NC0025071_Wasteload Allocation_19920520

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO,: NCO025071
PERMITTEE NAME: City of Eden
FACILITY NAME: Mebane Bridge W WTP
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major -4 Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity:
13.5 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
29.2 %
Comments:
plant expanded from 7.0 MGD
RECEIVING STREAM: Dan River
Class: C
Sub -Basin: 03-02-03
Reference USGS Quad: B20NW (please attach)
County: Rockingham
Regional Office: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 2/28/92 Treatment Plant Class: IV
Classification changes within three miles:
None within 3 miles.
PLOTTED
Requested by. Rosanne Barona Date: 10/7/91
Prepared by: Date: `�r[p
Reviewed by: f tG. >✓' Date: rbh
�OA t+� 4o21S / as—_
ti1�1�f— /
Modeler Date Rec. #
1J t nv r,
Drainage Area (mil ) 1? oo Avg. Streamflow (cfs): 1 L 7Z +
7Q10 (cfs) Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 57 30Q2 (cfs) %¢
Toxicity Limits: IWC `- % Acute/( E
if Downstream
Location: NCSR 1964 bridge
Downstream Location: NCSR 700 bridge
Parameters: DO, Temp, Fecal Coliform, Conductivity, PH - -
Three times a week (June, July, August and September), once a _
week during the rest of the year.
Upstream Location:
Downstream Location:
Parameters:
Above Eden Water Supply Intake on Smith
River
NC Hwy 87 bridge
NCSR 1761 bridge (individual samples on
transect at 114, 1/2 and 3/4 of the distance
across the river).
Color, pH
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
Wastetlow (MGD):
13.5
13.5
BOD5 (mg/1):
30
30
NH3N (mg/1):
12.7
monitor
DO (mgft
monitor
monitor
TSS (mg/1):
30
30
Fecal Col. V100 in]):
200
200
PH (SU):
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
28
28
Oil & Grease (mgll):
TP (mg/l):
monitor
monitor
TN (mg/1):
monitor
monitor
Daily Max
Daily Max
Color (ADMI):
4 4,8.,to
W300
Cadmium (µg/1):
monitor
monitor
Chromium (µg/l):
monitor
monitor
Copper (µg/1):
monitor
monitor
Nickel (µg/l):
monitor
monitor
Lead (µg/1):
399
399
Zinc (µg/l):
monitor
monitor
Cyanide (µg/l):
78
78
Phenols (µg/1):
monitor
monitor
Mercury (µg/1):
0.191
0.191
Silver (µg/1):
monitor
monitor
Comments: Facility should coordinate monitoring efforts at
the NC 700 bridge with Fieldcrest Cannon so as not to
duplicate data.

RECEIVED
N.C. Dept. NRCD
Facility Name:
NPDES No.:
Type of Waste:
Facility Status:
Permit Status:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
Subbasin:
County:
Regional Office:
Requestor:
Date of Request:
Topo Quad:
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request # 6470
City of Eden --Mebane Bridge W WTP
NCO025071
70.8% Domestic, 29.2% Industrial
Existing
Renewal
Dan River
C
03-02-03
Rockingham
Stream Characteristic:
Winston-Salem Regional Office
USGS #
Rosanne Barona
Date:
10/8/91
Drainage Area (mi2):
B20NW
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Renewal of NPDES permit at existing levels.
Schedule Requirepents and
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
Average Flow, (cfs):
30Q2 (cfs):
I�VC (%):
=
DEC 16 1991
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
1700
313
578
1620
704
6
�' b
us
_sue C_ x = �� _ �,
Recommended by: r(k ��x .ti, C �� -c Date: 12 3 • g
r °a Reviewed by 12- 13 I � I
rc / re Slob/r'ui� i
Instream Assessment: rti [' � n i4 � Date: L
LJ C.1
C), Regional Supervisor: Date:
Permits & Engineering: t Date:
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: 1+I 1T(5 9 -2—

2
Existing Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1).
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. 000 ml):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/l):
Oil & Grease (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
13.5
13.5
30
30
12.7
monitor
monitor
monitor
30
30
200
200
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
28
28
monitor monitor
monitor monitor
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
13.5
13.5
30
30
12.7
monitor
monitor
monitor
30
30
200
200
6.0-9.0
6.0-9.0
28
28
monitor monitor
monitor monitor
Limits Changes Due To:
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures
New facility information
WQ or EL
EL
WQ
EL
EL
EL
WQ
Parameters) Affected
(explanation of any modifications to past modeling analysis including new flows, rates, field data,
interacting discharges)
(See page 4 for miscellaneous and special conditions, if applicable)

3
TOMCS/METALS
Type of Toxicity Test: Chronic Toxicity Pass/Fail (Ceriodaphina)
Existing Limit: 6%
Recommended Limit: 6%
Monitoring Schedule: Feb, May, Aug, Nov
Existing Limits
Daily Max.
Color (ADW:
300
Cadmium (µg/1):
monitor
Chromium (µg/1):
monitor
Copper (µg/1):
monitor
Nickel (µg/1):
monitor
Lead (µg/1):
399
Zinc (µg/1):
monitor
Cyanide (µg/1):
78
Phenols (µg/l):
monitor
Mercury (µg/1):
0.191
Silver (µg/1):
monitor
Recommended Limits
Daily Max.
WQ or EL
Color (ADMI):
a.L40
WQ
Cadmium (µg/1):
monitor
Chromium (41):
monitor
Copper (µg/l):
monitor
Nickel (µg/1):
monitor
Lead (µg/1):
399
WQ
Zinc (4g)1):
monitor
Cyanide (µg/l):
78
WQ
Phenols (µg/1):
monitor
Mercury (µg/1):
0.191
WQ
Silver (µg/1):
monitor
Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
New pretreatment information
Failing toxicity test C016y lihti�+ Cb1j6idjr6 Inkr&II brc W ice'Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.) NeW
��-10 d qAw
yocl an a pY y CYPet�, and 9 � vw
X Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of �" ,-Att I;m
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
•s
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: NCSR 1964 bridge
Downstream Location: NCSR 700 bridge
Parameters: DO, Temp, Fecal Coliform, Conductivity, pH
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies: Three times a week (June, July,
August and September), once a week during the rest of the year.
FaGy� Should ewrd;naie monibrj'mj eAror(3 luCwead?Ce wig
�ie/dcrPsf C'anoost - SoaS not lv pupli A -be cicc
Upstream Location: Above Eden Water Supply Intake on Smith River
Downstream Location: NC Hwy 87 bridge
NCSR 1761 bridge (individual samples on transect at 1/4, 1/2 and 3/4 of the
distance across the river).
Parameters: Color, pH
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No ✓
If no, which parameters cannot be met? �o�i� il�,: �✓ �.i�iY,h..
i
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes .,/ No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? + (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

•
Facility Name ��N i Q�r� ��c —Perrriit4A05671 Pipe # ma
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is --�—To (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform
r r monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
rrmg after thirty from the effective date of this permit during the months of
au A" w B ✓ . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
pernutted al effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q 10 31 "b cfs
Permitted Flow 3. S MGD
IWC e. %
Basin&Sub-basin o3-oz-4p3
Receiving ream r)e v+ a e—Ir-
County f �o�cvhal,4w�-
Date _/L /�(• 9i
QCL PIF Version 9191

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Recommendations for Color Monitoring
Per 15 A NCAC 2B.0211(b)3(F) for colored wastes, the permittee shall discharge
only such amounts as will not render the waters injurious to public health,
secondary recreation, or aquatic life and wildlife or adversely affect the
palatability of fish, aesthetic quality or impair the waters for any designated
uses.
For the purpose of measuring compliance with this requirement, the permittee
shall perform the following:
Within 120 days of the effective date of this permit, the permittee shall begin
monitoring for color at the Effluent, Upstream, and Downstream at
designated sites (see part I.A.).
The samples shall be analyzed using the Spectrophotometric Method (2120 C.)
in the 17th edition of Standard Methods. The calculations must be done using
the weighted ordinance method. The test should be performed using a spectropho-
tometer with a 2.0 nanometer (ran) band pass and 50 millimeter cell path. The
operating range should begin at 400 nm and end at 700 nm (using 10 nm intervals)
and measure transmittance values at 31 wavelengths. The results shall be
calculated and reported in ADMI color units from the information indicated (see
reference below for worksheets and examples for calculation of ADMI values).
Analyze samples free from turbidity or at "true color" through the filtration
method using a .45 micron filter (centrifugation is not necessary).
Samples shall be collected on 3 consecutive days (between Tuesday and Friday)
during each month for twelve months following permit issuance, and on 3
consecutive days per quarter thereafter. Effluent samples shall be composited
over 24 hours, while instream samples shall be grab samples. For Publicly -Owned
Treatment Works (POTWs) with an approved pretreatment program, this sampling
regime (or alternative monitoring program approved by the Division's Pretreat-
ment Program) should be incorporated within the POTW's approved headworks
long-term monitoring program which should also include monitoring to assess
industrial sources of color and POTW color removal efficiency.
For the purpose of reporting: The ADMI values shall be reported at natural and
standard pH (7.6 SU) for all three sites. In addition to the ADMI measurements
reported on the permittee's DMR, the permittee shall attach a narrative
description of visual observations made during each sampling event using a form
provided by the Division. Such a description shall include perceived color in
the effluent and receiving stream (i.e. whether effluent plume is noticeable
and, if so, the approximate width and length of the plume), rainfall, and
streamflow. Also, the permittee shall verify on this form that the type of
spectrophotometer (indicating band pass (ran) and cell path (mm)) employed, and
method used for filtration are in accordance with the requirements of this
permit condition.
Reference (for calculating ADMI values):
Allen, W., W.B. Prescott, R.E. Derby, C.E. Garland, J.M. Peret & M. Saltzman.
1973. Determination of color water and wastewater by means of ADMI color values.
Eng. Ext. Ser. No. 142:661.

EI.: ON.r
JY_r.=R �1��71L?NATF�x1LYf �I TAPX
WIZDM
1
�W _
S' DYLtN
ma;( STArVi PA"I
H 1 1--
: ►.wt
1!i°t1,�GG
OMW
C*
rus�x aWrare.rtrc+i
oaew
T - S
&AC
I E
_ &A -M
�Git.GC
'§PThG
BEDS
RAV.•
�i18r
.L7 G6Y
nm LELEMD '�'a`
--�- lhtSlaCe�FR
FLOC:]_

TA%K
aN F.CC
PEM
FROL
MMM
TAW
®RA 5"
SLUXIE
L h RAA DE::A%'r
CUVW iAd&%W
OrLT4W
rAMW
rAW rj%vlw C."Vactm
sq.-
fmq MOT.
AAM gz
mmma —�j Li aw L
Tax
;011,11, j --L Nalf STAMW
Ewr
LACA:XW
F-Vd-,
Ml-.,W I
BEDS
FLOW LEOM
R.Ae
pftLw.
BLACM ro9w
*PSWITAV7,f
ALMM

-o.--AACD _
ezWL-A 3o/ram, n G� /io
vLLW �V-.Y` 3 D// 1 2.
c,v re. w.� u.p �.c>�.c `�j EN ."Dr/ 2
�f
-
C� \V ve�fStJ� �fF'e c3�.f,4 .tlC /fl � Ctdq,c��1��L1lrJ�
(��1NlC.tJ.1l2C� �--++�
cVAA-k-1ti14-1 "f- _ow
4JC`> S C ✓�r7 o GZ.e 55 rs.-) v 4�k s cwt_a�

'cdch-KPl ae& aria
ww �o
II T3C w - 1j0 Tcw�. Cond., �Gca( co(, vrm Bol>s
p AWar SuffIY ln%ka -5m� Q:K', - �2 �0
O N: $7 -DOLk L. er [,,,tpaf.ca.`.) - colavl-
D �C M,1 - I)an Clre e colo2
►noh�-{-r" Xt 1 �z , c... 3/y 6-1p rz Jtr

0 3 p 2 p =/
J
$(Zyl1� �7
G"j 10/2T/�i
@Y,rjlp I F
11 13.9 k f1�L. Ca,e�,.�TL
�7 S,
_og � "„DfR 0• ��
Q..�= O.S MG9
JP = noo—;Z S $g 010�402400 ��i0pn llbvnS l�
@1O. 313 cF5 n QP= 1621 cis
.+,moo- i,8
eQa-'7o$cE1 csofi: 141 �JfQ w,9�0: c-BO cFs
^ NP,nO� O SI�Q� �o2z ,06 c{5
C.3ofl ' loo
o �s
81? 0201406soJ
847 DA . V)11 — t
sa Ot 0.140621St y ` "QA: lbbS c(S
ql
co_o.qwlgo= SRi
sc}
3OQ2= 1.4 I
� V
$ 8 020140661 J' �� T ¢� •
qA:
t c} S
•Y` w,i:`l: o n c E t.
5,,(�-1 \\A s-,A'?
1 c(6, } ••1
0Z0-14oP_0 0
ww c�
GA=\I3o
QA;�64V 4�
y,
c
s,ca._ _ 18 c� s
t�c�
N00 QOw,�IR
w�glo> �-a8
88� o O'141460�
I
QW =I, o
DA= y1 ._..
60
QP- 41 cp S
3OQ2= 8.o c}s

SUMMER CAD'q 'rAz7
CITY OF EDEN, DRY CREEK AND
MEBANE BRIDGE WWTP
---------- MODEL RESULTS ---
Discharger : CITY OF EDEN
Receiving Stream : DAN RIVER
-------------------------------------------------
The End D.O. is 6.49 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 8.08 mg/l.
The End NBOD is 3.60 mg/l.
-------------------------------------------------
WLA
WLA
WLA
DO Min
CBOD
NBOD
DO
Waste Flow
(mg/1) Milepoint Reach #
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
----
(mg/1)
--
(mgd)
----------
Segment
1
----------------------
6.49 9.90 8
----
Reach
1��}c�'
60.00
57.15
0.00
13.50000
Reach
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
3
141.00
0.00
0.00
5.20000
Reach
4
���Z�^`S�
276.00
0.00
0.00
0.50000
Reach
5
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
7
60.00
90.00
0.00
1.00000
Reach
8
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000

L
• v
'
SUMMER
CITY OF
EDEN, DRY CREEK AND
MEBANE
BRIDGE WWTP
•I Seg #
I Reach # I
Seg Mi I
D.O. I
CBOD I
NBOD I
Flow I
1
1
0.00
6.97
5.63
4.52
333.93
1
1
0.10
6.97
5.62
4.51
333.97
1
1
0.20
6.96
5.61
4.49
334.01
1
1
0.30
6.96
5.60
4.48
334.05
1
1
0.40
6.95
5.59
4.46
334.09
1
1
0.50
6.95
5.58
4.45
334.13
1
1
0.60
6.94
5.57
4.44
334.18
1
1
0.70
6.94
5.56
4.42
334.22
1
1
0.80
6.93
5.55
4.41
334.26
1
1
0.90
6.93
5.54
4.40
334.30
1
1
1.00
6.93
5.53
4.39
334.34
1
1
1.10
6.92
5.52
4.37
334.39
1
1
1.20
6.92
5.51
4.36
334.43
1
1
1.30
6.91
5.50
4.35
334.47
1
1
1.40
6.91
5.49
4.33
334.51
1
2
1.40
6.91
5.49
4.33
334.51
1
2
1.50
6.91
5.48
4.32
334.55
1
2
1.60
6.90
5.47
4.31
334.60
1
2
1.70
6.90
5.46
4.29
334.64
1
2
1.80
6.89
5.45
4.28
334.68
1
2
1.90
6.89
5.44
4.27
334.72
1
2
2.00
6.89
5.43
4.26
334.76
1
2
2.10
6.88
5.41
4.24
334.81
1
3
2.10
6.72
8.60
4.14
342.87
1
3
2.20
6.72
8.59
4.13
342.91
1
3
2.30
6.71
8.57
4.12
342.95
1
3
2.40
6.71
8.55
4.11
342.99
1
4
2.40
6.69
9.16
4.10
343.77
1
4
2.50
6.68
9.14
4.09
343.77
1
5
2.50
6.69
9.12
4.08
344.67
1
5
2.60
6.68
9.10
4.06
344.93
1
5
2.70
6.68
9.08
4.05
345.19
1
5
2.80
6.67
9.06
4.04
345.46
1
5
2.90
6.67
9.04
4.02
345.72
1
5
3.00
6.66
9.01
4.01
345.98
1
5
3.10
6.66
8.99
4.00
346.25
1
5
3.20
6.65
8.97
3.98
346.51
1
5
3.30
6.65
8.95
3.97
346.77
1
6
3.30
6.65
8.95
3.97
346.97
1
6
3.40
6.64
8.93
3.96
346.99
1
6
3.50
6.64
8.91
3.94
347.02
1
6
3.60
6.63
8.90
3.93
347.04
1
6
3.70
6.63
8.88
3.92
347.06
1
6
3.80
6.63
8.87
3.91
347.09
1
6
3.90
6.62
8.85
3.90
347.11
1
6
4.00
6.62
8.83
3.89
347.13
1
6
4.10
6.61
8.82
3.88
347.16
1
6
4.20
6.61
8.80
3.86
347.18
1
6
4.30
6.61
8.78
3.85
347.20
1
6
4.40
6.60
8.77
3.84
347.22
1
6
4.50
6.60
8.75
3.83
347.25
1
6
4.60
6.60
8.74
3.82
347.27
1
6
4.70
6.59
8.72
3.81
347.29
1
6
4.80
6.59
8.71
3.80
347.32
1
6
4.90
6.59
8.69
3.79
347.34
1
6
5.00
6.58
8.67
3.78
347.36

• T
1
6
5.10
6.58
8.66
3.77
347.39
1
6
5.20
6.58
8.64
3.76
347.41
1
6
5.30
6.57
8.63
3.74
347.43
1
6
5.40
6.57
8.61
3.73
347.45
1
6
5.50
6.57
8.59
3.72
347.48
1
6
5.60
6.57
8.58
3.71
347.50
1
6
5.70
6.57
8.56
3.70
347.52
1
6
5.80
6.56
8.55
3.69
347.55
1
6
5.90
6.56
8.53
3.68
347.57
1
6
6.00
6.56
8.52
3.67
347.59
1
6
6.10
6.56
8.50
3.66
347.62
1
6
6.20
6.55
8.49
3.65
347.64
1
6
6.30
6.55
8.47
3.64
347.66
1
6
6.40
6.55
8.45
3.63
347.68
1
6
6.50
6.55
8.44
3.62
347.71
1
6
6.60
6.55
8.42
3.61
347.73
1
6
6.70
6.55
8.41
3.60
347.75
1
6
6.80
6.55
8.39
3.59
347.78
1
7
6.80
6.52
8.62
3.97
349.33
1
8
6.80
6.53
8.54
3.93
353.53
1
8
6.90
6.53
8.53
3.92
353.55
1
8
7.00
6.52
8.51
3.91
353.56
1
8
7.10
6.52
8.50
3.90
353.58
1
8
7.20
6.52
8.48
3.89
353.60
1
8
7.30
6.52
8.47
3.88
353.62
1
8
7.40
6.52
8.45
3.87
353.64
1
8
7.50
6.51
8.44
3.86
353.66
1
8
7.60
6.51
8.42
3.84
353.67
1
8
7.70
6.51
8.41
3.83
353.69
1
8
7.80
6.51
8.39
3.82
353.71
1
8
7.90
6.51
8.38
3.81
353.73
1
8
8.00
6.51
8.36
3.80
353.75
1
8
8.10
6.50
8.35
3.79
353.77
1
8
8.20
6.50
8.33
3.78
353.78
1
8
8.30
6.50
8.32
3.77
353.80
1
8
8.40
6.50
8.30
3.76
353.82
1
8
8.50
6.50
8.29
3.75
353.84
1
8
8.60
6.50
8.27
3.74
353.86
1
8
8.70
6.50
8.26
3.73
353.88
1
8
8.80
6.50
8.24
3.71
353.89
1
8
8.90
6.50
8.23
3.70
353.91
1
8
9.00
6.50
8.21
3.69
353.93
1
8
9.10
6.50
8.20
3.68
353.95
1
8
9.20
6.50
8.18
3.67
353.97
1
8
9.30
6.50
8.17
3.66
353.99
1
8
9.40
6.50
8.15
3.65
354.01
1
8
9.50
6.49
8.14
3.64
354.02
1
8
9.60
6.49
8.12
3.63
354.04
1
8
9.70
6.49
8.11
3.62
354.06
1
8
9.80
6.49
8.09
3.61
354.08
1
8
9.90
6.49
8.08
3.60
354.10
Seg #
I Reach #
I Seg Mi I
D.O. I
CBOD I
NBOD I
Flow

a
*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
'Discharger
Receiving Stream
Summer 7Q10
Design Temperature:
CITY OF EDEN Subbasin : 030203
DAN RIVER Stream Class: C
313. Winter 7Q10 : 578.
25.
ILENGTHI
SLOPEI
VELOCITY
I DEPTHI Kd I
Kd
I Ka I
Ka I
KN I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I mile I
ft/mil
fps
I ft
Idesignl
@204
Idesignl
@20;fi Idesignl
Segment
1
I I
1 1.401
I
2.301
0.929
I
1 4.90
I I
1 0.28 1
0.22
I I
1 2.10 I
I
1.881
I
0.44 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I I
1 0.701
I
2.301
0.930
I
1 4.90
I I
1 0.28 10.22
I I
1 2.10 1
I
1.881
I
0.44 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
1 1
1
I
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I I
1 0.301
I
2.301
0.947
I
1 4.91
I I
1 0.28 1
0.22
I I
1 2.14 1
I
1.921
I
0.44 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I I
1 0.101
I
2.301
0.948
I
1 4.92
I I
1 0.28 1
0.22
I I
1 2.14 1
I
1.921
I
0.44 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I I
1 0.801
I
2.301
0.949
I
1 4.93
I I
10.28 1
0.22
I I
1 2.14 1
I
1.921
I
0.44 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I I
1 3.521
I
2.301
0.950
I
14.94
I I
1 0.28 1
0.22
I I
1 2.14 1
I
1.921
I
0.44 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I I
1 0.031
I
2.301
0.954
I
1 4.94
I I
1 0.28 1
0.22
I I
1 2.15 1
I
1.931
I
0.44 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
Segment
1
I I
1 3.101
I
2.301
0.953
I
1 4.97
I I
1 0.28 1
0.22
I I
1 2.15 I
I
1.931
I
0.44 1
Reach
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8
1 1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
I Flow
cfs
Segment 1
Reach 1
Waste
120.925
Headwaters1313.000
Tributary
I 0.000
* Runoff
I 0.420
I CBOD
I NBOD I
D.O. I
I mg/1
I mg/1 I
mg/1 I
1 60.000
157.150 I
0.000
2.000
I 1.000 (
7.440
I 0.000
1 0.000 i
7.440
I 2.000
1 1.000 I
7.440
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste 1 0.000 1 0.000 I 0.000 1 0.000

T Tributary I
0.000 I
0.000 I
0.000 I
7.440
* Runoff I
0.420 I
2.000 I
1.000 I
7.440
Segment 1 Reach 3
Waste I 8.060 1141.000 I 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 7.440
* Runoff I 0.420 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.440
Segment 1 Reach 4
Waste I 0.775 1276.000 I 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 7.440
* Runoff ( 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 7.440
Segment 1 Reach 5
Waste I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary I 0.900 I 2.000 ( 1.000 ( 7.440
* Runoff I 2.630 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.440
Segment 1 Reach 6
Waste ( 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary I 0.200 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.440
* Runoff I 0.230 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.440
Segment 1 Reach 7
Waste ( 1.550 160.000 190.000 I 0.000
Tributary I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 7.440
* Runoff I 0..000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 7.440
Segment 1 Reach 8
Waste I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary I 4.200 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.440
* Runoff I 0.184 I 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.440
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile

II
Ammonia/Chlorine Worksheet
lI
IlFacillty:
II
(Town of Eden--Melbane Bridge WWTP
Permit Number:
NCO025071 II
IlReceiving Stream:
Modeler:
njb II
]Dan River
II
Date:
17-Oct-91 II
II
II-------------------------------------
I l Summer
I ------------------------_-----------II
I
II
IlNitrogen as NH3
]Residual Chlorine
II
II 7010 We):
313.000
I
I 7010 (cfs):
I
313.000 II
II Design Flow (MGD):
13.500
1 Design Flow (MGD):
13.500 II
II Design Flaw (cfa):
20.925
1 Design Flow (cfs):
20.925 II
II Stream STD (mg/1):
1.000
1 Stream STD (ug/l):
17.000 II
IlBackground level (mg/1):
0.220
(Background level (ug/1):
0.000 II
II IWC (8):
6.266
1 IWC (R):
6.266 II
IlAllowable concentration
jillowable concentration
II
II of NH3-N (mg/1):
_ -00
of Chlorine (ug/1):
271.289 II
II
(Allowable concentration
II
IlWinter
I of Chlorine (mg/1):
0.271 II
IlNitrogen as NH3
I
II
II
II 7Q10 (cfs):
578.000
I
I
II
II Design Flow (MGD):
13.500
1
II
II Design Flow (cfs):
20.925
I
II
II Stream STD (mg/1):
1.800
1
II
IlBackground level (mg/1):
0.220
1
II
11 IWC (8):
3.494
1
II
IlAllowable concentration
I
II
II of NH3-N (mg/1):
II--------------------------------------------------------------------------II
45.443
I
II

11/14/91 ver 3.1
Facility:
NPDES Permit No.:
Status (E, P, or M):
Permitted Flow:
Actual Average Flow:
Subbasin:
Receiving Stream:
Stream Classification:
7010:
INC:
Stn'd / Bkq
Pollutant AL Cone.
(ug/1) (ug/1)
Cadmium
S
2.0
Chromium
S
50.0
Copper
AL
7.0
Nickel
S
88.0
Lead
S
25.0
Zinc
AL
50.0
Cyanide
S
5.0
Mercury
S
0.012
Silver
AL
0.06
Selenium
S
5.00
Arsenic
S
50.00
Phenols
S
NA
NH3-N
C
T.R.Chlor.AL
17.0
Pollutant
Cadmium S
Chromium S
Copper AL
Nickel S
Lad S
zinc AL
Cyanide S
Mercury S
Silver AL
Selenium S
Arsenic S
✓phenols S
NH3-N C
T.R.Chlor.AL
T 0 X I C S R E V I E W
City of Eden--Melbane Bridge WWTP
NCO025071
E
13.5 mgd
6.7 mgd
030203
Dan River I -------- PRETREATMENT DATA -------------- I ---- EFLLUENT DATA---- I
C I ACTUAL PERMITTEDI I
313.0 efs I Ind. + Ind. + I FREQUENCY 1
6.27 A I Domestic PERMITTED Domestic I OBSERVED of Chronicl
Removal Domestic
Eff. Load
4 (4/d)
704 0.07
754 0.24
404 0.96
31% 0.48
80% 1.19
19% 5.01
584 0.00
85% 0.0
934 0.24
04 0.0
04 0.0
04 0.0
04 0.0
04 0.0
--------- ALLOWABLE PRDCT'D
Effluent Effluent
Cone. using
Allowable CHRONIC ACTUAL
Load Criteria Influent
(4/d) (ug/1) (ug/1)
11.62
31.916
1.13
348.59
797.909
2.30
20.33
111.707
89.68
222.29
1404.320
29.26
217.87
398.955
6.93
107.59
797.909
111.10
20.75
79.791
0.82
0.14
0.191
0.03
1.49
0.957
0.36
8.71
79.791
0.00
87.15
797.909
0.00
0.000
10.45
0.000
271.289
Act.Ind. Total Industrial Total I Eflluent Criteria I
Load Load Load Load I Cone. Violationsl
(4/d) (t/d) (4/d) (4/d) I (ug/1) (4vio/Osam)I
0.1403 0.210 0.4190 0.489 I I
0.2723 0.512 11.9070 12.147 I 60.0 I I
7.3500 8.310 29.1913 30.151 1 401.0 N
1.8780 2.358 3.2835 3.764 1 75.0 I P
0.7360 1.926 2.2055 3.396 1 65.0 1 U
2.6160 7.626 33.5060 30.516 1 260.0 I T
0.1086 0.109 1 16.0 I
0.0 0.012 0.3 I S
0.0476 0.286 I 20.0 I E
I C
I T
0.6 0.581 I 1
0
I N
I I
I I
I I
PRDCT'D PRDCT'O-------- MONITOR/LIMIT -------- 1--ADTN'L REC6ADTN'S--
Effluent Instream I Recomm'd
using Cone. Based on Based on Based on I FREQUENCY INSTREAM
PERMIT using ACTUAL PERMITTED OBSERVED I Eff. Mon. Monitor.
Influent OBSERVED Influent Influent Effluent I based on Recomm'd ?
(ug/1) (ug/1) Loading Loading Data I OBSERVED (YES/NO)
________ ________ ________ ________ _________I _________ ________
2.6385 0.000 Monitor Monitor I
54.6176 3.760 Monitor Monitor I NCAC NO
325.3724 25.128 Monitor Monitor Monitor I Weekly YES
46.7051 4.700 Monitor Monitor Monitor I NCAC NO
12.2140 4.073 Monitor Monitor !I NCAC NO
561.1121 16.293 Monitor Monitor Monitor I Monthly NO
0.0000 1.003 Monitor ® I NCAC NO
0.0000 0.019 qmwLimit NCAC YES
0.0000 1.253 Monitor Monitor I Weekly YES
0.0000 0.000 I
0.0000 0.000 I
0.0000 0.000
0.000 I
0.000

City of Eden W WTP--Mebane Bridge * Color (pH
**Color (pH 7.6)
Upstream Downstream Upstream Downstream Upstream Downstream Downstream
NCSR 1964 Hwy 700 Smith River -Eden Water Sul NC 1761 (Center) Hwy 87 SR 1761 (North) SR 1761 (South)
Date
Temp
DO
Fecal
Temp
DO
Fecal
pH
*00082
**00083
pH
*00082
**00083
pH
*00082
**00083
pH
*00082
**00083
pl-[
*00082
**00083'i=
z
Oct-91
16.0
9.1
71.0
16.0
9.3
122.0
7.9-7.7
43
44
7.8-7.6
48
45
7.6-7.4
53
50
7.8-7.6
48
46
7 3-7.6
45
48
Sep-91
21.0
8.1
130.0
27.0
7.7
159.0
7.8-7.5
<36
<36
7.7-7.5
42
41
7.7-7.4
48
49
7.7-7.6
44
44
7.7-7.5
45
43
<?->
Aug-91
23.0
8.3
188.0
23.0
8.2
199.0
7.9-7.6
<32
<32
7.3-7.5
<38
<37
7.7-7.6
<40
<39
7.7-7.5
<41
<41
7.6-7.5
<38
<36
`'
Jul-91
24.0
8.1
166.0
25.0
8.1
251.0
7.8-7.5
<33
<33
7.7-7.4
<43
<39
7.6-7.2
<40
<43
7.7-7.4
<42
<46
7.7-7.4
<38
<3911*,=
Jun-91
21.0
8.6
284.0
22.0
8.5
381.0
7.7-7.4
<56
<58
7.6-7.2
<45
<44
7.6-7.2
<52
<50
7.6-7.2
<44
<48
7.6-7.2
<46
May-91
19.01
9.01
342.0
1 19.0
8.9
363.0
7.7-7.5
<27
<25
7.5-7.3
<46
<46
7.5-7.3
<51
<40
7.6-7.3
<48
<55
7.5-7.4
Apr-91
15.01
10.01
168.0
1 15.01
10.0
165.0
7.7-7.6
<26
<25
7.5-7.3
<35
<38
7.5-7.3
<33
<35
7.5-7.3
<38
<36
7.5-7.3
<40
<38'<><
Mar-91
11.01
10.51
179.0
12.0
10.5
217.0
7.7-7.4
<31
<32
7.5-7.3
<36
<35
7.5-7.3
<38
<37
7.5-7.3
<35
<37
7.5-7.3
<35
<35
-:1
Feb-91
9.01
11.71
73.0
10.0
11.8
88.0
7.6-7.6
<25
<39
7.6-7.5
<29
<28
7.5-7.4
<30
<29
7.5-7.5
<28
<28
73-7.5
<29
<29
Jan-91
9.01
11.81
178.0
9.0
11.9
201.0
7.6-7.6
43
41
7.5-7.4
48
49
7.5-7.3
46
48
7.5-7.4
48
45
7.5-7.3
52
51
Dec-90
12.6
13.5
1514.0
11.5
10.5
1425.0
7.6-7.3
49
54
7.6-7.3
52
52
7.5-7.2
461
45
7.7-7.5
351
34
7.6-7.3
55
54
Nov-90
12.0
10.3
204.0
12.0
10.4
234.0
7.7-7.6
32
31
7.6-7.5
271
31
7.5-7.4
28
29
7.5-7.5
<25
<25
7.5-7.5
<25
<25
Oct-90
17.0
8.9
477.0
17.0
8.91
372.0
7.6-7.2
79
721
17.5-7.3
62
62
7.6-7.3
32
31
No Data
Sep-90
20.0
8.4
165.0
20.0
8.3
182.0
7.8-7.6
38
38
7.7-7.5
35
38
7.9-7.4
33
34
Aug-901eylfJaa.;
Jul-90
23.0
7.6
251.0
23.0
8.3
284.0
7.8-7.3
60
62
7.8-6.9
67
67
7.6-6.9
55
57
Jun-901
22.01
8.61
186.0
22.0
8.5
181.0
7.6-7.3
53
511
17.7-7.5
7.6-7.0
37
35
u

P- /19-19 /
pan v,'lc�
� ve laped 4r- X66hcu-9ers in. � YY�a.�/a �i . �'
be,AN qiU
Wa-�tii SuP/�y.
�. own off' M a yc dan
Ma baAJ ,Fpi ��( e
vA' Oi y &-teK� =
ee4renu tw 5 mac-lr ;
5YAO j 4c, f; v, kw i n �
� Borne v/O wI*�-k
jn,54uaWc. �Okc�ei3 PVY
OLY04OLMWruTP
Da.K
,qd -z! q. b 6 C,�
1�.5vey�l= a6.9a5cl;
�b �,Tew.
G.pd �iivev, -§asi /t-5
�7Q1O �l�cvs E kackpatct 6oel4l
�1'lar�'n�r�ll�
\Je, WWT F
7 4/0 r 191oc{s
Colov = D
Nor. cpgADM1
kAn melunegr
r3.5rrl cl
yr yCrteKWwTP
).o rnqd
07A16 I;rj - %a4K -him juporU/o /iat&J Gco w,s
h,1165 ,ha�ctr�ct
�7Alo� v�•Con�)tYrIGD*CuI = &741,0-fmgd)�55
�171ab t 04 Anrni) +a7./,25 Cw=(yat�.�ta�.�ah)�'a�F
� i a36 N ecu - y53.5a..ti �
Ua38.y�IC2 #7. i a5"
-� Ctu=�,�D►'Y►_T C�oloY ,In%ill Use �10,4DY►1I

January 14, 1992
MEMORANDUM"
TO: Carla Sanderson
THROUGH: Steve Mauney 1 6 1992
FROM: Ron Linville ' :BRANCH
Subject: Color Limits
Eden -Dry Creek & Mebane Bridge WWTPs
Mayodan WWTP
Rockingham County
After a review of the proposed ADMI Limits for Eden -Mebane
Bridge WWTP and Eden -Dry Creek WWTP, and discussions with the
Public Utilities Director of Eden, the WSRO recommends that the
Eden's request of January 2, 1992 be allowed if at all feasible.
That recommendation is that the color limit at the Mebane
Bridge facility remain 300 ADMI as this is the limit that the City was
told to target for Compliance in their SOC. (As the plant upgrade is
currently under construction, it would seem that we are changing the
rules after the game has started.) The City is aware that color limits
may change due to reallocation of color parameters. Additionally, the
City has requested a tighter limit at the Dry Creek facility to offset
their request to maintain the higher limit at Mebane Bridge as they
plan to pump colored water to the Mebane Bridge plant (upon
completion of the SOC) from the Dry Creek area through the Railroad
Pump Station. This color limit for Dry Creek could be from 100-240
ADMI depending on the modeling requirements. The WSRO would
further recommend relaxed monitoring at the Dry Creek WWTP due to
this diversion and the small flow (0.5-1.0 MGD) from this facility.

Page 2
This memo also confirms that the Mayodan WWTP will be given a
color limit of 240 ADMI. Although there is little color at that location
at the present time, the potential for future color discharges does
exist (Unifi & Tultex) and should therefore be addressed beforehand.
It would be conceivable and is recommended that this location could
also receive relaxed monitoring requirements until such time as color
from this WWTP becomes more significant
Please note that Mr. Dennis Asbury has requested a copy of the
modeling summaries in his letter. You may wish to respond to his
request The WSRO cannot accommodate him on this matter. If we
can be of further assistance on this matter or if we can further clarify
our reasoning, please do not hesitate to call.
cc: WSRO
Central Files

City of Eden
January 2, 1992
Mr. James R. Linville, Environmental Technician
Winston-Salem Regional Office
N. C. Department of Environment, Health,
and Natural Resources
8025 North Point Boulevard, Suite 100
Winston-Salem, NC 27106-3203
Dear Mr. Linville:
SUBJECT: MEBANE BRIDGE WWTP: NPDES NCO025071
DRY CREEK WWTP; NPDES NCO025151
ADMI COLOR LIMIT REDUCTION
r _
AFCEIVED -
N.C. Dept. NRCD
JAM 3 1992
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
This letter is in response to our recent conversations
regarding plans to reduce ADMI color limits for the subject
facilities.
As you are aware, the City of Eden is in the midst of a
$23,000,000 water and sewer improvement program. The
improvements to the Mebane Bridge WWTP are scheduled for
completion six months from now. Those improvements include color
removal facilities. Prior to design of the color removal
facilities, City officials and the City's consulting engineers
met with state officials to determine what target ADMI levels to
design for. Based on NC-DEM modeling studies, the City planned
for a 300 ADMI color limit. I am surprised that before we can
even get our color removal facilities installed and establish a
track record, the state is lowering the limit.
I feel that it would be more reasonable to retain the 300
ADMI color limit until we have the new facilities in place, and
have proven that levels below 300 ADMI units are feasible.
Historical records in Martinsville, Virginia suggest that color
levels below 300 ADMI units are feasible. However, there are
some inherent physical differences between the Martinsville WWTP
and the Mebane Bridge WWTP. Additionally, there is a significant
difference in the influent ADMI color loading on the two plants.
The influent ADMI color at the Mebane Bridge WWTP is about five
times that seen at the Martinsville plant.
350 West Stadium Drive • Eden, North Carolina 27288-3299 • Fax [phone]

P
r
K
It should be noted that the City's current sewer improvement
plans do not include any improvements at the Dry Creek WWTP. The
existing plans call for all textile wastewater from The City's
two major color producing industries, Sara Lee Knit Products
(formerly Pannill Knitting) and Pluma, Inc., to be pumped to the
Mebane Bridge WWTP where color removal facilities are being
installed. The only textile wastewater that will flow to the Dry
Creek WWTP after all improvements are completed will be from the
Fieldcrest Cannon Draper Dye House. The Dye House discharge
predates both Sara Lee and Pluma. ADMI color data collected at
the Dry Creek WWTP prior to the opening of Sara Lee and Pluma
showed that Dry Creek WWTP ADMI effluent levels were consistently
below 100 ADMI color units. Consideration should be given to the
possibility of reducing the Dry Creek ADMI requirement to include
monitoring only, and to leaving the Mebane Bridge WWTP limit at
300 ADMI units until a track record can be established.
I hope this info,.,mation is helpful. I would appreciate
copies of the modeling summaries which show that a 240 ADMI limit
is needed at the Mebane Bridge and Dry Creek WWTP's.
Should you have any questions about this matter, please call
me.
Sincerely,
Q� -
Dennis Asbury
Public Utilities Director
DA:bwj
c: Steve Routh, City Manager
David Cain; Finkbeiner, Pettis and Strout
Terry Shelton, Wastewater Superintendent

MEMO DATE:
SUBJECT:
TO: / EdW 61ebafu dr
1011 CIO*
C% ,�ru
E1
resu l
'CI
_ r ; boo �m-�-
�Prri iX e % r�r cf� a(s.yDrw`T
I�1a�oc ww7�
pn� ")t
,�n� ov
C l� wMTP >�educeo cr L _ ,25
1(
0pP "A'
l!� �ha/r�^d �oU�yLZ
uFrom:
".m... North Carolina Department of Environment,
�° Health, and Natural Resources g� Printed onRe oieaPaper

2,11 9�
Memorandum
This is your copy I have made one for each of you.
To: Carla
Ruth
Trevor
From: towm
Subject: Color Data
Here are the color data I collected from instream at Eden --Mebane
Bridge WWTP and the two ambient stations that monitor for color in
that area. I have included a map with distances and locations of the
players except the location of the Eden water supply intake station on
the Smith River (the Smith River instream station for Eden--mebane
Bridge). I think it is close to the confluence of the Dan and Smith
Rivers, more than likely downstream of the AMS on the Smith River.
I include data from color parameter 82 only because it was the first
one. The data from parameter 83 is about the same and I have it also
if we need it. The plots are the same except one has lines connecting
points and the other does not. I plotted only June through September
data where the facility collected three times a week but I have in the
table the entire data set from June 1990 to August 1991.
If you would like any other statistical analysis done on any of these data
let me know.

�A,s� �
�z o7
r
e �
CA
ri
M W W V P _ 3 7•� Jc-yL` r c4�C_ Vim) W\
a ac'5w.

300
250
M
100
50
L
Dan -Smith -Mayo River Area --Color Parameter 82
■ Dan R Hwy 87 ❑ Dan R SR 1761 (center) • Smith R
O AMS# 02074WO • AMS# 02070500
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
a�OOa�OOOa�a�a�a�c�OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOa�a�a�OOOOa�a�Oa�OOa�OOOa�a�OOa�a�a�OOO
`cOM-4OWWOr-+Nmt,.-0"MWOV-4mwt*-00d'c0O--' t,- Woo'011OW NNNNM�wt,-"M�t-0��locO[`
���� ��� � ��
N N N N N N +-4 N N N M �����+-i N N N N N N
CC cG CG ����������1N N N �����♦���%%. O �����"I%% %%%. %,.%
wwwwwowwww NNNNNNNNNN OOwwwwwwww OOOOOOOOOO

350
115
250
Vol
W1
KII
Dan -Smith -Mayo River Area --Color Parameter 82
Dan R Hwy 87 Dan R SR 1761 Smith R
(center)
AMS# AMS#
02074000 02070500
■
MOM 4MMMO�NWt*-MNMWOWO+-4N t,-WMMef Mw �NMwMOgtMt,-NMd't-0+4,'tm t-
\ \ \ � 9- 4 � +- 4 N N N N N N \ \ \ r-I +—I r" 4 +-i r- 4 i--1 N N N M \ \ \ \ \ � � � r-+ N N N N N M \ \ \ � � +-4 � N N N N N N
CO CO CO \\\%%.. t` \\\%_.. \00 00 a0 00 00 \\\1%1% \\\\\\\\\\
wwwwwwwwww t`t_NNNNtit`tiN wwwwwwwwww MOOMMOMMOM

Eden --Mebane Bridge WWTP
AMS#
Date
Dan R. Hwy 87
Dan R. SR 1761
Smith R.
2074000
2070500
6/5/90
28
42
33
6/6/90
33
24
35
6/8/90
36
26
17
6/11/90
160
175
305
6/13/90
31
37
38
24
6/15/90
21
24
35
6/18/90
28
18
40
6/20/90
24
15
24
6/21/90
9
6/22/90
24
21
30
6/25/90
21
20
25
6/27/90
17
31
29
6/29/90
16
16
27
7/2/90
16
18
19
7/3/90
19
16
21
7/5/90
14
17
18
7/10/90
19
19
19
7/11/90
23
22
24
7/13/90
26
28
24
7/16/90
243
309
197
150
7/17/90
136
193
128
45
7/19/90
68
47
43
7/23/90
37
41
113
7/24/90
35
57
103
7/26/90
46
51
33
7/30/90
29
58
39
8/1/90
54
31
55
8/2/90
30
27
29
8/7/90
28
37
37
8/8/90
23
31
27
8/9/90
29
22
21
8/13/90
9
8/14/90
32
31
43
8/15/90
26
48
31
20
8/16/90
24
41
38
8/21/90
33
35
74
8/22/90
35
41
41
8/23/90
41
30
33
8/28/90
28
36
42
8/29/90
35
32
27
8/30/90
47
35
35

9/4/90
32
30
32
9/5/90
30
30
31
9/7/90
25
25
25
9/12/90
30
25
29
9/13/90
34
31
35
9/14/90
28
38
43
9/17/90
51
49
44
33
9/20/90
36
52
28
9/21/90
25
25
25
9/24/90
21
9/25/90
31
31
31
9/26/90
33
45
33
9/27/90
25
42
25
10/3/90
<25
33
27
10/11/90
170
84
240
10/15/90
35
10/17/90
65
63
36
10/26/90
80
82
57
10/30/90
43
46
33
10/31/90
17
11/8/90
37
25
37
11/13/90
19
11/15/90
27
32
43
15
11/21/90
25
<25
<25
11/29/90
<25
<25
12/6/90
73
82
53
19
12/12/90
13
12/13/90
<25
<25
<25
12/20/90
<25
<25
<25
12/27/90
59
76
37
1/3/91
30
33
<25
1/9/91
57
54
47
1/14/91
29
1/17/91
71
80
95
1/22/91
31
1/23/91
46
49
<25
1/31/91
<25
25
<25
2/7/91
<25
<25
<25
2/14/91
<25
<25
<25
2/21/91
44
42
<25
2/28/91
<25
<25
<25
3/7/91
66
53
49
3/14/91
<25
<25
<25

3/21/91
35
39
<25
3/28/91
<25
<25
<25
4/4/91
48
48
30
1
4/11/91
<25
26
<25
7
4/16/91
48
4/18/91
37
41
<25
4/24/91
<25
<25
<25
5/2/91
78
63
<25
5/9/91
25
<25
<25
5/14/91
25
5/15/91
33
5/16/91
34
<25
<25
5/23/91
79
80
32
5/30/91
38
39
28
6/3/91
30
<25
56
6/4/91
45
33
35
6/5/91
47
31
<25
6/10/91
<25
<25
27
6/11/91
<25
<25
26
6/12/91
13
6/13/91
<25
<25
<25
6/17/91
<25
<25
28
36
6/18/91
38
26
43
6/20/19
152
118
139
6/24/91
112
78
121
6/25/91
75
104
126
6/27/91
29
<25
<25
7/1/91
36
<25
<25
7/2/91
<25
<25
<25
7/3/91
<25
<25
27
7/8/91
45
45
<25
7/9/91
31
<25
26
7/11/91
26
62
<25
7/15/91
122
103
69
7/16/91
57
80
57
26
7/18/91
35
36
<25
15
7/22/91
46
53
37
7/23/91
40
59
31
7/25/91
<25
<25
<25
7/29/91
41
47
58
7/30/91
40
401
44

NPDES PRETREATMENT INFORMATION REQUEST FORM
I ^vim CV K.�M
FACILITY NAMEvt p j c NPDES NO. NCO p� o
I
I
REQUESTER: pj DATE: _/_/ REGION:_
PERMIT CONDITIONS COVERING PRETREATMENT
This facility has no SIUs and should not have pretreatment language.
This facility should and/or is developing a pretreatment program.
Please include the following conditions:
Program Development ;
Phase I due
Phase II due
Additional Conditions
/ (attached)
✓ This facility is currently implementing a pretr tment program.
Please include the following conditions:
Program 7mplanentation
Additional Conditions
(attached)
I
1
SIG FLAW - TOTAL: b'M
I
- COMPOSITION: TEXTrr.F': MGD
METAL FINISHING: MGD
OTHER: MGD
MGD
MGD
i MGD
I �
I
I
HEADWORKS REVIEW
I PASS I
I PARAMETER !THROUGH DAILY LOAD IN LBS/DAY ACTUAL '
ALLJFIASLE DOMEST7C PERMITTED INDUSTRIAL % REMOVAL
Cd
Cr yn
i � ESL
Cu J�
I Ni �� I
I P,.Zn
CN
h
I
Penol '
I I
I Other
I � I
' OM illy 1C11� ./IJI���1/I •/ ilk

NPDES PRET ZEATNENT INFORMATION REQUEST FORM
'FACILITY NAME: / NPDES N0. NCo0 L '
r
REQUESTER:'DATE:/_FZ REGION :
r
r
r '
This facility has no SIUs and should not have pretreatment language.
This facility should and/or is developing a pretreatment program.
Please include the following conditions:
Program Development
r Phase I due
Phase IIdue / /—
ditional Conditions '
r
(attached)
This faciLi is currently implementing a etreatment program.
Please include the following conditions:
r Program Implementation
Additional Conditions
r (attached) '
r '
r '
r
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USERS' (81
SIU FLOW - TC.PAL :
1.1 p 4101- 1.•)
r
PARAMETER
r
r
Cd
Cr
Cu
Ni
Pb
Zn
GH
�• �I�fati �M •NS
PAS
TH
r ' x
�D
i Ir: 0 r
r�
TEXTILE: �
FINISHING:
Ie
ACTUAL
INDUSTRIAL % REMOVAL
N4o
23 ��
�qo
RECEIVED: / / REVIEWED BY : $ RE'II�ID : ( '
�a/31
r
r r

1'ne sAs system z
09:57 Thursday, October 3, 1991
' � r
__w----------------------------- NPDES=NC0025071----------------------------
Variable Sum
PIPE
4.0000000
_TYPE_
0
_FREQ_
105.0000000
MCDL
0.1403059
MCRL
0.2722510
MCUL
7.3497779
MNIL
1.8783668
MPBL
0.7360015
MZNL
2.6156172
MCNL
0.1085584
MHGL
0.0022987
MALL
0.0475964
MASL
0.3685513
MPHENOLL
0.5812751
MFLL
MBODL
3209.71
MCODL
13650.52
MTSSL
844.1857462
MTOLUL
MFLOW
----------------------
3.0904399

The SAS System 1
• 09:57 Thursday, October 3, 1991
♦ T
OBS NPDES IUNUM PIPE _TYPE_ _FREQ- MCDL MCRL MCUL
1. NCO025071 1004 1 0 24 0.015415 0.01305 0.15396
2 NCO025071 1005 1 0 22 0.018428 0.19917 0.15118
3 NCO025071 1008 1 0 27 0.041815 0.04971 5.40957
4 NCO025071 1009 1 0 32 0.064648 0.01033 1.63507
OBS MNIL MPBL MZNL MCNL MHGL MAGL MASL
1 0.05087 0.05558 0.41362
2 0.15888 0.15565 0.70930
3 1.08612 0.41457 0.93725 0.10856 .0022987 0.047596 0.36855
4 0.58250 0.11021 0.55544
OBS MPHENOLL MFLL MBODL MCODL MTSSL MTOLUL MFLOW
1 0.10304 378.75 1679.82 183.447 0.37043
2 0.09861 709.43 1882.82 328.499 0.55181
3 0.27173 1484.67 7394.76 200.640 1.29964
4 0.10790 636.86 2693.13 131.601 0.86856

1L t •
C
1L _
► ..�\► \
ii
�'
f 1
I i 1 1' 1
1 f
1 !
i_ ►-:i: `\ i
f 1
1 f
1 1 1 i 1.•:
`i.: __ ►\ '�•11
1 is
i-
:.11
1 1 i
1 _
_ C _.:.
`
_ _.�i 1 l.i� L_ ii• MOM
WIN! ! f 1
1 i f f •
• :-- •�—� •� \� - -
\�
•� IffWO
• : _ � . i 11 � _ � • � \ � i _
�
•� f �
fly f
• 1 f
EDEN (MEB BRID.) IUP LOAD, 10/3/91, page 1

11
��
•
14LG
MLEM,
FOR
•
• •
11m•
fa•
1 •�L
�� •
`f_
I i 1 1
1IM i
• • P., Me
, ! • /
�,
• • • •
,
�, L
L !
SM • i�
'�
it f�-
EDEN (MEB BRID.) IUP LOAD, 10/3/91, page 2
f `i

WIM�,
14W
LIMIT
1/
_•• •,
Ifl
If_
11
•.
1
f 1•
1 f:
1 1
._ 1 '.
_ 1 1
PROEM
ff'
11
•
i
•f•:
1 1
1 1
1 f ,
f 1
I f i i
0 000�'
��O
�-fl
f
EDEN (MEB BRID.) IUP LOAD, 10/3/91, page 3
• V, r

Z
ANNUAL POLLUTANT A►:ALYSIS MONITORING REQUIREMENT
REPORTING FORM A
(Revised June 1990)
I. Facility Information
NPDES Permit No: N00025017 Discharge (Pipe) No: 001 Year: 1991
Facility Name: City of Eden, Mebane Bridge WWTP class: IV County: Rockingham
Person(s) Collecting Samples: Roy Edwards
Status of facility wastewater treatment operation on day of sampling: Typical Yes X No
If no, explain briefly:
Analytical Laboratory: Burlington Research, Inc. (WO#-91-06-185)
II. Sampling
24 hr composite for main sample/grab sample for pirgeeble fraction
Date Sampled: (composite sample)
Sampling begun (date, time): Thursday. June 13, 1991; 12:30 PH
Sampling finished (date, time): _ Friday. June 14, 1991: 12:30 PH
Date and time sampled (grab sample): Friday. June 14, 1991; 12:30 PH
Corresponding sample taken for toxicity testing:
Yes X (BRI WON 91-06-138) No
Page 1 of 13
44b

INSTRUCTIONS
The purpose of this document and the NC DENNR memo of October 30, 1990 (Tedder)/mailing of December 1990 is to stondard-
ize the sampling, analysia and reporting procedures to be used for the Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring (APAM) Require-
ment as described in the permit.
Sampling
1 - Take a 24-hour composite sample from the final effluent during mid -week (Wednseday through Friday). Collect a grab
sample for the volatile organic fraction when collection of the 24-hour composite sample is completed. Follow any other
sampling instructions provided by the laboratory performing the analysis.
2 - Indicate in the space provided on Page 1 of 13 this page whether a corresponding sample for toxicity testing was taken.
3 - Make note of any unusual wastewater treatment operating conditions occurring on the day of sampling in the space pro-
vided on Page 1 of 13.
Analysis
4 - Analyze the effluent for pollutants listed on the APAM form, including those to be identified and approximately quan-
tified under the 10 significant peaks rule, using appropriate EPA -approved methods for each of the analytic fractions.
other analytical methods can be substituted only with prior, written approval of the Director of the Division of Environmen-
tal Management (DEM). Read and distribute to the laboratory performing the analysis the accompanying memo (Tedder, October
1990) clarifying analytical requirements.
5 - Identify chemicals to be analyzed for according to the 10 significant peaks rule (as described in item 2 of the Annual
Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Requirement in the permit) using a GC/MS library search. Tentative identification is all that
is required; confirmation by standard injection is not necessary. Estimate the concentration of each based on an internal
standard having the closest retention time.
Reporting
6 - ouantitation limit Targets that should be met are listed on this Revised APAM Reporting Form A. Report the use of any
higher quantition limit and an explanation as to why the listed quantitation limit target could not be met. Examples of
acceptable reasons for not meeting a quantitation limit target could be high background concentrations in a sample, or the
necessity for sample fraction dilution to bring a chemical to within a quantifiable concentration. List any quantitation
limit different (whether higher or lower) from the target in the column provided for the purpose.
7 - If a chemical is found to be below the quantitation limit, report the concentration detected as less than (or 10) the
quantitation limit in the appropriate space. Provide a concentration estimate for chemicals detected in concentrations
greater than the detection limit and less than the quantitation limit. Enter the detection limit in parentheses beside the
estimate. Chemicals detected in concentrations above the quantitation limits must be quantified. ouantitation limit and
detection limit are defined in the NC DEIINR memo (Tedder, October 1990). Enter the total number of peaks detected In
each analytic fraction in the appropriate space on this Revised APAM Form A. Report all concentrations in units of micro-
grams per liter (ug/L) and metals as total recoverable metal. If no peaks to be identified under the 10 significant peaks
rule are observed, enter "none" in the space provided for "other" compounds in each appropriate
Provide the concentration estimate and retention time for "unknowns""was well as for "significant peaks"
fraction section.
tural assignment can be made. g peaks for which a struc-
8 - If "significant peaks" are found, provide probable molecular weight, library match probability, retention time, ident-
ification basis, and HS scan number each. In addition, list internal standards and their retention times.
9 - In the section labeled "Organic Analytical information", (Page 11 of 13) include for each organic fraction the method,
extraction technique, GC operating conditions, and surrogate recovery. Report the size of the GC/MS library being utilized
in the appropriate space.
10 - Use copies of this Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Revised Form A to report the results of the analysis. Both
the analytical laboratory representative and the facility operator in responsible charge should sign completed forms
(last page).
11 - Mail two completed copies of the form (and the laboratory report, If submitted to the facility on a different form)
to: ATTN: Central Files, Division of Environmental Management, HC DEIINR, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611. Hail the APAM
form separately from Discharge Monitoring Reports.
Page 2 of 13

A. Purgeable (Volatile Organic) Fraction, EPA Method 624
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction
Fraction STORET Number 84085
STORET
Number
Compound
Quent tat on
Limit Target
Quentitat on
Limit*
Concentration
Detected
GC/MS
Confirmation?
. Pollutants
to be analyzed or:
(ug/ )
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
Yes
No
34210
342T5
30036-
32 001
32144
Acrolein
100
NO
Yes
Acrylonitrt a
100
NO
Yes
Benzene
ND
Yes
Bromodich oromet ene
5
ND
Yes
Bromoform
5
ND
Yes
3 + + �
32102
—343OF
Bromot.t ane
10
ND
Yes
Carbon tetrachloride
5
ND
Yes
Chlorobenzene
6
ND
Yes
34311
34576
32106
Chtoroethane
id
ND
Yes
2-Chtoroethyt vinyl ether
10
ND
Yes
Chloroform
5
Yes
34418-
32210
34496
3�1,2-Dichloroethene
3450
34546
Ch t oromet ane
10
ND
Yes
[t romoch oromet ane
5
ND
Yes
,1-Dichloroethane
5
NO
Yes
5
ND
Yes
-Dichloroethy ene
5
ND
Yes
trans- ,2-Dtc loroethy ene
5
ND
Yes
34541
3470
346 99
—MTF
34423
34516
34 7r
340 0
34506-
1,2-Dichioropropane
ND
Yes
cis ,3-Dtc oropropane
5
ND
Yes
trans 1,3•Dichloropropene
5
ND
Yes
Ethylbeenzene
8
ND
Yes
Methylene c6loride
5
ND
Yes
,2,2-Tetrach oroe tene
7
NO
Yes
Tetrachtoroethytene
5
ND
Yes
Toluene
6
NO
Yes
1,1,1-lrichtoroethene
5
NO
Yes
34511
39180
34488
39175
-7 [�dt
, , -Trtc oroet ane
5
ND
Yes
Trichioroethytene
5
NO
Yes
Trichtorofturomethene
10
NO
Yes
Vinyl chloride
ND
Yes
event from auent tat on M'I
t tnrnot _
ND=None Detected. < = As per instructions.
Page 3 of 13
44*

A2. Other Purgeebles (up to 10 highest peaks).
Conpound
Probable
Molecular
Weight
Est.
Conc.
(ug/L)
—79
Library Hatch
Probability
M
Retention
Time (RT)
(Min)
I enttf cet on Basis
(Check all that apply)
Scan
Number
Library
Match
Manuel
Interpretation
RT
2-Hethy - -Nitro-Propane
97
1793—
X
X
Complete only if non -targeted compounds are present:
Internal Standard
1,4 - Diftuorobenzene
Chlombenzene - d5
Page 4 of 13
Retention
Time
(Min)
25.8
4 46

B. Acid Extractable Fraction, EPA Method 625
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction
Fraction STORET Number 45582
STORET
Number Compound
Ouantitation
Limit Target
Quantitation
Limit*
Concentration
Detected
GUMS
Confirmation?
1. Pottutants to be ana yze or:
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
Yes
No
34452
34586
.34601-
34606
346 6
-Chtoro- -met y phenol
io
ND
Yes
-C oro eno
0
ND
Yes
, -Dic oro eno
w-
ND
Yes
2, -Dimet y eno
0
ND
Yes
2, -Dinitro eno
0
ND
Yes
34657
34591
34646
39032
34694
-3462F
* if ifferent
2 -Met h y I. - 4, 6 - d initro eno?—
50
ND
Yes
2-Nitrophenot
10
ND
Yes
4-Nitrophenot
so
ND
Yes
Pentachlorophenot
50
ND
Yes
Phenot
10
ND
Yes
2, , -Trtc oro ieno
0
ND
Yes
from auantttntion limit
tnraAt
ND=None Detected. < = As per instructions.
Page 5 of 13
'46

0
B2. Other Acid Extractebles (up to 10 highest peaks).
Compound
Probable
Molecular
Weight
Est.
Conc.
(ug/L)
Library Match
Probability
M
Retention
Time (RT)
(Min)
Identif cat on 8as s
(Check all that apply)
Scan
Number
Library
Match
Manuel
Interpretation
RT
NONE
Complete only if non -targeted compounds are present:
Internal Standard
1,4 - Dic oro nzene - d4
Naphtha ene - d8
Acenap t lane -
Phenant rene - d 0
Chrysene -
Perylene -
Page 6 of 13
Retention
Time
(Min)
10.50
.2
24.50
33.22

a
_ o
C. Bnse/Neutral Fraction, EPA Method 625
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction
Fraction STORET Number 45583
SiORET
Number
Compound
Quantitation
Limit Target
Quentii tion
Limit*
Concentration
Detected
GC/MS
Confirmation?
I. PoLLUtants
to 13.6 ana yze or:
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
Yes
No
4205
34 000
-NW
39120
34526
Acenaphthene
10
ND
Yes
Acena t y ene
lu
ND
Yes
Ant racene
io
ND
Yes
Benzidine
50
ND
Yes
Benz (a) anthracene
10
NO
Yes
34247
34230
3452
Benzo (a) pyrene
10
NO
Yes
Benzo (b) f uorant ene
10
NO
Yes
Benzo (g i) pert' ene
10
ND
Yes
-342 88
3427
-3Z=
3 1100
4466336
-34298
Benzo ( ) uorant ene
10
NO
Yes
Bis(2-c oroet oxy) methane
10
ND
Yes
Bis(2-c oroet y) et er
10
ND
Yes
Bis( -c oroisopropy ) ether
10
ND
Yes
Bis(2-et y exy ) pht a ate
10
ND
Yes
4-Bromophenyl. phenylether
io
ND
Yes
34581
34641
Butyl Eenzylit a ate
10
ND
Yes
2-C oronapht atene
10
ND
Yes
4-Ch orophenyphenyl et er
10
ND
Yes
34328
34�
34536
—93W
34571
34631
-34336
34341
391 00
—NUT
C rysene
10
ND
Yes
Di enz (a, ) ant racene
io
ND
Yes
,2-Dich orobenzene
10
ND
Yes
i,3-Dichlorobenzene
10
ND
Yes
1,4-Dichtorobenzene
10
ND
Yes
3,3-Dichtorobenzidine
20
ND
Yes
Diethyl t a ate
10
ND
Yes
Dimethyt phthalate
10
ND
Yes
Di-n-butythatate
10
328.0
Yes
462b-
34596
-3W
-Dinitroto uene
10
ND
Yes
,6-Dinitroto uene
10
ND
Yes
Di-n-octy t a ate
10
ND
Yes
34376
34381
--- — rnntinitnel_
-Di eny y razine
ND
Yes
Fluoranthene
10
ND
Yes
F uorene
1lila0nne ne*n..te i _ •..
10
.---—�--•_--_--
ND
Yes
Page 7 of 13
44

�
T
• r
C. Base/Neutral Fraction (Continued)
STORET
Number Compound
I. Potlutants to be analyzed for:
39700 Hexach oro nzene
-3439F Hexac lorobutediene
34386 Hexach orocyc epentediene
--J4396 Hexac loroet ene
34403 I eno( ,2, -cd) pyrene
344 88 Isophorone
34699 Naphthatene
34447 Nitrobenzene
344438 N-n tros imet y am ne
34428 N-n troso- i-n-propylemine
34 333 N-nitrosodlienytamlFe
34461 Phenanthrene
34 Pyrene
3455 F 1,2,4-Trichiorobenzene
ouentitation
Limit Target
(ug/L)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
* If different from quant totion target.
ND=None Detected. < = As per instructions.
Quentitotion
Limit*
(ug/L)
Page 8 of 13
Concentration
Detected
(ug/L)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Confirm
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
itiont
No
I

9 �
a
J
i
C2. Other Base/Neutrals (up to 10 highest peaks).
Compound
NONE
Probable
Molecular
Weight
Est.
Conc.
(ug/L)
Library Match
Probabitity
M
Retention
Time (RT)
(Min)
identification Basis
(Check all that apply)
Scan
Nurber
Library
Match
Manuel
interpretation
RT
Complete only if non -targeted compounds are present:
Internat Standard
1,4 - Dic oro enzene -
Napht a ene d8
Acenap t hene -
P enant rene ----dio
Chrysene 2
Pery ene -
Page 9 of 13
Retention
Time
(Min)
10.90
.2
19.80
24.50
.2
.4.jo

u
a '
D. Organochlorine/Organophosphorus Pesticides and PCB's
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction 0
Fraction STORET Number 00188
STORET
Number
Compound
Quant tation
Limit Target
Quant tation
Limit*
Concentration
Detected
Con
Duel
rmat
Col.
on7
GC/MS
1. Pollutants
Organochlorine
to be analyzed or:
Pesticides/PCB's: EPA Method
(ug/L)
8080
(ug/L)
(ug/ )
Yes
o
Yes
-
-
-
-
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
o
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
39330
39337
39338
34259
39340
39350
39310
39320
39300
39380
34�361
34356
34351
39390
34 66
39 0
39420
39480
39755
39400
34671
39488
39492
39496
39500
39504
39508
A drip
0.05
0.25
NO
Y
a pha-BIIC
0.05
0.25
ND
Y
Beta-BIIC
0.05
0.25
ND
Y
Delta-BHC
0.1
0.25
ND
Y
Gamma-BIIC (Li ane)
0.05
0. 5
ND
Y
Chtordane
0.2
0.25
ND
Y
Y
, '-DDD
0.1
0.29
ND
, ,-DDE
0.1
0.25
ND
Y
,41-DDT
0.1
0.25
ND
Y
Die drip
0.02
0.25
ND
Y
Endosutfan I (a pha)
0.1
0.25
NO
Y
Endosutfan If (be -to)
0.1
0.25
ND
Y
Endosulfan sulfate
0.7
0.25
ND
Y
Endrin
0.06
0.25
ND
Y
Endrin atdehyae
0.2
0.25
ND
Y
Heptachtor
0.05
0.25
ND
Y
Heptachlor epoxide
0.8
0.25
ND
Y
Methoxychtor
0.5
0.25
ND
Y
Mirex
o.2
0.25
ND
Y
Toxophene
2.4
2.5
ND
Y
PCB 0 6
o.5
2.5
ND
Y
PCB 1291
o.5
2.5
ND
Y
PCB 1232
0.5
2.5
ND
Y
PCB 1242
0.5
2.5
ND
Y
PCB 1248
0.5
2.5
ND
Y
PCB 1254
1.0
2.5
ND
Y
PCB 1260
1.0
2,5
ND
Y
ND=None
Detected- < _ At nor inatriertiftne
* Values listed are quantitation limits consistently achievable in wastewater matrices.
Page 10 of 13

a
0
e
s
� r
D. Pesticides (Continued).
STORET Compound
Number
Quatitat on
Limit Target
Quant tat on
Limit*
Concentration
Detected
Confirmation?
Dual Col.
GC/MS
Yes No
Y
. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
Orgenophosphorus Pesticides: EPA Method
(ug/L)
625/8080
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
Yes
No
39560
Demeton
2.5
ND
39540
Parathion (ethyl)
o.6
ND
Y
E. Herbicides, EPA Method 8150
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction 0
Fraction STORET Number 00148
STORET
Number Compound
Quant tat on
Limit Target
Quentitation
Limit*
Concentration
Detected
Confirmation?
Dual Column
I. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
Yes
No
39730
39OU
39740
2, -D
12
HD
No
Si I vex
2
ND
No
2, ,5-T
2
ND
No
'77f different
from auant I tat inn I im!t tnrnat
ND=None Detectable.
< = As per instructions.
Organic Analytical Information:
Organic Fraction
Method
6R—
Extraction
GC Operating Conditions
Column Description
Surrogates (Spikes)
Batch
Continuous
Length X 1D, Fitm Thickness,
Column Type, Carrier Gas & Flow
Rate, Temperature Program
Compound
•�
Recovery
x:
905
Purgeable
N/A
75m x 0.53mm, 3.0mm, DB-624
Bromofluorobenzene
He, cc/m C (9 Hin).
, -D c oroet ane-
�05',
•
C 2 60C/min. 2000C, C/min.
Totuene-dg
` 19
Acid Extractable
625
X
30m x 0. 2mr, 1.0mm, DB-
2-F uor.o eno
He, 2cc/m n., 400 C 0 m n)
Phenol- . d
�—
-719
3200 C, 80 C/min.
, , -Tr romo eno
Base/Neutral Ext.
625
X
30m x O.32mm, 1.0mm, DO-5,
2-F uoro i eny •
54
He, 2cc/min., 400 C ( min)
Nitrobenzene—
—�
320* C, 80 C/min.
-Ter eny -
�—
�0
Example:
Acid Extractable
625
X
Om x O.25mm, 0. um, DO- ,
He, 30 cm6sec, 40 C (4 min) -
270 C, 10 /min
-P eno
GC/MS Library size (number of reference spectra): 42,222
Page 11 of 13
't

a
.
�
f ..
�
� r
F. Metals and Other Chemicals
Number of Metals and Other Chemicats (as tlsted betox) detected in Semple 7
Fraction STORET Number 78240
STORET Quanitation
Number Compound Limit Target
. Pottutants to be analyzed or: I (ug/L)
01104
01077
—UTUUF
o 001Z
01027
7TU34-
01042
01051
—7190
AIuninun
Antimony
Arsenic
eery tun
cadmium
C romi um
Copper
Lea
001077
01147
`UTD7r
Mercury
Nice
Selenium
s t ver
01092
Zinc
2. Other inorganics:
0
0
10
25
2
0
0.2
0
Quantitoion
Limit's
Concentration
Detected
(ug/ )
(ug/L)
0
420
0
BDL
�'—
eo
0
BDL
o.5
BDL
BDL
2
70
BDL
0
BDL
BDL
3
01007
0OPW
00720
00951
Barium
500
100
BDL
Chloride
0
0229,000
Cyanide
20
17
BDL
Ftuori2e
100
100
980
Page 12 of 13

f
P
O
Analytical Laboratory Representatives:
L. .
Steven G. Yocklovich
Director, Chromatography Laboratories
Richard A. Diehl
Director, Environmental Laboratories
Date
Facility operator in Responsible charge (ORQ: 6; /e-o,4
1 certify that this r port is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge:
Signed: N*\' L Date:
Page 13 of 13
.k44

P
e , e
• e • Y
Facility Information:
Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Requirement
Reporting Form A
(Revised June' 1990)
Page 1 of 9
NPDES Permit No: r ('_, GO • !S Discharge Pipe) No: (301 ear: Y19 1
Facility Nam e-•&- v% A, z A. 4� ;', c W �,► N'T Class: I County:�DCkiri!ahrim
Person(s) Collecting Samples: �_ A 17, 5
Status of facility wastewater treatment operation on day of sampling: typical: ✓Yes No
If no, explain briefly:
Analytical Laboratory: rzig F (:,I-N
24 fir composite for main sample / grab sample for purgeable fraction
Date Sampled: (composite sample) Corresponding sample taken for toxicity testing:
Samoifng begun (date, tirne): 6-13 f i L) 0 Yes
Sampling finished (date, time):16` t w ` 9,1 1 D3 U No
Date and time sampled (grab sample):16 -14 -q I I X GI 0
Instructions
The puroose of this document and the accompanying memo Is to standardize the sampling, analysis and reporting procedures to be used
for the Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring (APAM) Requirement as described In the permit.
Sampling
1 • Take a 2•1-hour composite sample from the final effluent during midweek (Wednesday through Friday). Collect a grab sample for the volatile
organic l:acticn when collection of the 24-hour composite sample is completed. Follow any other sampling instructions provided by the laboratory
performing the analysis.
- Indicate in the space provided at the top of this page whether a corresponding sample for toxicity testing was taken.
3 Maize note of any unusual wastewater treatment operating conditions occurring on the day of sampling in the space provided on the form.
Analysis
4 • Analyze the effluent for pollutants listed on the APAM form, Including those to be identified and approximately quantified under the 10
significant peaks rule, using appropriate EPA -approved melhcos for pact of the analytic iractions. Other analytical methods can be substituted
�niv with prior. viril!en aoproval of the Director of the Division of Environmental Management (OEM). Read and distribute to the laboratory
performing the analysis the accompanving memo (Tedder, October i990) clarifying analytical requirements.
• Identify chemicals to be analyzed for according to the 10 significant Peaks rule (as described In item 2 of the Annual Pollutant Analysis
Monitoring Reaulrernent in ilia permit) using a GC1MS library search. Tentative laentificatlon Is all that Is required; confirmation by standard
Injection is not necessary. Estimate the concentration of each based on an internal standard having the closest retention time.
Reporting
6 - Ouentiiation Limit Targets that should be met are listed on this Revised APAM Reporting Form A. Report the use of any higher quantita-
lion limit and an explanation as to why the listed quantitallon Ilrnit target could not be met. Examples of acceptable reasons for not meeting
a quantitatlon limit target could be high background concentrations in a sample, or the necessity for sample fraction dilution to bring a chemical
to within a quantifiable concentration. List any quantitatlon limit dilfertent (whether higher or lower) from the target in the column provided
for this purpose.
7 • if a chemical !s found to be below the quantitatlon limit. report the concentration detected as less than (or '<') the quantitatlon limit
in the appropriate soace. Provide a concentration estimate for chemicals detected In concentrations greater than the detection limit and less
than the quantitatlon limit. Enter the detection limit In parentheses beside the estimate. Chemicals detected in concentrations above the quan-
Illation limits must be quantified. Ouantilation limit and detection limit are defined to the accompanying memo (Tedder, October 1990). Enter
the total number of peaks detected in each analytic fraction in the appropriate spats on this Revised APAM Form A. Report all concentrations
In untls of micrograms per liter (ug11) and metals as total recoverable metal. If no peaks to be Identified under the 10 significant peaks rule
are observed, enter "none" In the space provided for "other" compounds In each appropriate analytic fraction section. Provide the concentra-
tion estimate and retention time for "unknowns" as well as for "significant peaks" for which a structural assignment can be made.
8 If "significant peaks" are found, provide probable molecular weight, library match probability, retention time. Identification basis, and
NIS scan number for each. In addition, list Internal standards and their retention limes.
9 In the section labeled "Organic Analytical Information" (p. 9), Include for each organic fraction the method, extraction technique, GC
operating conditions, and surrogate recovery. Report the size of the GC/MS library being utilized In the appropriate space.
to - Use copies of this Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Revised Form A to report the results of the analysis. Both the analytical laboratory
representative and the facility operator In responsible charge should sign completed forms (last page).
11 • Mail Iwo completed copies of the form (and the laboratory report, if submitted to the facility on a different form) to: ATTN: Central Files,
Division of Environmental Management, NC DEHNR, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611. Mail the APAM form separately from Discharge Monitoring
Reports.
446

A,
s
Burlington
Research Post Office Box 2481.615 Huffman MITI Road • [phone] • Burlington, NC 27215 • Fax If [phone] Ext. 202
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
CLIENT: (—' Y L L-- A CONTACT PERSONJ�P_yi-w 5 �� e l •�. o r�
Facility/Site --� p., rr� ehn ne.� Pal c� 'e. VJJ WTP Phone Number: `��`� a`'.� �-`l 9 �-1
m��r.
Sampler: (Print) (,\C)y A WTI 1? AS Purchase Order #:
Sampler: (Signature)
SAMPLE
ID
SAMPLE
COLLECTION
SAMPLE TYPE
NO, OF
COW
TAINERS
SENT
ANALYSES
REQUIRED
COMPOSITE
HAND AUTO
GRAB
DATE
TIME
STARTED
DATE
TIME
ENDED
1-Dt30
.30
X
0
,R CLIENT USE: If l
tlinqu', d by: (St natture)
9 Vve2b/ •^ gnat
1
Date/Tlme U/ /1 //\\J
71 1
lip llsl�n
Received by: (Signature) 7
DatelTime
3thod of Shipment:
n LMD vbC WILT:
acely Le FR M: (Signature Recelv d for b by: (Signature) Datetriml
6114191
ethod of Shipment: ,
vv
C<
White —ORIGINAL- CLIENT REPORT Pink —ACCOUNTING Canary —LABORATORY
Goldenrod —ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
AMS# 02070500 Color Data 1989-91
Color 82 Color 83
N 0 -4 w m M N O -4 M N l` M d' +-4 It M N m d' m M w It w it N w O ti
•-+ O N ,-� ,-1 .-� r-1 ,-� r-1 r-1 N r--� ,� r-1 .-1 r-I ,--� ,--� .-� N p
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
*--� N M lqt m w N O O �-+ N N M d� Lf� CO l� 00 G� O �-+ N +--� d' its CO [� M O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ago ono 0Oo aOo aOo aOa oOo ago ono ono o � � � 0 0 0 0

XS: AMS# 02070500 (82)
Mean: Std. Dev.: Std. Error. Variance: CoeL Var.: Count:
128.17
21.43
3.91
459.32
76.09 T30
Minimum: Maximum: Ran e: Sum: Sum of r.: # Missing:
1
1120
1119
845
37121
0
t 95%: 95% Lower. 95% Upper. # < 10th %: 1 Oth W 25th W
8
20.16
136.17
3 112
116
50th %: 75th W 90th W # > 90th W
f2l.5 135
48.5
3
AMS# 02070500 (83)
Mean: Std. Dev.: Std. Error. Variance: CoeL Var.: Count:
128.33
126.57
14.85
1706.02
193.78
130 1
Minimum: Maximum: Ran e: Sum: Sum of r.: # Missing:
3
1150
147
1850
44558
0
t 95%: 95% Lower: 95% Upper. # < 10th W 1Oth W 25th W
19.92
1118.41
F38.26
3
111.5
115
50th W 75th %: 90th W # > 90th W
120.5
131
149
2

Histogram of X3: AMS# 02070500 (82)
10
9
8
7
6-
5- ❑ AMS# 0207...
U
4
3
2
1
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
AMS# 02070500 (82)
Histogram of is AMS# 02070500 (83)
10
9
8
7
fi
0
5 ❑ AMS# 0207...
U
4
3
2
1
0
0 1&
0 20 40 so 80 160 120 140 160
AMS# 02070500 (83)

Paired t-Test Xi: AMS# 02070500 (82) Yi: AMS# 02070500 (88)
DF: Mean X - Y: Paired t value: Prob. (2-tail):
129 1-.17 1-14 1.8892

J
2 #ma'©o
J
1
�,/A
—lc-

350
250
150
I
50
Ell
Dan -Smith -Mayo River Area --Color Parameter 82
Dan R Hwy 87 Dan R SR 1761 Smith R.
(center)
AMS# AMS#
02074000 02070500
"3O U
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
a�a�a�a�a�rnrnrna�a�rna�a�o�a�a�a�a�a�a�a�a�a�rnrna�a�a�rna�a�rnrna�.a�a�a�a�a�a�o�a�a�rnc�rna�rna�rna�a�a�a�
Mow r-immmo --l"MrI_ONMMO+--IMwt-Mmgz WO�Nt-MMMdtWWNMWMOd'tAtiNMd'tiOq;:vmot`
� � � r+ --{ r-+ � N N N N N N � � � � � •-+ *-� --� � N N N M � � � � � +--� r-+ � � N N N N N M � � � � � --+ r-+ N N N N N N
�w 0 0 o w ����������
CO CO CO CO CO C� CO CO CO CD [� h ti [` !` [� h L` [� a0 00 00 00 00 00 00 a0 00 00 O O O M M O O O O O

350
Q
250
1
150
100
50
L
Dan -Smith -Mayo River Area --Color Parameter 82
■ Dan R Hwy 87 ❑ Dan R SR 1761 (center) • Smith R
O AMS# 02074000 • AMS# 02070500
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
a�O�O�o�a�rna�O�a�rna�a�a�rnO�O�o�rnO�O�a�a�a�a�a�a�rnO�rnrnrno�rnO�O�O�a�O�a�rna�rnrna�O�rnrnrna�r�O�rnO�r�
mom __(M tf3 w O� N tf) l� ON M to O M 0 l` O M d' o O r-' N l` 0 0 M d' MO N M QO O O d' m l� N M o l� 0 r 4 d' M w t­
� �NNNNNN���NNNM����� NNNNNM���"4r-+r­4*-+NNNNNN
C000CGCOwwwowC`OC`OC`Owt�[-l`�l\ �[` ����t-tII_ 00000�M0\0M0�00`OG`00�00�00�00`0OOOMOMMOOMMOM

160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
AMS# 02074000 Color Data 1989-91
m- Color 82 a- Color 83
0 0 0 0 0 o O O O 0 0
ao ao 0o ao 0o ao ao 0o ao ao ao 00 � rn a� rn o� rn rn � rn rn a� rn rn a� c� o� o� v�
M to t� l� CO to O 0 0 l- w w w CO QO
r-4 r-+ r-, N N r-1 � N r-+ N N r-4 N N r-4 +--4 r-i M r 4 r-i N r-4 . 4 r-4 r1 N
� � � CIO � r-4 � � � � � � � � � � �
r-i N M d' m 0 l* 0 r-4 N -4 N M d' M 0 l- W 0 0 r-I N r-4 d' M 0 l� O
r-1 r-4 r-1 r•i r-4 �

4w
Xr. AMS#02074000 (82)
Mean: Std. Dev.: Std. Error. Variance: Coef. Var.: Count:
37
136.82
6.72
11355.52
199.51
130
Minimum: Maximum: Ran e: Sum: Sum of r.: # Missing:
2
1150
1148
1110
180380
0
Ot.q.5%:
95% Lower: 95% Upper. # < 10th W IOth %: 25th %:
113.75
23.25
F5O.75
2
9
115
50th W 75th %: 90th W # > 90th W
125.5
138
83
3
B2: AMS# 02074000 (83)
Mean: Std. Dev.: Std. Error. Variance: Coef. Var.: Count:
135.2
134.95
F63
T1221.27 7TW.28
130
Minimum: Maximum: Ran e: Sum: Sum of r.: # Missing
1
1150
1149
11056
172588_
0
t 95%: 95% Lower: 95% Upper. # < loth W loth W 25th W
113.05
122.15
1,0.25
3
8.5
15
50th W 75th W 90th W # > 90th W
125.5
134
T83
3

Histogram of XI: AMS#02074000
7
6
5
4
0
p AMS#02074...
U 3
2
1
0
0 20 40 60 80 160 120 140 160
AMS#02074000 (82)
Histogram of X2: AMS# 02074000
o AMS# 0207...
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
AMS# 02074000 (83)

Paired t-Test Xr. AMS#02074000 (S2) Y:L: AMS# 02074000 (S3)
DF: Mean X - Y: Paired t value: Prob. (2-tail):
129 TLS 11.91 1.0664