20120748 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_2014_20150414

Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
FINAL
Project Name: Junes Branch Stream Restoration
EEP Contract No.: 003979
EEP Project No.: 95027
Jackson County, NC
Data Collected: January 2015
Date Submitted: February 2015
t_
Submitted to:
•^ 'S Z
F Os stem
m wo S'luenicht
P * -r"
NCDENR -EEP, 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 -1652
r : ^-
w }-
h
% F_
A.
Submitted to:
•^ 'S Z
F Os stem
m wo S'luenicht
P * -r"
NCDENR -EEP, 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 -1652
r : ^-
w }-
h
% F_

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Prepared for:
Oebx
AN r, COMPANY
res
Prepared by:
EQUINOX
balance through proper planning

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Contents
1.0 Project Summary ------------------------------------------.|
iiGoals .............................................................................................................................................
l
1.2. Success Criteria .............................................................................................................................
l
1.3. Project Setting and Background ---------------------------------.2
1/4. Prnco( Approach ----------------------------------------'2
1.5. Project Performance ......................................................................................................................
2
2.0 Methods .............................................................................................................................................
4
3.0 References .........................................................................................................................................
4
AppendixA ...................................................................................................................................................
5
AppendixB .................................................................................................................................................
l7
AppendixC .................................................................................................................................................
39
AppendixD .................................................................................................................................................
47

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
1.1. Goals
The project goals address stressors identified in the Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) and include the
following:
• Improve water quality within the restored channel reaches and downstream watercourses
through:
• reducing turbidity by stabilizing existing stream banks and altering stream channel
dimension, pattern and profile
• reducing nutrient loads and fecal coliform bacteria from adjacent agricultural fields
by fencing the riparian area to keep livestock out of the stream and restoring a
wooded riparian buffer
Improve local aquatic and terrestrial habitat and diversity within the restored channels and
their vicinity through:
• reducing water temperatures by planting native vegetation in the riparian zone and
creating shade
• improving habitat complexity by restoring the stream profile to stable riffle /pool
complex and step /pool complexes
• improving terrestrial habitat by excluding livestock and creating a native riparian
buffer
• improving aquatic habitat by establishing tree canopy to provide organic material
such as woody debris and leaf packs to stream
• removing invasive exotic species and planting native vegetation in the riparian buffer
Improve flood flow attenuation on -site and downstream through:
o raising the bed or creating bankfull benches to allow for overbank flows every 1 -2
years and will improve the connection to the active floodplain
1.2. Success Criteria
1.2.1. Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability
Restored and enhanced streams shall be in compliance with the standards set forth in the USACE 2003
Stream Mitigation Guidelines and should demonstrate morphologic stability to be considered successful.
Stability does not equate to an absence of change, but rather to sustainable rates of change or stable
patterns of variation. Restored streams often demonstrate some level of initial adjustment in the several
months that follow construction and some change /variation subsequent to that is also to be expected.
However, the observed change should not be unidirectional such that it represents a robust trend. If some
trend is evident, it should be very modest or indicate migration to a stable form.
Dimension- Cross - section measurements should indicate little change from the as -built cross - sections.
If changes do occur, they will be evaluated to determine whether the adjustments are associated with
increased stability or whether they indicate movement towards an unstable condition.
Pattern and Profile- Measurements and calculated values should indicate stability with little
deviation from as -built conditions and established morphological ranges for the restored stream type.
Pool depths may vary from year to year, but the majority should maintain depths sufficient to be
observed as distinct features in the profile. The pools should maintain their depth with flatter water
surface slopes, while the riffles should remain shallower and steeper. Pattern measurements will not
be collected unless conditions seem to indicate that a detectable change appears to have occurred based
on profile and/or dimension measurements.
Substrate - Calculated D50 and D84 values should indicate coarser size class distribution of bed
materials in riffles and finer size class distribution in pools. The majority of riffle pebble counts
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 1 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

should indicate maintenance or coarsening of substrate distributions. Generally, it is anticipated that
the bed material will coarsen over time.
Sediment Transport- Depositional features should be consistent with a stable stream that is
effectively managing its sediment load. Point bar and inner berm features, if present, should develop
without excessive encroachment of the channel. Isolated development of robust (i.e. comprised of
coarse material and/or vegetation actively diverting flow) mid - channel or lateral bars will be
acceptable. Likewise, development of a higher number of mid - channel or lateral bars that are minor in
terms of their permanency such that profile measurements do not indicate systemic aggradation will be
acceptable, but trends in the development of robust mid - channel or alternating bar features will be
considered a destabilizing condition and may require intervention or have success implications.
Surface Water Hydrology - Monitoring of stream surface water stages should indicate recurrence of
bankfull flow on average every 1 to 2 years. At a minimum, throughout the monitoring period, the
surface water stage should achieve bankfull or greater elevations at least twice. The bankfull events
must occur during separate monitoring years.
1.2.2. Vegetation
Riparian vegetation monitoring shall be conducted for a minimum of five years to ensure that success
criteria are met per USACE guidelines. Accordingly, success criteria will consist of a minimum survival
of 320 stems per acre by the end of the Year 3 monitoring period and a minimum of 260 stems per acre at
the end of Year 5. If monitoring indicates either that the specified survival rate is not being met or the
development of detrimental conditions (i.e., invasive species, diseased vegetation), appropriate corrective
actions will be developed and implemented.
1.3. Project Setting and Background
The Junes Branch Restoration Site (Site) is located in central Jackson County approximately 2 miles east
of Sylva, NC (Figure 1). The site encompasses 5.8 acres of formerly agricultural land and includes
portions of Bumgamer Branch and three unnamed tributaries that for purposes of the project are referred
to as Junes Branch, Higdon Branch, and Doris Branch. The site is located within the Little Tennessee
River Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 14 -digit Hydrologic Unit 06010203 0200 10, and
the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ sub basin 04- 04 -02. The site watershed is
characteristic of the Blue Ridge region with moderate rainfall with annual precipitation averaging 52.9
inches. Elevation within the site ranges from 2,200 feet at the northwestern extent, to 2,150 feet along
Junes Branch. The drainage area of Bumgarner Branch at the downstream end of the Site is 1.03 square
miles (668 acres). Land use within the watershed is predominately forested (68 %) with the remaining
land use composed of low- density residential (21 %) and agricultural (11 %). Additional information
regarding project setting and background is found in the Final Mitigation Plan (EBX 2013)
1.4. Project Approach
Channel restoration involving improved pattern, dimension, and longitudinal profile was completed on all
four stream reaches. A Priority I approach was applied to all four reaches of the project (Rosgen 1996;
NCSRI 2004).
1.5. Project Performance
Monitoring Year 1 (MY I) data was collected during January 2015. Monitoring activities included visual
assessment of all reaches and the surrounding easement, fourteen permanent photo stations, five
permanent vegetation monitoring plots, 3,274 feet of longitudinal profile, fifteen cross - sections, and
fifteen pebble counts.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 2 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Generally, visual assessment of the project as a whole indicates that the streams are performing as desired
and, with the exception of several small bare areas, vegetation is becoming well established throughout
the easement. Summary tables and permanent photo station photos associated with the visual assessment
are located in Appendix B. Visual assessment of the stream was performed to document signs of
instability, such as eroding banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. No indication of
instability of was observed during visual assessment (Table 5 and Figure 2). Structures are intact and
performing as designed. Several pools at the upstream end of Junes branch have deposits of fine
sediment, but these deposits are expected to clear with high flows. Herbaceous vegetation has become
well established in both the wetland fringes along the stream as well as upland areas. Planted stems were
difficult to assess during the leaf -off condition; however, two bare areas were noted along the Junes
Branch reach totaling 0.07 acres (Table 6, Figure 2). Additionally, one small area of encroachment
(mowing) was noted at the private driveway crossing. EBX will be discussing the issue with the
landowner to prevent further encroachment and remedial action will take place to repair the vegetation.
Monitoring of permanent vegetation monitoring plots (n = 5) was completed during January 2015.
Summary tables and photographs associated with MY1 monitoring are located in Appendix C. MY1
monitoring data indicates that all vegetation monitoring plots are on track to meet the MY3 interim
success criteria of 320 stems per acre. Stem densities ranged from 445 to 769 stems per acre with a mean
of 615 stems per acre across all plots. A total of 12 species documented within the monitoring plots.
When volunteer stems are included, densities ranged between 607 and 2,752 stems per acre with a mean
of 1,246 stems per acre across all plots. As stated above, visual assessment of the easement indicates that
herbaceous vegetation has become well established throughout the project.
Geomorphic data for MY1 was collected during January 2015. Summary tables, cross - section plots, and
longitudinal profiles related to stream morphology are located in Appendix D. With the exception of XS-
3, noticeable change in the cross - section data between MYO and MY1 were limited to pools (Appendix B,
Table 11 a). Deposits of finer material in pools led to decreased pool depths. The only noticeable change
at a riffle cross - section was at XS -3 where downcutting of the channel was evident with an increase in
max and mean depths of 0.5 and 0.1 feet, respectively. Generally, longitudinal profile data (Appendix B,
Table l lb) indicated relatively little change in riffle and pool dimensions between MYO and MY1. Some
settling of riffles was noted on all reaches; however, this is expected between MYO and MY1 and does
not indicate instability. On Doris Branch, fine sediment accumulation in pools resulted in a drop in mean
pool max depth from 1.6 feet in MYO to 1.1 feet in Wt. Initial substrate monitoring was performed
during MY1. As expected pebble counts indicate that riffles are coarser than pools and the riffle D50 fell
into the coarse gravel size class for all Bumgarner I and lI, fine gravel for Junes and Doris Branch, and
medium gravel for Higdon Branch. Substrate will be monitored in future years for shifts in composition.
Documented shifts in stream morphology do not exceed expectations between MYO and MY1 as the
constructed stream adjusts to conditions at the site. The project is meeting success criteria regarding
stable dimension, pattern, and profile as well as substrate and sediment transport.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly Restoration Plan) documents available on EEP's website. All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from EEP upon request.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 3 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

2.0 METHODS
Visual assessment of the stream was performed at the beginning of the monitoring period. Permanent
photo station photos were collected during the initial visual assessment during leaf -off conditions.
Additional photos of vegetation or stream problem areas were documented with photographs throughout
the project area.
Geomorphic measurements were taken during low flow conditions using a Nikon NPR 332 Total Station.
Three- dimensional coordinates associated with cross - section and profile data were collected in the field
and geo- referenced (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200). Morphological data was limited to 15 cross -
sections, and 3,050 feet of longitudinal profile. Survey data was imported into CAD, ArcGIS, and Excel
for data processing and analysis. Channel substrate was characterized using a Wolman Pebble Count
outlined in the Harrelson et al (1994) and processed using Microsoft Excel.
Vegetation success is being monitored using 5 permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation monitoring
follows the CVS -EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and
includes analysis of composition and density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data
entry tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with rebar and photos of
each plot are taken from the origin each monitoring year.
Precipitation data was collected using an Onset HOBO Data Logging Rain Gauge. Bankfull events were
documented with crest gauges. During quarterly visits to the site, the height of the corkline was recorded
and cross - referenced with known bankfull elevations at each crest gauge.
3.0 REFERENCES
Environmental Banc and Exchange. 2013. Junes Branch Stream Restoration, Final Mitigation Plan,
Jackson County, North Carolina. NCEEP Project No. 95027
Lee, M.T.,R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. http : / /cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm; accessed November 2008.
NCSRI (North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute). 2004. Stream Restoration: A Natural Channel
Design Handbook. North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute and North Carolina Sea Grant.
Raleigh. http: / /www.bae.ncsu.edu /programs /extension/wgg/srR/
guidebook.html
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology. Pagosa Springs, Colorado.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 4 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix A
General Tables and Figures

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 6 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 7 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
4-4
6
A'W
74
23
,
74
441 .•
�r
r�
�-�
5yI~•a
i,7 Junes Branch
91� �41,n"tl
,
�
t
�"
LS 1im I' A,h—Ilse 1 k 1 -Z0 W-I 176 mild
v an! ia5.1')Y941iw. iAi m rlflc
-
Take sap lb aawerd 3unsx Crier R,wd o(J mew omo
[4.:5� i1vt,4ii 1Nea1 Arlo aygnr mur`.x ?il mYlrs, lake .^xii
kc I—W N1. 1 o7rCut6.6�, . Ki p chi m & 1i,rk m the n,mr
-
T
old cnmanur mn[a LS•23'AShrilW il�hwry hldcasl Lp7n kt
441
{Inln NC' 147a1:.na i+tain 5arcn !ue 1n+lar}slmekls ? mite+llelnre
t^$
+�, ��
- 1 wrmirtp Inn rim tlrall,l•Leu• Rrrsl {SFa: 77'Jl.
:1-
`TT
T&V- Wk PItlk51[ G iSan CnAMffiMa1 RY7lr4Llmn5ileofdte'
� a` °k[ 771- T411-x -70' 911 -0iwIieAA w i�An�rrltt1 OTP1 nd lc
l!l
"
1cne,pauel 6y sirarrled enur.',rvW neascinrnC 6w i.
In,nkmd by IenJ mukt privdcnwiwAbir..4cm I.Ilha.vlr,nap
1 nuplim Imvrr4 abeam near nr along Iha ceeemmi lwwdnry and
IherF'l41T'9FSCD� 41r cenrral ru�hlw ix9nl pxm1m1115+1 �,46i'ee by
:VAIrInfCN1� �
enitlnnaad prrxmm�sl nlwtrnnd t'n[ml apmcaexyr t]n^ir
Nn1iu
Ingem cnntrn a,xx insAd W in Ihrdm4ovmena, owmipin amd
swwudo-ri6p olNr rerlomlion xik ispamiIWwi6hvLIbc krms anJ
'y
J1 'y
,ilnelmaik°x r r,h 61 J. i'.n t1 iukx Any mkWJL%J Ak isiam6in.,1
� actirily in a Fkr�n,n 1 nisiJc c,611xx prc','ilwelp aan:li�trK'd rs Cer
-_
a,1d acfnalie. nynin-. pram r, a,niirmlion with l.P.P
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
- -; I= C) U I 0 "�
l �'+R
Junels Branch
F11 'tun
[',11 1'11 '111CIA
Projeet Nn. 95027
Jackson C•ounry. North C'arohnn
Notes: Cmisen`aiiun Easci nem from Key
Mapping K Survey. P.A-
05 1 2 3
AAW
hi lcs
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 7 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 8 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

i
2. Integrated Current Condition Plan view llralt
Prepared for
a
r4 '%A.- I
Frowstem
i
Bumgarner I1
Doris Branch
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 1
Sylva, Jackson County, NC
NCEEP Contract No. 003979
NCEEP Project No.: 95027
January 2015
Overview
/
/
/
s
I`
d
4
- --- -����;
e i 1
#7� _r3-W__7
4 I 1
I -
�� I
I
� I 1
I
1
-.1 "ShMet 1
Branch
Cross - Section
�i Thalweg
Top of Bank
Contour- Major
Contour- Minor
Vegetation Plot
Sheet Boundary
y /5�
ti
0 125 250 500
Feet
Notes:
1) Baseline Data Provided by Kee Mapping
2) Orthoimagery provided by NCOneMap (20 10)
Prepared by
A-.,100
-AW
EQUINOX
Hook -Log Run
Log Vane
with Hook
Hook Run
Log Sill
q
Boulder -Arch
Log Sill
no Baffle
Boulder -Arch
6ft
Brush Toe
with Log
Armored Riffle
ti
0 125 250 500
Feet
Notes:
1) Baseline Data Provided by Kee Mapping
2) Orthoimagery provided by NCOneMap (20 10)
Prepared by
A-.,100
-AW
EQUINOX

2. lnteerated Uurrent Uondition Plan View
W
Bumgarner II
/ o0
Juncs Branch ' yw
� •�� PP6 "1}
xp f
o ;
sp
•oo .� G
's
/ ' o XS3 PP9 • ��
XS11 £a,_ o f XS1 * .�
o +
PP1O �I.. _ O +� pp N +r
O U1 O A ' �y� 0 r �'
o .
Opal O A o }
x�
O a -�0 O •_• W O o }o
• O
« o
- lop o '��►
XSS r
XS4 0
a N
:120
t
i O
N
a
o XS13 XS 12 *�
P.
w PP13 '
w wo
o �
o iS is
w o
� o 0
oXS 15 XS 14 PI` 14 k �+
,. •` " • �.�, •Doris Branch
* •� �'•. H;
gdon Branch
Prepared for Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 1
Sylva, Jackson County, NC
NCEEP Contract No. 003979
E11���y'WS���11 � NCEEP Project No.: 95027
January 2015
Sheet 1 of 2
Bumgarner I
o
0 Rain Gauge Cross- Section
1
Easement
Hook -Log Run
Log Vane
Hook
with
Crest Gauge Long Pro Begin/End
Bare Area
Te
Hook Run
Log Sill
�7 Photo Point �� Thalweg
Encroachment
Control Point To of Bank
C P
� Low Stem Density
Boulder -Arch
�
Log Sill
no Baffle
�i Contour- Major
Vegetation Plot Success
Boulder -Arch
Brush Toe
Contour- Minor
Criteria Met
with Log
- Criteria Unmet
Armored Riffle
0 50
%%,f .WO ,P.W-,1
ti
r
100
Notes:
1) Baseline Data Provided by Kee Mapping
2) Orthoimagery provided by NCOneMap (2010)
200
Feet
Prepared by
,Ogj -
E UINO/N

2. lnteerated Uurrent Uondition Plan View
A-*- �' PP3
AO#
SIR—* pop ra
0 �.�`� �j• •�N. �r�...� Rte! M + CD
o ° ° o o N � + + - ° PP2 i{
' o ° o c+n `D 01 ° XS9 XS8 _ # ^9
00 0 CD
CD
O O
AL
4r or
Junes B
+ + N
O C O
O O O +
• +
}4
O
o
nr�
O
CO
U, • N
O
1 °
XS7 ° N
C) - + N
` O +
f PI ° o '
XS6
/
0 50 100 200
Feet
Notes:
Prepared for ° Log Vane Prepared b
P Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project O Rain Gauge Cross- Section � � Easement Hook -Log Run 1 )BaselineDataProvidedbyKeeMapping P Y
with Hook
Monitoring Year 1 & Crest Gauge Long Pro Begin /End ��� Bare Area 2) Orthoimagery provided by NCOneMap (20 10)
S lva Jackson Count NC Hook Run Log Sill
y y� �7 Photo Point �� Thalweg Encroachment
NCEEP Contract No. 003979 Control Point To of Bank Log sill
' P Low Stem Density Boulder -Arch no Baffle
NCEEP Project No.: 95027
Eliaiyl"' S January 2015 Contour- Major Vegetation Plot Success Boulder -Arch Brush Toe U I N �'k
Sheet 2 of 2 Contour- Minor -Criteria Met with Log
- Criteria Unmet Armored Riffle

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 12 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

`BR = Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond; FS = Filter
Strip; S = Grassed Swale; LS = Level Spreader;
NI = Natural Infiltration Area; FB = Forested Buffer
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 13 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Junes Branch / Project Number 95027
Mitigation Credits
Nitrogen Phosphorous
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non - riparian Wetland
Buffer
Nutrient
Offset
Nutrient Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
Totals
3,162
-
I -
-
-
-
-
-
-
Project Components
Project
Approach
pP
Restoration
Restoration
Component -or-
Stationing/Location
Existing
Footage /Acreage
(PI, PII
-or-
Restoration
Footage or
Mitigation
Ratio
Reach ID
etc.)
Equivalent
Acreage
Bumgarner Branch
100 +21 - 107 +49
610
PI
R
631
1:1
1
Bumgamer Branch
107 +49 - 112 +92
550
PI
R
501
1:1
2
June's Branch
200 +97 - 215 +77
1311
P1
R
1374
1:1
Higdon Branch
300 +45 - 304 +27
530
P I
R
376
1:1
Doris Branch
400+00 - 402 +88
260
PI
R
280
1:1
Component Summation
Restoration
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -riparian Wetland
Buffer
Upland
Level
(linear feet)
(acres)
(acres)
(square feet)
(acres)
Riverine
Non - Riverine
Restoration
3,162
Enhancement
-
Enhancement
Enhancement
II
Creation
-
Preservation
-
-
High Quality
Preservation
BMP Elements
Element
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
FB
Entire Site
Protect Stream
`BR = Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond; FS = Filter
Strip; S = Grassed Swale; LS = Level Spreader;
NI = Natural Infiltration Area; FB = Forested Buffer
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 13 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Junes Branch / Project Number 95027
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Completion
or Deliver
Mitigation Plan
Aug -12
April -2013
Final Design - Construction Plans
N/A
April -2013
Construction
N/A
June -2014
Temporary S &E Mix Applied to Entire Project Area
May -14
Permanent Seed Mix Applied
Ma -14
Containerized and B &B Plantings
May -14
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0 Monitoring -
Baseline
July -2014
July -2014
Year 1 Monitoring
Jan - 2015
Feb - 2015
Year 2 Monitoring
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 14 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Table 3. Project Contacts
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Site — EEP Project # 95027
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
Prime Contractor
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
David Godley (919) 829 -9909
Wolf Creek Engineering
Designer
12 -1/2 Wall St., Suite C
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Grant Ginn (828) 449 -1930 ext 102
Northstate Environmental
Construction Contractor
2889 Lowery Street
Winston Salem, North Carolina 27101
Darrell Westmoreland (336) 725 -2010
Northstate Environmental
Planting Contractor
2889 Lowery Street
Winston Salem, North Carolina 27101
Darrell Westmoreland (336) 725 -2010
Kee Mapping and Surveying
As -built Surveys
PO Box 2566
Asheville, North Carolina 28802
Phillip B. Key (828) 575 -9021
Green Resource
Seeding Mix Source
5204 Highgreen Court
Colfax, North Carolina 27235
(336) 855 -6363
Dykes & Son Nursery
Bare Root Seedlings
825 Maude Etter Road
McMinnville, Tennessee
(931) 668 -8833
Foggy Mountain Nursery
Live Stakes
797 Helton Creek Road
Lansing, North Carolina 28643
(336) 384 -5323
Equinox
Monitoring Performers (YO -Yl)-
37 Haywood St.
2014 -2015
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Hunter Terrell (828) 253 -6856
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 15 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 16 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Project Information
Project Name
Junes Branch
County
Jackson County
Project Area (acres)
5.8 ac.
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35.357378'N and longitude 83.191391° W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Blue Ridge
River Basin
Little Tennessee
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
6010203
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
6010203020010
DWQ Sub -basin
4/4/2002
Project Drainage Area (acres)
668
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<5%
CGIA Land Use Classification
2A 1.03 Hay and Pasture Land
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Bumgarner Br.I
Bumgarner Br. 11
Junes Br.
Higdon Br.
Doris Br.
Length of reach (linear feet)
610
550
1311
530
260
Valley classification (Rosgen)
11
11
H
II
II
Drainage area
0.93
1.03
0.23
0.08
0.01
NCDWQ stream identification score
40
40
38
38
29.5
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
C
C
-
_
_
Morphological Description (stream type) (Rosgen)
E
G
G
E
G
Evolutionary trend (Rosgen)
C
F
F
E
G
Underlying mapped soils
CwA, WtB
CwA, WtB
WtB
CwA
CwA
Drainage class
Somewhat Poorly
Drained -Mod. Well
Drained
Somewhat Poorly
Drained -Mod Well
Drained
Mod Well Drained
Somewhat
Poorly
Drained
Somewhat
Poorly
Drained
Soil Hydric status
Non- Hydric
Non- Hydric
Non- Hydric
Non- Hydric
Non- Hydric
Slope
2.20%
2.20%
2.30%
FEMA classification
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Native vegetation community
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
30%
30%
30%
40%
40%
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland 1
Weiland 2
Size of Wetland (acres)
0.03
0.13
Wetland Type (non - riparian, riparian riverine or riparian non - riverine)
Riparian
Non - Riverine
Riparian
Non - Riverine
Mapped Soil Series
CwA
G\vA
Drainage class
Somewhat Poorly Drained
Somewhat Poorly Drained
Soil Hydric Status
Hydric
Hydric
Source of Hydrology
Seep
Seep
Hydrologic Impairment
None
Dredging/Ditching
Native vegetation community
Scrub -Shrub
Forested
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
2%
42%
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section 404
Yes
Resolved
Action ID #2012 -01101
Waters of the United States — Section 401
Yes
Resolved
NCDWR Project # 20120748
Endangered Species Act
No
Yes
ERTR
Historic Preservation Act
No
Yes
ERTR
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
No
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
N/A
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N/A
N/A
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 16 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Bumgarner Branch I
Assessed Len th 631 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub - Category
Metric
Number
Stable
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2. Deeradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
13
13
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Death Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
13
13
1001%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
N/A
N -1
N/A
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
13
13
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
12
12
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
14
14
o
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
14
14
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
14
14
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15 %.
14
14
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining— Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
14
14
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 19 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Bumgarner II
Assessed Len th 543 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub - Category
Metric
Number
Stable
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2. Deeradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
7
7
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
8
8
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
2
2
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
8
8
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
8
8
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
7
7
o
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
7
7
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
7
7
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15 %.
7
7
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining— Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
7
7
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 20 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Junes
Assessed Len th 1,375 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub - Category
Metric
Number
Stable
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2. Deeradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
45
45
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
45
45
1001%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
N/A
N -1
N/A
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
45
45
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
45
45
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
45
45
o
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
45
45
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
45
45
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15 %.
45
45
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining— Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
45
45
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 21 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Higdon
Assessed Len th 376 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub - Category
Metric
Number
Stable
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2. Deeradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
18
18
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Death Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
18
18
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
3
3
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
18
18
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
18
18
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
15
15
o
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
15
15
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
15
15
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15 %.
15
15
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining— Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
15
15
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 22 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Doris
Assessed Len th 288 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub - Category
Metric
Number
Stable
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2. Deeradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
23
23
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
23
23
1001%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
N/A
N/A
N/A
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
23
23
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
23
23
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
23
23
o
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
23
23
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
23
23
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15 %.
23
23
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining— Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
23
23
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 23 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027
Planted Acreage: 5.81
% of
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Planted
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
N/A
2
0.07
1
2. Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3,
N/A
0
0.00
°
0%
4, or 5 stem count criteria.
Totals
2
0.07
1%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
N/A
0
0.00
0%
given the monitoring ear.
Cumulative Totals
2
0.07
1%
Easement Acreage: 5.81
of
Numbers
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
Cross Hatch
0
0.00
0%
(Red - Dense/Yellow - Present)
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
N/A
1
0.02
<1%
N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 24 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 1
Station 202 +60 - Downstream
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 1
Station 202 +60 - Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 25 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2
Station 206 +30 - Downstream
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2
Station 206 +30 - Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 26 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 3
Looking South/Downstream Junes Branch
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 3
Looking South/Downstream - Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 27 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 4
Station 210 +60 - Downstream
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 4
Station 210 +60 - Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 28 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 5
Station 211 +10 - Upstream
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 6
Station 214 +00 - Downstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 29 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 6
Station 214 +00 - Upstream
Bumgarner Branch I — Permanent Photo Station 7
Station 100 +21 - Downstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 30 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Bumgarner Branch I — Permanent Photo Station 8
Station 102 +70 - Downstream
Bumgarner Branch I — Permanent Photo Station 8
Station 102 +70 - Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 31 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Bumgarner Branch I — Permanent Photo Station 9
Station 105 +25 - Downstream
Bumgarner Branch I — Permanent Photo Station 9
Station 105 +25 —Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 32 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Bumgarner Branch I — Permanent Photo Station 10
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Junes Branch
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 10
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Bumgarner Branch
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 33 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Bumgarner Branch II — Permanent Photo Station Ll
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Higdon Branch
Higdon Creek — Permanent Photo Station 11
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Bumgarner Branch II
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 34 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Bumgarner Branch II — Permanent Photo Station 12
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Doris Branch
Doris Creek — Permanent Photo Station 12
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Bumgarner Branch II
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 35 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Higdon Creek — Permanent Photo Station 13
Station 302 +80 - Downstream
Higdon Creek — Permanent Photo Station 13
Station 302 +80 - Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 36 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Doris Creek — Permanent Photo Station 14
Station 400 +00 - Downstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 37 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 38 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027
Vegetation
Plot ID
Vegetation Survival
Threshold Met?
Tract Mean
1
Yes
100%
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
5
Yes
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 41 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

iz
Junes Branch - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
January 15, 2015
.af
r
Junes Branch - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
January 15, 2015
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 42
NCEEP Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

I
,l
0
Junes Branch - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
January 15, 2015
,-
Y P
gfo�in
Junes Branch - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
January 15, 2015
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 43 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
January 15, 2015
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 44 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Report Prepared By
Date Prepared
database name
database location
computer name
file size
Metadata
Proj, planted
Proj, total stems
Plots
Vigor
Vigor by Spp
Damage
Damage by Spp
Damage by Plot
Planted Stems by Plot and
Spp
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027
Owen Carson
1/19/2015 8:10
Equinox _2014_A Junes _MY1.mdb
Z: \ES \NRI &M \EBX Monitoring \Junes \MY1 - 2014 \Data \Ve
FIELDTECH3 -PC
61181952
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------- - - - --
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of
project(s) and project data.
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year.
This excludes live stakes.
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This
includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural /volunteer
stems.
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems,
dead stems, missing, etc.).
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and
percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each
plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and
natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems
ALLStems by Plot and spp are excluded.
Project Code
project Name
Description
River Basin
length(ft)
PROJECT SUMMARY
95027
Junes Branch
Little Tennessee
stream -to -edge width (ft)
area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots 5
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 45 Equinox
WEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Table 9. PlantedandTotal Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Junes Branch/Project No. 95027
Current Plot Data (MIT 2015)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
Plot
plot
Plot
Plot
Plot
MIT (2015)
MY0(2014)
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
5
5
5
1
1
1
6
6
6
11
11
11
Carpinus caroliniana var. caroliniana
Coastal American
Hornbeam
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
5
5
5
4
4
4
Cornus,/lorida
Flowering Dogwood
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Fraxinuspennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
9
9
9
2
2
2
4
4
4
5
5
5
20
20
20
21
21
21
Hamamelis virginiana var. virginiana
American witchhazel
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
5
5
5
Juglans nigra
Black Walnut
Tree
I
1
I
1
I
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera var. tulipifera
Tulip -tree, Yellow
Poplar, Whitewood
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
6
6
6
7
7
7
Platanus occidentalis var. occidentalis
Sycamore, Plane -tree
Tree
1
1
1
6
6
6
9
9
9
1
1
1
17
17
17
17
17
17
Prunus serotina var. serotina
Black Cherry
Tree
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
3
3
3
Quercus
Oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
6
6
6
6
Quercus rubra var. cobra
Northem Red Oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
6
6
6
5
1 5
5
Salix nigra
Black Willow
Tree
57
20
I
78
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
4
4
4
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRIE
19
19
19
11
11
68
11
11
31
21
21
21
E14#
14
1 S
7676
154
87
87
87
1
I
1
1
I
5
5
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.12
0.12
7
7
1 7
5
5
1 6
2
2
1 3
9
9
9
7
7
8
11
it
12
12
1 12
12
769
1 769
445
445
1 2752
1 445
445
1 1255
850
1 850
1 850
567
567
607
615
615
1246
704
1 704
704
'PnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 46 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Geomorphology Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Table I la. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Bumgarner I (631 feet)
Cross - Section 1
Riffle
Cross - Section 2
Pool
Cross - Section 3
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2,153.11
2,153.11
Bankfull Width (ft)
2,152.68
2,152.68
2,145.60
2,145.60
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.3
13.4
1 13.4
13.1
15.8
16.8
1.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
>79
>79
>124
>124
2.4
>42
>42.37
1.3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
0.8
18.9
1.5
1.1
13.4
0.8
0.9
11.9
13.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.5
1 1.3
18.4
1
2.9
1.9
>3.0
>3.1
1 1.2
1.7
>3.0
>3.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
11.7
1 11.3
1.0
1.0
1
20.6
14.0
1.0
1
12.2
14.5
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ftz)
31.9
26.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
15.2
15.8
28.0
27.6
8.7
12.3
d50 (mm),
N/A
N/A
20.4
19.4
N/A
25
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.9
>5.9
>9.3
>9.5
>2.7
>2.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ftz)
33.8
27.9
1
43.1
35.6
11
1 28.4
1 31
d50 (mm)
N/A
27
1
N/A
I
I N/A
1 16
N/A - Item does not apply.
Table Ila cont'd. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Bumgarner II (543 feet)
Cross - Section 4
Pool
Cross - Section 5
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2,140.17
2,140.17
2,139.81
2,139.81
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.5
16.1
16.3
15.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
>50
>48
>48
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
1.2
0.7
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.6
2.4
1.2
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
23.0
18.9
11.9
13.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.9
13.7
22.2
18.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.0
>3.1
>3.0
>3.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ftz)
31.9
26.1
28.0
27.6
d50 (mm),
N/A
N/A
N/A
25
N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 49 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Table I la cont'd. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Junes (1375 feet)
Cross - Section 6
Riffle
Cross - Section 7
Pool
Cross - Section 8
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation(datum)Used
2,172.66
2,172.66
2,171.35
2,171.35
2,163.28
2,163.28
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.6
8.8
8.2
8.8
9.6
10.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>94
>94
>111
>111
>53
>53
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.5
1.0
0.7
0.7
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.9
2.1
1.6
1.2
1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
3.7
4.1
8.6
6.1
6.4
6.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
19.7
18.9
7.9
12.7
14.3
18.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>11.0
>10.7
>13.5
>12.6
>5.5
>4.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft2)
24.9
17.8
25.8
24.4
38.6
39.6
d50 (mm)
N/A
1.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 4.7
N/A - Item does not apply.
Table I la cont'd. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Junes (1375 feet)
Cross - Section 9
Pool
Cross - Section 10
Pool
Cross - Section 11
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation(datum)Used
2,162.64
2,162.64
2,144.35
2,144.35
2,143.99
2,143.99
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.5
11.1
11.0
10.9
9.8
9.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>56
>56
>39
>39
>38
>38
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.0
1.8
1.7
1.5
1.2
1.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
10.5
8.4
9.0
7.9
5.8
5.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.4
14.7
13.4
15.0
16.5
15.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.3
>5
>3.5
>3.5
>3.9
>4.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft2)
46.1
44.3
32.4
31.0
23.7
23.2
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
12
N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 50 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Table lla. cont'd. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Higdon Branch (376 feet)
Cross - Section 12
Riffle
Cross - Section 13
Pool
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2,140.85
2,140.85
2,140.14
2,140.14
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.6
8.1
8.0
7.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
>40
>40
>30
>30
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.3
0.7
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
1.7
1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (112)
2.5
2.6
5.9
4.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
17.6
24.7
10.8
13.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>6.0
>4.9
>3.7
>4.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft2)
15.9
15.3
20.0
16.8
d50 m)
(m
N/A
IS
N/A
N/A
N/A - Item does not apply.
Table l la. cont'd Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 -Doris Branch (288 feet)
Cross - Section 14
Riffle
Cross - Section 15
Pool
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2,138.93
2,138.93
2,138.74
2,138.74
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.2
6.6
11.6
11.7
Floodprone Width (11)
>23
>23
>21
>21
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.4
0.8
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
2.3
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
2.3
2.4
9.4
8.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
16.7
18.2
14.3
16.5
Bankfoll Entrenchment Ratio
>3.8
>3.5
>1.8
>1.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ftz)
11.5
10.7
18.7
16.3
d50 (nun)
I N/A
0.062
N/A
N/A
N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 51 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
Station 103 +31
2157
2156.5
2156
21555
2155
2154.5
_ 2154
d
,153.5
2153
X152.5
W
2152
2151.5
2151
2150.5
2150
2149.5
2149
0 +00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35
Station (feet)
—MYO —&'—MY1 - -- BKF
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 52
NCEEP Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
i
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Junes Branch
Cross Section 2 - Pool
Station 103 +56
2157
2156.5
2156
2155.5
2155
2154.5
2154
u
,153.5
C
0
2153
�0
-- - - - - --
-- - - - ---
- - -- - --
-- - - - - --
--- - - - - --
- -- - --
-- - - - - --
-- - - - ---
t2152.5
W
2152
2151.5
2151
2150.5
2150
2149.5
2149
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40
Station (feet)
— MYO —MY1 - -- BKF
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 53
NCEEP Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Junes Branch
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
Station 106 +36
2149
2148.5
2148
2147.5
2147
2146.5
2146
- - --
- - - - - --
---------
- - - - --
,«2145.5
e
•R 0 2145
_144.5
La
2144
2143.5
2143
2142.5
2142
2141.5
2141
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45
Station (feet)
—MYO —MY1 - -- BKF
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 54
NCEEP Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
F
-m:
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Junes Branch
Cross Section 4 - Pool
Station 109 +24
2144
2143.5
2143
2142.5
2142
2141.5
_ 2141
,;;2140.5
a-
- -- –
-- - --
-
- - - - -- 4
---------------
- - - --
- - - - --
---------------
2140
R
Ile
139.5
W
2139
2138.5
2138
2137.5
2137
2136.5
2136
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0+50
Station (feet)
—MYO —MYl - -- BKF
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 55
NCEEP Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Junes Branch
Cross Section 5 -Riffle
Station 109 +58
2144
2143.5
2143
2142.5
2142
2141.5
2141
w 2140.5
c
2140
>
2139.5
d
W
2139
2138.5
2138
2137.5
2137
2136.5
2136
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0 +50
Station (feet)
MYO -MYI - -- BKF
diL
At
'T.
�s
.n•�:.rrrri:...
Left Descending Bank
4, '6
t.'
Right Descending Bank
a
Upstream Downstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 56 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
Station 202 +94
2177
2176.5
2176
2175.5
2175
2174.5
2174
.2173.5
c
2173
R-
�.2172.5
- - - - - - - - -
-- --- - - --
- -- _-
_-- _ -_ -_ -_
- - _ -_ - -_
_- _- - - -___
_-- _ -_ -_-
W
2172
2171.5
2171
2170.5
2170
2169.5
2169
0+00 0+95 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35
Station (feet)
MYO -MV1 - -- BKF
i „# 'k r_
Right Descending Bank
J
y
Upstream Downstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 57 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 7 - Pool
Station 203 +50
2176
2175.5
2175
2174.5
2174
2173.5
2173
u
,172.5
n
2172
R
t2171.5
W
2171
2170.5
2170
2169.5
2169
—
2168.5
2168
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35
Station (feet)
—'� MYO —MYI - -- BKF
Upstream
k
Downstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 58 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
Station 20 +99
2167
2166.5
2166
2165.5
2165
2164.5
_ 2164
&2163.5
e
0 2163
162.5
W
2162
2161.5
2161
2160.5
2160
2159.5
2159
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40
Station (feet)
MYO -MYI - -- BKF
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
NCEEP Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
yk
Right Descending Bank
Downstream
59 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Junes Branch
Cross Section 9 - Pool
Station 207 +18
2167
2166.5
2166
2165.5
2165
2164.5
_ 2164
&2163.5
e
0
2163
-- - - - - --
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- ---
- - - - - - -
- - - - --
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
-- - - - - --
162.5
W
2162
2161.5
2161
—
2160.5
2160
2159.5
2159
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45
Station (feet)
MYO -MYl - -- BKF
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 60
NCEEP Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Fp ti�
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Junes Branch
Cross Section 10 - Pool
Station 214 +53
2148
2147.5
2147
2146.5
2146
2145.5
_ 2145
&2144.5
e
0
2144
143.5
W
2143
2142.5
2142
2141.5
2141
2140.5
2140
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40
Station (feet)
MYO -MYl - -- BKF
Upstream
Downstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 61 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 11 -Riffle
Station 214 +65
2148
2147.5
2147
2146.5
2146
2145.5
_ 2145
&2144.5
a
0 2144
119
1
140o,
143.5
W
2143
2142.5
2142
2141.5
2141
2140.5
2140
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40
Station (feet)
MYO -MYI - -- BKF
Upstream
Downstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 62 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 12 -Riffle
Station 301 +99
2145
2144.5
2144
2143.5
2143
2142.5
_ 2142
&2141.
e
0 2141
140.5
W
2140
2139.5
2139
2138.5
2138
2137.5
2137
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30
Station (feet)
MYO -MYI - -- BKF
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 63
NCEEP Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Bank
1° A
1.
9r
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Junes Branch
Cross Section 13 - Pool
Station 302 +26
2144
2143.5
2143
2142.5
2142
2141.5
2141
&2140.5
f
a------
0 2140
- - - - --
----- - - - - --
--- -- - - --
-
139.5
W
2139
2138.5
2138
2137.5
2137
2136.5
2136
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30
Station (feet)
MYO -MYl - -- BKF
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 64
NCEEP Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
, Oz,
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Junes Branch
Cross Section 14 - Riffle
Station 401 +12
2143
d �s
Tr`
1'
2142.5
2142
2141.5
2141
2140.5
2140
u
,139.5
n
2139
R
---------
— ------------------
-- --
- - - - - --
t2138.5
W
2138
2137.5
2137
2136.5
2136
2135.5
2135
0+00 0+05 0+10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25
Station (feet)
MYO -MYI - -- BKF
-b
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
NCEEP Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
65
ignit uescenoing bank
c. K:
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report
d �s
Tr`
1'
ignit uescenoing bank
c. K:
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Junes Branch
Cross Section 15 - Pool
Station 401 +35
2142
2141.5
2141
2140.5
2140
2139.5
2139
u
,138.5
n
2138
R
t2137.5
W
2137
2136.5
—
2136
2135.5
2135
2134.5
2134
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25
Station (feet)
— NlYl - -- BKF
Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 66
NCEEP Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Downstream
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Table l Ib. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Junes Branch/ Project No. 95027 - Bum garner I (631 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY- 1
MY- 2
MY- 3
MY-4
MY- 5
Dimension & Substrate -Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.3
14.6
14.6
15.8
N/A
2
13.4
15.5
15.5
17.6
3.0
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
>42
>61
>61
>79
N/A
2
>42
>61
>61
>79
26.2
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
N/A
2
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.4
1.4
1.5
N/A
2
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.7
0.3
2
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
11.7
12.0
12.0
12.2
N/A
2
11.3
16.4
16.4
21.4
7.1
2
Width/Depth Ratio
15.2
17.8
17.8
20.4
N/A
2
15.8
18.6
18.6
21.4
4.0
2
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.7
>43
>4.3
>5.9
N/A
2
>2.4
>4.15
>4.15
>5.9
2.5
2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0-F
1.0
1.0
N/A
2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
0.5
13.7
14.4
23.0
7.4
14
10.5
17.0
14.5
25.6
5.7
11
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.016
0.061
0.039
0.251
0.063
14
0.019
0.030
0.027
0.055
0.010
11
Pool Length (ft)
5.2
10.2
9.2
22.5
4.3
12
5.0
7.6
7.3
13.4
2.2
12
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.1
2.8
2.8
3.6
0.5
14
1.9
2.5
2.4
3.7
0.5
14
Pool Spacing (ft)
24.2
45.2
44.1
60.3
10.3
11
25.3
41.8
41.1
59.9
11.9
11
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
24.5
25.3
25.3
26.2
N/A
2
Radius of Curvature (ft)
41.6
48.3
41.6
60.1
10.3
3
Re: Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
2.8
3.3
2.9
4.1
0.7
3
Meander Wavelength (ft)
69.8
81.7
75.9
105.4
16.6
4
Meander Width Ratio
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.1
N/A
2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Be
B
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
728
713
Sinuosity (ft)
1.09
1.09
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
0.0233
0.0243
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.0235
0.0245
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
37% 32% 24% 7% 0%
38%
34%
19%
9%
0%
SC% / SA% / G% / C% / B% / Be%*
d16/05/60/d84/05(mm)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Rim /P= Pool /G= Glide /S =Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand/ G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
- Information unavailable
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 67 Equinox
WEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Table llb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Bum arner II 543 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY-2
MY-3
MY-4
MY-5
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.3
N/A
l
-
15.7
-
-
N/A
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
>47
N/A
1
-
>48
-
-
N/A
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
N/A
I
-
0.9
-
-
N/A
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
N/A
I
-
1.3
-
-
N/A
1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
11.9
N/A
I
-
13.4
-
-
I N/A
1
Width/Depth Ratio
22.2
N/A
I
-
18.4
-
-
N/A
1
Entrenchment Ratio
>3
N/A
1
-
>3.1
-
-
N/A
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
N/A
I
-
1.0
-
-
N/A
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
3.1
29
32.3
38.6
12
7
27.2
34.5
34.5
42.0
5.5
6
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.016
0.026
0.020
0.064
0.017
7
0.015
0.017
0.016
0.021
0.002
6
Pool Length (ft)
12.1
17.8
19.2
22.4
4
7
9.1
13.9
12.7
25.2
5.6
7
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.3
2.9
3.1
3.4
0.4
7
2.2
2.7
2.7
3.2
0.4
7
Pool Spacing (ft)
61.5
70.2
69.9
80.2
6
6
60.7
66.7
66.4
74.5
5.1
6
Pattern WF
Channel Belt Width (ft)
25.4
28.0
26.2
26.2
3.8
3
Radius of Curvature (ft)
39.5
54.4
54.4
69.3
N/A
2
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
3.1
4.3
4.3
5.5
N/A
2
Meander Wavelength (ft)
109.3
123.2
65.2
134.6
12.8
3
Meander Width Ratio
2.0
2.2
2.1
2.6
0.3
3
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Bc
Bc
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
543
522
Sinuosity (ft)
1.07
1.06
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
0.0140
0.0151
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.0152
0.0154
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
45% 1 18% 28% 8%
0%
50%
16%
24% 10% 0%
SC %/ SA % /G % /C % /B % /Be /o
dl6 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mtn)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru = Run /P = Pool /G= Glide /S =Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand/ G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
- Information unavailable
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 68 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Table IIb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Junes Branch 1,375 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY- 2
MY-3
MV-4
MY-5
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n'
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.6
9.3
9.6
9.8
0.6
3
8.8
9.6
9.0
10.8
1.1
3
Flood rone Width (ft)
>38
>62
>53
>94
29.2
3
>38
>62
>53
>94
29.0
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.2
3
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.1
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
1.0
1.2
1.2
0.3
3
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.1
0.1
3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft2)
3.7
5.3
5.8
1 6.4
1.4
3
4.1
1 5.2
1 5.2
6.4
1 1.2
3
Width/Depth Ratio
14.3
16.8
16.5
19.7
2.7
3
15.9
17.7
18.2
18.9
1.6
3
Entrenchment Ratio
>3.9
>6.8
>5.5
>11
3.7
3
>4.2
>6.6
>4.9
>10.7
3.6
3
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0
3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
3
Riffle Length (ft)
7.8
14.9
14.4
33.7
4.1
44
4.9
13.8
14.1
20.5
3.5
43
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.007
0.029
0.030
0.052
0.010
44
0.007
0.030
0.032
0.049
0.010
43
Pool Length (ft)
4.7
10.7
10.4
19.5
3.0
42
1.6
7.8
7.6
14.8
2.9
43
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.9
1.9
3.2
0.4
44
1.0
2.1
2.0
3.8
0.6
43
Pool Spacing (ft)
12.3
30.0
30.5
42.1
6.2
41
19.7
29.8
31.5
38.2
5.4
40
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
18.5
19.7
20.1
21.0
1.5
3
Radius of Curvature (ft)
31.9
35.8
36.7
38.9
3.6
3
Re: Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
3.3
3.7
3.8
4.0
0.4
3
Meander Wavelength (ft)
53.7
67.1
61.4
88.3
12.5
6
Meander Width Ratio
1.9
2.1
2.1
2.2
0.2
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
Bc
B
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,480
1,4272
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
0.0231
0.0245
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.0246
0.0248
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
50%
0%
34%
9%
7%
47%
0%
26%
18% 9%
SC % /SA % /G % /C % /B % /Be %*
-_
dl6 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Rijn /P= Pool /G= Glide /S =Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand/ G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
- Information unavailable
'Number of riffle cross - sections mis- reported in baseline; Corrected value included here.
2Variation in channel thalweg length due to differences in length of monitored longitudinal profile from as- built.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 69 Equinox
WEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S =Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
Corrected Values
- Information unavailable
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 70 Equinox
WEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Table llb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Higdon Branch 376 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY-2
MY-3
MY-4
MY- 5
Dimension & Substrate -Riffle
Min
Mean'
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.0
N/A
1
8.1
N/A
l
Floodprone Width (ft)
>40
N/A
1
>40
N/A
I
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
N/A
1
0.3
N/A
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
N/A
1
0.7
N/A
1
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
2.5
N/A
I 1
2.6
-
-
N/A
I 1
Width/Depth Ratio
17.6
N/A
1
24.7
-
-
N/A
1
Entrenchment Ratio
>6
N/A
1
>4.9
-
-
N/A
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
-
-
N/A
1
Profile
AL
Riffle Length (ft)
2.5
7.7
7.6
15
2.9
13
6.5
9.8
9.1
15.6
2.9
13
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.002
0.021
0.017
0.047
0.012
13
0.007
0.021
0.019
0.040
0.011
13
Pool Length (ft)
4.6
8.1
8.4
11
1.8
14
2.5
6.1
6.3
9.1
1.7
14
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.7
1.7
2
0.2
13
1.2
1.5
1.4
2.0
0.3
12
Pool Spacin (ft)
13.1
18.6
17.5
26.6
3.8
13
14.6
20.3
19.0
31.2
4.5
12
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
9.1
10.6
10.6
12.1
2.1
2
Radius of Curvature (ft)
16.2
19.7
20.1
22.9
3.4
3
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
2.0
2.5
2.5
2.9
0.4
3
Meander Wavelength (ft)
11.8
31.1
31.5
39.5
9.3
7
Meander Width Ratio
1.1
1.3
1.3
1.5
N/A
2
_
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Be
Bc
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
382
370
Sinuosity (ft)
1.06
1.05
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
0.020
0.0191
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.018
0.0156
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
42%
1 %
47% 7%
2%
5%
34% 11%
0%
SC % /SA % /G % /C % /B % /Be %*
-51%
dl6 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S =Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
Corrected Values
- Information unavailable
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 70 Equinox
WEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Table 11 b. Monitoring Data -Stream Reach Data Summary
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Doris Branch (288 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY- I
MY-2
MY-3
MY-4
MY-5
Dimension & Substrate -Riffle
Min
Mean'
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
it
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.2
N/A
1
6.6
-
-
N/A
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
>23
N/A
1
-
>23
-
-
N/A
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
N/A
1
-
0.4
-
-
N/A
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
N/A
1
-
0.7
-
-
N/A
1
Bankf ill Cross- Sectional Area (ft)
2.3
N/A
1
-
2.4
-
-
I N/A
1
Width/Depth Ratio
16.7
N/A
1
-
18.2
-
-
N/A
1
Entrenchment Ratio
>3.8
N/A
1
-
>3.5
-
-
N/A
I
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
N/A
1
-
1.0
-
-
N/A
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
2.5
6.1
6.3 11.4
2.5
18
3.7
6.5
6.5 11.3
2.0
18
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.011
0.022
0.013 0.036
0.008
18
0.002
0.023
0.020 0.055
0.014
18
Pool Length (ft)
2.4
3.7
3.5 6.6
1
19
2.5
3.8
3.8 5.3
0.8
19
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.6
1.6 2.3
0.3
18
0.7
1.1
1.1 1.5
0.2
19
Pool Spacing (ft)
7.2
12.4
12.6 19.9
2.9
18
7.5
12.4
13.3 18.4
3.0
18
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
9.4
9.9
10.0 10.3
0.5
3
Radius of Curvature (ft)
7.9
12.0
12.0 16.1
5.8
2
Re: Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
3.1
4.3
4.3 5.5
N/A
2
Meander Wavelength (ft)
16.6
22.6
24.5 27.1
4.5
6
Meander Width Ratio
2.0
2.1
2.1 2.2
0.1
3
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Be
Be
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
288
274
Sinuosity (ft)
1.06
1.06
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
0.018
0.019
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.018
0.020
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
48%
8%
31 N
12%
1%
51%
6%
32% 11 %
0%
SC % /SA % /G % /C % /B % /Be %*
_
dl / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
% of Reach with Erodin Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S =Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G= Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
'Corrected Values
- Information unavailable
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 71 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

2162
2161
2160
2159
2158
2157
2156
2155
2154
2153
2152
2151
° 2150
2149
W
2148
2147
2146
2145
2144
2143
2142
2141
2140
2139
Bumgarner Branch I
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 100 +37 to 107 +27
Average Ba
XS -1 -R
•
--------- - - - - -- •
kfull Slope
XS -2 -P
•
XS -3 -R
1��X X l��x�0 l "X
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW - MYl 1/15/2015 C Structure - MYO BKF WS
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 72 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

2145
2144
2143
2142
2141
2140
at 2139
,o
2138
W
2137
2136
2135
2134
2133
2132
Bumgarner Branch II
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 107 +27 to 112 +35
fo
�x
1S
j0
9
2S
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/2011 --*— Tw- MY 1/15/15 ° Structure - MYO - - - - -- WS BKF
jr
jx
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 73 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Average Bankfull Slope
............... ... . ..
XS -S -R --------- - - - - --
P
•
XS -4-
fo
�x
1S
j0
9
2S
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/2011 --*— Tw- MY 1/15/15 ° Structure - MYO - - - - -- WS BKF
jr
jx
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 73 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

2180
2179
2178
2177
2176
2175
2174
2173
2172
2171
2170
2169
2168
0
2167
W 2166
2165
2164
2163
2162
2161
2160
2159
2158
2157
Junes Branch - Sheet 1
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 200 +97 to 215 +15
2156
lOOx s lO2x s �OIFx s 1O6x,S lOip
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW - MY1 1/15/15 O Structure - MYO ......... WS BKF
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 74 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
'
Average Bankfull Slope
XS -6-
XS -7 -P
XS -8 -R
•
XS -9 -P
2156
lOOx s lO2x s �OIFx s 1O6x,S lOip
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW - MY1 1/15/15 O Structure - MYO ......... WS BKF
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 74 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

2160
2159
2158
2157
2156
2155
2154
2153
2152
2151
2150
2149
2148
0
2147
W 2146
2145
2144
2143
2142
2141
2140
2139
2138
2137
2136
Junes Branch - Sheet 2
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 200 +97 to 215 +15
10
�x
�.S
�1
Ox
2.S
1�
�x
2.S
Station (feet)
- TW - W0 5/10/2011 - TW - MYI 1/15/15 o Structure - WO ---- WS BKF
1f
�x
2.S
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 75 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Aveir
age Bankfull Slope
•
—XS
-11-R
XS -10 -P
10
�x
�.S
�1
Ox
2.S
1�
�x
2.S
Station (feet)
- TW - W0 5/10/2011 - TW - MYI 1/15/15 o Structure - WO ---- WS BKF
1f
�x
2.S
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 75 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

2144
04FRIN
2142
2141
w
2140
_v
W
` RK
2138
2137
2136
Ox
2.S
Hidgon Branch
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 300 +46 to 304 +22
�OOxs .�O jx2s .?O,xs �O2x2s �?O2xs
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW - MYl 1/15/2015 O Structure - MYO WS 13 KF
`?O
2.S
`'?O
,?.X>
`?O
Irx
2.S
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 76 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Avera e BanIduII
Slope
—"!I
--------------
A
•
XS-12-R]
XS -13 -P
�OOxs .�O jx2s .?O,xs �O2x2s �?O2xs
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW - MYl 1/15/2015 O Structure - MYO WS 13 KF
`?O
2.S
`'?O
,?.X>
`?O
Irx
2.S
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 76 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

2142
2141
2140
2139
y 2138
w
;0- 2137
W
2136
2135
2134
2133
$ro
o,X
00
Doris Branch
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 400 +00 to 402 +82
jroo�o o so1�19 o �o2xso vo�Xoo
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW - MY1 1/15/2015 0 Structure - WO --------- WS B10
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 77 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Average Bankfull Slope
•
XS -14 -R
XS -15 -P
-------- - - - - --
jroo�o o so1�19 o �o2xso vo�Xoo
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW - MY1 1/15/2015 0 Structure - WO --------- WS B10
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 77 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 78 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2015; MY1
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
2
1.9%
2%
0.062 - 0.125
2
1.9%
4%
0.125-0.25
7
6.7%
10%
0.25-0.5
3
2.9%
13%
0.5 - 1.0
7
6.7%
20%
1 -2
8
7.6%
28%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
28%
4 - 8
1
1.0%
29%
8-16
5
4.8%
33%
16-32
26
24.8%
58%
32-64
28
26.7%
85%
64 -128
13
12.4%
97%
128 -256
3
2.9%
100%
256 -512
0
0.0%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
105
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
27
D84
63
D95
98
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 79
WEEP Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 80 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
l7
w
60%
a
c
50%
—F MY1 Cumulative %
~
v
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Oby 'y1y p'Ly Oy
O OOOi y1y' O'L
O'
y� y' L 'y'b p, cb 16 '�� r0� y'1$ 'y0
O• y
y<1
'L
OnL
yy
Ot$ pSO o�
�,y �% eac
ld ypb 0
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
70%
0
w
N
60%
T
a
a`
50%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
m
v
C
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
061' yti`' O'Ly
p. p.
p' poti ytih
O'
Oy
5•
O',L
1�
h•
O
y' L .y'b p; � '�tD 3ti r°t` y�O 'yh�0
$ yO, 3ti 6a y�,
y
yyti
5�
'L
p1"t`
ryy
cry
pad Op�O 0 e o�
bt, 'b at
y0'L yOb
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 80 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2015; MY1
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
37
35.2%
35%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
35%
0.125-0.25
5
4.8%
40%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
40%
0.5 - 1.0
0
0.0%
40%
1 -2
2
1.9%
42%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
42%
4 - 8
2
1.9%
44%
8-16
6
5.7%
50%
16-32
18
17.1%
67%
32-64
19
18.1%
85%
64 -128
14
13.3%
98%
128 -256
2
1.9%
100%
256 -512
0
0.0%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
105
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
16
D84
62
D95
87
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 81 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 82 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
l7
w
60%
a
c
50%
—F MY1 Cumulative %
~
v
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Oby 'y1y p'Ly
O OOOi y1y'
O'
Oy
O'L
y�
O•
y' L 'y'b p, cb ,6
y
'L
yy
yO'L ypb 0
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
70%
0
w
N
60%
T
a
a`
50%
IN MY1 %by Size Group
m
v
C
40%
30%
20%
10%
M:L
0%
061' yti`' O'Ly
p' poti ytih
O'
Oy
O',L
1
O
y'L .y'b p; '�tD 3ti bt, y�O 'yh�0
y
yyti
'L
pn"
cry
ap%
ay �p ear
y0'L yOb 0
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 82 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 5 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2015; MY1
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
8
7.5%
8%
0.062 - 0.125
6
5.7%
13%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
13%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
13%
0.5 - 1.0
2
1.9%
15%
1 -2
18
17.0%
32%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
32%
4 - 8
0
0.0%
32%
8-16
2
1.9%
34%
16-32
30
28.3%
62%
32-64
27
25.5%
88%
64 -128
12
11.3%
99%
128 -256
1
0.9%
100%
256 -512
0
0.0%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
106
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
25
D84
56
D95
95
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 83 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 84 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
100%
Cross Section 5 - Riffle
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
l7
w
60%
a
c
50%
—F MY1 Cumulative %
~
v
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Oby 'y1y p'Ly
O OOOi y1y'
O'
Oy
O'L
y�
O•
y' L 'y'b p, cb ,6 '�� r0� y'1$
'yy6
y
yy~
'L
yy
�,y
ld ypb 0
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 5 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
70%
0
w
N
60%
T
a
a`
50%
IN MY1 %by Size Group
m
v
C
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
061' yti`' O'Ly
p. p.
p' poti ytih
O'
Oy
5•
O',L
1�
h•
O
y' L .y'b p; � '�tD 3ti r°t` y�O
$ yO, 3ti 6a
'yh�0
y�,
y
yyti
5�
'L
p1"t`
ryy
cry
pad Op�O 0 e o�
bt, 'b at
y0'L yOb
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 84 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2015; MY1
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
39
36.8%
37%
0.062 - 0.125
1
0.9%
38%
0.125-0.25
10
9.4%
47%
0.25-0.5
1
0.9%
48%
0.5 - 1.0
1
0.9%
49%
1 - 2
2
1.9%
51%
2 - 4
2
1.9%
53 %
4 - 8
5
4.7%
58%
8-16
10
9.4%
67%
16-32
11
10.4%
77%
32-64
10
9.4%
87%
64 -128
14
13.2%
100%
128 -256
0
0.0%
100%
256 -512
0
0.0%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
106
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
1.4
D84
52
D95
86
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 85 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 86 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
l7
w
60%
a
c
50%
—F MY1 Cumulative %
~
v
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Oby 'y1y p'Ly
O OOOi y1y'
O'
Oy
O'L
y�
O•
cb
y'L 'y'b p, ,6 '�� r0�
y'1$ 'yy6
y
yy~
'L
O'Lb
yy
Ot$ pSO o�
yO'L ypb 0
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
70%
0
w
N
60%
T
a
a`
50%
IN MY1 %by Size Group
m
v
C
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
061' yti`' O'Ly
p' poti ytih
O'
Oy
O',L
1�
O
y'L .y'b p; '�tD 3ti r°t`
y�O 'yh�0
y
yyti
'L
pn"
cry
pad Op�O o�
ay �p ear
y0'L yOb 0
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 86 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2015; MY1
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
21
19.1%
19%
0.062 - 0.125
1
0.9%
20%
0.125-0.25
9
8.2%
28%
0.25-0.5
1
0.9%
29%
0.5 - 1.0
6
5.5%
35%
1 -2
14
12.7%
47%
2 - 4
1
0.9%
48%
4 - 8
5
4.5%
53%
8-16
9
8.2%
61%
16-32
26
23.6%
85%
32-64
11
10.0%
95%
64 -128
6
5.5%
100%
128 -256
0
0.0%
100%
256 -512
0
0.0%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
110
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
4.7
D84
32
D95
66
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 87 Equinox
WEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 88 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
100%
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
l7
w
60%
a
c
50%
—F MY1 Cumulative %
~
v
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Oby y'Ly p'Ly Oy
p. p. h'
O OOOi yly' O'L
O'
c - y� y'
O•
L 'y'b p, W ,(o "�'L r°b y'L4
°i ,yro• �'Y bD(
y5ro
,L�
y
yy'L
�0'
'L
,L%y by
yy ld ypb 0
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
90%
80%
a
'o
70%
w
60%
>
a
50%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
~
v
c
40%
2°
30%
20%
10%
0%
p�ti yti`' pye o`'
� OOOti Oyly' O'y
y° ti ti ti b a'� y� 3ti �b yti$
p. 'y 'S (o
,yeb
y'l.
yyti
,tiy
pti° p °`� p�6 0`
yil% yO,tiP ,bObO �e
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 88 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 11 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2015; MY1
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
30
28.3%
28%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
28%
0.125-0.25
9
8.5%
37%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
37%
0.5 - 1.0
2
1.9%
39%
1 -2
8
7.5%
46%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
46%
4 - 8
2
1.9%
48%
8-16
8
7.5%
56%
16-32
24
22.6%
78%
32-64
18
17.0%
95%
64 -128
5
4.7%
100%
128 -256
0
0.0%
100%
256 -512
0
0.0%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
106
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
12
D84
39
D95
63
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 89 Equinox
WEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 90 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 11 -Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
l7
w
60%
a
c
50%
—F MY1 Cumulative %
~
v
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Oby 'y1y p'Ly Oy
O OOOi y1y' O'L
O'
y�
O•
y' L 'y'b p, cb ,6 '�� r0� y'1$
'yy6
y
yy~
'L
yy
�,y
ld ypb 0
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 11 -Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
70%
0
w
N
60%
T
a
a`
50%
IN MY1 %by Size Group
m
v
C
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
061' yti`' O'Ly
p' poti ytih
O'
Oy
O',L
1�
O
y' L .y'b p; $ '�tD 3ti r61, y�O
'yh�0
y
yyti
'L
p1"t`
cry
pad o&
�p ear
yO'L yOb 0
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 90 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 12 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2015; MY1
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
17
16.0%
16%
0.062 - 0.125
7
6.6%
23%
0.125-0.25
12
11.3%
34%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
34%
0.5 - 1.0
0
0.0%
34%
1 - 2
0
0.0%
34%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
34%
4 - 8
1
0.9%
35%
8-16
20
18.9%
54%
16-32
27
25.5%
79%
32-64
18
17.0%
96%
64 -128
4
3.8%
100%
128 -256
0
0.0%
100%
256 -512
0
0.0%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
106
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
15
D84
37
D95
58
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 91 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 92 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 12 -Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
l7
w
60%
a
c
50%
—F MY1 Cumulative %
~
v
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Oby 'y1y p'Ly Oy
O OOOi y1y' O'L
O'
y�
O•
y' L 'y'b p, cb ,6 '�� r0� y'1$
°i yO. 3i bD(
'yy6
,yQi
y
yy~
yO'
'L
O'Lb
ti1
yy
Ot$ p o�
�,y ��` eac
ld ypb 11
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 12 -Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
70%
0
w
N
60%
T
a
a`
50%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
m
v
C
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
061' yti`' O'Ly
p. p.
p' poti ytih
O'
Oy
5•
O ',L
1�
h•
O
y'L .y'b p; '�tD 3ti r°t` y�O
$ yO, 3ti 6a
'yh�0
y�,
y
yyti
5�
'L
pn"
ryy
cry
pa% Op�O o &
bt, �A, eat
y0'L yOb 0
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 92 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 14 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2015; MY1
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
70
65.4%
65%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
65%
0.125-0.25
8
7.5%
73%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
73%
0.5 - 1.0
0
0.0%
73%
1 -2
0
0.0%
73%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
73%
4 - 8
1
0.9%
74%
8-16
4
3.7%
78%
16-32
7
6.5%
84%
32-64
12
11.2%
95%
64 -128
5
4.7%
100%
128 -256
0
0.0%
100%
256 -512
0
0.0%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
107
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
0.062
D84
32
D95
62
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 93
WEEP Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 94 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 14 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
P
70%
0
l7
w
60%
a
c
50%
—F MY1 Cumulative %
~
v
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Oby 'y1y 'y Oy
pL
O' O' y'
O OOOi y1y' O'L
O'
O•
cb ,6
y
'L
yy
yO'L ypb 0
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 14 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
a
70%
0
w
N
60%
T
a
a`
50%
IN MY1 %by Size Group
m
v
C
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
061' yti`' O'Ly
p' poti ytih
O'
Oy
O',L
1�
O
y'L .y'b p; '�tD 3ti r°t`
y�O
'yh�0
y
yyti
'L
pn"
cry
pad Op�O o�
ay �p ear
y0'L yOb 0
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 94 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 95 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 96 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027
Date of Data
Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method
Feet Above Bankfull
Elevation
Photo #
(if available)
No Bankfull MYO
No Bankfull MY1
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 97 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5

Figure 3. Daily Precipitation Totals for the Junes Branch Restoration Project
Figur
►unty
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 98 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5
1.8
1.6
1.4
y
1.2
FBI
�
1
J.+
I
�
p
0.
8
>, 0.6
N
A
0.4
0.2
0
U O
Figur
►unty
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 98 Equinox
NCEEP Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 1 of 5