20211267 Ver 3_ePCN Application_20230328

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only If needed.
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
7/2/2021
BIMS # Assigned
20211267
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Long Creek Greenway & Water Quality Improvement Project (Treyburn Dr. to 1-485)
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Wildlands Engineering (POC: Ian Eckardt)
1b. Primary Contact Email:
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
3/28/2023
Nearest Body of Water
Long Creek
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.342016-80.887008
A. Processing Information
Is this project connected with ARPA funding?
Yes No
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Mecklenburg
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Version#*
3
What amout is owed?*
$240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Andrew Pitner:[e-mail]
1c. Primary Contact Phone: *
[phone]
a
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No

1a.Type(s)of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
Please provide the date of the previous submission.
7/2/2021
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
13 - Bank Stabilization
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
27 - Restoration
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
42 - Recreation Facility
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? *
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Multiple parcels - see attached Parcel Information Sheet
2b. Deed book and page no.:
Multiple parcels - see attached Parcel Information Sheet
2c. Contact Person:
Mecklenburg County Asset and Facility Management (POC: David Booth)
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
*
Yes No
Yes No

2d. Address
Street Address
3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 6000
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28208
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
David. [e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
David Booth, Project Manager
3b. Business Name:
Mecklenburg County Asset and Facility Management
3c.Address
Street Address
3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 6000
Address Line 2
city
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28208
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
David. [e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Ian Eckardt
4b. Business Name:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
4c.Address
Street Address
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Address Line 2
city
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28203
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
0. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2. Project Identification
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
us
2f. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
us
3e. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
us
4e. Fax Number:
O

2a. Property Identification Number:
See attached Parcel Information Sheet
2c. Project Address
Street Address
8508 Beatties Ford Rd.
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28216
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:"
Long Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?
Catawba
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030501011403
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
Approximately 80 acres. This is a linear project
located on multiple parcels; therefore the size
is based on the overall project area.
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
US
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: *
The project is located in a developing watershed in northwest Mecklenburg County. Land use in the project area includes wooded floodplain corridors along Long Creek and maintained
utility right-of-ways. Surrounding land use include open spaces, shopping centers, residential communities, and some forest.
A review of aerial photography indicates the project area and surroundings were largely rural and agricultural through the 1970's with development increasing significantly during the period
from the late 1970s through the 1990s. Long Creek appears to have been historically straightened which also affected the adjacent tributaries. In the project area, Long Creek is generally
incised and disconnected from its historic floodplain with the exception of one section which is bedrock controlled. Bank erosion is common throughout the project area. Bedform diversity
is low and consists primarily of long sandy runs with pools developed around debris jams. Contributing tributaries are also incised in order to meet the lowering bed elevation of Long
Creek. During the 2000's, the project area saw increased pressure from suburban sprawl with the establishment of the 1-485 Outer Loop and associated increases in housing and
development. Additional impervious surfaces within the watershed have increased the magnitude and frequency of peak flows which has resulted in further damage to previously
manipulated and incised channels.
A portion of the project area on parcel PINS (03319199, 03313221, and 03327109) was utilized as a wetland mitigation site for North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) (TIP
R-2248), constructed in the mid to late 1990's and closed out in 2009. The parcels were transferred from NCDOT to Mecklenburg County with an agreement for a future greenway
allowance. The USACE has reviewed the situation and stated that impacts to the NCDOT wetland credit area can be allowed if Mecklenburg County can provide a "land swap" to preserve
the overall size of the mitigation site. Approximately 33 acres of Mecklenburg County land will be placed in a conservation easement. Correspondence with Mecklenburg County, NCDOT,
and USACE can be provided if necessary.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000).
DWR #21-1267
SAW-2019-00868
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
9.77 AC (wetlands & open waters)
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
14,662 LF
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project is a joint greenway and water quality improvement project. The greenway will provide a linear trail for recreation, fitness, and community connection. Water quality
improvements include stream restoration, enhancement,and preservation along Long Creek that will reduce erosion and increase aquatic habitat.

4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The project includes approximately two miles of greenway trail along Long Creek and 9,000 linear feet of stream improvements involving restoration and enhancement between Treyburn
Drive and the western 1-485 crossing. The greenway section begins in the vicinity of the Colonial gas pipeline crossing of Long Creek and continues southwestward to the second, western
crossing of 1-485. Connector trails or partially built/stub out portions of future connector trails are proposed at Ambleside Drive, Belstead Brook Court, Sheltonham Way, and Trotter Road to
provide direct access to surrounding neighborhoods. The greenway will be a 12-foot wide asphalt path with sections of raised boardwalk and prefabricated pedestrian bridges to cross
and/or over look streams and wetlands. Boardwalk sections will be supported by timber piers. A trailhead with parking is proposed immediately east of the Beatties Ford Road trail
crossing.
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services (CMSWS) identified the Long Creek corridor from Treyburn Drive to 1485 as a stream improvement opportunity, concurrent with Mecklenburg
County's Asset and Facilities Management's (AFM) development of the adjacent greenway corridor. NC Land & Water Fund (NCLWF) is a funding partner with CMSWS for the stream
improvement work along Long Creek which is not proposed for mitigation credit. Long Creek is generally incised and disconnected from its historic floodplain throughout the project area.
Eroding banks are common and existing stream bedform is limited to long sandy runs and pools that have developed at debris jams. An existing sewer line runs parallel with Long Creek
and is generally near the left top of bank.
The project seeks to improve water quality through restoration and enhancement activities. Water quality objectives include decreased nutrient and pollutant levels in storm flows achieved
by filtering in -stream flood flows through restored floodplain areas; decreased stream water temperatures achieved by planting vegetation along the stream for shade; and increased
dissolved oxygen concentrations through creating in -stream aeration points (structures) and developing deep pool zones. Ecological objectives include creating in -stream habitat through
structure placement, establishing woody vegetation along the stream banks, and diversifying the bedform; improving terrestrial habitat through invasive species removal and re-
establishing a native buffer along the riparian corridor; decreasing channel velocities by increasing channel roughness with bank vegetation and reconnecting the stream to a floodplain
through benching.
Stream restoration and enhancement approaches are based on existing conditions, constraints, habitat and water quality improvement potential, channel evolution stage, and the riparian
condition. Restoration and enhancement will be achieved using natural channel design and successful local stream design projects as reference reaches to inform design. Stream
restoration will involve a Rosgen Priority 2 approach and include the excavation of a new stream channel and associated floodplain benches to provide flood storage. Restoration will also
include the installation of in -stream structures such as constructed riffles, rock/log sills, rock/log j-hooks, log vanes, and brush toes. Enhancement is proposed where constraints limit
improvement opportunity and generally involve a combination of laying back stream banks, constructing a bankbull bench, and/or installing rock bank protection with keyed in riprap.
Preservation is proposed to a relatively stable portion of Long Creek that is bedrock controlled between the first 1485 and Beatties Ford Road crossings. Five unnamed tributaries will also
be impacted for relocation and stabilization purposes as they are re -connected to newly constructed sections of Long Creek. For project purposes the tributaries have been identified as
Trib A Lower, Trib B, Trib E, Trib N, and Trib U. Impact figures are provided in the Miscellaneous Section of this application.
Excavators will be used for channel and floodplain excavation as well as for bank grading and in -stream structure installation, while articulated and track trucks will be used for hauling soil.
Small equipment such as mini excavators and skid steers may also be used during grading activities. A native riparian buffer will be planted along project streams.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes
Comments:
No
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2019-00868
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Ian Eckardt
Agency/Consultant Company: Wildlands Engineering
Other:
O Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
A preliminary jurisdictional determination was issued on 9/21/2021 with the original 404 permit which is included with this submittal.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes O No
6b. If yes, explain.
The Long Creek Greenway is part of the overall Mecklenburg County greenway system with existing and proposed phases. A separate stream and wetland mitigation project (Long Creek
Corridor Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site) is being constructed immediately adjacent to portions of the greenway/water quality improvement project between Treyburn Drive and
Beatties Ford Road. The mitigation project is being constructed concurrently with the greenway/stream improvement project. Separate Nationwide permits have been sought for the
mitigation project.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams -tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
0
2. Wetland Impacts

2al Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W. *
2d. W. name
2e. Forested"
2f. Type of Jurisdicition
2g. Impact
area*
W1
Construction access
T
Ftt-mland Hardwood Forest
Wetland M
Yes
Both
0.027
(acres)
W2
Floodplain grading
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland A
Yes
Both
0.003
(acres)
W3
Filling as part of stream
P
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland B
Yes
Both
0.001
restoration
(acres)
W4
Construction access to
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland C
Yes
Both
0.122
build boardwalk
(acres)
W5
Construction access to
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland C
Yes
Both
0.186
build boardwalk
(acres)
W6
Construction access IT
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland D
Yes
Both
0.001
(acres)
W7
Construction access to
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland O
Yes
Both
0.092
build bridge and
(acres)
boardwalk crossings
W8
Construction access to
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland E
Yes
Both
0.151
build boardwalk
(acres)
t:::::1F
nstruction access
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 00
Yes
Both 1�=-
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.606
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.607
21. Comments:
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.001
Wetland impacts were avoided as much as possible. Impacts are primarily temporary for construction access necessary to build the greenway and
associated boardwalk sections. Wetland impact (W3) is the only permanent impact necessary for the restoration of Trib B which will be filled and
relocated.
3. Stream Impacts
F
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
3f. Type of
3g. S. width
3h. Impact
?)
Jurisdiction*
length*
S1
Construction access
Temporary
Other
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
64
Averege (feet)
(linear feet)
g2
Bank grading for stabilization
Temporary
Bank Stabilization J
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
249
Averege (feet)
(linear feet)
S3
Stream restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
3,096
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S4
Construction access
Temporary
Other
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
94
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S5
Bank stabilization (Rip rap)
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
24
Averege (feet)
(linear feet)
S6
Bank grading for stabilization
Temporary
Bank Stabilization J
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
305
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
g7
Bank grading for stabilization
Temporary
Bank Stabilization J
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
833
Averege (feet)
(linear feet)
gg
Stream restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
2,724
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S9
Construction access
Temporary
Other
Trib A Lower
Intermittent
Both
24
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S10
Stream restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Trib A Lower
Intermittent
Both
94
Averege (feet)
(linear feet)
S11
Stream restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Trib B
Perennial
Both
10
339
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S12
Stream restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Trib U
Intermittent
Both
320
Averege ((eeQ
(linear feet)

S13
Construction access
Temporary
Other
Trib D
Intermittent
Both -]
12
67
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S14
Construction access
Temporary
Other
Trib E
Perennial
Both
10
64
Averege (feet)
(linear feet)
S15
Stream restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Trib E
Perennial
Both
10
59
Averege (feet)
(linear feet)
S16
Stream restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Trib N
Intermittent
Both
10
137
Average (feet)
(linear feet)
S17
Relocation/stabilization
Permanent
Relocation
Trib E
Perennial
Both
10
70
Averege (feet)
(linear feet)
31. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
31. Total permanent stream impacts:
6,863
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
2748
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
1.700
3j. Comments:
Total stream impacts are miscalculated in Section 3i. The correct total stream impact length is 8,563 linear feet.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The greenway design incorporated the location of existing streams and wetlands in order to avoid these features as much as possible. Proposed
greenway crossings of streams and wetlands consist of either bridge or raised boardwalk to avoid permanent impacts. Bridge crossings will span top of
bank to top of bank. Boardwalk sections will be constructed using driven timber pilings to avoid impacts. Stream restoration and enhancement are
proposed on degraded sections of stream while relatively stable sections of stream are proposed for preservation and being avoided. Restored stream
alignments were designed to avoid wetland impacts.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Boardwalks crossings will be supported by timber piers that will be driven in to avoid discharge. Construction will be limited to the immediate project area
with silt and/or safety fence demarcating disturbance limits to avoid unnecessary impacts. Restored sections of Long Creek will be constructed
in the dry as much as possible through offline construction and pump around practices will be utilized where feasible when working in existing online
channels. Newly constructed channel banks will be stabilized using biodegradable coir fiber matting, seeding, and planted with native riparian species.
Haul roads, staging areas, and access routes are located on uplands as much as possible to avoid impacts and temporary crossings will be minimized.
Mud mats will be utilized for crossing existing wetlands. Construction practices will follow guidelines from the NC Erosion and Sediment Control Planning
and Design Manual.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
O
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Compensatory mitigation should not be required because the project intends to increase aquatic resource function and services through stream restoration and enhancement activities.
The greenway design has avoided impacts to stream and wetlands to the maximum extent practicable using bridge and boardwalk crossings.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) O
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
If no, explain why:
The project is located in the Catawba River basin where only the main stem of the Catawba River has associated NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules. The project area is on a smaller
tributary (Long Creek) to the Catawba River with no NC Riparian Protection Rules.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information O

1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federallstate) land?*
Yes No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?*
Yes No
Comments: *
This is a municipal greenway and stream restoration project not subject to NEPA or SEPA requirements.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The greenway project is proposed in an urban watershed where a majority of surrounding land has already been developed for commercial and
residential purposes. A majority of land within and immediately adjacent to the project area is wooded floodplain that is publicly owned by Mecklenburg
County. This will serve as buffers immediately adjacent to much of the trail and associated stream enhancement. A NC Land & Water Fund (NCLWF) will
be recorded on the water quality improvement project which will restrict future development. A conservation easement is also proposed on a separate
stream and wetland mitigation project (Long Creek Corridor Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site) which is being developed by Charlotte -Mecklenburg
Storm Water Services immediately adjacent to portions of the greenway project in between Treyburn Drive and Beatties Ford Road and will further
restrict future development immediately adjacent to the greenway/stream improvement project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?
Yes No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes No Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Correspondence with USFWS is enclosed in the miscellaneous section of this application. The project is currently in construction and minor design
revisions are within the previously evaluated assessment area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat? *
Yes No

6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website
(https://www.fi s heries. noaa. gov/resource/map/essential-fish-habitat-map per)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status? "
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? *
Correspondence with SHPO is included in the Miscellaneous section of this application.The project is currently in construction and minor design
revisions are within the previously evaluated assessment area.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The project was designed to result in no rise in the FEMA regulated base flood elevation. Wildlands worked with the local floodplain administrator
(Mecklenburg County) to obtain the appropriate floodplain development permit prior to construction.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? *
Mecklenburg County NC Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panels 4538 and 4548, with effective dates of September 2, 2015.
Miscellaneous
L
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Long Creek Greenway and Water Quality Improvement Project (Treyburn Dr. to 1485) RESUBMITTAL 2023 - PCN
50.53MB
Cover Letter and Uploads.pdf
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
A cover letter, table of contents, and supporting documentation are provided below.
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction' subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
David Booth
Signature
A V*�iiil
Date
3/28/2023
O