20061103 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20150414

Northgate Park (Ellerhe Creek)
Stream Restoration Monitoring Report
EEP Project # 272 Contract #: 6230
USACE Action ID #: 200620453 DWR Project #: N/A
County: Durham
Monitoring Year 03
Submitted to:
as stem
E a e er��
PROGRAM
NCDENR -EEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Data Collection: 2014
Construction Completed: December 2008
Submitted: January 2015

Monitoring Firm
K C I
ASSOCIATES OF NC
Landmark Center II, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Contact: Adam Spiller
Email: adam.spiller(&kci.com
KCI Project No: 16146867
Design Firm
[ij a
URS Corporation — North Carolina
1600 Perimeter Park Drive
Suite 400
Morrisville, North Carolina 27560
(919) 461 -1100
Fax [phone]
Northgate Park (Ellerhe Creek) KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 2014 - MY03

Table of Contents
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT ............................ ..............................1
2.0 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................... ..............................2
3.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................ ..............................3
Appendix A — Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure1. Vicinity Map ..................................................................................... ..............................5
Table la. Project Restoration Components ....................................................... ..............................6
Table lb. Project Component Summations ....................................................... ..............................7
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History ............................................ ..............................7
Table 3. Project Contacts Table ...................................................................... ..............................8
Table 4. Project Attribute Table ...................................................................... ..............................9
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2. Current Condition Plan View ........................................................... ............................... l l
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment ............................. .............................14
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment ..................................................... .............................16
StreamStation Photos .................................................................................................. .............................17
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos .............................................................................. .............................23
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment .................................................. .............................25
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata .......................................................... .............................25
Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species .................. .............................26
Appendix D — Stream Survey Data
Cross - Section Plots ...................................................................................................... .............................28
LongitudinalProfile Plots ............................................................................................ .............................33
PebbleCount Plots ....................................................................................................... .............................35
Table 10. Baseline- Stream Data Summary Table .............................................. .............................40
Table 11 a. Monitoring — Cross - Section Morphology Data Table ........................ .............................43
Table 1 lb. Monitoring — Stream Reach Morphology Data Table ....................... .............................44
Appendix E — Hydrologic Data
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events ......................................................... .............................47
Northgate Park (Ellerhe Creek) KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 2014 - MY03

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
In 2008, the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) restored and enhanced a reach of
Ellerbe Creek, an Unnamed Tributary to Ellerbe Creek (UT 3), and stream buffer within Northgate Park
in Durham County, NC. The project also included the creation of two stormwater wetlands with outfalls
to the project streams. The 5.9 -mi2 project watershed is located in US Geological Survey Hydrologic Unit
03020201 -05 -0010 (NC Division of Water Quality Sub -basin 03- 04 -01) of the Neuse River Basin. This
Hydrologic Unit is within EEP's Ellerbe Creek Local Watershed Plan (2003) area and is also listed as a
Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in EEP's Neuse River Basin Priorities Plan (2010).This project is
within the Falls Lake watershed, a drinking supply reservoir for the City of Raleigh. The drainage area for
the site is urban residential land. The State has a permanent conservation easement of 7.5 acres and the
project is located entirely within Northgate Park, which is a City of Durham public park. The project
stream begins at the pedestrian bridge near the baseball diamond and flows 2,284 linear feet to the culvert
under Acadia Street. The project goals and objectives are listed below.
Project Goals
• Improving water quality.
• Enhancing flood attenuation.
• Restoring aquatic and riparian habitat.
Project Objectives
• Restoring the Project Reach to a stable urban stream channel that will retain its dimension,
pattern, and profile over time, and that is capable of transporting watershed flows and sediment
load efficiently.
• Using Priority II restoration to change Ellerbe Creek from a G5c type stream channel to a E type
channel.
• Enhancing the capacity of the site to mitigate flood flows by improving the connection of the
stream to its floodplain.
• Improving aquatic habitat by establishing a heterogeneous bed morphology with riffle -pool
sequences supported by in- stream structures.
• Restoring the riparian buffer from park grasses and herbaceous vegetation to Piedmont
Bottomland Forest to provide filtration of nutrients and organic matter inputs into the stream, to
improve wildlife habitat, and to provide shade for the stream channel.
• Reducing sediment inputs from localized streambank erosion by re- establishing stream geometry
and by stabilizing and revegetating the stream banks.
• Installing three stormwater wetland best management practices (BMPs) to reduce stormwater
pollutants (namely nitrogen and phosphorus) and improve water quality prior to discharging into
the stream.
Construction was completed at the site in December 2008. In March 2009, live stakes were planted along
the stream and the stormwater wetlands were planted. The planting of the riparian buffer was delayed
until November 2009 when the rest of the site was planted with tublings and containerized plants. After
planting, six vegetation plots were installed following the CVS -EEP vegetation monitoring procedure,
five in buffer restoration areas and one in the planted stream riparian zone. Repairs were conducted at the
site beginning in late 2013 and ending in March 2014. Once construction was completed, newly repaired
banks were planted with live stakes and disturbed construction areas were planted with native transplants.
The vegetation monitoring success criterion for the planted stream riparian zone is a density of 320
stems /acre after the third year of monitoring and an allowance for 10% mortality in the fourth and fifth
years with a final density of 260 stems /acre. The vegetation monitoring success criterion for the buffer
restoration zone is a density of 320 stems /acre after the fifth year of monitoring. Plot I is located in the
stream riparian zone and Plots 2 -6 are located in the buffer enhancement and restoration zones. The third-
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 1 2014 - MY03

year vegetation monitoring was based on the Level 2 CVS -EEP vegetation monitoring protocol. The
site's average density for this monitoring period was 182 planted stems /acre. Five of the six plots had less
than 320 planted stems /acre, with plot 6 being the only one to meet the success criteria. Despite this lack
of planted woody vegetation, volunteer species are robust throughout the site and including volunteers,
the site averaged 3,642 total stems /acre. The easement includes a few isolated areas of managed
herbaceous zones (as shown in Figure 2) for public safety sight line considerations and pedestrian trail
access. Invasive species are present throughout the site, but are only scattered in small patches throughout
the easement. The 2014 monitoring found some areas with low densities of trees. The streamside
vegetation, especially the willows (Salix spp.) on the lower half of the site, has also been impacted by
beaver, and they have destroyed many of the previously large and healthy trees along the bankfull bench.
There is no beaver dam or lodge on -site; the beaver are most likely accessing the site from downstream of
the project reach.
The project as -built survey was conducted in January 2009 and KCI conducted the first -year monitoring
survey in January 2010. The longitudinal profile in Appendix D includes the longitudinal profile data
from both of these surveys. The as -built profile data are limited in that the survey measurements taken
were not annotated in the field and water surface measurements were not taken. As a result, the survey is
not detailed enough to generate baseline profile morphology data. The five detailed cross - sections were
installed after the as -built survey, so there are no baseline dimensional data, but there are first -year
dimensional data. Because of the repair work that occurred in 2013 and 2014, cross - sections 3, 4, and 5
were all reinstalled in October 2014. An effort was made to install these as close to the original cross -
sections as possible, but there are slight differences between the first two years and the current year of
monitoring. This year's cross - sectional survey showed all cross - sections functioning as intended. Cross -
sections 1 and 2 continue to trend towards stability. The banks of cross - sections 3 and 5 received
vegetated soil lifts and the bank of cross - section 4 was graded as part of the repair work mentioned above.
The third year of monitoring found both Reach 1 and 2 to be stable and functioning as designed. Although
the bed shows areas of significant aggradation along Reach 1 and degradation along Reach 2 compared to
the as -built conditions, it shows little change compared to the MY01 and MY02 surveys. Areas of bank
erosion and structural failure mentioned in previous reports were corrected during the repairs mentioned
above. As a part of the stream success criterion, the stream must experience at least two bankfull events,
each in separate monitoring years. The site has experienced multiple bankfull events since construction.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report and in the Mitigation Plan documents
available on the EEP's website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are
available from EEP upon request.
2.0 METHODOLOGY
The survey data were collected with a total station instrument, using control coordinates supplied by URS
and the as -built surveyor, Level Cross. The MY03 stream survey was completed on December 22, 2015
The stationing for the longitudinal profile is based on the thalweg stationing and has been adjusted to
match grade control structures from previous longitudinal profiles.
The CVS -EEP protocol, Level 2 (http:/ /cvs.bio.unc.edu /methods.htm) was used to collect vegetation data
from the site. The MY03 vegetation survey was conducted on October 22, 2014.
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCIAssociates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 2 2014 - MY03

3.0 REFERENCES
DWQ, 2000. Neuse Riparian Buffer Mitigation Rules. 15A NCAC 2B.0242
(http://ncrules.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-
% 20environment %20and %20natural %20resources /chapter %2002 %20 -
%20environmental %20management /subchapter %20b / 15a %20ncac %2002b %20.0242.html)
EEP. 2003. Ellerbe Creek Local Watershed Plan.
( htt p:// www .nceep.net/services /lwps/Upper Neuse/Ellerbe_Creek Local_ Watershed_Plan.pdf)
EEP. 2010. Neuse River Basin Restoration Priorities.
(draft available:
http: / /www.neeep .net /services /restplans/DRAFT RBRP Neuse_201007.pd1)
Lee, M. T., R. K. Peet, S. D. Roberts, and T. R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4.0 ( http: / /cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm).
USACE. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines.
(http: / /www. saw.usace. army. mil /wetlands/Mitigation /Documents /Stream/).
Weakley, A. S. 2006. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas.
(http://www.herbarium.unc.edu/FloraArchives/WeaklaFlora 2006-Jan.%ff).
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 3 2014 - MY03

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and
Background Tables
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCIAssociates ofNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 272 4 2014 - MY03

Ferns
kasr�oo GRANVILLE
d0.
•Q Rowemont Dr 3 •�i
Q d o �a
F
Astor ct E m so ORANGE L = y�
Glasgow
Kirkwood Dr _ e slO • , E Fairlawn Rd �- Commie St Richwood Rd WAKE
Ellen St o z C
A❑ 3 Lombard Ave
m♦ s ♦ ? 501
♦ E m 501
oyj ♦ .A
=irk Rd — — �
I
Stadium Dr ;
i
Fawn Ave •� obtc
0
ve
/
n � P
6tM1z ^
North Pointe Dr /
Front St Reichard St
S. Delatleld Ave
A
c �
o Rd
-- ? M"r-Y Ave
3 ob
a GreeK m
y ul 3 y rpe _ x10 J Maynard Ave
w �e
c / Leon St Leon St
Indian Trl
r 9P
w / 65
(Sunset Ave Ruby St
c
SP nt ve to
c�
NOR T GAT PARK _
Pershing St desO
Wils E U
o
d
Wilsonst o�
/ 3 Woodrow m ` S[ F St
ClubBlvd Brookline
Z SI LL �%
a
♦ , G/ Englewood Ave o a
O
N V
♦, Knox St Knox St i9 — in m
♦ < 65 rn �' o £' m
m m
♦ _ _ ' � � 3 Knox St < < vfn
♦ 2 `m > w m o .'fin+ —_
�St
♦ `O Demerius St v`i
♦ Green St O Clark St 5
♦ .J
Pratt Ave V%m., St Green St
N Elder St d�.. / rn` Markham Ave
s
o 8 o <
Elba St ♦ to = Macon St
Urban Ave N
O Fnym Rd 70 Dacian Ave Dacian Ave
❑ � g
3w _ � ♦ O
( ♦ Trinity Ave
♦ Minerva Ave
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Roads ^i Major Streams
QCounties wa
Municipalities
Project Location r�
- 1:24,000
�; OS Ill
'
Northgate Park inch = 2,000 feet xSte
k Hillandale Golf Course Project #127 Lt' kaoncement
K C I „ Local Watershed Plan Boundary 0 500 1,000 2,000 Pao�aoM
Feet

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
North ate Park (Ellerbe Creek), EEP Project #272
Miti ation Credits
Riparian
Non - riparian
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
Stream
Wetland
Wetland
Buffer
Nutrient
Nutrient
Offset
Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
Length
867
1,247
Credits
867
831
TOTAL
1,698
CREDITS
Project Components
Project
Existing
Approach
Restoration -or-
Component
Stationing/
Restoration
Mitigation
Footage/
(PI, PII
Restoration
-or-
Location
Acreage
etc.)
Equivalent
Footage /Acreage
Ratio
Reach ID
Reach 1
10 +00 —25+20
1,520
PII
Enhancement 1
1,247*
1.5:1
Reach 2
25 +20 —32+70
646
PII
Restoration
750
1:1
UT 3
100 +00 —101+17
104
PII
Restoration
117
1:1
Buffer
Restoration
3.63
1:1
Buffer
I W_�I
I
Enhancement
0.23
3:1
Comp onent Summation
Riparian
Stream
Non - Riparian
Upland
Restoration Level
wetlands
Buffer (square feet)
(linear feet)
Wetlands (Acres)
(Acres)
(Acres)
Restoration
867
158,172
Enhancement I
1,247
T
10,000
Enhancement II
TOTAL SMU
1,698
TOTAL RBMU
161,505
*The stream length for Reach 1 does not include the following easement exceptions: stream with one -sided easement, Lavender
Street Road right -of -way, pedestrian bridge crossing
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 6 2014 - MY03

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Number and Name: 272 - Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek)
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 6 yr 1 months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 5 yr 2 months
Number of Reporting Years: 3
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion
or Deliver
Concept Plan
Jan 06
Restoration Plan
Jun 06
Final Design - 90%
May 07
Construction
Dec 08
As -Built Survey
Jan 09
Live Stake Planting
Mar 09
Riparian Buffer Planting
Nov 09
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov 09 - Jan 10
May 10
Year 2 Monitoring
Sept 10 - Dec 10
Dec 10
Repair
Mar 14
Year 3 Monitoring
Jan 15
Jan 15
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 7 2014 - MY03

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Project Number and Name: 272 - Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek)
Design Firm
URS
1600 Perimeter Park Drive, Suite 400
Morrisville, North Carolina 27560
Contact: Ms. Kathleen McKeithan
Phone: [phone]
Construction Contractor
Environmental Quality Resources, LLC
1405 Benson Court, Suite C
Arbutus, MD 21227
Contact: Mr. John Talley
Phone: [phone] ext.110
Fax: [phone]
Planting Contractor
HARP
301 McCullough Drive, 4th Floor
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Contact: Mr. Alan Peoples
Phone: [phone]
Repair Design Firm
KCI Associates of NC
Landmark Center Il, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Repair Construction Contractor
Carolina Environmental Contracting, Inc.
PO Box 1905
Mount Airy, NC 27030 -6905
Contact: Ms. Joanne Cheatham
Phone: [phone]
Monitoring Performers
MY -00 - 03
KCI Associates of NC
Landmark Center Il, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 8 2014 - MY03

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Project Number and Name: 272 - North ate Park Ellerbe Creek
Project County
Durham County
Ph sio ra hic Region
Piedmont
Ecore ion
Triassic Basin
Project River Basin
Neuse
USGS HUC for Project (14 digit)
03020201050010
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project
03 -04 -01
Within extent of EEP Watershed Plan?
Yes - Ellerbe Creek LWP
WRC Class (Warm, Cool, Cold)
Warm
% of project easement demarcated
100%
Beaver activity observed during design phase?
No
Restoration Component Attribute Table
Reach 1
Reach 2
UT 3
Drainage Area
5.9 s .mi.
5.9 s .mi.
-
Stream Order
Third
Third
First
Restored length (feet)
1,466
690
117
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Perennial
Perennial
Watershed Type (Rural, Urban, Developing, etc.)
Urban
Watershed LULC Distribution
Urban
Ag -Row Crop
Ag- Livestock
Forested
Water/Wetlands
38%
0%
0%
62%
<1%
Watershed impervious cover ( %)
-
NCDWQ AU /Index Number
27- 5 -(0.7)
NCDWQ Classification
WS -IV; NSW
303d listed?
Yes
Upstream of a 303d listed segment?
Yes
Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor
impaired biological integrity
Total acreage of easement
7.5 Acres
Total vegetated acreage within the easement
1.0 Acre
Total planted acreage as part of the restoration
6.4 Acres
Ros en Classification of pre-existing
G5c
G5c
-
Ros en Classification of As -built
C5
C5
-
Valley Type
U
U
U
Valley Sloe
0.0006
0.0005
U
Valley side slope range (e.g. 2 -3 %)
U
U
U
Valley toe slope range (e.. 2 -3 %)
U
U
U
Trout waters designation
No
Species of concern, endangered etc.? (Y/N)
No
Dominant soil series and characteristics
Series
Chewacla and Wehadkee
Depth Cla %
-
-
-
K
-
-
T
-
-
"N /A" is for items that do not apply.
" -" is for items that are unavailable.
"U" is for items that are unknown.
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 9 2014 - MY03

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCIAssociates ofNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 272 10 2014 - MY03

* ,4y
"�7 p
4 h
LEGEND
EASEMENT BOUNDARY ......................
AS -BUILT STATIONED ........................
PHOTO POINT (PP) ........................... v�
CROSS - SECTION (XS) ....................... �o
BMP............... ............................... a
PROJECT CONDITION
VEG PLOT ACHIEVING
DENSITY CRITERION .........................
VEG PLOT BELOW ■
DENSITY CRITERION .........................
VEG PLOT TOTAL /
PLANTED STEM DENSITY ................... 3642/182
LOW PLANTED STEM DENSITY............ I I
wy F
Lu
R� try �,►��f} ��•- yyy} " �• � _. �1 ��;
�' rt
¢1V' Y Lu
1S . F•i / i Fr.
Tt e
Lij
uj
ui
Lu
A.
Z N
�.. X_ • i�� Vii•.., r-1 LL W O Q
r•
. •�0 r
A
2013 REPAIR ITEMS
SOIL LIFT ............................ ...............................
GRADED BANK ..................... ............................... , �U
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL ....... ...............................
C '
�o QZ
KJ
O
�a Z pU
wx
5
z
w
M
Y O
L
o
�
u z
Q
J
W
U } °
z
o
U
m
Q
N
z 2
F-
W
lo� _
of
co
O
W
J 0 z
o
w
W F
o
j
U
z
Y O
z
Q o
0
z
�
CV ¢_
U)
r`
w
<
Q
C
U
= U ¢
W
�w
0
J
p
z�
w
a
DATE JAN 2015
KD GRAPHIC
CURRENT
CONDITION
PLAN VIEW

1147 P 4 �' „ N'T
to *
L�
�t�. � �� `� ,�• sdu. },pp. a.1F�i 1r 3E�� }•h' •� //� � ®'p'f � °.� J . ,�• +iR
i R' "� ! �.'. 1 rt'�'a t. yy� ♦ 'Y .r ' r` ` a ✓Y g
�° +MpL p' /t �f r' si 1 ,. ?s• "tom -,,�� p ;`-
_0"
- " l
y.•y � l --., _� ••. , i y J f �y. -� '�` °s 1_ �����y� �• �-.,�`1�' y`bFf .4.t .�.�i' `,` � � Y p
.r} � l ��.1; Y d t � 'p ' -�fi~ ,�•�-.° •�K ,� -y. - M J, - a�i .1 +,:• ` ',, F° !� `j ,yr �'� ,
a ,
�. �.r�N. -" � .� �}�.`� �ap�a.. {. 11 � 1 i.1 r�w � 'fir ��'r . +� , �_ r � k �' •� � '� `+ �, .,a.
t + ! . J",
- a
t,3� r• tl, 4. �; i,- R� m
Lu
W
2
(n
LLl
LLJ
co
i
r.
".
LEGEND
N
PROJECT CONDITION
Lu
2013 REPAIR ITEMS
EASEMENT BOUNDARY ......................
W
(n
VEG PLOT ACHIEVING
DENSITY CRITERION .........................
a Z
O
SOIL LIFT............................ ...............................
AS -BUILT STATIONED.. ......................
0 O
=
VEG PLOT BELOW ■
DENSITY CRITERION .........................
Z
g
GRADED BANK ..................... ...............................
PHOTO POINT (PP) ........................... 0__
VEG PLOT TOTAL /
PLANTED STEM DENSITY ................... 3642/182
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL ....... ...............................
CROSS - SECTION (XS) ....................... °moo
LOW PLANTED STEM DENSITY............
BMP............... ...............................
�
w
Y
z
Z
O
K
{ r
ru c
I2
N
Lu
W
(n
U
a Z
O
Lu
LLl
Lu
o
0 O
=
cf)
Z
g
r
z
�
w
Y o
wN
z
+
N
LL W
C) }
J
°
o
F
co
Z
=
w elf
(if
U)
0
J O
z
o
� z
0
Z
0
z
Q
F-
°
0
L1J
Q
(n
w
Q
L
(7 F
U
2 ()
a
m
f— w
w
�OO
°
w
z �
onre JAN 2015
­Le GRAPHIC
CURRENT
CONDITION
PLAN VIEW
SHEET 2 OF 3

I,
i Cl
,� n.
N
H
W
W
2 •
U
W
W
W
z
J
U
Q
MWATER a�
LAND #2
r .
I�
LEGEND
EASEMENT BOUNDARY ......................
AS -BUILT STATIONED ........................
PHOTO POINT (PP) ...........................
CROSS - SECTION (XS) ....................... °moo
BMR............... ............................... n
f
w
A,
lk
' A
PROJECT CONDITION
VEG PLOT ACHIEVING
DENSITY CRITERION .........................
VEG PLOT BELOW ■
DENSITY CRITERION .........................
VEG PLOT TOTAL /
PLANTED STEM DENSITY ................... 3642/182
LOW PLANTED STEM DENSITY............
2013 REPAIR ITEMS
SOILLIFT ............................ ...............................
GRADED BANK ..................... ...............................
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL ....... ............................... iM
,d_ 1
i
,r L
z
O
O
a
M I
F
¢z
�w O O-
O
z oox
x�
111111 z a
z
w
It
Y o
' ■.� 11 W W z o
J M
LLI
Lu Go
.. W.Z F n
W 0 0
" JO z
x W +
`i Z Z N
YO D
o o
►'�" Q
�.f a_ N ¢
* W r w
f— N W
.� Q it
= U =
W w
O 0 W
pnp, z a
onre. JAN 2015
1 -. `� + • 1 scare. GRAPHIC
r�1 CURRENT
CONDITION
PLAN VIEW
Y .�•'.•Y SHEET 3 OF 3
i
rj-� -_7
i`
LEGEND
EASEMENT BOUNDARY ......................
AS -BUILT STATIONED ........................
PHOTO POINT (PP) ...........................
CROSS - SECTION (XS) ....................... °moo
BMR............... ............................... n
f
w
A,
lk
' A
PROJECT CONDITION
VEG PLOT ACHIEVING
DENSITY CRITERION .........................
VEG PLOT BELOW ■
DENSITY CRITERION .........................
VEG PLOT TOTAL /
PLANTED STEM DENSITY ................... 3642/182
LOW PLANTED STEM DENSITY............
2013 REPAIR ITEMS
SOILLIFT ............................ ...............................
GRADED BANK ..................... ...............................
RIFFLE GRADE CONTROL ....... ............................... iM
,d_ 1
i
,r L
z
O
O
a
M I
F
¢z
�w O O-
O
z oox
x�
111111 z a
z
w
It
Y o
' ■.� 11 W W z o
J M
LLI
Lu Go
.. W.Z F n
W 0 0
" JO z
x W +
`i Z Z N
YO D
o o
►'�" Q
�.f a_ N ¢
* W r w
f— N W
.� Q it
= U =
W w
O 0 W
pnp, z a
onre. JAN 2015
1 -. `� + • 1 scare. GRAPHIC
r�1 CURRENT
CONDITION
PLAN VIEW
Y .�•'.•Y SHEET 3 OF 3

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Project Number and Name: 272 - Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek)
Reach 1 Assessed Length 1520
Number
Number with Footage with Adjusted %for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of Amount of
%Stable,
Stabilizing Stabilizing Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable Unstable
Performing
Woody Woody Woody
Category
Sub - Category
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments Footage
as Intended
Vegetation Vegetation Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aegradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to
significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include
point bars)
0 0
100%
2. Deeradation - Evidence of downcutting
0 0
100%
2. Riffle Condition*
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser
substrate
8
8
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition'
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean
Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
6
13
46%
2. Length appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance
between tail of upstream riffle and head of
6
13
46%
downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position'
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend
0
0
N/A
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander
(Glide)
0
0
N/A
2. Bank
1. Scoured/ Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or scour and erosion
0
o 0
0 100 /0 0 0 100 /o
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass
2. Undercut
wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts
that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
o 0
0 100 /0 0 0 100 /o
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
lBank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
1 0 1 100% 1 0 1 0 1 100%
Totals
0
0 100% 0 0 100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged
boulders or logs.
6
6
o
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
6
6
o
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath
sills or arms.
6
6
o
100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
3. Bank Protection
influence does not exceed 15 %. (See guidance for
6
6
100%
this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool
4. Habitat
Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
6
6
100%
Rootwads /logs providing some cover at base -flow.
'This is not a meandering reach, so all pools are associated with structures.
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KC[ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 14 2014 - MY03

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Project Number and Name: 272 - Northgate Park (Fllerbe Creek)
Reach Assessed Length 750
Number
Number with
Footage with
Adjusted %for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
%Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Catetiory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Ve etation
Ve etation
Ve etation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aegradation -Bar formation /growth sufficient to
significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include
point bars)
0
0
o
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser
substrate
5
5
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean
Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
4
6
o
67 /o
2. Length appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance
between tail of upstream riffle and head of
4
6
67%
downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position
(R )alweg centering at upstream of meander bend
5
-
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander
(Glide)
5
5
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or scour and erosion
0 0 100 °��
0
0
o
100%
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass
2. Undercut
wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts
that are modest, appear sustainable and are
o
0 0 100 /0
0
0
0
100 /o
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0 0 100%
0
0
100%
'totals
T
0 0 100%
0
0
100 %
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged
boulders or logs.
4
4
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
grade across the sill.
4
4
o
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath
sills or arms.
2
?
100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
3. Bank Protection
influence does not exceed 15 %. (See guidance for
2
2
100%
this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool
Ad
4. Habitat
Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
2
2
100%
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
.
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KC[ Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 15 2014 - MY03

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Project Number and Name: 272 - Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek)
PlantedAcrea a 6.4 EasementAcrea a 7.5
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
% of Planted Acreage
Very limited cover of both woody
Pattern and
1. Bare Areas
0.1 acres
0
0.00
o
0.0%
and herbaceous material.
Color
Woody stem densities clearly below
2. Low Stem Density
Pattern and
target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5
0.1 acres
2
0.14
2.2%
Areas
Color
stem count criteria.
Wr 2,
0,14
Areas with woody stems of a size
3. Areas of Poor
Pattern and
class that are obviously small given
0.25 acres
0
0.00
0.0%
Growth Rates or Vigor
Color
the monitoring ear.
Cumulative Total
2
0.14
4. Invasive Areas of Areas or points (if too small to
Pattern and
1000 SF
0
0.00
0.0%
Concern render as polygons at map scale).
Color
5. Easement Areas or points (if too small to
Pattern and
Encroachment Areas render as polygons at map scale).
none
Color
0
0.00
0.0%
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 16 2014 - MY03

Stream Station Photos
PP #1 - MY01- 1/19/10
PP #1 - MY03 - 10/22/14
PP #2A - MY01- 1/19/10
PP #2A - MY03 - 10/22/14
PP #2B MY01 1/ 19/10
PP #2B MY03 10/22/14
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCIAssociates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 17 2014 - MY03

PP #3A - MY01 - 1/19/10
PP #3A - MY03 - 10/22/14
PP #3B - MY01 - 1/19/10
PP #3B - MY03 - 10/22/14
PP #4 MY01 - 1/19/10
PP #4 - MY03 - 10/22/14
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCIAssociates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 18 2014 - MY03

PP #5 - MY01 - 1/19/10
PP #5 - MY03 - 10/22/14
PP #6A - MY01- 1/19/10
PP #6A - MY03 - 10/22/14
PP #6B - MY01- 1/19/10
PP #6B - MY03 - 10/22/14
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCIAssociates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 19 2014 - MY03

PP #7A - MY01 - 1/19/10
PP #7A - MY03 - 10/22/14
PP #7B - MY01 - 1/19/10
PP #7B - MY03 - 10/22/14
PP #8A - MY01 - 1/19/10
PP #8A - MY03 - 10/22/14
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCIAssociates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 20 2014 - MY03

PP #8B - MY01 - 1/19/10
PP #8B - MY03 - 10/22/14
PP #9A - MY01- 1/19/10
PP #9A - MY03 - 10/22/14
PP #9B - MY01 - 1/19/10
PP #9B - MY03 - 10/22/14
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCIAssociates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 21 2014 - MY03

PP #9C - MY01- 1/19/10
PP #9C - MY03 - 10/22/14
PP #10 - MY01- 1/19/10
PP #10 - MY03 - 10/22/14
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCIAssociates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 22 2014 - MY03

Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Plot 1 Photo — Taken looking southeast from the
plot origin. MY03 — 10/22/14
Plot 2 Photo — Taken looking south from the plot
origin. MY03 — 10/22/14
Plot 3 Photo — Taken looking east from the plot
origin. MY03 — 10/22/14
Plot 4 Photo — Taken looking south from the plot
origin. MY03 — 10/22/14
Plot 5 Photo — Taken looking east from the plot
origin MY03 — 10/22/14
Plot 6 Photo — Taken looking south from the plot
origin. MY03 — 10/22/14
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCIAssociates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 23 2014 - MY03

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 24 2014 - MY03

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Project Number and Name: 272 - Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek)
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survlval Threshold Met?
1
No
2
No
3
No
4
No
5
No
6
Yes
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Project Number and Name: 272 - Northgate Park (Fllerbe Creek)
Report Prepared By
Tommy Seel i nger
Date Prepared
1/27/2015 14:38
database name
KCI- 2014 - Elerbe.mdb
database location
M: \2014 \16146867 NGP Monitoring
computer name
12- 3ZV4FP1
file size
148521216
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT ------------
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s)
and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This
excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes
live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural /volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems,
missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor bySpp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted by each.
Damage bySpp
Damagevalues tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead
and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural
volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY-------------------------------------
Project Code
272
project Name
Ellerbe Creek
Description
Stream and Buffer Restoration and Enhancement
River Basin
Neuse
length(ft)
2200
stream -to -edge width (ft)
40
area (sq m)
16349.28
Required Plots (calculated)
6
Sampled Plots
16
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 25 2014 - MY03

Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
Project Number and Name: 272 - North gate Park (Merbe Creek)
Current Plot Data (MY3 2014)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
E272 -A -0001
E272 -A -0002
E272 -A -0003
E272 -A -0004
E272 -A -0005
E272 -A -0006
MY3 (2014)
MY2 (2010)
MY1(2009)
Pno
P -all
T
Pno
P -all
T
Pno
P -all
T
Pno
P -all
T
Pno
P -all
T
Pno
P -all
T
Pno
P -all
T
Pno
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer
maple
Tree
5
5
5
Acernegundo
boxelder
Tree
1
1
Acerrubrum
red maple
Tree
3
3
6
1
Acersacchorum
sugar maple
Tree
1
3
31
3
1
1
1
1
1 3
1
1 31
3
61
41
4
5
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
1
2
1
1
12
1
1
15
54
3
3
3
Aronia arbutifolia
Red Chokeberry
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
Bacchoris halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
1
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
3
1
6
15
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
1
3
1
1
5
8
8
8
9
9
9
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
Cornus
dogwood
Shrub or Tree
1
3
3
3
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
2
2
4
4
6
2
3
3
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
3
3
3
3
4
4
6
7
7
12
10
10
10
2
2
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
20
7
5
1
33
1
1
30
1
1
1
Ilex cornuta
Chinese holly
Exotic
1
1
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
1
3
1 2
1
11
8
Juniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
1
1
2
23
2
1
2
2
3
3
3
31
5
5
6
5
5
5
Liquidambarstyrocifluo
sweetgum
Tree
69
62
28
14
16
189
144
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
20
1
6
6
2
2
3
2
2
36
4
4
9
5
5
5
Morus alba
white mulberry
Exotic
4
1
1
1
6
Oxydendrum arboreum
sourwood
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Physocarpus
ninebark
Shrub
1
1
Pinus toeda
loblolly pine
Tree
10
29
53
6
2
26
126
4
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
1
10
3
18
1
1
30
1
1
1
Prunus virginiana
chokecherry
Shrub
1
1
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1 41
1
Quercus coccinea
scarlet oak
Tree
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
9
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
6
6
9
9
9
12
12
12
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
3
31
3
3
41
3
3
3
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
11
11
2
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
1
1
1
4
1
1
5
2
2
2
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
1
1
2
1
1
11
1
1
1
Spiraea
spirea
Shrub
11
11
11
Symphoricarpos orbicu
coralberry
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
2
2
Ulmus
elm
Tree
1
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
1
1
1
1
1 3
Ulmus parvifolia
IChinese elm
Tree
1
1
Unknown
I
Shrub or Tree
1
2
2
2
14
14
14
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
4
4
139
7
7
93
0
01
153
2
2
61
6
61
31
8
8
63
27
27
540
57
57
361
85
89
89
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
0.02
0.02
1 0.02
1 0.02
0.02
0.02
1 0.15
0.15
0.15
21
21
15
31
3
171
01
01
15
2
2
11
2
2
8
41
41
12
10
10
31
17
17
26
20
22
22
162
162
5625
283
283
3764
0
0
6192
80.9
80.9
2469
243
243
1255
324
324
2550
182
1821364J2
384
384
2435
573
600
600
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCIAssociates ofNorth Carolina
EEP Project # 272 26 2014 - MY03

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCIAssociates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 27 2014 - MP03

Cross - Section Plots
River Basin:
Elevation
Watershed:
Neuse
XS ID
XS - 1, Reach 1, Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi):
5.9
Date:
1/7/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, A. Eason
7.6
299.66
9.3
299.25
n
a:
14.5
298.25
16.7
298.42
r
297.93
19.0
297.65
20.2
297.30
IliM�l
296.33
23.7
295.73
24.2
294.67
l
294.57
27.4
294.30
28.5
294.16
30.0
294.10
31.8
294.06
33.7
293.95
35.9
293.93
37.7
294.18
40.3
294.53
41.8
295.13
42.5
296.30
44.8
297.54
46.7
298.22
49.0
299.54
-
Neuse River
Basin, Ellerbe Creek, MY03, XS - 1, Reach 1, Riffle
303
301
-- - - - - -- --------------------------------------------------
- - - - -- --
299
0
297 -------------------------
---------------------- - - - - -- --
-- - - - - --
w
- Bankfull
- - - -Flood Prone Area
295
MY01, 1/15/10
MY02, 9/14/10
51.3
300.58
■ MY03. 1/7/15
293
0 10
20 30 40
50
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
Watershed:
Ellerbe Creek, MY03
XS ID
XS - 1, Reach 1, Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi):
5.9
Date:
1/7/2015
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger, A. Eason
Station
Elevation
0.0
302.61
0.3
302.40
2.6
302.24
4.0
302.23
5.7
301.01
7.6
299.66
9.3
299.25
11.3
298.37
14.5
298.25
16.7
298.42
17.8
297.93
19.0
297.65
20.2
297.30
21.9
296.33
23.7
295.73
24.2
294.67
25.5
294.57
27.4
294.30
28.5
294.16
30.0
294.10
31.8
294.06
33.7
293.95
35.9
293.93
37.7
294.18
40.3
294.53
41.8
295.13
42.5
296.30
44.8
297.54
46.7
298.22
49.0
299.54
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
296.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
51.4
Bankfull Width:
22.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
299.9
Flood Prone Width:
42.7
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.3
W / D Ratio:
10.1
Entrenchment Ratio:
1.9
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Neuse
Watershed:
Ellerbe Creek, MY03
XS ID
XS - 2, Reach 1, Pool
Drainage Area (sq mi):
5.9
Date:
1/7/2015
Field Crew:
IT. Seelinger, A. Eason
Station
Elevation
0.0
302.1
0.5
301.8
2.5
301.6
4.4
301.1
6.3
300.5
8.4
299.4
10.2
298.6
12.2
298.2
14.8
298.1
17.3
298.3
19.6
298.0
20.9
297.7
21.8
296.9
23.0
295.9
24.5
294.8
25.5
294.5
26.3
293.8
28.2
293.0
30.1
292.9
32.3
292.7
33.9
292.5
35.4
292.6
37.0
293.0
38.5
293.4
41.2
294.2
42.5
294.7
43.1
296.5
44.7
297.5
46.9
298.6
49.3
299.7
52.0
300.6
55.4
301.6
57.4
301.6
57.6
301.9
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
297.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
89.1
Bankfull Width:
24.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
-
Flood Prone Width:
-
Max Depth at Bankfull:
5.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
3.6
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Hei ht Ratio:
-
Neuse River Basin, Ellerbe Creek, MY03, XS - 2, Reach 1, Pool
303
301
299
297
ti
W
295
- - • Bankfull
MY01, 1 115 110
293
MY02, 9/14/10
MY03, 1/7/15
291
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Neuse
Watershed:
Ellerbe Creek, MY03
XS ID
XS - 3, Reach 1, Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi):
5.9
Date:
11/21/2015
Field Crew:
IT. Seelinger, A. French
Station
Elevation
0.0
300.19
1.7
299.85
4.9
298.89
9.3
297.96
13.9
296.78
17.1
296.70
18.8
296.90
20.9
297.15
24.0
296.67
26.3
296.13
27.1
294.15
27.3
293.19
28.9
292.70
31.0
292.21
32.9
291.89
35.0
291.97
36.8
291.92
38.7
291.77
40.5
291.83
42.9
291.84
44.4
291.88
46.0
292.12
47.3
292.70
48.3
293.42
50.0
294.69
52.6
295.72
55.1
296.95
59.4
296.80
64.5
296.81
68.4
296.96
72.3
298.50
76.1
300.36
80.9
300.60
82.6
300.77
82.6
301.75
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
296.1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
98.5
Bankfull Width:
28.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
300.5
Flood Prone Width:
74.6
Max Depth at Bankfull:
4.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
3.4
W / D Ratio:
8.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.6
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
* =pins reset for MY03 due to construction activity on site
Neuse River Basin, Ellerbe Creek, MY03, XS - 3, Reach 1, Riffle
302
300
- ---------------------------------------------------- - -
- - -- - -
298
296
- - - - - - -- - - -- ------------------ -- ------------
- - - - -- -- --
W
294
• Bankfull
- - • Flood Prone Area
292
MY01, 1115110
MY02, 9/14/10
290
t MY03 *, 1/21/15
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
70 80
Station (feet)
* =pins reset for MY03 due to construction activity on site

River Basin:
Elevation
Neuse
300.19
A.
Watershed:
4.9
Ellerbe Creek, MY03
9.3
XS ID
T. Seelin er, A. French
XS - 4, Reach 2, Riffle
296.70
18.8
Drainage Area (sq mi):
5.9
297.15
24.0
Date:
26.3
1/21/2015
27.1
i,
27.3
293.19
28.9
292.70
31.0
292.21
32.9
291.89
35.0
291.97
36.8
291.92
38.7
291.77
40.5
291.83
42.9
291.84
44.4
291.88
46.0
292.12
47.3
292.70
48.3
293.42
50.0
294.69
52.6
295.72
55.1
296.95
59.4
296.80
64.5
296.81
68.4
296.96
72.3
298.50
76.1
300.36
80.9
300.60
82.6
300.77
82.6
301.75
` - -
- -_
Neuse River Basin, Ellerbe
Creek, MY03, XS - 4, Reach 2, Riffle
302
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
300
298
296 ----- - - - - -- --
-------------
- - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ------- - - - - --
ti
W 294
- - - • Bankfull
- - • Flood Prone Area
292
MY01, 1/15/10
MY02, 9/15/10
�- MY03 *, 1/21/2015
290
0 10 20
30
40 50 60 70 80
Station (feet)
*=pins reset for MY03 due to construction activity on site
Station
Elevation
0.0
300.19
1.7
299.85
4.9
298.89
9.3
Field Crew:
T. Seelin er, A. French
Station
Elevation
0.0
300.19
1.7
299.85
4.9
298.89
9.3
297.96
13.9
296.78
17.1
296.70
18.8
296.90
20.9
297.15
24.0
296.67
26.3
296.13
27.1
294.15
27.3
293.19
28.9
292.70
31.0
292.21
32.9
291.89
35.0
291.97
36.8
291.92
38.7
291.77
40.5
291.83
42.9
291.84
44.4
291.88
46.0
292.12
47.3
292.70
48.3
293.42
50.0
294.69
52.6
295.72
55.1
296.95
59.4
296.80
64.5
296.81
68.4
296.96
72.3
298.50
76.1
300.36
80.9
300.60
82.6
300.77
82.6
301.75
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
296.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
98.5
Bankfull Width:
28.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
300.9
Flood Prone Width:
>75
Max Depth at Bankfull:
4.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
3.4
W / D Ratio:
8.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
>3.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Neuse
Watershed:
Ellerbe Creek, MY03
XS ID
XS - 5, Reach 2, Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi):
5.9
Date:
11/21/2015
Field Crew:
IT. Seelinger, A. French
Station
Elevation
0.0
297.88
0.1
296.86
4.1
296.83
7.7
296.74
11.6
296.70
15.6
296.52
18.0
296.42
19.3
295.44
21.2
294.07
21.9
293.77
21.8
293.05
23.3
293.16
24.6
293.00
27.1
292.79
28.1
292.82
29.1
292.81
30.7
292.95
32.2
292.94
33.3
292.93
34.7
293.07
35.9
293.07
37.5
293.09
38.4
293.09
39.2
293.38
40.3
293.68
41.8
294.12
44.0
293.88
46.0
293.59
47.2
294.06
48.7
295.21
51.8
295.89
55.1
296.00
59.5
296.24
62.0
296.22
62.1
296.99
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
296.3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
87.4
Bankfull Width:
33.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
300.3
Flood Prone Width:
>90
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.6
W / D Ratio:
12.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
>2.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
* =pins reset for MY03 due to construction activity on site
Neuse River Basin, Ellerbe Creek, MY03, XS - 5, Reach 2, Riffle
301
------------------------------------------------------------------------
299
297
o
-- -------- - - - - -- ----------------- - - - - --
----- - - - - --
295
ti
W
- - • Bankfull
- - - • Flood Prone Area
293
MY01, 1 /15 /10
MY02, 9/15/10
291
MY03 *, 1/21/15
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
80 90
Station (feet)
* =pins reset for MY03 due to construction activity on site

H
Z
O
d
W
W
W
304
303
302
301
300
299
298
297
296
295
294
293
292
291
290
■
■
Longitudinal Profile
Ellerbe Creek
EEP Project Number 272- MY03
Stations 10 +00 - 20 +00
SBKF _ - 0.0008x + 299.38
- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 23 — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — _ Sws = -0.001 Ix + 296.68
—
■
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900
STATION (FT)
As- Built, 1/09 MY -01, 1115110 MY -02, 9/14/10 MY -03, 1/21/15 — — — Water Surface ■ Bankfull A In- Stream Structures
2000

300
299
298
297
296
295
Pro
z
293
H
d�
a292
W
291
290
289
288
287
286
■
■
Longitudinal Profile
Ellerbe Creek
EEP Project Number 272- MY03
Stations 20 +00 - 33 +00
SBA _ - 0.0019x + 301.82 ■
■
constructed riffles ■
_ SWS = - O.00lx + 296.19
- / --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J�]�
( 111 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A- - - - - - - - - - - -
2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300
STATION (FT)
As- Built, 1/09 MY -01, 1115110 AMY -03, 1/21/15 - - - Water Surface ■ Bankfull o In- Stream Structures

Pebble Count Plots
Cross - Section 1 Riffle - MY03
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Ellerbe Creek
XS 1 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
2
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50-1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
19
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2 - 4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8-11.3
11.3-16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
2
80%
—� MY01
2
2
ro 60%
40%
t MY02
T MY03
8
8
13
u
0
13
4
20%
0%
4
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128-180
180-256
C
O
B
L
12
0.01
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
ID95
0.1
Size (mm)
0.93
15
24
62
110
170 1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
Size Distribution
mean 0.3
dispersion 1.3
skewness 0.00
1000 10000
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
2%
16%
47%
34%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
19
5
4
Small
Small
Medium
Lrg- Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
1
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
1
jr
Total
118
Note:

Cross- Section 2 Pool - MY03
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Ellerbe Creek
XS 2 Pool
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50-1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
1
37
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2 - 4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8-11.3
11.3-16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
1
ro
80%
60%
—� MY01
1
1
1
40%
t MYOz
1
2
3
3
20%
6
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128-180
180-256
C
O
B
L
9
0%
0.01
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
ID95
0.1
Size (mm)
0.66
0.95
43
89
150
200
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
Size Distribution
mean 0.3
dispersion 1.4
skewness -0.03
1000 10000
Type
silt/clay 0%
sand 38%
gravel 19%
cobble 43%
boulder 1%
bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%
13
15
6
Small
Small
Medium
Lrg- Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
1
t
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
101
Note:

Cross - Section 3 Riffle - MY03
Particle Size Distribution
Ellerbe Creek
XS 3 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
(,
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50-1
1 1 -2
S
A
N
D
S
1
17
42
2
100%
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2 - 4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8-11.3
11.3-16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
2
80%
6o i° °
MY02
1
1
2
4
w
t MY
t MY03
40%
0
4
1
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
Size mm
D16 0.18
D35 0.30
D50 0.38
D65 0.49
D84 48
D95 100
1 10 loo
Particle Size - Millimeters
Size Distribution
mean 2.9
dispersion 57.4
skewness 0.57
1000 10000
Type
silt/clay 6%
sand 62%
gravel 21%
cobble 11%
boulder 0%
bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%
6
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128-180
180-256
C
O
B
L
3
8
Small
Small
Medium
Lrg- Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
Total
100
Note:

Cross - Section 4 Riffle - MY03
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Ellerbe Creek
XS 4 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
33
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50-1
1 1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
1
10
47
2
>
1
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2 - 4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8-11.3
11.3-16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
2
80%
60 /° °
�MYO1
2
2
1
w
t MY02
t MYOs
40%
0
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
Size mm
D16 0.062
D35 0.14
D50 0.28
D65 0.34
D84 0.46
D95 3.9
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
Size Distribution
mean 0.2
dispersion 3.7
skewness 0.45
1000 10000
Type
silt/clay 33%
sand 60%
gravel 7%
cobble 0%
boulder 0%
bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128-180
180-256
C
O
B
L
Small
Small
Medium
Lrg- Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
IF—Total
101
Note:

Cross
- Section 5 Riffle
- MY03
l00%
Particle Size Distribution
Ellerbe Creek
XS 5 Riffle
Particle
Millimeter
Count
Silt/Clay
< 0.062
S/C
Very Fine
Fine
Medium
Coarse
Very Coarse
.062-.125
.125-.25
.25-.50
.50-1
1 - 2
S
A
N
D
S
1
4
Very Fine
Fine
Fine
Medium
Medium
Coarse
Coarse
Very Coarse
Very Coarse
2 - 4
4-5.7
5.7-8
8-11.3
11.3-16
16-22.6
22.6-32
32-45
45-64
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
80%
60%
4
�
w
MY02
t MY03
2
4
40%
0
2
6
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
*constructed riffle installed before start of MY03
23
Small
Small
Large
Large
64-90
90-128
128-180
180-256
C
O
B
L
14
10
20
11
Small
Small
Medium
Lrg- Very Lrg
256-362
362-512
512- 1024
1024-2048
B
L
D
R
2
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
I D95
Size mm
22
54
71
110
170
230
Size Distribution
mean 0.1
dispersion 3.1
skewness 0.42
Type
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
5%
41%
52%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Bedrock
>2048
BDRK
JF
Total
105
Note:

Table 10. Baseline - Stream Data Summary Table
Project Number and Name: 272 - Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek)
Segment Reach: Reach 1 (1,520 ft.)
Parameter
USGS Gage Data
Regional Curve
Interval
Pre - Existing Condition
Project Reference
Stream
Designs
As -built
Dimension
Min
Max
Mean
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Mean
Min
Max
Mean
Min
Max
Mean
Min
Max
Mean
Bankfull Width (ft)
30.8
13.5
30.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
60
300
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft 2)
118.6
30.8
54.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
3.9
2.3
1.8
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft)
4.6
3.8
2.5
Width/Depth Ratio
8.0
5.9
16.7
Entrenchment Ratio
1.9
22.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.7
0.9
1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
50
100
50
125
40
60
Radius of Curvature (ft)
150
180
16
30
165
180
Meander Wavelength (ft)
700
1000
115
200
700
1000
Meander Width Ratio
1.6
3.2
3.7
9.3
1.3
2.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.014
0.005
0.002
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
45
521
45
93
83
172
S u bstrate
d50 (mm)
d84 (mm)
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
Channel Length (ft)
1,466
1,466
Sinuosity
1.02
1.33
1.01
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
0.0009
0.0019
0.0006
BF Slope (ft /ft)
Rosgen Classification
G5c
E5
C5
Note: The Pre - Existing Condition and Project Reference Stream Data are the same for both reaches and are from the Restoration Plan document. The Design data are also
from the Restoration Plan, except for the Dimension Parameter, which is from the Construction Plans. As -Built data were not taken due to project delays.
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 40 2014 - MY03

Table 10. Baseline - Stream Data Summary Table
Project Number and Name: 272 - Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek)
Segment Reach: Reach 2 (750 ft.)
Parameter
USGS Gage Data
Regional Curve
Interval
Pre - Existing Condition
Project Reference
Stream
Design
As -built
Dimension
Min
Max
Mean
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Mean
Min Max
Mean
Min
Max
Mean
Min
Max
Mean
Bankfull Width (ft)
30.8
13.5
40.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
60
300
1
1
A
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft 2)
118.6
0
30.8
75.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
3.9
2.3
1.9
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft)
4.6
3.8
2.8
Width/Depth Ratio
8.0
5.9
21.1
Entrenchment Ratio
1.9
22.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.7
0.9
1.0
Pattern
Channel Bchwidth (ft)
50
100
50
125
80
100
Radius of Curvature (ft)
150
180
16
30
63
100
Meander Wavelength (ft)
700
1000
115
200
260
300
Meander Width Ratio
1.6
3.2
3.7
9.3
3.2
4.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.014
0.005-IF
0.001
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
45
521
45
93
83
172
S u bstrate
d50 (mm)
d84 (mm)
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
'
Channel Length (ft)
1,466
690
Sinuosity
1.02
1.33
1.02
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
0.0009
0.0019
0.0005
BF Slope (ft /ft)
Rosgen Classification
G5c
E5
C5
Note: The Pre - Existing Condition and Project Reference Stream Data are the same for both reaches and are from the Restoration Plan document. The Design data are also
from the Restoration Plan, except for the Dimension Parameter, which is from the Construction Plans. As -Built data were not taken due to project delays.
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 41 2014 - MY03

Table 10. Baseline - Stream Data Summary Table
Project Number and Name: 272 — Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek)
Segment Reach: UT 3 (117 ft.)
Parameter
USGS Gage Data
Regional Curve
Interval
Pre - Existing Condition
Project Reference
Stream
Design
As -built
Dimension
Min
Max
Mean
Min
Max
Med
Min
Max
Mean
Min Max
Mean
Min
Max
Mean
Min
Max
Mean
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.5
3.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
300
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft 2)
30.8
1.5
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.3
0.5
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft)
3.8
0.7
Width/Depth Ratio
5.9
6.4
Entrenchment Ratio
22.2
Bank Height Ratio
0.9
1.0
Pattern
Channel Bchwidth (ft)
50
125
Radius of Curvature (ft)
16
30
Meander Wavelength (ft)
115
200
Meander Width Ratio
3.7
9.3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.005
Pool Length (ft)
Pool Spacing (ft)
45
93
S u bstrate
d50 (mm)
d84 (mm)
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
Channel Length (ft)
117
Sinuosity
1.33
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
0.0019
BF Slope (ft /ft)
J
Rosgen Classification
7
E5
E5
Note: The Project Reference Stream Data are from the Restoration Plan document. The Design data are from the Construction Plans. There were no Pattern or Profile data
for UT3 in the Restoration Plan.
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 42 2014 - MY03

Table lla. Monitoring - Cross - Section Morphology Data Tables
Project Number and Name: 272 - Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek)
Segment Reach: Reach 1 (1,520 ft.) and Reach 2 (750 ft.)
Parameter
Cross- Section 1
Riffle - Reach 1
Cross- Section 2
Pool - Reach 1
Cross- Section 3
Riffle - Reach 1
Dimension
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3*
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) used
296.9
296.9
296.9
297.8
297.8
297.8
296.1
296.1
296.1
Bankfutl Width (ft)
24.0
23.8
22.8
28.5
29.2
24.7
25.0
23.8
28.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
42.0
42.0
42.7
1
-
-
-
62.0
62.0
74.6
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
45.0
43.1
51.4
82.4
77.3
89.1
53.4
63.4
98.5
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.9
1.8
2.3
2.9
2.6
3.6
2.1
2.7
3.4
Bankfall Maximum Depth (ft)
2.8
2.8
3.0
5.8
4.3
5.3
3.4
3.8
4.4
Width/Depth Ratio
12.8
13.1
10.1
-
-
-
11.7
8.9
8.4
Entrenchment Ratio
1.8
1.8
1.9
2.5
2.6
2.6
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross- Sectional Area Between End Pins (ft2)
-
188.5
178.6
-
250.3
262.5
-
327.4
326.1
d50 (mm)
A
1.2
1 0.35
24
0.08
0.33
43
L
1
0.06
0.39
1 0.38
Parameter
Cross- Section
Riffle -
4
Reach 2
Cross- Section 5
Riffle - Reach 2
Dimension
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3*
MY4
MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3*
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) used
296.4
296.4
296.4
296.3
296.3
296.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
25.2
28.4
28.7
1
36.1
26.9
33.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
>75
>75
>75
>90
>90
>90
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft 2)
80.2
84.9
98.5
82.0
1 81.2
87.4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
3.2
3.0
3.4
2.3
3.0
2.6
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft)
4.5
4.4
4.6
4.0
4.4
3.5
Width/Depth Ratio
7.9
9.5
8.4
15.9
8.9
12.8
Entrenchment Ratio
>3.0
>3.0
>3,0
>2.5
>2.5
>2.5
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross - Sectional Area Between End Pins (ft)
326.9
330.7
-
151.8
124.7
d50 (mm)
..IF
O.66
0.28
0.06
0.06
71
*= Cross - sections 3, 4, and 5 reset in October 2014, before MY3 survey
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 43 2014 - MY03

Table l lb. Monitoring - Stream Reach Morphology Data Table
Project Number and Name: 272 - Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek)
Segment Reach: Reach 1 (1,520 ft.)
Parameter
MY- 01 (2009)
MY- 02 (2010)
MY- 03 (2011)
MY- 04 (2012)
MY- 05 (2013)
Dimension
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
24.0
24.5
25.0
2
23.8
23.8
23.8
&
2
22.8
25.8
28.7
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
42.0
52.0
62.0
2
42.0
52.0
62.0
2
42.7
58.7
74.6
2
Bankf ill Mean Depth (ft)
1.9
2.0
2.1
2
1.8
2.3
2.7
2
2.3
2.8
3.4
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.8
3.1
3.4
2
2.8
3.3
3.8
2
3.0
3.7
4.4
2
Bankf ill Cross - Sectional Area (ft2)
45.0
49.2
53.4
2
43.1
53.3
63.4
2
51.4
75.0
98.5
2
Width/Depth Ratio
11.7
12.3
12.8
2
8.9
11.0
13.1
2
8.4
9.2
10.1
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.8
2.2
2.5
2
1.8
2.2
2.6
2
1.9
2.2
2.6
2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rad. of Curv.: Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
*
*
x
Meander Width Ratio
*
*
R
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
24.5
34.6
84.6
33.0
34.0
34.0
2
45.0
89.0
75.1
146.8
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.0000
0.0006
0.0010
0.0011
0.0010
0.0008
2
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.004
Pool Length (ft)
10.1
36.7
52.8
29.0
36.4
36.0
43.5
25.6
5
17.5
34.5
33.7
53.9
F0.0023
PoolMaxDepth(ft)
1.6
2.4
2.4
3.2
0.65
6
1.7
2.7
2.6
3.4
Pool Spacing(ft)
28.9
89.3
211.4
92.7
257.0
212.0
479.3
136.0
5
29.3
199.8
217.7
358.7
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
1,518
1,518
1,518
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,580
1,580
1,580
Sinuosity
1.04
1.04
1.04
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
0.0014
0.0014
0.0011
Bankfull Slope (ft /tt
0.0060
0.0008
Rosgen Classification
C5
C5
C5
Ri % /Ru % /P % /G % /S%
10/35/20/35/0
17/54/17/11/1
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
25/26/35/14/0/0
5/60/25/10/0/0
3/39/29/29/1/0
dl 6/d35/d50/d84/d95
0.062/0.15/1.2/51 /110
0.019/0.3/0.39/44 /94
0.6/5.4/23/51/103 /158
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
15%
0%
*Reach 1 was enhanced, and is not a meandering channel
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 44 2014 - MY03

Table llb. Monitoring - Stream Reach Morphology Data Table
Project Number and Name: 272 - Northgate Park (Fllerbe Creek)
Segment Reach: Reach 2 (750 ft.)
Parameter
MY- 01 (2009)
MY- 02 (2010)
MY- 03 (2011)
MY- 04 (2012)
MY- 05 (2013)
Dimension
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
I n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
I SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
I SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
25.2
30.7
36.1
2
23.8
25.4
28.4
2
28.7
31.1
33.5
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
36.1
55.55
75
2
42.0
68.5
90.0
2
>75
>90
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.3
2.7
3.2
2
1.8
2.8
3.0
2
2.6
3.0
3.4
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
4.0
1 4.3
4.5
2
2.8
1 4.1
4.4
2
3.5
1 4.0
1 4.6
1 2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
80.2
81.1
82.0
2
43.1
72.3
84.9
2
87.4
93.0
98.5
2
WidthMepth Ratio
7.9
11.9
15.9
2
8.9
9.2
13.1
2
8.4
10.6
12.8
2
Entrenchment Ratio
2.5
2.8
3.0
1 2
1.8
2.6
3.0
2
>2.5
>3.0
2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
59.0
74.0
94.0
0
Radius of Curvature (ft)
51.0
68.0
107.0
Rad. of Curv.: Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
237.0
276.0
303.0
Meander Width Ratio
2.1
2.7
3.4
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
9.2
16.1
29.2
12.1
154104.0
25.0
3
30.6
39.1
41213.91
2
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.001
0.001
0.00.003
3
0.003
0.006
0.2
Pool Length (ft)
18.4
66.9
91.3
64.0
80.0
73
3
57.1
71.9
71.9
9
3
PoolMaxDepth(ft)
2.5
2.9
2.3.6
3
2.7
4.1
3.4
3
PoolSpacing(ft)
67.7
156.6
183.7
154.8
170.0
185.7
2
167.2
254.1
32
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
658
658
658
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
710
710
710
Sinuosity
1.08
1.08
1.08
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
0.00017
0.0009
0.001
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.0005
0.0019
Rosgen Classification
C5
C5
C5
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
10/30/20/40/0
11/17/32/39/1
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
68/15/16/1/0/0
65/27/8/0/0/0
16/33/24/26/1/0
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95
0.062/0.062/.0062 /2.3/20
0.062/0.062/0.062 /0.4/16
11/27/36/55/85/117
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
41%
0%
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 45 2014 - MY03

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 46 2014 - MY03

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Project Number and Name: 272 - Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek)
Date of Data
Collection
Date of
Occurrence
Method
Photo
Number
6/14/2009
6/11/2009
Site visit to evaluate indicators of stage after storm event
N/A
11/11/2009
11/11/2009
Site visit to evaluate indicators of stage after storm event
N/A
12/25/2009
12/25/2009
Eye-witness account
N/A
1/25/2010
1/25/2010
Site visit to evaluate indicators of stage after storm event
N/A
5/17/2010
5/17/2010
Site visit to evaluate indicators of stage after storm event
N/A
9/30/2010
9/30/2010
Site visit to evaluate indicators of stage after storm event
N/A
6/30/2013
6/30/2013
Site visit to evaluate indicators of stage after storm event
1 -2
9/24/2014
9/24/2014
Site visit to evaluate indicators of stage during storm event
3 -4
Photo 1. Bankfull event 6/30/2013
Photo 2. Bankfull event 6/30/2013
Photo 3. Bankfull event 9/24/2014
Photo 4. Bankfull event 9/24/2014
Northgate Park (Ellerbe Creek) KCI Associates of North Carolina
EEP Project # 272 47 2014 - MY03