660014_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230327

PtWT- Division of Water Resources
Facility Number N' Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Irype of Visit: V Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: .39 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up _0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: 13�AL Owner Email:
Owner Name: T(a4y�t C\
Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact,
Title:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Form;
Swine
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
I 11-ayer I I —d
I IN n-Laxer I I
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
I I I I
Non -La
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current
Dischar2es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: 0 Structure El Application Field F-1 Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
[:] Yes ZNo �KNA E] NE
[:]Yes dNo [:] NA ONE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
Yes
U No
Lj NA
Lj NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
[—]Yes
No
[:] NA
[:] NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
Yes
D� No
E] NA
ONE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
Yes
[V No
[:] NA
0 NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

jFacili�y Number: L � _' - P4 lbate ;f Inspection: 3/)L-7122,
_j
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
0 Yes
EP�No
0 NA
0 NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
C—] Yes
Egl<o
[:] NA
0 NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: r1awn
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): -2-)%
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
OYes
1�rNo
0 NA
0 NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and. --'or managed through a
0 Yes
[dNo
Ej NA
0 NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmen I threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes No 0 NA 0 NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? Yes No NA NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes E�No NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Awlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need 0 Yes dNo F1 NA 0 NE
ma nLenance or mprovernent I
1. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes E� No 0 NA 0 NE
F� Excessive Ponding 0 Hydraulic Overload E] Frozen Ground 0 Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
PAN 0 PAN> 10% or 10 lbs. Total Phosphorus 0 Failure to Incorporate Manure. -Sludge into Bare Soil
Outside of Acceptable Crop Window 0 Evidence of Wind Drift E] Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
0 Yes
R�'No
0 NA
0 NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0 Yes
[9/No
0 NA
0 NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
0 Yes
Ej(No
C] NA
0 NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Yes
aN o
0 NA
0 NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0 Yes
[E�No
0 NA
ONE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
Yes
[Vf No
0 NA
0 NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
C] Yes
Ej�N o
0 NA
ONE
the appropriate box.
OWUP OChecklists. ODesign E] Maps 0 Lease Agreements OOther:
2 1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:] Yes E� No 0 NA 0 NE
F-1 Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers E] Weather Code
Fj Rainfall E]Stocking 0 Crop Yield E1120Minutclnspcetions 0 Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? El Yes dNo NA NE
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes gNo NA NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: C L - 14 1 jDaie-of Inspection: 3j;t-7j;t
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
D Yes
Q�No
0 NA D NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
D Yes
�o
D NA D NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
Failure to complete annual sludge survey D Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
[:]Yes
1E<0
[:] NA E] NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
OYes
[B<o
D NA [:] NE
Other Issues
28, Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 1. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
El Application Field 0 Lagoon/Storage Pond M Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the pen -nit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
D Yes [ErNo DNA ONE
D Yes [?�No 0 NA D NE
D Yes ONoo D NA [:] NE
D Yes [R<o DNA D NE
Yes Z'No
Yes :�No
Yes No
NA N E
NA NE
NA NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). I
WA� st'na Ct-wcas �-Ur
� t_'j'j Owe(-
-k- k'teb6a(-� . %
NO I (-C. �"A IS i, r,( C, Owe% . �A
�b 010 50 oxx�_ ayal
Reviewed Inspector Name
Reviewerl Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
It) se-'D�' er
Phone: 911- 9D6
- .
31
Date:
511212020