20071392 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_20150414

Cat Creek
Stream and Wetland Restoration
NCEEP Project Number: 71
Monitoring Contract Number: 004490
Monitoring Year 5
2014 Report
Submitted to
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
January 2015
Foogsstem
PROGRAM
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699

Monitoring Firm
4z -s
EQUINOX
bolonee through proper planning
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801.
Phone: 828 - 253 -6856
Project Contact: Hunter Terrell
Email: hunter @equinoxenvironmental.com

Cat Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration
2014 Monitoring Report (MY 5)
Table of Contents
1.0 Executive Summary / Project Abstract
Page 1
2.0 Methodology Page 5
3.0 References Page 5

Appendices
Appendix A. Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1.
Vicinity Map and Directions
Table la.
Project Components
Table lb.
Component Summations
Table 2.
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3.
Project Contacts
Table 4.
Project Attributes
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photo Station Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Cross - Sections with Annual Overlays and Photos
Longitudinal Profiles with Annual Overlays
Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table l la. Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional
Parameters — Cross - Sections)
Table 1 lb. Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Appendix E. Hydrologic Data
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Monthly Precipitation Data Compared to 30th and 70th Percentiles for
Macon County, NC
Precipitation and Water Level Plots
Table 13. Wetland Gauge Attainment Data
Appendix F. Wetland Boundary Delineation Data
Wetland Determination Forms

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The goals and objectives stated in the Cat Creek Restoration Plan (NCEEP 2007) are as follows:
Project Goals
• Provide a stable stream channel for the main channel and the unnamed tributaries to Cat
Creek that neither aggrades nor degrades while maintaining their dimension, pattern, and
profile with the capacity to transport their watershed's water and sediment load.
• Improve water quality and reduce erosion by stabilizing the stream banks for all streams
by improving riparian vegetation.
• Improve aquatic habitat of the main channel and tributaries with the use of natural
material stabilization structures such as root wads, rock vanes, woody debris, and a
riparian buffer.
• Provide aesthetic value, wildlife habitat, and bank stability through the creation or
enhancement of a riparian zone.
• Create contiguous wildlife corridor and provide diverse amphibian habitat with added
topographic and wetland features.
• Provide shading and biomass input to the stream and mast for wildlife when vegetation is
mature.
• Enhance wetland biochemical and geo- chemical processes over an extended area.
Project Objectives
• Restore or enhance over 8,881 feet of Cat Creek and its tributaries.
• Restore a natural riparian buffer.
• Restore or enhance 7.97 acres of swamp forest bog complex wetlands.
• Plant native trees and shrubs throughout the site.
Project Performance
The monitoring year five (MY5) vegetation plot data indicates that the site averaged 385
stems /acre across all plots. This is a 2% decrease in stems /acre from MY4 to MY5. This decline
can be attributed to 1 missing and 3 dead stems. The average number of stems is well above the
MY5 success criteria of 260 stems per acre. However, plots 2, 7, and 10 had 202, 202, and 121
stems per acre, respectively, which fail to meet the MY5 success criteria. When planted and
natural stems are combined, the average stem density is 760 stems per acre, which is above the
minimum established criterion. Of note, the additional volunteer stems were predominately alder
(Alnus serrulata) and silky dogwood (Corpus amomum). The site includes a diverse assemblage
of 16 planted species of native trees and shrubs. Planted species range from 3 to 8 per plot with
3 to 10 species observed when volunteers are included.
An initial treatment of exotic - invasive vegetation was performed in 2013, and isolated patches of
high threat invasive plant species were treated in winter, spring, and fall of 2014. After initial
treatments, invasive - exotics continue to persist on approximately 8% of the easement and require
re- treatment (Figure 2- "Re- treatment Required "). Additional treatments are scheduled for
spring and summer of 2015.Dominant invasive non - native plants include multiflora rose (Rosa
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland 3 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

multiflora), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), privet (Ligustrum sp.), and kudzu
(Pueraria montana var. lobata).
Stream longitudinal profiles have remained relatively stable among monitoring years. Five areas
of bed scour and two areas of deposition were the only significant differences between MY4 and
MY5 longitudinal profiles. Cross- sectional data from MY4 to MY5 also remained relatively
stable, with the exception of XS -2, XS -11, and UT -1 XS -2. XS -2 in the Swartwout reach
showed deposition on the left and right descending banks, respectively, resulting in reduced
bankfull widths, reduction in width/depth ratio, and increased entrenchment ratio. XS -11 in the
Parker reach had deposition on the left descending bank and scoured approximately one foot of
the bed, resulting in increased max depth. UT -1 XS -2 showed deposition on the left descending
bank and bed scour, causing a decrease in width/depth. Stream issues identified during MY5
visual assessments were minimal and consisted of two areas of degradation, one area of
aggradation, two undercut areas, and eleven bank erosion areas. These unstable areas represent
less than three percent of the project. The majority of these areas are found within the Upper
Swartwout reach and the Preserve reach.
Beaver activity was documented on the mainstem near cross - sections 7 and 8 as well as in the
Cat Creek Preserve reach. This information was conveyed to NCEEP, who prepared a beaver
removal request form that was submitted to the Animal and Plant Health Inspections Service
(APHIS) on December 15th, 2014. APHIS will be performing monthly site visits to trap beavers
and remove dams (as necessary) through project closeout.
Automated groundwater gauges were downloaded and checked for proper function on a monthly
basis during the growing season. Groundwater monitoring station data indicated that 17 of the
18 monitoring wells met and exceeded the eight percent hydroperiod success criteria during the
MY5 growing season. MW -18 failed to meet the 8% hydroperiod success criteria. Hydrology in
the vicinity of this monitoring well has been somewhat inconsistent between monitoring years,
meeting in MY2 and MY4, but not in MY I, MY3, or MY5.
In December 2013, wetland boundary delineations were performed to confirm the boundary of
wetland features on the project site. A Level -II Routine Determination method, as outlined in the
USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual (1987), was used to identify wetland boundaries. Data
points within wetlands were co- located with wetland gauges in order to provide relevant
hydrology data. Using plant community and soil data characterized at data points, the interface
of wetland and non - wetland plant communities and soils was identified and determined to be the
wetland boundary. A total of 9.06 acres of wetlands were delineated within the project site,
including 7.64 acres of restoration and 1.42 acres of enhancement. The MY4 wetland boundary
delineation indicates a 1.09 acre expansion in total wetland area compared to the original
baseline delineation of 7.97 acres. The shift in acreage is a result of a 0.04 acre and 0.02 acre
loss on the Swartwout and Cat Creek Preserve tracts, respectively, and a 1.15 acre expansion on
the Parker tract. The 0.04 acre loss on the Swartwout tract failed to meet the hydric soil field
indicator. The 0.01 acre loss on the Cat Creek Preserve tract failed to meet hydrology success
criteria 3 of the 4 monitoring years. Most of the expansion on the Parker tract was along the right
and left descending banks on the upstream end of the tract, as well as several marginal areas
along the periphery of previously delineated areas.
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland 4 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or easement
encroachment, statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements, and
data related to wetland boundary delineation can be found in the tables and figures in the report
appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports
can be found in the mitigation and restoration plan documents available on EEP's website. All
raw data supporting tables and figures in the appendices is available from EEP upon request.
Additionally, due to inconsistencies with previous thalweg stationing, the baseline thalweg data
and 2010 aerial imagery were utilized to apply the corrected stationing for the project site.
2.0 Methodology
The stream monitoring methodologies utilized in MY5 replicate those employed during the
previous monitoring year and are based on standard guidance and procedures documents
( Rosgen 1996 and USACE 2003). Vegetation monitoring data were collected following the
standard CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Level II (Lee et al. 2008). Wetland
hydrology was considered established if groundwater monitoring data indicated saturated soils
within 12 inches of the soil surface for 8% of the growing season. The growing season for the
site was based on the Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) data set for Macon County
(MRCS 2011).
3.0 References
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS -EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation. Version 4.2. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Department of Biology.
NCEEP (North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program). 2007. Cat Creek Stream
and Wetland Restoration. Macon County, North Carolina. Restoration Plan. Raleigh.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). Accessed June 2012. Climate Analysis
for Wetlands by County. http: / /www.wcc.nres.usda.gov /climate /wetlands.html
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa
Springs, Colorado.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACOE,
USEPA, NCWRC, NCDENR -DWQ. Wilmington District.
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland 5 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables

•- �t�•A�Crwt C'FI }
+ _ X11'• ,,�
I f•..
Ra
>f 58 —
J
ti
,
:
• I
_ • � ^-� ��! 'Y 1 ?i.' l-1� `A J`� °°•'h/+t Ali!! � _
J
441 } F - -' s '? l�
AA
puff 11 A,
G�. --
rr'': HI�FEq^ "3pritlAllClt a _
'
,
.4
a, I
r5r rr I Cat Creek Stream
& Wetland Restoration Site
[ i
t � Y
r � ` 64 .k LheP• d �
11
d a
j s{
Buncombe
Haywood County
S -, County
C un(y
Figure 1 - Vicinity Map �-
Graham �'
County Nenderso � t
Jackson C unry
`—iy Cat Creek Stream & ��
Cherokee Macon Transylvania
County Ccunry Ceunry €:A4 ICiY'I31F.'+7 Lt. F a ement OX
stem
oh G.eenvll Wetland Restoration Site °° ��°° • °°�° (�
C ry _ Cat Creek
_ _ -- _ _ Stream Restoration Site -u Y hkOGkAhk
Union' Towns Rebun Oconee Pickens
Cnun,y County Cean(y ;.- Ccunty C—ty Project No. 71 N C C
Directions: From Raleigh, proceed west on I -40 towards Knoxville, 0 0.25 0,5
TN. Merge onto US -74 (Exit 27) toward Waynesville. Follow US- Miles
74 to exit 81 US -23/US -441. Proceed south on US -441 for 17 miles Macon County North Carolina
to Cat Creek Road. Turn left onto Cat Creek Rd. and follow —1 mile e
to Ferguson Road. Turn left on Ferguson and continue —0.5 mile to 7.5 Minute Series Corbin Knob
the bridge crossing Cat Creek. The project site is upstream and
downstream of the bridge. Quadrangle

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table la. Project Components
Cat Creek Stream &Wetland / Pro'ect No. 71
Project
Riparian Wetland
(Ac)'
Non-
Riparian
Upland
(Ac)
Footage
BMP
Mitigation
Piverine
Non- Riverine
Component
Existing
Restoration
Approach
or
Mitigation
Units
*Stationing
BMP Elements
Comment
or
Feet/Acres
Level
1.42
Ratio
Enhancement I
Reach ID
Acreage'
(SMUS /WMUS)
Enhancement II
2,454
1
Creation
Livestock exclusion,
Cat Creek - Upper
Preservation
buffer plantings, bank
Swartwout
900 If
E2
900 If
2.51
360.00
00+00 - 09+00
stabilization in 3
Length /Area Total
8,881
9.06
locations
Cat Creek - Lower
0
0
2
Mitigation Unit Total
6,622.0
8.35
Swartwout
770 If
R
P 1
818 if
1:1
818.00
09 +00 - 17 +18
Cat Creek -Upper
1,4381£
E2
1,4391£
2.5:1
575.60
* *17 +49 -32 +13
Equipment crossing
Livestock exclusion,
Waldroup
and watering stations
bufferphm[ings
Livestock exclusion,
Cat Creek - Lower
Cattle crossing and
buffer plantings, and
Waldroup
4821f
E I
4821f
1.Sa
321.33
34 +37 - 39 +19
watering stations
structure to provide
enhanced profile
Cat Creek - Parker
1,750 If
R
PI
1,871 if
1:1
1871.00
39 +19 - 57 +90
Grade control, turbulent
riffles to add habitat,
Cat Creek Preserve
1,765 If
I[1
1,8791f
1.5:1
1252.67
59 +24 -78 +03
buffer plantings, and
invasive species
management
UT 1
1001£
E2
115 If
2.5:1
46.00
100 +00 - 101 +15
Livestock exclusion,
buffer plantings
UTl
3631£
R
PI
4581f
1:1
458.00
101 +15 - 105 +73
UT2
2101£
R
PI
381 If
1:1
381.00
200+00 - 203 +81
UT3
1651£
R
Pi
2941£
1:1
294.00
300+00- 302 +94
UT4
1101£
R
PI
2441f
1:1
244.00
400+00 - 402 +44
R
1.07
1:1
1.07
Swartwout
Livestock exclusion,
Wetlands
E
0.51
21
0.26
removal of drain pipe,
plantings
R
5.88
la
5.88
Parker Wetlands
E
0.25
2:1
0.13
R
0.69
1:1
0.69
Preserve Wetlands
E
0.66
2:1
0.33
= Non - Applicable
*See Appendix B Fig. 2. Stationing was Realigned in MY2 to Accurately Depict the Stream Reaches (See Executive Summary, Page 2)
—Stationing Stationing Includes a 25 Foot Crossing
Acreage updated based on MY4 wetland boundary delineation
Table lb. Component Summations
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
Restoration
Level
Stream
(it)
Riparian Wetland
(Ac)'
Non-
Riparian
Upland
(Ac)
Buffer
(Ac)
BMP
Piverine
Non- Riverine
Restoration
4,066
7.64
Enhancement
1.42
Enhancement I
2,361
1
Enhancement II
2,454
1
Creation
Preservation
HQ Preservation
Length /Area Total
8,881
9.06
1 0
0
0
2
Mitigation Unit Total
6,622.0
8.35
=Non-Applicable
IAcreage updated based on MY4 wetland boundary delineation
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland A -2
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History
Cat Creek Stream and Wetland / Project No. 71
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 4 Year 6 Months
Number of Reporting Years: 5
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
-
Jul -07
Final Design - Construction Plans
Jul -08
Jul -08
Construction
N/A
May -10
Temporary S &E mix applied
N/A
Jan -10
Permanent seed mix applied
N/A
Feb -10
Planting
N/A
Feb -10
Initial Wetland Monitoring Gauges & Rain Gauge Installed
N/A
Apr -10
Mitigation Plan / As -built (Year 0 Monitoring - Baseline)
Jun -10
Mar -11
Year I Monitoring
Dec -10
Mar -11
Year 2 Monitoring
Nov -11
Dec -11
Year 3 Monitoring
Nov -12
Dec -12
Year 4 Monitoring
Dec -13
Jan -14
Year 5 Monitoring
Dec -14
Dec -14
N/A - Item does not apply.
- Information unavailable.
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland A -3
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 3. Project Contacts
Cat Creek Stream and Wetland / Project No. 71
Designer
AECOM
701 Corporate Center Dr., Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
Primary Project Design POC
Ron Johnson (919 ) 854 -6210
Construction Contractor
Fluvial Solutions
P.O. Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Construction Contractor POC
Peter Jelenevs 919 605 -6134
Planting Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
P.O. Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
Planting Contractor POC
Charlie Bruton 919 242 -6555
Seeding Contractor
Fluvial solutions
P.O. Box 28749
Raleigh, NC 27611
Seeding Contractor POC
Peter Jelenevs 919) 605 -6134
Seed Mix Sources
Mellow Marsh Farm, Inc
1312 Woody Store Road
Siler City, NC 27344
919 742 -1200
Monitoring Performers (YO) - 2010
AECOM
701 Corporate Center Dr., Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
Stream Monitoring POC
Ron Johnson 919 854 -6210
Monitoring Performers (Yl) - 2010
AECOM
701 Corporate Center Dr., Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
Stream Monitoring POC
Ron Johnson (919 ) 854 -6210
Monitoring Performers (Y2) - 2011
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc.
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Steve Melton (828) 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Kevin Mitchell (828) 253 -6856
Wetland Monitoring POC
Win Taylor (828) 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y3)- 2012
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc.
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Steve Melton (828) 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Kevin Mitchell (828 ) 253 -6856
Wetland Monitoring POC
Kevin Mitchell 828 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y4)- 2013
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc.
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Hunter Terrell (828) 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Hunter Terrell (828) 253 -6856
Wetland Monitoring POC
Hunter Terrell 828 253 -6856
Monitoring Performers (Y5)- 2014
Equinox Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc.
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Hunter Terrell (828 ) 253 -6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Hunter Terrell (828 ) 253 -6856
Wetland Monitoring POC
Hunter Terrell 828 253 -6856
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland A -4
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 4. Project Attributes
Cat Creek Stream and Wetland / Project No. 71
Project County
Macon
Ph sio ra hic Region
Blue Ridge
Ecore ion
Blue Ridge Mountains - Broad Basins
River Basin
Little Tennessee River
USGS HUC
06010202040010
NCDW Sub -Basin
04 -0401
Within E#ent ofEEP Watershed Plan
Franklin to Fontana Planning Area
W RC Class
Cold
% of Project Easement Fenced or Demarcated
100%
Beaver Activity Observed During Des i nPhase
Yes
Restoration Component Attributes
Cat Creek
UT1
UT2
UT3
UT4
Drainage Areas .mi.
3.6
0.9
0.5
0.2
0.2
Stream Order
Third
Second
Second
First
First
Restored Length feet
*7,389
573
381
294
244
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Watershed Type
Rural
Watershed LUL.0 Distribution
Forest
Pasture /Managed Herbaceous
Other
700/a
70°/
50%
90"/
20%
301/6
30%
50%
10%
80%
0%
Oo/
0%
0%
0%
Watershed Inpervious Cover
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
NCDW AU /Index Number
2 -234
2 -234
2 -234
2 -234
2 -234
NCDWQ Classification
C
303d Listed
No
U streamof 303d Listed Segment
No
Reasons for 303d Listing orStressor
N/A
Total Acreage ofEasement
38.9
Total Vegetated Acrea e within Easement
38.9
Total Planted Acreage as Part of Restoration
20
Ros en Classification ofPre- Edstin
G4
Cb4
Ros en Classification of As -Built
C4
C4
C
C
Cb
Valley Type
VII
VII
VII
VII
VII
Valley Slope
0.0062 -0.015
0.023
0.013
0.013
0.048
Valley Side Slope Range
15 -30%
15 -30%
15 -30°/
15 -30%
15 -30"/
Valley Toe Slope Range
2 -3%
2 -3%
2 -3%
2 -3%
2 -3%
Cowardin Classification
Trout Waters Designation
No
Species of Concem, Endangered, Etc.
No
Dorfman[ Soil Series and Characteristics
Series
Depth
Clay%
K
T
Nikwasi
Reddies
Nikwasi
Nikwasi
Udorthents
> 60 inches
> 60 inches
> 60 inches
> 60 inches
> 60 inches
5 -18%
1 -18%
5 -18%
5 -18%
N/A
.05 -.20
.05-.20
.05-.20
.05 -.20
N/A
3
3
3
3.000
N/A
- Information unavailable.
N/A - Item does not apply.
s Stationing Includes a 25 Foot Crossing.
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland A -5
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

lire G. lule2rateu l.Urrelll l.ullulllull riall view Ornit
0
Cat Creek (Preserve)
41 A
tp _
R r 1 All oily
H
. � U'1'4 �! �'� SPringSRoad
fi
at Creek (Waldroup)
Ar
U 134 f
9
r� YA■
It Cat Creek (Parker)
UT2
f * Cat Creek
et'
Prepared for Project: Cat Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration
"Nw- Year 5 Monitoring
Macon County, North Carolina
Sheet 1 of 3
,,Eco.smstem Date
�•��,,� n January 2015
Notes: 1) 2010 Aerial Photo Prepared by
2) Base Map Data Provided by AECOM.
3) Wetland boundaries updated using MY4 Wetland Boundary Delineation data
_ 4,��""
Project Number E U 1 N
NCEEP # 71
Cross Sections
M�T
-W
Log Vane
Cross Vane
J -Hook
Legend
r Rock Sill
L
Easement Boundary
A Crest Gauges
- Stream Alignment
* Photo Points
Roads
Longitudinal Profile Begin /End
Notes: 1) 2010 Aerial Photo Prepared by
2) Base Map Data Provided by AECOM.
3) Wetland boundaries updated using MY4 Wetland Boundary Delineation data
_ 4,��""
Project Number E U 1 N
NCEEP # 71
Cross Sections
Beaver Dam
Log Vane
Cross Vane
J -Hook
Root Wad
r Rock Sill
L
n Control Points
A Crest Gauges
• Rain Gauge
* Photo Points
Wetlands
out)
® Creation
® Enhancement
Restoration
® Preservation
MY4- Expansion
a
4oa
®MY4- Not Meeting Wetland Criteria
be
a
Year 5 Conditions
Vegetation Plots
0 Criteria Met MY5
❑ Criteria Not Met MY5
Wetland Gauges
Criteria Met MY5
0 Criteria Not Met MY5
Bank /Bed Conditions
'r
Bed Aggradation
Bed Degradation
Bank Erosion
Mass Wasting
— - Undercut
Debris Jam
Vegetation Problem Areas
Low Stem Density
® Treated Invasives
Invasives - Re- treatment Required
Notes: 1) 2010 Aerial Photo Prepared by
2) Base Map Data Provided by AECOM.
3) Wetland boundaries updated using MY4 Wetland Boundary Delineation data
_ 4,��""
Project Number E U 1 N
NCEEP # 71

II]
2. Integrated Current Condition Flan View Dratt
Legend
Easement Boundary
- -- Stream Alignment
Roads
Longitudinal Profile Begin /End
Cross Sections
Log Vane
f�. Cross Vane
J -Hook
}� Root Wad
Rock Sill
A Control Points
® Crest Gauges
• Rain Gauge
* Photo Points
Wetlands
® Creation
® Enhancement
Q Restoration
® Preservation
MY4- Expansion
® MY4- Not Meeting Wetland Criteria
1
r
Year 5 Conditions
Vegetation Plots
0 Criteria Met MY5
❑ Criteria Not Met MY5
Wetland Gauges
(10 Criteria Met MY5
0 Criteria Not Met MY5
Bank /Bed Conditions
Bed Aggradation
Bed Degradation
Bank Erosion
r - ; dr -
.� III -, r
ti Cat Creek (Upper Swartwout)
MIN"-
T'
v� - -
Cat Creek (Lower Swartwout)
Longitudinal Profile Reach it V
Mass Wasting '
Undercut �r S ".0,.
Debris Jam for •,,
Vegetation Problem Areasr+"r+T ^
Low Stem Density y
Treated Invasives °'
_ -_ Cat Creek (Upper Waldroup) • nnws� 1
Invasives - Re- treatment Required
Cat Creek (Lower Waldroup)
WTI�NlI1',
Prepared for
Nw-
Eco.sv.steill
a
e�ti`Zaa ,
*fir h
600 f
m Feet
Project: Cat Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration
Year 5 Monitoring
Macon County, North Carolina
Sheet 2 of 3
Date
January 2015
V P3 4
'P2
11 As
i
} -
Longitudinal,Profile Reach OP
J6
L �
k
Notes: 1) 2010 Aerial Photo
2) Base Map Data Provided by AECOM.
3) Wetland boundaries updated using MY4 Wetland Boundary Delineation data
Project Number
NCEEP # 71
P1
,v
C
e
r
N
W E
*« ; s
Prepared by
EQUINO?CI

Figure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View Draft
NN7
C k
- •
`, �` o
�• I _
w{ Ate•
Cat Creek (Parker)
Longitudinal Profile Reach
-
/*
/•
k'
111111fff
,'S
Fer gp
�- son R ° a d
woo
i.
VP13 . � ♦
•W17 J
a ry
. \N.4 i
o.
UT4
•�.
ss u UT2
}
,, : }._
•�•�
_
•
/.�•— •— •�.`•.00l�
'�
�UT3 \�
`I.�
Legend
•
Easement Boundary
- - -- Stream Alignment
�- �.::..:; ��
♦•�:._.�•�
,
� Roads
_ . }y'
— Longitudinal Profile Begin /End
•`
G •
�� •
Year 5 Conditions
— Cross Sections
•`
• 1001*
Vegetation Plots
— Beaver Dam
011.% Log Vane
•�
de
■ Criteria Met MY5
Criteria Not Met MY5
Cross Vane
r.
/ '
,� J -Hook
•` cy
•
` -
Wetland Gauges
Root wad
Cat Creek (Preserve)
-
4 Criteria Met MY5
Criteria Not Met MY5
Bank /Bed Conditions
r Rock Sill
Control Points
® Crest Gauges
.n
Bed Aggradation
• Rain Gauge
_
Bed Degradation 9
Bank Erosion
Mass Wasting
� Photo Points
Wetlands
-
- — - Undercut
® Creation
w
Debris Jam
® Enhancement
Vegetation Problem Areas
Restoration
z v
Low Stem Density
® Preservation
0 212.5 425
850
• �
Treated Invasives
MY4- Expansion
Feet
Invasives - Re- treatment Required
® MY4- Not Meeting Wetland Criteria
3
Prepared for
Project:
Cat Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration
Year 5 Monitoring
Notes: 1) 2010 Aerial Photo
2) Base Map Data Provided by AECOM.
Prepared by
.,�
Macon County, North Carolina
3) Wetland boundaries updated using MY4 Wetland Boundary Delineation data
Sheet 3 of 3
°3n,
Eco.sv,,.steill
EQUINOX
Date
Project Number
January 2015
ry
NCEEP # 71
- ��c,K,,,,:�,r „,,

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - Cat Creek
Assessed Length 7,389 feet
Number
Footage
Adjusted%
Number
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
with
with
for
Major Channel
Channel
Stable,
Metric
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Category
Sub Category
Performing
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Ae2radation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
1
11
100%
1. Vertical Stability
flow laterally not to include point bars).
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
1
70
100
2. Riffle Condition
L Texture/ Substrate -Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
43
43
100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfill Depth ?1.6).
42
42
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
2. Leneth appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance between tail of
up stream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
42
42
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
37
42
88%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
41
42
98%
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
1. Scoured /Eroding
scour and erosion.
3
494
97%
9
45
98
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
3
66
100%
?
20
100%
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
21
1 560
96%
11
165
97%
3. Engineered
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
21
21
100%
Structures
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
13
13
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
18
18
100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT exceed
3. Bank Protection
15%.
17
17
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining- Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull
4. Habitat
Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads /logs providing some cover atbase -flow.
14
14
100%
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland B -4 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - UT1
Assessed Len th 573 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aearadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally not to include point bars).
1
17
99%
2 Deeradation - Evidence of downcutting
1
33
99%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
7
7
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth ? 1.6).
6
6
100%
Condition
2. Len pt appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance between tail of
up stream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
6
6
100%
1. Thalweg centering at up stream of meander bend (Run).
6
6
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
7
7
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resultingsimply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
24
9R%
1
10
100%
Banks undercut /overhangingto the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse.
0
u
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
1
1 24
98%
1
N/A
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
3
3
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
2
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
2
2
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15 %.
3
3
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining— Mar Pool Depth : Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio> 1.6. RootwadsAogs providing some cover at
3
3
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland B -5 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - UT2
Assessed Len th 381 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aearadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2 Devradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
5
5
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth ? 1.6).
4
4
100%
Condition
2. Len pt appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance between tail of
up stream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
4
4
100%
1. Thalweg centering at up stream of meander bend (Run).
4
4
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
4
4
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resultingsimply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Banks undercut /overhangingto the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse.
0
0
100 %
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
NiA
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
2
2
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
2
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
2
_
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15 %.
N/A
\ %A
N/A
Pool forming structures maintaining— Mar Pool Depth : Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio> 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
N/A
.A
N/A
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland B -6 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - UT3
Assessed Len th 294 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aearadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2 Deeradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
4
4
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth ? 1.6).
3
3
100%
Condition
2. Len pt appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance between tail of
up stream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
3
3
100%
1. Thalweg centering at up stream of meander bend (Run).
3
3
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
3
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resultingsimply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse.
0
u
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
2
2
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
2
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
2
_
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15 %.
N/A
N %.4
N/A
Pool forming structures maintaining— Mar Pool Depth : Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio> 1.6. RootwadsAogs providing some cover at
N/A
Ni.4
N/A
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland B -7 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - UT4
Assessed Len th 244 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aearadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2 Deeradation - Evidence of downcutting
1
48
80%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture /Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
5
5
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth ? 1.6).
4
4
100%
Condition
2. Len pt appropriate ( >30% of centerline distance between tail of
up stream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
4
4
100%
1. Thalweg centering at up stream of meander bend (Run).
4
4
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
4
4
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured /Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse.
0
u
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
2
2
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
2
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
2
_
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15 %.
2
2
100
Pool forming structures maintaining— Mar Pool Depth : Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. RootwadsAogs providing some cover at
2
2
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland B -8 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
Planted Acreage 20
% of
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Planted
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
N/A
0
0.00
0%
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3,
Stipple
2. Low Stem Density Areas
4, or 5 stem count criteria.
Orange Dots White Background
6
0.10
<1%
Totals
6
0.10
<1%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
N/A
0
0.00
o
0 /o
given the monitoring ear.
Cumulative Totals
6
0.10
<1%
Easement Acreage 38.9
of
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
Cross Hatch
9
2.95
8%
Red - Dense/Yellow - Present
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
Stipple
0
0.00
0%
Purple Dots White Background
N/A - Item does not apply.
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland B -9 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 1
Station 3 +65 - Downstream
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 2
Station 6 +30 - Downstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland B -10 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 3
Station 15 +98 - Downstream
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 4
Station 34 +70 - Downstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland B -11 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 5
Station 50 +20 - Upstream
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 6
Station 57 +36 - Downstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland B -12 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 7
Station 61 +43 - Downstream
UT4 — Permanent Photo Station 8
Station 402 +08 - Upstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland B -13 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 9
Station 65 +80 - Downstream
Cat Creek — Permanent Photo Station 10
Station 67 +88 - Downstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland B -14 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Cat Creek / Project No. 71
Vegetation Plot
1D
Vegetation
Survival
Threshold Met?
Tract Mean
I
Yes
75%
2
No
3
Yes
4
Yes
5
Yes
6
Yes
7
No
8
Yes
9
Yes
10
No
11
Yes
12
Yes
13
Yes
14
Yes
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland C -1
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Vegetation Plot Data
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
Monitoring Year 5 — July 25, 2014
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland C -2 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
Monitoring Year 5 — July 25, 2014
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland C -3 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6
Monitoring Year 5 — July 25, 2014
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland C -4 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8
Monitoring Year 5 — July 25, 2014
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland C -5 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 9
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 10
Monitoring Year 5 — July 25, 2014
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland C -6 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 11
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 12
Monitoring Year 5 — July 25, 2014
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland C -7
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 13
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 14
Monitoring Year 5 — July 25, 2014
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland C -8 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Cat Creek / Project No. 71
Report Prepared By
Owen Carson
Date Prepared
8/11/201410:56
Database Name
Equinox- 2014- A- CatCreek- MY5.mdb
Database Location
Z: \ES \NRI &M \EEP Monitoring \Cat Creek \CC -MY5- 2014 \Data \Veg
Computer Name
FIELDTECH3 -PC
File Size
145760512
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT ------------
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of
project (s) and project data.
Proj, Planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year.
This excludes live stakes.
Proj, Total Stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This
includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural /volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead
stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and
percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each
plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and
natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are
excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY -------------------------------------
Project Code
71
project Name
Cat Creek
Description
River Basin
Little Tennessee
Length(ft)
Stream -to -Edge Width (ft)
Area (sq m
Required Plots calculated
Sampled Plots
14
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland C -9 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix C
Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
EEP Project Code 71. Project Name: Cat Creek
Vegetation Assessment Data
Exceeds requirements by 109/6
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland C -10 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Current Plot Data (MY5 2014)
Annual Means
Stem
size (ares)l
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
Exceeds requirements by 109/6
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland C -10 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Stream Survey Data

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek- Swartwout
Cross - Section 1 - Riffle
Station 11 + 16
2114
2113
2112
2111
m
w
02110
W
- - - --
-
- - - - --
- -
- - - - --
- - - - --
- - - --
- - - - - - -
2109
2108
2107
2106
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0 +55
Station (feet)
As -built 2010 - MYl 12/2010 - MY2 5/25/2011 -W34111/2012 - MY4 4/1/2013 - MY5 4/2/2014 - - - Bkf
Upstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Downstream
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek- Swartwout
Cross - Section 2 - Pool
Station 12 + 86
2111
2110
2109
2108
u
w_
C
0 2107
m
W
2106
2105
Vr
2104
2103
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0+50 0+55
Station (feet)
— As -bu0t 2010 � MYl 12/2010 � MY2 5/25/2011 � MY3 4/11/2012 � MY4 4/1/2013 � MY5 4/2/2014 — — — BE,
Upstream
Downstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -2 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek- Swartwout
Cross - Section 3 - Riffle
Station 13 + 50
2110
2109
2108
2107
y
c-
- - - --
- - - - --
- - - - --
- - - - --
- - - - --
- - - - --
- - - - --
- - - - - --
2106
"
W
2105
2104
2103
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0+50
Station (feet)
- As -built 2010 � MY1 12/2010 - MY2 5/25/2011 - MY3 4/11/2012 � MY4 4/1/2013 - MY5 4/2/2014 - - - BkF
Upstream
Downstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -3 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek- Parker
Cross - Section 4 - Pool
Station 40 + 96
2079
2078
2077
2076
m
- - - --
- --
- - - - --
------------
- - - - --
- - - --
- - - --
— ---
- -- - --
- - - - --
a
2075
,LO
ca
m
67
W
2074
2073
2072
2071
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55
Station (feet)
— As- built2010 �WI12 /2010 �W25125/2011 �W34/11/2012 �W44/1/2013 �MP54/112014 - -- 131"
Upstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -4
Klght Uescendmg HanK
Downstream
Nil
" .I
A:
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek- Parker
Cross - Section 5 - Riffle
Station 44 + 04
2077
2076
2075
2074
m
w
------
—
- - --
- -- - --
r 2073
ce
d
W
2072
2071
2070
2069
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0 +45 0+50 0+55
Station (feet)
— As- bu0t2010 �WI12 /2010 �W25125/2011 �W34/11/2012 �W44/1/2013 �MP54/112014 - -- Bkf
Upstream
Downstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -5 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek- Parker
Cross - Section 6 - Pool
Station 45 + 06
2077
2076
2075
2074
OPPOW
m
w
--
- - - - --
- - - --
- - - - --
- --
- - - --
2073
a�
W
2072
2071
2070
2069
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0 +45 0+50 0+55
Station (feet)
— As -built 2010 � MY1 12/2010 � MY2 5/25/2011 � MY3 4/11/2012 � MY4 4/1/2013 � MY5 4/1/2014 — — — B "
Upstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -6
Downstream
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek- Parker
Cross - Section 7 - Riffle
Station 48 + 31
2075
2074
2073
2072
d
I
a-
--
-----------------------------
-
- - - - --
- - - --
- - - - --
2071
W
�
2070
2069
2065
2067
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
- As -built 2010 � W 1 12/2010 � W 2 5/25/2011 � W 3 4/12/2012 � W 4 4/2/2013 � MP5 4/1/2014 - - - 111"
Upstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -7
Downstream
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek- Parker
Cross - Section 8 - Riffle
Station 51 + 17
2073
2072
2071
2070
d
q
t 2069
--
d
W
2068
\
2067
2066
2065
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0 +45 0+50 0+55
Station (feet)
- As -built 2010 � MY1 12/2010 � MY2 5/26/2011 � MY3 4/12/2012 � MY4 4/2/2013 � MY5 4/1/2014 - - - 111"
Upstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -8
.i y.
5 �
Downstream
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Parker
Cross - Section 9 - Pool
Station 54 + 10
2071
2070
2069
2068
m
w
a-
- - - --
- - - --
- - - - --
-- --
- - - --
- - - - --
------
- - - - --
- - - - --
- - - - --
Lo 2067
ca
m
W
2066
2065
2064
2063
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55
Station (feet)
- As -built 2010 � MYl 12/2010 � W 2 5/26/2011 � W 3 4/12/2012 � W 4 4/2/2013 � MP5 4/1/2014 - - - 131"
Upstream
1\1�;lll L:)at ri
Downstream
A
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -9 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek- Parker
Cross - Section 10 - Riffle
Station 55 + 48
2070
2069
2068
2067
m
"'
- - --
- - - --
- - - --
- - - - --
------
- - - - --
-
2066
LO
OF
m
W
2065
2064
2063
2062
0+00 0+05 0+10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0 +50 0 +55
Station (feet)
- As -built 2010 � MYl 12/2010 � MY2 5/26/2011 � MY3 4/12/2012 - MY4 4/2/2013 - MY5 4/1/2014 - - - Bkf
Upstream
Downstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -10 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek- Parker
Cross - Section 11 - Pool
Station 56 + 22
2069
2068
2067
2066
^"
--
------
- - - - --
- - - - --
- - - --
- - - - --
- - - - --
—
--
- - - - --
d
w
2065
d
W
2064
2063
2062
2061
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0+30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55
Station (feet)
- As -built 2010 � MYl 12/2010 � MY2 5/26/2011 � MY3 4/12/2012 - MY4 4/2/2013 � MY5 4/1/2014 - - - Bkf
Upstream
Downstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D- I I Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT
Cross - Section 1 - Riffle
Station 102 + 68
2113
2112
2111
2110
d
w
p 2109
_d
W 2108
2107
way
2106
2105
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55
Station (feet)
M -built 2010 � MYl 12/2010 - MY2 5/25/2011 � MY3 4/11/2012 � MY4 4/1/2013 �MY5 4/2/2014 - - - fil l
Upstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -12
}+ e
- xr.
1 M.
itlgnt vescenamg bank
Downstream
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
UT
Cross - Section 2 - Pool
Station 104 + 09
2110
2109
2105
2107
u
w
0 2106
W
2105
2104
2103
2102
0+00 0+05 0 +10 0 +15 0 +20 0 +25 0 +30 0 +35 0 +40 0 +45 0+50 0+55
Station (feet)
— As -built 2010 � MY1 12/2010 — MY2 5/25/2011 � MY3 4/11/2012 � MY4 4/1/2013 � MY5 4/2/2014 — — — BE,
Upstream
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
D -13
Y
f r
�F� 1
R
t -
Downstream
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
OUR
2113
2111
2109
2107
4.
s~
O
Z
! 2105
W
2103
2101
2099
2097
`Px
SO
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek- Swartwout
Longitudinal Profile
Stationing 09 +04 - 17 +23
.9x
.SO
IO
�O
II
1O
I2
�O
Station (feet)
I�
�O
�O
IS
IO
I6
O
Ij
xs
O
— BAs- Built2010 ThalwegMY112 /2010 ThalwegMY25 /26/2011 Thalweg MY3 4/11/2012 �ThalwegMY44 /1/2013 — ThalwegMY54 /3/2014 • Bkf - ------- -WS (` StructuresMY2 Linear(Bkf)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -14 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Average Bankfull Slope
•.
•
r - -----•
i
i-
------•-- - --• -,
i
i
i
i
XS2 - P XS3 - R
.9x
.SO
IO
�O
II
1O
I2
�O
Station (feet)
I�
�O
�O
IS
IO
I6
O
Ij
xs
O
— BAs- Built2010 ThalwegMY112 /2010 ThalwegMY25 /26/2011 Thalweg MY3 4/11/2012 �ThalwegMY44 /1/2013 — ThalwegMY54 /3/2014 • Bkf - ------- -WS (` StructuresMY2 Linear(Bkf)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -14 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
2078
2076
2074
2072
2070
w
C
O
2068
W
2066
2064
2062
2060
Iro
x°
0
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek - Parker
Longitudinal Profile
Stationing 40 +35 - 57 +07
I I I
r % r0a r 6X °9 x °o sox°o 11% 0 sIr. s%19
Station (feet)
As -Built 2010 Thalweg MYl 12/2010 ■ Thalweg MY2 5/26/2011 Thalweg MY3 4/12/2012 Thalweg MY4 4/2/2013 Thalweg MY5 4/2/2014 ♦ Bkf - -------- WS < Structures MY2 Linear (Bkf)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -15 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
•
' - - - - --
------- - - - - --
Average B
nkfull Slope
XS4 - P
� r---
'
- - - - - --
R-
XS6 - P
'• - - ---
- - -- - -- •
-- - --
XS - R
•
` •
XS7 - R
XS9 - P •
�-R
•
FxS1 1 -
P'
I I I
r % r0a r 6X °9 x °o sox°o 11% 0 sIr. s%19
Station (feet)
As -Built 2010 Thalweg MYl 12/2010 ■ Thalweg MY2 5/26/2011 Thalweg MY3 4/12/2012 Thalweg MY4 4/2/2013 Thalweg MY5 4/2/2014 ♦ Bkf - -------- WS < Structures MY2 Linear (Bkf)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -15 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
2115
2113
2111
2109
2107
4.
0
2105
W
2103
2101
2099
2097
ID
Ix
Stream Survey Data
UT1
Longitudinal Profile
Stationing 101 +59 - 105 +53
I 0 I 0 xOO 10
I19,"X* l��xso
I os�0 I os�0
Station (feet)
As -Built 2010 — ThalwegMY112 /2010 Thalweg MY2 5/26/2011 Thalweg MY3 4/11/2012 Thalweg MY4 4/1/2013 — Th alweg MY5 4/3/2014 • Bkf - -- ------WS ( StructuresMY2 Linear(kfkf)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -16 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
•
--••----------- ---- ------- ---
Average I
iankfull Slope
--
,
,-
-------------------
XS1 -R
,
'
,
'r
,
•
XS2 - P
I 0 I 0 xOO 10
I19,"X* l��xso
I os�0 I os�0
Station (feet)
As -Built 2010 — ThalwegMY112 /2010 Thalweg MY2 5/26/2011 Thalweg MY3 4/11/2012 Thalweg MY4 4/1/2013 — Th alweg MY5 4/3/2014 • Bkf - -- ------WS ( StructuresMY2 Linear(kfkf)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -16 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
Swartwout Cross Section 1 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2014; MY5
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
8
7.3%
7%
0.062 - 0.125
2
1.8%
9%
0.125-0.25
16
14.5%
24%
0.25 -0.5
8
7.3%
31%
0.5 - 1.0
5
4.5%
35%
1 -2
7
6.4%
42%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
42%
4 - 8
4
3.6%
45%
8-16
5
4.5%
50%
16-32
7
6.4%
56%
32-64
4
3.6%
60%
64 -128
10
9.1%
69%
128 -256
34
30.9%
100%
256 -512
0
0.0%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
110
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
16
D84
160
D95
180
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -17 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -18
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
Cat Creek - Swartwout
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 1- Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
6'L ,lh ,yh Oh ,y0 'L
O� Oy O'
Oti h' h, 1
04 O'
b 4 1�O ,S'L hb ,lW hh 1ti 'LD`
ti �` 0 yb" hti 6P'y ,yW'ti h65 �ti0
b4 oi`°
�;LO �b0 eato
-MYO Cumulative % � MYl Cumulative %
�IVU Cumulative % � MY3 Cumulative % �MY4 Cumulative % tMY5 Cumulative %
Cat Creek - Swartwout
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 1- Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
' }
O' ti
O' O' S h"
O' oo6'y' O.1' O'
O'
ti � 'y ti h O
9i yh" 3ti hb' .tiW' hb ti1
'y 'L h'ti
O O o
bti 0b eac
10ti FOR 0
■ MYO % by Size Group ■ MY1 % by Size Group
■MY2 %by Size Group ■ MY3 %by Size Group ■ MY4 %by Size Group
■MY5 % by Size Group
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -18
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
Swartwout Cross Section 2 - Pool
Monitoring Year - 2014; MY5
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
34
32.4%
32%
0.062 - 0.125
4
3.8%
36%
0.125-0.25
10
9.5%
46%
0.25-0.5
26
24.8%
70%
0.5 - 1.0
3
2.9%
73%
1 -2
5
4.8%
78%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
78%
4 - 8
1
1.0%
79%
8-16
5
4.8%
84%
16-32
7
6.7%
90%
32-64
4
3.8%
94%
64 -128
6
5.7%
100%
128 -256
0
0.0%
100%
256 -512
0
0.0%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
105
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.28
D84
16
D95
68
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -19 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -20
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
Cat Creek - Swartwout
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 2 - Pool
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
OOti 'YTS O,Ly Oh ti y' L
0 ooey Y,yS' oti o
o
�; b p 6 ,�rO '�i'L t°a 1�$ 'LhrD
ti
ye' y'y1" O'L�`
ti yti
OC`b OArO oc.
Doti tioa o
t MYO Cumulative % t MY1 Cumulative % tMY2 Cumulative % tMY3 Cumulative % tMY4
Cumulative % --ll Cumulative %
Cat Creek - Swartwout
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 2 - Pool
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
In
30%
20%
10%
0%
ra'L .y5 ,yh h O 'L
O� Oti O O• 1 ti
O' OOti Y.yh O'L O
O•
b 0 ,Y0 ,5'L 6b ,y4 h0
ti �` 4i 6' 'l% b,1 0;L
'Y
titi ,yb
oy .YO
'L c�'Y
�4 00
,y0 b0 ago
YO'Y �Ob 0
■ MYO %by Size Group ■ MY1 %by Size Group ■ MY2 %by Size Group ■MY3 % by Size Group ■ MY4 %by Size Group
■ MYS %by Size Group
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -20
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
Swartwout Cross Section 3 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2014; MY5
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
9
9.0%
9%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
9%
0.125-0.25
20
20.0%
29%
0.25-0.5
8
8.0%
37%
0.5 - 1.0
5
5.0%
42%
1 -2
2
2.0%
44%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
44%
4 -8
7
7.0%
51%
8-16
19
19.0%
70%
16-32
10
10.0%
80%
32-64
6
6.0%
86%
64 -128
13
13.0%
99%
128 -256
1
1.0%
100%
256 -512
0
0.0%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
7.6
D84
45
D95
110
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -21 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -22
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
Cat Creek - Swartwout
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
OOti 'YTS O,Ly Oh ti y' L �; b p 6 ,�rO '�i'L t°a 1�$
0 ooey Yy5' oti o
o
'LhrD
ti
y'y1" O'L�`
ti yti
OC`b OArO oc.
Doti tioa o
t MYO Cumulative % t MY1 Cumulative
% tMY2 Cumulative % tMY3 Cumulative %
tMY4
Cumulative % tMY5 Cumulative %
Cat Creek - Swartwout
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
,111
1110 INN oil
11111,
11,111111&
0%
ra'L .y5 ,yh 5 O ti b 0 ,Y0 ,5'L 6b ,y4
O� Oti O O• 1 ti ti �` 4i 6' 'l% b,1
O' OOti Y.yh O'L O
O•
h6
0;L
'Y
titi ,yb
oy .YO
'L c�'Y
�4 00
,y0 b0 ago
YO'Y �Ob 0
■ MYO %by Size Group ■ MY1 %by Size Group ■ MY2 %by Size Group ■MY3 % by Size Group
■ MY4 %by Size Group
■ MYS %by Size Group
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -22
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
Parker Cross Section 4 - Pool
Monitoring Year - 2014; MY5
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
39
36.8%
37%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
37%
0.125-0.25
7
6.6%
43%
0.25-0.5
5
4.7%
48%
0.5 - 1.0
6
5.7%
54%
1 -2
2
1.9%
56%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
56%
4 - 8
1
0.9%
57%
8-16
10
9.4%
66%
16-32
13
12.3%
78%
32-64
20
18.9%
97%
64 -128
3
2.8%
100%
128 -256
0
0.0%
100%
256 -512
0
0.0%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
106
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.63
D84
40
D95
59
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -23 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -24
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 4- Pool
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
OOti 'YTS O,Ly Oh ti y' L �; b p 6 ,�rO '�i'L t°a 1�$
Q. ooey Yy5' oti o
o
'LhrD
ti
y'y1" O'L�`
ti yti
OC`b OArO oc.
Doti tioa o
t MYO Cumulative % t MY1 Cumulative
% tMY2 Cumulative % tMY3 Cumulative %
tMY4
Cumulative % --ll Cumulative %
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 4 - Pool
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
ra'L .y5 ,yh 5 O ti b 0 ,Y0 ,5'L 6b ,y4
O� Oti O O• 1 ti ti �` 4i 6' 'l% b,1
O' OOti Y.yh O'L O
O•
h0
0;L
'Y
titi ,yb
oy .YO
'L c�'Y
�4 00
,y0 b0 ago
YO'Y �Ob 0
■ MYO %by Size Group ■ MY1 %by Size Group ■ MY2 %by Size Group ■MY3 % by Size Group
■ MY4 %by Size Group
■ MYS %by Size Group
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -24
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
Parker Cross Section 5 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2014; MY5
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
1
0.9%
1%
0.062 - 0.125
8
7.0%
8%
0.125-0.25
5
4.4%
12%
0.25 -0.5
10
8.8%
21%
0.5 - 1.0
6
5.3%
26%
1 -2
5
4.4%
31%
2 -4
0
0.0%
31%
4 -8
0
0.0%
31%
8-16
19
16.7%
47%
16-32
17
14.9%
62%
32-64
10
8.8%
71%
64 -128
2
1.8%
73%
128 -256
29
25.4%
98%
256 -512
2
1.8%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
114
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
20
D84
160
D95
220
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -25 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -26
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 5 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0 o y' y' e' tip' ,i o°
0 ooey �,y5' oti o
o
yro
ti
ye' h'�~
yy
ti yti
oti �° ear
Doti tioa o
t MYO Cumulative % t MY1 Cumulative
% tMY2 Cumulative % tMY3 Cumulative %
tMY4
Cumulative % tMY5 Cumulative %
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 5 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
ra'L .y5 ,yh 5 O ti b 0 10 ,5'L 0b ,y4
O� Oti O O• 1 ti ti �` 4i 0' 'l% b,1
O OOti yti`' O'L O
O•
h0
0:L
ti
1ti ,yb
oy .y0
ti yti
�4 00
,y0 b0 ago
10'1. �Ob 0
■ MYO %by Size Group ■ MY1 %by Size Group ■ MY2 %by Size Group ■MY3 % by Size Group
■ MY4 %by Size Group
■ MYS %by Size Group
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -26
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
Parker Cross Section 6 - Pool
Monitoring Year - 2014; MY5
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
34
32.1%
32%
0.062 - 0.125
6
5.7%
38%
0.125-0.25
13
12.3%
50%
0.25-0.5
11
10.4%
60%
0.5 - 1.0
1
0.9%
61%
1 -2
9
8.5%
70%
2 - 4
7
6.6%
76%
4 -8
8
7.5%
84%
8-16
9
8.5%
92%
16-32
0
0.0%
92%
32-64
5
4.7%
97%
64 -128
2
1.9%
99%
128 -256
1
0.9%
100%
256 -512
0
0.0%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
106
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.25
D84
8.1
D95
43
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -27 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -28
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 6- Pool
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
r
10%
0%
OOti 'YTS O,Ly Oh ti y' L
o• o• y' y'
0 ooey Yy5' oti o
o
�; b p 6 ,�rO '�i'L t°a 1�$
e' ,Y�' ,,i o°`
'LhrD
,yro
ti
y'y1" O'L�`
ye' ,yy
ti yti
OC`b OArO oc.
o<ti �° ear
Doti tioa o
t MYO Cumulative % t MY1 Cumulative %
tMY2 Cumulative % tMY3 Cumulative %
tMY4
Cumulative % --ll Cumulative %
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 6 - Pool
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
ra'L .y5 ,yh h O 'L
O� Oti O O• 1 ti
O' OOti Y.yh O'L O
O•
b 0 ,Y0 ,5'L 6� ,y4
ti �` 4i 6' 'l% b,1
h0
0;L
'Y
titi ,yb
oy .YO
'L c�'Y
�4 00
,y0 b0 ago
YO'Y �Ob 0 e
■ MYO %by Size Group ■ MY1 %by Size Group
■ MY2 %by Size Group ■MY3 % by Size Group
■ MY4 %by Size Group
■ MYS %by Size Group
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -28
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
Parker Cross Section 7 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2014; MY5
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
11
10.0%
10%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
10%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
10%
0.25-0.5
9
8.2%
18%
0.5 - 1.0
0
0.0%
18%
1 -2
16
14.5%
33%
2 - 4
2
1.8%
35%
4 - 8
3
2.7%
37%
8-16
20
18.2%
55%
16-32
8
7.3%
63%
32-64
6
5.5%
68%
64 -128
11
10.0%
78%
128 -256
23
20.9%
99%
256 -512
1
0.9%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
110
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
12
D84
150
D95
200
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -29 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -30
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 7 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
OOti yti5 by Oh ,.O ; L
O. O. O' S• h, 1
O' OOby' ,Y'y5 O'L O'
O'
b 6 ,y`o ,5'L OA ,y'b yro ,y'L ,Lb
ti A �, yb, 3•L 0�1 ��:L ybh �,y0
1 'L y1
t'b pro
��0 �a0 �atQ
�O'L ryOP 0
t MYO Cumulative % t MY1 Cumulative % tMY2 Cumulative % tMY3 Cumulative % tMY4 Cumulative % tMY5 Cumulative %
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 7 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
Jill
111-
1. 1.
111.11
AI 1111
lil
IN
11jilloll-
-a
0%
ra'L .y5 ,yh 5 O ti
O� Oti O O• 1 ti
O OOti yti`' Oti O
O•
b 0 ,Y�o ,5'L 6b ,y4 h6 titi ,yb
�' �` 4i 6 'l% b,1 0;L �y .y0
ti ti yti
�4 Oro
,y0 b0 ato
10'1. �Ob 0 e
■ MYO %by Size Group ■ MY1 %by Size Group ■ MY2 %by Size Group ■MY3 % by Size Group ■ MY4 %by Size Group
■ MYS %by Size Group
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -30
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
Parker Cross Section 8 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2014; MY5
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
16
14.7%
15%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
15%
0.125-0.25
2
1.8%
17%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
17%
0.5 - 1.0
11
10.1%
27%
1 -2
0
0.0%
27%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
27%
4 - 8
4
3.7%
30%
8-16
26
23.9%
54%
16-32
6
5.5%
60%
32-64
4
3.7%
63%
64 -128
4
3.7%
67%
128 -256
27
24.8%
92%
256 -512
9
8.3%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
109
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
14
D84
180
D95
330
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -31 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -32
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
OOti yti5 by Oh ,.O ; L b 6 ,y`o ,5'L OA ,y'b
O. O. O' S• h, 1 ti A �, yb, 3•L 0�1
O' OOby' ,Y'y5 O'L O'
O'
yro ,y'L ,LR
��:L ybh
1 'L y1
t'b pro
�O'L ryOP 0
t MYO Cumulative % t MY1 Cumulative
% tMY2 Cumulative % tMY3 Cumulative %
tMY4 Cumulative % tMY5 Cumulative %
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
JII
F—�dn
1111, 111LI
milli.,
1,11LI1
0%
ra'L .y5 ,yh 5 O ti b 0 ,Yd ,5'L 6b ,y4
O� Oti O O• 1 ti �' �` 4i 6 'l% b,1
O OOti yti`' Oti O
O•
h0 titi ,yb
0;L �y .y0
ti ti yti
�4 00
,y0 b0 ato
10'1. �Ob 0 e
■ MYO %by Size Group ■ MY1 %by Size Group ■ MY2 %by Size Group ■MY3 % by Size Group
■ MY4 %by Size Group
■ MYS %by Size Group
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -32
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
Parker Cross Section 9 - Pool
Monitoring Year - 2014; MY5
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
25
23.8%
24%
0.062 - 0.125
5
4.8%
29%
0.125-0.25
25
23.8%
52%
0.25-0.5
28
26.7%
79%
0.5 - 1.0
17
16.2%
95%
1 -2
5
4.8%
100%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
100%
4 - 8
0
0.0%
100%
8-16
0
0.0%
100%
16-32
0
0.0%
100%
32-64
0
0.0%
100%
64 -128
0
0.0%
100%
128 -256
0
0.0%
100%
256 -512
0
0.0%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
105
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.23
D84
0.62
D95
0.99
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -33 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -34
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 9 - Pool
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
OOti 'YTS O,Ly Oh ti y' L
0 ooey Y,yS' oti o
o
�; b p 6 ,�rO '�i'L t°a 1�$
'LhrD
ti
ye' y'y1" O'L�`
ti yti
OC`b OArO oc.
Doti tioa o
t MYO Cumulative % t MY1 Cumulative %
tMY2 Cumulative % tMY3 Cumulative %
tMY4
Cumulative % --ll Cumulative %
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 9 - Pool
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
O� Oti O O• 1 ti
O' OOti Y.yh O'L O
O•
b 0 .yd ,5'L 6� ,y4
ti �` 4i 6' 'l% b,1
h0
0;L
'Y
yti .yo•
oy .YO
'L c�'Y
b4 00
,y0 b0 ago
YO'Y �Ob 0
■ MYO %by Size Group ■ MY1 %by Size Group
■ MY2 %by Size Group ■MY3 % by Size Group
■ MY4 %by Size Group
■ MYS %by Size Group
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -34
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
Parker Cross Section 10 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2014; MY5
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
11
10.2%
10%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
10%
0.125-0.25
4
3.7%
14%
0.25-0.5
4
3.7%
18%
0.5 - 1.0
2
1.9%
19%
1 -2
6
5.6%
25%
2 - 4
2
1.9%
27%
4 -8
4
3.7%
31%
8-16
10
9.3%
40%
16-32
11
10.2%
50%
32-64
21
19.4%
69%
64 -128
13
12.0%
81%
128 -256
15
13.9%
95%
256 -512
5
4.6%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
108
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
32
D84
150
D95
250
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -35 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -36
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 10 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
OOti ytih by Oh ,.O ; L b 6 ,y`o ,5'L OA ,y'b yro
O. O. O' S• h, 1 ti A �, yb, 3•L 0�1 ��:L
O' OOby' ,Y'y5 O'L O' 1
O'
,y'L ,Lb
ybh �,y0
'L y1
t'b pro
��0 �a0 �atQ
�O'L ryOP 0
t MYO Cumulative % t MY1 Cumulative
% tMY2 Cumulative % tMY3 Cumulative % tMY4 Cumulative % tMY5 Cumulative %
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 10 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0.1
1
Sim .1111 1111,11dillidd
0%
ra'L .y5 ,yh 5 O ti b 0 ,Yd ,5'L 6b ,y4 h0
O� Oti O O• 1 ti �' �` 4i 6 'l% b,1 0;L
O OOti yti`' Oti O ti
O•
titi ,yb
�y .y0
ti yti
�4 00
,y0 b0 ato
10'1. �Ob 0
■ MYO %by Size Group ■ MY1 %by Size Group ■ MY2 %by Size Group ■MY3 % by Size Group ■ MY4 %by Size Group
■ MYS %by Size Group
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -36
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
Parker Cross Section 11 - Pool
Monitoring Year - 2014; MY5
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
32
29.6%
30%
0.062 - 0.125
1
0.9%
31%
0.125-0.25
28
25.9%
56%
0.25-0.5
19
17.6%
74%
0.5 - 1.0
2
1.9%
76%
1 -2
6
5.6%
81%
2 - 4
3
2.8%
84%
4 - 8
9
8.3%
93%
8-16
3
2.8%
95%
16-32
2
1.9%
97%
32-64
2
1.9%
99%
64 -128
1
0.9%
100%
128 -256
0
0.0%
100%
256 -512
0
0.0%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
108
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.21
D84
3.7
D95
14
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -37 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -38
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 11- Pool
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
OOti 'YTS O,Ly Oh ti y' L �; b p 6 ,�rO '�i'L t°a 1�$
0 ooey Y,yS' oti o
o
'LhrD
ti
ye' y'y1" O'L�`
yy
ti yti
OC`b OArO oc.
oti �° ear
Doti tioa o
t MYO Cumulative % t MY1 Cumulative
% tMY2 Cumulative % tMY3 Cumulative %
tMY4
Cumulative % --ll Cumulative %
Cat Creek - Parker
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section it - Pool
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1-4
O� Oti O O• 1 ti ti �` 4i 6' 'l% b,1
O' OOti Y.yh O'L O
O•
h0
0;L
'Y
yti .yo•
oy .YO
'L c�'Y
b4 00
,y0 b0 ago
YO'Y �Ob 0
■ MYO %by Size Group ■ MY1 %by Size Group ■ MY2 %by Size Group ■MY3 % by Size Group
■ MY4 %by Size Group
■ MYS %by Size Group
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -38
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
UT Cross Section 1 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2014; MY5
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
10
9.5%
10%
0.062 - 0.125
3
2.9%
12%
0.125-0.25
6
5.7%
18%
0.25-0.5
9
8.6%
27%
0.5 - 1.0
4
3.8%
30%
1 -2
4
3.8%
34%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
34%
4 - 8
2
1.9%
36%
8-16
10
9.5%
46%
16-32
21
20.0%
66%
32-64
13
12.4%
78%
64 -128
15
14.3%
92%
128 -256
8
7.6%
100%
256 -512
0
0.0%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
105
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
18
D84
91
D95
150
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -39 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -40
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
Cat Creek - UTl
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 1- Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
OOti yti5 by Oh ,O ;L b 6 ,yro ,5'L OA ,y'b yro ,y'L ,Lb
O. O. O' S• h, 1 ti A �, yb, 3•L 0�1 ��:L ybh
O' OOby' ,Y'y5 O'L O' 1 'L y1
O'
t'b pro
�O'L ryOP 0
t MYO Cumulative % t MY1 Cumulative
% tMY2 Cumulative % tMY3 Cumulative % tMY4 Cumulative % tMY5 Cumulative %
Cat Creek - UTi
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 1- Riffle
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
ra'L .y5 ,y5 5 O ti b 0 ,Yd ,5'L 6� ,y4 h0 titi ,yb
O� Oti O O• 1 ti �' �` 4i 6 'l% b,1 0;L �y .y0
O OOti yti`' Oti O ti ti yti
O•
�4 00
,y0 b0 ato
10'1. �Ob 0
■ MYO %by Size Group ■ MY1 %by Size Group ■ MY2 %by Size Group ■MY3 % by Size Group ■ MY4 %by Size Group
■ MYS %by Size Group
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -40
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
UT Cross Section 2 - Pool
Monitoring Year - 2014; MY5
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
62
59.0%
59%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
59%
0.125-0.25
19
18.1%
77%
0.25-0.5
19
18.1%
95%
0.5 - 1.0
5
4.8%
100%
1 -2
0
0.0%
100%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
100%
4 - 8
0
0.0%
100%
8-16
0
0.0%
100%
16-32
0
0.0%
100%
32-64
0
0.0%
100%
64 -128
0
0.0%
100%
128 -256
0
0.0%
100%
256 -512
0
0.0%
100%
512 -1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024 -2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048 -4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
105
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.062
D84
0.33
D95
0.5
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -41 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -42
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015
Cat Creek - UTl
Pebble Count - Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 2 - Pool
100%
2 —X IN
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
e
20%
10%
0%
OOti 'YTS O,Ly Oh ti y' L
o• o• y' y'
0 ooey Yy5' oti o
o
�; b p 6 ,�rO '�i'L t°a 1�$
e' ,Y�' ,,i o°`
'LhrD
,yro
ti
y'y1" O'L�`
ye' ,yy
ti yti
OC`b OArO oc.
o<ti �° ear
Doti tioa o
t MYO Cumulative % t MY1 Cumulative % tMY2 Cumulative % tMY3 Cumulative %
tMY4
Cumulative % --ll Cumulative %
Cat Creek - UTi
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross Section 2 - Pool
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
ra'L .y5 ,yh 5 O ti
O� Oti O O• 1 ti
O' OOti ,
O•
b 0 ,Y0 ,5'L 6b ,y4
ti �` 4i 6' 'l% b,1
h0
0;L
titi ,yb
oy .YO
t4 00
,y0 b0 ago
■ MYO %by Size Group ■ MY1 %by Size Group ■ MY2 %by Size Group ■MY3 % by Size Group
■ MY4 %by Size Group
■ MYS %by Size Group
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -42
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - Cat Creek Swartwout 926 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre - Fisting Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.5
19.7
22.9
11.8
16.2
10.8
11.7
12.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
-
-
332.0
>36.0
45.0
46.0
47.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
1.4
2.2
1.3
1.4
0.7
0.8
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.0
2.8
3.8
2.1
2.0
1.2
1.3
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
16.7
28.3
40.3
15.3
22.4
7.9
9.9
11.8
Width/Depth Ratio
8.4
15.9
23.7
9.1
11.8
13.4
14.1
14.7
Entrenchment Ratio
1.6
73
6.9
28.1
>2.2
3.9
-
Bank Height Ratio
1.3
1.4
-
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.1
1
1.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
61.0
74.2
94.9
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.006
0.016
0.030
0.011
0.017
0.021
0.011
0.017
0.020
0.013
0.019
0.024
Pool Length (ft)
5.7
23.7
46.7
13.0
18.0
20.9
29.7
43.3
50.2
26.7
39.8
57.1
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
3.1
-
2.1
2.5
3.0
Pool Spacing (ft)
25.4
59.5
108.9
79.5
88.2
97.0
110.0
126.0
134.0
76.4
106.9
1141.11
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
-
-
-
22.0
37.2
57.1
30.0
51.0
78.0
60.0
75.0
100.0
Radius of Curvature ft
18.0
25.0
42.8
24.0
34.0
58.0
-
-
-
Rc: Bankfull Width ft /ft
1.5
2.1
3.6
-
2.1
-
-
-
-
Meander Wavelength (ft)
78.6
107.1
149.9
107.0
145.0
205.0
200.0
254.0
340.0
Meander Width Ratio
1.9
3.2
4.8
1.9
3.2
4.8
5.6
6.4
7.9
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib /ftZ
MaxPart Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
-
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W /m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4 - G4
E4
C4
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
-
-
-
Valley Length (ft)
200
690
682
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
288
832
926
Sinuosity
1.01 - 1.06
1.44
1.20
1.36
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
0.006 - 0.015
0.012
0.012
0.014
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
-
-
0.013
Bankfull Floodp lain Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
- Information unavailable.
Non - Applicable.
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -43 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - Cat Creek Parker 1,820 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre - Existing Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
18.5
26.0
21.5
18.0
21.4
24.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
-
-
140.0
200.0
280.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.2
2.5
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.8
-
2.6
1.9
2.2
2.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftz
40.3
65.0
39.0
22.3
28.5
33.0
Width/Depth Ratio
8.5
10.4
11.9
13.9
16.3
21.3
Entrenchment Ratio
5.7
5.0
>2.2
6.8
9.4
10.7
Bank Height Ratio
1.4
1.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
31.8
62.9
116.8
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.009
0.007
0.016
0.009
0.010
0.010
0.005
0.007
0.009
0.011
0.017
0.035
Pool Length (ft)
17.7
29.2
40.7
53.9
90.5
158.1
39.4
57.4
66.7
44.8
82.1
112.1
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4.0
-
2.6
3.6
4.7
Pool Spacing (ft)
54.3
72.3
90.2
-
-
158.1
-
147.0
167.0
178.0
99.0
168.0
230.0
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
-
-
-
71.0
91.3
118.0
40.0
68.0
104.0
53.0
88.0
125.0
Radius of Curvature (11)
23.6
48.3
32.7
45.6
77.8
-
-
-
Rc: Bankfull Width ft /ft)
0.9
1.9
2.1
Meander Wavelen h (ft)
82.0
205.0
L
143.0
194.0
273.0
185.0
259.0
345.0
Meander Width Ratio
2.7
3.5
6.7
9.0
12.7
2.9
4.1
5.1
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb /ft2
-
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W /m�
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
G4
C4
C4
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
-
-
-
-
Valley Length (ft)
2,150
142
1,480
1,120
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2,280
271
1,809
1,820
Sinuosity
1.06
1.90
1.22
1.63
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
0.006
0.010
0.005
0.006
Bankfitll Slope (ft /ft)
-
-
-
0.007
Bankfull Floodp lain Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
- Information unavailable.
Non - Applicable.
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -44 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - Cat Creek UTl 457 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre - Fisting Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.0
11.8
15.0
16.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
54.0
332.0
>33.0
85.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
1.3
1.3
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.2
2.1
1.8
1.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
20.2
15.3
18.9
13.1
Width/Depth Ratio
12.7
9.1
11.9
21.0
Entrenchment Ratio
3.4
28.1
>2.2
5.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.4
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
_+
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
19.0
29.0
45.1
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.009
0.040
0.100
0.011
0.017
0.021
0.011
0.018
0.021
0.017
0.029
0.048
Pool Length (ft)
9.9
13.0
16.2
13.0
18.0
20.9
27.5
40.1
46.5
19.3
33.0
49.1
Pool Max Depth (ft)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.8
-
2.1
2.3
2.7
Pool Spacing (ft)
43.4
68.8
91.7
79.5
88.2
97.0
102.0
117.0
124.0
45.1
65.3
95.6
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
22.0
37.2
57.1
28.0
47.0
72.0
35.0
49.0
55.0
Radius of Curvature (ft)
18.0
25.0
42.8
22.8
135.2
54.3
-
-
-
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
1.5
2.1
3.6
-
9.0
-
-
-
-
Meander Wavelength (ft)
78.6
107.1
149.9
99.0
131.0
190.0
129.0
155.0
150.0
Meander Width Ratio
1.9
3.2
4.8
1.9
3.2
4.8
-
3.0
-
Transport Parameters
Reach Shear Stress Com etenc lb /ft2
-
MaxPart Size (rnrn) Mobilized at Bankfull
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Cb4
E4
Cb4
C
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
-
-
-
-
Valley Length (ft)
440
200
490
400
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
470
288
581
457
Sinuosity
1.06
1.40
1.20
1.14
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft /ft)
0.021
0.012
0.013
-
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
-
-
-
0.015
Bankfull Floodp lain Area (acres)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
_
Biological or Other
- Information unavailable.
Non - Applicable.
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -45 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table l la. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary -7mr
UT Crab Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 857 - UT1 - Upper (500 Feet)
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - Cat Creek Swartwout (810 feet)
*Cross - Section 1
Riffle
*Cross- Section 2
Pool
*Cross- Section 3
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2109.5
2109.5
2109.8
2109.8
2109.8
2109.8
2106.8
2106.8
2107.0
2107.0
2107.0
2107.0
2107.6
2107.6
2106.5
2106.5
2106.5
2106.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.8
12.0
12.7
12.9
9.8
8.9
18.3
22.0
18.6
18.4
8.6
7.4
12.6
13.3
12.7
14.9
11.2
10.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
45.0
45.0
>100.0
>100.0
>100.0
>100.0
60.0
60.0
>100.0
>100.0
>100.0
>100.0
45.0
45.0
>100.0
>100.0
>100.0
>100.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
1.1
1.2
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.2
2.2
2.7
2.1
2.2
2.1
2.2
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft?')
7.9
7.6
7.0
5.9
4.9
6.4
17.0
16.9
14.2
12.8
9.7
9.2
11.8
12.0
10.4
9.1
7.9
8.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.7
18.7
23.1
28.3
19.8
12.3
19.7
28.6
24.3
26.6
7.6
5.9
13.4
14.8
15.6
24.3
15.8
14.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.2
3.8
>7.9
>7.7
>10.2
>11.2
3.3
2.7
>5.4
>5.4
>11.6
>13.6
3.6
3.4
>7.8
>6.7
>8.9
>9.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
-
-
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
-
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft
7.2
6.0
4.9
9.5
-
-
14.2
12.8
9.7
12.6
-
10.4
9.2
7.9
14.7
d50 (mm)
0.50
19.30
1.50
6.50
11.00
16.00
0.21
0.06
0.47
2.00
0.06
0.28
1 0.30
0.19
4.00
1 7.40
8.70
7.60
- Information unavailable.
*Elevation data was offset to match MY2 data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -46 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
IMI
Table lla. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary _N
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - Cat Creek Parker (1,672 feet) ff
Cross - Section 4
Pool
Cross - Section 5
Riffle
Cross - Section 6
Pool
Cross - Section 7
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2075.0
2075.0
2075.5
2075.5
2075.5
2075.5
2073.1
2073.1
2073.1
2073.1
2073.1
2073.1
2073.1
2073.1
2073.1
2073.1
2073.1
2073.1
2071.1
2071.2
2071.2
2071.2
2071.2
2071.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
24.9
26.0
31.3
32.2
31.4
30.6
24.4
24.1
26.0
25.5
24.1
25.4
28.4
28.6
27.9
28.2
28.5
28.5
22.5
24.0
23.0
23.1
23.1
23.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
80.0
80.0
>200.0
>200.0
>200.0
>200.0
180.0
180.0
>200.0
>200.0
>200.0
>200.0
160.0
160.0
>200.0
>200.0
>200.0
>200.01
240.0
270.0
>200.0
>200.0
>200.0
>200.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.0
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.9
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.4
Bankfu0 Max Depth (ft)
2.5
2.5
1 3.0
3.1
3.0
3.2
1.9
1.9
1 2.0
2.0
1.9
2.0
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.5
2.6
2.7
2.6
2.9
2.8
3.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
28.9
28.2
38.2
37.6
32.6
35.6
28.2
26.6
27.8
25.8
22.7
22.5
47.9
48.0
45.5
44.5
43.9
43.0
33.0
34.8
33.3
33.5
33.5
33.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
21.5
23.8
25.6
27.6
30.3
26.3
21.3
21.7
24.3
25.3
25.6
28.7
16.8
1 7.0
17.1
1 17.9
18.6
18.8
15.3
1 16.5
1 16.0
1 16.0
1 15.9
1 16.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
3.2
3.1
>6.4
>6.2
>6.4
>6.5
7.4
7.5
>7.7
>7.8
>8.3
>7.9
5.6
1 5.6
>7.2
1 >7.1
>7.0
>7.0
10.7
11.3
>8.7
>8.7
>8.7
>8.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
LO
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
L0
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ft2)
38.2
37.6
32.6
47.0
27.8
25.8
22.7
34.6
45.5
44.5
43.9
53.1
36.4
36.5
33.5
33.6
d50 (mm)
0.36
0.14
0.44
1.70
16.00
0.63
0.46
0.24
8.90
9.20
23.00
20.00
0.29
0.14
0.56
1.90
8.00
0.25
1.80
0.11
0.06
6.60
9.50
12.00
N/A - Item does not apply.
- Information -available.
Table lla. Monitoring Data -Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - Cat Creek Parker (1,672 feet)
Cross - Section 8
Riffle
Cross - Section 9
Pool
Cross - Section 10
Riffle
*Cross- Section 11
Pool
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2068.4
2068.7
2069.2
2069.2
2069.2
2069.2
2066.5
2066.5
2067.2
2067.2
2067.2
2067.2
2066.1
2066.2
2066.4
2066.4
2066.4
2066.4
2065.2
2065.2
2065.7
2065.7
2065.7
2065.7
Bankfu0 Width (ft)
18.0
20.7
32.6
32.4
32.5
32.2
15.7
18.5
30.6
29.7
28.5
28.8
20.6
23.6
25.9
26.7
25.7
26.1
23.6
23.7
37.3
35.9
34.7
35.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
170.0
170.0
>200.0
>200.0
>200.0
>200.0
260.0
260.0
>200.0
>200.0
>200.0
>200.0
140.0
140.0
>200.0
>200.0
>200.0
>200.0
140.0
140.0
>200.0
>200.0
>200.0
>200.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
12
1.2
1.1
1.1
LO
1.0
1.6
1.6
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.5
1.2
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.0
2.3
2.6
2.6
1 2.6
2.7
2.9
1 3.1
3.7
3.6
3.8
3.5
2.4
2.2
2.5
2.4
2.4
2.5
2.8
2.7
1 3.1
1 3.1
3.5
4.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2
22.3
23.8
35.5
34.7
33.9
33.2
25.7
29.7
40.8
36.9
34.0
30.7
30.4
28.8
33.2
31.5
30.1
31.7
33.0
32.4
45.0
42.7
44.7
52.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.5
18.0
29.9
30.3
31.2
31.3
9.7
11.5
23.0
1 23.9
23.9
1 27.0
1 13.9
19.4
20.3
22.6
21.8
21.5
16.9
17.3
31.0
30.2
27.0
24.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
9.4
8.2
>6.1
>6.2
>6.2
>6.2
16.6
14.1
>6.5
1 >6.7
>7.0
1 >6.9
1 6.8
5.9
>7.7
>7.5
>7.8
>7.7
5.9
5.9
>5.4
>5.6
>5.8
>5.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
LO
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
l.o
1.0
l.o
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins (ftZ )
35.5
34.7
33.9
49.3
40.8
36.9
1
34.0
37.3
35.4
33.1
30.1
36.7
45.0
42.7
44.7
66.8
d50 (mm)
1.33
2.00
2.00
6.00
9.40
14.00
0.34
0.26
0.41
0.63
1.30
0.23
0.45
32.45
7.30
22.00
15.00
32.00
0.18
0.05
0.36
1.30
0.74
0.21
- Intormation - available.
-Elevation data was offset to match MY2 data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -47 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table 11 a. Monitoring Data -Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross - Sections)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71 - Cat Creek UTI 396 feet
*Cross - Section 1
Riffle
*Cross- Section 2
Pool
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
2107.9
2107.9
2108.6
2108.6
2108.6
2108.6
2105.8
2105.8
2106.2
2106.2
2106.2
2106.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.6
20.9
19.5
18.9
19.7
19.9
16.6
17.9
16.3
16.8
7.3
7.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
85.0
85.0
>100.0
>100.0
>100.0
>100.0
200.0
200.0
>100.0
>100.0
>100.0
>100.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.8
1 0.8
1 0.8
0.7
1 0.8
0.8
1 0.6
0.7
1 0.7
1 1.3
1.6
Bankf ill Max Depth (ft)
1.6
1.8
1.9
1.6
1.7
1.8
2.2
1.7
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
13.1
15.8
16.3
15.4
14.3
15.1
12.1
11.1
12.0
11.5
9.8
11.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
21.0
27.5
23.3
23.2
27.1
26.2
21.8
28.9
22.2
24.4
5.5
4.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
5.1
4.1
>5.1
>5.3
>5.1
>5.0
12.1
11.2
>6.1
>6.0
>13.6
>14.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
-
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Sectional Area between End Pins ftz
16.3
15.4
14.3
26.4
-
-
14.5
12.7
9.8
13.3
d50 (mm)
0.19
24,95T4,90
15.00
15.00
18.00
0.11
0.06
0.33
0.44
0.06
0.06
- Information unavailable.
*Elevation data was offset to match MY2 data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -48
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table I lb. Monitoring D. Data Summary
Cat Creek Stream & Weiland Project No.71 - Cat Creek Swartwout l
1.
•
a�aaaa
®tea
®aa���
®�
®�
®
®
®
®
®�
®
®��a
®
®®
®tea
•
aaaaaaaaaaaa
®
®®
®tea
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®
®�
®
®
®
®
®
®a
®�a�aa
I I
®a�aa
l l•
��
I I
�o
l l
�
t l
��o�
I I
�®
l l®
II
��®
II
•
"��
®
®a�aa�
®a�aa
®
®®
®moo
®
®���o�����o
®
®®
®moo
I
l•
l
l
ll
N/A I N/A I N/A I N/A
Ri = Riffle / Ra= R- / P = Pool / G– Glide / S– Step
SC= Slt -Clay / SA =Saud/ G= Gravel / C= Cobble / B = Boalder / Be= Bedrock
"P erceutages based on riffle and vool vebble counts.
- Information unavailable
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -49 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table Ilb. Monitoring I. Data
Cat Creek Strem & Welland Project No. 71 - Cat Creek Parker (1,672 feet)
. •®
a�aa
®
®a
®aa�
®���0�
®
®��o�
®
®
®�o�
®��
®v
•
aaaaaaaaaaaa
®
®
®
®
®v
®
®
®
®
®v
®
®
®
®
®0
®
®
®
®
®®
MEa�aa�����������o������������������
,
N/A - Inform anon W" not apply.
Ri =Riffle /R,- Rm /P =Pool / G =Glide / S= Step
SC = Silt -Clay / S4= Sand / G= travel / C= Cobble / B= Boplder / Be = Bedrock
•Percen,a based oa riffle.dpool pebble —ta.
- Information .available
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -50 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Table I lb. Monitoring D. Data Summary
Cat Creek Stream & Weiland Project No. 71 - Cat Creek - UTI (396 feet)
•.
®
®®
®moo
®
®
®�
®v
®
®®
®moo
®
®
®
®
®o
®
®
®
®
®o�
®���o
••aaaaaaaaaaao
®
®®
®moo
®
®
®
®
®a
®
®
®
®
®o
®
®
®
®
®o
N/A I N/A I N/A I N
Ri = Riffle / Ra= R- / P = Pool / G– Glide / S– Step
SC= Slt -Clay / SA =Saud/ G= Gravel / C= Cobble / B = Boalder / Be= Bedrock
"P erceutages based on riffle and vool vebble counts.
- Information unavailable
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland D -51 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No.71
Date of Data
Collection
Date of
Occurrence
Method
No Events in 2010
No Events in 2011
3/29/2012
11/28/2011
Crest gauge & wrack lines
1/23/2013
1/17/2013
Crest gauge & wrack lines
4/2/2013
1/30/2013
Crest gauge & wrack lines
8/20/2013
Unknown
Crest gauge & wrack lines
7/9/2014
Unknown
Crest gauge
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -1
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix E
12.0
10.0
= 8.0
r-
0
ns
Q 6.0
d
i
a
4.0
2.0
0.0
montwy Precipitation vata uomparea to SU` "" ana /u... Fercentnes for Macon county, INU
Jan -14 Feb -14 Mar -14 Apr -14 May -14 Jun -14 Jul -14 Aug -14 Sep -14 Oct -14 Nov -14 Dec -14
- i 2014 Rainfall 30th Percentile . • • • • • 70th Percentile
Hydrologic Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -2 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -1 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
_
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
Maximum# of Consecutive Days >12 ":
% of Hyd roperiod During Growing Season
135
: 73.0%
,
Ground Surface
Required
Depth
10.0
5.0
0.0
-5.0
-10.0
._
`.
L
CD
3.0
3
0
Beginning of
;
-15.0
2.5
Growing Season
;
April 15
;
;
Q
Q
.L
�;
�
-20.0
�
2'0
End of
C
;
Growing Season
_25.0
0
d
;
;
October 17
1.5
Q
'
-30.0
4)
'
D
1.0
-35.0
0.5
,
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
T
T
T
T
T T T
T
T
T
T T T T T T T
T
T
T
T T
T T T
T T
C C
C
i i
L
i
i
"
> > v
v v
LL
LL 2 2
a
a
g
a
a
9
9
o Q
4 4 o
0 0
r
LO
r
01
N
p
*
00 N
Lh T
T
CNI
N
N
N
M
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -3 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -2 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -4 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
5.0
10.0
Maximum # of Consecutive Days> 12":
39
% of Hyd roperiod During Growing Season:
21.1%
4.5
Ground Surface
5.0
4.0
3.5
'
Required
-5. 0
. =
Depth
L
�
-10.0
CD
3.0
3
c
p
-15.0
Beginning of
M
2.5
Growing Season
CL
April 15
;
-20
O
L
.V
2.0
End of
Growing Season
-25.0
'+
d
October 17
i
1.5
�
Q
'
-30.0
4)
D
1.0
-35.0
0.5
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
T
T
T
T
T T T
T
T
T
T T T T T T T
T
T
T
T T
T T T
T T
C C
C
i i
L
i
i
i, C C - - a
61
G
fl
"
> > v
v v
LL
LL 2
a
a
g
a
s
rn
o q
z° o
2;
0 0
r
LO
r
01
N
N
t0 N t0
01
M
N
co N M M
ti
O
V
W N
N
M
T
N N
N
N
N
iy
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -4 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -3 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -5 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
5.0
10.0
Maximum #of Consecutive Days> 12":
23
% of Hyd roperiod During Growing Season
: 12.4%
4.5
Ground Surface
5.0
fifi
I1
*
II
0.0
4.0
3.5
Required
-5.0
._
Depth
L
�
-10.0
CD
3.0
3
C
p
-15.0
Beginning of
M
2.5
Growing Season
April 15
-20.0
.V
2.0
End of
Growing Season
-25.0
'+
d
October 17
i
1.5
�
Q
'
-30.0
4)
D
1.0
-35.0
0.5
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
T
T
T
T
T T T
T T
T
T T T T T T T
T
T
T
T T
T T T
T T
°
LL
9�
z 2; c
o c
r
LO
r
01
N
N
6 N 6
M M
N
T '�' 00 N M M
ti
O
4
N
Ln M
T
N N
N
N
N
M
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -5 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -4 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
5.0 10.0
Maximum #of Consecutive Days> 12": 186
% of Hyd roperiod During Growing Season : 100%
4.5 * t t Ground Surface 5.0
_ I� � • t _ _ 1! I� 1� �1 T IL T 0.0
CD
' 1 y
0 =
3.5 ' Required -5. .
Depth L
-10.0
3.0
p -15.0
;F, Beginning of
M 2.5 Growing Season
April 15 ; O
CL -20 L
.V 2.0 End of
Growing Season -25.0 'w
d October 17 i
1.5 �
Q
-30.0 4)
' D
1.0
-35.0
0.5
-40.0
0.0 -45.0
r r r r T r r r r r T r r r r T r T r r l r r r r T r
LL Li 2 Q Q g ? ? ? Q Q to cn Q Q Z Z G G G
r u7 01 N 6 N t0 01 M N
r Ln T Ii
N N N N N N N N
M
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -6 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -5 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
5.0 10.0
;
Maximum # of Consecutive Days> 12": 83
% of Hyd roperiod During Growing Season: 44.9%
4.5 Ground Surface 5.0
3c ..1'� _,fit _ � � i�•_ �t •�.. � n . * � � t t 1 t ; .
4.0 o. o
iM1i
Required -5.0 =
3.5 `.
Depth L
� -10.0 CD
3.0
c 3
p -15.0
;F, Beginning of
M 2.5 Growing Season
April 15 ; O
CL -20 L
.V 2.0 End of
Growing Season -25.0 'w
d October 17 i
1.5 4-0
Q
-30.0
' D
1.0
-35.0
0.5
-40.0
0.0 -45.0
T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T
C C C i i L i i i, C C — — a 61
LL Li 2 2 Q Q a? g ? ? ? Q Q to Q Q Z Z D O D
r LO 01 N t0 N t0 01 M T '�' co N M M ti O * 00 N
r Lh T TL
N N N N N N N N
iy
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -7 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -6 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -8 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
5.0
;
10.0
Maximum
# of Consecutive Days> 12":
38
% of Hyd roperiod
During Growing Season
: 20.5%
4.5
♦
Ground Surface
5.0
4.0
� �•s�Y
it
0.0
3.5
'
Required
-5. 0
. =
Depth
L
�
-10.0
CD
3.0
p
-15.0
M
2.5
Beginning of
Growing Season
CL
April 15 ;
-20
O
L
.V
2.0
End of
Growing Season
-25.0
'+
d
October 17
i
1.5
�
Q
'
-30.0
4)
D
1.0
-35.0
0.5
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
T T T T T T T T T
T T T
T
T T T
T
T
T
T
T T
T T T
T T
6'
°
v
v
v
U- LL. 2 a
g
z> 2> ; c
o c
L[) O) N 6 6 M
r r N N N N
1 7
W
N
N
L[) M
T
M
N
N
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -8 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -7 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -9 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
5.0
10.0
Maximum # of Consecutive Days> 12": 24
% of Hyd roperiod
During Growing Season: 13.0%
4.5
;t♦
Ground Surface
5.0
�� �
� �
T
� �
� �
T
4.0
ILA
II fl
* ♦
♦
a
0.0
3.5
Required
-5.0
._
Depth
L
171
�
-10.0
CD
3.0
3
c
p
-15.0
;W
Beginning of
M
2.5
Growing Season
CL
April 15
;
-20.0
O
L
.V
2.0
End of
Growing Season
-25.0
'+
d
October 17
i
1.5
�
Q
'
-30.0
4)
D
1.0
-35.0
0.5
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
v
T
v
T
v v v v
T T T T T
v v
T-
14
v v v
It I* It
It
vIT
v
v v
v v v
v V
.6 i i
L i
i
i, C C
— —
a
61
G
fl
"
> > v
° °
v v
Li Li
Q Q
g
Q
a
rn
Q
z 2 G
G G
r
LO
r
01 N t6 N t0
N
N
co
N M
M
ti
O
V
W N
N
Lh T M
T
N N
N
N
N
iy
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -9 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -8 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -10 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
5.0
;
10.0
Maximum
#of Consecutive
Days> 12": 186
% of Hyd roperiod
During
Growing Season : 100%
4.5
Ground Surface
5.0
,
1**M N4 t *t l_L' --
\,
4.0
..
...
..�-
-- •-.- -...
`
��
S
0.0
3.5
Required
-5.0
=
Depth
L
�
-10.0
CD
3.0
3
c
p
-15.0
;F,
M
2.5
Beginning of
Growing Season
CL
April 15
;
-20.0
.V
2.0
End of
TGrowing
Season
-25.0
'+
d
October 17
i
1.5
�
Q
'
-30.0
4)
D
1.0
-35.0
0.5
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
T T
T
T
T T T
T
T
T
T T
T T
T T T T T T T
T
T T T
T T
C C
C
i i
L
i
i
i, C
C
- - a 61 G fl "
> > v
v v
LL
LL 2
a
a
g
a a rn o
q
z° z° o
0 0
r u7
r
01
N
N
6 N 6
N N
01
M
N
00 N
� M M ti O V 00
N
N
N
M
T
iy
N
N
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -10 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -9 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
5.0 10.0
;
Maximum #of Consecutive Days> 12": 186
% of Hyd roperiod During Growing Season : 100.0%
4.5 Ground Surface 5.0
4.0 T ; -�. .. i .� �i I I 0.0
0 =
3.5 ' Required -5. .
Depth L
CD
� -10.0
3.0
c 3
p -15.0
;F, Beginning of
M 2.5 Growing Season
CL
April 15 -20.0
.V 2.0 End of
TGrowing Season -25.0 'w
d October 17 i
1.5 �
Q
-30.0 4)
' D
1.0
-35.0
0.5
-40.0
0.0 -45.0
T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T
C C C i i L i i i, C C - - a 61 G fl " > > v v v
U- Li 2 Q Q g ? ? ? Q Q to to Q Q Z Z G G G
r u7 01 N t6 N t0 01 M T '�' co N M M ti O V W N
r Ln M Ii
N N N N N N N N
iy
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -11 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -10 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -12 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
Maximum #of Consecutive Days> 12": 186
% of Hyd roperiod During Growing Season : 100%
Ground Surface
A6 IL t V
i
Required
Depth
10.0
5.0
0.0
-5.0
-10.0
•�
CD
3.0
;
-15.0
3
C
M
O
Beginning of
;
M
2.5
Growing Season
;
-20.0
M
Q
April 15
;
2
•O
(D
2.0
�
� End of
-25.0
O
Growing Season
++
d
' October 17
-30.0
i
1.5
�
Q
O
-35.0
0
1.0
-40.0
0.5
-45.0
0.0
-50.0
T
T
T
T
T T T
T
T
T
T T T
T T T T
T
T
T
T T T T T
T T
C C
C
i i
L
i
i
i, C C
— — a
61
G
fl
" > > v
°
v v
LL
LL 2 2
a
a
g
a
s
rn
o Q z 2; o
0 0
r
u7
r
01
N
N
t0 N OD
01
M
N
T '�' 00
N M M
ti
O
00 N 7 M
N
T
N N
N
N
N
iy
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -12 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -11 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -13 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
5.0
10.0
Maximum # of Consecutive Days> 12":
40
% of Hyd roperiod During Growing Season:
21.6%
4.5
Ground Surface
5.0
L
.� _ _ _
r.
b .� .. • �. A►. �►
t
�11�i�►
0.0
4.0
3.5
Required
-5.0
._
Depth
L
-10.0
CD
�
3.0
p
-15.0
;F,
Beginning of
M
2.5
Growing Season
CL
April 15
;
-20.0
O
L
.V
2.0
End of
Growing Season
-25.0
'+
d
October 17
i
1.5
�
Q
'
-30.0
4)
D
1.0
-35.0
0.5
J.
-40.0
LL
I 11111
i i i i i
1
0.0
1
1
-45.0
T
T
T
T
T T T
T
T
T
T T T T T T T
T
T
T
T T
T T T
T T
C C
C
i i
L
i
i 4
C
v
v v
Li
Li 2 2
Q
Q
g
o
�
9
2; 2; D
o D
r
LO
r
01
N
N
t0 N OD
01
M
N
00 N M M
ti
O
*
00 N
N
Lh M M
T
r
N r N
N T T
N
T
N
T
T iy
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -13 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -12 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -14 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
5.0
Maximum #of Consecutive Days> 12":
186
10.0
% of Hyd roperiod During Growing Season
: 100%
4.5
'
Ground Surface
5.0
VMV
3.5
Required
-5•
:-.
.-.
Depth
L-
-10.0
3
3.0
;F,
Beginning of
;
-15.0
C
M
2.5
Growing Season
�
_
.�
April 15 ;
\
�
-20.0
LC
0
2.0
End of
0
Growing Season
++
d
October 17
-25.0
1.5
�
Q
-30.0
0
1.0
-35.0
0.5
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
T
T
T
T
T T T
T
T
T
T T T T T T T
T T
T
T T
T T T
T T
C C
C
i i
i
i
i
i, C C - - a
61 G
fl
"
> > v
v v
LL
LL 2
a
a
g
a
s rn
o q
z° o
4
0 0
r
u7
r
01
N
co
p
V
W N
N
M
T
04
N
N
N
M
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -14 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -13 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -15 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
5.0
Maximum #of
Consecutive Days> 12":
186
10.0
% of Hyd roperiod During Growing Season : 100%
4.5
Ground Surface
5.0
�*►
vt-
0.0
3.5
Required
-5.0
Depth
L
C
01
�
-10.0
3
3.0
;F,
Beginning of
;
-15.0
C
M
2.5
Growing Season
�
. _
April 15 ;
\
�
-20.0
C
L
0
2.0
End of
0
Growing Season
++
d
October 17
-25.0
1.5
�
Q
-30.0
4) 0
1.0
-35.0
0.5
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
T
T
T T T T T
T
T
T
T T T
T T T T
T T T T T
T T T
T T
C C
C i i
i
i
i
°
LL 2
LL
4 o
0 0
r
u7
r
01
N
co
p V W N
N
M
T
N
N N
Cl)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -15 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -14 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -16 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
5.0
Maximum # of Consecutive Days> 12":
82
10.0
% of Hydro period During G rowi ng Seaso n
: 44.3%
4.5
'
Ground Surface
5.0
4.0
3.5
Required
-5.0
Depth
L
�
-10.0
M
3.0
3
;F,
2.5
Beginning of
Growing Season
;
-15.0
C
M
CL_
.�
April 15 ;
\
�
-20.0
O
�
2.0
End of
0
d
Growing Season
October 17
-25.0
++
1.5
�
Q
-30.0
4) 0
1.0
-35.0
0.5
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
T T
T
T T T T T
T
T T T T T T T T
T T
T
T T
T T T
T T
C C
C
L L L
2 2 Q
L
Q
i C
g ) n -3
o
O Q
> v
D
v v
o
Li Li
Q
a
a?
z z°
D
LO
r r
01
N
N t0 t0 0
04
N
N
p
N
*
N
00 N
N
Lh Im M
T
M
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -16 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -15 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -17 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
5.0
10.0
Maximum #of Consecutive Days> 12":
186
% of Hyd roperiod During Growing Season
: 100%
4.5
Ground Surface
5.0
4.0
mss-
M1
3.5
Required
-5.0
=
Depth
L
�
-10.0
CD
3.0
3
c
p
-15.0
;F,
M
2.5
Beginning of
Growing Season
CL
April 15
-20.0
.V
2.0
End of
Growing Season
-25.0
'+
d
October 17
i
1.5
�
Q
'
-30.0
4)
D
1.0
-35.0
0.5
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
T T
T
T
T T T
T T
T T T T T T T T
T T
T
T T
T T T
T T
C C
C
i i
L i
i
° > ° > v
v v
Li
L i
z 2 G
G D
r u7
r
01
N
N
t0 N t0
N N
N
co N M M
ti O
4
N
00 N
N
Ln T M
T
M
N
N
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -17 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E
uu -16 Precipitation anct water Level riot
Hydrologic Data
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -18 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
5.0
40.0
%of
Maximum
Hydroperiod
#of
Consecutive
During GrowingSeason:
Days>
12": 186
100%
35.0
4.5
30.0
4.0
20.0
..
3.5
,
15.0
C
L
'^
10.0
CD
C
: Ground
Surface
�
3.0
5.0
?�
C
�,�j,.�Ir
'
-
0.0
_
:W
2 5
Beginning
Growing
Season
of
Required
Depth
-5.0
QApril
.
15
;
V
2.0
-10.0
O
d
End of
-15.0
1.5
Growing
October
Season
17
-20.0
-W
Q
4)
�
-25.0
1.0
-30.0
-35.0
0.5
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T T
T
T
T
T
T
T T
T
T
T
T
T
7
LL
LL
2
a
a
g
a
s
rn
o q
z°
4
o
0
0
r
u7
01
co
p
V
W N
M
T
r
N
04
N
N
N
N
M
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -18 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -17 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
6.0 10.0
Maximum #of Consecutive Days> 12": 186
% of Hyd roperiod During Growing Season : 100%
Ground Surface 5.0
5.0
Required
-5.0 =
Depth `.
4.0 L
CD
-10.0
3
p -15.0
;F, Beginning of ;
M 3.0 Growing Season
April 15 ; -20.0 LO
Q \ ,
End of
Growing Season -25.0 'w
d ' October 17
2 i
.0
, r
Q
-30.0 4)
' A,'� D
1.0 -35.0
-40.0
0.0 -45.0
T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T
LL Li 2 Q Q g ? ? ? Q Q to cn Q Q Z Z D O D
r u7 01
r co p V 00 N M T TL
N
04 N N M N N
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -19 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E Hydrologic Data
CC -18 Precipitation and Water Level Plot
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -20 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
5.0
10.0
Maximum # of Consecutive Days> 12":
11
% of Hyd roperiod During Growing Season
: 5.9%
4.5
Ground Surface
5.0
4.0
3.5
Required
-5.0
._
Depth
L
All
-10.0
CD
3.0
3
c
p
-15.0
Beginning of
M
2.5
Growing Season
CL
April 15
;
-20
O
L
.O
2.0
End of
O
iGrowing
Season
-25.0
d
October 17
1.5
Q
'
-30.0
4)
D
1.0
-35.0
0.5
-40.0
0.0
-45.0
T
T
T
T
T T T
T
T
T
T T T T T T T
T
T
T
T T
T T T
T T
C C
C
i i
L
i
i
i, C C — — a
61
G
fl
"
> > v
v v
LL
LL 2 2
a
a
g
a
a
9
9
o q
z° 2; o
0 0
r
LO
r
01
N
N
t0 N OD
01
M
N
T '�' 00 N M M
ti
O
*
00 N
N
Lh M M
T
r
N r N
N T T
N
T
N
T
T iy
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -20 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
Table 13. Wetland Gauge Attainment Data
Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland / Project No. 71
Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season
(Percentage)
Gauge ID
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Yes /31
Yes /42
Yes /186
Yes /135
CC -1
Yes/ 35 Percent
16.8 Percent
22.6 Percent
100.0 Percent
73.0 Percent
Yes /37
Yes /26
Yes /65
Yes /39
CC -2
Yes/ 16 Percent
20.0 Percent
14.0 Percent
35.1 Percent
21.1 Percent
Yes /24
No /13
Yes /42
Yes /23
CC -3
Yes/ 8 Percent
13.0 Percent
7.0 Percent
22.7 Percent
12.4 Percent
Yes /88
Yes /64
Yes /186
Yes /186
CC4
Yes/ 35 Percent
47.6 Percent
34.4 Percent
100.0 Percent
100.0 Percent
Yes /50
Yes /52
Yes /186
Yes /83
CC -5
Yes/ 32 Percent
27.0 Percent
28.0 Percent
100.0 Percent
44.9 Percent
Yes /25
Yes /18
Yes /61
Yes /38
CC -6
No/ 2 Percent
13.5 Percent
9.7 Percent
33.0 Percent
20.5 Percent
No /12
No /12
Yes /41
Yes /24
CC -7
No/ 0 Percent
6.5 Percent
6.5 Percent
22.2 Percent
13.0 Percent
Yes /39
Yes /65
Yes /186
Yes /186
CC -8
Yes/ 33 Percent
21.1 Percent
34.9 Percent
100.0 Percent
100.0 Percent
Yes /186
Yes /186
Yes /186
Yes /186
CC -9
Yes/ 22 Percent
100.0 Percent
100.0 Percent
100.0 Percent
100.0 Percent
Yes /97
Yes /72
Yes /94
Yes /186
CC -10
Yes/ 9 Percent
52.4 Percent
38.7 Percent
50.8 Percent
100.0 Percent
Yes /27
Yes /40
Yes /61
Yes /40
CC -11
Yes/ 11 Percent
14.6 Percent
21.5 Percent
33.0 Percent
21.6 Percent
Yes /50
Yes /46
Yes /186
Yes /186
CC -12
Yes/ 41 Percent
27.0 Percent
24.7 Percent
100.0 Percent
100.0 Percent
Yes /118
Yes /186
Yes /186
Yes /186
CC -13
N/A
63.8 Percent
100.0 Percent
100.0 Percent
100.0 Percent
Yes /26
Yes /65
Yes /186
Yes /82
CC -14
Yes/ 30 Percent
14.1 Percent
34.9 Percent
100.0 Percent
44.3 Percent
Yes /88
Yes /73
Yes /186
Yes /186
CC -15
Yes/ 33 Percent
47.6 Percent
39.2 Percent
100.0 Percent
100.0 Percent
Yes /139
Yes /186
Yes /186
Yes /186
CC -16
Yes/ 100 Percent
75.1 Percent
100.0 Percent
100.0 Percent
100.0 Percent
Yes /117
Yes /186
Yes /186
Yes /186
CC -17
N/A
63.2 Percent
100.0 Percent
100.0 Percent
100.0 Percent
Yes /23
No /4
Yes /22
No /11
CC -18
No/ 3 Percent
12.4 Percent
2.2 Percent
11.9 Percent
5.9 Percent
N/A - Information does not apply.
Hydrology Success Criteria = 8%
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland E -21
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Equinox
January 2015

Appendix F
Wetland Boundary Delineation Data

YVETLAN❑ DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastem Mountains and Piedmont Region
Projecusailo. - - Cilylcourny: a r ^ sampling Date: + Z I?
ApplrceMlCrWW: $irte' hf C Sampling Park, + 1
ImusdgaNk(s): SeL111011, Towr>Fhlp, Raaye'
Landform aAskrpe, terrare. etc. }, (rrs � 'GA+o ,t_ Local relief (concave. cwvLx, nom): AD"/- Slope
Subregion (I.RRiXMLRq)f---Z- rS IAt: �S 4 `i'.,741 Lora: ml1$ f1is+ kAnry J! -S�3�
sail Map 1.141lkama: PNWI classiricallon:
Ave ckmarie I hyftlogic canddws our !ho site typical for this time of year? Yes °� No (If no, expialn In Remarks.)
Arc VCgetarlon t) , Soll ^ or t lylirdogy *nilicarrtly disturbed? Ne'Nmnal Clrcumsrarx es lxeselr[F Yew No
Arf� Vv €. lrrlarinn ., _, Srxl 0 , to Hyfli k iejy nalucarlly protilenialit? (If rk9r dad, erxlkoin rely m:;xwrs in Reininky.)
5UMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transecls, important features, Lft..
1- forephylic vo9cqation Present? Yes T No Is the Sampled Area
I10ric Sal Fresam? Yes No within a Wettand7 'M No
Welland "roloyty F'taWnt? Yes -� Ne
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Weaaad Hydrology indleaws;
Secondary
Incilmors irrirkmum of two reoulredl
larimj!rX lndicarg!s Gwinirwry of One 6 required
rligm* all thin u(pu
— galore Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ lrnn Aquatic+ Planks (914)
— SpHr�-aUlyr Vragalyded fOrx;iiva SIMAB V iRH)
Pugh Mater Table (A2)
_ I lydcoWri Sulflde Odor (CT)
_ DrainaW Paircrns (1110}
r Salurarion (ALM
A 0xildzed Rhixospberes on L'MN Roots (t3)
, Mass Trim Lines (1316)
_ wale+ Marks (51}
^ R"vaoor (A R@ducW Irnoi JCp)
_ tlry5er xixo Wn i;r rahie (Ci)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
Recent Iran ReduellMt In TIItd Spill (GG}
_ l rsfish Burrows (CO)
Drill D?E wits (13M
T Min Muck: Surface (Cl l
^ Satttrallon Visible on Aerlol Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mal or Crv% ((014)
' {]Shea If xplmri in Rumor ks.}
Shorted is 51rds5erI PlnnrS (I) I)
lion OLporitz (1 35)
_ Ceornifirphlc Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aeriin Imw,rpery 157)
_ Shallvx Aquiuird (Da)
_ Water- Stalned Leaves (B9)
_ Mirrotopographic Relief MAI
Arluaac Fauna (K13)
FAC Nauval rest (D5)
Pleld DbserVatlons:
Surraco Water Presonf7 Yo3_ NO
is Dew (Incites);
Wa1ar lane Present? YOE — NO
'� Depth (inches):
salvralion Prrs3nrrrr Yea x fia
� Depth (inclres}t :'7
X
WYedantl Hydrology PreseM7 Yeis No
trlbe Record" DOM (;[ream gauw, monitoring voce, al
1'-1 W I 1 —rla .+., !..I..
f „ i1 L� log .0r) .i,t?. L -I l.rl W I
US 7umy Corps of Engineers
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -1
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
I- .I 14
Castern Mau091% find mckdmtint - vQrmn 7.CI
Equinox
January 2015

fb1�
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sainpling Paint l
US ArMy Carps Of Engi!IMS
F- astern Mo"vins and Ptedmanl - Verw a.r,
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -2 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
AbsefulC []aRtinartt Indicator
QafntlLanlCO TOSt vwarkShaOt:
Trca Slratum. (P}ol seta: j
I. g 4 . L fx c .�
%Cover SmIeS7 5111A
.3 I/ FICIJ
Nanlbrar ol Lwinanl Spwas
Thal Are COL. FAM or FAC:
dotal Numbm d I7rsmn'INrM
SIA,cirt3 Across Pill S1r41a: (f3}
a.. I rf? Slims
Re rxrd. of norninent 5pedes q
That Are CRL. FAM or FAC;
G.
Prevalence Index�shest:
7.
ww % C.mn't ri: mule Y hv:
�$- - loltd �uvrs
_
50% tai total cover: , 7- 2-0% of total cover:
Cal species w t 151lcs X1 , 3s
FACW species 9540a121E06AV �-
sQliplolww Z twAum (Sol s120:
I
1. !}lM_. set F.. -i---
FAG species x3.
2. v,. sr�s
FACLI species X4.
fa
3. I r° p v a F' r
- si Aril
t1PL species x5-
Column To4al6: 165 (A) Zn�
_
—
4
(R)
Pmvalertce Index . 01A . LiS
5'
0
Hydrophylic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 • napld Test for "mo ytic Vegetation
a_
� 2 • oarrlinariCL' Tas[ is P 5Q95
3 • lSfeYalOnCe Index IS S3.0N
4. Marphnloepcai AdapiatirRrsr (Provide supputdN
1D = Tolel C r,tnx
5091 NN rued cover: � P 2096 of rota@ cavar:�
Mark'±tralL (Plot size: S }
data in RamWc% w un a separate 4w.")
Pra lemafit rly**PlrYK Verrelalian' (Fxptain
CIS
ry cj
2
P
r✓
' Indkarors of hydric sal and weltand hydrolopy must
3. i t J W . 4 . , , i." .�
$
he present- unless dlshxhed or proMematic.
4 '
_
I]afiniliorrs of Feu Vegetatfan Strata:
Tree - Wwypta nts, e%Grt dnvineiin- (7.5 cm) or
mare Nn clameter at breast helght. ID911}. regardless of
T.
hNghr.
8"
SapdtnWShruh - Woody plants" exclumN YInm. less
g•
than 3 in. DBW and greater Ulan or equal to 3.26 It (t
M ) lax
Herb - AD he,bacearrs (nw, ,�wwody) plants, regwdless
10
,,.
L
. Tulrrl Cmur
of SIZe, 8114 Woody plants less than 128 h IAn.
56% of blal W"!
20% flf at}tal COW
Woody vino - All wordy vines greater than 3.28 ti in
Woody Vinc SVatuM (Plat steal }
helat4.
3.
Hydro0irtic
4_ -
5.
VeWtation
. Total Cover
Pre5ent? YeS Flo
se% of Mot w vur:
ZO% of total cover:
f2e�5: {Include phata numbers here or on a separate sFreet.i
US ArMy Carps Of Engi!IMS
F- astern Mo"vins and Ptedmanl - Verw a.r,
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -2 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

SOIL
SarnpIN Point:
Prople Description: (Describe to the depth heeded to document the MiCakw or confirm the e49erme of indiclitom.)
L)epth Matrix
flndx> ,i color (4110511 %
Cabs (nw05et TeAture
Rarnarks
Y /T,
rr�.' , ,r (y r, —L P 4.
"F xr C- Ca"r9raboo, D-El _ -burr, RM-
Rodur:e) Mmrix, MSS+ -0Moak(M',and Grains. 'I PcH6nnr PL-.-Pare I,v11 . M �Ualrix.
Hydric Snit Indicators:
Indiralors for Prohtenrallc Hydric Soils'_
_ 1115towl (Al)
_. Dark 5urfece Is 1)
_ 2 Cm MUCK (AM MLRA 1471
Hislic rpiperton (A2)
_ PGlyvakte 13olaw Srafetce (SR) (MLRA 147, tea)
_ CAM51 Praidu Redox (A16)
_ Black His* (A3)
_ Thin baFk Surface (SO) (MLRA 147, 140)
(MLRA 141, 148)
_ Hyrlerxien Srdfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyecl rMArix (F 7)
FWrronl Fkwdplain S015 0'191
a Stratified Layers (A5l)
le DWbutod Matrix (F3)
paLRA 136,1471
cm MU[k (Alp) (LRR N)
_ R4dox Dark SUnaCe (FQ
_ Very 511altow Dark Sulfaco (TF12)
_ Optileted Bilow hark Sur$ece (Alf)
_ f3e} e.tW Dark Surface (F ))
_, Nher (E1r)rlain in l 7madlS)
Thkk Dark Surface (Al2)
Rndox Depressimxs (F6)
3andy Murky Mineral (Sl) (LRR N.
Irma ManrWese Masses (F1 e) (LRR N.
MLRA 147, 146)
MLRA 1981.
Sandy GlcyCd WOK 154j
_ Umlxk Sudac£ (F13) (MLRA 19#).1$2)
'Indltators of hy0tophytic vcgmolion and
Sandy Rcedox (S5)
Pwrimo-nt Fluadpiern S415 (F79) (ML RA 1481
wetland hydrology must he PFeseM.
Stripped Matrix (SE)
Rid P3rrrt6 Matarlal (F21) (MLRA 127. 14'1)
unless Ih:.lurltod d Iwolflnowuic,
Resiflo fe iLayLi rf u6u—ri :
I ypc:
Depth (ir dkn):
Hydrie Sail PresanP Yss No
Remarks.
US Army crxln al €ngunwexs
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Eastern Mountains and Niedrrwl - Version 2,0
F -3 Equinox
January 2015

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region I
Nao3eCU` [e: - �' ly `y CiCy }Crwnty (. ` Samplinq Cimie: I Z f r J J? r
ApplleaiwOwner: 9IUle= J L 5armplunj I'caiiii!f c, z
rrvesUgetorts }: '' -C _ Section. township. Rango-
Larldtntrn (#ddskrpc. Ia race. dC }; �ry.i fj � +n Local rRtttL+r (Concivo. corK !x. none)' r -' 6 - - -f[ Sbpe t 1 }: C3
Subregion ILRR or MI.RA) 1- r J !� ,_� _ 4 Long, $ ? - S H n J- t lletumr_J 44
$041 Map urvt Name k� �s � r 3 , NWldasslCcaiui: r-J
Air+ctirrurtic t hycffa4ogiu unridaions on ifie she Typical for Ihis (brie of pear? Yes No (if no. exptaln In Remarks.)
i,.
,arc Vegerailon rs _ Sad r-J _ ar Hydrology r) %nil,,nlIy dNurIbed7 A+ @'Ntxmat C.arct +mranec pr eN7 Yex. No
Are Vrgrtnrion !�? SiW ; A rY Hyiirnbgy t) rtirhwadry I)rulAFnialJ0 (it noudiml, ORiulain any atisvw'ry 6 Ueri iks..)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important Features, etc.
Hydrnphyix: Vugetalion Resent?
Hydric Sad Nesen17
W6JJFbrgi Hyr obw P-111
I tL mark s;�
HYDROLOGY
Yes NO 15 the Sampled Area
Yes No within a Welland? Yes Nb
YQS m_r No
Nirnary lndloakxs truinirriurn of one is reaured: craar;k all th;il a6ttitid
Surface LWaler (Al) _
€rur. Aquatic Plants (814)
4 High WAIL? Tahle W)
Hydrogen Sulride Odor (O1}
X Saturation (A3)
Oxic tired RK.2nSpherL's an LIMItig Roos (lam`$)
_ Wager Marks (51) _
Presence or Retlucccl Iron (C4)
S rtmnrt fie wi:,e% {62j _
d>eccrt Iran Redurxaan in Tilled Sobs fCfi1
_ Drill. ueposils M3) ,Y
thin MUCk Surtmo {Cl)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Cllher (Explain in Rernarks)
inn D"% (e5)
IrrUniallgrl'VI!OW on Aerial Imagery (571
Water•sltined Leaves (09)
_ Agnalic Faun4 {1313)
Fic1d r]bssrvativns:
Surface Water Resent? Yes. NG �`
Caelh (Inches):
Wrdul I aiihe Resent? Yes X No
Depth (Inches): 9,
Saturation Pre32nt7 YFls r; Na _-
Drluh (inches', 0
wetland
Surface Sail Cracks ;136)
_ Sparsely Vegelatea Concave Surface (158)
Dkaiwge Fatlerns (610)
_ Mass Trip Lines (Rl6)
_ c+ry Seti5on Water Tath, (Cr)
Crayfish Swrows (CE})
SaivaAcm lrisihlu w ALfial Inlaguy (CS)
_ Blunted or Stressed Planti t1) 1)
Creon14rphic F4siiion (ai)
Shallow Ageilard (03)
MIriocipoTaphic Raliq,{ (04)
FAC•Nfttral Taal 05)
177etirrihe Reenrded Darn (sueani gaNe, nionliorinq well, aerial photos, previous inspectiarn), t avaiisiiW.
Remarks:
US Army Carps of Englnecrs
Fa51etr1 Mauitatris aral € indmnrd - Version 2.13
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -4 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sarnplinq Pnini: i r 2
3
Absnkan DwilinPmr Irkiicaltk
�
Dominance Testwerkstweel:
r
Id@L$tr04urtl II'ttH
LV
Trc!c Stratum'. (Plot sud- j
% L'Mt Icr..:1
nrra
Kumlwi of Durenl Speein
_
,. A- ° t\X
llut Forthit.. I AC,W, or FAC:
lA}
2..
'IrdIcators of hydix sail tkld weiland bytlrobgy moat
I'
4.
r. pIDIOL.1_
G
TM& Ntjn*er d Duminant
17ernitltxis of Four vegetation strata:
7.
Spe-bes Across All Slrala;
(at
Tree - Woody plants, exckidirxy vh *w, 3 rt f1.6 emj of
rnot4 in diameter a[ braast height (Ut3F4j, ragmilloss of
7.
Percent of D ominarg Species / r
hr i^
k•
That AreOAL. PACK at FAC-
f>.
turn 3 Lit. ufil i And grehlEv tfori ur erTtral la 128 R (,
14
J.
m) Ittll
Pnlvaleoce Index 4verkslleel:
Herb All hertharems (rmrt woody) P1eM5, regandless
. TWI Cesar
7tlA312JS OU Mouldy by
15115 74'
Total Caner
5096 of total cover: r 20%of total covff- 17
5090 of total cove:
20% of total corer:
l:aeL SpK*S X1.
Woody wine - All woody vines grenier ftrb 3.28 It in
fill rn (No SI x: 1
9
FACWsprries IS151P6 2. :Lpa
• rt" FAC species 10 x3- 30
OAL FACUSparairrs 75 xrl. lop
UNI. spwOL
FAA- Calumn Tows: I'S (A) L (8)
FA &W 7
t"reralence Index BFA
_ t . Rapid Traa;l for Frydrrslattytic Vogolauon
W 2 - dnnrelan Teq m >St19i.
1� 3 • IF'revrdence Index 11 :113 0'
70 , Tolal Cover �[
bO% Of tout) cover: , 20% o(lotral carer _! 1-_
4 , Morpt"ugical A6ap[3lilpns` (NfpVIQe Sapporling
r
Id@L$tr04urtl II'ttH
LV
dais In Remark-, or on tt 5eppr9tC slrectl
Prob4 rnatx MydrophytIc Vcgeiailon' (Explaln)
_
$
3. . Gl
,r�,�
f
'IrdIcators of hydix sail tkld weiland bytlrobgy moat
I'
4.
r. pIDIOL.1_
G
17ernitltxis of Four vegetation strata:
1.
6
9
FACWsprries IS151P6 2. :Lpa
• rt" FAC species 10 x3- 30
OAL FACUSparairrs 75 xrl. lop
UNI. spwOL
FAA- Calumn Tows: I'S (A) L (8)
FA &W 7
t"reralence Index BFA
_ t . Rapid Traa;l for Frydrrslattytic Vogolauon
W 2 - dnnrelan Teq m >St19i.
1� 3 • IF'revrdence Index 11 :113 0'
3
Hydrophyric
Vegetation
. TOW71 Gpnrer Rerent7 Yes No
W% of total mover: 2046 of lolal trmur
rs here or on a separate sheOL)
U5 Aroly Carps ad ErIg beers
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Lantern Mounia ins And RIBLrhorlt Verson ZA
F -5 Equinox
January 2015
70 , Tolal Cover �[
bO% Of tout) cover: , 20% o(lotral carer _! 1-_
4 , Morpt"ugical A6ap[3lilpns` (NfpVIQe Sapporling
r
Id@L$tr04urtl II'ttH
LV
dais In Remark-, or on tt 5eppr9tC slrectl
Prob4 rnatx MydrophytIc Vcgeiailon' (Explaln)
_
3. . Gl
,r�,�
f
'IrdIcators of hydix sail tkld weiland bytlrobgy moat
I'
4.
r. pIDIOL.1_
be preserl, Ludes%dlsw txd oc Iarablem.9lic,
17ernitltxis of Four vegetation strata:
3.
6
Tree - Woody plants, exckidirxy vh *w, 3 rt f1.6 emj of
rnot4 in diameter a[ braast height (Ut3F4j, ragmilloss of
7.
hr i^
8.
saplingoShrufb - WwAy plants, exnttadirkj vine% lm
9•
turn 3 Lit. ufil i And grehlEv tfori ur erTtral la 128 R (,
14
m) Ittll
i
Herb All hertharems (rmrt woody) P1eM5, regandless
--
Total Caner
5096 of total cover: r 20%of total covff- 17
of size. and woody plants last: than 3.28 R tall.
Woody wine - All woody vines grenier ftrb 3.28 It in
Witte-
SValun (Plot size; }, V
Nelcfhl
1.-
I-- -)". - d
3
Hydrophyric
Vegetation
. TOW71 Gpnrer Rerent7 Yes No
W% of total mover: 2046 of lolal trmur
rs here or on a separate sheOL)
U5 Aroly Carps ad ErIg beers
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Lantern Mounia ins And RIBLrhorlt Verson ZA
F -5 Equinox
January 2015

SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed 14 ddcum n the Indlei tor or connini the eVAme or Intllcetwo
tvh Matrix Redux Featraes
(InerresY , Uolrx COHJ611 � Iw�c�Ldc� Tamura Remarks
Io*{IR Iflz q-5
Hydrie Sal Indicators:
1+51osol(A1')
t -ksk CpiWw (A2)
_ Olack Higtie (A3)
Hydrogen Suf fide (A41
_ Saalfried t ayms IAk51
_ 2 cm Muck 0110 (LRR N)
DiCpleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ ThKk Rork Surlow (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 1441
Sanely (deyed malrix (54)
Sandy Redox (55)
_ S1rrrl�wl MEetr ix t5G)
Reslnckrre Layer of otrservad):
1 ype.:
Depth (k7mhes):
US Army Corps of Engkreers
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Cdl! , MON,_MW &%keel land Camim.
— ..
'Lncet.rarr- PL-Porn Liniq. M *AAatrix..
Indlcau" W Pmbiorilellc Hyrdric 5c
Bark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Mack CA 10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalm Below Stxface (58) (MLRA 147,
14B) _ Coa51 Ptai" Redox (Aid)
Win bark Surface (S3) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 1481
_'Leamy CYeypd Maim V71
_ Prudmi6rt Aeon *in Sails (F 19)
' uepleled Matrix WX
(MLRA 138, 1471
Rerlax cork Surfam TO)
_ Very Slealtow Dark Surface (Tf l7)
_ neplr:4ed Ma Surlaco (k 7)
_ Olhcr (6xp4ain rn Remarks)
_ Ream Daprossions (178)
Iren- ManganeSe MgSS@g IF 17) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umlxic Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicates of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piebnml Ftoortplairr 541:s IF78) WLRA 1400 wetland hydie"y most Le ptesart,
Red Parent Maie(W (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) u*w, dlsiurbrd or pradler auk.
Hydric Soil Presern7 wes No
Lesion Mountain; and 111"ri M+t - Version Z.0
F -6 Equinox
January 2015

WETLAND DETERM(NATiON DATA fORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
PlTJjwvSlLe: �hl CirylCounry: , (' r, r . SMnpling Uala:
Applkarii)O ncr: i. K �° Stale; , -J SamplingPDint:���
Investyatcir(5): -5 Section, Township, Range:
Lark low) (IhCh3lao, ICirace, olc.): _ I ex;,iI mhef (r:ore:aae, crxiwx, rwrw,}: Sbpe 1%) - _ 41
5t dreg an { RR or )u1LRIi); e I' * r.J L al " ^( Lang;
$pa Map Lint N-9FF Q: f•.-.) E t ig z ( NWI cliisldwaliprt: v-P
Are dimnlir-! hydFu"ir ctinxlitiam tin The see t)T" for this time etf rail Yes ' No {if mi, explain in kemarks.)
Are VegetaTfoo -- Sall " ++ or Hydrology ! °� slgrlilcantly dislurbed? Air- 'Ncomul Cacurrimarkue ' {ar"..dait✓t Yes !' No
Are Vegelat on rJ .Sall e . or I lydrotagy naturally problernack7 (If needed. explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AtWh she asap showing sampling point lneations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetellonl Prvwni? Yes ' 1 ND Is the So mpW Area
Hyfitid Still P!reswi? Yes rku Within a Wetland? Yes N,3
wouand Hydrotow Presm? Yes ND }
ITawatks:
A ",y , K° R h 0. ,r.'
HYDROLOGY
Welland Hyfdrd6g Indicstora:
'$ow,gn(Itlry lnM,(Dr5 ftmrrrnum of (woo L%wed)
Primary Indicators (minInntn of erne 6 rcareircd:
Olin; 01 thal aurlly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (EK)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B1 4)
_ S(larsely Ilegelafl d Concave Surface (B9)
liirrjh WAIrs Table{ft;!'j
Hydtagen Sulfide Odor (C 1)
_ ntamage Partern%(RIO)
Saluralrgn (A3)
Uxidixod Rhirmpheras cart Lhing fawN5 (0)
_ M{755 Trim Lines ([31 W
_ Water Marks (Bi)
_ P(O-So 1Ce of Reftoi?d Iran (C4)
_ f]fy`SeaSatl W3lor Table (C2)
_ 9whmeril Oaprr. N (52)
_ Recm iron Reduakan In TWw $ttil5 (0)
' C;wyG517 Brio w (CB)
_ Brill Deposks {63)
_ TNn Mmk Surface (C3)
_ SaltraUtm Visible on Aedal Imagefyr (C9l
_ Algal Mat of Crust (134)
_rather (Explain in Remairks)
Stunted or Strmsed Pinnts (10t)
_ Ilan Deposits (35)
� C: .mmphir- fhaAftin (D ?)
_ Inurdalimun Visible on A:tirial IMaWy (0)
_ Shallow ARgoilard {p9)
_ Wale- Stand Lrtares fns)
i Akre agraphie Rebel (1141
Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ FAC,r utra1 Ter (D5)
Fidld tlhser atinm- -
5"Lelrlre Water Pretierd'i Yes_ ND_
nrl(sth imrdinsl;
Wales fable Pres01117 Yus N.
bupth litidlutll° .
5aluraltott F�raS¢nt7 Yes r,fo
_ bepM tincllOSI= '0
4Natlarld Hydlrotagy RFtY48rr17 V" Na�
(Ir'eludesca Ile frl
fJe nilie f txvdesl []rtlu (srre,�m +;ata�e, anrlarr®ig well, aerial pllotas, prWous irtspecflrulsj, !1 atrailahic
_f�e'1e71Tk5.
�
. ` J.10'� 5
p qq
F+YGtatl° 4N+e.+.xv+r ✓�lf,+,r,rt�
,�„e.nir� t'.t� S .v:r
J% Army CW13a of I ilgirxirs'N
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Eastetn Mouillains and Piedrnanl - Verswn 2.0
F -7 Equinox
January 2015

VEGETATION (Four Strata) Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point;
Al7solutu
d
Darrimml kldicatur
Dwnina a Test worksheet:
1100 `atrutu:. WiN size 7 L+zyCr.
1. �J e. k r 1 n 15..: rr .� ° -�
--
3p5y�"�
•rl
Status
Humber of Durlwlant Spmmcd .
rhal Are 081. -rACW. or I AC- �
Total Number 01 IR3min10t
{A)
n, x�OIL
m Total CaVV
3 - • 4
°c^ f
51796 d total c uvw,
Fio[b Stratum (Plot �Izle° � l
H
FAC
SpeCWs AcroSS All Slral &.
(91
4. ra v
on (Explain)
,rJ
^T
Finc! ,AIms nrhydriv ti(1iil nnrl umdarld hydrology muss
17v. prmprd, u"p..%% r iSlllrllr'd or pralllernatM.
Pereenl d Liutninant Species
Thal Aro USL. FAM arFnC: Od'P
(AHJ
Definitions of FoLw Vegutation Strata:
R&L
7-
Tree - vdrOady plar", exdJud7inrU tnrres, 3 in, 17.8 Cm) or
Pr4Vl}IOnC9IrIt1eM vr4Kls5heet;
mare in diamaler at hroast 11"kit ([713111, regsrd less of
7.
Total CovarI
Toral%Coverof: ktulirlrr. -i
a.
5n':tF, rll Od' +�I.cywer� OX: rrJ
10191 r:nver:,
d� _
L]6L 5peiiC°i x 1 -
than a In. DBI I and greater Man or equal to 3.20 0 [1
Sar>tinorShTUh'SSraSUrrr
m) 01.
rACW spr,�r x 2
13.
-or,� �. �.... z o
r
f&0
FACsperms x8.
20% of IC I cover: 2
2.
r ACU species X4.
Woody Vine Svatlan {PLOT site; )
3
he�ghl.
1
UPL Spxm-, x 5 n
4.
Calumn Totals: (A)
l6
5.
Prevalrrxe u9dex = 6fA
Hydtophytm
5., Vuydrtatmn
e Total GovLr Prasent7 Yes X Na
50% of Iota) wm; 20 % to iota] oiuvri:
Rernarksm (indu&k photo rlumlters here or on a scparale sheer.)
US Army Corps of Englnccrs
Eastern Mounlairrs and PiedmwN - Ver*n 2.01
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -8 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
_ 1 - Rapid Test Jar Hydraphyhr= Vrxjelatlnn
a - Domuaame Test n r5i %
3- P'(0ValOrWM index 15 63.O'
,rs
)V
m Total CaVV
_ d Morphological Adaptatkm' IPrnvW �r ppooh19
51796 d total c uvw,
Fio[b Stratum (Plot �Izle° � l
H
20% of lotal coin =�
data in Remarks or on a separate sheer)
Protllo-matic HWrooy is Vegetal
5
on (Explain)
.
Finc! ,AIms nrhydriv ti(1iil nnrl umdarld hydrology muss
17v. prmprd, u"p..%% r iSlllrllr'd or pralllernatM.
4-
Definitions of FoLw Vegutation Strata:
R&L
Tree - vdrOady plar", exdJud7inrU tnrres, 3 in, 17.8 Cm) or
mare in diamaler at hroast 11"kit ([713111, regsrd less of
7.
height
a.
SapllydgrShruh - wot9rfy plardls„ exCllading virus, ld'Sg
9•
than a In. DBI I and greater Man or equal to 3.20 0 [1
IQ.
m) 01.
13.
Herb - All routtwems (non-vrcody) p l&m. foamless
of sim and woody plants less than 3.28 A tall.
TOM Cava,
50% of 10MI Cover;
20% of IC I cover: 2
tiYoady vine All windy vulrs dTrratcr lharr 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Svatlan {PLOT site; )
he�ghl.
1
Hydtophytm
5., Vuydrtatmn
e Total GovLr Prasent7 Yes X Na
50% of Iota) wm; 20 % to iota] oiuvri:
Rernarksm (indu&k photo rlumlters here or on a scparale sheer.)
US Army Corps of Englnccrs
Eastern Mounlairrs and PiedmwN - Ver*n 2.01
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -8 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

SOIL
5amplIng Point: q {
Profile Description; (Describe to She depth deeded to document the indicator or co(rGrm the rtbserlce of indicates•)
Ueplh Metlix Redax Flaturgs ��,...�
5,r 11 2 �a a. tee 1=010
- _ _y�KYF� f
rime: C Cnecernrnlinm 17 Flnnierinn. RM ,Rv1Kvd Meuix. MS-Masked Sand Grpim. 'I. mminn- V[ PfNn I brim. M. Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problernatic Hydric Soils':
_ HiSM01 IA))
Dark Surface W5
_ 2 CM Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ I11VX LplpeWn (A21
PotyVakM BeR W SWORCFT $S81 (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Fame RCIX7x IA15j
_ Mack Hivic (A3)
^ Thin Oark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,14a)
(MLRA 147, 146)
I lydrpgen 5tdlldc (A4)
Loamy Gleyed matrix (r2)
_ Fkedment Flpcdplaln Soil, (F 191
_ Shaliriad LayuFr (AS)
?r Depkilad Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 W Muck (A10) (LRR hQ
R0009 Dark 50000 (F5)
!_
Very Shdllow Dark Surfaco (TF121
_ llupleted Hekrx 1]nrk Surfare (A11)
Depleted Dark Sodarw (F f)
011mr (Fxpdain in Remarks)
_ Th¢k dark Surface (A 12)
� Redox Depressions (FS)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1} JLFtR 11
, Iron Mangam;sc Masses (F12) (LRR H.
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 13%
Sandy Gieyed Matrix (54)
_ UmbriC 5urfaCC (F 13) (li 136, 124
'Indicators of hydro"ic vegcalion and
_ Sandy Redox (SS}
_ Piedinnom floodplain Sells (F$91 (MLRA 1481
w-lond hydrology mua pe presCm,
strr1>pe11 Matrix (SIR)
_ RuS1 Paraill Matrrrial (F21) (MLRA 127, 1471
uallrass disturbed ur prnhlen4nrre.
Re t icli re Layer (if absrved)
Tyfrn-
I7ep lh (inches):
US Arrny Cnrps al Enyinuurs
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Hydric Sail Present? Yc% INC
EaslcYn Mountains and Picdmorm - Version 2.0
F -9 Equinox
January 2015

,rr�} WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Fa stem Mountains and Piedmont Region
Rt[xoctlSite: [ , t K,1 4ityfGounty: i r• t SurnpWerp Date: ' i i
ApplKOntlOwr,or: f° � � 5tala; �-J( S:,n;l,kray P,,.,t: a s 1
lu>iresSkdatnr(sic '"� I tltl Suction. faanshigt, Range;
L:u,dlurtn (Ivll!Jloprr• Iia'r dGe. olc.): r e- -?'f 1}e 4 4e M.. Local roM (concavo. canna rtcne); 510pe (%)I
Sutlregion (DRR or MI.RA): L Q. l Lot: � i f 41 ri V/ Long• 33.3 3 $ 0atunr:
5011 Map UM roams: r ud4 NWI da silkArin r '
Aga clinnriC f hyftkl qie corediions w, the site typical for dis do,e of year? Yes Y No (If no. explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation -J . Soy -1 _ or Hydrology signifk;anlly diVur 7ed7 Art! "Nernmi Creu rrWauutts3 prey mtrF Yes rr No�
Are Vegetation _,,.L Sad w Hydromyy + r naturally proUnnianc? 1t naudcd_ exptainn any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling paint locations, transectsr important Features, etc.
1-lyd"Vhy1c Veg"ion Resw e Yes � Is the Sampled Area
Hydria loll Present? Yes Ne
within a Weifarxl7 Yes No
Wimma 1ydrology Present? Ye X No
HYDROLOGY
Primary IrAQaA7` Iminimti eil riot. uti teuluued
check, edl that < yl
_ Surlace Soil Cfack6 106)
�r Surface Warr (A 1)
— True Pajw ht; Planla (814)
— spa(sely Vegetated comove Surtaice (1381
o High Wirtw TRI* (A?.)
— Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
s Drainage Palterns (510)
SoluraWn IA3)
_ Qxl[L'red Rhiuspl3 nr u u Liwny hours (C3)
_ Mass Trim Lanes (El 16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ PreseMp of Rnduced Iran ((4)
— DrySeasan Watei lat4a (C2)
Sedone" Qepmv[s (152)
_ Recent Von Reductlon In Tiled Soils (C5)
_ Crayflsh Bvrrmws (C6)
orilt Dgmlts 1133)
a Tlin Mudt Sutix:e (C7)
5awcation VlslNe on Aerial ImagM (C91
Algal that or Crust (Bd)
miller (Ewplaln In Remarks)
Slurred m Slme wd Plaids (01)
Iran ppp"N (H5)
Geomorphic Fftdm 102)
InUnotlon Vis4ble on Aerial Imagery (01)
_ Shallow Aqueard 104
_ Water•Slaint:d Leaves (B9)
_ M`umalaWrapNr ROW fr)4)
_ Aquari( Fauna (Ala)
_ FAC•NCU1ral TcSC (I]51
Sarriat:v VVmFw Prnsenr? Yes No _ Oepttt linche5);
Wafer Tehle Preuill? Yes X No_ Depth (lrocheM: 0
520,uauo" PrB54nt Yes - No — Deplh (lurches): _n Wetlarud Hydrology Present? Yes h. No
(irtchldps Canillary drdngc) _ _ —
no -witty Recaded Data (stream gauge, rnottftuing wet aerial photos. pwvams imimmior"c), d available:
)0 . l,rT r -J ,% —�. �'f1.pr•' .�r'r V4 r V-r.�,.
US Army Corps of Lng steers
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Eastem Mw rilaut5 and Fhedmmnl - Vmmun 2.0
F -10 Equinox
January 2015

d.
� S � Total Dover
56� d Taal cower: I� , S zo9� a talal cover:
ub :. INN siae4
2,
3.
Prevalence index worftslleet
l
otal % cowei 9f:
08L specltrs
ML111IR v Vy
x I -
� Ul�
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
sampling point:
4
Tree Stratum (Plot *e: CJ
AbSoMe mrmnant Im[catm
Pr 44th
bominanoe Tftl. woru -skw,
x 5
4 ^�Iw. _ r _
1 to
NumbeF ad Dorrynam Spccios
That Fve ORL FACK or FAC
/
tP (A)
data In Remarks or on a scparaic sheen
Flrr. 4(ra.. turn {(sail star':.
}
Prahlwntiic Iloophpk Vrxgel:¢iar (EiMp6 i)
5
TgWI 4umbCr 41 ❑ardnalm
3.
Species Across AN Scram,.
(B)
7
llrydralu of hydiiG 3a1 and wetland hytkaltrZMM
Percent of Domirhlllt Species
e
t9 Present. uNm itisturtie0 or problemVk.
5.
Thal Are DBL, FAM or FAC`
r (IR)
d.
� S � Total Dover
56� d Taal cower: I� , S zo9� a talal cover:
ub :. INN siae4
2,
3.
Prevalence index worftslleet
l
otal % cowei 9f:
08L specltrs
ML111IR v Vy
x I -
F ACW species
x2
FAC species
x S
rACJ spmos
x d .
LJPL species
x 5
C&fM Tot&:.
(A) d6;1
Nrevalame Index WA
4° 17arWiucKns'Of Four vewation Susie:
5.
I ree - Warxly IAanL%, exrludrnrl Vila ' ' 3In. (7.B Coil rw
6- — mnrw in dcrrnvlm n twim%t Irogid (DBH)• rUgaP less d
7. _ hoghl
$. SnpilnVShrub
9. than 33 in. DBH and ocalcrt than or eroding vwtcs, less
qr equal to 3.2$ ft {a
in. ml tali.
14. tlerb -fie hLYbace'ous fno4i- wacdyj plans. tegardless
D = Taal Owu ul size, and woudy plarris loss than 3.28 11 tai.
5076 0l W191 savor, 2476 of [adi c rrw: p
Woody vine - an moody vine; greater than 3.20 p In
Wopo, yineSTrorLm (Pdofs4c: i
1. ,,... ? k z,.
U$ Army Caps of tliqlneM
rrydrophyne
vegetation
[ntrlt>der present? Yes No
W% of tdel Cover: 20% of IAlal [over:
us here or on a separs le ShWA.i
tas[[rn RSOUMains ar5d PiCCl110 1 VCrMnn 2.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -11 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
_ t • Rapid Test for i iydroptipie Vernrion
B,
X 2 nominance Testis x50%
9.
3 Prcwaicncc Index is x3.0'
TOW Cover
50% of meal coven_ aL-: 20% of lotal cover,
4 . Morprimgical Adaplitlionr,' (PrO cro suppDmn9
data In Remarks or on a scparaic sheen
Flrr. 4(ra.. turn {(sail star':.
}
Prahlwntiic Iloophpk Vrxgel:¢iar (EiMp6 i)
5
`s
7 °
llrydralu of hydiiG 3a1 and wetland hytkaltrZMM
3. 4
c A.
flip
t9 Present. uNm itisturtie0 or problemVk.
4° 17arWiucKns'Of Four vewation Susie:
5.
I ree - Warxly IAanL%, exrludrnrl Vila ' ' 3In. (7.B Coil rw
6- — mnrw in dcrrnvlm n twim%t Irogid (DBH)• rUgaP less d
7. _ hoghl
$. SnpilnVShrub
9. than 33 in. DBH and ocalcrt than or eroding vwtcs, less
qr equal to 3.2$ ft {a
in. ml tali.
14. tlerb -fie hLYbace'ous fno4i- wacdyj plans. tegardless
D = Taal Owu ul size, and woudy plarris loss than 3.28 11 tai.
5076 0l W191 savor, 2476 of [adi c rrw: p
Woody vine - an moody vine; greater than 3.20 p In
Wopo, yineSTrorLm (Pdofs4c: i
1. ,,... ? k z,.
U$ Army Caps of tliqlneM
rrydrophyne
vegetation
[ntrlt>der present? Yes No
W% of tdel Cover: 20% of IAlal [over:
us here or on a separs le ShWA.i
tas[[rn RSOUMains ar5d PiCCl110 1 VCrMnn 2.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -11 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

SOIL
Sampling Point: 13 _(�
Profile Description: @Describe 10 the depth needed to document the indlcahw ar confirm Ilia absence of indicators,}
Depth Malris Re. dox l'wilm".x
linchfi5l tir74Df fmd5ra S:DIPr [rru7e5[l !477 .._. 1,}yX!l�rq _ lir ±mxr*%
Hydr♦C Soil Indieamrs°
_ HistosDl (A1)
_ Hisile Fpipcdon (A2)
_
Slack Hlstic 03)
HydroWn Sulfde (A4)
SuatAw I.ayfss 06)
_ 2 ern Muck (A 10) tLRR N)
Deplcled Below UArk Surface (Al l)
_ Tf1ICk Bark 5tlrlaeE (Al 2)
Sandy Mucky MinWkd (51) (LRR N,
NfLRA 147, 148)
_ Sergly f teyed Mno-u 494)
_ Sandy Redox (SW
— Stripped Matrix (S81
Type.
Dupili tirwhc•,J.
U5 Army CVV, of Engineers
DArk Swi2co (57)
_ P41yValUe BeIDW Surface (5if} {MLRA 147, 148)
rhn Uerk Surface (S9) @MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gicycd Maarlx (F�)
Depleted Matror (173)
Rudus Uark Surface (F6)
_ DDPIeWO park 5uflm (F7)
Re6DXf&precjW',(r8)
_ Iron•Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
1rlLRA 1961
_ (Nnlxc Surface (1-13) ftRA 138,122)
seswdmax r'ippdpfain Sail, (r 19) (MLRA 149)
RKI P.9renl Marerrd (I J1l MLRA 137, 147)
frxkatcrs fur ProlAematic Hydric Sc
_ 2 CM Muck (Al 0) (MLRA 147)
_ CDa%RamRe" (AICr)
(MLRA 147. 1481
Pic -drna t noodplain soils (rig)
WLRA ash+ 147)
_ Very 511allm Dark 5utface (TF121
Clher (Explain in Rurna")
"Irkircalom of hy(Rophytic vegetation and
wel4,qnd hytfr". y must he prrru nt,
rank:es di,lurWd of Wo4lenalic.
Hydnc Sod prasOrtl7 Yes 1�- No
Easlern Maunlains and Piedmont Vcrslan 2,0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -12 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

WF..TI,AND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
mol pr sim 1` - r y (AylCuurAy- f " .. , , - , j
AFplirnnUt}nnr'' —�t, Slalc: "- °- $amorgPoint• t
Irrvuslw]atilr (�,): - StiMM. Tpwnstiip. Ramp:
Landrorm (hiltslape, terrace. em). ) ),peal renal (r omave, convex, none)' - —w!
SUWQglon {LRR or MLRA): I rl lat. � I It SG Ldi>4^ - • 3'i d $ d ❑awm:� t
sail Map urwiName: rJ Wr s� NWIdassa"tcation: 0c, —0. '
Air viirnntir: l hydlolo* ewidl6orks on the she typical For this time of year? Yes No (Ong. a IAMrl m Ronw ks.)
Ale Vegoatlan 'J . Sall r•'. or Hydrology ) "rot [trily,im.hed7 Ato "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes r No
Arc Vegctatbn -y Sail , a HydiOkXJy Pf naturally protAematic? (If needed, explain any ansvmrs in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - AtIll site map showing sampling paint locations, transects, important features, etc.
Ifydmq hyW Vagdalian Presiem7 Y. Nc
Hydrlc So9 Pr€senO Yes No
Wetland HytfrO"y Pfe';M? Yes t@o
HYDROLOGY
1% the Sarnpipti Area
withima Wetland? Yes Np
POMMY lwlk zqw., rrwrllrrwrn of Una is r0auked.
{tVLCk 311 thM 300141
Surlacp $oil r-racks (t96)
_ Surlaw Writer (Aty
_ True Aquatic Mants (014)
_ Spwwy vcgetalcd Uwxave Surface 11381
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sutli le Odor V I
rxalnago Patterns 1010)
^ Saturation (AS)
6rldized Rhizasphcres on Livinq Reds (C3)
_ Mass Trial tires (13169
Water Marks (31)
_ Prasenre of Reduced Iturt iC0
_ Dry -Stawn WA1or Table (C2)
s Sedirnerel beptislis (921
_ RmeM Iron Reducrim in TiRNI Spill (CG)
_ Craylril] Buriaws (CH)
Unit Deplxsrts Ste)
_ Th M Muck Surface (CI)
_ SaltRatian Visible on Aerial Imagery (CE)
P4al Mel tit Crust pity
_ olher IExplain In Rumwk %)
Swrited tv Stressed Plams (01)
kon Vepmds (Ft5)
= C;eamorphip Povion to?)
irundvibri VlsI*, on Aerial Imagery W)
_ Shalkm Aquaard (63)
Wale - Slained Leaves (691
_ MUE)k4juyraphkReai (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (Fill 3}
_ FAC Neutral Test (45)
Surlm;u Watei Resent? Yes_ No 2 Depth (trtcht 5li,
Wslrir table tvesent? Yes it No Depth (In#es) 't
SBtitracon Prosonr? Yes t No baps prunes):
Rlr<eaitded Data (stream gau . treLr tonng wra
,,, r ,? v14 A. �, f G,,d 1 s `T'
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wetland Hydrology Presemt? Yes Nu
ans). n available:
Lasiern Motwitams and Iticamoni Version 2.Q
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -13 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
AbscAule Dominant Iodicaror Dominance Test workshe8ti
tree Stratum 1[ lot s,xe l
'%, €
[ sub 50IM'"51 Nrwnlxv a[ Barroriant 5[rtViFS
- That rife 08L. FACW. IN FAC: � (A}
7
Tural Number of Uorninprn
3 specie, ACrir55 All Strata
4.
Percertt0t]MIrlanl species
�'/f
5. That Are 001- FACW. ar FAG: (Ad8)
Prevalence lrraex = WA -
8
- Tara[ Cowl
total % Carver 1$:
Muleory hv_
50% of lrltat [over•
w 20% of 11181 CO M: �
UK %pec"es
x i s
�A ,IiDo rub Strolurn 042 sico:
1
FACW spectin
X2.
1. t - — t * =.1 r _ � ,x ! ,
Ik (ape•
F.AC 5pceiDs
X3-
_
7 —
FACU species
x A -
3, �` r ? .'r% k t fr ? r a." ! ;• . - • n
_
UPL species
x 5 .
1 [Winhtions OF Four Vegetation Strati:
CuhurW Tafals:
tA} igl
Prevalence lrraex = WA -
8
_ I Rapid Test for Hydrophytic vegetation
X 2 raaminerxe Test Is >ib96
3 � Prevalaaite Iririmx i� i3.a1
°
�
9.
- f=1Cwur �i
5d'76 of tat &1 uwl'r. �.� •� 7496 ar (Val CBW2r.. e
4 - MtlfQhde{�iifaP AIWplrrinNrY. (PTOV"de 51r;�]9r[ing
herb 540lm jPiof gib_
'-
1
dala in Remarks or" a separate Meet)
Problematic I lydrophylie VCgewliGn' (Exp[ein)
j
"Indicatefs of hydric soil and wellarltf hydliofogy must
IL
r "r
be present unless dislurWd ot pieUemalt.
d. ' rW !,-I+!; fA
,-y, : Ar
1 [Winhtions OF Four Vegetation Strati:
Tree Woody plans. cxch dirig vines. 3 iris Il.6cm1 uf
6 mere in diameter at breast hclgllr I[313kj, argatrims d
7 height.
8.
SaplirglShrub - watu y *iil:ti. PxCWrNj vinPs, IPSO
9. [ban 3 a1. U1SH and gr{.atm trkln m "tri to 3.2a M {1
10. 111) to
if.
Har6 -All rtrahatxuxn Irron- vmttdyl fi[arKS, regardfcs5
Total Coven [} of size. arvf vnourly plc nii% lvS% llurn 3 -78 fi rail
SfP11i d IClal COVtiC; of lots) rxnr>at:_,L -__
art>wfy vine - All WOaUy LirteS greater llian 3.2811 In
Why Vanc Syalurn [Mot size; 7S O y hl
1 - r
Hydraphyrie
S- vegeuldo"r
Tnt 1. CrnrPr f'tC:iMtt'7 1'05 Nn
50% (it louI(,aver 20% of total cover:
liuntirrk%: Ilricluda lAiWo Ilnml]Pr %Fn'.r r! ar cal a %l:prlrare 4hPPL1
US ArrM Carps of Englirwi.
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -14
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
L95Cew I'MutllariNS mnd P®dmonl - Viars"on 7.0
Equinox
January 2015

SIOIL
to the death meeded to document Hre irtdktator or
Sampling froint= f'57
Depth Matrix Relax ri:AI 1rC5
Gnchlrs) Cahn trndsrl _ Color Lmolsal . T4 _ ILarure Remarks
',I- LrA y �'F {ter' r I f r' ' ' f rr 'r'i . . n-r r -< i S
r iii i i,. I•�
_ HM. SOI jAI)
Hislw F.pipd�rkln (AZ)
(Aack Hisrk tA+ )
_ Hydrwjtvr Sidlide (A4)
SUaliGed Laycrs (A6)
d Cm F,ALKk [Alq) (LRR 10
tlnlursrrrl lir my [lark Srldacp (All)
Thick Daik SuriacL (A$2)
_ Sang Mucky Mineral (51) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,14M
Sandy Gleym Matrix ISI)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Malrix (56)
Type:
Depth (rushes):
US Arrnp Corps of krnrrraars
)d"d Matrix, MS- Masked Sand Grains. xLOCadon: PL -Pow Llnim, M-Moulx
RedoxDWesslom (F8)
Urm-Mangareti8 Ma3SGt (F 1 i,) {LRR N.
MLRA 176)
(.rnwc Surface (r13) {MLRA 136, 122) 'lndiwlgrsof hyr&aphylicvcget,ilignand
_ 111eemmll Fluodplarn Suits (F 10) {MLRA 1481 w0L1nd. hydltFkrgy rrwu t bu pr1151arrl.
Red P'arorlt Mzwxk71 {F21) (MLRA 127, 167) unkess rirS Vr4ed of prpnremalle.
k
14ydric Sail Preserlt7 Yes No
Lavern MpuntamS arrd I? "Mont - Widen 7..0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -15 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Indice s for Probternahc Hy&ic So
Dark Suidaca (ST)
_ 7 cm Muck (Alli) (Vt RA 147)
F WpukIL 13eruw 5urlacL- M) (MLFZA 147. 16B)
^_
Coasi PralfiL IZL'dux (Al B)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,118)
(MLRA 147, 1481
_ Lawny Cloyed Mahe (F 2)
_ MudnuaM Hoodplain Sruls (F19)
DepiMed Mdtrlx (F3)
(MLRA 138, 147)
Rarlpx. Dark Surface 0 Q
_ very Shallow nark Surface ( f 1.12)
Dap 4ud Dark Sudary (1`1)
_ fillies (Fxplairr in Rchilarks)
RedoxDWesslom (F8)
Urm-Mangareti8 Ma3SGt (F 1 i,) {LRR N.
MLRA 176)
(.rnwc Surface (r13) {MLRA 136, 122) 'lndiwlgrsof hyr&aphylicvcget,ilignand
_ 111eemmll Fluodplarn Suits (F 10) {MLRA 1481 w0L1nd. hydltFkrgy rrwu t bu pr1151arrl.
Red P'arorlt Mzwxk71 {F21) (MLRA 127, 167) unkess rirS Vr4ed of prpnremalle.
k
14ydric Sail Preserlt7 Yes No
Lavern MpuntamS arrd I? "Mont - Widen 7..0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -15 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

WETLAND DETERMINATION DA A FORM - Eastern Mountains and PI40m¢rlt Region
prgorUSitc: C.k C-!e "t Y- QgyCounly: R.. « Sampki�4Dart:
Ap(iwin7UUwnar: i { S` G_ Stale: Samplktg Pair 1 $
IrnresligarurLsl:
314T DA Secrlon, Townatip Range:
Landforrrl (ritllst e, lerroce,. OCT I d ra P [ Local relief (concave, convex. none), a Siope 1%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA). L �fN Lac 715' i 11 & * is bong: - f'; , 'a i i �. `�,,11Datutm
Sml Ia V Unit Name: t .i 4 t t 1 S ,1 , k -Vl+ $. NWI des5ificalim, FJ . ".
Are dimalic .f hydrologic condilion5 on Iho site lyplcal for dtls lime of year? Yin -,K_ No (if no. explain in Rurl uks,)
Are V*getaWn "' . Boll -I or Hydrology ^) sfgnll9canllq distorted? Are 'Normal CircurlVances' pre5erx7 Yes X' No
Aru ViVeLminxa t1 Sail r, . w Ilydidutly.) nmlurally lxuhlumatie7 (11 needed, explain any answers in Remarks .I
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling po" locations, transacts, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vt't mLlon Present? Yes No_ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric SCw FNesert? Yeas ND within a We0.larrd? Ye!; `1 Nn
Wetland Hyorology PreSM7 Yeses Nd
HYDROLOGY
prifflWy htdicalors (minimum of one B (uhed:
check ill thJ74 pAF�Y1-
lUFIWU W8hi (Al)
Tnw A.quulic Plan[s lflsa)
V High Willer Todd W]
_ Hydrogen SUrm Quorr (C l)
,7r Sakwalirn (A3)
0xidited 42YtzLW- plui"oil Living RoWs(C: )
Water Marks (61)
_ Pre5emo of Reduocd Iron (C4)
SodinIL'nt DeposAl. (K)
Recall Iron Wduclion in Tilled Soils (C°ili)
Drill I1r stills 1113)
-�-: Thin Mmk Su llar.e lC 7)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Iran Deposits (BS)
_ Imindaburi Vivt#r on Aerial linagury (1577
_ Water Stained Loaves (69)
Aqualic Fauna (61 V
%urfave Water Resent? Yes_ No Depth finches),
Water Table Pre5en[9 Yes No, Depth [nctre5):�
Saturalirar Present? Yes r No Dwb [rlctrosp .
iincluders "allary lriooel
Describe Recorded uata (stream gauge. monitoring wen, aerial pnotos, pmious i
US Autry Corps of E=nglneLrs
_ Surface Soil Cracks (at)
'sparsely Vegolawo coricowe Surtace (138]
Drainage Patterns (BU})
_ Mass trim 1 iiKm (B1G)
pry °Season Water Table (C.i'.)
_ Crayfash SurFews (C6)
_ Satangtion Visikble on Aerial Imagery (C4)
Slurred or Sgwsod Ptahm (01)
�f GemnrxphicPosilion(02)
Shallow Aquitard (n3)
Micrdopographi: Relief (D4)
FAC.NLmi-Al Test (05)
t allarld Hydrology Present? Yas Nu
-
Fa ±:IiviiiMnnivains anal Plrgtnnnl Vmsinn 7f}
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -16 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

II
VEGETATION JFour Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: }(fir to -,
1 Rapti Teat for Hydrophytic vegetation
g
2 - Damineriee Test is 550%
_ 3 - NeValonoo Index is:Ua'
Taial C"
50'16 Of rmel Cr}ver. 5{ 1 20% pfd Mai ccpvM, �f, — 4 - MWplld0g=81 AdaptStiora` (Provide supparling
Y F date in Remarks tit on a Separate stwolj
raery 5 Tatum (PtdS sixd; }
1. 1,_ .r L a r. 0 } p k- s S — Prdalarmk Illydropki tic VcgMtlon' (Explain)
2'. 'r1 - -r a tG. rC- fli FA Vi
'Indlcalors of hydric soil aria wollarld hydrolagy riaesC
be present. urakss disturbed or protrlemialic..
Darknitiam of Fors Voila atton Strata:;
6 Tree - Wnndy playas, cxGndiny vines. 3 H1. (7.6 cm) at
}. m[ar in diameter at brmm height {pBH}, re films of
F�Ight
R.
SaplingtShrub - tflfoody plants. &vaudlny vines, wa
9. than 3 in. 0BH and greater than or equal to 3.78 h (t
10. m) tall.
1 t. Hftb All llerbaceaus (nett- wdodyj points, regardlf ,5
Total frvwv Of size. drxi woody plants less than 3 78 ft lall.
?{19G of total cover: - 11 24 % of local cover: �-
tRoody vine _ Atlwraady v*xas 9MRIeT than 3.P6 fl m
W .gQy Viha Stratum {l'la[ sizB: 0' } ht.
1.
a.
Hyd -pltydc
Ve"at;mr
= t
Touil Ccwrer NFManL7 Yes No
50% df Fatal eowir: 70% 04 Val cover:
rs here or nn it separate shed.)
05 Army eorpa al Engineers
EaSldrn Mounthlns anal Predmarrr - Version 7.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -17 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
'a c� '
Ahsokrte
Dominant Indicator
00011M Me- Test worksheet;
Tree Spat"
(P;Iot Site. 1 h
7
Nurrth[7 of nnrn narn SPeries
th2l N0O8L,FACW Gr FAC:
(AI
2
Total Nurrrbw of 0amklara Lr
Spei*S Across All Strata'
C _
5.
Pamera of L7wnlnam Species.
That Aro OBL. FACW, or FAG:
WO)
5.
7,
Piovalonre lndex worivah"L
TOIAI Cover
- Tr)tai 54 Coach af_ III
50% of Mal cover:
! ' � 26°96 of
intsi r-ow -r i
OHL specirxs x 1 .
@
Y�D1M1aiSIvl83
$o-BLUrti {p1oLSItC:
l
I ACW spodes X 2 -
1. -'�
FAG speedo-, x 3 =
2. } d r
t as x++t, A •
r +—
{AL�1
FACU spedm X d =
3.
I -
76t
i
UPL 5p&ies x&-
$ , +, e'k r.d
t sS
I}Cii
CdlumnTotals: (A)
{0j
5, r
751b vs P f
l
ProValance Inrfo-x = WA =
1 Rapti Teat for Hydrophytic vegetation
g
2 - Damineriee Test is 550%
_ 3 - NeValonoo Index is:Ua'
Taial C"
50'16 Of rmel Cr}ver. 5{ 1 20% pfd Mai ccpvM, �f, — 4 - MWplld0g=81 AdaptStiora` (Provide supparling
Y F date in Remarks tit on a Separate stwolj
raery 5 Tatum (PtdS sixd; }
1. 1,_ .r L a r. 0 } p k- s S — Prdalarmk Illydropki tic VcgMtlon' (Explain)
2'. 'r1 - -r a tG. rC- fli FA Vi
'Indlcalors of hydric soil aria wollarld hydrolagy riaesC
be present. urakss disturbed or protrlemialic..
Darknitiam of Fors Voila atton Strata:;
6 Tree - Wnndy playas, cxGndiny vines. 3 H1. (7.6 cm) at
}. m[ar in diameter at brmm height {pBH}, re films of
F�Ight
R.
SaplingtShrub - tflfoody plants. &vaudlny vines, wa
9. than 3 in. 0BH and greater than or equal to 3.78 h (t
10. m) tall.
1 t. Hftb All llerbaceaus (nett- wdodyj points, regardlf ,5
Total frvwv Of size. drxi woody plants less than 3 78 ft lall.
?{19G of total cover: - 11 24 % of local cover: �-
tRoody vine _ Atlwraady v*xas 9MRIeT than 3.P6 fl m
W .gQy Viha Stratum {l'la[ sizB: 0' } ht.
1.
a.
Hyd -pltydc
Ve"at;mr
= t
Touil Ccwrer NFManL7 Yes No
50% df Fatal eowir: 70% 04 Val cover:
rs here or nn it separate shed.)
05 Army eorpa al Engineers
EaSldrn Mounthlns anal Predmarrr - Version 7.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -17 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

SOIL
to
r
Sampling Point: 5 i` D iP
Uop[h MON R4if4x Fp�!urv%
Tnw !nc I�alure fiY�rrinrki
r ` jUX }pry+
g r I t y /1 /1 I" rJw c�in R- t�r,i n�RfPr'
RM -Muced
Hydric Sail lndirMors;
H66WOW (AT)
_ 1,10kc Fplpi3d ©n (A?)
9lock f lvlc (A3)
Ilyrirriyen %Ai le (A4)
SYralifiicd Layers IAW
_ Z cm Muck (Alp) (ERR X)
licrxnlod 8 duw 0M Surface (All)
_ Thick Dark. Surface (Al yl
Srlrrdy Mucky Malotal (51) (LRR IA
MLRA 147, 1461
Sanely GtGycd Mainx tS4)
_ %(rrrdy Flednx (S5)
Sttiplled Matrix (56)
Type.
f3epth (in0eSb
US Army Corps at Eklgifmm
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
MS-Masked Sand G,ciins A mWinn- P1 -Purr I ininil. M- Mrkix.
Uldlcators for Prohtamatic Hydric Sc
_ DR* 50ACR (57)
_ 2 cm Muck (A 10) (MLRA 147)
" Palywalue Below Surface (S81 IMLRA 147, 148)
_ Coa5t Prairie Rerlox (Al B)
Thor Dark Surlaco (90) (MLRA 147, 146)
[ULRA 147, 148]
Loamy Glrayad MBLrix (F2)
Ple*riont Floodp1alll 5MIS ff 19I
Depleted Matrix (F3)
PALRA 136, 147)
i Rerkix Dark Sulaoo [FS)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (7612)
Depletud [lark Surfwe (177)
_ 01wr (Explain in remarks)
_ Rudux Deptassions (FB)
IronNarlgorlc5c Masscs (F 12) (LRR W.
MLRA 136)
_ Urrilx Surfacu (F13) (MLRA 136, 132) irrWica rS of tlydroptlytt vWawn and
i P9CdrrWrat Flaodpldin 59119 (F 19) (M(LRA 146) welland lipa gy musl be pesunt.
R" varerx nnalerkal (F$1) (NA#A 127, 147) u1 1.G:ss dsrubLd or problematic.
it
Hydric Soil Priasonu? Yes Na
Eastern MOUI1tairr5 and Pfedmanl Versinn P.fF
F -18 Equinox
January 2015

CAI WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
&'ti4jErGrlSile� CAT C Cf e CilylCu�Yny: -i _ a el 0 "1 �aYYiplinq Dam f
AppVKznt*mlrv_ Ia! ' State: Sampling Pout
Irrrestigaliu(s). J 1`1T, SEgA"ix Raogc
Lan(IlExin IndlAupe, Imamat., Lrily. }; F1004 h or, tocaI relief (concave, convex, n�o}ne): JV491f e slope (ai; t"
subregion (LRR ar MLRA): LRA Lill; Lain: D �r • 31Q) Datum Nf AD $ 3
Soil Map Unit Narnc; AW W'k'4'ytf NWI CLwsilicatlan_ �d
Are climatIc i hydro is condA on the sNe typical Puff this lime ol yem? Yes No Of no, explain m Rernai%s.)
Are Vegetal- _ Sa4I 7• °f a Hydology sigiAwAntly dslurbad? Aro'Normal Circurnsunwr present? Yes X No
—
Air: Vc{ t.iaian Soil or Hydra Pogy naturally prahiematic? {K needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
HySophylk Vegetation PreSM? Yes-2L No Is Ihu Sanaplw Area
HyMi6 Sol Rass,a Yl7 Yes k Na within a 1Yelland? Yes No
Welland Hydrolagy Present? Yes 144__
Renvrks:
HYDROLOGY
Pdruiry Indiralrms trninimum al me is reuuirPd: Ehm:k rill Mat rtliply)
_ Slrfa a S6l Cracks (BG)
_ Surface Water (Ai)
_ True Aquae[ F401115 (1314)
— Sparsely V+o"aled [,IM WQ $urfao43 (Be)
Hlgh Water TiihN iA7l
_ Hydr0u9e11 Suflldo Oft (Cl)
s Drainage Panoms (BSO)
Satueallon (p 3)
Oxidized FNzuspheaeson Living Rrwls (G3)
_ Mass Trim L roes 11316)
Water Marks (51)
_ Nesorxe of Rcdxvd Iron (CA)
Dry- Season Wacer Table (C2}
Wment Deposes 1523
� Rllcaill bon RuLrucluaa in Tilted So4s (C6j
— Crayfish Bunncvs (CS)
_ Drift Deposits (W)
_ Thln Muck SW ace (C7)
_ Satwatkln Visible on Aerial Imagery (G4)
Alyal Mat ax Mutt I137)
� Ottler (Explain irl. Remarks)
_ slumed or Stressed f IWU (D1)
_ Iron [7epa5it45 IBS)
Geomorphic IYOSilrin (02)
hwndalkArl Visibl€ on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquilard ID3)
water- Stained Loaves (69)
v Mieraopograpltic Rem (04+
_ Aquati; Fauna 1813)
_ FAC- AwIral 7uFt(D5)
Field Obiuwvahians:;
Surface watt!( P(vSPM7 Yes No
oepit, (irxtk s).
Water TabM PreSenl? Yes No
r)rplh (irrtWq.) =.�i
_
Saturation Nesent? Yes X No
Depth (lrwh )'__2 VJelland Hydrulvgy Present? Yes '�_ No
iincludes capilHary fringe)
15r?sr nhe IIEtiraduif Dala (stream gaugrr rn0r11branq well, aerial "as. Fxcviom inspections). d available
Remarks,
U5 Afuly CGarpS Of E119 00US
EasiLirn Muun[ueiM gild Pic�Jrrxrrx Verson 2.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -19 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of Planes.
I AI>sallrlc [fomina+
{Plot,size: 2 1
%Cmn SpLcks7 Swab
U.
7
5a1Tlpling Point:
dnP111na— TMt workshed:
IVum6eF of oomina 4 Wftle6
OBLspetles
Thal Are 0RLr FAGWW. or FAC:
fat
Total rfunlGer W Damlroil
FACW specir s
SPOCICS ACroSS Al Strata;
IHi
Percent of Dorfluvird SW. res
Thal Are 06L, I ACM rx FAl::
V f
[J Fr WEIj
U.
�_ = Total C.,
Tot I % Goner of:
Multiply hv:
ff
5051. of totalrowy Ls7 2()55 oftMl:Co;; +
OBLspetles
x1
9
hruh r rn {PIq Sitg.6_i t d
FACW specir s
3 - Fh"alp."err Index i5 53.0'
1�%
C as 1 FAG
FAC species
SfY3L d blal irPt79r'
2
SAIr a d % QSL
FACU
x .
i.
—
UPI- %PK'*5
x 5 =
4.i�S�
— Prddlornallc hydrophylmvegewmol fEY.FAmril
Column Totals
(A) (9)
5,
big" Y+xVI $ Pr
3.
IV40 I � Ot ff 1 1 ljY
j
'Irdp=hxs rd hyrkic soil and wetland hytlrolpgy must
Plovafouce Index .BSA -
U.
I - Rapt], Test for 1Iydru{dhiyhu Vet,rllahrer
X' 7 - Dominerrx test 6'50%
9
3 - Fh"alp."err Index i5 53.0'
SfY3L d blal irPt79r'
Tula[ Cover
ZO% of total comr:,`�
— ! - Mcxphdrngcal AdaplTtior 5' (Prauide wpprHt q
I-FgrU
{
S¢ratum fPfat -dl2o; 7 t
data in Reinarks or on a sil�rarafe slwi l►
1.
64 ff S
J
— Prddlornallc hydrophylmvegewmol fEY.FAmril
3.
IV40 I � Ot ff 1 1 ljY
j
'Irdp=hxs rd hyrkic soil and wetland hytlrolpgy must
e
Pf iryt?
LL4
ho presant, a ie5s aishirhed of prohl'ematic.
me11nd1fon5 of Four Veoelation straw.
5. Doe - Woody plants, excluding Yir y-, :I m. (7.G rml tw
mere in 61AMIAW at breast t1019111 106regardless 11), re 01
7 Ildgtt!
S.
SapGrV5hrub - Woody plants. excluding Ones. less
9'
Pon 3 in. DRH.and geatdr Man or equal to 3.2a ft (1
10. on) tall.
11.
Herd All kfbacew., (non-woody) plaills. regardless
CC I,�` - Total Co% {i f nt star. and woody plarn;1e;;1har1 J,26 R tall.
noq ofiotalcover; is 20%of total r wm- 1 �
WtrmdY. Wile Shahan (Phil vwr. � �t y Wnotljr'Ame - All Woody rims greater than 3.28 fl In
height
1.
3.
Hydropftytic
- - 1Jegerauon
f ora(C:txvrlr PrP..SP.nt7 Yes T No
5095 Crf ICAeI CrnPr 2b45 of rolal r:oYC'r
or on a separate
415 Army Corps of Engnleeas
Eastem Mounldns and PiLdmtrru - Vemien 2. -a
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -20 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

SOIL
at
SampG ncJ Point, If" 7
glplh Malhx Rpd tx Fen aes
[inched Calm rMUNI _ 1WpH.. LRQ, . . l x6ure Rttmkrks
LI-1 toy 13 1 11,15
q -I6 roxV5 7.5yt 1 L S [ L
L.L
PIN05a (Al)
Higk Eplpedon W2)
Black Hstic (A3)
— Flydrerpn Sulfide (A4)
_ 5rralA*d Lbye1S (A,)
_ 9 tm Mrw:k (Al 0) ILRR N)
_ Depleted 130ow (lark Surface (All II
_ Thick Dark Str!yce (Al W)
_ 5muly Wmky Mhveral IST) [LRR R
MLRA 147,140
1$andy Gloycd Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redua ('-SS7
_ sinvow Matrix (SG)
Type:
DEp(h (iro:Oass);
US Any Carps of Er1gi11CMs
%arid titans.
Bark Sw1ace (S7)
_ Polywaloe Helrnr Surlace ISR) (MLRA 147, 1481
Main Jark Surface (s9) (MLRA 141, 1481
_ LDaroy 15" M#trlx(F2)
tieplreed Matrix (F3)
_ RLdox Dark Surface (HG
Duplrlrtl Dmk Soo IF?;
Ruaox ix:pressions (F8)
_ Iron-Mangairm Masses (Eta) if-RR N.
MLRA 136)
_ Lhnbirm Swlaccr (F13) (MLRA 136, 127)
Piedmorx Fldodplain Soils. (F19) {MLRA 1")
_ Red Parent Material (Fri) (OLRA't27, 141)
not PL Putu 1-mirry. M Mulrta.
Indicators for Problematic Hy&lc Sc
_ 2 crrt Mrrck (AID) (MLRA 147)
_ cuaM Prairie: KCtiJux (Alb)
(MLRA 147,149)
Pir.�dwnt I ioodplain Soils (Fig)
(MLRA 138, 147)
_ tiaery Stellow Dark Smface (fF12)
ailaor (LgAsin in Ruclatks)
'Wi3k tars or nydrophylit 4egetalidn and
Weiland hydrology musl ae p°esQ%,
unless :9sIwtaed ur Putrlernratk.
HyAric Soil Prasant7 Yes No
Easmfn klountains and Piodrnonl Vusron 2.17
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -21 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
PrmjkY�5Kr: r . q C rr.i_r itylGpu ry: t >� r v w . Snmdalirag Dana• -�'�` IZ y813
ApphcwL00wrtiar 0 t _ , G Q Slat&: _ Srhrrgsing POu1t:. ?
n+reshgeebr * -I-0'1 A Section, l wnship, Range.
Landlorin (11111s4o. terrace. etc.): Local new (ooncave. convex. mm): - 1.r on-n Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)_ Lai: 1 q Long° - . 'Sz- f T C? lieturrE J
i
Sall Map Una Namrr ,-y - ;•- k NWI dassikalterl. t) as sr,
Arm clhnartr_ r hydrok4C LVediaiar, an Are sire typical for this time of year? Yes No III na, explain in aernaft.)
Are Vegetation Sall r J or Hyrr alorjy ' signVirardty dmtuebaiP nue'Nrartral Ciruurn5laroBs° pruserd? Yes No
nee vegFAHI"1 , S AI �� . or Hydrology r ! nalurally ]rrohfernatie f (li needed, explain any answers in Rernarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetation present? Yes X NA
Hydric Sol Prescrua Yes �- Nn
wullandwydrelogyPmseax7 Yes, No,
rrernarks:
HYDROLOGY
is the Sampled Area
within a Welland?
Yes No
Prmtrry Indie,.gl, 5yntinimum of gM LS rnuuuud:
t:dru'rA 111 [flat aeWy!
Sun= 5911 Cracks ( @6)
_ Surface Water (A1.}
_, lrur: Aguahc PIMI5 [1317} _Sparsely
Mated Cioricave k4We (88)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sutfrde Odor (fit)
peanag, PnAenls (flip)
X Saturation (A3)
7C Oxldinr d Rrruusptwi s un Living Roots (C3) ,gloss
Trlm Lines (916)
_ Water Maas (131)
_ Resume all Reduced Irun (C4) :
Dry- Season Water Tuhle (C 2)
sadiax-111 Deposks (82)
_ Recw kon Ruiluctinn in Tilled %cAl5 (CG) _
Cray([ .5h 8urevr5 (Cg)
1Trift Deposits (03)
_ Thin Muclr Strface (CI) _
Saturallon Vi -Able on Aerlal Imagery (G9)
_ Aral Mayor Crust (&t)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
5lurlerl or 5ue '.ed Mugs (01)
Iran ❑apu%lis (BS)
Geomorphic Posiden [DP)
Inur4atkan Vl5OL tin Aerinl trnwtpry [57} :
Shallow Aquilard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (69)
Mrt :rnenptxfnlahi[! RFWI l04]
Aquak Fauna (1113)
rAC Neutral Test IDS)
Full observations;
Surface Water Present? Yes-
No + Oopth Grxhes):
Water Table Present? Yeses
No Ocpth Cinches): I�
Seitinjllon Presents Yr3s
hto Depth 0--hes }. 4
Welland Hydrology
Prnseat7 Yes He
(rrrr:harles nnpillerY hiMJe)
DLscrihc Rscoided Data (5'rLeam gauge. lrxrrrtorirrg
weal. Serial photos, previous Ina ), if aveilatiic.
rii r li�lnrylY� !0 MV3 f t+►r�fd +L+iyart L Violin k� ��
-
Rerrinrka:
+l ,r ■1 F( I I I
1h,7� {Y ��/r,d' art•r F` tr.4 ,'t�l r'I j Wf W� C4 l�.e -{
1I yI- C
4. +aJee#S -r .0 �rr4C r
41841
ML-5 +,y n 5
r, ,'R- r �ner �..e,?fr''P .. rru
Jf-iF
1�+-� A td's[.' 0 W .'' 'o
..,. -a�cr�
d. w. ear
L1S Army Carps of Lnglneers
rasa +n Muunulnn and 14ptlermnt - Vur5iun 2.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -22 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point. `-•
1
A13901u10 D0rt11nant IndlCalot
U011111i K9 TBSt workshmal:
-
Tr f 513e: }
Cover r ?
Number of D4mlrlent Spa,=,
1-
t - -$n1
I• t }ti !q W
niva Are 0131... FACW, or i At- °
1 (n)
a.
T �I'E f r
total Nutntter of LLAonrirNnl
A l errrtu.S DlVh&MLA" ){
3,
6,
SSPRO05 AMISS All Strata:
(�)
4.
7.
8.
-
5
9
percent of Dominant Species
���•y r�
Thal Are 06L., FACW, 0r FAC:
(NH)
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -23 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Total Cover
---- Mai Se Com pf: MtdEj 17Y'
OBL species x l .
5046 I bq A mover: 20% of Mal eouu : fe
Saotingnhluh
Sltolurn FPbtSit�_
FACW Ipecies %2a
t.
I• t }ti !q W
FAC spxirs x3.
FAC a species x 4 =
(t}LW
3.
T �I'E f r
t)PL species X5.
Column Iolals� (A) (tSi
A l errrtu.S DlVh&MLA" ){
6,
RrrMencn Index • B)A
Hydruphytic Vegetation Indicators
7.
8.
-
_ t • R2pid Tell for Hydrephyirc Vegoialipt
9
A 2 - Dominarce Test is �50%
i 3 - Prevalerroe Irulex is si.ri'
Total Cover
Jti 50%6 agal CcNwr: �r 24N rsf Iptal r,0ver.
4 - Mmpllolotlral AdaptalkRrs' (Pra*e Wpptiktg
I1r YG S[ralYn•n (:Pbl size: L y �f- I
[tali[ in Renwrks or on a 5aparate shee#j
vrrlbl r"tK Iiri9rophr is Vogotatlon' (Explain)
3
SCLf IP5 2(3 y r,�
'In lcalors or 11010 soil and wErlarxl hyrknlnyy rrnrsl
t
F
be prosm. unIcs- disluilbod or pfutilemxlir.
1JeGnikans OF Ft etation SUM:
5-
(d+irY'1 � •
6
Tree - Woody plarps, excluding vines. 3 in (7,6 cm) or
7.
mnmp in dinmryrr st breast "N (01811). ragardl0„ of
1169bl.
B.
g"
SapHrWShrub - Waoey plants. excluding vines, less
lhan 3 in. DISH and geoter than a eqP r to i.?tt ri (t
t¢.
m) tall,
Herb - All heilainimms (non- wDody) py9nt8, ieprdwss
size. Tins then ft
11
000 1414al Cmarr
.
11P
of and wxw-ly plants 3 ?A Fall.
S al cover: ?0% of total Lourv: }
YtmMy
Virw Iralum (Plot size: }
Woody vine - All *ootly+nn05 i"Ier than 3,2611 to
1tF.IP IN.
t,
-
2.
3.
S'
HydP*hyGc
Vegleta(ion
= Tolal Cover
Present? Yes "ti IWp
50 %0rtold]oovot: ?G%of1(1191roVer:
IAmwks 1 ne Wde p110Ib m mttcrs rYLn f. +[rt rn r 5#ylefete SI1CCt.)
US Army Corps of Ert wwern
Eastorn MOuncairis and Piadmont • Venlgn ?' -0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -23 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

SOIL Sampling Point:
Pieria Doscriptlon: (Describa to dw depth needed to documant Rie indicator or confirm rare absence of Indicaiors�)
Dopth _ Mallix Ity Jox F=16M-
eteesl w i . rr i Typo Hurnirks
h- C ! DIR `I /� 5 r S t1/6 5 C �L _ K
Hydric Soil Indicators-
1- 14%sol (A 1)
Histic LooWn (A2)
Black Hisric (Al,)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stutifiiod Ljyur,� (Ah)
_ x cm Muck (A10) (LRR Nj
nejAeled Oelow bark 5ur0aca (Al l
_ Thick dark Surface (Al2)
Samly Mkrcky Mineral (S1') (LRR N,
MLRA 141, 148)
Sandy € eyod Mauix (S4)
Sandy Rednx (SS)
Strippcil Mlainx *6)
Restrictive layer (it dtmerued):
Typo:
Depth (inches):
LIS Army Qxps of Enquvm"
RM- ReWced M_d_rrlx_._PAS- Masked Sand Grains. rl,acaliarr: PL,f'ure Lmlrel, M- Mrnrix
_
Indicators few Protilemnlc HydriC 50110
— Clark Surfacu (S7)
_ 2 con Wick {1110) (M LRA 1471
F0lyV8lue B010w SAaW (58) WLRA 147,148)
Coast Mamie Redux (A16)
_ Riin [lark Surface {59) (MLRA 147. 1481
[MLRA 147,148}
Loomy Gleyed Matrik (Q)
piedmont Flawplmin Soih (F-1%
7 Depteled Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,10
_ Radox Dark Surface (F5)
` Very Shallow Berk Surface (1F 14
s Daplot®u Dark 5urtgce (F7)
, 01hor (Explain in, Rurrrark%)
Rerlox DElyessfons (C8)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 1351
_ Umhric SurfaCe (1'13) (MLPA 139, 1.22)
'I lws ci hydrophylic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplaln Sell, (F 1% (MLRA 148)
wetierrrl hyulro"y mull Im preswnl.
_ Hod t?arurn Mol+ vjE (F 71) (MLRA 127, 147)
urilc53 disturbcd or ptl>bftmaiic,
Hydrlc Soil Nesent'2 Yes No
Ea5lern Mmnw n5 And Nwarriont - Verfian 2.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -24 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Easkein Mountains and Piedmont Region / /
f wIftusita; Cot � Crf(�p C4ytcoonty: �1*' tOrv^ Sampling Date: �� I i t / 13
AppfleaMMYOcr- N I{ slate' NC SmnlAirkjPent: -5}''f
rrMCSltgpla(g)
7f17 1 15 ii `�rri.uum iuvrn_-Mup, Rhuge:
Landfo nr UWhJgre, lerravu, utL* ii rltlior tcorlcavo. cortuax, 00W); lion L' Slope ( %);
sutrrorputi (LP R or MLRA); Lai; 3 S . 11 it 'f Long:- 13. 3 Z f3 Dalurrd: NIftfl?�
Soli Map Unl1 Name: � I f r 4�if _ NWI ctussirw -af ury
Are climacc I rryortgtxdiac condidcn on the Sire 1 Xrfl6 dry d®5 Gme of year? Yes 'f Na (Ir n0. explain in nemarks.)
Ar? VeWlgriW _+ Sall of Hydrokogy siga&anlly dlsturtmV Are'Normal Clictrmstances` presm[7 Yes Na,
Arc Vegot 0W , 5oll ar i lydrofogy —d— naiLaally problermtic7 (If neeclerJ. exploin any answers in Renwk5 )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site ft>tap showing sampling paint locations, transects, Important ieattires, etc.
Hy�kbphytic Vegetation Preaer47 Yes Nfi 15 the Sampled Area
Hy(rie 5nir pre9enl? Yes No within a Wellarrd7 Yes Nn
WetlaM Iiydrolagy Pr08pnl? Y85 NG
Remarks
HYDROLOGY
Wri afy Indicats15 tMirumlan at one Is reguuQd rbw k all Mul atljiI
_ SlafaCC Soil CFW.X& (86)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True ALluat¢; Plaids (1174)
— Sparsely Vegrxaled CorKave Surface (B8)
HNh Writer T.dr1e (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CT)
_ Drainage Patterns (f190)
5atLW3JtW (A3)
0xidl7ed khQu5pheies nn Lim" Wnas (CS)
_ Muss Trim liras (A16)
_ Water Warks (Bt)
_ Pivw- a of Reducerl Iron ICI)
_ My- Season Water latch (C2)
Sedinwent DepnniN (U)
_ Recent Iron Redtxdw In TIlled Snds (GS)
_ GrayFM Burrmrs (G@)
DOI Deposits (83)
thin Muck Smlacrr (C 1)
Snasativa Visbe an Aerisl Irnageoy (0)
A1911 Mat or CIU-t (fad)
_ 08M (Explain in Remafks)
Stunted or 51ressM Plants (D1)
_ Iran Deposals W)
m Gaornorphic Position (02)
I urwation VWWO W Actial Imagery (197)
_ Shttsow Agtrtard Dn7}
Water- Sidnerl Lan. ; (99)
_ McrolopoWaphit Reflef (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ I AC,Neulral test t051
FleRl UlrSarwForm,
Sorrlirce Water Present? Yns _ No Depth (inches);
Walter Ta1rla PYe &rxd? Yirs _ No _ Depth (Imhes); if
58tola w Presellt7 Yrn ]f• rap Dvpih Wd1Q!9); _ Wedand Hydrology Presern? Yes .k No
US Army Carps 0 Fnginp.crs
C,ViJUn Mpuntaln; acid Ptarnon: Version 2.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -25 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: y
` A+bsolMe Dominant Irld eatOr
Dorninance Test worksheet:
Prevalence Index W'4rkSh"t;
true Strdttlm {Plat size, J Y1, $DOC 'CS7 Sla'US
a. Swlr 4t4l� % _
� �
a 4 r f °v q x
Numb -' (71 Domin ml %pei;mg
Thai Are CAl3L. rAC W, or FAG:
ink
3
TraL51 hhlmtrdr d Dom nant
'Spe[les
x
{{#ef
- M r m {Pkm Slue: 7� 1
r
AVOSS All Strata:
x 2=
a. 1p ent /k r# 0
FAC Species
x3,
5 .
Percent of Dunlnaw Species
That Are oBf. I -ACty, of FAQ
� OD fAr[f1
&
Prevalence Index • WA -
1
Prevalence Index W'4rkSh"t;
• Total Cows
lelal Corer ol:
Mulilply by,
SrD95 d to cove : ��. 2tif r d ttltat caver-7
OUL Weeies
x
{{#ef
- M r m {Pkm Slue: 7� 1
r
FACW spL%ics
x 2=
a. 1p ent /k r# 0
FAC Species
x3,
7. T � f4ai
fACV *we&
x 4 .
data in Remarks or do a s4 aw sheee)
1_ `A s. Ft
-
4.
CpkrrtwTola[5,,
(A) f8�
&
Prevalence Index • WA -
r,
Hydrophydc Vegetadon lncNcmrw
—
t Rapid test km Hyrtrophyhc Vege 300"
2 • D0111i1181'We Test n a50
9
• Talral C"rrver
3 . F revnlerry index Is s3_0'
t
r ei [wal cover; { 7
—2JL—
YfY# of total cover: i
d - M rrpholpg cSl AddA4ktl5' {Pt4YidC SuPDJ
Sri S r to (Pkk slae- h
data in Remarks or do a s4 aw sheee)
1_ `A s. Ft
-
Z p fop)
_ PrMlDrnallc Hydrdphylic Vegetation' lExpliarnh
2, $Ca` S
3
— —
'Indii--Alats td acrd nyatic, y rn1151
ent &y%% Mu
he prese_x1t uriknic dislurhdd a pro6lematk.
or problematic,
QaiirrBlons of Few getet
V9ian Strata:
0
Tree - Woody plams, exclurgn� mrrtas, 3 rn. ll.� rrn] {e
M00 in diameter a[ lneasi hrag111 IIS[illh, regnrdlPSS pl
height.
e.
SWlinWStwuh - Wt)i ly plarxs. excluding vices, less
rhnn 3 mi. Grip I firxl groater Marl or egUal to 3.28 ft (1
10L
nr} tall.
11.
Total Cowri
herb - All hffbaCeOVS JFW mmXdy) plants, regardtoss
)I sizo, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
SU`xs nl trtlal rpvdr `� 1 r�
2A�� elf caul cpuer
e 5 r r Qf Ipt sixo: 3 A 4 }
Woeq vine - All woody vines tgteaer than 3 - 2,a fl in
.
a.
3.
4.
S,
Hyarophytic
�y
-Total Citvw
Vegewliotl
Present? Yes ND
SO`7fi Of Ia1al ctivru: !
20%of fwlal Ca'MCr:�
l.'tlnrarks: (Include photo nt"t -s I— tr on a "+[palate sheet)
US Army Corps of Erlg veers
Lesion Mpurxa+ns and Pledradlll - Vw ion 1.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -26 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

SOIL
Sampling Poinc -P7
PrrNrle 11H9UFlpbQn- PesurAm lu tha da,Fth treaded lrr rtuuumunt the lndwatnr or ronlirm 1ha a"e" of indlcaldrs.l
Depth MFrrnx ENgx FeHr a
[Khesl Cam � l "k, Qla Imo} Texture Remarks
p -(o 1 Jt j � 10 I.Sy 10 C pL
lour /1 LIO 10'11R a f T- ,• n f� ?Utz
Hyddc Soil Indication:
_ Histesol (Al)
_ His* Epgrexlel (A ?)
Black Hi51ic (A3)
Hydropri 5ulltde (A9)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ 17eopird Belirvr park Surtdr:e (Al 1)
_ )hick Dark. Surface (Al 21
Soddy Mucky Minval (51) (LRR R
MLRA 147, 142)
_ Sandy G"d Matrix (S4)
_ 5arxly Radox ('55)
-Al plx i mallix (SB)
T)IM:
pegxh WOK-5)!
U5 Army Corplc r11 rnglnFwr5
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
o"Finn: PI =Pme I. irung. M -MairL
htlk;ator3 for Prothnibitk HydfiC Soils':
Dark Surface (S7)
2 cm Muck (Atf)) (MLRA 't0
_ 'FUlyVldra3 BekM Surface 1SJll (MLRA 147, 1411)
� Goo5t Praile Rerlax (A16)
r Thk1 Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 141, 148)
MMLRA 147, 146)
Loamy G"d Matrix (F21
_ RlWMDnl FlOd44ln Spilt. (F 19)
pePlw.c'tf Matrix (F3)
(MILROk 136, 147)
Redox hark Wrice (F5)
_ Very Shallow Uarlr Sulhbte (TF17)
peple erg Druk Smime (F71
, Other (Fggain In Remarks)
Redox Depressions TS)
Iron MOngowe Ma-," ir12) (LRR N.
MLRA 126)
_ Umtxic Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indlcalors of hydralpfrylic veyulatarn ars,l
_ Fl@dmolll Fwwr6pWn'$oils IF 191 (MLRA 191J)
wM"nd ny0r,ylogy mum ti0 presom,
_ Red Parenl Mirreriid (F71) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless rbsnilwrl nr powninatic
Hydriv Soil Present? +lea No
L 1LNhwn Muurxaun trill Prerhrmrrt - Uer5lnn 7.4
F -27 Equinox
January 2015

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Easte.rryny Mountains and Piedmont Region
f 0iecl15lte: C"i cree �r d:nyf{ iueily: r "��ID� Sainplui�}U�Eu 11/1
Applicru,V4'�wrree: f'w SlatE-
p-Te ompling Point: 5 14
hlviistigalrrr(sp:
Jh7 I J ". DI-1 Secular. To%rlSnlp, Range:
Larvorm (hwslore. Menace. emc.): , _ f f vat � I-i IF local rkief (concave, cumex, none): 51ape (Yp=
subregion (Wk orMLI7A): y.CRP+J U.- M.M3$3'x" roily: %3.-37-7Y37 natim A D93
Sail Map unit Name- l . F �-%I NW7 classgiLaboa.
Are cllmalic I hydrologic candrdugs an the s.l� lyp calf it t waf yiaar? Yes I Na to no. explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegrttalion r " , Sa l! , or liytiralagy s grrif wily dislurbed? Are'Normal Clrcumstances" prewr?t? Y� y No
Are Vnyalaa TN! 5oilw—, a Hydrology naltirally pf0blemalIC? 110 needed, explain any answers in Remarks.}
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS a Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophylie Vegetation PTeserk? Yes � Nii Is the Sampled Area
Hydric SEA Present? Yes NO` within a Weiland? Yes No
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLDGY
l ainal,riy Indiuol. . (rrkrlr1116an a M & ir, re0lnr60'
check 311 T t 82 Vl
_ SurfFRw Soil Chicks W)
Surlricu WalcK (Alp
_ Truc A do Plar%5 (1114)
_ Sparsely VegetRled Comwre Suface (08)
High Water Table (A7)
Ilyatown Sulfide Odor Kli)
_ Drainage Pawns (010)
_ Saimaliut (A3)
k0wlJzed RhYxaspheres run bony HULAN WA
_ Ma55 biro ullh'S (B16)
water Marks 051)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
J pry- Seas.an Water lahle (C2)
Sediment Depcas45 (37)
_ Rectrit roil Red"tiori ua Tilled Soits (C6?
_ Ctay+fsh 9utmws ICS)
❑rill Depuslt9 (ga)
_ Thin (Muck Surface (C:1)l
_ Saturation Visible all Aerial Imagery (CD)
Algaf Mal ©r C;rtm (84)
— C;tlher (txpain in RcmarkQ
_. 'Stunted a StresSCd Maim (61)
Iron Deposits (B5)
— c,e llWphk: Pbsiriarl (172)
IF,••, afion Visible on Aerial ImagVy (117}
shadow Aquilard (D3)
Water- Stalncnd wve, (W)
_ Mierolopayraphic Relief (09)
_ Aquatic; f avna (1313)
FAC- Netflml To-1 (08)
Fleld obsavatlOM
Surfacc Wow Present? Yes No_
Dept, pnchms):
Waw, Table Prowl'> Yr5 No
Depth (in hr's)!
gatua w P0eseor? Yes , No
— Depth (inches):
WstLmW Hydrology Present? Yes NO
Indoda9ra{i Voyfrmgop
❑escnlae Recorded Data (Jstream gaur,{e. nVflit0lining wa1, aerial }hales, previous lospecdor s). Il avaaahk;
In VILi-W J .A.-I ll'ra
V-4
U5 Army Curps Of CNinW'5
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
ra:terri mowntam and pleornio ! - version E -rl
F -28 Equinox
January 2015

VEGFTAITfUN (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: `fic
Tree Stratum. (Pico size!
I- g
2.
Ahsntutl nominwil Indiratm
DNTn nanGl6 T65t Wor1t3nWz
rr ¢�aier�e rrnxex �vuxsr�er:
% -2 5
Number or Dominant Spocles
,YI
to
That Are COL. FACVd, or FAC:
(A)
a 1 e rdr: 20%of talal covet:
COL spaeios
Towl Number of DoMinanl
'r
j
/1 r C
Species Across All 5411an:
M
1.
2. Ow r� r) I`.'. gyp.
Percent of tlominard Specras
f f} l
x t
ii 1
Tito Am OK, FACK oc d "AC:
o -� (AV
i
rr ¢�aier�e rrnxex �vuxsr�er:
I� total cover
Total 96 Cpycf Of:
fNultinlp �y:
50% of
a 1 e rdr: 20%of talal covet:
COL spaeios
xi -
Syp}Ilrxd5lrnib Stratum (Pkn sieu: 1
F r Pe
j
/1 r C
l3pedoS
FAC
x 1
1.
2. Ow r� r) I`.'. gyp.
S_yJ
Specie.
FAC[1 spHCix9
x t
ii 1
3.
UPL species.
x5.
4.
Calumn T=K:
(A) (a)
6
1
9.
�- inTatC,over
511% rd tnlal enwnr 2��� r� 20% of tolal t: ;
4
2.
Prevalence Index , IVA -
Hydrophytic Vegel®tion Indtzatium;
_ 1 Popid Trsl for Ilyllig tic Vegelatlotl
,L 2 - Imminence Test Is s50%
_ 3 - Pn nalence Index Is 53 -0'
4 - Mofp"Olpgical Adaplabloins' (N itlu suppurtmvg
data In Remarks or on a scparalv9rr el}
PPObimnati Hyrfrnphylir. Ve- getalian' [LxpWln}
Ga �r r fat `+ � � "Indicatur5 of hydriirr sell and wetland hydrotogy rnwa
4. he primml, unless dislurbCd oc protkninric.
Oeflydtiorrs of Four llegetetrnn Slrala'
F. Tree - WrxvIy plants, excluMng VMS. 31n. (i.G cm) or
rrwxta
7 in dmmeter at typost hDlghl tfJBkl), f (rdltSS of
M.
8.
Sapiing[Shn]b - Woody plonk, excluding vines. 1e39
9. — Man 3 in. 0811 and featef than or equal to 3.28 ft (I
10. m) 1811
T1' Hwb - All hrxbacaous (non wmody) plans_ rucgntrllm-m
M l = Total Covet nl we. and woody plaNi ILA Ihan 3.28 I1 Iodl-
i0% of lvi cpvcr �J t 20%iid MAI imm: + r.i
Wi7gdY VI yiTfaiurn (Flix 512e: ) WoodV � " - All WC16G}�' 41n&S 4feapEP 014874 3.28 It on
1. 101on
US Army Corps of Engneers
Hyrlrophyttc
_ �IP9gP.IAllpn
60 - Total Com PM5en12 Yes No
-%% of total diver: 20% of lotal ettvetr_ i
M hero or on a se"wa T' -A-1 -
Eastern Mounlains and I'u:diTrurr - Verswn,2.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -29 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

SOIL
of
Dtplh MOWN Redux Fualuem
Iirlches) Coke (moist) % gM (maisil 7,b — _ ] 4UUr _ko Texture
0- It ling / +I0
RM•Reduced Matrix. MS =MaAwl Saml Graim.
Hy*k Sod tndirstars:
HI5103A1 (Al?
Hlslir Fplpednn (A2)
Blsck Ilistic (A3)
_ Hyrhogun Sullide (A4)
SVaIIFrcd Layer& (A5)
_ 2 em Muck (Alo) (LRR kq
Dt*&ied,Mew Mrk Smfaw (Al 1)
_Think Dark 5utlme (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral IS l (LRR N,
MLRA 167. 148)
Sandy C,leyea Matrix (Si)
_ Sarldyl ReJax (55)
Stfippoo Matrix (5lr)
Type:
DoW tinchos).
US Army Carps Of EnOr* S
Sampling Roint; 5NO
kocali l-. PL Bare Lining, M- Matrix,
IndipApirs for Prohlemahc Hydrac Snlsf:
D.rrk SLulace (S7)
_ 7 nn Mrnrlc (Alb) (MLRA 147)
_ Polywah•n! 80nw Sudacx (SA) (MLRA 147. 1481
_ Coast lsrairiie Redox. (A1G)
.._ Win Dark Sudece (S9) "LRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147,146)
Loamy 451" Matflx: IF 2)
_ I'°iw1muru FlEwd*ial SmIs (r19)
0opleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136.1471
_ Redox [lark SLdace (1`6)
_ Vmy tilmdlu Dwk 5urlew ITF121
_ iiepleled liark Surface IF A
_ Othcr FE)wlain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depfossiom (F$)
lmro•k4snganese Masses (Fl 2) (LRR N,
MLPA 136)
'Umbf1L rSurlaCe (F 13) (MLRA 136. 128)
rindlcmys of hyaropnyllo wer --lion will
PledmQM f'lWp 1r%sails (f 19) (MLRA 149)
wmianrl hytVUlagy muse he present.
Red Pmors Material (F21) (MLRA 127.147)
unless disturbed or pffob ?rrrala:.
'y.
Hydric Soil Prresam? YCS _ ' No
EastcYn Mnunlains and Pimlmwl - Verseun 2.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -30 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
iF.4 41 y ' £ `* OI iCuunk A, 8 4�_ , Sdnr- hn. WW;
ltivgal:I751Cn: gi Y' � �' 4
Appl6ant o mm +fit' C& t Statc. �e- Sampling C�ornt=
Invc5hgMnrJs)� .3n f P PA/4 SBCt on. Township, Range.
Landfuml IhdK4u, tetratr. LW .), Ja 0J 410/1 Local
, �' mnwnx, nT e
. Slope
Sbeglon (tRl M WIRR): 104111 fah
Lung: � r�' • �� f a 17ahirce:
5011 Map Unit Namw A I clasuictatioe:
Are cllrmlic ! hydr -ulo10c conditions on the Me typical Ica this Cane (A y"t a V— No (If no, explain in (ternarks -)
Are Vrgdarw " suit ^�, or 1- 1pdrelogy significantly diAurbed7 fve'Narmal Cin iirrrvnhces" prt wntl Yes Nn
Ain Vwjr4ati m sail or Hydrology naturally prowernaric'e i!I nr�n:inti. RxIA;iw any antiw6r% irr R0rrL.VkN -j
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -- Attach site tnep shcv4ng sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrdphylk Vegatatim Present?
Hydric Snd Paeseni?
Woland Hydrology Presont7
RMIlafl45: --
Yes
Yes
Yeti
No Is the Sampled Area
Nal Within a Wntlana4? Yeti No
HYDROLOGY
Weiland Hydrnfvgy IndiQUwa;
' Ur'6lrtriVry- IFICIM.7lnrti Dniaunulni d two a auu% Y}
PIIMr4 lnrllcator5 1r41lnlnatim {Ir win k%reeluirwd;
ctanck all 911at :1[aafYl
_. Soilage 4rxl Crocks IBB)
_ Surliacr Water (Al)
_
lion Aquatic. Plard-s (6141
_, Sparsely v tatQn UW Kyue Surface tlSn)
FIKS1 Water table (A:)
_
ity Fogen SulhdR iCkk r IC 1)
— Dri nags PattLeins (B] q
_ Salun titm W
''
0xidi Cd RhIionoeres on'LNetg Roots (M)
_ Mess Trlm tlnrts (51S)
_ WOtiv Marks (01)
_
PiLsence of Reduced Iran IC4�
� pry Season Water Tehb (Ott
_ Sedlrneirl Nep)5i15 11l
_
Recent Iron ReOwAim in Timid Suils (Cis)
, Crayfish Burreurs (C3)
_ Dirt ncepmils (63)
_
TNn Wick Surlacc [G7)
p F.UhIralmn VNdbl , un Aerwl Imagmy (CJ)
_ AlgaI Mat or Oru51 IRO
_
other (Explain 0 Rcinwks)
_ Stunted or Stressccr plants (01}
_ Iron 94osirs (135}
a Georriorphit Position {D?}
_. Irwnaatlon Vlsiblu on Ae.m9l lrru Wy (57)
� Shallow Agnilard (Ca3)
_ Water 54ained Leaves (BRI
Micraacpographic Relief (44)
Arlimix I auma (913)
_. FAC•fteutrat To-A (1)5)
fleld Obserualions:
�`
Sullaw Water Pro5WI7 Yes
� Np
tagpth JIM114N)._
Watt4 I able Present? Yes
No
satarabw Present? Yes
No
Drpth [inchusj.
Wantland Hydrology Present? Yes taro
r y;auyae, marakttxrrwdl+�ylL aerial pnolos. prevmu5 InSpectlonsf. Ir TwlluaulR
( -J I,� f.•f.J ,.rr�s? t -,Jr. ., � r� I
j�i .) �, .;� fill: 5dt��/'�) fl+,It4 ,�ra • I *� Y �; a• �. ,. . -_ _ r r<. `f
1 ✓ ✓' rr � J
ar 061 }
i1% Army 47m Ps u7 Fnr.�rar_b
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland
Project No. 71
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Enstr_,rn Mtaunl;aln5 and PwMiont Vemion 16
F -31 Equinox
January 2015

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific flames of plants.
Abschme Opnmant InUlCdh9i
rra4 Sitalum mote size: 310 l r r_ ��s7 stalki
I
Sampling Point, 5P10
Number of Dominant Species
Thar At 081. FAM la FAC, (A)
Total Number of botrrnanl
Species Across All Strata, {t#}
Pwrord of Domnrant Spews a
That Are 081, FAC W, or FAo4: {Afl3)
�. r
rr orornrua neuux wrrrxsrx�ra:
Total Covor T
Total %r Cover of Mkililoly Or-
or t _
28%i or idol Inver: 0
091 species x I
_Cmw: 2
FAGW species x 2
1. e4V L ,fA t f j F
FAC species x 3=
2. �i�ft�+es r+ u�rS rr #
#o � f
f {w� F
FACU speces _ x 4 -
1 ,
�tl L
LPL species x
, �
)J ,
,�, C
CdrRnn Tnitrlc• JAI [9t
bUlr P
6.
Prevalence inskx = 0fA =
r. H
Hydro"it; VegCisllm Indicawv
t • Rapid Test for Hydrophytkc VLVIatrun
- 2
2 - DaMnancc Test r ,&M
3 - Prevalence Index is 33.a'
U% of tow cavm: L0, 2
N Total CovBi' 4
_ 3
r Um Plpl Sl» +
in R
+ �
.air I
I"fi
L _
_ f�rntlerrr la; 3 Cyrin phylic Vrgefa[ am [Fxplaini
2, W
No f
3.
5v 11 Ax f a
a V `
`Indicaiars or hydric sail orui wolond hydrology must
be present, denims d'rsl.txb4d of pf0blixituli6
s. 41Ar a � 5
5
Oefini6on8i of Four Vegetation Strira:
. � rmj rx
nlrur: in e9iamnrer to txawsl iiraght (�lltn). regardtn33 d
hcigltt
5aplinglShruh .- Woodyptanls, excluding vines, less
Iliad 3 in. 03H and graAlar than 7 agtayl to 3,26 A V
m1 tall.
Bl.
Harp -All herharrnri [nnn-W40dy9 plarHS. rcgardltis
_ • Total Cuvcr t of mtp. and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
fl]G ni {t�lal tnYer. i 2{S of Id of coves: i r4 Mno - $111 Wes greater roan 3.28 it in
Wraadv One StraliAm {Plat Uze, I h . t.
- = Total Cr .i
WX 0( total COYer.; 70% of tntal rrnnr �d�
rs htpa or on a MRPMate sheix,j
US Army Carps of Engkneevs
Hydrophydo
Vegetalion �.
Present? Y. No
Eosiem Vlotmrtairrs and Pindrinont - VGrskon t:o
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -32 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

SOIL
Profile f)eWApllon: (DOSCrMe to thR Mpa1 neiadlm todQCUR18nL the indicator or confirm Ille abser
Depth Maw): Redyx r 01t445
(inches) 9b I r m 7vn�, luL�` _ (eatyuH
O -,(�Ol r Y R FL
5amplinq Faint: �pfif
Re.mark5
RM- RuiJuoud Mabim, MS- Maskcd Sand Grains. `Location: FL -Port: Lining. M- MaINX.
Nrk S rfftcu (57)
Frdyvaiue Bokow Slrlaou (58) R&RA 147. 146)
_ mull Dark Surface IS91(PALRA 1+!7.14111
Loamy Gkycd Mmix (F2)
DE!pletad Mnirix (F 3)
Rcdox Dark Surface (F6)
pepleled Dark Salrrar@ if 7)
P%Pdox Repressions (pa)
" Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 1351
_ Lfmtgk Surfocc t1: 13) (MLRA 136. 1221
_ ptodmonl Flnn*lain F;4s (rl% (MLRA 148)
RW Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Hytlric 5011 pRakatom
I - Il,msol (111)
_ Ms5bL Epipladrxl (A2)
_ $Irtk HISNIC (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide JAS)
$traufieti Layers (AS)
_ 2 un Muck (A-10) tLRR NJ
_ Deploted Below Dark Surface (AT 11
_ lnit<k Dark $urface (Ala)
Siinrly Mucky Muxral (S1) "R W.
MLRA 147, 1481
_ 5mrxly Gl[:yal Matrix 641
Sandy Redox IS$)
SLTpWd MW (58)
iyp�
nepih (Inches):
US Army r;rps of t nr nnrc +ti
Indlcauxs for Problemede WydrJe Sells'
2 cm Muck (A1 D) QNLRA 147)
Qoasl Prain2 Ret#1x (A16)
(MLRA 147. l4113)
Picdmont floodplain Sp#5 grl9)
Ip11LRA 156, 147)
_Vaty 5ha1D M QaO 5kWaCO (TF12)
C71nrx (1 xplpin W Rrrmarks)
'Indwatmn d hydrephylic vegetnllon and
weilarld hydrdlugy meal be plmurd,
unless dislurbexl Or probkwallc:
Nydric Soil Resm? Yes No
F aUem M15unL1111R allO PIP.rl WN11 - VP.r310fl 7.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -33 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -- Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
C ref I � 9 f:_.G'n. j2 ✓ajo
PrtyaccUSrta: iL.+S cltylCourlty: aamplingl }
:eta; _
App lair rlr?w w4- - r��., Slarc: nano g PahE,��.
Inve tigator(s): IT, I >' "' I Secti h nn. Towwns p, Ram:
Larxtfwnr llliil5lopi:, terrace. ate.); ,Ar I Local relief (crnrave, cor14Fi6 Irma);
Suibregwn (L RR or MLRA): a w�A Lot Long " S' DaWlni ,N" ) 9 3
SiA Map Urml Name,. n. lk—ek � _ NWl rlaesilicatrtnr
Are dimatic f 1,ydruloyic craitirnons on Ihv sito typical for this Ihno of ynat? Yes . ' No (if no, axpfain k1 Remarks.)
Aac Vcgctaiion Soll `° . or Hydrology stgnlllcmty dlsttrrbed? Are 'Normal C rcurnstantes' present? Yes f�L NO
i
Are Vedelzlinn r1 Sail , ur 1 tydru"y r rraluralfy pnkke71ra1a:? {If naedeei, explain any answers in fterniirks -)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site snap showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrolklyric Vegcu don Present? Yes Na
I5 the Sampterd Area
!"ic tirpl IIrrynrli? Yes. No— vdithin a Weiland? Yes No
WeOarrd HyVDID". WK M? Y06 No
HYDROLOGY
lndi for minimnrr of one i5 r , ov.d�
+ hKk oil 111a1 xRWy)
Suffer., Wafer (A1)
Tree AVlrntk. Ptards (514)
Hkjr Wnrer Talke Wj
Hydrogen Sulfide Cdor (C1)
Saalraaon (A3)
.1J j' rlxidifed RhirDSpliwie- an Living Rao[s IC3j
_ Water Marks {131)
PreWt:e of RedUel" Iron (C4}
Sndrmurrl 0LV&Si15 (e2)
keren, Iran Fjeduclian in Tilted Soils (C6)
ME Ueposfl, (83)
_ Titim mck Surfac (C7)
_ Algai Mar or Crust (134)
_ I:Xli rr (Explain in Penar#s�
Iran DopDs&, (e5)
Inundulion VrsrWn nil Annal WaWfy (1131)
Water-Stained Leaues 169)
Atluallc Fain (613)
_ surface Sail Craas (HIiy
W Spiusaly Vagittatod C.or/USVn Surface (eti)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Moss Trim rl (818)
UrySeasm Walm Tmtie (C1P
_ Crayfish Burruws (CO)
_ Sa ffaliorl visible an AvW Inlagury (C%
SLuaturl+ Slressr_wi Plants, (01)
_. Geomorphic pbsnron ton
_ Shallow AgWWd (03)
_ WaotopWaphic Robef (Q4)
T FAC-Nkminll Test (PL)
P tell UCSYrYa "N"v,
Stliface Water Pre"? Yet NO — Ixrpol 1-hL Y
Water7,9WPresenr7 Yes Nn Uupih[rr9chcs).- JEi
salraatlon Presmr7 Yes A No _ Dnpai (WoLhes); Welland Hyttrology Present? Yes - Na
us Army corps d I:.ngonmr5
EwAivrn Mounlains and Piedmmt - Versim 7.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -34 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

V
VEGETATION (Fnur Strata) — USG Scientific names of plants, 5a npliN Part: �
AlArAulr. Urammnanl Indicalor Dominance Test worksheet.
Tree (Pict slac }21 Cow r s? _ talus
Nunm4Cr W Dominant and spcCiaS
n%9 if 13 IL Thal Are 09L, FACW. or FAC. (A)
3., Total Numdxw 41 UOnun3nl f„
SpoCIO Actor All St+ala
4.
Pw-ont of Dominant spouas /
Thal Arc 48t. FAM or FAG: (At.)
7. _
Total Coyer
51391 of teal cnvan °, 29% d total cow: �
2. GOLis
Sat ®196 Cam, rf�
h�ulpl7tV Oy:
0111 species
rren - 49roody pta tits• exclicing vinM. 3 in.. (3.6 Cull or
mrur+: rn drpmrter at hrc351 llel$K (DBH}. fe W]CSS Qf
r.AL.W species
x Z a
FAG species
x a -
FACU speedes
x4-
UPL species
x 5 .
Column Totals:
W (B)
Prevalemce Index - WA -
.
_ 1 Rapid Test for h lydrophylir VcWtnpnn
rren - 49roody pta tits• exclicing vinM. 3 in.. (3.6 Cull or
mrur+: rn drpmrter at hrc351 llel$K (DBH}. fe W]CSS Qf
7-
2 . [lominarx:c Test is .5496
_ 3 I�r�EV21E11CQ Intle:R is S3.0,
= Taal GoVtx
4 - hipr0� Ada;ptarians' {Proy6de srJpporlwth
�-
51M of Mal cover: t'd 2n o! lcxai u vpf-
Herb 2rpluffn (p1o1 si B.
j
data In Reniarlis or cn a separate shed)
than i in. n9H and greats than or Neal to 128 ft (1
Probl=allc Kpkophyfx: Vi-qtllulmn' (Fxptnin)
m; tall.
Fler6 - All herbaccofrs {rx,n•tstrody} plarrls, regrrrilgc
of S00. anti wtiodyplants lass than 3.2811 tall.
3.
�{
'hrdarns of ki[ sell anJ v±Tenr nyaio ay must
$. i
®
bo proierl. unloss dWirlmd [x funhlemal:c.
5q of lfJl� owem: `20196 rf !u[al carve :
tPkrt sire_ j
©®Tinf inns of Fnur uegelalion Strata.
S.
.
rren - 49roody pta tits• exclicing vinM. 3 in.. (3.6 Cull or
mrur+: rn drpmrter at hrc351 llel$K (DBH}. fe W]CSS Qf
7-
—
luenlhl.
�-
SaplingfShrub - Woody plants. exChfdIng virx:5. ID55
than i in. n9H and greats than or Neal to 128 ft (1
10..
m; tall.
Fler6 - All herbaccofrs {rx,n•tstrody} plarrls, regrrrilgc
of S00. anti wtiodyplants lass than 3.2811 tall.
t1.
- Total Cavui
t�
w 3 Vi
5q of lfJl� owem: `20196 rf !u[al carve :
tPkrt sire_ j
WoMy Arm - All woody MO-S greater then 3.28 fl in
height.
US Army Corps d tnglneem
Hydinphytic
11 _ V"lahan
f� total C., Present? Yes Flo
5[396 urralal r,nver: — 4% of total ta7NM:
rs hare or on a sooarate she at1
eastern Moumalns and f wnimam - Vemi?n 2,6
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -35 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

SOIL SgMpling Paint: � t
Profile 17eatti n: (DESC7lba to 1tLe Lleplh naedBd 16 document the lruticarmr or cni fi m flue aMnee of irldicatom
Depin MaWA Reda9t Feann'es --�_r
6MIM) _ f 1e14tufe-
'TVile'
...., 1-1-1 ..,..,.., -._
Indicarars for Proldemalic Hydric Sailsr:
Hydric Soil Irowamm
HIsMol (Al)
_ bark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) WLRA 1471
_
i151ec L}xpcdon (A�)
_ PolyvzdLm iielrw SurfbOO (SB) 1M(PA 167, 1 48)
COM RaMe Red9x (Al 6)
a flank Hr.-Am (A3)
_ thin Dark Surface (SIN (MLRA 147, 148)
pNLRA 147,1481
Ilydrogert 5ulFlde (A4)
_ Loamy Geyed M:raix (F2)
_ piedmont rkwAplam7 Sods (F19)
Svadfied Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136. 1471
_^
2 crrt Muck (A10) {LRR N}
_ Redux hark. SLgIXC (F6)
Very sttallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_
_ Deptuyea gcivw Cark Surface (At 1)
_ NpledCd Dark Sudwe {F7)
_
orhL4 (Explain in Re.malm)
Tlilrk Dark Surlaec (Al 2}
_ Redox Depee%vons (FB)
Sandy Mucky tukaaral IS1) tLRR N,
_ Iran -M iliga(IM Mes593 (F l?) (LRR N.
MLRA 147, 448)
WLRA 1361
'Sandy Glcycd Matrix (4)
urnWr Surtacc (F 1.3) (All{.RA 136, 122)
'lndlcelwr ul hytiliophytiC ves1"I4rr and
Sandy Redrrx (55)
_� RL-d rront Floodplaw Sorts if 19) pHLRA 146)
wallartd hydrology must roo preGeru.
_ Slrippud M8V 1G {S41
_ Red P.ryrlt Maleriel (F 21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Lome" drstuOxM at In eWenratic
ReSu tlm Layer (tf rb—lled):
type:
x
A
Deplh (inches):
Hyrdflc soil Pm""t7 VQS No
US Army Corps 0 Lrrglnf M
EmAulll Wunlaio5 anti PwLkrroat - VCrAW 2.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -36 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM- Eastwn Mountains and Piedmont Region i� r
PrgerllSie9: l s -F" cl4ylcounly. r _') 4} -0 r Sampling Dale:
Appiicant/Owume i `r Slats: SamplingP+oint _' "!
fnve5tigalGr(5}- '' y', ' Scdnsra, ruvatship• Renye:
r
Landrorm {hdlslope, lerrace, etc ): 1 'S r _ �' Lei ;al ri uer ntavc. [ollrex. rWn[t �� } Slope {mil.
-`
L r�
f'i
Subtagairi ILRIi or MLRA). L P ni� Lat: 7 4 Long:
Soil Map UNINano. ��� ' �`' NWtcasstlfcathra
Arfa climatic f ttiyslrotogrc conditions on Ow. site rylik:af for IN& time of year? Yes , _ Na (ft no, eiipfaln in Remarks.} ]�"
Art Ve[je[nlion '+ + .Still . or N�yrdrologp � SlgnlficanlM distwined? Are -Nei nrdl Qrcumstasr7W Present? Yvs. �+. Nu
Are Vegetation A . Suil eN , au Hydrnlugy �1- rvi[Ur:illy 11"WHOW7 (if riecdea. explain ony answer: in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site strap showing sampling point locations, transects, important Features, etc.
Flydrophytic Vegetation fieserlf? Yes X N® Is the Sampled Area
Hyrlur:Soil rrreserd? Yea NU within a Weiland? Y•es No
Wedond Hydrobgy Present? Y, 4 No
RenlarkS.
HYDROLMY
Wettand Hydro[agy Iridicalira;
Primary Indicator!; (imnir rim of CwT. 15 nYnm uej; 1 hrf:k all Mat
Surface, Wiltur (A II
Tree Aquelie Planl9 (U14)
IlKjti Wrt1w 1 rule IA 4
_
_ Hytd own Sulllde Ador (C1)
_ Sattradron €A3)
0iU6,W Rhfxospheres on Living R=-. (0)
Lwalo Marks (81)
_ PrBliwwe of Rr:durvd trop (CAC
_ Sediment Deposits (BR)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Thle--d :Snits (cs)
roil [oapus &s t1j3)
_ Tltih MUCK SUrfaCe (C7)
Algal Mal rx rALMt (F14)
_ ())tiler (Explain in Remarks)
Iron GL"sks (85)
i [nund.ation Vrs-ihle err Pe inl Imagery (67)
_ W21er Stained Leaves (09)
s Aquatic Fa"w (813)
_ SUrfaCe Still Cracks (B6)
Spwudy V,.190laled Cmcava Surfai;0 (98)
_ Drainage Palfarm (Hip}
Mess Trap Unes W16)
f3tySeason wale! Table (C2)
_ crayilsh Burrows. (Ca)
Saturation Visible on Arxial Imagery (c9I
Swim or Stressed Plants (01)
Gerwtlorpl positiian €1 ?2➢
_ Shak'wAqutard (133)
_ Mlcrotopographic Relief (04)
FAC-N"Fal Taq (1)5�
Meet unsmvml nsr
Surface Water Preserrt? Yes No n pill (iwlies) _ r
Water Table Presen[7 Yes No DLpiJi (iridies): r1
Saturation Pre"MI? Yes_ No_ thipth(rrrrs)- '0 Welland Hydrolo{ly Present? Yes � No
Ema
previous
U5 Arnay f:nrPS uI 1 rl]netns Caslem 6Matintaim and Pwdmanl - Ver5ion 2.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -37 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of Plants- Sampllnp Point:
Au alurr Domparl wdicator Dominance 7em warksheeL
Tree 5XwtA1I [Pkr1 arrr: i % COVO Surcus'> SNIIUs Numher of bomninni NwimS
t.
that Ate 0131, rACW, or rAC-
z. —
1dal Nurrm of 0ommani
3. -
5peLoe5 Acr499 All S1nS18'
�.
Tcnal Coyar
.
5'
percorx W doorlant Spems
50% of tutarl covdr
That Are t3BL, rACW, or rAC
(A)
5 fBf
7, f revalarlce In last vrork wt-
- Tool Cavan Total %Com d: Muluuly by
STA of iolal cover. 2D% of told unvrr. 081. spc°ci is n i
$001inar;hnib 51ralum (Plat Size 1 FACW spucies x z
ro r Jl 'I', 7 I mil' rACwu FAC Npc i" x 3
,tF y� .-
i- 6 - of( 9J'1 ie OLI, f ACU %penes x d =
3• UPL gWICS x 5 =
t- Column Totals: (A) CB
5.
Prevateric€ Index BId =
s-
1 Rapid Test for "rophylic Va1IcWfi n
A 2 • Dominance Test is 50%
�.
Tcnal Coyar
_ 3 • PrevalereCe Index as s1Sl'
50% of tutarl covdr
4 2G°6 OF total cover
4 - Wld 1 Pau nlrevrs' Provide 5u
— p ` I'I I Pl linq
Hurl) Suawur (r1" site: )
dada In Rernark% to nn a w—pratp sheet}
1 r
p AC,J
_ Fretllumalleuyerophyli cvegetauon' froplain),
t.rf x
4 t ' f n y a
3. 1'
F° Sa fl��
Irdicatds of hy&K salt and Welland hyr ckgy muse
&
he LPPy, tr(I55 tr5lSlY]€d or pL1311C
DaMinitlon5 of FG lr Vegetation Sum:
B..
Tree - Woody rkws, excluding rings, 3 in. {x.6 rrn] or
more in dianwier at h(utrsl heigtil tUHH), rugmain- ^. ul
7.
heiytit,
8.
SaplinglShfub - Wluudy pbwLS, exCliullnU wne% IP55
Chan 3 in. DHI I and quMlin tlwi ur rnfwd to 1.78 It (1
10.
m} tall
11.
Herb - All trerlmceou5 (non -Mrly) planr5. rcy}ardtess
= TMI C-Over
W size, and imm)aypinnis IP.SS iMn 317E rr tail
5C17f of rota! eCivty:
C
7i7 20% of trial covet: 7 a
VJ[krrly vivre Shaturn fPb! siiae:
Woudy vivre - All, Axmty vines greater than 3.28 4 I
tnaulil
1
2
b
5-
Sly% d trial crag
fs iiilcw a Wg a 6Hr
US Army Coips d Enpmt rs
fiyArophytic
V tl6n
_ = X Total Cowin pr 3 Yes rb
20% of inial r
-w LA:;In..fn NlautMhinN noKI Plgrdnreid. - Vermun 7.11
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -38 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

SOIL
Sampling Point: r �
Profile De"4- iptitln; (Vescnbo to the depth a0oded in document the indicator or canfrrm tha ahsunce of indicators.}
EJCplh Meinx Rxalox Frsa rea
ski taa / COIX bnd5tl d 7exaue Remarks
U k v+ �I 0 �
Hydne Sail I rtdicatars:
_ Hr.MU�1aY (A1)
Hislic EpipcdOrl (A2)
tl0ack I 1131 (AS)
HydruWn Sulfide (A4)
_ Stral0ead L4yer3 (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A1 Q) (LRR N)
DCpAeted Below Dark Surface (A 11)
_ THO Durk Sutiaee (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (51} (LRR N.
N1LRA 147„ 148)
_ Sandy Cleyvd Mcmix (SA)
_Sandy Redox (55)
Slnppcvi Matrix (55)
Iypc
Depth (aches).
US Amny Ctxp4 of Fnyim0s
trains. 'Lacatiatt: €°L -Fora Ltr
Wit Stdace (53)
_ IanlyVHlue Elelim %urrkicc (.%Hj (MLRA 147. 1461
Thin Dark Surface (59) (M1 RA 147. 1480
_ t nAmy Gleynd. Maim U l)
Depicicd Malrix (0)
Rtt1ox Clark Suriece (F6)
_ Duplulm1 WikSurlacu(F1)
Rodox Depressions (F8)
Iron,Man janeu� MrsSeS (F12) (LAU N.
N"A 138)
_ Unitxk Sjibic =. (I 130 (MLRA 176, 122)
_ I'.ii:diirmt Flooijplain S(AN IF 12) (MLRA 148)
Red Pared MHlerrrsd (1 21) (MLRA 127, 1471
IndirAtti s for PmWanutie Hydric Sc
_ 2cmMurk(A10)WA147)
_ CoaSt Fr360 RM6k (A16)
(MLRA 147, 146)
pivomont Flocdptpin Solis irioli
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Vaty Shallow DarkSufaco(TF12)
_ 91" (Ekplikin to Remarks}
'Indicawrs of hydrophydc wgr: Ilon and
W05RU1 hydMiDdy nreIst he Pre5enl.
unkss dis[txbcd or prablemalic:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Eastern Maunialns and Piedmoru Veislon 1.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -39 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

WETLAND OETERMI111AT @Ohl DATA FORM - Eastern. Mountains and Piedmont Region � j► ��r i�,
PrgeCVSKe; _ —, -- -- — Citytcouniy. Rt v� `dwplaly Udlu.
ApiAmrirewaner C6 W Stater Sampling Pdrn
ri aslycrlu (sj: seaetr, towdrslup, Raw.
Lanafoirin (I+Instope. lerrace. elc -) 164rt Al LoCatreliel (Concave. corNex. pane): i1 ?'� cSWPQ
Subregion (tFtRorMLRA): _ Lea' -- Lwlg Datum! MAD it I
Srdl Map Unh Name- 17 f NWI etassircoti ry
Are dirmlic f hydrofegic conditions on The sito typical for Ihls lime of year? Yes No (I no. explain in Remarks.)
Arm Yyr)eladlrm A— Snit [ ' ur Hyrlrnlrxjy ii) xrdjrnrK;xNly dinlurUrnf7 Arm 'Normal Crcumxlpinw5 ly"enl'r Yes NU
Are Vegetalion Soil A or Hydrology � naturally Ixobleniatic7 (if needed. explain any.enswe:rs in Runuoks }
:SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features,,. etc.
Hydrophyp6 Vegetallon Pre5am? Y" No Is the Sampled Area
Hydrk Soil Present? Yes T No_ - within a Wetland? Yes Nv
Wetlnrrl HydokKjy Priserd7 YeK '� Nu
HYDROLOGY
Welland Hydrology Indicators:
edit e+lJ
Pei lrrldry lruliri11r115 (FT001111Un1 rd Una IS IL"Tlnlre°.d: OlUk all Thal err A _
5rrraacL Sell Cld A% (136)
Sutracu Watrr (At)
_ flue Aquatic Kings (814)
� 5parscly Vageaalad L "nrlr,:lvlr t:r:�l�n.:�.:� WHI
I liko Water Table [A2)
l Iyrlrmrdrn %drydr Carr (C1)
I7rainmv Patterns (0111)
A Solvration (A3)
Oxidized Rhlzosphefes on Uwing Roots (C 3)
— Moss Trim Linea (016)
_— WNer Marks Ml)
_ Preseneo'of Reduced Iron (Cd)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediri oppow —, [13p)
_ 82ACerd grim Reductlnn In tilled %ml_% (CS)
— 12 iyry3h BurrrywG (C8)
_ DrIR Deposits I93)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation ViSIVe on Aeelal IMaWV (C9)
Algol Mat or Crust (B4)
_ {)Hier (Explain in Remark,.)
_ Stumcd or Stressed Plants (91}
_ iron De(a *A5 (pG)
_ C�bansxptvc Pnsdi xi (137)
Inundation Vf,7hte on Aerial Imagery (a7)
_ Shallow Aquirard (f33)
Wsier- Ma;rtea L.eaves (69)
— Mw1LAcpu9ri101ir: ROW (04)
Aquatic Fauna (513)
_ r AC-Wutral 1 osf (DS)
FiBitl T]li3erVdSlan9:
Surf.-we Water rtia. eR ? Yes No
Y f"i (irk-hcs):
Wiow TtlW Primwra? ,YES No
Dept] i (lrwhus): �
v
52turallen Present? Yes X No_
t}g(rih (rrK.- liras): 0
Welland Hydrology Prasrrd7 Yes No
ga "A•
US Army Corps of Eng nears
prey ous
Edslern fabungolre,, ON Plcdmgm - VCrskon 2.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -40 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

VEGETATtaN (Four Strata) - Use scientgic mines of plants.
�/{}y Airsohile Dominant �irtr
Tree Strallan (Pbt 5+m. Y %Cfc . 13pm es7 slaws
Sampling Poknt:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OHL, FAG W, of FAC; (A)
Total Nurser of UarrLtant
Spocix:s ACrosl: All shale; —5 (H)
Percent of CSnntinrutr 51Iv_cc
Thai AnDOHL. FAM r8 fAC �� (AM)
f Prevelenae lindox Worksheet:
_ a Total t over U019$ QM of Muhioly by,
SM of 1 corer: M or RX24 oovor: ORL Specks x 1 -
1� rn r {Plpl size, _ ] � FAGW species x2-
iffF�104_1/M D �S 1tt'�•e FAC sixWes x3
2. _ [A V5 _ ',-Ifvf 43L FACU sAedes x4-
3. UPL specks x 5
t cokrrui Totals (A) (e)
6. Tree Woody plants. cxeludlrlq Vlnos. 3 in. t7.B tn$ W
7 mare Ir1 diarnoter at trust height i(6H •Ij, regardless of
hdiptat.
SapliF1WShrub - Woody plants, excluding vitals, fnSS
S. than 3 In. DHH and Wualet than or equal 1.0 3.28 It {1
10. m} tall.
11. Herb - All holbaCeoua (non - woody) plants, regardless
total r-OV€Y of sire, and WoNly plains bass thin 3.28 fl lall.
be% of Irdal cover.
Lb of tarot cover':
Wdody vbne flit woody vines cpoa[oi Ihan 3..78 0 in
Vine 5 Tatum {Plat size: 7 hot t.
1:
Hydnvphytic
�- errrgatedan
Total "W Prxisnrit7 Yes X No
50% of Imi corer; 20% of mal cnm,.
Y2amalkg- (Include ph= nUrriFIEYS Ise of cm a Sr47a RIP %ha.]
US Army CurK of Ertonecrs
Eastern Mountains and Piednror`i - VuiSa, 2.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -41 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Prnvnlance Index - EVA
5
Hy>trrl %YHC 1/09011allgn Ind1=015:
1 - RapI0 TeV W HydWhytle VL'Vt31ior1
Dor*onp- Tort is > $0%
3 - Prevaienre Index Is s3_d'
50 f 14WI cover;
Total Celacr
2[17b d Mal cover:
— 4 FAarptRtlltl€Jic31 Adaptations' {Provide suppWinU
tlwtr v,l�m s1z )
data In Romelks or on a sepa €aie shed)
l V,pi _
X
'°' PrOhl €vnrxe_ Hydrophyiic VBVemiion' (F ir"in)
2. .1 [ P ]
3. ty 4
y
°IYYdlresers ru hydro: un! nrl irnw. gy rnusl
4'
��.LrL
1.1Ff prasanl, UnIP,SS rII tiI,Ri}gd or prCM7leln�lre.
r)e or rA
- -
..
sierintttons or Four V"oiaiion Simla:
6. Tree Woody plants. cxeludlrlq Vlnos. 3 in. t7.B tn$ W
7 mare Ir1 diarnoter at trust height i(6H •Ij, regardless of
hdiptat.
SapliF1WShrub - Woody plants, excluding vitals, fnSS
S. than 3 In. DHH and Wualet than or equal 1.0 3.28 It {1
10. m} tall.
11. Herb - All holbaCeoua (non - woody) plants, regardless
total r-OV€Y of sire, and WoNly plains bass thin 3.28 fl lall.
be% of Irdal cover.
Lb of tarot cover':
Wdody vbne flit woody vines cpoa[oi Ihan 3..78 0 in
Vine 5 Tatum {Plat size: 7 hot t.
1:
Hydnvphytic
�- errrgatedan
Total "W Prxisnrit7 Yes X No
50% of Imi corer; 20% of mal cnm,.
Y2amalkg- (Include ph= nUrriFIEYS Ise of cm a Sr47a RIP %ha.]
US Army CurK of Ertonecrs
Eastern Mountains and Piednror`i - VuiSa, 2.0
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -41 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5

SGIL
to
or
Doplh MOVIx _Re[lal� Fr=.alurati
(inches} Color fmnf5ll rnr � I TO M9
"1' fGj J 2- J7
Hlst)sd (Al)
_
14151ia F013P inn (A7)
_
Back Hislit (A3)
Flyerrogen SAOD (A+)
5rradk -d Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck IA1D} (LRR N1
Deplowd 13GIGw Dark Smlace (A11)
_ Thuck Dark Surface (A77)
_
SarWy Mucky %neral (Sl) "R N,
MLRA 147. 148)
_ Sandy C.feyed Matrix (Sd)
_ Sandy Re dox (S6)
5lriplaecl Malroc (56)
Types
Del* (InGhOs):
L1 S Array Cur ps of Engineers
Dark Seafaw W)
Polyvalue Mew Swlaco (S8) (MLRA 147, 14$1
Thln Dark Surface IS9) (L1l.RA 147, 1411)
1—mimy Cle?yed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleipd Malnx (P3}
Rc4Ox Gable Surface (FS)
_ Deplwed Dnrk SraWa (Fl)
Hudok C7apressi m (F8)
Iton manganese Masses (F 12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
11n16rie Surface JF13) (MLRA 136,122)
_ Peerlmrml Fkxxlplain Srxls 11 "191 (MLRA 148)
Red PareaM Malcrfal (r2l) (IALRA 127,147)
Sampling Point: r
IrltlitatOfS IW` P(Ot"MaW HY" So
2 crn Muck (Al o) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairia Relax 0161
(MLRA 147, 146)
Piedmcni Floulplain 5erik(F19)
Ih1LRA 138.147)
_ VarY ShHfl r DHrk SurlaQF(TF1T)
_ DIM (Explain in Remarks)
'lrxfr twS Of hycaWtyhL WgWfilron anti
wetland hydooNy muss be preserll.
unless di,lurhed m prnlllednelk.
Hydrfc Sall Preser$7 Yd3 `•1 No
Easlefn Maunt fins and Ft*narll - VexW 2.f}
w
Cat Creek Stream & Wetland F -42 Equinox
Project No. 71 January 2015
Monitoring Year 5 of 5