20120946 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_20150414

Annual Monitoring Report YEAR #4
Morgan Creek Floodplain (at Mason Farm)
Biological Preserve
Orange /Durham Counties, North Carolina
EEP Project #258
Contract # 16- 005217
MY — 04 Monitoring Report
Data Collected: September 2014
Submitted: December 2014
os stem
E'n ar ement
PROGRAM
Prepared for:
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
217 West Jones St. Suite 3000A
Raleigh, NC 27603

Annual Monitoring Report YEAR #4
Morgan Creek Floodplain (at Mason Farm)
Biological Preserve
Orange /Durham Counties, North Carolina
EEP Project #258
Contract # 16- 005217
MY — 04 Monitoring Report
Data Collected: September 2014
Submitted: December 2014
Prepared for:
North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
217 West Jones St. Suite 3000A
Raleigh, NC 27603
Prepared by:
r �]
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
P.O. Box 690429 Daw
E
o stem
Charlotte, NC 28227
MOGEN5EN MITIGATION, INC
an�ement
PROGRAM

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Executive Summary ........................... ...............................
II. Methodology .................................... ...............................
III. References ....................................... ...............................
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Project Vicinity Map & Background
Figure 1. Vicinity Map ............................. ...............................
Tables 1.1. Project Components .................. ...............................
Tables 1.2. Component Summations ............ ...............................
Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History ...............................
Table 3. Project Contact Table .................... ...............................
Table 4. Project Attributes Table ................. ...............................
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2. Current Conditions Plan View ........ ...............................
Figure 3. Flood Plain Assessment ................ ...............................
Tables 5.0 -5.1 Vegetation Condition Assessment .............................
Photo's (Veg. Plots & Berm Openings) ......... ...............................
1
5
6
8
9
9
10
11
12
14
15
16
18
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Criterion Attainment ............................... 29
Table 7. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata ...... ............................... 30
Table 8. CVS Stem Count Total & Planted .... ............................... 31
Appendix D. Hydrologic Data
Tables 9.0 -9.1. Verification of Bankfull Events . ............................... 33
Table 10. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment .......................... 33
Figures 4.0 -4.6. Groundwater Gauge Charts ..... ............................... 34
Appendix E. USGS Stream Data
2014 Stream Data from USGS Station ID#02097517 ..................... 43

I. Executive Summary
The Morgan Creek Floodplain Site (Site) is located on the Mason Farm Biological Reserve
(MFBR) and is owned by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. It was constructed for
the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). The design was done by Ward
Consulting Engineers, P.C. and constructed by Riverworks, Inc. The fourth year monitoring was
done in September 2014 by Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. (MMI). Monitoring was done in
conformance with the NCEEP Monitoring Report Template_ Version 1.5—adopted 8 June 2012
and monitoring requirements issued by the NCIRT in November 7, 2011 and can be found at
http: // portal .ncdenr.org /c /document library/get file?p I id= 1169848 &f6lderld = 2288101 &nam
e= DLFE- 39234.pdf. The Site is located on the MFBR immediately adjacent to A. E. Finley Golf
Course and down the road from the North Carolina Botanical Garden. The Site is in the Morgan
Creek Local Watershed planning area and is in the Cape Fear River (Haw) 14 -digit HUC
03030002060080. The Site has been used for biological research for UNC — Chapel Hill.
Restoration actions included the construction of berm openings to increase flood water access to
the floodplain behind the artificial berm along Morgan Creek. The project involved 14.37 acres
of wetlands, the preservation of 5.61 acres of wetlands and preservation of 3200 linear feet of
riparian buffer along the south bank of Morgan Creek. The Catena Group delineated the wetland
preservation area in 2005 and the reference wetland in February 2008, neither of which were
verified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
PROJECT GOALS & OBJECTIVES:
Goals
1. Facilitate regular flooding of the Morgan Creek floodplain behind the berm;
2. Promote attenuation of sediment and nutrients on the flood plain;
3. Reduce downstream flooding by creating additional storm water detention;
4. Reduce erosion by limiting flooding shear stress on Morgan Creek banks ;
5. Restore more natural hydrology to 14.37 acres of impacted wetlands;
6. Preserve 5.61 acres of existing forested wetlands;
7. Re- establish a natural plant community through plantings and invasive species control;
8. Preserve 3200 linear feet of riparian buffer on the south bank of Morgan Creek.
Objectives
1. Create five (5) stable openings in the existing artificial berm to allow flood waters to
access the conservation easement area;
2. Successfully plant 14.37 acres of bottomland hardwood wetlands with native desirable
trees and shrubs;
3. Demonstrate jurisdictional hydrology in 14.37 restored wetland acres by measuring
groundwater through RDS continuous read monitoring gauges;
4. Preserve the entire Site through means of a conservation easement or deed restrictions in
perpetuity.
Five vegetation plots were located, flagged and monitored using Version 4.2 of the CVS -EEP
Level 2 Vegetation Monitoring Protocol. The success criterion specified in the mitigation plan
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 1 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

requires a minimum survival rate of 288 stems per acre for MY 4. During MY 5 the success
criterion drops to 260 stems /per acre.
All vegetation data was collected in September 2014. Based on the overall vegetation count data
for MY 4 there is a mean density of 194 planted stems /acre surviving. The mean density of
surviving planted stems and naturally occurring stems combined is 777 stems /acre. All five
vegetation plots fell short of meeting the 288 stems /per acre target this year, with three of them
failing by greater than 10%. The overall low density of surviving planted trees is supplemented
with a good survival of desirable native volunteer species except for Plot 5 which is overgrown
with Japanese stiltgrass ( Microstegium vimineum) and Johnson grass. All plots exhibited natural
regeneration of woody species, with stem densities of natural stems ranging from 283 to 1295
stems /acre. Native species observed in plots include green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), red elm
(ulmus rubra), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), silky dogwood (cornus amomum), and
persimmon (Diospyrus virginiana). It is important to note that given prolific regeneration of
volunteer native species resulting in an overall stem density of 777 stems /acre, NCEEP does not
anticipate supplemental planting of this site. Data collected for all the plots are included in
Appendix C. Problem vegetation areas were observed and photographed. These areas were
dominated by microstegium, Japanese honesuckle (Lonicera japonica) and the invasive shrub
buckthorn (Rhamnus davurica). Other invasive species observed included kudzu (Pueraria
Montana), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), Chinese lespedeza (Lespedeza sp.), multiflora
rose (Rosa multiflora) and porcelain berry (Ampelopsis brevipedunculata). The NCEEP is
actively treating Kudzu and porcelain berry on this site through an invasive species management
contract. Japanese stilt grass is ubiquitous throughout the site and is problematic but would be
very difficult to treat. The areas of problematic invasive species are noted as `VPAF on Figure
2. Vegetation Plot 5 is dominated by microstegium and is noted as `VPA2'. The low survival
rates of planted stems in Plots 2, 3, 4 & 5 are noted on Figure 2, notwithstanding the prolific
regeneration of natural stems in some of these areas, as noted in the text above.
Significant Flood Events
MMI began monitoring the Morgan Creek
Floodplain in the late summer of 2013. Several
significant flood events have taken place since the
data collection began this fall. Previous year's
monitoring reports note that there have been multiple
storm events which have successfully flooded the
conservation easement area through the berm
openings. MY 2 report prepared by Ward
Engineering, PC indicated that flood events that
reach 7.8 feet above normal water surface elevation
allows water to access the flood plain through the
berm openings. MMI has accessed the USGS Stream Gauge #02097517 and according to this
data flood stage reached 8 feet above normal water surface once (two consecutive days) in 2013
although none of those events occurred during the MMI monitoring time frame. Data from this
Gauge for 2014 are reported in Appendix E. Each significant flood event that occurred in 2014
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 2 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

was registered on the 5 crest stage gauges located at the berm openings. These occurrences are
included in Table 9, below.
MMI has installed manual crest stage gauges (CSG) at each
berm opening and have checked these after each significant
flood event. Each significant storm event crest elevation is
noted using the CSGs and comparing it to the USGS stream
gauge and precipitation data. The average flood height
measured on the five (5) crest stage gauges was 30 inches
during the fall monitoring. Due to the constriction through
the berm gap openings we have incorporated a correction
factor of negative 6 inches. Therefore, we have used a flood
height water surface elevation of 24 inches above the
existing ground elevation through each berm gap opening
during any flood event that accessed the flood plain. The
predicted flow pattern for a typical flood event is
extrapolated across the gently sloping flood plain and is
shown on Figure 3. The 24" water height flowing through
each berm gap opening was assumed to become gradually
shallower across the floodplain due to loss of head. This
elevation would range from 2 feet at the berm openings then
down to the receiving ditch that is at the back of the
floodplain. Due to the shape of the floodplain and the
associated existing berm it is assumed that the 24" water
depth is maintained for a larger area at the downstream most
portion of the project, as shown on Figure 3.
Wetland Hydrology
Nine RDS Groundwater gauges were installed according to the Technical Note HY- IA-3.1
(USACE 1993). The gauges record data every 24 hours and are downloaded quarterly. Seven
gauges are located within or immediately adjacent to the conservation easement area and one is a
reference gauge located off site. Gauge #8 was located approximately 1400 ft due south from
gauge #1 in an area referred to as the "Big Oak Woods" area. It was located quite a distance from
the conservation easement and therefore was abandoned according to Perry Sugg (NCEEP
Project Manager). The location is shown on "Figure 4 - Restoration Site Hydrologic Features and
Gauge locations" from the mitigation plan prepared by Becky Ward & Associates. Five gauges
(1, 2, 4, 5 and 6) are in Wetland Restoration Soil Unit 1 where groundwater is expected to be
within 12" of the surface for at least 12.5% of the growing season (27 consecutive days). Two
gauges (3 and 9) are located in Wetland Restoration Soil Unit 2 where the groundwater is
expected to be within 12" of the surface for at least 5% of the growing season (11 consecutive
days). According to the NRCS -USDA the growing season runs from March 27 to November 3
which is 221 days (0.125 x 221 = 27 days & 221 x 0.05 = 11 days). Gauge #7 was originally
installed in the reference wetland but was moved to a new location due to beaver activity and
was referred to as #10 in the MY3 report. This gauge ( #10) was submerged in spring 2014,
however it was subsequently located in the fall in a damaged condition and has been returned to
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 3 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

EEP for a replacement. Therefore, no data was available for this reference gauge for this MY 4
Report. NCEEP has replaced gauge #10 which will provide data for the MY5 monitoring report.
In an effort to further delineate the hydrology in Wetland Restoration Area Soil Unit2, NCEEP
installed three additional groundwater gauges (wells a -c) in October 2014. The locations of these
new wells have been added to the appropriate MY4 visual assessment figures, however data
from these new wells are not included in the MY4 monitoring report. NCEEP will be responsible
for downloading data from these three new wells and providing it to MMI for incorporation into
the MY5 annual report.Precipitation data was not collected from the onsite rain bucket gauge due
to a malfunctioning bucket, which was removed at NCEEPs direction in 2013. Therefore onsite
rainfall data from this rain gage was not available for the year. We have supplemented the site
data with data from the NC Climate Office (Station name: Chapel Hill — Williams Airport. A
USGS stream gauge located 1500 feet upstream of the Site (Station ID 0209517) was used to
correlate precipitation data and with groundwater gauge data and is shown in the Groundwater
Gauge Charts in Appendix E.
The data from the RDS gauges indicates nearly all gauges have achieved jurisdictional
hydrologic success criteria. The exception is Gauge # 3, which recorded groundwater depths
within 12 inches of the surface for only 3% of the growing season. All other gauges achieved
jurisdictional hydrology for more the 12.5% of the growing season with gauge #'s 1, 5 & 6
exceeding 20 %. Visually comparing these data to previous years' monitoring reports shows a
clear trend toward reaching jurisdictional hydrology in all the wetland areas being monitored.
Problem Areas
The following is a summary of other problem areas (other than vegetation survival and invasive
species) such as beaver encroachment, status of berm openings and anthropomorphic impacts.
No beaver activity was observed during the numerous site visits made this fall.
There is evidence of passive recreation by pedestrians but this is limited to walking on the
mowed paths so no problems exist at this time.
Several berm openings have erosion problems
especially Berm Opening #1 (see photo) which has
a significant pool that has eroded out. The erosion
at Berm Gap #1 is getting noticeably worse and ha
completely washed out the adjacent hiking trail (see
picture). This should be repaired as well as the other
berm openings that are experiencing erosion issues
(Berm Opening's #2 & #3). Berm Opening's #4 &
#5 are in reasonably good condition. Photos of all
Berm openings can be found in the Site Photo's in
Appendix B. NCEEP is scheduled to perform
maintenance repairs on Berm Openings #'s 1 -4
during MY5.
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 4 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

II. Methodology
All photos were taken with a Nikon digital camera and are available electronically. A Trimble
Hand Held GPS unit was used to locate veg. plot corners, groundwater gauges and problem
areas.
An RDS data collector was used to download the groundwater data from all gauges to an Excel
sheet format. All graphics have been done using ArcGIS and are available electronically.
A. Vegetation Methodologies
Five 10 x 10 square meter vegetation plots were monitored according to the CVS -EEP Level 2
Vegetation Monitoring Protocol for Recording Vegetation 4.2 (Lee et al 2008). The plot corners
are marked with 1" PVC pipe and marked with bright red flagging tape. All plots were relatively
easily located except for Plot #5 which was dominated by Japanese stilt grass, Johnson grass and
lacked any surviving planted trees. Data collected from each plot is included in Appendix C.
Monitoring plot locations are shown on the maps in Appendix A. Plant identification was aided
by the seminal publication Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia and Surrounding Areas
(Schaffle & Weakly).
B. Wetland Methodologies
Originally, nine (9) RDS GW Monitoring Gauges were installed. Gauge #8 is no longer being
monitored and Gauge #7 (previously labelled #10) was submerged and lost in the spring site visit
but recovered for this fall MY 4 Report. All gauges are downloaded quarterly throughout the
growing season to ensure that the gauges are functioning properly. Hence, gauges 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
7 & 9 provided data for MY4 and will be monitored in future years. Data is provided in an Excel
spreadsheet and supplemented with data from the State Climate Office.
All raw data supporting the tables, figures and graphs in the appendices are available to NCEEP
upon request.
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 5 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

III. References
Lee, Michael T.; Peet, Robert K.; Roberts, Steven D.; Wentworth, Thomas R. (2008). CVS -EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version 4.2.
NRCS -USDA. (2013). Climate Information for Orange County in the State of North Carolina.
NCCO. (2013). NC Climate Office Annual Precipitation Data (Station name: Chapel Hill —
Williams Airport).
USGS. (2013). USGS Real -Time Water Data for North Carolina. Stream Gauge Station ID
#02097517.
Weakly, Alan. (2011). Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia and the Surrounding Areas.
Miller, James. (2003). Nonnative Invasive Plants of Southern Forests. A field guide for
identification and Control. USDA Forest Service Southern Research station General Technical
Report SRS -62.
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 6 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

APPENDIX A. PROJECT VICINITY MAP AND BACKGROUND DATA
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 7 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Table la. Project Components
Table 1 a. Project Components
Mor an Creek Flood lain - EEP# 258
Project
Non -
Footage
Restoration
Stream
Riparian
Component
Existing
Restoration
Approach
or
Stationing
Mitigation
Mitigation
BMP
Comment
or Reach
Feet /Acres
Level
Acreage
Restoration
Ratio
Units
Elementsi
Enhancement I
ID
Enhancement II
Creation
Preservation
5.61
Totals
19.98
(Feet /Acres)
Wetlands
14.37
R
14.37
1:1
14.37
Wetlands
5.61
P
5.61
5:1
1.12
1 = BR = Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond; FS =
Filter Strip; Grassed Swale = S; LS = Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration Area, O = Other; CF = Cattle Fencing; WS = Watering
System; CH = Livestock Housing
Table lb. Component Summations
Non - Applicable
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
P]
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014
Table 1 b. Component Summations
Morgan Creek Floodplain — EEP# 258
Non -
Restoration
Stream
Riparian
Ripar
Upland
Buffer
Level
(If)
Wetland Ac
Ac
Ac
Ac
BMP
Non -
Riverine Riverine
Restoration
14.37
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Creation
Preservation
5.61
Totals
19.98
(Feet /Acres)
MU Totals
15.49
Non - Applicable
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
P]
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Morgan Creek Floodplain - EEP# 258
Activity or Deliverable
Data
Collection
Complete
Completion
or Delivery
Conservation easement MOA
NA
Aug-05
Restoration Plan
Jul -06
Aug-06
Final Design — Construction Plans
Aug-06
Nov -08
Permanent Conservation Easement
NA
May-09
Construction
NA
Jul -10
Bare root, containerized plantings
NA
Dec -10
Mitigation Plan / As -built (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline )
Mar -11
Aug-1 1
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov -11
Dec -11
Year 2 Monitoring
Oct -12
Nov -12
Year 3 Monitoring
Sep-13
Dec -13
Year 4 Monitoring
Sep-14
Oct -14
Bolded items are examples of those items that are not standard, but may come up and should be included.
Non - bolded items represent events that are standard components over the course of a typical project.
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 10 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Morgan Creek Floodplain -EEP# 258
Designer
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. 8368 Six Forks Rd, Suite 104 Raleigh,
NC 27615 -5083
Primary project design POC
Becky Ward 919 - 870 -0526
Construction Contractor
River Works, Inc. 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200 Cary, NC 27518
Construction contractor POC
Will Pedersen 919 - 459 -9001
Survey Contractor
Turner Land Surveying, PLLC 3201 Glenridge Dr Raleigh, NC 27604
Survey contractor POC
Elisabeth Turner 919 - 875 -1378
Planting Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc. P.O. Box 1197 Fremont, NC 27930
Planting contractor POC
Charlie Bruton 919 - 424 -6555
Seeding Contractor
River Works, Inc. 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200 Cary, NC 27518
Contractor point of contact
Will Pedersen 919 - 459 -9001
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource 336 - 855 -6363
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Core Nursery 919 - 542 -6186 Mellow Marsh Farm, Inc. 919 - 742 -1200
Dykes and Son Nursery 931 - 668 -8833 ArborGen (SuperTree
Seedlings) 800 - 222 -1290 NC Forestry Service (Claridge Nursery) 919-
731 -7988
Monitoring Performers
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.,
Goldstein & Associates, Inc. 1221
P.O. Box 690423 Charlotte, NC
Corporation Pkwy, Raleigh, NC
28227
27610
Stream Monitoring POC
N/A
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Rich Mogensen (Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.) 704 - 576 -1111
Wetland Monitoring POC
Rich Mogensen (Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.) 704 - 576 -1111
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 11 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Morgan Creek Floodplain -EEP# 258
Project County
Orange /Durham
Physiographic Region
Piedmont (Triassic Basin)
Ecoregion
Central Piedmont
Project River Basin
Cape Fear River Basin
USGS HUCfor Project (14 digit)
3.03E +12
NCDWQSub -basin for Project
3/6/2006
Within extent of EEP Watershed Plan?
Haw River (Jordan Lake)
WRC Hab Class (Warm, Cool, Cold)
Warm
of project easement fenced or demarcated
100%
Beaver activity observed during design phase?
No
Restoration Component Attribute Table
Site
Drainage area
N/A
Stream order
N/A
Restored length (feet)
N/A
Perennial or Intermittent
N/A
Watershed type (Rural, Urban, Developing etc.)
N/A
Watershed LULC Distribution (e.g.)
N/A
Residential
N/A
Ag -Row Crop
N/A
Ag- Livestock
N/A
Forested
N/A
Etc.
N/A
Watershed impervious cover ( %)
N/A
NCDWQ AU /Index number
N/A
NCDWQ classification
WS- IV;NSW
303d listed?
Yes
Upstream of a 303d listed segment?
Yes
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
Standard Violation
Total acreage of easement
31.54
Total vegetated acreage within the easement
19.75
Total planted acreage as part of the restoration
11.8
Rosgen classification of pre- existing
N/A
Rosgen classification of As -built
N/A
Valley type
N/A
Valley slope
N/A
Valley side slope range (e.g. 2 -3.%)
N/A
Valley toe slope range (e.g. 2 -3.%)
N/A
Cowardin classification
N/A
Trout waters designation
N/A
Species of concern, endangered etc.? (Y /N)
No
Dominant soil series and characteristics
Chewacla
Series
Depth
Clay%
K
T
Use N/A for items that may not apply. Use " -" for items that are unavailable and "U" for items that are unknown
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 12 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

APPENDIX B. VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 13 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Table 5.0. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Planted Acreage' 11.8
Easement Acreage2 31.54
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
% of Planted
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acrea e
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and
0.1 acres
Brown Line
0
0.00
0.0%
4. Invasive Areas of
herbaceous material.
500 SF
Brown Line
2
0.1
0.1%
2. Low Stem Density
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels
0.01 acres
Brown Line
4
0.44
3.7%
Areas
based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.
5. Easement 3
Areas or points (if too small to render as
none
Total
4
0.44
3.7%
3. Areas of Poor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are
Growth Rates or
obviously small given the monitoring year.
0.25 acres
Brown Line
0
0
0.0%
Vigor
Cumulative Total
1 4
1 0.44
3.7%
Easement Acreage2 31.54
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage, crossings or any other
elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment, the associated
acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern /interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are those with the
potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short -term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree /shrub stands over timeframes that are slightly longer (e.g. 1 -2
decades). The low /moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer
their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage,
distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb
layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree /shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray
shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of particular interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in
a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the
conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or polygon /area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in
legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the executive summary.
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
16
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014
% of
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Easement
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of
Areas or points (if too small to render as
500 SF
Brown Line
2
0.1
0.1%
Concern
polygons at map scale).
5. Easement 3
Areas or points (if too small to render as
none
Brown Line
0
0.00
0.0%
Encroachment Areas
polygons at map scale).
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage, crossings or any other
elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment, the associated
acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern /interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are those with the
potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short -term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree /shrub stands over timeframes that are slightly longer (e.g. 1 -2
decades). The low /moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer
their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage,
distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb
layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree /shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray
shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of particular interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in
a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the
conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or polygon /area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in
legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the executive summary.
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
16
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Table 5.1 Vegetation Condition Assessment — Species of Concern
High Concern:
Low /Moderate Concern:
Vines
Genus /Species
Shrubs /Herbs
Genus /Species
Shrubs /Herbs
Genus /Species
Kudzu
Pueraria lobata
Japanese Knotweed
Polygonum cuspidatum
Japanese Privet
Ligustrum Japonicum
Porcelain Berry
Ampelopsis brevipeduncul
Oriental Bittersweet
Celastrus orbiculatus
Glossy Privet
Ligustrum lucidum
Japanese Honeysuckle
Lonicera japonica
Multiflora Rose
Rosa multiflora
Fescue
Festuca spp.
Japanese Hops
Humulusjaponicus
Russian olive
Elaeagnus angustifolia
English Ivy
Hedera helix
Wisterias
Wisteria spp.
Chinese Privet
Ligustrum sinense
Microstegium
Microstegium vimineum
Winter Creeper
Euonymus fortunei
Chinese Silvergrass
Miscanthus sinensis
Burning Bush
Euonymus alatus
Bush Killer (Watch List)
Cayratia japonica
Phragmites
Phragmites australis
Johnson Grass
Sorghum halepense
Bamboos
Phyllostachys spp
Bush Honeysuckles
Lonicera, spp.
Trees
sericea Lespedeza
sericea Lespedeza
Periwinkles
Vinca minor
Tree of Heaven
Ailanthus altissima
Garlic Mustard (Watch List)
Alliaria petiolata
Morning Glories
Morning Glories
Mimosa
Albizia julibrissin
Cogon Grass (Watch List)
Imperata cylindrica
Bicolor Lespedeza (Watch List)
Lespedeza bicolor
Princess Tree
Paulownia tomentosa
Giant Reed (Watch List)
Arundo donax
Chinese Yams (Watch List)
Dioscorea oppositifolia
China Berry
Melia azedarach
Tropical Soda Apple (Watch List)
Solanum via rum
Air Potato (Watch List)
Dioscorea bulbifera
Callery Pear
Pyrus calleryana
IJapanese Spirea (Watch List)
I Spiraea japonica
Japanese Climbing Fern (Watch List)
I Lygodium japonicum
White Mulberry
I Morus alba
Japanese Barberry (Watch List)
Berberis thunbergii
Tallow Tree (Watch List)
ITriadica sebifera
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
17
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
rr P� i
A.
I:
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 19 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
20
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 21 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 22 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

^^
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
23
,
'
,
'
Morgan Creek F|oodp|oin
MY-04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 24 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
�S
25
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

vog +enMitigation, Inc.
k \ / • \ §
26
Morgan Creek Hood plain
MY-04 Monitoring Repo&
November 2014

Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 27 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

APPENDIX C. VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 28 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Table 6. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Appendix C
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Attainment
Morgan Creek Floodplain / EEP Project 258
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Attainment
Vegetation
Plot ID
Vegetation Survival
Threshold Met?
MY04 Planted Stem
Density (stems /acre)
MY04Total Stem Density
(stems /acre)
VP-1
No
243
283
VP-2
No
162
1133
VP-3
No
283
931
VP-4
No
283
1295
VP-5
No
0
486
SITE MEAN
194
826
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 29 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Table 7. CVS Metadata
Appendix C
Table 7. CVS Metadata
Morgan Creek Floodplain / EEP Project 258
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Report Prepared By Daniel Kuefler
Date Prepared 9/17/2014 12:02
database name cvs- eep- entrytool- v2.3.1.mdb
database location C: \Users \dkuefler \Desktop \CVS Veg File
computer name ZENBOOK
file size 74088448
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------- - - - --
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural /volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded
PROJ ECT SU M MARY-------------------------------------
Project Code 258
project Name Mason Farms
Description Wetland Enhancement and Restoration on Mason Farms Biological Reserve in Orange /Durham Counties
River Basin Cape Fear
length(ft)
stream -to -edge width (ft)
area(sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Plots
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
30
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Table 8. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Color for Density Exceeds requirements, but by less than 101/o
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
31
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014
Current Data •
�����voov00000���0000
©moo
©000000
��000���voo������0000
©moo
©000000
.'..:
��oo
©v0000
©�����oo
©moo
©vo
©0000000
•-
�����voo���oo
©���00000�oo
©000000
•
-
Size
•
00000�oo
®vv
®oo����
®��
®
®��oo���
00000000
©©
o
©000�oo
®vv
®000
®�
®oo
®���
®
®
®���
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Color for Density Exceeds requirements, but by less than 101/o
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
31
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

APPENDIX D. HYDROLOGIC DATA
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 32 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Table 9. Bankfull Events Accessing Through Berm Openings
Table 9. Bankfull Events Accessing Through Berm Openings
Morgan Creek Floodplain -EEP # 258
Date of Data
Collection
Date of
Occurrence
Method
Photo
#
17- Dec -10
n/a
Visual observation of wrack lines
MY-
01 #6
3- Jun -11
27- May -11
USGS Gauge height >11.0 feet, Visual observation of
overland flow /indicators
MY-
01 #7
1- Aug -11
31- Jul -11
USGS Gauge height >9.0 feet, Visual observation of overland
flow /indicators
MY-
01 #8
7- Sep -11
7- Sep -11
USGS Gauge height >8.5 feet
n/a
23- May -12
23- May -12
USGS Gauge height >8 feet
n/a
28- Jul -12
28- Jul -12
USGS Gauge height >9.7 feet
n/a
3- Sep -12
3- Sep -12
USGS Gauge height >9.3 feet
n/a
19- Sep -12
19- Sep -12
USGS Gauge height >10.1 feet, Visual observation of
overland flow /indicators
6
30- Jun -13
30- Jun -13
USGS Gauge height >8.5 feet
n/a
1- Jul -13
1- Jul -13
USGS Gauge height >8.5 feet
n/a
7- March -14
7- March -14
USGS Gauge height >8.5 feet
n/a
16- May -2014
16- May -14
USGS Gauge height >8.5 feet
n/a
2- Sept -2014
n/a
*Berm Gap 1 - Crest Stage Gauge Flood Elevation 24"
n/a
2- Sept -2014
n/a
*Berm Gap 2 - Crest Stage Gauge Flood Elevation 36"
n/a
2- Sept -2014
n/a
*Berm Gap 3 - Damaged
n/a
2- Sept -2014
n/a
*Berm Gap 4 - Crest Stage Gauge Flood Elevation 28"
n/a
2- Sept -2014
n/a
*Berm Gap 5 - Crest Stage Gauge Flood Elevation 36"
n/a
*Flood Elevations measured from existing ground. Gauge #3 has been repaired and reset.
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 33 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Table 10. Wetland Criteria Attainment
a -
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Gauge
#
Max#
Conseq.
Days
%
Growing
Season
Success
Criteria
Attained
Max#
Conseq.
Days
%Growing
Season
Success
Criteria
Attained
Max#
Conseq.
Days
%Growing
Season
Success
Criteria
Attained
Max#
Conseq.
Days
%Growing
Season
Success
Criteria
Attained
Max#
Conseq.
Days
%Growing
Season
Success
Criteria
Attained
1
20
9
Yes
61
28
Yes
35
16
Yes
50
22
Yes
46
21
Yes
2
53d
24
Yes
34
15
Yes
8
4
No
23
10
Yes
39
18
Yes
3
5d
2
No
5
2
No
3g
1
No
-
-
Yes
7
3
No
4
3e
1
No
8a
4
No
23
10
Yes
48
21
Yes
39
18
Yes
5
24d
11
Yes
53
24
Yes
61
28
Yes
52
23
Yes
46
21
Yes
6
23d
10
Yes
51
23
Yes
25
25
Yes
51
23
Yes
46
21
Yes
9
Od
0
No
32
14
Yes
11
11
Yes
32
15
Yes
45
20
Yes
10
Of
0
No
61
18
Yes
42
42
Yes
169
76
Yes
a -
Data missing
— groundwater level monitored for 71 days of the growing season
b -
Data missing
— groundwater level monitored for 115 days of the growing season
c -
Data missing
— groundwater level monitored for 145 days of the growing season
d -
Data missing
— groundwater level monitored for 141 days of the growing season
e -
Data missing
— groundwater level monitored for 131 days of the growing season
f -
Data missing —
groundwater level monitored for 116 days of the growing season
g -
Data missing
— groundwater level monitored for 69 days of the growing season
Gauge 3 was replaced due to malfunction and did not yield viable data.
Gauge 7 was removed prior to restoration activities.
Gauge 8 data is unrelated to the success of the wetland restoration project component.
Hydrology Success Criteria: Five gauges (1, 2, 4, 5, and 6) are in Wetland Restoration Soil Unit 1, where
groundwater is expected to be within 12 inches of the surface for at least 12.5% of the growing season.
Two gauges (3 and 9) are in Wetland Soil Unit 2 where the groundwater is expected to be within 12
inches of the surface for at least 5% of the growing season. Growing Season: March 23 to November 3
( source: http: / /www.wcc .nres.usda.gov /cgibin /state.pl ?state =nc)
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 34 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Figure 4.0. Groundwater Gauge 1 Data
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 35 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Figure 4.1. Groundwater Gauge 2 Data
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
36
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014
Morgan Creek Groundwater Gauge 2 -MY4 (2014)
80
N
5.00
u
m
60
4.00
40
0
m
c
3.00
3
0
20
0
r
„
2.00
N
- - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
-20
0.00
40
---- - - - -39 days------ -
-60
-1.00
1/1/2014
1/31/2014 3/2/2014 4/1/2014 5/1/2014 5/31/2014 6/30/2014 7/30/2014 8/29/2014
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface USGS Stream Gauge Height (in) Precipitation (in)
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
36
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Figure 4.2. Groundwater Gauge 3 Data
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
37
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014
Morgan Creek Groundwater Gauge 3 -MY4 (2014)
80
N
5.00
60
u
0
4.00
40
0
m
c
3.00
3
0
20
0
r
„
2.00
0
- - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -
J - -
-
--------------- - - - - - - - - - - -
1.00
-20
0.00
-40
- -7 days-- -
-60
-1.00
1/1/2014
1/31/2014 3/2/2014 4/1/2014 5/1/2014 5/31/2014 6/30/2014 7/30/2014 8/29/2014
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface USGS Stream Gauge Height (in) Precipitation (in)
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
37
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Figure 4.3. Groundwater Gauge 4 Data
Morgan Creek Groundwater Gauge 4 -MY4 (2014)
80 5.00
00
N
S
u
m
60
4.00
0
m
40
c
3.00
3
0
20
6
r
m
2.00
0
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — —
-20
A='jdUU
U'jUWk_1
A
0.00
40
---- - - - -39 days------ -
-60 -1.00
1/1/2014 1/31/2014 3/2/2014 4/1/2014 5/1/2014 5/31/2014 6/30/2014 7/30/2014 8/29/2014
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface USGS Stream Gauge Height (in) Precipitation (in)
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
w
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Figure 4.4. Groundwater Gauge 5 Data
Morgan Creek Groundwater Gauge 5 -MY4 (2014)
80
60
40
20
0
-20
-40
N
1
u
m
0
tw
m
c
3
0
0
r
m
-:L�jdW_ALL'JLJML_�
A
--------- - - - - -- 46 days --------- - - - - --
-60 -
1/1/2014
1/31/2014 3/2/2014 4/1/2014 5/1/2014
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
39
5/31/2014 6/30/2014
USGS Stream Gauge Height (in)
7/30/2014 8/29/2014
Precipitation (in)
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
-1.00
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Figure 4.5. Groundwater Gauge 6 Data
80
60
40
20
0
-20
-40
-60
1/1/2014
Morgan Creek Groundwater Gauge 6 -MY4 (2014)
N
s
u
m
0
0.,
bA
m
c
3
0
0
r
M
---------- - - - - -- 46 days -------- - - - - --
1/31/2014 3/2/2014 4/1/2014 5/1/2014
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
40
5/31/2014 6/30/2014
USGS Stream Gauge Height (in)
7/30/2014 8/29/2014
Precipitation (in)
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
-1.00
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

Figure 4.6. Groundwater Gauge 9 Data
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
41
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014
Morgan Creek Groundwater Gauge 9 -MY4 (2014)
80
N
5.00
60
u
f0
4.00
0
m
40
�
c
3.00
3
0
20
0
`m
2.00
0
— — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
1.00
-20
40
As
0.00
----------- - - - - -- 45 days ------ - - - - --
-60
-1.00
1/1/2014
1/31/2014 3/2/2014 4/1/2014 5/1/2014 5/31/2014 6/30/2014 7/30/2014 8/29/2014
Groundwater Depth (in) — — — 12 Inches Below Surface USGS Stream Gauge Height (in) Precipitation (in)
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
41
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

APPENDIX E. USGS STREAM DATA
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 42 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

# ---------------------------- - - - - -- WARNING ----------------------------------------
# The data you have obtained from this automated U.S. Geological Survey database
# have not received Director's approval and as such are provisional and subject to
# revision. The data are released on the condition that neither the USGS nor the
# United States Government may be held liable for any damages resulting from its use.
# Additional info: http: / /help.waterdata .usgs.gov /policies /provisional- data - statement
# File- format description: http: // help .waterdata.usgs.gov /faq /about- tab - delimited- output
# Automated - retrieval info: http: / /help.waterdata. usgs .gov /faq /automated - retrievals
# Contact: gs- w_support_nwisweb @usgs.gov
# retrieved: 2014 -09 -24 16:45:33 EDT (vaww02)
# Data for the following 1 site(s) are contained in this file
# USGS 02097517 MORGAN CREEK NEAR CHAPEL HILL, NC
# -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Data provided for site
02097517
# DD parameter statistic Description
# 04 00065 00003 Gage height, feet (Mean)
# 04 00065 00001 Gage height, feet (Maximum)
# 04 00065 00002 Gage height, feet (Minimum)
# Data -value qualification codes included in this output:
# P Provisional data subject to revision.
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
43
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014
Max
Min
Max
Date
Mean (ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(in)
USGS
2097517
1/1/2014
4.42
4.09
4.26
49.08
USGS
2097517
1/2/2014
4.68
4
4.21
48
USGS
2097517
1/3/2014
4.1
49.2
USGS
2097517
1/4/2014
4.46
4.23
4.38
50.76
USGS
2097517
1/5/2014
4.37
4.19
4.3
50.28
USGS
2097517
1/6/2014
4.62
4.25
4.46
51
USGS
2097517
1/7/2014
4.53
4.38
4.44
52.56
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
43
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

USGS
2097517
1/8/2014
4.39
4.26
4.33
51.12
USGS
2097517
1/9/2014
4.37
4.13
4.28
49.56
USGS
2097517
1/10/2014
5.13
4.09
4.43
49.08
USGS
2097517
1/11/2014
8.22
5.13
6.68
61.56
USGS
2097517
1/12/2014
7.77
5.21
6.01
62.52
USGS
2097517
1/13/2014
5.21
4.78
4.96
57.36
USGS
2097517
1/14/2014
5.17
4.7
4.88
56.4
USGS
2097517
1/15/2014
4.9
4.62
4.79
55.44
USGS
2097517
1/16/2014
4.75
4.54
4.67
54.48
USGS
2097517
1/17/2014
4.64
4.45
4.56
53.4
USGS
2097517
1/18/2014
4.56
4.37
4.48
52.44
USGS
2097517
1/19/2014
4.48
4.3
4.41
51.6
USGS
2097517
1/20/2014
4.44
4.25
4.37
51
USGS
2097517
1/21/2014
4.43
4.22
4.35
50.64
USGS
2097517
1/22/2014
4.42
4.22
4.36
50.64
USGS
2097517
1/23/2014
4.37
4.16
4.3
49.92
USGS
2097517
1/24/2014
4.33
4.11
4.26
49.32
USGS
2097517
1/25/2014
4.32
4.12
4.24
49.44
USGS
2097517
1/26/2014
4.34
4.08
4.23
48.96
USGS
2097517
1/27/2014
4.32
4.11
4.25
49.32
USGS
2097517
1/28/2014
4.28
4.07
4.22
48.84
USGS
2097517
1/29/2014
4.3
4.08
4.21
48.96
USGS
2097517
1/30/2014
4.3
4.06
4.2
48.72
USGS
2097517
1/31/2014
4.29
4.06
4.19
48.72
USGS
2097517
2/1/2014
4.34
4.06
4.2
48.72
USGS
2097517
2/2/2014
4.31
4.08
4.2
48.96
USGS
2097517
2/3/2014
4.41
4.1
4.25
49.2
USGS
2097517
2/4/2014
4.65
4.11
4.31
49.32
USGS
2097517
2/5/2014
4.64
4.32
4.47
51.84
USGS
2097517
2/6/2014
4.45
4.21
4.37
50.52
USGS
2097517
2/7/2014
4.35
4.15
4.29
49.8
USGS
2097517
2/8/2014
4.34
4.12
4.25
49.44
USGS
2097517
2/9/2014
4.31
4.09
4.23
49.08
USGS
2097517
2/10/2014
4.29
4.08
4.21
48.96
USGS
2097517
2/11/2014
4.29
4.06
4.21
48.72
USGS
2097517
2/12/2014
4.3
4.06
4.2
48.72
USGS
2097517
2/13/2014
4.73
4.29
4.5
51.48
USGS
2097517
2/14/2014
5.29
4.48
4.78
53.76
USGS
2097517
2/15/2014
6.17
4.89
5.49
58.68
USGS
2097517
2/16/2014
6.07
5.07
5.38
60.84
USGS
2097517
2/17/2014
5.1
4.81
4.97
57.72
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
44
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

USGS
2097517
2/18/2014
4.86
4.68
4.79
56.16
USGS
2097517
2/19/2014
5.21
4.68
5.02
56.16
USGS
2097517
2/20/2014
5.08
4.72
4.89
56.64
USGS
2097517
2/21/2014
6.17
4.65
5.21
55.8
USGS
2097517
2/22/2014
5.46
4.88
5.11
58.56
USGS
2097517
2/23/2014
4.88
4.62
4.76
55.44
USGS
2097517
2/24/2014
4.68
4.49
4.61
53.88
USGS
2097517
2/25/2014
4.58
4.32
4.48
51.84
USGS
2097517
2/26/2014
4.48
4.31
4.42
51.72
USGS
2097517
2/27/2014
4.45
4.28
4.4
51.36
USGS
2097517
2/28/2014
4.4
4.21
4.35
50.52
USGS
2097517
3/1/2014
4.39
4.18
4.31
50.16
USGS
2097517
3/2/2014
4.37
4.17
4.29
50.04
USGS
2097517
3/3/2014
4.67
4.19
4.42
50.28
USGS
2097517
3/4/2014
4.5
4.28
4.43
51.36
USGS
2097517
3/5/2014
4.43
4.23
4.37
50.76
USGS
2097517
3/6/2014
4.95
4.18
4.37
50.16
USGS
2097517
3/7/2014
11.36
4.95
8.44
59.4
USGS
2097517
3/8/2014
9.73
5.56
6.85
66.72
USGS
2097517
3/9/2014
5.58
5
5.23
60
USGS
2097517
3/10/2014
5
4.76
4.87
57.12
USGS
2097517
3/11/2014
4.8
4.59
4.7
55.08
USGS
2097517
3/12/2014
5.17
4.54
4.71
54.48
USGS
2097517
3/13/2014
5.02
4.63
4.79
55.56
USGS
2097517
3/14/2014
4.65
4.47
4.57
53.64
USGS
2097517
3/15/2014
4.53
4.39
4.48
52.68
USGS
2097517
3/16/2014
4.73
4.37
4.49
52.44
USGS
2097517
3/17/2014
5.31
4.73
4.89
56.76
USGS
2097517
3/18/2014
5.4
5.11
5.26
61.32
USGS
2097517
3/19/2014
5.3
4.87
5.02
58.44
USGS
2097517
3/20/2014
4.88
4.64
4.78
55.68
USGS
2097517
3/21/2014
4.71
4.5
4.62
54
USGS
2097517
3/22/2014
4.58
4.43
4.52
53.16
USGS
2097517
3/23/2014
4.59
4.4
4.49
52.8
USGS
2097517
3/24/2014
4.53
4.36
4.47
52.32
USGS
2097517
3/25/2014
4.47
4.33
4.42
51.96
USGS
2097517
3/26/2014
4.45
4.3
4.4
51.6
USGS
2097517
3/27/2014
4.44
4.25
4.36
51
USGS
2097517
3/28/2014
4.46
4.24
4.34
50.88
USGS
2097517
3/29/2014
4.71
4.39
4.59
52.68
USGS
2097517
3/30/2014
4.69
4.46
4.58
53.52
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
45
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

USGS
2097517
3/31/2014
4.5
4.31
4.43
51.72
USGS
2097517
4/1/2014
4.42
4.28
4.37
51.36
USGS
2097517
4/2/2014
4.28
51.36
USGS
2097517
4/3/2014
4.43
4.29
4.38
51.48
USGS
2097517
4/4/2014
4.45
4.29
4.37
51.48
USGS
2097517
4/5/2014
4.41
4.25
4.35
51
USGS
2097517
4/6/2014
4.36
4.21
4.31
50.52
USGS
2097517
4/7/2014
7.57
4.23
5.78
50.76
USGS
2097517
4/8/2014
6.54
5.04
5.48
60.48
USGS
2097517
4/9/2014
5.04
4.74
4.88
56.88
USGS
2097517
4/10/2014
4.76
4.55
4.68
54.6
USGS
2097517
4/11/2014
4.64
4.48
4.58
53.76
USGS
2097517
4/12/2014
4.61
4.4
4.52
52.8
USGS
2097517
4/13/2014
4.52
4.37
4.46
52.44
USGS
2097517
4/14/2014
4.54
4.35
4.45
52.2
USGS
2097517
4/15/2014
5.61
4.39
4.98
52.68
USGS
2097517
4/16/2014
5.3
4.72
4.91
56.64
USGS
2097517
4/17/2014
4.73
4.5
4.63
54
USGS
2097517
4/18/2014
4.62
4.43
4.54
53.16
USGS
2097517
4/19/2014
5.36
4.55
5.15
54.6
USGS
2097517
4/20/2014
5.2
4.76
4.94
57.12
USGS
2097517
4/21/2014
4.78
4.55
4.68
54.6
USGS
2097517
4/22/2014
4.66
4.5
4.6
54
USGS
2097517
4/23/2014
4.57
4.39
4.51
52.68
USGS
2097517
4/24/2014
4.48
4.31
4.42
51.72
USGS
2097517
4/25/2014
5.6
4.3
4.66
51.6
USGS
2097517
4/26/2014
4.98
4.62
4.82
55.44
USGS
2097517
4/27/2014
4.63
4.41
4.54
52.92
USGS
2097517
4/28/2014
4.49
4.31
4.43
51.72
USGS
2097517
4/29/2014
4.68
4.31
4.41
51.72
USGS
2097517
4/30/2014
4.9
4.56
4.76
54.72
USGS
2097517
5/1/2014
4.77
4.45
4.61
53.4
USGS
2097517
5/2/2014
4.53
4.33
4.45
51.96
USGS
2097517
5/3/2014
4.45
4.26
4.37
51.12
USGS
2097517
5/4/2014
4.37
4.21
4.31
50.52
USGS
2097517
5/5/2014
4.35
4.16
4.28
49.92
USGS
2097517
5/6/2014
4.29
4.12
4.23
49.44
USGS
2097517
5/7/2014
4.32
4.12
4.23
49.44
USGS
2097517
5/8/2014
4.27
4.1
4.21
49.2
USGS
2097517
5/9/2014
4.24
4.07
4.17
48.84
USGS
2097517
5/10/2014
4.25
4
4.17
48
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
46
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

USGS
2097517
5/11/2014
4.22
4.06
4.15
48.72
USGS
2097517
5/12/2014
4.22
4.02
4.14
48.24
USGS
2097517
5/13/2014
4.17
3.95
4.09
47.4
USGS
2097517
5/14/2014
4.14
3.89
4.02
46.68
USGS
2097517
5/15/2014
11.74
3.89
5.88
46.68
USGS
2097517
5/16/2014
11.84
5.68
8.69
68.16
USGS
2097517
5/17/2014
5.68
4.88
5.18
58.56
USGS
2097517
5/18/2014
5.07
4.59
4.76
55.08
USGS
2097517
5/19/2014
4.64
4.44
4.56
53.28
USGS
2097517
5/20/2014
4.51
4.35
4.45
52.2
USGS
2097517
5/21/2014
4.46
4.29
4.38
51.48
USGS
2097517
5/22/2014
4.4
4.24
4.33
50.88
USGS
2097517
5/23/2014
4.42
4.2
4.3
50.4
USGS
2097517
5/24/2014
4.32
4.14
4.24
49.68
USGS
2097517
5/25/2014
4.25
4.09
4.19
49.08
USGS
2097517
5/26/2014
4.25
4.08
4.17
48.96
USGS
2097517
5/27/2014
5
4.01
4.28
48.12
USGS
2097517
5/28/2014
4.41
4.12
4.26
49.44
USGS
2097517
5/29/2014
4.27
4.08
4.2
48.96
USGS
2097517
5/30/2014
4.25
4.03
4.14
48.36
USGS
2097517
5/31/2014
4.19
3.94
4.09
47.28
USGS
2097517
6/1/2014
4.16
3.95
4.07
47.4
USGS
2097517
6/2/2014
4.18
3.94
4.08
47.28
USGS
2097517
6/3/2014
4.15
3.94
4.07
47.28
USGS
2097517
6/4/2014
4.12
3.9
4.03
46.8
USGS
2097517
6/5/2014
4.16
3.82
4.04
45.84
USGS
2097517
6/6/2014
4.11
3.86
4
46.32
USGS
2097517
6/7/2014
4.08
3.81
3.99
45.72
USGS
2097517
6/8/2014
4.09
3.83
3.98
45.96
USGS
2097517
6/9/2014
4.39
3.9
4.04
46.8
USGS
2097517
6/10/2014
4.39
3.9
4.13
46.8
USGS
2097517
6/11/2014
4.27
3.9
4.05
46.8
USGS
2097517
6/12/2014
4.12
3.86
4.02
46.32
USGS
2097517
6/13/2014
4.11
3.85
4.02
46.2
USGS
2097517
6/14/2014
4.15
3.85
4
46.2
USGS
2097517
6/15/2014
4.08
3.83
3.98
45.96
USGS
2097517
6/16/2014
4.06
3.73
3.92
44.76
USGS
2097517
6/17/2014
4.07
3.82
3.96
45.84
USGS
2097517
6/18/2014
4.03
3.78
3.92
45.36
USGS
2097517
6/19/2014
4.02
3.68
3.9
44.16
USGS
2097517
6/20/2014
4.03
3.76
3.91
45.12
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
47
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

USGS
2097517
6/21/2014
4.16
3.78
3.96
45.36
USGS
2097517
6/22/2014
4
3.73
3.88
44.76
USGS
2097517
6/23/2014
3.99
3.7
3.88
44.4
USGS
2097517
6/24/2014
3.97
3.57
3.82
42.84
USGS
2097517
6/25/2014
3.97
3.67
3.85
44.04
USGS
2097517
6/26/2014
3.95
3.67
3.84
44.04
USGS
2097517
6/27/2014
4.56
3.73
4.01
44.76
USGS
2097517
6/28/2014
3.99
3.69
3.85
44.28
USGS
2097517
6/29/2014
3.94
3.68
3.82
44.16
USGS
2097517
6/30/2014
3.94
3.67
3.82
44.04
USGS
2097517
7/1/2014
3.95
3.47
3.77
41.64
USGS
2097517
7/2/2014
3.9
3.56
3.77
42.72
USGS
2097517
7/3/2014
3.91
3.42
3.73
41.04
USGS
2097517
7/4/2014
3.88
3.5
3.72
42
USGS
2097517
7/5/2014
3.86
3.58
3.72
42.96
USGS
2097517
7/6/2014
3.86
3.45
3.71
41.4
USGS
2097517
7/7/2014
3.87
3.55
3.72
42.6
USGS
2097517
7/8/2014
3.87
3.41
3.71
40.92
USGS
2097517
7/9/2014
3.88
3.45
3.69
41.4
USGS
2097517
7/10/2014
3.96
3.35
3.74
40.2
USGS
2097517
7/11/2014
3.97
3.59
3.78
43.08
USGS
2097517
7/12/2014
3.89
3.46
3.72
41.52
USGS
2097517
7/13/2014
3.86
3.46
3.69
41.52
USGS
2097517
7/14/2014
4.07
3.26
3.68
39.12
USGS
2097517
7/15/2014
6.1
3.69
4.31
44.28
USGS
2097517
7/16/2014
4.96
3.83
4.16
45.96
USGS
2097517
7/17/2014
4
3.68
3.86
44.16
USGS
2097517
7/18/2014
3.93
3.62
3.79
43.44
USGS
2097517
7/19/2014
3.94
3.54
3.76
42.48
USGS
2097517
7/20/2014
3.95
3.55
3.74
42.6
USGS
2097517
7/21/2014
3.56
42.72
USGS
2097517
7/22/2014
3.56
42.72
USGS
2097517
7/23/2014
3.92
3.58
3.76
42.96
USGS
2097517
7/24/2014
4.91
3.51
3.84
42.12
USGS
2097517
7/25/2014
4.47
3.64
4.04
43.68
USGS
2097517
7/26/2014
3.9
3.58
3.74
42.96
USGS
2097517
7/27/2014
4.45
3.54
3.9
42.48
USGS
2097517
7/28/2014
3.99
3.57
3.78
42.84
USGS
2097517
7/29/2014
3.85
3.55
3.72
42.6
USGS
2097517
7/30/2014
3.89
3.52
3.69
42.24
USGS
2097517
7/31/2014
4.51
3.51
3.72
42.12
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
48
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

USGS
2097517
8/1/2014
6.25
3.98
4.6
47.76
USGS
2097517
8/2/2014
4.59
3.8
4.12
45.6
USGS
2097517
8/3/2014
4.01
3.71
3.88
44.52
USGS
2097517
8/4/2014
3.99
3.68
3.82
44.16
USGS
2097517
8/5/2014
3.9
3.6
3.77
43.2
USGS
2097517
8/6/2014
3.94
3.51
3.73
42.12
USGS
2097517
8/7/2014
3.93
3.57
3.75
42.84
USGS
2097517
8/8/2014
3.94
3.53
3.76
42.36
USGS
2097517
8/9/2014
4.91
3.72
4.38
44.64
USGS
2097517
8/10/2014
4.6
3.87
4.25
46.44
USGS
2097517
8/11/2014
4.43
3.77
3.97
45.24
USGS
2097517
8/12/2014
4.99
4.12
4.44
49.44
USGS
2097517
8/13/2014
4.45
3.89
4.14
46.68
USGS
2097517
8/14/2014
4.08
3.76
3.91
45.12
USGS
2097517
8/15/2014
3.98
3.7
3.84
44.4
USGS
2097517
8/16/2014
3.94
3.55
3.79
42.6
USGS
2097517
8/17/2014
3.93
3.62
3.78
43.44
USGS
2097517
8/18/2014
5.21
3.58
3.96
42.96
USGS
2097517
8/19/2014
4.76
3.69
4.04
44.28
USGS
2097517
8/20/2014
3.94
3.64
3.82
43.68
USGS
2097517
8/21/2014
3.93
3.53
3.78
42.36
USGS
2097517
8/22/2014
4.21
3.49
3.8
41.88
USGS
2097517
8/23/2014
4.51
3.68
3.95
44.16
USGS
2097517
8/24/2014
4.02
3.64
3.83
43.68
USGS
2097517
8/25/2014
3.91
3.47
3.7
41.64
USGS
2097517
8/26/2014
3.91
3.53
3.76
42.36
USGS
2097517
8/27/2014
3.86
3.47
3.71
41.64
USGS
2097517
8/28/2014
3.85
3.35
3.64
40.2
USGS
2097517
8/29/2014
4.2
3.55
3.89
42.6
USGS
2097517
8/30/2014
3.85
3.49
3.67
41.88
USGS
2097517
8/31/2014
3.83
3.49
3.65
41.88
USGS
2097517
9/1/2014
3.83
3.49
3.66
41.88
USGS
2097517
9/2/2014
3.84
3.47
3.67
41.64
USGS
2097517
9/3/2014
3.84
3.37
3.63
40.44
USGS
2097517
9/4/2014
3.82
3.28
3.63
39.36
USGS
2097517
9/5/2014
3.82
3.44
3.64
41.28
USGS
2097517
9/6/2014
3.79
3.32
3.59
39.84
USGS
2097517
9/7/2014
3.84
3.43
3.64
41.16
USGS
2097517
9/8/2014
3.97
3.5
3.72
42
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 49 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

USGS
2097517
9/9/2014
3.94
3.5
3.71
42
USGS
2097517
9/10/2014
3.87
3.51
3.72
42.12
USGS
2097517
9/11/2014
3.83
3.46
3.67
41.52
USGS
2097517
9/12/2014
3.85
3.42
3.65
41.04
USGS
2097517
9/13/2014
3.86
3.41
3.64
40.92
USGS
2097517
9/14/2014
3.82
3.42
3.64
41.04
USGS
2097517
9/15/2014
3.8
3.42
3.64
41.04
USGS
2097517
9/16/2014
3.8
3.42
3.61
41.04
USGS
2097517
9/17/2014
3.93
3.38
3.7
40.56
USGS
2097517
9/18/2014
3.83
3.35
3.63
40.2
USGS
2097517
9/19/2014
3.8
3.42
3.63
41.04
USGS
2097517
9/20/2014
3.81
3.38
3.61
40.56
USGS
2097517
9/21/2014
0
USGS
2097517
9/22/2014
0
USGS
2097517
9/23/2014
3.81
3.43
3.65
41.16
USGS
2097517
9/24/2014
5.45
3.48
4.42
41.76
USGS
2097517
9/25/2014
4.98
3.65
4.15
43.8
USGS
2097517
9/26/2014
3.94
3.52
3.76
42.24
USGS
2097517
9/27/2014
3.86
3.49
3.69
41.88
USGS
2097517
9/28/2014
3.86
3.48
3.67
41.76
USGS
2097517
9/29/2014
3.9
3.46
3.71
41.52
USGS
2097517
9/30/2014
3.87
3.49
3.72
41.88
USGS
2097517
10/1/2014
3.83
3.48
3.69
41.76
USGS
2097517
10/2/2014
3.82
3.44
3.66
41.28
USGS
2097517
10/3/2014
3.81
3.41
3.66
40.92
USGS
2097517
10/4/2014
3.8
3.45
3.64
41.4
USGS
2097517
10/5/2014
3.81
3.45
3.65
41.4
USGS
2097517
10/6/2014
3.82
3.44
3.65
41.28
USGS
2097517
10/7/2014
3.78
3.35
3.6
40.2
USGS
2097517
10/8/2014
3.83
3.43
3.65
41.16
USGS
2097517
10/9/2014
3.84
3.43
3.67
41.16
USGS
2097517
10/10/2014
5.43
3.44
3.82
41.28
USGS
2097517
10/11/2014
5.12
3.72
4.23
44.64
USGS
2097517
10/12/2014
4.24
3.62
3.89
43.44
USGS
2097517
10/13/2014
3.92
3.54
3.75
42.48
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
50
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

USGS
2097517
10/14/2014
4.25
3.51
3.87
42.12
USGS
2097517
10/15/2014
5.56
3.7
4.48
44.4
USGS
2097517
10/16/2014
0
USGS
2097517
10/17/2014
3.88
3.5
3.72
42
USGS
2097517
10/18/2014
3.8
3.45
3.67
41.4
USGS
2097517
10/19/2014
3.8
3.45
3.66
41.4
USGS
2097517
10/20/2014
3.82
3.46
3.68
41.52
USGS
2097517
10/21/2014
3.82
3.44
3.67
41.28
USGS
2097517
10/22/2014
4
3.43
3.76
41.16
USGS
2097517
10/23/2014
4.02
3.65
3.86
43.8
USGS
2097517
10/24/2014
4
3.63
3.85
43.56
USGS
2097517
10/25/2014
3.98
3.56
3.83
42.72
USGS
2097517
10/26/2014
3.99
3.56
3.84
42.72
USGS
2097517
10/27/2014
3.99
3.62
3.85
43.44
USGS
2097517
10/28/2014
3.99
3.62
3.84
43.44
USGS
2097517
10/29/2014
4.22
3.61
3.87
43.32
USGS
2097517
10/30/2014
3.99
3.57
3.83
42.84
USGS
2097517
10/31/2014
4.05
3.56
3.86
42.72
USGS
2097517
11/1/2014
4.71
3.84
4.29
46.08
USGS
2097517
11/2/2014
4.19
3.78
4.03
45.36
USGS
2097517
11/3/2014
4.18
3.62
3.95
43.44
USGS
2097517
11/4/2014
4.22
3.76
4.02
45.12
USGS
2097517
11/5/2014
4.2
3.63
3.99
43.56
USGS
2097517
11/6/2014
4.46
3.64
4.07
43.68
USGS
2097517
11/7/2014
4.33
3.89
4.15
46.68
USGS
2097517
11/8/2014
4.17
3.71
3.98
44.52
USGS
2097517
11/9/2014
4.19
3.66
3.98
43.92
USGS
2097517
11/10/2014
4.2
3.67
4.02
44.04
USGS
2097517
11/11/2014
4.25
3.47
4.03
41.64
USGS
2097517
11/12/2014
4.25
3.68
3.96
44.16
USGS
2097517
11/13/2014
4.09
3.37
3.89
40.44
USGS
2097517
11/14/2014
4.15
3.63
3.9
43.56
USGS
2097517
11/15/2014
4.14
3.03
3.9
36.36
USGS
2097517
11/16/2014
4.14
3.06
3.9
36.72
USGS
2097517
11/17/2014
4.63
3.64
4.15
43.68
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc.
51
Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014

USGS
2097517
11/18/2014
4.43
3.03
4.17
36.36
USGS
2097517
11/19/2014
4.23
3.03
3.95
36.36
USGS
2097517
11/20/2014
4.25
3.03
3.99
36.36
USGS
2097517
11/21/2014
4.25
3.05
4.02
36.6
USGS
2097517
11/22/2014
4.19
3.1
3.93
37.2
USGS
2097517
11/23/2014
5.1
3.53
4.02
42.36
USGS
2097517
11/24/2014
5.1
4.08
4.51
48.96
USGS
2097517
11/25/2014
4.29
3.76
4.05
45.12
Mogensen Mitigation, Inc. 52 Morgan Creek Floodplain
MY -04 Monitoring Report
November 2014