20160402 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20150414

FINAL MONITORING REPORT
YEAR 2 of 5
Hockett Dairy Site
Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID Number 003993 — EEP Site 95013
Randolph County, North Carolina
Cape Fear River Basin
HUC 03030003010070
Submitted to:
O S L�1
El r� � t
PR OGRAM
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Construction Completed: October 2012
Data Collection Period: September 2014
Submission Date: October 2014

Provided by:
JBX
Environmental Banc & Exchange
909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh, NC 27606
919 - 829 -9909
psWI<
WDICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
720 Corporate Center Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
919 -782 -0495

011:7 3 11 WO 5[K17►Y I Dieu W
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives .............................
1.2 Project Background ............ ...............................
1.3 Vegetation Condition .......... ...............................
1.4 Summary Information / Data .............................
2.0 METHODOLOGY ....................... ...............................
3.0 REFERENCES ............................ ...............................
Appendix A. Pri
Figure 1
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
APPENDICES
eject Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Vicinity Map and Directions
Project Restoration Components
Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Contacts
Project Attributes
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2 Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Table 5 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Photos Vegetation Plot Photos
2
2
2
4
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6 Vegetation Plot Success by Project Asset Type
Table 7 CVS Stem Count Total and Planted with/without Livestakes by Plot and Species
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
E
Monitoring Report: Year 2 of 5
November 2014

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
The Hockett Dairy Buffer Mitigation Project is located in the 03030003 Catalog Unit (CU), in the Cape
Fear River Basin. Assets of this CU include the Deep River, the Randleman Reservoir, and major
communities including High Point, Asheboro, Siler City, and Sanford. Restoration goals for CU
03030003 as identified in the 2009 Cape Fear River Basin RBRP include protection of several species of
mussel and the Cape Fear Shiner (Notropis mekistocholas). Additional goals include the improvement in
water quality to waters draining to Randleman Reservoir.
The Hockett Dairy Buffer Mitigation Project was identified as an opportunity to improve water quality
and habitat within the CU. The project goals address stressors identified in the CU. The following table
lists the project goals and the project objectives through which the goals will be addressed:
Goals
Objectives
1. Nutrient removal
• Restore minimum 50 -foot riparian buffer by planting
2. Sediment removal
appropriate bottomland hardwood species to filter runoff.
3. Runoff filtration
• Convert active farm fields to forested buffers.
4. Increase dissolved oxygen
• Plant buffer vegetation to shade channel.
concentration
• Restore riparian buffer habitat to appropriate bottomland
5. Restore riparian habitats
hardwood ecosystem.
6. Reduce water temperature
. Restore canopy tree species in the stream buffer areas to
shade channel.
• Eliminate and control exotic invasive species.
• Replace two undersized and failing channel crossings with
appropriately sized culverts or ford.
• Stabilize two small dams on small farm ponds.
1.2 Project Background
The Hockett Dairy Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site is located on Hockett Dairy Road (SR 193 8) in
Randolph County approximately 12 miles north of Asheboro, NC (Figure 1). The site is located in the
Cape Fear River Basin within Cataloging Unit 03030003010070 (NCDWQ sub -basin 03- 06 -08). The site
has five unnamed tributaries (UT) that drain into Randleman Lake. The project consists of 11.82 acres of
buffer restoration.
The Hockett Dairy Buffer site is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province and in the Carolina Slate
Belt. The region is underlain by felsic metavolcanic rocks, which can be seen in the streambed of UT 2
and UT 3. The topography of the project area is generally rolling with elevations ranging from 670 to 760
feet. The five unnamed tributaries to Randleman Lake comprise the principle drainage features. These
tributaries have limited hardwood trees present within the buffer and lack significant ground cover. The
mature trees are less than 100 stems per acres. The project's watershed is primarily used for agricultural
production. Much of the surrounding land use is currently dairy cows and calves or row crop production
for dairy silage. Cattle have direct access to streams channels and ponds and are a source of ongoing
erosion along the banks and within the adjacent buffer. Cattle are excluded from some channels with
fencing on or near the top of bank, resulting in a degraded riparian buffer.. The project area has been in
agricultural use for several decades.
The Hockett Dairy mitigation project provides high quality riparian buffer restoration. Stream buffer
mitigation for the Hockett Dairy Site involved buffering five streams that flow directly and indirectly into
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report: Year 2 of 5
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013 November 2014

Randleman Lake. The mitigation design divides the site into five distinct reaches (Figure 2). Buffer
restoration was performed along five channels. Two undersized and failing channel crossings were
replaced with appropriately sized culverts to prevent erosion. Two small dams on small farm ponds have
been stabilized.
1.3 Vegetation Condition
The measure of vegetative success for the site is the survival of at least 320 five -year old planted trees per
acre at the end of year five of the monitoring period. CVS Level was performed in Year 2 to document
any volunteer generation. A total of 4 volunteers were observed across all 12 vegetation plots. Year 2
monitoring recorded an average of 523 planted stems per acre and 536 total stems per acre (planted and
volunteers) across all vegetation plots. Plots 2, 6, and 7 each had less than 300 stems per acre. All other
plots achieved success criteria in Year 2. Vegetation issues included invasive species (Johnsongrass,
Sorghum halepense) along portions of UT 4 and vegetation trampled by cattle near Plot 2. The cattle had
gained access to the easement prior to Year 1 monitoring when a tree fell onto the fence near Plot 2. This
fence was repaired prior to year 1 monitoring and the cattle have been excluded. The plot may need to be
replanted to meet success criteria. Overall, vegetation across the site is in good condition. The Current
Condition Plan View is provided in Appendix B, Figure 2.
1.4 Summary Information / Data
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and
figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on EEP's website. All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from EEP upon request.
2.0 METHODOLOGY
In order to determine if the success criteria are achieved and the planted areas are developing toward the
target community, NCEEP -CVS Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version 4.2 will be utilized. The
vegetation monitoring will include Level I and Level 1I plots distributed across the planted area. An
interim vegetation monitoring will occur in spring after leaf -out has occurred. The CVS monitoring will
be conducted toward the end of the growing season. Individual plot data will be provided to NCEEP and
CVS following NCEEP -CVS guidance. The annual monitoring requirements are summarized in the
following table:
Required
Parameter
Quantity
Frequency
12 Plots
Vegetation will be monitored using the
X
Vegetation
Located randomly
Annual
Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) protocols
across the project area
Exotic and
Exotic vegetation will be evaluated and spot
X
nuisance
N/A
Semi - Annual
treatment applied as needed
vegetation
Locations of fence damage, vegetation
X
Project
N/A
Semi - annual
damage, boundary encroacbments, etc. will be
boundary
mapped
Photographs will be used to visually document restoration success. Reference photos will be taken once a
year and will be used to visually document restoration success. Reference photo stations are marked with
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report: Year 2 of 5
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013 November 2014
2

wooden stakes. Reference stations will be photographed immediately following planting and continued
annually for at least five years following construction. Photographers will make every effort to maintain
the same area in each photo over time. Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate vegetation
establishment. A series of photos over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian
vegetation.
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration Monitoring Report: Year 2 of 5
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013 November 2014

3.0 REFERENCES
Lindenmayer, D.B., and J.F. Franklin. (2002), Conserving forest biodiversity.• A comprehensive
multiscaled approach. Island Press, Washington, DC.
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2004.
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration. Available online at http: / /portal.ncdenr.org /web /eep /process-
and- protocol.
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources. 2005. "Basinwide Planning Program:
October 2005 Cape Fear River Basinwide Water Quality Plan." October 2005. Available online at
http : / /portal.ncdenr.org/web /wq /ps. [Accessed 01 February 2012].
N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2012.
Procedural Guidance and Content Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports. Available online at
http: / /portal.ncdenr.org/web /eep /fd- forms- templates.
N.C. Division of Water Quality. 2010. Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial
Streams and their Origins, Version 4.11. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Water Quality. Raleigh, NC.
Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998), A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262 -274
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles and F.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. The
University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Schafale, M.P. and Weakley, A. S. (1990), Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
Third Approximation, NC Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC
United States Geological Survey. 1982. 7.5 Minute Topographic Map, Pleasant Garden, NC.
Young, T.F. and Sanzone, S. (editors). (2002), A framework for assessing and reporting on ecological
condition. Ecological Reporting Panel, Ecological Processes and Effects Committee. EPA Science
Advisory Board. Washington, DC.
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
4
Monitoring Report: Year 2 of 5
November 2014

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
A -1
Monitoring Report: Year 2 of 5
November 2014

The subject project site is an environmental restoration site
of the NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP)
and is encompassed by a recorded conservation easement,
but is bordered by land under private ownership. Therefore
access by the general public is not permitted. Access It
authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or t
designees /contractors involved in the development, me
and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted witY
terms and timeframes of their defined, pre- approved ro
intended site visitation or activity by any person outside
previously sanctioned activities /roles requires prior coo
with EEP.
r
h
03 Wan es
mill
Y
r�
' �1a41 M rAill .
Walt, Lr,
Guilford County
O
ailndolph County
c
3 cl�nl.rs l ilcp+ �� ?Qfrp„ � �
E
Z
o-
+rte
Hock, it
g
6
*f�
9ti �yrbor 0'
;l`
x
LahraQ'r'
AS Clgd ldtrr VI
kett Dairy Site
,
'ir ir,49 �,v
Holy Inman Rn
Legend Sources: Esri, HERE, DeL�orme, USGS
NRCAN, Esri Japan, MET I.;. Esri China
�' !ANDOLPH COUNTY
Hockett Dairy Site Mapmylndia, ©OpenStreeiMap contrib
ry Scale: NTS
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Hockett Dairy Riparian Buffer Restoration Site �Y
Randolph County, North Carolina
EEP Project ID# 003993
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 ©SteIl -
Feet I elf
1 inch = 2,000 feet
Date: November 2014 a.dG"

Table 1. Project Components and Nfitigation Credits
Hockett Dairy, Randolph County
EEP Project ID Number 003993 EEP Site 95013
Mitigation Credits
Acti-vity or Report
Stream
Riparian
Wetland
Non - riparian
Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
Type
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Restoration
N/A
N/A
Totals*
N/A
I N/A
N/A
I N/A
N/A
N/A
11.82 Ac.
N/A
N/A
Project Components
Reach ID
Stationing/
Location
D� isting
Footage (LF)
Approach
(PI, PII, etc.)
Restoration -or-
Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration
Area (acres)
Mitigation
Ratio
Reach UT2
N/A
733
N/A
Buffer Restoration
1.72
1:1
Reach UT3
N/A
817
N/A
Buffer Restoration
1.85
1:1
Reach UT4
N/A
1884
N/A
Buffer Restoration
4.62
1:1
Reach UT5
N/A
466
N/A
Buffer Restoration
0.89
1:1
Reach UT6
N/A
797
N/A
Buffer Restoration
1.84
1:1
Pond
N/A
378*
N/A
Buffer Restoration
0.52
1:1
Pond
N/A
338*
N/A
Buffer Restoration
0.38
1:1
Totall
11.82
Component Summation
Restoration
Level
Stream
linear feet
Riparian Wetland
Non - Riparian Wetland
acres
Buffer
acres
Upland
(acres)
Riverine
Non- Riverine
Restoration
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
11.82
N/A
*pond perimeter
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Hockett Dairy, Randolph County
EEP Project ID Number 003993 EEP Site 95013
Elapsed time since planting complete: 1 year, 7 months
Number of reporting ears: 2
Acti-vity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Deliver
Mitigation Plan
January 2012
May 2012
Final Design - Construction Plans
N/A
May 2012
Construction
N/A
October 2012
Temporary S &E mix applied to project area
N/A
June 2012
Permanent seed mix applied to project area
N/A
June 2012
Containerized and B &B plantings planted in project area
N/A
February 2013
Baseline Monitoring Document ear 0 Monitoring - baseline)
February 2013
March 2013
Year 1 Monitoring
October 2013
October 2013
Year 2 Monitoring
September 2014
September 2014
Year 3 Monitoring
Fall 2015*
Fall 2015*
Year 4 Monitoring
Fall 2016*
Fall 2016*
Year 5 Monitoring
Fall 2017*
Fall 2017*
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
A -3
Monitoring Report: Year 2 of 5
November 2014

Table 3. Project Contact Table
Hockett Dairy, Randolph County
EEP Project ID Number 003993 EEP Site 95013
Designer
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
Primary project design POC
Daniel Ingram - 919 782 -0495
Construction Contractor
KBS Earthworks
Construction contractor POC
Kory Strader - 336 362 -0289
Planting Contractor
Strader Fencing
Planting contractor POC
Kenneth Strader - (336) 697 -7005
Seeding Contractor
Strader Fencing
Planting contractor POC
Kenneth Strader - 336) 697 -7005
Seed Mix Sources
Evergreen Seed, Inc
Nursery Stock Suppliers
ArborGen
Monitoring Performers
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Daniel hi ram - (919) 782 -0495
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
A -4
Monitoring Report: Year 2 of 5
November 2014

Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Hockett Dairy, Randolph County
EEP Project ID Number 003993 EEP Site 95013
Project Information
Project Name
Hockett Diary Buffer Mitigation Site
County
Randolph
Project Area acres
12.99
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35° 53'55.219" N, 79° 49'37.381"W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Ph sio ra hic Province
Piedmont Ph sio ra hic Province
River Basin
Ca e Fear River Basin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
03030003
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
03030003010070
DWQ Sub -basin
03 -06 -08
Reach UT2 19.4 acres
Reach UT3 31.2 acres
Project Drainage Area (acres)
Reach UT4 76.3 acres
Reach UT5 9.1 acres
Reach UT6 34.4 acres
Project Drainage Area Percentage of
0.6%
Impervious Area
2.5 Residential
144.3 Cropland and Pasture
CGIA Land Use Classification
12.6 Other Agricultural Land
19.1 Passively Managed Forest Stands
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
A -5
Monitoring Report: Year 2 of 5
November 2014

Table 4 (cont.). Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Hockett Dairy, Randolph County
EEP Project ID Number 003993 EEP Site 95013
Parameters
Reach U17
Reach UT3
Reach UT4
Reach UT5
Reach UT6
Length of reach (linear feet)
733
817
1884
466
797
Valley Classification
X
X
X
X
X
Drainage area (acres)
19.4
31.2
76.3
9.1
34.4
NCDWQ stream identification
29
27.5
19 -25.5
21
13
score
NCDW Q Water Quality
WS -TV;CA
WS -IV;CA
WS -IV;CA
WS -TV;CA
WS -TV;CA
Classification
Morphological Description
E
E
G
G
G
streamt e
Evolutionary trend
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Mecklenburg CL
Underlying mapped soils
Wynott -Enon
Mecklenburg CL
McC2, Wynott-
Mecklenburg CL
Wynott -Enon
complexWvC2
McC2,
Enon complex
McC2
complexWvC2
WvC2
Drainage class
well
well
well
well
well
Soil Hydric status
Non -hydric
Non -hydric
Non -hydric
Non -hydric
Non -hydric
Slope (ft /ft)
0.0004
0.03%
0.02%
0.04%
0.02%
FEMA classification
Zone AE
Zone AE
Zone AE
Zone AE
Zone AE
Native vegetation conmiunity
Pasture
Pasture
Pasture
Pasture
Pasture
Percent composition of exotic
0.1
100/0
15%
5/a o
0
20%
invasive vegetation
Re ulatory Considerations
Supporting
Regulation
Applicable
Resolved
Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
see Mitigation Plan
Waters of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Yes
see Mitigation Plan
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
see Mitigation Plan
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
see Mitigation Plan
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) /Coastal
No
N/A
N/A
Area Management Act (LAMA)
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No
N/A
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
A -6
Monitoring Report: Year 2 of 5
November 2014

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
Monitoring Report: Year 2 of 5
November 2014

k,
UT 5\
Pond 2
UT 2
UT 4
Pond 3
UT 3
Figure 2a
s �
Legend
9
Hockett Dairy Buffer Site
FA
Y
Y�
Figure 2bi I I
Figure 2 -KEY. Current Condition Plan View
Hockett Dairy Riparian Buffer Restoration Site
Randolph County, North Carolina
EEP Project ID# 003993
0 500 1,000 2,000 EFjCUSYS�em
Feet l laY elllep
1 inch = 1,000 feet Date: November 2014 PROGRAM

Figure 2a. Current Condition Plan View
Hockett Dairy Riparian Buffer Restoration Site
Randolph County, North Carolina
EEP Project ID# 003993
0 200 400 800
Feet
1 inch = 400 feet Date: November 2014
r�
FF��
En la e e t
PROGR4M

Figure 2b. Current Condition Plan View
Hockett Dairy Riparian Buffer Restoration Site
Randolph County, North Carolina
EEP Project ID# 003993
0 200 400 800
Feet
1 inch = 400 feet Date: November 2014
FF��
En la e e t
PROGR4M

Table 5. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Hockett Dairy, Randolph County
EEP Project ID Number 003993 EEP Site 95013
Planted Acreage: 12.99
% of
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Planted
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Very limited cover of both woody
1. Bare Areas
and herbacious material.
0.1 acres
N/A
0
0.00
w
Woody stemdensities clearly
vertical
below target levels based on MY3,
yellow line
2. Low StemDensity Areas
4, or 5 stem count criteria.*
0.1 acres
fill
2
3.95
30`;,)
Total:
2
3.95
30%
Areas with woody stems of a size
3. Areas of Poor Growth
that are obviously small given the
Rates or Vigor
monitorin ear.
0.25 acres
N/A
0
0.00
0'%
*Cumulative Total:
2
3.95
30%
Easement Acreage: 12.99
% of
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Planted
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
horizontal
4. Invasive Areas of
Areas or points (if too small to
yellow line
Concern
render as polygons at niap scale)
1000 SF
fill
2
7.72
59%
5. Easement Encroachment
Areas or points (if too small to
J
Areas
render as polygons at ma scale)
none
N/A
0
0
0%
*3 vegetation plots are below success criteria, but project is currently in year 2 monitoring
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
1:."
Monitoring Report: Year 2 of 5
November 2014

Vegetation Plot 1
Vegetation Plot 3
Vegetation Plot 5
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
m,
Vegetation Plot 2
Vegetation Plot 4
Vegetation Plot 6
Monitoring Report: Year 2 of 5
November 2014

Vegetation Plot 7
Vegetation Plot 9
Vegetation Plot 11
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
Vegetation Plot 8
Vegetation Plot 10
Vegetation Plot 12
Monitoring Report: Year 2 of 5
November 2014

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
C -1
Monitoring Report: Year 2 of 5
November 2014

Stem Class
'Buffer Stems
Table 6. Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals Hockett
Dairy, Randolph County EEP Project ID Number
003993 EEP Site 95013
Plot #
Riparian
Buffer Stemst
(per acre)
Success Criteria
Met?
1
850
Yes
2
162
No
3
647
Yes
4
688
Yes
5
567
Yes
6
283
No
7
283
No
8
486
Yes
9
486
Yes
10
647
Yes
11
405
Yes
12
769
Yes
Project Aig
523
Yes
characteristics
Native planted hardwood trees. Does NOT include shrubs. No pines. No vines.
Hockett Dairy Site — Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
C -2
Monitoring Report: Year 2 of 5
November 2014

Table 7. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted with /without Livestakes by Plot and Species
Hockett Dairy, Randolph County
EEP Project ID Number 003993 EEP Site 95013
Color Key for Density
=Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10•� ®Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10•/6 _Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Hockett Dairy Site - Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
C -3
Monitoring Report: Year 2 of 5
November 2014
Current Plot Data 2014
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type PnoLS
003993 -01 -0001
003993 -01 -0002
003993 -01 -0003 1
003993 -01 -0004
003993 -01 -0005
003993 -01 -0006
003993 -01 -0007
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Pnol S
P -all
T
Betula ni ra
riverbirch
Tree
6
6
6
1
1
1
3
3
3
Cereis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Diospyros virginiana
common persunmon
Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
4
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
N ssas Ivatica
black um
Tree
2
Platoons occidentahs
American s camore
Tree
l
6
6
6
1
1
11
1
1
1
Quercus
oak
Tree
2
21
2
1
1
1
31
3
31
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
5
5
5
1
1
1 1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus rmchauxii
swa chestnut oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2 8
8
8
5
5
5
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus ni ra
water oak
Tree
2
2
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
Quercus mbm
northern red oak
Tree
Stem count
size(ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
21
21
25
4
4
4 16
16
16
17
17
17
14
14
14
7
7
7
7
7
7
1
I
I
1
1
1
I
0.02
L11
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
6
8
3
3
3 6
6
6
6
61
61
51
51
51
41 41
41
51
51
5
849.83985
I W.841
1011.711
161.874261
161,871
161.871
647.4971
647.51
647.51
687.965591687.971
687.971566.5598991566,561566.561
283.27994J 283.281281281
283.27991283.281
283.28
Current Plot Data (M12 2014
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
003993 -01 -0008
003993 -01 -0009
003993 -01 -0010
003993 -01 -0011
003993 -01 -0012
MV2 (2014)
MYl (2013)
MYO (2013)
Pno1S
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T lPnoLS
IP -all
T
lPnoIS
P -all
T
IPnoIS
IP -all
T
PmLS
P -all
T
Betula n' m riverbnch
Tree
2
2
2
2
2 2
1 1
1
15
15
15
27
27
27
58
58
58
Cercis canadensis eastern
dbud
Tree
I 1
1
2
2
2
8
8
8
2
2 2
Dios ms vir iniana common
persinmon
Tree
1 1
1
1
1
1
Fmxinus pennsylvanica green
ash
Tree
2
2
2
5
5
5
4
4 4
2 2
2
26
26
27
30
30
30
28
28
28
N ssas lvanica black
um
Tree
Platanus occidentalis Americans
catrore
Tree
6 6
(i
6
6
6
20
20
21
20
20
20
45
45
45
Quercus oak
IT.e
4
4
4
3
3 3
1 1
1
15
15
15
61
61
61
133
133
133
ercus falcata southern
red oak
Tree
3
31
31
1
1
12
12
12
1
1 1
Quereus ttuchauxii swanp
chestnut oak
I Tree
3
3
3
1
1 11
5
5
51
31
31
31
15
151
15
Quereus nira water
oak
ITree
1 1
1
3
3
3
4
41 4
emus phellos willow
oak
ITree
5 5
5
1
L
1
5 5
5
211
211
21
151
151
IS
emus rob. northem
red oak
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2 2
Stemcount
size(ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
St r AC
12
12
12
12
12
12
16
16
16
10
10
10
19
19
19
1551
1551
159
177
177
177
264
264
264
1
1
1
1
1
12
12
12
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.30
0.30
0.30
3 31
3
4
41
4
5
5
5
4
4 4
8 8
8
11
11
12
]0
10
10
4
4 4
485.62277
485.62
485.623
-.
485.62
485.62
647.497
647.5
647.5
404.68564
404.69
404.69
768.90272
768.9
7689
522.718954
522.72
536.21
596:9113
596.91
596.91
890.308412
890.31 890.31
Color Key for Density
=Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10•� ®Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10•/6 _Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Hockett Dairy Site - Riparian Buffer Restoration
EEP Project ID #003993 -EEP Site 95013
C -3
Monitoring Report: Year 2 of 5
November 2014