NC0025071_Permit Issuance_19970609

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
June 9, 1997
Mr. Terry Shelton
Water Reclamation Superintendent
City of Eden
191 Mebane Bridge Road
Eden, North Carolina 27288
A LT!MAI
IL4
INA FTL
Subject: NPDES Permit Issuance
NPDES: NCO025071 & NCO025151
Mebane Bridge & Dry Creek WWTPs
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Shelton:
In accordance with the application for renewal for discharge permits received on August 5
and August 2, 1996, the Division is forwarding herewith the subject NPDES permit. These permit
renewals are issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and
the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency dated December 6, 1983.
In response to your comment letter of January 16, 1997, several changes have been made
to this final permit.
NPDES NCO025071 - Mebane Bridge WWTP
1. Instrearn transect sampling for color has been eliminated and the permit has been modified to
reflect this change. After a review of the data the Division believes that the color monitoring,
as changed, will be sufficient.
2. The Special Condition requiring color monitoring at transmittance values of 31 wavelengths
has been removed. This condition was included in the permits of several faci1ities to help the
Division gather information on color discharges. This information may be used to develop a
color standard. The Division will not require the monitoring at transmittance values of 31
wavelengths, since your facilities have already compiled a large data base on color and the
purchase of additional equipment would be required. Your facilities may continue to conduct
the color monitoring at transmittance values of 3 wavelengths.
3. Effluent color monitoring samples shall be collected 3 times per week for the first 12 months,
and 3 times per quarter thereafter. The permit has been modified to reflect this change.
NPDES NCO025151 - DKy Creek WWTP
According to the Division's new policy, the whole effluent toxicity limit for the expansion above
0.5 MGD has been changed to a quarterly chronic Pass/Fail limit at 0.4%. See Part I, Condition A
(3), for details.
1. See note 2 under NCO02507 1.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

2. Due to the well documented improvements in instrearn color, quarterly monitoring for color
will be sufficient. The permit has been modified to reflect this change.
3. The narrative description for color is meant to further characterize this discharge. The Division
believes that this information will facilitate the evaluation of color in discharges.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit
are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within
thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written
petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the
Office of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 27447, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 -
7447. Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please take note that this permit is not transferable. Part II, EA. addresses the
requirements to be followed in case of change in ownership or control of this discharge.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be
required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources,
Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be
required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Steven D. Pellei at
telephone number [phone], extension 516.
Sincerely,
Original Signed '04
Pavid A. Goodrich
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
enc.: Permits NCO025071 and NC 0025151
cc: Central Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office, Water Quality Section
Mr. Roosevelt Childress, EPA
Permits and Engineering Univ
Facility Assessment Unit
Aquatic Survey and Toxicology Unit

Permit No. NCO025071
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215. 1, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
City of Eden
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant
Mebane Bridge Road (NCSR 1964)
south of Eden
Rockingham County
to receiving waters designated as the Dan River in the Roanoke River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I,
II, III and IV hereof
The permit shall become effective July 1, 1997
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on February Z8-, 2002
Signed this day June 9, 1997
Original Signed By
Qavid A. Goodrich
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

5-A
Permit No. NCO025071
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
City of Eden
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate an existing 13.5 M[GD wastewater treatment facility consisting of flow
meter, bar screens, grit separator, extended aeration basins, secondary clarifiers, chlorination,
dechlorination, aerobic digester, DAF, sludge lagoons, and polymer addition, located at Mebane
Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant, Mebane Bridge Road (NCSR 1964), south of Eden,
Rockingham County (See Part III of this Permit), and
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into Dan River
which is classified Class C waters in the Roanoke River Basin.

A. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL
Permit No. NCO025071
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from ouffall serial number
001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
I
LIMITS
I
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
MeasuremenTF
Frequency
—
Sample
Type
Sample
Location'
Flow
13.5 MGD
Continuous
Recording
lorE
BOD, 5 day, 20OC2
30.0 mg/I
45.0 mqA
Daily
Composite
E, I
Total Suspended Residue2
30.0 mq/I
45.0 mq/I
Daily
Composite
E, I
NI-13 as N (April I -October 31)
12.7 mg/I
Daily
Composite
E
NH3 as N (November 1 - March 31)
ji leekly
Composite
E
pl-13
Daily
Grab
E, U, D
Fecal Coliform (geometric mean)
200 100 ml
400 100 ml
Daily
Grab
E
Total Residual Chlorine
28.0 Ljqjl
Daily
Grab
E
Temperature
Daily
Grab
E, U, D
Conductivity
I
Grab
U, D
Dissolved Oxvqen
Daily
Grab
E, U, D
Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)
Monthly
Composite
E
Total Phosphorus
Monthly
Corn osite
E
Chronic Toxicity4
Quarterly
Composite
E
Zinc
2/Month
Composite
Copper
2/Month
22�212
E
Color5
300 ADM I
3/Week
CompoNt!
E
Color
I
Grab
U, D
Notes:
Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent, U - Upstream @ NCSR 1964, D - Downstream @ NCSR 700.
Upstream and downstream samples shall be grab samples. Stream samples shall be collected three times per week during June, July, August, and
September and once per week during the remaining months of the year.
2 The monthly average effluent BOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed 25% of the respective influent value (75% removal).
3 The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units.
4 Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 6%; March, June, September and December; See Part 1, Condition A. (2).
5 Limit is an instantaneous maximum (i.e., not to be exceeded at any time) not a daily maximum. Samples shall be collected 3 times per week for the first 12
months, and 3 times per quarter thereafter.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

79'45' 614m' E 615 42'30
?5!30'
Gc9f Course
6
H so C) 589 4
w, _E10
WNGS n enter
Ppi
60139� N.
527
C
C
ern
i 0
7
4038
— 13
Golf Course
663Y
-V
973
Discharge point
0
w36:
N
t I
ROAD CLASSIFICATION
PRIMARY HIGHWAY LIGHT.DU'ry ROAD, HARD OR
HARD SURFACE IMPROVED SURFACE
SECONDARY HIGHWAY
HARD SURFACE =311111119=1 UNIMPROVED ROAD
Latitude: 36028'17" Longitude- 79*44-35"
Map # B20NW Sub -basin 03-02-03
Stream Class C
Discharge Class 01 55 78 61
Receiving Stream Dan River
Qw: _ja_.LM0D_ Permit expires: _k2-8/02
SCALE 1:24 000
QUAD LOCATION City of Ed , en
Mebane Bridge WWTP
NCO025071
Rockingham County

90
Part I
Permit No. NCO025071
A. (2) CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in the "North
Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised November 1995, or subsequent
versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant
mortality is 6.0% (defined as treatment two in the procedure document). The permit holder shall perform
quarteLly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The tests will be
performed after thirty days from the effective date of this permit 4uring the months of March, June,
September and December. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be 'performed at the NPDES permitted
final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR- 1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, DWQ Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed
in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of.the effluent
toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility duninig -a month in wh�ich toxicity monitoring isr'eq6i*-re'd,
the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the
facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No
Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at
the address cited above.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should the perrnittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test
requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
6 10
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina ivisi n of
Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to
include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall
constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day
of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.
QAL Daphnid 48 Version 9196

DEHNR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NCO025071
Applicant/Facility Name:
Applicant Address:
Facility Address:
Permitted Flow
Type of Waste:
Facility Class
Facility/Permit Status:
County:
Regional Office:
USGS Topo Quad:
Stream Characteristics:
Receiving Stream
Stream Classification
Subbasin
Drainage Area (Mi2):
Summer 7Q 10 (cfs)
Winter 7Q 10 (cfs):
Average Flow (cfs):
IWC (%):
City of Eden/Dry Creek WWTP
308 E. Stadium Drive, Eden, NC 27288
19+-Mehane Bridge Road, Eden, NC 27288
13.5 M
L . - �5%, Industrial 45%
IV
Existing/Renewal
Rockingham
Winston-Salem
B20NW
Dan River
C
030203
12701
386
594
12970
5.1%
Wasteload Allocation (WLA
) Summ
lIq oojsjll�/
This WLA is for a renewal for the City of Eden's permit from the Mebane Bridge 13.5 MGD
WWTP. Monitoring and limits will remain the same for the majority of parameters in the permit.
Monitoring for colors and certain metals is being changed. A brief WLA history is as follows:
1985: modeled with interacting dischargers and recorrunended for Secondary Limits at 7.0 MGD.
1989: SOC for addition of facilities to increase flow up to 9.0 MGD, (with a proposed incremental increase to the current
13.5 MGD). Color was noted as a parameter which needed attention in the SOC and also in the upcoming permits
for increased flows. WLA was issued with renewal of conventional limits for 7.0 MGD as and EA was necessary
for the proposed expansion to 9.0 MGD. A color limit of 540 ADMI as well as monitoring for many metals was
recommended. Also, extensive instream monitoring for conventional parameters and color was recommended.
1990: Draft EA reviews in file. Color report from Juan Mangles and Betsy Johnson. WLA for 13.5 MGD with the
current permit limits reconunended.
1991: color run on Dan River was initiated by ESB and phone complaints from public. Instream color values (ADMI)
were highest at and below both Eden plants. Letter from facility, (and Region) requesting deletion of some
instream monitoring - request denied as quantity of instream data and types of parameters were needed.
1992: WLA for 13.5 MGD was re -issued w/ limits that are in current permit along with the various instream monitoring
requirements.
1993: Two requests for deletion of instream transect monitoring. The second request was granted with required
monitoring at one location at the transect site rather than across the river.
Color limit(s) at both Eden plants has seemed to have benefited the receiving environment
and downstream water intakes. Extensive changes in instrearn monitoring for color are
being recommended. The monitoring of Color will be conducted as described in Part I,
Special Condition A. (3).

This decrease in the instrearn color monitoring is being recommended due to a caveat which
was placed into the Eden - Dry Creek permit that no color effluent can be discharged from
the Dry Creek facility.
Limit changes due to:
Inclusion of metals and phenols being monitored in the Long Term Monitoring Plan and the
results of the reasonable potential analysis for certain parameters. As a result, monitoring/
limits for Cadmium, Chromium, Cyanide, Lead, Mercury, Nickel, Phenols, and Silver were
removed from the permit.
Instream Monitoring
Discussions with the Winston - Salem Regional Office in September, 1996 led to relaxation of the instrearn color
monitoring requirements for three reasons:
• consistent compliance and good history of trying to achieve compliance by the Eden facilities
• no public complaints of color problems
• when this was originally initiated, it was to be a short-term requirement to verify that the limit was achieving its aim
Both the 1990 color report, (in WLA file) and Region confn-med that it was the Smith River discharges that probably caused
most of this color problem. The Philpott dam, a hydroelectric dam located approximately 10 miles upstream of
Martinsville, Va on the Smith River does not discharge over the weekend. This causes the POTWs discharge into the Smith
River to pool up over the weekend and the dyes tend to concentrate. Therefore on Monday morning, the initial release from
this dam causes those dyes to rush out to the mouth of the Smith River and into the Dan River in a very concentrated slug.
Virginia has placed color limits on these discharges as well and since these facilities have been able to consistently meet
these limits, (note that in 1991 there were still problems on that river) no problems of color have been evident on the Dan
River. Up and downstream monitoring of color at SR 1964 and Highway 700 will coincide with the conventional instrearn
parameters required. A caveat was placed into the permit which states that no colored effluent may be released from the
Eden - Dry Creek Plant in accordance with this decreased instrearn monitoring. The Region concurred with this
reconunendation.
Special instrearn monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
Special monitoring for Color and pH:
A - Smith River above Eden Water Supply Intake, B - Downstream @ NC Hwy 87, C - Downstream @ NCSR
1761 (for July through October only, one sample per week shall be on a transect at 1/4, 1/2, and 3/4 of the
distance across the river).
Upstream and downstream samples shall be grab samples. Stream samples shall be collected three times per
week during June, July, August, and September and once per week during the remaining months of the year.
The Color Limit is an instantaneous maximum (i.e., not to be exceeded at any time) not a daily maximum. See Part
1, Condition A. (3).
Proposed Schedule for Permit Issuance
Draft Permit to Public Notice: 12/18/96
Permit Scheduled to Issue: 2/3/97
State Contact
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact
Steven D. Pellei at [phone] ext. 516.

Copies of the following are attached to provide further information on permit development:
1. Existing permit effluent sheets, and
2. Proposed draft permit.

. Ir
Request # 8509
Facility Name:
City of Eden - Mebane Bridge Waste Water Treatment Plant
NPDES No.:
NCO025071
Type of Waste:
55 % Domestic
45 % Industrial
Facility Status:
Existing
Permit Status:
Renewal
Stream Characteristic:
Receiving Stream:
Dan River
USGS #
Stream Classification:
C
Date:
Subbasin:
03-02-03
Drainage Area (Mi2):
1,701
County:
Rockingham
Summer 7Q1 0 (cfs):
—386
Regional Office:
Winston - Salem
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
—594
Requestor:
Pellei
Average Flow (cfs):
Date of Request:
8 /20/96
30Q2 (cfs):
—1,970
Topo Quad:
B 20 NW
IWC (%):
6.3%
1985: modeled with interacting dischargers and recommended for Secondary Limits at 7.0 mgd.
1989: SOC for addition of facilities to increase flow up to 9.0 mgd, (with a proposed incremental increase to the current 13.5 mgd).
Color was noted as a parameter which needed attention in the SOC and also in the upcoming permits for increased flows.
WLA was issued with renewal of conventional limits for 7.0 mgd as and EA was necessary for the proposed expansion to
9.0 mgd. A color limit of 540 ADMI as well as monitoring for many metals was recommended. Also, extensive instrearn
monitoring for conventional parameters and color was recommended.
1990: Draft EA reviews in file. Color report from Juan Mangles and Betsy Johnson. WLA for 13.5 mgd with the current permit limits
recommended.
1991: color run on Dan River was initiated by ESB and phone complaints from public. Instrearn color values (ADMI) were highest at
and below both Eden plants. Letter from facility, (and Region) requesting deletion of some instrearn monitoring - request
denied as quantity of instrearn data and types of parameters were needed.
1992: WLA for 13.5 mgd was re -issued w/ limits that are in current permit along with the various instrearn monitoring requirements.
1993: Two requests for deletion of instrearn transect monitoring. The second request was granted with required monitoring at one
location at the transect site rather than across the river.
Instrearn Monitoring
Attached is the instrearn monitoring data with two graphical displays from 1995 - 1996. All four sites closely mimic each other; even at
Highway 87 which should be an upstream site that is not influenced by colored effluent. Turbidity, (considered the major inhibitor to
good measurements of color) may well be affecting these samples and causing the background, (control) samples at Highway 87 to
read overly high.
I talked with Ron Linville, (who used to oversee this permit) and David Russell (who now oversees this permit) from the Winston -
Salem Regional Office on % September, 1996. Both agreed with easing up on the instrearn color monitoring requirements for three
reasons:
• consistent compliance and good history of trying to achieve compliance by the Eden facilities
• no public complaints of color problems
• when this was originally initiated, it was to be a short-term requirement to verify that the limit was achieving its aim
Both the 1990 color report, (in WLA file) and Region confirmed that it was the Smith River discharges that probably caused most of
this color problem. The Philpott dam, a hydroelectric dam located approximately 10 miles upstream of Martinsville, Va on the Smith
River does not discharge over the weekend. This causes the POTWs discharge into the Smith River to pool up over the weekend and
the dyes tend to concentrate. Therefore on Monday morning, the initial release from this dam causes those dyes to rush out to the
mouth of the Smith River and into the Dan River in a very concentrated slug. Virginia has placed color limits on these discharges as
well and since these facilities have been able to consistently meet these limits, (note that in 1991 there were still problems on that
river) no problems of color have been evident on the Dan River. I will recommend up and downstream monitoring of color at SR 1964
and Highway 700 to coincide with the conventional instrearn parameters required. The Region concurred with this recommendations.
Ron Linville also pointed out that a caveat needs to be placed into the permit which states that no colored effluent may be released
from the Eden - Dry Creek Plant in accordance with this decreased instrearn monitoring.

Cadmium:
Max. Pred Cw
0.0
13 out of 13 samples of < 2 /jg/I
Allowable Cw
32
Chromium:
Max. Pred Cw
304.5
12 out of 13 samples of < 5pg/I
Allowable Cw
798
maximum value of 35jug/I in December, 1995
Copper:
Max. Pred Cw
584
13 out of 13 samples were above detection
Allowable Cw
112
maximum value of 146 /jg/I in October, 1995
Cyanide:
Max. Pred Cw
0.0
52 out of 52 samples of < 5 /jg/I
Allowable Cw
78
Lead:
Max. Pred Cw
46.8
11 out of 51 samples above detection limit of < 10 /jg/I
Allowable Cw
399
maximum value of 26 yg/I in April, 1996
Mercury:
Max. Pred Cw
0.00
52 out of 52 samples of < 0.2 /jg/I
Allowable Cw
0.191
Nickel:
Max. Pred Cw
0.0
13 out of 13 samples of < 10 /ig/1
Allowable Cw
1,404
Phenols:
Max. Pred Cw
0.0
allowable based upon water supply standard - limit not
Allowable Cw
16
applicable to this water body - 12 samples of < 10 jig/I
Silver:
Max. Pred Cw
0.00
13 out of 13 samples of < 5.ugli
Allowable Cw
0.96
Zinc:
Max. Pred Cw
25,080
13 out of 13 samples were above detection
Allowable Cw
798
maximum value of 2,090 /ig/l in August, 1995
Slu's
Effluent Considerations
Pluma,
Incorporated dyes, various metals
Fieldcrest Cannon
various metals
Sara Lee Knitted Products
dyes, various metals
Mohawk - Karastan Rug Mill various metals
Eden - Mebane Bridge Waste Water Treatment Plant NCO025071

NPDES WAST7E LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NCO025071
PERMITTEENAME:
XTIM19 MA XIM
of Eden
Mebane Bridge Wastewater Treatment Plant
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity:
13.5 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
55%
45%
'170 C,"F%km , , Crlk.�T tS Fk,,
'10-- of ctcv"t WTV I�Tkv-c'
RECEIVING STREAM: Dan River
Class: C
Sub-Basin:-03-02-03
Reference USGS Quad: B20NW (please attach)
County: Rockingham
Rcgional Office: Winston-Salem Regional Office
Prcovious Exp, Date: 2/28/97 Treatment Plant Class: IV
Classification changes within three miles:
None within 3 miles.
Requested by: Stevo D. Pellei Date: 8/20/96
Prepared by:----,-- 1-
Date: 6 Ab�� i
Reviewed b Cfa�16' LVvm(Lb1>&V\.- Date:
V55
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
C- �L
'R � -Z.
I �� f,
zsw;
Drainage Area (mi2): 1,701 Average Strearnflow (cfs): - 1,970
s701 0 (cfs): - 386 w701 0 (cfs); - 594
Toxicity Limits: Chronic (Ceriodaphnia) P / F 6 %
March, June, September, and December
Upstream Location: SR 1964
Downstream Location: Highway 700
Parameters: temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH,
conductivity. �olotz-
Special instrearn monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies
This area of the Dan River is ideal for the formation of an association of
dischargers to perform instrearn monitoring.
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
Wasteflow (MGD):
13.5
13.5
BOD5 (Mg/1):
30
30
NH3N (mg/1):
12.7
monitor
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/1):
monitor
monitor
TSS (mg/1):
30
30
Fecal Coliform (/100 ml):
200
200
pH (SU):
6-9
6-9
Residual Chlorine (gg/l):
28
28
Temperature (0 C):
monitor
monitor
Total Phosphorus (mg/1):
monitor
monitor
Total Nitrogen (mgA):
monitor
monitor
Color (ADMI):
300 *
300 *
Copper (ILg/1):
monitor
monitor
Zinc (gg/l):
monitor
monitor
There shall be no discharge of floating
solids or visible foam in other
than trace amounts.
* note: Part 111, Condition H in Permit for special monitoring conditions
for color. Limit is an instantaneous
maximum (i.e.
not to be exceeded
at any time) not a daily maxumum.

FACT SBEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request # 8509 FIF-CF-IVED
Facility Name: City of Eden - Mebane Bridge Waste Water Treatment
NPDES No.: NCO025071 Dept. of EHNR
Type of Waste: Domestic - 55 % Industrial - 45 %
Facility Status: Existing 0 CT 2 8 1996
Permit Status: Renewal
Receiving Stream: Dan River Winston-Salem
Stream Classification: C Regional Office
Subbasin: 03-02-03
County: Rockingham Stream Characteristic:
Regional Office: Winston - Salem Drainage Area (mi2): 1,701
Requestor: Pellei Summer 7Q10 (cfs): —386
Date of Request: 8 / 20 / 96 Winter 7Q10 (cfs): —594
Topo Quad: B 20 NW Average Flow (cfs): —1,970
771
30Q2 (cfs):
IWC (%): 6.3 %
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Color limit(s) at both Eden plants has seemed to have benefited the receiving environment and .7.3
downstream water intakes. Extensive changes in instrearn monitoring for color are being —
recommended. Request Region comment and confirmation.
This area of the Dan River is ideal for the formation of an association of dischargers to perform
instrearn monitoring. Request Region comment as to whether this and other facilities in area
would be interested in forming such an association.
This decrease in the instrearn color monitoring can only be recommended if a caveat is placed into
the Eden - Dry Creek permit that no color effluent can be discharged from that facility.
Spep li��e Requ ements and ad tionkl co nts from Rev'
Lewers:
L5
d� x4 69 0 Sr"
Recommended
Instream Assessment
Regional Supervisor:
Permits & Engineerin
Z�3 O�Tgaap_
10 ko
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: ;10V 2 2 1996

I r,
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Existine Limits:
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
Wasteflow (MGD):
13.5
13.5
BOD5 (mg/1):
30
30
NH3N (mg/l):
12*7
monitor
DO (mg/l):
monitor
monitor
TSS (mg/1):
30
30
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
200
200
pH (SU):
6-9
6-9
Residual Chlorine (n/l):
28
28
Temperature (0Q:
monitor
monitor
TP (mgA):
monitor
monitor
TN (mg/l):
monitor
monitor
Color (ADMI):
300 *
300 *
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
* Limit is an instantaneous maximum (i.e., not to be exceeded at any time) not a daily maximum.
Recommended Limits:
Wasteflow (MGD):
BOD5 (mgA):
NH3N (mg/l):
DO 6-ng
Tss (tng/i):
Fecal Col. (/100 nil):
pH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (�Lgft
Temperature (0Q:
TP (mgA):
TN (mg/1):
Color (ADMI):
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
13.5
13.5
30
30
12.7
monitor
monitor
monitor
30
30
200
200
6-9
6-9
28
28
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
monitor
300 *
300 *
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
* Limit is an instantaneous maximum (i.e., not to be exceeded at any time) not a daily maximum.
(explanafion of any modifications to past modeling analysis including new flows, rates, field data,
interacting discharges)
(See page 4 for miscellaneous and special conditions, if applicable)
TOXICITY TEST
Type of Toxicity Test: Chronic (Ceriodaphnia) Toxicity P / F
Limit: 6%
Reconiniended Litnit: 6%
Monitoring SchedUle: March, June, September, and December

TO)aCS/UETALS
Existing Limits
Daffy Maximum
Cadmium (ggA):
monitor
Chromium (gg/1):
monitor
Copper (gg/1):
monitor
Cyanide (gg/l):
78
Lead (gg/1):
399
Mercury (gg/1):
0.191
Nickel (gg/1):
monitor
Phenols (ggll):
momtor
Silver (gg/l):
monitor
Zinc (gg/l):
monitor
Recommended Limits
Daily Maximum
Cadmium (gg/l):
not required
Chromium (gg/1):
not required
Copper (gg/l):
monitor *
Cyanide (gg/1):
not required
Lead (gg/1):
not required
Mercury (gg/1):
not required
Nickel (gg/1):
not required
Phenols (gg/1):
not required
Silver ([tg/1):
not required
Zinc (gg/1):
monitor *
* monitored in LTW
Cadmium:
Maximum Predicted
0.0
13 out of 13 samples of < 2 gg/l
Allowable
32
Chromium:
maximum Predicted
304.5
12 out of 13 samples of < 5 ggA
Allowable
798
maximum value of 35 gg/l in December, 1995
Copper:
Maximum Predicted
584
13 out of 13 samples were above detection
Allowable
112
maximum value of 146 pg/l in October, 1995
Cyanide:
Maximum Predicted
0.0
52 out of 52 samples of < 5 ggA
Allowable
78
Lead:
Maximum Predicted
46.8
11 out of 51 samples above detection limit of < 10 gg/l
Allowable
399
maximum value of 26 gg/l in April, 1996
Mercury:
Maximum Predicted
0.00
52 out of 52 samples of < 0.2 gg/l
Allowable
0.191
Nickel:
Maximum Predicted
0.0
13 out of 13 samples of < 10 ggA
Allowable
1,404
Phenols:
Maximum Predicted
0.0
allowable based upon water supply standard - limit not
Allowable
16
applicable to this water body - 12 samples of < 10 gg/l
Silver:
Maximum Predicted
0.00
13 out of 13 samples of < 5 gg/l
Allowable
0.96
Zinc:
maximum Predicted
259080
13 out of 13 samples were above detection
Allowable
798
maximum value of 2,090 gg/l in August, 1995

Many of the previous parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available
load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water
quality based effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: SR 1964
Downstream Location: Highway 700
Parameters: temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity, color
Special instrearn monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
Upstream and downstream samples shall be grab samples. Stream samples shall be collected three times per
week during June, July, August, and September and once per week during the remaining months of the year.
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
AdNuacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility de nstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
p,nX,
facilities? Yes I No
If no, which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "Phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) _ (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach updated evaluation of facility, including toxics spreadsheet, modeling
analysisif modeled at renewal, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? - (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

Facility Name Eden - Mebane Bridge WWTP Permit # NCO025071 Pipe # 001
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASSWAIL PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceiiodal2hnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic
Bioassay Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or
significant mortality is W % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document).
The permit holder shall perform quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance
with the permit condition. The first test will be performed after thirty days from the effective date of
this permit during the months ?f March, June, September, and December. Effluent sampling
for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment
processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter
code TGP3B. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements
performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for
disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly
monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this
monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit
may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will
require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to s bruit suitable test
results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10
Permitted Flow
IWC
Basin & Sub -basin
Receiving Stream
County
QCL PIF Version 9191
-386 cfs
13.5 MGD
6.3 %
03-02-03
Dan River
Rockingham
Recommended
Date z. 3 o=yPzyr m-i e,
Faffell Keough

Request # 8509
Facility Name: City of Eden - Mebane Bridge Waste Water Treatment Plant
NPDES No.: NCO025071
Type of Waste: 55 % Domestic 45 % Industrial
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal Stream Characteristic:
Receiving Stream: Dan River USGS #
Stream Classification: C Date:
Subbasin: 03-02-03 Drainage Area (Mi2): 1,701
County: Rockingham Summer 7010 (cf s): -386
Regional Office: Winston - Salem Wi nte r 7010 (cf s): -594
Requeslor: Pellei Average Flow (cfs):
Date of Request: 8 / 20 / 96 30Q2 (cfs): -1,970
Topo Quad: B 20 NW IWC (%): 6.3%
1985: modeled with interacting dischargers and recommended for Secondary Limits at 7.0 mgd.
1989: SOC for addition of facilities to increase flow up to 9.0 mgd, (with a proposed incremental increase to the current 13.5 mgd).
Color was noted as a parameter which needed attention in the SOC and also in the upcoming permits for increased flows.
WLA was issued with renewal of conventional limits for 7.0 mgd as and EA was necessary for the proposed expansion to
9.0 mgd. A color limit of 540 ADMI as well as monitoring for many metals was recommended. Also, extensive instrearn
monitoring for conventional parameters and color was recommended. a
1990: Draft EA reviews in file. Color report from Juan Mangles and Betsy Johnson. WLA for 13.5 mgd with the current permft limits
recommended.
1991: color run on Dan River was initiated by ES13 and phone complaints from public. Instrearn color values (ADMI) were highest at
and below both Eden plants. Letter from facility, (and Region) requesting deletion of some instrearn monitoring - request
denied as quantity of instrearn data and types of parameters were needed.
1992: WLA for 13.5 mgd was re -issued w/ limits that are in current permit along with the various instrearn monitoring requirements.
1993: Two requests for deletion of instrearn transect monitoring. The second request was granted with required monitoring at one
location at the transect site rather than across the river.
Instream Monilg Lina
Attached is the instrearn monitoring data with two graphical displays from 1995 - 1996. All four sites closely mimic each other; even at
Highway 87 which should be an upstream site that is not influenced by colored effluent. Turbidity, (considered the major inhibitor to
good measurements of color) may well be affecting these samples and causing the background, (control) samples at Highway 87 to
read overly high.
I talked with Ron Linville, (who used to oversee this permit) and David Russell (who now oversees this permit) from the Winston -
Salem Regional Office on % September, 1996. Both agreed with easing up on the instrearn color monitoring requirements for three
reasons:
consistent compliance and good history of trying to achieve compliance by the Eden facilities
no public complaints of color problems
when this was originally initiated, it was to be a short-term requirement to verify that the limit was achieving its aim
Both the 1990 color report, (in WLA file) and Region confirmed that it was the Smith River discharges that probably caused most of this
color problem. The Philpott dam, a hydroelectric dam located approximately 10 miles upstream of Martinsville, Va on the Smith River
does not discharge over the weekend. This causes the POTWs discharge into the Smith River to pool up over the weekend and the
dyes tend to concentrate. Therefore on Monday morning, the initial release from this dam causes those dyes to rush out to the mouth
of the Smith River and into the Dan River in a very concentrated slug. Virginia has placed color limits on these discharges as well and
since these facilities have been able to consistently meet these limits, (note that in 1991 there were still problems on that river) no
problems of color have been evident on the Dan River. I will recommend up and downstream monitoring of color at SR 1964 and
Highway 700 to coincide with the conventional ' instream parameters required. The Region concurred with this recommendations. Ron
Linville also pointed out that a caveat needs to be placed into the permit which states that no colored effluent may be released from the
Eden - Dry Creek Plant in accordance with this decreased instrearn monitoring.

Cadmium:
Max. Pred Cw
0.0
13 out of 13 samples of < 2 gg/I
Allowable Cw
32
Chromium:
Max. Pred Cw
304.5
12 out of 13 samples of < 5 pg/I
Allowable Cw
798
maximum value of 35 gg/I in December, 1995
Copper:
Max. Pred Cw
584
13 out of 13 samples were above detection
Allowable Cw
112
maximum value of 146 gg/I in October, 1995
Cyanide:
Max. Pred Cw
0.0
52 out of 52 samples of < 5 jig/I
Allowable Cw
78
Lead:
Max. Pred Cw
46.8
11 out of 51 samples above detection limit of < 10 gg/I
Allowable Cw
399
maximum value of 26 gg/I in April, 1996
Mercury:
Max. Pred Cw
0.00
52 out of 52 samples of < 0.2 gg/I
Allowable Cw
0.191
Nickel:
Max. Pred Cw
0.0
13 out of 13 samples of < 10 gg/I
Allowable Cw
1,404
Phenols:
Max. Pred Cw
0.0
allowable based upon water supply standard - limit not
Allowable Cw
16
applicable to this water body - 12 samples of < 10 gg/I
Silver:
Max. Pred Cw
0.00
13 out of 13 samples of < 5 gg/I
Allowable Cw
0.96
Zinc:
Max. Pred Cw
25,080
13 out of 13 samples were above detection
Allowable Cw
798
maximum value of 2,090 gg/I in August, 1995
S I U's
Pluma, Incorporated
Effluent Considerations
dyes, various metals
Fieldcrest Cannon
various metals
Sara Lee Knitted Products
dyes, various metals
Mohawk - Karastan Rug Mill
various metals
Eden - Mebane Bridge Waste Water Treatment Plant NCO025071

Page I
Note for Farrell Keough
From: Bo McMinn
Date: Oct 21, 1996 11:45 AM
Subject: FW: LTMP's
To: Farrell Keough
Cc: Tom Poe
From: Bo McMinn on MonOct 211996 11:44 AM
Subject: RE: LTMP's
To: Tom Poe
Farrell,
Eden - Mebane Bridge - quarterly - Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn, Hg, Ag, Cn, As, Mo, SE
Eden - Dry Creek - same
Mayodan - Quarterly - As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Cn, Pb, Hg, Mo, Ni, Se, Ag, Zn
It is possible that May9odan may request to have the frequency reduced to one 4 day
monitoring period every five years so if you need more data than that would provide, I
suggest you require it in their permit.
From: Tom Poe on MonOct 211996 9:03 AM
Subject: FW: LTMP's
To: Bo McMinn; Mike Blasberg
Please get this info to FerTell, THANKS
From: Farrell Keough on Mon, Oct 21, 1996 09:01
Subject: LT`MP's
To: Tom Poe
I need to know if the following facilites have LTMP's and what toxics will be monitored and
how often...
City of Eden - Dry Creek NCO0251-51
City of Eden - Mebane Bridge NCO025071
Town of Mayodan NCO021873
thanks

LONG TERM MONITORING PLAN REQUEST FORM
FACILITY: City of Eden - Mebane Bridge WTWTP
NPDES NO.: NCO025071
EXPIRATIONDATE: 2/28/97
REGION: WSRO
P&EREQUESTOR: StevePellei
PRETREATMENT CONTACT: Bo McMinn
DATEOFREQUEST 8/20/96
INDICATE THE STATUS OF PRETREATMENT PROGRAM:
1) THE FACILITY HAS NO SIU-S AND SHOULD NOT HAVE PRETREATMENT LANGUAGE.
HE FACILITY HAS OR IS DEVELOPING A PREATREATMENT PROGRAM.
3) ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS REGARDING THE PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ATTACHED.
PERMITTED FLOW: 13.5 MGD
% INDUSTRIAL 45 J
% DOMESTIC 55 '1
Pretreatment Unit Staff (Region)
(WSRO,
Melanie Bryson (ARO, WiRO)
Dana Folley (RRO, WaRO)
Mike Blasberg (MRO)
A -5 L -f
C r wy tk-5
fK
pDTW
A�AA�X� - a,4 DL- — 0, Jws, / 1.6 e

r6�() . \\ 6 1. � \j+ . S�
A=Act 0
\�' \UA\ V6'L
Eden -Mebane Bridoe Waste Water Treatment Plaq�-NC092M
SR 1964 Hwy 700 Hwy 87 r Smith FlIvIr (�water �Intake) E SR 1761 center N
Date
DO
Tomp
DO
Temp
Date
pH
Color 0
Color A
pH
C010rO
C010TA
pH
Color 0
Color A
Color 0 Color A
3-Jun-96
8.8
is
9.0
19
3,Jun-96
7.5
34
32
7.6
31
29
7.8
29
29
4-,Iur�96
8.4
18
8.7
18
4-Jun-96
7.1
29
37
7.4
52
42
7.7
41
42
5-Jun-96
9.1
19
9.4
19
5-Jun-96
7.8
< 25
<25
7.8
< 25
25
7.8
25
25
6-Jun-96
9.2
19
9.5
19
6-Jun-96
f
7-Jun-96
9.0
19
8.9
20
7-Jun-96
IG-Jun-96
8.4
19
8.6
19
10-Jun-96
8.8
158
256
8A
145
149
8.1
152
1 4
lWun-96
8.7
20
9.0
20
11-Jun-96
8.1
200
216
7.8
224
218
7.7
159 1
1 61
12-Jun-96
9.4
15
9.3
16
12-Jun-96
7.4
191
189
7.3
227
231
7.5
88
U2
13-Jun-96
10.0
15
9-6
16
13-Jun-96
14-Jun-96
10.0
16
10.0
18
14-Jun-96
17-Jun-96
92
21
9.5
23
17-Jun-96
6�8
42
56
7.3
34
< 25
6.9
45
51
18-Jun-96
82
21
7.9
25
18-Jun-96
6.7
30
29
7.0
36
36
6.4
52
46
19-Jun-96
9.6
24
97
25
19-Jun-96
7.4
< 25
< 25
7A
< 25
27
7.3
< 25
< 25
20-Jun-96
8.2
23
7.9
25
20-Jun-96
21-Jun-96
7.9
22
7.8
25
21-Jun-96
24-Jun-96
7.9
27
7.9
27
24-Jun-96
7.8
50
48
7.5
30
45
7.3
71
69
25-Jun-96
7.9
24
7.9
28
25-,Iur�96
7.4
46
66
7.3
30
< 25
7.3
45
45
26-Jun-96
8.0
22
7.7
25
26-Jun-96
7.4
36
49
6.9
37
49
6.7
53
53
27-Jun-96
8.5
22
8.0
24
27-Jun-96
28-Jun-96
7.8
21
72
25
28-Jun-96
1 -Sep-95
7.6
24
7.7
26
I-Sep-95
"ep-95
5.0
21
7.8
21
5-Sep-95
7.5
33
45
T7
54
43
7.6
57
46
6-Sep-95
7.6
22
7.8
23
6-sep-95
7.4
17
25
7.8
22
29
7.6
37
37
23 22
8-Sep-95
7.9
22
8.0
23
B-Sep-95
7.4
51
36
7.8
17
17
7.6
27
27
11-Sep-95
6.8
23
6.9
23
11-Sep-95
12-Sep-95
8.2
21
7.7
24
12-Sep-95
7.4
30
38
7.9
22
18
7.6
22
22
13-Sep-95
8.8
20
5.6
22
13-Sep-95
7.5
67
71
7.8
80
85
7.6
74
71
67 55
14-Sep-95
5.5
21
5.3
24
14-Sep-95
7.5
17
10
7.9
31
12
7.7
17
12
15-Sep-95
6.0
21
6.2
22
1 5-%P-95
18-Sep-95
8.1
21
8.8
22
18-Sep-95
1"ep-95
8.4
20
8.4
21
19-Sep-95
7.5
22
24
7.9
19
27
7.6
21
24
20-Sep-95
8.4
20
9.3
21
20-Sep-95
7.4
20
23
7.8
35
26
7.6
17
17
22 26
21 -Sep-95
8.2
20
8.5
20
21 -Sep-95
7.5
19
28
7.6
9
9
7.7
19
25
22-Sep-95
7.9
21
8.4
21
22�Sep-95
25-Sep.95
7.9
16
7.9
18
25-Sep-95
26-Sep-95
7.9
17
7.6
18
26-Sep-95
7.3
26
24
7.7
28
24
T6
26
26
27-Sep-95
8.9
16
9.3
18
27-Sep-95
7.5
21
28
7.7
2
6
7.6
25
25
21 21
28-Sep-95
8.7
17
9.4
17
28-Sep-95
7.5
18
18
7.6
3
2
7.7
24
21
29-Sep-95
8.1
17
8.7
18
29-Sep-95
1-Aug-95
7.4
25
6.9
29
1-Aug-95
7.6
37
37
7.8
27
23
7.7
46
52
2-Aug-95
7.4
27
7.2
29
2-Aug-95
7.5
39
45
77
37
37
7.6
38
29
53 53
3-Aug-95
7.4
26
7.2
28
3-Aug-95
7.5
35
51
7.6
28
17
7.6
31
30
4-Aug-95
7.9
24
7.3
28
4-Aug-95
7-Aug-95
5.2
24
4.9
26
7-Aug-95
8-Aug-95
62
23
6.2
24
8-Aug-95
7.4
28
28
8.2
29
37
7.6
5
5
9-Aug-95
7.7
22
7.8
23
9-Aug-95
7.4
20
17
7.6
25
25
7.6
23
19
30 30
IG-Aug-95
8.1
22
7.9
24
10-Aug-95
7.6
30
33
7.8
19
16
7.7
22
25
11-Aug-95
8.5
20
8.0
23
11-Aug-95
14-Aug-95
7.0
27
7.0
29
14-Aug-95
15-Aug-95
7.3
26
6.7
32
15-Aug-95
7.5
43
45
7.8
42
48
7.6
31
35

I t-ITIM J, qT- M, WITTValff ra F=, I ITTIR amn z
SR 1964 Hwv 700 Hwv 87 Smith River (water Intakel SR 1761 (north) SR 1761 (center)
Date
DO
Temp
DO
Temp
Date
pH
Color 0
Color A
pH
Color 0
Color A
pH
Color 0
Color A
Color 0 Color A
16-Aug-95
5.0
26
5.0
27
16-Aug-95
7.1
17
19
7.8
29
28
7.6
17
17
17 28
17-Aug-95
5.3
24
5.0
27
17-Aug-95
7.4
36
27
7.6
45
47
7.5
40
43
18-Aug-gS
5.2
25
5.2
28
18-Aug-95
21-Aug-95
7.4
27
6.9
25
21-Aug-95
2-2-Aug-95
7.4
25
7.2
27
22-Aug-96
7.4
18
13
7.g
13
17
7.6
9
9
23-Aug-95
7.6
24
7A
26
23-Aug-95
7.4
25
31
7.8
18
8
7.6
25
25
29 20
24-Aug-95
6.8
23
6.3
25
24-Aug-95
7.4
34
35
7.8
13
15
7.7
25
25
25-Aug-95
6.9
23
7.5
25
25-Aug-95
28-Aug-95
29-Aug-95
8.4
8.0
22
22
8.0
8.5
23
23
28-Aug-95
29-Aug-95
7.0
113
ill
7.7
41
47
7.1
-
152,)
157-/
30-Aug-95
8.4
24
7.6
25
30-Aug-95
7.1
44
45
7.7
20
31
7.4
V,
48
53 53
31-Aug-95
7.9
22
7.3
26
31-Aug-95
7.2
38
37
7.6
17
20
7.4
38
32
3-Jul-95
8.8
21
s.5
22
3-Jul-95
5-Jul-95
10.0
20
9.0
22
5-Jul-95
6.6
81
51
7.6
33
31
7.2
96
100
86 93
6-Jul-95
8.0
21
8.1
23
6-Jul-95
7.2
126
115
7.5
51
50
7.4
89
74
7-Jul-95
8.6
20
8.2
23
7-Jul-95
7.4
70
74
7.7
sl
56
7.5
74
75
10-Jul-95
6.5
22
6.9
21
I"ul-95
I I -Jul-95
5.7
22
5.7
24
11 -Jul-95
7.3
119
131
7.6
ill
105
6.8
143
12-Jul-95
8.2
24
7.5
26
12-Jul-95
7.5
46
52
7.8
25
22
8.4
-47'
79
46 49
13-Jul-95
7.6
24
7.8
28
13-Jul-95
7.3
43
47
7.6
31
27
7.5
41
43
14-Jul-95
7.8
25
7.7
28
14-Jul-95
17-Jul-95
7.3
24
7.1
29
17-Jul-95
18-Jul-95
7.s
25
9.3
27
18-Jul-95
19-Jul-95
6.6
26
6.4
26
1 9-JuI-95
7.5
157
153
7.7
131
136
7.6
157
159
164 171
20-Jul-95
5.4
26
5.0
25
20-Jul-95
7.6
34
43
7.7
55
55
7.6
44
40
21-Jul-95
6.6
27
5.0
26
21-Jul-95
24-Jul-95
7.8
26
8.2
29
24-Jul-95
25-Jul-95
7.8
26
7.g
29
25-Jul-95
7.5
115
98
7.8
256
244
7.6
- rl-�9-
r��
26-Jul-95
8.4
24
8.0
28
26-Jul-95
7.5
48
50
7.7
41
47
7.6
.50
52
60 54
27-Jul-95
8.3
23
8.2
27
27-Jul-95
7.7
60
61
7.6
so
46
7.5
57
62
28-Jul-95
8.2
24
7.9
27
28-Jul-95
31 -Jul-95
9.3
27
9.2
28
31 -Jul-95
I -Jun-95
8.4
20
8.2
21
Wun-95
7.6
32
39
7.6
25
27
7.6
39
41
2-Jun-95
8.5
20
8.5
22
2-Jun-95
7.6
< 25
26
7.5
< 25
< 25
7.5
29
29
5-Jun-95
10.6
23
8.4
24
5-Jun-95
6-Jun-95
13.6
23
15.0
24
6-Jun-95
7.5
40
43
7.8
43
44
7.6
60
49
7-Jun-95
8.5
21
8.4
22
7-Jun-95
7.4
54
64
7.7
74
68
7.5
73
79
8-Jun-95
8.4
22
8.5
24
8-Jun-95
7.5
38
38
7.8
32
37
7.5
50
50
9-Jun-95
8.3
22
8.0
26
"un-95
12-Jun-95
5.5
23
5.4
21
12-Jun-95
13-Jun-95
6.2
19
6.0
20
13-Jun-95
7.2
141
144
7.5
150
153
7.3
166
Z5)
14-Jun-95
9.0
21
8.8
21
14-Jun-95
7.5
< 25
< 25
7.6
132
132
7.4
118
1.1
15-Jun-95
9.1
21
8.6
21
1 5-Jun-95
7.4
72
74
7.7
33
38
7.5
'-V
-62
16-Jun-95
11.8
21
10.5
21
16-Jun-95
19-Jun-95
8.0
20
8.1
22
19-Jun-95
20-Jun-95
8.2
19
8.7
21
20-Jun-95
7.5
33
30
7.7
45
41
7.6
41
47
21 -Jun-95
6.9
22
6.6
21
21 -Jun-95
7.6
< 25
< 25
7.9
< 25
< 25
7.9
27
28
22-Jun-95
6.6
21
7.2
21
22-Jun-95
7.5
42
42
7.7
34
37
7.7
8�
38��
23-Jun-95
8.2
22
6.8
21
23-Jun-95
26-Jun-95
8.3
22
8.2
22
26-Jun-95
27-Jun-95
8.5
22
8.7
23
27-Jun-95
7.0
148
151
7.7
88
87
7.3 i
143
135
28-Jun-95
8.1
23
7.7
24
28-Jun-95
7.2
95
82
7.7
95
116
7.4
116
b/
133
30-Jun-95
8.2
20
7.8
20
30-Jun-95
6.8
192
188
7.3
175
179
L 6.9
173
186

OA 19
M
CL
C41
M
06
V
IS
8
miles between bddges
and facilldes.
1
0.1 0.4 1.2
0.6 0.1 0.4
1.4
3.1
3.1
Hwy 87
z
0
CO
0
Cn
jib
to
Cft
North Carolina Virginia
U: EM
U:MBjootajj
U:FC
D: FC
D: ED
D : Wt oway
D: EAf
[MB] Miller Brewing NCO029980
[ED] Eden - Dry Creek NCO025151
[EM] Eden - Mebane
N00025071
001 002
Upstream: nr
Upstream: NCSR 1964
Upstream: 100'above upstream
Downstream: NCSR 1761
Downstream: Hwy 700
Downstream: 300'below downstream
Parameters: Tamp, DO, (weekly) and
Parameters: Temperature, DO, oonductivity [Daily]
Parameters: BOD5, Tamp, turbidity (Wkly)
Fecal coliform (2 / month)
DO, (Daily)
Duke Power NCO003468
001
002 003
[FC] Fieldcrest Cannon NCO001643
Upstream: Intake
100'above nr
Upstream: 100' above
Downstream: NCSR1 761
1,000'below nr
Downstream: Hwy 700
Parameters: Tamp
As, Se, Suffate nr
Parameters: Tamp, DO, conductivity, (weekly),
and BOD5, (2 / month)

325 -
300 . .................................... Ur* 300 ADMI
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
275
250 Eden - Mebane Bridge NCO025071
Instream Color Data
225 Hwy - 87
2W Smith River
175 - - - - - -- SR 1761 north
150 —SR 1761 center
12S siz Out C�Czmj�-Q— 1
100 - Nolt
75
so
25
0
0 tn tn V) 0 tn 0
0 M 0
6=1 =6 r- C r_
N CO
42 9 CU V)
Eden - Water Intake (at Hwy 770)
Smith
Branch
"C' VA "*
k1wy 87 SR 1964 Rwy 14 Dan River Hwy 700 Dan River D..Ri"" SR 1 761
.1 r
-3.0 \1.b d.-ONYCok
Edon - Mow Inake
Edon'. Afabona Bli:w W1 002 - F1
Duke Power "UAW arewbv
Town
Edon - Dry aosk

9.0
Eden - Mebane Bridge NCO025071
8.5 Instrearn pH Data
8.0
7.5
7.0
Hvq 87
— — — Smith River
6.5 - - - - - - Sr 1761 north
6.0
%n %n fn %n in 4n 4n
CD q, CP
C? c
a T 04
D i a 9- -7 3 :3
1 -7 2 T I w -7 .7
cq Ob to cm N cc
cm —
Edon - Wolor Intako (at Hwy 770 )
Smtth
Branch
N"VA
r
KNY 700 Dan River 0 �R 176
67 SR IM Ray 14 Dan Rlvor CW
-3.0 \.I.: Ed, k
Eden - Ws br In IOU
Eden - Abbww Bridge
001 002 fielda"t
Duke Power ANIAor OrawkV I/
Town
Eden - Dry Creek

Dan River Instream Monitoring Requirements
03-02-03 Rockingham County
19 July, 1993
Eden - Mebane Bridge MtWTP WLA and Central Files NCQ025071
The City of Eden, Mebane Bridge Waste Water Treatment Plant, (NCO025071) had extensive file notes. The Fact Sheet
(1992) has hand-written language following the instream monitoring requirements stating: "Facility should coordinate
monitoring efforts at the NC 700 Bridge with Fieldcrest Cannon - so as not to duplicate data". This comment is not on the
finalized WLA. Previous downstream site for Eden - Mebane, was NC1 4, it was moved to NC 700 following correspondence
between the City of Eden WWTP, Winston-Salem Regional Off ice, and the Technical Support Branch., (February, 1991). The
memos between Betsy Johnson and Mike Mickey had the following points; Betsy felt that the monitoring locations should
remain as is. A response memo from Mike indicated that the required monitoring frequencies for Eden and Fieldcrest are
different, (i.e. Fieldcrest has 1 / week sampling while Eden has 3 / week). The last paragraph of Mike Mickey's February 15,
1991 memo states: *I would assume that the City of Eden and Fieldcrest could coordinate so that stream samples are not
collected on the same day".
Actual Permit Requirements:
Outfall 001, (13.5 mgd): upstream at NCSR 1964, Downstream at NCSR 700 with parameters of Temperature, di6solved
oxygen, and conductivity, (Daily).
Other locations, for color are A: Smith River above Eden Water Supply Intake, B: downstream at NC Hwy 87, C: downstream
at NCSR 1761, (for July through October only, one sample per week shall be on a transect at 1/4, U2, and 3/4 of the distance
across the river). Parameters for this transect include color and pH.
Duke Power: 001, 002, and 003 WILA and Central Files NCO003468
Outfall 001 cooling water (flow 126-158 mgd): upstream at intake and downstream at NCSR 1761. Parameter is Temperature,
(Daily). Mercury problems 1989. Lab analysis thought to be okay. No record of follow-up. Central files has correspondence
of high metals content, (esp. iron) in intake water.
Ouff all 002 ash basin (flow 0.5-1.2 mgd): at least 100' above discharge point for upstream and at least 1,000' below discharge
point for downstream. Parameters, (per letter dated June 16,1993) total arsenic, total selenium, and sulfate, (Quarterly). Many
sampling parameter requirements requested per Region(l 989); Arsenic, sulfate, and sulfide monitoring, pH at discrete point
before mixing w/ river, and jo]il is used to start-up the generating units. The permit should specify If this use of oil at start-up
constitutes "oil-firino" for the purpose of vanadium monitoring [sic] of Outf all 002".
Outfall 003 (settling basin overflow): No Instream monitoring required in Permit. WLA file recommended at least 100'above
discharge point for upstream and at least 1,000' below discharge point for downstream. Parameters include: mercury,
selenium, copper, iron, lead, zinc. No limits, not mentioned in Staff Report.
** Facility's instrearn monitoring locations not included in accompanying map due difference in constituents and dissolved
oxygen effects..
Miller Brewing WILA and Central Files NCO0299QO
There are no effluent guidelines currently in effect for Breweries. The current limits for this facility are based on their previous
limits, (of which no information exists as to how these were developed). The facility is well within its permitted limits.
Actual Permit Requirements:
Outfall 001 (5.2 mgd) is from WWTP with instrearn monitoring of at least 100' above and at least 300' below point of
discharge. Parameters: BOD6, dissolved oxygen, and temperature. Samples shall be grab, three times per week in the
months of June, July, August, and September and one time per week in the remaining months.
Outfall 002 is a stormwater discharge with instrearn requirements of upstream and downstream. (no locations specified) and
monitoring of turbidity.
A memorandum was written from Juan Mangles addressing the instrearn sampling sites in 1989. In it the recommended sites
are still requested to be maintained, but due to their inaccessibility, alternate sites are proposed; upstream site at Hwy 14 and
the downstream at Hwy 700. The parameters recommended by the Fact Sheet were color, conductivity, dissolved oxygen,
temperature, and BOD,5, with weekly sampling to be taken in the summer (Apr -Oct) and monthly sampling in the winter (Nov -
Mar). Fieldcrest suggested instrearn sites at the Smith River (prior to the confluence with the Dan) and at Hwy 87. The memo
addressed this location as a site which would provide useful information in general, but should not be placed in the permit, (it
would not be representative of the Dan River upstream conditions). No mention, in this memo of coordination of data between
Reldcrest and Eden - Mebane.
Actual Permit Requirements:
Outfall 001 instrearn monitoring Permit requirements are upstream monitoring at 50'above discharge point, and downstream
monitoring at Hwy 700. The parameters include; Temperature, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, (weekly) and BODr,, Color, (2
month).
Outfall 001 (0-5 mgd / 1.0 mgd) has itistrearn monitoring of only downstream at NCSR 1761 with parameters of temperature,
dissolved oxygen , fecal coliform, (this does not change with the expansion limits). Samples shall be weekly, except fecal
coliform which is twice per month. Facility will be included in the Color monitoring program once it is approved.

July, 1996 though June, 1996
Facility Name =
Eden - Mebane Bridge WWTP
NPDES # =
NCO025071
Ow (MGD) =
13.5 mgd
7010s (cfs)=
313 cfs
fiffic (96) =
6.27%
FINAL RESULTS
Cadmium
Maximum Value
I
Max. Prod Cw
0.0
Allowable Cw
32
Chromium
Maximum Value
35.0
Max. Prod Cw
304.5
rv% o to
Allowable Cw
798
Copper [AI]
maximum value
146
Max. Pred Cw
584.0
Allowable Cw
112
Cyanide
Maximum Value
2.6
Max. Prod Cw
0.0
Allowable Cw
so
Lead
Maximum Value
26
Max. Prod Cw
46.8
Allowable Cw
399
Mercury Maximum Value
0.1
Max. Prod Cw
0.00
eo�;
Not o eal(
Allowable Cw
0.19
Nickel Maximum Value
5
Max. Prod Cw
0.0
Allowable Cw
1,404
Silver [AL] Maximum Value
2.5
Max. Prod Cw
0-00
oot
Allowable Cw
0.96
Zinc [AL] Maximum Value
2090
Max. Prod Cw
25080.0
kOmi1O'F—
Allowable Cw
798
Phenols Maximum Value 5
Max. Pred Cw 0.0 Amt YUS6(.Ae6--
Allowable Cw 16
8/26/96

July, 1996 though June, 1996
Pamnater. Cadmium
StMdafdzr
2 p9A
n
BDL=1/2DL *ff 1PDL
RESULTS
I
I
Std Dev.
0.0
2
Mean
1.0
3
C.v.
0.0
4
6
1
Mult Factor a
0.0
7
Max. Value
1 ;19A
8
Max. Prod Cw
0 1194
9
Allowable Cw
32 jigA
10
11
12
13
14
is
16
17
is
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
36
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
46
46
47
48
49
50
61
52
53
64
66
marwwterm Chromium
SMWArd
50 jigA
n
BDL=1/2DL *1 lt2 DL
RESULTS
1
2.5
Std Dev.
9.0
2
2.5
Mean
5.0
3
2.5
C.V.
1.8
4
2.5
6
2.5
6
2.5
Mult Factor =
9.7
7
35 Dec-95
Max. Value
35
a
2.5
Max. Pred Cw
305
9
2.5
Allowable Cw
798
10
2.5
11
2.5
12
2.5
13
2.5
14
16
16
17
is
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
46
46
47
48
49
60
61
62
63
64
clarmwter -Copper [AQ
Standard
7
119A
n
BDL--li2DL *ff If2 DL RESULTS
I
is
Std Dev. 38.1
2
17
Mean 42.8
3
11
C.V. 0.9
4
12
6
15
6
24
MUN Factor = 4.0
7
22
Max Value 146
a
55
Max Pred Cv SH
9
40
Mowable C% 112
10
146
Oct-95
11
73
12
71
13
52
14
16
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2a
29
3D
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
so
51
52
63
64
65
W26/90

July, 1996 though June. 1996
Fammeter= Cyanide
Standard
5 pgA
n
BDL-1/2DL *ff It2 DL
RESULTS
1
2.5
Std Dev.
0.0
2
2.5
Mean
2.5
3
2.5
C.V.
0.0
4
2.5
6
2.5
6
2.5
Mult Factor =
0.0
7
2.5
Max. Value
2.5
a
2.5
Max. Prod Cw
0
9
2.5
Allowable Cw
so
10
2.5
11
2.5
12
2.5
13
2.5
14
2.5
is
2.5
16
2.5
17
2.5
is
2.5
19
2.5
20
2.5
21
2.5
22
2.5
23
2.5
24
2.5
26
2.5
26
2.5
27
2.5
28
2.5
29
2.5
so
2.5
31
2.5
32
2.5
33
2.5
34
2.5
36
2.5
36
2.5
37
2.5
38
2.5
39
2.5
40
2.5
41
2.5
42
2.5
43
2.5
44
2.5
46
2.5
46
2.5
47
2.5
48
2.5
49
2.5
so
2.5
51
2.5
62
2.5
53
64
66
Standard a
n
1
2
3
4
6
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
is
16
17
is
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
20
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
36
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
so
51
62
63
64
Lead
25
PgA
BDL=1)2DL If If2 DL
RESULTS
10
Jun-96
Sid Dev.
6.1
25
Jun-96
Mean
7.2
16
Jun-96
C.V.
0.7
5
5
5
Mult Factor =
1.8
12
May-96
Max. Value
26 pgA
5
Max. Prod Cw
47 go
5
Allowable Cw
399 jigA
5
-26
Apr-96
5
5
5
23
Mhr-96
5
6
'10
Feb-96
5
S
5
5
5
6
5
5
5
5
10
Dec-95
5
12
NOY-95
5
12
Nov-95
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
Aug-95
5
5
5
6
,anumter= Memury
standaid
0.012 PgA
n
BDL=lt2DL *ff 1/2 DL
RESULTS
1
0.1
Std Dev.
0.0
2
0.1
Mean
0.1
3
0.1
C.V.
0.0
4
0.1
6
0.1
6
0.1
Mult Factor =
0.0
7
0.1
Max Value
0.1
8
0.1
Max. Pred Cw
0.00
9
0.1
Aflowable Cw
0.19
10
0.1
11
0.1
12
0.1
13
0.1
14
0.1
16
0.1
16
0.1
17
0.1
Is
0.1
19
0.1
20
0.1
21
0.1
22
0.1
23
0.1
24
0.1
26
0.1
26
0.1
27
0.1
28
0.1
29
0.1
3D
0.1
31
0.1
32
0.1
33
0.1
34
0.1
36
0.1
36
0.1
37
0.1
38
0.1
39
0.1
40
0.1
41
0.1
42
0.1
43
0.1
44
0.1
45
0.1
46
0.1
47
0.1
48
0.1
49
0.1
so
0.1
61
0.1
62
0.1
63
64
66
W6196

July, 1996 though June, 1996
Paramform
Nickel
Standard
88 IL94
n
BDL=lt2DL *ff 11'2 DL
RESULTS
1
5
Std Dev.
0.0
2
5
Mean
5.0
3
5
C.V.
0.0
4
5
6
5
Mult Factor
0.0
7
5
Max. Value
5 pgA
a
5
Max. Prod Ow
0 pgA
9
5
Allowable Cw
1,404 jigA
10
5
12
5
13--,
5
14
16
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
46
49
so
61
52
63
64
3ammetef Silver [AL)
Standard
0.06 POA
n
BDL=lt2DL *1 1f2 DL
RESULTS
1
2.5
Std Dev.
0.0
2
2.5
Mean
2.6
3
2.5
C.V.
0.0
4
2.5
6
2.5
6
2.5
Muff Factor =
0.0
7
2.5
May- Vahie
2.5 p9A
a
2.5
Max. Prod Cw
0.0 pgA
a
2.5
Allowable Cw
1.0 v9A
10
2.5
11
2.5
12
2.5
13
2.5
14
Is
16
17
Is
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
3D
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
46
48
47
48
40
so
51
52
63
64
55
31aranmfor= Zinc [AL]
Standard
50
PgA
n
BDL=112DL
*ff V2 DL
RESULTS
1
61
Std Dev.
558.3
2
73
Mean
234.6
3
41
C.V.
2A
4
44
6
58
8
63
MUN Fodor
12
7
101
Dec-95
Max. Value
2,090
a
78
Max. Pred Cw
25,080
9
69
Allowable Ow
798
10
128
Oct-95
11
113
12
2, - 090
Aug-95
13
131
14
16
is
17
is
IQ
20
21
22
23
24
25
20
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
36
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
so
61
62
63
64
W6196

WHOLE ItIli.Um . I I OXICI I . Y 'I 1_� I ING 01SELF-MUNrIbRING SUMMARY I Fri,AU90.1991,
u-11 � HFOIJIREMFNT YPAR )AN Iffin MAR AM MAY JUN jln� AUG Sr.p (X.-r
1 7
Pest. skir turns U%
Pest. skir turns U%
N P ...
...
...
Is ...
...
...
Pas.
---
...
Pat.
Fnnjocuc,. Q, Pfl' A Jau Apr Jul Oct
N.ConcSie,las
93 P ...
...
...
Pa..
...
...
P ...
...
Pa..
lagimo A100 S.MossinAV1101
94 Is ...
...
P ...
...
...
Pa..
---
...
Let$
Per: 3.0 S,­j
0 NW..
Fred
Fred
Fal
Fail
N"ass
Pa.,
Pas.
IQI&. 14.4 MC(%); N Onsr.
N Pat,
...
I*
Par.
...
D.,b.. C...TI..,I. VV%VTP ProincIrrim9n
V N
P ...
...
Pa"
...
...
Pace
...
Pat.
NC(02r%XDADI Begin:4106 litcquesse, Q PIP A Feblit., A., Nov
NonconsSin'l.
93
Is ...
...
NFVF.1
w
NFt
Fail
Pa..
...
Late
F.l.P..
Courwy.D.Wast RcSim: RRO SuWmsin;CPID5
IN
Fal
P ...
...
8I.P ...
...
P...
...
Pa.,
...
Pir: 6.0 Spocid
0
Let.
Pa..
...
Feel
P...
Pa..
Pass
...
7QI0: 0.0 WQ%):]W QoJcr,.
96
Pa..
...
Pass
"'Istrace-Fie,der,tior ad. VVVVTP PWKM CUR LIM: 9(hir
V 92 Pa..
Paris
Pat.
P...
P...
Pass
Pa..
P...
P...
Pa..
Is...
at
NOX3,17597JO01 Bazin:4/1/91 ficrmr,; Q Fiffl A )an Apr Jul Oi.t
N.PCms,:
93 Pa,,
Pa.,
Pat.
Fal
NW.W
Pat.
�%
4667
.99
�%
�99
Is...
Coursay;Dwiters �'i ... : RRO Sublursin:CPF05
N "A
808
w a
�N
>911
�99
Fard
P...
L....Lat.
Pa..
P...
P....p.s.
PIP: 20.0 Special
95 Far!
P...
Pa..
Pa..
P ...
...
...
P ...
...
...
7QIO: 0.1 S MQ%):".s ()m.
W P ...
...
...
Pa..
Durhouse-Norl hild�%VWril IT-RM CHR LIM: i?(Al,
V 92 Pa,.
P ...
Fee
Pa.,
Pass
P...
Is ...
Feel
Pass
Fee
Is...
P ...
NO30231141=1 ab:5/3/93 Ftcurn": Q P/11 A J.Ap,1.10,t
NmCcinp.SINGII!
0 Pa.,
P ...
P...
Pass
NW>99
Pass
.0
�99
�w
�99
�99
P ...
Regina: RRO Srilabourin; M-U01
S4 >w
>w
.99
�w
�99
�99
Fed
Pa.,
Let.
P ...
P...
Pm..P...
PF; 10.0 Special
905 F.1
P...
Pa..
Pa..
...
Pass
...
P ...
7QW,. OWS WeV16t9r) 5 Order.
96 Pass
...
Par,
X. 1. D.pe.1 Vs Nmome./Kirelm Fes. PE -KM CHR LIM; 1.9%
w
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
NODD103760AGI Betar:17/1194 licrumc,; Q PIP A ).Apr WI 0.
NunC.,np:SINQ_a
93
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Rciciorr:WARO Subtenin:NEUM
...
...
...
pa".P...
Pa..
Per: 3.6 Specod
P ...
...
Pass
P ...
...
Par,
71)10�283.1 WC(igY 1.9 Omr.
96 Par.
Pass
...
E.I. D.,vat Dere,cratur,1001 PERM: 241 IN II/F AC LIM 9M FFI 0 (N.. crou 9/1196)
92
...
...
...
---
NC(XKJDQi3j0D1 BegicurSAP4 ho'cor"T Q A J. A, 1.10.
NmCra,:SlNGIT-.
93
...
...
...
...
...
Cmurry:111runswull, Ra,im:WIRO SirlibursucClIVII
IN
...
...
...
...
P ... I
...
fill,preel
PP; 2.3 Special
95 Parcel
...
...
P ... I
...
...
Pas.
P ...
...
...
?QIO; 918 IWQsWcO.38 (1do
N Pas.
...
...
P ...
...
Erill. Sa.ck,, I.,-001 Pronsturlm:58%
S2
P ...
...
...
fill
...
Pa..
P...
...
Pat.
...
NOX151195AX)l lingin:4/t/95 Prequirw. Q P/F A FcbM&y Aug Nov
NmCmrp;Siu&lc
93
P ...
...
...
P...
Pat.
...
...
Par,
...
Couro,manin Ragion:WARO Sublos-'JAR(gr
N
Late.Late
Pass
Litur.Pisar
P ...
...
...
FnLPm,
PF;D30 Species
0
P ...
...
...
P...
Par.
Puts
7QIO, 0.34 IWQ%): 511.0 Crocr.
95 ...
FM,FM
Fad
Pass
Pas.
Ernst. Division Perenclulm:21%(G.1r)
N Par,
P ...
...
Pas.
...
...
Pass
ldc'unclo/1195 finquesucy. Q Pop A ).Apr J.10.
N.Cmr,.Siu'l.
03 Pas.
P ...
...
...
Pass
Pas.
County:Treassylvarrat Region: ARO Subluesin; 1-1*101
N Fred
Fal
at
Ford.Fral
Pass
...
Pas,
---
...
Pat.
PP:V.5 Spics"
95 Pa..
...
...
Par,
...
...
Pas.
---
---
Pa..
7QI0:ISl MQ%): 21 Oution.
N Pa,
---
P ...
...
...
Eden VVY117P/Mebarre bridge PERM C! IR LIM; fil,
92
w
pauslm fi.
NH
F.1
Pa'.
w
P...
Jul
Pat.
NOD325071d001 Brairc5/1193 proome,. Q PIP A Marjurau'Do.
N.Crec,:SINGLE
93 ...
w
Pa.,
...
Pass
­ .
Pass
...
Is...
CousityrRockin,leart R.,jm:VVSR0 S.Mucirs:11OA03
Ste _-
P ...
...
...
Pa..
Pa..
PF: 13.5 SprciA
0 ...
pp:::
P ...
---
...
Pa.,
P ...
701(h. 313.0 IWQ%);6.0 Order.
96 ...
Pass
...
P ...
Eden -Dry Creek VVIVTP PERM 2411 IN PIF AC LINL 9" 1-1110
92 ...
w
...
---
NF1
900'
...
710.
P ... I
NM25151/001 flegirolill/92 Proluesicy: Q A MarJ.S.PDm
NmCmnp:SING.E
93
P ... I
...
...
Is ... I
...
P ... I
...
...
Perri
Courainiturlsinglessi Xs,i.:VVSRO S.bbsor;R0A03
941
...
Pearl
...
...
Panel
...
...
P ... I
Nmp..
PP;0.5 S,x;'d
115 ...
Poses
...
Pa..
...
Par.
...
Pa..
71)10� 313 IWC(%".0 Odr;
Or
% ...
...
Pass
...
Par.
lizabeth City WiliTIP HRMI 141111 PAI AC LIM: Surlier
92
N
�w
...
...
�w
...
...
>100
NC1Xy250IUD0I Begirals/1193 Funipmerp, Q A MUJuaScPDcc
N.Camp:SINGLH
93
---
.100
...
...
Am
---
---
FWII,P.c.f
-
...
Pat.(
C."T.P.-pareard, Rcem;WARO Subtacia;C11050
IN
P ... I
...
...
P ... I
...
...
F.H.Picioll
...
...
P ... 1
PP:150 S�id
0
...
Fiscal
...
---
Par.
---
...
P...
Per.
?QIO: TOM. MC(%): NA Ordir.
N ...
...
Pa..
...
---
Pass
0 2�tiwW�m�isd�tw�Ml� V PcI"2DmAvd.bI.
LEGEND:
pam-parrourite,wasseed, linquemy a Monitoring Inctrouncy: Q. Quarsol,, M- Muntld,, 104- Smoothly; SA- Scummoodly; A. Annually, OWD- Only wirm "clostrAin,; D. Disumititiciod crommeig mQuivenent; IS- Conduccull u"ki"'k10 o-1,
Brucia-l'ininuoundrinumnard A= . . sn' Mcardwilutemin . ..... ..m.JANAPR.JIJL.00F N.C., z; Current �u.,Iisuuc R.,uralsoo
P'1' d .. ,
IT-Kerniteredlion(MOD) ViliCigrikurearectionsensivice.b.i. dmeni... AC - Acura CIIR z Clumi,
Drug No"..; f - F.d.d Minjusuar; ar.; an, - M ysid shoom; CV - Cloture. veha: P - Moruslit, f.cated ser'se as Wirlicre maccurojoinn: at - Pulmond b, DHA To. lival Orm.; be - Red an
i.oNco'couniocc�1
19

STANDARD FORM A - MUNICIPAL
SECTION IV. INDUSTRIAL
WASTE CONTRIBUTION TO -MUNICIPAL SYSTEM
I I
Submit a description of each major Industrial faclk discharging Io the municipal system, using a sepwale SectlonIV for each
facility description. indicate the 4 digit standard Industrial Classification
(SIC) Code for the Industry, the major product or raw
material. the flow (In thousand gallons r day), and the characteristics of ov wastewater chachar&d from the Industrial ladlity
rIT,,
Into the municipal system. ConsuftT e III for standard
measums of products or raw materials. (seeinstructions)
1. Major Contributing Facility
(see instructions)
Name
401a
Pluma2 Inc.
Number & Street
0
401�
800 W. Fieldcrest Road
city
401c
EFe—n
County
401d
Rockingham
State
4010
North Carolina
Zip Code
401f
27288
2 Primary Standard Industrial
402
2253
Classification Code(see Instructions)
a Prim�ry Product or Raw Material
Units(See
(see InstrucUons)
Quanik— Table 111)
Product
403a
Knitted Fleec%03c
44 403e N-2
Outer Wear
Raw Material
4M
Knit Fabrics;
403d
N/A
4wi
N/A
Dyes
4. Flow Indicate the volume of water
discharged into the municipal sys-
tem In thousand gallons per day
and whether this discharge Is
Intermittent or continuous.
S. Pretreatment Provided Indicate It
prelmatment Is provided prior to
entering the municipal system
6. Characteristics of Wastewater
Jsee Instructions)
404a
404b
405
1200 _ thou . sand gallons per day
0 Intermittent(Int) M] Continuous (con)
[B Yes 0 No Screening, Flow Equalization
Parameter
Name
BOD
TSS
Cr
Cd
Cu
Pb-
Zn
Parameter
Number
00310
00530
61034
01027
01042
01051
10-10
01092
tie __A
400
1200
10.5
10-025
10.5
10.75 1
a
/ I Z_
0
& .0 4— 5- cr7_ 0;
ell
Do 11'e'

FUR AGENG US
.11 HITJ
STANDARD FORM A - MUNICIPAL
SECTION IV. INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTRIBUTION TO MUNICIPAL SYSTEM
I f
Submit a description of each major IndusWal facl* discharging to the municipw system, using a separate SwUon,IV for each
facility description. Indicate the 4 dV1 Standard Industrial Classification (sic) Code for the Industry. the major pmducl or raw
mateM, the flow (in thousand gallons r ckty), and do chameteristics of ft wastewater dischargOd from to Industrial facilfty
Into the municipal system. Consult TTle III for standard measures of products or mw materials. (see Instructions)
Major Contributing Facility
(see instructions)
Name Affla I Fieldcrest Cannon Tne*.
Number & Street
City
County
State
Zip Code
2 Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code(see Instructions)
3. Primary Product or Raw Material
(see instructions)
Product
Raw Material
4. Flow Indicate the volume of water
discharged into the municipal sys.
tem in thousand gallons per day
and whether this discharge 1.9
Intermittent or continuous.
6. Pretreatment Provided Indicate It
pretreatment Is provided prior to
entering the municipal system
6. Characteristics of Wastewater
(see instructions)
4011�
401c
401d
401e
4011
402
1111E�
nuk'.17�-
404a
404b
406
I
Blanket Finishing Mill
Warehouse Street
Eden
Rockingham
North Carolina
27288
2221
Unb(See
Quanlily Tabig-1111
Woven Blanket*03c N/A 403e
N/A 403d N/A _ 4W1 N/A
840 thousand gallons per day
E] Intermittent(int) ff] Continuous (con)
a Yes [] No Manual Bar Screen
Parameter
Name
-17500-5-9—r
BOD
TSS
Cr
Cd
Cu
Pb
Zn
Number
00310
00530
-
61035
01027
01042
01051
01092
LValue
1300 -1
150
20.214
.0.021
10.35
10.1
1.75 1
a

STANDARD FORM A - MUNICIPAL
SECTION IV. INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTRIBUTION TO MUNICIPAL SYSTEM
I
Submit a description of each major lndusbW facility discharging lo the municipal system, using a separate Section' 4V for each
facility description. Indicate ft 4 d4t standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code for the Industry, the ma
_)or product or raw
mateft, the flow (in thousand gallons r day), and the characlorlsocs of ft wastowa Ow Industrial facility
Into the municipal system. Consuft TITIce III for standard measures of products or raw materials. -(am hubuctions)
1. Major Contributing Facility
(see instructions)
Name 401a Sara Lee Knit Products
Number & Street 4016 328 Gant Road
city 401c Eden
County 401d Rockingham
state 401e North Carolina
Zip Code 4011 27288
2 Primary Standard Industrial 4M 2253
Classification Code(see Instructions)
3. Pflm�ry Product or Raw Material Units(See
(see instructions) Quantity Table 111)
Product 403a Kni t ted Fleec a 112 403e H-2
Outer Wear
Raw Material 403b -Knit Fabr1cs;_4wd1__ _N/A —14MI 1__N/A
4. Flow Indicate the volume of water
discharged into the municipal sys-
tem In thousand gallons per day
and whether this discharge is
intermittent or continuous.
5. Pretruabrnent Provided Indicate It
pretreatment Is provided prior to
entering the municipal system
61 Characteristics of Wastewater
.(see Instructions)
4M
404a
404b
405
Dyes
2800 usand gallons per day
0 Into rmittent(int) Continuous (con)
JE Yes N 0 Automatic Screening, Flow
Equalization, Cooling
Parameter
Name
BOD
TSS
Cr
Cd
Cu
Pb
Zn
Parameter
Number
00310
00530
61034
01027
01042
01051
01092
Value A
400
1 200
10.5 _110-021
__IJ
1.5 __1
0 .10
0.7"
0

FOR AGENC USE
STANDARD FORM A - MUNICIPAL
SECTION IV. INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTRIBUTION TO -MUNICIPAL SYSTEM
I
Submit a description of each major IndustrW fWrdy clischatong b the municipal system, using a separate Sectlion�,IV for each
facility descdpUon. Indicate ft 4 dVt Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code for the Industry, the major product or mw
mateft, the flow (In thousand gallons per day), and the characteristics of ft wastewater dischargOd from the Industrial facility
Into the municipal system. Consult Table III for standard measures of products or mw materials. (see Instriuctions)
1. Major Contributing Facility
(see instructions)
Name 401a Mohawk
Karastan Rug Mill
Number & Street 4011� 712 Henry Street
city 401c Eden
County 401d Rockingham
StaLe 401e North Carolina
Zp Code 4011 27288
2 Primary Standard IndustrW 402 2221
Classification Code(see Instructions)
3. Pdm�ry Product or Raw Material Units(See
(see Instructions) Quantity lable III)
Product 403a Woven Carpet 4D3c N/A Aran H-2
Raw Material
4. Flow Indicate the volume of water
discharged into the municipal sys-
tem In thousand gallons per day
and whether this discharge is
Intermittent or continuous.
5. Pretreatment Provided Indicate If
pretreatment Is provided prior to
entering the municipal system
6. Characteristics of Wastewater
Jsee instructions)
406a
Im
404a
404b
406
VA — 4wd I N/A _ 4wt N/A
1200 thousand gallons per day
E] Intermittent(int) Continuous (con)
[@ Yes No Automatic Bar Screen
Parameter
Name
BOD
TSS
Cr
Cd
Cu
Pb
Zn
Parameter
Number
00310
00530
61034
01027
01042
01051
01092
I Value
a—
200
1150
1 0. 214
0.021
I ----I
0.2
10.1
1 0*7 _ _ I
8

LABORATORY
OPERATIONS
BUILDING
v)
INF.
METER
W
<W
cow
Q
<
>
U)
0
0 Z
W
FINAL
SETTLING
TANK
FINAL �
SETTLING
AERATION
BASIN < U=J TANK
CDC)
LL-J
CL
RAS RAS
RAS
PUMP -0411- Pump
'AS STATION STATION
ffTER IDECANT Z
'S
rM:IPO7
N
----------- 4 --- RAS..
L
Ic
AERATION <LU
BASIN -j—
U--J
CL
FINAL
rSETTLING
TANK
FINAL
SETTLING
TANK
CL2 I
MIXER
DECANT
SLUDGE
LAGOON
OECANT
Lu
LLJ
0
la—i
Lu
F Z 7c=n
-------------
-----------------
W
_j
DISSOLVED
AIR
FLOATATION ------------
UNIT
-J U L)
< C%4 ccJN
L) r < <
4-
ELUC
U=F-
C C 0
LUW-- L) L)
C
.6 LL Q U
u M
W
PLANT CL2
EFFLUENT BUILDING
TO
DAN RIVER

A
6
Dischan,e 001
0
EFFLUENT TO 0.5 XGD
DAN RIVER
(APPROX 1 MILE I
FLASH MIX DIVERSION BOX
---CLARIFIER
—OC�RIFIER
INFLUENT
0.5 14GD
RECIRCULATION
PUMPING 0. 5 MCD
TION
RECIRCULATION METERING
J
DEWATERED SLUDGE ly PACKAGIE
I , —"-
SLUDGE' TO DRYING ING
BEDS BAR SCREENS AND PUMP
LAND DISPOSAL STATION
AERATION GRIT REMOVAL
T - - V.-%
13 .10
.0e INFLUENT METERING
B A S I N
0
AEROBIC OPERATIONS
DIGESTER BUILDING
FLOW LEGEND
WASTEWATER
o-- SUPERNATANT / ciLTRATE
— — ­0­ SLUDGE
seri. I cfq 6 ?hge 1 of 2

cc: Permits and Engineering
Technical Support Branch
County Health Dept.
Central Files
WSRO
SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes No X
If Yes, SOC No. —
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: Greg Nizich
k-0
Date: October 4, 1996
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County Rockingham
Permit No. NCO025151
PART I GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: City of Eden
Dry Creek WWTP
191 Mebane Bridge Road
Eden, N.C. 27288
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
Date of Investigation: October 2, 1996
Report Prepared by: David Russell
Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Terry Shelton, Plant
Superintendent [phone] Ext. 308; Charles Van Zandt,
ORC [phone] Ext. 320.
Directions to Site: From Winston-Salem travel 158E, US
220N, NC 135E, NC 770 (Truck Rt. E), NC 14N, NC 770E.
Treatment plant is on right.
Discharge Points(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: .360 311 1611 Longitude: 790 381 1211 .
U.S.G.S. Quad No. A20SW U.S.G.S. Quad Name NE Eden
site size and expansion area consistent with application?
x Yes — No If No, explain:
Topography (relationship to flood plain included): WWTP is
located above the flood plain.
Location of nearest dwelling: None within 10001.
Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Dan River

a. classification C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 030203
C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent
downstream uses: River flood through wooded/farmland
area.
Part II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of Wastewater to be permitted: 0.5 MGD (Ultimate
Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Waste
Water Treatment facility? 0.5 mgd
C. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility
(current design capacity)? 0.5 mgd
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two
years. NA
e. Please provide a description of existing or
substantially constructed wastewater treatment
facilities; Influent pumps, bar screen, grit chamber,
aeration basins, clarifier, chlorination, flow meter,
aerobic digester
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater
treatment facilities.
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
in development approved X
should be required not needed
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM
Permit No.
IM
Residuals Contractor 0
Telephone No.
Residuals stabilization:
Other
C. Landf i 11:
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 10/92
PSRP PFRP
Page 2

d. other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify): Sludge is
trucked to pump station and pumped to -Mebane Bridge
WWTP as influent flow.
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating
sheet).
4. SIC Code (s) : 4952
Primary 01 Secondary
Main Treatment Unit Code: 0 5 0 - 7
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant
Funds or are any public monies involved. (municipals only)?
NA
2. special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity)
requests: None
3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please
indicate) NA
Date
Submission of Plans and Specifications
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated
all of the non -discharge options available. Please provide
regional perspective for each option evaluated.
Spray Irrigation:
connection to Regional Sewer System: The flow from the Dry,
Creek WWTP could be pumped to the Mebane Bridge WWTP, but
the plant is operated as safety should the pump station to
Mebane Bridge WWTP fail. The flow handled by the pump
station could be routed to the Dry Creek plant and treated.
Subsurface:
other disposal options:
5. Other Special Items:
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 10/92
Page 3

z
PART IV EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This 100% domestic wastewater plant consistently meets
limits.
It is recommended that the permit be renewed.
dz F6/oc)3
Signature of report preparer
Water Quality� RegionA Supervisor
X
Date
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 10/92
Page 4