20060200 Ver 2_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20150414

L11 "Irl, eiment
Year 2 of 5 Monitoring Report
FINAL
Five -Mile Branch Stream and Wetland
Restoration, Iredell County
NCEEP IMS ID# 92185
DENR Contract # 6036
Prepared for:
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Raleigh, North Carolina
March 2015

Year 2 of 5 Monitoring Report
Five -Mile Branch Stream and
Wetland Restoration
NC Engineering License # C -1869
NC Surveying License # C -1869
Prepared for:
NCDENR -EEP
Prepared by:
ARCADIS G &M of North Carolina, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 300
Raleigh
North Carolina 27607
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
Our Ref.:
NC614002.0000
Project Manager:
Robert Lepsic
Date:
March 2015
This document is intended only for the use
of the individual or entity for which it was
prepared and may contain information that
is privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. Any
dissemination, distribution or copying of
this document is strictly prohibited.

1. Project Summary
1.1
Goals and Objectives
1.2
Project History
1.3
Vegetation
1.4
Streams
1.5
Wetlands
1.3 Note
2. Methodology
2.1 Vegetation
2.2 Stream Hydrology
2.3 Stream Stability
2.4 Wetland Hydrology
3. References
Figures
Figure 1 Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Project Components
Figure 3 Stream Current Condition Plan View
Appendices
A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
B Visual Assessment Data
C Vegetation Plot Data
D Stream Survey Data
E Hydrology Data
F Photographs
Five Mile Branch
1
1
2
3
4
4
5
6
6
6
6
7
Table of Contents

Year Two Monitoring Report
Five Mile Branch, Iredell Co.
1. Project Summary
1.1 Goals and Objectives
The primary goals of this restoration project focus on the following:
• Increase bank stability, nutrient filtration and aquatic habitat
• Reduce soil disturbance and nutrient inputs to stream
• Improve soil physical and chemical properties in the near term
• Improve hydrologic connectivity with floodplain
• Attenuate site impacts of storm flows
• Restore ground water hydrology to pre - agricultural levels
• Restore wetland and riparian habitat
These goals were accomplished by:
• Establishing a minimum 50 -foot buffer consisting of a mix of native species
representative of piedmont/mountain bottomland hardwood forest. The planted
species were selected by evaluation of adjacent reference sites and reviewing
species listed in Classification of Natural Communities of North Carolina: Third
Approximation (Schafale and Weakley 1990). A total of 1.9 acres of bottomland
hardwood forest were preserved through land ownership or conservation
easements. Land preservation reduced soil disturbance and nutrient input to the
streams.
• Grading stream banks, installation of in- stream structures, and removal of an
adjacent berm increased bank stability, improved in- stream habitat diversity and
improved the hydrologic connectivity with the adjacent floodplain. Gently sloped,
vegetated, stream banks in conjunction with in- stream structures increased bank
stability. The in- stream structures all increased stream habitat diversity by
establishing riffle -pool sequences and establishing stable woody debris.
Removal of the berm reduced the water surface elevation required to reach the
floodplain.
• Fill existing drainage ditches and excavating floodplain pools. Elimination of the
drainage ditches and grading the floodplain restored groundwater hydrology to
pre - agriculture conditions, in -turn restoring wetlands and riparian habitat.
Five Mile Branch

Year Two Monitoring Report
Five Mile Branch, Iredell Co.
Ripping floodplain soil prior to planting to reduce ground compaction cause by
past agricultural practice and allowing water infiltration.
1.2 Project History
The Five Mile Branch Mitigation site was selected for stream and wetland restoration
originally by the North Carolina Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) then
transferred to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). The
purpose of this restoration project was to restore, enhance and preserve streams and
wetlands within the site. Beaver and Fifth creeks are the primary stream within the
site. There are five unnamed tributaries that were preserved. The site's original design
was developed while the project was under NCDOT auspices and was a very sinuous,
priority 2 stream restoration with a great deal of structure, which presented concerns in
terms of cost and stability (risk /cost - benefit). The proposed alignment also led to
retrospective concerns of hydrologic trespass by NCDOT for the 1 -40 right of way.
Collectively, this prompted an enhancement approach to the stream channel through
stabilization, improvement of the profile, and the removal of berms to provide additional
floodplain connection. (NCEEP 2013)
The Five Mile Branch Site (site) is east of Statesville in Iredell County, southeast of
Interstate 40 (1 -40) and northwest of US Route 64 in the South Yadkin Watershed
(03040102). The site is in the Township of Cool Springs on the Statesville East, NC,
7.5- minute U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle (Figure 1). The
Site comprises 12 adjacent parcels totaling approximately 229 acres (92.67 ha). It is
bordered to the north by 1 -40 and to the south, east, and west by various forested,
pasture, and residential properties. Swann Road (SR 2167), running north and south,
bisects the site. Chimney Lane dead -ends on the site west of Swann Road.
The drainage area at the downstream end of the site (Reach 3) is 26.0 square miles.
The drainage area for Beaver Creek (Reach 1) and Fifth Creek (Reach 2) at their
confluence just west of Chimney Lane is 10.7 and 13.9 square miles respectively.
The restoration strategy implemented on Beaver and Fifth creeks consisted of
Enhancement Level II. Both streams were stabilized in their current locations. Their
north banks were re- graded to a flatter slope and boulder grade control structures were
installed. No work was performed on the unnamed tributaries. They were preserved
through conservation easements or property purchase. Wetland restoration was
accomplished by filling in the drainage ditches, grading floodplain pools and replanting
with native vegetation. Through these practices 12,085 linear feet if stream were
Five Mile Branch 2

Year Two Monitoring Report
Five Mile Branch, Iredell Co.
enhanced, 890 feet of stream preserved, 48.6 acres of wetland restored and 1.9 acres
of wetlands preserved. Due to the near systemic mature of the improvements to the
channel cross section and the localized improvements to the profile /in- stream habitat, a
credit ratio of 2:1 is being used.
1.3 Vegetation
Vegetation monitoring was conducted on August 14 and 15, 2014. After two growing
seasons, four (Plots 3, 4, 6, and 9) of the 23 vegetation plots are meeting the year
three success criteria of 320 stems per acre. On the whole, the site averages 179.5
planted stems /acre and 2,430 total woody stems /acre. River birch (Betula nigra), silky
dogwood (Corpus amomum), willow oak (Quercus phellos) and cherrybark oak (Q.
pagoda) have the highest occurrences. Other planted species include possumhaw
(Ilex decidua), black walnut (Juglans nigra), black gum (Nyssa sylvatica), sycamore
(Platanus occidentalis) and swamp chestnut oak (Q. michauxii).
Natural establishment of woody vegetation is prolific on site. The main source if woody
stems are from the on -site seed bank and natural seed sources upstream that are
being deposited by flood events. When considering these volunteer species the site
averages 2,430 stems per acre, a density 10 time greater than the established year
three success criteria. Over 20 volunteer species were identified during the monitoring
surveys. The most abundant being box elder (Acer negundo), sweetgum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), sycamore and river birch. Other common volunteer species include green
ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), common persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), red maple
(Acerrubrum), silky dogwood and slippery elm (Ulmus rubra).
No bare areas were observed within the floodplain. A few bare areas on stream banks
associated with bank erosion were noted. Refer to CCPV map.
Mowing encroachment is not as extensive as in year 1. Mowing encroachment on the
upstream parcel at veg plot 1 was reduced. Mowing encroachment is still occurring on
only half the area as previously. It is obvious the person conducting the mowing is
trying to stay off the site. They have mowed to what they thought was a property
marker when it was a marker for the vegetation plot. Mowing encroachment on the
Freeze easement has ceased.
Invasive vegetation is present throughout the site. Four invasive species were
identified during the year two monitoring events, Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense),
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), and tree-
Five Mile Branch

Year Two Monitoring Report
Five Mile Branch, Iredell Co.
of- heaven (Ailanthus altissima). Honeysuckle were observed throughout the site.
Tree -of- heaven is very sparse throughout the site, less than 10 individuals were
observed. Privet is located in areas that were not disturbed by construction.
The location of tree -of- heaven and honeysuckle are not shown on the CCPV. They
occur throughout the planted areas. Showing their locations would cover the majority
of the site. The location of denser stands of privet and rose are depicted on the CCPV.
1.4 Stream
There were no significant changes in the riffle cross section between year 1 and year
2. One pool cross section deepen. The maximum depth of pool cross section #5 on
Beaver Creek increase 2.2 feet.
Several bank stress areas were again identified in year 2. They are located in the
same areas as year 1. There did not seem to be a significant increase in the length of
stream bank affected.
The discrepancies between the as -built cross sections and the year 1 and year 2 cross
sections are the result of the as -built cross sections being generated from the surface
contours created from the as -built field survey, which was not surveyed by ARCADIS
staff. The annual monitoring surveys of the channel were generated using field
surveys and accurately represent actual field conditions.
Based on field observations and the insignificant changes in the channels cross
sections the project stream banks are stable and functioning properly. Thick stand of
vegetation have established on the banks throughout the site. In some areas, sandy
sediment has deposited on the banks, further encouraging the establishment of
vegetation. Only small areas of localized erosion were observed.
Three bankfull events occurred during the 2014 monitoring period. Beaver Creek
exceeded the bankfull stage on 1/11/2014, 3/7/2014 and 4/7/2014. Fifth Creek,
upstream and downstream of Beaver Creek exceed bankfull stage on 1/11/2014. The
cumulative total for the monitoring period is 6, with 3 occurring in 2013.
1.5 Wetland
Wetland hydrology was monitored for the entire growing season (April 17 — October
17) in the Year 2 monitoring term. Seven gauges (2, 7, 15, 16, 17, 19 and 27) of the
Five Mile Branch 4

Year Two Monitoring Report
Five Mile Branch, Iredell Co.
30 on site gauges did not meet the establish success criteria of saturation within 12
inches of the ground surface for 9 consecutive days of the growing season (5% of the
183 day growing season). Two gauges (22 and 23) had ground water within 12 inches
of the ground surface for 100% of the growing season. Gauges 5, 6, 18 and 28 barely
meet the established success criteria.
The functionality of the gauges was very unpredictable. Some gauges functioned
during one download event, not the next and then functioned properly at the next
event. Batteries were replaced and historical data was deleted from most gauges to
help improve their functionality. Sometime this was successful. Several
malfunctioning gauges were replaced with functioning gauges only to have the new
gauge malfunction at the next download. Gauges 7, 15, 16, 17, 19, 27 and 28
malfunctioned during the 2014 monitoring year. Gauges 7, 16, and 19 were replaced
with functioning gauges at the time of installation, only to have them malfunction during
the next downloading event. Table 14 outlines the history of the gauges through the
entire monitoring period.
1.6 Note
Summary information /data related to the occurrence of such things as beaver or
encroachment, and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring
elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative
background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in
the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the Mitigation Plan
(formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on EEP's website. All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from EEP upon
request.
Five Mile Branch

Year Two Monitoring Report
Five Mile Branch, Iredell Co.
2. Methodology
2.1 Vegetation
Vegetation monitoring followed Carolina Vegetative Survey Level 2.
Vegetation monitoring was conducted on August 14 and 15, 2014 and all
planted and volunteer stems were tallied.
2.2 Stream Hydrology
Stream water depth was measured and recorded with HOBO° pressure
sensor gauges manufactured by onset°. Three HOBO° devises were installed
at the Five Mile Branch restoration site, one on Beaver Creek upstream of
Chimney Lane, one on Fifth Creek upstream of the confluence with Beaver
Creek and one on Fifth Creek downstream of Swann Road. The dataloggers
were downloaded during the groundwater gauge downloading events.
2.3 Cross Section Surveys
Cross sectional surveys were conducted by ARCADIS staff on September 30,
2014 using a Topcon total station. The survey data was imported and plotted
using AutoCadd 2013 software
2.4 Wetland Hydrology
Wetland hydrology was monitored using RIDS Ecotone° WM Water Level
Instruments (gauges). The gauges were programmed to take one reading
daily at 8:00 AM EST. Gauges were downloaded approximately monthly using
a MeazuraTM handheld device manufactured by ACEECATM. Data from the
handheld device was then transferred to a Lenovo laptop computer and
processed using MicroSoft Excel software.
Five Mile Branch 6

Year Two Monitoring Report
Five Mile Branch, Iredell Co.
3. References
Lee, Michael T., R. K. Peet, S. D. Roberts, and T. R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS -EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.0
(hftp://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm).
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). 2008.
Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basinwide Water Quality Plan. Prepared by the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (NCDENR) 2014. Annual Monitoring and Closeout
Reporting Format, Data Requirements, and Content Guidance, February 2014.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2013. Letter dated
February 28, 2013.
Schafale, M.P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina, A Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program,
Division of Parks and Recreation, Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources, Raleigh, NC.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 2003. April 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service,
2011 Soil Survey of Iredell County, North Carolina. (Available online at
http: // soils. usda.goc /survey.printed_ surveys /)
Five Mile Branch 7

Year Two Monitoring Report
Five Mile Branch, Iredell Co.
3. References
Lee, Michael T., R. K. Peet, S. D. Roberts, and T. R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS -EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.0
(hftp://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm).
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). 2008.
Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basinwide Water Quality Plan. Prepared by the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (NCDENR) 2014. Annual Monitoring and Closeout
Reporting Format, Data Requirements, and Content Guidance, February 2014.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2013. Letter dated
February 28, 2013.
Schafale, M.P., and A. S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of
North Carolina, A Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program,
Division of Parks and Recreation, Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources, Raleigh, NC.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 2003. April 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service,
2011 Soil Survey of Iredell County, North Carolina. (Available online at
http: // soils. usda.goc /survey.printed_ surveys /)
Five Mile Branch 7

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and
Background Tables

Directions: Take 140 west out of Raleigh to US 64 west (exit 162)
toward Cool Springs. Turn left onto US 64. Turn right onto Swann
Road. Swann Road crosses the Site just before 140
Project Area
)7
• - - i ""' y k--.'� lF + IV
r
Z
1
it
\ ��.
4;
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement `Y
Program (EEP) and is encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is bordered by land
under private ownership. Accessing the site may require traversing areas near or along the easement
boundary and therefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access by authorized k
personnel of state and federal agencies or their designees /contractors involved in the development,
oversight and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the terms and timeframes of their
defined roles. Any intended site visitation or activities requires prior coordination with EEP. °
0 1,500 3,000 6,000 "
Feet
dk�lgw SCALE: 1:24,000 W E
Source: USGS Quadrangle Maps Statesville East and Cool Springs, NC s
Prepared For VICINITY MAP Figure No.
Five Mile Branch
Stream and Wetland Restoration Site
F iii meat Iredell County, North Carolina 1

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS ID# 92185
Mitigation Credits
Non - riparian
Nitrogen
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Buffer
Wetland
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
Totals
5,924.7
142.5
48.0
0.38
-
-
-
Project Components
Restoration -
Restoration
Project Component -or- Reach
Stationing /Location
Existing
Approach
or-
Footage or
Mitigation Ratio
ID
Footage /Acreage
(PI, PII etc.)
Restoration
Acreage
Equivalent
Reach 1 - Beaver Creek
10 +87.03 PRBVR to Fifth
6,133.7
E II
R
5935.38*
2:1 **
Creek
Reach 2 - Fifth Creek upstream
1 -40 to Beaver Creek
1,526.7
E II
R
1,526.7
2:1 **
of Beaver Creek
Reach 3 - Fifth Creek
Beaver Creek to 78 +60.00
5,333.3
E II
R
4387.26*
2:1 **
downstream of Beaver Creek
PRFTH
Reach 4 - Beaver Creek
Property line to 10 +87.03
Upstream
PRBVR
193.0
Pres.
RE
193.0
10:1
Reach 5 - UT to Beaver Creek
property line to Beaver Creek
180.1
Pres.
RE
180.1
10:1
(Upstream)
Reach 6 - UT
Property line to Beaver Creek
220.4
Pres.
RE
220.4
10:1
Reach 7 - UT at Chimney Lane
Property line to Beaver Creek
139.5
Pres.
RE
139.5
10:1
Reach 8 - UT at Swann Road
Property line to Fifth Creek
520.0
Pres.
RE
520.0
10:1
Reach 9 - UT at Freeze
Within the Conservation
172.0
Pres.
RE
172.0
10:1
Property
Easement
Wetlands
Throughout the site
48.0
Rest.
R
48.0
1:1
Wetlands
Throughout the site
1.9
Pres.
RE
1.9
5:1
Component Summation
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non - riparian Wetland
Buffer
Upland
Restoration Level
(linear feet)
(acres)
(acres)
(square feet)
(acres)
Riverine
Non - Riverine
Restoration
N/A
48.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Enhancement
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Enhancement I
N/A
Enhancement II
11,849.3
Creation
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Preservation
1,425.0
1.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
High Quality
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Preservation
* Difference between existing and restoration footage is due to a section of stream preservation at the the upstream limit of the
project and the absence of ownership of both side of the stream at the downstream limit of the project.
* *due to the near systemic nature of the improvement to the channel cross - section and the localized improvements to the profile /in•
stream habitat, a credit ratio of 2.0:1.0 is being used.

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS ID# 92185
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
Dec -09
Dec -09
Final Design — Construction Plans
Nov -10
Nov -10
Construction
Apr -11
Apr -12
Mitigation Plan / As -built (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline)
Jun -12
Mar -13
Year 1 Monitoring
Dec -13
Dec -13
Year 2 Monitoring
Oct -14
Dec -14
Year 3 Monitoring
-
Year 4 Monitoring
-
Year 5 Monitoring
-
-

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS ID# 92185
Designer
ARCADIS G &M of NC, Inc.
801 Corporate Center Dr., Suite 300, Raleigh NC 27607
Primar ro'ect design POC
Robert Lepsic 919 - 854 -9812
Construction Contractor
North State Environmental
2889 Lowery Street, Winston Salem, NC 27101
Construction contractor POC
Michael Anderson 336- 245 -1253
Survey Contractor
North State Environmental
2889 Lowery Street, Winston Salem, NC 27101
Survey contractor POC
David K. Alley, PLS 336- 250 -9225
Planting Contractor
Southern Garden, Inc.
PO Box 808, Apex, NC 27502
Planting contractor POC
Todd Laasko 919 - 362 -1050
Seeding Contractor
Canady's Landscape and Erosion Control
256 Fairview Acres Road,Lexington NC 27295
Contractor point of contact
336- 236 -1182
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource, Colfax, NC 27235
336- 855 -6363
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Foggy Mountain Nursery 336- 384 -5323
Claridge Nursery 919 - 731 -7988
Brook Run Plantation 434 - 292 -1677
Monitoring Performers
ARCADIS G &M of NC, Inc
801 Corporate Center Dr., Suite 300, Raleigh NC 27607
The CATENA Group
410 -B Millstone Drive, Hillsborough, NC 27278
Stream Monitoring POC
Robert Lepsic 919 - 854 -9812
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Robert Lepsic 919 - 854 -9812
Wetland Monitoring POC
lRobert Lepsic 919 - 854 -9812

Table 4. Attributes
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS ID# 92185
Project Information
Project Name
Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration
County
Iredell
Project Area (acres)
229
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
035° 50'40.18" N 080° 46'27.37" W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
3040102
DWQ Sub -basin
03 -07 -06
Project Drainage Area (square miles)
26
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious
Area
10 -20
CGIA Land Use Classification
Heavily developed, cultivated, herbaceous and
shrubland, forest land, water bodies
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Length of reach (linear feet)
6,134
1,527
5,333
Valley classification
VIII
VIII
VIII
Drainage area (square miles)
10.7
13.9
26
NCDWQ stream identification score
12- 108 -13 -1
12- 108 -13
12- 108 -13
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
Class C
Class C
Class C
Morphological Description (stream type)
E5
E5
E5
Evolutionary trend
Underlying mapped soils
Codorus loam
Codorus loam
Codorus loam
Drainage class
somewhat poorly drained
somewhat poorly drained
somewhat poorly drained
Soil Hydric status
Yes
Yes
Yes
Slope
0 -2%
0 -2%
0 -2%
FEMA classification
Zone AE
Zone AE
Zone AE
Native vegetation community
Bottomland hardwood
Bottomland hardwood
Bottomland hardwood

Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
1 <5
<5
<5
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland 1
Wetland 2
Wetland 3
Size of Wetland (acres)
48.0
Wetland Type (non- riparian, riparian riverine or riparian non-
riverine)
Riparian riverine
Mapped Soii Series
Codorus loam
Drainage class
somewhat poorly drained
Soil Hydric Status
Yes
Source of Hydrology
groundwater, precipitation
and overbank flooding
Hydrologic Impairment
Ditching
Native vegetation community
Bottomland hardwood
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
<5
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section 404
Yes
Yes
Restoration Plan
Waters of the United States — Section 401
Yes
Yes
Restoration Plan
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
Restoration Plan
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
Restoration Plan
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/ Coastal
Area Management Act (CAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
Yes
Restoration Plan
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

Q
M
O
O_
O
N
M
co
U �
U �
C
O �
fl- w
> [0
�a
m �
Z E
�o

X.,
�A.•'yF
_ • - + '� �.
0.
Ak
`i�1�. .� � IAA < r r, . �� "r:. •�►
V
Prepared For
em
x,11 ��11�'�llll�:llt
rrv�GRniw
R
Q'
�� .
- ' - - Service Layer Credits: Source � igitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar
{ - Geographies, CNES /Airbu DA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping,
Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, svV and the GIS User Community
N
STREAM CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
FIVE MILE BRANCH RESTORATION SITE
IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Aerial: 2011 Bing Maps Aerial
i•
Legend
t�, • Mme.
A
Photo Point
Root Wads
O
Stream Gage
`�
RAIN 14 +.�'Yi
Vegetation Plot Meeting
�•
■
Vegetation Plot Not Meeting
Study Area
Groundwater
Mowing encroachment
Gage Meeting
a
Groundwater.
y srR +`v•
-`. Invasive Population
Gage Not Meeting
Bank Stress
I Boundary
Figure No.
`
200
T` ,
�
- ,qtr.•
�x1
•
f..
1 inch = 200 feet
0 r '
.=
pAr
.
V
Q'
�� .
- ' - - Service Layer Credits: Source � igitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar
{ - Geographies, CNES /Airbu DA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping,
Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, svV and the GIS User Community
N
STREAM CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
FIVE MILE BRANCH RESTORATION SITE
IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Aerial: 2011 Bing Maps Aerial
i•
Legend
t�, • Mme.
A
Photo Point
Root Wads
O
Stream Gage
Cross - section
❑
Vegetation Plot Meeting
Structures
■
Vegetation Plot Not Meeting
Study Area
Groundwater
Mowing encroachment
Gage Meeting
Groundwater.
y srR +`v•
-`. Invasive Population
Gage Not Meeting
Bank Stress
I Boundary
Figure No.
0
200
400
Feet
2B
1 inch = 200 feet

O
C F-
0 CD
O_ t
>
is
E c
m �
z E
u
O O
�
0

N_
�I
O
NI
m
CL
m
m
>I
a
U
U
NI
m
N
x
X
E
N
d'
Q
w
r
c�
Z
ao
F_
a0 z
Np
L�
cn
03
M IL)
N LL
>
M
U)
Cz
� O
+� V
l6 O
o�
a
U a'
U �
7
a
,s=
E G
zE
w
0
Y 4
All
fir•._ � � •`�,' a ' � . _ f�a, ` 4 .
i
4 /
�M1 ,
rJ w.' =►x � ` ' { n it Fj �,r - �� . �,
f
.; 's r <� l
}� •+�
�' 'i ��T# * i� `, ,. ..y � _ -'. �,.- •"'tam- � � rf �,y_ •�
r�s
-•` :ri"` � mot/.
:, hti
A . •" 7 rya. 4�-' - -_
_ , +.\ - .- \�. � M'��. , ►fit:.
M
•
��ti ��ti ��ti
Legend
Photo Point
Root Wads
O
Stream Gage
Cross - section
❑
Vegetation Plot Meeting
Structures
■
Vegetation Plot Not Meeting
Study Area
Groundwater
Mowing encroachment
r
Gage Meeting
Groundwater,
Invasive Population
*,
Gage Not Meeting
Bank Stress
Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar
Geographics, CNES /Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping,
Boundary
Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
_
Prepared For N
E5VO" STREAM CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW Figure No.
FIVE MILE BRANCH RESTORATION SITE o 200 400eet
Item IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 2D
,1111c11 le lellt
���G Aerial: 2011 Bing Maps Aerial 1 inch = 200 feet

Table 5a Visual Stream Morpholocly Stability Assessment
Reach ID Beaver Creek
Assessed Length 5,935 linear feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub - Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Riffle and Run Units
1. Aggradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow lateral) not top include point bars
0 0
100%
2. De radation - Evidence of downcuttin
0 0
100%
2. Riffle Condition'
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Meander Pool
Condition —
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth /Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.5)
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Length sufficient ( >30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle)
N/A
N/A
N/A
4. Thalweq Position"
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend Run
12.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Thalweg centering at downstream of meander Glide
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacks vegetative cover due to active scour and erosion
6
280
95%
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting is
2. Undercut
expected. Do NOT include undercuts that are stabilized by roots and
0
0
100%
are provi din habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
Totals
6
280
95%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
24
23
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill.
4
4
100%
3. Engineered
Structires (cont'd.)
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or
arms.
20
20
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15 %. See exhibit describing bank influenced by vane arms.
20
18
90%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining Max Pool Depth /Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.5. Rootwads /lo s providing some cover at low flow.
8
8
o
100 /o
" Stream is a sand bed stream. No substrate sorting is occuring
" The stream is not a meandering stream. No meander pools exist.
Page 1 of 1

Table 5b Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Fifth Creek upstream of Beaver Creek
Assessed Length 1,526 linear feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub - Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Riffle and Run Units
1. Aggradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow lateral) not top include point bars
0 0
100%
2. De radation - Evidence of downcuttin
0 0
100%
2. Riffle Condition'
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Meander Pool
Condition —
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth /Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.5)
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Length sufficient ( >30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle)
N/A
N/A
N/A
4. Thalweq Position"
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend Run
12.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Thalweg centering at downstream of meander Glide
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacks vegetative cover due to active scour and erosion
1
45
97%
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting is
2. Undercut
expected. Do NOT include undercuts that are stabilized by roots and
0
0
100%
are provi din habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
Totals
1
45
97%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
6
6
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill.
1
2
50%
3. Engineered
Structires (cont'd.)
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or
arms.
3
3
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15 %. See exhibit describing bank influenced by vane arms.
3
3
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining Max Pool Depth /Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.5. Rootwads /lo s providing some cover at low flow.
5
5
o
100 /o
" Stream is a sand bed stream. No substrate sorting is occuring
" The stream is not a meandering stream. No meander pools exist.
Page 1 of 1

Table 5c Visual Stream Morpholocly Stability Assessment
Reach ID Fifth Creek downstream of Beaver Creek
Assessed Length 4,387 linear feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub - Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
% Stable,
Performing as
Intended
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Riffle and Run Units
1. Aggradation - Bar formation /growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow lateral) not top include point bars
0 0
100%
2. De radation - Evidence of downcuttin
0 0
100%
2. Riffle Condition'
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Meander Pool
Condition —
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth /Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.5)
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Length sufficient ( >30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle)
N/A
N/A
N/A
4. Thalweq Position"
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend Run
12.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Thalweg centering at downstream of meander Glide
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacks vegetative cover due to active scour and erosion
3
220
95%
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting is
2. Undercut
expected. Do NOT include undercuts that are stabilized by roots and
0
0
100%
are provi din habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
Totals
3
220
95%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
20
20
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the
sill.
2
3
67%
3. Engineered
Structires (cont'd.)
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath or around sills or
arms.
20
20
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15 %. See exhibit describing bank influenced by vane arms.
20
20
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining Max Pool Depth /Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.5. Rootwads /lo s providing some cover at low flow.
9
9
o
100 /o
" Stream is a sand bed stream. No substrate sorting is occuring
" The stream is not a meandering stream. No meander pools exist.
Page 1 of 1

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration
Planted Acreage 67.3
Easement Acreage 229
% of
Mapping
pp g
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Planted
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of
Very Limited cover of both woody and
Grassland/
Concern
polygons at map scale).
0.1 acres
None
0
0
0%
1. Bare Areas
herbaceous material.
Areas or points (if too small to render as
None
Open
1
2.1
3.0%
Woody stem densities clearly below target
polygons at map scale).
Pasture /Green
levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count
0.1 acres
None
0
0.38
<1%
2. Low Stem Density Areas*
criteria.
Total
0.38
<1%
3. Areas of Poor Growth
Areas with woody stems of a size class that
are obviously small given the monitoring
0.25 acres
None
0
0
0%
Rates or Vigor
year.
Cumulative Totall
0.38
<1%
Easement Acreage 229
* Acerage is combined acerage of 19 vegetation monitoring plots not meeting success criteria.
Page 1 of 1
% of
Mapping
pp g
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Planted
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of
Areas or points (if too small to render as
Grassland/
Concern
polygons at map scale).
1000SF
Green
6
2.87
4.0%
5. Easement Encroachment
Areas or points (if too small to render as
None
Open
1
2.1
3.0%
Areas
polygons at map scale).
Pasture /Green
* Acerage is combined acerage of 19 vegetation monitoring plots not meeting success criteria.
Page 1 of 1

Appendix C
Vegetation PlotData

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration
Iredell County
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #1 8/15/2014
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #2
w
.4r
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #3
8/15/2014
8/15/2014
Year 2
March 2015
r�
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #4
5
8/15/2014
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #5
8/15/2014
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #6 8/15/2014
Page 1 of 4

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration
Iredell County
v8,
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #7 8/15/2014
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #8 8/15/2014
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #9 8/15/2014
{ ;I' 5IF&
Year 2
March 2015
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #10
8/15/2014
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #11
8/15/2014
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #12 8/15/2014
Page 2 of 4

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration
Iredell County
rk-
yRR ,
7
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #13 8/15/2014
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #14 8/15/2014
r
A
e
t�• 9 �yL���
L
� µ F
Year 2
March 2015
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #16 8/15/2014
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #18 8/14/2014
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #15 8/14/2014 Vegetation Monitoring Plot #19 8/14/2014
Page 3 of 4

Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration
Iredell County
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #20 8/14/2014
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #21 8/14/2014
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #22 8/14/2014
Year 2
March 2015
Vegetation Monitoring Plot #23 8/14/2014
Page 4 of 4

EEP Project Code 29185. Project Name: Five Mile Branch
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
29185 -01 -0001
29185 -01 -0002
29185 -01 -0003
29185 -01 -0004
29185 -01 -0005
29185 -01 -0006
29185 -01 -0007
29185 -01 -0008
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
2
1
9
15
7
1
72
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
2
3
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Asimina triloba
pawpaw
Tree
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
1
2
2
2
Carya alba
mockernut hickory
Tree
Carya cordiformis
bitternut hickory
Tree
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
3
3
3
2
2
2
Corylus americana
American hazelnut
Shrub
1
1
1
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
Fraxinus americana
white ash
Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
Ilex decidua
possumhaw
shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
Juniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
Ligustrum sinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
38
62
65
24
51
2
5
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1
11
1
1
4
4
4
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
Pinus virginiana
Virginia pine
Tree
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
16
26
4
8
1
2
2
4
Populus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
2
2
2
41
4
41
1
21
2
2
3
3
3
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
3
Ulmus rubra
Islippery elm
ITree
I
1
3
2
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
2
2
2
61
61
65
81
81
100
91
91
90
51
5
48
81
81
77
7
71
12
41
41
91
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
11
1
1
5
5
10
31
31
91
61
61
10
41
41
8
51
51
101
2
2
6
21
21
6
80.941
80.94
80.94
242.81
242.81
26301323.71
323.71
40471
364.21
364.21
36421202.31
202.31
19421323.71
323.71
31161283.31283.31485.61161.91
161.91
3683

EEP Project Code 29185. Project Name: Five Mile Branch
Current Plot Data (MY2 2014)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
29185 -01 -0009
29185 -01 -0010
29185 -01 -0011
29185 -01 -0012
29185 -01 -0013
29185 -01 -0014
29185 -01 -0015
29185 -01 -0016
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
13
139
14
59
10
1
3
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
1
9
5
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Asimina triloba
pawpaw
Tree
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
3
3
4
2
2
2
6
1
1
1
2
2
3
1
1
2
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
1
Carya alba
mockernut hickory
Tree
Carya cordiformis
bitternut hickory
Tree
1
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Corylus americana
American hazelnut
Shrub
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
7
11
1
Fraxinus americana
white ash
Tree
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
6
1
1
12
2
6
10
1
1
3
Ilex decidua
possumhaw
shrub
2
2
2
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
Juniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
1
Ligustrum sinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
3
14
2
20
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
1
Pinus virginiana
Virginia pine
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
1
13
1
1
1
1
Populus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
5
5
5
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
Ulmus rubra
Islippery elm
ITree
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
101
101
36
7
+7154
7
71
68
3
3
76
21
2
1
01
0
1
2
21
41
41
41
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
41
41
101
61
61
91
41
41
11
31
31
81
21
21
6
01
0
1
11
11
7
41
41
5
404.71
404.71
14571283.31
283.31
62321283.31
283.31
27521121.41
121.41
3076180.941
80.941849.81
01
0
40.47
80.94180.941
16591161.91
161.91
404.7

EEP Project Code 29185. Project Name: Five Mile Branch
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
29185 -01 -0017
29185 -01 -0018
29185 -01 -0019
29185 -01 -0020
29185 -01 -0021
29185 -01 -0022
29185 -01 -0023
MY2 (2014)
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
1
3
8
1
13
372
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
4
24
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
Asimina triloba
pawpaw
Tree
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
26
1
1
1
2
2
3
1
1
3
2
22
22
62
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
2
2
4
Carya alba
mockernut hickory
Tree
2
2
Carya cordiformis
bitternut hickory
Tree
1
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
1
7
1
1
8
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
3
3
3
11
11
12
Corylus americana
American hazelnut
Shrub
1
1
1
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
131
1 2
1
1
25
Fraxinus americana
white ash
Tree
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
3
8
4
4
53
Ilex decidua
possumhaw
shrub
5
5
5
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
11
1
1
6
6
13
Juniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
1
Ligustrum sinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
2
2
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
33
1
192
93
10
615
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
1
1
1
61
6
6
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
1
Pinus virginiana
Virginia pine
Tree
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
27
1
1
1
1
5
2
5
6
6
117
Populus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
6
6
6
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
2
21
2
1
1
1
20
20
20
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
10
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
1
1
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
1
4
Ulmus rubra
slippery elm
Tree
3
1
1
1
1
1
10
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
0
0
59
0
0
1
5
5
57
3
3
17
5
5
209
4
4
115
1
1
31
102
102
1381
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
23
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.57
01
01
51
01
01
11
51
51
91
21
21
71
31
31
5
3
31
91
11
11
51
151
15
30
01
01
23881
01
01
40.471202.31
202.31
23071
121.41
121.41
6881202.31
202.31
8458
161.9
161.91
46541
40.471
40.471
12551179.51
179.51
2430

EEP Project Code 29185. Project Name: Five Mile Branch
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
MY1 (2013)
MYO (2012)
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
182
1
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
22
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
2
2
2
Asimina triloba
pawpaw
Tree
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
16
16
67
19
19
50
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
2
2
2
4
4
4
Carya alba
mockernut hickory
Tree
Carya cordiformis
bitternut hickory
Tree
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
4
4
6
5
5
9
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
4
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
7
7
9
12
12
12
Corylus americana
American hazelnut
Shrub
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
11
Fraxinus americana
white ash
Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
17
2
2
3
Ilex decidua
possumhaw
shrub
12
12
12
14
14
14
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
3
31
7
15
1SI
15
Juniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
Ligustrum sinense
Chinese privet
Exotic
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
393
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
Pinus virginiana
Virginia pine
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
6
6
159
5
5
37
Populus deltoides
eastern cottonwood
Tree
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
4
4
4
15
15
15
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
22
22
24
24
24
24
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
6
6
6
10
10
10
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
3
3
28
5
5
5
Ulmus rubra
Islippery elm
ITree
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
901
90
956
137
1371
206
23
23
0.57
0.57
141
141
19
151
15
16
158.41
158.41
1682
241.11
241.1
362.5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Beaver Creek
XS ID:
X -1 BVR
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
10.7
Date:
9/30/2014
Field Crew:
E. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
764421.6773
134
1472799.805
30.5
732.7755
764421.3083
Floodprone Width:
1472800.334
Max Depth at Bankfull
732.3751
764411.2841
4.4
1472814.525
6.9
732.5933
764397.0888
Bank Height Ratio:
1472833.858
733.2177
764386.4026
1472849.734
733.3646
764383.4433
1472854.157
731.8401
764380.8559
1472857.413
729.0092
764379.5344
1472858.749
727.931
764379.7477
1472858.806
727.4904
764377.7971
1472861.938
727.3533
764375.5108
1472865.845
727.1236
764373.4434
1472868.755
727.0457
764371.3857
1472871.24
727.065
764370.8669
1472871.225
727.8383
764370.6004
1472872.072
727.8677
764368.7515
1472874.067
733.954
764366.3274
1472878.334
734.585
764366.1339
1472878.666
735.2122
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
732.98
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
134
Bankfull Width:
30.5
Floodprone Area Elevation:
739.29
Floodprone Width:
200
Max Depth at Bankfull
6.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull
4.4
W/D Ratio
6.9
Entrenchemnt Ratio:
6.6
Bank Height Ratio:
1
Stream Type: I E5
Section 1 Looking downstream

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Beaver Creek
XS ID:
X -2 BVR
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
10.7
Date:
9/30/2014
Field Crew:
E. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
765773.6335
1473807.071
730.8371
765772.989
1473807.611
730.4926
765761.9093
1473816.271
730.3379
765740.5464
1473834.354
730.648
765721.8241
1473848.19
729.6751
765719.3039
1473849.467
728.5132
765716.0439
1473852.709
726.1953
765714.8684
1473853.576
725.1074
765714.5262
1473853.716
724.7465
765703.2945
1473863.51
724.6163
765711.1409
1473857.129
725.0047
765707.1892
1473860.191
724.7039
765704.1507
1473862.438
724.5189
765703.1696
1473863.906
724.6216
765702.5415
1473864.159
725.1775
765699.6965
1473864.792
730.5177
765691.8927
1473871.309
731.4065
765691.4414
1473871.742
731.8134
rU
rw
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
729.37
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
103.9
Bankfull Width:
27.7
Floodprone Area Elevation:
734.52
Floodprone Width:
200
Max Depth at Bankfull
5.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull
3.8
W/D Ratio
7.4
Entrenchemnt Ratio:
7.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1
Stream Type: I E5
Section 2 Looking downstream
•Je
CROSS - SECTION #'2
BANKFTS ELEi -729
724,
22
44 +UO. Ct0
AS -SUIL r --- - - - - --
YFAR 1
'YEAR 2
s sa R :2 51 # eR M as a R ., _ R 9 A A
is
rt

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Beaver Creek
XS ID:
X -3 BVR
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
10.7
Date:
9/30/2014
Field Crew:
E. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
766078.5517
1474217.357
728.9319
766078.1263
1474218.15
728.5393
766067.817
1474242.054
728.4895
766056.8738
1474267.46
729.7233
766048.1
1474288.257
729.909
766044.0415
1474296.171
727.6629
766042.0234
1474299.512
724.9458
766041.6156
1474300.858
724.1703
766041.5506
1474300.637
723.6748
766041.4967
1474300.706
723.6718
766040.4662
1474302.997
723.8142
766039.8373
1474303.672
722.6318
766038.4757
1474305
722.4598
766037.3707
1474307.07
722.9564
766036.1562
1474309.52
723.7425
766035.9638
1474309.657
724.1924
766035.75
1474310.111
724.436
766035.0177
1474312.483
725.067
766032.7088
1474316.771
728.5782
766031.1986
1474319.232
729.8556
766030.0022
1474321.811
730.0081
766029.1936
1474322.344
730.2105
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
730.15
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
137.1
Bankfull Width:
39.9
Floodprone Area Elevation:
737.93
Floodprone Width:
200
Max Depth at Bankfull
7.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull
3.4
W/D Ratio
11.6
Entrenchemnt Ratio:
5
Bank Height Ratio:
1
Stream Type: I E5
Section 3 Looking downstream
;tt5
I
I
i
CR�55- SEG`TI
{F3
�
9AAKFULL
ELEV. 754154
A
-
9
A5- OLIIL1r YEAR 4
YEAR 2
3.1
11 18
a e It 10 8 fi
A It
A R V 9 n
r, R t x is R it

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Beaver Creek
XS ID:
X -4 BVR
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
10.7
Date:
9/30/2014
Field Crew:
E. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
766346.6997
1474713.492
727.5734
766345.5301
1474714.478
727.2957
766330.8276
1474723.945
727.1513
766311.4448
1474738.363
727.4373
766289.044
1474753.397
728.5488
766270.0309
1474767.53
728.7234
766262.977
1474772.5
726.5241
766259.4191
1474775.238
724.3723
766258.8455
1474776.623
723.348
766258.5852
1474776.699
722.6616
766256.8347
1474778.165
722.3579
766254.2224
1474780.137
722.537
766252.3362
1474781.317
722.5966
766249.3408
1474783.185
722.9026
766249.1685
1474783.309
723.3786
766248.6928
1474783.658
723.4425
766246.9618
1474785.097
723.7769
766242.4616
1474785.417
726.776
766241.4824
1474785.498
729.081
766238.22
1474787.946
729.4317
766237.7562
1474788.987
729.7508
_75A
24
214.
ra
7N
TRA_
il}
in
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
728.25
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
134.8
Bankfull Width:
34.6
Floodprone Area Elevation:
734.61
Floodprone Width:
200
Max Depth at Bankfull
6.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull
3.9
W/D Ratio
8.9
Entrenchemnt Ratio:
5.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1
Stream Type: I E5
Section 4 Looking downstream
ego-
9 6 8 9 R. N 6 � it T 9 A R R R n r n d u+ T R. A R A 7 R aS $ .i R
CROSS -seCMN f+
-- -- ._ - - -' - - -
- - -- RANKFULL ELEV. 728.28
9 6 8 9 R. N 6 � it T 9 A R R R n r n d u+ T R. A R A 7 R aS $ .i R

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Beaver Creek
XS ID:
X -5 BVR
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
10.7
Date:
9/30/2014
Field Crew:
E. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
766934.9485
1475551.34
Bankfull Width:
726.5147
Floodprone Area Elevation:
766934.8385
1475551.652
200
726.3857
8.3
766925.6837
1475574.172
726.9752
7
766916.1938
1475596.537
Bank Height Ratio:
726.4118
766915.6242
1475597.891
726.0902
766912.4218
1475602.315
724.1375
766910.1662
1475605.4
721.0666
766910.1882
1475605.776
720.6849
766909.9113
1475606.224
719.7593
766909.3826
1475608.999
719.0669
766908.3752
1475611.38
718.0957
766907.4659
1475613.532
719.1733
766906.0076
1475615.594
719.4579
766905.2794
1475616.237
720.6368
766904.638
1475617.741
722.584
766900.9835
1475621.94
726.6045
766899.9192
1475623.567
726.9115
766899.1931
1475625.599
727.8809
7{5
Ito
735
7M
R75
Yd5
P1✓!
YEAR 1
YEAR 2
8 a SK 9 R 8 a
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
725.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
127.5
Bankfull Width:
30.5
Floodprone Area Elevation:
734.16
Floodprone Width:
200
Max Depth at Bankfull
8.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull
4.3
W/D Ratio
7
Entrenchemnt Ratio:
6.7
Bank Height Ratio:
1
Stream Type: I E5
Section 5 Looking downstream
I
R ti S iS
E1_�Y 729.
9
17 V a R B 8

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Fifth Creek
XS ID:
X -6 FTH U -S
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
13.9
Date:
9/30/2014
Field Crew:
E. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
767093.5733
1474624.936
728.3768
767092.7047
1474624.738
728.3011
767088.5133
1474623.782
728.3539
767082.989
1474622.59
729.1045
767074.5628
1474620.462
728.4396
767069.9463
1474619.38
726.4971
767066.3093
1474618.524
725.715
767061.8976
1474617.132
723.792
767061.1929
1474616.862
722.3975
767061.1824
1474616.86
722.0696
767058.6107
1474616.311
721.6799
767054.2313
1474615.286
720.9798
767050.9817
1474614.288
721.3046
767048.35
1474614.229
721.4054
767047.6685
1474613.72
722.344
767045.6639
1474613.224
725.9558
767042.5387
1474611.974
728.2817
767036.6902
1474610.171
729.5646
767028.7966
1474608.191
729.9779
767027.8935
1474607.921
730.496
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
729.99
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
146.2
Bankfull Width:
34.1
Floodprone Area Elevation:
737.45
Floodprone Width:
200
Max Depth at Bankfull
7.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull
4.3
W/D Ratio
8
Entrenchemnt Ratio:
5.9
Bank Height Ratio:
1
Stream Type: I E5
Section 6 Looking downstream

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Fifth Creek
XS ID:
X -7 FTH U -S
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
10.7
Date:
9/30/2014
Field Crew:
E. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
767265.1125
1475472.87
726.9658
767264.2633
YEAR •.
1475473.366
YL AR 2
726.8477
767254.0984
6.1
1475479.312
4.2
726.9729
767238.5507
Entrenchemnt Ratio:
1475488.13
727.7371
767225.3461
1475496.533
726.634
767206.2664
1475508.495
725.6962
767200.4357
1475512.303
722.8548
767198.942
1475512.332
720.5563
767198.3565
1475513.238
719.6468
767196.5041
1475513.73
719.8464
767193.5342
1475515.335
719.566
767190.9386
1475517.545
719.8094
767188.2024
1475519.614
719.4121
767187.0055
1475520.096
720.561
767182.1571
1475521.561
727.1334
767178.7637
1475523.881
727.831
767177.9062
1475524.664
728.4311
error=
!i
iJG
Bankfull Elevation:
726.85
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
ra
as -guilr - - --
711.37
YEAR •.
732.97
YL AR 2
!M'u
Max Depth at Bankfull
9 19 f2 Ir 12 19 S
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
726.85
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
112.4
Bankfull Width:
26.9
Floodprone Area Elevation:
732.97
Floodprone Width:
200
Max Depth at Bankfull
6.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull
4.2
W/D Ratio
6.4
Entrenchemnt Ratio:
7.4
Bank Height Ratio:
1
Stream Type: I E5
Section 7 Looking downstream
"'mss-' �'�_• � �:� {
r

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Fifth Creek
XS ID:
X -8 FTH D -S
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
26
Date:
9/30/2014
Field Crew:
E. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
767665.7104
1476406.533
725.539
767664.6441
1476406.778
725.119
767653.854
1476409.264
724.7142
767638.1075
1476414.055
725.322
767617.9847
1476419.909
725.309
767600.3495
1476424.758
725.4848
767596.7347
1476425.771
724.1911
767593.7288
1476425.929
722.3878
767592.8928
1476426.156
720.6244
767590.4881
1476427.112
719.96
767589.4781
1476427.31
719.5615
767589.2182
1476427.427
718.7748
767586.3373
1476428.433
718.9039
767580.1088
1476429.848
718.55
767574.5181
1476430.103
718.8727
767570.1784
1476431.319
718.4977
767570.1656
1476431.405
719.5709
767567.3465
1476431.627
725.4712
767563.8734
1476432.744
726.0703
767559.2798
1476434.035
726.5162
767558.4973
1476434.238
726.9218
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
726.25
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
174.5
Bankfull Width:
34
Floodprone Area Elevation:
733.19
Floodprone Width:
200
Max Depth at Bankfull
6.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull
5.1
W/D Ratio
6.6
Entrenchemnt Ratio:
5.9
Bank Height Ratio:
1
Stream Type: I E5
Section 8 Looking downstream
,.a
AS -OUV
YEAR
1
3S5
YEAR
2
-
-
rde
CIMSS
-SSEcn
Nd #S
w
7216.25 .
�zzia
�BAINVFUU iECZI
?+
-
e 3a
71031
3 +54.00
--
FTH

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Fifth Creek
XS ID:
X -9 FTH D -S
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
26
Date:
9/30/2014
Field Crew:
E. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
767737.1606
1477906.656
Bankfull Width:
722.2822
767736.4364
1477906.622
Floodprone Width:
721.9381
767722.9618
7.9
1477905.988
5
722.0485
767703.5484
Entrenchemnt Ratio:
1477904.738
Bank Height Ratio:
723.18
767686.3654
1477904.659
722.9717
767683.9205
1477904.937
721.4563
767679.9913
1477905.568
718.5859
767678.5671
1477905.983
716.7212
767674.4093
1477905.152
715.5845
767672.1583
1477906.037
717.0753
767673.8266
1477905.812
717.5443
767662.3444
1477905.282
717.0632
767672.4561
1477905.622
717.6203
767671.6958
1477905.3
715.6677
767667.6942
1477904.205
715.0504
767663.8207
1477905.332
715.9637
767662.4399
1477904.312
717.6527
767659.3115
1477904.523
717.9785
767656.1926
1477905.21
718.7468
767650.6961
1477905.843
723.6329
767647.5814
1477906.125
724.4081
767644.0907
1477906.637
724.0945
767643.0587
1477906.508
724.6259
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
723.78
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
189.8
Bankfull Width:
37.6
Floodprone Area Elevation:
731.73
Floodprone Width:
200
Max Depth at Bankfull
7.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull
5
W/D Ratio
7.4
Entrenchemnt Ratio:
5.3
Bank Height Ratio:
1
Stream Type: I E5
Section 9 Looking downstream

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Fifth Creek
XS ID:
X -10 FTH D -S
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
26
Date:
9/30/2014
Field Crew:
E. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
767806.8198
182.2
1478232.148
721.897
767805.7043
730.33
1478232.286
200
721.376
767786.9339
Mean Depth at Bankfull
1478234.599
W/D Ratio
722.0649
767768.2138
5.9
1478238.226
1
722.8212
767754.4228
1478240.624
722.854
767752.774
1478241.234
721.0513
767749.2419
1478242.008
719.1229
767747.6146
1478242.288
717.1961
767747.4069
1478242.19
716.3952
767744.7104
1478243.265
716.5727
767739.8547
1478243.83
716.4706
767734.0373
1478245.224
716.2745
767729.6477
1478246.369
716.5984
767725.1756
1478247.137
716.5613
767724.5327
1478247.858
717.1553
767721.0276
1478248.848
724.0582
767714.5982
1478250.721
723.9581
767713.8797
1478251.021
724.3456
AS- lsuiLr --
1f�AR 1 -
735 vt a>�
M
717,41
715
M
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
723.68
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
182.2
Bankfull Width:
34.1
Floodprone Area Elevation:
730.33
Floodprone Width:
200
Max Depth at Bankfull
6.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull
5.3
W/D Ratio
6.4
Entrenchemnt Ratio:
5.9
Bank Height Ratio:
1
Stream Type: I E5
Section 10 Looking downstream

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Fifth Creek
XS ID:
X -11 FTH D -S
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
26
Date:
9/30/2014
Field Crew:
E. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
767900.6523
155.9
1478770.228
38.2
722.0803
73016
767899.8493
200
1478770.799
7.2
721.736
4.1
767888.7231
9.4
1478780.333
5.2
722.0227
1
767874.4553
1478791.681
721.8128
767864.5048
1478799.802
721.4984
767862.0907
1478801.902
720.6948
767857.8868
1478805.875
718.0859
767855.7276
1478807.664
716.5968
767855.4544
1478807.891
716.0527
767850.2019
1478812.799
715.8515
767844.9414
1478818.091
715.716
767841.5694
1478821.997
714.87
767839.5351
1478822.605
715.3435
767839.1542
1478822.979
716.6037
767835.8153
1478827.049
721.0885
767833.131
1478829.4
721.6385
767829.5342
1478833.828
722.9684
767828.9669
1478834.336
723.3442
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
722.98
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
155.9
Bankfull Width:
38.2
Floodprone Area Elevation:
73016
Floodprone Width:
200
Max Depth at Bankfull
7.2
Mean Depth at Bankfull
4.1
W/D Ratio
9.4
Entrenchemnt Ratio:
5.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1
Stream Type: I E5
Section 11 Looking downstream
ne `.
d
to
+w
+yo-
8 41
Ai -GUILT
YEAR 1
YEAR 2
YEAR
e �9 2 N R fP
d11
4 4 R 9 2 V P
iANRFUL EI-EV. 7'22.%,
7t5.ii4 .
i FTH
51 IR
V
B

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Fifth Creek
XS ID:
X -12 Fth D -S
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
26
Date:
9/30/2014
Field Crew:
E. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
768097.4647
1479235.298
721.0605
768096.3265
1479235.693
720.6207
768070.7112
1479244.596
720.3264
768044.9215
1479252.704
721.2757
768025.391
1479259.488
720.7567
768021.5331
1479260.313
719.4375
768017.3066
1479260.985
717.5687
768013.7615
1479262.284
716.031
768011.9319
1479262.969
715.76
768011.7987
1479263.438
715.3504
768011.8451
1479263.093
714.5502
768009.2014
1479263.693
713.4291
768003.001
1479267.954
711.6975
767997.1241
1479270.619
715.3609
767998.069
1479268.645
712.5854
767996.5251
1479269.752
715.8968
767995.1112
1479270.259
715.4748
767994.4956
1479270.79
715.5063
767990.4121
1479272.724
718.7102
767987.2311
1479273.619
720.4022
767983.754
1479275.212
722.3668
767979.4195
1479276.743
722.6035
767978.7308
1479277.223
723.1086
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
720.24
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
216.6
Bankfull Width:
44.1
Floodprone Area Elevation:
729.3
Floodprone Width:
200
Max Depth at Bankfull
9.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull
4.9
W/D Ratio
9
Entrenchemnt Ratio:
4.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1
Stream Type: I E5
Section 12 Looking downstream
s�
a-

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
Fifth Creek
XS ID:
X -13 FTH D -S
Drainage Area (sq. mi.)
26
Date:
9/30/2014
Field Crew:
E. Toler, C. Campbell, R. Lepsic
Northing
Easting
Elevation
768867.6655
180.3
1480245.732
38.9
718.0172
725.9
768866.9055
200
1480246.461
717.4756
768851.6125
4.6
1480260.295
8.4
718.0932
5.1
768839.3596
1
1480273.059
719.4068
768826.2078
1480286.255
719.6251
768824.3359
1480288.388
719.0655
768821.1942
1480290.751
716.6812
768819.1653
1480293.266
714.4318
768818.8444
1480293.58
713.7045
768816.4252
1480295.95
713.5744
768812.0451
1480299.518
713.362
768808.3255
1480302.867
712.6938
768804.7745
1480306.222
712.8873
768801.1143
1480310.596
713.1077
768801.1294
1480310.893
714.3757
768798.648
1480313.791
717.257
768797.4877
1480316.944
719.6317
768794.8979
1480319.615
720.1918
768794.7318
1480320.1
720.5905
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
719.53
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area:
180.3
Bankfull Width:
38.9
Floodprone Area Elevation:
725.9
Floodprone Width:
200
Max Depth at Bankfull
6.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull
4.6
W/D Ratio
8.4
Entrenchemnt Ratio:
5.1
Bank Height Ratio:
1
Stream Type: I E5
Section 13 Looking downstream

Exhibit Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS ID# 92185 Segment /Reach: Reach 1 Beaver Creek 5,622 feet
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre- Existing Condition
References Reach(es) Data'
Design
As -Built / Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Equation
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
51.0
41.9*
20.2
26.7
26.3
35.2
4.3
48
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
20.7
27.6
38.8
24.1
29.5
26.3
38.1
7.5
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
100.0
180.0
-
250.0
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
100.0
180.0
250.0
-
>200
-
-
0.0
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.7
2.2*
3.3
4.5
4.5
5.9
0.5
48
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3.3
4.2
5.0
3.5
4.2
4.4
4.7
0.6
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.3
5.0
6.9
6.9
8.1
0.7
48
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.6
5.9
7.2
6.4
6.8
7.0
7.1
4.0
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
139.3
92.9 **
79.7
119.4
116.9
176.0
22.9
48
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
75.0
115.5
163.2
105.4
121.1
124.5
133.4
14.3
3
Width /Depth Ratio
18.8
4.4
6.0
5.9
9.1
1.2
48
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5.1
6.6
9.5
5.5
7.3
5.6
10.9
3.1
3
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4
4.6
8.2
-
10.9
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3.6
6.4
9.0
5.2
7.0
7.6
8.3
1.6
3
Bank Height Ratio
1.4
1.0
1.2
-
1.5
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
1.0
-
-
1.0
-
-
0.0
3
d50 (mm)
-
0.2
-
-
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
Riffle Slope (ft)
0.0
0.0020
0.0014
0.0094
0.003
26
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.0
0.0020
0.0094
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pool Length (ft)
5.5
25.7
19.1
161.9
27.5
34
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5.5
25.7
161.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pool Max Depth (ft)
4.7
6.7
6.6
7.8
0.9
13
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.7
6.7
7.8
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
0
2
Pool Spacing (ft)
20.6
176.7
19.1
748.9
27.5
34
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
20.6
176.7
748.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pool Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
1
80.9
100.6
1 -
119.8
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
80.9
100.6
119.8
74.4
40.4
40.4
52.1
16.5
2
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
47.0
235.0
443.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
47.0
235.0
443.0
47.0
235.0
-
443.0
-
Radius of Curvature (ft)
60.0
3527.0
14000.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
60.0
3527.0
14000.0
60.0
3527.0
14000.0
Re: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
2.7
161.8
-
642.2
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.2
127.8
507.2
2.2
127.8
-
507.2
-
-
Meander Wavelength (ft)
575.0
1380.0
-
2132.0
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
575.0
1380.0
2132.0
575.0
1380.0
-
2132.0
-
-
Meander Width Ratio
26.3
63.3
-
97.8
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
20.8
50.0
77.2
20.8
50.0
-
77.2
-
-
Substrate, bed and transport parameters
Ri % /Ru % /P % /G % /S%
-
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
SC% / Sa% /G.% / C% / B% / Be%
N/A
16 /d35 /d50 /d84 /d95 /diP /disp(mm)
>2.0mm
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib /f2
0.43
0.35
0.31
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
33.0
24.0
22.7
Stream power (transport capacity) W/m 2
1.58
1.3
1.29
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
10.76
N/A
Impervious cover estimate ( %)
10 -20
N/A
Rosgen Classification
B
E5
N/A
E5
E5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.9
4.1 * **
3.8
3.7
3.6
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
539.9
379.2 **
453.7
Valley length (ft)
-
N/A
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
-
N/A
-
-
Sinuosity (ft)
1.07
N/A
1.07
1.07
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0032
0.0016
N/A
0.0016
0.0014
BF slope (fUft)
-
-
N/A
-
-
Bankfull Floodplane Area (acres)
N/A
Additional Reach Parameters
Proportion over wide ( %)
N/A
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
N/A
Incision Class (BHR Range)
N/A
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E°%
N/A
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
N/A
Biological or Other
N/A
* NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Surry County NRCS, Draft 1/27/2010
*" NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Surry County NRCS, Draft 3/16/2006
** *Bankfull Discharge /Bankfull Cross Sectional Area
1 A singulare reference stream was not used to design the Enhancement Level II project.
2 As built profile parameters not calculated for Enhancement Level 11

Exhibit Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS ID# 92185 Segment /Reach: Reach 2 Fifth Creek upstream of Beaver Creek 1,251 feet
Parameter
Gauge'
Regional Curve
Pre- Existing Condition
References Reach(es) Data'
Design
As -Built / Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Equation
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
in
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
51.0
46.0'
23.9
30.7
30.3
40.3
4.8
11
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
25.1
29.0
33.0
24.2
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
>200.0
-
-
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
>200.0
-
-
>200.0
-
-
-
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.7
2.3'
3.8
4.2
4.2
5.0
0.4
11
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3.8
4.1
4.6
-
4.3
-
-
-
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.3
6.7
7.8
7.9
9.1
0.6
11
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6.4
7.4
8.3
-
7.7
-
-
-
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
139.3
112.5"
94.0
130.1
128.2
176.4
4.8
11
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
104.5
119.7
144.7
-
104.2
-
-
-
1
Width /Depth Ratio
18.8
5.3
7.0
7.1
8.4
1.0
11
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5.5
7.0
8.6
-
5.6
-
-
-
1
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4
-
6.5
-
-
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
6.5
-
8.3
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.4
1.1
1.1
-
1.2
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
1.0
d50 (mm)
_
0.2
1 -
1 -
I -
-
I N/A
I N/A
I N/A
I N/A
I N/A
I N/A
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
Rifne Slope (ft)
0.0009
0.0010
0.0010
0.0011
0.0001
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.0009
0.0010
0.0011
Pool Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
81.2
112.8
144.3
-
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
7.5
7.8
8.0
-
7.2
-
-
-
1
Pool Spacing (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
272.0
297.0
322.0
-
Pool Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
104.5
119.7
144.7
136.3
1
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
48.0
639.0
-
1566.0
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
48.0
639.0
1566.0
48.0
639.0
-
1566.0
-
-
Radius of Curvature (ft)
1275.0
2693.0
3800.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1275.0
2693.0
3800.0
1275.0
2693.0
3800.0
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
49.6
104.8
-
147.8
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
49.6
104.8
147.8
49.6
104.8
-
147.8
-
-
Meander Wavelength (ft)
4464.0
4618.0
-
4771.0
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4464.0
4618.0
4771.0
4464.0
4618.0
-
4771.0
-
-
Meander Width Ratio
173.7
179.7
-
185.6
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
173.7
179.7
185.6
173.7
179.7
-
185.6
-
-
Substrate, bed and transport parameters
Ri%/ Ru%/ P%/G%/S%
-
N/A
-
-
- - -
-
SC% / Sa% /G.% / C% / B% / Be%
N/A
16/d35/d50/d84/d95 /dip /disp(mm)
>2.0mm
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib /fz
0.38
0.3
0.37
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
28.0
17.0
27.9
Stream power (transport capacity) W/m 2
1.36
1.46
1.79
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
13.93
N/A
Impervious cover estimate ( %)
10 -20
N/A
Rosgen Classification
B
E5
N/A
E5
E5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.9
4.1 "'
3.4
3.4
3.9
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
539.9
466.8"
442.3
Valley length (ft)
-
N/A
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
-
N/A
-
-
Sinuosity (ft)
1.04
N/A
1.04
1.04
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0032
0.0013
N/A
0.0013
0.00171
BF slope (ft/ft)
-
-
N/A
-
-
Bankfull Floodptane Area (acres)
N/A
Additional Reach Parameters
Proportion over wide ( %)
N/A
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
N/A
Incision Class (BHR Range)
N/A
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E%
N/A
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
N/A
Biological or Other
N/A
* INC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Surry County NRCS, Draft 1/27/2010
** NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Surry County NRCS, Draft 3/16/2006
** *Bankfull Discharge /Bankfull Cross Sectional Area
1 A singulare reference stream was not used to design the Enhancement Level II project.
2 As built profile parameters not calculated for Enhancement Level 11

Exhibit Table 10c. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS ID# 92185 Segment/Reach: Reach 3 Fifth Creek downstream of Beaver Creek 4.377 feet
Parameter
Gauge"
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
References Reach(es) Data'
Design
As -Built / BaselineZ
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Equation
Min
Mean
Mad
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Mad
Min
Mean
Mad
Max
I SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
51
58*
27.9
35.6
34.7
44.1
3.9
27
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
26.3
33.4
40.8
28.4
34.1
32.2
41.7
6.9
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
250
316.7
-
400.0
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
>200.0
-
-
>200.0
-
-
-
-
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.7
2.8*
4.5
5.3
5.1
6.8
0.5
27
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.0
4.7
5.7
4.0
4.3
4.1
4.7
0.4
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.3
5.8
7.6
7.2
9.3
0.7
27
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/Al
5.1
6.5
7.8
5.6
6.3
6.3
7.1
0.8
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
139.3
179.2 **
192.6
202.5
175.5
222.2
22
27
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
120.3
157.8
202.7
115.3
143.5
150.2
165.2
25.6
3
Width /Depth Ratio
18.8
4.7
6.6
6.8
8.2
1.0
25
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5.2
7.1
8.8
6.9
8.1
6.9
10.4
2
3
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4
7.1
1 8.6
1 -
10.8
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
>6.5
4.8
1 6.0
1 6.2
1 7.0
1 1.1
3
Bank Height Ratio
1.4
1.3
1.5
-
1.7
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
1.0
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0
3
d50 (mm)
0.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
RifFleSlope(ft)
0.0
0.0017
0.002
0.004
0
18
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.0022
0.0026
0.003
-
-
-
-
-
-
PoolLength(ft)
15.2
30
27.5
69.8
15
19
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
81.2
112.8
144.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pool Max Depth (ft)
8
9.4
9.5
11.4
1.1
15
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
7.5
7.8
8.0
6.1
6.4
6.2
7.0
0.5
3
Pool Spacing (ft)
62.3
256.3
150.6
1206
298
18
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
272.0
297.0
322.0
-
-
-
-
-
Pool Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
199.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
120.3
157.8
202.7
148.3
169.9
152.2
209.2
1 34.1
1 3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
48
639
1556
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
48
639
1556
48
639
-
1556
-
Radius of Curvature (ft)
1275
2693
-
3800
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1275
2693
3800
1275
2693
-
3800
-
-
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
34.7
73.4
-
103.5
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
49.6
73.4
113.8
38.2
80.6
-
113.8
-
-
Meander Wavelength (ft)
4464
4618
-
4771
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4464
4618
4771
4464
4618
-
4771
-
-
Meander Width Ratio
121.6
125.8
-
130
-
-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
173.7
125.8
46.9
1.4
19.1
-
46.9
-
-
Substrate, bed and transport parameters
Ri % /RU % /P % /G % /S%
N/A
-
SC% / Sa% /G.% / C% / B% / Be%
N/A
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / dip / disp (mm)
> 2.0 mm
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
0.46
0.35
0.36
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
35
20
27.1
Stream power (transport capacity) W/M21
1
1
2.76
1
1
1.06
1.49
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
26.05
N/A
Impervious cover estimate ( %)
10 -20
N/A
Rosgen Classification
B
E5
N/A
E5
E5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.9
4.3 * **
5.2
3.9
3.7
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
539.9
772.1 **
1166.3
Valley length (ft)
-
N/A
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
-
N/A
-
-
Sinuosity (ft)
1.04
N/A
1.04
1.04
Additional Reach Parameters
BF slope (fUft)
N/A
-
-
Bankfull Floodplane Area (acres)
N/A
Proportion over wide ( %)
N/A
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
N/A
Incision Class (BHR Range)
N/A
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E%
N/A
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
N/A
Biological or Other
N/A
* NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Surry County NRCS, Draft 1/27/2010
** INC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve, Surry County NRCS, Draft 3/16/2006
** *Bankfull Discharge /Bankfull Cross Sectional Area
1 A singulare reference stream was not used to design the Enhancement Level II project.
2 As built profile parameters not calculated for Enhancement Level 11

Exhibit Table 11 a. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary (Dimensional Parameters -- Cross Section)
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS ID# 92185 Segment/Reach: Reach 1 Beaver Creek 5,622 feet
Based on fixed baseline bankfull
Sankfull Mean .>.
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
S.nkfIlWidth/D.pR.O.mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
BankfullEntmnchmentRati,MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
-----------------------------------
'
--m-------m-------m-------m--------
..
-
CmssSecUonalAmabeWeenendpins(A)MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
-®®-----®®-----M®-----®®-----m®----
bank u
Based on fixed baseline f
'
-----------------------------------
-----m-------m---------------m-----
'
-----------------------------------
-----------------------------------
...
--M-------M-------M-------M--------
.h •.b.-----------------------------------
-
-----------------------------------
Based on cument/developing bankfull
feet to
•
-----------------------------------
-----------------------------------
'
----------------------------m--m---
..
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Bankful[Width/DepthRatt.MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
B.nkf.liEntr.n&.ntRati.MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
-----------------------------------
•
-----------------------------------

Exhibit Table 11b. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary (Dimensional Parameters --Cross Section)
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS 113# 921185 Segment/Reach: Reach 2 Fifth Creek upstream of Beaver Creek 1,251
Based on fixed baselln: ban"
lavabo
Bankfull Width
BankfullBankHeightllati.000MENEEMENEENNEEMENMENEEMENEEMEMEN
Based on cuffendideveloping f 11
bank u
'
-------
--------------
--------------
-----------------------------------
-----------------------------------
-..-----------------------------------
'
-®®---�mm----�----------��-----
Based on fixed baseline bankfull
'
-------
--------------
--------------
- -..-----------------------------------
BankfullBankHeightllati.MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMENEEMENNEEMENE
Based on cument/developing ... f he 11
bank u
-----------------------------------
- .mmmmm--
----------------------------
- - ..-------
----------------------------
.-----------------------------------

Exhibit Table 11c. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary (Dimensional Parameters -- Cross Section)
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS ID# 92185 Segment/Reach: Reach 3 Fifth Creek downstream of Beaver Creek 4,377
Dimension and subah-ste
Based on fixed baseline bankfull
B.md.1l Width
..
mm®----mmm----
mm®----mmm----
mmm----
. -.t
®mm----m®m----
mmm----m®®----
m®m----
.000■■■■EME...■
EEM.■.■EEM■..■EEM■■.■
Based on current/developing bankfull
'
--------------
---------------------
--------------
---------------------
m-------------
---------------------
--------------
---------------------
Basedonfixedbaselin elevation
,mmm-------------------------
-------
..... - .
.
m
--------------------------------
BankfullEntrenchmentRati,MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
BankfullBankHeightRall.MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMENEEMENNEEMEMENEM
Based on current/developing f 11
bank u
--------------
---------------------
--------------
---------------------
• '----------------------------
-------
'--------------
--------------
BankfullBankHeightR •--------------
---------------------

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt /Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3
Exhibit Table 12a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS ID# 92185 Segment /Reach: Reach 1 Beaver Creek 5,622 feet
Parameter
Baseline MY -1
MY -2
MY- 3
MY- 4
MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate -
only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SID
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
24.1
29.5
26.3
38.1
7.5
3
27.9
30.1
30.7
31.8
2.0
3
27.7
30.9
30.5
34.6
3.6
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
200
200
200
200
0
3
200
200.0
200
200
0.0
3
200
200
200
200
0
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft
3.5
4.2
4.4
4.7
0.6
3
3.7
3.9
3.7
4.4
0.4
3
3.8
4
3.9
4.4
0.3
3
' Bankfull Max Depth (ft
6.4
6.8
7
7.1
4
3
5.2
5.5
5.5
5.9
0.4
3
5.1
5.9
6.3
6.4
0.7
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2
105.4
121.1
124.5
133.4
14.3
3
115
118.7
117.4
123.7
4.5
3
103.9
124.2
134
134.8
17.6
3
Width /Depth Ratio
5.5
7.3
5.6
10.9
3.1
3
6.3
7.7
8.3
8.6
1.3
3
6.9
7.7
7.4
8.9
1
3
Entrenchment Rati
5.2
7
7.6
8.3
1.6
3
6.3
6.7
6.5
7.2
0.5
3
5.8
6.5
6.6
7.2
0.7
3
Bank Height Rati
1
1
1
1
0
3
1
1
1
1
0
3
1
1
1
1
0
3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft
Riffle Slope (ft/ft
Pool Length (ft
Pool Max depth (ft
Pool Spacing (ft]
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft
Radius of Curvature (ft
Rc:Bankfull width (ft /ft
Meander Wavelength (ft
Meander Width Rati
LL
0
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classificatio
E5
E5
E5
Channel Thalweg length (ft
5,622
5622
5622
Sinuosity (ft
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
BF slope (ft /ft)
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
'SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be°/
3d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
2% of Reach with Eroding Bank
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt /Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt /Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3
Exhibit ... Data
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS ID# 92185 Segment/Reach: Reach 2 Fifth Creek upstream of Beaver Creek 1,251
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull •
Floodprone Width (ft):
Bankfull Mean Depth
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft,
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
Width/Depth Ratio
Entrenchment ...
=•--•
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
Pool Length (ft'
Pool Max depth (ft,
Pool Spacing (ft�
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft�
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
Meander Wavelength (ft)
Meander Width Ratit,
Additional Reach Parameters
...
Channel length (ft
Sinuosity (ft,
Water Surface Slope
BF slope
2% of Reach with ...:
Stability Channel ... .
Biological .. _
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt /Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3

Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt /Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3
Exhibit Table 12c. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Five Mile Branch Stream Restoration, EEP IMS ID# 92185 Segment /Reach: Reach 3 Fifth Creek downstream of Beaver Creek 4,377
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY- 3
MY- 4
MY- 5
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SID
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Mad
Max
SID
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
28.4
34.1
32.2
41.7
6.9
3
34
34.5
34.5
34.9
0.5
3
34
35.4
34.1
38.2
2.4
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
200
200
200
200
0
3
200
200.0
200
200
0.0
3
200
200
200
200
0
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft
4
4.3
4.1
4.7
0.4
3
4.8
4.9
4.9
4.9
0.1
3
4.1
4.9
5.1
5.3
0.7
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft
5.6
6.3
6.3
7.1
0.8
3
5.7
6.1
5.9
6.8
0.6
3
6.6
6.9
6.9
7.2
0.3
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe
115.3
143.5
150.2
165.2
25.6
3
162.8
167.9
170.2
170.7
4.4
3
155.9
170.9
174.5
182.2
13.5
3
Width /Depth Ratio
6.9
8.1
6.9
10.4
2
3
7
7.1
7.1
7.1
0.1
3
6.4
7.5
6.6
9.4
1.7
3
Entrenchment Rati
4.8
6
6.2
7
1.1
3
5.7
5.8
5.8
5.9
0.1
3
5.2
5.7
5.9
5.9
0.4
3
'Bank Height Rati
1
1
1
1
0
3
1
1
1
1
0
3
1
1
1
1
0
3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft
Riffle Slope (ft/ft
Pool Length (ft
Pool Max depth (ft
Pool Spacing (ft
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft
Radius of Curvature (ft
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft
Meander Wavelength (ft
Meander Width Rati
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classificatio
E5
E5
E5
Channel Thalweg length (ft
4377
4377
4,377
Sinuosity (ft
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
BF slope (ft /ft
3Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
'SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be°/
3d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
Z% of Reach with Eroding Bank
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Othe
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1 = The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross - section surveys and the longitudinal profile.
2 = Proportion of reach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey from visual assessment table
3 = Riffle, Run, Pool, Glide, Step; Silt /Clay, Sand, Gravel, Cobble, Boulder, Bedrock; dip = max pave, disp = max subpave
4. = Of value /needed only if the n exceeds 3

Appendix E
Hydrology Data

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration
NCEEP # 92185
Date of Data
Date of
Greater than Qbkf
Collection
Occurance
Method
Stage
Notes
Beaver Creek, Fifth Creek
7/18/2014
1/11/2014
On site Transducer
Y
Upstream and Fifth Creek
Downstream
7/18/2014
3/7/2014
On site Transducer
Y
Beaver Creek
7/18/2014
4/7/2014
On site Transducer
Y
Beaver Creek

-30%
70%
2014

4
N
d
t
V
_
0 2
.Q
a�
a
C
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #1 EBD3010
C -0 L L >1 C >1 ai — — > U
IL 2� Q Q O z o
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4 y
d
t
V
-6 =
-8 0
-10
w
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

m
m
s
U
6 2
.Q
L
a
m
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #2 13134C9138
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - October 17
cutiv Da
7
s
C -0 L A C >, 0) "' "_ > U
Q Q
LL 2: m 0 z
CO
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4 N
as
t
-6 =
c
-g o
-10 m
w
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

m
N
d
t
V
C
0 2
.Q
as
L
IL
C
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #3 13152502
C L L >1 C >1 ai — — > U
LL 2: Q Q N O Z 0
CO
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4 N
d
t
V
-6
c
-8 2
ca
-10
w
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

I:m
m
s
_
o 2
.Q
L
a
M
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #4 13D49A3B
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - October 17
V,47-�
24 Consecutive Da s
I
C > U
-�i U- 2t Q -a Q O z
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4 N
m
s
-6 =
-g o
c�
w
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

m
t
o 2
a
a
0
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #5 14E16DC9
a � = a)
CU 5 a o ai
Li Q
Q � Z
Date
� Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18 0
-20 m
-22
-24 w
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
-44

2
m
0 2
a
L
a
N
Five Mile Branch
Guage #6 14E1A3C5
C L L i, C %, 0) "-' "-' > U
LL Q Q O z
U)
Date
� Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12 (D
-14 u
-16
-18 0
-20
-22
-24 w
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
-44

N
m
s
0
a
m
a
4
2
[f7
Five Mile Branch
Guage #7 13D4CA32
0) � > U
LL. Q g Q a) Z
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
-44
a�
c
c
0
m
n
S
I

0
m
s
o 2
CL
L
a
0
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #8 13D49BC4
C L L >+ C >+ ".- i U
IL 2: O z
U)
Date
� Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18 0
-20
-22
-24 w
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
-44

m
s
_
0
a
L
a
4
FA
0
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #9 EBD20B9
L L >1 � >1 0) y--� y--r > U
IL e Q Q O z
Date
� Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
-44
m
t
_
_
0
cu
(D
w

m
CD
s
_
o 2
m
.Q
i
a.
m
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #10 13D4B632
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - October 17
61 Consecutive a s
I
I
C -0 L L >1 C >1 0 4-+ > U
U- 2: Q Q O z
U)
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
m
s
-6 =
-g o
ca
-102
w
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

N
m
t
0
a
m
a
4
FA
X
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #11 EBD074F
C L L >+ C >. 0) "' "' > U
LL Q g Q (' O z o
U)
Date
� Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
-44
m
t
U
_
_
0
m
n

a�
c
0
a
i
a
4
FA
0
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #12 14E13DAE
> U
LL Q Q Z
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
-44
m
t
U
0
a�
.J

4
N
d
t
V
c
0 2
.Q
m
IL
L
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #13 13D4A9D9
L L i1 C: >1 0) - - > U
IL -a Q Q O z
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
d
t
V
-6
c
-g 2
-10
w
-12 0
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

CI
m
s
0 2
CL
L
a
C�7
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #14 13D4C9C5
GROWING SEASON
Anril 1 R - nrtnhar 17
C s L L i, C >I 0) "� 4-' > U
IL Q 3 < 0 z
U)
Date
� Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10 N
-12
-14 .�
-16 0
-18
-20
-22 LU
-240
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40

4
m
t
2
0
.Q
as
IL
[t,
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #15 A28B85B
C -0 L L >1 C >1 0) > U
LL 2t Q Q O z D
U)
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4 u,
m
-6
_
-8 =
0
-10
-12
w
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

4
m
U
c
2
0
.Q
U
CD
a
[t,
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #16 A28B85B
C -0 L L >1 C >1 0) "-' "-' > U
U)
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4 u,
m
-6
c
-8
0
-10
-12
w
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

i1
a�
t
U
_
0 2
ca
.Q
a�
a
0
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #17 14E16DE5
GROWING SEASON
�o
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
_
-20
-22
-24 >
m
-26 w
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
-44
C -0 &- >+ C >% 0) 4- 4--' > U
CU a) CU LL Q Q °� O z
Date
� Precipitation GW Elevation

►,m
N
t
0 2
ca
.Q
m
L
a
Elm
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #18 1313493A9
GROWING SEASON
A i118- Qc t r17
S Cqrlsecutive
Days
Lb-
1
JLL
HHHHHHH]
11
-0 L L ^ C: >1 �-+ -FJ > U
U- Q g Q ) O z D
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4 N
d
s
-6 =
C
-g o
ca
w
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

0
N
d
t
o 2
CL
m
L
a
0
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #19 14D4B648
Date
� Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18 0
-20
-22
-24 w
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
-44

0
m
s
6 2
CL
m
L
a
0
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #20 9DE6C32
GROWING SEASON
April 18 - October 17
Vq
M
26 Consecutive Days
Ll
U- 2t Q Q a) O z
U)
Date
� Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18 c
-20
-22
-24 w
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
-44

E
m
t
c
2
0
m
a
d
L
a
J]
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #21 9DE6131 F
GROWING SEASON
(0 N (z =5 5 = Q U O O
LL Q Q (n O z o
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4 in
d
-6 c
C
-8 0
ca
-10 ?
w
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

4
m
t
0 2
a
.Q
U
m
L
a
Lim
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #22 EBD1038
G ROW ING 5 EASO
pri 1 - cto er 17
183 Consecutive Days
Ilk
I
jJ1,1111111, 11 11 11
LL Q Q U) O
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
O 0
Z 0
8
6
4
2
0
-2
m
-4
-6 =
0
-8
a�
-10 w
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

l:l
as
s
o 2
c�
.Q
m
a
D
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #23 13134B61 D
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
> U
6
4
2
0
-2
-4 y
a�
s
-6
C
-8 0
ca
-10
w
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

0
CIO
m
s
6 2
_m
CL
m
L
a.
0
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #24 A287DCE
G OWING SEASON
A ril 18 - October 17
A
%Aj j--V7--1 \J! It It
i
A I I
HII,
25 Consecutive ays
U- Q Q O Z
U)
Date
� Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
•0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18 c
-20
-22
-24 w
-26 �
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
-44

0
m
s
6 2
CL
m
L
a
0
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #25 13134B624
IL 2t Q Q a) O z
U)
Date
� Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18 c
-20
-22
-24 w
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
-44

C!
a�
t
C
o 2
CL
a�
a
N
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #26 EBDD6BE
CD(1 \A /IAIC CCAClIAI
c >, c >, v� 4- >
U)
Date
� Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10 N
m
-12 s
-14 .�
-16 0
-18
-20
-22 LU
-240
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40

4
U)
(D
s
c
0 2
c�
EL
IL
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #27 14E13D38
L L i1 C: it 0) y--. - i U
LL Q Q m 0 z
U)
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4 N
m
t
-6 c
-g o
c�
-10 m
w
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22

N
m
t
_
0
w
c�
r
.a
m
a`
4
2
U
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #28 14E1973F
LL 0 Z
U)
Date
Precipitation GW Elevation
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
y
m
s
_
_
0
R
m
w

0
ai
s
o 2
CL
m
a
D
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #29 14E177CO
> 0
Li � Q Q Z
Date
� Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12 a0i
-14
-16
-18 0
-20
-22
-24 w
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42
-44

5
N
m
t
c
6 2
ca
.Q
m
L
a
D
Five Mile Branch
Gauge #30 13134CA00
cc li 2 Q 2: Q a) O Z 0
U)
Date
� USGS Precipitation GW Elevation
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-120
-14
-18.2
-20
-22 w
-24 3:
-260
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
-42

Monitoring Gauge
Number
Max Consecutive Hydroperiod: Saturation within 12 Inches of Soil Surface (Percent of
Growing Season) WETS Station: USGS 354822080521501 Growing Season: 4/18 - 10/17
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Mean
1
68.3
36.1
52.2
2
23.0
3.8
13.4
3
23.0
13.1
18.1
4
54.1
13.1
33.6
5
48.6
8.7
28.7
6
16.9
7.7
12.3
7M
16.4
3.0
9.7
8
100.0
42.1
71.1
9
22.4
33.9
28.2
10
100.0
33.3
66.7
11
16.4
11.5
14.0
12
42.6
20.8
31.7
13
44.3
19.7
32.0
14
37.2
10.9
24.1
15M
23.0
0.0
11.5
16M
23.5
0.0
11.8
17M
2.2
0.0
1.1
18
9.8
8.2
9.0
19M
34.4
0.0
17.2
20
20.8
14.2
17.5
21
100.0
42.1
71.1
22
100.0
100.0
100.0
23
100.0
100.0
100.0
24
16.9
13.7
15.3
25
53.6
27.9
40.8
26
100.0
20.8
60.4
27M
16.4
0.0
8.2
28
7.7
8.2
8.0
29
67.2
34.4
50.8
30
20.2
10.9
15.6
Annual Precip 57.6
Total
WETS 30th Percent 34.9
WETS 70th Percent 51.5
Normal Y
M Malfunction, Data Overwritten or Unretrievable

Table 14. Groundwater Gauge Downloading History
Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration
NCEEP # 92185
Download Event Date
Number
Initial Gauge
3/20/2013
4/3/2013
5/29/2013
6/4/2013
8/20/2013
12/5/2013
12/15/2013
7/18/2014
10/17/2014
Seriel Number
1
13D413648
ok
ok
Failed
No attempt.
ok
Replaced with EBD3010.
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
Reprogrammed due o
2
14E14322
inconsistent logging
Replaced with 12D4C9D8.
ok
No attempt.
ok
failed
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
3
1314FC9A
Failed
ok
ok
No attempt.
Failed
Replaced with 13152502.
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
4
13D49A313
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
ok
ok
No attempt.
Ok. Replaced battery.
ok
Deleted old data.
5
14E16DC9
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
ok
ok
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
6
14E1A3C5
Reprogrammed due to not
ok
ok
No attempt.
Failed
ok
No attempt.
Ok. Replaced battery.
ok
downloading.
Deleted old data.
7
13D4CA32
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
ok
ok
No attempt.
Replaced with 1314FC9A
Partial data
8
13D49BC4
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
ok
ok
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
9
136136377
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
Failed
Replaced with EBD20B9.
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
10
13D413632
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
ok
ok
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
11
14E178FC
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
Failed
Replaced with EBD074F.
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
12
14E13DAE
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
ok
ok
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
13
13D4A9D9
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
ok
ok
No attempt.
Ok. Reprogrammed.
ok
Deleted old data.
14
13D4C9C5
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
Failed
ok
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
15
A2868513
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
No attempt due to
No attempt.
No attempt.
Ok. Replaced battery.
failed
malfunctioning handheld.
Deleted old data.
16
11312B9E
ok
Failed
ok
No attempt.
No attempt due to
No attempt. Submerged
No attempt.
Replaced with EBCFF2F
Partial data
malfunctioning handheld.
17
14E16DE5
ok
ok
ok
No attempt.
No attempt due to
ok
No attempt.
Ok. Replaced battery.
Partial data
malfunctioning handheld.
Deleted old data.
18
13153397
Failed
Replaced with 13D493A9.
No attempt due to
No attempt. Could not
No attempt due to
°k
No attempt.
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
accident.
locate.
malfunctioning handheld.
19
14E15453
ok
°k
No attempt due to
°k
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
Replaced with 13D413648
Partial data
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
20
9DE6C32
ok
°k
No attempt due to
°k
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
21
9DE6D1 F
ok
°k
No attempt due to
°k
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
Failed
ok
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
22
EBD1038
ok
°k
No attempt due to
°k
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
23
13D4B61 D
ok
°k
No attempt due to
°k
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
24
A287DCE
ok
°k
No attempt due to
°k
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.

Table 14. Groundwater Gauge Downloading History
Five Mile Branch Stream and Wetland Restoration
NCEEP # 92185
Download Event Date
Number
Initial Gauge
3/20/2013
4/3/2013
5/29/2013
6/4/2013
8/20/2013
12/5/2013
12/15/2013
7/18/2014
10/17/2014
Seriel Number
25
13D46624
ok
ok
No attempt due to
ok
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
26
EBDD66E
ok
ok
No attempt due to
ok
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
Reprogrammed due to no
No attempt due to
Reprogrammed due o
No attempt due to
27
14E13D38
ok
inconsistent logging
No attempt.
ok
Failed
Partial data
data.
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
28
14E1973F
ok
ok
No attempt due to
ok
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
Failed
Partial data
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
29
14E177C0
ok
ok
No attempt due to
ok
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
30
13D4CA00
ok
ok
No attempt due to
No attempt.
No attempt due to
No attempt.
ok
OK. Deleted old data.
ok
accident.
malfunctioning handheld.
RAIN
13D4BAF9
ok
ok
ok full of ants
No attempt.
Failed. Silt in gauge from
Failed
Failed
No attempt. Wasp nest on
No attempt
flooding.
gauge.

Appendix F
Photographs

Beaver Creek
Photo Point 1. Boulder Vane
10/17/14
Photo Point 1. Looking downstream
10/17/14
Photo Point 2. Looking downstream 10/17/14
Photo Point 3. Looking downstream 10/17/14
Photo Point 4. Floodplain looking east 10/17/14
Photo Point 4. Boulder Vane 10/17/14
Page 1 of 13

Beaver Creek
Photo Point 5. Cross Vane 10/17/14
Photo Point 6. Boulder Vane 10/17/14
Photo Point 7. Boulder Vane 10/17/14
Photo Point 7. Floodplain looking east 10/17/14
Photo Point 7. Floodplain looking west 10/17/14
Photo Point 8. Floodplain pool looking east 10/17/14
Page 2 of 13

Beaver Creek
Photo Point 9. Beaver dam at Cross Vane 10/17/14
Photo Point 10. Cross Vane 10/17/14
Photo Point 10. Floodplain looking east 10/17/14
Photo Point 10. Floodplain looking west 10/17/14
Photo Point 11. Looking downstream 10/17/14
Photo Point 12. Floodplain looking west 10/17/14
Page 3 of 13

Beaver Creek
Photo Point 12. Floodplain pool looking east 10/17/14
Photo Point 13. Floodplain pool looking west 10/17/14
Photo Point 13. Floodplain looking east 10/17/14
Photo Point 14. Floodplain pool looking east 10/17/14
Photo Point 15. Floodplain pool looking west 10/17/14
Photo Point 15. Floodplain looking east 10/17/14
Page 4 of 13

Beaver Creek
Photo Point 16. Looking downstream 10/17/14
Photo Point 16. Looking upstream 10/17/14
Photo Point 17. Floodplain looking west 10/17/14
Photo Point 17. Floodplain looking north 10/17/14
Photo Point 17. Floodplain looking east 10/17/14
Photo Point 18. Cross Vane 10/17/14
Page 5 of 13

Beaver Creek
Photo Point 19. Boulder Vanes 10/17/14
Photo Point 20. Looking downstream 10/17/14
Photo Point 20. Looking upstream 10/17/14
Page 6 of 13

Fifth Creek Upstream of Beaver Creek
Photo Point 21. Rootwads 10/17/14
Photo Point 21. Looking downstream 10/17/14
Photo Point 22. Cross Vane 10/17/14
Photo Point 23. Boulder Vane 10/17/14
Photo Point 23. Fallen tree 10/17/14
Photo Point 24. Rootwads 10/17/14
Page 7 of 13

Fifth Creek Upstream of Beaver Creek
Photo Point 24. Looking downstream 10/17/14
jr.', ,
mil'
Photo Point 25. Cross Vane 10/17/14
1-1
Photo Point 25. Cross Vane. Left arm scour. 10/17/14
Photo Point 26. Rootwads 10/17/14
J
Photo Point 26. Floodplain looking downstream 10/17/14
Photo Point 27. Floodplain pool looking west 10/17/14
Page 8 of 13

Fifth Creek Upstream of Beaver Creek
Photo Point 28. Floodplain looking west 10/17/14
Page 9 of 13

Fifth Creek Downstream of Beaver Creek
1
� 7 u'
Photo Point 28. Confluence looking east 10/17/14
14, tzt
4V AI-
i
Photo Point 29. Looking downstream 10/17/14
Photo Point 29. Floodplain looking east
10/17/14
40
Photo Point 30. Cross Vane
10/17/14
Photo Point 31. Floodplain pool looking northwest
10/17/14
Photo Point 31. Floodplain looking east
10/17/14
Page 10 of 13

Fifth Creek Downstream of Beaver Creek
Photo Point 32. Looking downstream 10/17/14
Photo Point 33. Floodplain looking west
10/17/14
I
FZ
Photo Point 34. Boulder Vane 10/17/14
M-�
Photo Point 34. Boulder Vane
10/17/14
fir. f
z�
wk +�
R
Photo Point 35. Boulder Vane 10/17/14
millt
L'i3.w t.i
Photo Point 35. Boulder Vane 10/17/14
Page 11 of 13

Fifth Creek Downstream of Beaver Creek
r,1 It F
Photo Point 36. Looking downstream 10/17/14
Photo Point 36. Looking upstream 10/17/14
Photo Point 37. Floodplain pool looking north
10/17/14
jr
e.
., 4 e,.
Photo Point 37. Floodplain looking east 10/17/14
w .
4 '
Photo Point 38. Cross Vane 10/17/14
Photo Point 38. Looking south 10/17/14
Page 12 of 13

Fifth Creek Downstream of Beaver Creek
Photo Point 39. Looking upstream 10/17/14
,i iy a4
t
Photo Point 39. Looking downstream 10/17/14
� r
Photo Point 39. Floodplain looking east
10/17/14
ti
. * {
L-1 }
Photo Point 40 Cross Vane
10/17/14
Photo Point 40. Looking downstream 10/17/14
Photo Point 41. Floodplain looking west 10/17/14
Page 13 of 13