,A
CH 3 A
United States Department of the Interior
Project Name
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date: 8/3/2022
Self -Certification Letter
Joshua Creek Mitigation Site
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or ❑
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
✓❑ "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑ "may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
❑✓ "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov. If you have any
questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact Leigh Mann of
this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Memorial Mitigation Site
Date: 8/03/2022
/ Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 / Eagle Act Determination
Notes / Documentation
-Species
Adjacent suitable
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
No permanent water habitat.
American Alligator
habitat
(Alligator mississippiensis)
Adjacent suitable
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
If necessary, stringent sediment and
Neuse River Waterdog
habitat
erosion control measures will be used to
(Necturus lewisi)
prevent offsite sediment movement into
Joshua Creek.
Adjacent suitable
May affect, not likely to adversely affect
If necessary, stringent sediment and
Carolina Madtom (Noturus
habitat
erosion control measures will be used to
furiosus)
prevent offsite sediment movement into
Joshua Creek.
No suitable habitat
No effect
Minimal to no early successional
Monarch butterfly
herbaceous edge habitat within project
(Danaus plexippus)
boundaries
Critical Habitat
No critical habitats
No effect
n/a
present
Bald Eagle
Unlikely to impact bald
No Eagle Act Permit Required
Project is more than 660 feet from any
eagles
potential or known bald eagle nest or any
roosting/nesting trees. No tree cutting or
tree removal will occur.
Migratory Birds
Unlikely to impact BCC
No effect
No tree cutting or tree removal will occur.
migratory birds
Northern Long-eared Bat
No suitable habitat
No effect
No tree cutting or tree removal will occur.
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
SC -Ott J Fr dericTTk / Environmental Scientist
ler T .Z4
Signature /Title Date
J:1LII11POW661

Roy Cooper, Governor
0■0■0 INC DEPARTMENT OF
■■0■o NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
July 19, 2022
Jennifer Burdette
Natural Resource Consultants, LLC
308 W Millbrook Rd
Raleigh, NC 27609
RE. Joshua Creek Buffer Mitigation Site, 21028
Dear Jennifer Burdette.
D_ Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-18706
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence, the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here.
httl2s //www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butlerLncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR71MENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
Q 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 918.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Joshua Creek Buffer Mitigation Site
Project No. 21028
July 19, 2022
NCNHDE-18706
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID cientific Name Common Name Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Statu Status Rank Rank
Date Rank i
Bird 8136 Picoides borealis Red -cockaded 1979-02 H 4-Low Endangered Endangered G3 S2
Woodpecker
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Managed Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on July 19, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q1, April 2022. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-18706: Joshua Creek Buffer Mitigation Site
,
/
m a /
cos /
/ a
E / 3�
3 / Ao
�J
F /
O /
N /
BCGI]Cl]
/
/
/
/
L /
/
N L 0.3 0.6 1.2 Miles
S / I I I I I I I
July 19, 2022
Buffered Project Boundary
❑ Project Boundary
So uross. Fsh, Airbus DS. USGS. NGA. NASA, CGIAR. N Robinson. NCFAS.
NLS. OS, NMA. Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat GSA, Geoland, FFMA,
It-mapand the GIS user community
Sources. Esri, HERE. Garm in. FAO. NOAA, USGS. © OpenStreetMap
contributors, and the GIS User in,
Page 3 of 3

ecolerra.
July 15, 2022
Ms. Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-4617
Re: Cultural Resource Environmental Review
Joshua Creek Buffer Mitigation Site
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley:
Eco Terra is requesting consultation with respect to a riparian buffer restoration site and
the project's impact (if any) on archaeological or cultural resources. The project
information is summarized below.
Project Name: Joshua Creek Buffer Mitigation Site
Project Location: Across from 4077 Elm Grove Rd
Woodington, North Carolina 28504
Lenoir County
35.121089,-77.579258
Project Contact: Scott J. Frederick
Eco Terra, LLC
117 Centrewest Court
Cary, NC 27513
919.368.2029
[e-mail]
Project Description:
The Joshua Creek Buffer Mitigation Site is located near the Township of Woodington,
NC, in the Upper Trent River watershed of the Neuse River Basin (HUC 030202040104).
The proposed project will provide riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation in the
Neuse River Basin. The project Involves the restoration and preservation of riparian
buffers along Joshua Creek, one unnamed tributary to Joshua Creek, and five ditches
that flow to Joshua Creek. Land disturbing activities include site preparation for planting
trees to enhance the vegetative buffer up to 200 feet from the streams and ditches
1328 Dekalb Avenue NE, Atlanta, GA 30307 1 EcoTerraxom

ecolerra.
within the approximate 49.9-acre project easement. The project area and surrounding
areas are open agricultural land, primarily farmed for row crops. Historical land use has
been agriculture for the past 50 years according to historical USDA aerials. The project
site will be permanently protected and preserved with a conservation easement that
will ultimately be transferred to a land trust for long-term stewardship.
The NC State Historic Preservation Office's online mapping resource was reviewed to
determine the presence of known historic resources at or near the project site.
According to the database, there are no known historical resources within the project
site. There are three historical resources within a mile of the project site: The Sam B.
Taylor House (LR1071), the Preston Gooding House (LR1072), and the Leroy & Elizabeth
Reynolds House (LR1070) are located 0.17, 0.46, and 0.60 miles, respectively, from the
project site. These three historical resources are classified as "Survey Only" sties and will
not be disturbed for the proposed project.
Project Area Map: See attached Figures 1 and 2
Site Photographs: See attached
We are requesting that you review the project site to determine if any historic resources
are present within the proposed conservation easement as shown in the attached
Figures 1 and 2. If you should have any questions or require additional information,
please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Scott J. Frederick
1328 Dekalb Avenue NE, Atlanta, GA 30307 1 EcoTerraxom

ecolerra.
Joshua Creek
1328 DekaIb Avenue NE, Atlanta, GA 30307 I EcoTerra.com

ecolerra.
Unnamed Tributary 1 (UT1)
1328 DekaIb Avenue NE, Atlanta, GA 30307 I EcoTerra.com

��_ Y —._ --- _ ��
- •� :�._
.r=s _� �
�yi� 5��,[{ ^� rti l• � - FEE: =-ti - ��..- ,. � .. '
c••� _
ti i'-,- ��d .� CJ •! •N�F�. Lr . '� �F_y�aYY .. _sue M1 � a, � i __ _ I .
v� fir. ��' � _ u =;y.��;.°• �,� :: c's:r..� �.'� .'F :. �
.fir _ •.11• � — �'•f `�;�; -:�. Z -� :,. ; _ �, . �,�.., - � '�

Legend
Project Area
- _ - - — -
Bearrve�l � � f � w
y%466-
�° i
yy. I alf•
1� co
ILI
.L-bit
-Yf
� � �
�
-
... 41�
r J3r-
4F -�
'6
�u
o � t
_ A.
-� ��Nkrth Ca li Esri, Ht6'E, Garmin, •eoTechnolo ies, Pfic.,
USGS, M TI/ 1 SA, A,i SD
Figure 1: USGS Map N
%0O
Owner(s): Milton Williams, Donald Brainard, w�E
— Floyd Taylor, & Offspring Farms, LLC s
Lenoir County, NC
ec terra. 350 7'15.92"N 77034'45.33"W 0 500 1,000 2,000
USGS 2016 Topographic Quadrangles: US Feet
comfort & Rivermont

Lenoir County
1 7 )r
-0
UT1
Goldsboro
II
I
I70
2Kinston
Len
ject'
Site
i
NMI
DITCH 5
Legend
Streams
Ditches
0 250 500 1,000 Conservation Easement
Feet et r- Q Property Line
!J,
Prepared For: JOSHUA CREEK BUFFER MITIGATION SITE Drawn By: CHJ FIGURE
Date: 7/15/2022
EC
�,%� VICINITY MAP &SITE MAP Project No.: ECT22002
'� -" Neuse 03020201 Scale: 1 in = 0.11 miles
WADAM� scoff errs Lenoir County, NC

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
August 9, 2022
Cameron Jernigan
McAdams
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
j erni _ an e,mcadamsco. com
Re: Joshua Creek Buffer mitigation site, 4077 Elm Grove Road, Woodington,
Lenoir County, ER 22-1822
Dear Mr. Jernigan:
Thank you for your email of July 19, 2022, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have reviewed
the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.review(a�ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
�Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
APPENDIX E
�` � Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan
eCO, erra® HUC 03020204 March 2023

2420000 FEET 2440000 FEET
520000 FEET 77°35'30"W 77°35'0"W 77°34'30"W 77°34'0"W 77°33'30"W 77°33'0"W 77°32'30"W 77°32'0"W 520000 FEET
Vi-n Swam p
" ., Tr-ibuiary
0
35° 10'0"N
•},,r. r
35°10'0"N
�' • 4'#5r.. '� • � Rusty Lee Rtl
6h�
.6� 3 oe Wfllid +
`'0 p16
C,
o � Pallas TumerRtl
G�
M
(p
a
io`r. Swam
P 35°9'30"N
L tip'
N
35°9'30
iI> fUi-ne Swamp
M
v F
I ^
tr 58 ,yo
N
T�LYL
S amp
Qa �6h 35°9'0"N
35°9'0"N
ca'
�a
Up'Q ,�pq
t:
y6^
LE'-�N IIR ZONE AE
UNhNCOO RPORATED AREAS °°�
370144
°rs
ss� 35°8'30"N
58
35°8'30"N
�s S9
S�
f MitltlieRa
os
s
e
35°8'0"N
1�
35°8'0"N oshua h ranch
+"reek
M
f`
�c
M m�
o - -
0
35°7'30"N
UNINCOO RPORATED A]ZEAS
35730"N �o 370379
N 6
Irv.
- 6^
2a�
� 235
3
A
57
a
3570"N �5
68.$
500000 FEET 500000 FEET
77°35'30"W 77°35'0"W 77°34'30"W 77°34'0"W 77°33'30"W 77°33'0"W 77°32'30"W 77°32'0"W
2420000 FEET 2440000 FEET
FEMA'SCOOPERATING 7ECHNICALPASTNEA
This digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) was produced through a unique
cooperative partnership between the State of North Carolina and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The State of North Carolina has
implemented a long term approach to floodplain management to decrease the
costs associated with flooding. This is demonstrated by the State's commitment
to map flood hazard areas at the local level. As a part of this effort, the State of
North Carolina has joined in a Cooperating Technical State agreement with
FEMA to produce and maintain this digital FIRM.
FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION NOTES TO USERS SCALE
SEE FIS REPORT FOR ZONE DESCRIPTIONS AND INDEX MAP
THE INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THIS MAP AND SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION ARE ALSO AVAILABLE IN DIGITAL FORMAT AT
HTTP://FRIS.NC.GOV/FRIS
Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Zone A,V, A99
With BFE or Depth zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR
SPECIAL FLOOD
Regulatory Floodway
HAZARD AREAS
�.
0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas
of 1% Annual Chance Flood with Average
Depth Less Than One Foot or With Drainage
Areas of Less Than One Square Mile zone x
Future Conditions 1%Annual
Chance Flood Hazard zone x
OTHER AREAS OF
Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee
FLOOD HAZARD
See Notes zone x
OTHER
Areas Determined to be Outside the
AREAS
0.2%Annual Chance Floodplain zone
-------------
Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer
Accredited or Provisionally Accredited
GENERAL
Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
STRUCTURES
Non -accredited Levee, Dike, or Floodwall
BM5510 X
North Carolina Geodetic Survey bench mark
BM5510 ®
National Geodetic Survey bench mark
BM5510<81
Contractor Est. NCFMP Survey bench mark
012 1,8-2—
Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance
Water Surface Elevation (BFE)
a - - - - -
Coastal Transect
--- ---
Coastal Transect Baseline
Profile Baseline
Hydrographic Feature
OTHER
Limit of Study
FEATURES
Jurisdiction Boundary
For information and questions about this map, available products associated with this FIRM including
historic versions of this FIRM, how to order products or the National Flood Insurance Program in general,
please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange at 1-877-FEMA-MAP (1-877-336-2627) or visit the FEMA Map
Service Center website at http://msc.fema.gov. An accompanying Flood Insurance Study report, Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR) or Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) revising portions of this panel, and digital versions of this
FIRM may be available. Visit the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program website at http://www.ncfloodmaps.com
or contact the FEMA Map Service Center.
Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the adjacent panel as well as
the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the Map Service Center at the number listed above.
For community and countywide map dates refer to the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction.
To determine if flood insurance is available in the community, contact your Insurance agent or call the National
Flood Insurance Program at 1-800-638-6620.
Base map information shown on this FIRM was provided in digital format by the North Carolina Floodplain
Mapping Program (NCFMP). The source of this information can be determined from the metadata available in the
digital FLOOD database and in the Technical Support Data Notebook (TSDN).
ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If an accredited levee note appears on this panel check with your local
community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of protection provided (which may exceed the
1-percent-annual-chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the levee system(s) shown as providing protection.
To mitigate flood risk in residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood
insurance and floodproofing or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested
parties should visit the FEMA Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/index.shtm.
PROVISIONALLY ACCREDITED LEVEE NOTES TO USERS: If a Provisionally Accredited Levee (PAL) note
appears on this panel, check with your local community to obtain more information, such as the estimated level of
protection provided (which may exceed the 1-percent-annual-chance level) and Emergency Action Plan, on the
levee system(s) shown as providing protection. To maintain accreditation, the levee owner or community is
required to submit the data and documentation necessary to comply with Section 65.10 of the NFIP regulations.
If the community or owner does not provide the necessary data and documentation or if the data and documentation
provided indicates the levee system does not comply with Section 65.10 requirements, FEMA will revise the flood
hazard and risk information for this area to reflect de -accreditation of the levee system. To mitigate flood risk in
residual risk areas, property owners and residents are encouraged to consider flood insurance and floodproofing
or other protective measures. For more information on flood insurance, interested parties should visit the FEMA
Website at http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/index.shtm.
LIMIT OF MODERATE WAVE ACTION NOTES TO USERS: For some coastal flooding zones theAE Zone
category has been divided by a Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA). The LiMWA represents the approximate
landward limit of the 1.5-foot breaking wave. The effects of wave hazards between the VE Zone and the LiMWA
(or between the shoreline and the LiMWA for areas where VE Zones are not identified) will be similar to, but less
severe than those in the VE Zone.
Limit of Moderate Wave Action (LiMWA)
COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) NOTE
This map may include approximate boundaries of the CBRS for informational purposes only. Flood insurance is not
available within CBRS areas for structures that are newly built or substantially improved on or after the date(s)
indicated on the map. For more information see http://www.fws.gov/habitatconservation/coastal barrier.html, the
FIS Report, or call the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Customer Service Center at 1-800-344-WILD.
CBRS Area : ; Otherwise Protected Area
Map Projection:
North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet (Zone 3200)
Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988 (Vertical)
1 inch = 1,000 feet 1:12,000
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
Meters
0 150 300 600
PANEL LO CATO R
I
I j
4641 4651 PITTCOUNTY
WAYNECOUNTY,GREENECOUNTY 4620 1 \
1 y 4640 465b 4660
3559 3569 3579 3589. 3599 4509 4519 4529 4539 4549 4559 4569
3558 3568 3578 3588 3598" 2f508 4518 4528 4538 4548 4558 4568` 4578 i
11 3557 13567 13577 13587 13597 14507 14517 14527 14537 14547 14557 I 1 1
r
3546 1 3556 3566 1 3576 1 3586 1 3596 1 4506 1 4516 1 4526 1 4536 1 4546 4556 1 ,
I
4525 1 4535 1 4545 4555
3544 1 3564 1 3584 1 4504
I
3542
I
4524 1 4534
CRAVEN COUNTY
3562 1 3582 1 4502 1 4522 1 �, 4542
3540 13571 13581 13591 I 4500
3560 t 3570 13580 13590
DUPLIN COUNTY 3468; 3488
i
I
1
� 3487 3497
3466
'� 3486 �3496
4408 4428
i
4406
4540
JONES COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
cc FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA a�eLft
0 y.
PANEL 4520 x
a+vo sti�4
v) FEMA
a
�* w*cc
Panel Contains:
COMMUNITY CID PANEL SUFFIX
JONES COUNTY 370379 4520 J
r'r Vr LENOIR COUNTY 370144 4520 J
0
0
U.
cc
0
ir cc
Ir
MAP NUMBER
3720452000J
MAP REVISED
07/02/04

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
APPENDIX F
�` � Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan
eCO, erra® HUC 03020204 March 2023

Joshua Creek Buffer Mitigation Site
Across from 4077 Elm Grove Rd
Woodington, NC 28504
Inquiry Number: 7066190.2s
July 26, 2022
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
(rEDW Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBD-MGA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary-------------------------------------------------------
ES1
Overview Map
2
Detail Map
3
Map Findings Summary----------------------------------------------------
4
Map Findings
8
OrphanSummary---------------------------------------------------------
9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking
GRA
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum------------------------------------------
A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary-------------------------------------------.
A-2
Physical Setting Source Map
A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings----------------------------------------
A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched------------------------------------.
PSGRA
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC7066190.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E1527-21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
ACROSS FROM 4077 ELM GROVE RD
WOODINGTON, NC 28504
COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
35.1210890 - 35- 7' 15.92"
77.5792580 - 77- 34' 45.32"
Zone 18
264953.2
3889318.5
69 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 13720720 COMFORT, NC
Version Date: 2019
North Map: 13720800 RIVERMONT, NC
Version Date: 2019
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140618, 20140521, 20140524
Source: USDA
TC7066190.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

F- MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
ACROSS FROM 4077 ELM GROVE RD
WOODINGTON, NC 28504
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS
NO MAPPED SITES FOUND
DATABASE ACRONYMS
RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ELEVATION DIRECTION
7066190.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL___________________________ National Priority List
Proposed NPL________________ Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS -------------------- Federal Superfund Liens
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL__________________ National Priority List Deletions
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY__________ Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS_________________________ Superfund Enterprise Management System
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE-------------- Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS------------------ Corrective Action Report
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF------------------ RCRA- Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG------------------- RCRA- Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG------------------- RCRA- Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG----------------- RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS_________________________ Land Use Control Information System
TC7066190.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US ENG CONTROLS_________ Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS --------- Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS_________________________ Emergency Response Notification System
Lists of state- and tribal (Supen°und) equivalent sites
NC HSDS_____________________ Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS------------------------- Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF_______________________ List of Solid Waste Facilities
OLI____________________________ Old Landfill Inventory
DEBRIS_______________________ Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
LCID__________________________ Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LAST__________________________ Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
LUST -------------------------- Regional UST Database
INDIAN LUST_________________ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST_________________ State Trust Fund Database
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST____________________ Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST___________________________ Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST___________________________ AST Database
INDIAN UST__________________ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP___________________________ Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
INDIAN VCP__________________ Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS______________ Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS----------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites
TC7066190.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY_______________________
Recycling Center Listing
HIST LF_______________________
Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI___________________
Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
DEBRIS REGION 9___________
Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
ODI___________________________
Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS___________
Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL_________________ Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL_______________________ National Clandestine Laboratory Register
PFAS-------------------------- PFAS Contamination Site Listing
Local Land Records
LIENS 2_______________________ CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS________________________
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS________________________
Spills Incident Listing
IMD___________________________
Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90____________________
SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80____________________
SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS_________________________
Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD__________________________
Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS_______
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR_______________
Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST____________
EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA_________________________
Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS__________________________
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS--------------------------
Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD__________________________
Records Of Decision
RMP__________________________
Risk Management Plans
RAATS________________________
RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP___________________________
Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS_________________________
PCB Activity Database System
ICIS___________________________
Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS__________________________
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS_________________________
Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE______________
Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA______________
Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER_______
PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO ---------------------
Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS____________________
FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS_____________________
Incident and Accident Data
TC7066190.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CONSENT____________________
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV_____________
Indian Reservations
FUSRAP______________________
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA_______________________
Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS____________
Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS______________________
Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES____________________
Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES ---------
Abandoned Mines
FINDS -------------------------
Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
DOCKET HWC----------------
Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
UXO ---------------------------
Unexploded Ordnance Sites
ECHO -------------------------
Enforcement & Compliance History Information
FUELS PROGRAM___________
EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS__________________________
Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS___________________
ASBESTOS
COAL ASH____________________
Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS______________
Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance -----------
Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES------------------------
NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC----------------------------
Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP---------------------------
Animal Operation Permits Listing
MINES MRDS-----------------
Mineral Resources Data System
CCB___________________________
Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
SEPT HAULERS______________
Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
PCSRP------------------------
Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP_____________________ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto ----------------- EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner_____________ EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
[:I Q 7 7X0191T/4 :11XCT91T/:I 7,I Mtl:1,III /_1YN:Ih/*1
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS____________________ Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF_______________________ Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST____________________ Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC7066190.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
TC7066190.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

OVERVIEW MAP - 7066190.2S
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
1
Manufactured Gas Plants
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1/4 1/2 1 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
County Boundary Disposal Sites
Special Flood Hazard Area (1%)
El0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
0 National Wetland Inventory
0 State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Joshua Creek Buffer Mitigation Site CLIENT: The John R. McAdams Co., Inc.
ADDRESS: Across from 4077 Elm Grove Rd CONTACT: Cameron Jernigan
Woodington NC 28504 INQUIRY #: 7066190.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.121089 / 77.579258 DATE: July 26, 2022 1:38 pm
Copyright �o 2022 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 Tom Tom Rel. 2015.

DETAIL MAP - 7066190.2S
Target Property
0 1/a
Zia 1/2Miles
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
Indian Reservations BIA
Hazardous Substance
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
Special Flood Hazard Area (1%)
Disposal Sites
the target property
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
1
Manufactured Gas Plants
El
National Wetland Inventory
i
Sensitive Receptors
El
State Wetlands
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Joshua Creek Buffer Mitigation Site CLIENT: The John R. McAdams Co., Inc.
ADDRESS: Across from 4077 Elm Grove Rd CONTACT: Cameron Jernigan
Woodington NC 28504 INQUIRY #: 7066190.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.121089 / 77.579258 DATE: July 26, 2022 1:39 pm
Copyright �o 2022 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 Tom Tom Rel. 2015.

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
Proposed NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
NPL LIENS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
Lists of Federal sites subject to
CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
SEMS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities
undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR 0
RCRA-SQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR 0
RCRA-VSQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR 0
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
US INST CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS 0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
Lists of state- and tribal
(Superfund) equivalent sites
NC HSDS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
Lists of state- and tribal
hazardous waste facilities
SHWS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
Lists of state and tribal landfills
and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
TC7066190.2s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
OLI 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
DEBRIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LCID 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LAST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LUST TRUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS
0.500
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY
0.500
HIST LF
0.500
INDIAN ODI
0.500
DEBRIS REGION 9
0.500
ODI
0.500
IHS OPEN DUMPS
0.500
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL
0.001
US CDL
0.001
PFAS
TP
Local Land Records
LIENS 2
0.001
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS
0.001
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
TC7066190.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database
(Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8 - 1/4
1/4 - 1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
SPILLS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
IMD
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
SPILLS 90
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SPILLS 80
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
FUDS
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
DOD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US FIN ASSUR
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
EPA WATCH LIST
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
2020 COR ACTION
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
TSCA
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
TRIS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SSTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ROD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
RMP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RAATS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PRP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PADS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ICIS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FTTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
MLTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH DOE
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH EPA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
PCB TRANSFORMER
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RADINFO
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
HIST FTTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
DOT OPS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
CONSENT
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
INDIAN RESERV
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
FUSRAP
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
UMTRA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LEAD SMELTERS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US AIRS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
ABANDONED MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
FINDS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
DOCKET HWC
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UXO
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
ECHO
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FUELS PROGRAM
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AIRS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ASBESTOS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
DRYCLEANERS
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Financial Assurance
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NPDES
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UIC
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
AOP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
TC7066190.2s Page 6

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Database
(Miles) Property
MINES MRDS
0.001
CCB
0.500
SEPT HAULERS
0.001
PCSRP
0.500
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000
EDR Hist Auto 0.125
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS 0.001
RGA LF 0.001
RGA LUST 0.001
- Totals -- 0
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
Total
< 1 /8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2-1
> 1
Plotted
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
0 0
0
0
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
0
0 0
TC7066190.2s Page 7

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Site
NO SITES FOUND
MAP FINDINGS
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
TC7066190.2s Page 8

Count: 0 records.
ORPHAN SUMMARY
City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s)
NO SITES FOUND
TC7066190.2s Page 9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/31/2022
Number of Days to Update: 26
NPL Site Boundaries
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 3
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 4
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 5
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 6
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 7
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 8
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/31/2022
Number of Days to Update: 26
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
TC7066190.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/31/2022
Number of Days to Update: 26
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAG) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States. The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/31/2022
Number of Days to Update: 26
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC7066190.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/31/2022
Number of Days to Update: 26
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 06/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 7
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 06/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 7
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 06/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC7066190.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 06/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate
less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 06/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 02/08/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 02/21/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 02/21/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC7066190.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2022 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2022 Last EDR Contact: 06/15/2022
Number of Days to Update: 6 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011 Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2022
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2022 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2022 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2022
Number of Days to Update: 1 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 11/12/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/11/2022 Last EDR Contact: 06/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DEBRIS: Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Temporary Disaster Debris Staging Site (TDDSS) Locations
which are available to be activated in a disaster or emergency.. Disaster Debris Sites can only be used for temporary
disaster debris storage if the site's responsible party activates the site for use by notifying the NCDEQ DWM
Solid Waste Section staff during an emergency
Date of Government Version: 03/14/2022 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/15/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2022 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 86 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC7066190.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information.
sites).
Date of Government Version: 09/11/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
(Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LCID: Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
A list all of the Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notification facilities (under 2 acres in
size) in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 05/11/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 01/28/2022 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/28/2022 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 01/28/2022 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/28/2022 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC7066190.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2022 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/05/2022 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2022
Number of Days to Update: 89 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC7066190.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 10/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/01/2022
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2022 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/22/2022 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2022
Number of Days to Update: 79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 03/09/2022 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2022 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC7066190.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 02/23/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2022
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC7066190.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/15/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 02/23/2022 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/06/2022 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2022
Number of Days to Update: 89 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2022 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/27/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2022 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2022
Number of Days to Update: 2 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 02/23/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 0
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
TC7066190.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 01/31/2022 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/29/2022 Last EDR Contact: 07/19/2022
Number of Days to Update: 86 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009
Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Source: EPA, Region 9
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2022
Number of Days to Update: 137 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivices, Indian Health Service
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2022
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
TC7066190.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 02/22/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 02/22/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 76
PFAS: PFAS Contamination Site Listing
List of PFAS facilities
Date of Government Version: 11/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78
Local Land Records
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/31/2022
Number of Days to Update: 26
Records of Emergency Release Reports
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 03/21/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills, hazardous material releases, sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets, citizen complaints, and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
TC7066190.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/21/2022 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/01/2022 Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2022
Number of Days to Update: 9 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2022 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2022 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Other Ascertainable Records
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 06/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 12/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/17/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC7066190.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 06/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2022
Number of Days to Update: 239
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019
Number of Days to Update: 574
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post -closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 03/21/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List' to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC7066190.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2022
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/14/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 01/19/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/11/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/31/2022
Number of Days to Update: 26
RMP: Risk Management Plans
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC7066190.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst -case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 01/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC7066190.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MILTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 03/11/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/15/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 91
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
COAL ASH DOE: Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019
Number of Days to Update: 251
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 96
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
TC7066190.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/23/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 03/31/2022 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2022 Telephone: Varies
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/12/2022 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2022
Number of Days to Update: 89 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 23
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
TC7066190.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 546
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.
Date of Government Version: 07/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020
Number of Days to Update: 74
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/31/2022
Number of Days to Update: 26
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub -system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
TC7066190.2s Page GR-19

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 02/01/2022 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/24/2022 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 90 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration.
Date of Government Version: 03/21/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/22/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron
ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such
as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/27/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/27/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory
contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
TC7066190.2s Page GR-20

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 03/10/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 96
Source: Department of Interior
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/31/2022
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 34
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels
Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 02/17/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/17/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
AIRS: Air Quality Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with air quality permits.
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/17/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC7066190.2s Page GR-21

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 03/08/2022 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2022 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2022
Number of Days to Update: 86 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ASBESTOS: ASBESTOS
Asbestos notification sites
Date of Government Version: 07/31/2021 Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2021 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage,
transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 11/12/2021 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/11/2022 Last EDR Contact: 06/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/13/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 74 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2022 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/22/2022 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2022
Number of Days to Update: 79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012 Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012 Last EDR Contact: 06/15/2022
Number of Days to Update: 23 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
TC7066190.2s Page GR-22

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2022 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2022 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2022 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2022 Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 02/22/2022 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2022 Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2022
Number of Days to Update: 87 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AOP: Animal Operation Permits Listing
This listing includes animal operations that are required to be permitted by the state.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2020 Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 1 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCSRP: Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
To treat petroleum -contaminated soil in order to protect North Carolinaa??s environment and the health of the
citizens of North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 03/28/2022 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/01/2022 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEPT HAULERS: Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
This list of all active and permitted Septage Land Application Site (SLAS) and Septage Detention and Treatment
Facility (SDTF) sites in North Carolina. The purpose of this map is to provide the public and government entities
a visual overview of the businesses that manage septage and septage facilities throughout the state.
Date of Government Version: 07/07/2022 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/19/2022 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2022
Number of Days to Update: 12 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CCB: Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
These are not permitted Coal Ash landfills A list all of the now closed Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) in North
Carolina, in point data form. The purpose is to provide the public and other government entities a visual overview
of coal ash structural fills throughout the state and increase public awareness of their current locations.
TC7066190.2s Page GR-23

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/27/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits
An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging.
Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 120
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES
facilities.
Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011
Number of Days to Update: 55
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 29
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
Source: EPA, Office of Water
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC7066190.2s Page GR-24

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt Archives
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 196 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
TC7066190.2s Page GR-25

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 172 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 12/03/2021 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2022 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2022 Last EDR Contact: 04/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2022
Number of Days to Update: 53 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Management
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2022 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC7066190.2s Page GR-26

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business
Media.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual surrey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
TC7066190.2s Page GR-27

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
A© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC7066190.2s Page GR-28

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
JOSHUA CREEK BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
ACROSS FROM 4077 ELM GROVE RD
WOODINGTON, NC 28504
11r_1 Z0:11i:j Z91» irlci•Z•]U•71�r_�r9
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map:
Version Date:
North Map:
Version Date:
35.121089 - 35- 7' 15.92"
77.579258 - 77- 34' 45.33"
Zone 18
264953.2
3889318.5
69 ft. above sea level
13720720 COMFORT, NC
2019
13720800 RIVERMONT, NC
2019
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC7066190.2s Page A-1

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site -specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General SSW
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
c
0
w.
- . -
. - .
- . -
. -
. - .
- . -
. - .
-
-
- -
-
-
- - .
North I South
TIP
0
W A A W W w+ N ' N W V fVp O 2 N N O O pip
N
West
TIP
Target Property Elevation: 69 ft.
East
1/2 1 Miles
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC7066190.2s Page A-2

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property
3720452000J
Additional Panels in search area:
3720450000K
3720440800J
3720442800J
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Quad at Target Property
COMFORT
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA FIRM Flood data
NWI Electronic
Data Coverage
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION
MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
Not Reported
TC7066190.2s Page A-3

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT
GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Mesozoic Category: Stratified Sequence
System: Cretaceous
Series: Navarro Group
Code: uK4 (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps.
The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data.
Soil Component Name: NORFOLK
Soil Surface Texture: loamy sand
Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to
water table is more than 6 feet.
Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil.
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: MODERATE
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 60 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > 60 inches
TC7066190.2s Page A-4

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
Permeability
Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr)
(pH)
1
0 inches
14 inches
loamy sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 20.00
Max: 6.00
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 6.00
Min: 3.60
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty, or
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
2
14 inches
38 inches
sandy loam
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 2.00
Max: 5.50
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 0.60
Min: 3.60
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
3
38 inches
70 inches
sandy clay loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 2.00
Max: 5.50
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 0.60
Min: 3.60
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
4
70 inches
99 inches
variable
Not reported
Not reported
Max: 0.00
Max: 0.00
Min: 0.00
Min: 0.00
OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA
Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may
appear within the general area of target property.
Soil Surface Textures: sandy loam
loam
mucky - loam
Surficial Soil Types: sandy loam
loam
mucky - loam
Shallow Soil Types: fine sandy loam
sandy clay loam
clay loam
Deeper Soil Types: sandy clay loam
stratified
sandy clay
TC7066190.2s Page A-5

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE
SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
Federal USGS
1.000
Federal FRDS PWS
Nearest PWS within 1 mile
State Database
1.000
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No PWS System Found
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
TC7066190.2s Page A-6

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 7066190.2s
0
e
0 0
NC
W- J
County Boundary
N Major Roads
N Contour Lines
OO Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater
® Water Wells
© Public Water Supply Wells
® Cluster of Multiple Icons
d
1�
0 1/4 1/2 1 Miles
Groundwater Flow Direction Wildlife Areas
c I Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location Natural Areas
c v Groundwater Flow Varies at Location o Rare & Endangered Species
SITE NAME: Joshua Creek Buffer Mitigation Site CLIENT: The John R. McAdams Co., Inc.
ADDRESS: Across from 4077 Elm Grove Rd CONTACT: Cameron Jernigan
Woodington NC 28504 INQUIRY #: 7066190.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.121089 / 77.579258 DATE: July 26, 2022 1:39 pm
Copyright �o 2022 EDR, Inc. (,)2015 TonnTom Rel. 2015.

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance Database EDR ID Number
NC_NHEO NC50007854
Elclass: A Precision1: G
Eostat: E Gisid: 2271617
Edr id: NC50007854
TC7066190.2s Page A-8

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
State Database: NC Radon
Radon Test Results
Num Results Avg pCi/L Min pCi/L Max pCi/L
1 0.30
0.3
0.3
2 0.30
0.3
0.3
1 0.30
0.3
0.3
Federal EPA Radon Zone for LENOIR County: 3
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Zone 2 indoor average level — 2 pCi/L and — 4 pCi/L.
Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
Federal Area Radon Information for LENOIR COUNTY, NC
Number of sites tested: 4
Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L % 4-20 pCi/L
Living Area - 1 st Floor 0.150 pCi/L 100% 0%
Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
Basement Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
% >20 pCi/L
0%
Not Reported
Not Reported
TC7066190.2s Page A-9

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC7066190.2s Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water WeIIs: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
North Carolina Wildlife Resources/Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Natural Heritage Occurrence Sites Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic) that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or high quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC7066190.2s Page PSGR-2

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
A© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC7066190.2s Page PSGR-3

Eco Terra, LLC I Joshua Creek Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
APPENDIX G
�` � Joshua Creek Bank Parcel Development Plan
eCO, erra® HUC 03020204 March 2023

SOUTHERN
CONSERVATION
TRUST
Eco Terra, LLC March 6, 2023
Attn: Jamey O'Shaughnessey
1328 DeKalb Ave NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30307
Re: Joshua Creek Riparian Buffer Mitigation Project
NCDWR Project # 20220819
Mr. O'Shaughnessey,
It is the Southern Conservation Trust's intent to serve as holder of a permanent
conservation easement on approximately 29.2 acres in Lenoir County, North
Carolina as part of the Joshua Creek Riparian Buffer Mitigation Project that you,
Eco Terra, sponsor. We understand that you are in the submittal phase of a
revised BPDP for the project. We plan to work with you as the project moves
forward and are ready to assume responsibility for holding the easement as soon
as it is ready to be recorded.
We are also agreeable to and intend to serve as the long-term steward upon
project closeout. We estimate we will need approximately $24,600 as a long-term
endowment for the responsibilities summarized in the BPDP you provided dated
November 2022. Please don't hesitate to reach out for discussion if adjustments
need to be made to meet new mitigation plan or third party requirements.
Our 501(c)(3) nonprofit land trust is a qualified easement holder and committed
to elevating nature through exceptional stewardship. We hold conservation
easements and own and manage fee simple property throughout the state of
North Carolina, including in the region of this particular project. We are prepared
and well-equipped to carry out the long term stewardship responsibilities
detailed in the plan you have proposed.
We look forward to working with you, the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources, and landowner partners on this important mitigation project in the
Neuse River Basin HUC 03020204.
Please reach out to us at the contact information below. Our Director of
Conservation & Stewardship, Jesse Woodsmith, is available to answer any
questions you may have or provide clarification.
Regards,
Katie Pace Quattlebaum
CEO & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
SOUTHERN CONSERVATION TRUST
E: [e-mail]
P: 770-486-7774 EXT. 2 -CONSERVATION
W. WWW.SCTLANDTRUST.ORG

Property: Joshua Creek Buffer Project (Lenoir County, NC)
29.2 ac
Requested by SCT: $24,600
A. Estimations
Travel Expenses
Miles from office to property (one-way)
32.0
In this case miles from closest existing SCT
easement in Onslow County, NC. —100 miles to SCT
owned property with residence (free lodging).
Average travel time in hours to property (one-way)
1.00
Time from nearest CE (since this will be monitored
with other CEs in the area) or nearest SCT property
(between 45 min - 1.25 hours, averaged to 1 hr)
Reimbursement per mile
$0.550
The IRS issues standard mileage rates based on the
Other reimbursable travel expenses (e.g., tolls, parking,
$190.00
1 meal & Hotel (Overestimate, budgeting for needing
meals, lodging)
to stay at a hotel in area. Reality is lower since this will
be monitored with other properties in the area and is
2.5 hours from SCT lodging at owned property in
Pinehurst, NC.)
Annual Monitoring Expenses
For monitoring, calculate based on Stew Coordinator
(Staff #2) lead. This was previously entered
backwards, with Cons/Stew Director lead (Staff #1).
For violations & amendments, will be Cons/Stew
Director lead.
Staff #1: Hours of preparation time per inspection
0.00
Staff #1: Hours of monitoring time per inspection -excluding
0.00
travel time
Staff #1: Hours of reporting and follow up
0.0
Staff #2: Hours of preparation time per inspection
1.0
Staff #2: Hours of monitoring time per inspection -excluding
0.80
Overestimating slightly for larger relative size.
travel time
Adjusted downward for size reduction.
Staff #2: Hours of reporting and follow up per inspection
1.0
Other Staff: Hours per inspection
0.5
Equipment and supplies per inspection
$8.00
Easement holders may depreciate the costs of
equipment (e.g., gps device, camera, computer) as
appropriate for the equipment and its use for each
property.

Number of regular monitoring visits per year
1
Number of cars used per monitoring trip
1
Staff may travel separately to the property
Consultant costs per year
$0.00
Depending on the features of the property and the
easement, the holder occasionally may need outside
expertise.
Drive By and Flyover Monitoring Expenses (used occasionally)
Number of drive -by monitoring trips per year
0.25
Occasional monitoring from the public road is
sometimes desirable to supplement on -site
inspections. (average rounded to 1 in 4 visits)
Staff #1: Average time (in hours) needed per drive -by
monitoring trip (excluding travel time to and from the
0.00
Staff #2: Average time (in hours) needed per drive -by
monitoring trip (excluding travel time to and from the
0.25
Cost of aerial flyover
$10.00
Some organizations use aerial monitoring to
supplement onsite visits. We fly the drone we own.
There will be an aerial flyover approximately every
years
3
For example, entering the number 20 would mean the
land trust expects 1 aerial flyover per 20 years.
Landowner Communication Expenses
1-2 landowners
Staff #1: Hours per year
1.00
Staff #2: Hours per year
1.50
Other Staff: Hours per year
0.00
Materials and supplies per year
$0.00
For example, printing of educational materials and
postage
Landowner Communication Expenses: Change in
Landowner
These costs should reflect the time and costs
associated with one change in ownership. Stew
Coordinator Lead (Staff #2).
Staff #1: Hours for establishing a relationship with new
landowners, excluding travel time
0.50
Staff #2: Hours for establishing a relationship with new
landowners, excluding travel time
3.00
Other staff: Hours for establishing a relationship with new
0.50

Staff #1: Number of site visits needed to establish a
0.00
This number may reflect an average for all properties
relationship with new landowner
and therefore is not necessarily a whole number.
Staff #2: Number of site visits needed to establish a
1.0
relationship with new landowner
Supplies
$0.00
For example, a copy of the easement and materials
about the land trust's stewardship program
It is estimated that there will be one change in land
25.0
This should not be zero. Adjusted downward from 30
ownership every years
to 25 in this case due to 2 landowners.
Review of Reserved and Permitted Rights and
The conservation easement document may specify
Approvals
that the landowner will pay for the land trust's costs at
the time of review. If this is the case, enter zeros in
this section.
It is estimated that there will be one review every _years
25.0
If the easement does not contain reserved or
permited rights, place a zero here. Adjusted
downward from 30 to 25 for 2 landowners.
Staff #1: Hours needed per action subject to review
1.00
Staff #2: Hours needed per action subject to review
2.00
Other staff: Hours needed per action subject to review
1.00
Staff #1: Number of site visits required to complete one
0.00
Staff #2: Number of site visits required to complete one
1.00
Consultant costs per review
$0.00
Land Trust Initiated Amendment Expenses
If the landowner seeks an easement amendment, the
landowner would normally be expected to pay the
costs associated with the amendment at the time of
amendment.
Staff #1: Hours needed to complete an amendment,
3.00
Occasionally a holder will want to initiate an
excluding travel time
amendment. The Pennsylvania Land Trust
Association has little empirical data on the costs of
these amendments, and no information on their
Staff #2: Hours needed to complete an amendment,
0.50
excluding travel time
Other staff: Hours needed to complete an amendment
0.00
Staff #1: Number of visits required per amendment
1.00

Staff #2: Number of visits required per amendment
0.00
It is estimated that there will be one land trust initiated
amendment every years.
60
Legal Expenses
Legal fees per year
$0.00
donated
Minor and miscellaneous legal expenses may be
incurred as the easement holder seeks to reconcile
monitoring findings with easement terms, the
landowner seeks clarification on easement terms, etc.
These costs are expected to occur with no particular
frequency.
Minor Violation Incidents (resolved without resort to the
courts)
On buffer projects with straightforward terms, this is re
It is estimated that there will be one minor violation every
years.
15.0
This should not be zero
Staff #1: Hours needed to address the violation, excluding
travel time
3.00
Staff #2: Hours needed to address the violation, excluding
travel time
1.00
Other staff: Hours needed to address the violation
0.50
Staff #1: Number of site visits required per violation
1.00
Staff #2: Number of site visits required per violation
0.00
Legal costs per incident
$500.00
Consultant costs per incident
$0.00
Depending on the complexity and provisions of the
easement, easement holders should plan for the
costs of hiring a consultant.
Major Violation Incidents (requiring litigation)
Reduced for buffer project type
It is estimated that there will be one major violation every
years
50
This should not be zero
Average cost to address major violation (staff, attorney,
court fees & other)
$10,000
Conservation defense insurance annual premium
$0.00
It is not our practice to insert this here - this line is
from another organization's template.

Annual Rate of Return
Average annual return on Stewardship Fund investments
less inflation rate
4.00%
Staff and Overhead Rates
Staff #1 Conservation Director: Hourly rate, including
$31.00
Staff #2 Stewardship Coordinator: Hourly rate, including
benefits
$20.00
Other Staff Executive Director: Hourly rate, including
benefits
$67.00
Office overhead costs (rent, insurance, equipment) as a
5%
Stewardship Needs -Final Calculations (This will automatically calculate
based on your entries in the estimations section)
Annual stewardship costs (including the cost to $783
respond to minor violations)
Endowment needed to fully cover annual $19,576
stewardship costs
Annual costs needed to defend against major $200
violations
Endowment needed to fund easements against $5,000
major violations
Total $24,576.44
Formulas used in this calculator to calculate total stewardship needs (the formalas are here to show users how total stewardship needs
These are all calculated automatically, you don't need to do anything! Formulae Used
Staff Costs
Executive Director: Hourly rate, including overhead and
$31.00
B94+(B94*B97)
Director of Conservation: Hourly rate, including overhead
$27.00
B95+(B95*B97)
Field Biologist: Hourly rate, including overhead and benefits
$17.00
B96+(B96*B97)

Travel Costs
Roundtrip mileage cost
$35.20
1315*1317*2
Other reimbursable travel expenses
$190.00
B18
Staff #1: Cost of staff time to travel to and from eased
$62.00
(13112*1316*2)
Staff #2: Cost of staff time to travel to and from eased
$54.00
(13113*1316*2)
Total Annual
Stewardship
Costs
Formulae
Annual Monitoring Costs
Staff time per regular inspection
$138.10
((1321+B22+B23)*B112)+((B24+B25+B26)*B113)+(B2
Travel costs per regular inspection
$225.20
(13117+13118)*B30
Consultant costs per regular inspection
$0.00
B31
Supplies per regular inspection
$8.00
B28
Annualized cost of drive -by monitoring
$239
IF(B34=0,0,(B35*B119)+(B36*B120)+B117+13118)
Annualized cost of aerial flyover
$3
IF(B38=0,0,(1/B38)*B37)
Total annual monitoring costs
$613.33
(B124+B125+B127)*B29+B128+B129
Annual Costs of General Landowner Communications
Staff time
$71.50
(1341 *B112)+(B42*B113)+(B43*B114)
Supplies
$0.00
B44
Total costs of general landowner communications
$71.50
13133+13134
Annualized Costs of Landowner Communications -Change
in Landownership
Staff time
$159.00
(1347*13112)+(B48*B113)+(B49*B114)+(B50*B119)+(B
Travel costs
$225.20
B50*(B117+13118)+B51*(B117+13118)
Supplies
$0.00
B52
Likelihood of a new landowner in any given year
4%
1/1353
Annualized cost associated with new landowner
$15.37
(13138+13139+13140)*13141
Annualized Costs for Review of Reserved and Permitted
Rights and Approvals
Staff costs
$156.00
(13112*B57)+(B113*B58)+(B114*B59)+(B60*B119)+(B
Travel costs
$225.20
(B60*(B117+13118))+(B61*(B117+13118))
Consultant Costs
$0.00
B62
Likelihood of an exercise of a reserved right in any given
4%
IF(B56=0,0,1/B56)
Annualized cost for review and approval of reserved rights
$15.25
(B145+B146+B147)*B148

Annual Costs of Holder Initiated Amendments
Staff time per amendment
$168.50
(1365*13112)+(B66*B113)+(B67*B114)+(B68*B119)+(B
Travel costs per amendment
$225.20
(B68*(B117+13118))+(B69*(B117+13118))
Likelihood of a holder initiated amendment in any given year
2%
1/1370
Total annualized holder initiated amendment costs
$6.56
(B153+B154)*B155
Annual Legal Costs
Legal fees per year
$0.00
B73
Total annual legal costs
$0.00
B159
Total Annual Regular Stewardship Expenses
$722.01
C130+C135+C142+C149+C156+C160
C. Calculation of Costs Associated with Violations
Minor Violations
Staff costs to address violation
$190.50
(13112*B77)+(B113*B78)+(B114*B79)+(B80*B119)+(B
Travel costs
$225.20
(B80*(B117+13118))+(B81*(B117+13118))
Legal costs
$500.00
B82
Likelihood of violation in any given year
7%
1/B76
Total annualized cost to deal with minor violations
$61.05
(B167+B168+B169)*B170
Major Violations
Cost to address violation
$10,000
B87
Likelihood of major violation in any given year
2%
1 /B86
Annualized cost to deal with major violations
$200.00
B174*B175
D. Endowment Calculations
Annual stewardship and minor violation costs
$783
C162+C171
Average annual return on stewardship fund investments less
4.00%
B91
Endowment needed to cover annual stewardship costs
$19,576.44
C182/C183
Annual costs needed to defend against major violations
$200.00
C176

Avera e annual return on stewardship fund investments less
4.00%
91
Endowment needed to fund easements against mamor
5 000.00
218TC188