BPDP for PN

ID#* 20220293 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 03/29/2023
Mitigation Project Submittal - 3/29/2023
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* Yes No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name: * Email Address:
Michael Beinenson [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#: * 20220293 Version:* 2
Existing ID# Existing Version
Project Type: DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Britt & Hales Mitigation Site
County: Wayne
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: 2023.03.28 Britt & Hales BPDP.pdf 27.93MB
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Kerry Bray
Signature: *
C4 �taJ

TI MCADAMS
March 28, 2023
Blake Hartshorn
NCDEQ, DWR
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS > ECT22001.00
RE: Britt & Hales BPDP
Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
NCDWR Project #2022-0293 V2
Response to Review Comments
The following are the response comments for the above -mentioned project. Our response comments are in bold.
NCDWR
Reviewer: Blake Hartshorn
Comment #
Page Label
Review Comments and Response
1
5
As stated in previous DWR Revision: When describing the restoration areas,
make sure to include "and adjacent riparian areas" . In some sections, it only
says the riparian restoration or preservation of "riparian buffers". However,
"Riparian Buffer" is defined in rules as having a "Zone 1" and a "Zone 2" and
only being the area adjacent to streams depicted on certain maps. Not all of
your streams on this Parcel were deemed "Subject to the Buffer rules",
therefore using the term "Riparian Buffer" is not accurate for describing those
areas. Errors can simply be avoided byjust saying "riparian buffers and
adjacent riparian areas".
The text has been revised to include "and adjacent riparian areas"
2
7
Different HUC code given in in Section 2.4. For future reference you only
need 8 digit HUC here.
Table 2 has been revised to provide the 8-digit HUC
3
8
This HUC seems to be the correct HUC. Please correct the Project Attributes
Table.
The HUC provided in Table 2 has been revised to the 8-digit HUC per
previous comment.
4
12
We need to know the actual square foot area deducted or reference the
credit table once deducted credits are appropriately addressed.
A reference to Table 10 has been added to text and Table 10 has
been revised to show diffused flow deduction.
creating experiences through experience 621 Hillsborough Street, Suite 500, Raleigh, NC 27603 / 919. 361. 5000

�� MCADAMS
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS > ECT22001.00
5
17
We need to know the actual square foot area deducted or reference the
credit table once deducted credits are appropriately addressed.
A reference to Table 10 is provided at the end of the paragraph and
Table 10 has been revised to include a line item for the diffuse flow
deduction.
6
18
add a line item for showing diffused flow deductions since those areas are still
being planted and still represent "Total Area" of the site. Credit Type = Buffer
Feature Name = Diffused Flow deductions Total Area = how much area is
deducted Total Creditable Area for Buffer Mitigation=0 then check No in both
boxes for the credits. If the diffuse flow deductions were calculated in
another way, please correct the error and address as requested above. This is
to ensure a transparent representation of where the deductions are occurring
and to ensure DWR knows they have been applied correctly.
Line has been added to Table 10 for the diffused flow deductions.
7
28
Please put sf in the call out box that applies to the deduction that will also be
entered into the credit table.
"Wedge" has been changed to "Angle" and 2,197 sf has been added
to call out box.
8
28
Please show the widths within the legend. i.e. 0-100ft and 101-200ft such as it
is labeled in the credit table.
Widths have been added to legend descriptions.
9
28
This area seems to be bumped out due to tree preservation area. We still
need to measure from TOB from the ditch, not the treeline. Please correct
and adjust the credit table as well.
We have verified that this is accurately shown from the surveyed
top of bank. No correction of area needed on Figure 7. However, the
boundary was revised on Figure 3.
10
28
Please label the tree preservation area as non-credit area.
Non-credit area has been revised with a hatched boundary, labeled
and added to legend.
11
28
We need to discuss credit assets maps representative during our meeting.
Items discussed on 3/21/23 have been incorporated into Figure 3
and Figure 7.
creating experiences through experience 2 of 3

TI MCADAMS
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS > ECT22001.00
Consideration of this response is greatly appreciated. If you should have any questions or require additional
information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 919. 287. 0812.
Sincerely,
MCADAMS
Kerry Bray, PE
Senior Project Manager, Water Resources
creating experiences through experience 621 Hillsborough Street, Suite 500, Raleigh, NC 27603 / 919. 361. 5000

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Table of Contents
BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE.................................................................................................................I
BRITT & HALES NUTRIENT OFFSET & RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE..............................................................I
1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................. 4
2.0 MITIGATION PROJECT SUMMARY.................................................................................................................5
2.1
PROJECT GOALS.......................................................................................................................................5
2.2
EXISTING CONDITIONS...............................................................................................................................
5
2.3
PARCEL VIABILITY.....................................................................................................................................7
2.4
WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION.................................................................................................................
7
2.5
SOILS AND GEOLOGY.................................................................................................................................8
2.6
VEGETATION...........................................................................................................................................
9
2.7
THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES.......................................................................................................
9
2.8
CULTURAL RESOURCES...............................................................................................................................
9
2.9
FEMA FLOODPLAIN AND PERMITTING COMPLIANCE......................................................................................
10
2.10
PARCEL CONSTRAINTS AND ACCESS............................................................................................................
10
2.11
OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS........................................................................................................
10
3.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT AND LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT............................................................10
4.0 MITIGATION WORK PLAN...........................................................................................................................11
4.1 PARCEL PREPARATION.............................................................................................................................11
4.2 RESTORATION ACTIVITIES......................................................................................................................... 12
4.3 NCDWR AS -BUILT EVALUATION............................................................................................................... 13
5.0 MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING PLAN...................................................................................................14
5.1 PERFORMANCESTANDARDS...................................................................................................................... 14
5.2 MONITORING........................................................................................................................................14
5.3 PARCEL MAINTENANCE............................................................................................................................ 15
5.4 PARCEL BOUNDARY MAINTENANCE............................................................................................................ 15
6.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES............................................................................................................................15
6.1 PERFORMANCE AND MAINTENANCE BONDS................................................................................................. 15
7.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS AND CREDIT RELEASE...................................................................................16
7.1 CREDIT POTENTIAL.................................................................................................................................. 16
7.2 CREDIT RELEASE.....................................................................................................................................16
8.0 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................................18
Tables
Table 1: Water Quality and Ecological Goals and Objectives
Table 2: Project Attributes
Table 3: Project Features and Viability
Table 4: Drainage Area and Land Use
Table 5: Soil Series
Table 6: Federally Listed Species
Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package ii
CCO1CrrCl HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Table 7: Landowner and Long-term Protection
Table 8: Proposed Planting Plan
Table 9: Monitoring Plan Components
Table 10: Project Credits
Figures
Figure 1.
Vicinity Map
Figure 2.
Credit Service Area Map
Figure 3.
Existing Conditions Map
Figure 4.
USGS Topographic Map
Figure 5.
Drainage Area Map
Figure 6.
NRCS Soil Survey Map
Figure 7.
Credit Generation & Vegetation Plot Map
Figure 8.
Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Zone Map
Appendices
Appendix A. Site Photographs —June 16, 2022
Appendix B. Historical Aerial Photographs
Appendix C. NCDWR Applicability to the Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules Letter — April 19, 2022
NCDWR Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Letter —June 15, 2022,
2022
Appendix D. USFWS List of Threatened and Endangered Species Letter — May 19, 2022
Self -Certification Letter to USFWS —June 10, 2022
Biological Assessment —June 6, 2022
NCNHP Natural Heritage Resources Letter— May 26, 2022
Request for Cultural Resource Review to SHPO — May 19, 2022
SHPO Cultural Resource Review Letter —June 15, 2022
Appendix E. EDR Report - May 24, 2022
Appendix F. Southern Conservation Trust, Inc. Letter of Intent — March 1, 2023
Southern Conservation Trust, Inc. Estimate for Long-term Endowment
Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package iii
eCOlerrc, HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed March 2023

Bank Parcel Development Package
Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer
Mitigation Site
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201 (excluding the Falls Watershed)
Wayne County, NC
NCDWR Project #: 2022-0293 V2
SPONSORED BY: PREPARED BY: PREPARED FOR:
" North Carolina Department of
—`� Environmental Quality
ecof errc, WADAMS Division of Water Resources
117 Centrewest Court 2905 Meridian Parkway 1617 Mail Service Center
Cary, NC 27513 Durham, NC 27713 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
MARCH 2O23

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
1.0 Introduction
The Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site (Parcel) is located near Mount
Olive, NC, in the Upper Falling Creek watershed of the Neuse River Basin. The project site is
approximately 6.5 miles northwest of the Town of Mount Olive and 1.7 miles south of US Highway
13 on McArthur Pond Road in Wayne County, NC (Figure 1). The Bank Parcel Development
Package (BPDP) is being submitted for review under the proposed Britt & Hales Mitigation
Banking Instrument (MBI) between the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) and
Eco Terra, LLC, the Bank Sponsor (Eco Terra or Sponsor). The proposed Parcel has been planned
and designed according to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 for buffer mitigation, 15A NCAC 02B .0703 for
nutrient offsets, and the MBI since Rule .0703 doesn't specifically address riparian restoration for
generating nutrient offsets.
The Parcel is approximately 24.7 acres (ac) or 1,076,524 square feet (sf) of a 180-ac tract that
encompasses a series of forked, interconnected ditches and unnamed tributaries to Falling Creek.
The project is located within the Neuse River Basin hydrological unit code (HUC) 03020201,
excluding the Falls Watershed. The BPDP is being submitted for riparian buffer and nutrient offset
credit in the service area designated by Neuse River Basin HUC 03020201, excluding the Falls
Watershed (Figure 2). The Parcel is located in the headwaters of three unnamed tributaries and
three agricultural ditches that converge and flow into an unnamed tributary to Falling Creek,
approximately 1.8 miles downstream of the project area, and subsequently into the Neuse River.
The proposed project will generate 334,369.784 riparian buffer credits (RBC) and 33,149.707
pounds (lbs) of nitrogen nutrient offset credits (NOC). The final project area will be delineated
and depicted in the As -Built Survey and submitted with the As -Built Survey. Therefore, credit totals
may change slightly depending on the As -Built Survey.
The Parcel will address agricultural runoff by reducing sediment and nutrient loading into the
unnamed tributaries and Falling Creek. Falling Creek is classified as Water Supply (WS-IV) and
Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) by NCDWR with an impairment for dissolved oxygen. The project
area and surrounding areas are open agricultural land, primarily farmed for row crops. The
proposed project will improve terrestrial habitats along the streams and ditches by establishing
and preserving the riparian buffers and adjacent riparian areas and allowing the land to undergo
a natural succession to a forested community. The project will restore forested riparian buffers
and adjacent riparian areas a minimum width of 50 feet from tops of banks and extend out to a
maximum of approximately 200 feet from the project features (streams and ditches) and will
remove rotating crops and fertilizer inputs. The restored riparian buffer and adjacent riparian areas
will filter agricultural runoff from the surrounding farm fields and provide shading to reduce
stream temperatures and improve aquatic habitat. Invasive vegetation will be managed as needed
within the project area to promote native vegetation.
The proposed project will provide riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offsets in the Neuse River
Basin. The project involves the restoration and preservation of riparian buffers and adjacent
riparian areas along three unnamed tributaries and two ditches that flow to Falling Creek. Land
disturbing activities include site preparation for planting trees to enhance the vegetative buffer
CCO'kf Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package 4
rrC- HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
up to 200 feet from the streams and ditches within the approximate 24.7-acre project easement.
The project area and surrounding areas are open agricultural land, primarily farmed for row crops.
Historical land use has been agriculture for the past 70 years according to historical USDA aerials.
The project site will be permanently protected and preserved with a conservation easement that
will ultimately be transferred to a DWR-approved land trust for long-term stewardship according
to the MBI.
2.0 Mitigation Project Summary
2.1 Project Goals
The major goal of the proposed buffer and adjacent riparian area restoration is to improve water
quality through ecological enhancements within the Neuse River Basin. This will be accomplished
with specific goals to address agricultural runoff, including nutrients and sediment, restore
terrestrial habitat and protect the project parcel in perpetuity. Specific goals and objectives are
outlined in Table 1.
Table 7: Water Quality and Ecological Goals and Objectives
Goal
Objective
Establish and restore riparian buffers and adjacent
riparian areas to filter runoff and subsurface flows from
Reduce nutrient loading
adjacent agricultural fields. Remove fertilizer input
through conversion of agricultural field to forested
ri arian buffer.
Establish and restore riparian buffers and adjacent
Reduce sediment loading
riparian areas to filter runoff from adjacent agricultural
fields. Provide vegetative bank stabilization to decrease
sediment input.
Establish a wide riparian corridor with canopy closure to
Decrease water temperature and
filter nutrients and provide stream shading, reducing
increase dissolved oxygen
water temperature and increasing concentration of
dissolved oxygen.
Restore terrestrial habitat
Plant riparian corridor with native vegetation and manage
invasives.
Protect project in perpetuity
Implement and record a conservation easement on the
Parcel.
2.2 Existing Conditions
The Parcel will convert approximately 22.2 acres of agricultural row crop fields to forested buffers
and riparian areas along three unnamed tributaries (UT1, UT2 and UT3) and three agricultural
ditches (Ditch Al, 131 and 132). Refer to Figure 3 and Appendix A for the Existing Conditions Map
and site photographs collected on June 16, 2022, respectively. The site has been revisited several
Vol
Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package 5
eCOlerrC- HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
times since the site viability assessment and being initially photographed and there have been no
changes to land use nor site conditions.
Ditch Al emerges from a farm road to the south of the project area, flows north along the eastern
border of the project area before turning west through the project area and transitioning into
UT1. UT1, an intermittent stream, continues to flow west, turns to the north before its confluence
with UT2 and then continues northward as UT3 to the project terminus. Ditches B1 and B2 flow
east and west, respectively, until the transition/confluence with UT2, an intermittent stream. UT2
flows due west to the confluence with Ditch B2, turns north and then flows northeast through the
site until its confluence with UT1. It should be noted the centerline of Ditch Al forms the eastern
boundary of the conservation easement. Both the unnamed tributaries and agricultural ditches
are shown as water features on the 1974 Wayne County Soil Survey, however, are not depicted
on the 2019 US Geological Survey's (USGS) Grantham NC 7.5-minute Topographic Quadrangle as
stream channels (Figure 4).
The Parcel is composed of and surrounded entirely by agricultural fields with the exception of two
small wetland areas with existing trees and vegetation to be preserved along UT1 and Ditch Al.
Historical aerials denote that land use, including configuration of the channels, at the project site
has been consistent since 1959 (see Appendix B). An area of dumped broken concrete exists
along the boundary of one of the tree preservation areas. The concrete and any other debris or
trash will be removed during the site preparation. Along UT2 and Ditch B1, there are three small
areas of bank erosion that will be stabilized as part of the riparian restoration (see Section 4.1).
There is a 30-inch reinforced concrete pipe culvert on UT3 within the Parcel near the project's
downstream terminus. The pipe will be removed, and the streambanks stabilized at this location
(see Sections 2.10 and 4.1).
Project attributes associated with the proposed Parcel are outlined in Table 2.
Table 2: Project Attributes
Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation
Site
• •• ••
03020201
Neuse
Neuse 03020201, excluding the Falls Watershed
• • • •
35.254653,-78.164589
'
Conservation Easement — to be recorded
•
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset
-
334,369.784 RBC'
33,149.707 NOC2
' P •
March 2023
'
April 2023
' • •
May 2023
' • •
December 2023
�.x
Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package 6
eCOlerrC- HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
MY2 Report Date
December
MY3 Report Date a ' mo
December
MY4 Report Date 1110 ■ December 20.
MY5 Report Date . ■ December 20
Riparian Buffer Credit (RBQ
Nutrient Offset Credit (NOQ
2.3 Parcel Viability
NCDWR staff visited the project Parcel on March 4, 2022 to review features and determine
applicability to the Neuse River Basin Riparian Area Protection Rules, Title 15A NCAC 02B .0714.
NCDWR issued the official Stream Call Determination letter on April 19, 2022. On May 19, 2022,
NCDWR staff re -visited the site to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and
nutrient offset within the proposed easement boundary per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and 15A NCAC
02B .0703, respectively. NCDWR issued the official Site Viability letter on June 15, 2022. A copy
of both the "Applicability to the Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules" and "Site Viability for Buffer
Mitigation and Nutrient Offset" letters issued by NCDWR are provided in Appendix C and
summarized in Table 3.
Table 3: Project Features and Viability
Feature Name
Classif icatio
RP
re 91IM30MO&
UT1 (A*)
Stream
Yes
Yes
UT2 (B*)
Stream
Yes
Yes
UT3 (C*)
Stream
Yes
Yes
Ditch Al
Ditch>3'
No
Yes
Ditch B1
Ditch>3'
No
Yes
Ditch B2
Ditch>3'
No
Yes
* Feature Name per NC DWR letters
2.4 Watershed Characterization
The Parcel is located within the Upper Falling Creek Subwatershed (HUC 030202011403) and
Neuse River Basin (HUC 03020201, excluding the Falls Watershed). All of the site's water
conveyance features drain to UT3 which flows to an unnamed tributary to Falling Creek. Falling
Creek is classified as Water Supply (WS-IV) and Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) by NCDWR with
an impairment for dissolved oxygen. Falling Creek is approximately 1.8 miles downstream of the
project area. WS-IV waters are used as sources of water supply for drinking, culinary, or food
processing purposes. They are protected for Class C uses which include aquatic life propagation,
survival and maintenance of biological integrity, wildlife, secondary recreation and agriculture.
The NSW designation is for waters needing nutrient management due to excessive growth of
microscopic or macroscopic vegetation.
Drainage areas were delineated for the project area's streams (UT1, UT2 and UT3) and viable ditch
features (Al, B1 and B2) utilizing Wayne County's 2-foot Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)
CCO'kf Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package 7
rrC- HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
data (Figure 5). According to the 2019 USGS National Land Cover Database (NLCD), the drainage
area is primarily agricultural use with limited residential use. Table 4 summarizes the drainage
areas and current land use.
Table 4: Drainage Area and Land Use
UT1 135,437 (3.1) 1,139,845 (26)
UT2 321,813 (7.4) 1,231,373 (28)
UT3 95,430 (2.2) 2,755,886 (63) 96% Agriculture, 4%
Ditch Al 129,539 (3.0) 1,007,712 (23) Developed
Ditch 131 105,297 (2.4) 295,282 (6.8)
Ditch 132 188,888 (4.3) 212,272 (4.9)
2.5 Soils and Geology
The project area's soils, as mapped by the 1974 Soil Survey of Wayne County, are loamy sand, and
consist of the Norfolk, Wagram and Weston series (Figure 6). The Weston (We) soils comprise the
majority of the soils underlying the Parcel at 78 percent. UT1 and UT2 are depicted as streams on
the 1974 USDA Soil Survey map sheet 35. A description of the site's soils is provided in Table 5.
Table 5: Soil Series
Well -drained soil on smooth, broad divides.
Norfolk loamy sand,
NoA
Infiltration is moderate and surface runoff is
0 to 2 percent slopes
slow. Seasonal high-water table is below a
depth of 5 feet.
Norfolk loamy sand,
Well -drained soil on short sides of divides.
6 to 10 percent
NoC
Infiltration is moderate, and surface runoff is
slopes
medium. Seasonal high-water table is below a
depth of 5 feet.
Well -drained soil on slightly convex, smooth
Wagram loamy sand,
WaB
and broad divides. Infiltration is rapid and
0 to 6 percent slopes
surface runoff is slow. Seasonal high-water
table is below a depth of 5 feet.
Wagram loamy sand,
Well -drained soil on short sides of divides.
6 to 10 percent
WaC
Infiltration is rapid, and surface runoff is
slopes
medium. Seasonal high-water table is below a
depth of 5 feet.
Poorly drained soil on smooth flats and in
Weston loamy sand
depressions on broad interstream divides.
(Woodington)
We
Infiltration is moderate, and surface runoff is
slow. Seasonal high-water table is at the
surface.
90 Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package 8
eCOlerrC- HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Geologically, the Parcel is located within the Rolling Coastal Plain of the Middle and Upper Coastal
Plains physiographic province. Broad, flat terraces, adjacent to low -gradient stream channels,
characterize both the Middle and Upper Coastal Plains.
2.6 Vegetation
Vegetative communities within the project area consist of active row crops of cotton and peanuts
and early successional, herbaceous and woody vegetation along the streams and ditches that are
mowed and maintained.
2.7 Threatened and Endangered Species
The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC)
database and NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database were utilized to identify federally
threatened and endangered species in the project area. In a letter dated June 6, 2022, the USFWS
identified four federally threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act
and one species under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act as potentially occurring in the project vicinity.
According to the USFWS, there are no critical habitats within the project area. A review of the NC
Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) data dated May 26, 2022 did not identify any known
occurrences of federally listed species within one mile of the project site; however, a Managed
Area is within a 1-mile radius. The area, associated with the Falling Creek Mitigation Parcel, is
managed by Unique Places to Save. Multiple site visits have occurred over the past 18 months
observing site conditions, habitat, and potential presence of species. No species, suitable habitat,
or critical habitats were observed within the project boundaries resulting in a "no effect"
determination for subject species. Additionally, no eagles, eagle nests, nor American kestrels were
observed, and construction activities will occur outside the window for the potential presence of
the migrating American Kestrel and breeding time for local birds. The USFWS Self -Certification
Letter, dated June 10, 2022, has been submitted to the Raleigh Field Office requesting comment
from USFWS. A response was not received from the USFWS within the 45-day response period.
All of the letters and responses have been included in the Appendix D. Table 6 summarizes the
threatened and endangered species evaluation.
Table 6: Federally Listed Species
7Picoidesrealis
Red -cockaded
Woodpecker
Endangered
No
Necturus lewisi
Neuse River
Waterdo
Threatened
No
Noturus furiosus
Carolina Madtom
Endangered
No
Danaus plexippus
Monarch Butterfly
Candidate
No
2.8 Cultural Resources
The National Historic Preservation Act declares a national policy of historic preservation to protect,
rehabilitate, restore, and reuse districts, sites, buildings, structures and objects significant in
American architecture, history, archaeology and culture. Section 106 mandates that federal
eCOlAO Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package 9
errC- HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
agencies take into account the effect that a project may have on a property that is included in or
is eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places.
The NC State Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) online mapping resource was reviewed to
determine the presence of known historic resources at or near the project site. According to the
database, there are no known historical resources within the project site. The Littleton House
(WY0384) is the closest resource which is located 2.3 miles from the project site. The Littleton
House is classified as a "Survey Only" site and will not be disturbed for the proposed project. A
letter was submitted to SHPO on May 19, 2022, requesting review and comment. SHPO
responded on June 15, 2022 indicating that they were not aware of any historic resources that
would be affected by the project. Both letters are included in the Appendix D.
2.9 FEMA Floodplain and Permitting Compliance
The Parcel is not located within the 100-year floodplain and will not require FEMA coordination
nor a floodplain development permit. Neither grading activities nor hydraulic modeling are
proposed for this project. The project will not encroach on the NCDOT right-of-way along
McArthur Pond Road. There are no other known easements at or near the project site that would
prevent project implementation.
2.10 Parcel Constraints and Access
The Parcel can be accessed via a driveway off McArthur Pond Road and a farm field path for long-
term access and site maintenance and monitoring. There is a 30-inch reinforced concrete pipe
culvert on UT3 within the Parcel near the project's downstream terminus. The culvert currently
provides the landowner with a walkable access to cross the stream; however, this pipe will be
removed, and a crossing will be provided downstream in an area outside of the proposed
conservation easement. Refer to Appendix A, Figure 3- Existing Conditions Map. There are no
other known constraints on the proposed project Parcel.
2.11 Other Environmental Conditions
A site assessment was conducted by Environmental Data Resources (EDR) to comply with
standards set forth by EPA, ASTM and other environmental due diligence requests to evaluate
environmental risk for the Parcel. The EDR report, May 24, 2022, determined the site was not
located in any Federal, State or Tribal environmental databases and there were no known,
potentially hazardous, waste sites within or immediately adjacent to the project site. The EDR
report is provided in Appendix E.
3.0 Site Protection Instrument and Long-term
Management
The land required to plant and restore the riparian buffer and adjacent riparian areas, access the
conservation easement, and manage the mitigation project includes 24.7 acres of the Parcel listed
in Table 7. The Parcel will be transferred to an approved NCDWR long-term stewardship entity
prior to the submittal of the Year 4 Monitoring Report. It will remain in private ownership,
"t Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package 10
eCOlerrC- HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
protected in its entirety by the long-term stewardship entity, and will be managed under the terms
detailed in an approved NCDWR conservation easement. The long-term trustee and manager will
be responsible for the periodic inspection of the Parcel to ensure the conservation easement is
upheld and the land is protected in perpetuity. Eco Terra has selected Southern Conservation
Trust, Inc. (SCT) to assume responsibility as holding the conservation easement and serving as the
long-term steward. Refer to Appendix F for SCT's letter of intent.
Table 7: Landowner and Long-term Protection
4.0 Mitigation Work Plan
The proposed project will restore high quality riparian buffers and adjacent riparian areas along
three ditches (Ditch Al, 131 and 132) and three unnamed tributaries (UT1, UT2 and UT3) that flow
to an unnamed tributary to Falling Creek. The Parcel will provide riparian buffer mitigation credits
by protecting the riparian area from top of bank to a minimum 30-foot width and maximum 100-
foot width along the streams (UT1, UT2 and UT3). Buffer mitigation credits are also proposed
through preservation of a riparian area adjacent to UT1 for a minimum 30-foot width and
maximum 200-ft width. The Parcel will provide nutrient offset credits by protecting the riparian
area from the 100-foot offset from top of banks along the streams and minimum 50-foot width
along the ditches, to a maximum 200-foot width. Ditch Al is subject to the Buffer
Interpretation/Clarification Memo #2008-019 where maintenance of diffuse flow into the
conservation easement cannot be attained. Where Ditch Al enters the easement boundary, a 60-
degree angle has been drafted 50 feet downstream which represents the deduction in buffer
credit. Refer to the Project Credit Table (Table 10) for diffused flow deduction. The project will
not have any adverse impacts to existing stream and water conveyances.
4.1 Parcel Preparation
The land proposed for riparian restoration is currently in agricultural row crop production,
therefore the site preparation will require minimal soil disturbance. Soil fertility will be assessed
to determine any site soil deficiencies prior to plant establishment. Planting will occur using
mechanical and manual methods. Soil ripping will occur in the mechanically planted rows to break
up plow pans and compacted soils. Additional site preparation such as ripping and disking will
occur within farm paths proposed for planting.
Appropriate pre -emergent and aquatic -safe herbicide will be applied by a licensed NC pesticide
applicator in the tree rows to control potential herbaceous weed competition. Additional
herbicide will be applied within the planting rows during the post -planting phase for at least the
first three years as needed and approved by NCDWR. Any invasive plants will be controlled
eCOlA# Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package 11
errC- HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
mechanically (e.g., bushhogging between the rows) and chemically (e.g., herbicidal spray
application). The fields within the project area contain limited number of invasive plants and
herbicide will only be sprayed in areas where there is an existing population of non-native invasive
plant species.
Areas immediately adjacent to the top of banks will not be ripped to prevent soil erosion and
runoff from entering the surface water. Non-native invasive species are present and will be
removed during planting to minimize potential for competition with target vegetative
communities. As noted in the NCDWR Site Viability Assessment letter, there is an area of concrete
debris that exists along the forested area to be preserved that will be removed and stabilized.
Planting rows will be approximately aligned to follow the existing contours to impede overland
flow and prevent erosion. Sediment and erosion control measures may be utilized, if necessary,
in all areas with existing rills and unstable banks, as well as areas prone to erosion, to prevent
stormwater runoff from entering surface waters during construction. Minor bank/riparian
stabilization and grading will be provided where erosional rills, sink holes and gullies are observed
on the banks of Ditch 131 and UT2 and where the 30-inch RCP culvert will be removed from UT3.
Stabilization will include minor grading, erosion control matting, seeding and/or live stakes
planted as necessary for soil stabilization. No DEMLR nor local County permits are anticipated for
stabilizing compromised areas. An appropriate temporary seed mix will be applied, as necessary,
to provide temporary ground cover for soil stabilization and reduction of sediment loss during
rain events in areas without existing herbaceous cover.
4.2 Restoration Activities
The planting plan for the riparian restoration area includes restoring native tree species with bare
root seedlings and seeding to convert the active farming area to a vegetated riparian corridor.
Trees will be planted with a density sufficient to meet the performance standards outlined in the
Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and in the MBI of 260 trees per acre at the end of five years. Initial
planting densities will be between approximately 726 trees per acre (6-foot by 10-foot spacing).
All species will be well mixed in the bags, prior to being planted, to ensure adequate distribution
across the planting areas. Eco Terra will oversee the planting efforts by the planting crews to
ensure adequate stem placement and diversity, including planting the top of banks. The Parcel's
riparian buffers and adjacent riparian areas will be re -vegetated with species consistent of those
identified during the reference survey and additional species suggested by Schafale (2012) for the
Mesic Mixed Forest and Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp (blackwater subtype) Forest
communities. Target community tree species are shown in Table 8, which include 12 species and
ensure that no one tree species will be greater than 50% as noted in the aforementioned rule. An
appropriate permanent seed mixture will be planted that may include species beneficial to
pollinators or species that act as larval hosts for pollinators such as butterflies (e.g., big bluestem).
Seeding will not be applied to areas with an existing native herbaceous layer. Planting will occur
in early April.
eCOlA# Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package 12
errC- HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Table 8: Proposed Planting Plan
ICarpinus caroliniana
American
MMF/SSS
Subcanopy
6%
Hornbeam
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
M
Subcanopy/MF/SSS
9%
Canopy
Fraxinus
Green Ash
SSS
Canopy
3%
pennsylvanica
Nyssa biflora
Swamp Tupelo
SSS
Canopy
3%
Nyssa sylvatica
Blackgum
MMF
Canopy
6%
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
MMF/SSS
Canopy
12%
Quercus lyrata
Overcup Oak
SSS
Subcanopy/6%
Canopy
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut
MMF/SSS
Canopy
15%
Oak
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
MMF/SSS
Canopy
9%
Quercus pagoda
Cherrybark Oak
MMF
Canopy
9%
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
MMF/SSS
Canopy
16%
Quercus shumardii
Shumard Oak
MMF
Canopy
6%
Andropogon gerardi
Big bluestem
Permanent
Seed Mix
Panicum virgatum
Switchgrass
Permanent
Seed Mix
Sorghastrum nutans
Indiangrass
Permanent
Seed Mix
*SSS-small stream swamp; MMF-mesic hardwood forest
4.3 NCDWR As -Built Evaluation
Within 30 calendar days after completing the establishment of the buffer and nutrient offset areas,
the Sponsor will submit written notification to NCDWR documenting that all buffer mitigation and
nutrient offset activities have been completed. Failure to submit written notification within 30
days may result in a modified credit release schedule or a delay in the issuance of credit releases.
An as -built report will be submitted to NCDWR, following the restoration planting, to document
the mitigation work plan to date.
Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package 13
eCOlerrC- HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
5.0 Maintenance and Monitoring Plan
The maintenance and monitoring plan has been developed to demonstrate required performance
standards and success criteria are met and project goals and objectives are achieved.
5.1 Performance Standards
The performance standards for the proposed project follow approved criteria presented in the
Buffer Mitigation Rule (15A NCAC 02B .0295). Annual monitoring and semi-annual site visits will
be conducted to assess the condition of the finished project. Performance standards will be
evaluated throughout the five-year post -construction monitoring period and summarized
annually in a monitoring report. This annual report shall provide project data and chronicle issues
that arise during the five-year monitoring period. The Sponsor shall submit annual monitoring
reports to NCDWR by December 31st of each year for at least 5 consecutive years until project
close-out and will follow the terms and conditions of the Britt & Hales MBI.
5.2 Monitoring
Permanent vegetation monitoring plots will be established and assessed within the riparian buffer
and adjacent riparian areas to document the survival and vigor of the planted trees. A total of 18
plots that are 10 meters by 10 meters each will be randomly established within the planted
restoration areas to document tree survival (Figure 7). The number of plots represent two percent
of the total mitigation area and is calculated as follows:
2% x 968,232 sf = 19,365 sf = 1,799 square meters
1,799 square meters - 10 meter x 10 meter plot = 18 plots
The Buffer Mitigation Rule (15A NCAC 02B .0295) and corresponding MBI require survival of at
least 260 stems per acre at the end of the five-year monitoring period. Measures will be taken to
ensure that plots are diverse, where a minimum of four native hardwood tree species are
represented and where no one species represents more than 50 percent of the plot. Vegetation
monitoring will follow the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) — NC Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP) Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2008).
The vegetation plots will be photographed each year with an additional seven photographs (25
total) taken to document project condition and easement integrity. All photos will be taken at the
same location and orientation each year. Plots will be demarcated with durable PVC or metal
markers and flagging during the monitoring period.
Visual assessments will be performed twice a year during the five-year monitoring period. Areas
of concern, low stem density, invasive species or easement encroachment, will be mapped,
photographed and described in the monitoring report. Problem areas will be re-evaluated during
subsequent site visits. Table 9 summarizes the proposed monitoring plan components associated
with this project.
Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package 14
eCOlerrC- HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Table 9: Monitoring Plan Components
CVS Level I/Photos
7Reference
All
18
Annual
tations Photos
All
7
Annual
Visual Assessments Visual Assessment/Photos
All
As needed
Semi-annual
The first growing period will be documented in the first annual report to be completed at least 5
months after planting has occurred and no earlier than the fall season. In order to meet
performance standards and determine stem health, species, height, planting date and vigor will
be documented for each monitoring plot and included in the annual report. Upon NCDWR
approval, desirable native volunteer species may be included in the overall tree density for the
Parcel to meet performance standards and success criteria.
5.3 Parcel Maintenance
Actions will be taken to correct issues identified in the annual monitoring reports that jeopardize
the success of the project such as tree survival and easement encroachment. Parcel maintenance
activities will be included in annual reports. As noted in the Parcel Preparation section, effective
herbicide application is critical to success of restoration areas, primarily historical agricultural land.
Herbicides approved for aquatic environments will be applied as necessary and in accordance with
the NCDA rules and regulations by a qualified NC licensed pesticide/herbicide applicator. Prior
approval from NCDWR is required if mowing within Zones 1 and 2 of the Neuse River basin buffers
is deemed necessary.
5.4 Parcel Boundary Maintenance
Conservation easement boundaries will be clearly marked with fencing, posts, paint or other
permanent material and will include appropriate contact information on the boundaries.
Established boundaries between the easement and the remaining parcel in agriculture will ensure
project protection and prevent encroachment. Boundary installation will occur immediately after
planting is completed and prior to the as -built survey and the Task 2 Milestone of the Credit
Release Schedule/DWR site walk according to the MBI. Boundary markers incidentally destroyed,
damaged or disturbed will be repaired and/or replaced as needed during the monitoring period
and in the future under the long-term trustee management. All easement boundaries will be
visually assessed twice per year as part of the monitoring protocol. Any easement encroachment
or performed maintenance will be documented in the annual monitoring reports.
6.0 Financial Assurances
6.1 Performance and Maintenance Bonds
Following approval of the Britt & Hales Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Plan, the Sponsor
shall provide a Performance Bond from a surety that is rated no less than an "A-" as rated by A.M.
Best. The performance bond amount shall be 100 percent of the estimated cost for
implementation of the project, but not less than $150,000 to comply with the MBI. In lieu of
Vol
Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package 15
CCO'k rrC- HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
posting the performance bond, the Sponsor may elect to construct the project prior to the first
credit release. Under the latter option, a performance bond is not necessary.
After completion of the restoration/construction, a separate Performance/Maintenance Bond will
be secured for 100 percent of the estimated cost, but not less than $100,000 to comply with the
MBI. Upon NCDWR approval, this may be lowered each year based on the adjusted cost to
complete the monitoring. Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed at least annually
to cover the next year's monitoring period, with confirmation of renewal provided to NCDWR with
each annual monitoring report (when applicable). NCDWR reserves the right to alter the credit
release schedule if monitoring reports are submitted without proof of bond renewals. Refer to
Appendix F for Southern Conservation Trust's estimate for long-term endowment.
7.0 Determination of Credits and Credit Release
7.1 Credit Potential
The potential project credits are based on the top of bank of the three unnamed tributaries (UT1,
UT2 and UT3) and three agricultural ditches (Ditch Al, B1 and 132). All areas within 200-linear feet
landward of the top of bank will be planted and accounted as either riparian buffer credit or
nutrient offset credit with the exception of the area where diffuse flow cannot be attained from
Ditch Al. The entire conservation easement boundary will be planted, however a credit deduction
has been calculated for the 60-degree angle where Ditch Al enters the easement boundary. Refer
to Figures 7 and 8 for a depiction of the proposed Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credit areas
for the Parcel. Riparian restoration adjacent to the streams is primarily intended to be used to
generate RBC out to 100 feet and to generate NOCs beyond 100 feet in width. RBC's generated
from preservation areas are capped at 25% of the total area. The preservation area for the
proposed Parcel represents 1.8% of total area. Riparian restoration adjacent to the ditches will be
used to generate NOC because they are not viable to generate RBC. Credits that could be
converted from RBC to NOC if still available are depicted in Table 10. Any credit conversion
requests must be submitted to DWR in writing and receive written approval from DWR prior to
debiting or crediting credits from the Parcel's credit ledgers. It should be noted the final project
area will be delineated and depicted in the As -Built Survey and submitted with the As -Built Survey.
Therefore, credit totals may change slightly depending on the As -Built Survey. The project's credit
potential is summarized in the Project Credit Table (Table 10).
In accordance with the MBI, any credit conversions will be calculated using the guidance provided
in the Clarified Procedures for Calculating Buffer Mitigation Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits letter
issued by the NCDWR.
7.2 Credit Release
Upon submittal of the appropriate documentation by the Sponsor and subsequent approval by
NCDWR, the riparian buffer and nutrient credits associated with the Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset
& Riparian Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel will be released as described in the approved MBI.
Vol
Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package 16
CCO'k rrC- HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
Table 70: Project Credits
Table. 10- Britt & Hales Nutrient Whet & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Bank, NCBWR Project It 2022-0293 V2. Project Credits
Neuse 03020201 - Outside Falls Lake
Project Area
N Credit Comrersion Ratio ift'Jpound}
P Credit Conversion Ratio ft� ound
19.16394
N!A
Credit Type
Location
5uhfect?(enter
NO I}
ephemeral u
dltdt'
Feature Type
MitigonatiAttixity
iM.lax erdfer
Mie
Width Ift�
eature ame
FN'
ivtal Mee lft}
Total[Cnditahleh
Area of BLrHer
r
Mitigation {fi h
Initial GediL
Ratio Ix11
XFu1lCredit
Tlnal GedL
Ratio Ix=11
Cor—tihlety
Riparian
Bufier7
RI P arlan Credits 6ufler
NConvertlhlto
utr@n[4fiset2
Delivered
Hu[rien[4ffs er
N fibs}
Delivered
Nutrient
Offseh P Ilbsl
Buffer
Rural
N6
lip
Restoration
0-100
UTL
65.760
85,76U
i
100%
1. P=
Tea
85,7W."
Yrs
4.475 072
—
Buffer
Rural
Yes
IJP
Re.sraroWn
0-100
UTir UT3
247r193
M7,193
1W%
1.CXX=
Yes
247,193.UM
Yes
12,898.861
—
NMrient ORact
RVral
NO
IJP
Restorafn
N1.200
If71
a1,S05
41,5W
1
33%
3.03030
NO
V43
2,146-766
NutrlenkMet
Rural
yes
IJP
Restoration
101-200
L1T2r Iff3
110AW
170,M
1
99%
3.03030
No
Yes
8.913-436
Nutrleni pffw
Rural
w
Ditch
Re.jwrown
11.1(0
Pitch Al, 91, 67
262r447
262,447
100%
1.006w
No
res
13,944.836
Nutrient Offset
Rural
No
Ditch
Restoration
101-200
ditch Al, BL 112
161,277
161.277
33%
3.03030
No
Yes
2,415.6R9
6u1FP.r
Rural
i. i
Rektarelinn
101)
91NUred FbW
peduttien [Diem
Al
2,197
0
1gg9C
No
—
Ng
—
—
Totals(}t2}:
Total Buffer Ift2}:
Total Nutrient Offset IfW:
976,426
968,232
332,4i3000 50.523,640 u660
335,150
332,953
635,279
NIA
Total Ephemeral Area IR) for Credit
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area (Ra):
Enter PreW— ion Credits Belgw
Credit Type I Location I 5olij$etT I Feature Type I Mltill t:on Acthrity I M'Wrdth lr I Feature Name
Rural No 1I f P
Rural Nv IIP
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION ITABM}
Mitigation Totals
r#Fait
Credits
RBSt4ratign�
332,953
2.32,953.000
Enhancement:
D
4,000
Pm ervatlofn:
1172
1.416-754
Total Riparian Buffer
341,125
334,369.764
TOTAL N UT R I ENT OFFSET
MITIGATION
Mitlgatlgn Totals
square Feet
Gedi15
Nutrient Offset:
NR lift
575.279
33,149,707
Phos horui:
o.aou
`,�.
eco, terra
0-10o Uil
YOY.200 UTi
Preservdtl-Dn Area Subtotal5
0
9
85,i31
0.0X
111,717
LB%
Total Area (sq
Tptal(CredRablel
Are$ for Buffer
Mltlgarlon twr
fi, 'Sib'
fi,548
1,fi24
1,624
6,172
�,1T2
Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package
HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed
Ephemeral Reaches as% TABM
PreWwati4n a5 % TABM
Initial Gedir
Final Credit
Riparian
Ratio tx:lj
yLFull Credit
Ratio Ix:ll
BufferCrediU
1.00'Y
5.00000
1.:i09.
5
33;a
]5.15.
ID7-1$4
March 2023
17

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
8.0 References
15A NCAC 02B .0295 Mitigation Program Requirements for Protection and Maintenance of
Riparian Buffers. 2015.
15A NCAC 02B .0703 Nutrient Offset Credit Trading. 2020.
15A NCAC 02B .0714 Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy:
Protection and Maintenance of Existing Riparian Buffers. 2020
Lee, M.T., Peet, R.K., Roberts, S.D., & Wentworth, T.R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Version 4.2. Available at: http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-
2.pdf
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality. Division of Mitigation Services. 2018. Neuse River Basin
Restoration Priorities.
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources. N.C. State Historic Preservation
Office. [web mapping application]. Available at:
https://nc.maps.arcgis.com/home/group.html?id=d56ec9c8aa77423b93l f4d359f103ae6&view= I
ist&categories=%5B%22%2FCategories%2FHPOWEB%22%5D#content. (Accessed May 2022)
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program. Flood Insurance Rate Map. Map Number
3720254400K. 2018.
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2022. Natural Heritage Data Explorer [web
application]. NCDNCR, Raleigh, NC. Available at: https:Hncnhde.natureserve.org (Accessed May
2022)
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Fourth. North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDENR. Raleigh, North Carolina.
217 pp.
United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1974. Soil
Survey of Wayne County, North Carolina.
United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2019. Web
Soil Survey [web mapping application]. Available at: https://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/aW.
(Accessed May 2022)
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal
Species of Concern and Candidate Species, Wayne County, NC. Available at:
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/?state=wC6sc65YLNAOFQvWg2MR5NmErSVrwH (Accessed
May/June 2022)
%® Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package 18
eCOlerrC- HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
United State Department of Interior. United States Geological Survey. Grantham, NC Quadrangle
Topographical Map. Scale 1:24000. 2019.
Wayne County Tax Department. Online Geographic Information System Maps. Available at:
https://wayne.connectgis.com/Map.aspx. (Accessed May 2022)
VA11111
Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package 19
eCOlerrC- HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed March 2023

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
FIGURES
Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package
GCOlCrram HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed
March 2023

Wayne County
/50 N
II
� � I
CProject Site Goldsboro:''avne
�\ I
� I
r
b
Oberry Rd
159 fl
0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Legend
c� ..
Miles Conservation Easement
Prepared For: BRITT & HALES NUTRIENT OFFSET & FIGURE
J Drawn /2/ 023
RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE Date:3/2/2023
`� VICINITY MAP Project No.: ECT22001
Scale: 1 in = 0.2 miles
WADAMS eco terra:. Neuse 03020201, excluding Falls Watershed
Wayne County, NC

Hyco Lake
c
yville
C
S
Prepared For: BRITT & HALES NUTRIENT OFFSET & FIGURE
Date 32/J
RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE Drawn /2/223 023
CREDIT SERVICE AREA MAP Project No.: ECT22001
MCADAwis
ecolerra, Neuse 03020201, excluding Falls Watershed Scale: 1 in - 10 miles
Wayne County, NC

4-0
Legend
QConservation Easement
Streams
Ditches
Pipes
Bank Erosion
Dumped Concrete
Tree Areas to be Preserved
Wayne County 2 Ft Contours
OBERRY ROAD
®R
ti.
Prepared For: bKI I I & HALLb NU I KILN I UrrJt I & KAB FIGURE
J
RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE Drawn 28Date: 3/28/202023
EXISTING CONDITIONS Project No.: ECT22001
� Scale: 1 inch = 300 feet
MCADAMs ecolerra. Neuse 03020201, excluding Falls Watershed
Wayne County, NC

N
M
F—
V'(2 �
Z)
l
131 Ditch 132 Ditch
UT2 Stream Origin
Legend
QConservation Easement
Streams
Ditches
UT1 Drainage Area (26 acres)
UT2 Drainage Area (28 acres)
QUT3 Drainage Area (63 acres)
Ditch Al Drainage Area (23 acres)
Ditch 131 Drainage Area (6.8 acres)
Ditch B2 Drainage Area (4.9 acres)
Wayne County 2 Ft Contours
Al Ditch
0
0
a
UT1 Stream Origin
OBERRY ROAD
Prepared For: bK1 I I & HALt5 NU I KILN I UrrJt I & KAB FIGURE
I" VA-0
�, RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE Drawn /2/ 023
J Date: 3/2/2023
DRAINAGE AREA MAP Project No.: ECT22001
� Scale: 1 inch = 300 feet
MCADAMs ecolerras Neuse 03020201, excluding Falls Watershed
Wayne County, NC

• f• ,
V.
Nos
• _ Ka
Rb; r 1
Was '
we NoA
NoA } .
'Ra
Ra �l
1 y;
NoA y -
)A �
.. �f N OA .
iaB ,+ -
NoA
1,11611
L lu
Legend h� Tr
QConservation Easement
f ,
NRCS 1974 Wayne County 1 0 300 600 1,200
Soil Survey Map Sheet 35
Prepared For: BRITT & HALES NUTRIENT OFFSET & Drawn By: KAB FIGURE `,, RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE Date:3/2/2023
NRCS SOIL SURVEY MAP Project No.: ECT22001
� Scale: 1 inch = 600 feet
MCADAMS ecolerra. Neuse 03020201, excluding Falls Watershed
Wayne County, NC

100' 1
s_
�100, 2
.. � 3
� u,
61 Ditch
5
4
7 ~
8
0
p K100'
� r 18 14
°� B2 Ditch
UT2 Stream Origin
UT3 Stream Origin
r 100,
100, 12 Non-credit Area
i�
41 Ditch
13 •'�
Q
/ 50'
UT1 Stream Origin
60-degree Angle to Deduct
Credit for Non -Diffuse Flow
(2,197 sf)
Legend
QConservation Easement
OBERRY ROAD
Streams
• • Ditches
® UT1, UT2, UT3 Riparian Restoration for RBC (0-100 ft)
UT1, UT2, UT3 Riparian Restoration for NOC (101-200 ft)
® Ditch Al, 131 & B2 Riparian Restoration for NOC (0-100 ft)
DitchAl, 131 & B2 Riparian Restoration for NOC (101-200 ft)
® Non -Subject UT1 Riparian Preservation for RBC (0-100 ft)
Non -Subject UT1 Riparian Preservation for RBC (101-200 ft)
® Non-credit Area
Vegetation Plot Locations (18)
Prepared For:
BRITT & HALES NUTRIENT OFFSET &
Drawn KAB
FIGURE
!!J
"
RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
02
Date: 3/28/2023
28
Project No.: ECT22001
J
J
�
CREDIT GENERATION & VEGETATION PLOT MAP
Scale: 1 inch - 300 feet
I
WADAMS
ecolerra.
Neuse 03020201, excluding Falls Watershed
Wayne County, NC

Legend
QConservation Easement
Streams
Ditches
30' from Top of Bank
50' from Top of Bank
— 100' from Top of Bank
200' from Top of Bank
Riparian Restoration for RBC
Riparian Restoration for NOC
Riparian Preservation for RBC
0 Planted Area
Prepared For:
!!J %$�
acolarras
MCADAwis
41,
.............
RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
NUTRIENT OFFSET & RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE MAP
Neuse 03020201, excluding Falls Watershed
Wayne County, NC
OBERRY ROAD
Drawn By: KAB
Date: 3/28/2023
Project No.: ECT22001
Scale: 1 inch = 300 feet
ti
FIGURE
8

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
APPENDIX A
`144,0 Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package
GCOlCrram HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed
March 2023

Ditch Al — Looking Downstream/North (06-16-22)
UT1 — Looking Upstream/East at Start of UT1 (06-16-22)
Ditch Al — Looking Downstream/West (06-16-22)
F_ UT1 — Looking Downstream/North (06-16-22)
UT1 — Confluence w/ UT2, Looking Upstream/South (06-16-22) Ditch B1 —Looking Downstream/East (06-16-22)

Ditch B1 — Looking Downstream/East, Start of UT2 (06-16-22) Ditch B1 — Start of UT2, Looking Upstream/West (06-16-22)
Ditch B2 — Looking Upstream/East (06-16-22) UT2 — Looking Upstream/West at start of UT2 (06-16-22)
UT2 — Looking Upstream/South (06-16-22) UT2 — Looking Upstream/Southwest (06-16-22)

UT2 — Looking Downstream/Northeast (06-16-22) UT2 — Looking Upstream/Southwest (06-16-22)
UT2 — Confluence w/ UT1, Looking Upstream/Southwest (06-16-22) FuT3
— UT1/UT2 confluence, Looking Downstream/North (06-16-22)
UT3 — Looking Upstream/South (06-16-22) UT3 — Looking Downstream/Northeast (06-16-22)

Concrete rubble to be removed (06-16-22) Concrete rubble to be removed (06-16-22)
Existing trees to be preserved (06-16-22)

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
APPENDIX 6
Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package
GCOlCrram HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed
March 2023

ML6�
•

w
I_ e
Y

Pi* ,,
.1...

INQUIRY #: 6992408.8 /�
YEAR: 1999 ",�J�'
= 500' (rEDR'

I

INQUIRY #: 6992408.8 N
YEAR: 1983 - �EDR'
500'

F
s e.
j.
• r
'i
V -

j
-6
hLO 'e 76 0-
Jr
q
.J6 f
jp
26
INQUIRY #: 6992408.8
YEAR: 1973
= 500' (rEDR'
&
IL
4V
4
AL
rx
P,

�A
a

:xN .
mow,
«.`..'
61
fo
�� �' �-'�d�s•°1h9"w4'd"ka°i'Q-ia+Hfra�:,y:•a+ew.'
"are;hLvr.i '
4f's

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
APPENDIX C
Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package
GCOlCrram HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed
March 2023

LJUL:UJnJ.II CI IVCIUPC ILJ.'FDOOODV'4-LOJlJW:7`4:1-.7'4U1+-I/1l.UH�lJI+I,O l!
ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
Jordan Burbage
Eco Terra LLC
i o rda n P ecote rra. co rn
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
April 19, 2022
Project 20220293 V1
Wayne County
Subject: Applicability to the Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules 15A NCAC 02B .0714
Project: Britt & Hales Buffer Mitigation Site
Address: 150 Mcarthur Pond Rd., Mount Olive, NC 28365, Wayne County
Location: Lat., Long: 35.254653,-78.164589
Dear Mr. Burbage:
On March 4, 2022, Shelton Sullivan of the Division of Water Resources (DWR) conducted an
on -site review of features located on the Britt & Hales Buffer Mitigation Site in Wayne County
to determine the applicability of features on the site to the Neuse River Basin Riparian Area
Protection Rules, Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0714.
The enclosed map(s) depict the feature(s) evaluated and this information is also summarized
in the table below. Streams were evaluated for being ephemeral, at least intermittent, and
for subjectivity to the Neuse River Basin Riparian Area Protection Rules. Streams that are
considered "Subject" have been located on the most recently published County NRCS Soil
Survey and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic (at 1:24,000 scale) map(s),
have been located on the ground at the site, and possess characteristics that qualify them to
be at least intermittent streams. Features that are considered "Not Subject" have been
determined to not be at least intermittent, not present on the property, or not depicted on
the required maps.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules within the
proposed easement and does not approve any activity within buffers or within waters
of the state. There may be other streams or features located on the property that
appear or do not appear on the maps referenced above. Any of the features on the site
may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and
subject to the Clean Water Act.
The following table addresses the features observed and rated during the DWR site visit. See
the attached site map for the labeled features.
Q
wNorth Carolina Department of Envilronmcntal Quality I Division ofWater Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
el ilii F�nl�U twwlTm+].�
�� 919J07.9000

UUUU01yiI CI IVCIUIJV, IU. 4D000O VY-GOJIi-'F.74J-.7Y Lll.i-I/ L'L/I1z1l'%.'UO II
Page 2 of 3
Britt & Hales Buffer Mitigation Site
Project 20220293 V1
Feature Type:
stream
(ephemeral,
Subject
Depicted on
Depicted
Feature ID
intermittent,
to Buffer
Start @
Stop @
Soil Survey
on
perennial),
Rules
USGS Topo
ditch, swale,
wetland, other
Ditch with
Near
Feature A
Al
Wider ditch
area before
No
southeast
Start at
Yes
No
project
Ditch/Stream
Feature A
boundary
transition
Start location
Yes, but
Stream - at
A Start, See
Confluence
has been
A
least
No
Pic and Map
with B
moved to
No
intermittent
current
location
Feature B
B1
Western
Start at
Ditch
Yes
project
Ditch/Stream
h/Stream
Yes
No
boundary
transition
Stream - at
B Start, See
Confluence
B
least
Yes
Pic and Map
with Feature
Yes
No
intermittent
A
B2
Ditch
No
See Pic and
Confluence
Yes
No
Flag.
Feature B
Confluence
Continues
Stream - at
with
beyond
C
least
Yes
northern
Yes
No
intermittent
Features A
project
and B
boundaLy
* E: Ephemeral, 1: Intermittent, P: Perennial
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter.
Landowners or affected parties that dispute this determination made by the DWR may
request an appeal determination by the Director of Water Resources. An appeal request
must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of the date of this letter to the Director in
writing.
If sending via U.S. Postal Service:
Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Ifsending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor
512 N Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27604
This determination is final and binding as detailed above unless an appeal is requested within
sixty (60) calendar days of the date of this letter.

UUI:UJIyII CIIVVIUP/ IV. Page 3 of 3
Britt & Hales Buffer Mitigation Site
Project 20220293 V1
If you have any additional questions or require additional information, please contact Shelton
Sullivan at sheltoii.stillivaii ticdeiir.gov or 919-707-3636. This determination is subject to
review as provided in G.S. 150B.
Sincerely,
�acu5igncd by:
10I
949O9F8R53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Attachments: Site Map with labels, Photos (if applicable), USGS Topographical Map, NRCS
County Soil Survey
cc: Scott Frederick, scotWecoterra.com
Jamey O'Shaughnessey, jameyC)ecoteri-a.com
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch Laserfiche File
Eddis Earl Britt, 3176 OBerry Road, Mount Olive, NC
Linda B. Hales, 1759 Grantham School Rd., Mount Olive NC
Filename: 2 0 22 0 29 3 V.1_Stream Calls_Britt&HalesBufferSite_Wayn e C o_4-19-22

u
Feature C Start
Al PIIrh
n
Feature A Start
81 Oftch Bi Ditch
Feature B Start 0
ti
s,
ft
F

LJUUUJIylI CI I VCIUPt! ILJ. `4�D000UV-LOJV-'Y.7YJ-S4Ulr- IHI+VMOI�I,I+O I !
Photographs, Britt & Hales Buffer Site, Shelton Sullivan, 3/4/2022
Feature A, Start location Feature A, looking downstream, just below start
Feature B Start, looking downstream, east
Feature C, looking upstream, south

UVI:UJIyll CIIVCIVFIC IU. 4D000DV4-LOJl..-V'4:J-.74 U1J- I/11. U/1.71..1.1..01 /
USGS Map
s
J6
i

VUI:UJI{J.II CI IVCIVFIC IV. I/11+V/1.7ll ll l,0 If
NRCS Wayne County Soils Map
We � , Go
Ke
Kiln
y,
_ -
Nod
Bh
a B
r ,A f
r•. Y Y e 1 �1 A'�y oA
- • o '• _1� -• -lam"' -,-_` �_ rY�,•
Ji
Ra
a k.Qi
N oA Ly
--t.. Ly -
NoA
WaB
Legend r r' � • - - -
=7'� =� , �xryi�{r'".`� X��• ni[.-1 I_r-�rl}. `-.I.;le �,1 � _Yhl I_,Irul�r•� LE. EE-
_'r" __o

uuuuoiyn Cn AL)PU iu. cowcyaar+-i�.o� rro�-or�.v-� i,�wruu�ovu
ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
June 15, 2022
Jordan Burbage
EcoTerra Partners, LLC
(via electronic mail: [e-mail] )
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset — Brit & Hales Site
Near 35.254653,-78.164589 off 145 Mcarthur Pond Rd, Mt. Olive NC
Neuse 03020201
Wayne County
Dear Mr. Burbage,
On April 27, 2022, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a request
from you on behalf of EcoTerra Partners, LLC (EcoTerra) for a site visit near the above -referenced
site in the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201. The site visit was
to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset adjacent to features within
a proposed conservation easement boundary, which are more accurately depicted in the attached
maps labeled "Figure 1" and "Figure 2" prepared by EcoTerra and edited by DWR. The proposed
easement boundary includes all riparian areas intended to be proposed as part of the mitigation site.
On May 19, 2022, Ms. Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject site. Staff with EcoTerra
were also present.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank JOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
I E
Q
� 512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
` 919.707.9000
.rwnM�w n� F��nm eury�

Uuuuolly.lI CIIVCIup1 w. LD-tzu 7uI1-IliOC-YrOC-DrIi U-l+l+l u%,ruU/ouLJ
tsnt at bates bite
EcoTerra
June 15, 2022
Feature
Classification
!Subject
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
3Nutrient
1s1liiti2ation Type Determination wlin
to
riparian areas
onsite
adjacent to Feature
Credit
Offset
Buffer
0f 200'1
Viable
Viable
Rule
Al
Ditch >3'
No
Non -forested agricultural
No
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site
fields.
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
A
Stream
No
Non -forested agricultural
ZYes
Yes (non-
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site
(at DWR
fields with forested areas
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)
flag)
along left bank (see map);
fields only)
Cement, debris and trash
Forested areas — Preservation Site per
present within forested
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4); need to
areas
remove all trash and debris.
C
Stream
Yes
Non -forested agricultural
'Yes
Yes (non-
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site
(at DWR
fields with forested areas
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
flag)
downstream at easement
fields only)
boundary
Forested areas — Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5);
B 1
Ditch >3'
No
Non -forested agricultural
No
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site
fields.
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
B
Stream
Yes
Non -forested agricultural
Yes
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site
(at DWR
fields.
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
flag)
Erosion and a sink hole
minor bank/riparian stabilization and
were observed along the
grading needed where erosional rills,
right bank
sink holes and gullies are observed
132
Ditch >3'
No
Non -forested agricultural
No
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site
fields.
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated April 19, 2022 (DWR# 2022-0293) using the
1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by
the NRCS .
ZThe area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
a Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
s All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a planted conservation easement established that includes the
tops of channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even if no credit is viable within that riparian
area.
'The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
7The area described as an Enhancement Site was assessed and determined to comply with all of 15A NCAC 02B .0295(o)(6). Cattle
exclusion fencing is required to be installed around the mitigation area to get buffer credit under this part of the rule.
Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas and features shown in Figure 2 and Figure 1 respectively. The map
representing the proposal for the site is attached to this letter and initialed by Ms. Merritt on June 15,
2022. Substantial changes to the proposed easement boundary as well as any site constraints
identified in this letter, could affect the Site's potential to generate buffer mitigation and nutrient
offset credits.
Page 2 of 3

UUUUJIIy.II CIIVUIUVU IU.LD4Ltl:l"JH- I JOU
twit & rtaies bite
EcoTerra
June 15, 2022
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load -reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
This viability assessment will expire on June 15, 2024 or upon approval of a mitigation plan by
the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset, buffer,
stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
PWAYM
Attachments: Figure 1, Figure 2
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
Doe Signed by;
r� WCL6�
9d9D978A53EF4E0-
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
Page 3 of 3

7ocuSign Envelope ID: 2B42955A-1 C6E-4F6E-BFCD-CC70CFOD736D
FIGURE 1

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
APPENDIX D
Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package
GCOlCrram HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed
March 2023

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2022-0044827
Project Name: Britt and Hales Buffer Mitigation Site
June 06, 2022
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

06/06/2022
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186. php.

06/06/2022
3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

06/06/2022
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

06/06/2022
Project Summary
Project Code: 2022-0044827
Event Code:
None
Project Name:
Britt and Hales Buffer Mitigation Site
Project Type:
Mitigation Development/Review - Mitigation or Conservation Bank
Project Description:
The Britt and Hales Buffer Mitigation Site is located near Mount Olive,
NC, in the Upper Falling Creek watershed of the Neuse River Basin
(HUC 03020201). The proposed project will provide riparian buffer and
nutrient offset mitigation in the Neuse River Basin. The project involves
the restoration and preservation of riparian buffers along two unnamed
tributaries and three ditches that flow to Falling Creek. Land disturbing
activities include site preparation for planting trees to enhance the
vegetative buffer up to 200 feet from the streams and ditches within the
approximate 24.7-acre project easement. The project area and surrounding
areas are open agricultural land, primarily farmed for row crops.
Historical land use has been agriculture for the past 70 years according to
historical USDA aerials. The project site will be permanently protected
and preserved with a conservation easement that will ultimately be
transferred to a land trust for long-term stewardship.
Project Location:
Approximate location
of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/Q35.255153500000006,-78.16481822980536,14z
Counties: Wayne County, North Carolina

06/06/2022 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME
STATUS
Endangered
STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME
STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Insects
NAME
STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743

06/06/2022
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

06/06/2022
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
American Kestrel Falco sparvenus paulus Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.

06/06/2022
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data

06/06/2022 3
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American
BCRestrel — — — — — — — — — — — — gill 111111111111 im - - - - - - - - ----'---
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoidinp--and-minimizinv--incidental-take-mip-ratorv-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?

06/06/2022 4
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my
project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab
of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of
interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your
migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.

06/06/2022 5
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

06/06/2022
[:]
IPaC User Contact Information
Agency:
McAdams
Name:
Kerry Bray
Address:
2905 Meridian Parkway
City:
Durham
State:
NC
Zip:
27713
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
9192870812

ENT OF Tye'
rri O
,A
CH 3 A
United States Department of the Interior
Project Name
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Date:June 10,2022
Self -Certification Letter
Britt & Hales Buffer Mitigation Site
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) Raleigh Ecological
Services online project review process. By printing this letter in conjunction with your
project review package, you are certifying that you have completed the online project
review process for the project named above in accordance with all instructions
provided, using the best available information to reach your conclusions. This letter,
and the enclosed project review package, completes the review of your project in
accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, 87 Stat.
884), as amended (ESA), and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C.
668-668c, 54 Stat. 250), as amended (Eagle Act). This letter also provides
information for your project review under the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (P.L. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, 83 Stat. 852), as amended. A copy of this
letter and the project review package must be submitted to this office for this
certification to be valid. This letter and the project review package will be maintained
in our records.
The species conclusions table in the enclosed project review package summarizes
your ESA and Eagle Act conclusions. Based on your analysis, mark all the
determinations that apply:
❑"no effect" determinations for proposed/listed species and/or
proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑ "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed/listed
species and/or proposed/designated critical habitat; and/or
❑ "may affect, likely to adversely affect" determination for the Northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and relying on the findings of the January 5,
2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion for the Final 4(d) Rule on the
Northern long-eared bat;
❑✓ "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.

Applicant Page 2
We certify that use of the online project review process in strict accordance with the
instructions provided as documented in the enclosed project review package results in
reaching the appropriate determinations. Therefore, we concur with the "no effect" or
"not likely to adversely affect" determinations for proposed and listed species and
proposed and designated critical habitat; the "may affect" determination for Northern
long-eared bat; and/or the "no Eagle Act permit required" determinations for eagles.
Additional coordination with this office is not needed. Candidate species are not
legally protected pursuant to the ESA. However, the Service encourages consideration
of these species by avoiding adverse impacts to them. Please contact this office for
additional coordination if your project action area contains candidate species.
Should project plans change or if additional information on the distribution of
proposed or listed species, proposed or designated critical habitat, or bald eagles
becomes available, this determination may be reconsidered. This certification letter is
valid for 1 year. Information about the online project review process including
instructions, species information, and other information regarding project reviews
within North Carolina is available at our website http://www.fws.gov. If you have any
questions, you can write to us at [e-mail] or please contact Leigh Mann of
this office at 919-856-4520, ext. 10.
Sincerely,
/s/Pete Benjamin
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Raleigh Ecological Services
Enclosures - project review package

Britt And Hales Buffer Mitigation
Site
Biological Assessment
Prepared using IPaC
Generated by Kerry Bray ([e-mail])
June 6, 2022
The purpose of this Biological Assessment (BA) is to assess the effects of the
proposed project and determine whether the project may affect any Federally
threatened, endangered, proposed or candidate species. This BA is prepared in
accordance with legal requirements set forth under Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1536 (c)).

In this document, any data provided by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is based on data as of June 6,
2022.
Prepared using IPaC version 6.75.1-rc2
2

Britt And Hales Buffer Mitigation Site Biological
Assessment
Table Of Contents
1 Description of the action
1.1 Project name
1.2 Executive summary
1.3 Project description
1.3.1 Location
1.3.2 Description of project habitat
1.3.3 Project proponent information
1.3.4 Project purpose
1.3.5 Project type and deconstruction
1.3.6 Anticipated environmental stressors
1.4 Action area
1.5 Conservation measures
1.6 Prior consultation history
1.7 Other agency partners and interested parties
1.8 Other reports and helpful information
2 Species effects analysis
2.1 Carolina Madtom
Relevant documentation
Justification for exclusion
2.2 Monarch Butterfly
Relevant documentation
Justification for exclusion
2.3 Neuse River Waterdog
Relevant documentation
Justification for exclusion
2.4 Red -cockaded Woodpecker
Relevant documentation
Justification for exclusion
3 Critical habitat effects analysis
4 Summary Discussion, Conclusion, and Effect Determinations
4.1 Effect determination summary
4.2 Summary discussion
4.3 Conclusion
5
5
5
6
6
7
7
7
7
10
11
12
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
14
15
16
16
16
16
3

I Description Of The Action
1.1 Project Name
Britt and Hales Buffer Mitigation Site
1.2 Executive Summary
The project area consists of intensive row crop agriculture with managed drainage of
hydric soils and channelized stream corridors. Riparian buffer is absent on the site with
the exception of a few scattered trees and two small forested wetland (mixed pine
hardwood) areas to the east. Multiple site visits have occurred over the past 18 months
observing site conditions, habitat, and potential presence of species. No species,
suitable habitat, or critical habitats were observed within the project boundaries resulting
in a "no effect" determination for all subject species. Riparian buffer restoration activities
on this parcel will improve upstream habitats, herbaceous cover for pollinators, and
forest cover for myriad of species utilizing the Falling Creek corridor and tributaries.
Effect determination summary
5

1.3 Project Description
1.3.1 Location
m

LOCATION
Wayne County, North Carolina
1.3.2 Description of project habitat
The project area consists of intensive row crop agriculture with managed drainage of
hydric soils and channelized stream corridors. Riparian buffer is absent on the site with
the exception of a few scattered trees and two small forested wetland (mixed pine
hardwood) areas to the east. Multiple site visits have occurred over the past 18 months
observing site conditions, habitat, and potential presence of species.
1.3.3 Project proponent information
Provide information regarding who is proposing to conduct the project, and their contact
information. Please provide details on whether there is a Federal nexus.
Requesting Agency
McAdams
'I 1LL NAME
Kerry Bray
STREET ADDRESS
2905 Meridian Parkway
STATE ZIP
Durham NC 27713
PHONE NUMBER E-MAIL ADDRESS
9192870812 [e-mail]
1.3.4 Project purpose
The purpose of the project is to develop and riparian buffer and nutrient offset
restoration Bank servicing the upper Neuse River HUC 03020201.
1.3.5 Project type and deconstruction
This project is a riparian buffer restoration project.
7

1.3.5.1 Project map

LEGEND
❑ Project footprint
r Riparian Buffer Restoration: Riparian buffer restoration.
L .

1.3.5.2 riparian buffer restoration.
Activity start date
February 01, 2023
Activity end date
February 28, 2023
Stressors
This activity is not expected to have any impact on the environment.
Description
No trees will be cut during the constrution of this project. Stringent E&SC measures
will be implemented if necessary to protect downstream habitats if minor bank
stability work is rerquired.
1.3.6 Anticipated environmental stressors
Describe the anticipated effects of your proposed project on the aspects of the land, air
and water that will occur due to the activities above. These should be based on the
activity deconstructions done in the previous section and will be used to inform the
action area.
10

1.4 Action Area
11

1.5 Conservation Measures
Describe any proposed measures being implemented as part of the project that are
designed to reduce the impacts to the environment and their resulting effects to listed
species. To avoid extra verbiage, don't list measures that have no relevance to the
species being analyzed.
Vo conservation measures have been selected for this project.
1.6 Prior Consultation History
None.
1.7 Other Agency Partners And Interested Parties
NC Divsion of Water Resources:
Katie Merritt
Nutrient Offset & Buffer Banking Coordinator
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Office: 919-707-3637
Work Cell: 919-500-0683
Website: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-quality-permitting/
401-buffer-permitting-branch
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27620
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
1.8 Other Reports And Helpful Information
None.
12

2 Species Effects Analysis
This section describes, species by species, the effects of the proposed action on listed,
proposed, and candidate species, and the habitat on which they depend. In this
document, effects are broken down as direct interactions (something happening directly
to the species) or indirect interactions (something happening to the environment on
which a species depends that could then result in effects to the species).
These interactions encompass effects that occur both during project construction and
those which could be ongoing after the project is finished. All effects, however, should
be considered, including effects from direct and indirect interactions and cumulative
effects.
2.1 Carolina Madtom
This species has been excluded from analysis in this environmental review
document.
Relevant documentation
Scott Frederick (Scientist) conducted the survey and analysis to determine the presence
of the Carolina Madtom and suitable habitat within the project bounds. Downstream
suitable habitat (if present) will be protected through careful site construction and
stringent E&SC if necessary for site construction.
Justification for exclusion
No species or suitable habitat present.
2.2 Monarch Butterfly
This species has been excluded from analysis in this environmental review
document.
Relevant documentation
Scott Frederick (Scientist) conducted the survey and analysis to determine the presence
of the Monarch Butterfly and suitable habitat within the project bounds.
Justification for exclusion
No riparian buffers exist along streams or ditches servicing streams providing minimal
herbaceous foraging/resting habitat.
13

2.3 Neuse River Waterdog
This species has been excluded from analysis in this environmental review
document.
Relevant documentation
Scott Frederick (Scientist) conducted the survey and analysis to determine the presence
of the Neuse River Waterdog and suitable habitat within the project bounds.
Downstream suitable habitat (if present) will be protected through careful site
construction and stringent E&SC if necessary for site construction.
Justification for exclusion
No species or suitable habitat present on the project site.
2.4 Red -Cockaded Woodpecker
This species has been excluded from analysis in this environmental review
document.
Relevant documentation
Scott Frederick (Scientist) conducted the survey and analysis to determine the presence
of the Red -cockaded Woodpecker and suitable habitat within the project bounds. No
birds, nesting cavities, or suitable foraging habitat were found on site.
Justification for exclusion
No birds, nesting cavities, or suitable foraging habitat were found on site.
14

3 Critical Habitat Effects Analysis
Vo critical habitats intersect with the project action area.
15

4 Summary Discussion, Conclusion, And Effect
Determinations
4.1 Effect Determination Summary
SPECIES
SCIENTIFIC
LISTING
PRESENT IN
EFFECT
(COMMON
NAME
STATUS
ACTION AREA
DETERMINATION
NAME)
Carolina Madtom
Noturus furiosus
Endangered
No
NE
Monarch Butterfly
Danaus plexippus
Candidate
Excluded from
Excluded from analysis
analysis
Neuse River Waterdoa Necturus lewisi Threatened No NE
Red -cockaded Picoides borealis Endangered No NE
Woodpecker
4.2 Summary Discussion
No effects to listed species, critical habitats, or migatory birds with potential presence
during construction.
4.3 Conclusion
Riparian buffer restoration activities on this parcel will improve upstream habitats,
herbaceous cover for pollinators, and forest cover for myriad of species utilizing the
Falling Creek corridor and tributaries.
16

Roy Cooper, Governor
0■0■0 INC DEPARTMENT OF
■■0■o NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
May 26, 2022
Alec Pierzga
Natural Resource Consultants
10212 Creedmoor Rd
Raleigh, NC 27615
RE. Britt & Hales - Conservation Easement, 220228
Dear Alec Pierzga.
D_ Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-18092
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence, the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here.
httl2s //www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butlerLncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR71MENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOVRCES
Q 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 918.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Britt & Hales - Conservation Easement
Project No. 220228
May 26, 2022
NCNHDE-18092
No Element Occurrences are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner
Unique Places to Save Easement Unique Places to Save
Owner Type
Private
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on May 26, 2022; source: NCNHP, Q1, April 2022. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-18092: Britt & Hales - Conservation Easement
r
c
v �
m
4
tt
0
0
u
N
E
L
C
I
171 ft
d
158f
�5 O'Be2-
0d
3
0 a
o
0 o
a �o
L�
Cr �
oN's FoocQ-
N
W�E
1.1 Miles
S
May 26, 2022
Managed Area (MAREA)
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
❑ Project Boundary
So uross. Fsh, Airbus DS. USGS. NGA. NASA, CGIAR. N Robinson. NCFAS.
NLS. OS, NMA. Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat GSA, Geoland, FFMA,
It-mapand the GIS user community
Sources. Esri, HERE. Garm in. FAO. NOAA, USGS. © OpenStreetMap
contributors, and the GIS User in,
Page 3 of 3

ecolerraR
May 19, 2022
Ms. Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-4617
Re: Cultural Resource Environmental Review
Britt & Hales Buffer Mitigation Site
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley:
Eco Terra is requesting consultation with respect to a riparian buffer restoration site and
the project's impact (if any) on archaeological or cultural resources. The project
information is summarized below.
Project Name: Britt and Hales Buffer Mitigation Site
Project Location: 145 McArthur Pond Rd
Mount Olive, North Carolina 28365
Wayne County
35.254653,-78.164589
Project Contact: Scott J. Frederick
Eco Terra, LLC
117 Centrewest Court
Cary, NC 27513
919.368.2029
[e-mail]
Project Description:
The Britt and Hales Buffer Mitigation Site is located near Mount Olive, NC, in the Upper
Falling Creek watershed of the Neuse River Basin (HUC 03020201). The proposed project
will provide riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation in the Neuse River Basin. The
project involves the restoration and preservation of riparian buffers along two unnamed
tributaries and three ditches that flow to Falling Creek. Land disturbing activities include
site preparation for planting trees to enhance the vegetative buffer up to 200 feet from
the streams and ditches within the approximate 24.7-acre project easement. The
1328 Dekalb Avenue NE, Atlanta, GA 30307 1 EcoTerraxom

ecolerraR.
project area and surrounding areas are open agricultural land, primarily farmed for row
crops. Historical land use has been agriculture for the past 70 years according to
historical USDA aerials. The project site will be permanently protected and preserved
with a conservation easement that will ultimately be transferred to a land trust for long-
term stewardship.
The NC State Historic Preservation Office's online mapping resource was reviewed to
determine the presence of known historic resources at or near the project site.
According to the database, there are no known historical resources within the project
site. The Littleton House (WY0384) is the closest resource which is located 2.3 miles
from the project site. The Littleton House is classified as a "Survey Only" site and will not
be disturbed for the proposed project.
Project Area Map: See attached Figures 1 and 2
Site Photographs: See attached
We are requesting that you review the project site to determine if any historic resources
are present within the proposed conservation easement as shown in the attached
Figures 1 and 2. If you should have any questions or require additional information,
please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Scott J. Frederick
1328 Dekalb Avenue NE, Atlanta, GA 30307 1 EcoTerraxom

ecolerraR
Unnamed Tributary 1 (UT1) Unnamed Tributary 2 (UT2)
1328 Dekalb Avenue NE, Atlanta, GA 30307 1 EcoTerra.com

ecolerraR
Unnamed Tributary 2 (UT2)
1328 Dekalb Avenue NE, Atlanta, GA 30307 1 EcoTerra.com

II
� � I
Goldsboro
CProject Site .'Anne
Ki
� I Lcn--ir
Wayne County
S amp son
.• � � N
0
I,, r-1
L:150
0 0.1
0.2
0.4 013ERRY D
Legend
Miles
L.Conservation Easement
J
Prepared For:
BRITT & HALES BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
Drawn By: KAB
Date: 5/20/2
FIGURE
VICINITY MAP (GRANTHAM USGS QUADRANGLE)
Project No.: EC ECT22001
Neuse 03020201
Scale: 1 in = 0.2 miles
MCADAMS
�CD��rra.
Wayne County, NC

R � T
r - Jy lr `�--•
i!ilr�s�rr
Legend
QConservation Easement
— OBERRY ROAD
Streams
00 .01
Ditches-
..
022
!!J
Prepared For: BRITT & HALES BUFFER MITIGATION SITE Drawn By: KAB FIGURE
Date: t No.: EC
� OVERVIEW SITE MAP Project No.: ECT22001 rf
Neuse 03020201 Scale: 1 inch - 300 feet L
WADAMS eCO,lerras Wayne County, NC

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
June 15, 2022
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
Kerry Bray PE bray(r)c mcadamsco.com
McAdams Company
2905 Meridian Parkway
Durham, NC 27713
Re: Britt and Hales Buffer Mitigation Site, 145 McArthur Pond Road, Mount Olive, Wayne County,
ER 22-1535
Dear Kerry Bray,
Thank you for your letter of May 23, 2022, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have reviewed
the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.review(a�ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
(1., 04�
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
APPENDIX E
Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package
GCOlCrram HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed
March 2023

Britt & Hales Buffer Mitigation Site
145 Mcarthur Pond Road
Mount Olive, NC 28365
Inquiry Number: 6992408.2s
May 24, 2022
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
(rEDW Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBC-MGA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary-------------------------------------------------------
ES1
Overview Map
2
Detail Map
3
Map Findings Summary----------------------------------------------------
4
Map Findings
8
OrphanSummary---------------------------------------------------------
9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking
GRA
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum------------------------------------------
A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary-------------------------------------------.
A-2
Physical Setting Source Map
A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings----------------------------------------
A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched------------------------------------.
PSGRA
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC6992408.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E1527-21), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
145 MCARTHUR POND ROAD
MOUNT OLIVE, NC 28365
COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
35.2546530 - 35- 15' 16.75"
78.1645890 - 78- 9' 52.52"
Zone 17
757973.2
3904771.5
149 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 13847225 GRANTHAM, NC
Version Date: 2019
South Map: 13847209 DOBBERSVILLE, NC
Version Date: 2019
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20141018
Source: USDA
TC6992408.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

F- MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
145 MCARTHUR POND ROAD
MOUNT OLIVE, NC 28365
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS
NO MAPPED SITES FOUND
DATABASE ACRONYMS
RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ELEVATION DIRECTION
6992408.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL___________________________ National Priority List
Proposed NPL________________ Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS -------------------- Federal Superfund Liens
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL__________________ National Priority List Deletions
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY__________ Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS_________________________ Superfund Enterprise Management System
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE-------------- Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS------------------ Corrective Action Report
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF------------------ RCRA- Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG------------------- RCRA- Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG------------------- RCRA- Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG----------------- RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS_________________________ Land Use Control Information System
TC6992408.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US ENG CONTROLS_________ Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS --------- Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS_________________________ Emergency Response Notification System
Lists of state- and tribal (Supen°und) equivalent sites
NC HSDS_____________________ Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS------------------------- Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF_______________________ List of Solid Waste Facilities
DEBRIS_______________________ Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
OLI____________________________ Old Landfill Inventory
LCID__________________________ Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LAST__________________________ Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
LUST -------------------------- Regional UST Database
INDIAN LUST_________________ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST_________________ State Trust Fund Database
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST____________________ Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST___________________________ Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST___________________________ AST Database
INDIAN UST__________________ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP___________________________ Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
INDIAN VCP__________________ Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS______________ Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS----------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites
TC6992408.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY_______________________
Recycling Center Listing
HIST LF_______________________
Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI___________________
Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
ODI___________________________
Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9___________
Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
IHS OPEN DUMPS___________
Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL_________________ Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL_______________________ National Clandestine Laboratory Register
PFAS-------------------------- PFAS Contamination Site Listing
Local Land Records
LIENS 2_______________________ CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS________________________
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS________________________
Spills Incident Listing
IMD___________________________
Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90____________________
SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80____________________
SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS_________________________
Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD__________________________
Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS_______
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR_______________
Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST____________
EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA_________________________
Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS__________________________
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS--------------------------
Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD__________________________
Records Of Decision
RMP__________________________
Risk Management Plans
RAATS________________________
RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP___________________________
Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS_________________________
PCB Activity Database System
ICIS___________________________
Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS__________________________
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS_________________________
Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE______________
Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA______________
Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER_______
PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO ---------------------
Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS____________________
FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS_____________________
Incident and Accident Data
TC6992408.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CONSENT____________________
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV_____________
Indian Reservations
FUSRAP______________________
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA_______________________
Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS____________
Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS______________________
Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES____________________
Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES ---------
Abandoned Mines
FINDS -------------------------
Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
ECHO -------------------------
Enforcement & Compliance History Information
UXO ---------------------------
Unexploded Ordnance Sites
DOCKET HWC----------------
Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
FUELS PROGRAM___________
EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS__________________________
Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS___________________
ASBESTOS
COAL ASH____________________
Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS______________
Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance -----------
Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES------------------------
NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC----------------------------
Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP---------------------------
Animal Operation Permits Listing
SEPT HAULERS______________
Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
CCB___________________________
Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
PCSRP------------------------
Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
MINES MRDS-----------------
Mineral Resources Data System
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP_____________________ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto ----------------- EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner_____________ EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
[:I Q 7 7X0191T/4 :11XCT91T/:I 7,I Mtl:1,III /_1YN:Ih/*1
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS____________________ Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF_______________________ Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST____________________ Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC6992408.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
TC6992408.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

OVERVIEW MAP - 6992408.2S
Target Property
—
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
A
Manufactured Gas Plants
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1/4 1/2 1 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA a Hazardous Substance
Special Flood Hazard Area (1%) Disposal Sites
0.211/. Annual Chance Flood Hazard
National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Britt & Hales Buffer Mitigation Site
CLIENT: John R McAdams Company Inc
ADDRESS: 145 Mcarthur Pond Road
CONTACT: Kerry Bray
Mount Olive NC 28365
INQUIRY #: 6992408.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.254653 / 78.164589
DATE: May 24, 2022 11:30 am
Copyright �o 2022 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 Tom Tom Rel. 2015.

DETAIL MAP - 6992408.2S
*
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
A
Manufactured Gas Plants
t
Sensitive Receptors
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1 /16 1 /B 1 /4 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
National Wetland Inventory Disposal Sites
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Britt & Hales Buffer Mitigation Site
CLIENT: John R McAdams Company Inc
ADDRESS: 145 Mcarthur Pond Road
CONTACT: Kerry Bray
Mount Olive NC 28365
INQUIRY #: 6992408.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.254653 / 78.164589
DATE: May 24, 2022 11:31 am
Copyright �o 2022 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 Tom Tom Rel. 2015.

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
Proposed NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
NPL LIENS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Delisted NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
Lists of Federal sites subject to
CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
SEMS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities
undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
RCRA-TSDF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
RCRA-LQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR 0
RCRA-SQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR 0
RCRA-VSQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR 0
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
US INST CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
Lists of state- and tribal
(Superfund) equivalent sites
NC HSDS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
Lists of state- and tribal
hazardous waste facilities
SHWS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR 0
Lists of state and tribal landfills
and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
TC6992408.2s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
DEBRIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
OLI 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LCID 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
LAST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LUST TRUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS
0.500
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY
0.500
HIST LF
0.500
INDIAN ODI
0.500
ODI
0.500
DEBRIS REGION 9
0.500
IHS OPEN DUMPS
0.500
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL
TP
US CDL
TP
PFAS
TP
Local Land Records
LIENS 2
TP
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS
TP
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
0
0
0
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR 0
TC6992408.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database
(Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8 - 1/4
1/4 - 1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
SPILLS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
IMD
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
SPILLS 90
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SPILLS 80
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
FUDS
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
DOD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US FIN ASSUR
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
EPA WATCH LIST
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
2020 COR ACTION
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
TSCA
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
TRIS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SSTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ROD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
RMP
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RAATS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PRP
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PADS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ICIS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FTTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
MLTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH DOE
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH EPA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
PCB TRANSFORMER
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RADINFO
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
HIST FTTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
DOT OPS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
CONSENT
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
INDIAN RESERV
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
FUSRAP
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
UMTRA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LEAD SMELTERS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US AIRS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
ABANDONED MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
FINDS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ECHO
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UXO
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
DOCKET HWC
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FUELS PROGRAM
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AIRS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ASBESTOS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
DRYCLEANERS
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Financial Assurance
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NPDES
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UIC
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
AOP
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
TC6992408.2s Page 6

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance
Target
Total
Database
(Miles)
Property < 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
SEPT HAULERS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
CCB
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
PCSRP
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
MINES MRDS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
:IQ :IM:I F-1"C16.1[07 W-,To 1*0191 IR
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
EDR Hist Auto 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
:I Q 7 *0191T/:I 7:11excloly/:I 7z I Mtl:11z IN r_1 li:IW* :
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LF TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LUST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
- Totals -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC6992408.2s Page 7

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Site
NO SITES FOUND
MAP FINDINGS
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
TC6992408.2s Page 8

Count: 0 records.
ORPHAN SUMMARY
City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s)
NO SITES FOUND
TC6992408.2s Page 9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Lists of Federal NPL (Superfund) sites
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
NPL Site Boundaries
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 3
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 4
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 5
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 6
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 7
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 8
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
TC6992408.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Lists of Federal Delisted NPL sites
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal sites subject to CERCLA removals and CERCLA orders
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAG) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 05/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/01/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States. The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Lists of Federal CERCLA sites with NFRAP
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC6992408.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of Federal RCRA facilities undergoing Corrective Action
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 15
Lists of Federal RCRA TSD facilities
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 15
Lists of Federal RCRA generators
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6992408.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate
less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 02/08/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 11/19/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 11/19/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6992408.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022 Last EDR Contact: 03/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 9 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state- and tribal (Superfund) equivalent sites
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011 Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011 Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Lists of state- and tribal hazardous waste facilities
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 11/30/2021 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2022 Last EDR Contact: 03/09/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Lists of state and tribal landfills and solid waste disposal facilities
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 11/12/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/11/2022 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information. (Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version: 09/11/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2020 Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6992408.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DEBRIS: Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Temporary Disaster Debris Staging Site (TDDSS) Locations
which are available to be activated in a disaster or emergency.. Disaster Debris Sites can only be used for temporary
disaster debris storage if the site's responsible party activates the site for use by notifying the NCDEQ DWM
Solid Waste Section staff during an emergency
Date of Government Version: 12/08/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/09/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/15/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LCID: Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
A list all of the Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notification facilities (under 2 acres in
size) in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 05/11/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Lists of state and tribal leaking storage tanks
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 01/28/2022 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/28/2022 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 01/28/2022 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/28/2022 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6992408.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 04/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 01/03/2022 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2022 Last EDR Contact: 04/07/2022
Number of Days to Update: 75 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6992408.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Lists of state and tribal registered storage tanks
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 10/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/01/2022
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2022 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/22/2022 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2022
Number of Days to Update: 3 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 11/15/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6992408.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/07/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 11/30/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/09/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6992408.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Lists of state and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/16/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 11/30/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2022 Last EDR Contact: 03/09/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
Lists of state and tribal brownfield sites
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 12/01/2021 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/21/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/11/2022 Last EDR Contact: 03/30/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 02/23/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 0
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/15/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
TC6992408.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 01/31/2022 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/29/2022 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 86 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009
Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Source: EPA, Region 9
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 137 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivices, Indian Health Service
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Last EDR Contact: 04/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
TC6992408.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 02/22/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 02/22/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 76
PFAS: PFAS Contamination Site Listing
List of PFAS facilities
Date of Government Version: 11/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78
Local Land Records
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Records of Emergency Release Reports
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 12/15/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills, hazardous material releases, sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets, citizen complaints, and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
TC6992408.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/16/2021 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Number of Days to Update: 79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
Date of Government Version: 01/28/2022 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/28/2022 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Other Ascertainable Records
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 02/28/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 12/01/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/17/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6992408.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 06/07/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2022
Number of Days to Update: 239
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/12/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019
Number of Days to Update: 574
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post -closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/13/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2022
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List' to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6992408.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/14/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 01/19/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/11/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
RMP: Risk Management Plans
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6992408.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst -case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 01/20/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6992408.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MILTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/24/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
COAL ASH DOE: Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019
Number of Days to Update: 251
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 96
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
TC6992408.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020 Last EDR Contact: 04/26/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2021 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2022 Telephone: Varies
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2022
Number of Days to Update: 70 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 23
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
TC6992408.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 546
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.
Date of Government Version: 07/26/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/28/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020
Number of Days to Update: 74
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 01/25/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2022
Number of Days to Update: 19
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/11/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub -system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
TC6992408.2s Page GR-19

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration.
Date of Government Version: 03/21/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/22/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 11/02/2021 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron
ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such
as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory
contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
TC6992408.2s Page GR-20

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/15/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Interior
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 11/04/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022
Number of Days to Update: 95
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2022
Number of Days to Update: 34
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/19/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/12/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels
Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 02/17/2022
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/17/2022
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82
AIRS: Air Quality Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with air quality permits.
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/17/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6992408.2s Page GR-21

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2022 Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ASBESTOS: ASBESTOS
Asbestos notification sites
Date of Government Version: 07/31/2021 Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2021 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage,
transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 11/12/2021 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/11/2022 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2022
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
Date of Government Version: 12/06/2021 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/13/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2022 Last EDR Contact: 03/18/2022
Number of Days to Update: 74 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/27/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 03/31/2022 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/27/2022 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2022
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012 Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012 Last EDR Contact: 03/18/2022
Number of Days to Update: 23 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/04/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
TC6992408.2s Page GR-22

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/03/2021 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/07/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2022 Last EDR Contact: 03/07/2022
Number of Days to Update: 78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2022 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/20/2022 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/26/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2020 Last EDR Contact: 03/01/2022
Number of Days to Update: 7 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AOP: Animal Operation Permits Listing
This listing includes animal operations that are required to be permitted by the state.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2020
Number of Days to Update: 1
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/11/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits
An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging.
Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 120
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES
facilities.
Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011
Number of Days to Update: 55
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: EPA, Office of Water
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6992408.2s Page GR-23

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
CCB: Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
These are not permitted Coal Ash landfills A list all of the now closed Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) in North
Carolina, in point data form. The purpose is to provide the public and other government entities a visual overview
of coal ash structural fills throughout the state and increase public awareness of their current locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/27/2021
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCSRP: Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
To treat petroleum -contaminated soil in order to protect North Carolinaa??s environment and the health of the
citizens of North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 09/15/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/05/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/23/2021
Number of Days to Update: 79
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEPT HAULERS: Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
This list of all active and permitted Septage Land Application Site (SLAS) and Septage Detention and Treatment
Facility (SDTF) sites in North Carolina. The purpose of this map is to provide the public and government entities
a visual overview of the businesses that manage septage and septage facilities throughout the state.
Date of Government Version: 03/25/2021
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2021
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/24/2021
Number of Days to Update: 79
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/12/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC6992408.2s Page GR-24

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt Archives
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 196 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
TC6992408.2s Page GR-25

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 172 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 12/03/2021 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2022 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2022 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2022
Number of Days to Update: 84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2022
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019 Last EDR Contact: 04/07/2022
Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/18/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2022 Last EDR Contact: 04/28/2022
Number of Days to Update: 82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2022
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019 Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2022
Number of Days to Update: 53 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/25/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Management
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2021 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2022 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2022
Number of Days to Update: 80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6992408.2s Page GR-26

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2022
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/20/2022
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business
Media.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual surrey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
TC6992408.2s Page GR-27

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
A© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6992408.2s Page GR-28

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
BRITT & HALES BUFFER MITIGATION SITE
145 MCARTHUR POND ROAD
MOUNT OLIVE, NC 28365
11r_1 Z0:11i:j Z91» irlci•Z•]U•71�r_�r9
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map:
Version Date:
South Map:
Version Date:
35.254653 - 35- 15' 16.75"
78.164589 - 78- 9' 52.52"
Zone 17
757973.2
3904771.5
149 ft. above sea level
13847225 GRANTHAM, NC
2019
13847209 DOBBERSVILLE, NC
2019
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC6992408.2s Page A-1

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site -specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General NNE
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
North I South
TIP
0
N V W - W f�li N V -- O fAp W ONi fNli W N fAp OAO O
West
TIP
Target Property Elevation: 149 ft.
East
1/2 1 Miles
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC6992408.2s Page A-2

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property
3720254400J
Additional Panels in search area:
3720254500J
3720255500J
3720255400J
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Quad at Target Property
GRANTHAM
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA FIRM Flood data
NWI Electronic
Data Coverage
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION
MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
Not Reported
TC6992408.2s Page A-3

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT
GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Mesozoic Category: Stratified Sequence
System: Cretaceous
Series: Washita Group
Code: IK3 (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps.
The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data.
Soil Component Name: AUTRYVILLE
Soil Surface Texture: sand
Hydrologic Group: Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained to
excessively drained sands and gravels.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to
water table is more than 6 feet.
Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil.
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: LOW
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 60 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > 60 inches
TC6992408.2s Page A-4

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
Permeability
Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr)
(pH)
1
0 inches
26 inches
sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 20.00
Max: 6.50
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 6.00
Min: 4.50
pct. or less
Clean Sands,
passing No.
Poorly graded
200), Silty, or
sand.
Clayey Gravel
COARSE -GRAINED
and Sand.
SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
2
26 inches
41 inches
sandy loam
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 6.00
Max: 5.50
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 2.00
Min: 4.50
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty, or
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
3
41 inches
58 inches
sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 20.00
Max: 5.50
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 6.00
Min: 4.50
pct. or less
Clean Sands,
passing No.
Poorly graded
200), Silty, or
sand.
Clayey Gravel
COARSE -GRAINED
and Sand.
SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
4
58 inches
85 inches
sandy loam
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 2.00
Max: 5.50
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 0.60
Min: 4.50
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty, or
Clayey Gravel
and Sand.
OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA
Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may
appear within the general area of target property.
Soil Surface Textures: loamy sand
loamy fine sand
loam
sandy loam
Surficial Soil Types: loamy sand
loamy fine sand
loam
sandy loam
Shallow Soil Types: loamy sand
sand
sandy clay loam
fine sandy loam
Deeper Soil Types: sandy clay loam
TC6992408.2s Page A-5

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
stratified
sand
sandy clay
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE
SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
Federal USGS
1.000
Federal FRDS PWS
Nearest PWS within 1 mile
State Database
1.000
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No PWS System Found
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
1 NC3000000008283 1/2 - 1 Mile ESE
2 NC3000000008284 1/2 - 1 Mile NNE
TC6992408.2s Page A-6

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 6992408.2s
6 (�0
16�
` 60,
County Boundary
N Major Roads
N Contour Lines
OO Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater
® Water Wells
© Public Water Supply Wells
® Cluster of Multiple Icons
o 7
� 6 0
PQ
C.
I
�0 Q
b�
� 0
o'% o
—16 ti0
NC
120
0
ti
0
20 0
0 1/4 1/2 1 Miles
Groundwater Flow Direction Wildlife Areas
c I Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location Natural Areas
c M Groundwater Flow Varies at Location o Rare & Endangered Species
SITE NAME: Britt & Hales Buffer Mitigation Site
CLIENT: John R McAdams Company Inc
ADDRESS: 145 Mcarthur Pond Road
CONTACT: Kerry Bray
Mount Olive NC 28365
INQUIRY #: 6992408.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.254653 / 78.164589
DATE: May 24, 2022 11:31 am
Copyright �o 2022 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 Tom Tom Rel. 2015.

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
1
ESE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
PWD ID:
NC0496065
PWS Type:
Community
Water Type:
Ground Water
Facility Type:
Well
Owner:
WAYNE WATER DIST COMBINED BD
2
NNE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
PWD ID:
NC0496065
PWS Type:
Community
Water Type:
Ground Water
Facility Type:
Well
Owner:
WAYNE WATER DIST COMBINED BD
Database EDR ID Number
NC WELLS NC3000000008283
System Name: WAYNE WATER DISTRICTS
Primary Source: Ground Water
Facility Name: MURRAY SITE WELL #14
Well Depth: 182
NC WELLS NC3000000008284
System Name: WAYNE WATER DISTRICTS
Primary Source: Ground Water
Facility Name: BRITT SITE WELL #15
Well Depth: 198
TC6992408.2s Page A-8

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
State Database: NC Radon
Radon Test Results
Num Results Avg pCi/L Min pCi/L Max pCi/L
1 0.30 0.3 0.3
Federal EPA Radon Zone for WAYNE County: 3
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Zone 2 indoor average level — 2 pCi/L and — 4 pCi/L.
Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
Federal Area Radon Information for WAYNE COUNTY, NC
Number of sites tested: 2
Area
Average Activity
% <4 pCi/L
% 4-20 pCi/L
Living Area - 1 st Floor
0.300 pCi/L
100%
0%
Living Area - 2nd Floor
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
Basement
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
% >20 pCi/L
0%
Not Reported
Not Reported
TC6992408.2s Page A-9

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC6992408.2s Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water WeIIs: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
North Carolina Wildlife Resources/Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Natural Heritage Occurrence Sites Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic) that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or high quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC6992408.2s Page PSGR-2

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
A© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6992408.2s Page PSGR-3

Eco Terra, LLC I Britt & Hales Nutrient Offset & Riparian Buffer Mitigation Site
APPENDIX F
`144,0 Britt & Hales Bank Parcel Development Package
GCOlCrram HUC 03020201, Excluding Falls Watershed
March 2023

SOUTHERN
CONSERVATION
TRUST
Eco Terra, LLC March 1, 2023
Attn: Jamey O'Shaughnessey
1328 DeKalb Ave NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30307
Re: Britt & Hales Riparian Buffer Mitigation Project
NCDWR Project # 20220293
Mr. O'Shaughnessey,
It is the Southern Conservation Trust's intent to serve as holder of a permanent
conservation easement on approximately 24.7 acres in Wayne County, North
Carolina as part of the Britt & Hales Riparian Buffer Mitigation Project that you,
Eco Terra, sponsor. We understand that you are in the submittal phase of a
revised BPDP for the project. We plan to work with you as the project moves
forward and are ready to assume responsibility for holding the easement as soon
as it is ready to be recorded.
We are also agreeable to and intend to serve as the long-term steward upon
project closeout. We estimate we will need approximately $24,500 as a long-term
endowment for the responsibilities summarized in the BPDP you provided dated
September 2022. Please don't hesitate to reach out for discussion if adjustments
need to be made to meet new mitigation plan or third party requirements.
Our 501(c)(3) nonprofit land trust is a qualified easement holder and committed
to elevating nature through exceptional stewardship. We hold conservation
easements and own and manage fee simple property throughout the state of
North Carolina, including in the region of this particular project. We are prepared
and well-equipped to carry out the long term stewardship responsibilities
detailed in the plan you have proposed.
We look forward to working with you, the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources, and landowner partners on this important mitigation project in the
Neuse River Basin HUC 03020201.
Please reach out to us at the contact information below. Our Director of
Conservation & Stewardship, Jesse Woodsmith, is available to answer any
questions you may have or provide clarification.
Regards,
Katie Pace Quattlebaum
CEO & EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
SOUTHERN CONSERVATION TRUST
E: [e-mail]
P: 770-486-7774 EXT. 2 -CONSERVATION
W. WWW.SCTLANDTRUST.ORG

Property: Britt & Hales Buffer Project (Wayne County, NC)
24.7 ac
Requested by SCT: $24,500
A. Estimations
Travel Expenses
Miles from office to property (one-way)
47.0
In this case miles from closest existing SCT
easement in Cumberland County, NC. Not much
further to SCT owned property with residence (free
lodging).
Average travel time in hours to property (one-way)
1.0
Time from nearest CE (an overestimate since this will
be monitored with over properties in the area)
Reimbursement per mile
$0.550
The IRS issues standard mileage rates based on the
Other reimbursable travel expenses (e.g., tolls, parking,
$180.00
1 meal & Hotel (Overestimate, budgeting for needing
meals, lodging)
to stay at a hotel in area. Reality is lower since this will
be monitored with other properties in the area and is
<2 hours from SCT lodging at owned property in
Pinehurst, INC.)
Annual Monitoring Expenses
For monitoring, calculate based on Stew Coordinator
(Staff #2) lead. This was previously entered
backwards, with Cons/Stew Director lead (Staff #1).
For violations & amendments, will be Cons/Stew
Director lead.
Staff #1: Hours of preparation time per inspection
0.00
Staff #1: Hours of monitoring time per inspection -excluding
0.00
travel time
Staff #1: Hours of reporting and follow up
0.0
Staff #2: Hours of preparation time per inspection
1.0
Staff #2: Hours of monitoring time per inspection -excluding
0.75
Overestimating slightly for larger relative size.
Staff #2: Hours of reporting and follow up per inspection
1.0
Other Staff: Hours per inspection
0.5
Equipment and supplies per inspection
$8.00
Easement holders may depreciate the costs of
equipment (e.g., gps device, camera, computer) as
appropriate for the equipment and its use for each
property.
Number of regular monitoring visits per year
1

Number of cars used per monitoring trip
1
Staff may travel separately to the property
Consultant costs per year
$0.00
Depending on the features of the property and the
easement, the holder occasionally may need outside
expertise.
Drive By and Flyover Monitoring Expenses (used occasionally)
Number of drive -by monitoring trips per year
0.25
Occasional monitoring from the public road is
sometimes desirable to supplement on -site
inspections. (average rounded to 1 in 4 visits)
Staff #1: Average time (in hours) needed per drive -by
monitoring trip (excluding travel time to and from the
0.00
Staff #2: Average time (in hours) needed per drive -by
monitoring trip (excluding travel time to and from the
0.25
Cost of aerial flyover
$10.00
Some organizations use aerial monitoring to
supplement onsite visits. We fly the drone we own.
There will be an aerial flyover approximately every
years
3
For example, entering the number 20 would mean the
land trust expects 1 aerial flyover per 20 years.
Landowner Communication Expenses
1 landowner
Staff #1: Hours per year
0.75
Staff #2: Hours per year
1.25
Other Staff: Hours per year
0.00
Materials and supplies per year
$0.00
For example, printing of educational materials and
postage
Landowner Communication Expenses: Change in
Landowner
These costs should reflect the time and costs
associated with one change in ownership. Stew
Coordinator Lead (Staff #2).
Staff #1: Hours for establishing a relationship with new
landowners, excluding travel time
0.50
Staff #2: Hours for establishing a relationship with new
landowners, excluding travel time
3.00
Other staff: Hours for establishing a relationship with new
0.50
Staff #1: Number of site visits needed to establish a
relationship with new landowner
0.00
This number may reflect an average for all properties
and therefore is not necessarily a whole number.

Staff #2: Number of site visits needed to establish a
relationship with new landowner
1.0
Supplies
$0.00
For example, a copy of the easement and materials
about the land trust's stewardship program
It is estimated that there will be one change in land
ownership every years
30.0
This should not be zero.
Review of Reserved and Permitted Rights and
Approvals
The conservation easement document may specify
that the landowner will pay for the land trust's costs at
the time of review. If this is the case, enter zeros in
this section.
It is estimated that there will be one review every _years
30.0
If the easement does not contain reserved or
permited rights, place a zero here.
Staff #1: Hours needed per action subject to review
1.00
Staff #2: Hours needed per action subject to review
2.00
Other staff: Hours needed per action subject to review
1.00
Staff #1: Number of site visits required to complete one
0.00
Staff #2: Number of site visits required to complete one
1.00
Consultant costs per review
$0.00
Land Trust Initiated Amendment Expenses
If the landowner seeks an easement amendment, the
landowner would normally be expected to pay the
costs associated with the amendment at the time of
amendment.
Staff #1: Hours needed to complete an amendment,
excluding travel time
3.00
Occasionally a holder will want to initiate an
amendment. The Pennsylvania Land Trust
Association has little empirical data on the costs of
these amendments, and no information on their
Staff #2: Hours needed to complete an amendment,
excluding travel time
0.50
Other staff: Hours needed to complete an amendment
0.00
Staff #1: Number of visits required per amendment
1.00
Staff #2: Number of visits required per amendment
0.00
It is estimated that there will be one land trust initiated
amendment every years.
60

Legal Expenses
Legal fees per year
$0.00
donated
Minor and miscellaneous legal expenses may be
incurred as the easement holder seeks to reconcile
monitoring findings with easement terms, the
landowner seeks clarification on easement terms, etc.
These costs are expected to occur with no particular
frequency.
Minor Violation Incidents (resolved without resort to the
On buffer projects with straightforward terms, this is re
It is estimated that there will be one minor violation every
years.
15.0
This should not be zero
Staff #1: Hours needed to address the violation, excluding
travel time
3.00
Staff #2: Hours needed to address the violation, excluding
travel time
1.00
Other staff: Hours needed to address the violation
0.50
Staff #1: Number of site visits required per violation
1.00
Staff #2: Number of site visits required per violation
0.00
Legal costs per incident
$500.00
Consultant costs per incident
$0.00
Depending on the complexity and provisions of the
easement, easement holders should plan for the
costs of hiring a consultant.
Major Violation Incidents (requiring litigation)
Reduced for buffer project type
It is estimated that there will be one major violation every
years
50
This should not be zero
Average cost to address major violation (staff, attorney,
court fees & other)
$10,000
Conservation defense insurance annual premium
$0.00
It is not our practice to insert this here - this line is
from another organization's template.
Annual Rate of Return
Average annual return on Stewardship Fund investments
less inflation rate
4.00%

Staff and Overhead Rates
Staff #1 Conservation Director: Hourly rate, including
$31.00
Staff #2 Stewardship Coordinator: Hourly rate, including
benefits
$20.00
Other Staff Executive Director: Hourly rate, including
benefits
$67.00
Office overhead costs (rent, insurance, equipment) as a
5%
Stewardship Needs -Final Calculations (This will automatically calculate
based on your entries in the estimations section)
Annual stewardship costs (including the cost to $776
respond to minor violations)
Endowment needed to fully cover annual $19,402
stewardship costs
Annual costs needed to defend against major $200
violations
Endowment needed to fund easements against $5,000
major violations
Total $24,402.00
Formulas used in this calculator to calculate total stewardship needs (the formalas are here to show users how total stewardship needs
These are all calculated automatically, you don't need to do anything! Formulae Used
Staff Costs
Executive Director: Hourly rate, including overhead and
$31.00
B94+(B94*B97)
Director of Conservation: Hourly rate, including overhead
$27.00
B95+(B95*B97)
Field Biologist: Hourly rate, including overhead and benefits
$17.00
B96+(B96*B97)
Travel Costs
Roundtrip mileage cost
$51.70
B15*B17*2
Other reimbursable travel expenses
$180.00
B18
Staff #1: Cost of staff time to travel to and from eased
$62.00
(B112*B16*2)
Staff #2: Cost of staff time to travel to and from eased
$54.00
(13113*1316*2)

Total Annual
Stewardship
Costs
Formulae
Annual Monitoring Costs
Staff time per regular inspection
$136.75
((B21 +B22+B23)*B 1 12)+((B24+B25+B26)*B 1 13)+(B2
Travel costs per regular inspection
$231.70
(13117+13118)*B30
Consultant costs per regular inspection
$0.00
B31
Supplies per regular inspection
$8.00
B28
Annualized cost of drive -by monitoring
$245
IF(B34=0,0,(B35*B119)+(B36*B120)+B117+13118)
Annualized cost of aerial flyover
$3
IF(B38=0,0,(1/B38)*B37)
Total annual monitoring costs
$624.98
(B124+B125+B127)*B29+B128+B129
Annual Costs of General Landowner Communications
Staff time
$57.00
(1341 *B112)+(B42*B113)+(B43*B114)
Supplies
$0.00
B44
Total costs of general landowner communications
$57.00
13133+13134
Annualized Costs of Landowner Communications -Change
in Landownership
Staff time
$159.00
(1347*13112)+(B48*B113)+(B49*B114)+(B50*B119)+(B
Travel costs
$231.70
B50*(B117+13118)+B51*(B117+13118)
Supplies
$0.00
B52
Likelihood of a new landowner in any given year
3%
1/1353
Annualized cost associated with new landowner
$13.02
(B138+B139+B140)*B141
Annualized Costs for Review of Reserved and Permitted
Rights and Approvals
Staff costs
$156.00
(13112*B57)+(B113*B58)+(B114*B59)+(B60*B119)+(B
Travel costs
$231.70
(B60*(B117+13118))+(B61*(B117+13118))
Consultant Costs
$0.00
B62
Likelihood of an exercise of a reserved right in any given
3%
IF(B56=0,0,1/B56)
Annualized cost for review and approval of reserved rights
$12.92
(B145+B146+B147)*B148
Annual Costs of Holder Initiated Amendments
Staff time per amendment
$168.50
(1365*13112)+(B66*B113)+(B67*B114)+(B68*B119)+(B
Travel costs per amendment
$231.70
(B68*(B117+13118))+(B69*(B117+13118))
Likelihood of a holder initiated amendment in any given year
2%
1/B70

Total annualized holder initiated amendment costs
$6.67
(B153+B154)*B155
Annual Legal Costs
Legal fees per year
$0.00
B73
Total annual legal costs
$0.00
B159
Total Annual Regular Stewardship Expenses
$714.60
C130+C135+C142+C149+C156+C160
C. Calculation of Costs Associated with Violations
Minor Violations
Staff costs to address violation
$190.50
(13112*B77)+(B113*B78)+(B114*B79)+(B80*B119)+(B
Travel costs
$231.70
(B80*(B117+13118))+(B81*(B117+13118))
Legal costs
$500.00
B82
Likelihood of violation in any given year
7%
1/1376
Total annualized cost to deal with minor violations
$61.48
(B167+B168+B169)*B170
Major Violations
Cost to address violation
$10,000
B87
Likelihood of major violation in any given year
2%
1 /B86
Annualized cost to deal with major violations
$200.00
B174*B175
D. Endowment Calculations
Annual stewardship and minor violation costs
$776
C162+C171
Average annual return on stewardship fund investments less
4.00%
B91
Endowment needed to cover annual stewardship costs
$19,402.00
C182/C183
Annual costs needed to defend against major violations
$200.00
C176
,Average annual return on stewardship fund investments less
4.00%
B91
Endowment needed to fund easements against major
5 000.00
C187/C188