20120102 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_2014_20150414

MONITORING YEAR 1
ANNUAL REPORT
Final
BYRDS CREEK MITIGATION SITE
Person County, NC
DENR Contract 003987
NCEEP Project Number 95020
Data Collection Period: March 2014 - September 2014
Draft Submission Date: December 1, 2014
Final Submission Date: December 10, 2014
PREPARED FOR:
stem
E"Val ~1lle
1t
rROCwern
NC Department of Environment and Natural
Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652

PREPARED BY:
%two
WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Kirsten Y. Gimbert
kgimbert @wildlandseng.com
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report— FINAL

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Wildlands Engineering (Wildlands) completed a full - delivery project for the North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program (NCEEP) to restore and enhance a total of 7,328 linear feet (LF) of stream in Person
County, North Carolina. The project streams consist of Byrds Creek, a third order stream, as well as three
unnamed first and second order tributaries to Byrds Creek (South Branch, Southeast Branch, and West
Branch). At the downstream limits of the project, the drainage area is 2,957 acres (4.62 square miles).
The Byrds Creek Mitigation Site, hereafter referred to as the Site, is approximately 1.8 miles south of
Hurdle Mills, NC off of Wolfe Road in southwestern Person County (see Figure 1). The Site is located in
the Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province (USGS, 1998). The site is within the South
Flat River watershed (North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) Subbasin 03- 04 -01) of the
Neuse River Basin (United States Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03020201010020). Land use
within the watershed is rural and is dominated by forestry, agriculture, and livestock operations; with
approximately 60% of the watershed used for agriculture and 40% forested. The Site is located in an
active cattle pasture surrounded by wooded lots, small agricultural operations, and rural residential areas.
The Site is comprised of three contiguous, but separately owned tracts totaling 377 - acres.
Prior to construction activities, the streams on the Byrds Creek Site were heavily impacted by cattle, which
led to stream bank erosion and instability. The primary objectives of the project were to decrease on -site
nutrient inputs, stabilize streambanks, restore riffle /pool sequences, improve habitat diversity, restore
the riparian buffer, and implement a conservation easement within the project area. These objectives
were achieved by restoring 3,096 LF of perennial and intermittent stream channel and enhancing 4,232
LF of perennial stream channel. Figure 2 and Table 1 present the restoration and enhancement design for
the site.
The following project goals were established to address the effects listed above in the executive summary
from watershed and project site stressors:
• Reduce nutrient loads within the watershed and to downstream waters;
• Stabilize eroding stream banks greatly reducing, if not eliminating, sediment loads;
• Restore riffle /pool sequencing resulting in decreased water temperatures and increased
dissolved oxygen concentrations;
• Establish in- stream structures to improve habitat diversity and trap detritus;
• Restore native vegetation and riparian buffers; and
• Protect the restored land in perpetuity through a conservation easement.
Restoration and enhancement construction and planting efforts were completed in December 2013. A
conservation easement is in place on 25.6 acres of riparian corridor and stream resources to protect them
in perpetuity.
Monitoring Year 1 (MY -1) monitoring and site visits were completed during March - September, 2014 to
assess the conditions of the project. All streams within the Site are stable and functioning as designed.
The sites overall average stem density of 653 stems/ acre is greater than the 320 stem/ acre density
required for MY -3. Hydrologic monitoring gauges documented bankfull events for reaches BC3 and SB1.
The Monitoring Year 5 (MY -5) hydrology success criteria has been partially met for the Site at this time.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report — FINAL iii

BYRDS CREEK MITIGATION SITE
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report
1 �_T •3 � � � I � � L � I � > Y � t ��
Section 1:
PROJECT OVERVIEW ......................................................................... ...............................
1 -1
1.1
Project Goals and Objectives ......................................................................... ............................1
-1
1.2
Monitoring Year 1 Data Assessment .............................................................. ............................1
-2
1.2.1
Vegetative Assessment .......................................................................... ............................1
-3
1.2.2
Vegetation Areas of Concern ................................................................. ............................1
-3
1.2.3
Stream Assessment ................................................................................ ............................1
-3
1.2.4
Stream Areas of Concern ....................................................................... ............................1
-3
1.2.5
Hydrology Assessment ........................................................................... ............................1
-4
1.2.6
Maintenance Plan .................................................................................. ............................1
-4
1.3
Monitoring Year 1 Summary .......................................................................... ............................1
-4
Section2:
METHODOLOGY ................................................................................... ............................2
-1
Section3:
REFERENCES ..................................................................................... ...............................
3 -1
APPENDICES
Appendix 1
General Tables and Figures
Figure 1
Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2
Project Component /Asset Map
Table 1
Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3
Project Contacts Table
Table 4
Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Appendix 2
Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3
Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5a -i
Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 6
Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Photographs
Vegetation Photographs
Appendix 3
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7
Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8
CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9
Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Appendix 4
Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Table 10a -c
Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11
Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters
— Cross - Section)
Table 12a -f
Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Cross - Section Plots
Reachwide and Cross - Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report — FINAL iv

Appendix 5 Hydrology Data
Table 13 Verification of Bankfull Events
Byrds Creek Stream Gauge Plot
South Branch Stream Gauge Plot
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report — FINAL

Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Byrds Creek Mitigation Site, hereafter referred to as the Site, is located in southwestern Person
County within the Neuse River Basin (USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020201). The project site is located south
and east of Wolfe Road south of Hurdle Mills, North Carolina. The Site is located in the Carolina Slate Belt
of the Piedmont Physiographic Province (USGS, 1998). The Multi- Resolution Land Characteristics
Consortium (MRLC, 2001) classified approximately 57% of the land in the project watershed as managed
herbaceous cover or agricultural, 42% is classified as forested /scrubland, and the remaining 1% is open
water. The drainage area for the Byrds Creek Site is 2,957 acres (4.62 square miles).
The project stream reaches consist of Byrds Creek reach 2 (BC -2), Byrds Creek reach 3 (BC -3), South branch
(SB -1), Southeast branch reach 1 (SE -1), and Southeast branch reach 2 (SE -2) [stream restoration and /or
enhancement level I approach] and Byrds Creek reach 1 (BC -1), Byrds Creek reach 4 (BC -4), and West
branch (WB -1) [enhancement level II approach]. Mitigation work within the Site included restoring and
enhancing 7,328 linear feet of perennial and intermittent stream channel. The stream areas were also
planted with native vegetation to improve habitat and protect water quality. Construction activities were
completed by North State Environmental in September 2013. Planting and seeding activities were
completed by Bruton Natural Systems, Inc. in December 2013. Three separate conservation easements
have been recorded and are in place along the riparian corridors and stream resources to protect them in
perpetuity; 19.701 acres (Deed Book 819, Page 176) within the tract owned by The Homeplace, 3.39 acres
(Deed Book 819, Page 202) within the tract owned by Charles E. Hall, and 2.542 acres (Deed Book 819,
Page 191) within the tract owned by Noell W. Bradsher and Floyd D. Bradsher. Directions and a map of
the Site are provided in Figure 1 and project components are illustrated for the Site in Figure 2.
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
Prior to construction activities, the streams on the Byrds Creek Site were heavily impacted by cattle, which
led to stream bank erosion and instability. Related degradation includes declining aquatic habitat, loss of
forest, degraded riparian buffers, and water quality problems related to increased sediment and nutrient
loadings. Tables 10a, 10b, and 10c in Appendix 4 present the pre- restoration conditions in detail.
The Site was designed to meet the over - arching goals as described in the mitigation plan (2013). The
project is intended to provide numerous ecological benefits within the Neuse River Basin. While many
of these benefits are limited to the Site, others, such as pollutant removal and improved aquatic and
terrestrial habitat, have more far - reaching effects. The following project specific goals established in the
mitigation plan include:
• Reduce nutrient loads within the watershed and to downstream waters;
• Stabilize eroding stream banks greatly reducing, if not eliminating, sediment loads;
• Restore riffle /pool sequencing resulting in decreased water temperatures and increased
dissolved oxygen concentrations;
• Establish in- stream structures to improve habitat diversity and trap detritus;
• Restore native vegetation and riparian buffers; and
• Protect the restored land in perpetuity through a conservation easement.
The design features of this project were developed to achieve multiple project objectives. The stream
restoration elements were designed to frequently flood the reconnected floodplain. This design
approach provides more frequent dissipation of energy from higher flows (bankfull and above) to
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report — FINAL 1 -1

improve channel stability; provide water quality treatment through detention, settling, and biological
removal of pollutants; and restore a more natural hydrologic regime. The project objectives defined in
the mitigation plan (2013) are as follows:
• On -site nutrient inputs will be decreased by removing cattle from streams and filtering on-
site runoff through buffer zones. Off -site nutrient input will be absorbed on -site by filtering
flood flows through restored floodplain areas, where flood flow will spread through native
vegetation. Vegetation is expected to uptake excess nutrients.
Stream bank erosion which contributes sediment load to the creek will be greatly reduced, if
not eliminated, in the project area. Eroding stream banks will be stabilized using
bioengineering, natural channel design techniques, and grading to reduce bank angles and
bank height. Storm flow containing grit and fine sediment will be filtered through restored
floodplain areas, where flow will spread through native vegetation. Spreading flood flows will
also reduce velocity and allow sediment to settle out. Sediment transport capacity of restored
reaches will be improved so that capacity balances more closely to load. Sediment load
reduction will be monitored through assessing bank stability with cross section and profile
surveys and visual assessment through photo documentation which serves as an accepted
surrogate for direct turbidity measurements.
• Restored riffle /pool sequences will promote aeration of water and create deep water zones,
helping to lower water temperature. Establishment and maintenance of riparian buffers will
create long -term shading of the channel flow to minimize thermal heating. Lower water
temperatures will help maintain dissolved oxygen concentrations.
• In- stream structures will be constructed to improve habitat diversity and trap detritus. Wood
habitat structures will be included in the stream as part of the restoration design. Such
structures may include log drops and rock structures that incorporate woody debris.
• Adjacent buffer and riparian habitats will be restored with native vegetation as part of the
project. Native vegetation will provide cover and food for terrestrial creatures. Native plant
species will be planted and invasive species will be treated. Eroding and unstable areas will
also be stabilized with vegetation as part of this project.
• The restored land will be protected in perpetuity through a conservation easement.
The design streams were restored to the appropriate type based on the surrounding landscape, climate,
and natural vegetation communities but also with strong consideration to existing watershed conditions
and trajectory. The designs were developed to correct incision and lack of pattern caused by
channelization, bank instability caused by erosion and livestock access, lack of vegetation in riparian
zones, and lack of riparian and aquatic habitat. The final mitigation plan was submitted and accepted by
the NCEEP in January of 2013. Construction activities were completed by North State Environmental in
September 2013. Planting and seeding activities were completed by Bruton Natural Systems, Inc. in
December 2013. Baseline monitoring (MY -0) was conducted between October 2013 and January of 2014.
Annual monitoring will be conducted for five years with the close -out anticipated to commence in 2019
given the success criteria are met. Appendix 1 provides more detailed project activity, history, contact
information, and watershed /site background information for this project.
1.2 Monitoring Year 1 Data Assessment
Annual monitoring and quarterly site visits were conducted during monitoring year 1 (MY -1) to assess the
condition of the project. The stream success criteria for the Site follow the approved success criteria
presented in the Byrds Creek Mitigation Plan (2013).
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report — FINAL 1 -2

1.2.1 Vegetative Assessment
Planted woody vegetation is being monitored in accordance with the guidelines and procedures
developed by the Carolina Vegetation Survey -NCEEP Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al., 2008). A total of 14
vegetation plots were established during the baseline monitoring within the project easement area. The
majority of the plots were established as standard 10 meter by 10 meter plot with one plot established as
a 5 meter by 20 meter plot. The final vegetative success criteria will be the survival of 260 planted stems
per acre in the riparian corridor along restored and enhanced reaches at the end of year five of the
monitoring period. The interim measure of vegetative success for the Site will be the survival of at least
320 planted stems per acre at the end of year three of the monitoring period.
The MY -1 vegetative survey was completed in September 2014. The 2014 annual vegetation monitoring
resulted in an average stem density of 653 stems per acre, which is greater than the interim requirement
of 320 stems /acre, but approximately 11% less than the baseline density recorded (734 stems /acre) in
January 2014. There is an average of 16 stems per plot and all plots are on track to meet the success
criteria required for MY -5 (Table 9, Appendix 3). The isolated areas of floodplain scour between station
35 +00 and 40 +00 were stabilized with new matting and a seeding application in the spring of 2014. Please
refer to Appendix 2 for vegetation plot photographs and the vegetation condition assessment table and
Appendix 3 for vegetation data tables.
1.2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern
The isolated area of tree of heaven (Ailanthis altissima) documented at the site was treated during MY -1
and will be assessed during subsequent monitoring efforts. The presence of this invasive species does
not appear to be affecting the survivability of planted stems.
1.2.3 Stream Assessment
Morphological surveys for the MY -1 were conducted in April 2014. All streams within the Site are stable
with little to no erosion and have met the success criteria for MY -1. Please refer to Appendix 2 for the
visual assessment table, Integrated Current Condition Plan View, and reference photographs. Refer to
Appendix 4 for the morphological data and plots.
While there have been some minor post- construction adjustments within the restored channels; the
cross - sections show little to no change in the bankfull area, maximum depth ratio, or width -to -depth ratio.
Surveyed riffle cross - sections fell within the parameters defined for channels of the appropriate Rosgen
stream type. The surveyed longitudinal profile data for BC2, BC3, S131, SE1, SE2a and SE2b illustrates that
the bedform features are maintaining lateral and vertical stability. The riffles are remaining steeper and
shallower than the pools, while the pools are remaining deeper than the riffles and maintaining flat water
surface slopes. The longitudinal profiles show that the bank height ratios remain very near to 1.0 for the
restoration reaches. Pattern data will be collected in MY -5 only if there are indicators from the profile or
dimensions that significant geomorphic adjustments have occurred. No changes were observed during
MY -1 that indicated a change in the radius of curvature or channel belt width.
1.2.4 Stream Areas of Concern
No stream areas of concern were identified during MY -1.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report — FINAL 1 -3

1.2.5 Hydrology Assessment
At the end of the five year monitoring period, two or more bankfull events must have occurred in separate
years within the restoration reaches. Bankfull events were recorded for two of the three gauged streams
during the MY -1 data collection. Please refer to Appendix 5 for hydrologic data.
1.2.6 Maintenance Plan
Maintenance of invasive vegetation will be assessed in the winter of 2014/2015 and a follow up herbicide
application will occur in the spring of 2015 if deemed necessary. Additional follow up treatments will be
conducted annually as necessary to control their spread and dominance.
1.3 Monitoring Year 1 Summary
All streams within the Site are stable and functioning as designed. The average stem density for the Site
is 653 stems per acre and is on track to meeting the MY -3 interim success criteria. Bankfull events were
documented with the gauges located on BC3 and SB1 during MY -1. The MY -5 stream hydrology
attainment requirement has been partially met for the Site at this time.
Summary information and data related to the performance of various project and monitoring elements
can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Mitigation Plan documents available on
NCEEP's website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from
NCEEP upon request.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report — FINAL 1 -4

Section 2: METHODOLOGY
Geomorphic data was collected following the standards outlined in The Stream Channel Reference Site:
An Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et al., 1994) and in the Stream Restoration: A Natural
Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al., 2003). Longitudinal and cross - sectional data were collected using
a total station and were georeferenced. All CCPV mapping was recorded using a Trimble handheld GPS
with sub -meter accuracy and processed using Pathfinder and ArcView. Crest gages were installed in
surveyed riffle cross - sections and monitored quarterly. Hydrology attainment installation and monitoring
methods are in accordance with the USACE (2003) standards. Vegetation monitoring protocols followed
the Carolina Vegetation Survey -NCEEP Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al., 2008). Reporting follows the NCEEP
Monitoring Report Template and Guidance Version 1.3 (NCEEP, 2010).
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report — FINAL 2 -1

Section 3: REFERENCES
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, C.C., Rawlins, C.L., Potyondy, J.P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide
to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p.
Lee, M.T., Peet, R.K., S.D., Wentworth, T.R. 2008. CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version
4.2. Retrieved from http: / /cvs.bio.unc.edu/ protocol /cvs -eep- protocol- v4.2- lev1- 5.pdf.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP). 2010. Monitoring Report Template and
Guidance. Version 1.3. Raleigh, NC.
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169 -199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
Rosgen, D.L. 1997. A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers. Proceedings of the
Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. Center For
Computational Hydroscience and Bioengineering, Oxford Campus, University of Mississippi,
Pages 12 -22.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDENR-
DWQ, USEPA, NCWRC.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 1998. North Carolina Geology.
http: / /www. geology. enr .state.nc.us /usgs /caroIina.htm.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2013. Byrds Creek Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan. NCEEP, Raleigh, NC.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2014. Byrds Creek Mitigation Site Baseline Monitoring Document and As-
Built Baseline Report. NCEEP, Raleigh, NC.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Annual Report — FINAL 3 -1

APPENDIX 1. General Tables and Figures

Hydrologic Unit Code (14)
© EEP Targeted Local Watershed
I
i
2Q,
r= leas
t -"
o°
1 iu
� Rirer:.
141,
faun
Mil
- 244 m— -
246 m
Project Location
Directions:
The Site is located in southwestern Person County,
southwest of Roxboro (Figure 1). From Roxboro take
Route 157 south 9.8 miles. Turn right on Charlie
Monk Road. Travel 1.0 miles and turn left on Wolfe
Road. Travel 0.4 miles to the end of Wolfe Road.
The project site is located south and east of the end of
Wolfe Road and is bound by Route 157 to the west
and Walnut Grove Church Road to the east.
The site is within the Nuese River Basin
(HUC 03020201).
R�,�boio
I
"
2a?
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the
NCDENR Ecoysystem Enhancement Program (EEP) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement,
but is bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the
site mayrequire traversing areas near or along the easement
boundary and therefore access by the general public is not
permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state and
federal agencies or their designees /contractors involved in
the development, oversight,and stewardship of the restoration
site is permitted within the terms and timeframes of their defined
roles. Any intended site visitation or activity by any person
outside of these previously sanctioned roles and activites
requires prior coordination with EEP.
N
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map
W I L D L A N D S Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING
0 1 2 Miles NCEEP Project # 95020
1 1 1 1 I Monitoring Year 1
Person County, NC

Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement II
Easement Area
1`7
N
A
Culverted Stream Crossing
. � 1
■�
7 1,
,,: * *,±! ♦♦ ��;'..- ''''�,� Culverted Stream Crossing
Culverted Stream Crossing y
Jv
F �-
A.
Figure 2 Project Componenet/ Asset Map
W I L D L A N D S Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
ENGINEERING 0 250 500 Feet NCEEP Project #95020
I I I I I Monitoring Year 1
Person County, NC

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No.95020)
Monitoring Year 1
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non - Riparian Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
Totals
5,371
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Project Components
Reach ID
As -Built
Stationing /
Location (LF)
Existing
Footage (LF) /
Acreage (Ac)
Approach
Restoration or Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration Footage (LF) /
Acreage (Ac)
Mitigation
Ratio
Credits (SMU/
WMU)
Streams
BC1
10 +00 -16 +43
643
N/A
Enhancement Level II
643
2.5:1
257
BC2
16 +43 -32 +89
1,630
N/A
Enhancement Level 1
1,646
1.5:1
1,097
BC3
32 +89 -34 +05
34 +64 -47 +55
1,368
Priority 1
Restoration
1,407
1:1
1,407
BC4
47 +55 -55 +51
796
N/A
Enhancement Level II
796
2.5:1
318
561
60 +00 -66 +48
67 +08 -70 +69
976
Priority 1
Restoration
1,009
1:1
1,009
SE1
80 +00 -84 +85
916
Priority 1
Restoration
485
1:1
485
SE2a
85 +88 -91 +24
524
N/A
Enhancement Level
536
1.5:1
357
SE2b
91 +24 -93 +19
50
Priority 1
Restoration
195
1:1
195
WB1
100 +00 - 106 +11
611
N/A
Enhancement Level II
611
2.5:1
244
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream
(linear feet)
Riparian Wetland
(acres)
Non - Riparian Wetland
(acres)
Buffer (square
feet)
Upland
(acres)
Riverine
Non - Riverine
Restoration
3,096
Enhancement
Enhancement 1
2,182
Enhancement II
2,050
Creation
Preservation
-
High Quality Preservation

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No.95020)
Monitoring Year 1
Activity or Report
Date Collection
Completion or Scheduled
Mitigation Plan
January 2013
January 2013
Final Design - Construction Plans
June 2013
June 2013
Construction
September 2013
September 2013
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project areal
September 2013
September 2013
Permanent seed mix applied to reach /segments
September 2013
September 2013
Bare root and live stake plantings for reach /segments
December 2013
December 2013
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0)
October 2013
January 2014
Year 1 Monitoring
September 2014
December 2014
Year 2 Monitoring
2015
December 2015
Year 3 Monitoring
2016
December 2016
Year 4 Monitoring
2017
December 2017
Year 5 Monitoring
2018
December 2018
'Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed.
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No.95020)
Monitoring Year 1
Designer
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Jeff Keaton, PE
Raleigh, NC 27609
919.851.9986
Construction Contractor
North State Environmental
2889 Lowery Street
Winston Salem, NC 27101
Planting Contractor
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
P.O. Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
Seeding Contractor
North State Environmental
2889 Lowery Street
Winston Salem, NC 27101
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource, LLC
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Bare Roots
ArborGlen, Inc
Live Stakes
Foggy Mountain Nursery
Monitoring Performers
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Stream and Vegetation Monitoring, POC
Kirsten Gimbert
704.332.7754, ext. 110

Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No.95020)
Monitoring Year 1
Project Information
Project Name
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
County
Person County
Project Area (acres)
24.42
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
36° 14.744'N, 79° 79° 2.636'W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
03020201010020
DWQ Sub -basin
03 -04 -01
Project Drainiage Area (acres)
2,957 ac
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<1%
CGIA Land Use Classification
57% managed herbaceous cover /agricultural, 42 %forested /scrubland, 1% open water
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
BC1
BC2
BO
BC4
SBS
SE1
SE2a
SE2b
WBi
Length of reach (linear feet) - Post - Restoration
643
1,646
1,407
796
1,009
485
536
195
611
Drainage area (acres)
2,635
2,637
2,703
2,957
164
56
62
62
255
NCDWQ, stream identification score
51.75
25.75
46.25
46.75
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
WS -III, NSW
Morphological Desription (stream type)
P
P
P
P
p
P
P
P
Evolutionary trend (Simon's Model) - Pre- Restoration
IV/V
IV
IV/V
IV
III
IV/V
III /IV
III /IV
IV/V
Underlying mapped soils
Chewacla / Georgeville Loam
Drainage class
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
Soil Hydric status
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
Slope
- --
- --
- --
---
---
- --
- --
- --
- --
FEMA classification
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
Native vegetation community
Piedmont bottomland forest
Percent composition exotic invasive vegetation -Post-
Restoration
0.8%
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation Applicable? Resolved? Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
X
X
USACE Nationwide Permit No.27 and DWQ 401 Water Quality Certification No. 3885
Waters of the United States -Section 401
X
X
Division of Land Quality (Dam Safety)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Endangered Species Act
X
X
Byrds Creek Mitigation Plan; no critical habitat for listed species exists within the project area
(Pedestrian Survey)
Historic Preservation Act
I X
I X
No historic resources were found to be impacted (letter from SHPO)
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) /Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA)
N/A
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
N/A
N/A
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N/A
N/A
N/A

APPENDIX 2. Visual Assessment Data

Figure 3 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
�OTW W I L D L A N D S 0 125 250 375 500 Feet Byrd's Creek Stream Restoration Site
ENGINEERING NCEEP Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 1
Person County, NC

Table 5a. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No.95020)
BC1 (643 LF)
Monitoring Year 1
Number
Number with
Footage with
Adjust %for
Stable,
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Major Channel
Performing as
Total Number
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Channel Sub-Category
Metric
Intended
in As -Built
Segments
Footage
Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0
0
100%
Degredation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture /Substrate
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
n/a
n/a
n/a
Condition
Lenth Appropriate
n/a
n/a
n/a
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
n/a
n/a
n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured /Eroded
simply from poor growth and /or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut /overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dilodged boulders or logs.
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15 %.
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth? 1.6
Rootwads /logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow.

Table 5b. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No.95020)
BC2 (1,646 LF)
Monitoring Year 1
Number
Number with
Footage with
Adjust %for
Stable,
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Major Channel
Performing as
Total Number
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Channel Sub- Category
Metric
Intended
in As -Built
Segments
Footage
Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0
0
100%
Degredation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture /Substrate
10
10
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
9
9
100%
Condition
Lenth Appropriate
9
9
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
9
9
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
9
9
100%
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured /Eroded
simply from poor growth and /or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut /overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dilodged boulders or logs.
2
2
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
1
1
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
1
1
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15 %.
2
2
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth? 1.6
Rootwads /logs providing some cover at
1
1
100%
baseflow.

Table 5c. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No.95020)
BC3 (1,407 LF)
Monitoring Year 1
Number
Number with
Footage with
Adjust %for
Stable,
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Major Channel
Performing as
Total Number
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Channel Sub- Category
Metric
Intended
in As -Built
Segments
Footage
Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0
0
100%
Degredation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture /Substrate
11
11
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
11
11
100%
Condition
Lenth Appropriate
11
11
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
11
11
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
11
11
100%
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured /Eroded
simply from poor growth and /or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut /overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dilodged boulders or logs.
5
5
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
3
3
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
3
3
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15 %.
3
3
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth? 1.6
Rootwads /logs providing some cover at
1
1
100%
baseflow.

Table 5d. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No.95020)
BC4 (2,957 LF)
Monitoring Year 1
Number
Number with
Footage with
Adjust %for
Stable,
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Major Channel
Performing as
Total Number
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Channel Sub-Category
Metric
Intended
in As -Built
Segments
Footage
Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0
0
100%
Degredation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture /Substrate
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
n/a
n/a
n/a
Condition
Lenth Appropriate
n/a
n/a
n/a
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
n/a
n/a
n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured /Eroded
simply from poor growth and /or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut /overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dilodged boulders or logs.
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15 %.
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth? 1.6
Rootwads /logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow.

Table 5e. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No.95020)
SB1 (1,009 LF)
Monitoring Year 1
Number
Number with
Footage with
Adjust %for
Stable,
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Major Channel
Performing as
Total Number
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Channel Sub-Category
Metric
Intended
in As -Built
Segments
Footage
Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0
0
100%
Degredation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture /Substrate
17
17
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
14
14
100%
Condition
Lenth Appropriate
14
14
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
14
14
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
14
14
100%
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured /Eroded
simply from poor growth and /or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut /overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dilodged boulders or logs.
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15 %.
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth? 1.6
Rootwads /logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow.

Table 5f. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No.95020)
SE1 (485 LF)
Monitoring Year 1
Number
Numberwith
Footagewith
Adjust %for
Stable,
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Major Channel
Performing as
Total Number
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Channel Sub- Category
Metric
Intended
in As -Built
Segments
Footage
Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0
0
100%
Degredation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture /Substrate
12
12
n/a
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
7
7
n/a
Condition
Lenth Appropriate
7
7
n/a
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
7
7
n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
7
7
n/a
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured /Eroded
simply from poor growth and /or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut /overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dilodged boulders or logs.
11
11
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
11
11
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
11
11
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15 %.
11
11
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth ? 1.6
Rootwads /logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow.

Table 5g. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No.95020)
SE2a (536 LF)
Monitoring Year 1
Number
Number with
Footage with
Adjust %for
Stable,
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Major Channel
Performing as
Total Number
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Channel Sub-Category
Metric
Intended
in As -Built
Segments
Footage
Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0
0
100%
Degredation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture /Substrate
12
12
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
8
8
100%
Condition
Lenth Appropriate
8
8
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
8
8
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
8
8
100%
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured /Eroded
simply from poor growth and /or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut /overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dilodged boulders or logs.
9
9
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
6
6
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
6
6
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15 %.
9
9
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth? 1.6
Rootwads /logs providing some cover at
3
3
100%
baseflow.

Table 5h. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No.95020)
SE2b (195 LF)
Monitoring Year 1
Number
Numberwith
Footagewith
Adjust %for
Stable,
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Major Channel
Performing as
Total Number
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Channel Sub- Category
Metric
Intended
in As -Built
Segments
Footage
Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0
0
100%
Degredation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture /Substrate
4
4
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
3
3
100%
Condition
Lenth Appropriate
3
3
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
3
3
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
3
3
100%
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured /Eroded
simply from poor growth and /or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut /overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dilodged boulders or logs.
3
3
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
3
3
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
3
3
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15 %.
3
3
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth ? 1.6
Rootwads /logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow.

Table 5i. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No.95020)
Wb1 (611 LF)
Monitoring Year 1
Number
Number with
Footage with
Adjust %for
Stable,
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Major Channel
Performing as
Total Number
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Channel Sub-Category
Metric
Intended
in As -Built
Segments
Footage
Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0
0
100%
Degredation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture /Substrate
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
n/a
n/a
n/a
Condition
Lenth Appropriate
n/a
n/a
n/a
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
n/a
n/a
n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured /Eroded
simply from poor growth and /or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut /overhanging to the
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Totals
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dilodged boulders or logs.
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms.
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15 %.
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth? 1.6
Rootwads /logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow.

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (EEP Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
Planted Acreage 38
Easement Acreage 38
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Number
Combined
Acreage
% of
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
Threshold
of
Combined
Planted
Vegetation Category
Definitions
(Ac)
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
0.1
0
0
0.0%
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count
Low Stem Density Areas
0.1
0
0.0
0.0%
criteria.
Total
0
0.0
0.0%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
0.25 Ac
0
0
0%
year.
Cumulative Total
0
0.0
0%
Easement Acreage 38
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
(SF)
Number
of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Planted
Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1,000
1
0.29
0.8%
Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
0
0
0%

Stream Photographs

Photo Point 1— looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 1— looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 2 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 2 — looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 3 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 3 — looking downstream (04/28/2014) I
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Photo Point 4 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 4 — looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 5 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 5 — looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 6 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 6 — looking downstream (04/28/2014) I
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Photo Point 7 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 7 — looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 8 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 8 — looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 9 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 9 — looking downstream (04/28/2014) I
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Photo Point 12 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 12 — looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 13 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 13 — looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 14 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 14 — looking downstream (04/28/2014) I
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Photo Point 15 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 15 — looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 16 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 16 — looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 19 — looking downstream (08/04/2014) I
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Photo Point 20 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 20 — looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 21— looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 21— looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 22 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) I Photo Point 22 — looking downstream (04/28/2014) I
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Photo Point 23 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 23 — looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 24 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 24 — looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 25 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) I Photo Point 25 — looking downstream (04/28/2014) I
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Photo Point 26 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 26 — looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 27 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 27 — looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 28 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) I Photo Point 28 — looking downstream (04/28/2014) I
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Photo Point 29 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 29 — looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 30 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 30 — looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 31— looking upstream (04/28/2014) I Photo Point 31— looking downstream (04/28/2014) I
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Photo Point 32 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 32 — looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 33 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 33 — looking downstream (04/28/2014)
Photo Point 34 — looking upstream (04/28/2014) 1 Photo Point 34 — looking downstream (04/28/2014) I
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Visual Assessment Data — Stream Photographs

Vegetation Photographs

Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Vegetation Plot Data — Vegetation Photographs

Vegetation Plot 7 (09/04/2014) 1 Vegetation Plot 8 (09/04/2014) 1
Vegetation Plot 9 (09/04/2014) 1 Vegetation Plot 10 (09/04/2014) 1
Vegetation Plot 11 (09/04/2014) I Vegetation Plot 12 (09/04/2014) I
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Vegetation Plot Data — Vegetation Photographs

Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix 2: Vegetation Plot Data — Vegetation Photographs

APPENDIX 3. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
Plot
MY1 Success Criteria
Met (Y /N)
Tract Mean
1
Y
100%
2
Y
3
Y
4
Y
5
Y
6
Y
7
Y
8
Y
9
Y
10
Y
11
Y
12
Y
13
Y
14
Y

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Tables - Metadata
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
Database name
Byrds Creek MY1 cvs- eep- entrytool- v2.3.1.mdb
Database location
TRACTIVE PROJECTS (NC) \005 -02128 Byrds Creek Mitigation Site \Monitoring \Monitoring Year 1 \Vegetation Assessment
Computer name
WIN -PC
File size
52690944
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT ------------
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural /volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJ ECT SU M MARY-------------------------------------
Project Code
95020
project Name
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Description
Stream Mitigation Site
River Basin
Neuse
Sampled Plots
14

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project Code 95020)
Monitorina Year 1
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY1 - 9/2014)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95020 -01 -0001
95020 -01 -0002
95020 -01 -0003
95020 -01 -0004
95020 -01 -0005
PnoL
P -all
T
PnoL
P -all
T
PnoL
P -all
T
PnoL
P -all
T
PnoL
P -all
T
Betula nigro
river birch
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
Cercis conadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
3
8
8
8
9
9
9
13
13
13
1
1
1
Lincidendron tulipifero
tuliptree
Tree
2
1 2
2
1 4
4
1 4
1 2
2
1 2
1 1
1
1 1
1 5
5
5
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
8
8
Quercus michouxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus rubro
northern red oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
Stem count
15
15
15
17
17
17
15
15
15
15
15
15
18
18
18
size (ares)
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Species count
8
1 8
8
6
6
6
5
5
5
3
3
3
6
6
6
Stems per ACRE
607
1 607
607
688
688
1 688
607
607
1 607
607
607
1 607
728
1 728
1 728
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project Code 95020)
Monitorina Year 1
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY1- 9/2014)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95020 -01 -0006
95020 -01 -0007
95020 -01 -0008
95020 -01 -0009
95020 -01 -0010
PnoL
P -all
T
PnoL
P -all
T
PnoL
P -all
T
PnoL
P -all
T
PnoL
P -all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
Carpinus caroliniono
American hornbeam
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
11
11
11
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
3
1 3
1 3
2
1 2
1 2
2
2
2
6
6
6
1 2
2
2
Platanus occidentolis
American sycamore
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
1 3
1 3
11
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
ITree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
Stem count
17
17
17
12
12
12
17
17
17
16
16
16
17
1 17
1 17
size (ares)
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Species count
8
1 8
1 8
7
7
7
9
9
9
5
5
5
5
5
5
Stems per ACRE
688
1 688
1 688
486
1 486
1 486
688
688
688
647
1 647
1 647
688
1 688
688
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project Code 95020)
Monitorina Year 1
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MYI - 9/2014)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95020 -01 -0011
95020 -01 -0012
95020 -01 -0013
95020 -01 -0014
MY1(9/2014)
MYO(1/2014)
PnoL
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoL
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
I T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Betulo nigro
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
3
3
3
29
29
29
41
41
41
Carpinus coroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
12
12
12
Cercis conodensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
8
8
8
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
5
5
5
2
2
2
4
4
4
7
7
7
73
73
73
72
72
72
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
4
4
4
1 2
1 2
2
1 2
1 2
2
3
3
3
40
40
40
49
49
1 49
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
31
31
31
32
32
32
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
3
1 3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
13
13
13
19
19
19
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
20
20
20
13
13
13
Quercus rubro
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
9
9
16
16
16
Stem count
16
16
16
15
15
15
18
18
18
18
18
18
226
226
226
254
254
254
size (ares)
1
1
1 1
1
42
42
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.35
0.35
Species countl
5
1 5
5
8
1 8
8
6
6
6
7
7
7
9
9
9
8
8
8
Stems per ACRE
647
647
647
607
607
607
728
1 728
728
728
728
728
653
653
653
734
734
734
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

APPENDIX 4. Morphological Summary Data and Plots

Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
( - - -): Data was not provided
N /A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
zData only utilized as a reference point on the the project- specific drainage area - discharge curve.
'Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length /channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.
Pre - Restoration Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
As -Built /Baseline
Parameter
Gage
BC2
BC3
Spencer Creek Downstream
UT Cane Creek'
UT Richland Creek Upstrea4=1;n
ocky Branchz
BC2
BC3
BC2
BC3
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
19.0
26.1
27.4
35.9
10.7
11.2
11.5
1
12.3
8.8
10.4
12.2
33.2
38.3
25.0
28.9
42.7
20.4
36.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
145
231
116
124
60.0
114+
31.0
27.6
31.4
72.0
156
160
95
1
350
150+
150+
150+
150+
Bankfull Mean Depth
2.2
3.4
1.9
2.3
1.6
1.8
0.8
1.0
0.8
0.9
1.3
1.6
1.9
1.8
1.6
2.1
1.0
1.4
Bankfull Max Depth
3.8
4.4
2.6
3.4
2.1
2.6
1.2
1.6
1.1
1.3
1.8
2.8
3.2
2.8
2.9
3.4
2.1
3.0
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft')
n/a
58.4
64.5
62.5
66.7
17.8
19.7
8.9
12.2
7.8
8.5
16.3
59.8
61.5
45.3
56.2
88.7
28.8
37.4
Width /Depth Ratio
5.6
11.7
9.3
19.3
5.8
7.1
12.3
14.4
10.0
12.8
9.1
18.0
24.5
13.5
14.8
22.2
14.5
36.5
Entrenchment Ratio
5.5
12.1
3.2
5.5
5.5
10.2
>2.5
2.5
4.0
6.0
4.1
4.8
3.S
14.0
3.5+
5.2+
4.7+
7.4+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
- --
1.4
2.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
0.41
22.6
12.5
26.4
29.3
45.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
-
--
-
--
- --
- --
-
--
- --
13
59
12
57
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0074
0.0075
0.0043
0.0133
0.0130
0.0185
0.0704
0.0210 1 0.0450
0.0606 0.0892
0.0029
1 0.0052
0.0076
0.0134
0.0036
0.0097
0.0022
0.0190
Pool Length (ft)
-
--
-
--
- --
- --
-
--
- --
34
179
46
129
Pool Max Depth (ft)
n/a
- --
- --
- --
- --
-
--
-
--
- --
- --
--
- --
1.21
2.58
0.97
2.43
Pool Spacing (ft)A
54
103
70
124
71.0
27
73
N/A
26 81
102
211
60
141
84
278
73
129
Pool Volume (fta)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
N/A
N/A
38
41
102
N/A
N/A
-
--
52
116
26
57
31
62
Radius of Curvature (ft)
N/A
N/A
11
15
23
38
N/A
N/A
-
--
50
80
19
79
44
84
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
n/a
- --
- --
1.0
1.3
2.0
3.1
N/A
N/A
-
--
2.0
3.2
0.7
1.9
2.2
2.3
Meander Length (ft)
N/A
N/A
46
48
45
81
N/A
N/A
-
--
177
263
279
603
190
255
Meander Width Ratio
-
--
---
3.6
3.7
3.9
6.6
N/A
N/A
-
--
2.1
4.6
0.9
1.3
1.5
1.7
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri % /Ru % /P % /G % /S%
SC % /Sa% /G % /C % /B % /Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
SC/0.19/0.41/116/232/>2048
SC/0.41/22.6/143.4/2048/ >2048
- --
- --
- --
--
SC/SC/SC/55/128/362
SC/SC/SC/107.3/362/ >2048
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft'
n/a
---
---
IL
-
--
0.69
1
1.71
N/A
0.31
1
0.23
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W /mz
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
4.12
4.22
0.96
0.29
0.28
1.10
4.12
4.22
4.12
4.22
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate ( %)
1%
<1%
- --
- --
- --
- --
1%
<1%
1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
C5 /E5
C4 /E4
E4
C4 /E4
C4 /E4
E4b
C4
C4
C4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
2.7
3.0
2.5
2.5
4.9
5.4
3.8
3.5
4.1
5.5
3.0
3.3
4.6
3.6
7.3
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
-
--
-
--
97
40
29.1
32.0
85.0
'200
210
200
210
Q -NFF regression
-
--
-
--
Q-USGS extrapolation
n/a
-
--
-
--
Q-Mannings
-
--
-
--
Valley Length (ft)
-
--
-
--
---
---
---
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,630
1,368
- --
- --
- --
- --
1,630
1,402
1,646
1,407
Sinuosity (ft)'
1.18
1.01
1.30
1.40
1.00
1.10
-
--
1.11
1.18
1.06
Water Surface Slope ft ft
---
--
---
--
-
--
0.0039
0.0016
0.0043
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
-
--
-
--
-
--
-
--
i - --
i - --
i -
--
i
0.0046
0.0013
0.0042
( - - -): Data was not provided
N /A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
zData only utilized as a reference point on the the project- specific drainage area - discharge curve.
'Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length /channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.

Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
( - -): Data was not provided
N /A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
2Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project- specific drainage area - discharge curve.
'Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length /channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.
Pre - Restoration Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
As -Built /Baseline
Parameter
Gage
SB3
SE3
Spencer Creek Upstream
UT Richland Creek Downstream
UT Cane Creeks
UT Richland Creek Upstreamz
UT Rocky Branchz
SB3
SE3
SB3
SE3
Min
T Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
I Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.4
7.9
7.7
8.7
13.3
15.2
11.5 1 12.3
8.8
10.4
12.2
10.0
8.0
9.3
19.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
96.0
98.0
9.5
229.0
>50
31.0
27.6
31.4
72.0
70.0
1 375.0
30
1 100
>100
>75
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.0
1.2
0.8
1.2
1.1
1.3
0.8
1.0
0.8
0.9
1.3
1.0
0.7
0.7
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth
2.3
2.4
1.0
1.9
1.8
2.1
1.2
1.6
1.1
1.3
1.8
1.3
1.0
1.4
1.5
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ftz)
n/a
8.0
8.7
6.2
10.6
16.5
17.5
8.9
12.2
7.8
8.5
16.3
9.6
5.7
6.5
9.6
Width /Depth Ratio
6.2
7.8
9.6
7.3
10.1
13.9
12.3
14.4
10.0
12.8
9.1
10.4
11.2
13.4
37.7
Entrenchment Ratio
12.4
13.1
1.2
26.3
>2.5
>2.5
2.5
4.0
6.0
7.0
37.5
3.8
12.5
>2.2
>2.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
3.7
1.0
1.4
2.1
- --
1.4
2.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
1.0
0.09
A111
56.1
28.5
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
8
46
10
28
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.0176
0.0349
0.0247
0.0490
0.0188
1 0.0704
0.0183
0.0355
0.0188 1 0.0704
0.0210
0.0450
0.0606 1 0.0892
0.0052
0.0199
0.0220
0.0410
0.0021
0.0178
0.0023
0.0527
Pool Length (ft)
- --
---
---
-
---
---
---
20
64
7
45
Pool Max Depth (ft)
n/a
- --
- --
- --
- --
-
--
-
--
- --
-
--
- --
- --
- --
0.4
2.2
0.9
2.3
Pool Spacing (ft)^
30
62
35
90
13
47
33
1 93
27 73
N/A
26 81
34
85
21
53
36
116
26
58
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
N/A
N/A
24
52
NA
102
N/A
N/A
25
48
16
39
14
35
10
27
Radius of Curvature (ft)
N/A
N/A
5.4
22.1
NA
23
38
N/A
N/A
20
35
18
26
17
32
14
30
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
n/a
-
--
-
--
0.6
2.5
NA
2.0
3.1
N/A
N/A
2.0
3.5
2.3
3.3
1.8
3.4
0.7
1.6
Meander Length (ft)
N/A
N/A
54
196
NA
45
81
N/A
N/A
76
120
47
93
78
127
65
74
Meander Width Ratio
-
--
-
--
2.8
6
NA
3.9
1 6.6
N/A
N/A
7.6
12.0
5.9
11.6
8.4
13.6
3.4
3.9
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri % /Ru % /P % /G % /S%
SC % /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
_
d16 /d35 /d50 /d84 /d95 /d 100
SC/SC/1.0/45/107.33/180
SC/SC/0.09/26.23/50.61/180
-
--
-
--
- --
--
- --
SC/SC/SC/103.6/256/362
SC/SC/SC/68.1/180/362
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft
n/a
---
-
--
0.28
0.98
0.94
1.34
0.23
0.37
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W/m
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.25
0.09
0.50
0.97
0.29
0.28
1.10
0.25
0.09
0.25
0.09
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate ( %)
<1%
1%
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
<1%
1%
<1%
1%
Rosgen Classification
E5
E6 /G6
E4
C4 /E4
C4 /E4
C4 /E4
E4b
E4
E4
C3
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.7
2.8
-
--
4.2
4.5
3.8
3.5
4.1
5.5
3.1
3.5
4.6
2.1
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
- --
---
68.9
78.6
40
29.1
32.0
85.0
30
20
30
20
Q -N FF regression
-
--
-
--
Q-USGS extrapolation
n/a
-
--
-
--
Q-Mannings
-
--
-
--
Valley Length (ft)
-
--
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
976
916
-
--
-
--
- --
-
--
- --
971
792
1,009
485
Sinuosity (ft)3
1.03
1.31
1.40
1.10
1.40
1.00
1.10
- --
1.13
1.06
1.18
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
-
--
-
--
-
--
-
--
- --
--
- --
0.0068
0.0161
0.0070
0.0138
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
-
--
- --
- --
0.0075
0.0182
0.0068
0.0136
( - -): Data was not provided
N /A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
2Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project- specific drainage area - discharge curve.
'Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length /channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.

Table 1 Oc. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
( - - -): Data was not provided
N /A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
'Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project- specific drainage area- discharge curve.
3Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length /channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.
Pre - Restoration Condition
Reference Reach Data
Design
Design
As -Built /Baseline
As -Built /Baseline
Parameter
Gage
SE2
Spencer Creek
Upstream
UT Richland Creek
Downstream
UT Cane
1
Creek
UT Richland Creek
Upstrea mz
z
UT Rocky Branch
SE2a
SE2b
SE2a
SE26
Min
Max
Min I Max
Min I Max
Min I
Max
Min I Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.2
7.4
8.7
13.3 15.2
11.5
12.3
8.8
10.4
12.2
11.7
15.0
9.0
10.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
8.0
9.8
229.0
>50
31.0
27.6
31.4
72.0
114.7
120.1
140.0
F
310.0
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.3
1.4
1.2
1.1
1.3
0.8
1.0
0.8
0.9
1.3
0.7
0.9
0.7
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth
1.6
1.9
1.9
1.8
2.1
1.2
1.6
1.1
1.3
1.8
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.2
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft)
n/a
8.9
9.4
10.6
16.5
17.5
8.9
12.2
7.8
8.5
16.3
10.2
10.5
6.5
6.8
Width /Depth Ratio
5.8
7.3
7.3
10.1
13.9
12.3
14.4
10.0
12.8
9.1
13.5
21.3
12.5
16.5
Entrenchment Ratio
1.6
6.2
26.3
>2.5
>2.5
2.5
4.0
6.0
7.7
10.3
15.6
34.4
>2.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.5
2.1
1.0
1.4 2.1
- --
1.4
2.1
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
0.04
_
06
37.2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
-
--
-
--
4
20
11
36
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.0047
0.0147
0.0188 0.0704
0.0183 0.0355
0.0188
0.0704
0.0210 0.0450
0.0606 0.0892
0.0122
0.0367
0.0202
0.0145
0.0454
0.0119
0.0606
Pool Length (ft)
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
-
--
-
--
21
53
27
45
Pool Max Depth (ft)
n/a
- --
- --
--
--
--
- --
- --
---
-
--
1.3
2.6
0.89
2.23
Pool Spacing (ft)^
17
122
13 47
33 93
27
73
N/A
26
81
27
55
43
49
25
54
34
73
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
N/A
24
52
NA
102
N/A
N/A
N/A
27
3
22
12
22
Radius of Curvature (ft)
N/A
5.4
22.1
NA
23
38
N/A
N/A
N/A
22
30
7
58
21
25
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
n/a
- --
0.6
2.5
NA
2.0
3.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.4
1
3.3
0.7
5.5
N/A
Meander Length (ft)
N/A
54
196
NA
45
81
N/A
N/A
N/A
82.0
43
80
88
88
Meander Width Ratio
- --
2.8
6
NA
3.9
6.6
N/A
N/A
N/A
3.0
4.1
7.5
N/A
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri % /Ru % /P % /G % /S%
SC% /Sa % /G % /C % /B % /Be%
d16/d35/d5O/d84/d95/d100
SC/0.02/0.04/0.05/33.2/79.6
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
SC/SC/SC/70.9/256/362
SC/SC/SC/70.9/256/362
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft
n/a
-
--
AN
0.93
1.14
0.93
1.14
0.47
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W/m
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.09
0.50
0.97
0.29
0.28
1.10
0.09
0.10
0.09
0.10
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate ( %)
1%
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
1%
1%
1%
1%
Rosgen Classification
E6/G6
E4
C4 /E4
C4 /E4
C4 /E4
E4b
C4
C4
C4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
2.9
3.4
---
4.2
4.5
3.8
3.5
4.1
5.5
3.0
3.3
3.1
4.4
N/A
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
-
--
- --
68.9
1 78.6
40
29.1
1 32.0
85.0
"30
20
30
N/A
Q -NFF regression
-
--
Q-USGS extrapolation
n/a
-
--
Q-Mannings
-
--
Valley Length (ft)
- --
524
- --
- --
- --
- --
---
- --
---
- --
---
- --
---
533
---
180
536
195
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)3
1.17
1.40
1.10
1.40
1.00
1.10
-
--
1.21
1.11
1.23
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
-
--
0.0101
0.0144
0.0160
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
-
--
- --
- --
- --
- --
- --
-
--
0.0122
0.0146
0.0168
( - - -): Data was not provided
N /A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
'Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project- specific drainage area- discharge curve.
3Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length /channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.

Table 11. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
BC2
Cross - Section 1 (Riffle)
Cross - Section 2 (Pool)
Cross - Section 3 (Riffle)
Cross - Section 4 (Riffle)
Cross - Section 5 (Pool)
Dimension and Substrate
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
based on fixed bankfull elevation
Bankfull Width (ft)
36.4
36.6
42.2
42.1
28.9
24.7
42.7
36.0
34.8
34.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
>1S0
>150
N/A
N/A
>1S0
>1S0
>150
>150
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.6
1.4
1.9
1.9
1.9
2.1
2.1
2.2
2.4
2.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.9
2.7
4.6
4.5
3.4
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.7
4.3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
59.8
51.1
80.3
79.9
56.2
51.6
88.7
78.3
84.3
80.2
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
22.2
26.2
1 22.1
1 22.2
14.8
11.8
20.6
16.6
14.3
14.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
N/A
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
BC3
SBl
Cross - Section 6 (Pool)
Cross- Section 7 (Riffle)
Cross- Section 8 (Riffle)
Cross- Section 9 (Pool)
Cross- Section 10 (Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS
based on fixed bankfull elevation
Bankfull Width (ft)
34.7
49.0
20.4
22.6
36.9
45.0
34.2
33.6
9.3
8.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
N/A
>150
>150
>150
>150
N/A
N/A
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
1.0
1.4
1.4
1.0
1.2
2.0
2.0
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.2
3.0
2.1
2.2
3.0
2.8
3.9
3.8
1.4
1.3
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft2)
47.7
S0.2
28.8
31.0
37.4
54.1
69.6
1 66.5
6.5
6.4
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratio
25.3
47.7
14.5
16.5
36.5
37.5
16.8
17.0
13.4
12.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
N/A
N/A
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.3
1.0
1.0
SB1
SE1
SE1
SE2
Cross - Section 11 (Pool)
Cross - Section 12 (Riffle)
Cross - Section 13 (Pool)
Cross - Section 14 (Pool)
Cross - Section 15 (Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate
Base MY1 MY2 I MY3 I MY4 MY5
Base MY1 I MY2 I MY3 I MY4 MYS
Base MY1 I MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 I MY4 MY5
Base MY1 I MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
based on fixed bankfull elevation
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.2
9.7
19.0
16.8
12.8
8.6
16.7
14.8
10.6
9.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
N/A
>75
>75
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.0
0.5
0.3
1.3
1.1
1.7
1.5
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.0
1.9
1.5
0.9
2.5
2.3
3.5
3.2
1.2
1.0
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft')
11.6
10.1
9.6
5.2
16.9
9.4
28.0
22.0
6.8
5.8
Bankfull Width /Depth Ratiol
8.9
1 9.2
1
1
1
37.7
1 54.9
1
1
1
1
1 9.8
7.9
1
10.0
1 10.0
1
1
16.5
1 16.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
I N/A
I
I
I
1
1 >2.2
1 >2.2
1
1
1
1
1 N/A
I N/A
I
I
I
I
I N/A
I N/A
I
I
I
1
1 >2.2
1 >2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1
1
1
1
1 1.0
1 1.0
1
1
1
1
1 1.0
1 1.0
1
1
1
1
1 1.0
1 1.0
1
1
1
1
1 1.0
1 1.0

Table 12a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
BC2
Monitoring Year 1
Parameter
As -Built /Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY -3
MY -4
MY -5
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
28.9
42.7
24.7
36.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
150+
150+
150+
150+
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.6
2.1
1.4
2.2
Bankfull Max Depth
2.9
3.4
2.7
3.2
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft)
56.2
88.7
51.1
78.3
Width /Depth Ratio
14.8
22.2
11.8
26.2
Entrenchment Ratio
3.5+
5.2+
>2.2
>2.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
12.5
26.4
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
13
59
12
59
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.0036
0.0097
0.0019
0.0147
Pool Length (ft)
34
179
34
182
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.7
4.6
4.3
4.5
Pool Spacing (ft)
84
278
80
214
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
26
57
Radius of Curvature (ft)
19
79
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
0.7
1.9
Meander Wave Length (ft)
279
603
Meander Width Ratio
0.9
1.3
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,646
1,646
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
0.0016
0.0018
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.0013
0.0018
Ri % /Ru % /P % /G % /S%
SC% /Sa % /G% /C% /B % /Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
0.2/0.6/5.6/55/128 /362
0.3/1.2/2.9/75.9 /122.5/256
of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%

Table 12b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
BC3
Monitoring Year 1
Parameter
As -Built /Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY -3
MY -4
MY -5
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
20.4
36.9
22.6
45.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
150+
150+
150+
150+
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.0
1.4
1.2
1.4
Bankfull Max Depth
2.1
3.0
2.2
2.8
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft)
28.8
37.4
31.0
54.1
Width /Depth Ratio
14.5
36.5
16.5
37.5
Entrenchment Ratio
4.7+
7.4+
>2.2
>2.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
29.3
45.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
12
57
26
43
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.0022
0.0190
0.0065
0.0311
Pool Length (ft)
46
129
33
134
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.2
3.9
3.0
3.8
Pool Spacing (ft)
73
129
82
190
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
31
62
Radius of Curvature (ft)
44
84
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
2.2
2.3
Meander Wave Length (ft)
190
255
Meander Width Ratio
1.5
1.7
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,407
1,407
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
0.0043
0.0045
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.0042
0.0047
Ri % /Ru % /P % /G % /S%
SC% /Sa % /G% /C% /B % /Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
0.1/0.6/16/107.3/362/>2048
0.2/9.1/29/82.6 /180/362
of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%

Table 12c. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
SB1
Monitoring Year 1
Parameter
As -Built /Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY -3
MY -4
MY -5
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.3
8.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth
1.4
1.3
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft)
6.5
6.4
Width /Depth Ratio
13.4
12.2
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
56.1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
8
46
10
39
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.0021
0.0178
0.0022
0.0431
Pool Length (ft)
20
64
22
65
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.0
1.9
Pool Spacing (ft)
36
116
22
87
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
14
35
Radius of Curvature (ft)
17
32
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
1.8
3.4
Meander Wave Length (ft)
78
127
Meander Width Ratio
8.4
13.6
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C3
C3
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,009
1,009
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
0.0070
0.0065
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.0068
0.0062
Ri % /Ru % /P % /G % /S%
SC% /Sa % /G% /C% /B % /Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
SC/SC/SC/103.6/256/362
SC/0.2/5.3/71.7/141.1/180
of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%

Table 12d. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
SE1
Monitoring Year 1
Parameter
As -Built /Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY -3
MY -4
MY -5
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
19.0
16.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>75
>75
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.5
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth
1.5
0.9
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft)
9.6
5.2
Width /Depth Ratio
37.7
54.9
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
28.5
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
10
28
10
28
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.0023
0.0527
0.0100
0.0390
Pool Length (ft)
7
45
10
54
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.5
2.3
Pool Spacing (ft)
26
58
18
78
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
10
27
Radius of Curvature (ft)
14
30
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
0.7
1.6
Meander Wave Length (ft)
65
74
Meander Width Ratio
3.4
3.9
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
485
485
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
0.0138
0.0140
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.0136
0.0141
Ri % /Ru % /P % /G % /S%
SC% /Sa % /G% /C% /B % /Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
SC/0.2/8/68.1/180/362
SC/0.1/4/67.2/151.8/362
of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%

Table 12e. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
SE2a
Monitoring Year 1
Parameter
As -Built /Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY -3
MY -4
MY -5
Min Max
Min Max
Min F Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
9.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth
1.2
1.0
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft')
6.8
5.8
Width /Depth Ratio
16.5
16.4
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
37.2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
4
20
4
26
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.0145
0.0454
0.0017
0.0845
Pool Length (ft)
21
53
9
44
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.5
3.2
Pool Spacing (ft)
25
54
16
88
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
3
22
Radius of Curvature (ft)
7
58
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
0.7
5.5
Meander Wave Length (ft)
43
80
Meander Width Ratio
4.1
7.5
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
536
536
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
0.0144
0.0134
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.0146
0.0135
Ri% /Ru % /P% /G % /S%
SC% /Sa% /G% /C % /B% /Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
SC/0.1/17.1/70.9/256/362
SC/0.1/18/78.1/143.4/362
of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%

Table 12f. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
SE2b
Monitoring Year 1
Parameter
As -Built /Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY -3
MY -4
MY -5
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
9.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth
1.2
1.0
Bankfull Cross - sectional Area (ft')
6.8
5.8
Width /Depth Ratio
16.5
16.4
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
37.2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
11
36
14
36
Riffle Slope (ft /ft)
0.0119
0.0606
0.0017
0.0520
Pool Length (ft)
27
45
27
44
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.5
3.2
Pool Spacing (ft)
34
73
33
60
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
12
22
Radius of Curvature (ft)
21
25
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft /ft)
N/A
Meander Wave Length (ft)
88 1 88
Meander Width Ratio
N/A
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
195
195
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft /ft)
0.0160
0.0085
Bankfull Slope (ft /ft)
0.0168
0.0092
Ri% /Ru % /P% /G % /S%
SC% /Sa% /G% /C % /B% /Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
SC/0.1/17.1/70.9/256/362
SC/0.1/18/78.1/143.4/362
of Reach with Eroding Banks
1
0%

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
BC2
Monitoring Year 1

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
BC3
Monitoring Year 1
580
578
576
574
572
570
568
566
w
c 564
0
v 562
W 560
558
556
554
552
550
3250
3350 3450 3550 3650 3750 3850 3950 4050 4150 4250 4350 4450 4550 4650 4750
Station (feet)
0 TW (MYO- 9/2013) 0 TW (MY1- 4/2014) - - - - - -- WS (MY1- 4/2014) ♦ BKF/TOB (MYl- 4/2014) • STRUCTURES (MYl- 4/2014)
------- ---
---------------
vii
x
h '--'-----'-
x
a0
x
x
x
3350 3450 3550 3650 3750 3850 3950 4050 4150 4250 4350 4450 4550 4650 4750
Station (feet)
0 TW (MYO- 9/2013) 0 TW (MY1- 4/2014) - - - - - -- WS (MY1- 4/2014) ♦ BKF/TOB (MYl- 4/2014) • STRUCTURES (MYl- 4/2014)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
SB1
Monitoring Year 0
585
580
575
v
w 570
0
.j
w
565
560
555
6000
6100 6200 6300 6400 6500 6600 6700 6800 6900 7000 7100
Station (feet)
TW (MYO- 9/2013) 4 TW (MY1- 4/2014) - - - - - -- WS (MY1- 4/2014) • BKF/TOB (MY1- 4/2014)
• ...... •
•
- - - -
•
Aws
-- - ♦ •
X
X
1
6100 6200 6300 6400 6500 6600 6700 6800 6900 7000 7100
Station (feet)
TW (MYO- 9/2013) 4 TW (MY1- 4/2014) - - - - - -- WS (MY1- 4/2014) • BKF/TOB (MY1- 4/2014)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
SE1
Monitoring Year 1
590
588
586
584
582
_ -,
v-----------
v
- -- ♦
c
_ -----'- __
580
o-----------
♦
w
- - ---- ---- --- ---
578
♦
576
x x
574
572
570
8000 8050 8100 8150 8200 8250 8300 8350 8400 8450 8500
Station (feet)
+TW (MYO- 9/2013) —TW (MYS -4 /2014) - - - - - -- WS (MYI- 4/2014) ♦ BKF/TOB (MYS- 4/2014) s STRUCTURES (MYl 4/2014)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
SE2a
Monitoring Year 0
585
580
575
v 570
0
w 565
560
555
550
8550
8600 8650 8700 8750 8800 8850 8900 8950 9000 9050 9100 9150
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO- 9/2013) —a —TW (MYI- 4/2014) - - - - - -- WS (MYI- 4/2014) • BKF/TOB (MY1- 4/2014) • STRUCTURES (MY1- 4/2014)
- -- - - - - --
-- - - - - --
ILA
------- - - - - --
----- ------ - - --
-- --- - -
a
�n -- - - - - - -- - --
N
x
ti
x
x
x
8600 8650 8700 8750 8800 8850 8900 8950 9000 9050 9100 9150
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO- 9/2013) —a —TW (MYI- 4/2014) - - - - - -- WS (MYI- 4/2014) • BKF/TOB (MY1- 4/2014) • STRUCTURES (MY1- 4/2014)

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
SE2b
Monitoring Year 1
572
570
568
♦
-----------------------------
-
``" ---------------------
------------------
v 566
c
0
w
564
562
560
558
9100 9150 9200 9250 9300 9350
Station (feet)
TW (MYO- 9/2013) t TW (MYl -4 /2014) - - - - - -- WS(MYI- 4/2014) ♦ BKF/TOB(MYi- 4/2014) • STRUCrURES(MYi 4/2014)

Cross - Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
Cross Section 1 -BC2
16 +62 Riffle
578
576
574
c
0
572
v
w
570
I
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) t MY1 (3/2014) — Bankfull — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
51.1 x- section area (ft.sq.)
36.6 width (ft)
1.4 mean depth (ft)
2.7 max depth (ft)
37.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.4 hyd radi (ft)
26.2 width -depth ratio
150.0 W flood prone area (ft)
4.1 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
574
c
0
572
v
w
570
I
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) t MY1 (3/2014) — Bankfull — Floodprone Area

Cross - Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
Bankfull Dimensions
79.9 x-section area (ft.sq.)
42.1 width (ft)
1.9 mean depth (ft)
4.5 max depth (ft)
44.4 wetted parimeter (ft)
22.2 width-depth ratio
-s
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
Cross Section 3 -BC2
20 +85 Riffle
sso
578
r
0 574
576
—,,, 572
570
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) t MY1 (3/2014) — Bankfull — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
51.6 x- section area (ft.sq.)
24.7 width (ft)
2.1 mean depth (ft)
3.2 max depth (ft)
26.2 wetted parimeter (ft)
2.0 hyd radi (ft)
11.8 width -depth ratio
150.0 W flood prone area (ft)
6.1 entrenchment ratio
- -
1.0 low bank height ratio
J
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
r
0 574
—,,, 572
570
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) t MY1 (3/2014) — Bankfull — Floodprone Area

Cross - Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
Cross Section 4-BC2
578
576
574
c
0
572
v
w
570
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) t MY1 (3/2014) — Bankfull — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
78.3 x-section area (ft.sq.)
r
1 .
.. 3'
2.2 mean depth
3.2 max depth
r
'd
...
�.
width-depth
1 1 ... prone
I
1 . .. .
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
30 +04 Riffle
578
576
574
c
0
572
v
w
570
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) t MY1 (3/2014) — Bankfull — Floodprone Area

Cross - Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1 INS
- LL
Cross Section 5-BC2
30 +93 Pool
576
574
572
c
0
v
w
570
568
566
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Width (ft
depth
depth 4.3 max
•• •.
• .
• ••• .
- -
Survey �.
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
)
View D •
)
t MYO (9/2013) t MY1 (3/2014) — Bankfull

Cross - Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
Cross Section 6-130
3.0 max depth
depth
26.3 .'
.. '
14.1 • .•• ratio
Survey �. 1
Field Crew: . . Engineering
View t. •.
36 +g4 Pool
574
572
570
c
0
568 -
v
w
566 -
564
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Width (ft
)
t MYO (9/2013) t MY1 (3/2014) - Bankfull

Cross - Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1 Bankfull Dimensions
31.0 x-section area (ft.sq.)
22.6 width (ft)
Icross Section 7-130
s74
s7o
0
,s
s68
v
w
-
s66
-
s64
0 10 20 30 40 s0 60 70 80 90 100 110
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) t MY1 (3/2014) - Bankfull - Floodprone Area
1.4 mean depth
depth 2.2 max
wetted 23.2 ..
f -
16.5 width-depth ratio
.... .
t
--- entrenchment ratio
1.0 low .. .
-
Date: Survey
Field Crew: .. Engineering
Downstream View
37 +23 Riffle
s74
s7o
0
,s
s68
v
w
-
s66
-
s64
0 10 20 30 40 s0 60 70 80 90 100 110
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) t MY1 (3/2014) - Bankfull - Floodprone Area

Cross - Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
Cross Section 8 -130
46 +25 Riffle
569
567
565
0
v
w
563
561
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) t MY1 (3/2014) — Bankfull — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
54.1 x- section area (ft.sq.)
45.0 width (ft)
1.2 mean depth (ft)
2.8 max depth (ft)
45.6 wetted parimeter (ft)
1.2 hyd radi (ft)
37.5 width -depth ratio
150.0 W flood prone area (ft)
3.3 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
0
v
w
563
561
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) t MY1 (3/2014) — Bankfull — Floodprone Area

Cross - Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
(Cross Section 9 -130
47 +03 Pool
570
568
566
0
0
564
v
w
562
560
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Width (ft)
t MYO (9/2013) t MY1 (3/2014) - Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
66.5
x- section area (ft.sq.)
33.6
width (ft)
2.0
mean depth (ft)
3.8
max depth (ft)
34.9
wetted parimeter (ft)
1.9
hyd radi (ft)
17.0
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross - Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
Cross Section 10 -SB1
65 +41 Riffle
574
573
572
c
lzzz
0
571
v
w
570
569
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) t MY1 (4/2014) — Bankfull — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
6.4 x- section area (ft.sq.)
8.8 width (ft)
0.7 mean depth (ft)
1.3 max depth (ft)
9.3 wetted parimeter (ft)
�I
0.7 hyd radi (ft)
12.2 width -depth ratio
100.0 W flood prone area (ft)
11.4 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
572
c
0
571
v
w
570
569
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) t MY1 (4/2014) — Bankfull — Floodprone Area

Cross - Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
Cross Section 11-SBI
NINE ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
son IIIIIIIRS2 Emissions
I Emil
1 1 (4/2014) Bankfull
Dimensions Bankfull
1 . . =
width A s e
1.0 mean depth
1.9 max depth (ft)
t•
1 parimeter (ft)
1 • hyd radi (ft) width-depth -
Survey 1. 1
Downstream Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View

Cross - Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
Cross Section 12 - SE1
82 +39 Riffle
583
582
—�—
t
581
c
0
580
w
w
-
579
r
578
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) t MY1 (4/2014) — Bankfull — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
5.2 x- section area (ft.sq.)
16.8 width (ft)
0.3 mean depth (ft)
0.9 max depth (ft)
17.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
0.3 hyd radi (ft)
54.9 width -depth ratio
75.0 W flood prone area (ft)
4.5 entrenchment ratio
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
aa„
View Downstream
582
581
c
0
580
w
w
-
579
r
578
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) t MY1 (4/2014) — Bankfull — Floodprone Area

Cross - Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
82 +54 Pool
583
582
581
580
c
0
579
v
578
577
576
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) s MY1 (4/2014) — Bankfull

Cross - Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
Cross Section 14 - SE2
88 +10 Pool
576
575
574
573
0
572
571
)
t MYO (9/2013) t MY1 (4/2014) — Bankfull
m
w
570
569
568
0 10 20
30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft
Dimensions Bankfull
22.0 . .
14.8 width (ft)
depth 1.5 mean
3.2 max depth (ft)
wetted parimeter (ft)
. ..
11 . .•. .
Survey 1. 1
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream
)
t MYO (9/2013) t MY1 (4/2014) — Bankfull

Cross - Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigtion Site (Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
■����r�r��l� ■ ■rte' ■�� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■
1 � � 1 •1 1 .1 1
1 � 1
Dimensions Bankfull
5.8 x-section area •
0.6 mean depth (ft)
1.0 max depth (ft)
10.1 wetted parimeter (ft)
y f
0.6 hyd radi
width-depth
100.0 W flood prone area (ft)
10.3 entrenchment ratio .
1.0 low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 2/2014
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Reachwide and Cross - Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
BC2, Reachwide
Monitoring Year 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
BC2 Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILTICLAY
Silt /Clay
0.000
0.062
2
2
2
2
Very fine
0.062
0.125
1
1
1
3
Fine
0.125
0.250
4
7
11
11
14
��„�,
Medium
Coarse
0.250
0.5
0.500
1.0
2
2
10
4
12
6
12
6
26
32
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
3
7
10
10
42
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
2
5
7
7
49
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
5
5
10
10
59
70
Fine
4.0
5.7
2
3
5
5
64
Fine
5.7
8.0
64
JF�
L�
Medium
Medium
8.0
11.3
11.3
16.0
4
1 1
4
1
4
1
68
69
Coarse
16.0
22.6
69
Coarse
22.6
32
1
v
1
1
70
Very Coarse
32
45
3
3
3
73
Very Coarse
45
64
7
7
7
80
40
Small
64
90
5
3
8
8
88
Small
90
128
6
2
8
8
96
�CyO
Large
128
180
1
1
1
97
Large
180
256
3
3
3
100
Small
256
362
20
10
100
O�Q
Small
362
512
100
IS
Medium
512
1024
100
Large /Very Larg
1024
2048
100
BFURCK
Bedrock
1 2048
1 >2048
1
1
1
1
100
Totall
50
I s0
1 100
1 100
1 100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
0.3
D35 =
1.2
D50 =
2.9
D %4 =
75.9
D95 =
122.5
D100 =
256.0
BC2, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
70%
v 60%
a
_m
50%
40%
30%
v
20%
10%
0%
0 ob'L y�h tih oy 1 'L ,ti6 b y'\ 'b y� , ti ,L-, ,. 3ti ", 0P �o ti ti ti ' $o y6
o. o. o ti 3 5 10 yo
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MYO- 10/2013 ■ MYl- 04/2014
100
BC2, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
90
rav
Cob
le
I er
80
v
70
m
E
60
v
50
�
40
m
a
30
20
10
0
0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 1000.000 10000.000
Particle Class Size (mm)
�—MYO- 10/2013 — f —MY1- 04/2014
BC2, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
70%
v 60%
a
_m
50%
40%
30%
v
20%
10%
0%
0 ob'L y�h tih oy 1 'L ,ti6 b y'\ 'b y� , ti ,L-, ,. 3ti ", 0P �o ti ti ti ' $o y6
o. o. o ti 3 5 10 yo
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MYO- 10/2013 ■ MYl- 04/2014

Reachwide and Cross - Section Substrate Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
BC2, Cross - Section 1
Monitoring Year 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle
Count
Cross-Section 1 Summary
min
max
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT /CLAY
Silt /Clay
0.000
0.062
362.0
0
Very fine
0.062
0.125
0
Fine
0.125
0.250
v
0
Medium
Coarse
0.250
0.5
0.500
1.0
12
12
0
12
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
2
2
14
m
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
80
14
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
2
2
16
Fine
4.0
5.7
16
20%
Fine
5.7
8.0
4
4
20
JV
Medium
8.0
11.3
2
2
22
o ti ti 5 5 ti ti w o. �� 3 6 e ti h a o w o� ti ti a w
00 otiti oti o• ti• y by ti titi• 3 0< o o yti .,w ,ye 36 5ti tioti ,voa
Medium
11.3
1 16.0
9
9
1 31
Coarse
16.0
22.6
8
8
39
Coarse
22.6
32
16
16
55
�
Very Coarse
32
45
21
21
76
Very Coarse
45
64
12
12
88
Small
64
90
10
10
98
Small
90
128
50
V
98
Large
128
180
98
Large
180
256
98
Small
256
362
2
2
100
©F�
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
6�J
Large /Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK '
Bedrock
1 2048
1 >2048
1
1
100
Totall
100
1 100
1 100
Cross - Section 1
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
5.6
D35 =
19.0
D50 =
28.7
D84 =
56.9
D95 =
81.3
D100 =
362.0
Cross - Section 1
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90
Cross- Section 1
Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
E
v
70%
a
60%
rav
I
Cob
le
Boulder
m
50%
80
40%
c
30%
20%
10%
70
">
60
0%
o ti ti 5 5 ti ti w o. �� 3 6 e ti h a o w o� ti ti a w
00 otiti oti o• ti• y by ti titi• 3 0< o o yti .,w ,ye 36 5ti tioti ,voa
Particle Class Size (mm)
■MYO- 10/2013 ■MYl- 04/2014
�
50
V
40
a 30
20
10
0
0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 1000.000 10000.000
Particle Class Size (mm)
f MYO- 10/2013 t MY1- 04/2014
Cross- Section 1
Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
E
v
70%
a
60%
m
U
m
50%
v
40%
c
30%
20%
10%
0%
o ti ti 5 5 ti ti w o. �� 3 6 e ti h a o w o� ti ti a w
00 otiti oti o• ti• y by ti titi• 3 0< o o yti .,w ,ye 36 5ti tioti ,voa
Particle Class Size (mm)
■MYO- 10/2013 ■MYl- 04/2014

Reachwide and Cross - Section Substrate Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
BC2, Cross - Section 3
Monitoring Year 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle
Count
Cross-Section 3 Summary
min
max
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILTJCLAY
Silt /Clay
0.000
0.062
1 362.0
0
Very fine
0.062
0.125
80%
0
Fine
0.125
0.250
6
6
6
4P�o
Medium
Coarse
0.250
0.5
0.500
1.0
6
6
12
12
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
50%
12
m
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
v
40%
12
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
c
12
Fine
4.0
5.7
4
4
16
20%
Fine
5.7
8.0
16
JQV
Medium
8.0
11.3
16
e
Medium
11.3
16.0
2
2
18
Coarse
16.0
22.6
10
10
28
0 oyti titih yh oy ti ti ti� a h� tig ti6 tib 3ti ah ba �o yw yo y6
3 bti titi ,ya N%
o. o. o• ti ti ti ti ti h do ,yo
Coarse
22.6
32
10
10
38
Very Coarse
32
45
14
14
52
Very Coarse
45
64
14
14
66
Small
64
90
22
22
88
Small
90
128
2
2
90
Q0
Large
128
180
4
4
94
Large
180
256
4
4
98
Small
256
362
2
2
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large /Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
113edrock
1 2048
1 >2048
1
100
Totall
100
1 100
1 100
Cross - Section 3
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
11.0
Di5 =
28.8
D50 =
42.9
D84 =
84.6
D95 =
196.6
D100 =
1 362.0
Cross - Section 3
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90%
80%
E
v
70%
a
60%
m
U
50%
m
v
40%
4�
c
30%
90
so
20%
Gavel
o bb
e
11 Pr
171
0%
0 oyti titih yh oy ti ti ti� a h� tig ti6 tib 3ti ah ba �o yw yo y6
3 bti titi ,ya N%
o. o. o• ti ti ti ti ti h do ,yo
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MYO- 10/2013 N MYl- 04/2014
0
70
'–
60
E
50
u'
40
30
v
a
zo
10
0
0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 1000.000 10000.000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MYO- 10/2013 --m— MYS- 04/2014
Cross - Section 3
Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
E
v
70%
a
60%
m
U
50%
m
v
40%
c
30%
20%
10%
0%
0 oyti titih yh oy ti ti ti� a h� tig ti6 tib 3ti ah ba �o yw yo y6
3 bti titi ,ya N%
o. o. o• ti ti ti ti ti h do ,yo
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MYO- 10/2013 N MYl- 04/2014

Reachwide and Cross - Section Substrate Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
BC2, Cross - Section 4
Monitoring Year 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle
Count
Cross - Section 4 Summary
min
max
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILTJCLAY
Silt /Clay
0.000
0.062
1 256.0
c
0
Very fine
0.062
0.125
70%
v
0
60%
Fine
0.125
0.250
10
10
10
Medium
Coarse
0.250
0.5
0.500
1.0
12
8
12
8
22
30
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
c 30%
30
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
30
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
10%
30
0%
Fine
4.0
5.7
Particle Class Size (mm)
30
■ MYO- 10/2013 ■ MYl- 04/2014
Fine
5.7
8.0
2
2
32
Medium
8.0
11.3
4
4
36
�QP
Medium
11.3
16.0
4
4
40
Coarse
16.0
22.6
4
4
44
Coarse
22.6
32
6
6
50
Very Coarse
32
45
6
6
56
Very Coarse
45
64
16
16
72
Small
64
90
18
18
90
Small
90
128
2
2
92
Large
128
180
4
4
96
Large
180
256
4
4
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
OJV
Medium
512
1024
100
Large /Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK '
Bedrock
1 2048
1 >2048
100
Totall
100
1 100
1 100
Cross - Section 4
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
0.4
D35 =
10.2
D50 =
32.0
D84 =
80.3
D95 =
165.3
D100 =
1 256.0
Cross - Section 4
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90 Sill avel
So
70
60
E 50
obb e
U
40
m 30
a
20
to
0
0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 1000.000 10000.000
Particle Class Size (mm)
t MY0- 10/2013 f MY1- 04/2014
Cross - Section 4
Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
c
70%
v
60%
m
50%
'a
40%
c 30%
20%
10%
01L=,111111111
0%
-,L m,m m all
0 a
bti tititi by oy ti ti tit' a y1 tig ti6 ti� 3ti ah �o �o yw yo 56 oti titi yd e
lz o o. o ti ti ti ti ti 3 10 tio°
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MYO- 10/2013 ■ MYl- 04/2014

Reachwide and Cross - Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
BC3, Reachwide
Monitoring Year 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
BC3 Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILTfCLAY
Silt /Clay
0.000
0.062
1
6
7
7
7
Very fine
0.062
0.125
2
2
2
9
Fine
0.125
0.250
1
7
8
8
17
0
Medium
Coarse
0.250
0.5
0.500
1.0
1
1
1
18
18
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
7
7
7
25
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
4
4
4
29
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
29
Fine
4.0
5.7
2
2
4
4
33
Fine
5.7
8.0
33
GQ�
Medium
Medium
8.0
11.3
11.3
1 16.0
4
1
1 1
5
1
5
1
38
39
Coarse
16.0
22.6
2
4
6
6
45
Coarse
22.6
32
4
3
7
7
52
Very Coarse
32
45
8
5
13
13
65
Very Coarse
45
64
7
3
10
10
75
Small
64
90
10
2
12
12
87
Small
90
128
4
1
5
5
92
�0
Large
128
180
3
3
3
95
Large
180
256
1
1
2
2
97
Small
256
362
2
1
3
3
100
00�
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
1
100
�0
Large /Very Larg
1024
2048
4-
100
BEDROCK
Bedrock
1 2048
1 >2048
1
1
1
100
Totall
s0
I s0
1 100
1 100
1 100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
0.2
D3s =
9.1
Ds0 =
29.0
D84 =
82.6
D98 =
180.0
D100 =
362.0
BC3, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90
avel obb e
80 er Ock
70
60
E 50
V
40
u
`w 30
a
20
10
0
0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 1000.000 10000.000
Particle Class Size (mm)
t MYO- 10/2013 t MY1- 04/2014
BC3, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
70%
v
a 60%
a
m
50%
V
ao%
30%
=a
20%
10%
0%
O y'L .15 .Lh
Oh
09 oti o ti ti ti ti ti 3 5 do ,yo
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MYO- 10/2013 s MY1- 04/2014

Reachwide and Cross - Section Substrate Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
BC3, Cross - Section 7
Monitoring Year 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle
Count
Cross-Section 7 Summary
min
max
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILTJCLAY
Silt /Clay
0.000
0.062
4
4
4
Very fine
0.062
0.125
70%
v
4
a 60%
Fine
0.125
0.250
6
6
10
X10
Medium
Coarse
0.250
0.5
0.500
1.0
4
2
4
2
14
16
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
6
6
22
30%
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
22
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
22
Fine
4.0
5.7
4
4
26
Fine
5.7
8.0
2
2
28
JttV
Medium
8.0
11.3
6
6
34
�QP
Medium
11.3
16.0
4
4
38
Coarse
16.0
22.6
2
2
40
Coarse
22.6
32
4
4
44
Very Coarse
32
45
8
8
52
Very Coarse
45
64
1 10
10
62
Small
64
90
6
6
68
Small
90
128
6
6
74
Large
128
180
14
14
88
Large
180
256
8
8
96
Small
256
362
4
4
100
ptQ'
Small
362
512
100
Medium
Large /Very Large
512
1024
1024
2048
100
100
BEDROCK
113edrock
1 2048
1 >2048
T 100
Totall
100
1 100
1 100
Cross - Section 1
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
1.0
D35 =
12.1
D50 =
41.3
D84 =
163.3
D95 =
245.0
D100 =
362.0
Cross - Section 7
Cross - Section 7
Individual Class Percent
100%
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
90%
100
80%
70%
v
a 60%
m
50%
m
90
v
40%
f
30%
20%
10%
0%
Gravel
0 obti 1tih by o`' ti ti ti� a 5^ ti3 tib tib 3ti ah 60 �0 1yw ti$o �y0 �bti ytiti oya ��
o. o. o ti ti y ti
bb
e
■ MYO- 10/2013 ■ MYl- 04/2014
1
Pr
so
0
70
'—
60
E
50
U
40
a
30
20
Ir
10
0
0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 1000.000 10000.000
Particle Class Size (mm)
t MYO- 10/2013 f MYl- 04/2014
Cross - Section 7
Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
70%
v
a 60%
m
50%
m
v
40%
f
30%
20%
10%
0%
0 obti 1tih by o`' ti ti ti� a 5^ ti3 tib tib 3ti ah 60 �0 1yw ti$o �y0 �bti ytiti oya ��
o. o. o ti ti y ti
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MYO- 10/2013 ■ MYl- 04/2014

Reachwide and Cross - Section Substrate Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
BC3, Cross - Section 8
Monitoring Year 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle
Count
Cross-Section 8 Summary
min
max
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILTJCLAY
Silt /Clay
0.000
0.062
1 2048.0
m
U
0
50%
Very fine
0.062
0.125
0
Fine
0.125
0.250
30%
0
Medium
Coarse
0.250
0.5
0.500
1.0
2
2
2
2
10%
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
2
2
4
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
4
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
Particle Class Size (mm)
4
Fine
4.0
5.7
4
Fine
5.7
8.0
2
2
6
Jt�V
Medium
8.0
11.3
14
14
20
�QP
Medium
11.3
16.0
12
12
32
Coarse
16.0
22.6
6
6
38
Coarse
22.6
32
4
4
42
Very Coarse
32
45
6
6
48
Very Coarse
45
64
8
8
56
Small
64
90
4
4
60
Small
90
128
14
14
74
Large
128
180
14
14
88
Large
180
256
6
6
94
Small
256
362
4
4
98
OFQ
Small
362
512
98
Medium
512
1024
98
Large /Very Large
1024
2048
2
2
100
BEDROCK '
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Totall
100
1 100
1 100
Cross - Section 1
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
10.0
D35 =
19.0
D50 =
49.1
DS4 =
163.3
D95 =
279.2
L D100 =
1 2048.0
Cross - Section 8
Cross - Section 8
Individual Class Percent
100%
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
90%
80%
100
a 60%
m
U
50%
40%
c
30%
20%
90
10%
0%
0 obti 1tih by o`' ti ti ti� a 5^ ti3 tib tib 3ti ah 60 00 1yw ti$o �y0 �bti ytiti oya ��
o. o. o ti ti y ti
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MYO- 10/2013 ■ MYl- 04/2014
avel
e
War
so
0
70
v
60
E
SO
U
40
a
30
20
to
o
0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 1000.000 10000.000
Particle Class Size (mm)
t MYO- 10/2013 MYl- 04/2014
Cross - Section 8
Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
70%
v
a 60%
m
U
50%
40%
c
30%
20%
10%
0%
0 obti 1tih by o`' ti ti ti� a 5^ ti3 tib tib 3ti ah 60 00 1yw ti$o �y0 �bti ytiti oya ��
o. o. o ti ti y ti
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MYO- 10/2013 ■ MYl- 04/2014

Reachwide and Cross - Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
SB, Reachwide
Monitoring Year 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
SB Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILTfCLAY
Silt /Clay
0.000
0.062
5
26
31
31
31
Very fine
0.062
0.125
3
3
3
34
Fine
0.125
0.250
2
2
2
36
0
Medium
Coarse
0.250
0.5
0.500
1.0
1
1
2
2
38
38
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
3
2
5
5
43
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
1
1
2
2
45
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
Cob
le
45
Fine
4.0
5.7
2
4
6
6
51
Fine
5.7
8.0
2
1
3
3
54
GQ�
Medium
Medium
8.0
11.3
11.3
1 16.0
4
3
5
1
9
3
9
3
63
66
Coarse
16.0
22.6
1
4
5
5
71
Coarse
22.6
32
5
5
5
76
Very Coarse
32
45
3
3
3
79
Very Coarse
45
64
3
1
4
4
83
Small
64
90
3
3
3
86
Small
90
128
7
7
7
93
�0
Large
128
180
7
7
7
100
Large
180
256
100
Small
256
362
100
00�
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
1
E
100
�0
Large /Very Larg
1024
2048
4-
100
BEDROCK
113edrock
1 2048
1 >2048
1
1
1
100
Totall
s0
I s0
1 100
1 100
1 100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt /Clay
D35 =
0.2
D50 =
5.3
D84 =
71.7
D95 =
141.1
D100=1
180.0
SB, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
70%
w60%
a
50%
40%
-O 30%
v
20%
10%
0% r
O 6'L �h by
Oh
09 oti o ti ti ti ti ti 3 5 do ,yo
Particle Class Size (mm)
■MYO- 10/2013 8 MY1- 04/2014
SB, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90
ravel
Cob
le
Ider
80
R
70
'—
60
E
50
U
40
E
30
20
t
10
0 ---1
-
0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 1000.000 10000.000
Particle Class Size (mm)
t MYO- 10/2013 —a— MYl- 04/2014
SB, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
70%
w60%
a
50%
40%
-O 30%
v
20%
10%
0% r
O 6'L �h by
Oh
09 oti o ti ti ti ti ti 3 5 do ,yo
Particle Class Size (mm)
■MYO- 10/2013 8 MY1- 04/2014

Reachwide and Cross - Section Substrate Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
SB, Cross - Section 10
Monitoring Year 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle
Count
Cross-Section 10 Summary
min
max
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT /CLAY
Silt /Clay
0.000
0.062
20
20
20
Very fine
0.062
0.125
20
Fine
0.125
0.250
20
70%
Medium
Coarse
0.250
0.5
0.500
1.0
4
4
24
24
a
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
16
16
40
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
m
40
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
obb
40
40%
Fine
4.0
5.7
6
6
46
E
Fine
5.7
8.0
2
2
48
JV
Medium
8.0
11.3
4
4
52
Medium
11.3
16.0
2
2
54
Coarse
16.0
22.6
6
6
60
Coarse
22.6
32
6
6
66
Very Coarse
32
45
2
2
68
Very Coarse
45
64
4
4
72
Small
64
90
14
14
86
Small
90
128
6
6
92
Large
128
180
4
4
96
Large
180
256
4
4
100
Small
256
362
100
©F�
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
6�J
Large /Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK '
Bedrock
1 2048
1 >2048
1
1
100
Totall
100
1 100
1 100
Cross - Section 10
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt /Clay
D35 =
1.6
D50 =
9.4
D84 =
85.7
D95 =
165.3
D100 =
256.0
100
Cross - Section 10
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
90
Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
70%
v
a
60%
80
m
m
50%
avel
obb
e
40%
E
30%
20%
10%
a
'—
70
"`
O Obti ytih ,y5 oy ti ti ti� o< h� tig .,� ,�� 3ti 6h 6a Co ti$ 90 �� oti titi tia a�
o. o. o• ti ti ti ti ti 3 h do .yo
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MYO- 10/2013 OM -04/20M
7
E
60
v'
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 1000.000 10000.000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MYO- 10/2013 f MYl- 04/2014
Cross - Section 10
Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
70%
v
a
60%
m
m
50%
v
40%
E
30%
20%
10%
0%
"`
O Obti ytih ,y5 oy ti ti ti� o< h� tig .,� ,�� 3ti 6h 6a Co ti$ 90 �� oti titi tia a�
o. o. o• ti ti ti ti ti 3 h do .yo
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MYO- 10/2013 OM -04/20M

Reachwide and Cross - Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
SE1, Reachwide
Monitoring Year 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
SEI Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILT /CLAY
Silt /Clay
0.000
0.062
4
30
34
34
34
Very fine
0.062
0.125
34
Fine
0.125
0.250
7
7
7
41
Medium
Coarse
0.250
0.5
0.500
1.0
2
2
2
2
2
2
43
45
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
2
3
5
5
50
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
50
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
50
Fine
4.0
5.7
1
1
1
51
Fine
5.7
8.0
2
2
2
53
Medium
8.0
11.3
2
2
4
4
57
�QP
Medium
11.3
16.0
3
1
3
3
60
Coarse
16.0
22.6
2
4
6
6
66
Coarse
22.6
32
2
1
3
3
69
Very Coarse
32
45
6
6
6
75
Very Coarse
45
64
7
1
8
8
83
Small
64
90
7
7
7
90
�+
Small
90
128
3
3
3
93
Large
128
180
4
4
4
97
Large
180
256
97
Small
256
362
3
3
3
100
Small
362
512
100
J�
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/VeryLarg
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK__R
Bedrock
1 2048
1 >2048
1
1
1
1
100
Totall
s0
I s0
1 100
1 100
1 100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt /Clay
D35 =
0.1
D50 =
4.0
D %4 =
67.2
D95 =
151.8
D100 =
362.0
SE1, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90
avel obb e
80 er
70
60
E 50
Ld
40
m 30
a
20 1 kid
10
0
0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 1000.000 10000.000.
Particle Class Size (mm)
t MYO- 10/2013 —41 1-04/2014
SE1, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
70%
v
v 60%
o.
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
O Obti 1.1,5 ,lh Oh 'y ti ,y0 b 5^ 4 ,y'? 1�0 ,y6 15 0 41 41 ,L� 00 ��° 41'
O, O, p� 1 -y 'ti 1 ti 3
Particle Class Size (mm)
0 MYO- 1012013 ■MYl-04/2014

Reachwide and Cross - Section Substrate Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
SE1, Cross - Section 12
Monitoring Year 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle
Count
Cross- Section 12 Summary
min
max
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILTJCLAY
Silt /Clay
0.000
0.062.
1 180.0
2
2
Very fine
0.062
0.125
E
2
Fine
0.125
0.250
2
2
4
4P�o
Medium
Coarse
0.250
0.5
0.500
1.0
4
4
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
v' 40%
4
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
4
20%
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
4
10%
Fine
4.0
5.7
2
2
6
Fine
5.7
8.0
2
2
8
J�
Medium
8.0
11.3
8
8
16
■ MYO- 10/2013 ■ MY1- 04/2014
Medium
11.3
16.0
6
6
22
Coarse
16.0
22.6
10
10
32
Coarse
22.6
32
12
12
44
Very Coarse
32
45
14
14
58
Very Coarse
45
64
16
16
74
Small
64
90
8
8
82
Small
90
128
12
12
94
X00
Large
128
180
6
6
100
Large
180
256
100
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large /Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK 'Bedrock
1 2048
1 >2048
1
1
100
Totall
100
1 100
1 100
Cross - Section 12
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
11.0
Di5 =
24.7
D50 =
37.0
D84 =
95.4
D95 =
135.5
D100 =
1 180.0
Cross - Section 12
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90
80 avel obb e
70
60
E 50
40
v
m 30
a
20
10
0
0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 1000.000 10000.000
Particle Class Size (mm)
f MYO- 10/2013 f MYS- 04/2014
Cross - Section 12
Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
E
70%
v
60%
m
50%
m
v' 40%
c 30%
20%
10%
0%
0 o6ti titih by oy ti ti ti� a h� w ti3 tie ti� 3ti o-h �o- �o yw �o y� �ti titi
o yo
o. o. ti ti ti ti ti 3 h do yo
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MYO- 10/2013 ■ MY1- 04/2014

Reachwide and Cross - Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 94641)
SE 2 and 3, Reachwide
Monitoring Year 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
SE2 & 3 Reach Summary
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILTfCLAY
Silt /Clay
0.000
0.062
1
30
31
31
31
Very fine
0.062
0.125
7
7
7
38
Fine
0.125
0.250
4
4
4
42
0
Medium
Coarse
0.250
0.5
0.500
1.0
2
2
2
44
44
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
2
2
2
46
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
46
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
46
Fine
4.0
5.7
46
Fine
5.7
8.0
46
GQ�
Medium
Medium
8.0
11.3
11.3
1 16.0
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
47
49
Coarse
16.0
22.6
2
1
3
3
52
Coarse
22.6
32
6
2
8
8
60
Very Coarse
32
45
8
8
8
68
Very Coarse
45
64
8
1
9
9
77
Small
64
90
12
12
12
89
Small
90
128
5
5
5
94
�0
Large
128
180
3
3
3
97
Large
180
256
1
1
2
2
99
Small
256
362
1
1
1
100
00�
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
�0
Large /Very Larg
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK
113edrock
1 2048
1 >2048
1
1
1
100
Totall
s0
I s0
1 100
1 100
1 100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt /Clay
D35 =
0.1
D50 =
18.0
D84 =
78.1
D95 =
143.4
D100 =
362.0
SE2 & 3, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90
avel .bb e
80 er Bec roc
70
60
E 50 IN
u'
40
a 30
20
10
0
0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 1000.000 10000.000
Particle Class Size (mm)
[-WO-10/2013 t MY1- 04/2014
SE2 & 3, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
70%
`w 60%
a
50%
40%
j 30%
v
20%
10%
0%
o Doti titi5 by oy ti ti tiw a 5� w ti� tib ti� 3ti o-y oa �o ,yc� $o h6 �ti titi ti� a�
o. o. o ti ti ti ti ti 3 5 10 ,yo
Particle Class Size (mm)
■MYO- 10/2013 ■MY1- 04/2014

Reachwide and Cross - Section Substrate Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
SI Cross- Section 15
Monitoring Year 1
Particle Class
Diameter (mm)
Particle
Count
Cross - Section 15 Summary
min
max
Total
Class
Percentage
Percent
Cumulative
SILTfCLAY
Silt /Clay
0.000
0.062
16
16
16
Very fine
0.062
0.125
v
16
60%
Fine
0.125
0.250
16
��t14
Medium
Coarse
0.250
0.5
0.500
1.0
v 40%
16
16
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
4
4
20
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
20
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
20
10%
Fine
4.0
5.7
6
6
26
Fine
5.7
8.0
8
8
34
�(rV
Medium
8.0
11.3
6
6
40
Medium
11.3
16.0
18
18
58
Coarse
16.0
22.6
10
10
68
Coarse
22.6
32
12
12
80
Very Coarse
32
45
6
6
86
Very Coarse
45
64
6
6
92
Small
64
90
92
90
128
2
2
94
cdo,Small
Large
128
180
6
6
100
Large
180
256
100
�Q
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
OJ�O
Medium
512
1024
100
Large /Very Large
1024
2048
100
BEDROCK 'Bedrock
1 2048
1 >2048
100
Totall
100
100
100
Cross - Section 15
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
Silt /Clay
D35 =
8.4
Dso =
13.5
DS4 =
40.2
D95 =
135.5
D100 =
180.0
Cross - Section 15
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90
avel obb .B er
80
70
v
'— 60
E 50
U
40
u
a 30
20
10
0 - - - --- L
0.010 0.100 1.000 10.000 100.000 1000.000 10000.000
Particle Class Size (mm)
t MYO- 2/2013 ­1I MYl- 04/2014
Cross - Section 15
Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
u 70%
v
60%
m
50%
m
v 40%
c 30%
20%
10%
0%
O OOti ytih by O5 'y 'L ,L� b y1 4 ,y?� ,y0 ,ti6 ,5'1. A� OA 00 yti4 y�0 ��O �bti �1ti O,yD 0p
o. o. o• ti ti ti ti
Particle Class Size (mm)
■ MYO- 10/2013 ■ MY1- 04/2014

APPENDIX 5. Hydrology Summary Data and Plots

Table 13. Verification of Bankfull Events
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (NCEEP Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1
Reach
Date of Data
Collection
Approximate Date of
Occurrence
Method
BC3
1/16/2014
1/11/2014
Crest Gage /
Pressure
Transducer
2/27/2014
9/4/2014
4/7/2014
SBl
1/16/2014
*
2/27/2014
*
9/4/2014
5/15/2014
SE2a
1/16/2014
2/27/2014
9/4/2014
*data collected, but level was below bankfull elevation

Recorded Bankfull Events
Byrd's Creek Stream Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1 - 2014
x
w
a
a
A
_2
-3
-4
Byrds Creek: Crest Gage for Byrds Creek
Monitoring Year 1- 2014
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
c
2.0 i
c
M
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
I
> u c T C m ¢ > u
0 Z O LL 5 Q S I! ¢ 0 Z O
Rainfall — Byrds Creek Water Depth — — Bankfull — _ • Thalweg Byrds Creek Manual Crest Gage Readings
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
c
2.0 i
c
M
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

Recorded Bankfull Events
Byrd's Creek Stream Restoration Project (EEP Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 1 - 2014
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
v
>
-1.5
v
3 -2.0
-2.5
-3.0
-3.5
-4.0
Byrds Creek: Crest Gage for South Branch
Monitoring Year 1 - 2014
> v c >, c m a + > u
0 Z O ii 5 Q S a 0 Z D
Rainfall —South Branch Water Depth — — Bankfull — • - Thalweg South Branch Manual Crest Gage Readings
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
c
2.0 @
c
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0