20120747 Ver 1_Year 0 Monitoring Report_2014_20150414

DEVIL'S RACETRACK STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION SITE
Johnston County, NC
DENR Contract 003989
NCEEP Project Number 95021
Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report
FINAL
Data Collection Period: December 2013 - April 2014
Draft Submission Date: May 5, 2014
Final Submission Date: May 20, 2014
f
Prepared for:
ir ,-
I1111
rwaGe
NCDENR, NCEEP
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC
27699 -1652

Prepared by:
wlp.rw,
WILDLANDS
CNG•o'dC =RIMaG
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 S. Mint Street, # 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
P - 704 - 332 -7754
F - 704 - 332 -3306
Kirsten Y. Gimbert
kgimbert @wildlandseng.com

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Wildlands Engineering (Wildlands) restored and enhanced a total of 19,128 linear feet (LF) of stream and
restoring 63.3 acres of wetlands on a full delivery mitigation site in Johnston County, NC. The project
streams consist of five unnamed tributaries (UTs) to the Neuse River (Figures 2a and 2b). The largest of
these streams, Devil's Racetrack Creek (East and West), drains directly to the Neuse River. The other
four streams are small headwater tributaries to Devil's Racetrack Creek (Southwest Branch, Middle
Branch, Southeast Branch, and North Branch). The project will provide 18,688 stream mitigation units
(SMUs) and 62.1 wetland restoration units (WMUs).
The Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (Site) is located near the town of Four Oaks in Eastern Johnston
County, NC. The site is located in the Neuse River Basin; eight digit Cataloging Unit (CU) 03020201 and
the 14 -digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03020201140010 (Figure 1). The adjacent land to the streams
and wetlands is primarily agricultural lands and forestry. The project will contribute to meeting the
restoration goals for the Targeted Local Watershed described in the Neuse River Basin Restoration
Priorities (RBRP). The RBRP identified the following goals for the watershed:
• Wetland restoration and enhancement that contribute to the improvement of water quality
downstream in the estuary; and
• Implementation of buffer and stream projects in headwaters.
The project goals established in the mitigation plan (Wildlands, 2013) were completed with careful
consideration of goals and objectives that were described in the RBRP and to meet the North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program's (NCEEP) mitigation needs while maximizing the ecological and water
quality uplift within the watershed. The following project goals established include:
• Restore a large wetland complex to a naturally occurring community to improve riparian habitat
and water quality;
• Restore a network of badly degraded stream channels, including multiple headwaters streams,
to create aquatic habitat and further improve water quality to receiving waters; and
• Restore riparian buffers along stream corridors for additional habitat and water quality benefits.
Secondary project goals established in the mitigation plan were to restore fish passage from the Neuse
River to Devil's Racetrack Creek. This is a secondary goal because success will not be measured during
monitoring.
The Site construction and as -built surveys were completed between August 2013 and April 2014.
Minimal adjustments were made during construction, where needed, based on field evaluation. Several
constructed riffles were added or substituted for brush shallows along Southeast branch during
construction. Specific changes are detailed in Section 5.1. Baseline (MY -0) profiles and cross - section
dimensions closely match the design parameters. Some locations along the as -built profiles are not
consistent in slope due to the sandbed nature of the stream. These sorts of bed changes do not
constitute a problem or indicate a need for remedial actions. The Site appears to have been built as
designed and is on tract to meeting the upcoming monitoring year's success criteria.

DEVIL'S RACETRACK STREAM AND WETLAND MITIGATION SITE
Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report
EXECUTIVESUMMARY .................................................................................................... ............................... i
1.0
Project Goals, Background and Attributes ......................................................... ...............................
1
1.1
Project Location and Setting .......................................................................... ...............................
1
1.2
Project Goals and Objectives ......................................................................... ...............................
2
1.4
Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data ................................................ ............................... 4
2.0
Success Criteria ................................................................................................... ..............................4
2.1
Streams .......................................................................................................... ...............................
5
2.2
Vegetation ....................................................................................................... ..............................5
2.3
Wetlands ......................................................................................................... ..............................6
2.4
Schedule and Reporting ................................................................................. ............................... 6
3.0
Monitoring Plan .................................................................................................. ..............................7
3.1
Stream ............................................................................................................. ..............................7
3.2
Vegetation ....................................................................................................... ..............................8
4.0
Maintenance and Contingency Plans .................................................................. ..............................8
4.1
Stream ............................................................................................................. ..............................8
4.2
Vegetation ....................................................................................................... ..............................9
4.3
Wetlands ......................................................................................................... ..............................9
5.0
As -Built Condition (Baseline) ............................................................................. ...............................
9
5.1
As- Built /Record Drawings .............................................................................. ............................... 9
5.2
Baseline Data Assessment ........................................................................... ...............................
12
6.0
References ......................................................................................................... .............................14
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 General Tables and Figures
Figure 1
Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2a -b
Project Component /Asset Map
Table 1
Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3
Project Contact Table
Table 4
Project Information and Attributes
Appendix 2 Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Table 5a -f Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 6a -f Morphology and Hydraulic Summary
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Cross - Section Plots
Stream Photographs
Appendix 3 Vegetation Plot Data
Appendix 4 As -Built Plan Sheets

1.0 Project Goals, Background and Attributes
1.1 Project Location and Setting
The proposed stream and wetland mitigation site is located in central Johnston County along Devil's
Racetrack Road just east of its intersection with U.S. Highway 701 and approximately one mile east of
Interstate 95 (Figure 1). The Site is located on two tracts owned by Nell Howell Revocable Trust (PIN
168100 -48 -4293 and PIN 168100 -28- 6055). A conservation easement was recorded on 96.065 acres
with the two parcels (Deed Book 4221, Page 419 -433). To access the site, drive east along Devil's
Racetrack Road approximately 1.2 miles from the Highway 701 intersection. Both portions of the site
can be accessed on either side of Devil's Racetrack Road.
The Site is located in the western portion of the Inner Coastal Plain Physiographic Province (USGS, 1998).
The project watershed consists primarily of agricultural lands and forest. The only significant
development in the watershed is a campground adjacent to Devil's Racetrack Creek on the western
portion of the project site, a middle school in the upper portion of the watershed, a low- density
subdivision with single family homes, and a small section of 1 -95. The drainage area for the project site
is 831.4 acres at the lower end of Devil's Racetrack Creek (east).
Located within the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) subbasin 03- 04 -02, none of the
tributaries on the Site, including Devil's Racetrack Creek, are classified by NCDWR. Therefore they all
are, by default, required to meet the standards for Class C waters which are waters protected for
secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife and aquatic life, maintenance of biotic integrity, and agriculture.
Devil's Racetrack Creek discharges into a section of the Neuse River (NCDWR AU# 27- (41.7)) that is
classified as Class WS -V; NSW. Class WS -V waters are water supplies which are generally upstream and
draining to Class WS -IV waters or waters used by industry to supply their employees with drinking water
or waters that were formerly used as water supply. These waters are also protected for Class C uses.
The Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) classification is a supplemental classification for waters needing
additional nutrient management due to excessive growth of microscopic or macroscopic vegetation
(NCDWQ, 2011). This section of the Neuse River, which extends from the City of Smithfield water supply
intake to a point 1.7 miles upstream of the confluence of Bawdy Creek, is listed as impaired for aquatic
life on the North Carolina 303(d) list (NCDWQ, 2009).
The Site is located in the eight -digit Cataloging Unit (CU) 03020201, in the Neuse River Basin, otherwise
known as the Neuse 01 CU. The 14 -digit hydrologic unit, or "Targeted Local Watershed," within the
03020201 CU that includes the project site is Neuse River Basin Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC)
03020201140010. Restoration goals for the Targeted Local Watershed in the 2010 Neuse River Basin
Restoration Priorities (RBRP) document (http: / /www.nceep.net /services/
restplans/ FINAL %20RBRP%20Neuse %2020111207 %2000RRECTED.pdf) include the following:
• Wetlands restoration and enhancement that contribute to the improvement of water quality
downstream in the estuary; and
• Implementation of buffer and stream projects in headwaters.
Prior to construction activities, the streams had been relocated and channelized and the surrounding
wetland complex had been drained for agricultural purposes. Stream valleys and other low areas were
filled to raise wet areas and even out the fields. At the same time the streams were straightened,
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report —FINAL Page 1

riparian vegetation was also removed. The project area west of Devil's Racetrack Road was used for row
crop agriculture and the eastern portion was used for timber production.
The channelization of streams on the Site resulted in severely over - enlarged channels that were
extremely deep in many locations. The alterations of the Site to promote farming resulted in complete
elimination of the ecological function of this small stream /wetland complex. Specifically, functional
losses at the Site include degraded aquatic habitat, altered hydrology (related to loss of floodplain
connection and lowered water table), and reduction of quality and amount of riparian wetland habitats
and related water quality benefits. Ongoing bank erosion was also occurring at some locations due to
high, overly steep banks and lack of bank vegetation. Table 4 in Appendix 1 and Tables 5a -e in Appendix
2 present the pre- restoration conditions in detail.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The mitigation project is intended to provide numerous ecological benefits within the Neuse River Basin.
While many of these benefits are limited to the Devils Racetrack Creek Site project area, others, such as
pollutant removal and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have more far - reaching effects.
Expected improvements to water quality and ecological processes are outlined below as project goals
and objectives. These project goals established were completed with careful consideration of goals and
objectives that were described in the RBRP and to meet the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program's (NCEEP) mitigation needs while maximizing the ecological and water quality uplift within the
watershed.
The following project specific goals established in the mitigation plan (Wildlands, 2013) include:
• Restore a large wetland complex to a naturally occurring community to improve riparian habitat
and water quality;
• Restore a network of badly degraded stream channels, including multiple headwaters streams,
to create aquatic habitat and further improve water quality to receiving waters; and
• Restore riparian buffers along stream corridors for additional habitat and water quality benefits.
Secondary project goals established in the mitigation plan were to restore fish passage from the Neuse
River to Devil's Racetrack Creek. This is a secondary goal because success will not be measured during
monitoring.
The primary project goals were addressed through the following project objectives:
• Promote wetland hydrology by raising channelized stream beds and filling drainage ditches;
• Plant wetland areas with native tree species to restore a Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp —
Blackwater Subtype community;
• Reconstruct stream channels to have the appropriate slope, planform, and cross - sectional
geometry for the region of the Coastal Plain in which the project is located;
• Size reconstructed stream channels to flood floodplains and wetlands frequently;
• Stabilize stream banks using bioengineering, natural channel design techniques, and grading to
reduce bank angles and bank height;
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report —FINAL Page 2

• Install in- stream structures and woody debris to promote aeration of water, create habitat, and
influence the creation of bed forms commonly found in sand bed channels;
• Restore riparian buffer areas with native tree species to stabilize channels, filter flood flows and
runoff, and supplement wetland plantings; and
• Remove project area from agricultural production further improving water quality.
These objectives were achieved through restoring and enhancing a total of 19,016 LF of stream and
restoring 63.3 acres of wetlands. The riparian and wetland areas were also planted with native
vegetation to improve habitat and protect water quality.
1.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach
The design streams were restored to the appropriate type based on the surrounding landscape, climate,
and natural vegetation communities but also with strong consideration to existing watershed conditions
and trajectory. Specially, the site design was developed to restore a large stream /wetland complex
directly adjacent to the Neuse River to a naturally occurring community to create riparian and wetland
habitat and improve water quality. Other key factors addressed in the design were to create stable
habitats, improve riparian buffers, and restore the natural migration patterns for anadromous and other
fish for spawning. Figure 2 and Table 1 in Appendix 1 present the stream and wetland mitigation
components for the Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site.
The final mitigation plan was submitted and accepted by the NCEEP in January of 2013. Construction
activities were completed by Fluvial Solutions and Land Mechanic Design, Inc in February 2014. The
planting was completed by Bruton Natural Systems, Inc. in January /February 2014. The baseline as -built
survey was completed by Turner Land Surveying, PLLC on the west side and Stewart Proctor Engineering
and Surveying, PLLC on the east side between September 2013 and March 2014. There were no
significant deviations reported in the as -built project elements compared to the design plans. A few
structures were either added, eliminated, or adjusted slightly based on field conditions. Field
adjustments made during construction are described in detail in section 5.1. Appendix 1 provides more
detailed project activity, history, contact information, and watershed /site background information for
this project.
1.3.1 Project Structure
The project will provide 18,687 stream mitigation units (SMUs) and 62.1 wetland restoration units
(WMUs). Please refer to Figures 2a and 2b for the project component /asset map for the stream
restoration feature exhibits and Table 1 for the project component and mitigation credit information
for the Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site.
1.3.2 Restoration Type and Approach
The design streams and wetlands were restored to the appropriate type based on the surrounding
landscape, climate, and natural vegetation communities but also with thorough consideration to
existing watershed conditions and trajectory. The project includes stream restoration and
enhancement as well as wetland restoration. The specific proposed stream and wetland types are
described below.
The stream restoration portion of this project includes six reaches:
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report —FINAL Page 3

• Southwest Branch from its headwaters to the confluence with Devil's Racetrack Creek;
• Middle Branch from its headwaters to the confluence with Devil's Racetrack Creek;
• Southeast Branch from its headwaters to the confluence with Devil's Racetrack Creek;
• North Branch from the northeast corner of the property to its confluence with Devil's
Racetrack Creek;
• Devil's Racetrack Creek (west) from U.S. Highway 701 to Devil's Racetrack Road; and
• Devil's Racetrack Creek (east) from Devil's Racetrack Road to its confluence with the Neuse
River.
The upper 530 LF of Middle Branch was designed as a headwater wetland feature. Stream restoration
credit was generated by construction of this feature and was calculated as valley length through the
feature. The project also includes one stream Enhancement II reach and one Enhancement I reach. The
Enhancement II reach consists of the upper 131 LF of Southwest Branch along with 23 LF of a channel
connecting the spring head to Southwest Branch. The Southwest Branch design includes 75 LF of
Enhancement I in the transition between Enhancement II and restoration.
The project design was developed based on similar reference conditions representing small inner
Coastal Plain stream and wetland complexes with low gradient, meandering streams and straighter,
higher - gradient zero- to first -order tributaries. The streams on the site are all sand bed channels and
the designs incorporated abundant woody structures that will drive scour pool formation and provide
aquatic habitat. While the larger meandering streams will also have some pool formation in the bends,
the bed profile of the steeper streams are completely controlled by the woody structures.
1.4 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data
The Site was restored by Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) through a full delivery contract with
NCEEP. Tables 2, 3, and 4 in Appendix 1 provide detailed information regarding the Project Activity and
Reporting History, Project Contacts, and Project Baseline Information and Attributes.
2.0 Success Criteria
The stream restoration success criteria for the Site were established in the approved mitigation plan and
followed approved performance criteria presented in the in the NCEEP Mitigation Plan Template
(version 2.1, 09/01/2011), the NCEEP Monitoring Requirements and Performance Standards for Stream
and /or Wetland Mitigation (11/7/2011), and the Stream Mitigation Guidelines issued in April 2003 by
the USACE and NCDWR. Annual monitoring and bi- annual site visits will be conducted to assess the
condition of the finished project. The stream and wetland restoration and enhancement sections of the
project were assigned specific performance criteria components for hydrology, vegetation, and
morphology (streams only). Performance criteria will be evaluated throughout the seven year post -
construction monitoring. If all performance criteria have been successfully met and two bankfull events
have occurred during separate years, Wildlands may propose to terminate stream and /or vegetation
monitoring. These success criteria are covered in detail in the following paragraphs.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report —FINAL Page 4

2.1 Streams
2.1.1 Dimension
Shallow section cross - sections on the restoration reaches should be stable and should show little
change in bankfull area, maximum depth ratio and width -to -depth ratio. Shallow cross - sections
should fall within the parameters defined for channels of the appropriate Rosgen stream type (when
applicable). If any changes do occur, these changes will be evaluated to assess whether the stream
channel is showing signs of instability. Indicators of instability include a vertically incising thalweg or
eroding channel banks. Changes in the channel that indicate a movement toward stability or
enhanced habitat include a decrease in the width -to -depth ratio in meandering channels or an
increase in pool depth. Remedial action would not be taken if channel changes indicate a
movement toward stability. It is important to note that in sand bed channels pools and bed forms
(ripples, dunes, etc.) may migrate over time as a natural function of the channel hydraulics. These
sorts of bed changes do not constitute a problem or indicate a need for remedial actions.
2.1.2 Pattern and Profile
Longitudinal profile surveys will not be conducted during the seven year monitoring period unless
other indicators during the annual monitoring indicate a trend toward vertical and lateral instability.
As mentioned above, migration of pools and bed forms are expected and do not require remedial
action. Stream pattern and profile will be assessed visually as described below.
2.1.3 Substrate
Pebble count procedures will not be conducted for this project due to the sand bed nature of the
streams.
2.1.4 Photo Documentation
Photographs should illustrate the site's vegetation and morphological stability on an annual basis.
Cross - section photos should demonstrate no excessive erosion or degradation of the banks.
Longitudinal photos should indicate the absence of persistent bars within the channel or vertical
incision. Grade control structures should remain stable. Deposition of sediment on the bank side of
vane arms is preferable. Maintenance of scour pools on the channel side of vane arms is expected.
Reference photos will also be taken for each of the vegetation plots.
2.1.5 Bankfull Documentation
Two bankfull flow events must be documented on the restoration and enhancement reaches within
the seven -year monitoring period. The two bankfull events must occur in separate years. Stream
monitoring will continue until success criteria in the form of two bankfull events in separate years
have been documented. Consistent flow must be documented in the smaller drainage area streams
on the project site including Southwest Branch, Middle Branch, and Southeast Branch. Under
normal circumstances stream flow must be documented to occur every year for at least 30
consecutive days during the seven year monitoring period. Stream flow must also be documented
to occur intermittently in all months other than July through September of each monitoring year.
2.2 Vegetation
The final vegetative success criteria will be the survival of 210 planted stems per acre in the riparian
corridor along restored and enhanced reaches and within the wetland restoration areas at the end of
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report —FINAL Page 5

the required monitoring period (year seven). The interim measure of vegetative success for the site will
be the survival of at least 320 planted stems per acre at the end of the third monitoring year and at least
260 stems per acre at the end of the fifth year of monitoring. Planted vegetation must average 10 feet
in height in each plot at the end of the seventh year of monitoring. If this performance standard is met
by year five and stem density is trending towards success (i.e., no less than 260 five year old
stems /acre), monitoring of vegetation on the site may be terminated provided written approval is
provided by the USACE in consultation with the NC Interagency Review Team. The extent of invasive
species coverage will also be monitored and controlled as necessary throughout the required
monitoring period.
It is expected that vegetation in the power line easements will be controlled by the power company.
Therefore, vegetation in these areas is not expected to meet performance criteria. As shown in Table 1,
mitigation credits for these areas will be reduced by 75% due to the expectation of maintenance by the
power company.
2.3 Wetlands
The final performance standard for wetland hydrology will be a free groundwater surface within 12
inches of the ground surface for 8.5 percent of the growing season, which is measured on consecutive
days under typical precipitation conditions. This performance standard was determined through model
simulations of post restoration conditions and comparison to reference wetland systems. If a particular
gauge does not meet the performance standard for a given monitoring year, rainfall patterns will be
analyzed and the hydrograph will be compared to that of the reference wetlands to assess whether
atypical weather conditions occurred during the monitoring period.
2.4 Schedule and Reporting
Monitoring reports will be prepared in the fall of each year of monitoring and submitted to NCEEP.
Based on the NCEEP Monitoring Report Template (version 1.3, 01/15/2010), the monitoring reports will
include the following:
• Project background which includes project objectives, project structure, restoration type and
approach, location and setting, history and background;
• As -built topographic plans of major project elements including such items as grade control
structures, vegetation plots, permanent cross - sections, crest gages, and pressure transducers;
• Photographs showing views of the restored Stream Site taken from fixed point stations;
• Assessment of the stability of the Stream Site based on the cross - sections and longitudinal
profile, where applicable;
• Vegetative data as described above including the identification of any invasion by undesirable
plant species;
• Groundwater gauge attainment;
• A description of damage by animals or vandalism;
• Maintenance issues and recommended remediation measures will be detailed and documented;
and
• Wildlife observations.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report —FINAL Page 6

3.0 Monitoring Plan
Monitoring will consist of collecting morphological, vegetative, and hydrological data to assess the
project success based on the restoration goals and objectives on an annual basis or until success criteria
is met. The success of the project will be assessed using measurements of the stream channel's
dimension, pattern, profile, substrate composition, permanent photographs, vegetation, surface water
hydrology, and groundwater hydrology. Any areas with identified high priority problems, such as
streambank instability, aggradation /degradation, insufficient groundwater hydroperiod, or lack of
vegetation establishment will be evaluated on a case -by -case basis. The problem areas will be visually
noted and remedial actions will be discussed with NCEEP staff to determine a plan of action. A remedial
action plan will be submitted if maintenance is required. In addition to the above annual monitoring,
benthic macroinvertebrate sampling will be conducted during the winter following monitoring years 2,
4, and 7.
3.1 Stream
Geomorphic assessments follow guidelines outlined in the Stream Channel Reference Sites: An
Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et al., 1994), methodologies utilized in the Rosgen
stream assessment and classification document ( Rosgen, 1994 and 1996), and in the Stream
Restoration: A Natural Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al, 2003). Please refer to Figure 2a and b and
Appendix 4 for monitoring locations discussed below.
3.1.1 Dimension
A total of 37 cross - sections were installed along the stream restoration and Enhancement I reaches.
Two cross - sections were installed per 1,000 linear feet of stream restoration work, with riffle and
pool sections in proportion to NCEEP guidance. Each cross - section was permanently marked with
pins to establish its location. Annual cross - section survey will include points measured at all breaks
in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, edge of water, and thalweg. Photographs will be taken
annually of the cross - section looking upstream and downstream.
3.1.2 Pattern and Profile
Longitudinal profile surveys will not be conducted during the seven year monitoring period unless
other indicators during the annual monitoring indicate a trend toward vertical and lateral instability.
Stream pattern and profile will be assessed visually as described below.
3.1.3 Substrate
Pebble count procedures will not be conducted for this project due to the sand bed nature of the
streams.
3.1.4 Photo Reference Points
A total of 94 permanent photograph reference points were established within the project area after
construction. Photographs will be taken once a year to visually document stability for five years
following construction. Permanent markers were established so that the same locations and view
directions on the site are monitored each year. Photographs will be used to monitor stream
restoration and enhancement reaches. The photographer will make every effort to maintain the
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report —FINAL Page 7

same view in each photo over time. The representative digital photo(s) will be taken on the same
day(s) the surveys are conducted.
3.1.5 Bankfull Documentation
Six crest gages and three pressure transducers were installed on the site (Appendix 4). The gages
and transducers were installed onsite in a surveyed riffle cross - section of the restored channels at a
central site location and will be checked during each site visit to determine if a bankfull event has
occurred since the last visit. Photographs will be used to document the occurrence of debris lines
and sediment deposition as evidence of bankfull events. Additionally, the pressure transducer data
will be plotted and included in the annual monitoring reports.
3.1.6 Visual Assessment
Visual assessments will be conducted along all reaches each year to obtain qualitative geomorphic
data. Each visual assessment evaluation after the baseline survey will include re- evaluation along
the same profile.
3.2 Vegetation
Planted woody vegetation will be monitored in accordance with the guidelines and procedures
developed by the Carolina Vegetation Survey -EEP Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al., 2006) to monitor and
assess the planted woody vegetation. A total of 51 vegetation plots were established within the project
easement area. The majority of the plots were established as standard 10 meter by 10 meters with one
plot established as a 5 meter by 20 meter plot.
Vegetation plots were randomly established within the planted corridor of the restoration areas to
capture the heterogeneity of the designed vegetative communities. The vegetation plot corners have
been marked and are recoverable either through field identification or with the use of a GPS unit.
Reference photographs at the origin looking diagonally across the plot to the opposite corner were
taken during the baseline monitoring in February 2014. Subsequent annual assessments following
baseline survey will capture the same reference photograph locations. Species composition, density and
survival rates will be evaluated on an annual basis by plot and for the entire site. Individual plot data
will be provided and will include diameter, height, density, vigor, damage (if any), and percent survival.
Planted woody stems will be marked annually as needed based off of a known origin so they can be
found in succeeding monitoring years. Mortality will be determined from the difference between the
baseline year's living planted stems and the current year's living planted stems.
4.0 Maintenance and Contingency Plans
Any identified high priority problem areas, such as streambank instability, aggradation /degradation, lack
of vegetation establishment, or failure to meet groundwater hydrology success criteria will be evaluated
on a case -by -case basis. The problem areas will be visually noted and remedial actions will be discussed
with NCEEP staff to determine a plan of action. A remedial action plan will be submitted if maintenance
is required.
4.1 Stream
Stream problem areas will be mapped and included in the Current Condition Plan View (CCPV) as part of
the annual stream assessment. Stream problems areas may include bank erosion, structure failure,
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report —FINAL Page 8

beaver dams, aggradation /degradation, etc. Appropriate remedial actions will be determined with
NCEEP correspondence. A proposal of work will be submitted if remediation of an area is required.
4.2 Vegetation
Vegetative problem areas will be mapped and included in the CCPV as part of the annual vegetation
assessment. Vegetation problems areas may include planted vegetation not meeting success criteria,
persistent invasive species, barren areas with little to no herbaceous cover, or grass
suffocation /crowding of planted stems. Appropriate remedial actions will be determined with NCEEP
correspondence. A proposal of work will be submitted if remediation of an area is required.
4.3 Wetlands
Wetland problem areas will be mapped and included in the CCPV as part of the annual wetland
assessment. Wetland problems areas may include planted vegetation not meeting success criteria,
persistent invasive species, barren areas with little to no herbaceous cover, grass suffocation /crowding
of planted stems, or wetland hydrology not meeting success criteria. Appropriate remedial actions will
be determined with NCEEP correspondence. A proposal of work will be submitted if remediation of an
area is required.
5.0 As -Built Condition (Baseline)
The Site construction and as -built surveys were completed between August 2013 and April 2014. The
survey included developing an as -built topographic surface, locating the channel boundaries, structures,
and cross - sections. For comparison purposes, the baseline monitoring divided the reach assessments in
the same way they were established for design parameters: Devil's Racetrack (East and West), North
Branch, Southwest Branch, Middle Branch, and Southeast Branch.
5.1 As- Built /Record Drawings
A half size baseline plan is located in Appendix 4 with the post- construction locations and alignments for
the project. A record drawing has also been provided to NCEEP as a separate document that redlines
any significant field adjustments made during construction that were different from the design plans.
Minimal adjustments were made during construction, where needed, based on field evaluation. Several
constructed riffles were added or substituted for brush shallows along Southeast branch due to damage
from flashy flows during construction. Specific changes are detailed below:
5.1.1 Devils Racetrack (West)
• General Note — some pools have filled in between construction and as -built primarily due to
runoff from adjacent agricultural fields prior to buffer establishment;
• Station 00 +50 native sod mat was substituted for brush toe due to available sod from test plots;
• Station 03 +85 native sod mat was substituted for brush toe due to available sod from test plots;
• Station 06 +60 native sod mat was substituted for brush toe due to available sod from test plots;
• Station 09 +60 native sod mat was substituted for brush toe due to available sod from test plots;
• Station 11 +10 native sod mat was substituted for brush toe due to available sod from test plots;
• Station 12 +10 native sod mat was substituted for rootwads due to available sod from test plots;
w
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report —FINAL Page 9

• Station 18 +75 native sod mat was substituted for brush toe due to available sod from test plots;
• Station 20 +80 native sod mat was substituted for brush toe due to available sod from test plots;
• Station 00 +50 native sod mat was substituted for brush toe due to available sod from test plots;
• Station 25 +10 native sod mat was substituted for brush toe due to available sod from test plots;
• Station 26 +75 native sod mat was substituted for brush toe due to available sod from test plots;
• Station 30 +10 native sod mat was substituted for brush toe due to available sod from test plots;
• Station 30 +75 native sod mat was substituted for brush toe due to available sod from test plots;
• Station 31 +40 native sod mat was substituted for brush toe due to available sod from test plots;
• Station 37 +90 native sod mat was substituted for brush toe due to available sod from test plots;
and
• Station 38 +75 native sod mat was substituted for brush toe due to available sod from test plots.
5.1.2 Devils Racetrack (East)
• Station 55 +00 native stone and brush added to constructed riffle;
• Station 66 +70 a log j -hook was shifted upstream to Station 66 +50 to encourage scour in the
pool;
• Station 69 +90 a log j -hook was shifted upstream to Station 69 +70 to encourage scour in the
pool;
• Station 70 +80 the 12" CMP floodplain culverts were replace with 24" CMP due to maintenance
concerns with smaller pipe sizes;
• Station 73 +70 a log vane was removed and the log was used to construct a log sill at Station
73 +60 to provide additional grade control;
• Station 76 +20 rootwads were substituted for brush toe due to material availability;
• Station 80 +60 rootwads were substituted for brush toe due to material availability;
• Station 88 +25 the 12" CMP floodplain culverts were replace with 24" CMP due to maintenance
concerns with smaller pipe sizes;
• Station 88 +75 brush drop not installed due to low slope conditions;
• Station 91 +00 brush toe was substituted for brush mattress due to the timing of installation;
• Station 93 +70 brush toe was substituted for rootwads due to material availability;
• Station 97 +60 brush toe was substituted for rootwads due to material availability;
• Station 100 +40 brush toe was substituted for rootwads due to material availability; and
• Station 107 +75 boulder toe was substituted for brush toe and log vanes on the left bank due to
scour concerns.
w
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report —FINAL Page 10

5.1.3 North Branch
• Station 400 +00 a constructed riffle was added upstream of Station 400 +00 to ensure adequate
grade control; and
• Station 400 +00 — 403 +80 structures were installed as designed but several were not located in
the as built survey due to sediment deposition which was the intended purpose of these
structures.
5.1.3 Middle Branch
• Station 204 +10 the pond bottom was graded more irregularly than designed to create more
diversity in water depth and habitat availability.
5.1.4 Southeast Branch
• Station 301 +25 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control;
• Station 301 +90 a brush riffle was added for additional habitat;
• Station 304 +55 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control;
• Station 305 +05 a constructed riffle was substituted for a brush drop due to observed stability
problems with brush drops on steep slopes during construction;
• Station 305 +35 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control;
• Station 306 +40 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control;
• Station 306 +60 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control;
• Station 306 +45 a log sill was added and cover log removed for additional grade control;
• Station 306 +80 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control;
• Station 306 +95 a constructed riffle was substituted for a brush drop for additional grade
control;
• Station 307 +25 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control;
• Station 307 +90 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control;
• Station 307 +95 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control;
• Station 308 +10 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control;
• Station 308 +25 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control;
• Station 308 +65 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control;
• Station 309 +00 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control;
• Station 309 +10 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control;
• Station 309 +60 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control;
• Station 310 +50 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control;
• Station 310 +60 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control;
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report —FINAL Page 11

• Station 310 +90 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control;
• Station 310 +20 a constructed riffle was substituted for a brush drop due to observed stability
problems with brush drops on steep slopes during construction;
• Station 311 +70 a constructed riffle was substituted for a brush drop due to observed stability
problems with brush drops on steep slopes during construction;
• Station 312 +30 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control; and
• Sod mats were not installed in several locations due to lack of availability.
5.1.5 Southwest Branch
• Station 502 +60 a constructed riffle was added for additional grade control;
• Station 503 +70 a constructed riffle was substituted for brush shallow for additional grade
control;
• Station 504 +20 a constructed riffle was substituted for brush shallow for additional grade
control;
• Station 503 +55 a constructed riffle was substituted for a brush drop for additional grade control;
and
• Sod mats were not installed in several locations due to lack of availability.
5.2 Baseline Data Assessment
Baseline monitoring (MY -0) was conducted between December 2013 and April 2014. The first annual
monitoring assessment (MY -1) will be completed in the fall of 2014. The streams and wetlands will be
monitored for a total of seven years, with the final monitoring activities conducted in 2020. The close-
out for the Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site will be conducted in 2021 given the success criteria is met.
As part of the closeout process, NCEEP will evaluate the site at the end of the fourth year monitoring
period to determine whether or not the site is eligible to closeout following monitoring year five. If the
Site is meeting success criteria, NCEEP will propose to the interagency review team (IRT) to proceed with
the closeout process. If the Site is not meeting success criteria, then an additional two years of
monitoring will be conducted by Wildlands.
5.2.1 Morphological State of the Channel
Morphological data for the as -built profile was collected in December 2013 and February 2014.
Please refer to Appendix 2 for summary data tables, morphological plots, and stream photographs.
Profile
The baseline (MY -0) profiles closely match the profile design parameters. On the design profiles,
riffles were depicted as straight lines with consistent slopes. However, at some locations the as-
built survey riffle profiles are not consistent in slope due to the sandbed nature of the stream. As
noted in the mitigation plan section 13.1, sand bed channels pools and bed forms (ripples, dunes,
etc.) may migrate over time as a natural function of the channel hydraulics. These sorts of bed
changes do not constitute a problem or indicate a need for remedial actions and will be assessed
visually during the CCPV site walks.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report —FINAL Page 12

Dimension
The baseline (MY -0) dimension numbers closely match the design parameters with minor variations
in all reaches. These variations are primarily due to constructed riffles or brush shallows in the riffle
sections and brush toe in the pool sections. Installation of these structures results in irregularity of
the surface which is reflected in the cross sections. Summary data and cross - section plots of each
project reach can be found in Appendix 2.
Pattern
The baseline (MY -0) pattern metrics fell within the design parameters for all six reaches. No major
design changes were made to alignments during construction. Pattern data will be evaluated in
monitoring year five if there are any indicators through the profile or dimensions that significant
geomorphic adjustments have occurred.
Sediment Transport
Due to the sandbed nature of the streams within the Site, sediment transport analyses were not
performed along the stream reaches for the as -built conditions. Prior to construction, a HEC -RAS
sediment capacity analysis was conducted along representative project reaches to compare existing
and proposed conditions. Please refer to section 10.5 of the mitigation plan for more detail. Results
from this pre- construction analysis indicated that the transport capacity of the proposed streams
was equal to or slightly more than that of the existing channels, although in a few cases it was
slightly less. These results indicated that the proposed channels have the capacity to move at least
as much sediment at the design bankfull discharge as the existing channels.
Although a stream capacity analysis was not conducted using the as -built conditions in HEC -RAS, it is
assumed that the as -built streams have the capacity to move the same amount sediment as the
design bankfull discharge. The as -built stream dimension and profile for the streams are similar to
design parameters and should reduce the risk of further erosion along all restoration reaches. The
as -built condition for each of the project reaches is summarized in Tables 5a — 5f.
5.2.2 Vegetation
The baseline (MY -0) planted density is 702 stems /acre, which exceeds the MY -5 density
requirement. Summary data and photographs of each plot can be found in Appendix 3.
5.2.4 Hydrology
Several bankfull events have been observed following completion of construction. Bankfull events
recorded will be included in the year 1 monitoring report.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report —FINAL Page 13

6.0 References
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, Cheryl C; Rawlins, C.L.; Potyondy, John P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An
Illustrated Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p.
Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. 2006. CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation Version 4.0. Retrieved from http: / /www.nceep.net /business/
monitoring /veg /datasheets.htm.
Multi- Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium (MRLC). 2001. National Land Cover Database.
http: / /www.mrlc.gov /nlcd.php
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2011. Surface Water Classifications.
http: // portal. ncdenr. org /web /wq /ps /csu /classifications
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 2009. Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan.
http: / /portal.ncdenr. org /web /wq /ps /bpu /basin /neuse /2009
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2010. Neuse River Basin Restoration
Priorities.
http: / /www.nceep. net / services /restplans/ FINAL %20RBRP%20Neuse %2020111207 %2000RRECTED.
pdf
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169 -199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDENR-
DWQ, USEPA, NCWRC.
United States Geological Survey (USGS), 1998. North Carolina Geology.
http: / /www. geology. enr .state.nc.us /usgs /coastalp.htm
Wildlands Engineering, Inc (2013). Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan. NCEEP, Raleigh, NC.
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Baseline Report —FINAL
Page 14

APPENDIX 1. General Tables and Figures

11
CII C iIY 7l Y�l % 6 f �, ii711 C it
1
03020201130030 Country Club
Country Chub of
of Johnston Johnston County
County a
Smithfield
BlIwA, Creek
_ 11011,s 11,115 Four,,,
Lake 1.rtke' Oaki
Four Oaks
Four Oaks -�
Elementary jl�
School
Four �.i' 1
^4% Oaks 4040
ur
�I Oaks
`/ 595 f►
0
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the
NCDENR Ecoysystem Enhancement Program (EEP) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is
bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the site may
require traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and
therefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access by
authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or their
designees /contractors involved in the development, oversight,
and stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within the terms
and timeframes of their defined roles. Any intended site visitation or
activity by any person outside of these previously sanctioned roles
and activates requires prior coordination with EEP.
W LDLANDS r
E N G I N E E R I N G �
l'aw'°s�ttttt
03020201150020
Directions:
From 1 -95 exit 90, turn left onto NC -96 N.
NC -96 N turns slightly left and becomes
Devils Racetrack Rd. Follow Devils
Racetrack Road south for 2.1 miles.
03020201
116 1 m �� Hydrologic Unit Code (14)
- EEP Targeted Local Watershed
- Project Location
03020201140010
03020201150050
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
0 0.5 1 Miles Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site
I 1 I EEP Project No. 95021
Monitoring Year 0
Johnston County, NC

0 4b
1
f.
mr
r � C
7 F
r mss`
+ = i
*If ♦
k} — Overhead Transmission Easement
/ ♦ Conservation Easement
Stream Restoration
Stream Restoration - Partial Credit
Stream Restoration - No Credit
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement 11
"2011 Aerial Photograp: ,�� ®Wetland Restoration
1
Figure 2a. Project Component /Asset Map
�i.--, \V 1 L 1) L A N D S � � 0 250 500 Feet Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING
l'ANWE]iCtlt I I I EEP Project No.95021
Monitoring Year 0
Johnston County, NC

-- — Overhead Transmission Easement
Conservation Easement
Stream Restoration
Stream Restoration - Partial Credit
Stream Restoration - No Credit
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement 11
- ® Wetland Restoration
Figure 2b. Project Component /Asset Map
VV 1 I.. D L A N p S , � 0 250 500 Feet Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site
�'dU1�iC ►71 I i I f�l EEP Project No.95021
Monitoring Year 0
Johnston County, NC

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No.95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Mitigation Credits
Nitrogen
Nutrient
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non - Riparian Wetland
Buffer
Offset
Phosphorous Nutrient Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
Totals
18,688
0
62.1
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Project Components
As -Built
Existing
Stationing/
Footage/
Restoration or Restoration
Restoration Footage/
Mitigation
Credits (SMU/
Reach ID
Location
Acreage
Approach
Equivalent
Acreage
Ratio'
WMU)2
Streams
Devil's Racetrack Creek
Restoration
0 +00 -0 +20
20 LF
Pi
20
N/A
N/A
(West) (DOT ROW)
(No Credit)
Devil's Racetrack Creek
0 +20 -16 +26 &
4,755 LF
PI
Restoration
5,061
1:1
5061.00
(West)
17 +50 -52 +OS
Devil's Racetrack Creek
Restoration
(West) (Power Line
16 +26 -17 +50
196 LF
Pi
124
4;11
31.00
(Partial Credit)
Easement)
Devil's Racetrack Creek
Restoration
52 +05 -52 +11
5 LF
Pi
6
N/A
N/A
(West) (DOT ROW)
(No Credit)
Devil's Racetrack (East) (DOT
Restoration
52 +59 -52 +65
5 LF
Pi
6
N/A
N/A
ROW)
(No Credit)
52 +65 -70 +68 &
Devil's Racetrack (East)
71 +08 -87 +97 &
4,778 LF
P1 /2
Restoration
5,461
1:1
5461.00
88 +37- 106 +85
Devil's Racetrack (East)
Restoration
70 +68 -71 +08
30 LF
P1 /2
40
N/A
N/A
(Easement Break)
(No Credit)
Devil's Racetrack (East)
Restoration
87 +97 to 88 +37
31 LF
P1/2
40
N/A
N/A
(Easement Break)
(No Credit)
Restoration
Devil's Racetrack (East)
106 +85 - 107 +97
0 LF
P1/2
0
N/A
N/A
(No Credit)
Southwest Branch
500 +00 - 501 +31
154 LF
Ell
Enhancement
154
2.5:1
61.60
Southwest Branch
501 +31 - 502 +07
75 LF
El
Enhancement
76
1.5:1
50.67
Southwest Branch
502 +07 - 511 +32
740 LF
P1/2
Restoration
811
1:1
811.00
Southwest Branch (Power
Restoration
504 +85 - 505 +99
111 LF
P1/2
114
4:1
28.50
Line Easement)
(Partial Credit)
Middle Branch
200 +00 - 204 +00
410 LF
Headwater Wetland
400
1:1
400.00
Middle Branch
204 +00 - 219 +06
1,326 LF
P1 /2
Restoration
1,506
1:1
1506.00
Southeast Branch
300 +00 - 328 +92
2,946 LF
P1
Restoration
2,848
1:1
2848.00
Southeast Branch (Easement
Restoration
304 +97 - 305 +40
30 LF
Pi
43
4:1
10.75
Break)
(Partial Credit)
North Branch
400 +00 - 424 +18
- --
Pi
Restoration
2,418
1:1
2418.00
Wetlands
Riparian Wetlands (West)
N/A
0.0 ac
N/A
Restoration
57.9
1:1
57.90
Riparian Wetlands (West)
Restoration
N/A
0.0 ac
N/A
1.6
4:1
0.40
(Power Line Easement)
(Partial Credit)
Riparian Wetlands (East)
N/A
0.0 ac
N/A
I Restoration
3.8
1:1
3.80
Component Summation
Buffer
Riparian Wetland
Non - Riparian Wetland
(square
Upland
Restoration Level
Stream (LF)
(acres)
(acres)
feet)
(acres)
Riverine
Non - Riverine
Restoration
18,786
63.3
Enhancement
-
Enhancement 1
76
Enhancement II
154
Creation
Preservation
High Quality Preservation
N /A: not applicable
1. Ratio of 4:1 based on an expected 75% reduction in credits for stream restoration with shrub buffer zone in power line easements.
2. Wetland restoration acreage and credits are higher than what was reported in the Final Mitigation Plan approved by the IRT in January 2013 due to an Autocad error that resulted in an
under reporting of wetland acreage.

kip
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
February 5, 2015
Mr. Jeff Schaffer
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
RE: Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site
Contract Number 003989; RFP Number 16 -003624
EEP Project Number: 95021
Neuse River Basin Cataloging Unit 03020201; Johnston County, NC
Dear Mr. Schaffer:
Year #1 monitoring activities are complete and the Monitoring Report has been accepted by EEP at the
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site in Johnston County. During monitoring year #1, Wildlands discovered
errors in the calculations of SMUs in the as -built report. The errors were mainly along North Branch,
where work was completed several hundred feet upstream of the easement. This portion of North Branch
was calculated in the as -built report by mistake. Per EEP, updated Table 1 (Project Components and
Mitigation Credits) and Figure 2a and 2b (Project Component/ Asset Map) were updated for the as -built
report.
Please contact me at 919- 851 -9986 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
John Hutton
jhutton @wildlandseng.com
Cc: Table 1 (Project Components and Mitigation Credits) and
Figure 2a and 2b (Project Component/ Asset Map)
wildlands Engineering, Inc. • phone [phone] • fax [phone] • 1430 S. Mint Street, 4 104 • Charlotte, NC 28203

Table 1. Project Components and Mitlgation Credit*
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No.95021)
Monitoring Yeor 0
Devil's Racetrack Creek
ar,
N/A
0.0 ac
Restoration
Restoration
57.9
Nitrogen
{West] (DOT ROW)
0+00.0+20
20 LF
P1
(No Credit)
20
Nutrient
N/A
Devil's Racetrack Creek
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non - Riparian Wetland
Buffer
Offset
Phosphorous Nutrient Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
1:1
5,122
Devil's Racetrack Creek
Totals
18,381
0
62.1
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Y
NIA
Devil's Racetrack Creek
Riparian Wetlands (West)
N/A
0.0 ac
Restoration
Restoration
57.9
1:1
{West] (DOT ROW)
0+00.0+20
20 LF
P1
(No Credit)
20
N/A
N/A
Devil's Racetrack Creek
0+20 -16 +47 &
N/A
0.0 ac
N/A
Restoration
3.8
1:1
(West)
17 +74 -52 +69
4,755 LF
P1
Restoration
5,122
1:1
5,122
Devil's Racetrack Creek
Riverine
I Non- Riverine
(West) (Power line
16+47 -17 +74
196 LF
P1
Restoration
127
4:11
32
Easement
(Partial Credit)
Devil's Racetrack Creek
Restoration
{West] (DOT ROW)
52 +69 -52 +73
5 LF
p1
(No Credit)
q
N A
/
N A
/
Devil's Racetrack (East) (DOT
Restoration
ROW)
52 +59 -52 +66
5 LF
P3
(No Credit)
7
N/A
N/A
52 +66 -70 +72 &
Devil's Racetrack (East)
71 +12 -88 +12 &
4,778 LF
P1/2
I Restoration
5,364
1:1
5,364
88+53 - 107 +11
Devil's Racetrack (East)
Restoration
{Easement Break}
70 +72 -71 +12
30 LF
PI/2
(No Credit)
40
N/A
N/A
Devil's Racetrack (East)
Restoration
(Easement Break)
gg +12 to sa+53
31 LF
p2
(No Credit)
41
N/A
N/A
Devil's Racetrack (East)
107 +11 - 108+21
0 LF
PI/2
Restoration
110
N/A
N/A
{N0 Credit)
Southwest Branch
500+00 - 501 +31
154 LF
Ell
Enhancement
154
2.5:1
62
60Or40- 600+23
Southwest Branch
501 +31 - 502 +07
75 LF
El
Enhancement
76
1.5:1
51
Southwest Branch
502 +07 - 504+89
740 LF
P1/2
Restoration
829
1:1
829
506 +05 - 511 +52
Southwest Branch (Power
Restoration
Line Easement )
504+89- 506+05
111 LF
P112
(Partial Credit
116
4:1
29
Middle Branch
200 +00 - 204+00
410 LF
Headwater Wetland
410
1:1
410
Middle Branch
204 +00 - 219 +05
1,326 LF
P1/2
Restoration
1,505
1:1
1,505
Southeast Branch
300+00. 305+03
2,946 LF
P1
Restoration
2,916
1:1
2,916
305+48- 329 +61
Southeast Branch (Easement
Restoration
Break
305 +03 - 305+48
30 LF
P1
Partial Credit
45
4:1
11
North Branch
403 +89. 424 +39
—
P1
Restoration
2,050
1:1
2,050
wetlands
Riparian Wetlands (West)
N/A
0.0 ac
N/A
Restoration
57.9
1:1
57.9
Riparian Wetlands {West)
(Power Une Easement)
N/A
0.0 ac
N/A
Restoration
partial Credit
I
1.6
4:1
0.4
Riparian Wetlands (East)
N/A
0.0 ac
N/A
Restoration
3.8
1:1
3.8
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream (LF)
Riparian Wetland
{acres)
Non - Riparian Wetland
(acres)
Buffer
I square Upland
feet) (acres)
Riverine
I Non- Riverine
Enhancement II 1 154
Preservation
High Quality Preservation
N /A: not applicable
1. Ratio of4:1 based an an expected 75% reduction in creditsforstmam restoration with shrub buffer zone in power line easements.
2. Wetland restoration acreage and credits are higher than what was reported In the Final Mitigation Plan approved by the IR7In January 20I3 due to an Autocad error that resulted In
an under reporting of wetland acreage.
*Table 1 updated during MY1 due to stream credltcalculation errors discovered in MYO moon.

* N r-I O U
Q :�! N z
m Vi O m
p :� }
pA
N ++ O O 7
v
c c
W D �f cz
O u d z
CL
CL 41 L
E V W D
O m
u ix
U 0
a '�
o m
N
N
w
3
by
E
4+
6F
N
CL
O
V7
O
CJ
Vt
N
WE
(r
A'
tc
zw
a
�lu
lu
a
3
I�

* m-iO u
C :e O e
0 rn - jz
N N Z C Q
H to L
c
0
o +r
c u a` g°
M � w JI-
M (u w
u° `0
ac
oQj
a �
N
2
3
OD
LL
+r
N
11
O
O
Ln
O
Ln
N
+..
} �a
A
VI V
z
a4
A`
W
a
!c

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No.95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Activity or Report
Date Collection
Completion or Scheduled
Mitigation Plan
September 2011-
March 2012
January 2013
Final Design - Construction Plans
September 2011-
March 2012
August 2013
Construction
December 2013-
January 2014
February 2014
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area 1
January 2014
January 2014
Permanent seed mix applied to reach /segments
January 2014
January 2014
Bare root and live stake plantings for reach /segments
January 2014
January 2014
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0)
December 2013-
February 2014
May 2014
Year 1 Monitoring
2014
December 2014
Year 2 Monitoring
2015
December 2015
Year 3 Monitoring
2016
December 2016
Year 4 Monitoring
2017
December 2017
Year 5 Monitoring
2018
December 2018
Year 6 Monitoring
2019
December 2019
Year 7 Monitoring
2020
December 2020
Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed.
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No.95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Designer
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Jeff Keaton, PE
919.851.9986
Construction Contractor (East Side)
Land Mechanic Designs, Inc.
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Construction Contractor (West Side)
Fluvial Solutions
P.O. Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Planting Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
P.O. Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
Seeding Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
P.O. Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource, LLC
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Dykes and Son Nursery and NC Forest Service
Bare Roots
(Claridge Nursery)
Live Stakes
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
Monitoring Performers
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Monitoring, POC
Kirsten Gimbert
704.332.7754, ext. 110

Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No.95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Project Information
Project Name
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site
County
Johnston County
Project Area (acres)
96
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35° 27'01.58" N, 78° 23' 18.08" W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Upper Coastal Plain
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
03020201140010
DWR Sub -basin
03 -04 -02
Project Drainiage Area (acres)
831.4 ac
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<1%
CGIA Land Use Classification
62 %forest /wetland, 34% farm land, 4% developed
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Southwest
Branch
Middle
Branch
Southeast
Branch
North
Branch
Devil's
Racetrack Creek
(west)
Devil's
Racetrack Creek
(east)
Length of reach (linear feet) - Post- Restoration
927
1,906
2,892
2,418
5,061
5,461
Drainage area (acres)
20.6
10.8
69.9
49.9
493.5
831.4
NCDWR stream identification score
34.5-37
30
29-30.75
1 32
38
37.5
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
C /NSW
Morphological Desription (stream type)
P
P
P/I
P
P
P
Evolutionary trend (Simon's Model) - Pre- Restoration
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
Underlying mapped soils
Altavista fine sandy loam, Bibb sandy loam, Cecil loam, Goldsboro sandy loam, Leaf silt
loam, Lynchburg sandy loam, Nason silt loam, Norfolk loamy sand, and Rains sandy loam.
Drainage class
- --
- --
- --
Soil Hydric status
- --
- --
- --
Slope
--
- --
- --
FEMA classification
None
Native vegetation community
Coastal Plain bottomland riparian forest
Percent composition exotic invasive vegetation -Post-
Restoration
0%
Regulatory Considerations Aw
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
X
X
USACE Nationwide Permit No.27 and DWQ 401
Water Quality Certification No. 3885.
Waters of the United States - Section 401
X
X
Division of Land Quality (Dam Safety)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Endangered Species Act
X
X
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Plan; Wildlands
determined "no effect" on Johnston County listed
endangered species.
Historic Preservation Act
X
X
No historic resources were found to be impacted
(letter from SHPO dated 7/20/2011).
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) /Coastal Area
Management Act (LAMA)
N/A
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
N/A
N/A
The project streams do not have an associated
regulatory flooplaing; however the downstream end
of Devil's Racetrack Creek is located within the
floodwasy and flood fringe of the Neuse River (FEAM
Zone AE, FIRM panel 1680).
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N/A
N/A
N/A

APPENDIX 2. Morphological Summary and Data Plots

Table 5a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Devils Racetrack- West
( - - -): Data was not provided
N /A: Not Applicable
Pre - Restoration Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
As -Built /Baseline
Parameter
Gage
Devil's
Racetrack
- West
Scout West
1
Scout East 2
Scout West 2
Johanna Creek
Jarman Oak
Devil's Racetrack - West (Reach
1)
Devil's Racetrack - West (Reach
2)
Devil's Racetrack - West (Reach
1)
Devil's Racetrack - West (Reach
2)
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
I Max
Min
Max
Min
I
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.8
8.0
2.6
6.3
4.7
6.1
5.6 7.6
9.7
9.3
9.0
11.5
4.7
9.6
7.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
7.8
18.0
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
100
1 300
100
F 300
>200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.8
1.2
0.3
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.6
0.8
0.4
0.9
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth
1.3
1.6
0.5
0.7
1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
0.9
1 1.1
1.1
F 1.5
1.1
1.4
0.7
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft)
N/A
5.7
6.3
1.3
2.0
6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4
7.2
7.8
11.6
5.8
9.5
2.1
8.5
4.0
Width /Depth Ratio
4.0
10.5
5.4
19.4
3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0
10.1
19.7
7.4
14.0
14.5
14.0
10.6
14.8
14.5
Entrenchment Ratiol
1.6
2.2
>2.2
>2.2
22.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
1
26.9
11.1
33.3
8.7
26.1
>20.9
>42.5
226.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.9
4.5
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.1 1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
0.464
N/A
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
3.7
86.8
7.4
54.2
Shallow Slope (ft /ft)
---
0.026
T
0.047
N/A
0.033 0.051
N/A
0.0129
0.0036
1 0.0277
0.0023
0.0072
0.0013
0.0593
0.0008
0.0195
Pool Length (ft)
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
5.5
63.1
18.7
72.9
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
1.2
0.6
N/A
1.7 1.9
1.5
3.1
0.9
2.1
1.1
2.5
1.1
2.9
1.4
1.9
Pool Spacing (ft)^
Pool Volume ft3
27
67
N/A
21 27
16
Pattern
59
32
55
14
63
18
81
9
132
38
104
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
- --
8.7
1
14.3
1 7.2
1
16.2
1 9.1
1 9.8
1 14.0
1
20.0
21.0
36.0
12.0
72.0
15.0
92.0
13.0
53.0
16.0
73.0
Radius of Curvature (ft)
- --
3.1
9.0
5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8
15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
14.0
43.0
17.0
55.0
12.0
40.0
17.0
35.0
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
N/A
- --
0.6
1.6
1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0
1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.5
4.8
1.5
4.8
2.6
4.2
2.2
4.5
Meander Length (ft)
39.8
84.8
36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
27
153
35
196
52
133
70
137
Meander Width Ratio
- --
1.6
2.6
1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5
1 1.4 1
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
8.0
1.3
8.0
2.8
5.5
2.1
9.5
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri % /Ru % /P % /G % /S%
SC% /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
N/A
0.168/0.33/0.464 /1.23/2.0/9.6
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
EF
N/A
N/A
Reach Shear Stress Com etenc lb/ft'
0.18
0.23
-
--
-
--
N/A
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at Bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W /mZ
NEW—
I
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area ISM)
0.77
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.60
0.70
0.60
0.70
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate %
<1%
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
Gc5
E /C5b
E5
E5
E5 /C5
E6
E /CS
E /C5
E /C5
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
1.5
1.8
1.3
2.0
2.5
2.9
1.2 1.2
1.8
1.9
0.95
1.7
1.2
1.2
4.8
3.3
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
9.2
10.6
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
10.0
13.0
10.0
13.0
Q -NFF regression
- --
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
- --
Q-Mannings
---
Valley Length (ft)
- --
- --
--
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
4,976
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
4,245
966
4,239
962
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.2
1 1.6
1.2
1 1.6
1.2
1.4
Water Surface Slope ft /ftZ
- --
- --
- --
- --
0.0054
0.0015
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.0041
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0025
0.0087
0.0016
0.0022
0.0053
0.0054
0.0017
0.0023
( - - -): Data was not provided
N /A: Not Applicable

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Devil's Racetrack Creek (West Reach 1) - Sta 00 +00 to Sta 42 +45
145
144
143
142
139
141
138
140
AAA •
13
♦
Ay • •
" I
y 9
138
- -- - --
-- -- —
------
— —
- - - --
---
f f 1' ,6�
•
c 137
—
_ --- ---
— --
•
J
135
•
O
'p 136
__
— —
• •♦f♦
134
_
AF
--
Alum A 4L
> 135
iii i •
�!•~
ji ••
_
__ _
Y
i LA
AAA
AA
AAM
—
"' 134
—
— - --
- --
—0—
--
-- --
133
___
—
AAA
cu
132
__
132
131
""
m131
i1
N
_
—
-----
••
I♦
♦♦♦
x
x
130
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) • STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
140
139
138
137
136
135
•
134
_
AF
--
Alum A 4L
L • !
iii i •
�!•~
ji ••
Y
—
- - -- - --
133
___
—
AAA
cu
__
132
""
m131
_
—
-----
••
I♦
♦♦♦
- --
—
AL
••••
v 130
---
--
••
♦♦
----
—
—
w 129
- ---
--- --
128
127
m
N
126
x
x
125
1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000
Station (feet)
4 TW (MYO- 3/2014) - WS (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) 0 STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Devil's Racetrack Creek (West Reach 1) - Sta 00 +00 to Sta 42 +45
135
129
128
134
133
125
AAA
132
AAA A i A A
A
♦♦♦♦♦
"
123
—
,: A A
♦ ♦♦
♦
131
- -- -- --
ZAAA
-- -- ---
--
♦ !
♦♦
o--
121
---
130
__ _—
____ ---
—m MMLAAAAW
—'
A644
46&1&
v
w
119
,
♦♦
_ —
—
129
fit
_
Y
- - -----------
. !r
128
_
x
v
127
____
_—
♦
♦
♦! ♦
J1 ♦
♦ ♦♦♦
0
m 126
115
3000 3050 3100 3150 3200 3250 3300 3350 3400 3450 3500 3550 3600 3650 3700 3750 3800 3850 3900 3950 4000
Station (feet)
TW (MYO- 3/2014) WS (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) • STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
_
__ _ ___
__ _______
__ __
- - ---
-- - ---
♦
------
Z
>
125
--
��— ♦_
"U 124
_
123
122
121
Ln
x
x
120
2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 2250 2300 2350 2400 2450 2500 2550 2600 2650 2700 2750 2800 2850 2900 2950 3000
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) • STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
130
129
128
127
126
125
AAA
124
AAA A i A A
A
♦♦♦♦♦
"
123
—
,: A A
♦ ♦♦
♦
w
122
- -- -- --
ZAAA
-- -- ---
--
♦ !
♦♦
o--
121
---
120
__ _—
____ ---
—m MMLAAAAW
—'
A644
46&1&
v
w
119
_ —
—
118
fit
_
117
116
x
115
3000 3050 3100 3150 3200 3250 3300 3350 3400 3450 3500 3550 3600 3650 3700 3750 3800 3850 3900 3950 4000
Station (feet)
TW (MYO- 3/2014) WS (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) • STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Devil's Racetrack Creek (West Reach 1) - Sta 00 +00 to Sta 42 +45
Devil's Racetrack Creek (West Reach 2) - Sta Sta 42 +45 to 52 +11
125
120
119
I
118
124
117
116
123
I
115
a --
--
%
!♦
114
DRC Reach 1 END
122
v
Reach 2 BEGIN
121
113
w
120
1
112
0
,Z1
111
m
119
•
1
v 110
W
v
118
AAtAA r
- - ---
• •Ay
A
1
109
v
__
- - --
108
0 117
107
106
.2
--
-- - --
- - - --
------
-------
.
••• ••.
A• At
!•
t
!
A
r
••
! •
lkw
•
v 116
5000 5050 5100 5150 5200 5250 5300 5350 5400 5450 5500 5550 5600 5650 5700 5750 5800 5850 5900 5950 6000
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) • LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) • RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) • STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
- - --
-- - --- --
---
---
-
--- --
- -- - - --
- - -
l
LL
- - - - --
--- -- --
- ---- --
--- - - --
- - - -- -&
-
115
1
114
113
112
1
x
`^
X
111
1
110
4000 4050 4100 4150 4200 4250 4300 4350 4400 4450 4500 4550 4600 4650 4700 4750 4800 4850 4900 4950 5000
Station (feet)
TW (MYO- 3/2014) WS (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) • RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) O STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
120
119
118
117
116
115
a --
--
%
!♦
114
_
v
113
w
112
0
,Z1
111
m
v 110
W
109
108
107
106
105
5000 5050 5100 5150 5200 5250 5300 5350 5400 5450 5500 5550 5600 5650 5700 5750 5800 5850 5900 5950 6000
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) • LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) • RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) • STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)

Table 6a. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Devil's Racetrack (West)
Cross - Section 1 (Riffle)
Cross- Section 2 (Pool)
Cross- Section 3 (Riffle)
Cross- Section 4 (Pool)
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
based on fixed bankfull elevation
135.4
135.1
131.0
130.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.6
10.7
9.5
11.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
>200
N/A
>200
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
0.7
0.9
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.1
1.7
1.4
1.7
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
6.2
1
7.8
1
8.5
1
1
1 10.7
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
14.8
14.6
1
1
10.6
1
1
11.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>20.9
N/A
>21.1
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross - Section 5 (Pool)
Cross- Section 6 (Riffle)
Cross- Section 7 (Pool)
Cross- Section 8 (Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
based on fixed bankfull elevation
125.3
124.7
120.8
119.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.9
8.7
9.5
4.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
>200
N/A
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.5
1.1
1.6
1.3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (fe)
7.5
1
1
1
1 6.0
1
1
7.6
1
1 2.1
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
10.7
12.6
11.7
1
1
10.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
>23.0
N/A
>42.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross
- Section
9 (Riffle)
Cross
- Section
10 (Pool)
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
based on fixed bankfull elevation
116.4
116.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.7
6.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>200
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.9
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (fe)
4.0
1
1
1
1
1 4.4
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
14.5
1
10.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>26.1
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 1 -DRC West
9+38 riffle
140
i
i
138
136
c
0
v
w
134
132
�
i
-
130
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014) — Bankfull — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
6.2 x- section area ( ft.sq.)*
9.6 width (ft)
0.6 mean depth (ft)
1.1 max depth (ft)
9.9 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.6 hyd radi (ft)
14.8 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
0.0 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
x`
Survey Date: 2/2014
1
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream
i
i
136
c
0
v
w
134
132
�
i
-
130
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014) — Bankfull — Floodprone Area

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 2 -DRC West
9+70 pool
140
138
136
c
0
, 134 -
a'
"IV Ile
w
132 -
�
130
i
0 10
20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
4 MYO (2/2014) — Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
7.8 x- section area (ft.sq.)
10.7 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.7 max depth (ft)
11.3 wetted parimeter(ft)r�;—
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
14.6 width -depth ratio
j�. t, '• I
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 3 -DRC West
18+48 riffle
136
134
132
130
c
0
128
v
w
126
124
122
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014) - Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
8.5 x- section area (ft.sq.)
9.5 width (ft)
0.9 mean depth (ft)
1.4 max depth (ft)
10.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8 hyd radi (ft)
10.6 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft) a "
21.1 enchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 4 -DRC West
18+80 pool
139
137
135
133
c
0
131
>
w
129
127
125
0 10 20
30 40 50 60 70
80 90 100
Width (ft)
—MYO (2/2014) — Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
10.7 x- section area (ft.sq.)
11.1 width (ft)
1.0 mean depth (ft)
1.7 max depth (ft)
11.8 wetted parimeter (ft)
-
0.9 hyd radi (ft)-'"
- -
-- f
11.4 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 5 -DRC West
28+73 pool
134
132
130
128
c
0
M 126
>
w
124
122
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
—MYO (2/2014) — Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
7.5 x- section area (ft.sq.)
8.9 width (ft)
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.5 max depth (ft)
9.4 wetted parimeter (ft) _ -
0.8 hyd radi (ft)
10.7 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 6 -DRC West
29+11 riffle
134
132
130
128
c
0
126
>
w
124
122
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014) - Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
6.0 x- section area (ft.sq.)
8.7 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.1 max depth (ft)
9.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
12.6 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
23.0 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 7 -DRC West
37 +4 pool
129
127
125
123
c
0
121
v
w 119
117
115
0 10 20
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
—MYO (2/2014) — Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
7.6 x- section area (ft.sq.)
9.5 width (ft)
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.6 max depth (ft)
10.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8 hyd radi (ft)
11.7 width -depth ratio
a e
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 8 -DRC West
37+46 riffle
126
124
122
120
c
0
118
v
w
116
114
112
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014) - Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
2.1 x- section area (ft.sq.)
4.7 width (ft)
0.4 mean depth (ft)
1.3 max depth (ft)
5.7 wetted parimeter (ft) -
0.4 hyd radi (ft) _ +'
i 4
10.6 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
42.5 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying s
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 9 -DRC West
45+77 riffle
125
123
121
119
117
115
0
113
v
w 111
109
107
105
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014)
— Bankfull — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
4.0 x- section area (ft.sq.)
7.7 width (ft)
0.5 mean depth (ft)
0.7 max depth (ft)
7.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.5 hyd radi (ft)
14.5 width -depth ratio
-
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
..s
26.1 entrenchment ratio'
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 10 -DRC West
46+14 pool
125
123
121
119
117
115
0
113
v
w 111
109
107
105
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
Width (ft)
—MYO (2/2014) — Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
4.4 x- section area (ft.sq.)
6.8 width (ft)
0.6 mean depth (ft)
0.9 max depth (ft)
7.0 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.6 hyd radi (ft)
10.6 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Stream Photographs — Devils Racetrack (West)

Photo Point 1— looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 1— looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 2 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 2 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 3 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 3 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) I
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Photo Point 4 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 4 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 5 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 5 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 6 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 6 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Photo Point 7 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 7 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 8 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 8 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 9 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 9 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Photo Point 10 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 10 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
IF
77 Ir
Photo Point 11— looking upstream (04/01/2014) Photo Point 11— looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Photo Point 12 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 12 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) I
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs
Photo Point 13 — looking upstream (04/01/2014)
Photo Point 13 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
a
Photo Point 14 — looking upstream (04/01/2014)
Photo Point 14 —
looking downstream (04/01/2014)
f
s-
Photo Point 15 — looking upstream (04/01/2014)
Photo Point 15 —
looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Photo Point 19 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 19 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 20 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) Photo Point 20 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Photo Point 21— looking upstream (04/01/2014) Photo Point 21— looking downstream (04/01/2014) I
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Table 5b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Devils Racetrack- East
( - - -): Data was not provided
N /A: Not Applicable
Pre - Restoration Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
As -Built /Baseline
Parameter
Gage
Devil's
Racetrack - East
Scout West 1
Scout East 2
Scout West 2
Johanna Creek
= =.rm;.nk
Devil's Racetrack - East
(Reach 1)
Devil's Racetrack - East
(Reach 2)
Devil's Racetrack - East
(Reach 3)
Devil's Racetrack - East
(Reach 1)
Devil's Racetrack - East
(Reach 2)
Devil's Racetrack - East
(Reach 3)
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
I
Max
Min
I
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
I Max
Min
I Max
Min F Max
Min
I Max
Min
Max
Min
I Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.1
10.4
2.6
6.3
4.7
6.1
5.6
7.6
9.7
9.3
13.0
8.0
8.0
12.2
13.7
8.2
-
--
Floodprone Width (ft)
14.2
18.6
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
100
T 500
100
1 500
100 500
>300
>300
-
--
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.0
1.8
0.3
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
1.0
0.6
- --
0.8
1.1
0.7
-
--
Bankfull Max Depth
2.1
2.8
0.5
0.7
1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
1.4
1.8
0.8
1 1.0
0.9
1.3
1.7
1.1
-
--
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area ftZ
N/A
14.2
19.1
1.3
2.0
6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4
7.2
7.8
11.6
12.8
4.8
- --
10.3
13.9
5.7
-
--
Width /Depth Ratio
5.0
7.8
5.4
19.4
3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0
10.1
19.7
7.4
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
- --
12.1
14.6
11.9
-
--
Entrenchment Ratio
1.6
1.8
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
26.9
7.7
38.5
12.5
62.6
--
>21.9
>24.5
>36.5
-
--
Bank Height Ratio
2.6
4.3
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
- --
1.0
1.0
-
--
D50 (mm)
0.179
N/A
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
13.0
80.1
20.8
42.4
11.3
25.9
Shallow Slope (ft /ft)
- --
0.026
0.047
N/A
0.033
1
0.051
N/A
0.0129
0.0007
0.0025
0.0377
1 0.0671
--
0.0004
0.0099
0.0192
0.0318
0.0072
0.0675
Pool Length (ft)
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
16.0
77.3
16.5
66.1
13.0
34.2
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
- --
0.6
N/A
1.7
1.9
1.5
3.1
1.4
3.2
0.8
2.0
1.2
1.9
3.4
1.7
2.7
1.4
2.5
Pool Spacing (ft)^
- --
27
67
N/A
21
27
16
59
32
55
21
91
39
64
--
26
131
43
73
25
70
Pool Volume ft3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
- --
8.7
14.3
7.2
16.2
9.1
9.8
14.0
20.0
21.0
36.0
17.0
65.0
10.0
40.0
- --
15.0
55.0
21
41
12
32
Radius of Curvature (ft)
- --
3.1
9.0
5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8
15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
20.0
62.0
12.0
36.0
- --
18.0
65.0
12
26
10
35
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
N/A
- --
0.6
1.6
1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0
1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.5
4.8
1.5
4.5
- --
1.5
4.7
1.5
3.2
-
--
Meander Length (ft)
- --
39.8
84.8
36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
39
221
64
136
- --
62
203
101
140
52
112
Meander Width Ratio
- --
1.6
2.6
1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5
1.4
1 2.1
2.3 1
2.9
1.3
5.0
1.3
5.0
- --
1.2
4.0
2.6
5.0
-
--
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri % /Ru % /P % /G % /S%
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
-/- /0.179/0.642/1.0 /9.6
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
N/A
N/A
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib /ft2
N/A
0.01
N/A
N/A
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacityl W /mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
1.30
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
1.14
1.30
- --
1.14
1.30
-
--
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate ( %)
<1%
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
Gc5
E /C5b
E5
E5
E5 /C5
E6
E /CS
E /C5
E /C5
C
C
--
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
0.3
1
0.4
1.3
1
2.0
2.5
2.9
1.2
F
1.2
1.8
1 1.9
0.95
1.2
3.5
- --
1.2
1.6
3.0
-
--
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
8.5
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
16.0
17.0
- --
16.0
17.0
-
--
Q-NFF regression
--
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
--
Q-Mannings
---
Valley Length (ft)
- --
- --
--
--
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
4,844
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
4,840
313
385
4,833
310
372
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.1
1.3
1.1
F 1.2
- --
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope ft /ftZ
---
---
- --
- --
- --
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.0003
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0004
0.0008
0.0224
0.0251
0.0007
0.0008
0.0153
1 0.0166
0.0219
0.0231
( - - -): Data was not provided
N /A: Not Applicable

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Devil's Racetrack Creek (East Reach 1) - Sta 52 +65 to Sta 100 +99
120
119
118
117
116
115
114
v 113
w
112
° 111
.Y
m
v 110
109
108
107
106
Inc
5000 5050 5100 5150 5200 5250 5300 5350 5400 5450 5500
Station (feet)
4 TW (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014)
5550 5600 5650 5700 5750 5800 5850 5900 5950 6000
RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) O STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
120
119
118
117
A 4
4L A
_ ♦
r 1► A A
AAtI. !
, ♦ !
♦
♦
♦ A •
•
AL
115
•
♦ ♦
4k
114
113
w
112
�
-°
111
m
110
_v
"' 109
M
x
X
X
X
108
107
106
5000 5050 5100 5150 5200 5250 5300 5350 5400 5450 5500
Station (feet)
4 TW (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014)
5550 5600 5650 5700 5750 5800 5850 5900 5950 6000
RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) O STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
120
119
118
117
116
•
•
115
•
♦ ♦
4k
114
113
w
112
�
-°
111
m
110
_v
"' 109
M
x
X
108
107
106
105
6000 6050 6100 6150 6200 6250 6300 6350 6400 6450 6500 6550 6600 6650 6700 6750 6800 6850 6900 6950 7000
Station (feet)
4 TW (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) • STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Devil's Racetrack Creek (East Reach 1) - Sta 52 +65 to Sta 100 +99
120
119
118
117
116
115
114
w 113
112
° 111
.Y
m
v 110
"' 109
108
107
106
Inc
7000 7050 7100 7150 7200 7250 7300 7350 7400 7450 7500
Station (feet)
4 TW (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014)
7550 7600 7650 7700 7750 7800 7850 7900 7950 8000
• RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) O STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
120
119
118
117
116
•
A
•
Ai
••
♦ I
!
••Y
•
!
•!
•
A& AA
••
•
114
4K
AA •
♦
♦
♦
t A&
• •
IAL •
,
• #A #A
!
• •
•
113
w
112
•
•
AL a
4L
--
111
110
Zo
_v
"' 109
X
X
108
X
107
106
7000 7050 7100 7150 7200 7250 7300 7350 7400 7450 7500
Station (feet)
4 TW (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014)
7550 7600 7650 7700 7750 7800 7850 7900 7950 8000
• RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) O STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
120
119
118
117
116
115
114
4K
AA •
♦
♦
♦
t A&
• •
IAL •
,
• #A #A
!
• •
•
113
w
112
•
•
AL a
4L
--
111
110
_v
"' 109
108
X
107
106
105
8000 8050 8100 8150 8200 8250 8300 8350 8400 8450 8500 8550 8600 8650 8700 8750 8800 8850 8900 8950 9000
Station (feet)
4 TW (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) • STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Devil's Racetrack Creek (East Reach 1) - Sta 52 +65 to Sta 100 +99
Devil's Racetrack Creek (East Reach 2) - Sta Sta 100 +99 to 104 +12
Devil's Racetrack Creek (East Reach 3) - Sta Sta 104 +12 to 107 +97
114
118
112
117
116
111
110
115
109
114
108
113
112
, k- ♦
*A IL
♦
♦ A
♦♦♦♦
♦ ♦♦♦
♦♦ ♦
♦ ♦ ♦♦
A ♦
♦AA ♦
♦ ♦
♦
♦ ♦♦
♦♦ ♦
♦ AAA
!♦
v 106
v
♦
105
111
c
0
110
0 104
N
0
109
x
y
103
x
v
w
108
00
v
x
m
vii
x
v 102
101
107
100
'
106
99
105
98
104
97
103
9000 9050 9100 9150 9200
9250 9300 9350 9400 9450 9500 9550 9600 9650 9700 9750 9800 9850 9900 9950 10000
Station (feet)
96
—0--TW (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) O STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
114
113
112
111
110
IRA
109
108
107
v 106
♦
105
a
0
0 104
N
x
y
103
x
r
v 102
101
100
'
99
98
97
96
10000 10050 10100 10150 10200 10250 10300 10350 10400 10450 10500 10550 10600 10650 10700 10750 10800 10850 10900 10950 11000
Station (feet)
+TW (MYO- 3/2014) A LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) • STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)

Table 6b. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Devil's Racetrack (East)
Cross - Section 11 (Pool)
Cross - Section 12 (Riffle)
Cross - Section 13 (Pool)
Cross - Section 14 (Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
based on fixed bankfull elevation
115.4
115.1
115.0
114.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
15.0
12.2
19.8
12.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
>300
N/A
>300
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
0.8
1.5
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.1
1.3
2.7
1.6
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area ft)
18.8
1
1
1
1
1
10.3
1
1
30.2
13.3
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
12.0
14.6
13.0
1
1
12.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
>24.5
N/A
>23.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross - Section 15 (Pool)
Cross- Section 16 (Riffle)
Cross- Section 17 (Riffle)
Cross - Section 18 (Pool)
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
based on fixed bankfull elevation
114.2
114.1
113.3
112.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
15.6
13.4
13.7
15.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
>300
>300
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.1
1.7
1.7
2.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (W)
17.3
1
1
1
1
1 13.2
13.9
25.0
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
14.0
13.6
13.4
9.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
>22.3
>21.9
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 11 -DRC East
57+24 pool
124
122
120
118
c
0
m 116
v
w
114
112
110
0 10 20
30 40 50 60
70 80
90 100
Width (ft)
—MYO (2/2014)
— Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
18.8 x- section area (ft.sq.)
15.0 width (ft)
1.2 mean depth (ft)
2.1 max depth (ft)
15.6 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.2 hyd radi (ft)
12.0 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
+
is
�fi
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 12 -DRC East
57+74 riffle
122
120
118
116
c
0
114
v
w
112
110
108
0 10 20
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014) - Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
10.3 x- section area (ft.sq.)
12.2 width (ft)
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.3 max depth (ft)
12.6 wetted parimeter (ft)
_
0.8 hyd radi (ft)
14.6 width -depth ratio
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)
24.5 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
_
s x!
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 13 -DRC East
66+64 pool
119
117
115
113
c
0
v
w
109
107
105
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
+MYO (2/2014) — Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
30.2 x- section area (ft.sq.)
19.8 width (ft)
1.5 mean depth (ft) _
2.7 max depth (ft)
20.6 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.5 hyd radi (ft)
13.0 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying ,
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 14 -DRC East
67+2 riffle
122
120
118
116
c
2
114
v
w
112
110
108
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014) - Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
13.3 x- section area (ft.sq.)
12.7 width (ft)
1.1 mean depth (ft) --
1.6 max depth (ft)
13.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.0 hyd radi (ft)
12.1 width -depth ratio
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)-
23.7 entrenchment ratio r
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
f _
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 15 -DRC East
77 +4 pool
119
—
117
115
113
c
0
v
w
109
107
105
0 10 20
30 40 50 60
70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
—MYO (2/2014)
— Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
17.3 x- section area (ft.sq.)
15.6 width (ft)
1.1 mean depth (ft)
- --
2.1 max depth (ft)
16.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
tr
1.1 hyd radi (ft)4��
-
14.0 width -depth ratio
.d:•
a .
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream ,

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 16 -DRC East
77+40 riffle
120
118
116
c
0
114
w 112
110
0 10
20
30
40
50 60
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014)
- Bankfull
- Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
a!
13.2 x- section area (ft.sq.)
13.4 width (ft)
1.0 mean depth (ft)
1.7 max depth (ft)
13.9 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.0 hyd radi (ft)
13.6 width -depth ratio
-
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)
22.3 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
..•
Survey Date: 2/2014
y
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
j•-
S
+�?'
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 17 -DRC East
86+95 riffle
119
117 —
115
113
c
0
v
w
109
107
105
0 10 20 30 40
50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014)
— Bankfull — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
13.9 x- section area (ft.sq.)
13.7 width (ft)
1.0 mean depth (ft)
1.7 max depth (ft)
14.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.0 hyd radi (ft)
13.4 width -depth ratio
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)
21.9 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 18 -DRC East
91 +0 pool
120
118
116
114 - --
112
110
0
108
v
w 106
104
102 —
100
0 10 20 30 40
50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
Width (ft)
+MYO (2/2014) — Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
=
25.0 x- section area (ft.sq.)
15.5 width (ft)
1.6 mean depth (ft)
2.8 max depth (ft)
16.8 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.5 hyd radi (ft)
9.5 width -depth ratio
T
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
s
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 19 -DRC East
91+48 riffle
119
117
115
113
c
0
v
w
109
107
105
0 10 20 30 40
50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014)
— Bankfull — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
12.5 x- section area (ft.sq.)
13.3 width (ft)
0.9 mean depth (ft)
1.6 max depth (ft)
-
13.7 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.9 hyd radi (ft)
14.1 width -depth ratio
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)
22.6 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 20 -DRC East
102+92 riffle
117
115
113
111
c
0
109
v
w
107
105
103
0 10 20
30 40 50
60 70
80 90 100
Width (ft)
t MYO (2/2014) - Bankfull
- Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
5.7 x- section area (ft.sq.)
8.2 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.1 max depth (ft)
8.6 wetted parimeter (ft)
t;
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
11.9 width -depth ratio
a __
300.0 W flood prone area (ft)
36.5 entrenchment ratio
-
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 21 -DRC East
pool
114
112
110
108
c
0
106
v
w
104
102
100
0 10 20
30 40 SO
60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
--�— MYO (2/2014)
— Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
-_
10.8 x- section area (ft.sq.)
8.8 width (ft)
1.2 mean depth (ft)
2.0 max depth (ft)
10.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
t
1.1 hyd radi (ft)
7.3 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014rf
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
sytW�y
View Downstream

Stream Photographs — Devils Racetrack (East)

Photo Point 27 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 28 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 28 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 29 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 29 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Photo Point 30 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 30 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 31— looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 31— looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 32 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 32 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs
4 - .
J
pxr _
Photo Point 33 — looking upstream (04/01/2014)
Photo Point 33 —
looking downstream (04/01/2014)
IF
� '�� • � rte„ ,: -
Photo Point 34 — looking upstream (04/01/2014)
Photo Point 34 —
looking downstream (04/01/2014)
to
n'
{.-
-
_•:t
Fil III
Photo Point 35 — looking upstream (04/01/2014)
Photo Point 35 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Photo Point 36 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 36 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 37 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 37 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 38 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 38 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Photo Point 39 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 39 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 40 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 40 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 41— looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 41— looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Photo Point 45 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 45 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 46 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 46 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 47 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 47 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs
Photo Point 48 — looking upstream (04/01/2014)
Photo Point 48 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Photo Point 49 — looking upstream (04/01/2014)
Photo Point 49 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Photo Point 50 — looking upstream (04/01/2014)
Photo Point 50 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Photo Point 51— looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 51— looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 52 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 52 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) I
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Table 5c. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Southeast Branch
( - - -): Data was not provided
N /A: Not Applicable
Pre - Restoration Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
As -Built /Baseline
Parameter
Gage
Southeast Branch
Scout West
Scout East 2
Scout West
Johanna Creek
Jarman Oak
Southeast Branch (Reach
1)
Southeast Branch
2)
(Reach
Southeast Branch (Reach
3)
Southeast
Branch
(Reach 1)
Southeast Branch (Reach
2)
Southeast Branch
(Reach 3)
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
2.7
5.7
2.6
6.3
4.7
6.1
5.6
7.6
9.7
9.3
3.0
4.0
5.4
3.0
3.8
5.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
8.6
11.4
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
25
7 35
50
70
100
300
>30
>60
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.5
0.6
1.0
0.3
0.4
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth
0.4
1.4
0.5
0.7
1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
0.4
1 0.6
0.5
0.7
0.8
1 1.2
0.5
0.5
0.6
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft)
N/A
1.1
1.4
1.3
2.0
6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4
7.2
7.8
11.6
1.0
1.5
2.5
0.8
1.3
2.1
Width /Depth Ratio
6.8
24.3
5.4
19.4
3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0
10.1
19.7
7.4
9.0
10.0
10.0
12.0
11.0
12.0
11.4
10.8
13.8
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
4.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
1 9.6
16.1 1
26.9
8.3
11.7
12.5
17.5
18.5
55.6
>9.9
>15.8
>37.5
Bank Height Ratio
2.2
6.0
1.1
1
1.3
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
0.409
N/A
N/A
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
2.1
64.4
3.4
144.4
6.0
47.3
Shallow Slope (ft /ft)
- --
0.026
1
0.047
N/A
0.033
1
0.051
N/A
0.0129
0.0162
F 0.0681
0.0144
1 0.0384
0.0035
1 0.0285
0.0010
0.0803
0.0021
0.0272
0.0005
0.0168
Pool Length (ft)
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
2.1
36.7
3.1
33.6
3.2
61.3
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
0.4
0.6
N/A
1.7
1.9
1.5
3.1
0.5
1.1
0.4
1.2
0.5
1.5
0.7
1.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
1.1
Pool Spacing (ft)^
- --
27
67
N/A
21
27
16 59
32
55
15
24
20
32
9
38
4
76
8
90
14
52
Pool Volume ft3)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
- --
8.7
14.3
7.2
1
16.2
9.1
9.8
14.0
20.0
21.0
36.0
4.0
9.0
5.0
12.0
7.0
43.0
5.3
11.2
6.8
14.3
12.7
32.8
Radius of Curvature (ft)
- --
3.1
9.0
5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8
15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
5.0
14.0
6.0
18.0
8.0
26.0
5.0
23.5
10.0
25.6
10.4
29.5
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
N/A
- --
0.6
1.6
1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0
1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.5
4.5
1.5
4.5
1.5
4.8
1.7
7.8
2.6
6.7
2.0
5.6
Meander Length (ft)
- --
39.8
84.8
36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
24
51
32
68
16
92
22
63
33
70
32
74
Meander Width Ratio
- --
1.6
2.6
1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5
1.4 1 2.1
2.3 1
2.9
1.3
3.0
1.3
3.0
1.3
8.0
1.8
3.7
1.8
3.8
2.4
6.2
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri % /Ru % /P % /G % /S%
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
IL
I
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
0.08/0.28/0.41/0.94 /1.6/9.6
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
N/A
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft'
N/A
0.51
N/A
N/A
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W1m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.19
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.03
0.07
0.10
0.03
0.07
0.10
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate ( %)
<1%
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
G /FS
E /CSb
ES
ES
E5 /CS
E6
- --
- --
E /CS
E /C5
E /CS
E /C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
2.2
1.3
2.0
2.5
F
2.9
1.2
1
1.2
1.8 1.9
0.95
1.7
1.4
1.4
1.9
1.5
1.4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
2.4
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
Q -NFF regression
- --
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
X
•
Q- Mannings
- --
Valley Length (ft)
--
--
- --
- --
---
---
-
--
-
--
-
--
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2,976
--
--
- --
- --
- --
1,559
716
617
1,559
713
616
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.1
1.2
1.1
F
1.2
1.2
1.6
1.6
1.1
1.3
Water Surface Slope ft /ftZ
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
0.0221
0.0174
0.0030
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.0230
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0108
0.0227
0.0096
0.0128
0.0025
0.0089
0.0222
0.0015
0.0119
0.0028
1 0.0030
( - - -): Data was not provided
N /A: Not Applicable

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
JOUTneaST brancn (Keacn I ) - JTa 3uu +uu f0 J3 I S +SY
30000 30050 30100 30150
t TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014)
150
149
148
147
146
145
144
143
4 142
m
v 141
w
140
139
138
137
136
135
30200 30250
Station (feet)
LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014)
30300 30350
♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014)
30400 30450 30500
O STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
160
159
158
157
AAA
156
155
154
153
0
152
>
151
w
_
150
149
148
147
146
145
30000 30050 30100 30150
t TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014)
150
149
148
147
146
145
144
143
4 142
m
v 141
w
140
139
138
137
136
135
30200 30250
Station (feet)
LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014)
30300 30350
♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014)
30400 30450 30500
O STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
AAA
_
AAA A: ♦
AA AL-A
AA
AAJWkA
' —_ .� ♦�
A AAA,
*AA __ --
'-- !
_ — —A
�j A
Alt
--
30000 30050 30100 30150
t TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014)
150
149
148
147
146
145
144
143
4 142
m
v 141
w
140
139
138
137
136
135
30200 30250
Station (feet)
LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014)
30300 30350
♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014)
30400 30450 30500
O STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
30500 30550 30600 30650 30700 30750 30800 30850 30900 30950 31000
Station (feet)
TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) • RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) 0 STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
AAA
AAJWkA
46
*AA __ --
_ — —A
�j A
Alt
--
30500 30550 30600 30650 30700 30750 30800 30850 30900 30950 31000
Station (feet)
TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) • RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) 0 STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Southeast Branch (Reach 1) - Sta 300 +00 to 315 +59
Southeast Branch (Reach 21 - Sta 315 +59 to 322 +75
140
1
129
139
1
128
138
137
♦
4
127
_
126
125
136
135
__ � _�
1
— 124
_
�
Southeast Br Reach 1 END
Reach 2 BEGIN
134
W
x
x
All
A
v
123
_
1
133
122
_
0 132
A ALA
N
•
> 121
x
x
131
w
130
120
-_ rte♦
119
_
rn
'
129
128
118
127
117
116
AVL
_
126
115
31500 31550 31600 31650 31700 31750 31800 31850 31900 31950 32000
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) 0 STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
125
31000 31050 31100 31150 31200 31250 31300 31350 31400 31450 31500
Station (feet)
4 TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) 0 STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
130
1
129
1
128
127
126
125
1
— 124
o
�
Southeast Br Reach 1 END
Reach 2 BEGIN
W
x
x
All
A
�1
I
123
1
122
A ALA
> 121
w
120
119
rn
118
117
116
115
31500 31550 31600 31650 31700 31750 31800 31850 31900 31950 32000
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) 0 STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
1
1
1
o
�
Southeast Br Reach 1 END
Reach 2 BEGIN
x
x
�1
I
1

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Southeast Branch (Reach 2) - Sta 315 +59 to 322 +75
soutneast Brancn (Keacn 3) - Jta 311 + /5 to 3Zt3 +Yl
32000 32050 32100 32150 32200 32250 32300 32350 32400 32450 32500
Station (feet)
TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) O STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
125
124
123
122
121
120
119
v
118
c
0 117
a' 116
w
115
114
113
112
111
110
125
124
123
122
121
120
119
118
117
116
w
115
114
113
112
111
! _♦ A649L
110
32000 32050 32100 32150 32200 32250 32300 32350 32400 32450 32500
Station (feet)
TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) O STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
125
124
123
122
121
120
119
v
118
c
0 117
a' 116
w
115
114
113
112
111
110
I
1
1
! _♦ A649L
A&
1
Ap ♦ 11 #A
=t ♦ A♦ ♦
1
A4& ♦ ♦ ♦ •
I
Southeast Br Reach 2 END
Reach 3 BEGIN
m AL AL AL
c�
Y)
m
m
1
I
1
VI
X
32000 32050 32100 32150 32200 32250 32300 32350 32400 32450 32500
Station (feet)
TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) O STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
125
124
123
122
121
120
119
v
118
c
0 117
a' 116
w
115
114
113
112
111
110
32500 32550 32600 32650 32700 32750 32800 32850 32900 32950 33000
Station (feet)
s TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) 0 STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
=t ♦ A♦ ♦
1
A4& ♦ ♦ ♦ •
•
m AL AL AL
c�
Y)
m
m
N
X
VI
X
32500 32550 32600 32650 32700 32750 32800 32850 32900 32950 33000
Station (feet)
s TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) 0 STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)

Table 6c. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Southeast Branch
Cross - Section 28 (Pool)
Cross - Section 29 (Riffle)
Cross - Section 30 (Pool)
Cross- Section 31 (Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
based on fixed bankfull elevation
137.7
137.1
122.8
122.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.8
3.0
3.8
3.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
>30
N/A
>60
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.8
0.5
0.4
0.5
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
1.5
0.8
1
1
1 1.3
1
1
1
1
1
1.3
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
9.3
11.4
11.2
10.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
>9.9
N/A
.15.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross
- Section
32 (Riffle)
Cross
- Section
33 (Pool)
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
based on fixed bankfull elevation
116.5
116.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
5.3
6.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>200
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.6
0.8
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
2.1
1
2.4
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
13.8
16.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>37.5
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 28 -DRC Southeast Br
310 +3 pool
143
141
139
c
0
137
v
w
135
133
0 10 20
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
—MYO (2/2014) — Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
1.5 x- section area (ft.sq.)
3.8 width (ft)
0.4 mean depth (ft)
0.8 max depth (ft)
4.3 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.4 hyd radi (ft)'
9.3 width -depth ratio
A.
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 29- Southeast Br
310+15 riffle
144
142
140
138
136
v
w
134
132
130
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
t MYO(2 /2014) - Bankfull - FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
0.8 x- section area (ft.sq.)
3.0 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.5 max depth (ft) _
3.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
11.4 width -depth ratio
30.0 W flood prone area (ft)
9.9 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 30- Southeast Br
318+11 pool
130
128
126
c
0
124
v
w
122
120
0 10 20
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
—MYO (2/2014) — Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
1.3 x- section area (ft.sq.)
3.8 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.4 max depth (ft)
4.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
11.2 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 31- Southeast Br
318+27 riffle
128
126
124
c
122
v
w
120
118
0 10 20 30 40
50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
MYO (2/2014)
— Bankfull — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
1.3 x- section area (ft-sq.)
3.8 width (ft)
0.4 mean depth (ft)
0.5 max depth (ft)
4.0 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
10.8 width -depth ratio
60.0 W flood prone area (ft)
15.8 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 32- Southeast Br
325+58 riffle
122
120
118
c
2
116
v
w
114
112
0 5 10 15 20
25 30 35 40 45 50
Width (ft)
MYO (2/2014)
— Bankfull — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
2.1 x- section area (ft-sq.)
5.3 width (ft)
0.4 mean depth (ft)
0.6 max depth (ft)
5.5 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.4 hyd radi (ft)
13.8 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
37.5 entrenchment ratio
7;
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 33- Southeast Br
325+73 pool
120
118
116
c
0
114
v
w
112
110
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
—MYO (2/2014) — Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
2.4 x- section area (ft.sq.)
6.3 width (ft)
0.4 mean depth (ft)
0.8 max depth (ft)
6.6 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.4 hyd radi (ft)
16.8 width -depth ratio
a -
Survey Date: 2/2014 rF"
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
a
View Downstream

Stream Photographs— Southeast Branch

Photo Point 70 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 70 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 71— looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 71— looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
APW
Photo Point 72 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 72 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Photo Point 73 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 73 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 74 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 74 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 75 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 75 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Photo Point 76 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 76 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 77 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 77 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 78 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 78 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

PIS
a 5-9,
Photo Point 79 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) Photo Point 79 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Photo Point 80 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 80 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 81— looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 81— looking downstream (04/01/2014) I
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs
Ni,
Photo Point 81— looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 81— looking downstream (04/01/2014) I
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Photo Point 82 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 82 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 83 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 83 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) I
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Table 5d. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Middle Branch
( - - -): Data was not provided
N /A: Not Applicable
Pre - Restoration Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
As -Built /Baseline
Parameter
Gage
Middle
Branch
Scout West
Scout East 2
Scout West
Johanna Creek
Jarman Oak
Middle Branch
1)
(Reach
Middle Branch
2)
(Reach
Middle Branch
1)
(Reach
Middle Branch
2)
(Reach
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
1.8
2.3
2.6
6.3
4.7
6.1
5.6 7.6
9.7
9.3
3.0
4.0
2.2
3.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
4.6
6.8
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
40
1 60
100
1 300
>50
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth
0.3
0.6
0.5
0.7
1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft)
N/A
0.4
0.5
1.3
2.0
6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4
7.2
7.8
11.6
0.9
1.5
0.7
1.1
Width /Depth Ratio
6.9
12.0
5.4
19.4
3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0
10.1
19.7
7.4
10.0
10.5
10.0
12.0
6.7
10.1
Entrenchment Ratiol
2.0
3.8
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
26.9
33.3
100.0
22.2
66.7
>22.9
>58.8
Bank Height Ratio
5.3
6.5
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.1
D50 (mm)
0.083
1W
I
I
I
N/A
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
2.5
46.6
16.1
Shallow Slope (ft /ft)
- --
0.047
N/A
0.033 0.051
N/A
0.0129
0.0144
0.0489
0.0002
0.0074
0.0008
0.0492
0.0236
Pool Length (ft)
LO.
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
2.9
17.3
19.8
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
- --
N/A
1.7 1.9
1.5
3.1
0.4
1.0
0.5
1.0
0.5
1.2
LO.O059
0.9
Pool Spacing (ft)^
Pool Volume ft3
- --
67
N/A
21 27
16
Pattern
59
32
55
15
24
S
22
8
56
24
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
- --
8.7
1
14.3
1 7.2
1
16.2
1 9.1
1 9.8
1 14.0
1
20.0
21.0
36.0
4.0
9.0
6.0
36.0
4.1
9.4
6.7
20.9
Radius of Curvature (ft)
- --
3.1
9.0
5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8
15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
5.0
14.0
7.0
22.0
7.0
23.9
9.2
23.5
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
N/A
- --
0.6
1.6
1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0
1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.7
4.5
1.5
4.8
3.2
10.9
2.7
6.9
Meander Length (ft)
39.8
84.8
36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
24
51
14
77
23
44
32
57
Meander Width Ratio
- --
1.6
2.6
1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5
1 1.4
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
3.0
1.3
8.0
2.2
4.3
2.0
6.1
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri % /Ru % /P % /G % /S%
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
qP
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
-/- /0.083/0.498/0.9 /9.6
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
N/A
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft'
N/A
0.24
0.27
-
--
-
--
N/A
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power Ca acit W /mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area ISM)
0.02
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate %
<1%
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
GS
E /CSb
E5
E5
E5 /CS
E6
N/A
E /CS
E /C5
E /C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
1.4
1.5
1.3
2.0
2.5
2.9
1.2 1.2
1.8
1.9
0.95
1.3
0.8
1.4
0.9
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
0.6
0.7
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Q -NFF regression
- --
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
- --
Q-Mannings
- --
Valley Length (ft)
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
---
- --
- --
985
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,736
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
1,060
436
1,058
432
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.1
F 1.2
1.2
T 1.5
1.1
1.2
Water Surface Slope ft /ftZ
- --
- --
- --
- --
0.0145
0.0064
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.0240
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0096
0.0163
0.0024
0.0077
0.0148
0.0024
0.0066
( - - -): Data was not provided
N /A: Not Applicable

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Miaale Branch (Reach 1) - sta 1U4 +1 U to Jta 714 + /U
142
140
W 137
0
w
135
132
20400
135
133
130
c
0
v
w
128
125
20900
20450 20500 20550 20600 20650 20700 20750 20800 20850 20900
Station (feet)
TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) • RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) • STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
!AA i ♦yA
♦•4A
♦ A • ♦♦
♦
♦♦♦ ♦ ♦♦
_ _ ♦♦♦
__-
A
- __
'
♦♦ AA
- --:— _ _ ♦♦♦ ♦♦♦
- ♦__ •••�
♦ ♦♦ _y♦ • ♦�
-__ •
&A AL ,
AA
N
N
Ali
*♦
X
X
- ~ ♦ ♦ ♦♦
135
133
130
c
0
v
w
128
125
20900
20450 20500 20550 20600 20650 20700 20750 20800 20850 20900
Station (feet)
TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) • RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) • STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
!AA i ♦yA
- __
'
♦♦ AA
- --:— _ _ ♦♦♦ ♦♦♦
♦ ♦♦ _y♦ • ♦�
-__ •
&A AL ,
20950 21000 21050 21100 21150 21200 21250 21300 21350 21400
Station (feet)
—s TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) 0 STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Middle Branch (Reach 1) - Sta 204 +10 to Sta 214 +70
Middle Branch (Reach 2) - Sta 214 +70 to Sta 219 +10
130
1
1
1
1
128
1
I
�– • •♦ � � ♦♦
Reach 1 END
125
Reach 2 BEGIN
1
N N
X
1
X
1
c
m
I"
ILA:A
w
--- ----------
•
Middle Or
123
Ln
120
21400
21450 21500
21550
21600
21650
21700
21750 21800
21850 21900 21950 22000
Station (feet)
—�— TW (MYO- 3/2014)
- - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014)
LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014)
♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014)
O
STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
�– • •♦ � � ♦♦
Reach 1 END
Reach 2 BEGIN
1
N N
X
1
X
1

Table 6d. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Middle Branch
Cross - Section 24 (Riffle)
Cross - Section 25 (Pool)
Cross - Section 26 (Pool)
Cross - Section 27 (Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
based on fixed bankfull elevation
136.4
136.4
124.7
124.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
2.2
3.1
4.1
3.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
N/A
N/A
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.5
0.7
0.9
0.5
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
0.7
1
1.2
1.4
1
1
1
1
1 1.1
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
6.7
1
8.1
1
1
1
1
1
1 11.9
10.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>22.9
N/A
I
I
I
I
I
I N/A
>58.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1
1
1.0
1
1
1
1
1
1 1.0
1
1
1
1
1
1 1.0

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 24- Middle Br
207+0 riffle
140
138
c
0
w
i
i
i
I
136
130
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
-
� MYO (2/2014) - Bankfull Floodprone Area
134
132
Bankfull Dimensions
0.7 x- section area (ft.sq.)
2.2 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.5 max depth (ft)
2.5 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
6.7 width -depth ratio
r,
50.0 W flood prone area (ft)
22.9 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
F
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
F
View Downstream
c
0
w
i
i
i
I
130
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
-
� MYO (2/2014) - Bankfull Floodprone Area

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 25- Middle Br
207+8 pool
140
138
136
c
0
134
v
w
132
i
130
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
—MYO (2/2014) — Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
1.2 x- section area (ft.sq.)
3.1 width (ft)
0.4 mean depth (ft)
0.7 max depth (ft)
3.6 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
8.1 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 26- Middle Br
216+22 pool
130
128
i
126
c
0
124
v
w
122
I
120
I
0 10
20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
4 MYO (2/2014) - Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
1.4 x- section area (ft.sq.)
4.1 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.9 max depth (ft)
4.8 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
11.9 width -depth ratio
, r } „•:
L y,
4Y -411
f1�
, ')'•
Survey Date: 2/2014
��,�� ng -A•'r. L tin ti �” ; i. Ir l
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 27- Middle Br
216+34 riffle
130
128
—
126
I
�
o
I
124
v
w
122
120
0 10 20
30 40 50
Width (ft)
MYO (2/2014)
— Bankfull — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
1.1 x- section area (ft.sq.)
3.4 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.5 max depth (ft)
3.6 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
10.1 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
58.8 enchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Stream Photographs — Middle Branch

Photo Point 61— looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 61— looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 62 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 62 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 63 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 63 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Photo Point 64 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 64 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 65 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 65 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 66 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 66 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) I
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Photo Point 67 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 67 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 68 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 68 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 69 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 69 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Table 5e. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Southwest Branch
( - - -): Data was not provided
N /A: Not Applicable
Pre - Restoration Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
As -Built /Baseline
Parameter
Gage
Southwest Branch
Scout West
1
Scout East 2
Scout West 2
Johanna Creek
Jarman Oak
Southwest Branch
(Reaches 1 -3)
Southwest Branch
4)
(Reach
Southwest Branch
1-3)
(Reaches
Southwest Branch
4)
(Reach
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
2.8
3.4
2.6
6.3
4.7
6.1
5.6 7.6
9.7
9.3
3.0
3.3
- --
2.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
4.9
6.2
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
40
1 60
100
1 300
- --
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.3
0.3
- --
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth
0.3
0.9
0.5
0.7
1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
0.5
1 0.6
0.4
0.5
- --
0.4
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft)
N/A
0.8
0.9
1.3
2.0
6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4
7.2
7.8
11.6
1.0
1.0
- --
0.6
Width /Depth Ratio
10.0
14.0
5.4
19.4
3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0
10.1
19.7
7.4
9.0
10.0
10.0
12.0
- --
9.7
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
1.9
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
26.9
13.3
20.0
30.3
90.9
- --
82.3
Bank Height Ratio
10.0
10.7
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
- --
1.0
D50 (mm)
0.105
- --
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
3.8
51.6
8.3
44.1
Shallow Slope (ft /ft)
- --
0.026
0.047
N/A
0.033 0.051
N/A
0.0129
0.0257
0.0648
0.0109
0.0308
0.0015
0.0339
0.0032
0.0228
Pool Length (ft)
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
1.7
19.9
4.3
23.4
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
- --
0.6
N/A
1.7 1.9
1.5
3.1
0.5
1.1
0.4
1.0
0.3
1.2
0.6
1.4
Pool Spacing (ft)^
Pool Volume (ft?)
--
27
67
N/A
21
27
16
Pattern
59
32
55
15
24
5
23
8
53
12
51
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
I
- --
8.7
1
14.3
1 7.2
1
16.2
1 9.1
1 9.8
1 14.0
1
20.0
21.0
36.0
4.0
9.0
4.0
26.0
3.9
10.2
5.2
18.9
Radius of Curvature (ft)
- --
3.1
9.0
5.5
16.0
5.4
6.8
15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
5.0
14.0
5.0
16.0
10.0
19.0
7.4
20.3
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
N/A
- --
0.6
1.6
1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0
1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.7
4.5
1.5
4.8
- --
3.1
8.5
Meander Length (ft)
- --
39.8
84.8
36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
24
51
10
56
27
50
28
54
Meander Width Ratio
- --
1.6
2.6
1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5
1.4 1
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
3.0
1.3
8.0
- --
2.2
7.9
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri % /Ru % /P % /G % /S%
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
A
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
N/A
- /0.065/0.105/0.336 /0.4/9.6
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
E4
N/A
N/A
Reach Shear Stress Com etenc Ib /ftZ
0.37
0.42
-
--
N/A
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
l
Stream Power (Capacity) W /mZ
WE
mar
Aw-
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area ISM)
0.03
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate ( %)
<1%
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
<1%
<1%
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
G5
E /C5b
E5
E5
E5 /C5
E6
NA
E /C5
N/A
E /C5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
1.8
1.9
1.3
F
2.0
2.5 1
2.9
1.2 1 1.2
1.8 1
1.9
0.95
1.7
1.3
N/A
2.5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
1.6
1
1.7
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
Q -NFF regression
- --
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
- --
Q-Mannings
- --
IIIIIIIIIIIIIL
_
Valley Length
- --
- --
--
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,080
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
650
482
646
479
Sinuosity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.1
F 1.2
1.1
T 1.5
1.0
1.3
Water Surface Slope ft /ftZ
- --
- --
- --
---
0'0191
0.0090
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.0320
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.0171
0.0216
0.0078
0.0096
0.0186
0.0191
0.0085
0.0088
( - - -): Data was not provided
N /A: Not Applicable

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Southwest Branch (Reach 1) - Sta 500 +00 to Sta 501 +31
Southwest Branch (Reach 2) - Sta 500 +00 to Sta 502 +07
Southwest Branch (Reach 3) - Sta 502 +07 to 506 +50
Southwest Branch (Reach 4) - Wa 506 +50 to 511 +32
155
153
150
tt v
148
0
w 145
143
140
♦
1
1
1
1
1
1
__
1
♦♦♦ V ♦♦♦ ♦♦
------- -- --
♦
♦♦ _
>AAA•
-
°u
♦ ♦ •
AA • A
• 1
1
1
1
X
X
1
1
1
- •
♦
1
- ILA
1
_'�` �-
• •
••♦
Southwest Br Reach 1 END
Southwest Br Reach 2 END
!y •� •
Reach 2 BEGIN
Reach 3 BEGIN
_ •_ ,,��
1
1
�
1
1
1
1
50000 50050 50100 50150
TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014)
145
143
140
v
138
c
0
w 135
133
130
50200 50250 50300
Station (feet)
LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) • RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014)
50350 50400 50450 50500
O STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014) - -- Southwest Br Reach 2 END Reach 3 BEGIN
50500 50550 50600 50650 50700
t TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014)
50750
Station (feet)
LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014)
50800 50850
♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014)
50900 50950 51000
0 STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
A♦♦
-
__
♦ ♦ ♦ •
-- —
♦♦♦ V ♦♦♦ ♦♦
------- -- --
♦
♦♦ _
>AAA•
-
°u
♦ ♦ •
Southwest Br Reach 3 END
Reach 4 BEGIN
X
X
50500 50550 50600 50650 50700
t TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014)
50750
Station (feet)
LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014)
50800 50850
♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014)
50900 50950 51000
0 STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Southwest Branch (Reach 4) - Sta 506 +50 to 511+32
145
143
140
v
138
c
0
v
w 135
♦ - _ _--
�V1► ♦
!
_ 'L
♦ A A 11
133
130
51000 51050 51100 51150 51200 51250 51300 51350 51400 51450 51500
Station (feet)
TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) O STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)

Table 6e. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Southwest Branch
Cross - Section 22 (Pool)
Cross- Section 23 (Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
based on fixed bankfull elevation
136.4
136.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.9
2.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.8
0.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft')
1.8
1
1
1
1
1
1 0.6
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratiol
13.2
1
9.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
I
>82.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1
1.0

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 22- Southwest Br
509+4 pool
140
138
136
c
0
134
v
w
132
130
0 10
20 30
40 50
Width (ft)
—MYO (2/2014) — Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
1.8 x- section area (ft.sq.)
4.9 width (ft)
Y.
"
0.4 mean depth (ft)
0.8 max depth (ft)
5.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
13.2 width -depth ratio
_
e
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 23- Southwest Br
509+15 riffle
140
138
136
c
0
134
v
w
132
130
0 10 20
30 40 50
Width (ft)
MYO (2/2014)
— Bankfull — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
0.6 x- section area (ft.sq.)
2.4 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
_
0.4 max depth (ft)
2.6 wetted parimeter (ft)
j�
0.2 hyd
radi (ft)t
9.7 width -depth ratio
�?
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
82.3 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Stream Photographs— Southwest Branch

Photo Point 55 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 55 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 56 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 56 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 57 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 57 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Photo Point 58 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 58 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 59 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 59 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 60 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 60 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Table St. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
North Branch
( - - -): Data was not provided
N /A: Not Applicable
Pre - Restoration Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
As -Built /Baseline
Parameter
Gage
North Branch
Scout West
1
Scout East 2
Scout West
2
Johanna Creek
Jarman Oak
North Branch
North Branch
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
- --
2.6
6.3
4.7
6.1
5.6 1
7.6
9.7
9.3
9.2
8.6
9.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
- --
>20
>50
>50
>75
>150
100
F
300
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth
- --
0.3
0.5
1.1
1.3
0.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
0.6
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth
- --
0.5
0.7
1.7
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.1
2.3
0.9
1.1
1.0
1.2
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area ftZ
N/A
- --
1.3
2.0
6.0
6.9
5.3
5.4
7.2
7.8
11.6
5.9
5.7
6.5
Width /Depth Ratio
- --
5.4
19.4
3.6
5.4
5.7
11.0
10.1
19.7
7.4
14.0
14.5
13.1
13.2
Entrenchment Ratio
- --
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
8.0
9.6
16.1
26.9
10.9
32.6
>21.6
>23.2
Bank Height Ratio
- --
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
D50 (mm)
N/A
Profile
Shallow Length (ft)
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
5.3
35.8
Shallow Slope (ft /ft)
- --
0.026
0.047
N/A
0.033
0.051
N/A
0.0129
0.0010
0.0065
0.0013
0.0163
Pool Length (ft)
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
8.5
80.8
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
- --
0.6
N/A
1.7
1.9
1.5
3.1
0.9
2.1
1.0
3.8
Pool Spacing (ft)^
Pool Volume (fl?).
- --
27
67
N/A
21
Pattern
27
16
59
32
55
15
64
17
101
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
- --
8.7
1
14.3
1 7.2
1
16.2
1 9.1
1
9.8
1 14.0
1
20.0
1 21.0
1
36.0
12.0
1
74.0
1 16
72
Radius of Curvature (ft)
- --
3.1
1
9.0
1 5.5
1
16.0
1 5.4
1
6.8
1 15.0
27.0
13.7
18.6
14.0
44.0
15
40
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
N/A
- --
0.6
1.6
1.0
3.0
0.8
1.0
1.5
2.8
1.5
2.0
1.5
4.8
1.7
4.3
Meander Length (ft)
39.8
84.8
36.5
63.2
32.5
36.9
50.0
N/A
28
156
79
129
Meander Width Ratio
- --
1.6
2.6
1.3
3.0
1.4
1.5
1.4
2.1
2.3
2.9
1.3
8.0
1.9
7.7
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri % /Ru % /P % /G % /S%
IL
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
N/A
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
N/A
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft'
21
---
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W /mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.08
0.06
0.67
0.34
0.90
1.27
0.19
0.19
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate %
<1%
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
<1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
N/A
E /C5b
E5
E5
ES /CS
E6
E /C5
CS
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
- --
1.3
2.0
2.5
2.9
1.2
1.2
1.8
1.9
0.95
0.9
0.8
0.9
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
- --
2.6
17.5
6.4
14.0
11.0
5.0
5.0
Q -NFF regression
- --
Q-USGS extrapolation
N/A
- --
•
Q- Mannings
---
Valley Length (ft)
- --
- --
--
- --
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
2,418
2,410
Sinuosity
- --
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.2
F
1.6
1.31
Water Surface Slope ft /ftZ
- --
---
- --
- --
- --
0.0016
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.0260
0.0170
0.0040
0.0022
0.0040
0.000
F
0.0020
1 0.0004 1
0.0020
( - - -): Data was not provided
N /A: Not Applicable

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
North Branch - Sta 400 +00 to Sta 424 +18
v
c
0
v
w
125
124
123
122
121
120
119
118
117
116
115
114
113
112
111
110
40000 40050 40100 40150 40200 40250 40300
t TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014)
40350 40400
Station (feet)
LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014)
40450 40500 40550 40600 40650 40700 40750
® RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) O STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
125
124
123
AA
♦ •
♦
AA •
122
A&
121
120
119
v
m
t
• �j♦
•
♦ • ♦ ♦ •
• •
• !
♦•••
V)
x
-- 118
2
--- - --- --
-- -------
--- ---- -----
__!A;
••
!
A A AA
117
----
-- - ------
- -- -- - ---
- -- - - - - - --
--- - - --
- --
m
40000 40050 40100 40150 40200 40250 40300
t TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014)
40350 40400
Station (feet)
LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014)
40450 40500 40550 40600 40650 40700 40750
® RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) O STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
125
124
123
122
121
120
119
t
• �j♦
•
♦ • ♦ ♦ •
• •
• !
♦•••
-- 118
2
--- - --- --
-- -------
--- ---- -----
__!A;
••
!
A A AA
117
----
-- - ------
- -- -- - ---
- -- - - - - - --
--- - - --
- --
m
a>i 116
w
115
Ln
114
N
x
113
112
111
110
40750 40800 40850 40900 40950 41000 41050 41100 41150 41200 41250 41300 41350 41400 41450 41500
Station (feet)
0 TW (MYO- 3/2014) WS (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) 0 STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
North Branch - Sta 400 +00 to Sta 424 +18
125
124
123
122
121
120
121
120
119
119
v
v
118
118
g 117
117
m
116
---------
-- -- - -- - --
--- --
---- -- - - --
---- - - -- --
116
115
A Ail
AW
T
w
115
--- —
�o
m
114
n
114
113
X
113
x
m
112
111
112
111
110
110
42250 42300 42350 42400 42450 42500 42550 42600 42650 42700 42750 42800 42850 42900 42950 43000
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) 0 STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
41500 41550 41600 41650 41700 41750 41800 41850 41900 41950 42000 42050 42100 42150 42200 42250
t TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ LBK A%b� 6eP2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) O STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)
125
124
123
122
121
120
119
v
118
g 117
m
---------
-- -- - -- - --
--- --
---- -- - - --
---- - - -- --
116
115
A Ail
AW
�o
m
n
114
113
X
x
112
111
125
124
123
122
121
120
119
v
118
g 117
m
116
115
A Ail
AW
114
113
112
111
110
42250 42300 42350 42400 42450 42500 42550 42600 42650 42700 42750 42800 42850 42900 42950 43000
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO- 3/2014) - - - -- WS (MYO- 3/2014) LBKF /LTOB (MYO- 3/2014) ♦ RBKF /RTOB (MYO- 3/2014) 0 STRUCTURE (MYO- 3/2014)

Table 6f. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Section)
Devil's Racetrack Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
North Branch
Cross - Section 34 (Pool)
Cross - Section 35 (Riffle)
Cross - Section 36 (Riffle)
Cross - Section 37 (Pool)
Dimension and Substrate
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
Base
MY3
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
based on fixed bonkfull elevation
118.6
118.7
116.8
116.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.8
8.6
9.3
10.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
>200
>200
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.0
1.2
1.4
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft')
7.5
1
5.7
6.5
1
9.2
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
12.8
1
13.1
1
1
1
1
1
1 13.2
12.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
>23.2
1
1
1
1
1
1 >21.6
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1
1
1.0
1
1
1
1
1
1 1.0
1
1
1
1
1
1 1.0

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 34 -North Br
407+67 pool
124
122
120
118
c
0
116
v
w
114
112
110
0 10 20
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
—MYO (2/2014) — Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
7.5 x- section area (ft.sq.)
r
9.8 width (ft)`
0.8 mean depth (ft)
1.3 max depth (ft)
10.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
12.8 width -depth ratio
t %
r
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 35 -North Br
407+67 riffle
125
--
123
121
c
0
v
119
w
117
115
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
� MYO (2/2014) — Bankfull — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
5.7 x- section area (ft.sq.)
8.6 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.0 max depth (ft)
8.9 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.6 hyd radi (ft)
�....
13.1 width -depth ratio
-r r'
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
23.2 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream
--
121
c
0
v
119
w
117
115
0 10 20 30 40 50
Width (ft)
� MYO (2/2014) — Bankfull — Floodprone Area

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 36 -North Br
416+47 riffle
122
120
118
c
0
116
v
w
114
112
0 10 20 30 40
50
60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
MYO (2/2014)
— Bankfull
— Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
6.5 x- section area (ft.sq.)
9.3 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.2 max depth (ft)
9.6 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
13.2 width -depth ratio
200.0 W flood prone area (ft)
21.6 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Devil's Racetrack Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Cross Section 37 -North Br
416+85 pool
120
118
116
c
0
114
v
w
112 -
110
0 10 20 30
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Width (ft)
—MYO (2/2014) — Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
9.2 x- section area (ft.sq.)
10.7 width (ft)
0.9 mean depth (ft)
1.4 max depth (ft)
11.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.8 hyd radi (ft)
12.4 width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Turner Surveying
View Downstream

Stream Photographs —North Branch

Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs
r
Photo Point 87 — looking upstream (04/01/2014)
Photo Point 87 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Photo Point 88 — looking upstream (04/01/2014)
Photo Point 88 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
P
x
Photo Point 89 — looking upstream (04/01/2014)
Photo Point 89 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Photo Point 90 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 90 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 91— looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 91— looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 92 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 92 — looking downstream (04/01/2014)
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

Photo Point 93 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) 1 Photo Point 93 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) 1
Photo Point 94 — looking upstream (04/01/2014) I Photo Point 94 — looking downstream (04/01/2014) I
Devils Racetrack Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Morphological Summary Data and Plots— Stream Photographs

APPENDIX 3. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 7. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (EEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MYO 2014)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021 -01 -0001
95021 -01 -0002
95021 -01 -0003
95021 -01 -0004
95021 -01 -0005
95021 -01 -0006
95021 -01 -0007
95021 -01 -0008
95021 -01 -0009
95021 -01 -0010
PnoLS
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
3
3
3
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
8
8
8
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
1 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
1 4
1 4
1
1 1
1
1 1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
5
1 5
5
5
5
5
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
3
3
3
6
6
6
1
1
1
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
5
5
5
4
4
4
5
5
5
3
3
3
Stem count
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
1 0.02
1 0.02
1 0.02
1 0.02
1 0.02
1 0.02
1 0.02
Species count
7
1 7
7
6
6
6
7
L
7
6
1 6
1 6
7
1 7
7
7
7
7
5
5
5
7
7
1 7
6
1 6
6
7
7
7
Stems per ACRE
688
1 688
688
688
688
688
688
688d
688
688
1 688
1 688
688
1 688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
1 688
688
1 688
688
688
688
688
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems

Table 7. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (EEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MYO 2014)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021 -01 -0011
95021 -01 -0012
95021 -01 -0013
95021 -01 -0014
95021 -01 -0015
95021 -01 -0016
95021 -01 -0017
95021 -01 -0018
95021 -01 -0019
95021 -01 -0020
95021 -01 -0021
95021 -01 -0022
PnoLS
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
6
6
6
2
2
2
3
3
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
5
5
5
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
5
5
5
3
3
3
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
6
6
6
1
1
1
3
3
3
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
1 2
2
5
5
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
1 4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
7
7
7
2
2
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
4
4
4
5
5
5
1
1
1
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
6
6
6
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
10
10
10
8
8
8
10
10
10
5
5
5
4
4
4
7
7
7
5
5
5
7
7
7
Stem count
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
1 17
17
17
17
16
16
16
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
1 0.02
0.02
0.02
Species count
5
1 5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
4
4
4
5
1 5
5
6
1 6
6
5
5
1 5
5
5
5
4
4
4
1 6
6
6
5
5
5
4
4
4
Stems per ACRE
688
1 688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
1 688
688
688
1 688
688
688
688
1 688
688
688
688
647.5
647.5
647.5
1 688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems

Table 7. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (EEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MYO 2014)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021 -01 -0023
95021 -01 -0024
95021 -01 -0025
95021 -01 -0026
95021 -01 -0027
95021 -01 -0028
95021 -01 -0029
95021 -01 -0030
95021 -01 -0031
95021 -01 -0032
95021 -01 -0033
95021 -01 -0034
PnoLS
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
6
6
6
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
9
9
2
2
2
1
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
1 1
1
1
5
5
5
1
1
1
2
2
2
5
5
5
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
7
1 7
7
4
4
4
3
3
1 3
1
1 1
1 1
1
1 1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
6
6
6
5
5
5
8
8
8
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
10
6
6
6
6
6
6
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
6
6
6
3
3
3
9
9
9
3
3
3
6
6
6
4
4
4
2
2
2
7
7
7
4
4
4
2
2
2
Stem count
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
21
21
21
17
17
1 17
21
21
21
18
18
18
21
21
21
18
18
18
18
18
18
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
1 0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Species count
6
6
6
5
5
5
7
7
7
6
6
6
5
5
5
6
6
6
5
5
5
6
6
6
7
7
7
5
5
5
7
7
7
7
7
7
Stems per ACRE
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
849.818498
849.8
688
1 688
1 688
1849.8
1849.8
849.8
1728.4
1728.4
1728.4
1 849.81
849.8
849.8
728.4
728.4
728.4
728.4
728.4
728.4
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems

Table 7. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (EEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MYO 2014)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021 -01 -0035
95021 -01 -0036
95021 -01 -0037
95021 -01 -0038
95021 -01 -0039
95021 -01 -0040
95021 -01 -0041
95021 -01 -0042
95021 -01 -0043
95021 -01 -0044
95021 -01 -0045
95021 -01 -0046
PnoLS
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
6
6
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
4
4
4
5
5
5
1
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
5
5
5
2
2
2
6
6
6
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
1
1
1
2
2
2
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
5
1 5
5
1
1
1
3
3
3
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
4
4
4
2
2
2
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
5
5
5
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
3
3
3
5
5
5
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
6
6
6
4
4
4
5
5
5
6
6
6
1
1
1
4
4
4
6
6
6
5
5
5
Stem count
20
20
20
18
18
18
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
1 17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
1 0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
1 0.02
0.02
0.02
Species count
6
1 6
6
7
7
7
1 6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
7
6
6
6
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
Stems per ACRE
809.4
809.4
809.4
728.4
728.4
728.4
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
1 688
1 688
1 688
1 688
688
1 688
1 688
1 688
1 688
1 688
1 688
688
1 688
1 688
688
1 688
1 688
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems

Table 7. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Devils Racetrack Mitigation Site (EEP Project No. 95021)
Monitoring Year 0
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MYO 2014)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95021 -01 -0047
95021 -01 -0048
95021 -01 -0049
95021 -01 -0050
95021 -01 -0051
MYO(2014)
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
3
3
106
106
106
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
5
5
5
6
6
6
5
5
5
3
3
3
2
2
2
126
126
126
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
2
2
20
20
20
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
1
60
60
60
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
I
1 10
10
10
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
124
124
124
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
108
108
108
Quercus phellos
I willow oak
I Tree
6
6
6
7
7
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
125
125
125
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
4
1 4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
3
3
3
206
206
1 206
Stem count
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
1 17
885
885
1 885
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
51
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
1.26
Species count
5
5
5
4
4
4
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
1 7
1 7
9
9
9
Stems per ACRE
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
688
1 688
1 688
702.21
702.2
1702.2
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes
T: Total Stems

Vegetation Photographs

�t rya'
Vegetation Plot 1 (02/20/2014) Vegetation Plot 2 (02/20/2014) 1
Vegetation Plot 3 (02/20/2014) Vegetation Plot 4 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 5 (02/20/2014) Vegetation Plot 6 (02/20/2014)

-
YS-
rn
r f
Vegetation Plot 7 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 8 (02/20/2014)
6.
M1 f.
Vegetation Plot 9 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 10 (02/20/2014)
VVJ ``yy 4#yUi ,yy..4
x
L�WL,
4
Vegetation Plot 11 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 12 (02/20/2014)

I
I'
7
..
Vegetation Plot 13 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 14 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 15 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 16 (02/20/2014)
r
Vegetation Plot 17 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 18 (02/20/2014)

y.
Vegetation Plot 19 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 20 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 21 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 22 (02/20/2014)
y+t•
T1
Vegetation Plot 23 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 24 (02/20/2014)

Vegetation Plot 25 (02/20/2014) Vegetation Plot 26 (02/20/2014) 1
r_
Vegetation Plot 27 (02/20/2014) 1 Vegetation Plot 28 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 29 (02/20/2014) Vegetation Plot 30 (02/20/2014)

Vegetation Plot 31 (02/20/2014) Vegetation Plot 32 (02/20/2014) 1
Vegetation Plot 33 (02/20/2014) 1 Vegetation Plot 34 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 35 (02/20/2014) Vegetation Plot 36 (02/20/2014)

ar ;�
Vegetation Plot 37 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 38 (02/20/2014)
7N,sA
-t r
Vegetation Plot 39 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 40 (02/20/2014)
� _
-
Vegetation Plot 41 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 42 (02/20/2014)

l a'
.'�� -'. nom. i�
- • J
-
Vegetation Plot 43 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 44 (02/20/2014)
f
Vegetation Plot 45 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 46 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 47 (02/20/2014)
Vegetation Plot 48 (02/20/2014)

Vegetation Plot 49 (02/20/2014) Vegetation Plot 50 (02/20/2014) 1
_,ate
Vegetation Plot 51 (02/20/2014)

APPENDIX 4. As -Built Plan Sheets

Devil's 'Racetrack Mitipration Site
r)
�®hnst ®n County NCB
for
North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program
9- thridd
J
1 !`
Praleot Lxetlan �. • I
1fl
{ I'.
F r t:, 0
Site Directions:
d
• \ f. J 1
Vicinity Map
Not to Scale
BEFORE YOU DIGI
CALL 1 -800 -632 -4949
N.C. ONE —CALL CENTER
IT'S THE LAWI
From 1 -95 exit 90 (HWY 701) take Devil's Racetrack Road east
approximately 1.2 miles. The temporary construction entrances will be
located on both sides of the road.
E �fi�
N.—
►721 ji
BASE LINE DRAWINGS
ISSUED MAY 2, 2014
Title Sheet
Legend
Stream Overview
]Base ]Larne Plains
Sheet Index
]project Directory
Surveying:
Turner Land Surveying, PLLC
3201 Glernridge Drive
Raleigh, NC 27604
David S. Turner, PLS
919- 875 -1378
Stewart Proctor Engineering and
Surveying, PLLC
322 Chapaanolze Road, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27603
Herbert Proctor Jr., PLS
919 - 799 -1855
Engineering:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc
License No. P -0831
5605 Chapel Hill Road, Smite 122
Raleigh, NC 27607
Jeff Keaton, PE
919 - 851 -9986
0.1
0.2
1.0
1.1 -l.lz8
Owner:
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Jeff Jurek
919 - 715 -1157
DENR Contract No. 003989
EEP ID No. 95021
Disturbed Area =107 Acres
:n
Tc s8°
ra =v��Fw 5
fr11Jj �'
e�
y�
e�
RN
e�
N
z
�• U Y
a
o`�woc�

PL PL
Existing Property Line/ Right -of -Way
Existing Road Edge Of Pavement
— — — — —
— Existing Thalweg
X
Existing Fence
- - - - -- 100- - - - -
-- Existing Major Contour
-- — — — — — — — — — — —
— — Existing Minor Contour
100 -
Existing NCDOT 2 Foot Contour
OHE
Existing Overhead Electric
SS SS
Existing Sanitary Sewer
Existing Dirt Path
Existing Wood Power Pole
Existing Metal Power Pole
©
Existing Sanitary Sewer Manhole
_____________________________
Existing Utility Easement
Existing Pipe Culvert
Existing Treeline
Existing Tree
FEMA FP - FEMA FP 100 Year Floodplain
7c�oo V
�joUFW E
V
eb
e�
CE CE
Conservation Easement
4-4
10 +00
----- 1 - - - --
Design Thalweg Alignment
— — —
Design Bankfull
Design Construction Entrance
2 a�
Design Log Vane
0
Design Contour
Design Pipe Culvert
Design Brush Toe
Design Straw Wattle
�•1
Design Forestry Road
Design Angled Log Drop
Design Temporary Stream Crossing
b
F— _ _
Design Farm Path
v v v v o v o v
vvvvvov
Design Brush Mattress
/
Design Pump Around
Design Outlet Protection
Design Transplanted Sod Mats
I
Design Haul Road
Design Brush Drop
7
Design Stockpile/ Staging Area
Design Log & Roll Shallow
Design Double Log Drop
MoD
Limits Of Disturbance
Design Log & Roll Shallow With Brush
Design Cover Log
W W W
Wetland Planting Zone
Design Brush Shallow
Design Log With Root Wad
VP#
VEGETATION PLOT
y
Design Brush Shallow With Log Toe
.a
Design Channel Fill
XS \#
Design Rock & Roll Rife
Design Wetland Area
-
\ \/
CROSS SECTION
>_
Design Chunky Riffle
Design Rootwad
I_7
PP #
PHOTO POINT
OGG
CREST GAGE
b
OGW
GROUND WATER GAGE
8
w
z C
v
J

I
PL S
-
P
PL L; Nye°
U
PL � PL .o I �u.mzMMz
Tc s$$
PP4'ta
-oHE I
P P oHE � -GE--
ZO �c J:11" P
IV v
.V ,� IV
IV � ,>r �, � � � � 'IV IV 35 xszV � 5FJ1L
Xs
� � �
v �c v vie 03' M 9. 00 s I
X v
Begin Devil's Racetrack Creek (west) w ,y y ° ° ° 7 +00'
Reach 1 STA 0 +00 VP �, y �, IV —'��y \,1
oa0 v W
IV J' "V `V .V 511 +3277 +p0 Z
p +00 y \V M y j y `i' End Southwest Branch J ,V
.V `v `'V `V Reach _ IV
�V STA: 511 +322 0® V V
De
S
BRANCH >v `v `� � -, IV
3 +00 _ W "� _ IV `V
o+�
.V �, .V 137 _ pp `V ° `I' �' co w ® co
w vP s y
IV � Z.4
v y w 13g n *po w - I 0
IV ILI IV
V IV w -V ,� b
IV
I' xs 22,1, V w
IV 1I�
IV
XS 23
IV I
0 41 Co
\V IV GVV If
IV w � w � � �,.P� 5oax� •V � \V �� � / � I y � POJ � � CG
p p IV IV
ILI IV
IV IV IV IV 41 IV IV IV
f
1 y y w v vP� PP sa w o�� I\V
IV
w y IV IV IV
y w
y y y os y IV IV
IV IV y y y oo ,v �i IV
dJ w
y w v W '
dJ y y vP y V IV
IV M
i y
v IV �� v �� m
d N N x v
e
d \ \�30- U y y w r^
�� 3J - w
o' 40' 30, 12C
(HORIZONTAL)

f¢
011 -
GE ' Tcs
I i ii �u=io�FW �
I °N�
3p
Pt CE -
w
w w
w '
w w w
- e
-
VP 11
w
OGW w -� PP 8— vs0
w w V"
w w a w w pp Z
'• �' _ '(' `(' w w y. w i oo �F, i 22 +00
i
w 135
1
w w
PP SO I w DE P9 w nr °�� PP In w w � w �U
w PP 7i n \ f U)
� I w 7� DEVIL'S RACETRACK �- � - � / / '� w VP 13 �I
� � °N w
WESTBRNCH 20 +0o
w w w 4, w
11, 'PP ; 130 2� ✓1�� QA
y
i
w w 1
w w m
w w w w w xs 3
w w
w I w w w w w w �w y o�� v n xs a // w w w
w w /
w °NE w / eon vv r�p�
Iw w
w
Ile
w '
w w w VP 10
\J, w 4) /
w OGW /
w
J w w w w
w w w
z
A 8 'l Vl
� e
a
0' 40' 80, 120'.
(HORIZONTAL) � Z a �. K

/ I
�r /CE CE
/ CE CE CE CE
/ CE CE CE CE CE CE G�
/ CE —
y
S 6
/ y y
� \
.v
26t ° y X y DEVIL'S RACETRACK
i 's ° y y y 30 +00' ° WEST BRANCH y y y
/ N II y 126 y 29 +pp y
/ f y
y y y y
I
A y y � �f N y �V `J` y y� y
25 +00 / y y y y y y y �� y y y
28.pp y
y y h y o° � y I
y ry `� End Middle Branch v y y y
`V y y V y Reach 2 y
y y '.V y y w y STA: 219 +06 y
y y `� y y .V V O
y y y y y y y y y y y y -V y +
J y y y 3 Co
y y y y y y y y `� y %p0 _ y I M y N
O /o� ' ^rye y y OG`* y y y �' p Pp .V
/° y y y y 00 •V y 7?
x M tV y 2,1* ,. y �v 2
E 129 y "� y
S��r ry � p 68 d, y -V
P� �' r' y y y py Z
y y y y oOL y ,V y y y y y y y y y y y y y y I= y
.�v [ram' y y y. `I! y y .V `V Z16t y 27 vi y y y a' y 'V .v FV--
y
y y y y 6V y IV r g
/ y y y y y ( pp 67 y y XS 26 `� y y y y
y V y y y
V \V vp 13 y �l��J�i� J� y J� y !' y y y y y y
y \ a/ h/' yam_ y y
y y y y y y y y y ry "� y y VP 1w y y. y y y y y y y y y y
X'V y
-V y 30 y y y y y y y y Gw y y y �,
1130 y y .V y
,V/ `V y �' y y y y y y �/
y y y y V y y y .� .V
y y y V ,y p0 y y y y y y y y y y \VP 20 y y y y
y y y y y y y y y y y y V y I y y
.y�QQ y
y y y G!v y y y y ! v` _ y y `V y y y y -V y y y y y y -V
y y �O / y y y yN�l" y �\p�� y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y
y y y j V y y y y y y y y y y y y y V y y y l y y
U� yIy y y y y y y y y y y y y
/ .V �-! — y y .V .V y y y y .V y y y
y y y Y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y
y y y y y y y y I y
y y y y y y y y
G -VPP 65 -00 y y y y y y y y y y y
2,2' ' y y y y y y y y y I
/ y y y y y y y y I y
y, y y� y y y y y y y y y y y y y ,v y y y y y y y y
y y ly
�lv y l y y y y y \d! .V
y y y y y y y y y y y y y
�' y ')' .V y �! y y y 1 y
y y y y y y y y J/ y y y I y
y y y y y
y y y y y y y wig .y y y y y I y
y �Nf y y y y y y y `V
.V y y y y y y y y y y � y
.V `�
y
81�1 y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y -V y .V
0' 40' 80' 120
(HORIZONTAL)
u�
xmvy�=
J ZT
cs
it
eon �p
b M
8
a
e�

GG
X337 V
y
��
���' .. ..,,
I GE y y y .V y y y y y
y
y tl!
GI-- y y y y y y y y OOH, ✓
y y y V J!
w y y y y
y y y y °j y YV /,v
y W y
V, y W y y
w y � y y � %
y y y y `� y y y y y
a,
y cy. y y
v y y y y
y `)' W y P 35 y *L y
�
1�py /y
y �p
:LI y y `i'
y y �, ,I, ,�
^o y y y y y y y y y Pw12o
`I' y y y y y O „o°� y y8 wT80nN y y y y/
'PP
41 -_ 41' ” --
W y y w y v y y — az +ooy h,- w /
y yPP 22
IV *1J y y y
End Devil's Racetrack West
y q, y Reach 1
J, Begin Reach 2
y y y W y y BTA: 42 +45 y y /
y y
y y
q
d O
A/ 1 4 727 y y iG y y y mob' '�V `i' AAA\ V
G y y 4,
y y y y
-37+0 y 41
Vi p0 y— y SB
y y y y y y XS 27 y y y y y y y y y y
y
y y
y w y y y y y y OG
y y y /
P `� y y y y y y y y y y y
y y y y y y y y y y y y w y y y
,I / y y w w
w y y y y
IV y y y y *L IV
y y y VP 26 y y y y tY `�' y. y y
y y y
y f
� y y y y w y v y �" y y y y � �
y w
y y y w y y '41
w y y
y� �' y y �
w
y y y y y y y y .�Le y \4/
y y y y y y y y
y y <y �' y y y y y y �' y y y y y
w y y y y w `I' \V y y �, y �, •� y
y/ y y y y y y y y y y IV y `U W y y
y y y y J y y y y y IV
y '
y \11 `I, y y i L:
y
y y
y y y y y y, A,
yC'��`
y
y y y y *b V
�V y y y y ��' y y y,
y y y y y y y y y y y y ,� i
W .y. �l! `t' ao' 80' 120'
(HORi20NTAL)
z *v,
v�MNz
Tc�
ra =v��Fw 5
I
e u
eon �p
b M
PP 11 �
Ag
� e
vzv�G�

y
y �� \
y !
y y
.v
OG*
-V y y GE y y
y y y GE y y
,y y
y E y
\� y/ y.
y y
y
.V y y y y
y y y yy oy
\ y J/ y y y y y.
y y
\ \ / y YV y A!
� y y �3
y y y\ v o0 p 1Pp g3 y y y y y y y J! \
y y y y y y IV \ \ ! CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE —
y J/ � `V y � � \
d! /y VP 36 y y y y y y y y \ --
GW �V `V y y
y y
y � � m � Begin Devil's Race Vack Creek (east) y V
y y y -V `V v y y p s y Reach 1 STA 52 +59 �V y
y y V
V y V/ y y y y y y y y y y
y y� �� y 53 0 ��� y y y
y ,V y
y
y ( 5ti: y y y y
y / V y xS 10 `V — y y y y y
� y � 0p y y � y y � P 26 y y
xg�s v �! y
7 y y y y
v*Oy y J/ y VP 4�1 ' ` 6ti 11 \ y s4 +\ , 00— y y
PP 22
V \ V O
y y �� 2 3 +pp✓ --1 y End North Branch
46 +00 STA:424 +18
/ y \ y y y
y C� y y y
y y y
y � Z y y 11 y y � y °° y � � y � y � � V y y y �
/ y o y y
y y ,V y `? / Devil's Racetrack Creek (west) \ y y
y \ J y 116 v y V y Reach 2 STA 52 +11
y y y y ,424 18 -'' y y y y y \ \ y y y
y y y DEV'IL'S RACE o °6 —- v 00 2.5 v y y
/" y y y �y WESt 13RAVNCHCK as y y V y y y y £3
Al y y y y y y y y y H y y y y y y v y 38L ------ 39L� -38L-----38L
y y y y @ a8 +00
/ `V '-
y
y p
y V y y y y y y y y y y y y OGW y
y /J! -V y y y `V �, / y
a! y y y y y' End Southeast Branch y y y / y y PL PL PL
y y `V y -V y .y / Reach 3 y `// y y y \ PI-
y V y STA: 328 +92 y y VP 41 y
Ji y y -V y y y \ .V
y OGW y y -V
�' ,V 328 +00. y y
-V y y y y y `V yV y VP y y y
V y y y y y _ V y ��
y y y V
y y y y y oo .v_ —_� � �' -, y y y y
y y y PP 82� /o y y ��� y y y y y y y y -0!
�V�
y y y (�/ y y y rye -- - y 't' y �
y v y �, y �� ,v y ,v y �' y � y
y y y \ y y y y y y -V !
y y y y .V V y h\ xS`v'3 y y y y y y y y y/
IV y y y y y y y y
y y y y y y / `V yXS 32 y y y y y y y -V
V / y y y � ✓// y y y
y y y y y y y y y
y y y / y y Cy y y y yV
y y �' y
/ y y y y y y y y y .�7 q
IV `V \ �
f /y �� G y y y y y y Oy
y y y y y
y y
y y y y y 9GJ y *V y y y y y `V / A
y y
y y y y Pv °y
y y .V `V y y y V y y y y
y y y
IV
✓ y y y y ryi. y y y IV y y VW37 y !
y
y �y-
y `V � � � y y y V y IV
0' 40' 80' 120'
(HORIZOMAL)
Z cNFMw
VMN
�Ez$$
Tcs
ra =o�Fw 5
w
�I
lJ 1
b
b
h
8 '� d
a �
A

V, 1 V, V- V, oo r 2s cF
I o
28 128 2A+0 Pp 7 J �,1 o
V' V P 13 V-
V,
L I V, V, V, 7 V,
8 N� 127 -
2
V- 12 V- `L V, � V,
8 N
II C 30 3C 30 V, 12 V, 0 V, CF
V- V, V- 26 Vxs s
1 V, V- V- 1 6 V, 6 C�
V, 2°
IG� V- V- V, V� V- V- �P 17 OGy� V, V, ,L
IV- V- 1Q25 —
GE / V, V-
V- V-
V- ti V- V- V, V, 125 y� ` V-
' V- +?
cn V- V- V- V, L�
cy� V a ST�yC
N V- V, w V- V, V, V-
V- 1 V- PP w V, y i +oo w MIDDLE BRANCH P 66 V- V- V G V- �Cy9C�1 F
W �� ,_ .214 +00 V- +00 V- V- 4` ,r, v
Z I _ �0 //''�� _, 215 `- V, �... �i218 +00 CF
J / �G �31 +00 06 w v-
I STA 214 +70 End Middle Branch Reach 1 V- v 6�. - :;-
V- V, V•' Begin Middle Branch Reach 2 V, V, �H V- V-
V-
V,
V, V- „` PP �8 V V, v y V- CE CE CE CE CE CE —
2 1 V- V, `L XS 2� Xt27 V, End Middle Branch Reach 2 JJJ // �" V-
V, V- V- �, V, V- V, V- V- V, V- STA 219 +06 V, -Z V-
V, V- V- V" V, V V, V- °o V, 1L
V, V, V- V- V- V- V- V-
V- V, V" V, V- � V, 123 V- V- V-
V, I V, w V- V,
V, V- V- V- V, V, V, V- V� V- V- V- V- V- V, V- V- V, V- V, V, V- V- V- V- V- V, V- V, V- V- V, V, V- V- V, V, V- V- V- V- V- V, V- -0 V- V- V- V, V, V- V- ��7v, - V V- - V,
V- V- V- V- V, V, V- V V, V- V, s V- V, V- V, 0-�V, V, V V, V
/ ^ V- V, V- V- V- V, V- V, V� - V- V- V V: V, V- V-
V- V- V- V- V, V- V- V- V- V- V, V� V, V, V, V,
V-1 V- NN V, ti V- V-
IV- V- V- V- V- V- V, V, V_VP 2e V- � V` V, V- V, V- V, \11
J V- V- V, V- � � `y> � � � � � � V. � V-
`� V V `� V- V, V- V-
V- V, V- w V-
V- VP 16 V" � V- � V- V' V- V, V- V" V- V- V- V- V, V, 1L
V• V- V<
� � V, VPVf9 � � � ti � � �
V V V V
� V' � w V- V' V-. � w � V- V' � � V-
V V V
V. V" V- V, V, V- V, V- V- V- V, �
V, V, \ v A V-
V- V, V, V, V, V, 36 +00 V,
\ V- V, V, V- V" —1 —__ / V, 38 +00 V- o�
V,
V- V- V- V- V- V- V, V, V, V- V- V- V-. \ 3j•00 __� \L . V-
V, V, ks V-
0>J V" 3., 3'J V- VP 26 V- VP 27 38 `L
0' 40' 80' 120'
(xoRiZO —)
z*N'vyi°
Tc s$$
ra =o�Fw 5
w
.lF
it
C�
€�
b
b
m
e
a �
o`�woc�

�J w w w w w w w w w w w w w -- w, w �%
\ w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w N w w w 3�* w p �CK /
V, w w w w w w w w w w w w w °p -w - r- -A
w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w - -- w bvj \\ s BRpN
u w w w w w w w w w w w w w w I w w v1E�3 w
V, w w w w w w w V, w w ao w w
V, w w w w w w w w w w w w w w cK w w w wxs� s8 w V
V, w w w w V. w w w w w w w VP 27 w w
V- w w V. w w w w w w w.. w VP 28 w w w V. w w
V, w
J w w w w w
\w w w � w w w `� w w w w w w w w w w w � w w �
V, w V- w w w w w w w w w
w w w 30 30 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
�� 30 w w w w w w w w w w w w
�J w w w w w w w w w `� w w Iw
\ w w w w w w w V w w w `� w w w w
V, w w w w w w � w w w I w
w w w w w w w w w w w IL
V, w w w w w w w
�J w w w w w V, w w w w.. w w w I w
w w w w w w w w w w w w w
V- V, w w w w w w w w w wl
w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
�u w w w w w w w w w w w Iw
\ w w w � w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w � w '� I �
V, w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w V w i w
�J w w w w w w w w w w w w
V, w w w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w w w
V, w w w w w I
w w w w w w w w w w w `� w w
�J w w w w w w w w w w '� w w w w I 4
V- w w w w w w w w w w
V, w w w w w w w w w w V-
w w w w w w w w w w w w w `�
w ICE �J w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
G' CE CE w w w w w w w w v w w w w w w l w
CE � CE � 0 w w w w w w w w
CEO CEO G w w w w w w w w w w w w w w wl
CE CE w vP z3- w w w w w w ti w w w w w w o w
CE CE — w w w w w w w w w w w w w w I +.
w w w
V, w w w w w w w w w w w w I N1,
w w w w w w w w w w M
311 +0� �\ w w w w w w w w w w w w� Q v..
\ 312400 w w V. VP 25w w$ V-
V'
w w w-_
_ w w w w w SOUTHEAST BRANCH 3zz +oo j
w V, 4 \ t - �373xOp w w w w w w w w w w - -319,00 w y" 6 pa-p0 w w w w w w LI.1
�9� �, PP 77 w `�' w w w w w PP 79 w w w - V, w 32 1e1� l-= -C _ - -'_ w V-
V, I Z w
w w w w 3 / { w w_��_ -� w� ' w w i 2
w w w - 3 7 +00 _ P4 i Oa"\Y./ � w w 2 l V-
V-
U V.
XS R *O w w w _/ 8. w CO w V-
V- w tlPP 80 w w w I a
_ w w w
V- w w w w l \ w w w w w w w w w w w w I w w
a
w �t 11-4,\, oo h w w w w XS 31 w V- w w w w w w w
9Q\ 30 w END SOUTHEASTBRANCHI J ` V w w V- )�30 w w w V. w w w w w l w
w REACH 1 JJJJ / /// V- w w w v' w w w w w w w w
x\ 1 w BEGIN REACH 2 w w w w w w w
/O \ w STA: 315 +59 w � w � v, w w w V, w w
\ Ow w w VP 24 w w w w w V-
I I w
w w Gw w w w w w w w w w w w w w I w w
w w w w w w w w V-
v
w w w w
w w w w w w w w w w w w w w" VP 29
w w w ww w w w w w w w w w w V, w w w w w w
V, w w w I I w w w w w w w w w
V, w w w w w w w w w w w w w wl w
V- w w w w w w w w w
w w w w w w w
�J w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w —3C
V- w w V w w w w 30
w
w w w w w w w w V-
V,
\ w w:! w w w w w w w w 30
\ �J w w w w w w w w w w w —30
V- w i /w w w w w w X30
V- w w w w w w w X30
\ w w w w w w 30
V, w w 30
�u w w w w X30
—
V, w w —30
"
30 30 30 30 30 — 30
I
\ � I
0' 40' 80' 120'
(HORIZO -)
z op- R -.
�WV��Nz
Tc s$$
ra =o�Fw 5
w
'•r
r„ r•
C�
e�
GD
b
h
ed2
P,
Ag
e
a �
A

V- V- V- o _ V-
28 ks SB V' V- V- 42x `L V- �� V- V- w `- ,,� a V_
V, VP 27 V- ti >L V- V- pp V- a V'
V- V- V V- V- V- V, V- V, V- w C CE
°' u CE
V, V, V, V, V, V- V, V- V- V, V, Y V, V, V- V, CE
V- V- w I V, V. V- V, V- V-
V- V- V- V, V, V- V- V- V, V, a V- V- V- V- o `- V, `, V_ CE -
w V- 4 ti V- V- V- � �;t W V, V, V,
V, V, V V- V- V- V- V, V- I a V- V
`� V, V- V, V, V- V- V- V. �� x V- V- V- V, Z V, V, V- V-
V, V, V- I V- V, V, V- O V- V,
V v %0 V,
V V- V, V, V s i rr�1 V. V- w �€
V, V- V, V, V- V, V- I V- V, V- V- 41� V- 44 +00 V, V, V, V- V- N� � V- V, V-
V, V- V- V, V, V- � VII V- V, V- V, (� 13 V- ks V- V- V- V- V-
7�_ L
V- V, V- V- IV, V- V- PEVI 'S RACETRACK 11e rPP z. V- V- (o° V- V_ V- V-
w
V- V V, V, V V, V- I V- V, V- V, WEST 4x100 oti� V; V-
wV, V, V, V
v V- V- V-0.
V V- V, IV- V- V, V- IV V- V- V- V, V- V, V- V-
V- V- V- V- V, Vr V- I V- V- V- V- V, V- V- V- V- V- V- V- \ ff2 V, V- c V V-
V, V- V-
V V- V- V- V-
m I
V- `L V, V, I ti PP 82 V- V, PP-24 V, V,
V, w V, V- V, V- O I V, V- V V- �I\ 6=° V, V, 116 0 V, o VILrSRACET�
�� V- w v I V- V, I\ 'z o `� `- oo a9x0� N WEST BRANCH V, m
N V- V, V- V, V
V V-
V, V~ 325 +pp _ \L
V- M I 1 ��SOUTHEA� ( \
�y� --g
�1�'P \ �G I� Yc, ` 327 +00 _'..... 1128. j2 -
2px'8 � � yOx00
SOUTHEAST BRANCH �? o
s +po az_z +oo . v) .o °- �� 1 /I //� v ks ks BRANCH _ ^ ^6 �i �> wv �(�
�� \ g20x0° ,i 0 V- LL I ..._ _323/..'- w I 32 \ �2B End Norlh B - M
�c-�' '? h Z V, �G V V, ��o,' � V- STA 404 +18 Branch ` 51 +00 - -11 -
V, ti V- — V_ J V, V V, V, V- END SOUTHEAST BRANCH V-
V, V, < -Va V, V- _ END SOUTHEAST BRP,NCH V- V✓ V- V, REACH 3
V- P8p V, U I V' V- V ;52 +(52 +11
V. ti STA: 326 +92
V, � � � REACH 2 V- � � �
V' V' ~ BEGIN REACH 3 V% V- ti w V, ^
V- Q I V, V-
� STA: 322 +75 � � � � � V,
V
V, V. V- V- VP 36
V- V, V, V' Devil's ISTA 52 Creek (west)
V, V, w Re STA 52 +11 m
V, V, V V- �. v w V }
V, V, V, V, V- V- VP 41
� � � �L � � � � � w � � 'L � � � � � � �37 � � � � V- � � � � V- w V✓ V, � V-
V- V, V- V- V, V, V- V V, V- V- V- V- V,
V- 3� �� 3� V- V- V- I= zi.
I
� 33 � 30 -I- 30 3C V. V V, Q
3C V-
� u, —3��3a I 3��3� � � � � � �
— 30 so 33 — 33 — 3� — V- V, V,
I 30— 3�_ V-�
I 30 — 30 psq
I I
I�
I r
Im
0' 40' 80' 120'
u�
xmvy�=
z�N�Mw
�v "z
Tc9
ra =o�Fw 5
w
r
�I
A ,
Q
r4
8
b M
L0
e
a �
z a € x
oi wo�

J I 3 r
o a I U >\ >\
I ' ol 3
I W VP 40
a I U >\
CL 9
o_ >\ _
LU o + I Y
J I I
� a � �
—PE GE Gr=— � nt_— rt I� a 3 W
�-e _Ty C-E�t r� �4 a CD
3 > Pi rr (YF -fro
9 y 9 7 3;
fir( \�� I 1`1 x x o 3 _ a2a +oo pryo '
421 +00_ 494
'—
00 `3iii 1 PP �G �;_ VP,94 j 'h"� >\
419 +00
0"�I
A
PP 24
n
420+
JVP 36
NORT*I BRANCH_,d ^� 3
pl, 91
>\ >\
y 3
>\
3 3 y
3 W 3
3 I 3 3 111 a Q — � � l0k
y VP 31 3 / 3
-4 3 >\ 0,3 >\
—)
1 9 3 3 *tea
3J 30 v" >\
30 30 3 3 3 3 >\ 3C -4 OF
4 o >\ >\
U 3
o' ao' ao, 120' � � � � � ?� >\ >\ >\
ixoRMN.Ay
u�
ps
;v�MMz
n =� p
:a
-QuFw 5
^w w
C�
e�
0
f�
eon
b
e�
is Q3
Ag
e
z
N v $ F�
o�

\\ \\ E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
138 E E E
r \\ \t E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
E E E E E E E E E E E
\ E E E E E E E Iso E E E
o \ \
\\ \ u \\E E
-r vv y Evv E E E E E E E E k E a„ •. E E E
\\ \ J E E E E E E E E E E E PP�i
le,
\ \
e�A%Q �s E E E
\ \ f E STA 506 +50 End Southwest Branch Reach 3; E E E E E • t/ '9 E E E
'O< Begin Southwest Branch Reach 4� .. E E E E E E E E Ciy % E E
E
E \� E x E E E E E 4z E E
E E \ E E 'SE yon +o6 _ E E E E E E E E
P� CE CE CE
CE E E
E
E E E E E
PE \ 57
E E E E xm Ew E 5 o 9 +0-o A P E �6
STA 501 +31 End Southwest Branch Reach 1 — E s P 6E `O,F xO 0� E E E E E E E E
Begin Southwest Branch�ea2 50 00 �
%a ss
' 0E 0
Begin Southwest Branch Reach 3 STA 502 +07 End Southwest Ba/ 10
E .
E E u
E
I vP I \ E E E E \\ E E E E E E E
o f E E\ E E E E �sc®° E E E
Begin Southwest Branch J
Reach 1 STA 500 +00 - 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 ,>-\ E k-
-30 E 51 o E
°y E \\ E E E End Southwest Branch E E
30 A\ E E \ E E Reach 4 STA 511 +32 +! E
J 30 \\ E E \ E E E E E E E
E E Ev v E E E E E 135 E
/ E E E E E E E E E O
��vvE E E E vv E E E E
E
w E vvv E E E Ev E OE E E �o � E E
2 E v E E 0"
E E E °�� E E v E E E E E E E E
w E E vE E E E vv E E I E E E
Q IE E E y E E E Evv E 1 +0 E E �
u�
xmvy�=
z�N�Mw
�
ZT
cs „
r
�I
e�
eon �p
b M
C�
z
8
e
a �
0' 40' 80' 120
(HORIZONTAL)