NC0020664_Permit Issuance_20040213

WArF,�
Q
G
y
Michael F. Easley, Governor
1 State of North Carolina
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
*'C Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
February 13, 2004
Mr. Bill Hodge
Town of Spindale
P.O. Box 186
Spindale, North Carolina 28160
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NCO020664
Spindale WWTP
Rutherford County
Dear Mr. Hodge:
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject
permit. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued
pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of
Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9,1994 (or
as subsequently amended).
The following changes have been made to the final permit:
➢ Since the most recent 15 months of mercury data tested using method 254.1 were below the
detection limit of 0.2 µg/L, the Division will allow the permittee to petition for removal of the
mercury limit if six months of samples analyzed via method 1631 (consecutive to the
aforementioned 15-month dataset) demonstrate no reasonable potential for the exceedance of
water quality standards. This should alleviate much of Spindale's estimated financial burden
since most was attributed to the high cost of mercury sampling under the new method.
➢ It is the Division's policy to retain modeled ammonia limits (that were based on oxygen
consumption) during permit renewals unless a facility expands. Therefore, ammonia limits at
3.0 MGD should remain the same as the limit in the previous permit. The monthly average
ammonia limit at 3.0 MGD has been changed to 10.0 mg/L (summer and winter) with a weekly
max of 30.0 mg/L.
In response to your questions/comments on the draft permit:
➢ The EPA mercury water quality standard referenced in Spindale's comment document was 0.77
µg/L. This is an aquatic life standard, whereas DWQ's mercury water quality standard is based
on human health; in many cases, State requirements are more stringent than EPA requirements.
The current mercury surface fresh water quality standard of 0.012 µg/L became effective in
October,1989. This standard was calculated based on the EPA -endorsed, FDA fish tissue action
level at the time of 1 mg/kg fish. In order to calculate a water column standard, the fish tissue
action level was divided by a Bioaccumulation factor (BAF) of 81,700 L/kg, provided by EPA.
Therefore, 1.0 mg/kg divided by 81,700 L/kg is 0.0000122 mg/L or 0.012 µg/L. In January, 2001
EPA promulgated a new national water quality standard for the protection of human health of
0.3 mg/kg based on the new fish tissue action level. A new water quality standard could be
calculated by dividing this new fish tissue action level by an approved BAF. However, EPA has
not yet provided the implementation guidance for this new fish tissue action level. In the
absence of this guidance, DWQ has chose to retain its existing water quality standard for the
time being.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
[phone]
FAX [phone]
On the Internet at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/

%Y
➢ In the case of the RPA conducted for mercury, six samples were above the maximum allowable
effluent concentration. This in itself demonstrates reasonable potential for an exceedance of
water quality standards — in effect, there is no need to conduct a statistical analysis. Even so, the
method used to conduct reasonable potential analyses is EPA approved and consistent with 40
CFR 122.44.
➢ The town "requests that NCDENR utilize procedures discussed in the EPA Technical Support
Document for Water Quality Based Toxics Control to convert data to a four -day average for all the
toxics" when performing RPAs. The Division uses an EPA approved method for conducting
RPAs that is more stringent than the method used by EPA. The Divisions feels that this method
is appropriately protective of NC waters.
➢ Attached to this final permit is a memo on the Total Residual Chlorine policy for NPDES
permits. This policy was adopted during the triennial review of State surface water quality
standards required by the Clean Water Act. The policy caps TRC limits at 28 µg/L to protect
against acute impacts in the receiving water. Any changes to this policy or its implementation
would be addressed during the 2003-2006 Triennial Review. You may contact Tom Reeder with
any questions or comments at [phone] x557.
➢ The town requested an explanation of the calculated 1h FAVs used to develop permit limits, as
well as the opportunity to review and comment on this methodology. Attached to this final
permit is a memo on Acute Toxicity Values and Calculated 1h FAVs. While the Division
welcomes comments on its policy, we are not able to allow an extension of the public comment
period.
➢ EPA has approved the Division's policy establishing weekly average and daily maximum
ammonia limits. The methodology described in the October 15,2002 memorandum is currently
being applied statewide.
➢ The town objects to the inclusion of a requirement to perform an annual priority pollutant scan
in the NPDES permit. It is Division policy to include this requirement in all major permits to
ensure the availability of sufficient data for the next permit cycle.
➢ The town requests relief from WET testing if it passes all tests within a two-year period.
Quarterly WET testing is a NPDES program requirement. It cannot be waived.
➢ The town objects to boilerplate language included in the NPDES permit. Comments cite 40 CFR
regulations that state the language in question applies only to manufacturing, commercial,
mining, and silvicultural dischargers, not to POTWs. As previously mentioned, EPA allows for
state programs to be more stringent than the federal requirements. The Division feels that the
language is appropriate, particularly for facilities with full pre-treatment programs that may
include manufacturing and commercial facilities as indirect dischargers.
➢ The town states that the cost associated with the implementation of new requirements contained
in this final permit causes a financial burden ($52,000 in additional costs over the life of the
permit). It appears that much of the burden is due to the cost of mercury testing (estimated at
$56,000 over the life of the permit). As previously mentioned, if after six months your facility
does not show potential to cause an exceedance of mercury water quality standards, you may
petition to have the mercury limit removed. Furthermore, as mentioned in a letter to your
facility dated December 2, 2003, the Division has established a 12-month evaluation period for
the new mercury method during which no civil penalties will be assessed for violations
(provided samples are analyzed using the new method). A copy of this letter has been included
with this final permit.
2

If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty
(30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition,
conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of
Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such
demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division
may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits
required by the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or
Local governmental permit that may be required. If you have any questions concerning this permit,
please contact Toya Fields at telephone number [phone], extension 551.
Sincerely,
XQJ!nal Sgned dt
:) yid X Goodre
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Asheville Regional Office/ Water Quality Section
Mr. Roosevelt Childress, EPA
NPDES Unit
Central Files

Permit NCO020664
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, the
Town of Spindale
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Spindale WWTP
Ecology Drive
Spindale
Rutherford County
to receiving waters designated as Catheys Creek in the Broad River Basin in
accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions
set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective March 1, 2004.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on July 31, 2008.
Signed this day February 13, 2004.
C3
T)avid A. Good,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NCO020664
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked. As of
this permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the
exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements,
terms, and provisions included herein.
The Town of Spindale is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate an existing 6.0 MGD wastewater treatment facility
consisting of screening, grit removal, extended aeration, clarification,
chlorination, and dechlorination located at the Town of Spindale Wastewater
Treatment Plant on Ecology Drive in Spindale in Rutherford County.
2. Operate at 4.5 MGD until the average flow for any twelve(12) month period
exceeds 80% of the permitted flow (3.6 MGD), after which time the facility
must monitor in accordance with effluent limitations and monitoring
requirements specified for 6.0 MGD.
3. Operate at 3.0 MGD until the average flow for any twelve(12) month period
exceeds 80% of the permitted flow (2.4 MGD) , after which time the facility
must monitor in accordance with effluent limitations and monitoring
requirements specified for 4.5 MGD
4. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached
map into Catheys Creek, classified C waters in the Broad River Basin.

Spindale WWTP - NCO020664 Facility
Location a
USGS Quad Name: Rutherfordton North Lat.: 35°22'52"
Receiving Stream: Catheys Creek Long.: 81°53'18"
Stream class: C Not to SCALE
Subbasin: Broad — 03-08-02 North

{1
Permit NCO020664
r •
A. '(1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (3.0 MGD)
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until the twelve (12) month average
flow exceeds 2.4 MGD, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be
limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
ELlENT
0H , AAO11%
LIMIT s
MON[TORtN%, 019
10 OR t►
,irraae;
Weekly
Average
Qlily,[asemerl
MWmui
fir: �te0
Sample .
`f`
anipl0 Location
Flow
3.0 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5-day, 209C 2
22.5 m L
38.2 m L
Daily
Composite
Effluent, Influent
Total Suspended Solids2
30.0 m L
45.0 m L
Daily
Composite
Effluent, Influent
NH3 as N (April 1- October 31
10.0 m
30.0 m L
Daily
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N November 1-March 31)
10.0 m /L
30.0 m L
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen3
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean
200 / 100 ml
400 / 100 ml
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine4
28 µg1L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
H
Between
6.0 - 9.0 standard
units
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature °C
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen NO2 + NO3 + TKN
Quarterly -Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity5
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Cyanide-
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Total Copper
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Total Mercury6
0.06 µg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Nickel
261 µg/L
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Selenium
27 µg/L
56 µg/L
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Silver
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Total Zinc
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Chlorides
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Sulfate
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
BODs, 200C
7
Grab
U & D
NH3 as N
7
Grab
U & D
Dissolved Oxygen
7
Grab
U & D
Fecal Coliform(geometric mean
7
Grab
U & D
Temperature
7
Grab
U & D
Conductivity
7
Grab
U & D
Notes:
1. U: upstream at NCSR 1547. D: downstream at NCSR 1549.
2. The monthly average BODs and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15% of
the respective influent value (85% removal).
3. The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/L.
4. The Total Residual Chlorine limit takes effect September 1. 2005
5. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnic), P/F at 19%. Test shall be conducted in March, June, September
and December [see condition A. (4) for more details].
6. If 6 months of data analyzed using EPA method 1631 show no reasonable potential to exceed
mercury water quality standards, the permittee may petition for removal of the mercury limit.
7. Instream monitoring shall be conducted 3/week from June 1-September 30 and 1/week from
October 1-May 31.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Permit NC0020664
A. (2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (4.5 MGD)
During the period beginning when the twelve (12) month average flow exceeds 2.4 MGD lasting until the twelve
(12) month average flow exceeds 3.6 MGD or expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall
001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
EFFLUENT
CHARACTERISTICS
- Lf�tf-S
MONIYQ UNG 1 ' - 910 S
M AY
N-V60,0 e;
'eel C Y
►e a
Deii Yp
Maxial4lm
rAeasu reinent
Fre encY
S le
ant le Location'
Flow
4.5 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5-day, 202C 2
22.5 m /L
38.2 m /L
Daily
Composite
Effluent, Influent
Total Suspended Solids2
30.0 m L
45.0 m /L
Daily
Composite
Effluent, Influent
Was N (April 1- October 31)
3.2 m L
9.6 m L
Daily
Composite
Effluent
NH3 as N November 1-March 31
7.7 m L
23.1 m /L
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen3
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean
200 / 100 ml
400 / 100 ml
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine4
28 µg/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
H
Between
6.0 - 9.0 s.u.
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature °C
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen NO2 + NO3 + TKN
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity5
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
-Total Cadmium
7.7 µg/L
15 µg/L
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Cyanide
19 µg/L
22 µg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Copper
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Total Mercury
0.05 µg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Nickel
261 µg/L
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Selenium
19 µg/L
56 µg/L
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Silver
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Total Zinc
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Chlorides
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Sulfate
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
BOD5, 20QC
6
Grab
U & D
NH3 as N
6
Grab
U & D
Dissolved Oxygen
6
Grab
U & D
Fecal Coliform(geometric mean
6
Grab
U & D
Temperature
6
Grab
U & D
Conductivity
6
Grab
U & D
Notes:
1. U: upstream at NCSR 1547. D: downstream at NCSR 1549.
2. The monthly average BOD5 and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15% of
the respective influent value (85% removal).
3. The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/L.
4. The Total Residual Chlorine limit takes effect September 1, 2005.
5. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia), P/F at 26%. Test shall be conducted in March, June, September
and December [see condition A. (5) for more details].
6. Instream monitoring shall be conducted 3/week from June 1-September 30 and 1 /week from
October I -May 31.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Permit NCO020664
A. "(3) EFFLUENT LDUTATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (6.0 MGD)
During the period beginning when the twelve (12) month average flow exceeds 3.6 MGD lasting until expiration,
the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by
the Permittee as specified below:
--FF WENT
CHARACTERISTICS
LIMP
MONITORING R QUCR t�Y
I IQotfil t
►Qfe . _.
W Iciy
A""'
Daily
;.I ctmur�
Measurement
Fregenc
Sa>t I.e
p
T A se . .
• i
$0, , W-10dation
P
Flow
6.0 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
BOD, 5-da , 202C 2
22.5 m L
38.2 m
Daily
Composite
Effluent, Influent
Total Suspended Solids2
30.0 m L
45.0 m L
Daily
Composite
Effluent, Influent
NH3 as N(April 1- October 31
2.7 m /L
8.1 m L
Daily
composite
Effluent
NH3 as N November 1-March 31
6.2 m
18.6 m L
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen3
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean
200 / 100 ml
400 / 100 ml
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine4
28 µg/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
H
Between
6.0 - 9.0 sm.
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature 'C
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen NO2 + NO3 + TKN
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity5
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Cadmium
6 µg/L
15 µg/L
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Cyanide
16 µg/L
22 µg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Copper
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Total Mercury
0.04 µg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Nickel
261 µg/L
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Selenium
16 µg/L
56 µg/L
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Silver
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Total Zinc
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Chlorides
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
Sulfate
2/Month
Composite
Effluent
BODs, 200C
6
Grab
U & D
NH3 as N
6
Grab
U & D
Dissolved Oxygen
6
Grab
U & D
Fecal Coliform(geometric mean
6
Grab
U & D
Temperature
6
Grab
U & D
Conductivity
6
Grab
U & D
Notes:
1. U: upstream at NCSR 1547. D: downstream at NCSR 1549.
2. The monthly average BOD5 and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15% of
the respective influent value (85% removal).
3. The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/L.
4. The Total Residual Chlorine limit takes effect September 1, 2005.
5. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnta), P/F at 32%. Test shall be conducted in March, June, September
and December [see condition A. (6) for more details].
6. lnstream monitoring shall be conducted 3/week from June I -September 30 and 1 /week from
October 1-May 31.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Permit NC0020661,
A. (4) QUARTERLY CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (3.0 MGD) ' 1 1
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant
mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 19%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined
in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998,
or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure"
(Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of
March, June, September and December. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at
the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below
the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the
two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the
highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest
concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of
"detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are
specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -
February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the
parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ
Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention:North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no
later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and
all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved
designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and
reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the Permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT)
test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of
the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be
submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.

4,
Permit NCO020664
A.'(5) QUARTERLY CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (4.5 MGD)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant
mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 26%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, guarterlu monitoring using test procedures outlined
in the "North Carolina Ceriodaph.nia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998,
or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure"
(Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of
March, June, September and December. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at
the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below
the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the
two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the
highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest
concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of
"detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are
specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -
February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the
parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ
Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention:North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no
later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and
all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved
designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and
reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the Permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT)
test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of
the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be
submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.

Permit NC002066;1i
1 i
r
A. (6) QUARTERLY CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (6.0 MGD)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant
mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 32%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterImonitoring using test procedures outlined
in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998,
or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure"
(Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of
March, June, September and December. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at
the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below
the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the
two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the
highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest
concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of
"detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are
specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -
February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the
parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ
Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention:North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no
later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and
all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved
designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and
reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the Permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT)
test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of
the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be
submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.

Permit NCO020664
A. (7) EFFLUENT POLLUTANT SCAN
The Permittee shall perform an annual Effluent Pollutant Scan for all parameters listed in the
attached table. The Permittee shall perform an annual Effluent Pollutant Scan for all parameters
listed in the attached table. The analytical methods shall be in accordance with 40 CFR Part 136 and
shall be sufficiently sensitive to determine whether parameters are present in concentrations greater
than applicable standards and criteria. Samples shall represent seasonal variations. Unless
otherwise indicated, metals shall be analyzed as "total recoverable."
Ammonia (as N)
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
1,1-dichloroethylene
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Dissolved oxygen
1,2-dichloroproparte
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Nitrate/Nitrite
1,3-dichloropropylene
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Kjeldahl nitrogen
Ethylbenzene
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Oil and grease
Methyl bromide
2-chloronaphthalene
Phosphorus
Methyl chloride
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Total dissolved solids
Methyiene chloride
Chrysene
Hardness
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Antimony
Tetrachloroethylene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Arsenic
Toluene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Beryllium
1,11-trichloroethane
1,2-dichlorobenzene
Cadmium
1,12-trichloroethane
1,3-dichlorobenzene
Chromium
Trichloroethylene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
Copper
Vinyl chloride
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Lead
Acid -extractable compounds:
Diethyl phthalate
Mercury
P-chloro-m-creso
Dimethyl phthalate
Nickel
2-chlorophenol
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Selenium
2,4-dichlorophenol
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Silver
2,4-dimethylphenol
1,2-diphenyihydrazine
Thallium
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Fluoranthene
Zinc
2,4-dinitrophenol
Fluorene
Cyanide
2-nitrophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Total phenolic compounds
4-nitrophenol
Hexachlorobutadiene
Voladle organic compounds.
Pentachlorophenol
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Acrolein
Phenol
Hexachloroethane
Acrylonitrile
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Benzene
Base -neutral compounds:
Isophorone
Bromotorm
Acenaphthene
Naphthalene
Carbon tetrachloride
Acenaphthylene
Nitrobenzene
Chlorobenzene
Anthracene
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Chlorodibromomethane
Benzidine
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Chloroethane
Benzo(a)anthracene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Benzo(a)pyrene
Phenanthrene
Chloroform
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Pyrene
Dichlorobromomethane
Benzo(ghi)perylene
1,2,4-tichlorobenzene
1,1-dichloroethane
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
1,2-dichloroethane
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Test results shall be reported to the Division in DWQ Form- A MR-PPA1 or in a form approved by the
Director within 90 days of sampling. The report shall be submitted to the following address:
NC DENR / DWQ / Central Files, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617.

R-: Town of Spindale WWTP
Subject: Re: Town of Spindale WWTP
From: [e-mail]
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 15:15:26 -0500
To: Toya Fields <toya.fields @ ncmail.net>
thanks for the update. Go ahead and issue. Marshall
1 of 1 2/6/2004 3:21 PM

imap://chades weavei'[e-mail]-143/f...
-C.
Subject: [Fwd: Re: Town of Spindale WWTP]
From: Toya Fields <toya.fields a@?acmail.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 200410:32:39 -0500
To: Charles Weaver <Char}.es.Weaver@ncrnail-net>
-------- Original Message--------
Subject:Re: Town of Spindale WWTP
Date:Mon, 02 Feb 2004 08:41:16 -0500
From:[e-mail]
To:Toya Fields <toya.fields ncmail.net>
CC:Dominy.Madolyn ^ eparnail.epa.9ov_
Hi, Toya. That facility doesn't show up in our tracking system, so it
doesn't look like we got it before. I'll be glad to quickly review what
you sent, but with the NPDES managers meeting here this week, I may not
be able to get to it until next weep. Marshall
1 of 1 */2/2004 3:02 Ply[

WRIGHT
Kurt D. Wright & Associates, Inc.
WATER / WASTEWATER ENGINEERING SERVICES
October 31, 2003
Ms. Natalie Sierra
NCDENR — D WQ — NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
. L. J
RE: Draft NPDES Permit -
Permit NCO020664 - Spindale W WTP
Town of Spindale, Rutherford County
Dear Ms. Sierra:
On behalf of the Town of Spindale enclosed are the town's comments regarding the draft
NPDES Permit for the Spindale WWTP.
If you should have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Very truly yours,
KURT D. WRIGHT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Kurt Wright, PE, DEE
President
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Tim Barth (w/Enclosure)
Mr. Bill Hodge (w/Enclosure)
Solutions for a sustainable environment
163 Heritage Lane Bostic, NC 28018 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Mobile: [phone] www.kdwright.com
LVE) aus- 01y�

ram
rs1
COMMENTS
DRAFT NPDES PERMIT
Town of Spindale
Rutherford County
North Carolina
October 31, 2003
am TIERED PERMIT
The Town of Spindale would like to thank the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (NCDENR) for issuing the permit with three tiers for different plant flow
conditions. The town requested NCDENR to provide limits for flows lower than the original 6.0
MGD design capacity of the WWTP. NCDENR has honored that request and issued a tiered
permit that allows for flows of 3.0, 4.5 and 6.0 MGD. The town appreciates NCDENR's
responsiveness to its request.
Pon MERCURY LIMIT
The Town of Spindale recognizes the importance of controlling levels of methylmercury in
Catheys Creek. However, the data and methods utilized by NCDENR to establish the need for the
"+ water quality based effluent limit (WQBEL) and the limits themselves are questionable for the
reasons cited below.
Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA)
Background:
In order to determine the need for a WQBEL, NCDENR conducted a Reasonable Potential
Analysis for mercury. NCDENR conducted the RPA using existing effluent data. Table 1
presents the results of sixty-two (62) effluent samples tested for mercury according to EPA test
method 254.1 with a detection level of 0.2 Ng/L. The time period for the data set is January 1,
`M 2001 through May 20, 2003 or two years and five months. In the data set of the sixty-two (62)
samples, six (6) samples reported values higher than the detection level. Table 2 presents these six
MR (6) samples and their corresponding values. For those values that reported results below the
detection level NCDENR entered a value computed as one-half the detection level, or 0.1 ug/L
and revised the data set accordingly. The revised data set was then reduced to a mean and
standard variation, from which a coefficient of variation (CV) was computed. The CV of the
CAR revised data set was 1.15. A probable maximum effluent value of 2.2 Ng/L was then computed
based on the CV and the highest measured value in the data set (1.0 Ng/L). Comparing the
probable maximum value of 2.2 Ng/L with the calculated effluent limits for the various flows
MR (0.06, 0.05, and 0.04 pg/L), NCDENR deemed there was a reasonable potential for the WWTP to
exceed the calculated limit.
MR There are several issues the town wishes to raise regarding mercury and the RPA conducted by
NCDENR.
am
A. The Data Set
(L) Sampling and Testing Methods:
ow EPA Test Method 254.1 (TM-254.1) does not require the use of clean sampling and testing
techniques; therefore, clean sampling and testing techniques were not utilized for these samples.
P"

Town of Spindale - Draft NPDES Permit Comments October 31, 2003
Mercury contamination of samples is well documented. The existing NPDES permit calls for
mercury sampling by composite. There is a high degree of probability that most if not all twenty-
four hour compost samples were contaminated and do not represent the true level of mercury in
the effluent. Regarding the samples in Table 2 reporting over 0.200 ug/L the town believes these
samples were contaminated and that they do not represent the level of mercury that might have
.. been present in the effluent.
NCDENR is utilizing a water quality criterion for mercury of 0.012 pg/L; 16 times lower than the
detection limit of TM-254.1. The sampling and testing method employed under the previous
permit does not provide data that is compatible with a water quality criterion of 0.012 Ng/L. EPA
Test Method 1631 and the associated clean sampling requirements of Method 1669 are necessary
for sampling and testing for trace mercury concentrations at this level. It is for these reasons the
town believes that none of the data used in the RPA is valid. In order to conduct a valid RPA for
trace mercury concentrations measured in nanograms per liter, sampling and testing according to
Methods 1631 and 1669 is required.
TABLE 1
MERCURY DATA SET
(Results reported in pg/L)
`
Actual
Data
-
1/2DL
1
<
0.2
0.100
2
<
0.2
0.100
3
<
0.2
0.100
4
<
0.2
0.100
5
1 <
1 0.2
10.100
6
<
0.2
0.100
7
<
0.2
0.100
8
<
0.2
0.100
9
<
0.2
0.100
10
0.2
0.200
11
<
0.2
0.100
121
<
1 0.2
0.100
13
<
0.2
0.100
14
<
0.2
0.100
15
<
0.2
0.100
16
<
0.2
0.100
17
0.6
0.600
18
<
0.2
0.100
19
<
1 0.2
0.100
1201
<
1 0.2
0.100
°
`
Actual
Data
=
1/2DL
21
<
0.2
0.100
22
<
0.2
0.100
23
<
0.2
0.100
24
<
0.2
0.100
251
0.5
0.500
26
<
0.2
0.100
27
1 0.8
10.800
28
<
0.2
0.100
29
<
0.2
0.100
30
0.6
0.600
31
<
0.2
0.100
32
1.0
1.000
33
<
0.2
0.100
34
<
0.2
0.100
35
<
0.2
0.100
36
<
0.2
0.100
37
<
0.2
0.100
38
<
0.2
0.100
39
<
0.2
0.100
401
<
0.2
0.100
°
`
ctua
Data
-
1/2DL
41
1 <
1 0.2
10.100
42
<
0.2
0.100
43
<
0.2
0.100
44
<
0.2
0.100
45
<
0.2
0.100
46
<
0.2
0.100
47
<
0.2
0.100
481
<
1 0.2
0.100
49
<
0.2
0.100
50
<
0.2
0.100
51
<
0.2
0.100
52
<
0.2
0.100
53
<
0.2
0.100
54
<
0.2
0.100
55
<
1 0.2
0.100
56
<
0.2
0.100
57
<
0.2
0.100
58
<
0.2
0.100
59
<
0.2
0.100
60
<
0.2
10.1001
61
<
0.2
10.1001
62
<
1 0.2
0.100
Page 2 of 7

T
. Town of Spindale - Draft NPDES Permit Comments October 3122003
rim
TABLE 2
MR SAMPLES REPORTING OVER MINIMUM DETECTION LEVEL
(Results reported in pg/L)
am
am
MR
n'
n
<
Actual
Data
1/2DL
1
10
0.2
0.2
2
1 17
0.6
0.6
3
25
0.5
0.5
4
27
0.8
0.8
5
30
0.6
0.6
6
1 32
1.0
1 1.0
(2.) Recent Data Consistently Below the Detection Level
The most recent samples taken from March 19, 2002 through the last sample in the data set
(May20, 2003) reported consistent results below the detection limit. This represents 46% of the
samples in the data set and a period of 1 year and 2 months. This is a clear indication of
improvement in the reporting. There can be many reasons for this such as improved sampling and
testing techniques; changes in the influent wastewater; elimination of an unknown source of
sample contamination, etc. Based on samples take over the last year, the town questions
NCDENR's position that the WWTP plant effluent demonstrates a potential problem for mercury.
(3.) Modifying Sample Data
Fifty six (56) of the samples in Table 1 reported a result of less than detection level of 0.200 pg/L.
For all 56 of these samples NCDENR entered a value of one-half the detection level of TM-254.1,
or 0.100 Ng/L. Consequently, 90% of the samples in the data set were assumed to have and thus
"reported" to have concentrations of mercury eight (8) times higher than the state's water quality
�+ criterion of 0.012 pg/L. The town has begun testing according to EPA Test Method 1631. The
first sample to be analyzed under this new method was taken September 30, 2003 and the result
was 0.010 pg/L. This initial test has indicated a level of mercury in the effluent ten (10) times
lower than the assumed value of 0.100 pg/L. It is theoretically possible that the samples reporting
less than the minimum detection level were in the range of 0.010 pg/L versus the value of
0.100 pg/L assumed by NCDENR. The town objects to NCDENR utilizing assumed or
calculated data to conduct an RPA. If the data is not adequate for use in conducting an RPA due
to the limitations of the sampling and testing methods used to secure the data, then additional data
must be secured that has the requisite level of detection.
Resolution:
In order to obtain appropriate data for the RPA for mercury, it is suggested that the re -issued
permit call for monitoring only for mercury utilizing the new sampling and testing techniques to
build the data set needed to conduct the RPA for mercury.
Potential for Contamination of Future Samples Even if the Method 1631 is used
Sample contamination was raised above in connection with the existing data set. The town is
compelled to raise the issue of sample contamination in connection with future samples as well.
Despite the new methods and procedures to sample and test for mercury, the ease of sample
"" Page 3 of 7

"1
Town of Spindale - Draft NPDES Permit Comments October 31, 2003
contamination is significant. The following quotations are excerpts from EPA's own Method
1631, Revision C. Mercury in Water by Oxidation, Purge and Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic
Fluorescence Spectrometry, March 2001.
■ "The ease of contaminating ambient water samples with mercury and interfering substances cannot be
overemphasized." (pg. 1)
■ "Samples may become contaminated by numerous routes. Potential sources of trace metals contamination
during sampling include: metallic or metal -containing labware, containers, sampling equipment, reagents,
and reagent water, improperly cleaned or stored equipment, labware, and reagents; and atmospheric inputs
such as dirt and dust. Even human contact can be a source of trace metals contamination. For example, it
,.., has been demonstrated that dental work... in the mouths of laboratory personnel can contaminate samples
directly exposed to exhalation." (page 3)
■ "Avoid sources of contamination —Avoid contamination by being aware of potential sources and routes of
contamination." EPA then lists the following sources of potential contamination with a discussion for each
(a) carryover, (b) other samples, (c) indirect contact, (d) airborne particulate matter and (e) reagents. These
are just some of the potential sources and the ease with which a sample can be contaminated can be quickly
determined by reading these sections in TM- 1631.
MR
This raises significant concerns to the Town of Spindale. It is important to note that coal fired
power plants alone emit several tons of mercury into the atmosphere each year. Realizing the ease
OR with which samples can be contaminated, and that airborne particles are a key source, the town
takes note that there is a coal-fired power plant in Cliffside, not far from the Town of Spindale.
There are other coal-fired power plants in the state and adjoining states as well. The National
FW Atmospheric Deposition Program, Mercury Deposition Network, has a monitoring station in
Richland County South Carolina, Station SC19, that is approximately 125 miles (direct) from the
Town of Spindale. This data reveals atmospheric concentrations many times over the water
quality criterion on several occasions. See Appendix A. Due to the significant potential of sample
contamination from many sources, the town questions the ability to provide NCDENR with true
representative samples and true test results of total mercury in the town's wastewater treatment
► plant effluent. The question is raised as to whether or not another method to determine
compliance with federal and state water quality limits can be used. The constituent of concern is
methylmercury; this is the substance that bioaccumulates in the food chain and results in humans
ingesting it through fish consumption. There is no site -specific evidence of the amount of
mercury in the wastewater treatment plant effluent that is converted by bacteria to methylmercury
and the amount of methylmercury uptake in edible fish. The town asks if there are other ways to
sample and test for methylmercury impact to the receiving stream.
Water Ouality Criterion
Putting aside the issue of sample contamination the town wishes to raise another issue regarding
the proposed mercury limits. The draft permit includes for the first time a Daily Maximum Limit
(DML) for mercury as shown in Table 3. EPA's current water quality criteria for total mercury
(freshwater aquatic life) are 0.77 Ng/L (chronic) and 1.4 pg/L (acute). NCDENR used a chronic
water quality criterion of 0.012 Ng/L to develop the draft permit limits. If the EPA 0.77 Ng/L
(chronic) value were used by NCDENR, the corresponding values would be several times higher.
See Table 3 for a comparison.
no
om
no Page 4 of 7

Town of Spindale - Draft NPDES Permit Comments October 31, 2003
TABLE 3
PROPOSED MERCURY LIMITS
Draft Permit Limits Based on Revised Limits Based on EPA Criterion of 0.77
NCDENR Criterion of 0.012 pg/L I Ng/L
A. (L) 0.06 pg/L for the 3.0 MGD tier A. (1.) 4.09 pg/L — over 68 times the draft permit
A. (2.) 0.05 pg/L for the 4.5 MGD tier limit
A. (3.) 0.04 pg/L for the 6.0 MGD tier A. (2.) 2.98 pg/L — over 59 times the draft permit
limit
A. (3.) 2.43 pg/L — over 60 times the draft permit
limit
The town asks NCDENR to use the EPA water quality criterion of 0.77 pg/L.
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS (RPA) FOR ALL TOXICS
NCDENR statistically evaluated all daily (24-hour composite) values to estimate the maximum
expected daily value. The daily values should have been converted to 4-day averages in
accordance with determinations for chronic criteria. The town rejects this methodology and
requests that NCDENR utilize the procedures discussed in the EPA Technical Support Document
for Water Quality Based Toxics Control (EPA/505/2-90-001) to convert the data to a four -day
average for all the toxics. (See comments above pertaining to the existing data set for mercury.)
TOTAL RESIDUAL CHLORINE (TRC)
Based on the water quality criterion in the federal regulations of 17 µg/L, the effluent limit for
TRC should be 90 µg/L (0.09 mg/L). The Fact Sheet indicated that a lower limit was imposed
because of a newly implemented TRC standard for all waters of the state. However, that data was
not provided in the Fact Sheet. Please provide this policy or standard so that the town may review
the method of determination.
DAILY MAXIMUM TOXICS LIMITS
The Fact Sheet shows the NCDENR computed daily maximum limits for nickel, mercury and
selenium using a value described as "1/2 FAV." The Fact Sheet does not adequately explain this
procedure for the derivation of these values. Without an adequate explanation in the Fact Sheet,
the town cannot evaluate properly the establishment of these limits. The town requests NCDENR
provide the background information on the derivation of the daily maximum limits allowing the
town the opportunity to review and comment on them.
rim
WEEKLY AVERAGE AMMONIA LIMITS
NCDENR has established a weekly average ammonia limit in the draft NPDES permit; the
existing permit does not have a weekly average ammonia limit. The weekly average ammonia
limit is based on NCDENR policy as contained in the NCDENR October 15, 2002 memorandum
OR from S. Wilson to C. Sullins. The town objects to NCDENR establishing a permit limit based on
policy.
am Page 5 of 7

r" * Fr
Town of Spindale - Draft NPDES Permit Comments October 31, 2003
MR
Regarding the policy as contained in the above named memorandum, the town would like to make
,M the following comment. The 3X multiplier was chosen using a very small sample of eight (8)
municipal dischargers. It is assumed that the municipal dischargers selected represent typical
properly operated and maintained wastewater treatment plants. The multiplier was also based on
selecting the 95t' percentile of actual weekly averages versus monthly averages, this will
invariably lead to the value calculated being exceeded over the life of the permit. In order for the
value not to be exceeded, the town would have to operate its wastewater system significantly
better than the typical wastewater treatment plants represented in the sample. This limit is
supposed to be a technology -based limit that a well run wastewater treatment plant can meet.
However, by using the 95 percentile this creates a limit that a well -run municipal wastewater
treatment plant will eventually violate due to the fact that 5% of the values have been deemed
unacceptable by NCDENR. The town challenges the method utilized in the policy.
PART II — SECTION A. (7) EFFLUENT POLLUTANT SCAN
NCDENR has included the requirement of an annual priority pollutant scan in the NPDES permit
under Section A. (7). The justification for doing so is as follows:
`By performing this scan concurrent with your toxicity test (at different times of the year), you will
be able to collect sufficient data for the new renewal application required by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA)."
F, EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99), the form for an NPDES renewal application, states:
"At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no
more than four and one-half years old."
The Town of Spindale intends to secure the priority pollutant scans required by the application
form within the next five (5) years of the re -issued permit cycle. The town objects to NCDENR
placing as a condition of its NPDES permit a requirement to secure this information.
WET TESTING
The town has had to conduct WET testing in the past on a quarterly basis which amounts to a
�, minimum of 20 WET tests per life of the permit. Additional sampling is necessary if the WET test
fails. The town requests relief from WET testing. It is requested that if all WET tests pass over a
two-year period that WET testing can then be suspended until it is time to conduct WET testing
�+ for the next permit renewal which would occur in the fifth year of the permit.
PART III - 40CFR122.42
See page 12 of 16, PART III, OTHER REQUIREMENTS. This section of the draft NPDES
permit adds the following language to the NPDES permit that was not included in the previous
permit.
ran "Section C. Changes in Discharges of Toxic Substances
The Permittee shall notify the Permit Issuing Authority as soon as it knows or has reason to believe
(40 CFR 122.42):
OR a. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in the discharge, on a routine or
frequent basis, of any toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed
the highest of the following "notification levels";
(1) One hundred micrograms per liter (100 µg/L);
�+ (2) Two hundred micrograms per liter (200 µg/L) for Acrolein and acrylonitrile; five hundred
micrograms per liter (500 µg/L) for 2.4-dinitrophenol and for 2-methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol; and one
milligram per liter (1 mg/L) for antimony;
(3) Five times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit
application.
an Page 6 of 7

MR t
Town of Spindale - Draft NPDES Permit Comments October 31, 2003
b. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in any discharge, on a non -
routine or infrequent basis, of a toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge
will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels";
(1) Five hundred micrograms per liter (500 µg/L);
(2) One milligram per liter (1 mg/L) for antimony;
(3) Ten times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit
application."
The above language that was included in the draft permit is only part of paragraph (a) of 40 CFR
on 122.42. The language at the beginning of paragraph (a) was not included in the draft permit but it
is quoted below.
"§ 122.42 Additional conditions applicable to specified categories of NPDES permits (applicable to
State NPDES programs, see § 123.25).
A' The following conditions, in addition to those set forth in § 122.41, apply to all NPDES permits
within the categories specified below:
(a) Existing manufacturing, commercial, mining, and silvicultural dischargers. In addition to the
reporting requirements under § 122.41 (1), all existing manufacturing, commercial, mining, and
silvicultural dischargers must notify the Director as soon as they know or have reason to believe:"
By its own admission, the statute states that this regulation applies only to "existing
SIR manufacturing, commercial, mining, and silvicultural dischargers." This language was not
intended for municipal wastewater treatment plants.
MR Since the new language added under PART III does not apply to municipal wastewater treatment
plants, it should not be included in the Town of Spindale's NPDES Permit. The town objects to
NCDENR adding this language to the new permit and asks NCDENR to strike it from the final
rm NPDES Permit.
SAMPLING AND TESTING COSTS
ra+ The town estimates that the sampling and testing costs alone to comply with the draft permit as
written will costa minimum of $53,000 over the life of the permit, not adjusted for inflation. See
Appendix B. This alone places a financial burden on the town during a period when the annual
ran operation and maintenance budget for the wastewater treatment plant is already strained.
MR
M
am
GENERAL COMMENT
The draft permit contained several issues of significant concern to the Town of Spindale. The
town requested a 30-day extension in order to review all the elements of the permit, however, this
request was denied. The above comments are those the town has been able to determine within
the time allotted to it to conduct their review. There may be other concerns that come to light as
the town continues to review the draft permit.
Page 7 of 7

' ' NADP Site Information
Page 1 of 1
�' Home AIRMoN MD_N Search
Z, Contacts Site Map Site List Data Access
National Atmospheric Deposition Program
NADP/MDN Monitoring Location SC19
Station
Location
Dates of
Operation
Latitude
Longitude
Elevation
USGS 1:24000
Map Name
Congaree Swamp (SC19)
Richland County, South
Carolina
3/14/1995 - present
33.8145
-80.7809
145 meters
Gadsden
Operating South Carolina Division of Air More Site Photographs
Agency Quality 2000 Site Survey Large Small
Sponsoring South Carolina Division of Air (10)
Agency Quality
— NADP/MDN Wet Deposition
Data Available
— Transition Phase Data
1996-1997 Weekly Data
1998-200.2_Weekiv Data
http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/sites/siteinfo.asp?id=SC19&net--MDN 10/30/2003

' MDN Weekly Data Page 1 of 9
National Atmospheric Deposition Program/MDN
Weekly Mercury Concentrations and Depositions
Site Date Date Subppt Pptrec HgConc HgDep QR Sample Not(
On Off mm mm ng/L ng/mz Type
SC19 12/31/1997 01/06/1998 27.9 27.9 5.8 162.9 B W m
SC19 01/06/1998 01/14/1998 57.0 9.4 533.6 B W dhm
SC19 01/14/1998 02/09/199 116.8 : 116.8 7.1 833.7 B W em
SC19 02/09/1998 02/17/1998 61.0 61.0 3.7 227.7 B w dhm
SI C19 02/17/1998 02/24/1998 21.6 21.6 15 0 . 324.2 B W dm
SC�19 02/24/1998 03/03/1 6 23.1 23.1 18.91 437.3 B W m
S� C19 103/03/1998 03/25/1998 90.9 90.9 17.1J 1557.7 B W ern
SC19 03/25/1998 03/31/1998 0.0 0.0 --... 0.0 B D m
SC19 03/31/1998 04/29/1998 106.7 106.7 15.4 1638.5 B W ehm
SC19 04/29/1998 05/07/1998 41.6 -- 6.51 271.5 B W dhm
SC19 05/07/1998 05/13/1998 41.9 - 18.4 768.1 B W dm
SC19 05/13/1998,05/19/1998 5.8 11.0 63.3 B w hm
SC19 05/19/1998 05/26/1998 0.0 0.0 4i C w vhm
SC19 05/26/1998 06/02/1998 1.0 1.0 161.3 163.9 B W hml
SC19 06/02/1998 06/09/1998 23.1 23.1 22.6' 5
23.4 B W dm
SC19 06/09/1998 T06/16/1998 11.0 -- 15.2 167.8 B W dm
SC19 06/16/1998 06/23/1998 13.7 13.7 18.3 250.3 B W dhm
SC19 06/23/1998 06/30/1998 1.8 1.8 34.8 62.0 B W hm
SC19 06/30/1998 07/07/1998 5.7 6.537.0 B W m
SC19 07/07/1998 07/14/1998 0.0 0.0 -- 0.0 B D dhm
SC19 07/14/1998 07/21/1998 72.5 -- 20.7 1497.1 I B W hm
SC19 07/21/1998 07/28/1998 38.7 9.6 371.9 B W hm
SC19 07/28/1998 08/04/1998 0.3 31.4 10.7 B T hmi
SC19 08/04/1998 08/11/1998 36.7 12.4 455.0 B W hm
littp://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/nadpdata/mdnReport98.asp 10/30/2003

MDN Weekly Data
Page 2 of 9
f"
rm►
MR
am
f"
fm
f"
fm
m"
M,
S"
mq
MR
mm
MR
SC19
1 08/11/1998
08/18/1998
90.2
--
12.1
1094.5
B
W
hm
SC19
08/18/1998
08/25/1998
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
08/25/1998
09/01/1998
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
hm
SC19
09/01/1998
09/08/1998
144.0
--
4.6
669.4
B
W
m
SC19
09/08/1998
09/15/1998
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
09/15/1998
09/22/1998
10.8
--
11.0
119.4
B
W
m
SC19
09/22/1998
09/29/1998
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
09/29/1998
10/06/1998
2.0
2.0
20.2
41.0
B
W
m
SC19
10/06/1998
10/13/1998
3.6
3.6
9.0
32.0
B
W
hm
SC19
10/13/1998
10/20/1998
0.0
--
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
10/20/1998
10/27/1998
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
10/27/1998
11/04/1998
0.8
0.8
21.0
16.0
B
W
mi
SC19
11/04/1998
11/10/1998
1.3
1.3
24.7
31.3
B
W
mi
SC19
11/10/1998
11/17/1998
11.9
11.9
8.1
96.7
B
W
hm
SC19
11/17/1998
11/24/1998
0.4
--
18.6
7.6
B
T
mi
SC19
11/24/1998
12/01/1998
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
hm
SC19
12/01/1998
12/08/1998
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
12/08/1998
12/15/1998
10.5
--
7.3
77.3
B
W
m
SC19
12/15/1998
12/22/1998
29.5
--
4.0
117.9
B
W
m
SC19
12/22/1998
12/29/1998
24.0
--
6.8
163.1
B
W
m
SC19
12/29/1998
01/05/1999
--
--
--
--
C
W
chm
SC19
01/05/1999
01/12/1999
0.3
--
12.3
4.3
B
W
im
SC19
01/12/1999
01/19/1999
30.7
--
7.2
219.4
B
W
m
SC19
01/19/1999
01/26/1999
48.6
--
4.9
237.8
B
W
dm
SC19
01/26/1999
02/02/1999
33.7
--
6.5
219.7
B
W
dm
SC19
02/02/1999
02/09/1999
4.4
--
7.2
32.0
B
W
m
SC19
02/09/1999
02/16/1999
0.7
--
20.5
14.1
B
T
dmi
SC19
02/16/1999
02/23/1999
8.3
--
11.8
98.1
B
W
hm
SC19
02/23/1999
03/02/1999
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
hdm
i
i
am
http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/nadpdata/mdnReport98.asp
10/30/2003

I • MDN Weekly Data
Page 3 of 9
Fm
L-j
No
Ism
ram
IOR
f"
ram
f"
p"
p,
F"
FM
FIR
MR
am
SC19
1 03/02/1999
03/09/1999
5.8
--
6.6
38.2
B
w
hdm
SC19
03/09/1999
03/16/1999
12.5
--
34.6
432.3
B
w
hdm
SCi9
03/16/1999
03/23/1999
7.4
7.4
71.7
528.5
B
w
hdm
SC19
03/23/1999
03/30/1999
13.5
13.5
8.8
118.8
B
w
hdm
SC19
03/30/1999
04/06/1999
15.5
--
11.4
177.4
B
w
hdm
SC19
04/06/1999
04/13/1999
0.4
--
48.1
17.5
B
T
dmi
SC19
04/13/1999
04/20/1999
2.1
--
11.8
24.6
B
w
hdm
SC19
04/20/1999
04/27/1999
0.0
--
--
0.0
B
T
dm
SC19
04/27/1999
05/04/1999
90.1
--
5.2
465.8
B
w
hdm
SC19
05/04/1999
05/11/1999
14.5
--
12.9
187.1
B
w
dm
SC19
05/11/1999
05/18/1999
2.5
--
16.4
40.9
B
w
dm
SC19
05/18/1999
05/25/1999
4.6
--
12.2
55.8
B
w
dm
SC19
05/25/1999
06/01/1999
0.0
--
--
0.0
B
D
dm
SC19
06/01/1999
06/08/1999
2.6
--
11.9
31.3
B
w
dm
SC19
06/08/1999
06/15/1999
28.8
--
8.8
252.8
B
w
hdm
SC19
06/15/1999
06/22/1999
36.3
36.3
5.2
188.3
B
w
hdm
SC19
06/22/1999
06/29/1999
75.9
--
5.7
433.3
B
w
m
SC19
06/29/1999
07/06/1999
17.5
17.5
--
--
C
w
fm
SC19
07/06/1999
07/13/1999
51.8
51.8
10.7
552.6
B
w
hdm
SCi9
07/13/1999
07/20/1999
15.5
15.5
6.9
106.1
B
w
dm
SC19
07/20/1999
07/27/1999
6.9
--
47.0
323.2
B
w
dm
SCi9
07/27/1999
08/03/1999
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
hm
SC19
08/03/1999
08/10/1999
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
08/10/1999
08/17/1999
41.7
41.7
15.3
635.5
B
w
hdm
SCi9
08/17/1999
08/24/1999
30.2
30.2
23.7
716.2
B
w
hdm
SCi9
08/24/1999
08/31/1999
2.5
2.5
30.8
78.2
B
w
dm
SC19
08/31/ 1999
09/07/ 1999
9.4
9.4
14.4
135.0
B
w
dm
SC19
09/07/1999
09/14/1999
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
m
SCi9
09/14/1999
09/21/1999
63.5
63.5
6.6
416.4
B
w
hdm:
p"
http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/nadpdata/mdnReport98.asp
10/30/2003

MDN Weekly Data
Page 4 of 9
FM
am
MR
rim
FM
am
MR
MR
fam
p"
f"
f,
F"
M
P,
w.
SC19
09/21/1999
09/28/1999
50.8
50.8
8.4
424.0
B
w
hm
SC19
09/28/1999
10/05/1999
26.9
26.9
10.0
268.8
B
w
m
SC19
10/05/1999
10/12/1999
2.8
2.8
7.0
19.5
B
w
dm
SC19
10/12/1999
10/19/1999
71.4
3.0
215.1
B
w
hdm
SC19
10/19/1999
10/26/1999
6.1
6.1
6.5
39.6
B
w
dm
SC19
10/26/1999
11/03/1999
3.3
3.3
9.5
31.5
B
w
dm
SC19
11/03/ 1999
11/09/ 1999
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
dm
SC19
11/09/1999
11/16/1999
3.5
--
24.8
87.4
B
w
dm
SC19
11/16/1999
11/23/1999
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
dmz
SC19
11/23/1999
11/30/1999
12.0
--
7.0
83.7
B
w
dm
SC19
11/30/ 1999
12/07/ 1999
3.3
--
11.4
38.2
B
w
dm
SC19
12/07/1999
12/15/1999
9.7
9.7
12.2
117.7
B
w
dm
SC19
12/15/1999
12/21/1999
39.1
39.1
--
--
C
w
fdmz
SC19
12/21/1999
12/28/1999
2.0
2.0
--
--
C
w
fdmz
SC19
12/28/1999
01/04/2000
9.1
9.1
--
--
C
w
fm
SC19
01/04/2000
01/11/2000
39.1
39.1
--
--
C
w
fmz
SC19
01/11/2000
01/18/2000
4.3
4.3
21.6
93.1
B
w
dmz
SCi9
01/18/2000
02/08/2000
132.3
--
4.4
579.4
B
w
ehdr
SC19
02/15/2000
02/22/2000
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
zm
SC19
02/22/2000
02/29/2000
7.6
7.6
10.4
79.3
B
w
dm
SCi9
02/29/2000
03/07/2000
17.5
17.5
5.1
90.1
B
w
dm
SC19
03/07/2000
03/14/2000
24.4
24.4
26.6
650.2
B
w
dhm
SC19
03/14/2000
03/21/2000
57.2
57.2
4.3
244.9
B
w
dm
SC19
03/21/2000
03/30/2000
3.3
3.3
--
--
C
w
evfd i
SC19
03/30/2000
04/04/2000
0.8
0.8
50.4
38.4
B
w
sdmi
SCi9
04/04/2000
04/11/2000
4.8
4.8
11.1
53.4
B
w
dhm
SC19
04/11/2000
04/18/2000
16.3
16.3
6.9
112.9
B
w
dm
SCi9
04/18/2000
04/25/2000
2.3
2.3
22.0
50.7
B
w
dm
SC19
04/25/2000
05/02/2000
19.3
19.3
15.8
305.9
B
w
dhm
0"
http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/nadpdata/mdnReport98.asp
10/30/2003

'�' ' MDN Weekly Data
i
Page 5 of 9
am
no
fm
fm
fam
Mn
Faq
MR
p"
rm
f"
F"
no
SC19
05/02/2000
05/09/2000
2.5
2.5
17.2
43.6
B
w
hm
SC19
05/09/2000
05/16/2000
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
dm
SC19
05/16/2000
05/23/2000
17.8
17.8
9.6
169.9
B
w
m
SC19
05/23/2000
05/30/2000
30.0
30.0
16.6
496.5
B
w
dm
SC19
05/30/2000
06/06/2000
14.5
14.5
7.6
110.4
B
w
m
SC19
06/06/2000
06/13/2000
67.2
--
0.3
17.3
B
w
hm
SC19
06/13/2000
06/21/2000
48.8
48.8
17.9
872.0
B
w
dm
SC19
06/21/2000
06/27/2000
8.3
8.3
20.2
166.7
B
w
dm
SC19
06/27/2000
07/03/2000
36.1
36.1
13.7
493.0
B
w
dm
SC19
07/03/2000
07/11/2000
59.8
59.8
15.9
949.9
B
w
dm
SC19
07/11/2000
07/18/2000
3.4
3.4
19.8
67.8
B
w
dm
SC19
07/18/2000
07/25/2000
12.2
12.2
7.6
92.2
B
w
dm
SC19
07/25/2000
08/01/2000
8.0
8.0
29.8
238.3
B
w
d
SC19
08/01/2000
08/08/2000
81.8
81.8
15.5
1268.0
B
w
dm
SC19
08/08/2000
08/15/2000
24.4
24.4
20.6
504.8
B
w
dm
SC19
08/15/2000
08/22/2000
0.1
--
46.7
4.7
B
T
mi
SC19
08/22/2000
08/29/2000
5.3
5.3
16.1
85.9
B
w
d
SC19
08/29/2000
09/05/2000
36.3
36.3
6.1
222.5
B
w
d h m
SC19
09/05/2000
09/12/2000
8.0
8.0
--
--
C
w
ufd
SC19
09/12/2000
09/19/2000
20.3
20.3
6.5
131.9
B
w
d
SC19
09/19/2000
09/26/2000
112.5
112.5
10.0
1126.9
B
w
dhm
SC19
09/26/2000
10/03/2000
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
10/03/2000
10/10/2000
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
A
D
SC19
10/10/2000
10/17/2000
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
A
D
SC19
10/17/2000
10/24/2000
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
A
D
SC19
10/24/2000
10/31/2000
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
A
D
SC19
10/31/2000
11/07/2000
1.8
1.8
6.9
12.3
B
w
m
SC19
11/07/2000
11/14/2000
5.1
5.1
--
--
C
w
vm
SCi9
11/14/2000
11/21/2000
37.0
37.0
--
--
C
w
fhm
http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/nadpdata/mdnRepori98.asp
10/30/2003

MDN Weekly Data
Page 6 of 9
no
am
MR
m
MR
M
f"
f"
r"
am
m"
MR
w.
m
SC19 1
11/21/2000
11/28/2000
49.3
49.3
--
--
C
W
vfm
SC19
11/28/2000
12/05/2000
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
zm
SC19
12/05/2000
12/12/2000
2.8
2.8
--
--
C
W
vfhm
SC19
12/12/2000
12/19/2000
3.9
3.9
18.3
70.9
B
W
dzm
SC19
12/19/2000
12/26/2000
2.7
2.7
--
--
C
W
fhm
SC19
01/16/2001
01/23/2001
23.9
23.9
11.2
266.9
B
W
dm
SC19
01/23/2001
01/30/2001
1.9
1.9
11.8
22.4
B
W
dmh
SC19
01/30/2001
02/06/2001
6.0
6.0
10.9
64.9
B
W
dm
SC19
02/06/2001
02/13/2001
23.5
23.5
4.8
112.8
B
W
dmh
SC19
02/13/2001
02/20/2001
9.1
9.1
5.7
52.4
B
W
dm
SC19
02/20/2001
02/27/2001
32.3
32.3
4.0
129.7
B
W
dmh
SC19
02/27/2001
03/06/2001
51.8
51.8
5.8
299.0
B
W
dm
SC19
03/06/2001
03/ 13/2001
6.1
--
19.5
119.0
B
W
m h
SC19
03/13/2001
03/20/2001
42.3
42.3
6.8
289.1
B
W
dm
SC19
03/20/2001
03/28/2001
25.3
25.3
0.4
9.1
B
W
dmh
SC19
03/28/2001
04/03/2001
34.4
34.4
10.3
353.0
B
W
d
SC19
04/03/2001
04/10/2001
1.8
1.8
23.8
42.4
B
W
dm
SC19
04/10/2001
04/17/2001
2.7
--
17.1
46.6
B
W
dm
SC19
04/17/2001
04/24/2001
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
04/24/2001
05/01/2001
7.2
7.2
16.8
120.7
B
W
dm
SC19
05/01/2001
05/08/2001
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
mh
SC19
05/08/2001
05/15/2001
63.0
63.0
12.9
814.9
B
W
d
SC19
05/15/2001
05/22/2001
0.9
0.9
--
--
C
W
v
SC19
05/22/2001
05/29/2001
73.7
73.7
6.3
460.8
B
W
d
SC19
05/29/2001
06/05/2001
4.8
4.8
20.2
97.4
B
W
d
SC19
06/05/2001
06/12/2001
10.2
10.2
13.6
138.0
B
W
dzh
SC19
06/12/2001
06/19/2001
50.3
50.3
8.9
445.5
B
W
dh
SC19
06/19/2001
06/26/2001
57.1
57.1
13.3
760.0
B
W
dz
SC19
06/26/2001
07/03/2001
25.1
25.1
21.6
542.2
B
W
dmz
am
http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/nadpdata/mdnReport98.asp
10/30/2003

FNq MDN Weekly Data
Page 7 of 9
rap
raq
rim
fm
MR
tam
m"
am
SC19
1 07/03/2001
07/10/2001
42.2
42.2
13.3
561.3
B
W
dmzl
SC19
07/10/2001
07/17/2001
6.6
6.6
19.1
126.1
B
W
dmz
SC19
07/17/2001
07/24/2001
20.1
20.1
8.1
162.8
B
W
dmz
SC19
07/24/2001
07/31/2001
28.3
28.3
12.2
345.3
B
w
dm
SC19
07/31/2001
08/07/2001
0.2
--
64.2
12.8
B
T
mi
SC19
08/07/2001
08/14/2001
32.0
32.0
8.3
265.6
B
w
dmz
SC19
08/14/2001
08/21/2001
13.2
13.2
23.0
303.6
B
W
dmz
SC19
08/21/2001
08/28/2001
0.0
--
--
0.0
B
D
dmz
SC19
08/28/2001
09/04/2001
75.2
75.2
15.1
1135.5
B
W
dmz
SC19
09/04/2001
09/11/2001
6.4
6.4
11.4
73.0
B
w
dm
SC19
09/11/2001
09/18/2001
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
09/18/2001
09/25/2001
19.0
19.1
8.0
152.0
B
W
dmzl
SC19
09/25/2001
10/02/2001
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
10/01/2001
10/09/2001
44.2
44.2
5.7
251.9
B
W
dm
SC19
10/09/2001
10/16/2001
14.0
14.0
5.8
81.2
B
W
dm
SC19
10/16/2001
10/23/2001
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
mh
SC19
10/23/2001
10/30/2001
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
10/30/2001
11/06/2001
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
dm
SC19
11/06/2001
11/13/2001
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
11/13/2001
11/20/2001
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
dm
SC19
11/20/2001
11/27/2001
21.8
21.8
9.2
200.6
B
W
dmh
SC19
11/27/2001
12/04/2001
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
12/04/2001
12/ 11/2001
6.0
6.0
7.2
43.2
B
W
dm
SC19
12/11/2001
12/18/2001
6.4
6.4
7.0
44.8
B
W
dm
SC19
12/18/2001
12/26/2001
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
12/26/2001
01/02/2002
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
dmh
SC19
01/02/2002
01/08/2002
7.1
--
2.1
15.0
B
W
dm
SC19
01/08/2002
01/15/2002
20.8
20.8
2.8
58.3
B
W
dmh
SC19
01/15/2002
01/22/2002
10.3
10.3
9.7
99.8
B
w
dm
i
I
http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/nadpdata/mdnReport98.asp
10/30/2003

'ow' ' MDN Weekly Data
Page 8 of 9
mm
wo
m"
run
0"
f"
m"
p"
MR
me
fan
M"
r^
M"
mm
no
SC19
1 01/22/2002
01/29/2002
5.2
5.2
9.7
50.5
B
W
dm
SC19
01/29/2002
02/05/2002
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
02/05/2002
02/ 12/2002
37.0
--
4.2
155.3
B
W
dm
SC19
02/12/2002
02/19/2002
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
02/19/2002
02/26/2002
0.6
--
26.8
14.7
B
T
dmi
SC19
02/26/2002
03/05/2002
37.7
--
3.2
120.6
B
W
dm
SC19
03/05/2002
03/12/2002
10.5
--
6.7
70.1
B
W
mh
SC19
03/12/2002
03/19/2002
0.0
0.0
16.6
0.0
B
D
d
SC19
03/19/2002
03/26/2002
23.6
--
9.7
228.7
B
W
dm
SC19
03/26/2002
04/02/2002
60.6
--
13.5
820.6
B
W
dmh
SC19
04/02/2002
04/09/2002
0.0
--
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
04/09/2002
04/16/2002
16.0
16.0
10.0
160.8
B
W
dm
SC19
04/16/2002
04/23/2002
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
04/23/2002
04/30/2002
5.6
5.6
9.7
54.1
B
W
m
SC19
04/30/2002
05/07/2002
54.4
54.4
12.0
649.8
B
W
dmh
SC19
05/07/2002
05/14/2002
76.2
76.2
10.0
759.2
B
W
dm
SC19
05/14/2002
05/21/2002
17.5
17.5
8.9
156.1
B
W
dm
SC19
05/21/2002
05/28/2002
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
m
SC19
05/28/2002
06/04/2002
3.6
3.6
15.0
53.3
B
W
dmzl
SC19
06/04/2002
06/11/2002
8.2
--
16.4
135.3
B
W
dmz
SC19
06/11/2002
06/18/2002
1.3
1.3
25.9
32.9
B
W
dmzl
SC19
06/18/2002
06/25/2002
13.8
13.8
10.0
139.1
B
W
dmz
SC19
06/25/2002
07/02/2002
14.6
--
18.9
275.9
B
W
dmzl
SC19
07/02/2002
07/09/2002
3.0
3.0
17.0
51.7
B
W
dmz
SC19
07/09/2002
07/16/2002
2.9
2.9
14.8
43.2
B
W
mz
SC19
07/16/2002
07/23/2002
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
mz
SC19
07/23/2002
07/30/2002
3.6
3.6
24.6
87.4
B
W
dmz
SC19
07/30/2002
08/06/2002
21.6
21.6
36.3
784.5
B
W
dmzl
SC19
08/06/2002
08/13/2002
3.3
3.3
22.0
72.6
B
W
dmz
no
h4://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/nadpdata/mdnReport98.asp
10/30/2003

M ,' MDN Weekly Data Page 9 of 9
SC19
08/13/2002
08/20/2002
42.3 42.3
11.5I
484.2
B
W
dmzl
SC19
08/20/2002
08/27/2002
17.0
17.0
17.6
299.3
B
W
mz
SC19
08/27/2002
09/03/2002
74.7,
74.7
7.91
592.0
B
W
m
SC19
09/03/2002
09/10/2002
0.0
0.0
--
0.0 :
B
D
mZ
SC19
09/10/2002
09/17/2002
48.9
48.9:
8.61
421.3
B
W
mzh
SC19
09/17/2002
09/24/2002
11.2
11.2
13.0
145.2
B
W
mzh
SC19
09/24/2002
10/01/2002
42.7
42.7
2.7
115.2
B
W
dmz
SC19
10/01/2002
10/08/2002
0.0
0.0
0.0
B
D
mz
SC19
10/08/2002
10/15/2002 ;
54.4
54.4
7.31
396.8
B
!W
dmZ
SC19
10/15/2002
10/22/2002
11.4
11.4
5.51
62.9
B
W
mz
SC19
10/22/2002
10/29/2002
46.9
46.9
10.0
468.6
B
W
dmzl
SC19
10/29/2002
11/05/2002
2.0
2.0
25.4
51.6
B
I W
mzh
SC19
11/05/2002
11/12/2002
47.2
47.2
10.71
505.5
B
W
dmz
SC19
11/12/2002
11/19/2002 !
_
31.5
31.51
5.71
179.5
B
W
I
dmz
SC19
11/19/2002
11/26/2002
0.0
0.0
--
0.0
B
D
i
dmz
SC19
11/26/2002
12/03/2002
0.0
0.0
0.0
B
D
dmz
SC19
12/03/2002
12/10/2002 '
12.3
12.3
12.8
157.7
B
W
mzh
SC19
12/10/2002
12/17/2002
39.4
39.4
8.8
346.5
B
W
dmzI
SC19
12/17/2002
12/23/2002
11.3
11.3
12.3
139.0
B
' W
zh
SC19
12/23/2002
12/31/2002
39.4
39.4
11.0
433.1
B
W
dmzl
http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/nadpdata/mdnReport98.asp
10/30/2003

FR 1 1 MR
* O�

TOWN OF SPINDALE, NC - DRAFT NPDES PERMIT LIMITS
COMPARISON WITH EXISTING LIMITS
Abbreviations
C = composite
U = upstream
G = Grab
D = downstream
WET P/F 300/sample
Note: The unit cost for mercury includes the cost of sampling according to EPA Method 1669
and testing according to EPA Method 1631. The town does not have the resources to perform
sampling according to EPA Method 1669.
Kurt D. Wright Associates, Inc.

TOWN OF SPINDALE, NC - DRAFT NPDES PERMIT LIMITS
COMPARISON WITH EXISTING LIMITS
DRAFT' PERMIT LIMITS for3.0 MGD
EXISTING PERMIT LIMITS
PARAMETERS
Monthly
Average
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measrmnt
Fregncy
Sample
Type
Locatio
SampleF25.5
Weekly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measrmnt
Fregncy
Sample
Type
Sample
Location
I low
3.0 MGD
Cont.
Recordin
I or E
Cont.
Recording
1 or E
BOD, 5-day, 20 deg. C.
(Apr I -Oct 31)
mo. avg. <
85%removal
Daily
C
E& I
38.2 mg/L
mo. avg._
85%removal
Daily
C
E&I
BOD, 5-day, 20 deg. C.
(Nov 1 - Mar 31)
Dail y
C
E & I38.2
m �'
Dail y
C
E & I
BOD, 5-day, 20 deg. C.
22.5 m
38.2 m
Daily
C
E & I
N/A
I N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
TSS
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
C
E & 1
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
C
E & I
NH3 (Apr 1 - Oct 31)
4.4 mgfL
113.2 mgfL
Daily
C
E
10.0 mg/L
Daily
C
E
NH3(Nov 1 - Mar 31)
10.6 mg/L
31.8 mg/L
Dail
C
E
10.0 mg/L
Daily
C
E
DO
daily avg. shall be > 6.0 mg/L
Daily
G
E
daily avg. shall be > 6.0 mg/L
Daily
G
E
Fecal Conform (geo. mean)
200 / 100 ml 400 / 100 m1
Daily
G
E
200 / 100 ml 400 / 100 roll
Daily
G
E
TRC
(Effective in 18 months)
1 28 pg/L.
Daily
G
E
Daily
G
E
pH
between 6.0 - 9.0 s.u.
Daily
G
E
between 6.0 - 9.0 S.U.
Daily
G
E
Temp (deg. C)
Daily
G
E
Daily
G
E
Total N
I
Quart.
C
E
Quart.
C
E
Total P
I
Quart.
C
E
Quart.
C
E
Chronic Toxicity
c-daph P/F 19%; Mar, Jun, Sep, Dec
Quart.
C
E
cdaph P/F
Q 26%; Mar, Jun, Sep, Dee
Quart.
C
E
Conductive
(not required)
Daily
G
E
Cadmium
(not required)
7.7 pg/L.
Weekly
C
E
Chromium
(not required)
2/mo
C
E
Cyanide
Quart.
G
E
19.3 pg/L
Weekly
G
E
Total Copper
2/mo
C
E
2/mo
C
E
Total Mercury
0.06 pg(L
Weekly
C
E
2/mo
C
E
Total Nickel
261 pg/L
Weekly
C
E
340.3 PgfL
Weekly
C
E
Total Selenium
27 pg/L
56 pg/L
Weekly
C
E
Weekly
C
E
Total Silver
2/mo
C
E
2/mo
C
E
Total Zinc
2/mo
C
E
2/mo
C
E
Chlorides
2/mo
C
E
2/mo
C
E
Sulfate
2/mo
C
E
2/mo
C
E
Lead
I
not required)
2/mo
C
E
BOD, 5-day, 20 deg. C.
3/week from
Jun I - Sep
3o
t/week from
Oct I - May
31
G
U& D
sample
locations arc
Same es
p revious
3/week from
Jun I -Sep
30
1/week from
Oct I - May
31
G
U& D
NH3
G
G
U & D
DO
G
G
U & D
Fecal Coliform (gee. mean)
G
G
U & D
Temp (deg. C)
G
G
U & D
Conductivity
G
1 G
U& D
Abbreviations
C = composite
E = effluent
mo = month
U = u stream
G = Grab
I Z influent
uart. _;quarterly
D = downstream
Kurt D. Wright Associates, Inc.

October 29, 2003
Ms. Natalie Sierra
NCDENR — DWQ — NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
WRIGHT
Kurt D. Wright & Associates, Inc.
WATER / WASTEWATER ENGINEERING SERVICES
VIA FACSIMILE
[phone]
Hard Copy to Follow
RE: Draft NPDES Permit
Permit NCO020664
Spindale WWTP I OCT 3 1 2003
Rutherford County
Dear Ms. Sierra:
The purpose of this correspondence is to confirm with you our discussions regarding the
submission of comments by the Town of Spindale regarding the draft NPDES permit. The permit
requires the submission of comments no later than thirty (30) days following receipt of the draft
NPDES permit. Based on the date the Town of Spindale received the draft NPDES permit, and
according to our telephone discussions, the deadline for submission of the town's comments is
Friday, October 31, 2003. You indicated it would be acceptable to submit the comments via email
on Friday, October 31, 2003 with a hard copy postmarked to NCDENR that same day.
Kurt D. Wright & Associates, Inc. is assisting the Town of Spindale with the preparation and
submission of the town's review comments. An electronic copy of the comments will be
submitted to you by 3:OOPM on Friday, October 31, 2003 with a hard copy sent via US parcel post
the same day.
If this is not in accordance with your understanding please notify me as soon as possible so that
proper submission of the draft NPDES review comments is not jeopardized. If you should have
any questions regarding the above please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
KURT D. WRIGHT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Kurt Wright, PE, DEE
President
cc: Mr. Tim Barth, Manager
Mr. Bill Hodge, WWTP Superintendent
Solutions for a sustainable environment
163 Heritage Lane Bostic, NC 28018 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Mobile: [phone] www.kdwright.com

PUBLIC NOTICE
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION/NPDES UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1517
NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO ISSUE
A NPDES WASTEWATER PERM
On the basis of thorough staff review and
application of NC General Statute 145.21, Public
law 92-500 and other lawful standards and
regulations, the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission proposes to issue a
National Pollutant Discharge Eimination System
(NPDES) wastewater discharge permit to the
person(s) listed below effective 45 days from the
publish date of this notice.
Written comments regarding the proposed
permit will be accepted until 30 days after the
publish date of this notice. All comments
received prior to that date are considered in the
final determinations regarding the proposed
permit. The Director of the NC Division of Water
Quality may decide to hold a public meeting for
the proposed permit should the Division receive
a significant degree of public. interest.
Copies of the draft permit and other supporting
information on file used to determine conditions
present in the draft permit are available
upon request and payment of the costs of
reproduction. Mail comments rand/or requests
for information to the NC Division of Water
Quality at the above address or call Ms. Valery
Stephens at [phone], extension 520.
Please include the NPDES permit number
(attached) in any communication Interested
persons may also visit the Division of Water
Quality at 512 N Salisbury Street Raleigh, NC
27604-1148 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m to review information on file.
The Town of Spindale (P.O. Box 186,..Spindale,-
NC 28160) has applied for renewal of NPDES
Permit NC 0020664 for its WWiP in Rutherford
County. This permitted facility discharges treated
wastewater to Cathy's Creek in the Broad River
Basin. Currently BOD, ammonia nitrogen, fecal
coliform, oadmiun, cyanide, mercury, nickel, sele-
nium and total residual chlorine are water quality
limited. This discharge may affect future alloca-
tions in this portion of the Broad River Basin.
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
RUTHERFORD COUNTY
)re the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County and State,
commissioned, qualified, and authorized by law to administer
s, personally appeared
HEATHER RHODES
being first duly sworn, deposes and says: that they are
Classified Advertising Representitive
vner, partner, publisher, or other officer or employee authorized to
ke this affidavit) of THE DAILY COURIER, a newspaper
,fished, issued and entered as second class mail In the town of
REST CITY, In said County and State; that they are authorized to
ke thls affidavit and sworn statement; that the notice or other legal
,ertisement, a true copy of which is attached hereto, was published
'HE DAILY COURIER on the following dates:
September 26, 2003
i that said newspaper in which such notice, paper, document, or
al advertisement was published was, at the time of each and every
;h publication, a newspaper meeting all of the requirements and
alifications of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North
rolina and was a qualified newspaper within the meaning of Section
i97 of the General Statutes of North Carolina.
is the 30th day of September, 2003.
to and subscribed before me this the 30th day of September,
2003.
My commission expires: November 21, 2007

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NCO020664
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
Town of Spindale/Spindale WWTP
Applicant Address:
P.O. Box 1869; Spindale, North Carolina 28160
Facility Address:
Ecology Street; Spindale, North Carolina 28160
Permitted Flow
3.0 MGD, 4.5 MGD, 6.0 MGD (phasedpermit)
Type of Waste:
Domestic (22%) and industrial (78%) with full pretreatment program
Facility/Permit Status:
Class IV/Active; Renewal
Count
Rutherford County
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
Catheys Creek
Regional Office:
Asheville (ARO)
Stream Classification:
C
State Grid / USGS Quad:
F11NW
303(d) Listed?
Yes
Permit Writer:
Natalie V. Sierra
Subbasin:
03-08-02
Date:
September 12, 2003
Drainage Area (mi):
41.6
- Lat. 350 22' 52" N Long. 8l° 53' 18" W
Summer 7Q10 (efs)
20
Winter 7Q10 (cfs)
26
30Q2 (cfs)
35
Average Flow (cfs):
62
IWC (%):
19, 26, 32%
BACKUROUND
The Spindale WWTP is a Class IV facility with an ultimate permitted flow of 6.0 MGD. The plant serves
domestic users in the Town of Spindale and six Significant Industrial Users (SIUs). The most recent
permit was issued on December .7, 1998 and expired on July 31, 2003. The Permittee submitted
Standard Form A on January 30, 2003 in order to request renewal of the permit. The Permittee has
requested several changes to the existing NPDES permit: reduction of instream sampling to once per
week in the summer months, elimination of the 85% removal clause for BOD and TSS, and the addition
of another tier of flow at 3.0 MGD.
At the time of the previous permit renewal, the facility had lost some SIU contribution to the plant and
was about to lose another industrial contribution. Since the plant was running at about half its permitted
flow, the Division allowed a reduction in the flow limit to 4.5 MGD with the stipulation that once the 12
month average flow exceeded 3.6 MGD, the Permittee would return to the 6.0 MGD limits. The
Permittee is requesting a similar action at this renewal — loss of industry has caused flows to drop even
further, such that a 3.0 MGD limits page would be appropriate.
The Town of Spindale has a full pretreatment program with the Division of Water Quality's Pretreatment
Unit and will continue to implement this program in the new permit term. Data collected through the
pretreatment program were used in this permit renewal.
Instream Monitoring, Verification of Existing Conditions and DMR Data Review
This facility discharges to Catheys Creek in subbasin 03-08-02 of the Broad River Basin. This portion
of Catheys Creek bears a C classification and is considered impaired (due to sediment) as of the 2002
303(d) list.
Instream data (upstream and downstream of the discharge, as specified in the permit) from May January
2002 through May 2003 were analyzed and plotted (plots are attached to this fact sheet). Spindale is
required to monitor instream conductivity, fecal coliform, temperature and dissolved oxygen (D.O.). Of
these parameters, downstream conductivity is the most significantly elevated above upstream levels. This
may be partly attributable to the large industrial contribution to this discharge. Fecal coliform levels
downstream are also slightly higher than the upstream values. D.O. and temperature plots show little
difference between the upstream and downstream values. D.O. was always above 5.0 mg/L, the stream
standard.
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC0020664 Renewal
Page t

Effluent data from DMRs dating from January 2001 through May 2003 were also reviewed. Data for
conventional parameters are summarized in Table 1. Several monthly average violations of the Total
Suspended Solids (TSS) limit are noted and are discussed further in the Correspondence section.
The Permittee is also required to monitor for total residual chlorine, sulfates, ammonia nitrogen (NH,-N),
total nitrogen and total phosphorus. Data for these parameters is summarized in Table 2. The monthly
average ammonia nitrogen limit was violated in May 2003, but the Permittee was otherwise in
compliance.
Table 1. NC0020664 Conventional Data (January 2001-May 2003)
Table 2. NC0020664 Toxicant and nutrient Data (January 2001— May 2003)
A review of the metals (from both the DMRs and Pretreatment data) and toxicants was also performed.
With the exception of total residual chlorine (TRC), these are discussed in the Reasonable Potential
Analysis section.
Correspondence
The Asheville Regional Office (ARO) conducted several site visits during this permit term to evaluate
compliance. ARO has found the facility to in compliance and well operated. The Town of Spindale, has,
however, received eleven Notices of Violation for violations of permit effluent limits. Several of these
NOVs had civil penalties associated with them. Six NOVs were associated with toxicity failures. The
Permittee has been in compliance with its toxicity limit, however, since December 2001. Three NOVs
were issued, at least in part, for violations of the monthly average TSS limit. Two were severe enough to
warrant civil penalties. Two NOVs were associated with three violations of the daily maximum nickel
limit. Finally, once NOV was issued for violations of the weekly average fecal coliform limit and the
daily average dissolved oxygen limit. All civil penalties issued have been paid.
PERMITTING STRATEGY
Waste Load Allocation (WLA)
The Division prepared the last WLA for the previous permit renewal. The previous and current effluent
limits were based on guidelines and water quality standards. The Division has judged most previous
parameters and limits to be appropriate for renewal with some exceptions. Changes to toxicant
monitoring are discussed in the Reasonable Potential Analysis section.
As discussed above, the permit limits page at a flow of 3.0 MGD will be permitted, based on previous
actions on this permit. The trigger to the 4.5 MGD sheet will be when the average 12-month flow
reaches 80% of the permitted flow (as with the trigger from 4.5 MGD to 6.0 MGD). Thus, when the
average monthly flow reaches 2.4 MGD, the Permittee will be held to the limits at 4.5 MGD. In
addition, the previous permit contained limits pages for a discharge to Hollands Creek (in addition to
those for the discharge to Catheys Creek). Since the discharge has been moved to Catheys Creek, these
pages can be eliminated.
Ammonia is one of the most affected parameters in this permit. The original monthly average permit
limits (10.0 mg/L, summer and winter) were calculated at 6 MGD based on oxygen consumption. These
Fact Shcct
NPDFS NC0020664 Renc\eal
Page

limits were not changed for the 4.5 MGD tier added during the last renewal, as Division guidance
stipulates that limits will only change when the facility expands. However, ammonia limits were
changed to reflect ammonia toxicity for the 6.0 MGD discharge, as this would reflect an expansion. A
similar approach will be taken for this renewal.
The 3 MGD discharge will have a monthly average limit of 10.0 mg/L (summer and winter) to
correspond with the "original" modeled ammonia limits based on oxygen consumption. The 4.5 MGD
discharge will have a summer monthly average limit of 3.2 mg/L and a winter monthly average of 7.7
mg/L based on toxicity. The 6.0 MGD discharge will also have a toxicity based monthly average limit of
of 2.7 mg/L in the summer and 6.2 mg/L for the winter. Judging from the facility's effluent data,
meeting these limits should not pose a problem.
In addition, weekly average ammonia limits based on a 3:1 ratio with the monthly average (but no higher
than 35.0 mg/L) will be implemented in this permit. This is a new statewide policy that resulted from
EPA requirements. For the 3 MGD discharge, this results in a summer and winter limits of 30 mg/L.
The 4.5 MGD discharge will have a summer limit of 9.6 mg/L and a winter limit of 23.1 mg/L. The 6.0
MGD discharge will have a summer limit of 8.1 mg/L and a winter limit of 18.6 mg/L.
In addition, all effluent limits pages will include a TRC limit of 28 µg/L. This is a result of the newly
implemented TRC standard for all waters of the state. An 18-month compliance schedule will be
included with this limit to allow the Town sufficient time to construct dechlorination facilities.
Finally, an annual pollutant scan will be added such that the Permittee can collect the necessary data
required by EPA Form 2A throughout the permit term. This condition is now standard on all major
municipal permits in North Carolina.
Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA)
The Division conducted EPA -recommended analyses to determine the reasonable potential; for toxicants
to be discharged by this facility, based on DMR data from January, 2000-May 2003. These toxicants
consist of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, cyanide, lead, mercury, nickel, silver, selenium and
zinc. The data for, this analysis comes from monitoring ,efforts required by the NPDES permit and. the,".,
pretreatment program. Since the allowable .concentrations' vary according to the Instream Waste
Concentration '(IWC), which in turn is based on the relationship between discharge flow and stream flow,
they are discussed separately below.
3 MGD
Results suggest no reasonable potential for the facility to discharge arsenic, cadmium, chromium,
cyanide, and lead. All but cyanide will continue to be monitored through the pretreatment program.
Since cyanide monitoring is not required by the pretreatment program, it will be monitored quarterly
through the NPDES permit. The facility did demonstrate reasonable potential to discharge copper,
mercury, nickel, silver, selenium and zinc. Copper, silver and zinc are all action level parameters and
will not be limited unless they can be attributed to toxicity failures. They will be monitored twice
monthly in the NPDES permit. Mercury, nickel and selenium will be monitored weekly and limited in
the new permit as follows:
Parameter of
Concern
Weekly average Daily maximum
limit limit
Total mercury
N/A 0.06 µg/L
Total nickel
261 µg/L
Total selenium
27 µg/L 56 µg/L
Since the weekly average total nickel limit (467 ug/1) is higher than the daily maximum, it can be
eliminated, as the daily maximum limit will be sufficiently protective.
Fact Sheet
N }'DES NCO020604 Renewal
Page 3

Parameter of
Concern
Weekly average
limit
Daily, maximum
limit
Total cadmium
6 µg/L
15 µg/L
Cyanide
16 µg/L
22 µg/L
Total mercury
N/A
0.04 µg/L
Total nickel
277 µg/L
261 µg/L
Total selenium
16 µg/L
56 µg/L
4 MGD
Results suggest no reasonable potential for the facility to discharge arsenic, chromium and lead. These
will continue to be monitored through the pretreatment program, such that chromium and lead may be
removed from the permit's monitoring requirements. The facility did demonstrate reasonable potential
to discharge cadmium, copper, cyanide, mercury, nickel, silver, selenium and zinc. Copper, silver and
zinc are all action level parameters and will not be limited unless they can be attributed to toxicity
failures. They will be monitored twice monthly in the NPDES permit. Cadmium, cyanide, mercury,
nickel and selenium will be monitored weekly and limited in the new permit as follows:
Parameter of
Concern
Weekly average
limit
Daily maximum
limit
Total cadmium
7.7 µg/L
15 µg/L
Cyanide
19 µg/L
22 µg/L
Total mercury
N/A
0.05 µg/L
Total nickel
261 µg/L
Total selenium
19 µg/L
56 µg/L
As with the 3MGD calculations, the weekly average nickel limit (340 ug/1) is higher than the daily
maximum limit, and so is not necessary.
6 MGD
Results suggest no reasonable potential for the facility to discharge arsenic, chromium and lead. These
will continue to be monitored through the pretreatment program, such that chromium and lead .may be
removed from the permit's monitoring requirements. The facility did demonstrate reasonable potential
to discharge cadmium, copper, cyanide, mercury, nickel, silver, .selenium and zinc. Copper, silver and
zinc are all action level parameters and will not be limited' unless they can be attributed to -toxicity
failures. They will be monitored twice monthly in the NPDES permit. Cadmium, cyanide, mercury,
nickel and selenium will be monitored weekl ' and limited in the new permit as follows:
As with the 3MGD calculations, the weekly average nickel limit (277 ug/1) is higher than the daily
maximum limit, and so is not necessary.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES
In keeping with Division policies, the following will be incorporated into the permit:
• Elimination of the Hollands Creek effluent pages
• 3.0 MGD permit limits page
New weekly average ammonia limits
Updated monthly average ammonia limits for the 4.5 MGD discharge
• Annual pollutant scan
Elimination of chromium and lead monitoring
Addition of mercury and selenium limits at 4.5 and 6.0 MGD
Update of limits for cyanide, nickel and cadmium.
New Weekly Average and Daily Maximum limits are derived from the latest NC/EPA policies
considering 1/2 FAVs and allowable concentrations based on reasonable potential.
Fact Sheet
NPDES NCO020664 Renewal
Pa<_e 4

NC0020664
Facility: Town of Spindale WWTP
Discharge to: Cathey's Creek
Residual Chlorine
Ammonia as NH3
(summer)
7Q10 (CFS)
20
7010 (CFS)
20
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
4.5
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
4.5
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
6.975
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
6.975
STREAM STD (UG/L)
17.0
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (UG/L)
0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
0.22
IWC (%)
25.86 .
IWC (%)
25.86
Allowable Conc. (ug/1)
6�
Allowable Concentration (mg/1)
B34
Ammonia as NH3
(winter)
7Q10 (CFS)
26
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
4.5
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
6.975
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.8
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
0.22
IWC (%)
2
Allowable Concentration (mg/1)
7.6
Chlorine_
Residual chlorine must be capped at
to protect for

NCO020664
Facility: Town of Spindale WWTP
Discharge to: Cathey's Creek
Residual Chlorine
7Q10 (CFS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (UG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (UG/L)
IWC (%)
Allowable Conc. (ug/1)
20
4.5
=C 14* 1.55
17
0
=(C 15/(C 13+C 15)) * 100
=((C13+C15)*17)/C15
Ammonia as NH3
(summer)
7010 (C FS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (mg/1)
Ammonia as NH3
(winter)
7Q10 (CFS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (mg/1)
=C13
=C14
=F14*1.55
0.22
=(F15/(F13+F15))*100
=(((F13+F15)*(F16))-(F13*F17))/F15
26
=C14
=F26*1.55
1.8
0.22
=(F27/(F25+F27)) * 100
=(((F25+F27)*(F28))-(F25*F29))/F27

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary September 16, 2003
FACILITY REQUIREMENT
YEAR LAN
PER
MAR APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP OCT
NOV
DEC
Sparta III cbr I.... 9%
1999 -
-
Pass -
-
Pass
-
-
Pass -
-
Pass
NC0026913N01 Begin:4/112001 FremencyQ Ma, )a. Sea Me
^ NonCodP Single
am-
-
Pass -
-
Pass
-
-
Pass -
-
Pass
CounT,Allegludy Region: ViSRO Subbnsin: NEWoi
2001 -
-
Pins -
-
Pass
-
-
Pass -
-
Pass
[IF: 116 Sleeinl
2002 -
-
Pass -
-
Pass
-
-
Pass -
-
Pass
7Q10--9.9 IWCI't;119.11
2003 -
-
Pass -
-
Pass
-
Simulale Wt3TP chr him: 26%; 32%if6MGD
V 1999 -
-
ale -
-
49
31
-
53.7 -
-
419
NC00206(4100I Rtgail/I/1999 Frequency Q PIF + Mu,Jun Sea Dee
NauCar, SINGLE
2000 -
-
41.9 -
-
Fai
124
-75,36.1
Pass -
-
Pass
(loms<Rn11wr1uud Region: ARO Subbed. BRDo2
2001 -
-
Pass -
-
36.1
� l Late
61.21s)
36.1
PF; 45 S,I
202 -
-
We Pass
-
Peas
-
-
Pass -
-
721
7QI0: 20 111
2003 -
-
Paea.rt00 -
-
154
72A
Sm, Lake VVNVT' it, had: 5.3%
1999-
Pass
- -
Pass
-
-
Pass
- -
Pass
-
NC00309711/0111 Begii,61112001 FmquencyQ Feb May Aug Nov
- NonComp Single
2000-
Pass
- -
Pass
-
-
Pass
- -
Pass
-
ConmyLlunberLed Region: FRO Sublu,m CPF14
2001 -
Pass
- -
Pass
-
-
Pass
- -
NRIPass
-
PT 15 Saeeinl
2002 _
Pass
- -
Pass
-
-
Pass
- -
Pass
-
7QI11:4nh IIII 0L;55
2003 -
Pass
- -
Pass
-
-
Springs Ind In,, 24hr p1fuc llm: 90%nhd
1999
Pass - -
Pass - -
Pass -
- Pass - -
NC00057J4111111 Bcgtn:l211IIYW FrcqucncyQPIF + Jan Apr Jul Oct
+ NonComp Single 2000
Pass - -
Pass Pass -
Pass -
- Pass - -
Cmmy:ScdImd Region: FRO Subbmin: LUM55
2001
Pass - -
Pass - -
Pass -
- Pass - -
PF: 0.03 5Re41
2002
Fall Pass -
Pass - -
Pass -
- Pass - -
7Q10:34.0 IWC15%;0.14
2003
Pass - -
Pass - -
Pass
Spruce Pine SV\VTP cut him:
6.6%
V 1990 -
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
NCOIC142.t/001 Begin 7/111997 Frequency Q Fir
+ Feb May Aug Nov
+ NonComp
Single
2000 -
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pas.
-
Cmmty:Mad"ll Region:ARO Subbiain:M06
2001-
Fail
>24
Laid
Pass,>24
-
-
Fail
>13.2
>132
Pass
-
PF: 2.0 Special
2002 -
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pa..
-
-
Pass
-
7QIO:44,11 IWC(%:6.4
2003-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Stluarv0-Pbaael ehr lim:14%;
upon c., m 0.0432 MUD chr]ins 25%(Garb)
1999-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
NC'nOM340nI111Begin 2/Ia003 Frequency
Feb May Aug Nov
+NonComp
Single
20M-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
Cnnnry: Waka Region: PRO Subbain:
NEU02
2001 -
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pas.
-
PF: 0.021 SI•i
2002 -
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
7Q10: B20 IWC(-.'14
2003 -
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Stanley V"VfP chr lid:
65A%; if PF 1.0 chr him 79°%
Y 1999 Pass
-
-
Fall
Fail
Fail
793
<40
-100
79.3
-
-
NC00H1036'001 Begin9Ula001 FrequcncyQ
Ian Apr Jul Oct
+ NonComp
Single
2000 Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Fail
94.9
35.4
-100
-
-
Conmy:Gnqun Region: MRO Subbain;
M35
2001 Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Invalid
Paas
-
Fall
940
MR
PIP : 115 special
2002 Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
7Q10:11.41 IWC(%:65
2003 Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
Sur NAVTP chr It.,:
90%
V 1999.25
49
49
>80
>90
Invalid
32
NRJ<25
32
Late
32
25
NC005164111001 Begin: 1✓I2001 FrequcncyQ
+ Jan APr Jul Oel
NonComp
Single
20M -25
49
69.3
<25
<30
<30
67.1
52
<30
<30
<30
<30
Coudy: Muargdnery Region: FRO Subbain:
CPFIO
20(11 <30
<30
52
36L7
20
52
<30
M,7
Late
<30
52
<30
PF:On" Sdaiol
2002 Late
aP)
>90
'he
vse
<W
<30
20
QO
<30
367
v30
7QI0: un I\\'t't°. 100
2003 1,30
<30
-30
<30
<30
en
20
Statesville Fmvth C'ruek Wss'1'1• chr liar:
36%; if avg. fow>3.6MGD chr Iran 55%
V 1999 Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
NC11113133611I111 Bt,g 311,2001 FmgncucyQ
Jan Apr Jul Oct
+ NonComp
Single
2000 Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Cnuntr:I rcddl Region: MRO Seth....:
YAD06
2001 Fall
>72
40.2
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
PF:40 SPooial
2002 FeII
>50
-50
PmsDF-
-
-
P.,i(s)f
-
-
Pass(s)
-
-
7QI0:119 IW('r,360
2003 Pauds)
Pmu(9)
-
-
Paas(a)
Slamxville Third Creek o'%ITP chrllm:
3091.
1999 Pass
-
-
Pas.
-
-
Pass
-
-
Paas
-
-
NCI1920591N01 ftun:VL2001 Frequency
Jan Aprlul Oct
+ NonComp
Single
2000 Pass
-
-
Pa.s
-
-
Fail
>75
>75
Pass
-
-
C.mv Inedcll Region: MRO Subbain:
YAD06
201)1 Fail
-78
48
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Fail
178
-78
IT 4.0 Special
2002 Pass
-
-
Faisal
-
-
Pass(s)
-
-
Pass
-
-
7Q10;9.8 IWCI%:39
2003 Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
Sakes C.- Sehnnir-N. Stokes [IS chr ling
23%
19"-
Pass
-
-
Fail
Pass
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
NCI)044'MV001Begin:3/1a002 Frequency
Feb May Aug Nov
+NonComp
Single
2000-
Pass
-
-
Fan
H
H
FeII
-11.5
39.8
Pass
-
County: Slokes Region: WSRO Subbasin:
ROAOI
2001 -
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pas.
-
-
Pass
-
PF: 00115 S"W
2002 -
pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
-
Pass
-
7Q10:0,11(. IWC(%:21
2003 -
Invalid
Pass
-
Pass
-
-
LEGEND:
PERNI=I4amn Rcqurnmem LET- Administrative Lener- Target Frequency= Monitoring frequency, Q- Quarterly;M- Monthlp BM. Bimonthly; SA- Semiannually; A- Annually;OWD- Only when discharging;D- Discontinued monitoring acquirement
Begin=Finnllomhrequmd 7QIO= Receiving swam low Dow eriumm,(its +- quartcdymonilonng increases to monthly upon failumor N Months that testing added occur- ex. Jan. Apr. Jul. Be, NonComp- Current Compliance Requirement
PP-PcrminednoW(MGD) IWC%G Imtrcamwdleconccmmli PIT =PonaTitil teat AC - Acute CHR=Chrome
Dina Notvlion: f. Fmhcud Madan, Cc,..daphnia IF.; my- Mysid shrimp; ChV - Chronic value; P - Mortality treated percentage at highest conecnno0on: at - Performed by DWQ Aquatic Tax Unit; In - Bad test
impeding Nutuhn: - -- Data n9trcquircJ; NR- Notacpane Facility Activity Status: I - Inactive,N - Newly Ism.hT.c... I ... Q; It- Active but nut&,charging; T-Mom data available for month in quotion;•- ORC signature needed
40

IWC Calculations
Spindale - 3 MGD discharge
Prepared By: Natalie Sierra, NPDES Unit
Enter Design Flow (MGD): 3
Enter s7Q10(cfs): 20
Enter w7Q10 (cfs): 26
Residual Chlorine
Ammonia (NH3 as N)
(summer)
7Q10 (CFS)
20
7Q10 (CFS)
20
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
3
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
3
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
4.65
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
4.65
STREAM STD (UG/L)
17.0
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (I
0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL
0.22
IWC (%)
18.86
IWC (%)
18.86
Allowable Conc. (ug/1)
90
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
4.4
Ammonia (NH3 as N)
(winter)
7Q10 (CFS)
26
Fecal Limit
200/100ml
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
3
(If DF >331; Monitor)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
4.65
(If DF <331; Limit)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.8
Dilution Factor (DF)
5.30
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL
0.22
IWC (%)
15.17
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
10.6
INPDES Servor/Current Versions/IWC
9/22/03

IWC Calculations
Spindale - 3 MGD discharge
Prepared By: Natalie Sierra, NPDES Unit
Enter Design Flow (MGD): 4.5
Enter s7Q10(cfs): 20
Enter w7010 (cfs): 26
Residual Chlorine
Ammonia (NH3 as N)
(summer)
7010 (CFS)
20
7Q10 (CFS)
20
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
4.5
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
4.5
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
6.975
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
6.975
STREAM STD (UG/L)
17.0
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (1
0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL
0.22
IWC (%)
25.86
IWC (%)
25.86
Allowable Conc. (ug/1)
66
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
3.2
Ammonia (NH3 as N)
(winter)
7010 (CFS)
26
Fecal Limit
200/100ml DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
4.5
(If DF >331; Monitor)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
6.975
(If DF <331; Limit)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.8
Dilution Factor (DF)
3.87 UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL
0.22
IWC (%)
21.15
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
7.7
JNPDES Servor/Current Versions/IWC
9/22/03
9/22/03

IWC Calculations
Spindale - 3 MGD discharge
Prepared By: Natalie Sierra, NPDES Unit
Enter Design Flow (MGD): 4.5
Enter s7Q10(cfs): 20
Enter w7Q10 (cfs): 26
Residual Chlorine
Ammonia (NH3 as N)
(summer)
7010 (CFS)
20
7010 (CFS)
20
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
4.5
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
4.5
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
6.975
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
6.975
STREAM STD (UG/L)
17.0
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (1
0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL
0.22
IWC (%)
25.86
IWC (%)
25.86
Allowable Conc. (ug/1)
66
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
3.2
Ammonia (NH3 as N)
(winter)
7Q10 (CFS)
26
Fecal Limit
200/100ml
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
4.5
(If DF >331; Monitor)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
6.975
(If DF <331; Limit)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.8
Dilution Factor (DF)
3.87
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL
0.22
IWC (%)
21.15
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
7.7
INPDES Servor/Current Versions/IWC
9/22/03

IWC Calculations
Spindale - 3 MGD discharge
Prepared By: Natalie Sierra, NPDES Unit
Enter Design Flow (MGD): 6
Enter s7Q10(cfs): 20
Enter w7010 (cfs): 26
Residual Chlorine
Ammonia (NH3 as N)
(summer)
7Q10 (CFS)
20
7Q10 (CFS)
20
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
6
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
6
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
9.3
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
9.3
STREAM STD (UG/L)
17.0
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (1
0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL
0.22
IWC (%)
31.74
IWC (%)
31.74
Allowable Conc. (ug/1)
54
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
2.7
Ammonia (NH3 as N)
(winter)
7010 (CFS)
26
Fecal Limit
200/100ml
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
6
(If DF >331; Monitor)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
9.3
(If DF <331; Limit)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
1.8
Dilution Factor (DF)
3.15
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL
0.22
IWC (%)
26.35
Allowable Conc. (mg/1)
6.2
INPDES Servor/Current Versions/IWC
9/22/03

Facility Name =
Qiv (MGD) =
WWTP Classification
NPDES # =
Receiving Stream
/WC (%) =
Final Results:
Town of Spindale
3
4
NCO020664
Catheys Creek
18.86
Reasonable Potential Summary
10 .20 30 4° - •
Stream Classification C
7QIOs (cfs)= 20 - -
30Q2 (cfs) 35
Qavg (cfs)l 62
Arsenic
,Implementation
Max. Pred Cw
45.7 µg/I
jAre all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
No
Monitoring
Allowable Cw
265.1 µgll
I Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
No
I Frequency None
Cadmium
i Implementation
j
Max. Pred Cw
6.8 µg/l
Are all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
No
! Monitoring
Allowable Cw
10.6 µ /1
I Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
No
!Frequency None
1/2 FAV (non Trout)
15.0 µg/l
Chromium
I Implementation
I
Max. Pred Cw
30.0 µg/1
'Are all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
No
-Monitoring
Allowable Cw
265.1 µ /l
!Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
No
!Frequency None
1/2 FAV
1022 1 µg/1
I
I
Ctilipe:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
I Implementation
Max. Pred Cw
376.6 µg/l
Are all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
No
' Monitoring
Allowable Cw
37.1 AgIl
I Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
Yes
Frequency 2/Month
1/2 FAV
7.3 µgll
Cyanide
I Implementation
I
Max. Pred Cw
20.4 µg/I
jAre all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
No
'Monitoring
Allowable Cw
26.5 /I
.Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
No
Quarterly
1/2 FAVI
22.0 1 µg/l
I
Lead
I Implementation
I
Max. Pred Cw
21.5 µg/l
jAre all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
No
j Monitoring
Allowable Cw
132.5 ggll
GIs the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
No
iFrequency None
t/2 Fav
33.8 µg/1
(Mercury
I Implementation
I
Max. Pred Cw
2.2102 µg/l
j Are all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
Yes
j Monitoring
Allowable Cw
0.0636 µg/l
!Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
Yes
Frequency Weekly
Nickel
, Implementation
,
Max. Pred Cw
653.9 µg/I
Are all reported values less than?
Yes
Limit?
Yes
(Monitoring
Allowable Cw
466.5 µg/1
Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
Yes
j Frequency Weekly
1/2 FAVI
261.0 1 µg/l
Silver.:::':::,:::*;=:::,:::::::::::,:,:::::::,.:,-
I Implementation
Max. Pred Cw
35.9 µg/l
jAre all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
No
Monitoring
Allowable Cw
0.3 /l
Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
Yes
I Frequency 2/Month
1/2 FAVI
1.2 µg/I
I

Selenium
lImplementation
I ,
Max. Pred Cw
39.1 µg/l
!Are all reported values less than?
No Limit? Yes
!Monitoring
Allowable Cw
26.5 µg/l
1/2 FAV
56.0
µg/1
I is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes Monitor? Yes
Frequency Weekly
............................
Max. Pred Cw
829.2 µgll
Implementation
IAre all reported values less than?
No Limit? No
'
Monitoring
Allowable Cw
265.1 g/1
GIs the detection limit acceptable?
Yes Monitor? Yes
Frequency 2/Month
1 /2 FAV
67.0
µg/1

Facility Name =
Town of Spindalc
NPDES # =
NCO020664
Q►v (MGD) =
3
7QIOs (cfs)=
20
IWC (%) =
18.86
FINAL RESULTS
Silver
Max. Pred Cw
35.89
Allowable Cw
0.32
RESULTS
Std Dev. 4.2016
Mean 8.9
C.V. 0.4698
Number
of data points 62
Mull Factor =
1.471
Max. Value
24.40 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
35.89 µg/I
Allowable Cw
0.32 µg/l
Parameter = Silver
Standard = 0.06 µg/l
n
<
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
I
<
5
2.5
2
<
5
2.5
3
<
5
2.5
4
<
5
2.5
5
<
5
2.5
6
<
5
2.5
7
<
5
2.5
8
<
5
2.5
9
<
5
2.5
10
<
5
2.5
11
<
5
2.5
12
<
5
2.5
13
<
5
2.5
14
<
5
2.5
15
<
5
2.5
16
<
5
2.5
17
<
5
2.5
18
<
5
2.5
19
<
5
2.5
20
<
5
2.5
21
<
5
2.5
22
<
5
2.5
23
<
10
5.0
24
<
10
5.0
25
<
10
5.0
26
<
10
5.0
27
<
10
5.0
28
<
5
2.5
29
<
10
5.0
30
<
10
5.0
31
<
10
5.0
32
<
10
5.0
33
<
10
5.0
34
<
10
5.0
35
<
10
5.0
36
<
10
5.0
37
<
10
5.0
38
7.
7.0
39
24.
24.0
40
<
10
5.0
41
<
10
5.0
42
<
10
5.0
43
17.6
17.6
44
10.
10.0
45
<
10
5.0
46
10.5
10.5
47
24.4
24.4
48
10.2
10.2

49
14.9
14.9
50-
18.6
18.6
51
<
10
5.0
52
<
10
5.0
53
<
10
5.0
54
<
10
5.0
55
<
10
5.0
56
<
10
5.0
57
<
10
5.0
58
<
10
.5.0
59
11.
11.0
60
..11-3
11.3
61
<
10
5.0
62
<
10
5.0

Facility Name =
Town of Spindale
NPDES # =
NCO020664
Qiv (MGD) =
3
7QIOs (cfs)=
1 20
lWC (%) =
18.86
FINAL RESULTS
Arsenic
Max. Pred Cw
45.73265127
Allowable Cw
265.1
RESULTS
Std Dev.
3.4220
Mean
5.8
C.V.
0.5887
Number
of data points
8
Mull Factor =
3.27
Max. Value
14.0 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
45.73265127 µg/l
Allowable Cw
265.1 µgll
Parameter = Arsenic
Standard = 50.0 d µg/]
n < Actual Data BDL=1/2DL
1
<
10
5.000
2
<
5
2.500
3
<
10
5.000
4
<
10
5.000
5
14
14.000
6
<
10
5.000
7
<
10
5.000
8
<
10
5.000

Facility Name =
Town of S indale
NPDES # =
NCO020664
Qtiv (MGD) =
3
7Q10s (cfs)=
20
IWC
18.86
FINAL RESULTS
Cadmium
Max. Pred Cw
6.8
Allowable Cw
10.6
RESULTS
Std Dev. 1.2552
Mean 1.9
C.V. 0.6472
(Number
of data points 124
Mith factor =
1.371
Max. Value
5.0 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
6.8 µg/1
Allowable Cw
10.6 µg/l
Parameter = Cadmium
Standard = 2.0 µg/l
n
<
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
1
<
2
1.0
2
<
2
1.0
3
<
2
1.0
4
<
2
1.0
5
<
2
1.0
6
<
2
1.0
7
<
2
1.0
8
<
2
1.0
9
<
2
1.0
10
<
2
1.0
11
<
2
1.0
12
<
2
1.0
13
<
2
1.0
14
<
5
2.5
15
<
1
0.5
16
<
2
1.0
17
<
2
1.0
18
<
2
1.0
19
<
2
1.0
20
<
2
1.0
21
<
2
1.0
22
<
2
1.0
23
<
2
1.0
24
<
2
1.0
25
<
2
1.0
26
<
2
1.0
27
<
2
1.0
28
<
2
1.0
29
<
2
1.0
30
<
2
1.0
31
<
2
1.0

32
<
2
1.0
33
<
2
1.0
34
<
2
1.0
35
<
2
1.0
36
<
2
1.0
37
<
2
1.0
38
<
2
1.0
39
4.
4.0
40
<
2
1.0
41
<
2
1.0
42
<
2
1.0
43
<
2
1.0
44
<
2
1.0
45
<
2
1.0
46
<
2
1.0
47
<
2
1.0
48
<
2
1.0
49
2.
2.0
50
<
2
1.0
51
2.
2.0
52
<
2
1.0
53
<
2
1.0
54
<
2
1.0
55
<
2
1.0
56
<
2
1.0
57
<
1
0.5
58
<
1
0.5
59
<
1
0.5
60
<
2
1.0
61
<
1
0.5
62
<
2
1.0
63
<
2
1.0
64
<
2
1.0
65
<
2
1.0
66
<
2
1.0

67 <
2
1.0
68 <
2
1.0
69 <
2
1.0
70 <
5
2.5
71 <
5
2.5
72 <
5
2.5
73 <
5
2.5
74 <
5
2.5
75 <
5
2.5
76 <
5
2.5
77 <
5
2.5
78 <
5
2.5
79 <
5
2.5
80 <
5
2.5
81 <
5
2.5
82 <
5
2.5
83 <
5
2.5
84 <
5
2.5
85 <
5
2.5
86 <
5
2.5
87 <
5
2.5
88 <
5
2.5
89 <
5
2.5
90 <
5
2.5
91 <
5
2.5
92 <
5
2.5
93 <
5
2.5
94 <
5
2.5
95 <
5
2.5
96 <
5
2.5
97 <
5
2.5 -
98 <
5
2.5
99 <
5
2.5
100 <
5
2.5
101 <
5
2.5

102 < 5
103 < 5
104 < 5
105 < 5
106 < 5
107 < 5
108 < 5
109 < 5
110 < 5
111 < 10
112 < 10
113 < 10
114 < 10
115 < 10,
116 < 10
117 < 10
118 < 10
119 < 10
120 < 10
121 < 5
122 < 5
123 < 10
124 < 10
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
2.5
2.5
5.0
5.0

Facility Name =
Town of S indale
NPDI:S ## =
NCO020664
Q►v (MGD) =
3
7Q10s (cfs)=
20
IwC (%) =
18.86
FINAL RESULTS
Cyanide
Max. Pred Cw
20.4
Allowable Cw
26.5
RESULTS
Std Dev. 1.2375
Mean 5.1
C.V. 0.2406
(Number
of data points 126
Midi Factor
1.131
Max. Value
18.0 µg/I
Max. Pred Cw
20.4 µg/I
Allowable Cw
26.5 µgA
Parameter = Cyanide
Standard = 5.0 1 µg/I
n
<
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
I
<
10
5.0
2
<
10
5.0
3
<
10
5.0
4
<
10
5.0
5
18.
18.0
6
<
10
5.0
7
<
10
5.0
8
<
10
5.0
9
<
10
5.0
10
<
10
5.0
11
<
10
5.0
12
<
10
5.0
13
<
10
5.0
14
<
10
5.0
15
<
10
5.0
16
<
10
5.0
17
<
10
5.0
18
<
10
5.0
19
<
10
5.0
20
<
10
5.0
21
<
10
5.0
22
<
10
5.0
23
<
10
5.0
24
<
10
5.0
25
<
10
5.0
26
<
10
5.0
27
<
10
5.0
28
<
10
5.0
29
<
10
5.0
30
<
10
5.0
31
<
10
5.0

32
<
10
5.0
33
<
10
5.0
34
<
I0
5.0
35
<
10
5.0
36
<
10
5.0
37
<
10
5.0
38
<
10
5.0
39
<
10
5.0
40
<
10
5.0
41
<
10
5.0
42
<
10
5.0
43
<
10
5.0
44
<
10
5.0
45
<
10
5.0
46
<
10
5.0
47
<
10
5.0
48
<
10
5.0
49
<
10
5.0
50
<
10
5.0
51
<
10
5.0
52
<
10
5.0
53
<
10
5.0
54
<
10
5.0
55
<
10
5.0
56
<
10
5.0
57
<
10
5.0
58
<
10
5.0
59
<
10
5.0
60
<
10
5.0
61
<
10
5.0
62
<
10
5.0
63
<
10
5.0
64
<
10
5.0
65
<
10
5.0
66
<
10
5.0

67
<
10
5.0
68
<
10
5.0
69
<
10
5.0
70
<
10
5.0
71
<
10
5.0
72
<
10
5.0
73
<
10
5.0
74
<
10
5.0
75
<
10
5.0
76
<
10
5.0
77
<
10
5.0
78
<
10
5.0
79
<
10
5.0
80
<
10
5.0
81
<
10
5.0
82
<
10
5.0
83
<
10
5.0
84
<
10
5.0
85
<
10
5.0
86
<
10
5.0
87
<
10
5.0
88
<
10
5.0
89
<
10
5.0
90
<
10
5.0
91
<
10
5.0
92
<
10
5.0
93
<
10
5.0
94
<
10
5.0
95
<
10
5.0
96
<
10
5.0
97
<
10
5.0
98
<
10
5.0
99
10.
10.0
100
<
10
5.0
101
<
10
5.0

102
<
10
5.0
103
<
10
5.0
104
<
10
5.0
105
<
10
5.0
106
<
10
5.0
107
<
10
5.0
108
<
10
5.0
109
<
10
5.0
110
<
10
5.0
111
<
10
5.0
112
<
10
5.0
113
<
10
5.0
114
<
10
5.0
115
<
10
5.0
116
<
10
5.0
117
<
10
5.0
118
<
10
5.0
119
<
10
5.0
120
<
10
5.0
121
<
10
5.0
122
<
10
5.0
123
<
10
5.0
124
<
10
5.0
125
<
10
5.0
126
<
10
5.0

Facility Name =
Town of S indale
NPDES # =
NCO020664
Qw (MGD) =
3
7Q10s (cfs)=
20
IWC (%) =
18.86
FINAL RESULTS
Copper
Max. Pred Cw
376.6
Allowable Cw
37.1
RESULTS
Std Dev. 45.2950
Mean 110.9
C.V. 0.4085
Number
of data points 66
Mull Factor =
1.38
Max. Value
272.0
µg/I
Max. Pred Cw
376.6
µg/l
Allowable Cw
37.1
µg/I
Parameter = Copper
Standard = 7.0 µg/l
n <
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
1
85.
85.0
2
92.
92.0
3
158.
158.0
4
98.
98.0
5
78.
78.0
6
73.
73.0
7
55.
55.0
8
98.
98.0
9
85.
85.0
10
116.
116.0
11
98.
98.0
12
150.
150.0
13
184.
184.0
14
70:
70.0
15
130.
130.0
16
138.
138.0
17
184.
184.0
18
140.
140.0
19
132.
132.0
20
122.
122.0
21
90.
90.0
22
48.
48.0
23
167.
167.0
24
224.
224.0
25
121.
121.0
26
173.
173.0
27
147.
147.0
28
94.
94.0
29
165.
165.0
30
272.
272.0
31
126.
126.0

32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
244.
244.0
143.
143.0
62.
62.0
106.
106.0
110.
110.0
56.
56.0
83.
83.0
86.
86.0
57.
57.0
55.
55.0
92.
92.0
67.
67.0
90.
90.0
87.3
87.3
97.
97.0
94.
94.0
110.
110.0
77.2
77.2
81.8
81.8
64.8
64.8
123.
123.0
110.
110.0
95.8
95.8
103.
103.0
87.
87.0
90.5
90.5
114.3
114.3
91.8
91.8
110.
110.0
91.9
91.9
97.1
97.1
97.2
97.2
77.3
77.3
62.7
62.7
191.
191.0

Facilitv Name = Town of Spindale
NPDES ## =
NCO020664
Qiv (MGD) =
3
7QIOs (cfs)=
20
1WC (%) =
18.86
FINAL RESULTS
Mercury
Max. Pred Cw
2.210
Allowable Cw
0.064
RESULTS
Std Dev. 0.1725
Mean 0.150
C.V. 1.1500
of data points 62
Mult Factor =
2.2101
Max. Value
1.000 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
2.210 µg/l
Allowable Cw
0.064 µg1l
Parameter = Mercury
Standard = 0.012 µg/l
n < Actual Data BDL=1/2DL
1
<
0.2
0.100
2
<
0.2
0.100
3
<
0.2
0.100
4
<
0.2
0.100
5
<
0.2
0.100
6
<
0.2
0.100
7
<
0.2
0.100
8
<
0.2
0.100
9
<
0.2
0.100
10
.2
0.200
11
<
0.2
0.100
12
<
0.2
0.100
13
<
0.2
0.100
14
<
0.2
0.100
15
<
0.2
0.100
16
<
0.2
0.100
17
.6
0.600
18
<
0.2
0.100
19
<
0.2
0.100
20
<
0.2
0.100
21
<
0.2
0.100
22
<
0.2
0.100
23
<
0.2
0.100
24
<
0.2
0.100
25
.5
0.500
26
<
0.2
0.100
27
.8
0.800
28
<
0.2
0.100
29
<
0.2
0.100
30
.6
0.600
31
<
0.2
0.100
32
1.
1.000
33
<
0.2
0.100
34
<
0.2
0.100
35
<
0.2
0.100
36
<
0.2
0.100
37
<
0.2
0.100
38
<
0.2
0.100
39
<
0.2
0.100
40
<
0.2
0.100
41
<
0.2
0.100
42
<
0.2
0.100
43
<
0.2
0.100
44
<
0.2
0.100
45
<
0.2
0.100

46
<
0.2
0.100
47
<
0.2
0.100
48
<
0.2
0.100
49
<
0.2
0.100
50
<
0.2
0.100
51
<
0.2
0.100
52
<
0.2
0.100
53
<
0.2
0.100
54
<
0.2
0.100
55
<
0.2
0.100
56
<
0.2
0.100
57
<
0.2
0.100
58
<
0.2
0.100
59
<
0.2
0.100
60
<
0.2
0.100
61
<
0.2
0.100
62
<
0.2
0.100

Facility Name =
Town of S indale
NPDES ## =
NCO020664
Qw (MGD) =
3
7QIOs (cfs)=
20
IWC (%) =
18.86
FINAL RESULTS
Chromium
Max. Pred Cw 30.0
Allowable Cw 265.1
RESULTS
Std Dev. 4.2775
Mean 6.6
C.V. 0.6468
INuinber
of data points 62
Mull Factor =
1.67
Max. Value
18.0 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
30.0 µgll
Allowable Cw
265.1 µgll
Parameter = Chromium
Standard = 50.0 1 µg/l
n < Actual Data BDL=1/2DL
1
< 5
2.5
2
< 5
2.5
3
< 5
2.5
4
< 5
2.5
5
< 5
2.5
6
< 5
2.5
7
< 10
5.0
8
< 5
2.5
9
7.
7.0
10
7.
7.0
11
< 5
2.5
12
11.
11.0
13
13.
13.0
14
< 5
2.5
15
10.
10.0
16
< 5
2.5
17
7.
7.0
18
< 5
2.5
19
6.
6.0
20
< 5
2.5
21
< 5
2.5
22
< 5
2.5
23
< 10
5.0
24
< 10
5.0
25
< 10
5.0
26
< 10
5.0
27
< 10
5.0
28
< 5
2.5
29
< 10
5.0
30
< 10
5.0
31
< 10
5.0

32 <
10
5.0
33 <
10
5.0
34 <
10
5.0
35 <
10
5.0
36 <
10
5.0
37 <
10
5.0
38
17.
17.0
39
18.
18.0
-40
B.
13.0
41
10.8
10.8
42
B.
13.0
43
14.
14.0
44
17.5
17.5
45
10.6
10.6
46 <
5
2.5
47 <
5
2.5
48
12.5
12.5
49
10.5
10.5
50
6.3
6.3
51
6.95
7.0
52
5.9
5.9
53
6.4
6.4
54
13.5
13.5
55
7.1
7.1
56
6.3
6.3
57 <
10
5.0
58
11.2
11.2
59 <
10
5.0
60 <
10
5.0
61 <
5
2.5
62
13.5
13.5

Facility Name =
Town of S indale
NPDES # =
NCO020664
Qvv (MGD) =
3
7Q10s (cfs)=
20
/WC {%) =
18.86
FINAL RESULTS
Nickel
Max. Pred Cw
653.9
Allowable Cw
466.5
RESULTS
Std Dev. 67.9207
Mean 44.7
C.V. 1.5182
(Number
of data points 128
Midl Factor =
1.751
Max. Value
373.0 µg/I
Max. Pred Cw
653.9 µg/l
Allowable Cw
466.5 µgll
Parameter = Nickel
Standard = 88.0 1 µg/l
n <
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
I
it.
11.0
2
32.
32.0
3
16.
16.0
4
12.
12.0
5
13.
13.0
6
10.
10.0
7
16.
16.0
8
12.
12.0
9
12.
12.0
10
10.
10.0
II
Il.
11.0
12
9.
9.0
13
36.
36.0
14
23.
23.0
15
112.
112.0
16
62.
62.0
17
40.
40.0
18
30.
30.0
19
23.
23.0
20
24.
24.0
21
23.
23.0
22
P.
17.0
23
14.
14.0
24
19.
19.0
25
31.
31.0
26
21.
21.0
27
20.
20.0
28
18.
18.0
29
11.
11.0
30
15.
15.0
31
16.
16.0

32
17.
17.0
33
22.
22.0
34
23.
23.0
35
20.
20.0
36
21.
21.0
37
M.
16.0
38
17.
17.0
39
27.
27.0
40
28.
28.0
41
49.
49.0
42
36.
36.0
43
80.
80.0
44
74.
74.0
45
66_
66.0
46
36.
36.0
47
63.
63.0
48
119.
119.0
49
62.
62.0
50
54.
54.0
51
43.
43.0
52
35.
35.0
53
35.
35.0
54
31.
31.0
55
22.
22.0
56
14.
14.0
57
20.
20.0
58
37.
37.0
59
32.
32.0
60
150.
150.0
61
332.
332.0
62
346.
346.0
63
373.
373.0
64
312.
312.0
65
237.
237.0
66
117.
117.0

67
72.
72.0
68
41.
41.0
69
37.
37.0
70
27.
27.0
71
22.
22.0
72
21.
21.0
73
20.
20.0
74
22.
22.0
75
61.
61.0
76
43.
43.0
77
40.
40.0
78
40.
40.0
79
43.
43.0
80
43.
43.0
81
33.5
33.5
82
34.
34.0
83
30.
30.0
84
32.
32.0
85
26.
26.0
86
26.
26.0
87
27.6
27.6
88
26.6
26.6
89
26.3
26.3
90
19.2
19.2
91
15.8
15.8
92
13.2
13.2
93
10.6
10.6
94
10.
10.0
95
19.9
19.9
96
32.3
32.3
97
25.3
25.3
98
25.3
25.3
99
28.
28.0
100
25.5
25.5
101
15.8
15.8

102
29.9
29.9
103
28.9
28.9
104
28.5
28.5
105
20.7
20.7
106
23.3
23.3
107
22.2
22.2
108
14.5
14.5
109
19.6
19.6
110
22.6
22.6
111
19.1
19.1
112
21.2
21.2 '
113
18.3
18.3
114
19.
19.0
115
14.8
14.8
116
15.
15.0
117
10.6
10.6
118
17.5
17.5
119
10.
10.0
120
372.
372.0
121
78.8
78.8
122
27.3
27.3
123
18.1
18.1
124
12.9
12.9
125
19.3
19.3
126
25.3
25.3
127
57.4
57.4
128
39.8
39.8

Facility Name =
Town of 5 indale
NPDES # =
NCO020664
Qtv (MGD) =
3
7Q10s(cfs)=
20
IWC (%) =
18.86
FINAL RESULTS
Lead
Max. Pred Cw 21.5
Allowable Cw
t32.S
RESULTS
Std Dev,
2.1994
Mean
4.1
C.V.
0.5402
Number
of data points
63
Mult Factor =
L54
Max. Value
14.0
µg/1
Max. Pred Cw
21.5
µg/l
Allowable Cw
132.5
µg/I
Parameter = Lead
Slandard = 1 25.0 µg/1
n
<
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
I
<
5
2.5
2
<
5
2.5
3
<
5
2.5
4
<
5
2.5
5
<
5
2.5
6
<
5
2.5
7
<
5
2.5
8
<
5
2.5
9
<
5
2.5
10
<
5
2.5
11
<
5
2.5
12
<
5
2.5
13
14.
14.0
14
10.
10.0
15
<
5
2.5
16
7.
7.0
17
5.
5.0
18
<
5
2.5
19
6.
6.0
20
<
5
2.5
21
<
5
2.5
22
<
5
2.5
23
6.
6.0
24
<
5
2.5
25
<
5
2.5
26
<
5
2.5
27
<
5
2.5
28
<
5
2.5
29
<
5
2.5
30
<
5
2.5
31
<
5
2.5

32
<
5
2.5
33
<
5
2.5
34
<
5
2.5
35
<
5
2.5
36
<
5
2.5
37
<
5
2.5
38
ll.
11.0
39
<
5
2.5
40
<
10
5.0
41
<
5
2.5
42
<
10
5.0
43
<
10
5.0
44
<
10
5.0
45
<
10
5.0
46
<
10
5.0
47
<
10
5.0
48
<
l0
5.0
49
<
10
5.0
50
<
10
5.0
51
<
10
5.0
52
<
10
5.0
53
<
10
5.0
54
<
10
5.0
55
<
10
5.0
56
<
10
5.0
57
<
10
5.0
58
<
10
5.0
59
<
10
5.0
60
<
10
5.0
61
<
10
5.0
62
<
10
5.0
63
<
10
5.0

Facility Name =
Town of Spindale
NPDE'S # =
NCO020664
Qiv (MGD) =
3
7Q10s (cfs)=
20
IWC (%) =
18.86
FINAL RESULTS
Selenium
Max. Prcd Cw
39.1
Allowable Cw
26.5
RESULTS
Std Dev. 3.0815
Mean 5.7
C.V. 0.5418
Number
of data points 8
Mult Factor =
3.011
Max. Value
13.0 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
39.1 µg/l
Allowable Cw
26.5 µg/l
Parameter =
Scicnium
Standard =
5.0 µg/i
n
<
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
<
10
5.0
2
<
5
2.5
3
<
10
5.0
4
<
10
5.0
5
13
13.0
6
<
10
5.0
7
<
10
5.0
8
<
10
5.0

Facility Name =
Town of S indale
NPDES # =
NCO020664
Qw (MGD) =
3
7QIOs (cfs)=
20
IWC (%n) =
18.86
FINAL RESULTS
Zinc
Max. Pred Cw
829.2
Allowable Cw
265.1
Allowable Wday
0.0
RESULTS
Std Dev. 99.7453
Mean 179.8
C.V. 0.5547
(Number
of data points 66
Mult Factor =
1.54
Max. Value
540.0 µgll
Max. Pred Cw
829.2 µfill
Allowable Cw
265.1 µg/I
Parameter = Zinc
Standard = 50.0 µg/l
n <
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
1
145.
145.0
2
226.
226.0
3
257.
257.0
4
174.
174.0
5
197.
197.0
6
189.
189.0
7
144.
144.0
8
139.
139.0
9
194.
194.0
10
252.
252.0
11
247.
247.0
12
199.
199.0
13
220.
220.0
14
72.
72.0
15
173.
173.0
16
254.
254.0
17
272.
272.0
18
189.
189.0
19
433.
433.0
20
275.
275.0
21
236.
236.0
22
140.
140.0
23
540.
540.0
24
367.
367.0
25
392.
392.0
26
267.
267.0
27
164.
164.0
28
186.
186.0
29
356.
356.0
30
335.
335.0
31
258.
258.0

32
424.
424.0
33
240.
240.0
34
124.
124.0
35
141.
141.0
36
153.
153.0
37
186.
186.0
38
120.
120.0
39
156.
156.0
40
102.
IO2.0
41
103.
103.0
42
108.
108.0
43
106.
106.0
44
119.
119.0
45
115.9
115.9
46
108.
108.0
47
114.
114.0
48
131.
131.0
49
106.6
106.6
50
113.
113.0
51
89.
89.0
52
139.
139.0
53
123.
123.0
54
87.3
87.3
55
133.
133.0
56
101.
101.0
57
90.5
90.5
58
134.5
134.5
59
125.6
125.6
60
133.
133.0
61
103.
103.0
62
72.8
72.8
63
51.1
51.1
64
72.2
72.2
65
42.7
42.7
66
108.
108.0
• w

facility Narne =
Q►v (MGD) =
WWTP Classification
NPDES # =
Receiving Stream
1WC(%n) =
Final Resells:
Town of Spindale
4.5
4
NC0020664
Catheys Creek
25.86
Reasonable Potential Summary
Stream Classification C
7Q10s (cfs)= 20
30Q2 (cfs) 35
Qavg (cfs)l 62
Arsenic
Implementation
Max. Pred Cw
45.7 µg/1
(Are all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
No
(Monitoring
1
Allowable Cw
193.4 µg11
is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
No
Frequency None
Cadmium
j Implementation
j
Max. Pred Cw
6.8 µg/l
Are all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
No
Monitoring
Allowable Cw
7.7 µ 1
Its the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
Yes
!Frequency 2/Month
1/2 FAV (non Trout)
15.0 µg/1
I
Chromium
I Implementation
I
Max. Pred Cw
30.0 µg/l
'Are all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
No
Monitoring
Allowable Cw
193.4 µ 1
I Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
No
Frequency None
1/2 FAV
1022 µg/1
CopPec:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::...
(Implementation
Max. Pred Cw
376.6 µgll
jAre all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
No
j Monitoring
Allowable Cw
27.1 Agll
, Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
Yes
, Frequency 2/Month
1/2 FAV
7.3 µg/1
Cyanide
I Implementation
I
Max. Pred Cw
20.4 µg/l
jAre all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
Yes
'Monitoring
!Frequency
Allowable Cw
19.3 µg/l
i Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
Yes
Weekly
1/2 FAVI
22.0 µg/l
Lead
I Implementation
I
Max. Pred Cw
21.5 µg/l
i Are all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
No
j Monitoring
Allowable Cw
96.7 µg/l
GIs the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
No
iFrequency None
1/2 Fav
33.8 µg11
Mercury
I Implementation
Max. Pred Cw
2.2102 µg/1
jAre all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
Yes
I Monitoring
Allowable Cw
0.0464 µg/1
Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
Yes
Frequency Weekly
Nickel
Max. Pred Cw
653.9 µg/l
, Implementation
I Are all reported values less than?
GIs
No
Limit?
Yes
I Monitoring
Allowable Cw
340.3 µ /l
the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
Yes
jFrequency Weekly
1/2 FAV
261.0 µg/1
Silver :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
s Implementation
Max. Pred Cw
35.9 µgA
Are all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
No
Monitoring
Allowable Cw
0.2 AgIl
Is the detection limit acceptable?
-Yes
Monitor?
Yes
I Frequency 2/Month
1/2 FAV
1.2 µg/1
'

Selenium
I Implementation
Max. Pred Cw
39.1 µg/l
Are all reported values less than?
No Limit? Yes
! Monitoring
Allowable Cw
19.3 µg/l
I Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes' Monitor? Yes
( Frequency Weekly
1 /2 FAVI
56.0
µg/1
............................
Zino ::.:::::::::
.........................
Max. Pred Cw
829.2 µgll
' Implementation
(Are all reported values less than?
No Limit? No
'
, Monitoring
Allowable Cw
193.4 µg/l
I Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes Monitor? Yes
( Frequency 2/Month
1/2 FAV
67.0
µgll

Facilh), Name =
Town of Spindale
NPDCS ## =
NCO020664
Qiv (MGD) =
4.5
7Ql os (cfs)=
1 20
1 vc
25.86
FINAL RESULTS
Arsenic
Max. Pred Cw
45.73265127
Allowable Cw
193.4
RESULTS
Std Dev.
3.4220
Mean
5.8
C.v.
0.5887
Number
of data points
8
Mull Factor =
3.27
Max. Value
14.0 µg/1
Max. Pred Cw
45.73265127 µg/1
Allowable Cw
193.4 µg/1
Parameter = Arsenic
Standard = 50.0 µg/l
n
<
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
I
<
10
5.000
2 .
<
5
2.500
3
<
10
5.000
4
<
10
5.000
5
14
14.000
6
<
10
5.000
7
<
10
5.000
8
<
10
5.000

Facility Name =
Town of S indale
NPDES # =
NCO020664
Qw (MGD) =
4.5
7Q10s (cfs)=
20
1WC (%n) =
25.86
FINAL RESULTS
Cadmium
Max. Pred Cw
6.8
Allowable Cw
7.7
RESULTS
Std Dev. 1.2552
Mean 1.9
C.V. 0.6472
Number
of data points 124
Mult Factor =
1.371
Max. Value
5.0 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
6.8 µgll
Allowable Cw
7.7 µg/l
Parameter = Cadmium
Standard = 2.0 µg/l
n
<
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
I
<
2
1.0
2
<
2
1.0
3
<
2
1.0
4
<
2
1.0
5
<
2
1.0
6
<
2
1.0
7
<
2
1.0
8
<
2
1.0
9
<
2
1.0
10
<
2
1.0
l l
<
2
1.0
12
<
2
1.0
13
<
2
1.0
14
<
5
2.5
15
<
1
0.5
16
<
2
LO
17
<
2
1.0
18
<
2
1.0
19
<
2
1.0
20
<
2
1.0
21
<
2
1.0
22
<
2
1.0
23
<
2
1.0
24
<
2
1.0
25
<
2
1.0
26
<
2
1.0
27
<
2
1.0
28
<
2
1.0
29
<
2
1.0
30
<
2
1.0
31
<
2
1.0

32
< 2
1.0
33
< 2
1.0
34
< 2
1.0
35
< 2
1.0
36
< 2
1.0
37
< 2
1.0
38
< 2
1.0
39
4.
4.0
40
< 2
1.0
41
< 2
1.0
42
< 2
1.0
43
< 2
1.0
44
< 2
1.0
45
< 2
1.0
46
< 2
1.0
47
< 2
1.0
48
< 2
1.0
49
2.
2.0
50
< 2
1.0
51
2.
2.0
52
< 2
1.0
53
< 2
1.0
54
< 2
1.0
55
< 2
1.0
56
< 2
1.0
57
< 1
0.5
58
< 1
0.5
59
< 1
0.5
60
< 2
1.0
61
< 1
0.5
62
< 2
1.0
63
< 2
1.0
64
< 2
1.0
65
< 2
1.0
66
< 2
1.0

67 <
2
1.0
68 <
2
1.0
69 <
2
1.0
70 <
5
2.5
71 <
5
2.5
72 <
5
2.5
73 <
5
2.5
74 <
5
2.5
75 <
5
2.5
76 <
5
2.5
77 <
5
2.5
78 <
5
2.5
79 <
5
2.5
80 <
5
2.5
81 <
5
2.5
82 <
5
2.5
83 <
5
2.5
84 <
5
2.5
85 <
5
2.5
86 <
5
2.5
87 <
5
2.5
88 <
5
2.5
89 <
5
2.5
90 <
5
2.5
91 <
5
2.5
92 <
5
2.5
93 <
5
2.5
94 <
5
2.5
95 <
5
2.5
96 <
5
2.5
97 <
5
2.5
98 <
5
2.5
99 <
5
2.5
100 <
5
2.5
101 <
5
2.5

102 <
5
2.5
103 <
5
2.5
104 <
5
2.5
105 <
5
2.5
106 <
5
2.5
107 <
5
2.5
108 <
5
2.5
109 <
5
2.5
110 <
5
2.5
111 <
10
5.0
112 <
10
5.0
113 <
10
5.0
114 <
10
5.0
115 <
10
5.0
116 <
10
5.0
117 <
10
5.0
118 <
10
5.0
119 <
10
5.0
120 <
10
5.0
121 <
5
2.5
122 <
5
2.5
123 <
10
5.0
124 <
10
5.0

Facility Name =
Town of S indale
NPDCS # =
NCO020664
Qw (MCD) =
4.5
7Q10s (cfs)=
20
/WC
25.86
FINAL RESULTS
Cyanide
Max. Pred Cw
20.4
Allowable Cw
19.3
RESULTS
Std Dev. 1.2375
Mean 5.1
C.V. 0.2406
Number
of data points 126
Mull Factor =
1.13
Max. Value
18.0 µg/1
Max. Pred Cw
20.4 µg/1
Allowable Cw
19.3 µg/l
Parameter = Cy anide
Standard = 5.0 µg/l
n
<
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
1
<
10
5.0
2
<
10
5.0
3
<
10
5.0
4
<
10
5.0
5
t8.
18.0
6
<
10
5.0
7
<
10
5.0
8
<
10
5.0
9
<
10
5.0
10
<
10
5.0
11
<
10
5.0
12
<
10
5.0
13
<
10
5.0
14
<
10
5.0
15
<
10
5.0
16
<
10
5.0
17
<
10
5.0
18
<
10
5.0
19
<
10
5.0
20
<
10
5.0
21
<
10
5.0
22
<
10
5.0
23
<
10
5.0
24
<
10
5.0
25
<
10
5.0
26
<
10
5.0
27
<
10
5.0
28
<
10
5.0
29
<
10
5.0
30
<
10
5.0
31
<
10
5.0

32
<
10
5.0
33
<
10
5.0
34
<
I0
5.0
35
<
10
5.0
36
<
10
5.0
37
<
10
5.0
38
<
10
5.0
39
<
10
5.0
40
<
10
5.0
41
<
10
5.0
42
<
10
5.0
43
<
10
5.0
44
<
10
5.0
45.
<
10
5.0
46
<
10
5.0
47
<
10
5.0
48
<
10
5.0
49
<
10
5.0
50
<
10
5.0
51
<
10
5.0
52
<
10
5.0
53
<
10
5.0
54
<
10
5.0
55
<
to
5.0
56
<
10
5.0
57
<
10
5.0
58
<
10
5.0
59
<
10
5.0
60
<
10
5.0
61
<
10
5.0
62
<
10
5.0
63
<
10
5.0
64
<
10
5.0
65
<
10
5.0
66
<
10
5.0

67
<
10
5.0
68
<
10
5.0
69
<
10
5.0
70
<
10
5.0
71
<
10
5.0
72
<
10
5.0
73
<
10
5.0
74
<
10
5.0
75
<
10
5.0
76
<
10
5.0
77
<
10
5.0
78
<
10
5.0
79
<
10
5.0
80
<
10
5.0
81
<
10
5.0
82
<
10
5.0
83
<
10
5.0
84
<
10
5.0
85
<
10
5.0
86
<
10
5.0
87
<
10
5.0
88
<
10
5.0
89
<
10
5.0
90
<
10
5.0
91
<
10
5.0
92
<
10
5.0
93
<
10
5.0
94
<
10
5.0
95
<
10
5.0
96
<
10
5.0
97
<
10
5.0
98
<
10
5.0
99
10.
10.0
100
<
10
5.0
101
<
10
5.0

102
<
10
5.0
103
<
10
5.0
104
<
10
5.0
105
<
10
5.0
106
<
10
5.0
107
<
10
5.0
108
<
10
5.0
109
<
10
5.0
110
<
10
5.0
11I
<
10
5.0
112
<
10
5.0
113
<
10
5.0
114
<
10
5.0
115
<
10
5.0
116
<
10
5.0
117
<
10
5.0
118
<
10
5.0
119
<
10
5.0
120
<
10
5.0
121
<
10
5.0
122
<
10
5.0
123
<
10
5.0
124
<
10
5.0
125
<
I0
5.0
126
<
10
5.0

Facility Name =
Town of S indale
NPDES # =
NCO020664
Q%v (MGD) =
4.5
7QIOs (cfs)=
20
IWC
25.86
FINAL RESULTS
Copper
Max. Pred Cw
376.6
Allowable Cw
27.1
RESULTS
Std Dev. 45.2950
Mean 110.9
C.V. 0.4085
INuniber
of data points 66
Mull Factor =
=1.38
Max. Value
272.0
µg/I
Max. Pred Cw
376.6
µg/l
Allowable Cw
27.1
µg/I
Parameter = Copper
Standard = 7.0 µg/l
n <
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
1
85.
85.0
2
92.
92.0
3
158.
158.0
4
98.
98.0
5
78.
78.0
6
73.
73.0
7
55.
55.0
8
98.
98.0
9
85.
85.0
10
116.
116.0
11
98.
98.0
12
150.
150.0
13
184.
184.0
14
70.
70.0
15
130.
130.0
16
138.
138.0
17
184.
184.0
18
140.
140.0
19
132.
132.0
20
122.
122.0
21
90.
90.0
22
48.
48.0
23
167.
167.0
24
224.
224.0
25
121.
121.0
26
173.
173.0
27
147.
147.0
28
94.
94.0
29
165.
165.0
30
272.
272.0
31
126.
126.0

32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
244.
244.0
143.
143.0
62.
62.0
106.
106.0
110.
110.0
56.
56.0
83.
83.0
86.
86.0
57.
57.0
55.
55.0
92.
92.0
67.
67.0
90.
90.0
87.3
87.3
97.
97.0
94.
94.0
110.
110.0
77.2
77.2
81.8
81.8
64.8
64.8
123.
123.0
110.
110.0
95.8
95.8
103.
103.0
87.
87.0
90.5
90.5
114.3
114.3
9I.8
91.8
110.
110.0
91.9
91.9
97.1
97.1
97.2
97.2
77.3
77.3
62.7
62.7
191.,
191.0

Facility Name =
Town of S indale
NPDES ## =
NCO020664
Q►v (MGD) =
4.5
7Q10s (cfs)=
1 20
IWC (%n) =
F 25.86
FINAL RESULTS
Chromium
Max. Pred Cw 30.0
Allowable Cw 193.4
RESULTS
Std Dev. 4.2775
Mean 6.6
C.V. 0.6468
Number
of data points 62
Mult Factor =
1.67
Max. Value
18.0 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
30.0 µg/l
Allowable Cw
193.4 µg/I
Parameter = Chromium
Standard = 50.0 1 µg/1
n < Actual Data BDL=I/2DL
1
< 5
2.5
2
< 5
2.5
3
< 5
2.5
4
< 5
2.5
5
< 5
2.5
6
< 5
2.5
7
< 10
5.0
8
< 5
2.5
9
7.
7.0
10
7.
7.0
11
< 5
2.5
12
11.
11.0
13
13.
13.0
14
< 5
2.5
15
10.
10.0
16
< 5
2.5
17
7.
7.0
18
< 5
2.5
19
6.
6.0
20
< 5
2.5
21
< 5
2.5
22
< 5
2.5
23
< 10
5.0
24
< 10
5.0
25
< 10
5.0
26
< 10
5.0
27
< 10
5.0
28
< 5
2.5
29
< 10
5.0
30
< 10
5.0
31
< 10
5.0

32
<
10
5.0
33
<
10
5.0
34
<
10
5.0
35
<
10
5.0
36
<
10
5.0
37
<
10
5.0
38
17.
17.0
39
18.
18.0
40
B.
13.0
41
10.8
10.8
42
13.
13.0
43
14.
14.0
44
17.5
17.5
45
10.6
10.6
46
<
5
2.5
47
<
5
2.5
48
12.5
12.5
49
10.5
10.5
50
6.3
6.3
51
6.95
7.0
52
5.9
5.9
53
6.4
6.4
54
13.5
13.5
55
7.1
7.1
56
6.3
6.3
57
<
10
5.0
58
11.2
11.2
59
<
10
5.0
60
<
10
5.0
61
<
5
2.5
62
13.5
13.5

Facility Name =
Town of S indale
NPDESN=
NCO020664
Qw (A?GD) =
4.5
7QIOs (efs)=
20
IWC (%) =
25.86
FINAL RESUI,1'S
Lead
Max. Pred Cw 21.5
Allowable Cw
'16.
RESULTS
Std Dev.
2.1994
Mean
4.1
C.V.
0.5402
Number
of data points
63
Midi Factor =
1.54
Max. Value
14.0
µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
21.5
µg/l
Allowable Cw
96.7
µg/I
Parameter = Lead
Standard = 25.0 µg/I
n
<
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
I
<
5
2.5
2
<
5
2.5
3
<
5
2.5
4
<
5
2.5
5
<
5
2.5
6
<
5
2.5
7
<
5
2.5
8
<
5
2.5
9
<
5
2.5
10
<
5
2.5
11
<
5
2.5
12
<
.5
2.5
13
14.
14.0
14
10.
10.0
15
<
5
2.5
16
7.
7.0
17
5.
5.0
18
<
5
2.5
19
6.
6.0
20
<
5
2.5
21
<
5
2.5
22
<
5
2.5
23
6.
6.0
24
<
5
2.5
25
<
5
2.5
26
<
5
2.5
27
<
5
2.5
28
<
5
2.5
29
<
5
2.5
30
<
5
2.5
31
<
5
2.5

32
<
5
2.5
33
<
5
2.5
34
<
5
2.5
35
<
5
2.5
36
<
5
2.5
37
<
5
2.5
38
IL
11.0
39
<
5
2.5
40
<
10
5.0
41
<
5
2.5
42
<
10
5.0
43
<
10
5.0
44
<
10
5.0
45
<
10
5.0
46
<
10
5.0
47
<
10
5.0
48
<
10
5.0
49
<
10
5.0
50
<
10
5.0
51
<
10
5.0
52
<
10
5.0
53
<
10
5.0
54
<
10
5.0
55
<
10
5.0
56
<
10
5.0
57
<
10
5.0
58
<
10
5.0
59
<
10
5.0
60
<
10
5.0
61
<
10
5.0
62
<
10
5.0
63
<
10
5.0

Facility Name =
Town of Spindale
NPDES # =
NCO020664
Qiv (MGD) =
4.5
7Q1Os (cf5)=
20
1WC {oIo) =
25.86
FINAL RESULTS
Mercury
Max. Pred Cw
2.210
Allowable Cw
0.046
RESULTS
Std Dev. 0.1725
Mean 0.150
C.V. 1.1500
of data points 62
Milt Factor = I
2.2101
Max. Value
1.000 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
2.210 µg/l
Allowable Cw
0.046 µg/l
Parameter = Mercury
Stanelard = 0.012 µg/l
n
<
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
1
<
0.2
0.100
2
<
0.2
0.100
3
<
0.2
0.100
4
<
0.2
0.100
5
<
0.2
0.100
6
<
0.2
0.100
7
<
0.2
0.100
8
<
0.2
0.100
9
<
0.2
0.100
10
.2
0.200
11
<
0.2
0.100
12
<
0.2
0.100
13
<
0.2
0.100
14
<
0.2
0.100
15
<
0.2
0.100
16
<
0.2
0.100
17
.6
0.600
18
<
0.2
0.100
19
<
0.2
0.100
20
<
0.2
0.100
21
<
0.2
0.100
22
<
0.2
0.100
23
<
0.2
0.100
24
<
0.2
0.100
25
.5
0.500
26
<
0.2
0.100
27
.8
0.800
28
<
0.2
0.100
29
<
0.2
0.100
30
.6
0.600
31
<
0.2
0.100
32
1.
1.000
33
<
0.2
0.100
34
<
0.2
0.100
35
<
0.2
0.100
36
<
0.2
0.100
37
<
0.2
0.100
38
<
0.2
0.100
39
<
0.2
0.100
40
<
0.2
0.100
41
<
0.2
0.100
42
<
0.2
0.100
43
<
0.2
0.100
44
<
0.2
0.100
45
<
0.2
0.100

a
46
<
0.2
0.100
47
<
0.2
0.100
48
<
0.2
0.100
49
<
0.2
0.100
50
<
0.2
0.100
51
<
0.2
0.100
52
<
0.2
0.100
53
<
0.2
0.100
54
<
0.2
0.100
55
<
0.2
0.100
56
<
0.2
0.100
57
<
0.2
0.100
58
<
0.2
0.100
59
<
0.2
0.100
60
<
0.2
0.100
61
<
0.2
0.100
62
<
0.2
0.100

Facility Name =
Town of S indale
NPDCS # =
NCO020664
Qiv (MGD) =
4.5
7QIOs (cfs)=
20
IWC (°In) =
25.86
FINAL RESULTS
Nickel
Max. Pred Cw
653.9
Allowable Cw
340.3
RESULTS
Std Dev. 67.9207
Mean 44.7
C.V. 1.5182
Number
of data points 128
Mult Factor =
1.75
Max. Value
373.0 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
653.9 µg/l
Allowable Cw
340.3 µg/1
Parameter = Nickel
Standard = 88.0 µg/I
n <
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
1
11.
11.0
2
32.
32.0
3
16.
16.0
4
12.
12.0
5
13.
13.0
6
10.
10.0
7
16.
16.0
8
12.
12.0
9
12.
12.0
10
10.
10.0
11
11.
11.0
12
9.
9.0
13
36.
36.0
14
23.
23.0
15
112.
112.0
16
62.
62.0
17
40.
40.0
18
30.
30.0
19
23.
23.0
20
24.
24.0
21
23.
23.0
22
17.
17.0
23
14.
14.0
24
19.
19.0
25
31.
31.0
26
21.
21.0
27
20.
20.0
28
18.
18.0
29
11.
11.0
30
15.
15.0
31
16.
16.0

32
17.
17.0
33
22.
22.0
34
23.
23.0
35
20.
20.0
36
21.
21.0
37
16.
16.0
38
17.
17.0
39
27.
27.0
40
28.
28.0
41
49.
49.0
42
36.
36.0
43
80.
80.0
44
74.
74.0
45
66.
66.0
46
36.
36.0
47
63.
63.0
48
119.
119.0
49
62.
62.0
50
54.
54.0
51
43.
43.0
52
35.
35.0
53
35.
35.0
54
31.
31.0
55
22.
22.0
56
14.
14.0
57
20.
20.0
58
37.
37.0
59
32.
32.0
60
150.
150.0
61
332.
332.0
62
346.
346.0
63
373.
373.0
64
312.
312.0
65
237.
237.0
66
117.
117.0

67
72.
72.0
68
41.
41.0
69
37.
37.0
70
27.
27.0
71
22.
22.0
72
21.
21.0
73
20.
20.0
74
22.
22.0
75
61.
61.0
76
43.
43.0
77
40.
40.0
78
40.
40.0
79
43.
43.0
80
43.
43.0
81
33.5
33.5
82
34.
34.0
83
30.
30.0
84
32.
32.0
85
26.
26.0
86
26.
26.0
87
27.6
27.6
88
26.6
26.6
89
26.3
26.3
90
19.2
19.2
91
15.8
15.8
92
13.2
13.2
93
10.6
10.6
94
10.
10.0
95
199
19.9
96
32.3
32.3
97
25.3
25.3
98
25.3
25.3
99
28.
28.0
100
25.5
25.5
101
15.8
15.8

102
103
104
I05
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
29.9
29.9
28.9
28.9
28.5
28.5
20.7
20.7
23.3
23.3
22.2
22.2
14.5
14.5
19.6
19.6
22.6
22.6
19.1
19.1
21.2
21.2
18.3
18.3
19.
19.0
14.8
14.8
15.
15.0
10.6
10.6
17.5
17.5
10.
10.0
372.
372.0
78.8
78.8
27.3
27.3
18.1
18.1
12.9
12.9
19.3
19.3
25.3
25.3
57.4
57.4
39.8
39.8

Facility Name =
Town of Spindale
NPDCS ## =
NCO020664
Qiv (MGD) =
4.5
7QIOs (cfs)=
20
IWC (%) =
25.86
FINAL RESULTS
Selenium
Max. Pred Cw
39.1
Allowable Cw
19.3
RESULTS
Std Dev. 3.0815
Mean 5.7
C.V. 0.5418
(Number
of data points 8
Mult Factor =
3.011
Max. Value
13.0 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
39.1 µg/l
Allowable Cw
19.3 µg/l
Parameter =
Selenium
Standard =
5.0 µg/l
n
<
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
1
<
10
5.0
2
<
5
2.5
3
<
10
5.0
4
<
10
5.0
5
13
13.0
6
<
10
5.0
7
<
10
5.0
8
<
10
5.0

r
r
Facility Name =
Town of Spindale
NPDCS # =
NCO020664
Qw (MGD) =
4.5
7Q1Os (cfv)=
20
IWC (°!o) =
25.86
FINAL RESULTS
Silver
Max. Pred Cw
35.89
Allowable Cw
0.23
RESULTS
Std Dev. 4.2016
Mean 8.9
C.V. 0.4698
(Number
of data points 62
Mult Factor =
1.47
Max. Value
24.40 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
35.89 µg/l
Allowable Cw
0.23 µg/1
Parameter = Silver
Standard = 0.06 µg/l
n
<
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
I
<
5
2.5
2
<
5
2.5
3
<
5
2.5
4
<
5
2.5
5
<
5
2.5
6
<
5
2.5
7
<
5
2.5
8
<
5
2.5
9
<
5
2.5
10
<
5
2.5
11
<
5
2.5
12
<
5
2.5
13
<
5
2.5
14
<
5
2.5
15
<
5
2.5
16
<
5
2.5
17
<
5
2.5
18
<
5
2.5
19
<
5
2.5
20
<
5
2.5
21
<
5
2.5
22
<
5
2.5
23
<
10
5.0
24
<
10
5.0
25
<
10
5.0
26
<
10
5.0
27
<
10
5.0
28
<
5
2.5
29
<
10
5.0
30
<
10
5.0
31
<
10
5.0
32
<
10
5.0
33
<
10
5.0
34
<
10
5.0
35
<
10
5.0
36
<
10
5.0
37
<
10
5.0
38
7.
7.0
39
24.
24.0
40
<
10
5.0
41
<
10
5.0
42
<
10
5.0
43
17.6
17.6
44
10.
10.0
45
<
10
5.0
46
10.5
10.5
47
24.4
24.4
48
10.2
10.2

49
14.9
14.9
50
18.6
18.6
51
<
10
5.0
52
<
10
5.0
53
<
10
5.0
54
<
10
5.0
55
<
10
5.0
56
<
10
5.0
57
<
10
5.0
58
<
10
5.0
59
11.
11.0
60
11.3
11.3
61
<
10
5.0
62
<
10
5.0

Facility Name =
Town of S indale
NPDES # =
NCO020664
Qw (MGD) =
4.5
7Q/Os (cfs)=
20
IWC (°%n) =
25.86
FINAL RESULTS
Zinc
Max. Pred Cw
829.2
Allowable Cw
193.4
Allowable Wday
0.0
RESULTS
Std Dev. 99.7453
Mean 179.8
C.V. 0.5547
Number
of data points 66
Mull Factor =
1.54
Max. Value
540.0 µg/1
Max. Pred Cw
829.2 µg/1
Allowable Cw
193.4 µg/I
Parameter = Zinc
Standard = 50.0 dAg1l
n <
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
1
145.
145.0
2
226.
226.0
3
257.
257.0
4
174.
174.0
5
197.
197.0
6
189.
189.0
7
144.
144.0
8
139.
139.0
9
194.
194.0
10
252.
252.0
11
247.
247.0
12
199.
199.0
13
220.
220.0
14
72.
72.0
15
173.
173.0
16
254.
254.0
17
272.
272.0
18
189.
189.0
19
433.
433.0
20
275.
275.0
21
236.
236.0
22
140.
140.0
23
540.
540.0
24
367.
367.0
25
392.
392.0
26
267.
267.0
27
164.
164.0
28
186.
186.0
29
356.
356.0
30
335.
335.0
31
258.
258.0

32
424.
424.0
33
240.
240.0
34
124.
I24.0
35
141.
141.0
36
153.
153.0
37
186.
186.0
38
120.
120.0
39
156.
156.0
40
102.
102.0
41
103.
103.0
42
108.
108.0
43
106.
106.0
44
119.
119.0
45
115.9
115.9
46
108.
108.0
47
114.
114.0
48
131.
131.0
49
106.6
106.6
50
113.
113.0
51
89.
89.0
52
139.
139.0
53
123.
123.0
54
87.3
87.3
55
133.
133.0
56
101.
101.0
57
90.5
90.5
58
134.5
134.5
59
125.6
125.6
60
133.
133.0
61
103.
103.0
62
72.8
72.8
63
51.1
51.1
64
72.2
72.2
65
42.7
42.7
66
108.
108.0

Facility Naute =
Qw (MGD) =
WWTP Classification
NPDGS # =
Receiving Stream
l WC (%) =
Final Resulls:
Town of Spindale
6
4
NC0020664
Catheys Creek
31.74
Reasonable Potential Summary
10 20 30 4°
Stream Classification C .
7QIOs (cfs)= 20 ,
30Q2 (cfs) 35
Qavg (cfs) 62
Arsenic
:Implementation
1.
Max. Pred Cw
45.7 µg/1
Are all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
No
Monitoring
Allowable Cw
157.5 µg/1
Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
No
lFrequency None
Cadmium
j Implementation
j
Max. Pred Cw
6.8 µg/l
Are all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
Yes
Monitoring
Allowable Cw
6.3 µ /1
I Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
Yes
Frequency Weekly
1/2 FAV (non Trout)
15.0 µgli
I
I
Chromium
I Implementation
I
Max. Pred Cw
30.0 µg/1
'Are all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
No
Monitoring
Allowable Cw
157.5 µgll
I Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
No
Frequency None
1/2 FAVI
1022 µg/1
I
I
Copper- ::'::::::::::::::
::::::::::::
Ilmplementation
Max. Pred Cw
376.6 µg/l
'Are all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
No
' Monitoring
Allowable Cw
22.1 µ /l
Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
Yes
Frequency 2/Month
1/2 FAV
7.3 µg/1
I
Cyanide
I Implementation
Max. Pred Cw
20.4 µgll
jAre all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
Yes
j Monitoring
Allowable Cw
15.8 Agli
iIs the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
Yes
Frequency Weekly
1/2 FAVI
22.0 µg/1
Lead
I Implementation
I
Max. Pred Cw
21.5 µg/1
jAre all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
No
j Monitoring
Allowable Cw
78.8 µg/1
GIs the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
No
Frequency None
1/2 Fav
33.8 1 µg/1
Mercury
I Implementation
I
Max. Pred Cw
2.2102 µg/l
jAre all reported values less than?
No
Limit?
Yes
j Monitoring
Allowable Cw
0.0378 µgll
I Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
Yes
-Frequency Weekly
Nickel
,Implementation
,
Max. Pred Cw
653.9 µg/l
Are all reported values less than?
Yes
Limit?
Yes
I Monitoring
Allowable Cw
277.2 µg/I
Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
Yes
j Frequency Weekly
1/2 FAV
261.0 µg/1
Syet:::::::::::::::::::..;..:::::::::::::
Implementation
Max. Pred Cw
35.9 µg/l
I Are all reported values less than?
'
No
Limit?
No
I Monitoring
'
Allowable Cw
0.2 µ 1
Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes
Monitor?
Yes
I Frequency 2/Month
1/2 FAV
1.2 µg/1
I

Selenium
I Implementation
Max. Pred Cw
39.1 µg/l
kre all reported values less than?
No Limit? Yes
Monitoring
Allowable Cw
15.8 µgll
I Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes Monitor? Yes
I Frequency Weekly ,
1/2 FAV
56.0
µg/1
............................
.......................
Max. Pred Cw
829.2 µgll
Implementation
IAre all reported values less than?
No Limit? No
'
Monitoring
Allowable Cw
157.5 µg/1
I Is the detection limit acceptable?
Yes Monitor? Yes
I Frequency 2/Month
1/2 FAV
67.0 µg/l

Facility Name =
Town of Spindale
NPDES ## =
NCO020664
Qw (MGD) =
6
7Q10s (cfs)=
20
IWC (%) =
31.74
FINAL RESULTS
Arsenic
Max. Pred Cw
45.73265127
Allowable Cw
157.5
RESULTS
Std Dev.
3.4220
Mean
5.8
C.V.
0.5887
Number
of data points
8
Mull Factor =
3.27
Max. Value
14.0 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
45.73265127 µgll
Allowable Cw
157.5 µg/l
Parameter = Arsenic
Standard = 50.0 d µg/l
n
<
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
1
<
10
5.000
2
<
5
2.500
3
<
10
5.000
4
<
10
5.000
5
14
14.000
6
<
10
5.000
7
<
10
5.000
8
<
10
5.000

Facility Name =
Town of Spindale
NPDES # =
NCO020664
Qw (MGD) =
6
7QIOs (cfs)=
20
IWC (%) =
31.74
FINAL RESULTS
Cadmium
Max. Pred Cw
6.8
Allowable Cw
6.3
RESULTS
Std Dev. 1.2552
Mean 1.9
C.V. 0.6472
lNumber
of data points 124
Malt Factor =
1.371
Max. Value
5.0 µg/1
Max. Pred Cw
6.8 µg/1
Allowable Cw
6.3 µg/1
Parameter = Cadmium
Standard = 2.0 µg/l
n
<
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
I
<
2
1.0
2
<
2
1.0
3
<
2
1.0
4
<
2
1.0
5
<
2
1.0
6
<
2
1.0
7
<
2
1.0
8
<
2
1.0
9
<
2
1.0
10
<
2
1.0
1 I
<
2
1.0
12
<
2
1.0
13
<
2
1.0
14
<
5
2.5
15
<
1
0.5
16
<
2
1.0
17
<
2
1.0
18
<
2
1.0
19
<
2
1.0
20
<
2
1.0
21
<
2
1.0
22
<
2
1.0
23
<
2
1.0
24
<
2
1.0
25
<
2
1.0
26
<
2
1.0
27
<
2
1.0
28
<
2
1.0
29
<
2
1.0
30
<
2
1.0
31
<
2
1.0

32
<
2
1.0
33
<
2
1.0
34
<
2
1.0
35
<
2
1.0
36
<
2
1.0
37
<
2
1.0
38
<
2
1.0
39
4.
4.0
40
<
2
1.0
41
<
2
1.0
42
<
2
1.0
43
<
.2
1.0
44
<
2
1.0
45
<
2
1.0
46
<
2
1.0
47
<
2
1.0
48
<
2
1.0
49
2.
2.0
50
<
2
1.0
51
2.
2.0
52
<
2
1.0
53
<
2
1.0
54
<
2
1.0
55
<
2
1.0
56
<
2
1.0
57
<
1
0.5
58
<
1
0.5
59
<
1
0.5
60
<
2
1.0
61
<
1
0.5
62
<
2
1.0
63
<
2
1.0
64
<
2
1.0
65
<
2
1.0
66
<
2
1.0

67 <
2
1.0
68 <
2
1.0
69 <
2
1.0
70 <
5
2.5
71 <
5
2.5
72 <
5
2.5
73 <
5
2.5
74 <
5
2.5
75 <
5
2.5
76 <
5
2.5
77 <
5
2.5
78 <
5
2.5
79 <
5
2.5
80 <
5
2.5
81 <
5
2.5
82 <
5
2.5
83 <
5
2.5
84 <
5
2.5
85 <
5
2.5
86 <
5
2.5
87 <
5
2.5
88 <
5
2.5
89 <
5
2.5
90 <
5
2.5
91 <
5
2.5
92 <
5
2.5
93 <
5
2.5
94 <
5
2.5
95 <
5
2.5
96 <
5
2.5
97 <
5
2.5
98 <
5
2.5
99 <
5
2.5
100 <
5
2.5
101 <
5
2.5

102 <
5
2.5
103 <
5
2.5
104 <
5
2.5
105 <
5
2.5
106 <
5
2.5
107 <
5
2.5
108 <
5
2.5
109 <
5
2.5
110 <
5
2.5
111 <
10
5.0
112 <
10
5.0
113 <
10
5.0
114 <
10
5.0
115 <
10
5.0
116 <
10
5.0
117 <
10
5.0
118 <
10
5.0
119 <
10
5.0
120 <
10
5.0
121 <
5
2.5
122 <
5
2.5
123 <
10
5.0
124 <
10
5.0

Facility Name =
Town of S indale
NPDES # =
NCO020664
Q►v (MGD) =
6
7QlOs (cfs)=
20
lWC (%n) =
31.74
FINAL RESULTS
Cyanide
Max. Pred Cw
20.4
Allowable Cw
15.8
RESULTS
Std Dev. 1.2375
Mean 5.1
C.V. 0.2406
lNumber
of data Points 126
Mult Factor =
1.13
Max. Value
18.0 µg/1
Max. Pred Cw
20.4 µgll
Allowable Cw
15.8 µg/l
Parameter = Cyanide
Standard = 5.0 µg/l
n
<
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
1
<
10
5.0
2
<
10
5.0
3
<
10
5.0
4
<
10
5.0
5
B.
18.0
6
<
10
5.0
7
<
10
5.0
8
<
10
5.0
9
<
10
5.0
10
<
10
5.0
11
<
10
5.0
12
<
10
5.0
13
<
10
5.0
14
<
10
5.0
15
<
10
5.0
16
<
10
5.0
17
<
!0
5.0
18
<
10
5.0
19
<
10
5.0
20
<
10
5.0
21
<
10
5.0
22
<
10
5.0
23
<
10
5.0
24
<
10
5.0
25
<
10
5.0
26
<
10
5.0
27
<
10
5.0
28
<
10
5.0
29
<
10
5.0
30
<
10
5.0
31
<
10
5.0

32
<
10
5.0
33
<
10
5.0
34
<
10
5.0
35
<
10
5.0
36
<
10
5.0
37
<
10
5.0
38
<
10
5.0
39
<
10
5.0
40
<
10
5.0
41
<
10
5.0
42
<
10
5.0
43
<
10
5.0
44
<
10
5.0
45
<
10
5.0
46
<
10
5.0
47
<
10
5.0
48
<
10
5.0
49
<
10
5.0
50
<
10
5.0
51
<
10
5.0
52
<
10
5.0
53
<
10
5.0
54
<
10
5.0
55
<
10
5.0
56
<
10
5.0
57
<
10
5.0
58
<
10
5.0
59
<
10
5.0
60
<
10
5.0
61
<
10
5.0
62
<
10
5.0
63
<
10
5.0
64
<
10
5.0
65
<
10
5.0
66
<
10
5.0

67
<
10
5.0
68
<
10
5.0
69
<
10
5.0
70
<
10
5.0
71
<
10
5.0
72
<
10
5.0
73
<
10
5.0
74
<
10
5.0
75
<
10
5.0
76
<
10
5.0
77
<
10
5.0
78
<
10
5.0
79
<
10
5.0
80
<
10
5.0
81
<
10
5.0
82
<
10
5.0
83
<
10
5.0
84
<
10
5.0
85
<
10
5.0
86
<
10
5.0
87
<
10
5.0
88
<
10
5.0
89
<
10
5.0
90
<
10
5.0
91
<
10
5.0
92
<
10
5.0
93
<
10
5.0
94
<
10
5.0
95
<
10
5.0
96
<
10
5.0
97
<
10
5.0
98
<
10
5.0
99
10.
10.0
100
<
10
5.0
101
<
10
5.0

102
<
10
5.0
103
<
10
5.0
104
<
10
5.0
105
<
10
5.0
106
<
10
5.0
107
<
10
5.0
108
<
10
5.0
109
<
10
5.0
110
<
10
5.0
111
<
t0
5.0
112
<
to
5.0
113
<
10
5.0
114
<
to
5.0
115
<
10
5.0
116
<
10
5.0
117
<
10
5.0
118
<
10
5.0
119
<
10
5.0
120
<
10
5.0
121
<
10
5.0
122
<
10
5.0
123
<
10
5.0
124
<
10
5.0
125
<
10
5.0
126
<
to
5.0

Facility Name =
Town of S indale
NPDES # =
NCO020664
Qiv (MCD) =
6
7QIOS (Gf5)=
20
IWC (%n) =
3 l .74
FINAL RESULTS
Copper
Max. Pred Cw
376.6
Allowable Cw
22.1
RESULTS
Std Dev. 45.2950
Mean 110.9
C.V. 0.4085
Number
of data points 66
Mult Factor =
I.38
Max. Value
272.0
µgll
Max. Pred Cw
376.6
µg/l
Allowable Cw
22.1
µg/l
Parameter = Copper
Standard = 7.0 µgIl
n <
Actual Data
BDL=I/2DL
1
85.
85.0
2
92.
92.0
3
158.
158.0
4
98.
98.0
5
78.
78.0
6
73.
73.0
7
55.
55.0
8
98.
98.0
9
85.
85.0
10
116.
116.0
11
98.
98.0
12
150.
150.0
13
184.
184.0
14
70.
70.0
15
130.
130.0
16
138.
138.0
17
184.
184.0
18
140.
140.0
19
132.
132.0
20
122.
122.0
21
90.
90.0
22
48.
48.0
23
167.
167.0
24
224.
224.0
25
121.
121.0
26
173.
173.0
27
147.
147.0
28
94.
94.0
29
165.
165.0
30
272.
272.0
31
126.
126.0

32
244.
244.0
33
143.
143.0
34
62.
62.0
35
106.
106.0
36
110.
110.0
37
56.
56.0
38
83.
83.0
39
86.
86.0
40
57.
57.0
41
55.
55.0
42
92.
92.0
43
67.
67.0
44
90.
90.0
45
87.3
87.3
46
97.
97.0
47
94.
94.0
48
110.
110.0
49
77.2
77.2
50
81.8
81.8
51
64.8
64.8
52
123.
123.0
53
110.
110.0
54
95.8
95.8
55
103.
103.0
56
87.
87.0
57
90.5
90.5
58
114.3
114.3
59
91.8
91.8
60
110.
110.0
61
91.9
91.9
62
97.1
97.1
63
97.2
97.2
64
77.3
77.3
65
62.7
62.7
66
191.
191.0

Facility Name =
Town of S indale
NPDCS # =
NCO020664
Qw (MGD) =
6
7QIOs (cfs)=
20
IWC (%) =
31.74
FINAL RESULTS
Chromium
Max. Pred Cw 30.0
Allowable Cw 157.5
RESULTS
Std Dev. 4.2775
Mean 6.6
C. V . 0.6468
INumber
of data points 62
Mull Factor =
1.67
Max. Value
18.0 µg/1
Max. Pred Cw
30.0 µg/I
Allowable Cw
157.5 µg/l
Parameter = Chromium
Standard = 50.0 µg/I
n < Actual Data BDL=1/2DL
1
<
5
2.5
2
<
5
2.5
3
<
5
2.5
4
<
5
2.5
5
<
5
2.5
6
<
5
2.5
7
<
10
5.0
8
<
5
2.5
9
7.
7.0
10
7.
7.0
11
<
5
2.5
12
11.
11.0
13
13.
13.0
14
<
5
2.5
15
10.
10.0
16
<
5
2.5
17
7.
7.0
18
<
5
2.5
19
6.
6.0
20
<
5
2.5
21
<
5
2.5
22
<
5
2.5
23
<
10
5.0
24
<
10
5.0
25
<
10
5.0
26
<
10
5.0
27
<
10
5.0
28
<
5
2.5
29
<
10
5.0
30
<
10
5.0
31
<
10
5.0

32
< 10
5.0
33
< 10
5.0
34
< 10
5.0
35
< 10
5.0
36
< 10
5.0
37
< 10
5.0
38
17.
17.0
39
18.
18.0
40
13.
13.0
41
10.8
10.8
42
13.
13.0
43
14.
14.0
44
17.5
17.5
45
10.6
10.6
46
< 5
2.5
47
< 5
2.5
48
I2.5
12.5
49
10.5
10.5
50
6.3
6.3
51
6.95
7.0
52
5.9
5.9
53
6.4
6.4
54
13.5
13.5
55
7.1
7.1
56
6.3
6.3
57
< 10
5.0
58
11.2
11.2
59
< 10
5.0
60
< 10
5.0
61
< 5
2.5
62
13.5
13.5

Facility Name =
Town of S indale
NPDC.S N =
NCO020664
Qw (MGD) =
6
7Q10s(cfs)=
20
IWC(%)=
31.74
FINAL RESULTS
Lead
Max. Pred Cw 21.5
Allowable Cw
7S S
I Dev. 2.1994
:an 4.1
V. 0.5402
data points 63
Mult Factor
Max. Value
14.0
µ9/1
Max. Pred Cw
21.5
µg/I
Allowable Cw
78.8
µg/l
Parameter = Lead
Standard = 25.0 µgll
n
<
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
1
<
5
2.5
2
<
5
2.5
3
<
5
2.5
4
<
5
2.5
5
<
5
2.5
6
<
5
2.5
7
<
5
2.5
8
<
5
2.5
9
<
5
2.5
10
<
5
2.5
11
<
5
2.5
12
<
5
2.5
13
14.
14.0
14
10.
10.0
15
<
5
2.5
16
7.
7.0
17
5.
5.0
18
<
5
2.5
19
6.
6.0
20
<
5
2.5
21
<
5
2.5
22
<
5
2.5
23
6.
6.0
24
<
5
2.5
25
<
5
2.5
26
<
5
2.5
27
<
5
2.5
28
<
5
2.5
29
<
5
2.5
30
<
5
2.5
31
<
5
2.5

32
<
5
2.5
33
<
5
2.5
34
<
5
2.5
35
<
5
2.5
36
<
5
2.5
37
<
5
2.5
38
11.
11.0
39
<
5
2.5
40
<
10
5.0
41
<
5
2.5
42
<
I0
5.0
43
<
10
5.0
44
<
10
5.0
45
<
10
5.0
46
<
10
5.0
47
<
10
5.0
48
<
10
5.0
49
<
10
5.0
50
<
10
5.0
51
<
10
5.0
52
<
10
5.0
53
<
10
5.0
54
<
10
5.0
55
<
10
5.0
56
<
10
5.0
57
<
10
5.0
58
<
10
5.0
59
<
10
5.0
60
<
10
5.0
61
<
10
5.0
62
<
10
5.0
63
<
10
5.0

Facility Name =
Town of Spindale
NPDES # =
NCO020664
Q►v (MGD) =
6
7Q10s (cfs)=
20
IWC
31.74
FINAL RESULTS
Mercury
Max. Pred Cw
2.210
Allowable Cw
0.038
RESULTS
Std Dev. 0.1725
Mean 0.150
C.v. 1.1500
lNumber
of data points 62
Mult Factor =
2.210
Max. Value
1.000 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
2.210 µg/l
Allowable Cw
0.038 µgll
Parameter = Mercury
Standard = 0.012 µg/l
n
<
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
I
<
0.2
0.100
2
<
0.2
0.100
3
<
0.2
0.100
4
<
0.2
0.100
5
<
0.2
0.100
6
<
0.2
0.100
7
<
0.2
0.100
8
<
0.2
0.100
9
<
0.2
0.100
10
.2
0.200
11
<
0.2
0.100
12
<
0.2
0.100
13
<
0.2
0.100
14
<
0.2
0.100
15
<
0.2
0.100
16
<
0.2
0.100
17
.6
0.600
18
<
0.2
0.100
19
<
0.2
0.100
20
<
0.2
0.100
21
<
0.2
0.100
22
<
0.2
0.100
23
<
0.2
0.100
24
<
0.2
0.100
25
.5
0.500
26
<
0.2
0.100
27
.8
0.800
28
<
0.2
0.100
29
<
0.2
0.100
30
.6
0.600
31
<
0.2
0.100
32
1.
1.000
33
<
0.2
0.100
34
<
0.2
0.100
35
<
0.2
0.100
36
<
0.2
0.100
37
<
0.2
0.100
38
<
0.2
0.100
39
<
0.2
0.100
40
<
0.2
0.100
41
<
0.2
0.100
42
<
0.2
0.100
43
<
0.2
0.100
44
<
0.2
0.100
45
<
0.2
0.100

{
46
<
0.2
0.100
47
<
0.2
0.100
48
<
0.2
0.100
49
<
0.2
0.100
50
<
0.2
0.100
51
<
0.2
0.100
52
<
0.2
0.100
53
<
0.2
0.100
54
<
0.2
0.100
55
<
0.2
0.100
56
<
0.2
0.100
57
<
0.2
0.100
58
<
0.2
0.100
59
<
0.2
0.100
60
<
0.2
0.100
61
<
0.2
0.100
62
<
0.2
0.100

Facility Name =
Town of S indale
NPDES # =
NCO020664
Q►v (MGD) =
6
7QIOs (cfs)=
20
IWC (%n) =
31.74
FINAL RESULTS
Nickel
Max. Pred Cw
653.9
Allowable Cw
277.2
RESULTS
Std Dev. 67.9207
Mean 44.7
C.V. 1.5182
Number
of data points 128
Mult Factor =
1.75
Max. Value
373.0 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
653.9 µg/1
Allowable Cw
277.2 µg/l
Parameter = Nickel
Standard = 88.0 1 µg/l
n <
Actual Data
BDL=I/2DL
1
11.
11.0
2
32.
32.0
3
16.
16.0
4
12.
12.0
5
13.
13.0
6
10.
10.0
7
16.
16.0
8
12.
12.0
9
12.
12.0
10
10.
10.0
I
ll.
11.0
12
9.
9.0
13
36.
36.0
14
23.
23.0
15
112.
112.0
16
62.
62.0
17
40.
40.0
18
30.
30.0
19
23.
23.0
20
24.
24.0
21
23.
23.0
22
17.
17.0
23
14.
14.0
24
19.
19.0
25
31.
31.0
26
21.
21.0
27
20.
20.0
28
18.
18.0
29
11.
11.0
30
15.
15.0
31
16.
16.0

32
17.
17.0
33
22.
22.0
34
23.
23.0
35
20.
20.0
36
21.
21.0
37
16.
16.0
38
17.
17.0
39
27.
27.0
40
28.
28.0
41
49.
49.0
42
36.
36.0
43
80.
80.0
44
74.
74.0
45
66.
66.0
46
36.
36.0
47
63.
63.0
48
119.
119.0
49
62.
62.0
50
54.
54.0
51
43.
43.0
52
35.
35.0
53
35.
35.0
54
31.
31.0
55
22.
22.0
56
14.
14.0
57
20.
20.0
58
37.
37.0
59
32.
32.0
60
150.
150.0
61
332.
332.0
62
346.
346.0
63
373.
373.0
64
312.
312.0
65
237.
237.0
66
117.
117.0

67
72.
72.0
68
41.
41.0
69
37.
37.0
70
27.
27.0
71
22.
22.0
72
21.
21.0
73
20.
20.0
74
22.
22.0
75
61.
61.0
76
43.
43.0
77
40.
40.0
78
40.
40.0
79
43.
43.0
80
43.
43.0
81
33.5
33.5
82
34.
34.0
83
30.
30.0
84
32.
32.0
85
26.
26.0
86
26.
26.0
87
27.6
27.6
88
26.6
26.6
89
26.3
26.3
90
19.2
19.2
91
15.8
15.8
92
13.2
13.2
93
10.6
10.6
94
10:
10.0
95
19.9
19.9
96
32.3
32.3
97
25.3
25.3
98
25.3
25.3
99
28.
28.0
100
25.5
25.5
101
15.8
15.8

102
29.9
29.9
103
28.9
28.9
104
28.5
28.5
105
20.7
20.7
106
23.3
23.3
107
22.2
22.2
108
14.5
14.5
109
19.6
19.6
110
22.6
22.6
111
19.1
19.1
112
21.2
21.2
1 I 3
18.3
18.3
114
19.
19.0
115
14.8
14.8
116
15.
15.0
117
10.6
10.6
118
17.5
17.5
119
10.
10.0
120
372.
372.0
121
78.8
78.8
122
27.3
27.3
123
18.1
18.1
I24
12.9
12.9
125
19.3
19.3
126
25.3
25.3
127
57.4
57.4
128
39.8
39.8

FacililY Name =
Town of Spindale
NPDES ## =
NCO020664
Qw (MGD) =
6
7Q10s (cfs)=
20
IWC (°In) =
31.74
FINAL RESULTS
Selenium
Max. Pred Cw
39.1
Allowable Cw
15.8
RESULTS
Std Dev. 3.0815
Mean 5.7
C.V. 0.5418
(Number
of data points 8
Mull Factor =
3.011
Max. Value
13.0 µg/1
Max. Pred Cw
39.1 µg/l
Allowable Cw
15.8 µg/l
Parameter =
Selenium
Sttuulard =
5.0 µg/I
n
<
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
1
<
10
5.0
2
<
5
2.5
3
<
10
5.0
4
<
10
5.0
5
13
13.0
6
<
10
5.0
7
<
10
5.0
8
<
10
5.0

facility Name = Town of Spindale
NPDCS ## =
NCO020664
Qiv (MGD) =
6
7Q10s (cfs)=
20
IWC (%) =
31.74
FINAL RESULTS
Silver
Max. Pred Cw
35.89
Allowable Cw
0.19
RESULTS
Std Dev. 4.2016
Mean 8.9
C.V. 0.4698
(Number
of data points 62
Mult Factor =
1.47
Max. Value
24.40 µgll
Max. Pred Cw
35.89 µg/1
Allowable Cw
0.19 µg/l
Parameter = Silver
Stcmdarcl = 0.06 µg/I
n
<
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
<
5
2.5
2
<
5
2.5
3
<
5
2.5
4
<
5
2.5
5
<
5
2.5
6
<
5
2.5
7
<
5
2.5
8
<
5
2.5
9
<
5
2.5
10
<
5
2.5
11
<
5
2.5
12
<
5
2.5
13
<
5
2.5
14
<
5
2.5
15
<
5
2.5
16
<
5
2.5
17
<
5
2.5
18
<
5
2.5
19
<
5
2.5
20
<
5
2.5
21
<
5
2.5
22
<
5
2.5
23
<
10
5.0
24
<
10
5.0
25
<
10
5.0
26
<
10
5.0
27
<
10
5.0
28
<
5
2.5
29
<
10
5.0
30
<
10
5.0
31
<
10
5.0
32
<
10
5.0
33
<
1.0
5.0
34
<
10
5.0
35
<
10
5.0
36
<
10
5.0
37
<
10
5.0
38
7.
7.0
39
24.
24.0
40
<
10
5.0
41
<
10
5.0
42
<
10
5.0
43
17.6
17.6
44
10.
10.0
45
<
10
5.0
46
10.5
10.5
47
24.4
24.4
48
10.2
10.2

t
�
L
t
d
49
14.9
14.9
50
18.6
18.6
51
<
10
5.0
52
<
10
5.0
53
<
10
5.0
54
<
10
5.0
55
<
10
5.0
56
<
10
5.0
57
<
10
5.0
58
<
10
5.0
59
11.
11.0
60
11.3
11.3
61
<
10
5.0
62
<
10
5.0

Facility Name = Town of S indale
NPDES # =
NCO020664
Q►v (MGD) =
6
7Q IOs (cfs )=
20
IWC
31.74
FINAL RESULTS
Zinc
Max. Pred Cw
829.2
Allowable Cw
157.5
Allowable Wday
0.0
RESULTS
Std Dev. 99.7453
Mean 179.8
C.V. 0.5547
Number
of data points 66
Mult Factor =
1.54
Max. Value
540.0 µgh
Max. Pred Cw
829.2 µg/l
Allowable Cw
157.5 µg/l
Parameter = Zinc
Standard = 50.0 j µg/l
n <
Actual Data
BDL=1/2DL
1
145.
145.0
2
226.
226.0
3
257.
257.0
4
174.
174.0
5
197.
197.0
6
189.
189.0
7
144.
144.0
8
139.
139.0
9
194.
194.0
10
252.
252.0
11
247.
247.0
12
199.
199.0
13
220.
220.0
14
72.
72.0
15
173.
173.0
16
254.
254.0
17
272.
272.0
18
189.
189.0
19
433.
433.0
20
275.
275.0
21
236.
236.0
22
140.
140.0
23
540.
540.0
24
367.
367.0
25
392.
392.0
26
267.
267.0
27
164.
164.0
28
186.
186.0
29
356.
356.0
30
335.
335.0
31
258.
258.0

32
424.
424.0
33
240.
240.0
34
124.
124.0
35
141.
141.0
36
153.
153.0
37
186.
186.0
38
120.
120.0
39
156.
156.0
40
102.
102.0
41
103.
103.0
42
108.
108.0
43
106.
106.0
44
119.
119.0
45
115.9
115.9
46
108.
108.0
47
114.
114.0
48
131.
131.0
49
106.6
106.6
50
113.
113.0
51
89.
89.0
52
139.
139.0
53
123.
123.0
54
87.3
87.3
55
133.
133.0
56
101.
101.0
57
90.5
90.5
58
134.5
134.5
59
125.6
125.6
60
133.
133.0
61
103.
103.0
62
72.8
72.8
63
51.1
51.1
64
72.2
72.2
65
42.7
42.7
66
108.
108.0

Spindale DMRs
Zinc
Sulfate
Lead
Mercury
Copper
Chromium
Month Day
Year
Value UoM
Value UoM
Comment
Value UoM
Comment
Value UoM
Value UoM
Comment
Value UoM
1
2
2001
145. ug/l
205. mgll
<
5 ugA
<
0.2 ug/l
85. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
1
23
2001
226. ug/l
100. mg/l
<
5 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
92. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
2
6
2001
257. ug/l
192. mg/l
<
5 ug/l
<
0.2 ugA
158. ug/l
<
5 ugA
2
20
2001
174. ug/l
214. mg/l
<
5 ug/l
<
0.2 ugA
98. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
3
6
2001
197. ug/l
208. mg/l
<
5 ugA
<
0.2 ugA
78. ugA
<
5 ugA
3
13
2001
189. ugh
230. mg/l
<
5 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
73. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
4
4
2001
144. ug/l
217. mg/l
<
5 ug/l
<
0.2 ugA
55. ug/l
<
10 ugA
4
17
2001
139. ug/l
181. mg/l
<
5 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
98. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
5
8
2001
194. ug/l
180. mg/l
<
5 ugA
<
0.2 ugA
85. ugA
7. ugA
5
22
2001
252. ug/l
200. mg/l
<
5 ug/l
.2 ug/l
116. ug/l
7. ug/l
6
5
2001
247. ug/l
217. mg/l
<
5 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
98. ugA
<
5 ugA
6
12
2001
199. ug/l
209. mg/l
<
5 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
150. ug/l
11. ug/l
6
26
2001
220. ugA
189. mg/l
14. ugA
<
0.2 ug/l
184. ug/l
13. ugA
7
10
2001
72. ug/l
65.8 mg/l
10. ugA
<
0.2 ug/l
70. ugA
<
5 ug/l
7
24
2001
173. ugA
216. mg/l
<
5 ugA
<
0.2 ugA
130. ugA
10. ug/i
8
7
2001
254. ug/l
186. mg/l
7. ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
138. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
8
21
2001
272. ug/l
277. mg/l
5. ug/l
.6 ugA
184. ugA
7. ug/l
9
4
2001
189. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
140. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
9
11
2001
433. ugA
190. mg/l
6. ugA
<
0.2 ugA
132. ugA
6. ugA
9
25
2001
275. ug/l
193. mg/l
<
5 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
122. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
10
9
2001
236. ugA
184. mg/l
<
5 ugA
<
0.2 ug/l
90. ugA
<
5 ug/l
10
23
2001
140. ug/l
189. mg/l
<
5 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
48. ugA
<
5 ug/l
11
8
2001
540. mg/l
220. mg/l
6. ugA
<
0.2 mgll
167. mgA
<
10 mgA
11
13
2001
367. mg/l
<
5 ug/l
224. mg/l
11
16
2001
392. mgll
121. mg/l
11
20
2001
267. mg/l
<
5 ug/l
<
0.2 mg/l
173. mg/l
<
10 mg/l
11
27
2001
164. mgA
198. mgA
<
5 ugA
.5 mg/l
147. mg/l
<
10 mgA
12
4
2001
186. ug/l
202. mg/l
<
5 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
94. ug/l
<
10 ug/l
12
18
2001
356. ug/l
238. mg/l
<
5 ugA
.8 ugA
165. ugA
<
10 ugA
1
2
2002
335. ug/l
201. mg/l
<
5 ug/l
<
0.2 ugll
272. ug/l
<
5 ugA
1
15
2002
258. ugA
197. mg/l
<
5 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
126. ug/l
<
10 ugA
1
18
2002
424. ug/l
244. ug/l
1
25
2002
240. ug/l
143. ugA
2
5
2002
124. ug/l
206. mg1l
<
5 ug/l
.6 ug/l
62. ugA
<
10 ug/l
2
19
2002
141. ug/l
240. mgll
<
5 ug/l
<
0.2 ugA
106. ug/l
<
10 ugA
3
12
2002
153. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
1. ug/l
110. ug/l
<
10 ug/l
3
19
2002
186. ugA
163. mg/l
<
5 ugA
<
0.2 ug/l
56. ug/l
<
10 ug/l
3
26
2002
120. ug/l
175. mg/l
<
5 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
83. ug/l
<
10 ug/l
4
9
2002
156. ug/l
182. mg/l
<
5 ugA
<
0.2 ug/l
86. ug/l
<
10 ug/l
4
23
2002
102. ug/l
131. mg/l
<
5 ugA
<
0.2 ug/l
57. ug/l
<
10 ug/l
5
7
2002
103. ug/l
130. mg/l
11. ug/l
<
0.2 ugA
55. ug/l
<
10 ugA
5
21
2002
108. ug/l
135. mg/l
<
5 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
92. ug/l
17. ug/l
6
6
2002
106. ug/l
144. mg/l
<
10 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
67. ug/l
18. ugA
6
18
2002
119. ug/l
134. mg/l
<
5 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
90. ug/l
13. ug/l
7
2
2002
115.9 ug/l
132. mg/l
<
10 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
87.3 ug/l
10.8 ug/l
7
16
2002
108. ug/l
118. mg/l
<
10 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
97. ug/l
13. ug/l
8
6
2002
114. ug/l
156. mg/l
<
10 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
94. ug/l
14. ug/l
8
20
2002
131. ug/l
63.4 mg/l
<
10 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
110. ug/l
17.5 ug/l

9 5
2002
106.6 ug/l
120. mg/l <
9 17
2002
113. ug/l
152. mg/l <
10 1
2002
89. ug/l
122. mg/l <
10 15
2002
139. ugA
137. mgA <
11 5
2002
123. ug/l
132. mgA <
11 19
2002
87.3 ug/l
106. mgA <
12 5
2002
133. ug/l
S. mgA <
12 17
2002
101. ug/l
125. mgll <
1 7
2003
90.5 ugA
126. mg/l <
1 21
2003
134.5 ug/l
191. mgll <
2 4
2003
125.6 ugA
129. mgll <
2 18
2003
133. ugA
149. mg/l <
3 3
2003
103. ugA
134. mgA <
3 19
2003
72.8 ug/l
121. mg/l <
4 1
2003
51.1 ug/l
105. mg/l <
4 15
2003
72.2 ug/l
82.2 mg/l <
5 6
2003
42.7 ugA
96.9 mgll <
5 20
2003
108. ug/I
75.1 mg/l <
averag 161.294915
10 ug/l
<
0.2 ugA
77.2 ug/l
10.6. ug/l
10 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
81.8 ug/l <
5 ug/l
10 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
64.8 ug/l <
5 ug/l
10 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
123. ug/l
12.5 ugA
10 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
110. ug/l
10.5 ug/l
10 ug/l
<
0.2 ugA
95.8 ug/l
6.3 ug/l
10 ugA
<
0.2 ugA
103. ug/l
6.95 ug/l
10 ugA
<
0.2 ugA
87. ugA
5.9 ug/l
10 ugA
<
0.2 ugA
90.5 ugA
6.4 ug/l
10 ugA
<
0.2 ugA
114.3 ug/l
13.5 ug/l
10 ugA
<
0.2 ug/l
91.8 ug/l
7.1 ug/l
10 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
110. ug/l
6.3 ug/l
10 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
91.9 ugA <
10 ug/l
10 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
97.1 ug/l
11.2 ug/l
10 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
97.2 ugA <
10 ugA
10 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
77.3 ug/l <
10 ug/l
10 ugA
<
0.2 ugA
62.7 ugA <
5 ug/l
10 ug/l
<
0.2 ug/l
191. ug/l
13.5 ug/l

Silver Arsenic Selenium
Comme Value UoM
< 5 ugA
< 5 ug/l
< 5 ugA
< 5 ug/l
< 5 ugA
< 5 ug/l
< 5 ugA
< 5 ug/I
< 5 ug/I
< 5 ugA
< 5 ug/l
< 5 ugA <10
< 5 ugA
< 5 ug/l
< 5 ug/l
< 5 ugA
< 5 ug/I
< 5 ugA
< 5 ugA <5
< 5 ug/l
< 5 ug/l
< 5 ugA
< 10 mg/I
<10
<5
< 10 mg/I
< 10 mg/I
< 10 ug/I
< 10 ug/l <10 <10
< 5 ugA
< 10 ug/l
< 10 ug/l
< 10 ugA
< 10 ug/l
< 10 ug/l
< 10 ug/l <10 <10
< 10 ug/I
< 10 ug/l
< 10 ug/l
7. ugA
24. ugn 14 13
< 10 ug/l
< 10 ugn
< 10 ug/l
17.6 ug/l
10. ugn

10 s
a.
10 ug/l <10 <10
10.5 ug/l
24.4 ug/l
10.2 ugA
14.9 ug/l
18.6 ug/l
< 10 ug/l <10 <10
< 10 ug/l
< 10 ugli
< 10 ugA
< 10 ug/l
< 10 ugA
< 10 ug/l <10 <10
< 10 ugA
11. ug/l
11.3 ug/i
< 10 ug/l
< 10 ugA

Nickel
Cyanide
Cadmium
Month
Day
Year Comment
Value UoM
Comment
Value UoM
Comment
Value UoM
1
2
2001
11. ug/l
<
5 ugA
<
2 ugA
1
9
2001
32. ug/l
<
5 ugA
<
2 ug/l
1
16
2001
16. ug/l
<
5 ugA
<
2 ug/I
1
23
2001
12. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ug/l
1
30
2001
13. ug/I
18. ug/I
<
2 ug/I
2
6
2001
10. ug/I
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ugA
2
13
2001
16. ug/l
<
5 ug/I
<
2 ugA
2
20
2001
12. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ugA
2
27
2001
12. ug/l
<
5 ug/I
<
2 ugA
3
6
2001
10. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ug/I
3
13
2001
11. ug/l
<
5 ug/I
<
2 ug/l
3
20
2001
9. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ug/I
3
27
2001
36. ugA
<
5 ugA
<
2 ug/I
4
4
2001
23. ug/l
<
5 ugA
<
5 ug/l
4
10
2001
112. ugA
<
5 ugA
<
1 ug/I
4
17
2001
62. ugA
<
5 ugA
<
2 ug/I
4
24
2001
40. ug/l
7. ugA
<
2 ugA
5
1
2001
30. ugA
<
5 ug/I
<
2 ug/I
5
8
2001
23. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ug/l
5
15
2001
24. ug/l
<
5 ugA
<
2 ug/l
5
22
2001
23. ugA
<
5 ugA
<
2 ug/l
5
29
2001
17. ugA
<
5 ugA
<
2 ug/l
6
5
2001
14. ug/l
<
5 ugA
<
2 ug/l
6
12
2001
19. ugA
<
5 ugA
<
2 ug/I
6
19
2001
31. ug/l
7. ug/l
<
2 ug/I
6
26
2001
21. ug1l
<
5 ugA
<
2 ug/l
7
3
2001
20. ugA
<
5 ugA
<
2 ug/l
7
10
2001
18. ug/l
<
5 ugA
<
2 ugA
7
17
2001
11. ugA
<
5 ugA
<
2 ug/l
7
24
2001
15. ugA
<
5 ugA
<
2 ugA
7
31
2001
16. ug/l
<
5 ugA
<
2 ug/l
8
7
2001
17. ug/I
<
5 ug/I
<
2 ug/I
8
14
2001
22. ug/I
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ug/I
8
21
2001
23. ugA
<
5 ugA
<
2 ug/l
8
28
2001
20. ugA
<
5 ugA
<
2 ug/l
9
4
2001
21. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ugA
9
11
2001
16. ugA
<
5 ugA
<
2 ug/l
9
18
2001
17. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ug/l
9
25
2001
27. ug/I
<
5 ug/l
4. ug/l
10
2
2001
28. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ug/I
10
9
2001
49. ug/l
<
5 ugA
<
2 ug/l
10
16
2001
36. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ug/l
10
23
2001
80. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ugA
10
30
2001
74. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ug/l
11
8
2001
66. ug/I
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ug/I
11
13
2001
36. ug/I
<
5 ug/I
<
2 ug/l
11
20
2001
63. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ug/l
11
27
2001
119. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ug/l

12 4
2001
62. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
2. ug/l
12 11
2001
54. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ug/l
12 18
2001
43. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
2. ug/l
12 26
2001
35. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ugh
1 2
2002
35. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ug/l
1 8
2002
31. ug/l
5.1 ug/l
1 15
2002
22. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ugA
1 18
2002
14. ugli
1 22
2002
20. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ugA
1 25
2002
37, ug/l
ug/l
1 29
2002
32. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ug/l
2 5
2002
150. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
1 ug/l
2 12
2002
332. ugA
<
5 ug/l
<
1 ugA
2 19
2002
346. ugA
<
5 ug/l
<
1 ugA
2 26
2002
373. ugA
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ugA
3 5
2002
312. ugA
<
5 ug/l
<
1 ugA
3 12
2002
237. ugA
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ugA
3 19
2002
117. ugA
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ugA
3 26
2002
72. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ugA
4 2
2002
41. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ug/l
4 9
2002
37. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ugA
4 16
2002
27. ugA
<
5 ug/l
ugA
4 23
2002
22. ugA
<
5 ug/l
<
2 ugA
4 30
2002
21. ugll
<
5 ugli
<
2 ugA
5 7
2002
20. ugli
<
5 ugA
<
2 ugA
5 14
2002
22. ugli
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ugA
5 21
2002
61. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
5 28
2002
43. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ugA
6 6
2002
40. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ugA
6 11
2002
40. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
6 18
2002
43. ugA
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ugA
6 25
2002
43. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ugA
7 2
2002
33.5 ug/l
<
5 ugli
<
5 ugA
7 9
2002
34. ugA
<
5 ugli
<
5 ugA
7 16
2002
30. ug/l
<
5 ugli
<
5 ug/l
7 23
2002
32. ug/l
<
5 ugli
<
5 ugA
7 30
2002
26. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ugA
8 6
2002
26. ug/l
<
5 ugli
<
5 ugA
8 12
2002
27.6 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ugA
8 20
2002
26.6 ug/l
<
5 ugli
<
5 ugA
8 27
2002
26.3 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ugA
9 5
2002
19.2 ug/l
<
5 ugli
<
5 ugA
9 10
2002
15.8 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ugA
9 17
2002
13.2 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
9 24
2002
10.6 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
10 1
2002
10. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
10 8
2002
19.9 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ugli
10 15
2002
32.3 ugA
<
5 ugli
<
5 ug/l
10 22
2002
25.3 ug/l
<
5 ugA
<
5 ug/i
10 29
2002
25.3 ug/l
<
5 ugil
<
5 ug/l
11 5
2002
28. ug/l
<
5 ugil
<
5 ug/l
11 12
2002
25.5 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ug/l

9
11 19
2002
15.8 ug/l
10. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
11 26
2002
29.9 ug/i
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
12 5
2002
28.9 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
12 10
2002
28.5 ug/l
<
5 ugll
<
5 ug/l
12 17
2002
20.7 ugll
<
5 ugli
<
5 ug/l
12 23
2002
23.3 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
12 31
2002
22.2 ug/l
<
5 ugli
<
5 ugli
1 7
2003
14.5 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ugll
1 14
2003
19.6 ugli
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ugll
1 21
2003
22.6 ug/l
<
5 ugll
<
5 ug/l
1 28
2003
19.1 ugll
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
2 4
2003
21.2 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
2 11
2003
18.3 ug/l
<
5 ugll
<
5 ug/l
2 18
2003
19. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
2 25
2003
14.8 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
10 ugll
3 3
2003
15. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
10 ug/l
3 11
2003
10.6 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
10 ug/l
3 19
2003
17.5 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
10 ug/l
3 25
2003
10. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
10 ug/l
4 1
2003
372. ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
10 ug/l
4 8
2003
78.8 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
10 ug/l
4 15
2003
27.3 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
10 ug/l
4 22
2003
18.1 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
10 ugll
4 29
2003
12.9 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
10 ug/l
5 6
2003
19.3 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
5 13
2003
25.3 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
<
5 ug/l
5 20
2003
57.4 ugll
<
5 ugn
<
10 ugll
5 27
2003
39.8 ugll
<
5 ug/l
<
10 ug/l

Spindale Instream
BOD and ammonia nitrogen generally below detection both u and d
Date
Upstream - Cathey's Creek at SR 1547
Downstream - Cathey's Creek at SR 1549
Temp. eca Conductivity
(deg. C) (mg/L) mL) (umhos)
emp. D.0 FecalConductivity
(deg. C) (mg/L) mL) (umhos)
Jan-02
3.5
13
151
54.4
4.2
12.3
120
239
Feb-02
5.3
11.5
154
50.8
5.3
11.3
188
221
Mar-02
9.5
11
86
58.5
9.8
10.6
154
160
Apr-02
14.1
9.6
144
58.6
14.3
9.4
185
172
May-02
15.5
9.2
192
61.5
15.4
9
299
202
Jun-02
20.1
8.4
221
59.6
19.8
8.4
266
326
Jul-02
22.5
8
205
62
22.5
7.9
263
339
Aug-02
21.5
8.5
222
67.2
21.9
8.2
366
407
Sep-02
19.5
8
260
61.1
19.9
7.9
327
265
Oct-02
16.4
8.7
299
59.6
16.2
8.5
286
223
Nov-02
10.3
10.3
195
85
10.4
9.9
228
197
Dec-02
6
12
230
102
5.9
11.6
246
173
Jan-03
3.5
13
177
106
3.4
12.8
214
176
Feb-03
6.5
11.7
107
68.8
6.7
11.3
136
167
Mar-03
10.1
11.3
186
70.8
9.8
10.9
183
134
Apr-03
12.6
10.1
118
77.8
12.1
9.8
128
145
May-03
15.4
9.2
221
63.3
15.2
8.9
292
110

I Data Summary
emp.
D.O.
BOD
TSS
Conductivity
Fecal
(deg. C)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
(umhos)
mL)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
TN (mg/L)
17.1
8.88
7.0
16.0
3443.6
22.9
0.284
0.02
18.9
8.64
4.6
14.9
3586.1
5.7
0.453
0.00
19.7
7.75
7.5
28.5
1475.0
34.0
0.286
0.29
6.38
21.4
7.69
5.4
27.1
2806.0
10.3
0.264
1.48
24.5
7.48
4.3
18.6
3195.4
41.3
0.117
0.21
26.5
7.48
4.4
38.3
3192.7
75.0
0.058
0.56
13.54
27.4
7.76
5.7
34.3
2464.0
10.5
0.178
0.17
28.7
7.51
5.2
38.8
2785.0
28.2
0.024
0.00
25.6
6.92
3.8
15.3
2488.6
2.1
0.238
0.00
6.57
21.3
8.28
3.6
11.9
2791.6
6.5
0.181
1.03
18.9
8.89
2.2
7.5
2972.5
3.5
0.265
0.05
18.1
9.12
3.2
15.4
2834.7
11.3
0.202
0.00
5.6
15.4
9.06
3.3
8.3
2452.8
3.1
0.430
0.03
18.0
8.58
3.3
11.2
2765.3
6.3
0.461
0.39
18.3
8.68
2.9
11.5
2185.3
24.4
0.226
0.00
9.54
22.5
3.7
21.4
1818.2
54.3
0.088
0.43
23.6
7.54
3.2
15.0
1742.0
137.9
0.068
0.00
26.9
7.09
3.1
20.9
1705.8
51.3
0.126
0.11
5.7
27.5
7.15
2.8
17.3
1553.0
20.8
0.303
0.17
27.7
7.80
3.5
20.6
1795.1
107.8
0.365
0.08
25.7
7.60
1.2
9.1
1610.5
86.7
0.326
0.00
8.72
33.3
7.99
3.0
28.9
1406.5
12.6
0.676
0.48
29.1
8.93
3.0
15.9
1958.9
113.4
0.568
0.00
15.4
10.02
2.9
24.1
1702.5
52.6
0.246
0.03
11.88
14.6
9.50
4.1
23.4
1931.4
17.4
0.300
0.15
15.6
9.09
3.4
15.5
1939.5
11.1
0.257
0.06
18.4
8.17
10.1
24.7
1560.8
13.3
0.558
4.50
9.04
20.4
7.27
21.1
26.6
1493.3
3.4
0.375
7.40
16.36
23.0
7.39
38.4
49.5
1751.9
39.6
0.134
25.70
27.43
22.2
8.2
5.8
21.1
2255.4
34.7
0.3
1.5
11.0
33.3
10.0
38.4
49.5
3586.1
137.9
0.7
25.7
27.4
14.6
6.9
1.2
7.5
1406.5
2.1
0.0
0.0
5.6

KEA50NA13LE POT-EN-FIAL
Facility Name
SPINDALE(001)
NPDES 4 =
NC0020664
Qw (MGD) =
4.5
7Q10 (cfs)-HOLLANDS=
3.5
IWC (%) =
66.59
Cadmium
Max. Pred Cw
FINAL RESULTS
LIMIT
159.8
Allowable Cw
3.0
Chlorides
Max. Pred Cw
ABOVE ACTION LEVEL
1,180,690
Allowable Cw (AL)
345,412
Chromium
Max. Pred Cw
25
Allowable Cw
75.1
Cyanide
Max. Pred Cw
LIMIT
22
Allowable Cw
7.5
Lead
Max. Pred Cw
LIMIT
55
Allowable Cw
37.5
Mercury
Max. Pred Cw
0.11
Allowable Cw
0.018
Nickel
Max. Pred Cw
LIMIT
2,796
Allowable Cw
132.2
Copper
Max. Prod Cw
ABOVE ACTION LEVEL
2,100
Allowable Cw (AL)
10.5
Zinc
Max. Pred Cw
ABOVE ACTION LEVEL
2,530
Allowable Cw (AL)
75.1
Silver
Max. Pred Cw
ABOVE ACTION LEVEL
420
Allowable Cw (AL)
0.09
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Cadmium
Standard = 2.0 µg/I
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
0.5
<1
980120
0.5
<1
980113
0.5
<1
980106
0.5
<1
971230
0.5
<1
971223
0.5
<1
971217
0.5
<1
971209
0.5
<I
971202
0.5
<1
971125
0.5
<1
971118
0.5
<1
971111
0.5
<1
971104
0.5
<I
971028
0.5
<I
971021
0.5
<I
971014
37/<I
971007
6
6
970930
1
<2
970923
0.5
<I
970917
1
<2
970909
34
34
970902
6
6
970826
1
<2
970819
1
<2
970812
181
18
970805
1
<2
970729
1
<2
970722
1
<2
970715
12
12
970708
4
4
970701
1
<2
970624
0.5
<1
970617
0.5
<1
970610
0.5
<1
970603
0.5
<1
970527
0.5
<1
970520
0.5
<I
970513
0.5
<1
970506
0.5
<1
40
RESULTS
Sul Dev.
6.28778761
Mean
2.63157894
C.V.
2.38935929
Mult Factor =
4.7 (n=38)
Max. Value
34 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
159.8 µg/I
Allowable Cw
3.0 µg/l
L01

Facility Name =
NPDES 9 _
Qw (MGD) * _
7Q 10(cjs)=
IWC
SPINDALG (001)
NC0020664
4.5
3.5
66.59
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Chlorides
Standard = 230000 µg/I (AL)
It
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980217
452,000
452,000
980210
423,600
423,600
980204
423,600
423,600
980129
459,550
459,550
990122
540,350
540,350
980114
843,350
843,350
980107
409,050
409,050
971231
375,000
375,000
971224
425,000
425,005
971216
480,000
480,000
971210
515,000
515,000
971204
457,500
457,500
971203
485,000
485,000
971202
485,000
485,000
971201
490,000
490,000
21126
495,000
495,000
971125
490,0001
490,000
9711241
490,0001
490,000
19
RESULTS
Std Dev.
98241.9343
Mean
485,500
C.V.
0.20235208
Mult Factor
Max. Value
843,350 µg/1
Max. Pred Cw
1,180,690 µg/I
Allowable Cw
345,412 µg/I

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qsv (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cjs)=
IWC (%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
4.5
3.5
66.59
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Chromium
Standard = 50 µg/l
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
2
2
980120
2
2
980113
0.5
<1
980106
0.5
<1
971230
0.5
<1
971223
0.5
<1
971217
1
1
971209
0.5
<1
971202
2
2
971125
2
2
971118
3
3
971111
0.5
<1
971104
0.5
<1
971028
0.5
<1
971021
2
2
971014
<20/<1
971007
10
<20
970930
10
<20
970923
0.5
<1/<20
970917
10
<20
970909
10
<20
970902
10
<20
970826
10
<20
970819
10
<20
970812
10
QO
970805
10
<20
970729
10
<20
970722
10
<20
970715
10
<20
970708
10
<20
970701
0.5
<1
970624
1
1
970617
2
2
970610
0.5
<1
970603
1
1
970527
5
5
970520
1
1
970513
1
1
970506
1
<2
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
4.288183
Mean
4.25
C.V.
1.008984
Mult Factor = 2.5 (n=38)
Max. Value 10 µg/1
Max. Pred Cw 25 µg/1
Allowable Cw 75.1 µg/l

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
4.5
3.5
66.59
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Cyanide
Standard = 5.0 µg/l
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
2
2
980120
2
2
980113
1
<2
980106
2
2
971230
31
971223
2
2
971217
10
10
971209
2
2
971202
1
<2
971125
8
8
971118
2
2
971111
3
3
971104
1
<2
971028
1
<2
971021
1
<2
971014
2.5
<5
971007
2.5
<5
970930
2.5
<5
970923
2.5
<5
970917
2.5
<5
970909
2.5
<5
970902
2.5
<5
970826
2.5
<5
970819
2.5
<5
970812
2.5
<5
970805
2.5
<5
970729
2.5
<5
970722
2.5
<5
970715
2.5
<5
970708
10
<20
970701
2
2
970624
2
2
970617
1
<2
970610
3
3
970603
1
<2
970527
3
3
970520
3
3
970513
3
3
9705061
11
<2
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
2.097041
Mean
2.684211
C.V.
0.781251
Mult Factor = 2.2 (n=38)
Max. Value 10 µg/I
Max. Pred Cw 22 µg/I
Allowable Cw 7.5 µg/I

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
4.5
3.5
66.59
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Lead
Standard = 25 µg/l
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
2.5
<5
980120
2.5
<5
980113
2.5
<5
980106
2.5
<5
971230
2.5
<5
971223
2.5
<5
971217
2.5
<5
971209
2.5
<5
971202
2.5
<5
971125
2.5
<5
971118
2.5
<5
971111
2.5
<5
971104
2.5
<5
971028
2.5
<5
971021
2.5
<5
971014
2.5
<5
971007
2.5
<5
970930
2.5
<5
970923
2.5
<5
970917
2.5
<5
970909
22
22
970902
2.5
<5
970826
2.5
<5
970819
2.5
<5
970812
2.5
<5
970805
17
17
970729
2.5
<5
970722
2.5
<5
970715
6.25
<12.5
970708
6.25
<12.5
970701
8
8
970624
2.5
<5
970617
2.5
<5
970610
7
7
970603
2.5
<5
970527
2.5
<5
970520
2.5
<5
970513
2.5
<5
970506
2.51
<5
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
3.977299
Mean
3.820513
C.V.
1.041038
Mull Factor 2.5
Max. Value 22 µg/I
Max. Pred Cw 55 µg/I
Allowable Cw 37.5 µg/I

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
4.5
3.5
66.59
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Mercury
Standard = 0.012 µg/l
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
0.1
<0.2
980120
0.1
<0.2
980113
0.1
<0.2
980106
0.1
<0.2
971230
0.1
<0.2
971223
0.1
<0.2
971217
0.1
<0.2
971209
0.1
<0.2
971202
0.1
<0.2
971125
0.1
<0.2
971118
0.1
<0.2
971111
0.1
<0.2
971104
0.1
<0.2
971028
0.1
<0.2
971021
0.1
<0.2
971014
0.1
<0.2
971007
0.1
<0.2
970930
0.1
<0.2
970923
0.1
<0.2
970917
0.1
<0.2
970909
0.1
<0.2
970902
0.1
<0.2
970826
0.1
<0.2
970819
0.1
<0.2
970812
0.1
<0.2
970805
0.1
<0.2
970729
0.1
<0.2
970722
0.1
<0.2
970715
0.1
<0.2
970708
0.1
<0.2
970701
0.1
<0.2
970624
0.1
<0.2
970617
0.1
<0.2
970610
0.1
<0.2
970603
0.1
<0.2
970527
0.1
<0.2
970520
0.1
<0.2
970513
0.1
<0.2
970506
0.1
<0.2
40*
RESULTS
Std Dev.
0
Mean
0.1
C.V.
0
Mult Factor
Max. Value 0.1 µg/1
Max. Pred Cw* * 0.11 µg/l
Allowable Cw 0.018 µg/1
**Since all data are non -detects, max.
predicted concentration does not
wan -ant a limit.
*Several more measurements (all <0.2 pg/1) inbettiveen--weekly monitoring performed.

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
4.5
3.5
66.59
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Nickel
Standard = 88 µg/l
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
25
<50
980120
25
<50
980113
25
<50
980106
25
<50
971230
25
<50
971223
25
<50
971217
25
<50
971209
25
<50
971202
25
<50
971125
25
<50
971118
25
<50
971111
25
<50
971104
25
<50
971028
25
<50
971021
25
<50
971014
<20/<50
971007
325
325
970930
10
<20
970923
25
<50/226
970917
699
699
970909
10
QO
970902
10
>20
970826
35
35
970819
10
<20
970812
47
47
970805
10
<20
970729
10
<20
970722
10
<20
970715
41
41
970708
10
<20
970701
310
310
970624
390
390
970617
310
310
970610
25
<50
970603
25
<50
970527
25
<50
970520
25
<50
970513
25
<50
9705061
25
<50
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
142.7327
Mean
73.34211
C.V.
1.946122
Mull Factor = 4.0 (n=38)
Max. Value 699 µg/I
Max. Pred Cw 2796 µg/l
Allowable Cw 132.2 µg/I

Facility Name
NPDES # =
Qiv (MGD) *
7Q10 (cfs)
IWC ("/o)
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
4.5
3.5
66.59
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Copper
Standard = 7 µg/l (AL)
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
70
70
980120
60
60
980113
40
40
980106
60
60
971230
50
50
971223
60
60
971217
50
50
971209
20
20
971202
70
70
971125
60
60
971118
20
20
971111
60
60
971104
70
70
971028
60
60
971021
5
<10
971014
100.5
90/111
971007
101
101
970930
86
86
970923
60
60
970917
77
77
970909
117
117
970902
95
95
970826
193
193
970819
23
23
970812
107
107
970805
108
108
970729
91
91
970722
74
74
970715
117
117
970708
92
92
970701
700
700
970624
700
700
970617
110
110
970610
160
160
970603
140
140
970527
160
160
970520
140
140
970513
70
70
9705061
961
96
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
143.6533
Mean
114.6795
C.V.
1.25265
Mull Factor
Max. Value 700 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw 2100 µg/1
Allowable Cw 10.5 µg/1

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC ("/) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
4.5
3.5
66.59
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Zinc
Standard = 50 µgA (AL)
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
150
150
980120
110
110
980113
110
110
980106
90
90
971230
280
280
971223
1100
1100
971217
120
120
971209
140
140
971202
170
170
971125
140
140
971118
40
40
971111
120
120
971104
140
140
971028
90
90
971021
110
110
971014
141
130/152
971007
83
83
970930
159
159
970923
190
190
970917
416
416
970909
233
233
970902
2.5
<5
970826
408
408
970819
59
59
970812
166
166
970805
91
91
970729
63
63
970722
110
110
970715
156
156
970708
146
146
970701
280
280
970624
210
210
970617
260
260
970610
370
370
970603
280
280
970527
270
270
970520
310
310
970513
220
220
9705061
1701
170
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
177.3019
Mean
197.5256
C.V.
0.897615
Mull Factor
Max. Value 1100 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw 2530 µg/l
Allowable Cw 75.1 µg/l

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC ('%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
4.5
3.5
66.59
Spi»dale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Silver
Standard = 0.06 µg/l (AL)
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
980120
980113
140
140
980106
25
<50
971230
25
<50
971223
60
60
971217
25
<50
971209
80
80
971202
25
<50
971125
25
<50
971118
25
<50
971111
25
<50
971104
25
<50
971028
25
<50
971021
25
<50
971014
12/<50
971007
20
20
970930
5
<10
970923
5
<10
970917
5
<10
970909
5
<10
970902
5
<10
970826
5
<10
970819
5
<10
970812
5
<10
970805
5
<10
970729
5
<10
970722
5
<10
970715
5
<10
970708
5
<10
970701
5
<10
970624
5
<10
970617
5
<10
970610
5
<10
970603
50
<100
970527
50
<100
970520
5
<10
970513
50
<100
9705061
251
<50
40
RESULTS
Std Dev. 27.45089
Mean 22.63889
C.V. 1.212555
Mull Factor = 0(n=36)
Max. Value 140 µg/1
Max. Pred Cw 420 µg/l
Allowable Cw 0.09 µg/l

Facility Name =
SPINDALE (001)
NPDES # =
NC0020664
Qw (MGD) =
4.5
7QI0 (cjs)-CA THEYS=
20
I{PC ("/) =
25.86
Cadmium
Max. Fred Cw
FINAL RESULTS
LIMIT
159.8
Allowable Cw
7.7
Chlorides
Max. Pred Cw
ABOVE ACTION LEVEL
1,180,690
Allowable Cw (AL)
889,498
Chromium
Max. Fred Cw
25
Allowable Cw
193.4
Cyanide
Max. Fred Cw
LIMIT
22
Allowable Cw
19.3
Lead
Max. Pred Cw
55
Allowable Cw
96.7
Mercury
Max. Fred Cw
0.11
Allowable Cw
0.046
Nickel
Max. Fred Cw
LIMIT
2,796
Allowable Cw
340.3
Copper
Max. Fred Cw
ABOVE ACTION LEVEL
2,100
Allowable Cw (AL)
27.1
Zinc
Max. Pred Cw
ABOVE ACTION LEVEL
2,530
Allowable Cw (AL)
193.4
Silver
Max. Fred Cw
ABOVE ACTION LEVEL
420
Allowable Cw (AL)
0.23
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Cadmium
Standard = 2.0 µg/l
n
BDL=1/2DLI
Actual Data
RESULTS
980127
0.5
<I
Sul Dev.
6.28778761
980120
0.5
<I
Mean
2.631578947
980113
0.5
<I
C.V.
2.38935929
980106
0.5
<1
Mult Factor = 4.7 (n=38)
Max. Value 34 µgA
971230
0.5
<1
971223
0.5
<1
971217
0.5
<1
971209
0.5
<I
Max. Fred Cw 159.8 µg/I
97I202
0.51
<1
Allowable Cw 7.7 µg/1
971125
0.5
<1
_
971118
0.5
<1
971111
0.5
<1
971104
0.5
<I
971028
0.5
<I
971021
0.5
<I
971014
37/<I
971007
6
6
970930
11
<2
970923
0.5
<1
970917
1
<2
970909
34
34
970902
6
6
970826
1
<2
970819
1
<2
970812
18
18
970805
1
<2
970729
11
<2
970722
1
<2
970715
12
12
970708
4
4
970701
1
<2
970624
0.5
<1
970617
0.5
<t
970610
0.5
<1
970603
0.5
<1
970527
0.5
<I
970520
0.5
<I
970513
0.51
<I
970506
0.51
<1
40

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs) =
IWC ('%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
4.5
20.0
25.86
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Chlorides
Standard = 230000 µg/I (AL)
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980217
452,000
452,000
980210
423,600
423,600
980204
423,600
423,600
980129
459,550
459,550
980122
540,350
540,350
980114
843,350
843,350
980107
409,050
409,050
971231
375,000
375,000
971224
425,000
425,000
971216
480,000
480,000
971210
515,000
515,000
971204
457,500
457,500
971203
485,000
485,000
971202
485,000
485,000
971201
490,000
490,000
971126
495,000
495,000
971125
490,000
490,000
971124
490,000
490,000
19
RESULTS
Std Dev. 98241.9343
Mean 485,500
C.V. 0.20235208
Mull Factor = 1 1.4
Max. Value 843,350 µg/I
Max. Pred Cw 1,180,690 µg/I
Allowable Cw 889,498 µg/I

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs) =
IWC (%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
4.5
20.0
25.86
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Chromium
Standard = 50 µg/l
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
2
2
980120
2
2
980113
0.5
<1
980106
0.5
<1
971230
0.5
<1
971223
0.5
<1
971217
1
1
971209
0.5
<1
971202
2
2
971125
2
2
971118
3
3
971111
0.5
<1
971104
0.5
<1
971028
0.5
<1
971021
2
2
971014
`
<20/<l
971007
10
<20
970930
10
<20
970923
0.5
<1/<20
970917
10
<20
970909
10
QO
970902
10
<20
970826
10
<20
970819
10
<20
970812
10
<20
970805
10
<20
970729
10
<20
970722
10
<20
970715
10
<20
970708
10
<20
970701
0.5
<1
970624
1
1
970617
2
2
970610
0.5
<1
970603
1
1
970527
5
5
970520
1
1
970513
1
1
9705061
11
<2
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
14.288183
Mean
1 4.25
C.V.
11.008984
Mull Factor = 2.5 (n=38)
Max. Value 10 µg/I
Max. Pred Cw 25 µg/l
Allowable Cw 193.4 µg/1

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * _
7Q10 (cfs) _
IWC (0/o) _
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
4.5
20.0
25.86
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Cyanide
Standard = 5.0 µg/l
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
2
2
980120
2
2
980113
1
<2
980106
2
2
971230
31
971223
2
2
971217
10
10
971209
2
2
971202
1
<2
971125
8
8
971118
2
2
971111
3
3
971104
1
<2
971028
1
<2
971021
1
<2
971014
2.5
<5
971007
2.5
<5
970930
2.5
<5
970923
2.5
<5
970917
2.5
<5
970909
2.5
<5
970902
2.5
<5
970826
2.5
<5
970819
2.5
<5
970812
2.5
<5
970805
2.5
<5
970729
2.5
<5
970722
2.5
<5
970715
2.5
<5
970708
10
<20
970701
2
2
970624
2
2
970617
1
<2
970610
3
3
970603
1
<2
970527
3
3
970520
3
3
970513
3
3
9705061
11
<2
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
12.097041
Mean
12.684211
C.V.
10.781251
Mult Factor = 2.2 (n=38)
Max. Value 10 µg/1
Max. Pred Cw 22 µg/l
Allowable Cw 19.3 µg/l

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
4.5
20.0
25.86
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Lead
Standard = 1 25 µg/l
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
2.5
<5
980120
2.5
<5
980113
2.5
<5
980106
2.5
<5
971230
2.5
<5
971223
2.5
<5
971217
2.5
<5
971209
2.5
<5
971202
2.5
<5
971125
2.5
<5
971118
2.5
<5
971111
2.5
<5
971104
2.5
<5
971028
2.5
<5
971021
2.5
<5
971014
2.5
<5
971007
2.5
<5
970930
2.5
<5
970923
2.5
<5
970917
2.5
<5
970909
22
22
970902
2.5
<5
970826
2.5
<5
970819
2.5
<5
970812
2.5
<5
970805
17
17
970729
2.5
<5
970722
2.5
<5
970715
6.25
<12.5
970708
6.25
<12.5
970701
8
8
970624
2.5
<5
970617
2.5
<5
970610
7
7
970603
2.5
<5
970527
2.5
<5
970520
2.5
<5
970513
2.5
<5
970506
2.5
<5
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
3.977299
Mean
3.820513
C.V.
1.041038
Mull Factor
Max. Value 22 µg/1
Max. Pred Cw 55 µg/l
Allowable Cw 96.7 µg/l

Facility Name =
NPDES 4 =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
4.5
20.0
25.86
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Mercury
Standard = 0.012 µg/1
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
0.1
<0.2
980120
0.1
<0.2
980113
0.1
<0.2
980106
0.1
<0.2
971230
0.1
<0.2
971223
0.1
<0.2
971217
0.1
<0.2
971209
0.1
<0.2
971202
0.1
<0.2
971125
0.1
<0.2
971118
0.1
<0.2
971111
0.1
<0.2
971104
0.1
<0.2
971028
0.1
<0.2
971021
0.1
<0.2
971014
0.1
<0.2
971007
0.1
<0.2
970930
0.1
<0.2
970923
0.1
<0.2
970917
0.1
<0.2
970909
0.1
<0.2
970902
0.1
<0.2
970826
0.1
<0.2
970819
0.1
<0.2
970812
0.1
<0.2
970805
0.1
<0.2
970729
0.1
<0.2
970722
0.1
<0.2
970715
0.1
<0.2
970708
0.1
<0.2
970701
0.1
<0.2
970624
0.1
<0.2
970617
0.1
<0.2
970610
0.1
<0.2
970603
0.1
<0.2
970527
0.1
<0.2
970520
0.1
<0.2
970513
0.1
<0.2
970506
0.1
<0.2
40*
RESULTS
Std Dev.
0
Mean
0.1
C.V.
0
Mult Factor
Max. Value 0.1 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw** 0.11 µg/1
Allowable Cw 0.046 µg/l
**Since all data are non -detects, max.
predicted concentration does not
warrant a limit.
*Several more measurements (all <0.2 pg/l) inbetween-weekly monitoring performed.

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cis)=
IWC (%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
4.5
20.0
1-7 25.86
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Nickel
Standard = 88 µg/l
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
25
<50
980120
25
<50
980113
25
<50
980106
25
<50
971230
25
<50
971223
25
<50
971217
25
<50
971209
25
<50
971202
25
<50
971125
25
<50
971118
25
<50
971111
25
<50
971104
25
<50
971028
25
<50
971021
25
<50
971014
<20/<50
971007
325
325
970930
10
<20
970923
25
<50/226
970917
699
699
970909
10
<20
970902
10
>20
970826
35
35
970819
10
<20
970812
47
47
970805
10
<20
970729
10
<20
970722
10
<20
970715
41
41
970708
10
<20
970701
310
310
970624
390
390
970617
310
310
970610
25
<50
970603
25
<50
970527
25
<50
970520
25
<50
970513
25
<50
970506
25
<50
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
142.7327
Mean
73.34211
C.V.
1.946122
Mull Factor =
4.0 (n=38)
Max. Value
699 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
2796 µg/I
Allowable Cw
340.3 µg/l

Facility Name =
NPDES # _
Q►v (MGD) * _
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
4.5
20.0
25.861
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Copper
Standard = 7 µg/l (AL)
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
70
70
980120
60
60
980113
40
40
980106
60
60
971230
50
50
971223
60
60
971217
50
50
971209
20
20
971202
70
70
971125
60
60
971118
20
20
971111
60
60
971104
70
70
971028
60
60
971021
5
<10
971014
100.5
90/111
971007
101
101
970930
86
86
970923
60
60
970917
77
77
970909
117
117
970902
95
95
970826
193
193
970819
23
23
970812
107
107
970805
108
108
970729
91
91
970722
74
74
970715
117
117
970708
92
92
970701
700
700
970624
700
700
970617
110
110
970610
160
160
970603
140
140
970527
160
160
970520
140
140
970513
70
70
9705061
96
96
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
143.6533
Mean
114.6795
C.V.
1.25265
Mull Factor
Max. Value 700 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw 2100 µg/1
Allowable Cw 27.1 µg/l

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC ('%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
4.5
20.0
25.86
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Zinc
Standard = 50 µg/I (AL)
n
BDL=I/2DL
Actual Data
980127
150
150
980120
110
110
980113
110
110
980106
90
90
971230
280
280
971223
1100
1100
971217
120
120
971209
140
140
971202
170
170
971125
140
140
971118
40
40
971111
120
120
971104
140
140
971028
90
90
971021
110
110
971014
141
130/152
971007
83
83
970930
159
159
970923
190
190
970917
416
416
970909
233
233
970902
2.5
<5
970826
408
408
970819
59
59
970812
166
166
970805
91
91
970729
63
63
970722
110
110
970715
156
156
970708
146
146
970701
280
280
970624
210
210
970617
260
260
970610
370
370
970603
280
280
970527
270
270
970520
310
310
970513
220
220
9705061
1701
170
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
177.3019
Mean
10.897615
197.5256
C.V.
Mult Factor
Max. Value 1100 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw 2530 µg/l
Allowable Cw 193.4 µg/l

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
4.5
20.0
25.86
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Silver
Standard = 0.06 µg/l (AL)
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
980120
980113
140
140
980106
25
<50
971230
25
<50
971223
60
60
971217
25
<50
971209
80
80
971202
25
<50
971125
25
<50
971118
25
<50
971111
25
<50
971104
25
<50
971028
25
<50
971021
25
<50
971014
12/<50
971007
20
20
970930
5
<10
970923
5
<10
970917
5
<10
970909
5
<10
970902
5
<10
970826
5
<10
970819
5
<10
970812
5
<10
970805
5
<10
970729
5
<10
970722
5
<10
970715
5
<10
970708
5
<10
970701
5
<10
970624
5
<10
970617
5
<10
970610
5
<10
970603
50
<100
970527
50
<100
970520
5
<10
970513
50
<100
970506
25
<50
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
27.45089
Mean
22.63889
C.V.
1.212555
Mull Factor = 0 (n=36)
Max. Value 140 µg/I
Max. Pred Cw 420 µg/l
Allowable Cw 0.23 µg/I

Facility Name =
SPINDALE (001)
NPDES # =
NC0020664
Qu, (MGD) =
6.0
7Q10 (cjs)-HDLLANDS=
3.5
/ WC (%) =
72.66
Cadmium
Max. Pred Cw
FINAL RESULTS
LIMIT
159.8
Allowable Cw
2.8
Chlorides
Max. Pred Cw
ABOVE ACTION LEVEL
1,180,690
Allowable Cw (AL)
316,559
Chromium
Max. Pred Cw
25
Allowable Cw
68.8
Cyanide
Max. Pred Cw
LIMIT
22
Allowable Cw
6.9
Lead
Max. Pred Cw
LIMIT
55
Allowable Cw
34.4
Mercury
Max. Pred Cw
0.11
Allowable Cw
0.017
Nickel
Max. Pred Cw
LIMIT
2,796
Allowable Cw
121.1
Copper
Max. Pred Cw
ABOVE ACTION LEVEL
2,100
Allowable Cw (AL)
9.6
Zinc
Max. Pred Cw
ABOVE ACTION LEVEL
2,530
Allowable Cw (AL)
68.8
Silver
Max. Pred Cw
ABOVE ACTION LEVEL
420
Allowable Cw (AL)
0.08
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Cadmium
Standard = 2.0 µg/I
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Dotal
RESULTS
Std Dev. 6.28778761
Mean 2.631578947
IC.V. 2.38935929
980127
0.5
<1
980120
0.5
<1
980113
0.5
<I
980106
0.5
<1
Mult Factor = 4.7 (n=38)
Max. Value 34 µg/l
971230
0.5
<1
971223
0.5
<I
971217
0.5
<1
971209
0.51
<1
Max. Pred Cw 159.8 µg/l
971202
0.5
<I
Allowable Cw 2.8 µg/l
971125
0.5
<1
971118
0.5
<I
971111
0.5
<1
971104
0.5
<1
971028
0.5
<1
971021
0.5
<1
971014
37/<I
971007
61
6
970930
1
<2
970923
0.5
<1
970917
1
<2
970909
34
34
970902
6
6
970826
1
<2
970819
1
<2
970812
18
18
970805
1
<2
970729
1
<2
970722
1
<2
970715
12
12
970708
4
4
970701
1
<2
970624
0.5
<1
970617
0.5
<1
970610
0.5
<l
970603
0.5
<1
970527
0.5
<1
970520
0.5
<1
970513
0.5
<1
970506
0.5
<1
40

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
6.0
3.5
72.66
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Chlorides
Standard = 230000 µg/l (AL)
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980217
452,000
452,000
980210
423,600
423,600
980204
423,600
423,600
980129
459,550
459,550
980122
540,350
540,350
980114
843,350
843,350
980107
409,050
409,050
971231
375,000
375,000
971224
425,000
425,000
971216
480,000
480,000
971210
515,000
515,000
971204
457,500
457,500
971203
485,000
485,000
971202
485,000
485,000
971201
490,000
490,000
971126
495,000
495,000
971125
490,000
490,000
971124
490,000
490,000
19
RESULTS
Std Dev.
98241.9343
Mean
485,500
C.V.
0.20235208
Mult Factor = 1.4
Max. Value 843,350 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw 1,180,690 µg/1
Allowable Cw 316,559 µg/l

Facility Name =
NPDES # _
Qw (MGD) * _
7Q10 (cfs) =
IWC (%) _
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
6.0
3.5
72.66
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Chromium
Standard = 50 µg/1
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
2
2
980120
2
2
980113
0.5
<1
980106
0.5
<1
971230
0.5
<1
971223
0.5
<1
971217
1
1
971209
0.5
<1
971202
2
2
971125
2
2
971118
3
3
971111
0.5
<1
971104
0.5
<1
971028
0.5
<1
971021
2
2
971014
<20/<l
971007
10
<20
970930
10
<20
970923
0.5
<1/<20
970917
10
<20
970909
10
QO
970902
10
<20
970826
10
<20
970819
10
QO
970812
10
<20
970805
10
<20
970729
10
<20
970722
10
<20
970715
10
<20
970708
10
<20
970701
0.5
<1
970624
1
1
970617
2
2
970610
0.5
<1
970603
1
1
970527
5
5
970520
1
1
970513
1
1
9705061
11
<2
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
4.288183
Mean
1
4.25
C.V.
1.008984
Mult Factor = 2.5 (n=38)
Max. Value 10 µg/1
Max. Pred Cw 25 µg/l
Allowable Cw 68.8 µg/l

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC ('%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
6.0
3.5
72.66
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Cyanide
Standard = 5.0 µg/l
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
2
2
980120
2
2
980113
1
<2
980106
2
2
971230
31
971223
2
2
971217
10
10
971209
2
2
971202
1
<2
971125
8
8
971118
2
2
971111
3
3
971104
1
<2
971028
1
<2
971021
1
<2
971014
2.5
<5
971007
2.5
<5
970930
2.5
<5
970923
2.5
<5
970917
2.5
<5
970909
2.5
<5
970902
2.5
<5
970826
2.5
<5
970819
2.5
<5
970812
2.5
<5
970805
2.5
<5
970729
2.5
<5
970722
2.5
<5
970715
2.5
<5
970708
10
<20
970701
2
2
970624
2
2
970617
1
<2
970610
3
3
970603
1
<2
970527
3
3
970520
3
3
970513
3
3
9705061
11
<2
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
2.097041
Mean
2.684211
C.V.
0.781251
Mull Factor =
2.2 (n=38)
Max. Value
10 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
22 µg/l
Allowable Cw
6.9 µg/l

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cis)=
IWC (%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
6.0
3.5
72.66
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Lead
Standard = 25 µg/l
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
2.5
<5
980120
2.5
<5
980113
2.5
<5
980106
2.5
<5
971230
2.5
<5
971223
2.5
<5
971217
2.5
<5
971209
2.5
<5
971202
2.5
<5
971125
2.5
<5
971118
2.5
<5
971111
2.5
<5
971104
2.5
<5
971028
2.5
<5
971021
2.5
<5
971014
2.5
<5
971007
2.5
<5
970930
2.5
<5
970923
2.5
<5
970917
2.5
<5
970909
22
22
970902
2.5
<5
970826
2.5
<5
970819
2.5
<5
970812
2.5
<5
970805
17
17
970729
2.5
<5
970722
2.5
<5
970715
6.25
<12.5
970708
6.25
<12.5
970701
8
8
970624
2.5
<5
970617
2.5
<5
970610
7
7
970603
2.5
<5
970527
2.5
<5
970520
2.5
<5
970513
2.5
<5
970506
2.51
<5
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
3.977299
Mean
3.820513
C.V.
1.041038
Mull Factor
Max. Value 22 µg/1
Max. Pred Cw 55 µg/l
Allowable Cw 34.4 µg/l

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
6.0
3.5
72.66
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Mercury
Standard = 0.012 µg/l
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
0.1
<0.2
980120
0.1
<0.2
980113
0.1
<0.2
980106
0.1
<0.2
971230
0.1
<0.2
971223
0.1
<0.2
971217
0.1
<0.2
971209
0.1
<0.2
971202
0.1
<0.2
971125
0.1
<0.2
971118
0.1
<0.2
971111
0.1
<0.2
971104
0.1
<0.2
971028
0.1
<0.2
971021
0.1
<0.2
971014
0.1
<0.2
971007
0.1
<0.2
970930
0.1
<0.2
970923
0.1
<0.2
970917
0.1
<0.2
970909
0.1
<0.2
970902
0.1
<0.2
970826
0.1
<0.2
970819
0.1
<0.2
970812
0.1
<0.2
970805
0.1
<0.2
970729
0.1
<0.2
970722
0.1
<0.2
970715
0.1
<0.2
970708
0.1
<0.2
970701
0.1
<0.2
970624
0.1
<0.2
970617
0.1
<0.2
970610
0.1
<0.2
970603
0.1
<0.2
970527
0.1
<0.2
970520
0.1
<0.2
970513
0.1
<0.2
970506
0.1
<0.2
40*
RESULTS
Std Dev.
0
Mean
0.1
C.V.
0
Mull Factor
Max. Value 0.1 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw* * 0.11 µg/l
Allowable Cw 0.017 µg/l
**Since all data are non -detects, max.
predicted concentration does not
warrant a limit.
*Several more measurements (all <0.2 µg/1) inbetween--weekly monitoring performed.

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC (0/o) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
6.0
3.5
72.66
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Nickel
Standard = 88 µg/l
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
25
<50
980120
25
<50
980113
25
<50
980106
25
<50
971230
25
<50
971223
25
<50
971217
25
<50
971209
25
<50
971202
25
<50
971125
25
<50
971118
25
<50
971111
25
<50
971104
25
<50
971028
25
<50
971021
25
<50
971014
<20/<50
971007
325
325
970930
10
<20
970923
25
<50/226
970917
699
699
970909
10
H2O
970902
10
>20
970826
35
35
970819
10
H2O
970812
47
47
970805
10
<20
970729
10
<20
970722
10
<20
970715
41
41
970708
10
<20
970701
310
310
970624
390
390
970617
310
310
970610
25
<50
970603
25
<50
970527
25
<50
970520
25
<50
970513
25
<50
9705061
251
<50
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
142.7327
Mean
73.34211
11.946122
C.V.
Mult Factor = 4.0 (n=38)
Max. Value 699 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw 2796 µg/1
Allowable Cw 121.1 µg/l

Facility Name =
NPDES # _
Qw (MGD) * _
7Q10 (cfs) _
IWC (°i) _
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
6.0
3.5
72.66
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Copper
Standard = 7 µg/1(AL)
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
70
70
980120
60
60
980113
40
40
980106
60
60
971230
50
50
971223
60
60
971217
50
50
971209
20
20
971202
70
70
971125
60
60
971118
20
20
971111
60
60
971104
70
70
971028
60
60
971021
5
<10
971014
100.5
90/111
971007
101
101
970930
86
86
970923
60
60
970917
77
77
970909
117
117
970902
95
95
970826
193
193
970819
23
23
970812
107
107
970805
108
108
970729
91
91
970722
74
74
970715
117
117
970708
92
92
970701
700
700
970624
700
700
970617
110
110
970610
160
160
970603
140
140
970527
160
160
970520
140
140
970513
70
70
970506
96
96
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
143.6533
Mean
114.6795
C.V.
1.25265
Mult Factor
Max. Value
700 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
2100 µg/1
Allowable Cw
9.6 µg/l

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs) =
IWC (%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
6.0
3.5
72.66
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Zinc
Standard = 50 µg/I (AL)
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
150
150
980120
110
110
980113
110
110
980106
90
90
971230
280
280
971223
1100
1100
971217
120
120
971209
140
140
971202
170
170
971125
140
140
971118
40
40
971111
120
120
971104
140
140
971028
90
90
971021
110
110
971014
141
130/152
971007
83
83
970930
159
159
970923
190
190
970917
416
416
970909
233
233
970902
2.5
<5
970826
408
408
970819
59
59
970812
166
166
970805
91
91
970729
63
63
970722
110
110
970715
156
156
970708
146
146
970701
280
280
970624
210
210
970617
260
260
970610
370
370
970603
280
280
970527
270
270
970520
310
310
970513
220
220
9705061
1701
170
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
177.3019
Mean
197.5256
C.V.
0.897615
Mult Factor
Max. Value 1100 µg/I
Max. Pred Cw 2530 µg/1
Allowable Cw 68.8 µg/I

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cls)=
IWC ('%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
6.0
3.5
72.66
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Silver
Standard = 0.06 µg/1(AL)
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
980120
980113
140
140
980106
25
<50
971230
25
<50
971223
60
60
971217
25
<50
971209
80
80
971202
25
<50
971125
25
<50
971118
25
<50
971111
25
<50
971104
25
<50
971028
25
<50
971021
25
<50
971014
12/<50
971007
20
20
970930
5
<10
970923
5
<10
970917
5
<10
970909
5
<10
970902
5
<10
970826
5
<10
970819
5
<10
970812
5
<10
970805
5
<10
970729
5
<10
970722
5
<10
970715
5
<10
970708
5
<10
970701
5
<10
970624
5
<10
970617
5
<10
970610
5
<10
970603
50
<100
970527
50
<100
970520
5
<10
970513
50
<100
9705061
251
<50
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
27.45089
Mean
22.63889
C.V.
1.212555
Mult Factor (n=36)
Max. Value 140 µg/I
Max. Pred Cw 420 µg/I
Allowable Cw 0.08 µg/I

Facility Name =
SPINDALE (001)
NPDES # =
NC0020664
Qw (MGD) =
6.0
7Q10 (cjs)-CA THEYS=
20
IWC (%) =
31.74
Cadmium
Max. Pred Cw
FINAL RESULTS
LIMIT
159.8
Allowable Cw
6.3
Chlorides
Max. Pred Cw
ABOVE ACTION LEVEL
1,180,690
Allowable Cw (AL)
724,624
Chromium
Max. Pred Cw
25
Allowable Cw
157.5
Cyanide
Max. Pred Cw
LIMIT
22
Allowable Cw
15.8
Lead
Max. Pred Cw
55
Allowable Cw
78.8
Mercury
Max. Pred Cw
0.11
Allowable Cw
0.038
Nickel
Max. Pred Cw
LIMIT
2,796
Allowable Cw
277.2
Copper
Max. Pred Cw
ABOVE ACTION LEVEL
2,100
Allowable Cw (AL)
22.1
Zinc
Max. Fred Cw
ABOVE ACTION LEVEL
2,530
Allowable Cw (AL)
157.5
Silver
Max. Pred Cw
ABOVE ACTION LEVEL
420
Allowable Cw (AL)
0.19
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Cadmium
Standard = 2.0 µgA
n
BDL=I2DL
Actual Data
RESULTS
980127
0.5
<1
jStd Dev. 1 6.28778761
IMean 1 2.63157894
IC.V. 1 2.38935929
Mull Factor = 4.7 (n=38)
Max. Value 34 µgA
980120
0.5
<1
980113
0.5
<1
980106
0.5
<1
971230
0.5
<1
971223
0.5
<1
971217
0.5
<1
971209
0.5
<I
Max. Pred Cw 159.8 µSA
971202
0.5
<11
Allowable Cw 6.3 µgA
971125
0.5
<l
971118
0.5
<1
971111
0.5
<1
971104
0.5
<I
971028
0.5
<1
971021
0.5
<I
971014
37/<1
971007
6
6
970930
1
<2
970923
0.5
<I
970917
1
<2
970909
34
34
970902
6
6
970826
1
<2
970819
1
<2
970812
18
18
970805
1
<2
970729
1
<2
970722
1
<2
970715
12
12
970708
4
4
970701
1
Q
970624
0.5
<l
970617
0.5
<1
970610
0.5
<I
970603
0.5
<t
970527
0.5
<1
970520
0.5
<1
970513
0.5
<1
970506
0.5
<l
40

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC ("/) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
6.0
20.0
31.74
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Chlorides
Standard = 230000 µg/1(AL)
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980217
452,000
452,000
980210
423,600
423,600
980204
423,600
423,600
980129
459,550
459,550
980122
540,350
540,350
980114
843,350
843,350
980107
409,050
409,050
971231
375,000
375,000
971224
425,000
425,000
971216
480,000
480,000
971210
515,000
515,000
971204
457,500
457,500
971203
485,000
485,000
971202
485,000
485,000
971201
490,000
490,000
971126
495,000
495,000
971125
490,000
490,000
971124
490,000
490,000
19
RESULTS
Std Dev.
98241.9343
Mean
485,500
C.V.
0.20235208
Mull Factor = 1.4
Max. Value 843,350 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw 1,180,690 µg/1
Allowable Cw 724,624 µg/l

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (c, fs) =
IWC (v'/) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
6.0
20.0
31.74
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Chromium
Standard = 50 µg/l
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
2
2
980120
2
2
980113
0.5
<1
980106
0.5
<1
971230
0.5
<l
971223
0.5
<1
971217
1
1
971209
0.5
<1
971202
2
2
971125
2
2
971118
3
3
971111
0.5
<1
971104
0.5
<1
971028
0.5
<1
971021
2
2
971014
<20/<1
971007
10
<20
970930
10
<20
970923
0.5
<1/<20
970917
10
<20
970909
10
<20
970902
10
<20
970826
10
<20
970819
10
<20
970812
10
<20
970805
10
<20
970729
10
<20
970722
10
<20
970715
10
<20
970708
10
<20
970701
0.5
<1
970624
1
1
970617
2
2
970610
0.5
<1
970603
1
1
970527
5
5
970520
1
1
970513
1
1
970506
1
<2
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
4.288183
Mean
4.25
11.008984
C.V.
Mult Factor = 2.5 (n=38)
Max. Value 10 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw 25 µg/l
Allowable Cw 157.5 µg/l

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC (i) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
6.0
20.0
31.74
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Cyanide
Standard = 5.0 µg/1
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
2
2
980120
2
2
980113
1
<2
980106
2
2
971230
31
971223
2
2
971217
10
10
971209
2
2
971202
1
<2
971125
8
8
971118
2
2
971111
3
3
971104
1
<2
971028
1
<2
971021
1
<2
971014
2.5
<5
971007
2.5
<5
970930
2.5
<5
970923
2.5
<5
970917
2.5
<5
970909
2.5
<5
970902
2.5
<5
970826
2.5
<5
970819
2.5
<5
970812
2.5
<5
970805
2.5
<5
970729
2.5
<5
970722
2.5
<5
970715
2.5
<5
970708
10
<20
970701
2
2
970624
2
2
970617
1
<2
970610
3
3
970603
1
<2
970527
3
3
970520
3
3
970513
3
3
970506
11
<2
40
RESULTS
Sid Dev.
12.097041
Mean
12.684211
C.V.
10.781251
Mull Factor = 2.2 (n=38)
Max. Value 10 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw 22 µg/1
Allowable Cw 15.8 µg/l

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
6.0
20.0
31.74
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Lead
Standard = 25 µg/1
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
2.5
<5
980120
2.5
<5
980113
2.5
<5
980106
2.5
<5
971230
2.5
<5
971223
2.5
<5
971217
2.5
<5
971209
2.5
<5
971202
2.5
<5
971125
2.5
<5
971118
2.5
<5
971111
2.5
<5
971104
2.5
<5
971028
2.5
<5
971021
2.5
<5
971014
2.5
<5
971007
2.5
<5
970930
2.5
<5
970923
2.5
<5
970917
2.5
<5
970909
22
22
970902
2.5
<5
970826
2.5
<5
970819
2.5
<5
970812
2.5
<5
970805
17
17
970729
2.5
<5
970722
2.5
<5
970715
6.25
<12.5
970708
6.25
<12.5
970701
8
8
970624
2.5
<5
970617
2.5
<5
970610
7
7
970603
2.5
<5
970527
2.5
<5
970520
2.5
<5
970513
2.5
<5
970506
2.51
<5
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
3.977299
Mean
3.820513
C.V.
1.041038
Mult Factor
Max. Value 22 µg/1
Max. Pred Cw 55 µg/l
Allowable Cw 78.8 µg/1

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qtiv (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
6.0
20.0
31.74
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Mercury
Standard = 0.012 µg/1
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
0.1
<0.2
980120
0.1
<0.2
980113
0.1
<0.2
980106
0.1
<0.2
971230
0.1
<0.2
971223
0.1
<0.2
971217
0.1
<0.2
971209
0.1
<0.2
971202
0.1
<0.2
971125
0.1
<0.2
971118
0.1
<0.2
971111
0.1
<0.2
971104
0.1
<0.2
971028
0.1
<0.2
971021
0.1
<0.2
971014
0.1
<0.2
971007
0.1
<0.2
970930
0.1
<0.2
970923
0.1
<0.2
970917
0.1
<0.2
970909
0.1
<0.2
970902
0.1
<0.2
970826
0.1
<0.2
970819
0.1
<0.2
970812
0.1
<0.2
970805
0.1
<0.2
970729
0.1
<0.2
970722
0.1
<0.2
970715
0.1
<0.2
970708
0.1
<0.2
970701
0.1
<0.2
970624
0.1
<0.2
970617
0.1
<0.2
970610
0.1
<0.2
970603
0.1
<0.2
970527
0.1
<0.2
970520
0.1
<0.2
970513
0.1
<0.2
970506
0.1
<0.2
40*
RESULTS
Std Dev.
0
Mean
0.1
C.V.
0
Mult Factor
Max. Value
0.1 µg/I
Max. Pred Cw* *
0.11 µg/l
Allowable Cw
0.038 µg/l
**Since all data are non -detects, max.
predicted concentration does not
warrant a limit.
*Several more measurements (all <0.2 pg/1) inbetween--weekly monitoring performed.

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
6.0
20.0
31.74
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Nickel
Standard = 88 µg/l
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
25
<50
980120
25
<50
980113
25
<50
980106
25
<50
971230
25
<50
971223
25
<50
971217
25
<50
971209
25
<50
971202
25
<50
971125
25
<50
971118
25
<50
971111
25
<50
971104
25
<50
971028
25
<50
971021
25
<50
9710.1.4
Q0/<50
971007
325
325
970930
10
<20
970923
25
<50/226
970917
699
699
970909
10
<20
970902
10
>20
970826
35
35
970819
10
<20
970812
47
47
970805
10
QO
970729
10
<20
970722
10
<20
970715
41
41
970708
10
<20
970701
310
310
970624
390
390
970617
310
310
970610
25
<50
970603
25
<50
970527
25
<50
970520
25
<50
970513
25
<50
970506
25
<50
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
1142.7327
Mean 173.34211
C.V. 11.946122
Mult Factor = 4.0 (n=38)
Max. Value 699 µg/1
Max. Pred Cw 2796 µg/1
Allowable Cw 277.2 µg/l

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * _
7QI0 (cfs) =
IWC (%) _
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
6.0
20.0
31.74
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Copper
Standard = 7 µg/1(AL)
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
70
70
980120
60
60
980113
40
40
980106
60
60
971230
50
50
971223
60
60
971217
50
50
971209
20
20
971202
70
70
971125
60
60
971118
20
20
971111
60
60
971104
70
70
971028
60
60
971021
5
<10
971014
100.5
90/111
971007
101
101
970930
86
86
970923
60
60
970917
77
77
970909
117
117
970902
95
95
970826
193
193
970819
23
23
970812
107
107
970805
108
108
970729
91
91
970722
74
74
970715
117
117
970708
92
92
970701
700
700
970624
700
700
970617
110
110
970610
160
160
970603
140
140
970527
160
160
970520
140
140
970513
70
70
9705061
961
96
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
143.6533
Mean
114.6795
C.V.
1.25265
Mult Factor
Max. Value 700 µg/1
Max. Pred Cw 2100 µg/1
Allowable Cw 22.1 µg/1

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC (a/) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
6.0
20.0
31.74
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Mpg/I
Standard = (AL)
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
150
150
980120
110
110
980113
110
110
980106
90
90
971230
280
280
971223
1100
1100
971217
120
120
971209
140
140
971202
170
170
971125
140
140
971118
40
40
971111
120
120
971104
140
140
971028
90
90
971021
110
110
971014
141
130/152
971007
83
83
970930
159
159
970923
190
190
970917
416
416
970909
233
233
970902
2.5
<5
970826
408
408
970819
59
59
970812
166
166
970805
91
91
970729
63
63
970722
110
110
970715
156
156
970708
146
146
970701
280
280
970624
210
210
970617
260
260
970610
370
370
970603
280
280
970527
270
270
970520
310
310
970513
220
220
9705061
1701
170
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
177.3019
Mean
197.5256
C.V.
0.897615
Mull Factor
Max. Value 1100 µg/1
Max. Pred Cw 2530 µg/1
Allowable Cw 157.5 µg/l
A.

Facility Name =
NPDES # =
Qw (MGD) * =
7Q10 (cfs)=
IWC (%) =
SPINDALE (001)
NCO020664
6.0
20.0
31.74
Spindale WWTP, 03-08-02
Parameter = Silver
Standard = 1 0.06 µg/l (AL)
n
BDL=1/2DL
Actual Data
980127
980120
980113
140
140
980106
25
<50
971230
25
<50
971223
60
60
971217
25
<50
971209
80
80
971202
25
<50
971125
25
<50
971118
25
<50
971111
25
<50
971104
25
<50
971028
25
<50
971021
25
<50
971014
12/<50
971007
20
20
970930
5
<10
970923
5
<10
970917
5
<10
970909
5
<10
970902
5
<10
970826
5
<10
970819
5
<10
970812
5
<10
970805
5
<10
970729
5
<10
970722
5
<10
970715
5
<10
970708
5
<10
970701
5
<10
970624
5
<10
970617
5
<10
970610
5
<10
970603
50
<100
970527
50
<100
970520
5
<10
970513
50
<100
9705061
251
<50
40
RESULTS
Std Dev.
27.45089
Mean
22.63889
C.V.
1.212555
Mull Factor
(n=36)
Max. Value
140 µg/l
Max. Pred Cw
420 µg/l
Allowable Cw
0.19 µg/l

lef
WRIGHT
N�o�s J,�.,•,?� .if R/'C-
Kurt D. Wright & Associates, Inc.
WATFR / WASTEWATER ENGINEERING SERVICES
_LTa—
j
Solutions for a sustainableY._
,( --
L_���"!
environment
R�
�al'S
Kurt D. Wright, P.E.
163 Heritage Lane
Bostic, North Carolina 28018
—
Phone: 828,247.6580
Fax: [phone]
y —
Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

April 2, 2003
Mr. Charles Weaver
NC Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
NPDES Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: Spindale WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NCO020664
Town of Spindale
Rutherford County, NC
SUBJ: Aeration Pond
SolarBee Equipment — Pilot Testing
Dear Mr. Weaver:
WRIGHT
Kurt D. Wright & Associates, Inc.
WATER / WASTEWATER ENGINEERING SERVICES
�OOZ ti - dad
In accordance with our telephone conversations March 27 and April 1, 2003 I am
corresponding with you regarding the Solar Bee pilot test that is currently underway at
the Spindale W WTP, Spindale, NC. KURT D. WRIGHT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
(KDWA) will be assisting the Town of Spindale with the pilot testing and related issues
on an as needed basis.
The Town of Spindale (Town) is currently testing the performance of new technology,
the SolarBee Pond Circulator. The SolarBee enables mixing of the aeration lagoon with
minimal energy consumption. The required horsepower to mixing ratio is low and the
power source during daytime operation is solar, with AC power during nighttime
operations. The goal of the pilot test is reduced operation and maintenance costs. This
equipment has been installed in the lagoon and is currently being utilized for mixing in
lieu of the existing fixed surface mounted mixers/aerators. The existing mixers/aerators
have not been disturbed and are currently functional (with the exception of one unit
which is out of service due to mechanical problems). The mixers/aerators will not be
operated during the pilot test stage. The SolarBee is manufactured by Pump Systems,
Inc. 530 25th Ave. E., P.O. Box 1940, Dickinson, ND 58601, Telephone [phone],
www.solarbee.com. Air entrainment is provided by a venturi. Mr. Bill Hodge,
Superintendent Spindale W WTP, has discussed the pilot testing with Mr. Roger Edwards,
NCDENR-Asheville. Also, I discussed the pilot testing with Mr. Edwards today. We
discussed permitting issues and methodologies for the pilot test.
Solutions for a sustainable environment
163 Heritage Lane Bostic, INC 28018 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Mobile: [phone] [e-mail]

Mr. Charles Weaver
April 2, 2003
Page 2
KDWA recently assisted the Town with the preparation and submission of the NPDES
permit renewal for the WWTP. KDWA will also be assisting the Town with an
engineering evaluation and cost effective analysis of the SolarBee as well as permit
related issues should the Town decide, based on the analysis, to switch to the use of the
SolarBee on a permanent basis. In our conversations you mentioned that permitting of
the use of the SolarBee could be addressed during the NPDES renewal stage. You asked
that I coordinate pilot testing of the SolarBee with the engineer assigned to the Town of
Spindale's NPDES permit renewal review process. I will do this as soon as the engineer
has been assigned.
If you should have any questions regarding the above please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Sincerely yours,
KURT D. WRIGHT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
( vft�
Kurt Wright, PE
President
Enclosure
cc (w/ enclosures): Tim Barth
Bill Hodge
Roger Edwards
WRIGHT

P o n d C i r c u l a t o r s
"Solutions for pond problems"
Description
The SolarBee is a floating solar -powered pond
and lake circulator. It is 16 ft. in diameter and
constructed of stainless steel. Depending on
the model, the SolarBee draws up to 10,000
gallons per minute from below the machine
and spreads it gently across the top of the pond
for continuous surface renewal. The
SolarBee's mixing action greatly accelerates
the biological and solar processes that clean
up wastewater and freshwater.
OPERATION AND FEATURES
Features
• Solar powered for no energy costs. Operates sunup to
sundown 365 days per year.
• Shore power option allows 24 hrs/day operation which
costs approximately $10.00/month for electricity.
• Simple installation, no contractor required.
• Five year parts and labor warranty.
• Low maintenance, long life, stainless steel construction.
• Can be purchased outright, or on a lease purchase or
on a rent to own basis.
The SolarBee Can Solve These Problems:
in Wastewater
• High Aeration Energy Costs
• Odor Events and Overloading
• Discharge Permit Problems
BOD, TSS, and Algae Problems
High Ammonia (N) and Phosphorus (P)
High pH, Low DO
• Excessive Sludge Buildup
• Short Circuiting and Stratification
Basic Operation
The SolarBee's high
flow mixing action
accelerates the
normal purification
process in the pond
through gentle,
thorough mixing and
surface re -aeration.
C
in Fresh Water
• Algae Blooms
• Taste and Odor in Drinking Water
• Fish Kills
• Odors
• Excessive Vegetation
• Appearance
• Eutrophication
• Optional Buoy Marker Lights for Boat Traffic
Surface aeration Increases Near laminar flow reaches
dramatically as the surface up to 50 acres or more per
Is renewed at Flows up to machine.
o
10,000 gpm depending on
the model Installed.
Larger Aerobic Zone
Vertical
Mixing
Facultative Zone - Slurry
Primary .
flow
Both horizontal and vertical
circulation patterns are
created for improved
distribution of oxygen,
algae, bacteria, and nutrients.
Horizontal Mixing
Manufactured By: PUMP SYSTEMS, INC., 530 25th Ave. E., P.O. Box 1940, Dickinson, ND 58601
Ph [phone] Fax [phone] Ph [phone] www.pumpsystems.com www.solarbee.com
OPER110402 ®PUMP SYSTEMS, INC., 2002

C.
A
Pond CBirruDatays
"Solutions for pond problems"
"...The SolarBee Pond Circulators also helped to reduce the CBOD5
and the TSS.... l believe that the installation of the Pond Circulators
has had a big part in keeping the Tribe in compliance with the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and their imposed NPDES
discharge limits...." Native American Settlement in Iowa
"...60% reduction in ammonia levels. Lowest level recorded to date
.416 Mg/L...." City in North Dakota
"...1 believe they (SolarBee Circulators) have been a good investment
for the city. Our pH and suspended solids have declined since
installation.... We have very little odor problems even at ice off in
the spring. They have been virtually maintenance free since installa-
tion...." City in Nebraska
I TESTIMONIALS I
"...Since the units have been installed we noticed a
large reduction in BOD's, odors have been signifi-
cantly reduced and suspended solids have been
well below permit limits. What little monitoring we
have done suggest that the anaerobic bottom layer
of sludge is being reduced... " City in West
Virginia
"...In late May of 2000, Pump Systems, Inc. installed
2 SolarBee Pond Circulators. The only fish kill we
experienced was during ice -thaw this spring, which
is a statewide occurrence. This summer we encoun-
tered a 5 to 6 week period of extremely hot weather
with no rain. Unbelievably we did not have a fish
kill. Dissolved oxygen and pH levels remained
constant and local residents were not faced with the
offending odors. It also appears that the weed
growth and algae blooms have diminished...."
Freshwater lake In North Dakota
Full testimonials are available by request. Owner's
comments refer to machines which Pump Systems,
Inc. designed, manufactured, and installed before it
adopted the trade name "SolarBee".
Manufactured By: PUMP SYSTEMS, INC., 530 25th Ave. E., P.O. Box 1940, Dickinson, ND 58601
Ph [phone] Fax [phone] Ph [phone] www.pumpsystems.com www.solarbee.com
TEST110402 ®PUMP SYSTEMS, INC., 2002

SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: No
IF YES, SOC NUMBER
TO: NPDES UNIT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
ATTENTION:
DATE: February 21, 2003
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
RUTHERFORD COUNTY
PERMIT NUMBER NC0020664
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Address: Town of Spindale
Mailing: Post Office Box 186
Ecology Street
Spindale, North Carolina 28160
2. Date of Investigation: February 13, 2003
3. Report Prepared By: Roger C. Edwards
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Bill Hodge
828-286-3407
5. Directions to Site: From Asheville take I-26E to Hwy. 74E exit onto
Hwy. 74 Business go through 4 traffic light exit to right onto
Oakland Road. Travel to the second traffic light and turn right,
travel to next traffic light turn left. Travel approximately 3
miles turn right onto Ecology Drive, WWTP is at end of drive.
6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points:
Latitude: 35 22' 52" Longitude: 81 53' 18"
Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility site and
discharge point on map.
U.S.G.S. Quad No.03-08-02 U.S.G.S. Quad Name Rutherford South
-1-

7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application?
_X_ Yes No If No, explain:
8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Above 100 year
flood plain
9. Location of nearest dwelling: M mile
10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Catheys Creek
a. Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Broad River Basin 03-08-02
C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
Typical piedmont stream; going from urban to rural area.
Receiving stream is rated as impaired for aquatic life and
secondary recreational uses & is on 303d list.
PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Volume of wastewater to be permitted 3.0 MGD (Ultimate
Design Capacity)
b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Wastewater
Treatment facility? 4.5 to 6.0 MGD
C. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current
design capacity 6.0 MGD
d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous
Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two years:
N/A
e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially
constructed wastewater treatment facilities: Influent bar
screen, grit removal, aeration basin, 3 secondary clarifiers,
chlorination & de -chlorination, associated return and waste
pumps.
f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment
facilities: N/A
g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: typical toxic impacts
associated with domestic and textile dye waste.
-2-

h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
in development approved X
should be required not needed
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme:
a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DWQ Permit
Number WQ0001953
Residuals Contractor Precision Land Applicators
Telephone Number 336-957-8839
b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP X PFRP OTHER
C. Landfill:
d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify):
3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet):
Grade IV
4. SIC Codes (s) : 4952
Primary 55 Secondary 01, 58
Main Treatment Unit Code: 05003
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or
are any public monies involved. (municipals only)? N/A
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests:
None
3. Important SOC, JOC, or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please indicate)
N/A
Date
Submission of Plans and Specifications
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
-3-

4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of
the non -discharge options available. Please provide regional
perspective for each option evaluated. N/A
Spray Irrigation:
Connection to Regional Sewer System:
Subsurface:
Other disposal options:
5. Other Special Items:
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Re -issue the permit in a tiered fashion beginning at 3.0 MGD, then to 4.5
MGD and then to 6.0 MGD.
Signa ure of Report Preparer
dw� &4, ri
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
.2,1 !� 3
Dat
-4-

January 30, 2003
Mrs. Valery Stephens
NC DENR
Water Quality / Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: TOWN OF SPINDALE
RUTHERFORD COUNTY
NPDES PERMIT NCO020664
SUBJ: RENEWAL APPLICATION
Dear Mrs. Stephens:
WRIGHT
Kurt D. Wright & Associates, Inc.
WATER / WASTEWATER ENGINEERING SERVICES
On behalf of the Town of Spindale Kurt D. Wright & Associates, Inc. hereby submits the NPDES
Permit NCO020664 renewal application (application) for the continued operation of the Spindale
Wastewater Treatment Plant. The application has been submitted in accordance with instructions
provided in Mr. Charles Weaver's July 2, 2002 correspondence to the town.
Enclosed please find three completed executed application forms. The application also includes
attachments consisting of the following.
a. Map of the point discharge,
b. Schematic of the plant process,
c. A narrative description of the bio-solids management plan for the facility,
d. Copies of the town's toxicity tests, and
e. Copies of the town's Priority Pollutant Analysis.
Also included with the submittal package is one copy of Macroinvertebrate Stream Assessment of
Cathey's Creek near Spindale, NC, January 2002, prepared by ETT Environmental. This study
demonstrates that the Spindale W WTP discharge has no adverse impact upon Cathey's Creek.
Items to Note in the Permit Renewal Application:
The town was not aware that Oil and Grease and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) would be required
for the application (Part B.6, page 8 of 20) when sampling and analyses were ordered during
2002. Consequently there are no test results to report for these two parameters.
Regarding Part D on page 10 of 20, expanded effluent testing data. The analytical work for this
section was performed by Research & Analytical Laboratories, Inc. (R&A), Kennersville, NC
[phone]. Mr. Sid Champion, R&A, states that Acrolein was run for the September sample
but was missed for the December sample. The Acrolein test results in September were Below
Quantization Limits (BQL) and this has been entered in the application in Part D on page 1 I of
20. Also, R&A states that they looked for 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether in both samples and did not
find any but, they did not run a standard for it. Therefore, there is no result to report in Part D for
this parameter.
The application has only two of the required three toxicity tests (Part E, page 15 of 20) for a
species other than Ceriodaphnia dubia. The other test species is Pimephales promelas (Fathead
Solutions for a sustainable environment
163 Heritage Lane Bostic, NC 28018 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Mobile: [phone] [e-mail]

Mrs. Valery Stephens
January 30, 2003
Page 2
Minnow). Mr. Bill Hodge, WWTP Superintendent, discussed with NCDENR on September 25,
2002 the fact that the third quarterly toxicity test for Pimephales promelas would not be
performed in time to be included with this NPDES permit renewal package. Mr. Hodge was
informed by NCDENR that the town should submit the renewal package with the two tests and
submit the third test when it has been completed in March 2003. Also, the toxicity tests for
Ceriodaphnia dubia included in the Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR) over the past 4 %2
years are included in this application by reference. This has been done to satisfy item EA on page
17 of 20 according to instructions from Ms. Susan Wilson. A statement has been included in the
application to this affect just before page 15 of 20.
The current permit requires upstream and downstream grab samples to be taken 3 times/week
during June —September and 1 time/week during October —May. A review of the data shows that
the downstream water quality is not adversely impacted by the WWTP effluent. Consequently,
the town requests that upstream and downstream sampling be reduced to 1 time/week year round.
The current permit requires that the daily average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Solids
(TSS) concentration shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent values or 85% removal. The
wastewater has a significant textile waste component, consequently the influent BOD5 and TSS
concentrations are low; the town requests that this requirement be dropped.
The current permit is a tiered permit allowing the plant to operate at a flow rate less than design.
The design flow for the WWTP is 6.0 MGD; the tiered permit is based on the plant operating at
an operational design flow rate of 4.5 MGD. The town requests that the operational flow rate be
reduced from 4.5 MGD to 3.0 MGD due to the additional loss of industrial users.
If you should require any additional information regarding the renewal application please do not
hesitate to contact me at [phone] or Mr. Bill Hodge, WWTP Superintendent, at (828) 286-
3407.
Very truly yours,
KURT D. WRIGHT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
KURT WRIGHT, PE
President
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Tim Barth
Mr. Bill Hodge (w/ enclosure)
WRIGHT

�1
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Spindale WWTP, NCO020644
Renewal
Broad
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant Industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of SlgNfieant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SlUs. 4
b. Number of ClUs. 2
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following Information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submtt additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Spindale Colormasters LLC
Mailing Address: 101 Spindale Street
Soindale NC 28160
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Dyed yam cutting and sewing tapestry fabric for wall and tabletop decorations
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Wall and tabletop decor products dyed Yam
Raw material(s): cotton Polyester, acrylic
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent
250,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is con8nuous or intermittent.
35,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SJU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA fortes 7550-6 8 7550-22.
Page 18 of 20

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQU ESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Spindale WWTP, NCO020644
Renewal
Broad
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.S. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ❑ No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12 Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ❑ No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) con8nuous or Intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1.99). Replaces EPA forms 755M & 7550-22.
Page 19 of 20

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Spindale WWTP, NCO020644
Renewal
Broad
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART R INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 4
b. Number of CIUs. 2
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following Information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treahnent works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: The Torrington Company
Mailing Address: 1510 Highway 221 South
Rutheriordton NC 28139
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manganese phosphating, tumbling and alkaline washing, grinding, heat treatment and assembly of ball bearings and bushings
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Assembled Bearings
Raw materlal(s): steel stock. iron forainas
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
9,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged Into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
6,000 gpd ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433 — Metal Finishing
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

14nr%
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Spindale WWTP, NCO020644
Renewal
Broad
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works In the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ❑ No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remedlatlon Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has It been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ❑ No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLAIRCRAtor other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment
i. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
i. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If Intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1 ) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Spindale WWTP, NCO020644
Renewal
Broad
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART FANDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRAICERCLA WASTES
All treatmentworks receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
C. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 4
d. Number of CIUs. 2
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following Information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the Information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Mastercraft Fabrics. LLC —Andrew Maior Plant
Mailing Address: 210 Ball Park Road
Spindale, NC 28160
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Textile Yam dyeing, fabric weaving
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Woven upholstery fabric
Raw material(s): Yam, dyes
F.S. Flow Rate.
C. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
800,000 gpd ( continuous or X Intermittent)
d. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
3,500 gpd ( continuous or X Intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

/0%
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Spindale WWTP, NCO020644
Renewal
Broad
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ❑ No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remedlatton Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ❑ No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCWRCRAIor other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment
a. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe Discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

/m►,
Aaw\
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Spindale VWVfP, NCO020644
Renewal
Broad
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant Industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject at, an approved pretreatment program?
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
Industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
e. Number of non -categorical SlUs. 4
f. Number of ClUs. 2
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following Information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Mastercraft Fabric LLC— Oakland Plant
Mailing Address: 111 Oakland Road
Spindale NC 28160
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Slashing, printing and weaving of upholstery fabric
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Woven upholstery fabric
Raw material(s): fiberssize oigmentst
F.6. Flow Rate.
e. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or Intermittent.
114,670 pod (_continuous or X intermittent) Runoff period is 5 to 5.5 days.
f. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged Into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge Is continuous or intermittent.
11,000 and jcontinuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

.r
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Spindale WWTP, NCO020644
Renewal
Broad
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ❑ No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
FA 1. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Am un Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remedlation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ❑ No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets If necessary.)
FAIL Waste Treatment.
C. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
d. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

iOW
..<t
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Spindale WWTP, NCO020644
Renewal
Broad
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant Industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
g. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 4
h. Number of ClUs. 2
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the Information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Ultimate Textiles, Inc.
Mailing Address: 1437 US Highway 221 South
Ruthedordton, NC 28139
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Custom dyeing of textile fabrics
F.B. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Dyed fabrics used in the upholstered furniture industry
Raw material(s): cotton, polvkotton, cottonlacetate, dyes
F.6. Flow Rate.
g. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
87,000 god ( continuous or X intermittent)
h. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
4,6000 and ( continuous or X intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ❑ Yes ® No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

)OPsk.
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Spindale WWTP, NCO020644
Renewal
Broad
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works In the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ❑ No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ❑ No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets If necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment
e. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
f. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

,/4
/\
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Spindale WWTP, NCO020644
Renewal
Broad
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject ot, an approved pretreatment program?
® Yes ❑ No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
I. Number of non -categorical SlUs. 4
j. Number of ClUs. 2
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the Information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name: Watts Regulator
Mailing Address: 100 Watts Road
Spindale, NC 28160
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Manufacturers water supply and drainage Products for commercial and residential uses.
F.6. Principal Product(s) and Raw Materlal(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Temperature and pressure relief valves ball valves water supply, sink and drainage Products
Raw material(s): bronze ingot strip steel and brass tubular brass and cooper, Plastic resin cooper and nickel anode and chromium flake
F.6. Flow Rate.
I. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
9,500 antl ( continuous or X intermittent)
j. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
16,650 god ( continuous or X Intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ® Yes ❑ No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ® Yes ❑ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433— Metal Finishing (Electroplating)
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

/►
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
RIVER BASIN:
Spindale WWTP, NC0020644
Renewal
Broad
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
❑ Yes ❑ No (go to F.12)
F.10. Waste transport Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
❑ Truck ❑ Rail ❑ Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
11
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remedlation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
❑ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ❑ No
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRAlor other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets If necessary.)
F.15. Waste Treatment
g. Is this waste treated (or will be treated) pdor to entering the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
h. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
❑ Continuous ❑ Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information

Town of Suindale Wastewater Treatment Plant
Schematic Diagram and Water Balance
Schematic of Wastewater Flow, Spindale , N.C.
3.0 Page 1 of 2 .
MGD Clarifier 8
Influent
:
Screening
A�emtion mein
F
ecirculation= 10%
f influent flow
Grit Removal Clarifier 2 Recircul ItIon Pumps
8: Flow Measurement
s
Clarifier 1
Chlorination
-s
Sludge Holding Tank # 1 , Oechlorinatio 3.0
post Aeration MGD
lud a Holding Tank # 2 Effluent
Bio-solids =1.4 to 1.5 MG per
year or 600 Dry Tons
i
9

I
)
--
• '
1
EL 7434-
• W.L 1
/V. y ,
• 1
ExrD �.
�%\ gx 1Y at OIe
1
w..!•1•nw�..rwwwwww�rrr�lrrrr rnlrrr.Ir�r�rwM 9x W T -e
. � w ar sow
w '
1 Y � i i `; Al • s,
11
w 1 1
1 c� •
twsT,# ANAt�'o�s � 1
11 s
0 l L86
J V%
qp
t�C 4' � — ' S�PiRNAt/WT
•_'��`"' _.=.��: ••'1`•.:wir� 8•��'�1�� e�c' 1 ���: :�==ter= � •
r
•may Yr � • � . .
�� i� •• 1 , • '_
r j J TO CHARGE 1 (• \
CATHEYS
CREEK
TAN
CITY OF SPINDAtE, N.C.
. WASTE WATER
TREATMENT POINT
•
scat: �• • as
schematic of WlstOwioter F19W , $p��ds�c , N. C,
Page 2 of 2

Bio-solids Management Plan — Town of Spindale, North Carolina;
NPDES Permit # NC0020664, Rutherford County.
The Town of Spindale's bio-solids Management Plan consists of a Land Application Program
administered by the State of North Carolina and governed by permit # WQ0001953.
The permit is for the land application of 600 dry tons per year of bio-solids to 199.2 acres of land
in Rutherford County.
The Town of Spindale operates an extended aeration activated sludge wastewater treatment plant
with separate aerobic digestion and storage equal to 1.4 million gallons.
Bio-solids are wasted to achieve maximum operational efficiency of the wastewater treatment
plant and maintain compliance with the NPDES permit.
Bio-solids are land applied 2 to 3 times per year dependent upon influent flow conditions. The
Bio-solids are applied meeting the class B pathogen reduction requirement of 40 CFR 503.