Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310035_Compliance Report_20221107Environmental Chemists, Inc. envirochem ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS Smithfield Hog Productions - Warsaw Post Office Box 856 Warsaw NC 28398 Attention: Lab ID Sample ID: 22-43818 Site: influent-2748 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 • 910.392.0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Fax 710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax Test Method Sulfur Copper Zinc Ammonia Nitrogen Total Phosphorus Fecal Coliform Total Nitrogen (Calc) Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen Total Nitrogen info@environmentalchemists.com Date of Report: Oct 26, 2022 Customer PO #: Customer ID: 08110011 Report #: 2022-17857 Project ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 9/12/2022 10:35 AM Water Derek Brown EPA 200.7 EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4, 1994 EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4, 1994 EPA 350.1, Rev. 2.0, 1993 SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011 SM 9222 D-2015 MF EPA 351.2, Rev. 2.0, 1993 EPA 353.2, Rev. 2.0, 1993 Total Nitrogen Results Date Analyzed 185 mg/L 10/25/2022 32.2 mg/L 10/17/2022 30.8 mg/L 10/17/2022 1100 mg/L 09/19/2022 341 mg/L 09/19/2022 >600000 Colon ies/1 00ml- 09/12/2022 2090 mg/L 0.87 mg/L 2090 mg/L 09/20/2022 09/13/2022 09/22/2022 Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 22-43819 Site: effluent-2748 9/12/2022 10:30 AM Water Derek Brown Test Method Results Date Analyzed Sulfur EPA 200.7 65.5 mg/L 10/25/2022 Copper EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4, 1994 2.36 mg/L 10/13/2022 Zinc EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4, 1994 2.46 mg/L 10/13/2022 Ammonia Nitrogen EPA 350.1, Rev. 2.0,1993 1100 mg/L 09/19/2022 Total Phosphorus SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011 107 mg/L 09/19/2022 Fecal Coliform SM 9222 D-2015 MF 58000 Colon ies/100mL 09/12/2022 Total Nitrogen (Calc) Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) EPA 351.2, Rev. 2.0,1993 1230 mg/L 09/20/2022 Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen EPA353.2, Rev. 2.0,1993 0.81 mg/L 09/13/2022 Total Nitrogen Total Nitrogen 1230 mg/L 09/22/2022 Comment: Reviewed by: Report $V 2022-17857 Page 1 of 1 Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, INC Lab #94 Sample Receipt Checklist 6602 Windmill Way Wilmington, NC 28405 910.392.0223 Client: Date: "I 12- Report Number: _ 2022- 1�5� Receipt of sample: ECHEM Pickup Client Delivery ❑ JUPS ❑ FeclEx ❑ Other ❑ ❑ YES ❑ NO N N/A 1. Were custody seals present on the cooler? ❑ YES I0 NO N/A 12. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken? Original temperature upon receipt °C Corrected temperature upon receipt °C How temperature taken: ❑ Temperature Blank Against Bottles OR IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 192511657 IR Gun Correction Factor °C: 0.0 YES ❑ NO 3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6°C, was Project Mgr./QA notified? YES ❑ NO 4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed? YES ❑ NO 5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC? YES ❑ NO 6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers? YES ❑ NO 7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC? YES ❑ NO 8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC? YES ❑ NO 9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test? YES ❑ NO 10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test? YES ❑ NO 11. Was adequate sample volume availableT YES ❑ NO 12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests? YES ❑ NO 13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2? ❑ YES ❑ NO 14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12? ❑ YES ❑ NO 15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9? YES ❑ NO 16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? ** ❑ YESI,—, NO 17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? ❑ YES 10 NO 18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes? * TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet. ** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet. Sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace) Sample(s) were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly by adding (circle one): H2SO4 HNO3 HCl NaOH Time of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. Who was notified, date and time: Volatiles Sample(s) were received with headspace COMMENTS: DOC, QA.002 Rev 1 • _ 1 Analytical & Consulting Chemists ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS, INC NCDENR: DWO CERTIFICATION # 94 NCDHHS: DLS CERTIFICATION # 37729 COLLECTION AND CHAIN OF CHSTinnY 6602 Windmill Way Wilmington, NC 28405 OFFICE: 910-392-0223 FAX 910-392-4424 info@environmentalchemists.com Client: Smithfield Hog Production PROJECT NAME: Wastewater/Digester REPORT NO: ADDRESS: CONTACT NAME: PO NO: REPORT TO: Amy Elmore/Warsaw PHONE/FAX: COPY TO: email: Sampled By: fYrD%Jr) SAMPLE TYPE: I = Influent_ E = Effluent W = We!! cT - St am cn _ Q^-[ c, _ ci...•,.,. Sample Identification Collection E F E g o a o a, E ' - LU m m g z -------•-o PRESERVATION -- - .. _.., _ . - _.. v....y _v - vv.., v- - v. ANALYSIS REQUESTED Date Time Temp w z Z = v 0 _ 0 = = 0 z x w o Influent C P X Fecal G G 7 3 -- �6 t Y f �� C P X 11� X LITN", N TP, NH3 G G C P X lCopper", Sulfur, Zinc G G C P G G Efflluent C P X Fecal G G �/ t vt� X ITN,'TP,NH3 /o a G G C P X Co er, Sulfur, Zinc G G C P G G C P G G C P G G Transfer Relinquished By: Date/Time Received By: Date/Time 2. I emperature when deceived -L;: — y �!5 �, Accepted: ✓ Rejected: Resample R que ted: Delivered By: `,.N Received By: � Date:g77; Time: 015 Comments: TURNAROUND: