Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
WQ0044258_Application_20230324
Initial Review Reviewer Nathaniel.Thornburg Is this submittal an application? (Excluding additional information.) * Yes No Permit Number (IR) * WQ0044258 Applicant/Permittee Micro Land Group, LLC Applicant/Permittee Address 1015 Ashes Drive, Suite 102, Wilmington, NC 28405 Is the owner in BIMS? Yes ) NO Is the facility in BIMS? Owner Type Facility Name County Fee Category Major Is this a complete application?* Yes No Signature Authority Signature Authority Title Signature Authority Email Document Type (if non -application) Email Notifications Organization Micro Land Group WWIS Duplin Does this need review by the hydrogeologist? * Yes No Regional Office CO Reviewer Admin Reviewer Fee Amount Complete App Date 03/24/2023 Yes No $1,310 Below list any additional email address that need notification about a new project. Email Address Comments to be added to email notfication Comments for Admin Comments for RO Comments for Reviewer Comments for Applicant Submittal Form Project Contact Information Please provide information on the person to be contacted by NDB Staff regarding electronic submittal, confirmation of receipt, and other correspondence. Name* William Simmons Email Address* gus.simmons@cavanaughsolutions.com Project Information ......................... Application/Document Type* New (Fee Required) Modification - Major (Fee Required) Renewal with Major Modification (Fee Required) Annual Report Additional Information Other Phone Number* 9106190072 Modification - Minor Renewal GW-59, NDMR, NDMLR, NDAR-1, N DAR-2 Residual Annual Report Change of Ownership We no longer accept these monitoring reports through this portal. Please click on the link below and it will take you to the correct form. https://edoes.deq.nc.gov/Forms/NonDischarge_Monitoring_Report Permit Type:* Wastewater Irrigation High -Rate Infiltration Other Wastewater Reclaimed Water Closed -Loop Recycle Residuals Single -Family Residence Wastewater Other Irrigation Applicant/Permittee* Micro Land Group, LLC Applicant/Permittee Address* 1015 Ashes Drive, Suite 102, Wilmington, NC 28405 Facility Name* Micro Land Group WWIS Please provide comments/notes on your current submittal below. Thank you, in advance, for your review and efforts. Please contact me via phone or email with any questions or if there appears to be an issue with the document that has been uploaded. We look forward to your review and comments. This is a new application for a wastewater irrigation system via center pivot irrigation. The applicant will receive pre-treated wastewater from an adjacent meat processing facility, store the effluent in any or all of three storage lagoons, and irrigate the effluent at hydraulic or agronomic rates. Gus Simmons, P.E. 910.619.0072 gus.simmons@cavanaughsolutions.com At this time, paper copies are no longer required. If you have any questions about what is required, please contact Nathaniel Thornburg at nathaniel.thornburg@ncdenr.gov. Please attach all information required or requested for this submittal to be reviewed here. (Application Form, Engineering Plans, Specifications, Calculations, Etc.) Micro Land Group WWIS Permit Application Pkg with 137.42MB 11x17s 3-20-2023.pdf Upload only 1 PDF document (less than 250 MB). Multiple documents must be combined into one PDF file unless file is larger than upload limit. * By checking this box, I acknowledge that I understand the application will not be accepted for pre -review until the fee (if required) has been received by the Non -Discharge Branch. Application fees must be submitted by check or money order and made payable to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). I also confirm that the uploaded document is a single PDF with all parts of the application in correct order (as specified by the application). Mail payment to: NCDEQ — Division of Water Resources Attn: Non -Discharge Branch 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Signature lwlaw �. 514woNs, Jr., ? e. Submission Date 3/20/2023 CAVANAU G H February 20, 2023 Stewardship Through Innovation Nathaniel Thornburg Environmental Program Supervisor II Division of Water Resources Non -Discharge Branch 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Subject: Permit Application Package Submittal: Micro Land Group Wastewater Irrigation System Dear Mr. Thornburg, Cavanaugh & Associates, P.A., on behalf of Micro Land Group, Inc., hereby submits this application to the Non -Discharge Branch seeking a Wastewater Irrigation Systems permit for the Micro Land Group Wastewater Irrigation system located at 135 Carter Best Road, Warsaw, NC 28398 in Duplin County. Micro Land Group, Inc. receives process wastewater from a meat processing facility (The Pork Company) located at 135 Carter Best Road in Warsaw, NC for the purpose of using the process wastewater to irrigate land under their control. The Applicant wishes to install a wastewater irrigation system to manage the process wastewater resulting from their meat processing facility. Please note that this facility is not a slaughtering facility, but further processes meat products from the applicant's other facilities. The Applicant has presented the proposed project to the local planning, zoning, and governance groups at the Town of Warsaw, including a public planning board meeting, and met with support and approval for the proposed wastewater irrigation system. To facilitate your review of the enclosed permit application package, the following is an itemized listing of the information provided and submitted for your review. Please note the comments regarding the nature of some of the items required. One (1) original and two (2) copies of each item is provided, unless otherwise noted: A. Cover letter (this document) B. Application Fee: A check in the amount of $1,310 to satisfy the application fee, made payable to 'NCDEQ' is submitted separately. C. WWIS 06-16: A completed form of the 'Wastewater Irrigation Systems' application is enclosed. Additional information is provided below to assist your review, with the item number below corresponding to the same identifier in the permit application. Documentation from the Secretary of State website describing registration of the applicant's corporation is also provided. www. Solutions.com Page 1 of 5 IV.4: Please note the following regarding the status of other permits and certifications: o Collection System: N/A o Dam Safety: Based on proposed earthen dam heights, determined N/A o Erosion & Sedimentation Control Plan: Applicant will seek Erosion & Sedimentation Control Plan approval upon determination of acceptance of this permit application by the Division. It is acceptable, if needed, for acquisition of this Plan Approval to be a condition of permit issuance. o Nationwide 12 / Section 404: Potential impacts avoided, no impact. o Pretreatment: N/A o Sewer System: N/A o Stormwater Management Plan: N/A o Wetlands 401: Potential impacts avoided, no impact. V: For clarity, no additional wastewater treatment processes are proposed to be installed for this permit application. The Applicant currently has an internally fed drum screen that screens the process water from the facility for solids and debris. The proposed storage lagoons are to be provided for storage of effluent provided for irrigation only. V.3: The facility does not have a bypass nor overflow; however, the facility currently has a connection to the Town of Warsaw WWTP that will remain in place and may be used in case of wastewater irrigation system malfunction or pump station malfunction. V.4: Regarding influent lift station, yes. However, irrigation pumps are not provided in duplex given storage capabilities of the effluent lagoons. V.S: The applicant requests approval from the Director that the applicant has sufficient storage capacity that no potential for overflow exists. V.7: The applicant is seeking this wastewater irrigation system permit without a requirement for residuals storage. The system is designed to provide storage only— no treatment is designed to be included within the storage lagoons, as the existing screening system employed by the facility removes a significant portion of the solids, including those that would potentially clog the spray nozzles. The storage lagoons are designed to be pumped to empty (or near empty) routinely given the storage requirements described in the water balance (see Hydrogeologist Report). V.B: The applicant is requesting approval of this application and issuance of the requested permit without providing a standby power system as specified in 15A NCAC 02T .0305(h)(B) as the facility will maintain its current connection to the local POTW, and with simple valve manipulation, can direct the process flow to the POTW. V1.12: As the design for the proposed facility includes three (3) effluent storage lagoons, the information requested in this table is provided in an attachment subsequent to the permit application, clearly labeled to avoid confusion. VII.8: The Spray Irrigation Design Elements table is not completed as all wastewater irrigation is to be provided via center pivot irrigation system; and as there are several center pivots proposed, with varying nozzle size from center point to extent of irrigation pivot, the table is incompatible. Please see Engineering Plans and irrigation system specifications provided with this application package for additional information. www. Solutions.com Page 2 of 5 D. Property Ownership Documentation: The property card information obtained from the Duplin County GIS system is enclosed. Additional property lease documents are also attached hereto and included with this application package. No additional easements or setback waivers are required for the proposed project. E. Soil Evaluation report, enclosed. F. Agronomist Evaluation report; enclosed. G. Hydrogeologic Report; enclosed. H. Water Balance; included in the soils evaluation report and hydrogeologic report. Engineering Plans: Three (3) copies of standard size engineering plans and three (3) copies of 11"x17" plans are enclosed. J. Specifications: The technical specifications are included on the plans. K. Engineering Calculations: The engineering calculations are enclosed. The calculations reflect those associated with the pumping systems and piping systems for the wastewater transfer to the storage lagoons, and subsequently, the irrigation system. Hydraulic modeling was completed using EPAnet, and the model outputs are submitted herewith. The proposed storage lagoons are for effluent storage only, and not to provide treatment. L. Site Map: A site map is included with the Engineering Plans, as described in Item I, above. M. Power Reliability Plan: As this system solely serves a meat processing facility that may adjust its operations in accordance with power supply, including inclement weather that may lead to power disruptions, the Applicant hereby requests approval from the Director that sufficient storage capacity has been provided such that no potential for overflow exists, and therefore, no provisions to provide standby power are required. An existing connection to the local POTW will also provide redundancy in case of power failure or equipment failure. N. Operation and Maintenance Plan; enclosed. O. Residuals Management Plan: The proposed wastewater irrigation system does not propose biological treatment of the process wastewater, only storage; and therefore minimal or no lagoon residuals are expected to accumulate. The Applicant has, currently, an internal drum screen with a 3/16" screen opening (rated at 250,000 gpd) that screens the process wastewater for solids and debris prior to transfer to the storage lagoons. The applicant has obtained a written commitment from GFL to accept, manage, and properly dispose of any residuals that may need to be removed from the wastewater storage lagoons. P. Additional Documentation: www. Solutions.com Page 3 of 5 a. Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity: Not applicable for this facility. b. Existing Permit: There is no existing permit for this facility. c. Final Environmental Document: Not applicable for this facility. d. Floodway Regulation Compliance: A copy of the flood insurance map for the project area is enclosed demonstrating no proposed activities in the floodway. e. Operational Agreements: Not applicable for this facility. f. Threatened or Endangered Aquatic Species Documentation. The Natural Heritage Web Mapper was used to evaluate the proposed wastewater irrigation site for species habitat, and none was noted. The overwhelming majority of the proposed site is currently under agricultural use (row cropping), so it is logical that no threatened or endangered species habitat was noted within the project area. A print of the National NMFS ESA Critical Habitat Mapper examination in included with the supplemental information in this package. g. Wastewater Chemical Analysis: Copies of the wastewater chemical analysis are enclosed. Thank you in advance for your review and assistance in this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions, comments, or require any additional information. Regards; illiam G. "Gus" Simmons, Jr CIO, Director of Bioenergy Sei Cc: Joe Villari, Micro Land, LLC David Meyer, N.C.L.S.S., Protocol Sampling Service, inc. (Soil Scientist and Agronomist) Eric Lappala, P.E., P.H., Eagle Resources (Hydrogeologist) Attachments: Permit Application Package www. Solutions.com Page 4 of 5 Supplemental Information to Permit Application Form WWIS 06-16 www. Solutions.com Page 5 of 5 State of North Carolina DWR Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources 15A NCAC 02T .0500 — WASTEWATER IRRIGATION SYSTEMS Division of Water Resources INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: WWIS 06-16 & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Plans, specifications and supporting documents shall be prepared in accordance with 15A NCAC 02H .0400 (if necessary), 15A NCAC 02L .0100, 15A NCAC 02T .0100, 15A NCAC 02T .0700, Division Policies and good engineering practices. Failure to submit all required items will necessitate additional processing and review time. For more information, visit the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit website General — When submitting an application to the Water Quality Permitting Section's Non -Discharge Permitting Unit, please use the following instructions as a checklist in order to ensure all required items are submitted. Adherence to these instructions and checking the provided boxes will help produce a quicker review time and reduce the amount of requested additional information. Unless otherwise noted, the Applicant shall submit one original and two copies of the application and supporting documentation. A. Cover Letter (All Application Packages): Z List all items included in the application package, as well as a brief description of the requested permitting action. B. Application Fee (All New and Major Modification Application Packages): Submit a check, money order or electronic funds transfer made payable to: North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). The appropriate fee amount for new and major modification applications may be found at: Standard Review Project Fees. C. Wastewater Irrigation Systems (FORM: WWIS 06-16) Application (All Application Packages): ® Submit the completed and appropriately executed Wastewater Irrigation Systems (FORM: WWIS 06-16) application. Any unauthorized content changes to this form shall result in the application package being returned. If necessary for clarity or due to space restrictions, attachments to the application may be made, as long as the attachments are numbered to correspond to the section and item to which they refer. • If the Applicant Type in Item L2. is a corporation or company, provide documentation it is registered for business with the North Carolina Secretary of State. ❑ If the Applicant Type in Item L2. is a partnership or d/b/a, enclose a copy of the certificate filed with the Register of Deeds in the county of business. ❑ The facility name in Item IL 1. shall be consistent with the facility name on the plans, specifications, agreements, etc. ® The Professional Engineer's Certification on Page 12 of the application shall be signed, sealed and dated by a North Carolina licensed Professional Engineer. ® The Applicant's Certification on Page 12 of the application shall be signed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .0106(b). Per 15A NCAC 02T .0106(c), an alternate person may be designated as the signing official if a delegation letter is provided from a person who meets the criteria in 15A NCAC 02T .0106(b). ❑ If this project is for a renewal without modification, use the Non -Discharge System Renewal (FORM: NDSR) application. D. Property Ownership Documentation (All Application Packages): ➢ Per 15A NCAC 02T .0504(f), the Applicant shall demonstrate they are the owner of all property containing the wastewater treatment, storage and irrigation facilities: ❑ Legal documentation of ownership (i.e., GIS, deed or article of incorporation), or ❑ Written notarized intent to purchase agreement signed by both parties with a plat or survey map, or ❑ Written notarized lease agreement that specifically indicates the intended use of the property and has been signed by both parties, as well as a plat or survey map. Lease agreements shall adhere to the requirements of 15A NCAC 02L .0107. ❑ Provide all agreements, easements, setback waivers, etc. that have a direct impact on the wastewater treatment, conveyance, storage and irrigation facilities. INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: WWIS 06-16 & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Page 1 of 6 E. Soil Evaluation (All Application Packages that include new irrigation sites): ® Per 15A NCAC 02T .0504(b) and the Soil Scientist Evaluation Policy, submit a detailed soil evaluation that has been signed, sealed and dated by a North Carolina Licensed Soil Scientist and includes at a minimum: ® The report shall identify all the sites/fields with project name, location, and include a statement that the sites/fields were recommended for the proposed land application activity. ® Field delineated detailed soils map meeting all of the requirements of the Soil Scientist Evaluation Policy. ® Soil profile descriptions meeting all of the requirements of the Soil Scientist Evaluation Policy. ® Provide all soil boring logs performed at the site. ® Standard soil fertility analysis conducted no more than one year prior to permit application for each map unit in the soil map legend for the following parameters: ❑ Acidity ❑ Exchangeable sodium percentage (by calculation) ❑ Phosphorus ❑ Base saturation (by calculation) ❑ Magnesium ❑ Potassium ❑ Calcium ❑ Manganese ❑ Sodium ❑ Cation exchange capacity ❑ Percent humic matter ❑ Zinc ❑ Copper ❑ pH Saturated hydraulic conductivity (KSAT) data that shall include at a minimum: ® A minimum of three KSAT tests shall be conducted in the most restrictive horizon for each soil series in the soil map. ® All KSAT tests shall be conducted in areas representative of the site. ® All KSAT tests shall be run until steady-state equilibrium has been achieved. ® All collected KSAT data shall be submitted, including copies of field worksheets showing all collected readings. ® Submit a soil profile description for each KSAT data point that shall extend at least one foot below the tested horizon. ➢ Soil evaluation recommendations shall include at a minimum: ® A brief summary of each map unit and its composition and identification of minor contrasting soils. ® Maximum irrigation precipitation rate (in/hr) for each soil/map unit within the proposed irrigation areas. ® Seasonal irrigation restrictions, if appropriate. ® Identification of areas not suitable for wastewater irrigation. ® Recommended geometric mean KSAT rate to be used in the water balance for each soil/map unit based upon in -situ measurement of the saturated hydraulic conductivity from the most restrictive horizon. ® Recommended drainage coefficient to be used in the water balance based upon comprehensive site evaluation, review of collected onsite data, minor amounts of contrasting soils and the nature of the wastewater to be applied. ® Recommended annual hydraulic loading rate (in/yr) for each soil/map unit within the proposed irrigation areas based upon in -situ KSAT measurements form the most restrictive soil horizon. NOTE — If the soil evaluation was performed more than one year prior to the submittal of this application package, a statement shall be included indicating that the site has not changed since the original investigation. F. Agronomist Evaluation (All Application Packages that include new irrigation sites or new crops for existing irrigation sites): ® Per 15A NCAC 02T .0504(i), submit an agronomist evaluation that has been signed, sealed and dated by a qualified professional and includes at a minimum: ® Proposed nutrient uptake values for each cover crop based upon each field's dominant soil series and percent slope. ® Plant available nitrogen calculations for each cover crop using the designed effluent concentrations in Application Item V.1. and proposed mineralization and volatilization rates. ® Historical site consideration, soil binding and plant uptake of phosphorus. ® Seasonal irrigation restrictions, if appropriate. ® A clear and reproducible map showing all areas investigated and their relation to proposed fields and crops. ® Maintenance and management plan for all specified crops. INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: WWIS 06-16 & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Page 2 of 6 G. Hydrogeologic Report (All Application Packages treating industrial waste or having a design flow over 25,000 GPD): Per 15A NCAC 02T .0504(e), the Hydrogeologic Investigation and Reporting Policy, the Groundwater Modeling Policy and the Performance and Analysis of Aquifer Slug Tests and Pumping Tests Policy, submit a detailed hydrogeologic description that has been signed, sealed and dated by a qualified professional and includes at a minimum: ® A hydrogeologic description to a depth of 20 feet below land surface or bedrock, whichever is less. A greater depth of investigation is required if the respective depth is used in predictive calculations. ® Representative borings within the irrigation areas and all proposed earthen impoundments. ® A description of the regional and local geology and hydrogeology. ® A description, based on field observations of the site, of the site topographic setting, streams, springs and other groundwater discharge features, drainage features, existing and abandoned wells, rock outcrops, and other features that may affect the movement of the contaminant plume and treated wastewater. ® Changes in lithology underlying the site. ® Depth to bedrock and occurrence of any rock outcrops. ® The hydraulic conductivity and transmissivity of the affected aquifer(s). ® Depth to the seasonal high water table (SHWT). ® A discussion of the relationship between the affected aquifers of the site to local and regional geologic and hydrogeologic features. ® A discussion of the groundwater flow regime of the site prior to operation of the proposed facility and post operation of the proposed facility focusing on the relationship of the system to groundwater receptors, groundwater discharge features, and groundwater flow media. ® If the SHWT is within six feet of the surface, a mounding analysis to predict the level of the SHWT after wastewater application. H. Water Balance (All Application Packages that include new or modified irrigation sites, changes in flow or changes in storage): ® Per 15A NCAC 02T .0504(k) and the Water Balance Calculation Policy, submit a water balance that has been signed, sealed and dated by a qualified professional and includes at a minimum: ® At least a two-year iteration of data computation that considers precipitation into and evaporation from all open atmosphere storage impoundments, and uses a variable number of days per month. ® Precipitation based on the 80' percentile and a minimum of 30 years of observed data. ® Potential Evapotranspiration (PET) using the Thornthwaite method, or another approved methodology, using a minimum of 30 years of observed temperature data. ® Soil drainage based on the geometric mean of the in -situ K AT tests in the most restrictive horizon and a drainage coefficient ranging from 4 to 10% (unless otherwise technically documented). ➢ Other factors that may restrict the hydraulic loading rate when determining a water balance include: • Depth to the SHWT and groundwater lateral movement that may result in groundwater mounding. • Nutrient limitations and seasonal application times to ensure wastewater irrigation does not exceed agronomic rates. • Crop management activities resulting in cessation of irrigation for crop removal. NOTE — Wastewater Irrigation Systems serving residential facilities shall have a minimum of 14 days of wet weather storage. L Engineering Plans (All Application Packages): ® Per 15A NCAC 02T .0504(c)(1), submit standard size and 11 x 17-inch plan sets that have been signed, sealed and dated by a North Carolina licensed Professional Engineer, and shall include at a minimum: ® Table of contents with each sheet numbered. ® A general location map with at least two geographic references and a vicinity map. ® A process and instrumentation diagram showing all flow, recycle/return, aeration, chemical, electrical and wasting paths. ® Plan and profile views of all treatment and storage units, including their piping, valves, and equipment (i.e., pumps, blowers, mixers, diffusers, flow meters, etc.), as well as their dimensions and elevations. ® Details of all piping, valves, pumps, blowers, mixers, diffusers, recording devices, fencing, auxiliary power, etc. ® A hydraulic profile from the treatment plant headworks to the highest irrigation point. ® The irrigation area with an overlay of the suitable irrigation areas depicted in the Soil Evaluation. ® Each nozzle/emitter and their wetted area influence, and each irrigation zone labeled as it will be operated. ® Locations within the irrigation system of air releases, drains, control valves, highest irrigation nozzle/emitter, etc. ® For automated irrigation systems, provide the location and details of the precipitation/soil moisture sensor. ® Plans shall represent a completed design and not be labeled with preliminary phrases (e.g., FOR REVIEW ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION, etc.) that indicate they are anything other than final specifications. However, the plans may be labeled with the phrase: FINAL DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION. INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: WWIS 06-16 & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Page 3 of 6 J. Specifications (All Application Packages): Per 15A NCAC 02T .0504(c)(2), submit specifications that have been signed, sealed and dated by a North Carolina licensed Professional Engineer, and shall include at a minimum: ❑ Table of contents with each section/page numbered. ® Detailed specifications for each treatment/storage/irrigation unit, as well as all piping, valves, equipment (i.e., pumps, blowers, mixers, diffusers, flow meters, etc.), nozzles/emitters, precipitation/soil moisture sensor (if applicable), audible/visual high water alarms, liner material, etc. ® Site Work (i.e., earthwork, clearing, grubbing, excavation, trenching, backfilling, compacting, fencing, seeding, etc.) ❑ Materials (i.e., concrete, masonry, steel, painting, method of construction, etc.) ® Electrical (i.e., control panels, transfer switches, automatically activated standby power source, etc.) ® Means for ensuring quality and integrity of the finished product, including leakage, pressure and liner testing. ® Specifications shall represent a completed design and not be labeled with preliminary phrases (e.g., FOR REVIEW ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION, etc.) that indicate they are anything other than final specifications. However, the specifications may be labeled with the phrase: FINAL DESIGN - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION. K. Engineering Calculations (All Application Packages): ® Per 15A NCAC 02T .0504(c)(3), submit engineering calculations that have been signed, sealed and dated by a North Carolina licensed Professional Engineer, and shall include at a minimum: ® Hydraulic and pollutant loading calculations for each treatment unit demonstrating how the designed effluent concentrations in Application Item V.1. were determined. ® Sizing criteria for each treatment unit and associated equipment (i.e., blowers, mixers, flow meters, pumps, etc.). ® Total and effective storage calculations for each storage unit. ® Friction/total dynamic head calculations and system curve analysis for each pump used. ® Manufacturer's information for all treatment units, pumps, blowers, mixers, diffusers, flow meters, irrigation system, etc. ® Flotation calculations for all treatment and storage units constructed partially or entirely below grade. ® A demonstration that the designed maximum precipitation and annual loading rates do not exceed the recommended rates. ❑ A demonstration that the specified auxiliary power source is capable of powering all essential treatment units. L. Site Map (All Application Packages): ® Per 15A NCAC 02T .0504(d), submit standard size and 11 x 17-inch site maps that have been signed, sealed and dated by a North Carolina licensed Professional Engineer and/or Professional Land Surveyor, and shall include at a minimum: ® A scaled map of the site with topographic contour intervals not exceeding 10 feet or 25 percent of total site relief and showing all facility -related structures and fences within the wastewater treatment, storage and irrigation areas. ® Soil mapping units shown on all irrigation sites. ® The location of all wells (including usage and construction details if available), streams (ephemeral, intermittent, and perennial), springs, lakes, ponds, and other surface drainage features within 500 feet of all wastewater treatment, storage and irrigation sites. ® Delineation of the compliance and review boundaries per 15A NCAC 02L .0107 and .0108, and 15A NCAC 02T .0506 c if applicable. ® Setbacks as required by 15A NCAC 02T .0506. ® Site property boundaries within 500 feet of all wastewater treatment, storage and irrigation sites. ® All habitable residences or places of public assembly within 500 feet of all treatment, storage and irrigation sites. NOTE — For clarity, multiple site maps of the facility with cut sheet annotations may be submitted. M. Power Reliability Plan (All Application Packages): Per 15A NCAC 02T .0505(1), submit documentation of power reliability that shall consist of at a minimum: ❑ An automatically activated standby power supply onsite that is capable of powering all essential treatment units under design conditions, OR ➢ Approval from the Director that the facility: ❑ Serves a private water distribution system that has automatic shut-off during power failures and has no elevated water storage tanks, ® Has sufficient storage capacity that no potential for overflow exists, and ❑ Can tolerate septic wastewater due to prolonged detention. INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: WWIS 06-16 & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Page 4 of 6 N. Operation and Maintenance Plan (All Application Packages): ® Per 15A NCAC 02T .0507, submit an operation and maintenance (O&M) plan encompassing all wastewater treatment, storage and irrigation systems that shall include at a minimum a description of: ® Operation of the wastewater treatment, storage and irrigation systems in sufficient detail to show what operations are necessary for the system to function and by whom the functions are to be conducted. ® Anticipated maintenance of the wastewater treatment, storage and irrigation systems. ® Safety measures, including restriction of access to the site and equipment. ® Spill prevention provisions such as response to upsets and bypasses, including how to control, contain and remediate. ® Contact information for plant personnel, emergency responders and regulatory agencies. NOTE — A final O&M Plan shall be submitted with the partial and/or final Engineering Certification required under 15A NCAC 02T .0116, however, a preliminary O&M Plan shall be submitted with each application package. O. Residuals Management Plan (All Application Packages with new, expanding or replacement wastewater treatment systems): ® Per 15A NCAC 02T .0504(i) and .0508, submit a Residuals Management Plan that shall include at a minimum: ® A detailed explanation of how generated residuals (including trash, sediment and grit) will be collected, handled, processed, stored, treated, and disposed. ® An evaluation of the treatment facility's residuals storage requirements based upon the maximum anticipated residuals production rate and ability to remove residuals. ® A permit for residuals utilization or a written commitment to the Applicant from a Permittee of a Department approved residuals disposal/utilization program that has adequate permitted capacity to accept the residuals or has submitted a residuals/utilization program application. ® If oil/grease removal and collection are a designed unit process, submit an oil/grease disposal plan detailing how the oil/grease will be collected, handled, processed, stored and disposed. NOTE — Per 15A NCAC 02T .0505(o), a minimum of 30 days of residual storage shall be provided. NOTE — Per 15A NCAC 02T .0504(i), a written commitment to the Applicant from a Permittee of a Department approved residuals disposal/utilization program is not required at the time of this application, however, it shall be provided prior to operation of any permitted facilities herein. NOTE — If an on -site restaurant or other business with food preparation is contributing wastewater to this system, an oil/grease disposal plan shall be submitted. P. Additional Documentation: M.M.—Mm vw - . . . ................. ➢ Floodway Regulation Compliance (All Application Packages where any portion of the wastewater treatment, storage and irrigation system is located within the 100-year floodplain): ® Per 15A NCAC 02T .0105(c)(8), provide written documentation from all local governing entities that the facility is in compliance with all local ordinances regarding construction or operation of wastewater treatment and/or disposal facilities within the floodplain. INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: WWIS 06-16 & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Page 5 of 6 P. Additional Documentation (continued): ➢ Threatened or Endangered Aquatic Species Documentation (All Application Packages): ® Per 15A NCAC 02T .0105(c)(10), submit documentation from the Department's Natural Heritage Program demonstrating the presence or absence of threatened or endangered aquatic species within the boundary of the wastewater treatment, storage and irrigation facilities. ❑ If the facility directly impacts such species, this documentation shall provide information on the need for permit conditions pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0110. ➢ Wastewater Chemical Analysis (All Application Packages treating Industrial Waste): ® Per 15A NCAC 02T .0504(h), provide a complete Division certified laboratory chemical analysis of the effluent to be irrigated for the following parameters (For new facilities, an analysis from a similar facility's effluent is acceptable): ❑ Ammonia Nitrogen (NH3-N) ❑ Nitrate Nitrogen (NOs-N) ❑ Total Organic Carbon ❑ Calcium ❑ pH ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) ❑ Phenol ❑Total Trihalomethanes ❑ Chloride ❑ Sodium ❑ Total Volatile Organic Compounds ❑ Fecal Coliform ❑ Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) ❑ Toxicity Test Parameters ❑ 5-day Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BODS) ❑ Total Dissolved Solids ❑ Magnesium ❑ Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) THE COMPLETED APPLICATION AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO: NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES WATER QUALITY PERMITTING SECTION NON -DISCHARGE PERMITTING UNIT By U.S. Postal Service: 1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (919) 807-6464 By Courier/Special Delivery: 512 N. SALISBURY ST. RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27604 FAX NUMBER: (919) 807-6496 INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM: WWIS 06-16 & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Page 6 of 6 State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality DWR Division of Water Resources 15A NCAC 02T .0500 — WASTEWATER IRRIGATION SYSTEMS Division of Water Resources FORM: WWIS 06-16 L APPLICANT INFORMATION: 1. Applicant's name: Micro Land Group, LLC 2. Applicant type: ❑ Individual ® Corporation ❑ General Partnership ❑ Privately -Owned Public Utility ❑ Federal ❑ State ❑ Municipal ❑ County 3. Signature authority's name: Joe Villari per 15A NCAC 02T .0106(b) Title: Manager 4. Applicant's mailing address: 1015 Ashes Drive, Suite 102 City: Wilmington State: NC Zip: 28405- 5. Applicant's contact information: Phone number: (910) 293-2157 Email Address: joe.v&avfgmail.com I 11111111 OI:1ty 10111•/ 1►1 a[$] NU Ell ll Well 1. Facility name: Micro Land Group Wastewater Irrigation System 2. Facility status: Existing 3. Facility type: Major (> 10,000 GPD or > 300 disposal acres) 4. Facility's physical address: 135 Carter Best Road City: Warsaw State: NC Zip: 28398- County: Duplin 5. Wastewater Treatment Facility Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 34.988631' Longitude:-78.083661' Datum: NAD83 Level of accuracy: Nearest second Method of measurement: Navigation quality GPS 6. USGS Map Name: Wasaw South 2022 III. CONSULTANT INFORMATION: 1. Professional Engineer: William G. Simmons, Jr., P.E. License Number: 27407Firm: Cavanaugh & Assoc., P.A. Mailing address: PO Box 11197 City: Winston-Salem State: NC Zip: 27116- Phone number: 3( 36) 759-9001 Email Address: gus.Simmonskeavanaughsolutions.com 2. Soil Scientist: Dave E. Meyer, N.C.L. S. S. License Number: 1044 Firm: Protocol Sampling Service, Inc. Mailing address: 4114 Laurel Ridge Drive City: Raleigh State: NC Zip: 27612- Phone number: (919) 210-6547 Email Address: protocolsamplingkyahoo.com 3. Geologist: Eric G. Lapala, PE, PH License Number: 26990 Firm: Eagle Resources Mailing address: PO Box 11189 City: Southport State: NC Zip: 28461- Phone number: (919) 345-1013 Email Address: elappakeagleresources.com 4. Agronomist: Dave E. Meyer, N.C.L.S.S. Firm: Protocol Sampling Service, Inc. Mailing address: 4114 Laurel Ridge Drive City: Raleigh State: NC Zip: 27612- Phone number: (919) 210-6547 Email Address: protocolsamplingkyahoo.com FORM: WWIS 06-16 Page 1 of 12 IV. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS — 15A NCAC 02T .0100: 1. Application type: ® New ❑ Major Modification If a modification, provide the existing permit number: WQOQ 2. Application fee: $1,310 -Standard -Major Facility -New Permit 3. Does this project utilize public monies or lands? ❑ Yes or ® No ❑ Minor Modification and most recent issuance date: If yes, was an Environmental Assessment required under 15A NCAC 01 C? ❑ Yes or ❑ No If yes, which final environmental document is submitted? ❑ Finding of No Significant Impact or ❑ Record of Decision Briefly describe any mitigating factors from the Environmental Assessment that may impact this facility: 4. What is the status of the following permits/certifications applicable to the subject facility? Permit/Certification Date Submitted Date A roved Permit/Certification Number Agency Reviewer Collection System (Q > 200,000 GPD) Dam Safety Erosion & Sedimentation Control Plan Nationwide 12 / Section 404 Pretreatment Sewer System Stormwater Management Plan Wetlands 401 Other: 5. What is the wastewater type? ❑ Domestic or Industrial (See 15A NCAC 02T .0103(20)) Is there a Pretreatment Program in effect? ❑ Yes or ® No Has a wastewater chemical analysis been submitted? ® Yes or ❑ No 6. Wastewater flow: 332,562 (max) GPD Limited by. ❑ Treatment, ® Storage, ❑ Field Hydraulics; ❑ Field Agronomics or ❑ Groundwater Mounding 7. Explain how the wastewater flow was determined: ❑ 15A NCAC 02T .0114 or Z Representative Data Has a flow reduction been approved under 15A NCAC 02T .0114(f)? ❑ Yes or ❑ No Establishment Type Daily Design Flow a No. of Units Flow Meat Processing Plant 332,562 gal/day 1 332,562 GPD gal/ GPD gal/ GPD gal/ GPD gal/ GPD gal/ GPD Total 332,562 GPD a See 15A NCAC 02T .0114(b), (d), (e)(1) and (e)(2), for caveats to wastewater design flow rates (i.e., minimum flow per dwelling; proposed unknown non-residential development uses; public access facilities located near high public use areas; and residential property located south or east of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to be used as vacation rentals as defined in G. S. 42A-4). FORM: WWIS 06-16 Page 2 of 12 IV. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS —15A NCAC 02T .0100 (continued): 8. What is the nearest 100-year flood elevation to the facility? 127.4 feet mean sea level. Source: Stewarts Creek Are any treatment, storage or irrigation facilities located within the 100-year flood plain? ❑ Yes or Z No If yes, which facilities are affected and what measures are being taken to protect them against flooding? If yes, has the Applicant submitted written documentation of compliance with § 143 Article 21 Part 6? ❑ Yes or ❑ No 9. Has the Applicant provided documentation of the presence or absence of threatened or endangered aquatic species utilizing information provided by the Department's Natural Heritage Program? Z Yes or ❑ No 10. Does the facility have a proposed or existing groundwater monitoring well network? Z Yes or ❑ No If no, provide an explanation as to why a groundwater monitoring well network is not proposed: The Hydrogeologist has requested review feedback from the Division as to the proposed location for Monitoring Wells and will established the Latitude and Longitude for each upon receipt of such feedback. If yes, complete the following table (NOTE — This table may be expanded for additional wells): Well Name Status Latitude a Longitude a Gradient Location MW-1 Proposed 0- Up Gradient Select MW-2 Proposed 0- Down Gradient Select MW-3 Proposed 0- Down Gradient Select Select 0- Select Select Select 0- Select Select Select 0- Select Select Select 0- Select Select Select 0- Select Select Select 0- Select Select Select 0- Select Select a Provide the following latitude and longitude coordinate determination information: Datum: Select Level of accuracy: Select Method of measurement: Select I I. If the Applicant is a Privately -Owned Public Utility, has a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity been submitted? ❑ Yes, ❑No or HN/A 12. If the Applicant is a Developer of lots to be sold, has a Developer's Operational Agreement (FORM: DEV) been submitted? ❑ Yes, ❑No or ZN/A 13. If the Applicant is a Home/Property Owners' Association, has an Association Operational Agreement (FORM: HOA) been submitted? ❑ Yes, ❑No or EN/A 14. Demonstration of historical consideration for permit approval — 15A NCAC 02T .0120: Has the Applicant or any parent, subsidiary or other affiliate exhibited the following? a. Has been convicted of environmental crimes under Federal law or G.S. 143-215.613? ❑ Yes or ® No b. Has previously abandoned a wastewater treatment facility without properly closing that facility? ❑ Yes or E No c. Has unpaid civil penalty where all appeals have been abandoned or exhausted? ❑ Yes or E No d. Is non -compliant with an existing non -discharge permit, settlement agreement or order? ❑ Yes or ® No e. Has unpaid annual fees in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .0105(e)(2)? ❑ Yes or ® No FORM: WWIS 06-16 Page 3 of 12 V. WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY DESIGN CRITERIA — 15A NCAC 02T .0505: 1. For the following parameters, provide the estimated influent concentrations and designed effluent concentrations as determined in the Engineering Calculations, and utilized in the Agronomic Evaluation and Groundwater Modeling (if applicable): Parameter Estimated Influent Concentration Designed Effluent Concentration (monthly average) Ammonia Nitrogen (NH3-N) 10 mg/L 10 mg/L Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) 6000 mg/L 6000 mg/L Fecal Coliforms 200 per 100 mL Nitrate Nitrogen (NO3-N) I mg/L 1 mg/L Nitrite Nitrogen (NO2-N) 1 mg/L l mg/L Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 350 mg/L Total Nitrogen 350 mg/L 350 mg/L Total Phosphorus 300 mg/L 300 mg/L Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 6,000 mg/L 6,000 mg/L 2. Is flow equalization of at least 25% of the average daily flow provided? ❑ Yes or ® No 3. Does the treatment facility include any bypass or overflow lines? ❑ Yes or ® No If yes, describe what treatment units are bypassed, why this is necessary, and where the bypass discharges: 4. Are multiple pumps provided wherever pumps are used? E Yes or ❑ No If no, how does the Applicant intend on complying with 15A NCAC 02T .0505(k)? 5. Check the appropriate box describing how power reliability will be provided in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .0505(1): ❑ Automatically activated standby power supply onsite capable of powering all essential treatment units; or ® Approval from the Director that the facility: ➢ Has a private water supply that automatically shuts off during power failures and does not contain elevated water storage tanks; ➢ Has sufficient storage capacity that no potential for overflow exists; and ➢ Can tolerate septic wastewater due to prolonged detention. 6. If the wastewater treatment system is located within the I00-year flood plain, are there water -tight seals on all treatment units or a minimum of two feet protection from the 100-year flood plain elevation? ❑ Yes, ❑ No or Z N/A 7. In accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .0505(o), how many days of residuals storage are provided? None 8. How does the Applicant propose to prohibit public access to the wastewater treatment and storage facilities? Barbed Wire fencing and signage 9. If an influent pump station is part of the proposed facility (i.e., within the wastewater treatment plant boundary), does the influent pump station meet the design criteria in 15A NCAC 02T .0305(h)? ❑ Yes, E No, ❑ N/A — To be permitted separately, or ❑ N/A — Gravity fed 10. If septic tanks are part of the wastewater treatment facility, do the septic tanks adhere to the standards in 15A NCAC 18A 1900? ❑ Yes, ❑ No or Z N/A FORM: WWIS 06-16 Page 4 of 12 V. WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY DESIGN CRITERIA — 15A NCAC 02T .0505 (continued): ale e€ Di em i - Ma4efi-4 spReh+gs (in) = 4 — CA selee �veaeee �evaeee FORM: WWIS 06-16 Page 5: of 12 �� ACTTtI7 A T7 n TUT A TAiTNT F A A i f LTV rwF IGN CUTTER A 15A NC A CA r 1 , FORM: WWIS 06-16 Page 6 of 12 VI. EARTHEN IMPOUNDMENT DESIGN CRITERIA — 15A NCAC 02T .0505: IF MORE THAN ONE IMPOUNDMENT, PROVIDE ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PAGE AS NECESSARY. 1. What is the earthen impoundment type? Effluent Storage 2. Storage Impoundment Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 34 9858800 Longitude:-78.0793850 Datum: NAD83 Level of accuracy: Nearest second Method of measurement: Map interpretation by extraction 3. Do any impoundments include a discharge point (pipe, spillway, etc)? ❑ Yes or Z No 4. Are subsurface drains present beneath or around the impoundment to control groundwater elevation? ❑ Yes or ® No 5. Is the impoundment designed to receive surface runoff? ❑ Yes or ® No If yes, what is the drainage area? ft', and was this runoff incorporated into the water balance? ❑ Yes or ❑ No 6. If a liner is present, how will it be protected from wind driven wave action?: 60 mil HDPE Liner 7. Will the earthen impoundment water be placed directly into or in contact with GA classified groundwater? ❑ Yes or H No If yes, has the Applicant provided predictive calculations or modeling demonstrating that such placement will not result in a contravention of GA groundwater standards? ❑ Yes or ❑ No 8. What is the depth to bedrock from the earthen impoundment bottom elevation? >5 ft If the depth to bedrock is less than four feet, has the Applicant provided a liner with a hydraulic conductivity no greater than I x 10-' em/s? ❑ Yes, o or Z N/A Has the Applicant provided predictive calculations or modeling demonstrating that surface water or groundwater standards will not be contravened? ❑ Yes or ❑ No If the earthen impoundment is excavated into bedrock, has the Applicant provided predictive calculations or modeling demonstrating that surface water or groundwater standards will not be contravened? ❑ Yes, ❑ No or ® N/A 9. If the earthen impoundment is lined and the mean seasonal high water table is higher than the impoundment bottom elevation, how will the liner be protected (e.g., bubbling, groundwater infiltration, etc.)? N/A 10. If applicable; provide the specification page references for the liner installation and testing requirements: Specifications provided on plan sheets 11. If the earthen impoundment is located within the 100-year flood plain, has a minimum of two feet of protection (i.e., top of embankment elevation to 100 year flood plain elevation) been provided? ® Yes or ❑ No 12. Provide the requested earthen impoundment design elements and dimensions: Earthen Impoundment Design Elements Earthen Inuitioueddonent Dhneatsiioav Liner type: ❑ Clay ® Synthetic Top of embankment elevation: ❑ Other I ❑ Unlined Liner hydraulic conductivity: freeboard elevation: ` .zard class: 1 slope clevatior,, ,tive volume: nt slope: Fffective storage time: Tnn of (-Ism water surface m-n Sheet Referen' elevation N NOTE — The effective volume shall be the volume between the two foot freeboard elevation and the: (1) pump intake pipe elevation; (2) impoundment bottom elevation or (3) mean seasonal high water table, whichever is closest to the two foot freeboard elevation. FORM: WWIS 06-16 Page 7 of 12 VIL IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA — 15A NCAC 02T .0505: 1. Provide the minimum depth to the seasonal high water table within the irrigation area: 18 inches NOTE — The vertical separation between the seasonal high water table and the ground surface shall be at least one foot. 2. Are there any artificial drainage or water movement structures (e.g., surface water or groundwater) within 200 feet of the irrigation area? ® Yes or ❑ No If yes, were these structures addressed in the Soil Evaluation and/or Hydrogeologic Report, and are these structures to be maintained or modified? Yes. See Soils Report and Hrogeolo ig c Report Soil Evaluation recommended loading rates (NOTE — This table may be expanded for additional soil series): Fields within Recommended Recommended Annual /Seasonal If Seasonal, list Soil Series Soil Series Loading Rate Loading Rate Loading appropriate in/hr in/ r months Autryville Zone 4 1 66.45 Annual Norfolk Zone IA 1 49.75 Annual IB = 20.71 Zones 113 Goldsboro 1 3A = 27.48 Annual 3A, & 3B 3B = 33.82 Lynchburg Zone 2 1 30.79 Annual Select Select 4. Are the designed loading rates less than or equal to Soil Evaluation recommended loading rates? ® Yes or ❑ No If no, how does the Applicant intend on complying with 15A NCAC 02T .0505(n)? 5. How does the Applicant propose to prohibit public access to the irrigation system? Perimeter Fencing & Signage 6. Has the irrigation system been equipped with aflow meter to accurately determine the volume of effluent applied to each field as listed in VIL 8.? ® Yes or ❑ No If no, how does the Applicant intend on complying with 15A NCAC 02T .0505(t)? 7. Provide the required cover crop information and demonstrate the effluent will be applied at or below agronomic rates: Nitrogen Uptake Rate Phosphorus Uptake Cover Crop Soil Series % Slope lbs/ac• r Rate lbs/ac r Hybrid Coastal Autryville 0%-5% 270/104 Bermuda/Rye Hybrid Norfolk 0% to 5% 299/125 Coastal/Rye Hybrid Coastal Goldsboro 0% to 5% 299/136 Bermuda/Rye Coastal Lynchburg 0% to 5% 264/91 Bermuda/Rye Specify where the nitrogen and phosphorus uptake rates for each cover crop were obtained: North Carolina Interagency Nutrient Management Committee. 2014. Realistic yields and nitrogen application factors for North Carolina crops. realisticyields.ces.ncsu.edu North Carolina State University, North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Raleigh NC. FORM: WWIS 06-16 Page 8 of 12 a. Proposed nitrogen mineralization rate: 0.4 b. Proposed nitrogen volatilization rate: 0_5 � Pitl ti-k%Fiii t-ti-i-Y ,re4t9 c1t1-ff3c ' tfIII 4++o��,-Fef2EiH-iq4 r•.am Ati Effj'S flitr—Ogrcif Ja AI,,.,,, �? @. Iainrr-FH 1R-Igatfali H'F@----nr---- I`y'---- l.,,l„ 42- FORM: WWIS 06-16 Page 9 of 12 VIL IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA — 15A NCAC 02T .0505 (continued): 8. Field Information (NOTE — This table may be expanded for additional fields): Field Area (acres) Dominant Soil Series Designed Loading Rate (in/hr) Designed Loading Rate (in/ r) Latitude a Longitude a Waterbody Stream Index No. Classification IA 42.49 Norfolk 1 49.75 34.97720 -78.07590 18-68-2-10 C; SW 1B 15.64 Goldsboro 1 20.71 34.97720 -78.07590 18-68-2-10 C; SW 2 23.6 Lynchburg 1 30.79 34.98310 -78.08150 18-68-2-10 C; SW 3A 14.46 Goldsboro 1 27.48 34.97990 -78.07990 18-68-2-10 C; SW 3B 10.8 Goldsboro 1 33.82 34.98020 -78.08020 18-68-2-10 C; SW 4 13.68 Autryville 1 66.45 34.98180 -78.07650 18-68-2-10 C; SW 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total a Provide the following latitude and longitude coordinate determination information: Datum: NAD83 Level of accuracy: Nearest second Method of measurement: Map interpretation by extraction b For assistance determining the waterbody stream index number and its associated classification, instructions may be downloaded at: http://deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/planning/classification-standards/classifications FORM: WWIS 06-16 Page 10 of 12 Spray Irrigation Design Elements11 4,_ ..y. -, -_ Nozzle wetted diameter: Varies ft Nozzle wetted area: Varies ftz T,:... •, o.,.-�.", ' .a._ •'": t Nozzle capacity: Varies GPM Nozzle manufacturer/model: / Elevation of highest nozzle: See Plans ft ------- Specification Section: See Plans VIH. SETBACKS —.15A NCAC 02T .0506: 1. Does the project comply with all setbacks found in the river basin rules (15A NCAC 0213.0200)? ® Yes or ❑ No If no, list non -compliant setbacks: 2. Have any setback waivers been obtained in order to comply with 15A NCAC 02T .506(a) and .0506 ? Z Yes or ❑ No If yes, have these waivers been written, notarized and signed by all parties involved and recorded with the County Register of Deeds? ❑ Yes or ® No 3. Provide the minimum field observed distances (ft) for each setback parameter to the irrigation system and treatment/storage units (NOTE — Distances greater than 500 feet may be marked N/A): Setback Parameter Irrigation System Treatment / �Storage Units Any habitable residence or place of assembly under separate ownership or not to be maintained as art of the roJect site 483 400 Any habitable residence or place of assembly owned by the Permittee to be maintained as art of the project site N/A Any private or public water supply source 265 348 Surface waters (streams — intermittent and perennial, perennial waterbodies, and wetlands) 105 78di Groundwater lowering ditches (where the bottom of the ditch intersects the SHWT) 105 Subsurface groundwater lowering drainage systems N/A Surface water diversions (ephemeral streams, waterways, ditches) 105 Any well with exception of monitoring wells 265 348 Any property line 150 203 Top of slope of embankments or cuts of two feet or more in vertical height 28 Any water line from a disposal system N/A Any swimming pool >500 ft Public right of way 153 Nitrification field >500 ft Any building foundation or basement 483 Impounded public water supplies >500 ft Public shallow groundwater supply (less than 50 feet deep) >500 ft 4. Does the Applicant intend on complying with 15A NCAC 02T .0506(c) in order to have reduced irrigation setbacks to property lines? ❑ Yes or ® No If yes, complete the following table by providing the required concentrations as determined in the Engineering Calculations: FORM: WWIS 06-16 Page 11 of 12 J k-406 o.,,:,.6. „ 1 ma gr— q---4-, r f`, r" 7 Al SUSP,Oral,- l S84EIS /TCC\ fn FORM: WWIS 06-16 Page 12 of 12 IX. COASTAL WASTE TREATMENT DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS — 15A NCAC 02H .0400: 1. Is this facility located in a Coastal Area as defined per 15A NCAC 02H .0403? ❑ Yes or ® No For assistance determining if the facility is located within the Coastal Area, a reference map may be downloaded at: Coastal Areas Boundary. 2. Is this an Interim Treatment and Disposal Facility per 15A NCAC 02H .0404(g)? [:]Yes or H No NOTE — Interim facilities do not include County and Municipal area -wide collection and treatment systems. Yes No 0 or 0 ., - - T. . , :7 r,,,v.. a,0 E1@Si oa ffilflt+a, ,,,aa;. ,-a.@ 0o,a 91 , ,.,,o._•, n vO., OF n , ,,, FORM: WWIS 06-16 Page 13 of 12 Professional Engineer's Certification: ►- William G. Simmons, Jr. P.E. attest that this application for (Professional Engineer's name from Application Item III.1.) Micro Land Group Wastewater Irrigation System (Facility name from Application Item II.1.) has been reviewed by me and is accurate, complete and consistent with the information supplied in the plans, specifications, engineering calculations, and all other supporting documentation to the best of my knowledge. I further attest that to the best of my knowledge the proposed design has been prepared in accordance with this application package and its instructions, as well as all applicable regulations and statutes. Although other professionals may have developed certain portions of this submittal package. inclusion of these materials under my signature and seal signifies that i have reviewed this material and have judged it to be consistent with the proposed design. NOTE — In accordance with General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-215.613, any person who knowingly makes any false statement. representation, or certification in any application package shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor, which may include a fine not to exceed $10,000, as well as civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation. North Carolina Professional Engineer's seal, signature, and date: Q i CSn3 )if ate: Applicant's Certification per 15A NCAC 02T .0106(b): 1, Joseph P. Villari attest that this application tier (Signature Authority's name & title from Application Item I.3.) Micro Land Group Wastewater Irrigation System (Facility name from Application Item II.1.) has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that any discharge of wastewater from this non -discharge system to surface waters or the land will result in an immediate enforcement action that may include civil penalties, injunctive relief, and/or criminal prosecution. I will make no claim against the Division of Water Resources should a condition of this permit be violated. I also understand that if all required parts of this application package are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this application package will be returned to me as incomplete. I further certify that the Applicant or any affiliate has not been convicted of an environmental crime, has not abandoned a wastewater facility without proper closure, does not have an outstanding civil penalty where all appeals have been exhausted or abandoned, are compliant with any active compliance schedule, and do not have any overdue annual fees per 15A NCAC 021' .0105(e). NOTE — In accordance with General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement. representation, or certification in any application package shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor, which may include a fine not to exceed $10,000 as w 1 as civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation. Signature: Date: 2 /aa/a o FORM: WWIS 06-16 Page 14 of 12 LAGOON DATA TABLE LAGOON A: Earthen Impoundment Design Elements Earthen Impoundment Dimensions ❑ Clay ®Synthetic Liner type: Top of embankment elevation: 148 ft ❑ Other I ❑ Unlined Liner hydraulic 0 x cm/s Freeboard elevation: 146 ft conductivity: Hazard class: Not Applicable Toe of slope elevation: 129 ft Designed freeboard: 2 ft Impoundment bottom elevation: 133 ft Total volume: 2,757,015 ft3 20,622,472 Mean seasonal high water table 5 ft allons depth: Effective volume: 2,309,463 17,275,983 Embankment slope: 3 : 1 ft3 gallons Effective storage time: 53 days Top of dam water surface area: 230,280 ft2 Plan Sheet Reference: C.3.1 Freeboard elevation water 217,308 ft2 surface area: Specification Section: C.1.2 Bottom of impoundment surface 140,010 ft2 area: LAGOON B: Earthen Impoundment Design Elements Earthen Impoundment Dimensions ❑ Clay ®Synthetic Liner type: Top of embankment elevation: 148 ft ❑ Other I ❑ Unlined Liner hydraulic 0 x cm/s Freeboard elevation: 126 ft conductivity: Hazard class: Not Applicable Toe of slope elevation: 125 ft Designed freeboard: 2 ft Impoundment bottom elevation: 133 ft Total volume: 2,984,340 ft3 22,322,863 Mean seasonal high water table 5 ft gallons depth: Effective volume: 2,514,512 ft3 18,809,856 gallons Embankment slope: 3 : 1 Effective storage time: 58 days Top of dam water surface area: 240,800 ft2 Plan Sheet Reference: C.3.1 Freeboard elevation water 229,064 ft2 surface area: Specification Section: C.1.2 Bottom of impoundment surface 159,800 ft2 area: Page 1 of 2 LAGOON C: Earthen Impoundment Design Elements Earthen Impoundment Dimensions ❑ Clay ®Synthetic Liner type: Top of embankment elevation: 161 ft ❑ Other I ❑ Unlined Liner hydraulic 0 x cm/s Freeboard elevation: 159 ft conductivity: Hazard class: Not Applicable Toe of slope elevation: 148 ft Designed freeboard: 2 ft Impoundment bottom elevation: 146 ft Total volume: 1,695,015 ft3 12,678,712 Mean seasonal high water table 2 ft gallons depth: Effective volume: 1,412,073 10,563,040 Embankment slope: 3 : 1 ft3 gallons Effective storage time: 33 days Top of dam water surface area: 146,205 ft2 Plan Sheet Reference: C.3.1 Freeboard elevation water 136,773 ft2 surface area: Specification Section: C.1.2 Bottom of impoundment surface 82,485 ft2 area: NOTE — The effective volume shall be the volume between the two foot freeboard elevation and the: (1) pump intake pipe elevation; (2) impoundment bottom elevation or (3) mean seasonal high water table, whichever is closest to the two foot freeboard elevation. ADDITIONAL NOTES: 1. The liner hydraulic conductivity is provided as "0" as the proposed effluent storage lagoons will have a synthetic HDPE liner, designed to have no permeability. 2. "Effective storage time" provided in the table derived by relative ratio of the volume of each effluent storage lagoon to the total volume of all lagoons, compared to the modeled number of storage days. Please refer to page 31 of the Hydrogeologic and Spray Capacity Report submitted with this permit application package. 3. Mean seasonal high water table depth information obtained from Soil Scientist Evaluation Report submitted with this permit application package. Additional water table depth information may also be observed from the Geotechnical Engineering Report submitted with this permit application package. Page 2 of 2 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF DUPLIN FARM LEASE AGREEMENT THIS FARM LEASE ("Lease" or "Agreement") is made and entered into as of the Effective Date, by and among Rock Creek Livestock, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company whose address is 7303 Artifact Court. Wilmington NC 28411 (herein called "Lessor"); and Micro Land Group, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company (herein called "Lessee") 1. DEMISE AND PROPERTY. The Lessor leases to the Lessee, for the herein stated purpose portions of those certain lots, tracts, or parcels of real estate located in Duplin County, North Carolina, and more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Property"). 2. TERM. The initial term of this Lease shall run for a period of five (5) years, to commence on January 1, 2023, and terminate on December 31, 2027 ("Term"). Each calendar year of the Term shall be defined as a "Lease Year." a. Renewal Term. This lease shall automatically renew for five (5) successive one (1) year periods unless terminated or amended as provided herein. Either party may end the lease after the initial 5 year period with a one year notice. b. RENT. TBD 3. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. Lessee, at Lessee's sole expense, shall comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations and restrictive covenants applicable to Lessee's use and occupancy of the Property. Lessee will not knowingly commit or willingly permit to be committed any act or thing which shall be contrary to the rules and regulations of any federal, state, or municipal authority, including rules and regulations issued by Lessor regarding protection of the environment, health or safety. 4. INSURANCE. Lessee shall carry and maintain a policy of commercial general liability insurance insuring Lessor against liability for accidents on the Property with limits of coverage not less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence and $2,000,000.00 aggregate bodily injury and sufficient in all respects. 5. INDEMNIFICATION. Unless caused by Lessor's sole negligence or misconduct, Lessee hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Lessor and any of its officers, directors, employees, shareholders, agents, affiliated businesses, other Property owners/lessors, and contractors against any and all claims of damages or injury, demands, and/or causes of action, including all reasonable expenses arising from Lessee's use of the Property or the conduct of its business or from any activity, work or thing done, permitted, or suffered by Lessee on the Property b. Recording . This Lease shall not be recorded. At the request of either party, the parties hereto shall execute a Memorandum of Lease, in recordable form, specifying the Commencement and Expiration Dates of the Lease only, a description of the Property, and any other provisions which the parties mutually agree to incorporate therein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute, seal and deliver this Agreement, all as of the day and year first written above. LESSOR: Rock Creek Livestock, LLC a North Carolina limited liability company $y: Z a-(" �- � Name: Rocco Villari Title: Manager Date of Lessor's Execution: 2/23/23 Initial address for notices: Rock Creek Livestock, LLC 7303 Artifact Court Wilmington, NC 28411 LESSEE: Micro Land Group, LLC A North Carolina limited liability company By• 0-Y , N e: oseph Villari Title: Manager Date of Lessee's Execution: 2/23/23 Initial address for notices: Micro Land Group, LLC 1015 Ashes Drive — suite 102 Wilmington, NC 28405 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF DUPLIN I, N ecutc, M - ! haspt&,,s , a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that Rocco Villari personally appeared before me this day and affrmed that he is the Manager of the Rock Creek Livestock, LLC and that this document was signed by him on behalf of said company by the authority of its Operating Agreement. WITNESS my hand and notarial seal, this 23`d day of February 2023. My commission expires � - ) 4 - ad D. U STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF DUPLIN Notary Public Printed Name: re- I, M Notary Public, do hereby certify that Joseph Villari appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein expressed for Micro Land group, LLC. WITNESS my hand and notarial seal, this 23`d day of February 2023. Notary Public Printed Name: i'�:�.-e�-�� !L-( :`�'2G•r�;�San My commission expires � ` <<-�'' � �'�� EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description TRACT 6: 32.47 Acres± (Portion of Parcels 0 1- 1656 and 01-253) Located in Warsaw Township, Duplin County, State of North Carolina, 0.18 mile east of S.R. No. 1902 (Carter Best Road), and being described with bearings relative to the North Carolina Grid Meridian (NAD 83)(2011) and with distances scaled to Grid as follows: BEGINNING at an iron pipe, a corner of Tract Two on Map Book 32, Page 348, said iron pipe located North 83 Degrees 02 Minutes 58 Seconds East a distance of 941.03 feet from a mag nail in the center of S.R. No. 1902, said iron pipe having North Carolina Grid Coordinates of N=450,880.26 ft. and E=2,275,097.69 ft. and runs thence With the lines of Tract Two (Map Book 32, Page 348) North 52 Degrees 02 Minutes 58 Seconds East a distance of 239.87 feet to an iron pipe, North 37 Degrees 08 Minutes 58 Seconds East a distance of 176.78 feet to an iron pipe, North 62 Degrees 03 Minutes 28 Seconds East a distance of 243.52 feet to an iron pipe, and North 65 Degrees 05 Minutes 28 Seconds East a distance of 106.23 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 65 Degrees 05 Minutes 28 Seconds East a distance of 260.82 feet to an iron pipe, the northwest corner of Tract B; thence With the line of Tract B South 27 Degrees 42 Minutes 19 Seconds East a distance of 1425.63 feet to an iron pipe; thence With the line of Leonard Franklin Sutton, Jr. tract (Deed Book 1637, Page 913) South 50 Degrees 53 Minutes 44 Seconds West a distance of 108.87 feet to an iron pipe; thence With the lines of Leonard Franklin Sutton, Jr. tract (Deed Book 1983, Page 58) South 50 Degrees 53 Minutes 44 Seconds West a distance of 886.81 feet to an iron pipe, North 22 Degrees 14 Minutes 24 Seconds West a distance of 266.55 feet to an iron pipe, and North 17 Degrees 12 Minutes 05 Seconds West a distance of 430.55 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 36 Degrees 50 Minutes 53 Seconds West a distance of 843.58 feet to the point of beginning, CONTAINING 32.47 acres more or less, and being part of that land described in a Deed to Leonard Franklin Sutton, Jr., as recorded in Book 1637, Page 913 of the Duplin County Registry, and all of that land described in a Deed to Leonard Franklin Sutton, Jr., as recorded in Book 1983, Page 5 8 of the Duplin County Registry, and further being the Tract A shown on a map recorded in Map Book 33 at Page 75 of the Duplin County Registry. NOTE: This Tract to benefit from a 30 foot wide private easement. LESS AND EXCEPT THAT area shown as "Lagoon A" on the below sketch which is to be installed in February 2023. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF DUPLIN FARM LEASE AGREEMENT THIS FARM LEASE (`Lease" or "Agreement") is made and entered into as of the Effective Date, by and among Sutton Land Renewal, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company whose address is PO Box Drawer 279. Wilson, NC 27894 (herein called "Lessor"); and Micro Land Group, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company (herein called "Lessee"). 1. DEMISE AND PROPERTY. The Lessor leases to the Lessee, for the herein stated purpose portions of those certain lots, tracts, or parcels of real estate located in Duplin County, North Carolina, and more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Property"). 2. TERM. The initial term of this Lease shall run for a period of five (5) years, to commence on January 1, 2023, and terminate on December 31, 2027 ("Term"). Each calendar year of the Term shall be defined as a "Lease Year." a. Renewal Term. This lease shall automatically renew for five (5) successive one (1) year periods unless terminated or amended as provided herein. Either party may end the lease after the initial 5 year period with a one year notice. b. RENT. TBD 3. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. Lessee, at Lessee's sole expense, shall comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations and restrictive covenants applicable to Lessee's use and occupancy of the Property. Lessee will not knowingly commit or willingly permit to be committed any act or thing which shall be contrary to the rules and regulations of any federal, state, or municipal authority, including rules and regulations issued by Lessor regardintD g protection of the environment, health or safety. 4. INSURANCE. Lessee shall carry and maintain a policy of commercial general liability insurance insuring Lessor against liability for accidents on the Property with limits of coverage not less than $1,000,000.00 per occurrence and $2,000,000.00 aggregate bodily injury and sufficient in all respects. 5. INDEMNIFICATION. Unless caused by Lessor's sole negligence or misconduct, Lessee hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Lessor and any of its officers, directors, employees, shareholders, agents, affiliated businesses, other Property owners/lessors, and contractors against any and all claims of damages or injury, demands, and/or causes of action, including all reasonable expenses arising from Lessee's use of the Property or the conduct of its business or from any activity, work or thing done, permitted, or suffered by Lessee on the Property 6. Recording. This Lease shall not be recorded. At the request of either party, the parties hereto shall execute a Memorandum of Lease, in recordable form, specifying the Commencement and Expiration Dates of the Lease only, a description of the Property, and any other provisions which the parties mutually agree to incorporate therein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute, seal and deliver this Agreement, all as of the day and year first written above. LESSOR: Sutton Land Renewal, LLC a North Carolina limited liability company By:e" (, fJ Name: Rocco Villari Title: Manager Date of Lessor's Execution: 2/23/23 Initial address for notices: Sutton Land Renewal, LLC 7303 Artifact Court Wilmington, NC 28411 LESSEE: Micro Land Group, LLC A North Carolina limited liability company By: Z1WX� Nam . Aose-opph Villari Title: Manager Date of Lessee's Execution: 2/23/23 Initial address for notices: Micro Land Group, LLC 1015 Ashes Drive — Suite 102 Wilmington, NC 28405 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF DUPLIN I, 1\ 2—aa-en GA ; -tA-b- rt 55 -N , a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that Rocco Villari personally appeared before me this day and affirmed that he is the Manager of the Sutton Land Renewal, LLC and that this document was signed by him on behalf of said company by the authority of its Operating Agreement. WITNESS my hand and notarial seal, this 23rd day of February 2023. Notary Public Printed Name: e My commission expires 3 ` 1 — Z� 2'�c p. , r . STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA A COUNTY OF DUPLIN 'O BL C' Notary Public, do hereby certify that Joseph Villari appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein expressed for Micro Land Group, LLC. WITNESS my hand and notarial seal, this 23rd day of February 2023. My commission expires 'j ` 1�-C - �p C') L-c Notary Public Printed Name: i -k , lC�j kjp S M T! O ""', TARy' 2. :2 "'''•�N C EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description TRACT 1: 218.47 Acresf (Portion of Parcels # 01-1656 and # 01-11—) Located in Warsaw Township, Duplin County, State of North Carolina, on the east side of S.R. No. 1902 (Carter Best Road) and being described with bearings relative to the North Carolina Grid Meridian (NAD 83)(2011) and with distances scaled to Grid as follows: BEGINNING at a mag nail in the center of S.R. No. 1902, the southwest corner of tract two shown on Map Book 32, Page 348, said mag nail having North Carolina Grid Coordinates ofN= 450,766.38 ft. and E= 2,274,163.57 ft. and runs thence With the southern lines of Tract Two shown on Map Book 32, Page 348 North 83 Degrees 02 Minutes 58 Seconds East a distance of 30.09 feet to an iron pipe, and North 83 Degrees 02 Minutes 58 Seconds East a distance of 910.94 feet to an iron pipe; thence With the lines of Tract A shown on Map Book 33, Page 75 South 36 Degrees 50 Minutes 53 Seconds East a distance of 843.58 feet to an iron pipe, South 17 Degrees 12 Minutes 05 Seconds East a distance of 430.55 feet to an iron pipe, South 22 Degrees 14 Minutes 24 Seconds East a distance of 266.55 feet to an iron pipe, North 50 Degrees 53 Minutes 44 Seconds East a distance of 886.81 feet to an iron pipe, and North 50 Degrees 53 Minutes 44 Seconds East a distance of 108.87 feet to an iron pipe; thence With the lines of Tract B shown on Map Book 33, Page 75 South 42 Degrees 37 Minutes 11 Seconds East a distance of 1251.15 feet to an iron pipe, South 30 Degrees 18 Minutes 39 Seconds East a distance of 608.32 feet to an iron pipe, South 51 Degrees 40 Minutes 57 Seconds East a distance of 358.17 feet to an iron pipe, South 07 Degrees 37 Minutes 08 Seconds East a distance of 1213.13 feet to an iron pipe, South 00 Degrees 49 Minutes 23 Seconds East a distance of 483.65 feet to an iron pipe, South 65 Degrees 24 Minutes 19 Seconds West a distance of 824.44 feet to an iron pipe, South 87 Degrees 01 Minutes 59 Seconds West a distance of 671.47 feet to an iron pipe, North 25 Degrees 50 Minutes 25 Seconds West a distance of 410.59 feet to an iron pipe, North 45 Degrees 36 Minutes 37 Seconds West a distance of 1391.95 feet to an iron pipe, and South 56 Degrees 42 Minutes 44 Seconds West a distance of 77.78 feet to a mag nail in the center of S.R. No. 1902; thence With the center of S.R. No. 1902 North 32 Degrees 54 Minutes 42 Seconds West a distance of 1626.03 feet to a mag nail, and North 32 Degrees 34 Minutes 21 Seconds West a distance of 796.33 feet to a mag nail; thence Along the center of S.R. No. 1902 as it curves to the right, chords of the curve are: North 25 Degrees 57 Minutes 39 Seconds West a distance of 121.84 feet to a mag nail, North 13 Degrees 14 Minutes 47 Seconds West a distance of 99.63 feet to a mag nail, and North 01 Degrees 25 Minutes 27 Seconds West a distance of 115.68 feet to an iron stake; thence With the center of S.R. No. 1902 North 00 Degrees 39 Minutes 34 Seconds West a distance of 29.63 feet to an iron stake; thence With the lines of Lot One shown on Map Book 32, Page 349 North 86 Degrees 34 Minutes 44 Seconds East a distance of 30.20 feet to an iron pipe, North 86 Degrees 34 Minutes 44 Seconds East a distance of 192.23 feet to an iron pipe, North 00 Degrees 29 Minutes 34 Seconds East a distance of 220.81 feet to an iron pipe, South 83 Degrees 58 Minutes 13 Seconds West a distance of 185.47 feet to an iron pipe, and South 83 Degrees 58 Minutes 13 Seconds West a distance of 29.26 feet to a mag nail in the center of S.R. No. 1902; thence With the center of S.R. No. 1902 North 01 Degrees 43 Minutes 13 Seconds East a distance of 82.46 feet to a mag nail, North 01 Degrees 12 Minutes 40 Seconds East a distance of 122.68 feet to a mag nail, North 01 Degrees 08 Minutes 35 Seconds West a distance of 44.40 feet to a mag nail, and North 02 Degrees 37 Minutes 50 Seconds West a distance of 173.69 feet to the point of beginning, CONTAINING 218.47 acres more or less, and being part of that land described in a Deed to Leonard Franklin Sutton, Jr., as recorded in Book 1637, Page 913 of the Duplin County Registry, and being part of Parcel Three described in a Deed to Leonard Franklin Sutton, Jr., as recorded in Book 1637, Page 904 of the Duplin County Registry, and further being the 218.47 acre tract shown on a map recorded in Map Book 33 at Page 134 of the Duplin County Registry. Note:This tract subject to a 30' wide access easement agreement recorded in Deed Book 1985, Page 227 of the Duplin County Registry. This tract subject to an easement agreement recorded in Deed Book 1985, Page 219 of the Duplin County Registry. With the lines of Leonard Franklin Sutton, Jr. tract (Deed Book 1983, Page 58) South 50 Degrees 53 Minutes 44 Seconds West a distance of 886.81 feet to an iron pipe, North 22 Degrees 14 Minutes 24 Seconds West a distance of 266.55 feet to an iron pipe, and North 17 Degrees 12 Minutes 05 Seconds West a distance of 43 0.5 5 feet to an iron pipe; thence North 36 Degrees 50 Minutes 53 Seconds West a distance of 843.58 feet to the point of beginning, CONTAINING 32.47 acres more or less, and being part ofthat land described in a Deed to Leonard Franklin Sutton, Jr., as recorded in Book 1637, Page 913 of the Duplin County Registry, and all of that land described in a Deed to Leonard Franklin Sutton, Jr., as recorded in Book 1983, Page 58 of the Duplin County Registry, and further being the Tract A shown on a map recorded in Map Book 33 at Page 75 of the Duplin County Registry. NOTE: This Tract to benefit from a 30 foot wide private easement. LESS AND EXCEPT THAT area shown as "Lagoon A" on the below sketch which is to be installed in February 2023. Soil Scientist Evaluation Report Villari Brothers Sprayfield WQ0001173 Warsaw, Duplin County, North Carolina Prepared for: Villari Brothers 1012 US Highway 117 South Warsaw, NC 28398 and Cavanaugh Solutions 1904 Eastwood Road, Suite 205 Wilmington NC 28403 December 3, 2022 o N 1044 9rFOpry�{G� DavidE. Meyer, N.C.L.S.S. Soil Scientist/President Protocol Sampling Service, Inc. 4114 Laurel Ridge Drive Raleigh, NC 27612 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1 2.0 SITE EVALUATION..............................................................................................................1 2.2 Soils and Agronomic Evaluations............................................................1 3.0 LOADING RATES.................................................................................................................2 3.1 Hydraulic Loading Rate........................................................................................................... 2 3.2 Nitrogen Loading Rate.............................................................................................................4 4.0 SODIUM ADSORPTION RATIO..........................................................................................4 5.0 Cover Crop Establishment, Monitoring and Maintenance..........................................5 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................. 6 Attachment1 Soil Profiles.................................................................................................................... 9 Attachment2 Ksat data.........................................................................................................................9 Tables Table1.-- Summary of Ksat Tests...................................................................................................3 Figures Figure 1.-- Soils Investigation Map.................................................................................................8 -1- 1.0 INTRODUCTION This soil and agronomic report is prepared as part of a supporting document for a non -discharge permit application using treated water from the Villari Brothers Water Treatment Plant (WWTP). The treated waste water will be applied on four (4) pivots on one tract of land located to the south of the existing plant which is shown on Figure 1. Villari Brothers is interested in applying effluent from the WWTP for irrigation on 121 wetted acres consisting of former agricultural fields. Accordingly, the purpose of this report is to provide a soils and agronomic evaluation of the site to determine suitability of the site for the application of treated waste water and provide recommendations for the hydraulic loading rate and any agronomic enhancements that will be needed to establish and maintain the chosen cover crop. 2.0 SITE EVALUATION 2.1 TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE The topography at the site is shown on Figure 1. The site is located at the interface of the middle and lower Coastal Plain Physiographic Region. Locally, the lower and middle Coastal Plain is characterized as consolidated sands and clays that comprise the Columbia Group of Pleistocene Age. The proposed spray fields are located on the Sunderland Terrace which slopes southeastward from an elevation of 170 feet at its northern boundary to an elevation of 105 to 107 feet near the edge of the escarpment that forms its southeastern boundary with the Wicomico Terrace. Elevations range from 150 to 114-feet msl across the subject property. The topography is young, and differences in elevation between stream bottoms and the adjacent uplands are slight. Stream gradients are low, and all the bottomlands are wet. On broad interstream flats Carolina Bays, shallow elliptical or oval -shaped depressions with outer rims of sand that are oriented northwest to southeast with lengths ranging from 100 feet to nearly a mile, are evident (Geologic Map of North Carolina, 1985). The area is generally overlain by a veneer of silts, sands and clays deposited as part of the Cape Fear River Basin. The Black Creek Formation is found under a majority of the spray fields and consists of fossiliferous clay with varying amounts of fine-grained sand with bluish gray clays. Shell material is commonly contained in lenses. The geology encountered during drilling at the site consisted of varying depths of clayey sands and silty fine sands over a gray sandy clay which was encountered from thirty to forty-five feet below land surface in the deep lithology borings. The site is located on a river terrace that gently slopes towards Stewarts Creek located along the site's eastern property border. Drainage ditches are located around the perimeter of the site and provides ground water and storm water control for the site towards Stewarts Creek located along the site's eastern property border. 2.2 Soils and Agronomic Evaluations The area available for spray irrigation of treated waste water was covered by foot in February, March and April 2022 by Protocol Sampling Service, Inc. personnel and the soil profiles were inspected by hand auger borings at 81 locations to provide a field description of soil texture, color, structure, depth, thickness and type of restrictive horizons and presence or absence and depth of evidence of any seasonal high-water table. The hand auger boring locations are shown on Figure 1. Soil profile logs of each soil boring are given in Attachment 1. Seventeen (17) composite soil samples were also collected on December 27, 2021 for agronomic analysis prior to planting winter -1- wheat by the Waters Agricultural Laboratories, Inc. located in Warsaw, North Carolina. The Soil Test Report is included in Appendix B. The soils found within the proposed spray fields belong primarily to the somewhat excessively well drained (Autryville) and are designated Group I soils, the well -drained (Norfolk) designated Group II soils, the moderately well drained (Goldsboro) designated group III soils and the somewhat poorly drained (Lynchburg) designated Group IV soils. Somewhat excessively well drained soils have a water table below 48-inches below land surface (bls) while well drained soils have a water table between 40 and 48-inches bls. Moderately well drained soils have a water table between 20 and 40-inches bls while somewhat poorly drained soils have a water table have a water table between 10 and 20-inches bls. Seasonal high water table indicators observed during the advancement of hand auger borings revealed that the seasonal high- water tables range from greater than 18-inches in the Lynchburg series and below 66-inches in the Autryville series. Agronomic analysis has revealed that the site soils have an average cation exchange capacity of 6.28 and an average pH of 6.18 (5.5 is ideal for a mineral soil) which indicates that the mineral site soils have not been over limed (base saturation averages 83%) and the planted cover crop will respond well to initial fertilization and liming on these soils. The phosphorus index, which averaged 165.72, was high and the potassium index which averaged 114.94 was high, indicating that only potassium would need to be added from 20 to 40 lbs/acre on three (3) selected fields. Lime was added to two (2) selected fields at a low rate of 0.3 tons/acre. Nitrogen was added to all fields at a rate of at a rate of 100 lbs N/acre. Soil sampling should be conducted prior to the first year of application to adjust the yearly application rates of phosphorus, potassium, lime and nitrogen subtracting the calculated PAN load after the waste water system is constructed. 3.0 LOADING RATES 3.1 HYDRAULIC LOADING RATE Thirty-two (32) constant head subsurface permeameters were run across the site (Appendix C) using Amoozemeters at the locations shown in Figure 1. The subsurface permeability (GeoMean) of the most restrictive layer the Btl, Bt2 and B/E horizons in the somewhat excessively well drained Autryville (Group I soil), the Btl and Bt3 horizons in the well -drained Norfolk soil (Group II soil), the Btl and Bt2 horizons in the Goldsboro soil (Group III soil) and the Btl and B/E horizons in the Lynchburg soil (Group IV) soil), ranged from 2.041 inches/hour in the Group I soil (Autryville), 0.20 inches/hour in the Group II soil (Norfolk), 0.597 inches/hour in the Group III soil (Goldsboro) and 0.255 inches/hour in the Group IV soil (Lynchburg). The data for these tests is included as Attachment 2 and is and summarized in Table 1. We recommend using a recommended maximum drainage coefficient applied to these rates of 6% or less, which results in a Soil Scientist recommended maximum annual loading rate of 66 inches for the Autryville, 40 inches or less for the Norfolk and Goldsboro soils (Group I, II and III) and 25 inches or less for the Lynchburg soil (Group IT). We recommend that these maximum coefficients be used to constrain loading rates evaluated during the mounding analysis in the hydrogeologic evaluation. -2- Location Test Number Soil Group Soil Series Horizon Depth Ksat Inches Cm in/hr cm/hr ft/day SB-5 1 I Autry Ville A 18 46 8.455 21.48 16.91 SB-5 1 2 Btl 40 102 1.691 4.30 3.38 SB-5 4 E' 48 122 5.636 14.32 11.27 SB-5 5 B't/B't2 60 152 5.636 14.32 11.27 SB-7 6 II Norfolk Btl 18 46 0.107 0.27 0.21 SB-7 7 Bt2 32 81 2.748 6.98 5.50 SB-7 8 Bt3 53 135 1.785 4.53 3.57 SB-8 8 II Norfolk E/Btl 18 46 0.564 1.43 1.13 SB-8 9 Btl 24 61 0.266 0.68 0.53 SB-8 10 Bt2 34 86 8.455 21.48 16.91 SB-8 11 Bt3 50 127 1.691 4.30 3.38 SB-9 12 II Norfolk Btl 24 61 0.68 1.73 1.36 SB-9 13 Bt3 48 122 0.283 0.72 0.57 SB-44 14 IV Lynchburg E/B Btl 18 24 46 61 0.348 0.085 0.88 0.22 0.70 0.17 SB-44 15 SB-42 16 IV Lynchburg Btl E/B 24 12 61 30 0.564 0.705 1.43 1.79 1.13 1.41 SB-42 17 SB-40 18 IV Lynchburg E/B Btl 12 24 30 61 4.274 0.986 10.86 2.50 8.55 1.97 SB-40 19 SB-56 20 III Goldsboro Btl 31 79 2.255 5.73 4.51 SB-56 21 Bt2 42 107 2.067 5.25 4.13 SB-57 22 III Goldsboro Btl 24 61 2.818 7.16 5.64 SB-57 23 Bt2 30 76 0.564 1.43 1.13 SB-57 24 Bt3 48 122 1.127 2.86 2.25 SB-67 25 III Goldsboro Btl 18 46 0.705 1.79 1.41 SB-67 26 Btl 30 76 0.535 1.36 1.07 SB-76 27 I Autryville E 24 61 5.636 14.32 11.27 SB-76 28 B/E 30 76 3.57 9.07 7.14 SB-76 29 Bt2 42 107 4.133 10.50 8.27 SB-76 30 Btl 54 137 22.54 57.25 45.08 SB-70 31 I Autryville Bt2 30 76 5.636 14.32 11.27 SB-70 32 Bt2 32 81 1.409 3.58 2.82 Table 1.-- Summary of Ksat Tests. Bermuda grass needs a weekly application of about 1 to 11/4 inches of water/week. On coarser textured soils, which comprise the top layer (Ap horizon) on the site, it often requires longer watering periods, for example, 1/2 inch of water every other day to help establish a drought tolerant and deep root system (North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service Publication Number AG- 431 Revised: January 1994 Last Electronic Revision: August 1997). -3- 3.2 NITROGEN LOADING RATE Considering the organic nitrogen mineralization rate of 40 percent, the Plant Available Nitrogen in the effluent is estimated as follows: PAN, mg/L = (TKN - NH3-N) 0.40 + (NH3-N) 0.50 + (NO2-NO3-N) The current calculated PAN using October 2022 data, prior to treatment is 61.90 mg/l. Considering the average daily flow of 332,562 gal/day that can be land applied by practicing year- round spray irrigation of Hybrid Coastal Bermuda/Rye grass, the total annual Plant Available Nitrogen loading at the site would be: 61.90 mg/L PAN x 8.34 x 0.332 mgd x 365 day/yr 120.67 acre 518 lb PAN/acre/year The proposed receiver crop consisting of Hybrid Coastal Bermuda Hay/Rye grass that will be planted at the site and their respective Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) uptake rate as outlined in Realistic Yields (RYE) and Nitrogen Applications for Duplin County North Carolina crops is given as follows: Cover Crop(s) Nitrogen Uptake Rate Soil Series Lb PAN/acre/year Hybrid Coastal Bermuda/Rye 270/104 Autryville Hybrid Coastal/Rye 299/125 Norfolk Hybrid Coastal Bermuda/Rye 299/136 Goldsboro Coastal Bermuda/Rye 264/91 Lynchburg Once the waste water system is constructed the Plant Available Nitrogen loadings can be calculated and compared to the Nitrogen Uptake Rates of the proposed and existing cover crops. Any supplemental nitrogen application will then be determined. 4.0 SODIUM ADSORPTION RATIO A high sodium concentration in irrigation water combined with low calcium and magnesium concentrations will cause reduction in soil permeability and infiltration, breakdown in the physical structure of the soil, reduction of soil tilth and impairment of plant growth. Water with an SAR greater than 9 is generally not recommended for irrigation use even if the total salt content is relatively low. Waters with SARs in the range of 0 to 6 can generally be used on all soils with little problem of a sodium buildup. The permeability of sandy soils may not deteriorate as readily as C� heavier soils when irrigated with high SAR water, but a potential problem does exist. When the SAR ranges from 6 to 9, chances for permeability problems increase. In this situation soils should be sampled and tested every 1 to 2 years to determine whether the water is causing a sodium increase and a need for corrective actions. The SAR of the Villari Brothers raw effluent prior to treatment is determined as follows: Effluent Constituents* Concentrations Equiv. Wt. Milli Equivalent Sodium (Na) 3350 mg/L, 23 145.65 Calcium (Ca) 810 mg/L 20 40.5 Magnesium (Mg) 13.1 12 1.09 *- July 2022 data Sodium Adsorption Ratio, SAR — Na' Milli Equi . 10-5 ica Milli Eq_ + Mg + Milli FR.) � _ 145.65 [0.5 (40.5 +1.09)]0.5 32.0 The above SAR value is calculated before treatment and should be reduced to within the acceptable range of SAR values of water for spray irrigation use after treatment. 5.0 COVER CROP ESTABLISHMENT, MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE The proposed cover crop of Hybrid Coastal Bermuda grass should be planted at a rate of 5-10 pounds of seed per acre. Spring and summer plantings should utilize hulled bermudagrass seed for faster germination. Late fall and winter plantings should be with unhulled bermudagrass seed to delay germination of a significant amount of seed until more favorable conditions occur in the spring. Unhulled bermudagrass should be planted with Rye grass (Abruzzi) in the fall to provide temporary cover and protection from soil erosion during the winter months. If sprigging is chosen, the Hybrid Coastal Bermuda grass should be planted at a rate of 10-15 bushels per acre to establish a fast cover. Sprigs should be broadcast on a clean seedbed and pressed into moist soil with a roller or covered lightly with soil. Moist conditions must be maintained for 2 — 3 weeks after planting to obtain a good cover. The seed or sprigs must be planted before soil temperature exceeds 65' F. Soil temperatures of between 65' and 75' F are ideal for germination and rapid development of the grass. Nitrogen at the rate of 60 — 80 pounds/acre should be applied at 3 to 4 week intervals until the grass is established. Soil samples should be collected after site preparation to determine exact nutrient needs prior to planting of the cover crop. -5- Any herbaceous broadleaf and small leaf weeds that will inevitably grow between the cover crop before a sufficiently thick grass stand is established (6 months - year) can be sprayed with 2, 4 — D and MSMA or an equivalent to ensure the maximization of nutrient uptake by the cover crop. By eliminating the growth of weed colonies, a quicker cover crop establishment will be realized. 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon the soils and agronomic evaluations, the site is suitable for the application of treated waste water from the Villari Brothers WWTP on the proposed Hybrid Coastal Bermuda/Rye grass cover crop that will be established at the site. The site considered for spray irrigation contains somewhat excessively well, well drained, moderately well drained and somewhat poorly drained soils (Group I, II, III and IV) with seasonal high water table elevations below 40-inches deep. The water quality of the Villari Brothers WWTP treated waste water is excellent for irrigation use. Based upon standard irrigation loading to sustain both the Hybrid Coastal Bermuda and Rye grass cover crops during the growing season the hydraulic loading rates at the site would range from 1.25-inch/week in the Group I soils, to 0.6-inches/week or less in Group II and III soils, and 0.4-inches/week or less in the Group IV soils. The recommended short-term precipitation rate at this site is 1.0 inches/hr for all soil groups due to slopes ranging from 0 — 5%. This rate is dependent upon enhancing and maintaining the Hybrid Coastal Bermuda grass cover crop, once established, at the site. Aeration and fertilization of the cover crop is recommended to increase the infiltration capacity of the soil. Soil samples should be collected after site preparation to determine exact nutrient needs of the cover crop and then annually during the operational life of the spray fields to monitor nutrient build-up or leaching in the subsurface soils and to sustain a healthy cover crop throughout the growing season. Harvesting of the Hybrid Coastal Bermuda grass and Rye grass (Abruzzi) winter cover crop will be required at least twice during the growing season initially and more frequently after the grass is established. The hay can be bailed, removed from the site and used as cattle feed by local farmers. References I Me Bermuda Grass Management in North Carolina, North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service, North Carolina State University, 1993. North Carolina Interagency Nutrient Management Committee. 2014. Realistic yields and nitrogen application factors for North Carolina crops. realisticyields.ces.ncsu.edu North Carolina State University, North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Raleigh NC. Soil Survey of Duplin County, North Carolina. United States Soil Conservation Service, 1959. -7- go - MP him e 200 0 EA �1 ,♦ ,1000,' -- -�.� — •SB67 Ksat25,26 ------�-�.� r•--- B66 1 i•SB64 � ` I ` 1 •SB65 I B63 , I - _ B62 � ` I I 4k OWN 1 ` I •SB61 1 B58 ` SB34 • ®SB-57 � ` , 1 Zone 2 A SB-56 1 SB59• •SB 81 \ •SB 80 ` •SB33 •SB55 ` J ` ` •SB60 SB79 •SB 75 ; ` SB54• SB 78 74 •SB ` •SB32 SB52 • SB53 SB 77 B 73 • � ` B31 SB 71 •SB 72 SB30 SB51 SB-70 SB ®6 S B29 • SB 68' ` •SB28 •SB50 • SB 69 ` ` SB48 O B27 • Zone •SB26 Zone 3B ` •SB47 SB25• ` SB36 B24 •SB37 ` ` SB38 SB39 SB-40 SM ♦ SB-41 ` SB-42 SB23 ` •SB43 -B-44 Zone 3A •SB2 SB45 •SB46 • •SB22 •SB3 ` SB4 •SB14 ` B21 ` •SB15 •SB20 SB1: •SB16 •SB19 Zone 1B •SB17 : B18 1 200 400 600 800 ft t 7 .SB-5 B6 %* 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 •SB11 ! B10 ! _ I 10 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I EXPLANATION Soil Group I Autryville II Norfok III Goldsboro IV Lynchburg V Bibb VI Mc C VII Bba — 'j • PSS Soil Borings A PSS Ksat locations 4jjjjkL==kw - MMONIF r w c� LL E O. a3 E D) ILI H Ca C rn .y c Ca y y C as y C O U rn c Co AU Ca W E o. U m L C Q T C C-)O O � 3 C fa O p U 0 c a) U Q 0 E C V CO 01 .y O Ca c M 0 0 0 O c fU a) v � � c O O -C N fa cca o c0 ,c y Ca O a) c (D o N y a) L E O a) w 2 O O > Y rn CL `9 a) a) ,c 3 y -c (DO Ca N O O J U -0 a C w y a) O a) O C E Ca c m y a3 a) 2 a) m U as 0) - fn a) U 0 ,C j 2 0 J CD 2 a a Q N N O N m 00 E V y a) N � Q O a O � C0,04 O V N Z a) y cc Q a) a) > 4 Q. 0� Q W N U) a) ATTACHMENT I SOIL PROFILES -8- SOIL EVALUATION FORM c ° Structure / Consistence / Matrix Mottle Colors 4 Texture Mineralogy Color (Quantity, Size, Contrast, Color) SB5 A 0-18 GR / LFS VFR / SO,PO 10YR 4/3 E 18-30 GR / FS VFR / SO,PO 10YR 8/2 Bt1 3040 SBK /SCL Fi / S5, SP 10YR 6/8 E' 40-52 SBK/SL FR / SO, PO 10YR 6/8 B"t1 52-60 SBK, LFS/SL FR / SO, PO 10YR 6/6 C, 2,P 7.5YR 8/2 B`t2 60-84 SBK/ LF5/SL/LS FR / 5o, PO 10YR 6/6 AWT@ >84" SB7 A 0-6 SBK J LFS VFR / SO,PO 10YR 4/3 E 6-18 SBK / SL VFR / SO,PO 10YR 6/6 Btl 18-24 SBK /SCL FR / SS, 5P 10YR 5/8 Bt2 24-32 SBK /SCL FR / SS, SP 10YR 6/8 Bt3 32-50 SBK /SL FR / SQ,PO 10YR 6/8 B/C 50-84 SBK / SL FR / SO, PO 10YR 6/8 C,2,P 10YR 6/1 AWT @ >70„ SB8 A 0-6 GR / LFS VFR / SO,PO 10YR 4/3 E 6-17 GR LS VFR / SO,PO 10YR 6/6 Bt1 17-28 SBK / SCL F9 / SS, SP 10YR 5/6 Bt2 28-40 SBK /SL LS FR / SO, PO 10YR 7/6 Bt3 40-60 SBK / SCL H / SS,SP lOYR 5/6 C,2,P 1OYR 6/1 B/C 6044 1 GR/ SL FR / S0, PO 10YR 6/4 AWT @ 57W SB9 A 0-11 GR / LFS VFR / SO,PO 10YR 5/3 _ E 11-18 GR / FS VFR / SO,PO 10YR 7/4 Bt1 18-30 SBK / SCL Fi / SS, SP 10YR 5/6 Bt2 30-42 SBK/SL FR/SO,PO 10YR 6/8 Bt3 42-48 SBK/ SCL Fi / SS, SP 10YR 5/8 C,2,P 10YR 6/1 Bt4 48-60 SBK/SCL VFi/SS, SP 10YR 5/1 C,2,P 10YR 5/6 B/C 60-84 SBk/SCL/SL Fi/SO, PO 10YR S/1 AWT@ >70" SB-40 A 0-8 GR /FSL VFR / SO,PO 10YR 3/2 E 8-18 GR /FSL VFR / SO,PO 10YR 4/2 Bt1 18-30 SBK / SCL FR / SS, SP 10YR 6/1 C,2,F 10YR 5/8 Bt2 30-50 SBK /SCL FR / SS, SP 10YR 5/6 C,2,F 10YR 5/8; C,2,Q 1 YR 5/2 B/C 50-60 SBK/SCL/SL FR / SS,SP 10YR 5/1 C,2,P 10YR 5/6 C9 60-84 GR/SBKJSCL/S FR / SS, SP 10YR 5/1 L AWT @ 24" SOIL EVALUATION FORM SB-42 A 0-8 GR /FSL VFR / SO, PO 10YR 3/2 E 8-18 GR /FSL VFR / SOYO 10YR 4/2 Bt1 18-30 SBK / SCL FR / SS, SP 10YR 6/1 C,2,F 10YR 5/8 Bt2 30-50 SBK /SCL FR / SS, SP 10YR 5/6 C,2,F 10YR 5/8; C,2,D 10Y 5/2 B/C 50-60 SBK/SCL/5L FR / SO,PO 10YR 5/1 C,2,P 10YR 5/6 60-84 I GR/SCL/SL FR / SS, SP 10YR 5/1 AWT @ 37" SB-44 I A 0-8 GR /FSL VFR / SO,PO 10YR 3/2 E 8-18 GR /FSL VFR / SO, PO 10YR 4/2 Bt1 18-30 SBK / SCL FR / SS, SP 10YR 6/1 C,2,F 10YR 5/8 Bt2 30-50 SBK /SCL FR / SS, 5P 10YR 5/6 C,2,F 10YR 5/8; C,2,D 10 R 5/2 B/C 50-60 SBK/SCL/SL FR / SS,SP 10YR 5/1 C,2,P 10YR 5/6 Cg 60-84 SBK/SCL/SL FR / SS, SP 10YR 5/1 AWT @ 47" SB-56 A 0-6= GR /FS VFR / SO,PO 10YR 5/3 E 6-16 GR /FS VFR / SO,PO 10YR 6/4 Btl 16-34 SBK / SL FR / SO, PO 10YR 5/8 Bt2 34-45 SBK /SL FR / SO, PO 10YR 5/8 C,2,D 10YR6/1 Bt3 45-55 SBK/SL FR / SO,PO 10YR 5/1 C,2,P 10YR 5/6 55-84 SBK/SL FR / SO, PO 10YR 5/1 AWT @ >60„ SB-57 A 0-12 GR /FSL VFR / SO,PO 10YR 5/3 Bt1 12-24 GR /SL VFR/SO,PO 10YR 6/4 Bt2 24-30 SBK / SCL FR / SS, SP 10YR 5/8 Bt3 30-48 SBK /SL FR / SO, PO 10YR 5/8 C,2,D 10YR6/1 Bt4 48-60 5BK/SL FR / SO,PO 10YR 5/1 C,2,P 10YR 5/6 Cg 60-84 SBK/SL FR / SO, PO 10YR 5/1 AWT @ >65„ SB-67 A 0-11 GR /SL VFR / SO,PO 10YR 6/4 Bt1 11-34 SBK /SCL VFR / SS,SP 10YR 5/8 Bt2 34--48 SBK / SCL FR / SS, SP 10YR 5/8 C,2,D 10YR6/1; C,2,P 10YR 5/6 Bt3 48-60 SBK /SL FR / SO, PO 10YR 5/8 C,2,D 10YR6/1 BC 60-84 SBK/SL FR / SO,PO 10YR 5/1 C,2,P 10YR 5/6 Cg 60-84 SBK/LS FR / SO, PO 10YR 5/1 AWT [?a >65„ SB76 A 0-12 GR /FS VFR/SO,PO 10YR 4/2 E 12-24 GR /LFS VFR / 50,'PO 10YR 6/6 B/E 24-36 GR /LFS FR / SO, PO 10YR 6/8 Bt1 36-48 SBK/SL/SCL Fi / SS,SP 10YR 6/8 Bt2 48-60 SBK, LFS/SL FR / SO, PO 10YR 6/6 C, 2,P 7.5YR 8/2 BC 60-84 SBK/SL/LS FR / SO, PO 10YR 6/6 AWT@ >84" SOIL EVALUATION FORM SB70 A 0-8 GR / FS VFR / SO, PO 10YR 6/2 E 8-24 GR / FS VFR / SO,PO 10YR 6/6 Bt1 24-33 SBK /SCL Fi / SS, SP 10YR 6/8 E' 33-48 GR/LFS FR / SO,PO 10YR 4/4 B't1 48-78 SBK, SCL Fi / SS, SP 10YR 6/6 C, 2,P 7.5YR 8/2 BC 78-84 SBK/SL/LS FR / SO, PO 10YR 6/6 AWT@ >84„ SOMM EVA4UATION skecr l of 1 (Crurd�wad'ian SDteeA-Costplete a1f field in jut1J Protwol S=piiv SeMm, Ina. PROPERTY ID #: 4114 Laurel Ridge Dr DATE OF EVALUA ON: Ralei,gb, NC 27612 CO Y: " P 0 0 SOIL MORPHOLOGY Q F (.I%I) PROM E FACTORS i .� LANDSCAPE POSMON ![_ ON .1941 .1941 J942 WIL 1 1943 .1956 .1944 PROFILE SLOPE % STRUC"f URFJ CONSIS'fEMGFJ WCMESW SODS UPW MTR CLASS TMURE MMERALOGY Molt DEPTH CL&SS HOW & MAR lift! L Tory, I i T a�0 OKRtk 1� • fro`' �� -2o 30 _R 6" lOILME EVA14UATIONf (Con inuavon Sheer -Complete 4U jw in f do Protocol Sampling Sm4ce, Inc. 4114 Laurel Ridge Dr Raleigh, NC 27612 Sheet 1- of 4' PROPERTY #: DATE OF EVALUA ON; 2 CO era a SOIL MORPHOLOGY OTHER F (.194i) PROFILE FACTORS i '' LANDSCAPE 6 .� �0 9 .1H4Y .A941 $OIL .1943 .M6 .19" PROFILE SLOPE -A DIFFMSTRUCTUREI COFOSMONI ONNSISTENiCFJ w 91 SOIL 3APR0 CLE►Ss TRI11,11MV7 I V',fNERALOGV COLOR DEPTH CLASS HONZ & LTAR � 1 70,011 I 1 1 18" 5r t sa ss sf dG .Sim 1��0 N Protocol Sampling Service, Inc. 4114 Laurel Ridge Dr Raleigh, NC 27612 �Q IF .19y4 LANDSCAPE P ON !RAPE % =Ir SORJSi'f F, EVA , UATION {Continuation Sheet -Complete ali fteld in full} Sills, MORPHOLOGY (.1+341) PO, k # ONA ,15�M5ri I .19qY �'�• :s ff=CTUREICONSISTENCE/ TMCM;2 -VINERALOGY Y L�JL rtll— Ito Tom. LFf LA xCLI PROPERTY DATE OF EVALUAT� OTHM PROFILE FACTORS .19y42 SUIL .1943 .19s6 WETNESS/ SOIL SAPRO c;,nop DEPTH CLASS rA fq � sf Zip si if �l 8v J Ly $4o Sud 3 e to )N: 'z.zy- u .1944 1 PROFILE RESTR CLASS HOB & LTAR 'At p it 0 F 4SORAITE FWA.4UA.TION fflo tray ion Sheet-Com#edo di field in full) Pmtcool Sampli'-n Service, Inc. 4114 Laurel Rld, Raleigk NC 276 ± `. PROPERTY DATE OF EVALUAT] SOIL MORPHOLOGY OTHER (1941) 1 PROFILE FACTORS "f L D CY: pip, 1441 LANDSCAPE , .194 Sul .L .1943 PROFELE CONSISTENCLI w SLIM % STRUCTUFM t h%s.s/ son, BMW FJ= CLASS TIT, = - %t s3 r? 3r ` , xa lk p PL Ls i L.0 lop) 9-10 SOIL/SITE EVALUATION {Continuation Sheet -Complete all field in full) Pmtacal Sampling Service, Inc. 4114 Laud Ridge Dr Raleigh, NC 27612 Sheet of —Lb — PROPERTY ID #: DATE OF EVALUATION: 3.1,zz P # R SOILMORPHOLOGY OTHER F 1 (.1941) PROMS FACTORS 1� 1" E LANDSCAPE mx� POSMONf N �N 9 SWIPE DT�PTI -i .1941 TrMITIME <1942 .1941 ;On .1943 .199 CONSISTENCE/ WETNESS/ SOIL SAPRO M11+ RALOGY COLOR DEPTH CLASS 1%4 PROFILESTRUCTURE/ RIMM CLASS HORIZ & LTAR �S s, qtr 3) 4 _ [! y 1 fit' F1 I d? i, i w oil Protocol Swipling Service, Inc. 4114 Laml �Ridge Dr Raleigk NC 27612 SOXLfS1fiE EVALUATION sheer (2 of i� don Skeet -Complete all field in full} PR.QPEItTYgI7 #: DATE OF EWALUAT N: 1 19-1 � co : Pqw-j $ SOIL MORPHOLOGY OTHER. 4,1941j PROFILE FACTORS L LANDSCAPE N .1942 i1ATF .1 dY .a�41 SOIL .1943 .1956 PNDS $IAl y� I STRUCTURE/ � CONSISTENCE/ WETNESS/ SOIL, SAPRO 0IPTA °1'I MIR 1 WaRALOGY COLOR DEPTH CLASS AA 2e IOU ��i sarll� la - - i14� Vor IL 110 IUD" R3 611 30' y yet � M lie J)72 L X)Jr LL .1,1" j PHOFIL3 RUM !IMW ROM R /,TAR SOIL/gff'u EVALUATION (Condauution.9,'yff o-Complete atijk1dinfull} Protocol Sampling Service, Inc. 4114 Laml ---,-bdge Dr Meigh, NC 27612 PROPERTY DATE OF EVALUAI 0: Sheet -7 of LO P It SOIL MORPHOLOGY OTHER 0 (1941) PROFILE FACTORS L X PROFILE FGSIT M/ MI.1943 REM CLASS BLOPIS % M—MR, STRUCTURE/ CONSISTENCE/ WETNESS/ SOIL SAPRO & LTAR M1111TIE MINERALOGY COLOR onym CLASS NORM T & Bli KI a &7 a_ f�,,r � f�c fSG� � _- ��r�,�F%� Zc�r 5a LF�' 4p- v �t 4a 1+1 ff 17— 5e. - soFIL t (r 7_7 lvyo 77 'wo 0 L 71 G4 SOnAYFE EVALUATION {Comkma on Sheet -Complete all kid m full} Protocol Service, Inc. 4114 Laurel1qdge Dr Race NC 27612 PROPERTY DATE OF EVALUA7 i A SOIL MORPHOLOGY OTHER (.1941) PROFILE FACTORS -- - L9NDSCAPE x��a�x + SOIL KIM % i 9flaucTum CONSISMCEI � VVE�iq`N�S#�1 S[)�iL u Y...� A , � ij ki :1�i1t9AALOGY I�.°OR DE +fla �AT, SL Fu srar ��...s� �s 3 .-_ �� � irrrrir„wr�rarw.��N i ■ Nl 7�_?r1. ��sF� �► �� re _S�� 314W Ls 1 -�[--- - T shut L of i U Y'�� .1956 SAPRO REM CLASS HUWZ t LTAR I 'CLum EVALUATION (Cvn6wxd on Shea-Compkic aftfield in full) Prouml Sampling SeMet, inc. 4114 Laurel Ridge Dr Raleigt4 NC 27612 PROPERTY DATE OF EVALUAI SOIL MORPHOLOGY OTHER (.1941) PROFILE FACTORS I "It MUM '1941 SOIL .19U SLOPE % BE 9MUCTURE/ CONSISTINM WETNESS/ SOIL M MMI(Ik WINERALOGY 031LOR DEPTH op -A) 33h , _,£mac -.� j>?t, IFK 1� SIA 4r L L tq 'j, ivy lr[Z Lit M'ej � f - I q, 7- � PRLR FILE S. RESCASSCLAHOPIZ & TAR Protocol Sampling Service, Inc. 4114 Laurel Ridge Dr ReW&% NC 27612 09 � e y LANDSCAPE 3PCST'Z' ov ° ;i'a SLOPE % n!TPT.q Q,, rvw�+ �NqUmti S01USITE EVALUATION (Cantu &W1on Sheet -Complete all,ield n fuH) PROPERTY DATE OF EVALUA7 Sheet l °b Of �O QJ: ,rt•LT a. Cu SOM MORPHOiDGY OTHER (.1941) PROME FACTORS .1942 I .��nAtUCT'[ M CONSISTENCE/ WETNESS/ k SOIL ��% CY�AA^Tv a3'li :N- UNE'RAIA)GY (-,,X, P. ` DEPTH ` CLASS KOIUZ �cLTAR 64L Wow S? , I j I c 'ka Al C.:L'i rz ATTACHMENT 2 KSAT DATA Test # Location Number Horizon Depth IN/HR LTAR Soil Group I SB-5 I A 18 8.455 126.49 I Autryville 2 SB-5 2 Btl 40 1.691 25.299 1 3 SB-5 4 E' 48 5.636 84.33 I 4 SB-5 5 B'tIB1t2 60 5.636 84.33 1 5 SB-7 6 Btl 18 0.107 1.61 lI Norfolk 6 SB-7 7 Bt2 32 2.748 41.11 I1 7 SB-7 8 Bt3 53 1.785 26.704 II 8 SB-8 8 E/BtI l8 0.564 8.433 II 9 SB-8 9 Btl 24 0.266 3.982 II 10 SB-8 10 Bt2 34 8.455 126.494 11 11 SB-8 11 Bt3 50 1.691 25.299 II 12 SB-9 12 Btl 24 0.68 10.176 II 13 SB-9 13 Bt3 48 0.283 4.241 II 14 SB-44 14 EIB 18 0.348 5.2 1V Lynchburg 15 SB-44 15 Btl 24 0.085 1.265 IV 16 SB-42 16 Btl 24 0.564 8.433 IV 17 SB-42 17 E/B 12 0.705 10.541 IV 18 SB-40 18 EIB 12 4.274 63.95 IV 19 SB-40 19 Bt1 24 0.986 14.758 IV 20 SB-56 20 Btl 31 2.255 33.732 111 Goldsboro 21 SB-56 21 Bt2 42 2.067 30.921 111 22 SB-57 22 Btl 24 2.818 42,165 111 23 SB-57 23 Bt2 30 0.564 8.433 III 24 SB-57 24 Bt3 48 1.127 16.866 111 25 SB-67 25 Btl 18 0.705 10.541 I11 26 SB-67 26 Btl 30 0.535 8.011 III 27 SB-76 27 E 24 5.636 84.33 1 Autryvi le 28 SB-76 28 BIE 30 3.57 53.409 I 29 SB-76 29 Bt2 42 4.133 61.842 1 30 SB-76 30 BtI 54 22.54 337.234 I 31 SB-70 31 Bt2l 30 5.636 84.33 1 32 SB-70 32 Bt2 32 1.409 21.082 I Group 1 GeoMean 2.041 inches/hour Group 11 GeoMean 0.200 inches/hour Group Ill GeoMean O.S97 inches/hour Group IV GeoMean 0.255 inches/hour Comment 1 autryville 2 autryville 3 norfolk 4 norfolk 5 autryville 6 autryville 7 norfolk 8 norfolk 9 norfolk 16 goldsboro 11 norfolk 12 norfolk 13 goldsboro 14 norfolk 15 goldsboro 16 norfolk 17 norfolk 18 goldsboro 19 goldsboro 20 goldsboro SB9 Ksat 12, 13 norfolk S810 goldsboro SB8; Ksat 8,9,10,1 norfolk SB7 ksat 5,6, 7 norfolk SB6 autryville SB5 ksat 1-4 autryville SB1 autryville SB2 autryville SB3 norfolk SB4 norfolk SB14 norfolk SB13 goldsboro SB12 norfolk S811 norfolk SB17 norfolk 5B16 norfolk SB15 goldsboro SB24 goldsboro SB19 goldsboro SB18 goldsboro SB21 goldsboro SB22 goldsboro S823 goldsboro SB24 goldsboro SB25 lynchburg SB47 goldsboro SB48 lynchburg SB50 goldsboro SB51 lynchburg SB52 goldsboro SB26 lynchburg S827 lynchburg SB28 lynchburg SB29 lynchburg SB30 lynchburg SB31 lynchburg SB32 lynchburg 00,34 yufuz5uulu SB62 goldsboro SB63 goldsboro SB64 goldsboro SB66 norfolk SB67 goldsboro SB65 norfolk SB61 goldsboro SB58 lynchburg SB57 goldsboro SB56 goldsboro SB56 goldsboro SB55 norfolk SB59 norfolk SB60 norfolk SB54 norfolk SB53 norfolk SB45 goldsboro SB46 goldsboro SB44 Ksat 14,15 lynchburg SB43 goldsboro SB40 lynchburg SB39 lynchburg SB38 lynchburg SB37 lynchburg SB36 lynchburg SB 68 autryville SB 70 ksat 31, 32 autryville SB 71 norfolk SB 72 norfolk SB 73 goldsboro SB 74 goldsboro SB 75 autryville SB 77 autryville SB 78 autryville SB 79 autryville SB 80 autryville SB 81 autryville SB 76 ksat 27-29 autryville SB 69 autryville SB-41 lynchburg SB-42 Ksat 16,17 lynchburg SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villari Brothers Date: 31=022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SE-5 Autryville Temperature (F): 80 Number: Ksatl Horizon: A em in Depth(inches): 18.0 $9T UP Target Water Level: 15.2 6.0 j em in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 45.7 18.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 10.2 4.0 Head: 15.2 6.0 CHT Tube(s) setting: = 40,6 16.0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 QM Valve Setting: x coefficient A: 0.001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Level Cove rs[on Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time 0 K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3lhr) (cm/hr) (inlhr) galfft2lday 44 0.0 39 1.0 36 3.0 105.D 2.0 1,00 0,017 18900.0 21.4747 8.4546 126.494 33 3.0 105.0 3,0 1.00 0.017 18900.0 21.4747 8.45461 126-494 30 3,0 105.0 4.0 1.00 0.017 18900.0 21,4747 8,4546 126.494 27 3,0 105.0 5.0 1,00 0.017 18900.0 21,4747 8,4546 126.494 24 3.0 105.0 6.0 1,00 0.017 18900.0 21,4747 8.4546 126.494 21 3.0 105.0 7.0 1.00 0.017 18900.0 21,4747 8,45461 126.494 3 18.0 105.0 13.0 6.00 0.100 18900.0 21.4747 8,4546 126.494 Final Ksat 21.476 8.455 126.494 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Viliari Brothers Date: 3/3/2022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB-5 Autryville Temperature fl: 80 Number: Ksat2 Horizon: Bt1 cm in Depth(inches): 40.0 BET UP Target Water Level: 152 6.0 cm n Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 101.6 40.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 10.2 4.0 Head: - 152 6.0 CHT Tubes) setting: = 96.5 38.0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: x coefficient A: 0.001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Level Covers Ion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Change in Chamber Clack Elapsed Time Q K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3lhr) (cm/hr) (inlhr) gaVft2lday 39 0.0 27 12.0 105.0 15.0 15.00 0250 5040.0 6.7265 2.2546 33.732 24 3.0 10&0 20.0 5,00 0.083 3780.0 4.2949 1.6909 25,299 20 4.0 105.0 30.0 10.00 0.167 2520.0 2.8633 1.1273 16.865 17 3.0 105.0 35,0 5.00 0.083 3780.0 4.2949 1-6909 25.299 14 3,0 105.0 40.0 5.00 0.083 3780.0 4.2949 1.6909 25.299 1.1 3.0 105.0 45.0 5.00 0.083 3780,0 4,2949 1,6909 25.299 8 3.0 105.0 50,0 5.00 0.083 3780.0 4,2949 1.6909 25.299 5 3.0 105.0 55,0 5.00 0.083 3780.0 4,2949 1.6909 25.299 Final Ksat 4.296 1.691 25.299 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Vlllarl Brothers Date: 313/2022 Weather Condition: Skinny Location: SB-5 Autryville Temperature (F): 80 Number: Ksat3 Horizon: E' cm in Lleoth[inchesl: 48.0 SET UP Taraet Water Level: 152 6.0 Hole Depth: 121,9 48.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 10.2 4.0 Head: 15.2 6.0 CHT Tube(s) setting: = 116.8 46.0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 crn Valve Setting: x coefficient A: 0,001136 1-ON 2-ON j NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Level Coversion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K K Reading Water Level G.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3lhr) (cm/hr) (inlhr) gaVft2lday 36 0.0 28 8.0 105.0 2.0 2.00 0.033 25200.0 28.6329 11,2728 168.66 21 7.0 105.0 4.0 2.00 0.033 22050,0 25.0538 9.8637 147.58 17 4.0 105,0 5.0 1.00 0.017 25200.0 28,6329 11,2728 168,66 13 6.0 9 4.0 105.0 7.0 1,00 0.017 25200.0 28.6329 11,2728' 168,66 7 2.0 105.0 8.0 1.00 0.017 12600.0 14,3165 5,63641 84.33 5 2.0 105.0 9,0 1.00 0.017 12600.0 14.3165 5.6364 84.33 3 2.0 105.0 10.0 1.00 0.017 12600.0 14.3165 5.6364 j 84.33 Final Ksat 14.316 6.638 84.33 I SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villad Brothers Date: 313/2022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB-5 Autryville Temperature (F): 80 Number: Ksat 4 Horizon: B't11B't2 cm in Depth(inches): 60.0 SETUP Target Water Level: 15.2 6.0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hale Depth: 152.4 60.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: 16.5 6.5 CHT Tube(s) setting: - 147.3 58.0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hale radius (r): 2.5 om Valve Setting: x coefficient A: 0.001135 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Level Coversion Factor (C.F.): 105:0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3lhr) (cm/hr) (irdhr) gallft2lday 47 0.0 29 5A 20 10.0 18 16 14 12 10 8 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,0 105.0 105.0 105.0 105.0 105.0 105.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.017 12600.0 0.017 12600.0 0.017 12600.0 0.017 12600.0 0.017 12600.0 0.017 12600.0 14.3165 14.3165 14.3165 14.3165 14,3165 14.3165 5.6364 5.6364 5,6364 5.6364 5,6364 5,6364 Final Ksat 14.316 5.636 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villari Brothers Date: 3/3/2022 Weather Condillon: Sunny Location: SB-7 Norfolk Temperature (F): 80 Number: Ksat 5 Horizon: Sti cm n Depth(lnches): 18.0 R Target Water Level: 15.2 6.0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 45.7 18.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: - 16.5 6.5 CHT Tubes) setting: = 40.6 15.5 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hale radius (r). 2.5 cm Valve Setting: x coefficient A: 0.001136 84.33 84.33 84.33 84.33 84.33 84.33 84.33 1-ON 2-ON Coversion Factor (C.F.): 20.0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3lhr) (cm/hr) (inlhr) gallft2/day 41 0.0 31.8 92 20.0 20.0 20.00 0,333 552.0 0,6272 02469 3,69 30 1.8 20.0 30,0 10.00 0,167 21&0 0.2454 0.0966 1,45 28 2.0 20.0 40.0 10-00 0,167 240.0 0.2727 0.1074 1.61 26 2.0 20.0 50.0 10.00 0,167 240.0 02727 0.1074 1.61 24 2.0 20.0 60.0 10.00 0.167 240.0 .0.2727 0.1074 1.61 22 20 20.0 70.0 10.00 0,167 240.0 0.2727 0.1074 1.61 18 4.0 20.0 90.0 2000. 0.333 240,0 0.2727 0.1074 1.61 12 6.0 20.0 120.0 30.00 0.500 240.0 0.2727 0.1074 1.61 Final Ksat 0.273 0.107 i 1.61 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Creekside Manor Date: 313/2022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB-7 Norfolk Temperature (F): 80 Number: Ksat 6 Horizon: Bt2 cm in Depth(inches): 32.0 SET UP Target Water Level: 152 6.0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 81,3 32.0 Ending Water Level 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4,5 Head: - 16,5 6.5 CHT Tube(s) setting: e 76.2 29.5 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: x coefficient A: 0.001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Lev I Coversion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm31hr) (cm/hr) (inlhr) gallft2/day 41 0,0 105.0 0.0 36.5 4.5 105.0 2.0 2.00 0.033 14175.0 16,1060 6.3410 94.87 35 1,5 105.0 3.0 1.00 0.017 9450.0 10-7374 4.2273 63,25 34 1,0 105.0 4.0 1.00 0.017 6300.0 7.1582 2.8182 i 42.16 33 1,0 105.0 5.0 1.00 0,017 6300.0 7,1582 2.81821 42.16 28 5.0 105.0 10.0 5.00 0.083 6300.0 7.1582 2.8182 42.16 22.6 15.0 18 4,5 105.0 20.0 5.00 0.083 5670.0 6.4424 2.5364 37.95 13 5.0 105.0 25,0 5.00 0.083 6300.0 7.1582 2.8182 42,16 8 5.0 105.0 30.0 500 0.083 6300,0 7.1582 2.8182 42,16 3 5,0 105,0 35,0 5.00 0,083 6300.0 7.1582 2.8182 42.16 Final Ksat 6.979 2.748 41.11 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Milan Brothers Date: 31312022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB-7 Norfolk Temperature (F): 80 Number: Ksat7 Horizon: Bt3 cm n Depth(inches): 510 P Target Water Level: 15.2 6.0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 134.6 53.0 Ending Water Level: 15,2 6.0 Reference: + 11,4 4.5 Head: - 16.5 6.5 CHT Tube(s) setting: = 129.5 51.0 Hale diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2,5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0.001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Lev eI Coversion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3lhr) (cm/hr) (inlhr) gaVft2/day 37 0.0 105.0 0.0 - - 35 1.0 105.0 2.0 2.00 0.033 3150.0 3,5791 1.4091 21.082 33.2 2.8 105.0 &0 3.00 0.050 5880.0 6,6810 2,6303 39.354 30 3.2 105.0 10.0 5.00 0.083 4032.0 4.5813 1.80361 26.985 28 20 105.0 15.0 5,00 0,08$ 2520.0 2.8633 1,1273 16.866 26 2.0 105.0 20.0 5.00 0,083 2520.0 2.8633 1.1273' 16.866 19 7.0 105.0 30.0 10.00 0.167 4410.0 5.0108 1.97271 29.515 10 9.0 105.0 45.0 15,00 0.250 3780.0 4.2949 1.6909 25299 1 9.0 105.0 60.0 16.00 0.250 3780.0 4.2949 1.6909 25.299 Final Ksat 4.534 1.785 26.704 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY I Villari Brothers Date: 3/3/2022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB-8 Norfolk Temperature (F): 80 Number. Ksat 8 Horizon: E/Btl cm in Depth(inches): 18.0 Target Water Level: 15.2 6.0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 45.7 18.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: 16.5 6.5 CHT Tube(s) setting: - 40.6 16.0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0.001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Lev I Coversion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time 0 K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3/hr) (cm/hr) (in/hr) gaUft2/day 41 0.0 105.0 0.0 37.5 3.5 105.0 5.0 500 0.083 4410.0 5.0108 1.9727 29,515 33.5 4.0 105.0 20.0 15,00 0.250 1680.0 1.9089 0.7515 11.244 30.5 3.0 105.0 30.0 10.00 0.167 1890.0 2.1475 0.8455 12.649 28.5 2.0 105,0 40.0 10.00 0,167 1260.0 1,4315 0.5636 8.433 26.5 2.0 105,0 50.0 10.00 0,167 1260.0 1.4318 0.5636 8.433 24.5 2.0 105.0 60.0 10.00 0.167 1260.0 1,4315 0.5636 8.433 18.5 6.0 105.0 90.0 30.00 0.500 1260.0 1.4316 0.5536 8.433 12.5 6.0 105.0 120.0 30.00 0.500 1260.0 1 A316 0.5636 8.433 Final Ksat 1.432 0.664 j 8.433 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villari Brothers Date: 3/412022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB-8 Norfolk Temperature (F): 80 Number: Ksat 9 Horizon: Btl cm in Depth(inches): 24.0 SET a Target Water Level: 15.2 6.0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 61.0 24.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: 16.5 6.5 CHIT Tube(s) setting: 55.9 21.5 Hale diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0.001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Lev l Coversion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3/hr) (cmlhr) (in/hr) gal/ft2lday 41 0.0 105.0 0.0 35.8 5.2 105.0 20.0 20,00 0.333 1538.0 1,8611 0.7327 10.963 35A 0.4 106.0 30.0 10.00 0.167 252.0 0,2863 0.1127 1.687 34.5 0.9 105.0 40.0 10.00 0.167 567.0 0.6442 0.2536 3,795 33.5 1.0 105.0 50.0 10,00 0.167 630.0 0.7158 02818 4218 32.5 1.0 105.0 60.0 10.00 0.167 630.0 0.7158 0,2818 4.216 31.5 1.0 105.0 70.0 10.00 0,167 630.0 07158 02818 4.216 29.5 2.0 105.0 90.0 20.00 0.333 630.0 0.7158 02818 4.216 [ Final Ksat 0.676 0.266 i I SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Vlllari Brothers Date: 3*2022 Weather Condltion: Sunny Location: SB-8 Norfolk Temperature (F): 80 Number: Ksat 10 Horizon: Bt2 cm in Depth(inches): 34.0 SET UP Target Water Level: 15.2 6,0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 &0 � Hole Depth: 66.4 34.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: 16.5 6.5 i CHIT Tube(s) setting: = 81.3 31.5 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 crn Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient& 0,001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Lev I Coversion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Change in. Chamber Clock Elapsed Time 4 K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3fhr) (cm/hr) (in/hr) , gal1ft21day 36 0.0 105.0 0.0 27 9.0 105.0 2.0 2A0 0.033 28350.0 32.2121 12.6819 189.742 19 8.0 105:0 4.0 2.00 0.033 25200.0 28.6329 11.2728 168.659 16.5 2.5 105.0 5.0 1.00 0.017 15750.0 17.8956 7.0455 106,412 13.5 3.0 105.0 6.0 1.00 0.017 18900.0 21.4747 8A546 126.494 10.5 3.0 105.0 7.0 1 A0 0.017 18900.0 21.4747 8.4546 126.494 7.5 3.0 105.0 8.0 1,00 0.017 18900.0 21.4747 8.4546Ll 6.494 4.5 3.Q 105.0 9.0 1.00 0.017 18900.0 21.4747 8.45466,494 1.5 3,0 10&0 10.0 1,00 0.017 18900.0 21.4747 8,45466.494Final Ksat 21.475 8.4556.494 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTVITY STUDY V€llari Brothers _ Date: 3/4/2022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB-8 Norfolk Temperature (F): 8o Number: Ksat 11 Horizon: Bt3 cm in Depth(inches): 50.0 SET UP Target Water Level: 15.2 6.0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 127.0 50.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: - 16.5 6.5 CHIT Tube(s) setting: = 121.9 48.0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0.001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Lev I Coversion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm31hr) (cm/hr) (in/hr) gaIMJday 39 0,D 105.0 0.0 36 3.0 105.0 2.0 2.00 0.033 9450.0 10.7374 4.2273 63247 33 3.0 105.0 5.0 3.00 0,050 6300.0 7A582 2.8182 41165 28.5 4.5 105.0 10.0 5.00 0,083 5670.0 6.4424 2.5364 37.948 20.5 &0 105.0 20.0 10.00 0,167 5040.0 5.7266 2,2546 33.732 12.5 8.0 105.0 30.0 10.00 0.167 5040.0 5.7266 2,2546 33.732 9.5 3.0 1 D5.0 35.0 5.00 0,083 3780.0 42949 1.6909 25,299 8.5 3.0 105.0 40.0 5.00 0.083 3780.0 42949 1,6909 25.299 3.5 3.0 105.0 45.0 5.00 0.083 3780.0 4.2949 1.6909 25.299 Final Ksat 4.295 1.691 25.299 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Allan Brothers Date: 3/412022 Weather Condition: Sunny I Location: SB-9 Norfolk Temperature (F): 80 Number. Ksat 12 Depth(inches): 24.0 SET uP Target Water Level: 15.2 i 6.0 cm In Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth; 61.0 24,0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11 A 4.5 Head: - 16.5 6.5 CHIT Tubes) setting: 55.9 21.5 Hale diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 0 coefficient A: 0.001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Lei el Coversion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time a K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3/hr) (cmlhr ) (inmr) , galfft2lday 38 0.0 10&0 0.0 i 33 5.0 105.0 10.0 10.00 0.167 3150.0 a5791 1.4091 21.082 29 4.0 105.0 20.0 10.00 0,167 2520.0 2.8633 1.1273 16,866 22.5 6.5 105.0 40.0 20.00 0,333 2047.5 2.3264 0.9159 13,704 19.5 3.0 105.0 50.0 10.00 0,167 1890.0 2.1475 0.84551 12.649 12 7.5 105.0 75.0 25.DO 0.417 1890.0 2.1475 0.8455 12.649 10.8 1.2 105.0 80.0 5.00 0.083 1512.0 1.7180 0,67641 10.120 9.6 1.2 105.0 85.0 5.00 0,083 1512.0 1.7180 0.6764 10.120 3.5 6.1 105.0 110.0 25.00 0.417 15372 1.7466 0.6876 10,288 Final Ksat 1.728 0.680 10.176 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villarl Brothers Date: 314/2022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SS-9 Norfolk Temperature (F}: 80 Number: Ksat 13 Horizon: Bt3 cm in Depth(inches): 48.0 SET UP Target Water Level: 15.2 5.0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 121.9 48.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: 16.5 6.5 CHIT Tube(s) setting: = 116,8 46.5 Hale diameter (d): 0.0 cm Hole radius (r): 0.0 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: #DIV101 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Level Coversion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3thr) {cmlhr } (in/hr) gal/ft2lday 42 0.0 105.0 0.0 41.4 0.6 105.0 2.0 ZD0 0A33 1890.0 2.1475 0.8455 12.649 41 0.4 105.0 &0 3.00 0.050 840.0 0.9544 0.3758 5.622 40.3 0.7 105.0 10.0 5.00 0.083 882.0 1.0022 0.3945 5,903 37 3.3 105.0 35.0 25.00 0.417 831.6 0,9449 0.3720 5.566 36.5 0.5 105.0 40.0 5.00 0.083 630.0 0.7158 0.2818 4.216 36 0.5 105.0 45.0 5.00 0.083 630.0 0,7158 0,2818 4216 33.4 2.6 105.0 70.0 25,00 0.417 655.2 0.7445 0.2931i 4.385 29 4.4 105.0 115.0 45.00 0,750 616.0 0.6999 0.2756 i 4.123 Final Ksat 0.720 0.283 4.241 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villari Brothers Date: 3/1512022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB-44 Lynchburg Temperature IF): 55 Number: Ksat 14 Horizon: EIB cm in Depth(inches): 18.0 h20 @ 47" SET LIP Target Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Cm in Beginning Water Level' 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 45.7 18.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: 16.5 6.5 CHIT Tube(s) setting: = 40.8 16.0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm 1-ON 2-ON i i Factor 105.0 NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Level Coversion (C.F.): Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3lhr) (cm/hr) Qnlhr) gallft2/day 44 0,0 105.0 0.0 40 4.0 106.0 10.0 10.00 0.167 2520.0 2.8633 1,1273 16.866 39.6 0.4 105.0 15.0 5.00 0.083 504.0 0,5727 0.2255 3.373 39.2 0.4 105.0 20.0 5.00 0.083 504.0 0.5727 0.2255 3.373 38.8 0.4 105.0 25.0 5.00 0.083 504,0 0.5727 0.2255 3.373 37.5 1,3 105.0 30.0 5.00 0A83 1538.0 1.8611 0.7327 10.963 36.2 1.3 105.0 40.0 10.00 0.167 819.0 09306 0.3664 5.481 35 1.2 105.0 50.0 10.00 0.167 756.0 0.6590 0.3382 5.060 33.8 1.2 105.0 60.0 10,00 0.167 756.0 0.8590 0.3382 5.060 Final Ksat 0.883 0.348 5.200 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villari Brothers Date: 31IM022 Lynchburg Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB-44 Temperature (F): 55 Number: Ksat 15 Horizon: Bt1 cm in Depth(inches): 24.0 h2o @ -47" MWE Target Water Level: 16.2 6.0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 61.0 24.0 Ending Water Level: 152 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: 16.5 6.5 CHT Tubes) setting: = 55.9 22.0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0.001136 1-ON 2-ON 105.0 NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Levi I Caversian Factor (C.F.): Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (crnftr) (cm/hr) (inlhr) galfft2lday 38 0.0 105.0 0,0 37 1.0 105.0 20.0 20.00 0.333 315.0 0.3579 0.1409 2,108 35.8 1.2 10&0 50.0 30.00 0.500 252.0 0.2863 0.1127 1.687 35 0.8 105.0 70.0 20.00 0.333 252.0 0.2863 0.1127 1.687 34.6 0.4 105.0 80.0 10.00 0.167 252.0 0.2863 0.1127 1.687 34.3 0.3 105.0 90.0 10.00 0.167 189.0 0.2147 0.08451 1.265 34 0.3 105.0 100.0 10.00 0.167 189.0 0,2147 0.0845 1.265 33.7 0.3 105.0 110.0 10.00 0,167 189.0 0.2147 0.0845 1265 33A 0.3 105.0 120.0 10.00 0.167 189.0 0.2147 0.0845 1.265 Final Ksat 0.215 0.0851 1.265 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villari Brothers Date: 311512022 Lynchburg Weather Condition: Sunny Location. SB-42 Temperature (F): 55 Number: Ksat 15 Horizon: Btl cm in Depth(inches): 24.0 h20 a 40" SET UP Target Water Level: 15.2 6.0 cm In Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 61.0 24.0 Ending Water Level: 20.3 8.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: 16.5 6.5 CHIT Tube(s) setting: = 55.9 22.0 Hale diameter (d): 6.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0.000735 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Level Coversion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3lhr) (cm/hr) (inlhr)I gallft2lday 40.5 0,0 105.0 0.0 33 T5 105.0 30,0 30.00 0.500 1575.0 1.7896 i I 0.7046I 10.541 26 7.0 105.0 60.0 30.00 0,500 1470.0 1.6703 0.65761 9.83B 24 2.0 105.0 70.0 10,00 0.167 1260.0 1.4316 0,5636i 8.433 22 2.0 105.0 80.0 10.00 0.167 1280.0 1.4316 0.5636 8.433 20 2,0 105.0 90.0 10.00 0.167 1260.0 1.4316 0.5636 B-433 18 2.0 105.0 100.0 10.00 0.167 1260.0 1.4316 0.5636 8,433 16 2.0 105.0 110.0 10.00 0.167 1260.0 1.4316 0.5636 8.433 14 2,0 105.0 120.0 10.00 0.167 1260.0 1,4316 0.58381 8.433 Final Ksat 1,432 0.664 8.433 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villad Brothers Date: 311512022 Lynchburg Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB-42 Temperature fl: 55 Number. Ksat 17 Horizon: EIB cm in Depth(inches): 12.0 h2o (P 40" 99LUE Target Water Level: 15.2 6.0 cm n Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 30.5 12.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6,0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: 16.5 5.5 CHIT Tube(s) setting: = 25.4 10.0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0,001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Lev1a1 Covers ion Factor (C,F.): 105.0 I Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time 0 K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3lhr) (cm/hr) (in/hr) gallft2Jday 38.5 0.0 105.0 0.0 34.5 4.0 105.0 5.0 5.00 0.083 5040.0 5.7266 2.2545 33.732 31 3.5 105.0 10.0 5.00 0.083 4410.0 5.0108 1.9727 29,515 28.5 2.5 105.0 15.0 5.00 0,083 3150.0 3.5791 1,4091 21.082 26 2.5 105.0 20.0 5.00 0.083 3150.0 3.5791 1,4091 21,082 23.5 2.5 105.0 30.0 10,00 0.167 1575.0 1,7896 0.7046 10,541 21 2.5 105.0 40.0 10.00 0,167 1575.0 1.7898 0.7046 10.541 18.5 2.5 105.0 50.0 10.00 0.167 1575.0 1.7896 0.70461 10.541 16 2.5 105.0 60.0 10.00 0,167 1575.0 1.7896 0.70461 10,541 Final Ksat 1.790 0.705 10,541 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villari Brothers Date: 2r612014 Lynchburg Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB-40 Temperature tFJ: 55 I Number: Ksat 18 Horizon: ElB cm in Depth(inches): 12.0 h2o [ 37" $ET UR Target Water Level: 15.2 6.0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 30.5 12,0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: 16.5 6.5 CHT Tube(s) setting: = 25.4 10.0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0.001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based I on Ending Water Level Coversion Factor (C.F.)! 105.0 1 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time 0 K K K Reading Water Level C.F, Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm31hr) (cmlhr) (inlhr) gallft2/day 38 0.0 105.0 0.0 37.5 0.5 105.0 1.0 1.00 0.017 3150.0 3.5791 1.4091 21,082 35 2.5 105.0 5.0 4,00 0,067 3937.5 4.4739 1.7614 26.353 30 5.0 105.0 6.0 1.00 0,017 31500.0 35.7912 14.0910 210.824 24 6.0 105.0 7.0 1.00 0.017 37800.0 42.9494 16.9092 252.989 20.5 3.5 105.0 8.0 1.00 0.017 22050.0 25.0538 9.8637 147.577 17 3.5 105.0 10.0 2.00 0.033 11025.0 12.5269 4.9319 73.788 10 7.0 105.0 15.0 5.00 0.083 8820.0 10.0215 19455 59.031 Final Ksat 10.857 4.274 i &3.9fi0 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villari Brothers Date: 311512022 Lynchburg Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB-40 Temperature (F): 55 Number: Ksat 19 Horizon: Bt1 cm in Depth(inches): 24.0 h2o a 37" SET UP Target Water Level: 15.2 6,0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 61.0 24.0 Ending Water Level: 20.3 8.0 Reference: + 11,4 4.5 Head: 16.5 6.5 CHT Tube(s) setting: = 55,9 22.0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0,000511 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Level Coversion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3lhr) (cmlhr) (in/hr) gallft2lday 38 0.0 105.0 0.0 28.5 9.6 105.0 20.0 20.00 0,333 2992.5 3,4002 1.3386 20.028 25 3,5 105,0 30.0 10,00 0.167 2205,0 2,5054 0,9864' 14.758 21.5 3.5 105.0 40.0 10,00 0.167 2205.0 2,5054 0,9864 14.758 18 3.5 105.0 50.0 10.00 0,167 2205.0 2.5054 0.9864 14.758 14.5 3,5 105.0 60.0 10,00 0.167 2205.0 2.5054 0,9864 14,758 11 3.5 105.0 70.0 10.00 0,167 2205.0 2,5054 0,98641 14.758 7.5 3.5 105.0 80.0 10M 0,167 2205.0 2.5054 0,9864 14.758 4 3.5 105.0 90.0 10,00 0,167 2205.0 2.5054 0.9864 14,758 Final Ksat 2.505 0.986 14.758 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villari Brothers i Date: 4/412022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB56 Goldsboro Temperature (F): 68 Number: Ksat 20 Horizon: Bt1 cm n Depth(inches): 31.0 h20 >60" St=T UP Target Water Level: 15.2 6.0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 78.7 31.0 Ending Water Level: 152 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: - 16.5 6.5 CHT Tubes) setting: = 73.7 29.0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0.001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Le lel Coversion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3lhr) (cmlhr) (in/hr) gallft2lday 42 0.0 105.0 0.0 34.5 7.5 105.0 5.0 5,00 0.083 9450.0 10,7374 4,2273 63247 28 6.5 105.0 10,0 5.00 0.083 8190.0 9.3057 3.6637 54.814 23 5,0 106.0 15.0 5.00 OM3 6300.0 7.1582 2.8182 42.165 19 4.0 105.0 20,0 5.00 0.083 5040.0 5.7266 2.2546 33.732 15 4.0 105.0 25.0 5.00 0.083 5040.0 5.7266 2.2546 33,732 11 4,0 105.0 30,0 5.00 0.083 5040.0 6.7266 2.2546 33.732 7 4.0 105.0 35.0 5,00 0.083 5040.0 5,7265 2.2546 33.732 3 4.0 105.0 40.0 5.00 0.083 5040.0 5.7266 2,2546 33,732 Final Ksat 5.727 2.2551 1 33.732 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Milan Brothers Date: 4/412022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB 56 Goldsboro Temperature (F): 68 Number. Ksat 21 _ Depth(inches): 42.0 h2o >60" SETT Target Water Level: 15.2 fi.0 cm in Beginning Water Level 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth (cm): 105,7 42.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference (cm): + 11.4 4.5 Head (cm): 16.5 6.5 CHT Tubes) setting: - 101.6 40,0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0.001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Level Coversion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3lhr) (cm/hr) (in/hr) gal/ft2lday 40 0.0 105,0 0.0 33 7.0 105.0 5,0 5.00 0.083 8820.0 10.0215 3.9455 59.031 30 3.0 105.0 10,0 5.00 0.083 3780.0 4,2949 1.6909 25,299 28.5 3.5 10&0 15.0 5.00 0.083 4410.0 5.0108 1,9727 29,515 22,5 4.0 10&0 20.0 5.00 0.083 5040,0 5.7266 2,2546 33.732 19.5 3.0 105.0 25.0 5.00 0.083 3780.0 4.2949 1.6909 25,299 15.5 4.0 105.0 30.0 5.00 0,083 5040.0 5,7265 2.2546 33.732 12 3.5 105.0 35.0 5.00 0.083 4410.0 5.0108 1.9727 29.515 8.5 3.5 105,0 40.0 5.00 0.083 4410.0 5,0108 1.9727 29.515 Final Ksat 5.249 2.067 30.921 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villari Brothers Date: 4/42022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SR 57 Goldsboro Temperature (F): 68 Number. Ksat 22 Horizon: Bt1 cm in Depth(inches): 24.0 h2o >65" SET UP Target Water Level: 15.2 6.0 _ cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 61,0 24.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: 16.5 6.5 CHT Tubes) setting: = 55.9 22.0 Hole diameter (d): 5,0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0.001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Level Coversion Factor (C.F.): 105,0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (rain) (min) (hr) (cm3lhr) (cm/hr) (inlhr) gaVft2/day 35 0.0 105.0 0.0 30 5.0 105.0 2.0 2.00 OA33 15750.0 17.8956 7.0455 105.412 27 3.0 105.0 4.0 2.60 0.033 9450.0 10-7374 4.2273 63.247 24 3.0 105.0 6.0 2,00 ❑.033 9450.0 10-7374 4.2273 63,247 21 3.0 105.0 8.0 2,00 0.033 9450.0 10.7374 4.2273 63.247 19 2.0 105.0 10.0 2.00 0.033 6300.0 7.1582 2.8182 42.165 14 5.0 105.0 15,0 5.00 0.083 6300.0 7.1582 2,8182 42.165 9 5.0 105.0 20.0 5.00 0.083 6300.0 7.1582 2.8182 42.165 4 5,0 105.0 25.0 5,00 0.083 6300.0 7.1582 2.8182 42.165 Final Ksat 7.158 2.818 42.165 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villari Brothers Date: 4/4/2022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB 57 Goldsboro Temperature (F): 68 Number: Ksat 23 Horizon: Bt2 crn n Depth(inches): 30.0 SET UP Target Water Level: 152 &0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 152 6.0 Hole Depth: 76.2 30.0 Ending Water Level: 152 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: 16.5 6.5 CHT Tube(s) setting: = 71.1 30.0 Hole diameter (d): 5,0 cm Hale radius (r): 2.5 cm 1-ON 2-ON Covers on Factor (C.F.): 105.0 NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Level Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time 0 K K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3lhr) (cm/hr) (in/hr) gallrt2/day 38 0.0 105.0 0.0 30 8.0 106.0 30.0 30.00 0.600 1680,0 1.9089 0.7515 11,244 27 3.0 105.0 40,0 10.00 0,167 1890.0 2.1475 0.8455 12.649 25 2.0 105.0 50.0 10,00 0.167 1260.0 1.4316 0.56361 8.433 23 2.0 105.0 60.0 10.DD 0.167 1260.0 1.4316 0,5636 8.433 21 2.0 105.0 70.0 10.DO 0.167 1260.0 1.4316 0,5636 8,433 19 2.0 105.0 80.0 10A0 0,167 1260.0 1.4316 0.5636 8.433 17 2.0 105-0 90.0 10.00 0.167 1260.0 1.4316 0.5638 8.433 11 6.0 105.0 120.0 30.00 0.500 1260.0 1.4316 0.5636 8.433 final Ksat 1.432 0.564 8.433 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villari Brothers Date: 4/412022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB 57 Goldsboro Temperature (F): 68 Number: Ksat 24 Horizon: Bt3 cm in Depth(inches): 48.0 SET UR Target Water Level: 15.2 6.0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 121.9 48.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: - 16.5 6.5 CHT Tube(s) setting: 116.8 46.0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: a x coefficient A: 0.001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based an Ending Water Level Covers ion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time O K K K Reading Water Level G.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm31hr) (cmlhr) (inlhr) gallft2lday 40 0.0 105.0 0.0 33 7.0 105.0 5.0 5.00 0.083 8820,0 10.0215 3,9455 59.031 26 7.0 105.0 10.0 5.00 0,083 8520.0 10.0215 3.9455 59.031 22 4.0 105.0 20.0 10.00 0.167 2520.0 2.8633 1.1273 , 16.866 18 4.0 105.0 30.0 10.00 0,167 2520,0 2,8633 1.1273 16,866 14 4.0 105.0 40.0 10.00 DA67 2520.0 2.8633 1.1273 16.866 10 4.0 106.0 50.0 10,00 0.167 2520.0 2.8633 1.1273 16.866 6 4.0 105.0 60.0 10.00 0.167 2520.0 2.8633 1.1273 16,866 2 4,0 105.0 70.0 10.00 0,167 2520.0 2.8633 1.1273 16.866 Final Ksat 2,863 1.127 16.866 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY _ Villari Brothers Date: 4/4/2022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB 67 Goldsboro Temperature fl: 68 Number: Ksat 25 Horizon: Bt1 cm in Depth(inches): 18.0 SET UP Target Water Level: 15.2 6.0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 45.7 18.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: 16.5 6.5 CHT Tube(s) setting: = 40.6 16.0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0,001136 1-ON 2-ON F NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Level I Coversion actor (G.F.). 105.0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time 0 K K K Reading Water Level G.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3lhr) (cmlhr) (in/hr) gal/ft2Jday 40 0.0 105.0 0.0 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villarl Brothers Date: 4/5/2022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: S8 76 Autryville Temperature (F): 75 Number: Ksat 28 Horizon: BIE Cm in Depth(inches): 30 AMU Target Waiter Level: 15,2 6.0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15,2 6.0 Hale Depth: 76.2 30.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11 A 4.5 Head: 16.5 6.5 CHT Tube(s) setting: = 71.1 28.0 Hale diameter (d): 5.0 Cm i Hole radius (r): 2.5 Cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0.001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Le iel Covers ion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Reading Change In Water Level Chamber C,F, Clock Time (min) Elapsed Time (min) (hr) Q _ (cm3lhr) K (cm/hr) K (in/hr) 46 0.0 105,0 0.0 42 4.0 105.0 2.0 2.00 0.033 12600.0 %3165 5.63641 38 4.0 105.0 4A 2.00 0.033 12600.0 14.3165 5.6364 34 4.0 105.0 6.0 2.00 0.033 12,300.0 14.3165 5,6364 31 3.0 105.0 8.0 2,00 0.033 9450.D 10.7374 4.22731 29 2,0 105.0 10.0 2.00 0,033 8300.0 7.1582 2.8182, 22 7.0 105A 15.0 5.00 0,083 8820.0 10,0215 3.9451 16 6,0 105.0 20A 5.00 0.083 7660.0 8.5899 3,38181 10 6.0 105.0 25.0 5.00 0.083 7560.0 8.5899 3,3815; Final Ksat 9.067 3.570 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY VEllari Brothers Date: 4/5/2022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: 8876 Temperature (F): 76 Number. Ksat 29 Horizon: Bt1 cm in Depth(inches): 42 5Ei UP Target Water Level: 15,2 6.0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 106,7 42.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11A 4.5 Head; - 16.5 &.5 CHT Tube(s) setting: - 101.6 40.0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0.001136 Coverslan Factor (C.F.): 1-ON 105:0 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water terel Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K Read[ng Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm31hr) (cmlhr) (inlhr) 42 0.0 105.0 0.0 1 36 6.0 105.0 4.0 4.00 0,057 9450.0 10.7374 4.2273 33 3.0 105.0 6.0 2.00 0.033 9450,0 107374 4.227� 30 3.0 105.0 8.0 2.00 0.033 9450.0 10.7374 4,227; 28 2,0 105,0 10.0 2.00 0.033 6300.0 7.1582 2.818E 22 6,0 105.0 15.0 5.00 0.083 7660.0 8.5899 3.381q 16 6,0 105.0 20.0 5,00 0,083 7560.0 8.5899 3.381 12 4.0 105.0 22.5 2,50 0.042 10080.0 11.4632 4.5091 8 4.0 105.0 25,0 2.50 0,042 10080.0 11A532 4.500 30.5 M 10&0 20.0 20.00 0.333 2992.5 3.4002 1.3386 20.028 23.5 7.0 105A 40.0 20.00 0.333 2205.0 2.5054 0.9864 14.758 17 6.5 106.0 60.0 20.00 0.333 2047.5 2.3264 0.9159 13.704 15 2.0 105.0 70.0 10.00 0.167 1260.0 1.4316 0.5636 8.433 12.5 2.5 105.0 80.0 10.00 0.167 1575.0 1.7896 0.7046 10.541 10 2.5 105.0 90.0 10.00 0.167 1575.0 1.7896 0.7048 10.541 5 5.0 105.0 110.0 20.00 0.333 1575.0 1.7896 0.7046 10.541 2.5 2.5 105.0 120.0 10.00 0.167 1575.0 1.7896 0.7046 10.541 Final Ksat 1.790 0.706 10.641 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY i Villari Brothers Date: 4/412022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB 67 Goldsboro Temperature (F): 68 Number: Ksat 26 Horizon: Bt1 cm in Depth(inches): 30.0 SET UP Target Water Level: 15.2 6.p cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 76.2 30.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: - 16.5 6.5 CHT Tube(s) setting: - 71.1 28.0 Hale diameter (d): &0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0.001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Level Coversion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3thr) (cmlhr) (in/hr) 39 0.0 105.0 0.0 33.5 5.5 105.0 20,0 20.00 0.333 1732.5 1.9685 0.779 29.8 3.7 105.0 40.0 20:00 0.333 1165.5 1.3243 0.5214, 25.5 4.3 105.0 60.0 20.00 0.333 1354.5 1.5390 0.60591 24.3 1.2 105.0 70.0 10.00 0.167 756.0 0.8590 0.338 22.4 1.9 105.0 80.0 10.00 0A67 1197.0 1.3601 0.5355 20.5 1.9 105.0 90.0 10.00 0.167 1197.0 1.3601 i 0.5355I 16.7 3.8 105.0 110.0 20.00 0.333 1197.0 1.3601 0.5355 14.8 1.9 105.0 120.0 10.00 0.167 1197.0 1.3601 0.5355 Final Ksat 1.360 0.535' SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY _ Villa_n Brothers Date: 4/5/2022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB 76 Autryville Temperature (F): 75 Number: Ksat 27 Horizon: E cm In Depth(Inches): 24.0 SET UP Target Water Level: 15.2 6.0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 61.0 24.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: 16.5 6.5 CHT Tube(s) setting: - 55.9 22.0 Hale diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0,001136 1-ON 2-ON Coversion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Level Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3/hr) (cmlhr) (in/hr) 47 0.0 105.0 0.0 41 6.0 105.0 2.0 2.00 0.033 18900.0 21.4747 8.4644 30 11.0 105.0 5.0 3.00 0.050 23100.0 26.2469 10.333JJ4 15 15.0 105.0 10.0 5.00 0.083 18900.0 21.4747 8.4546 12 3.0 105.0 11.0 1.00 0.017 18900.0 21.4747 8.454 10 2.0 105.0 12.0 1.00 0.017 12600.0 14.3165 5.636 8 2.0 105.0 13.0 1.00 0.017 12600.0 14.3165 5.636 6 2.0 105.0 14.0 1.00 0.017 12600.0 14.3165 5.636� 4 2.0 105.0 15.0 1.00 0.017 12600.0 14,3165 5.6364 Final Ksat 14.316 5.636I SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villarl Brothers Date: 415120" Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB 78 Autryville Temperature (F): 75 Number. Ksat 28 Horizon: B1E cm in Depfth(inches): 30 S Target Water Level: 15.2 6.0 i cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 76.2 30.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.6 Head: - 16.5 6.5 CHT Tube(s) setting: - 71.1 28.0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0.001136 1-ON Coverslon Factor (C.F.): 105.0 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm3fhr) (cm/hr) (inihr) 46 0.0 105.0 0.0 42 4.0 105.0 2.0 2.00 0.033 12600.0 14.3165 5.6364 38 4.0 105.0 4.0 2.00 0.033 12600.0 14.3105 5.6364 34 4,0 105.0 5.0 2.00 0.033 12600.0 14,3165 5.6364 31 3.0 105.0 8.0 2.00 0,033 9460.0 10.7374 4.2273 29 2.0 105.0 10.0 2.D0 0.033 6300,0 7.1582 2.8182 22 7.0 105.0 16.0 5,00 0.083 8820.0 10.0216 3:9455 16 8.0 105.0 20.0 5.00 0.083 7560.0 8.5899 3.3818 10 6.0 105:0 25.0 5,00 0.083 7580.0 8.5899 3.3818 Final Mat 9.067 3.570 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Vlllari Brothers Date: 4/612022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB 76 Temperature (F): 75 Number. Ksat 29 Horizon: Bill cm in Depth(inches): 42 UMUE Target Water Level: 15.2 6.0 cm In Beginning Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Hole Depth: 106.7 42.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: 16.5 6.5 CHT Tube(s) setting: = 101.6 40.0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coeff!dent A: 0.001136 Coversion Factor (C.F.): 1-ON 105.0 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Lev Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm31hr) (cmlhr) (in/hr) 42 0.0 105.0 0.0 36 6.0 105.0 4.0 4.00 0.067 9450.0 10.7374 4.2273 33 3.0 105,0 6.0 2.00 0.033 9450.0 10.7374 4.2273 30 3.0 105.0 8.0 2.00 0,033 9450.0 10.7374 4.2273 28 2.0 105.0 10.0 2,00 0,033 6300.0 7,1582 2.8182 22 6.0 105.0 16.0 5.00 0.083 7560.0 8.5899 3.38181 16 6.0 105.0 20.0 5.00 0,063 7560.0 6.5899 3.3818 i 12 4.0 105.0 22.5 2.50 0.042 10080.0 11.4532 4.5091 8 4.0 105.0 2&0 2.50 0,042 10080.0 11.4532 4,5091 Final Ksat 10.499 i 4.1331 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villari Brothers Date: 415/2022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB 76 Temperature IF)_ 78 Number: Ksat 30 Horizon: Bt2 cm in Depth(inches): 54 T U Target Water level: 15.2 8.0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 BA Hole Depth: 137.2 54.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: - 16.5 6.5 CHT Tube(s) setting: = 132.1 52.0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0,001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Level Coversion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Reading Change in Water Level Chamber C.F. Clock Time (min) Elapsed Time Q (min) (hr) (cm3lhr) K (cm/hr) K (in/hr)' 37 0.0 105.0 0.0 29 8.0 105.0 1.0 1,00 0,017 50400.0 57.2669 22.6456 21 8.0 106.0 2.0 1.00 0.017 50400.0 57.2659 22.5455 13 8.0 105.0 3.0 1.00 0.017 60400.0 57.2669 22.6456 5 8.0 105.0 4.0 1.00 0.017 50400.0 67.2659 22.6450 0 5.0 105.0 0.0 4,00 -0.087-7875.0 -8.9478 -3.5220 0 0.0 105.0 0.0 0.00 O.00O #DIVIOI #DIVIOI #DIV/l?! 0 0,0 105.0 0.0 0,00 0.000 #DIVIOI #DN101 #DIVIO', 0 0.0 105.0 0.0 0.00 0.000 #DIVIO! #DIVI01 #DIV/0! Final Ksat 57.262 22.54 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villad Brothers Date: 4/5/2022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB 70 Temperature (F): 78 Number: Ksat 31 Horizon: Bt1 cm in Depth(inches): 33 5E7 UP Target Water Level 15.2 BA cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 &0 Hole Depth: 818 33.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4,5 Head: 16.5 6.5 CHT Tube(s) setting: = 78.7 310 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0,001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Le vel Coversion Factor (C.F.): 10&0 Water Change in Chamber Cluck Elapsed Time Q K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (em31hr) (CM/hr) (inlhr 39 0.0 105.0 0.0 36 310 105.0 1.0 1.00 0.017 18900.0 21.4747 8.45 33 3.0 106.0 2.0 1.00 0,017 18900,0 21-4747 8A540 31 2.0 105,0 3.0 1.00 0,017 12600,0 14,3165 5.6364L 28 3,0 105.0 4.0 1.00 0.017 18900.0 21.4747 6.4544 25 3.0 105.0 5.0 1,00 0,017 18900,0 21,4747 8.454� 15 10.0 105.0 10.0 5.00 0.083 12600.0 14,3165 5.636� 5 10.0 105.0 15,0 5,00 0.083 12600.0 14.3166 5,6360 1 4.0 105.0 17.0 2.00 0.033 12600.0 14.3165 5.6364 Final Ksat 14.316 5.636 SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY STUDY Villari Brothers Date: 4/5/2022 Weather Condition: Sunny Location: SB 70 Temperature (F): 78 Number: Ksat 32 Horizon: Bt2 cm in Depth(inches): 53 Target Water Level: 15.2 6.0 cm in Beginning Water Level: 15.2 &0 Hole Depth: 134.6 53.0 Ending Water Level: 15.2 6.0 Reference: + 11.4 4.5 Head: 16.5 6.5 CHT Tube(s) setting: = 129.6 51.0 Hole diameter (d): 5.0 cm Hole radius (r): 2.5 cm Valve Setting: 0 x coefficient A: 0,001136 1-ON 2-ON NOTE: Readings based on Ending Water Level Coversion Factor (C.F.): 105.0 Water Change in Chamber Clock Elapsed Time Q K K Reading Water Level C.F. Time (min) (min) (hr) (cm31hr) (cmlhr (inlhr) I 39 0.0 105.0 0.0 i 35 4.0 105.0 5,0 5.00 0.083 5040,0 5.7288 2.2546i 32 3.0 105.0 10,0 5.00 0.083 3780.0 4.2949 1.6909 29 3.0 105.0 15.0 5.00 0.083 3780,0 4.2949 1.5909 26 3.0 106.0 20.0 5.00 0,083 3780.0 4,2949 1.6909 21 5.0 105.0 30.0 10.00 0,167 3150.0 3.5701 1.4091 16 5,0 105.0 40,0 10.00 0.167 3150.0 3.5791 1.4091 11 5.0 105.0 50.0 10.00 0,167 3150.0 3.5791 1.40111 6 5,0 105.0 60.0 10.00 0.167 3150.0 3.5791 1.4091 Final Ksat 3.679 1.4091 ATTACHMENT 3 SOIL SAMPLING LAB RESULTS -1D- III Meherrin Location Warsaw Grower Kornegay Farms Faris Warsaw farm Master Sail Book Meld Sample Summary Overview Area Centroid 312.0 acres 34.983196,-78.079402 Min Max Avg P 149.0 858.0 VH 397.66 VH K 215.0 698.0 VH 449,56 VH Mg 112.0 208.0 1 fiQ.25 11 IT!� ; I ; Ca 886.0 2436.0 VH 156a94 H Na 0.1 0.2 0.12 S 28.0 86.0 H 47,66 B 0.5 1.4 0.83 ;M p ' r Cu 4.7 16.9 VH 8.63 H {l Fe 220.0 H 474.0 VH 371,53 H l.. t Mn &0 41,0 16.22 Zn 9,5 35,0 VH 17.85 VH 1 1 PI 62,0 358.0 165.72 KI 55.0 179.0 114,94 SI 29.0 90.0 49.69 OIL9 Cul 118.0 422.0 215,88 Mnl 25.0 128.0 50.72 Znl 119.0 438.0 223.19 5 pH 5.5 6.9 6118 apH 7.45 7.95 7.75 17 CEC 4.0 a's 6.28 1 Y K 6.4 14.0 9.2 9 `Y Mg B.5 14.4 10.76 13 12 %Ca 42.7 78.4 61.53 RLH 2.9 37.8 1 16.59 its %Na 1.3 3.5 1.92 115 "t AC 0.2 2.2 1.01 9S 61.5 97.07 83.07 HM 0.26 4.09 1,26 ESP 110 4.0 2.03 ID f' K Mg Ca lbs/ac Ibsiac Na S B Cu Fe Mn Zn pl KI SI Cul Mnl Zni bpH CEC %K %Mg %Ca i%H %Na AC SS HM Ibslac Ibslac meq lbslac lbslac Ibslac Ibslac Ibslac Ibsfac pH meq % % % Ia % ESF meq % % Farm Name Field Name Sample Date Sail Lab j Warsaw farm 1 2021-12-27 Waters NC 149.0 361.0 146.0 1743 0.1 47.0 0.8 6.0 330.0 8.0 13.7 am 62.0 92.0 49.0 150.0 25.0 171.0 6.2 7.75 6.5 7.1 9.3 66.7 ' 5.3 1.5 1.0 84.5 1.7 2.0 Farm Name Field Name Sample Date Soil Lab Warsaw farm 2 2021-12-27 Waters N 1 411.0 581.0 190.0 1999 0.1 32.0 1 A 9.3 4321 13.0 17.1 171.0 149.0 33.0 232.0 41.6 214.0 6.7 7,85 7.2 10.3 10.9 69.0 1.5 0.6 91.70.9 2.0 2 242.0 600.0 205.0 2152 0.1 50.0 1.3 7.4 334.09.0 10.2 101.0 153.0 52.0 185.0 28.0 128.0 6.3 7.70 8.3 9.2 10.3 64.6 �1.3 4.4 1.5 1.2 85A 1.8 1.0 3 34-4.0 514.0 153.0 1228 0.1 33.0 1.0 10.8 363.0 15.0 19.1 143.0 131.0 34.0 270.0 47.0 239.0 6.5 7.80 5.3 12.5 12.1 58.4 15.2 1.7 0.8 84.5 0.9 2.0 4 793.0 499.0 174.0 1851 0.1 40.0 0.9 13.2 455.0 17.0 26.9 330.0 128.0 42.0 330.0 53.0 336.0 6.2 7.76 7.1 9.0 10.2 65.3 4.1 1 A 1.0 85.8 0.7 1.0 5 659.0 398.0 153.0 1322 0.1 42.0 0.7 11.8 454.0 13.0 23.6 275.0 102.0 44.0 295.0 41.0 295.0 5.9 7.65 5.9 8.6 10.7 55.6 3,5 1.6 1.4 76.1 0.4 2.0 Farm Name Field Name Sample Date Soil Lab Warsaw farm 4 2021-12-27 Waters N 1 280.0 430.0 160.0 1385 0.1 57.0 0.7 8.5 418.0 17.0 12.6 117.0 110.0 59.0 212.0 53.0 158.0 5.8 7.60 6.4 8.7 10.5 54.4 5.1 1.4 1.6 74.5 1.2 1.0 Farm Name Field Name Sample Date Soil Lab Warsaw farm 5 2021-12-27 Waters N 1 462.0 486.0 200.0 1947 0. f 58.0 0.8 11.4 407.0 16.0 22.6 192.0 124.0 60.0 285.0 50.0 282.0 6.4 7.85 7.1 8.8 11.8 68.6 .5 2.1 0.6 91.3 1.4 2.0 Farm Name Field Name Sample Date Soil Lab Warsaw farm 6 2021-12-27 Waters Nit 1 572.0 644.0 144.0 1059 0.1 55.0 0.6 9.2 351.0 16.0 21.5 238.0 165.0 57.0 230.0 50.0 269.0 5.5 7.50 6.2 13.3 9.7 42.7 $2.2 2.1 2.0 67.1 1.0 2.0 Warsaw 01/03/22 08:42 AM 1/12 Al O N C N � v fV1 � c +y O L L CL � J 0- z � 4S1 e a� vI Q C I C C C C C C C C v' 'g Ph n b ri 04 4i i niNa IL M CO0 C c l s A co 000 m a3 m 0 N c co �O OIP. G1��.r os 1,119 9 e[i tei w to rn to 1 CO. 0 It {li N N N N N N r N N C7 � 1 iL log®Ic+�0 Opt 40 C� C5 '.i CM- I M M i Q! M iO^l c An � � � N';N T11N N �N C'7 C n LO It 1� © CO [y CO N CO O O9 N ff7 = cR 49 c0 't r cl V eq 0? M fl uri to to w to w m w u5 0 Cp M YO7 C67 La A ems^ tT lC} 0 0 CA Ch P CA Y C%lp Loiw vow LO 1 CO �a �Mo �mV,RR � � �LaC9LnI Lni La C9 NNNN mN —lcmIm I*ILDIcolr- ImIMIC �izs c U � 8 d 7 a U CC, 67 p U x c LU a �LU er N C7 u 0 E 0 _ i E a U, m m I z ch m M M 0 W M M a/ VL a $ u V C O r O O C? r NA 0 m S V f E N E Lo I Of Al {L '0 Z a © o o a o 0 0 G U f O p i w z w z N z w z w w z z w z of z N z w z t7 L? U C'} C7 C7 C7 t7 C� t9 I ■ r N M V W) m I- 0 07 O rn 0 CO in C {0 C7 �p ld � � d .C7 E z Loa 0 a 1° C T t CL CI IL) C? y L a CU a A {ap C J 0 Q co N Q co C C7 r JR V 0 r0+ O r z , a 0J Qi z ■L - -` — � a U a `S cle cc c c c r N O II bY7 N 0 a a a o Q'o cc a.— a a c z a m to m cra w 0•;rn ml [N N LS7 3! to R R r [Ji W f T�;�- a a ci o a d in w co r p i p r" to <0 S] .N r LA r Q1 t!7 m N ti pp N .� tt C N N r r C? [+] r r _ � co d n Q7 IV iV 04 r t2 r c7 <+1 r r Y � i sd Ll Uy Z [") Y o 4 a t0 o N q7 a N K4 a [] N C? C O d L; J a r f0 �CG C9 M l0 fD C1 SO c0 �[O R �G X � m g � � -• R eh to ca CH i N T�A IrC'7�6 Oj� 0. N1NIN�MIN'Ir �g O) O NIm [wl ,110 u`# m � e Mlcn C9 3 $ d� 1 r r m 1� I L Ti 4 I a —� a 0 A C4 4) Y O Q ' CL a !6 e - 0 ,.� a Z 4 4 4;O�C Fig r C w g C7 O O C1 O r r i? Q1 I � U) U) . co (D U) w U) _zzz_zzzz ii i,ix aC7C9C0c,o. <2; N So U) U, to (n U] it r N w c7 r Y r in r w r r r M U 0 G 0 a w 0 E 0 c 0 f� c m S. Ul a o E O ` Fm ❑ y U °1 Z � _r O � C M o m m E E z C a O m v m c � A a y w 0 w E Cm Y a t m 0 CY 'yeJ cc € E m U) o g m a � c E� v IU _ :c ll r Hydrogeologic and Spray Capacity Report Villari Brothers Foods Warsaw, North Carolina Prepared for: Villari Brothers 1012 US Highway 117 South Warsaw, NC 28398 and Cavanaugh Solutions 1904 Eastwood Road, Suite 205 Wilmington NC 28403 December 9, 2022 Eric G. Lappala, P.E., P.H. Advocacy Sound Science Innovation Solutions 215 West Moore Street Southport, NC 28461 Jraie kke ar6c Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Disclaimer...........................................................................................................................................................................................................2 Purpose................................................................................................................................................................................................................2 Approach.............................................................................................................................................................................................................4 Physiographic, Geologic and Hydrogeologic Setting.................................................................................................. 4 Physiography..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 RegionalGeology.............................................................................................................................................................................................4 FieldInvestigation................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Soil Evaluation and Testing Installationof New Monitoring Wells....................................................................................................................................................9 Water Levels and Hydraulic Conductivity Testing............................................................................................................................9 Rechargeand Discharge...........................................................................................................................................................................11 Precipitation...................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Soils........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 Vegetationand Land Cover......................................................................................................................................................... 13 GroundwaterRecharge................................................................................................................................................................. 14 MOUNDING ANALYSIS MODEL.........................................................................................................................................16 ModelGrid.......................................................................................................................................................................................................16 BoundaryConditions...................................................................................................................................................................................16 ModelCalibration.........................................................................................................................................................................................16 MOUNDING ANALYSIS.........................................................................................................................................................18 WaterBalance.......................................................................................................................................................................31 Conclusions............................................................................................................................................................................32 ATTACHMENT 1 Logs of Borings.....................................................................................................................................33 ATTACHMENT 2 Convergent Water Balance..............................................................................................................37 1 ea* &5arce5 Figures Figure 1.Project Location, Proposed Sprayfields and Wet Weather Storage . ...........................3 Figure 2.-- Water Supply Wells and Line of Section shown in Figure 3........................................5 Figure 3..-- Section from WW-4 to WW-5.....................................................................................6 Figure 4.-Field investigation locations.........................................................................................7 Figure 5.-- Fit between water levels recorded in TW-2 and modeled using the Air Permeability Method...................................................................................................................................10 Figure 6.-- Annual precipitation series used to determine the 80th%o wet year .............................11 Figure 7.-- Soil Series used for SWAT Model..............................................................................12 Figure 8.-- Land use and land cover used for the SWAT model..................................................13 Figure 9.-- Cumulative annual distribution and monthly recharge computed with the SWAT model.....................................................................................................................................14 Figure 10.-- Average monthly water balance components from the SWAT model and the 80th% wet precipitation and deep percolation values.......................................................................15 Figure 11.Calibrated hydraulic conductivity zones for the surficial unit and Polaris Ksat values usedas a zonation guide........................................................................................................17 Figure 12.-- Results of model calibration......................................................................................18 Figure 13.--Areas with modeled depth to watertable 1 foot or less (red areas) February ............ 20 Figure 14.--Areas with modeled depth to watertable 1 foot or less (red areas) March ................ 21 Figure 15.--Areas with modeled depth to watertable 1 foot or less (red areas) for April . ............ 22 Figure 16.--Areas with modeled depth to watertable 1 foot or less (red areas) for May . ............. 23 Figure 17.--Areas with modeled depth to watertable 1 foot or less (areas) for June.....................24 Figure 18.--Areas with modeled depth to watertable 1 foot or less (red areas) for July . .............. 25 Figure 19.--Areas with modeled depth to watertable 1 foot or less (red areas) for August .......... 26 Figure 20.--Areas with modeled depth to watertable 1 foot or less (red areas) for September.....27 Figure 21.--Areas with modeled depth to watertable 1 foot or less (red contours) for October...28 Figure 22.--Areas with modeled depth to watertable 1 foot or less (red contours) for November. ...............................................................................................................................................29 Figure 23.--Areas with modeled depth to watertable 1 foot or less (red contours) for December. ...............................................................................................................................................30 Tables Table 1.-- Thickness and top elevations of hydrogeologic units beneath the site ...........................4 Table 2.-- Ksat Tests Conducted by PSS.........................................................................................8 Table 3.-- Well construction details and slug tests on three new monitoring wells.......................9 Table 4.-- Water levels in existing and new monitoring wells........................................................9 Table 5.-- Hydraulic Conductivity from Slug Tests......................................................................10 Table 6.-- Hydraulic conductivities of the modeled units for the calibrated model......................18 Table 7.Monthly drainage coefficients and resultant irrigation rates used for mounding analysis and water balance....................................................................................................19 Table 8.Wastewater storage surface areas and volumes for the water balance .........................31 Table 9.-- Summary of the convergent water balance...................................................................31 i INTRODUCTION This report documents the results of the hydrogeologic investigation, mounding analysis, and water balance to evaluate the capacity of areas within a new sprayfields on property under the control of Villari Brothers Foods which is located on approximately 281 acres as shown in Figure 1. These areas are being permitted to receive treated wastewater effluent under 15A NCAC.02T. This report provides the analyses and information required for the Hydrogeologic and Water Balance reports under 15A NCAC.092T.0504(e). This work was performed by Eagle Resources, P.A. for the Villari Food Group. The Soil Scientist and Agronomic Evaluation for the project as required by 15A NCAC.0504(b) were conducted by Protocol Sampling Services Inc. under subcontract to Eagle Resources for this project. The Soil Scientist and Agronomic Report is being provided as a separate document'. Disclaimer Analyses contained in this report relied upon topographic, surveying, and engineering data and information provided by the others. We have reviewed this information and found it to be consistent with acceptable industry standards of practice and state and federal regulations and guidelines. However, Eagle Resources P.A. makes no representations regarding the completeness, accuracy and reliability of that data and information. Purpose This hydrogeologic study was conducted to conform with the requirements of 15A NCAC 02T.0504(e): (1) a description of the regional and local geology and hydrogeology; (2) a description, based on field observations of the site, of the site topographic setting, streams, springs and other groundwater discharge features, drainage features, existing and abandoned wells, rock outcrops, and other features that may affect the movement of the contaminant plume and treated wastewater; (3) changes in lithology underlying the site; (4) depth to bedrock and occurrence of any rock outcrops; (S) the hydraulic conductivity and transmissivity of the affected aquifer(s); (6) depth to the seasonal high water table; (7) a discussion of the relationship between the affected aquifers of the site to local and regional geologic and hydrogeologic features; (8) a discussion of the groundwater flow regime of the site prior to operation of the proposed facility and post operation of the proposed facility focusing on the relationship of the system to groundwater receptors, groundwater discharge features, and groundwater flow media; and (9) if the SHWT is within six feet of the surface, a mounding analysis to predict the level of the SHWT after wastewater application. ' Protocol Sampling Services Inc.,2022: Soil Scientist and Agronomic Report Villari Foods Group Sprayfields Warsaw NC. 2 We &arzes 71 1 :wrkrtiliil�� 1V -.-� --► -If '• y�yarr.i�r.-ri-�{` # Property Evaluated Groundwater Model Boundary 1 I t 2,500 0 2,500 5,000ft,. = !F `' LOCATION MAP EXPLANATION -- 100-Foot Setback from NFWS Wetland Boundary -100 foot Setback ILne from Wetlands Mapped for this Project -- Wetland Boundary Mapped for this Project — Topographic Contours: Surveyed within Property LIDAR Outside - - Property Line Setback - - Duke Power ROW O Proposed Pivots WW Storage 092822 -- Surveyed Property Line (Blanchard) 600 Zane 7a 0 600 1,200 Figure]. Project Location, Proposed Sprayfields and Wet Weather Storage, 1,800 2,400 Ft 3 Approach The analyses documented in this report are summarize by the following approach: • Documenting the regional physiographic, geologic and hydrogeologic setting; • Field investigation of hydrogeologic conditions; • Construction and calibration of a three-dimensional groundwater flow model; • Preparation of a water balance to assess wet weather storage and loading rates; and • Watertable mounding analysis with the groundwater flow model. Physiographic, Geologic and Hydrogeologic Setting The conceptual model of the physiography, geology, and hydrogeology of the Project is based upon regional studies and information, supplemented by site -specific information from field investigations. Physiography The Project and the surrounding area are located in western edge of the Coastal Plain Physiographic Province of North Carolina. Based upon topography from LIDAR mapping by the NC Floodplain Mapping Information System', the site comprises flat to slightly to moderately sloping areas that drain to Stewarts Creek and its western tributary as shown on Figure 1. Land surface slopes average 1 percent and are as high as 60 percent on the eastern edge of the property sloping towards Stewarts Creek. Land surface elevations range from 111 to 151 feet and average 136 feet, NAVD88. All subsequent references to elevations I this report refer to the NAVD88 Datum. Regional Geology The site is underlain by a series of aquifers and intervening confining units that dip and thicken to the east from the western boundary of the coastal plain which is located along the so-called fall -line that is approximately parallel to Interstate 95'. The surficial soils at the site are underlain by these units at the depths and thicknesses shown in Table 1. Unit Thickness Elevation of Top Avgerage Minimum Maximum Avgerage Minimum Maximum Feet Feet Feet Feet Feet Feet Surficial 37 20 46 136 111 151 Peedee Confining Unit 7 9 7 99 91 105 Peedee Aquifer 32 30 33 92 82 98 Black Creek Confinng Unit 40 38 40 60 52 65 Black Creek Aquifer 139 138 141 20 14 25 Table 1.-- Thickness and top elevations of hydrogeologic units beneath the site. z https:Hsdd.nc.gov/DataDowrdoad.aspx s Winner, M.D, and R.W..Coble, 1996: Hydrogeologic Framework of the North Carolina Coastal Plain, Regional Aquifer - System Analysis, North Atlantic Coastal Plain: U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1404-I. 0 ) �a je Z!5am-5 The Peedee Aquifer is not being used as a water supply in the area surrounding the site. The underlying Black Creek Aquifer is used as a water supply for the four (4) wells shown on Figure 2 for the Town of Warsaw. Figure 6 is a cross section of the units from the Surficial Aquifer through the Black Creek Aquifer along a line connecting WW-4 and WW-5. w i WW 2 4 ' Test 6-2 l . _ WIN 3' _ I -t WIN'. Is ' ' •. ,.w Test 6-1 1 +l/ I' 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 ft Figure 2.-- Water Supply Wells and Line of'Section shown in Figure 3. 5 We &arzes Southwest MWANTMI. Section through Coastal Plain Sediments Surficol Sandy Clay Surficial Clayey Sand Peedee Confining Unit Peedee Aquifer Black Creek Confining Unit Black Creek Aquifer Feet (U.S. Survey) 50 = 100 Verticall Exaggeration: 8X Figure 3..-- Section from WW-4 to WW-5 Field Investigation Surfcial Sand Northeast Site -specific hydrogeologic conditions were by field tests conducted by Protocol Sampling Service, Inc under subcontract to Eagle Resources and included a wetlands mapping, soils mapping , Ksat testing, installation and slug testing of piezometers and test wells, and water level measurements. Figure 4 shows the locations for these tests. I We &arzes 0 MT EXPLANATION -- Property Line Soil Series Mapped by PSS I Autryville II Norfok III Goldsboro IV Lynchburg V Bibb VI Mc VII Bba • PSS Soil Borings ♦ PSS Ksat Test Sites Piezometers and Test Wells ti • r S y T%V-2 • PZ-z I 4 j 500 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Ft Figure 4. Field investigation locations. 151 We &-as-ces Soil Evaluation and Testing The Soil Scientist evaluation included 68 soil borings and hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) tests at 12 locations shown on Figure 4. The locations and soil profile descriptions for the borings are provided in the Soil Scientist report. The Ksat tests were conducted at multiple depths at each location to determine the least permeable soil horizon at representative locations in or near proposed sprayfields. The location of the soil borings and Ksat tests were determined by GPS by PS S. The results of the Ksat tests are included in Table 2. Location Test Number Soil Grou Soil Series Horizon Depth Ksat Inches Cm in/hr cm/hr ft/day SB-5 1 I Autryville A 18 46 8.455 21.48 16.91 SB-5 2 Btl 40 102 1.691 4.30 3.38 SB-5 4 E' 1 48 122 5.636 14.32 1 11.27 SB-5 5 B'tB't2 60 152 5.636 14.32 11.27 SB-7 6 II Norfolk Btl 18 46 0.107 0.27 0.21 SB-7 7 Bt2 32 81 2.748 6.98 5.50 SB-7 8 Bt3 53 135 1.785 4.53 3.57 SB-8 8 II Norfolk E/Btl 18 46 0.564 1.43 1.13 SB-8 9 Btl 24 61 0.266 0.68 0.53 SB-8 10 Bt2 34 86 8.455 21.48 16.91 SB-8 11 Bt3 50 127 1.691 4.30 3.38 SB-9 12 II Norfolk Btl 24 61 0.68 1.73 1.36 SB-9 13 Bt3 48 122 0.283 0.72 0.57 SB-44 14 IV Lynchburg EB Btl 18 24 46 61 0.348 0.085 0.88 0.22 0.70 0.17 SB-44 15 SB-42 16 IV Lynchburg Btl EB 24 12 61 30 0.564 0.705 1.43 1.79 1.13 1.41 SB-42 17 SB-40 18 IV Lynchburg EB Btl 12 24 30 61 4.274 0.986 10.86 2.50 8.55 1.97 SB-40 19 SB-56 20 III Goldsboro Btl 31 79 2.255 5.73 4.51 SB-56 21 Bt2 42 107 2.067 5.25 4.13 SB-57 22 III Goldsboro Btl 24 61 2.818 7.16 5.64 SB-57 23 Bt2 30 76 0.564 1.43 1.13 SB-57 24 Bt3 48 122 1.127 2.86 2.25 SB-67 25 III Goldsboro Btl 18 46 0.705 1.79 1.41 SB-67 26 Btl 30 76 0.535 1.36 1.07 SB-76 27 I Autryville E 24 61 5.636 14.32 11.27 SB-76 28 B/E 30 76 3.57 9.07 7.14 SB-76 29 Bt2 42 107 4.133 10.50 8.27 SB-76 30 Btl 54 137 22.54 57.25 45.08 SB-70 31 I Autryville Bt2 30 76 5.636 14.32 11.27 SB-70 32 Bt2 32 81 1.409 3.58 2.82 Table 2.-- Ksat Tests Conducted by PSS We Pesai-ces Installation of New Monitoring Wells PSS installed piezometers and test wells shown on Figure 4. The logs and Well Completion Records are included in Attachment 1. The well construction details for these wells is included in Table 3. Site ID Easting Northing Ground Elevation Top of Casing Elevation Screeed Depths NAD83 Ft NAD83 Ft NAVD88 Ft NAVD88 Ft Ft TW-1 1 2,275,956 448,634 148.46 150.26 8.8 - 13.8 TW-2 2,277,130 447,516 133.90 135.90 16.5-21.5 PZ-2 2,276,952 447,128 126.60 128.10 9.0 - 12.0 PZ-3 2,275,042 450,349 146.35 149.35 13.0 - 18.0 PZ-4 2,276,027 449,715 146.50 148.00 13.5 - 16.5 PZ-5 2,275,211 448,338 146.55 150.55 11.0 - 16.0 PZ-6 2,277,146 448,856 141.50 146.00 20.0 -25.0 TW-3 2,275,092 449,512 149.40 150.40 13.0 - 18.0 PZ-7 2,274,937 1 450,210 148.40 150.90 12.5 - 17.5 DW-1 2,276,906 1 448,926 143.90 145.40 25.0.30.0 Table 3.-- Well construction details and slug tests on three new monitoring wells. . The locations, ground surface elevations, and top of casing elevations were surveyed by Blanchard Surveying 4 and these data were provided as both a drawing file and pdf. Water Levels and Hydraulic Conductivity Testing Three rounds of water level measurements were completed in the new and existing monitoring wells used for model calibration as shown in Table 4. Top Casing Water Level Depth and Elevation 3/25/22 5/9/22 5/19/22 6/1/22 Average Elev Depth Elevation Depth Elevation Depth Elevation Depth Elevation Depth Elevation Well NAVD88 Ft NAVD88 Ft NAVD88 Ft NAVD88 Ft NAVD88 Ft NAVD88 PZ-2 128.1 7.5 120.6 8.75 119.35 n/m n/m 9.58 118.52 8.61 119.49 PZ-3 148.35 6.85 141.5 8.28 140.07 8.52 139.83 8.65 139.7 8.08 140.28 PZ-4 148.00 15.5 1 132.5 15.9 132.1 n/m n/m n/m n/m 15.70 1 132.30 PZ-5 150.55 8.24 142.31 9.32 141.23 9.5 141.05 9.62 140.93 9.17 141.38 PZ-6 146.00 21.3 124.7 22.3 123.7 22.45 123.55 22.63 123.37 22.17 123.83 PZ-7 150.90 6.18 144.72 7.5 143.4 7.7 143.2 7.75 143.15 7.28 143.62 TW-1 150.26 5.75 144.51 7.17 143.09 7.45 142.81 7.68 142.58 1 7.01 143.25 TW-2 135.90 14.72 1 121.18 14.33 121.57 14.65 121.25 14.8 121.1 14.63 121.28 TW-3 150.40 10.45 139.95 11.1 139.3 n/m n/m 11.35 139.05 10.97 139.43 DW-1 145.40 24.4 121 24.3 121.1 24.48 120.92 1 24.65 120.75 24.46 120.94 Table 4.-- Water levels in existing and new monitoring wells. Slug tests were conducted in the each of the piezometers and test wells of the screened zone in each. The hydraulic conductivities from this analysis are included in Table 5. The slug tests were analyzed using the commercial AgteSolve' program and the analysis curves are included as Attachment 2. Pumping 'Blanchard Surveying drawing file Villari Bros_ Map3contours.dwg s hlw://www.mtesolv.com/ M taje kesarces tests planned for each of the three test wells (TW-1,TW-1, and TW-3) were not conducted because none of them could sustain constant pumping rates without dewatering the wells. The results of the slug tests test are shown in Table 5 and the analysis curve is included in Attachment 2. Site ID Screened Depth Test Method Hydraulic Conductivity Air Permeability Test Ft Ft/Day Ft/Day PZ-2 13.0 - 18.0 Slug In 0.8148 PZ-3 13.5 - 16.5 Slug In 0.1379 PZ-5 11.0 - 16.0 Slug In 0.0251 PZ-6 20.0 - 25.0 Slug In 0.3368 PZ-7 12.5 - 17.5 Slug In 0.2535 TW-1 8.8 - 13.8 Slug In 0.0190 TW-2 16.5 - 21.5 Slug In 0.8618 0.61 TW-3 13.0 - 18.0 Slug In 0.1020 GEOMEANI 0.1587 Table 5.-- Hydraulic Conductivity from Slug Tests An additional check on the slug test data was conducted using measurements of water levels in TW-2 to changes in barometric pressure using a method developed by the USGS6 as shown in Table 5. Figure 5 shows the fit between measured and modeled water levels using this method. 10.755 10745 3 R-AL! 10735 - 5/1/22 -Mdeled WL -OBS WL 5/31122 6/30122 7/1a22 8/29/22 9/28/22 Figure 5.-- Fit between water levels recorded in TW-2 and modeled using the Air Permeability Method. 6 Edwin P. Weeks, 1978, Field Determination of the Vertical Permeability to Air in the Unsaturated Zone: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1051. 10 Recharge and Discharge Recharge to the modeled area results from the balance between infiltrated precipitation and evapotranspiration (ET) from the soil zone. The USDA Soil and Water Balance Tool, (SWAT)' was used to determine recharge by modeling the daily water balance for the period 1/1/1990 through 5/9/2022. The SWAT model requires inputs of daily precipitation, daily minimum and maximum air temperature and daily solar radiation (used to compute Potential ET or ETo). Soil properties for soils are also required that are used to model infiltration, runoff, evaporation from the soil surface, moisture holding capacity, deep percolation, and groundwater recharge. Modeling the effects of vegetation and land cover on interception of rainfall, uptake of soil moisture and discharge by ET requires the definition of classes of land cover. Precipitation Daily precipitation was used for the 4km x 4km grid cell containing the site downloaded from the nation- wide PRISM' national dataset for the period 1/1/1990 through 5/9/2022. This data was used to prepare a cumulative annual precipitation distribution curve to determine the average and 80'% wet year for the site, which is shown in Figure 6. The 80'% wet year precipitation from the annual frequency analysis with the PRISM dataset is 51.85 inches and the average year precipitation is 46.71 inches. 100% 90% 80% a� _3 > 709'o Q x 60% c t v 50% oa c 40% 0 T 30% 0 O` a 2 0"/0 10% 0% • • • PRISM precipitation NOrmal Distribution • • 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Annual Precipitatiion Inches Figure 6.--Annual precipitation series used to determine the 80th% wetyear. ' http://swat.tamu.edu/software/areswat/ s hlW://www.prism.oreQonstate.edu/explorer/ 11 We &-a®-ces Soils For the SWAT model, soils were modeled using the MRCS SSURGO soil datasets4 as they contain all the necessary sail characteristics needed by the SWAT model and because they are generalizations of the mapping by the Soil Scientist for the Project. Figure 7 shows these soils that were used for the SWAT model. !1 _ �r`�!!` _"� EXPLANATION -- Property Boundary =1 Proposed Spray Areas ,1, "4 Soils used for SWAT Model S,k 500 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Ft 1�y ,1 h f v� Figure 7.-- Sail Series used for SWAT Model, 12 We Pesarc—c-s Vegetation and Land Cover The land use and land cover needed for the SWAT model used modifications based on the development plans provided by the CE Group to the 2011 National Land Use/Land Cover Dataset9 downloaded from the U.S. Geological Survey National Map and is shown on Figure 8. EXPLANATION Property Boundary Proposed Spray Areas Land Cover used for SWAT Model '-S -� " 1 Evergreen Forest — - — - — } _ L7, Range Shrubland Row Crops _ Urban Medium Density _ Woody Wetlands 57, r, 4 - 4 r ''y 7 ' l 500 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Ft Figure 8.-- Land use and land cover used for the SWAT model. ' hops://www.usgs.gov/the-national-map-data.-delivery 13 taje kesarces Groundwater Recharge The daily PRISM dataset values from 1/1/1990 through 04/26/2022 were used in calculating groundwater recharge with the SWAT model for calibrating the groundwater model to the three rounds of water level measurements in the four piezometers that encountered groundwater. The cumulative annual distribution and monthly average over the model area recharge is shown in Figure 9. SWAT model results for the first year (1990) of data input were not used for this because one year was used as the model initialization period. The mean annual recharge is 7.13 inches and the recharge for the 80'% wet year is 7.99 inches. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 309/. 20% 10% 0% • SWAT PERC -NOrmal Distribution 10 15 20 Annual Recharge as PERC, Inches Figure 9.-- Cumulative annual distribution and monthly recharge computed with the SWAT model. Potential and Actual Evapotranspiration (ETo and Eta) The SWAT model calculates Eta by applying seasonal crop coefficients based on seasonal growth stages for each modeled crop or vegetation simulated to ETo. Values of ETo were calculated with the Priestly - Taylor Equation. Numerous studies1o,"," have shown that this equation, which is also the standard used by the United Nations FAO, is the most applicable for determining ETo in the southeastern United States. Figure 10 shows the monthly values of water balance components from the SWAT model for average conditions over the period from 1991 to 2021. The maj ority of precipitation goes to satisfying ET demand, and to satisfy soil moisture deficits (DEL SM) during the summer months. PERC is the percolation below the root zone which becomes groundwater recharge. These values are essentially zero during the summer months and are low the remaining months because of the other components of the water balance. 10 http://rei)ositorv.lib.ncsu.edu/ir/bitstream/1840.16/710/1/etd.bdf I Puryear, Margaret W. P., 2005: Observations and Modeling of Evapotranspiration across North Carolina: htti3:Hrei3ository.lib.ncsu.edu/ir/handle/l 840.16/1636?mode=fu II 12 Lu, Jinbao, S.B. McNulty, and D.M. Amatya, 2005: A comparison of Six Potential Evapotranspiration Methods for Regional Use in the Southeastern United States: Journal of the American Water Resources Association, V. 41, No. 3, pp621- 633. 14 taje kesarces 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 s C 2.00 0 2 1.00 u c 0.00 -1.00 -2.00 -3.00 1.1111.111 JIM JIM II II i0_i Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ■ Precipitation ■ Surface runoff ■ Deep Percolation ■ ET ■ Soil Moisture Change Figure 10.--Average monthly water balance components from the SWAT model and the 80th% wet precipitation and deep percolation values. 15 We &arzes MOUNDING ANALYSIS MODEL The analyses documented in this report used MODFLOW-NWT, a three-dimensional finite difference model that is developed and maintained as a public domain code by the U.S. Geological Survey (USES) The model was developed, calibrated, and applied within the commercial GMS modeling system13 Model Grid The regular finite difference grid used for the simulation model covers an area of 2,700 acres (4.22_ square miles) as shown on the previous figures and comprises 97 horizontal rows, 99 vertical columns 6 layers, and 57,618 computational cells. The horizontal and vertical grid spacing over the spray areas area was 50 ft by 50 ft, which was expanded to 125 x 125 feet at the model boundaries. Layers 1 and 2 were used to model the Surficial Unit with a thickness varying between the land surface and the top of the Peedee confining unit. Layer 3 was used to model the Peedee Confining Unit with a constant thickness of 7 feet. Layer 3 was used to model the Peedee Aquifer with a constant thickness of 30 feet. Layer 4 was used to model the Black Creek Confining Unit with a constant thickness of 40 feet. Layer 5 was used to model the Black Creek Aquifer with a constant thickness of 100 feet. The bottom of the aquifer corresponded to the Upper Cape Fear Confining Unit which was considered to be impermeable. The tops of Layers 3 through 6 were determined from the NC DWR aquifer database14 Boundary Conditions No flow boundary conditions were used in all layers along the lateral model boundary as well as the bottom of Layer 2. Recharge to the groundwater was modeled using the ModFlow Unsaturated Zone Flow (UZF) package with the specified infiltration rates equal to the sum of natural recharge computed from the SWAT model and any applied irrigation. The UZF package can include additional evapotranspiration from above the watertable driven by upward capillary action as ETo when the watertable is at the surface and zero below a specified extinction depth. The initial extinction depth was modeled as 10 feet for this study based upon the deep-rooted deciduous trees present in the majority of the modeled area. The input to the UZF package for the model calibration were the daily recharge rates for 1/1/1991 through 5/9/2022 computed using the SWAT model. For mounding analyses average recharge rates over the model area for each month of the 80'% wet year computed with the SWAT model were used. Surface water drainage features were modeled as seepage to the land surface in topographically low areas using the UZF package. Model Calibration Calibration was implemented by assessing the goodness of fit of modeled average values of the watertable elevation to the water levels shown in Table 3. Recharge for calibration was the 30-year average from the SWAT analysis of 6.98 inches/year. The standard statistics used for assessing the degree of fit are: Mean Residual (Mean of observed minus computed water level elevations), Mean Absolute Residual " https://www.aquaveo.com/software/gms-groundwater-modeling-system-introduction 14 hops://www.ncwater.org/GWMS/openlayers/ol.php?menulist=bl 16 We &axzi � (Absolute value of the Mean Residual ), the Root Mean Squared Residual (RMSR), and the normalized RMSR (RMSR divided by the range in observed values). Calibration was achieved by manual zoning the hydraulic conductivity of the Surficial Unit into three zones shown in the right side of Figure 11. Ksat values from the Polaris Soil Properties Database maintained by Duke University",16 for the soil depths between 100 and 200 centimeters on a 30-meter grid as shown on the left side of Figure 11, slug test results shown in Table 5, and plots of measured vs observed average water levels shown in Table 4 were used as a guide to defining these zones. __ ~ _ .__—• '� o I •� � Property Ll 1 500 0 500 1,000 1,500 2.000 F1 r'� •, -- CreFaM Line 1 Gyrated Swii 1HYd—, CaNuef yIFVO y) O HK-01 j " Rd w42s �o 500 2,000 ft Figure 11. Calibrated hydraulic conductivity zones for the surficial unit and Polaris Ksat values used as a zonation guide. The values of hydraulic conductivity for the units underlying the Surficial unit are shown in Table 6 and are based upon values from regional studies published by the USGS17. " hlW://hydrology.cce.duke.edu/POLARIS/ 16 httas://www.gooale.com/url?sa=t&rct=i&a=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiT2YS-8rT3AhWPg- AKHWZPDCsOFnoECAUOAO&url=httas%3A%2F%2Fbubs.er.usgs. Eov%2Fbublication%2F70170912&use=AOvVawOK JfAbj 891EzquCSLINypz " G.I. Giese, J. L. Eimers, and R. W. Coble, 1997: Simulation of ground -water flow in the Coastal Plain aquifer system of North Carolina: USGS Professional Paper 1440-M. 17 j We P,k3a ces Unit U niforn, Isotropic Hydraulic Conductivity, Ft/Day Surficial 1 Surficial Low 0.1 Surficial Sand 25 Peedee Confinging 0.003 Peedee Aquifer 10 Blac Creek Confining L025Black Creek Aquifer Table 6.-- Hydraulic conductivities of the modeled units for the calibrated model. Figure 13 shows the fit of measured to computed water levels. The goodness of fit is well within the 10% for NRMS as recommended by NC DEQ modeling guidance. Observed Calculated Residual Absolute (Residual) Squared Residual Well Ft Ft Ft Ft Ft^2 TW-1 143.25 142.92 0.33 0.33 0.11 TW-2 121.28 120.56 0.72 0.72 0.52 PZ-2 1 119.49 122.06 -2.57 1 2.57 6.63 PZ-4 132.30 129.12 3.18 3.18 10.12 PZ-5 141.38 142.29 -0.91 0.91 0.83 PZ-6 123.83 121.14 2.69 2.69 7.22 TW-3 139.43 141.76 -2.33 2.33 5.44 PZ-7 143.15 143.42 -0.27 0.27 1 0.07 DW-1 1 120.921 121.80 -0.88 1 0.88 1 0.78 Mean -0.01 1 1.54 Minimum 119.49 1 Root Mean Square Residual (RMS), Ft 1.88 Maximum 143.25 1 Normalized RMS 7.90% Range 23.76 Figure 12. --Results of model calibration. MOUNDING ANALYSIS 150 145 140 a z .a 135 d 130 3 125 E 120 a om • Da[a Linear (Data) ....... • PZ • "02 z-c 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 Observed Water Level Elevatinm Ft NAVD88 A mounding analysis was completed with the calibrated groundwater flow model to evaluate the maximum monthly irrigation rates on each of the new sprayfields during the 80th% wet year that would not result in any area within the fields where the modeled watertable depth was less than 1 foot. . Table 7 shows the monthly values of drainage coefficients applied to the geometric mean Ksat values reported by PSS for the soils in the sprayfields, irrigation rates and irrigation capacities resulting from this analysis. ) �aje A-5arce5 0 0 PRECIP PET from SWAT (PreistleV/T a for V) RECHARGE Zone 1A(42.49 Acres) Zone 1B(15.64 Acres) Zone 2(23.6 Acres) Zone 3A(14.46 Acres) Zone 3B(10.8 Acres) Zone 4 (13.68 Acres) Mean 80% Wet Mean ° 80%Wet w w 0 u w nu 0 m o C 0 L - C 0 U m m nu a L M _ u w w u w nu M 5 m o C 0 - C 0 r,,_ m° nu a L M _ u w w 0 u w ou M 5 m o C 0 L - C 0 4, U m m nu a L M _ u w w u w nu M 5 m o C o L - a ° u w w u nu 5 m o C 0 L - a ° u w w 0 u nu 5 m o C 0 L - a M u C 0 nu a 0 L M F_ u inches inches inches inches inches inches GPD inches GPD inches GPD inches GPD inches GPD inches GPD GPD 1 3.69 4.09 1.59 0.89 0.99 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 2 3.05 3.38 1,90 0.96 1.08 1,00%° 1.36 55,375 0.00% 0.00 0,00%° 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 1.00%° 4.05 53,207 108,582 3 3.91 4.34 3.04 1.11 1.24 1,00% 1.49 55,375 0.00% 0.00 0,00% 0.00 0.000% 0.00 1.00% 1.90 18,016 1.25% 5.55 66,508 139,899 4 3.57 3.97 4.59 0.85 0.96 4.00% 5.76 221,501 1.00% 1.84 26,098 2.50% 3.60 76,888 2.000% 3.60 47,124 2.00% 3.69 36,031 1,50% 6.45 79,810 461,353 5 3.42 3.80 5.81 0.54 0.60 4.00% 5.95 221,501 2.00% 3.81 52,196 3.50%° 5.21 107,643 3.000% 5.58 70,685 3.00% 5.71 54,047 1.50%° 6.66 79,810 533,685 6 4.64 5.15 635 0.36 0.40 5.50% 7.92 304,564 2.00% 3.69 52,196 4.00% 5.76 123,020 3.000% 5.40 70,685 3.50% 6.45 63,054 2.00% 8.60 106,413 667,736 7 4.68 5.19 6.39 0.23 0.26 5.50% 8.18 304,564 2.00% 3.81 52,196 4.00% 5.95 123,020 3.000% 5.58 70,685 3.50% 6.67 63,054 2.00% 8.88 106,413 667,736 8 4.77 5.30 5.87 0.19 0.21 5.25% 7.81 290,720 2.00% 3.81 52,196 4.00% 5.95 123,020 2.000% 3.72 47,124 3.00% 5.71 54,047 2.00% 8.88 106,413 621,323 9 4.87 5.40 4,53 0.28 0.32 4.25% 6.12 235,345 1.00°% 1.84 26,098 3.00% 4.32 92,265 2.000% 3.60 47,124 2.00% 3.69 36,031 1.25% 5.37 66,508 477,272 10 3.47 3.85 3,32 0.49 0.55 2.00% 2.98 110,750 1.00% 1.90 26,098 0.00% 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 - 1.25% 5.55 66,508 177,259 11 3.24 1 3.60 2.08 0.54 0.61 1 1.00% 1.44 55,375 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 1.50% 6.45 79,810 135,185 12 3.41 1 3.78 1.66 0.69 0.77 1 0.50% 0.74 27,688 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.000% 0.00 0,00% 0.00 0,00%0 0.00 27,688 IYearl 46.711 51.85 1 47.13 1 7.13 1 7.99 1 1 49.75 1 1 1 20.71 1 1 1 30.79 1 1 1 27.48 1 1 33.82 1 1 1 66.45 Table 7. Monthly drainage coefficients and resultant irrigation rates used for mounding analysis and water balance. Figures 13 through 23 show the one -foot depth to watertable contours, watertable elevation and the pivots that received irrigation for each month of the 8O'% wet year that irrigation was applied. No irrigation was applied to any field for January. 19 We &arces Zon. 4 _ r 500 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Ft Figure 13.- Areas with modeled depth to watertable 1 foot or less (red areas) February. 20 We &arc,-5 Property Line Depth to Watertable <= 1 Ft for March Irrigated Applied in March Watertable ElevationMarch 13 Wet Weather Storage Lagoons W Irrigated a a ated te a t We Applied ble El he r rt e ied vat in io� <= 1 F March t for March 1 Ma h 13 t Storage Lagoons s Weather age I a n I 500 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Ft—_---- Aw Figure 14.--Areas with modeled depth to watertable I foot or less (red areas) March . 21 We &arzes r -- Property Line Depth to Watertable <= 1 Ft for April Irrigated Applied in April_-- Watertable Elevation,April Wet Weather Storage Lagoons 1 11 h _. II � 1 - a Zone 7 m 1 'N Zone 7 4 1,000 1,500 2,000 Ft Figure 15.- Areas with modeled depth to watertable I foot or less (red areas) for April. t I I I I 1 , I 22 We &arzes 1,200 i -- Property Line Depth to Watertable <= 1 Ft for May Irrigated Applied in May WatertableElevation,May Wet Weather Storage Lagoons 1,800 2,400 Ft Figure 16 --Areas with modeled depth to watertable I foot or less (red areas) for Hay. 23 We &arzes Zone Property Line -- Depth to Watertable <= 1 Ft for June Irrigated Applied in June Watertable Elevation,June Wet Weather Storage Lagoons N\10 •i155\ 1�\ 5 Zone 1A Zone 76 R` T8 W! ell �f�'I• — — ''/' - 600 0 600 1,200 1,800 2,400 Ft Figure 17.- Areas with modeled depth to watertable ]foot or less (areas) for June. 24 We &arzes f_ J -- �- Property Line ,—.— — Depth to Watertable <= 1 Ft for July i -•', r + — Irrigated Applied in July a Watertable Elevation,July We Weather Storge Lagoons - y' CUM `. ZOrf f X`a r - •, : J8 t ` r * Zone If a� �y , r i k k Op j 1,200 1,800 2,400 Ft 1 M' Figure 18.- Areas with modeled depth to watertable I foot or less (red areas) for July. 25 We &arzes Property Line - — Depth to Watertable <= 1 Ft for August Irrigated Applied in August Watertable Elevation,August Wet Weather Storage Lagoons I ^ zone Figure 19.- Areas with modeled depth to watertable I foot or less (red areas) for August. 26 We &arzes 600 0 lt1`► Property Line -- Depth to Watertable <=1 Ft for Septemer Irrigated Applied in September �J Watertable Elevation,September — - Wet Weather Storage Lagoons Zane t 600 1,200 1,800 2,400 Ft 1 Figure 20.- Areas with modeled depth to watertable I foot or less (red areas) for September. 27 We &arzes Figure 21.- Areas with modeled depth to watertable I foot or less (red contours) for October. W We &arzes Figure 22.- Areas with modeled depth to watertable I foot or less (red contours) for November. 29 We &arzes Property Line Depth to Watertable <- 1 Ft for December Irrigated Applied in December Watertable Elevation,December — Wet Weather Storge Lagoons LT 3B � Zone 4-- - I Zone 3A 1�onB 16 00 600 0 600 1,200 1,800 2,400 Ft G� Figure 23.- Areas with modeled depth to watertable I foot or less (red contours) for December. 30 ,Pa je &ar-ces Water Balance A water balance was completed to determine the required volume of wet weather storage while maximizing the irrigation of wastewater. The monthly irrigation rates and irrigation capacity of each of the irrigation areas were shown in Table 7. The water balance was constrained to wastewater irrigation rates that were constrained to the designed total volume of storage in the three wastewater lagoons shown in Table 8 that was provided by Cavanaugh. Reservoir Area Ac Volume, Mgal Lagoon A 5.29 17.28 Lagoon B 5.53 .81 Lagoon C 3.72 t�, 1.89 Total Surface Area 14.54 Total Storage 47.98 Table 8. Wastewater storage surface areas and volumes for the water balance. The summary of the convergent water balance is shown in Table 9. The maximum irrigation capacity of the spray areas is 334,016 gallons/day (gpd). The maximum wastewater flow after subtracting the balance between precipitation on and evaporation from the ponds is 333,206 gpd. The convergent balance is shown in Attachment 2. Area or Soil Category Area. Acres Irri lation Capacity of Sp ra fields Prorated Net Precip - Evap on Storage ac-ft/ r Maximum Net Wastewater Flow Not Constrained by Available Stora e in/wk in/ r ac-ft/ r Average al/da Average a ljd� av ac-ft/ r Zone 1A 42.49 0.96 49.75 176.16 157,143 12.48 146,007 163.67 Zone 1B 15.64 0.40 20.71 26.99 23,923 1.91 22,373 25.08 Zone 2 23.60 0.59 30.79 60.55 54,016 4.29 50,188 56.26 Zone 3A 14.46 0.53 27.48 33.12 29,545 2.35 27,451 30.77 Zone 3B 10.80 0.65 33.82 30.44 27,153 2.16 25,229 28.28 Zone 4 13.68 1.28 66.45 75.73 67,555 5.37 62,768 70.36 Totals 120.67 402.98 359,335 28.56 334,016 374.43 Analysis Date and Time 11/30/22 17:51 Capacity - Constrained by Storage 333,206 Mgal Required Wet Weather Storage: 47.98 Mgal 144 Days Available Wet Weather Storage: 47.98 Mgal 144 j Days Table 9.-- Summary of the convergent water balance. 31 ,Pa je &arces Conclusions A defensible conceptual hydrogeologic model of the proposed sprayfields and surrounding areas has been constructed using available information from public domain sources, field investigations, and existing water supply well information. A three-dimensional groundwater flow model has been constructed and successfully tested against measured groundwater level measurements. The simulated groundwater flow patterns are consistent with the conceptual model. The best fit with the calibrated model resulted from adjusting initial values of hydraulic conductivity from slug and pumping rests by least squares fitting to measured water levels. Based on the statistics of this fit the agreement between measured and observed water level elevations is within industry and NC DEQ guidelines. Consequently, the model can reliably be used to assess the likely average water table configuration and depth to water table under conditions that include the wettest month of the 80'% wet year. A mounding analysis was completed with the calibrated groundwater flow model to evaluate the maximum monthly irrigation rates on each of the three new sprayfields during the 805h% et year that would not result in any area within the fields where the modeled watertable depth was less than 1 foot. The maximum irrigation capacity of the spray areas is 334,016 gpd which is constrained by the available wet weather storage of 47.98 million gallons. The maximum wastewater flow after subtracting the balance between precipitation on and evaporation from the ponds is 333,206 gpd. This report provides the data and analyses to support the permitting of all the spray areas and the construction of all the wet weather storage lagoons. However, it is our understanding that implementation of the permitted facilities swill be done in stages with the first stage comprising only spray zones IA and 1B and Lagoon A. The wastewater capacity of these two zones is shown in Table 9 and totals 168,380 gallons/day. 32 ,Pa je &arces ATTACHMENT 1 Logs of Borings 33 Villari Brothers Warsaw, Duplin County, North Carolina Drilled Boring Log Boring Depth (feet) Description TW-1 0.0 - 3.0' Yellowish brown clayey fine sand (SC). 3.0 - 5.0' White silty fine sand (SM). 5.0 -13.0' Gray fine sandy clay (CL). 13.0 - 21.0' Gray clayey fine sand (SC). Set 12' deep 2" pvc well with 5' 0.010" well screen static water level: 4.0' bls (3/21/2022). TW-2 0.0 - 3.0' Yellowish brown clayey fine sand (SC). 3.0 - 5.0' Yellowish brown fine sandy clay (CL). 5.0 - 7.0' Yellowish brown fine sand (SM). 7.0 -10.0' Gray clayey fine sand (SC). 10.0 -12.0' Gray silty fine sand (SM). 12.0 -15.0' Gray fine sandy clay (CL). 15.0 -16.0' Gray clay (CL). 16.0 - 21.0' Brownish gray clayey fine sand (SC) Set 21.5' deep 2' pvc well with 5' 0.010" well screen static water level: 13.0' bls (3/21/2022). Boring Depth (feet) Description TW-3 0.0 - 3.0' Yellowish brown clayey fine sand (SC). 3.0 - 5.0' Yellowish brown sandy clay (CL). 5.0 - 8.0' Gray fine sandy clay (CL). 8.0 -13.0' Gray clayey fine sand (SC). 13.0 - 21.0' Very dark gray clayey fine sand and clay (SC/CL) Set 18' deep 2" pvc well with 5' 0.010" well screen static water level: T bls (3/21/2022). Villari Brothers Warsaw, Duplin County, North Carolina Boring Depth (feet) Description PZ-2 0.0 -1.0' Dark yellowish brown silty fine sand (SM). 1.0 - 3.0' Grayish brown sandy clay (CL). 3.0 - 5.0' Dark gray sandy clay (CL). 5.0 - 7.0' Dark gray clayey sand (SC) 7.0 -12.0' Yellowish red clayey fine sand/sandy clay (SC/CL). Set 12' deep 2" pvc well with 3' 0.010" well screen static water level: 6.0' bls (3/21/2022). PZ-6 0.0 - 3.0' Yellowish brown fine sand (SM). 3.0 - 4.0' Yellow fine sand (SM). 4.0 - 6.0' Yellowish red clayey fine sand (SC). 6.0 - 8.0' Gray sandy clay (CL). 8.0 - 10.0' Grayish brown clayey fine sand (SC). 10.0 -16.0' White silty fine sand (SM). 16.0 - 20.0' Yellow clayey fine sand (SC). 20.0 - 23.0' Very dark gray sandy clay and clayey fine sand (CL/SC) Set 25' deep 2' pvc well with 5' 0.010" well screen static water level: ?? bls (3/21/2022). Boring Depth (feet) Description PZ-5 0.0 - 3.0' Yellowish brown clayey fine sand (SC). 3.0 - 6.0' Yellowish brown fine sand (SM). 6.0 -13.0' Dark grayish brown sandy clay (CL). 13.0 -17.0' Gray clayey fine sand/sandy clay (SC/CL). Set 16' deep 2" pvc well with 4' 0.010" well screen static water level: T bls (3/25/2022). Villari Brothers Warsaw, Duplin County, North Carolina Boring Depth (feet) Description PZ-4 0.0 - 2.0' Light yellowish brown silty fine sand (SM). 2.0 - 4.0' Yellowish red clayey sand (SC). 4.0 - 6.0' Light yellowish brown silty fine sand (SM). 6.0 -11.0' Gray clayey fine sand/sandy clay (SC) 11.0 -17.0' Gray silty fine sand (SM). Set 15' deep 2" pvc well with 5' 0.010" well screen static water level: 12' bls (3/25/2022). PZ-7 0.0 -1.0' Light yellowish brown silty fine sand (SM). 1.0 - 3.0' Yellowish red clayey sand (SC). 3.0 - 5.0' Grayish brown clayey fine sand (SC). 5.0 - 10.0' Grayish brown silty fine sand (SM) 10.0 -13.0' Gray clayey fine sand (SC). 13.0 -15.0' Dark gray sandy clay (CL). Set 15' deep 2" pvc well with 5' 0.010" well screen static water level: T bls (3/25/2022). Boring Depth (feet) Description PZ-3 0.0 -1.0' Very dark brown silty fine sand (SC). 1.0 - 3.0' Dark yellowish red silty fine sand (SM). 3.0 - 6.0' Gray silty fine sand (SM). 6.0 -15.0' Gray clayey fine sand (SC). Set 15' deep 2" pvc well with 5' 0.010" well screen static water level:5.0' bls (3/25/2022). ) �aje A-5asze5 ATTACHMENT 2 Convergent Water Balance A-mge Prerip 1 .1 % Wet• Precip Evap. Zona 1A Zone 1B Zone 2 Zone 3A Zone 38 Zone Total hngaton Precp on Slorege In from WWIP Total In to Stomge Evap from Stomge Total Out of Stomge End of Month Stomge Required 42.49 Acres 15.64 Apes 23.60 Ages 14.46 Apes 10.80 Ayes 13.68 Acres Inigabon Irrigation Imgation Imgabun hngation Irrigation Yr Mo Days Inches Inches Inches Inches Ac-Ft I GPD Inches Ac-Ft GAD Inches Ac-Ft I GPD Inches Ac-Ft GPD Inches Ac-R GPO Inches Ac-Ft GPD GPD Ao+1 Ac-Ft Ac-Ft GPD Ac-Ft Ac-R A. -Ft Ac-R Days MGal Jan 31 1 3.69 4.09 1.59 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 1 4.96 31.70 333,2061 36.66 1.15 1.15 35.51 35 11.57 Feb 28.25 3.05 3.38 1.90 1.36 4.80 55,375 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 4.05 4.61 53,207 108,582 9.41 4.10 28.89 333,206 32.99 1.38 10.79 57.71 56 18.80 Mar 31 3.91 4.34 3.04 1.49 5.27 55,375 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 1.90 1.71 18.016 5.55 6.33 66,508 139.899 13.31 525 31.70 333,206 36.96 2.21 15.52 79.14 77 25.79 Apr 30 3.57 3.97 4.59 5.76 20.39 221,501 1.84 2.40 26,098 3.60 7.08 76,888 3.60 4.34 47.124 3.69 3.32 36,031 6.45 7.35 79,810 487.451 44.88 4.81 30.68 333,206 35.49 3.34 48.22 66.41 65 21.64 May 31 3.42 3.80 5.81 5.26 21.07 221,501 3.81 4.97 52.196 5.21 10.24 107.643 5.58 6.73 70.685 5.71 5.14 54.047 6.66 7.59 79,810 585,881 55.74 4.60 31.70 333.206 36.30 4.22 59.96 42.75 42 13.93 Jun 30 1.64 5.15 6.35 7.92 28.04 304.564 3.69 4.81 52,196 5.76 11.33 123.020 5.40 6.51 70.685 6.45 5.81 63.054 8.60 9.8D 106,413 719.932 66.29 6.24 30.08 333,206 36.92 4.61 70.90 8.77 9 2.86 1 Jul 31 4.68 5.19 6.39 8.18 28.98 304,5641 3.81 4.97 52.196 5.95 11.70 123,020 5.58 6.73 70,685 6.67 6.00 63,054 8.98 10.12 106,413 719,932 68.50 6.29 31.70 333,206 37.99 4.65 73.14 0.00 0 0.00 Aug 31 4.77 5.30 5.87 7.81 27.66 290.720 3.81 4.97 52,196 5.95 11.70 123,020 3.72 4.48 47,124 5.71 5.14 54,047 8.89 10.12 106,413 673,519 64.08 6.41 31.70 333.200 38.12 4.27 88.35 0.00 0 0.00 Sep 30 1.87 5.40 4.53 6.12 21.67 235,345 1.84 2.40 26.098 4.32 8.50 92,265 3.60 4.34 47,124 3.69 3.32 36,031 5.37 6.12 66,508 503,370 46.35 6.55 30.68 333,206 37.23 3.29 49.64 0.00 0 0.00 oc 31 3.47 3.85 3.32 2.98 10.54 110,750 1.90 2.48 26,098 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 5.55 6.33 66,508 203,356 19.35 4.66 31.70 333,206 36.36 2.42 21.76 14.60 14 4.76 Nov 30 3.24 3.60 2.08 1.44 5.10 55,375 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 6.45 7.35 79,810 135,1115 12.45 4.36 30.08 333.206 35.04 1.51 13.96 35.67 35 11.62 Dec 31 3.41 3.78 1.66 0.74 2.63 27,088 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 27,688 2.63 4.58 31.70 333,206 36.28 1.20 3.84 68.12 67 22.19 Jan 31 3.69 4.09 1.59 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 4.96 31.70 333,206 36.66 1.15 1.15 103.62 101 33.76 Feb 28.25 3.05 3.38 1.90 1.36 4.80 55,375 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 4.05 4.61 53,207 108.582 9.41 4.10 28.89 333.206 32.99 1.38 10.79 125.82 123 41.00 Mar 31 3.91 4.34 3.04 1.49 5.27 55.375 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 1.90 1.71 18.016 5.55 6.33 66,508 139.899 13.31 5.25 31.70 333,206 36.96 2.21 15.52 147.26 144 47.98 Apr 30 3.57 3.97 4.59 5.76 20.39 1221,501 1.81 1 2.40 26,098 3.60 7.08 76,888 3.80 1 4.34 47.124 3.69 3.32 36,031 1 6.45 7.35 79,810 487.451 44.88 4.81 30.68 333,206 35.49 3.34 48.22 1134.52 132 43.83 May 31 3.42 3.80 5.81 5.95 21.07 221,501 3.81 4.97 52.196 5.21 10.24 107,643 5.58 6.73 70.685 5.71 5.14 54,047 6.66 7.59 79,810 585,881 55.74 4.60 31.70 333,206 36.30 4.22 59.96 110.87 108 36.12 2 Jun 30 4.64 5.15 6.35 7.92 28.04 304.564 3.69 4.81 52,196 5.76 11.33 123,020 5.40 6.51 70,685 6.45 5.81 63.054 8.60 9,80 106,413 719.932 66.29 6.24 30.68 333.206 36.92 4.01 70.90 76.89 75 25.05 Jul 31 4.68 5.19 6.39 8.18 28.98 304,564 3.81 4.97 52,196 5.95 11.70 123,020 5.58 6.73 70,685 6.67 6.00 63,054 8.88 10.12 106,413 1719,932 68.50 1 6.29 1 31.70 333,2061 37.99 1 4.65 73.14 41.74 41 13.60 Aug 31 4.77 5.30 5.87 7.81 27.66 290,720 3.81 4.97 52.196 5.95 11.70 123,020 3.72 4.48 47.124 5.71 5.14 54,047 8.98 10.12 106,413 673.519 64.08 6.41 31.70 333,206 38.12 4.27 68.35 11.51 11 3.75 Sep 30 4.87 5.40 4.53 6.12 21.67 235,345 1.84 2.40 26.098 4.32 8.50 92.265 3.60 4.34 1 47.124 3.69 3.32 36,031 5.37 6.12 66,508 503.370 46.35 6.55 30.08 333,206 37.23 3,29 49.64 0.00 0 0.00 llc 31 3.47 3.85 3.32 2.98 10.54 110,750 1.90 2.48 26,098 0.00 1 0.00 1 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 5.55 6.33 66508 203,356 19.35 4.66 31.70 333,206 36.36 2.42 21.76 14.60 14 4.76 Nov 30 3.24 3.60 2.08 1.44 5.10 55,375 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 6.45 7.35 79,910 135.185 12.45 4.36 30.68 333,206 35.04 1.51 13.96 35.67 35 11.62 Dec 31 3.41 3.78 1.66 0.74 2.63 27,688 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0,00 0 27,688 2.63 4.58 31.70 333.206 36.28 1.20 3.84 68.12 67 22.19 Jan 31 3.69 4.09 1.59 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 4.96 31.70 333,206 36.66 1.15 1.15 103.62 101 33.76 Feb 28.25 3.05 3.38 1.90 1.36 4.80 55,375 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 4.05 4.61 53,207 108,582 9.41 4.10 28.89 333,206 32.99 1.38 10.79 125.82 123 41.00 Mar 31 3.91 4.34 3.04 1.49 5.27 55,375 0.00 0,00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 1.90 1.71 18,016 5.55 6.33 66,508 139,899 13.31 5.25 31.70 333,206 36.98 1 2.21 15.52 147.28 144 47.98 Apr 30 3.57 3.97 4.59 5.76 20.39 221,501 1.84 2.40 26,098 3.60 7.08 76,888 3.60 4.34 47,124 3.69 3.32 36,031 6.45 1 7.35 79,810 487,451 44.88 4.81 30.68 333,206 35.49 3.34 48.22 134.52 132 43.83 May 31 3.42 3.80 5.81 5.95 21.07 221,501 3.81 4.97 52.196 5.21 10.24 107,643 5.58 6.73 70.685 5.71 5.14 54,047 6.66 7.59 79,810 585,881 55.74 4.60 31.70 333,206 36.30 4.22 59.96 110.87 108 1 36.12 Jun 30 4.64 5.15 1 6.35 7.22 28.04 304.SG41 3.69 1 4.81 52,196 5.76 11.33 123,0201 5.40 6.51 70.685 6.45 5.81 63,054 8.60 9.80 106,413 719.932 66.29 6.24 30.68 333,206 30.92 4.61 70.90 76.89 75 25.05 3 Jul 31 4.68 5.19 6.39 8.18 1 28.98 304,584 3.81 4.97 52,198 1 5.85 11.70 123,020 5.58 8.73 70,885 8.87 6.00 83,054 8.88 10.12 106,413 719,932 88.50 8.29 31.70 333.208 37.89 4.65 73.14 41.74 41 13.60 Aug 31 1.77 5.30 5.87 7.81 27.66 290,720 3.81 4.97 52,196 5.95 11.70 123.020 3.72 4.48 47,124 5.71 5.14 54.047 8.98 10.12 106,413 673.519 64.08 6.41 31.70 333,206 38.12 4.27 68.35 11.51 11 3.75 Sep 30 4.87 5.40 4.53 6.12 21.67 235.345 1.84 2.40 26,098 4.32 8.50 92.265 3.80 4.34 47,124 3.69 3.32 36.031 5.37 6.12 66,508 503,370 46.35 6.55 30.68 333,206 37.23 3.29 49.64 0.00 0 0.00 Od 31 3.47 3.85 3.32 2.98 10.54 110,750 1.90 2.48 20,098 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 5.55 6.33 66,508 203,356 19.35 4.66 31.70 333,206 36.36 2.42 21.76 14.60 14 4.76 Nov 30 3.2/ 3.60 2.08 1.44 5.10 55,375 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 6.45 7.35 79,810 135,185 12.45 1 4.38 1 30.68 333,2061 35.04 1 1.51 13.96 1 35.67 35 11.62 Dee 31 3.41 3.78 1.66 0.74 2.63 27,688 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 27,688 2.63 4.58 31.70 333,226 36.28 1.20 3.84 68.12 67 22.19 Jan 31 3.69 4.09 1.59 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 4.96 31.70 333.206 36.66 1.15 1.15 103.621 101 33.76 4.80 55,375 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 4.05 4.61 53,207 108.582 9.41 4.10 28.89 333,208 32.89 1.38 10.79 125.82 123 41.00 Mar 31 3.91 0.3/ 3.04 1.49 5.27 55,375 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 1.90 1.71 18,018 5.55 6.33 66,508 139,899 13.31 525 31.70 33],208 38.96 2.21 15.52 147.28 144 47.98 Apr 30 3.57 3.97 4.59 5.76 20.39 221,501 1.84 2.40 28,088 3.80 7.08 76,888 3.60 4.34 47,124 3.89 3.32 36,031 6.45 7.35 79,810 487,451 44.88 4.81 30.88 733,208 35.49 9.34 4822 134.52 132 47.83 May 31 3.42 3.80 5.81 5.95 21.07 221.501 3.81 4.97 52,198 5.21 10.24 107,843 5.58 8.73 70,885 5.71 5.14 54.047 6.66 7.59 79,830 585,881 55.74 4.80 31.70 333,208 38.30 4.22 59.96 110.87 108 36.12 Jun 30 4.64 5.15 6.35 7.92 28.04 304,564 3.69 4.81 52.196 5.76 11.33 123,020 5.40 6.51 70,685 8.45 5.81 63,054 8.60 9.80 106,413 719,932 66.29 6.24 30.08 333,206 36.92 4.61 70.90 76.89 75 25.05 4 Jul [AugSep 31 4.68 5.19 6.39 8.18 28.98 304.564 3.81 4.97 52,196 5.95 11.70 123.020 5.58 6.73 70,685 6.67 6.00 63,054 8.88 10.12 106,413 719,932 68.50 6.29 31.70 333,206 37.99 4.65 73.14 41.74 41 13.60 31 4.77 5.30 5.87 7.81 27.66 290,720 3.81 4.97 52,196 5.95 11.70 123.020 3.72 4.48 47.124 5.71 5.14 54.047 8.98 10.12 106,413 673.519 64.08 6.41 31.70 333,206 38.12 4.27 68.35 11.51 11 3.75 30 4.87 5.40 4.53 6.12 21.67 235,345 1.84 2.40 26,098 4.32 8.50 92,265 3.60 4.34 47.124 3.69 3.32 36,031 5.37 6.12 66,508 503,370 46.35 6.55 30.68 333,206 37.23 3.29 49.64 0.00 0 0.00 Oc 31 3.47 3.85 ].32 2.98 10.54 110,750 1.90 2.48 26,098 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 5.55 6.33 66,508 203,358 19.35 4.88 31.70 337,208 38.38 2.42 21.78 14.60 14 4.78 Nov 30 3.24 3.80 2.08 1.44 5.10 55,375 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0,00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 6.45 7.35 79,830 135.185 12.45 4.38 30.88 333.208 35.04 1.51 13.96 35.67 35 11.62 Dec 1 31 1 3.41 1 3.78 1 1.66 1 0.74 1 2.63 1 27,688 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0 1 27,688 1 2.63 1 4.58 1 31.70 1 333,206 1 36.28 1 120 1 3.84 1 68.12 1 67 1 22.19 1 37 WASTEWATER IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS WARSAW, DUPLIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA OWNER VILLARI BROTHERS FOODS 1012USHWY117 WARSAW, NORTH CAROLINA 28398 PHYSICAL ADDRESS: 135 CARTER BEST ROAD WARSAW, NORTH CAROLINA 28398 (910) 293-2157 CIVIL ENGINEER CAVANAUGH & ASSOCIATES, P.A. PO BOX 11197 WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 28405 (910) 392-4462 SURVEYOR JIM BLANCHARD ASSOCIATES, PC PO BOX 5 KENANSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28349 (910) 296-1921 FINAL DESIGN NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION SOIL SCIENTIST / AGRONOMIST/ HYDROGEOLOGIST EAGLE RESOURCES P.O. BOX 11189 SOUTHPORT, NORTH CAROLINA 28461 SHEET INDEX C.1.1 C.1.2 C.2.1 C.3.1 C.3.2 C.3.3 C.3.4 C.4.0 C.4.1 C.4.2 C.4.3 C.4.4 C.4.5 C.5.0 C.5.1 C.5.2 - COVER & SHEET INDEX - GENERAL NOTES - EXISTING SITE PLAN - OVERALL - PROPOSED SITE PLAN - OVERALL - PROPOSED IRRIGATION AREAS - IRRIGATION SYSTEM DETAILS - IRRIGATION NORTH - IRRIGATION SYSTEM DETAILS - IRRIGATION SOUTH - PROPOSED INFLUENT - PUMP STATION - PROPOSED INFLUENT FORCE MAIN A - PLAN AND PROFILE - PROPOSED INFLUENT FORCE MAIN B - PLAN AND PROFILE - PROPOSED IRRIGATION FORCE MAIN - PLAN AND PROFILE - PROPOSED IRRIGATION FORCE MAIN - PLAN AND PROFILE - PROPOSED IRRIGATION LATERALS - PLAN AND PROFILE - GENERAL SITE DETAILS - GENERAL PUMP STATION DETAILS - GENERAL LAGOON DETAILS PERMIT APPLICANT MICROLAND GROUP, LLC. 1015 ASHES DRIVE SUITE 102 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28406 EXISTING wEr 1 Cr`CKIn PROPERTY LINE / RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE MAJOR CONTOURS MINOR CONTOURS IRRIGATION MAIN PLUG VALVE MONITORING WELL PROPERTY LINE SETBACK RESIDENCE SETBACK STREAM SETBACK IMPOUNDMENT SETBACK 250' COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY 50' COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY 150' REVIEW BOUNDARY REVIEW BOUNDARY WETLANDS TREE LINE DITCH FILLED DITCH X x FENCE oe OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL `� UTILITY POLE PROPOSED LOD 130 IRR m 150' SB 400' SB 100' SB 15' SB 250' CB 50' CB 125' RB RB BEFORE YOU DIG! NC ONE CALL (TOLL FREE) 0 0 Q 1� (OR 1-800-632-4949) IT'S THE LAW! °fir _: SEAL E C-1273 =� = y' PROJECT AREA DUPLIN COUNTY PROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP SCALE- NOT TO SCALE E:AVANAU G H Stewardship through innovation DATE: MARCH, 2023 SHEET C.1.1 PROJECT NO. BE.22.001 EXCAVATION SPECIFICATIONS 1. PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT STRUCTURES FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY SETTLEMENT, LATERAL MOVEMENT, UNDERMINING, WASHOUT AND OTHER HAZARDS CREATED BY EARTHWORK OPERATIONS. ANY SETTLEMENT IN BACKFILL, FILL OR IN STRUCTURES BUILT OVER THE BACKFILL OF FILL, WILL BE CONSIDERED TO BE CAUSED BY IMPROPER COMPACTION METHODS AND SHALL BE CORRECTED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S SOLE EXPENSE. ALSO, ANY STRUCTURES DAMAGED BY SETTLEMENT SHALL BE RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS SOLE EXPENSE. 2. DEWATERING PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED AND EMPLOYED TO PREVENT RAINFALL AND SURFACE RUNOFF FROM ACCUMULATING OR FLOWING INTO EXCAVATIONS AND FROM FLOODING THE PROJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA. PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN PUMPS, SUMPS, SUCTION AND DISCHARGE LINES, AND OTHER DEWATERING SYSTEM COMPONENTS NECESSARY TO CONVEY WATER AWAY FROM THE EXCAVATIONS. THE DISPOSAL OF CONVEYED WATER SHALL BE DIVERTED IN SUCH A MANNER THAT NATURAL DRAINAGE OF THE AREA SHALL NOT BE DISTURBED. 3. SOIL EROSION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PREVENTION OF SOIL EROSION DURING CONSTRUCTION TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE. 4. STRIPPING ALL VEGETATION SUCH AS BRUSH, HEAVY SODS, HEAVY GROWTH OF GRASS, DECAYED VEGETABLE MATTER, RUBBISH AND ANY OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIAL WITHIN THE EXISTING PROJECT SITE SHALL BE STRIPPED OR OTHERWISE REMOVED PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF EMBANKMENT. 5. EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT FOR SITE FEATURES THE ROUGH EXCAVATION SHALL BE CARRIED TO THE NECESSARY DEPTH AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, TO THE LINES, GRADES AND ELEVATION SHOWN OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL BE MADE SO THAT THE REQUIREMENTS FOR FORMATION OF EMBANKMENTS CAN BE FOLLOWED. ON EMBANKMENT, THE DEPTH OF SUBGRADE DENSIFICATION SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR, THROUGH NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER FAULT, EXCAVATE BELOW THE DESIGNATED LINES, HE SHALL REPLACE THE EXCAVATION WITH APPROVED MATERIALS, IN AN APPROVED MANNER AND CONDITION, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE. THE ENGINEER SHALL HAVE COMPLETE CONTROL OVER THE EXCAVATION, MOVING, PLACING AND DISPOSITION OF ALL MATERIAL AND SHALL DETERMINE THE SUITABILITY OF MATERIAL TO BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENTS. ALL MATERIAL DETERMINED UNSUITABLE SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN WASTE AREAS OR AS DIRECTED AND SHALL BE REPLACED WITH SELECT MATERIALS DEEMED SUITABLE BY THE ENGINEER. TOPSOIL SHALL NOT BE USED IN SUBGRADES BUT SHALL BE HANDLED AND PLACED AS DIRECTED. SHOULD EXCESS MOISTURE BE ENCOUNTERED DURING EXCAVATION IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREAS, IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM ANY NECESSARY DEWATERING OF THE SITE IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A STABLE EXCAVATED AREA FOR THE PLACEMENT OF EMBANKMENT. THE ENGINEER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS OR REVISIONS IN LINES OR GRADES, IF FOUND NECESSARY, AS THE WORK PROGRESSES DUE TO DISCREPANCIES IN THE PLANS OR TO OBTAIN SATISFACTORY CONSTRUCTION. STONES OR ROCK FRAGMENTS LARGER THAN 2" IN THE GREATEST DIMENSION WILL NOT BE PERMITTED IN THE TOP 5" OF THE SUBGRADE. 6. FORMATION OF EMBANKMENTS EMBANKMENTS SHALL BE FORMED OF SATISFACTORY MATERIALS PLACED IN SUCCESSIVE HORIZONTAL LAYERS OF NOT MORE THAN 6" IN COMPACTED DEPTH FOR THE FULL WIDTH OF THE CROSS SECTION. THE GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED, AND THE VARIOUS SOIL STRATA SHALL BE PLACED, TO PRODUCE A SOIL STRUCTURE AS SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OR AS DIRECTED. ALL MATERIALS ENTERING THE EMBANKMENT SHALL BE REASONABLY FREE OF ORGANIC MATTER SUCH AS LEAVES, GRASS, ROOTS, AND ANY OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL. OPERATIONS ON EARTHWORK SHALL BE SUSPENDED AT ANY TIME WHEN SATISFACTORY RESULTS CANNOT BE OBTAINED BECAUSE OF RAIN, FREEZING WEATHER, OR OTHER UNSATISFACTORY CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DRAG, BLADE OR SLOPE THE EMBANKMENT TO PROVIDE PROPER SURFACE DRAINAGE AT ALL TIMES. THE MATERIAL IN THE LAYERS SHALL BE OF PROPER MOISTURE CONTENT BEFORE ROLLING TO OBTAIN THE PRESCRIBED COMPACTION. WETTING OR DRYING OF THE MATERIAL AND MANIPULATION WHEN NECESSARY TO SECURE A UNIFORM MOISTURE CONTENT THROUGHOUT THE LAYER SHALL BE REQUIRED. SHOULD THE MATERIAL BE TOO WET TO PERMIT PROPER COMPACTION OR ROLLING, ALL WORK ON ALL PORTIONS OF THE EMBANKMENT THUS AFFECTED SHALL BE DELAYED UNTIL THE MATERIAL HAS BEEN DRIED TO THE PROPER MOISTURE CONTENT. SPRINKLING SHALL BE DONE WITH APPROVED EQUIPMENT THAT WILL SUFFICIENTLY DISTRIBUTE THE WATER. SUFFICIENT EQUIPMENT TO FURNISH THE REQUIRED WATER SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES. THE EMBANKMENT SHALL BE COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN 95% OF THE MAXIMUM STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE. DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE EMBANKMENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUTE HIS EQUIPMENT AT ALL TIMES, BOTH WHEN LOADED AND WHEN EMPTY, OVER THE LAYERS AS THEY ARE PLACED AND SHALL DISTRIBUTE THE TRAVEL EVENLY OVER THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE EMBANKMENT. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN, HOWEVER, NOT TO OVERLOAD THE EMBANKMENT AREA WITH CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT. IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF EMBANKMENTS, STARTING LAYERS SHALL BE PLACED IN THE DEEPEST PORTION OF THE FILL; AS PLACEMENT PROGRESSES, LAYERS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED APPROXIMATELY PARALLEL TO THE FINISHED PAVEMENT GRADE LINE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STABILITY OF ALL EMBANKMENTS MADE UNDER THE CONTRACT AND SHALL REPLACE ANY PORTION WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER, HAS BECOME DISPLACED DUE TO CARELESSNESS OR NEGLIGENCE ON THE PART OF THE CONTRACTOR. 7. TESTING THE OWNER WILL PROVIDE THE SERVICES OF AN INDEPENDENT SOILS TESTING FIRM FOR PERFORMING TESTS AS ARE REQUIRED TO IDENTIFY MATERIALS, TO DETERMINE COMPACTION CHARACTERISTICS, TO DETERMINE MOISTURE CONTENT, AND TO DETERMINE DENSITY OF FILL IN PLACE. THESE TESTS PERFORMED WILL BE USED TO VERIFY THAT THE FILLS CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS. GENERAL NOTES 1. TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY JIM BLANCHARD ASSOCIATES, PC. INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR GENERAL DESIGN PURPOSES ONLY - NOT FOR RECORDATION. 2. THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (N.A.V.D. 1988) DETERMINED BY G.P.S. OBSERVATIONS. 3. PROPERTY LINES AS PROVIDED BY JIM BLANCHARD ASSOCIATES, PC. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY UPON DETERMINATION THAT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AS SHOWN MAY RESULT IN THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT(S). THE BEARINGS AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL VALUES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM. 4. THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INDICATED ON THE PLANS ARE FROM ASSUMED INFORMATION MADE AVAILABLE FROM THE OWNER. THIS INFORMATION IS NOT INCLUSIVE OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND CABLES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WORK WITH THE OWNER TO MINIMIZE CONFLICTS. 5. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK THAT MAY AFFECT EXISTING UTILITIES. 7. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE RELOCATION AND/OR ADJUSTMENT OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITH UTILITY OWNER. 8. ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL NCDOT, LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY AND ALL PERCEIVED CONFLICTS THAT MAY ARISE FROM THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 9. SEWER AND STORMWATER PIPES TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 24" SEPARATION, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, FROM BOTTOM OF STORMWATER PIPE AND TOP OF SEWER PIPE. 10. LATERAL SEPARATION OF SEWERS OR WATER MAINS. WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID AT LEAST TEN (10) FEET LATERALLY FROM EXISTING OR PROPOSED SEWERS, UNLESS LOCAL CONDITIONS OR BARRIERS PREVENT A TEN (10) FOOT LATERAL SEPARATION -- IN WHICH CASE: (A) THE WATER MAIN IS LAID IN A SEPARATE TRENCH, WITH THE ELEVATION ON THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER MAIN AT LEAST EIGHTEEN (18) INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF SEWER; OR (B) THE WATER MAIN IS LAID IN THE SAME TRENCH AS THE SEWER WITH THE WATER MAIN LOCATED AT ONE SIDE ON A BENCH OF UNDISTURBED EARTH, AND WITH THE ELEVATION OF THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER MAIN AT LEAST EIGHTEEN (18) INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF SEWER. 11. CROSSING A WATER MAIN OVER A SEWER. WHENEVER NECESSARY FOR A WATER MAIN TO CROSS OVER A SEWER, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE LAID AT SUCH AN ELEVATION THAT THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER MAIN IS AT LEAST EIGHTEEN (18) INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER, UNLESS LOCAL CONDITIONS OR BARRIERS PREVENT AN EIGHTEEN (18) INCH SEPARATION -- IN WHICH CASE, BOTH THE WATER MAIN AND SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF FERROUS MATERIALS AND WITH JOINTS THAT ARE EQUIVALENT TO WATER MAIN STANDARDS FOR A DISTANCE OF TEN (10) FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE CROSSING. 12. CROSSING A WATER MAIN UNDER A SEWER. WHENEVER IT IS NECESSARY FOR A WATER MAIN TO CROSS UNDER A SEWER, BOTH THE WATER MAIN AND THE SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF FERROUS MATERIALS AND WITH JOINTS EQUIVALENT TO WATER MAIN STANDARDS FOR A DISTANCE OF TEN (10) FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE POINT(S) OF CROSSING. A SECTION OF WATER MAIN PIPE SHALL BE CENTERED AT THE POINT OF CROSSING. 13. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, MAXIMUM SLOPES OF EARTHEN AREAS SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER. 14. CONTROLLED SEDIMENTATION OUTLETS TO BE PLACED AT LOW SPOTS ALONG SEDIMENT FENCING. 15. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED, MULCHED, AND STABILIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS. 16. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DISPOSAL OF ALL DEMOLITION AND WASTE MATERIALS. 17. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND AMENDMENTS OR SUPPLEMENTS THERETO. PROPER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, SIGNS, ETC., SHALL BE INSTALLED TO ENSURE PUBLIC SAFETY. 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH APPLICABLE ELECTRIC UTILITY REGARDING INSTALLATION OF PIPELINES NEAR UTILITY POLES, INCLUDING ANY REQUIRED COSTS. IF POSSIBLE, CONTRACTOR SHALL ACHIEVE 5' SEPARATION FROM ALL UTILITY POLES. 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SWALES AS NECESSARY TO DIVERT STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM PROPOSED STORAGE LAGOONS. 20. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. GENERAL NOTES (RELATING TO SHEET C.3.1 1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON AN ASSUMED BENCHMARK ELEVATION AND DO NOT REPRESENT MEAN SEA LEVEL DATUM. 2. ANY HEAVY VEGETATION AND/OR ROOT MATTER SHALL BE STRIPPED FROM PAD AREA PRIOR TO PLACING FILL. ALL OF TOP SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO PLACING FILL. ROOTS IN EXCESS OF 2 INCHES IN DIAMETER WILL NOT BE ALLOWED IN FILL SECTIONS. TOP SOIL SHALL BE STOCKPILED AT PERIMETER OF PAD FOR USE IN FINAL GRADING AND ESTABLISHING VEGETATION. 3. ALL FILL MATERIAL PLACED ON THE BUILDING PAD SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% OF THE STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY. IT IS REQUIRED THAT COMPACTION BE DONE WITH A SHEEPSFOOT ROLLER. 4. PAD ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN REPRESENT FINISHED SLAB. SEE PAD CROSS SECTIONS FOR GRADE REFERENCE POINT. 5. PAD SIDE SLOPES ARE 3:1 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLAN. 6. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW PAD AND ROAD SHALL MEET ENGINEER'S APPROVAL. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ANY ROADS THAT ARE USED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. 7. FILL FOR CONSTRUCTION AT THIS SITE SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM BORROW AREAS APPROVED BY ENGINEER. 8. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING/REPAIRING ANY DAMAGE TO DITCHLINES DURING CONSTRUCTION. THIS INCLUDES REPAIR TO ANY DISTURBED AREAS 9. WATER SUPPLY WELLS PLACED ON THE SITE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 1 00'AWAY FROM THE CLOSEST POINT OF ANY SEPTIC AREA OR LAGOON. 10. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ARE REQUIRED TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE SITE. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN ALL SUCH MEASURES THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. 11. ALL PROPERTY LINES, BLUE LINE STREAMS, AND DRINKING WATER WELLS THAT EXIST IN THE LIMITS OF THIS MAP ARE SHOWN. 12. ANY WELLS THAT REQUIRE CLOSING ARE TO BE CLOSED SUBJECT TO STATE REGULATIONS. 13. SECONDARY CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES SHALL BE LOCATED ON SITE SUCH THAT ALL POTENTIAL WASTE WATER FROM RECYCLE OR DISCHARGE PIPES SHALL BE COLLECTED ON SITE. 14. POWER AND/OR PHONE LINES MAY BE WITHIN CONSTRUCTION AREA. THEY SHALL BE LOCATED PRIOR TO EXCAVATION AND REROUTED AS NECESSARY. 15. UPON ENCOUNTERING ANY BURIED UTILITY, DEBRIS, OR UNSUITABLE FILL MATERIAL, THE ENGINEER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE CONTACTED IMMEDIATELY. 16. DRAINAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED UPON FIRST OPPORTUNITY TO ENSURE ROAD, PADS, AND NEW CONSTRUCTION AREAS SHED WATER. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1. OBTAIN PLAN APPROVALS (IF NECESSARY) AND OTHER APPLICABLE PERMITS. 2. FLAG THE WORK LIMITS AND BUFFER AREA FOR PROTECTION. 3. HOLD PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE(S) AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. 4. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 5. ROUGH GRADE SITEWORK AREAS AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL. 6. COMPLETE FINAL GRADING OF GROUNDS, TOPSOIL CRITICAL AREAS, AND PERMANENTLY VEGETATE, LANDSCAPE, AND MULCH. 7. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND WITHIN 24 HRS AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS. NEEDED REPAIRS WILL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. 8. AFTER SITE IS STABILIZED, REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY MEASURES AND INSTALL PERMANENT VEGETATION ON THE DISTURBED AREAS. 9. PERMANENT GROUND COVER TO BE ESTABLISHED WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS OR 30 CALENDAR DAYS, WHICHEVER IS SHORTER. EROSION AND MAINTENANCE CONTROL SCHEDULE 1. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED FOR STABILITY AND OPERATION FOLLOWING EVERY RUNOFF -PRODUCING RAINFALL BUT IN NO CASE LESS THAN ONCE EVERY WEEK. ANY NECESSARY REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN THE INTEGRITY OF ALL SUCH DEVICES. 2. TEMPORARY ENTRANCE STONE SHALL BE CLEANED OR REPLACED WHEN THE SEDIMENT NO LONGER DRAINS. 3. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE SEDIMENT FENCE AND AT THE INLET PROTECTION SEDIMENT FENCE WHEN IT BECOMES APPROXIMATELY 6" DEEP AT THE FENCE. THE SEDIMENT FENCE SHALL BE REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO PRESERVE THE INTEGRITY OF THE FENCE. 4. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE FERTILIZED, RESEEDED AND MULCHED AS NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH A VIGOROUS, DENSE VEGETATIVE COVER. T 0 m 0 a a U o co co U 11 cn >- cn Wk 1 SHEET NUMBER C. 1.2 O O � N O N � � � Z N m J J W � W Z Q U � U W J Z WO Z U)Q:) W 0 W U) a� Z 0 ~U IL Z w O LL M GENERAL NOTES: THE SETBACKS FOR THE SPRAY IRRIGATION SITE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: • EACH HABITABLE RESIDENCE OR PLACE OF ASSEMBLY UNDER SEPARATE OWNERSHIP OR NOT TO BE MAINTAINED AS PART OF THE PROJECT SITE: 400 FT (1) TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM NCDOT CONTOUR DATA SUPPLEMENTED BY FIELD SURVEY • EACH HABITABLE RESIDENCE OR PLACE OF ASSEMBLY OWNED BY THE PERMITTEE TO BE MAINTAINED AS PART OF THE PROJECT SITE: 200 FT FROM JIM BLANCHARD ASSOCIATES, PC. INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN PURPOSES ONLY - • EACH PRIVATE OR PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SOURCE: 100 FT NOT FOR RECORDATION. • SURFACE WATERS SUCH AS INTERMITTENT AND PERENNIAL STREAMS, PERENNIAL WATERBODIES, AND WETLANDS: 100 FT (2) WETLAND INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM EAGLE RESOURCES, P.A. • GROUNDWATER LOWERING DITCHES WHERE THE BOTTOM OF THE DITCH INTERSECTS THE SHWT: 100 FT (3) CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. • SURFACE WATER DIVERSIONS SUCH AS EPHEMERAL STREAMS, WATERWAYS, AND DITCHES: 25 FT (4) ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL NCDOT, LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL STANDARDS • EACH WELL WITH EXCEPTION OF MONITORING WELLS: 100 FT AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY AND ALL PERCEIVED • EACH PROPERTY LINE: 150 FT CONFLICTS THAT MAY ARISE FROM THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE CONTRACT • TOP OF SLOPE OF EMBANKMENTS OR CUTS OF TWO FEET OR MORE IN VERTICAL HEIGHT: 15 FT DOCUMENTS. 1 • EACH WATER LINE FROM A DISPOSAL SYSTEM: 10 FT (5) UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, MAXIMUM SLOPES OF PROPOSED GRADING AREAS SHALL BE 3:1---\ SUBSURFACE GROUNDWATER LOWERING DRAINAGE SYSTEMS: 100 FT I ��-• ' OR FLATTER. • PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY: 50 FT \ �� (6) CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE RELOCATION AND/OR ADJUSTMENT OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITH UTILITY /� � NITRIFICATION FIELD: 20 FT OWNER. --J - • EACH BUILDING FOUNDATION OR BASEMENT: 15 FT I\ (7) CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK THAT MAY AFFECT EXISTING UTILITIES. F THE SETBACKS FOR TREATMENT AND STORAGE UNITS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: , (8) CONTROLLED SEDIMENTATION OUTLETS TO BE PLACED AT LOW SPOTS ALONG SEDIMENT FENCING NOT TO ) \ EXCEED 200 L.F. INTERVALS. �• EACH HABITABLE RESIDENCE OR PLACE OF ASSEMBLY UNDER SEPARATE OWNERSHIP OR NOT TO BE MAINTAINED AS PART OF THE PROJECT SITE: 100 FT 9 ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED, MULCHED, AND STABILIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEEDING #-.0 EACH PRIVATE OR PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SOURCE: 100 FT SPECIFICATIONS AND AGRONOMISTS RECOMMENDATIONS WITHIN 15 DAYS OF GRADING ACTIVITIES. p` • SURFACE WATERS SUCH AS INTERMITTENT AND PERENNIAL STREAMS, PERENNIAL WATERBODIES, AND WETLANDS. 50 FT NOW OR FORMERLY (10) CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DISPOSAL OF ALL DEMOLITION AND WASTE MATERIALS. EACH WELL WITH EXCEPTION OF MONITORING WELLS: 100 FT OWEN, KRYSTLE LEIGH & HUS • EACH PROPERTY LINE: 50 FT \ SEARLES, ALBERT JONATHAN (11) DITCH IN ZONE 4 PROPOSED CENTER PIVOT IS TO BE FILLED SUBSEQUENT TO APPROVAL OF WETLAND r �\ DUPLIN CO. PIN:247400972449 J \- � - DELINEATION AND ISSUANCE OF A JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD OR AJD) BY THE ARMY CORPS OF f % I f DB 1946 PG. 792 w ENGINEERS. NOW OR FORMERLY / - FREEMAN, SARA B DUPLIN CO. PIN: 249500835775 DB 1368/PG. 526 ( P N NOW OR FORMERLY WOR FORMERLY 1 ; 1 NOW OR FORMERLY I _ i� / / \ QUINN, DOUGLAS RONALD \ NOW OR FORMERLY OWEN, KRYSTLE LEIGH & HUS SUTTON, LEONARD FRANKLIN, JR. e / DUPLIN CO. PIN: 247500801202 DUPLIN CO. PIN: 247400487004 �' �• � �' i "'' SEARLES, ALBERT G. &WIFE SEARLES, ALBERT JONATHAN /� DB 909/PG. 776 ' SEARLES, JAN K. DUPLIN CO. PIN: 247400981424 I -i' --DB 1637/PG. 904 DUPLIN CO. PIN: 247400899049 DB 1890/PG. 149 37 rOS„F / rX NOW OR FORMERLY -�- MAREADY, EDDIE R. ET ALS DBA fig' E ~ 'J9�� - -' " � ` / MAREADY ENTERPICES LLC / / \ c3C�1 \\ / DUPLIN CO. PIN: 247500215543 \ / v _��3 F DB 151 O/PG. 568 NOW OR FOR r �� \� �� ., / / c NOW OR FORMERLY QUINN, DOUGLAS RONALD / QUINN, DOUGLAS RONALD I J DUPLIN CO. PIN: 246515744703 / DUPLIN CO. PIN: 247500627224 I DB 860/PG. 187 DB 1248/PG. 198 L \ 00 cs .�- �'"'� \ 100' WETLAND � � � � TEMPORARY I / SETBACK (TYP.) , �g E - f l-. MONITORING I �-- - -- 27 42 -/ / `� �r WELL NOW OR FORMERLY / �` �j,6'-� \ /� �ci`1 (TYP.) SUTTON, LEONARD FRANKLIN, JR. \ i DUPLIN CO. PIN: 247500328271 N65* �O' 28" E I DB 1637/PG. 913260 . 2 / / S'6' 07 E �^' � / :� � NOW OR FORMERLY 1 s� NASH JOHNSON & SONS FARMS DUPLIN CO. PIN: 248500413579 / ( 597 DB PG. 39 WASTEWATER LIFT STATION / FOR TOWN OF WARSAW �J / i l t _ -- Y ADJACENT / (� 1 PROPERTY PZ-4 BOUNDARY co 1r 5 5- NOW OR FORMERLY i ,,�. TW-1 �V E�0 2 MICRO LAND / GROUP, LLC DUPLIN CO. PIN. 247513243308 I / DB 1874/PG. 435 INTERIOR PARCEL N5 21 55 W � `' � LINE (TYP.) � 6 j 196' ' < j 5 NOW OR FORMERLY 49 x /'' % EXISTING POWER / ��1 GARDNER, FRED THOMAS & MOTHER I / N84� 05"E .+ 1 ` PREVIOUSLY FILLED LINE EASEMENT W/ ' O / GARDNER, CATHERINE MOSS HRS 574.77' < ; I I Z-3 <� �' DITCH (TYP.) 50' SETBACK '' ./ �� SUBJECT DUPLIN CO. PIN: 246500610675 I -� ♦PROPERTY DB 788 PG. 438 / ^ BOUNDARY / /$ r (TYP.) �.... o AOl - / I � TW-3 S 69 ' 42' I _ ' J \„ NOW OR FORMERLY �. � PZ 7 � 77.7$ DUPLIN MICRO INCO. PIGROUP, > N: 24500427402 �_ I I \ - - DB 1958/PG. 184 I �-� O� 150' PROPERTY LINE SETBACK (TYP.) _ SWALE (TYP.) SR rL 4j 8 3� NO' 29' 34"E �� // 6 - , w� CPR G tPVE�' !� „W8S �� p6 08'\ 185.47'\ 220.81 „ �� 32' S NOW' OR FORMERLY \ \ ni / 3 0 ' �� - N86' 34 44 E N N 3 5 » _..i BUTTON, LEONARD FRANKLIN, JR. \ �! --- 2 \ / O ��w � X � r � 192.23 � �� ����j._ \ DUPLIN CO. PIN: 247400487004 '�. / �� p -�` / o \ 18 N 86' 34 44 E/ o DB 1637/PG. 904 J --J Q 1 N 2' 37 50 W X i NOW OR FORMERLY \ % 0 173.69' s 30.20' ;b c, _ NOW OR FORMERLY O� \ N1 08' 35"W ® �g ! �_ , ALLEN, THELMA S. 1 ROCK CREEK LIVESTOCK, LLC ;, 6t J, 10 d S DUPLIN CO. PIN:247514338649 DUPLIN CO. PIN: 247500317822 W I I 44.40 i 0 O I DB 1 OE/PG. 52 1D DB 1958/PG. 256 ml 613 N1 12'-40' NO 39 34 W / �� o� I OP O �, r� / NOW OR FORMERLY �- -- - - - - �� W y122.68'296° S O DAVIS, EARL C. &WIFE DAVIS, �-►- --... ,' " +, -N�.' 18' 24"E 13 C0� �,� Al r l SYLVIA JOY JOHNSON - NC HWY 117 _ _ _ a � �N1 43 13 E \ / DUPLIN CO. PIN: 247500723161 �00 �) 82.46' `-'Jl'. .�F, �Q`Z` / DB 1897/PG. 972 i I -r - RESIDENCE SETBACK FROM Q, r _ / SF� ��3 ❑ \ RESIDENCE (TYP.) GP NOW OR FORMERLY Desc Property Owner DUPLIN CO. PIN: DEED: 1 WARSAW PROPERTIES, LLC 247514247341 1602 285 2008 2 WARSAW PROPERTIES, LLC 247500306859 1603 285 2008 3 SCHWARZ-RJR, LLC 247500306657 1649 958 2010 4 GARCIA, ELIDA MAIYRA 247500400538 1857 724 2018 5 KEA, LEON & WIFE VERLEA P KEA 246515549193 1100 694 1994 6 BROWN, STEPHEN & BROWN, MARIANNE 247500400430 1850803 2018 7 ROCK CREEK LIVESTOCK, LLC 247500400310 1958 256 2022 8 KORNEGAY, JOHN DANIEL & WIFE KORNEGAY, DORIS ANN S. 249500943086 1467 12 2005 91 FOSTER, CHRISTAINA L 246516844092 1451805 2004 10 ROCK CREEK LIVESTOCK, LLC 247500400103 1958 256 2022 11 JIMENEZ, COINTA 246500436817 1454072011 12 SOUTHERLAND, SAMUEL ERIC 246500435847 1825 754 2017 13 LEONARD, PAUL L. JR., LE 246500435164 1917 2012021 14 WILLIFORD, TRACEYA & WIFE WILLIFORD, WANDA L 247400398569 1174 276 1997 15 ALLEN, DAVIDCLAYBOURNE 247400398484 10646911992 16 ALLEN, THELMA S. 247514237528 10E 52 2011 17 ORTEZ, EDUARDO 247513232542 1552 338 2007 18 ROCK CREEK LIVESTOCK, LLC 247500402284 1958 256 2022 9 s , --� -- _� 12 1c�; ���1� NOW OR FORMERLY N3' 34' 59"W�� _ C� �� 16 I NICHOLSON, KICKY D. &WIFE / / TOWN OF WARSAW N9 25 28 W O I\ , - S 17 �� \ NICHOLSON, ANTOINETTE M. / PUBLIC WATER (100' 64.66 - DUPLIN CO. PIN:245500725711 �% 46.94 S� % d DB 1663/PG. 976 SETBACK) N 16' 38' 18"W 52.89 - --N23 25 40 W -- H-E- RAILROAD _,��� - �-+- m ASPHALT - 2 W (Co 4ED 1At/ R EAD) ---�� r--- __ ,_N28' 29' 26"W - --, \ \ T - - - -- `- - - --�- i T- - -'� T 61.02 ��� / V 1 ' Site -ID Northing Easting Elevation DW-1 448,925.75 2,276,905.59 144.50 PZ-2 447,127.70 2, 276, 952.07 126.53 P Z-3 450, 755.00 2, 275, 526.82 138.77 PZ-4 449, 715.30 2, 276, 026.27 148.30 PZ-5 448,372.80 2,275,300.24 146.49 PZ-6 448,855.89 2,277,146.41 141.97 PZ-7 450,209.60 2,274,937.00 148.40 TW-1 448,637.43 2,275,929.49 148.21 TW-2 447,516.06 2,277,129.97 134.00 TW-3 449, 676.77 2, 275, 319. 37 148.48 BEFORE YOU DIG! NC ONE CALL (TOLL FREE) (OR 1-800-632-4949) IT'S THE LAW! SCALE: 1" = 300 300 0 300 SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION LLJ O 00 Z ccl- J z� Lij W c Z � � W J Q SHEET NUMBER C. 2. 1 o � ~ oLu N � N m z cn L z � � U W J :o Z 0 Q W �WU) v Q�z =Z .,� 01-�'--, z O U W Z 0� 11''" 0 LL LAGOON A DATA TABLE DESCRIPTION DATA UNITS TOD ELEVATION 148.0 FT FB ELEVATION 146.0 FT BOTTOM ELEVATION 133.0 FT TOE OF SLOPE ELEV. 129.0 FT TOP SURFACE AREA 230,280.0 SQ. FT. FREEBOARD SURFACE AREA 217,308.0 SQ. FT. BOTTOM SURFACE AREA 140,010.0 SQ. FT. TOTAL VOLUME 20,622,472.0 GALLONS 2,757,015.0 CU. FT. FREEBOARD VOLUME 17,275,983 GALLONS 2,309,463 CU. FT. LAGOON B DATA TABLE DESCRIPTION DATA UNITS TOD ELEVATION 148.0 FT FB ELEVATION 146.0 FT BOTTOM ELEVATION 133.0 FT TOE OF SLOPE ELEV. 125.0 FT TOP SURFACE AREA 240,800.0 SQ. FT. FREEBOARD SURFACE AREA 229,064.0 SQ. FT. BOTTOM SURFACE AREA 159,800.0 SQ. FT. TOTAL VOLUME 22,322,863.0 GALLONS 2,984,340.0 CU. FT. FREEBOARD VOLUME 18,809,856.0 GALLONS 2,514,512.0 CU. FT. J � � I r -A, C �� \ 1 DITCH IN ZONE 4 PROPOSED CENTER PIVOT '�• a �- -- .� `\� � _ --- �� / AF IS TO BE FILLED SUBSEQUENT TO APPROVAL, OF WETLAND DELINEATION AND ISSUANCE OF �A JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD ORIN \\ �- / \ / --�` ,P• -�Jl n AJD) BY THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. 1� I �\ I \ y �� / I ` f V � Klk �- '\\ \ �� \ / / j-- \ ✓ --'/ -� FLOOD ZONE AE LIMITS _ Jr ' \ J \ \ o c �� (2018) l:� 101 INSTALL DOUBLE -ROW TEMPORARY SILT FENCE, / ` \ \� \ O APPROX 1.400 LF TYP. i �� I �`e \ SEE DETAIL PROPOSED CLEARING �; LIMITS. TYP. / ,/���„s r` INSTALL IRRIGATION SUCTION PIPE 16" DR21 HOPE, PLACE LOW END AT BOTTOM OF LAGOON, INSTALL % INSTALL SINGLE -ROW ANTI -SEEP COLLAR, SEE DETAIL TEMPOFENCE, TIYP + .`... i/ ( \ ZONE lA � SEE DETAIL �P�``'� \ � � � � 42.49 ACRES A_ \�- � � 7- ) INSTALL APPROX. 870'LF. � 1 \ ti - `` OF 8" (DR 17) HDPE �� _��-- 7 INSTALL RAIN - - / -�- _ / I SHUTOFF SENSOR l IRRIGATION LATERAL ��l F8 ACRES 14R- 1 I ` 1 li. r-�l �, \ t % C I \ 1 \ ( INSTALL LINED STORAGE Q #I \. ` INSTALL APPROX. 2,702 % EXISTING WOODSL[NE �- ` L.F. 3F 12" Gft 17 HDPE LAGOONS, P.� 1 } ( )� SEE DETAIL �' \ < IRRIGATION FORCEMAIN 1 � � d� LAGOON B \/r� IF J 5.53 ACRES � FB STORAGE I \ r i ®/ �� , �� ( 115 64N ACRES ' l l 1 ♦ �' \ � v \ 1� l �a� r / LAGOON A - 18.82 MG) � . r� \R ` 1 � � � 1 I I c z � �\\\\\\\ rS // f I 5.29 ACRES (FB STORAGE ..� INSTALL A PROX. 353 /�J L.F. OF 8" HDPE DR 17.27 MG) ( \� I/ram �) � l % ���� INSTALL IRRIGATION 17) LATERAL I �% 1 -+ PUMP STATION 2, /` J ! % % y I 1 ( L. ) " \ ♦� \ \ \ SEE DETAIL \\ 1 \ INSTALL APPROX. \ 1 m\\ NOW OR FORMERLY r. 537 L.F. OF 12" MICRO LAND GROUP, LLC / INSTALL APPROX. 2 32 �G � HDPE (DR 17) / e DUPLIN CO. PIN: 247513243308 B IRRIGATION a� ` DB 1874 PG. 435 I ` \\P L.F. OF 12"�DPERA) 1 FORCEMAIN 2 2, l ( I l f �� / INFLUENT FORCEMAIN J\R \, INSTALL APPROX. 1,280 - / _ \ \R INSTALL APPROX. 353 L.F. c 11 I/ INSTALL APPROX. 158 L.F. OF 8" HDPE (DR17) ,� INSTALL APPROX. 682 L.F. ZONE 3B OF 8" (DR 17) HDPE ` ( 1 > ' INFLUENT FORCEMAIN B i� OF 12" HDPE (DR17) 10.95 ACRES L.F. OF 8" HDPE DR � .•3 ` IRRIGATION FORCEMAIN 1 -,e IRRIGATION LATERAL 2 � �� / ✓ 21) GRAVITY LIN Z3NE 2 / \ / S / PROPOSED 4' HIGH SEE SHEET C.4. l g e j I I I 25.00 ACRES / / '�L • �� \� \ \ ' v � RESTRICTIVE 3-STRAND ,J ` BARBED WIRE FENCE (END S _� \� AT EXISTING WOODLINE)'000 ,001 INSTALL INFLUENT �r ZONE 3A J PUMP STATION 1, f 14.59 ACRES 8S ` i SEE SHEET C.4.0 o \ INSTALL IRRIGATION lb PUMP STATION 1, /; j x / / ., s O \ �� •� �\ -� \\\ j % i-� SEE DETAIL LAGOON C U / SS RO R IW \s ,./ J -11 \� -. 3.35 ACRES , xBE 60�-- //i, PRE (FB STORAGESQN 10.56 MG) C cc N r O r I PROPOSED 4' HIGH �/ ! ��'�\ u- \ 1 1 \ 1 \ \ \\ IQ(1p1 `) 1 _� I I EXISTING OVERHEAD RESTRICTIVE 3-STRAND / -J Od POWER LINES AND ROW\ (� / / � \ �w l 1 WITH 50' SETBACK BARBED WIRE FENCE / NC ASPHALT _ 60' r7 - S� � INSTALL IRRIGATION SUCTION PIPE C I -R/N/ f 16" HDPE (DR17), PLACE LOW END I I I I AT BOTTOM OF LAGOON, INSTALL \ I \ \ �( ' f r ANTI -SEEP COLLAR, SEE DETAIL \ \ \ I r r a o \ ' asIt It l l /v J ti I - _ �_ _ NC HWY 117 ASPHALT - 200 R/W (COMBINED W/ RAILROAD) -�"- \ ---- -._- LAGOON C DATA TABLE DESCRIPTION DATA UNITS TOD ELEVATION 161.0 FT FB ELEVATION 159.0 FT BOTTOM ELEVATION 146.0 FT TOE OF SLOPE ELEV. 148.0 FT TOP SURFACE AREA 146,205.0 SQ. FT. FREEBOARD SURFACE AREA 136,773.0 SQ. FT. BOTTOM SURFACE AREA 82,485.0 SQ. FT. TOTAL VOLUME 12,678,712.0 GALLONS 1,695,015.0 CU. FT. FREEBOARD VOLUME 10,563,040.0 GALLONS 1,412,073.0 CU. FT. Wetted Area Predominant Soil Series Soil Designation Max Zone Flow Rate AHLR Design Max PR Zone Name (acres) (GPM) (in/ac-yr) (in/hr) 1A 42.49 Norfolk Group II 109.21 49.75 113 15.64 Goldsboro Group III 16.73 20.71 2 25.05 Lynchburg Group IV 39.85 30.79 3A 14.59 Goldsboro Group III 20.71 27.48 313 10.95 Goldsboro Group III 19.13 33.82 4 13.68 Autryville Group 1 46.96 66.45 Totals 1 122.4 252.60 BEFORE YOU DIG! NC ONE CALL (TOLL FREE) 0 0 Q 1 0 (OR 1-800-632-4949) IT'S THE LAW! SCALE: 1" = 300 300 0 300 SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION. 0*40 �e I Z i CU `v Ucz v JLd o Z (� (R- o J ��Q LL Z O Q I,' LLJ W ~ z LLJ cL CL " C o QCL J � SHEET NUMBER C.3. 1 o � ~ NCB N Q N m O Z co V z Q z U W J Z O ZW (.9Q0 U �wU) QU Z O ~U ILZw O LL PM _'g,11,10P AP PI 111 ON P-4 I �4, �MA i Ira VM PI SIMP71 III '40 pm ON MIN LVP IMF Im PIP In OEM \%%%I wmr INNA-11, wm\,m 0% M Mmi Wetted Area Predominant Soil Series Soil Designation Max Zone Flow Rate AHLR Design Max PR Zone Name (acres) (GPM) (in/ac-yr) (in/hr) 1A 42.49 Norfolk Group II 109.21 49.75 16 15.64 Goldsboro Group III 16.73 20.71 2 25.05 Lynchburg Group IV 39.85 30.79 3A 14.59 Goldsboro Group III 20.71 27.48 3113 10.95 Goldsboro Group III 19.13 33.82 4 13.68 Autryville Group 1 46.96 66.45 Totals 122.4 252.60 Site ID Eason Northing Ground Elevation Top of Casing Elevation Screeed Depths NA,D83 Ft NAD83 Ft NAVD88 Ft NAVD88 Ft Ft 7W-1 2,275,956 448,634 148.46 150.26 8.8 - 13.8 7W-2 2,277,130 447 516 133.90 135.90 16.5 - 21.5 PZ`2 2,276,952 44,128 126.60 128.10 9.0 - 12.0 P`3 2,275,042 450,349 146.35 149.35 13.0 - 18.0 PZ-4 2,278,027 449 715 146.50 148.00 13.5 - 16.5 PZ-5 2,275,211 448,338 146.55 150.55 11.0 - 16.0 Pz-6 2 277 146 448,356 141.50 146.00 20.0 - 25.0 7-3 2,275,092 449,512 149.40 150.40 13.0 - 18.0 PZ-7 2,274,937 450,210 148.40 150.90 12.5 - 17.5 D1N-1 2,276,906 448,926 143.90 145.40 25.0..30.0 BEFORE YOU DIG! NC ONE CALL (TOLL FREE) SCALE: 1" 11 11 1 200 SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY DUE TO METHODSPROD U� w� z Lij �:z Q J U co O z ct Cc J co Q:� SHEET NUMBER C.3.2 o � ~ O N �Z N m O co ( Z Q Q. z O U W N WO Z FnaZ) W cn a�0 z00 ILZw 0 LL -PROPOSEDZONE 4 � I -� (34.9818,-78.0765 CENTER PIVOT 1 — ) , ER MFR a r 160 / ►►►� _ /s LAGOON B �� t 155 ��� ► 12 x12 x8 TEE, 8 GATE __ f ►/ FB 146.0 VALVE AND 8" (DR21) 150 BOT 133.0 HDPE LATERAL ' LAGOON Ate, / / ' 1 CENTER PIVOT �� 145 TOD 148.0 FB 146.0 BOT 133.0�_ / 12"x12"x8" TEE, 8" GATE 140 / VALVE AND 8" HDPE LATERAL (#3) TO -CENTER PIVOT 135 130 \ ' 125 12"x12"x§ TEE, 8" GATE VALLVE AND 8" HDPE / / LATERAL/ TO CENTER PIVOT-- PROPOSED ZONE 3B a 120 \R (34.9802,-78.0802) CENTER PIVOT f / 625, �R �I ---►� PER MFR �- PER MFR PROPOSED ZONEI 2 (34.9831,-78.0815) I CENTER PIVOT \ / �� \ C:• / f / �f f� HIGHEST IRRIGATION DROP ELEVATION = 153.00' TOB 148.00' RIM 147.00' TWL 1 -46.00' STORAGE LAGOON BOT 133.00' LEGEND TOB = TOP OF BERM TWL = TOP WATER LEVEL TOB 161.00' 1 6 0 TWL 159.00, LAGOON C 155 TOD 161.0 150 -` FB 159.0 BOT 146.0 ,- �145 140 SCALE: 1" =200 200 0 200 SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION. IRRIGATION RISER HYDRANT ASSEMBLY CONTROL PANEL 8" DIP 90° BEND (FLANGE) IRRGATION NORTH ZONES DETAIL , SCALE: NOT TO SCALE C.3.3 CENTER PIVOT SUPPLY LINE IRRIGATION DROP (TYP.) 135 130 INSTALL DROPS AS PER — MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS STORAGE LAGOON C IRRIGATION PUMP STATION 2 160 155 150 145 140 135 130 125 IRRIGATION SYSTEM 120 115 Ml'1�1��,1�1�L�1:��1�I��' SCALE: NOT TO SCALE HIGHEST IRRIGATION DROP ELEVATION = 153.00' RIM 162.00' LEGEND. TOB = TOP OF BERM TWL = TOP WATER LEVEL TRUSS SUPPORT BOT 146.0011 IRRIGATION PUMP STATION 1 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE AN LENGTH PER M CABLE SUPPORT 160 155 IRRIGATION 150 AREA 145 140 MODEL: CENTER -PIVOT SYSTEM OVERHANG LENGTH: END GUN SPRAY DIAMETER: I (EFFECTIVE SPRAY DIAMETER: PER MFR') CENTER PIVOT CONSOLE: C.A.M.S. SELECT CONSOLE (CONTROLS CENTER PIVOT OPTIONS) CENTER PIVOT VOLTAGE: 480V (AMP DRAW = 6.1 AMPS) SUPPLY WIRE: 3 PHASE COPPER WIRE (8-10GA.) CENTER -PIVOT REQUIREMENTS: 1. AUTOMATIC END GUN SHUTOFF - TURNS END GUN ON OR OFF AUTOMATICALLY AT ANY PRESET AREA IN THE FIELD WITH CONTROLS AT CENTER PIVOT CONSOLE. 2. END GUN OVERRIDE - PROVIDES CHECK FOR THE OPERATION OF THE END GUN AT ANY TIME. -� 3. LOW PRESSURE SHUTOFF SHUTS THE CENTER PIVOT OFF IF THERE IS A LOSS OF WATER PRESSURE WHILE THE PIVOT IS OPERATING. 4. HIGH VOLTAGE SURGE PROTECTION - HELPS PROVIDE PROTECTION TO THE PIVOT AGAINST LIGHTNING AND < VOLTAGE SPIKES. ca c 5. PHASE LOSS PROTECTION - PROVIDES PROTECTION FOR PIVOT COMPONENTS FROM DAMAGE DUE TO THE LOSS OF INCOMING VOLTAGE. 6. RUNNING LIGHT - FLASHING STROBE LIGHT LOCATED AT THE CENTER PIVOT TO MONITOR THE OPERATION OF THE CENTER PIVOT SYSTEM. �+ 7. LOW -VOLTAGE MONITOR - SHUTS THE PIVOT OFF WHEN THE VOLTAGE SUPPLY DROPS, AND PROTECTS THE MOTORS AND THEIR ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS. N 8. MOTOR COVERS - SHIELD MOTORS FROM DIRECT WATER APPLICATION FOR EXTENDED MOTOR LIFE. 9. POLY SPAN PIPE - SPANS ARE LINED FOR CORROSION PROTECTION DUE TO INDUSTRIAL WASTE PROPERTIES. 10. HIGH FLOATATION TIRES - 14.9" x 24" TIRES (RIM = 12" x 24"). 11. HDPE DROPS - PROVIDE IMPROVED EFFICIENCY (UNIFORMITY COEFFICIENT) FOR SPRAY NOZZLES. 12. END GUN - END GUN TO OPERATE AT DESIGNATED LOCATIONS IN THE SPRAY FIELD. i 13. BOOSTER PUMP - A BOOSTER PUMP MAY OR MAY NOT BE NECESSARY FOR THE OPERATION OF THE END GUN, AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. cif) O NOTE: ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS AND EQUIPMENT ABOVE ARE TO BE INSTALLED AS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. �:4 1!1121zaa Well IgLe_3iNN,1 1 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE CADMIUM PLATED NUTS, BOLTS, & WASHERS. 11-619/1'-010/.080 ALUM. NO SWIMMING, FISHING, OR DRINKING SIGN TO READ: "ATTENTION — NON —POTABLE WATER: NO WADING OR DRINKING" WITH IDENTIFICATION SYMBOL. BOLT TO STL. SIGN POST STANDARD STEEL SIGN POST 135 130 8" DIA. 3000 PSI CONC. BASE 3" IRRIGATION FIELD —12"---w- 1 11 /16" ATTENTION 6" NON -POTABLE 18" WATER: NO WADING OR DRINKING C1 4" 3' NOTE: PLACE SIGN EVERY 100' ALONG ALONG PUBLIC ROADWAY OF IRRIGATION FIELD LINE. 0 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE SPAN LENGTH VARIES (SEE PLAN) 4" MIN. 2,500 PSI YIELD STRENGTH 3.00' CENTER PIVOT TOWER CONCRETE SLAB (TYP.) 3 III III II I I III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III III 8" FEMALE FEMALE QD x FLANGE ADAPTER HIGH FLOATATION TIRE (TYP.) .; 14.9" x 24 CONNECTING HOSE ZONE CENTER -PIVOT (PROFILE VIEW; " DETAIL 4 8" MALE QD x FLANGE ADAPTER SCALE: NOT TO SCALE C.3.3 8" PLUG VALVE Ld Q � J o zoo J 02� m� d W ~ J Ld 0 � Q Q Q � � Q J W I— cr_ J cr- 0-4 SHEET NUMBER C. 3..3 0 0 0 N N NO Z m J N O J � Q D_ Z Z W O v ww�';vi ��Z I. 0 Q -0 Z 0 V ILZof O LL HIGHEST IRRIGATION DROP ELEVATION = 153.00' 160 160 155 ' i 155 150 145 140 135 130 125 120 v _ _ 150 TOB 148.00' RIM 147.00' IRRGATION SOUTH ZONES DETAIL , SCALE: NOT TO SCALE C.3.4 SCALE: 1 " = 200 200 0 200 SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION. CENTER -PIVOT REOUIREMENTS MODEL: CENTER —PIVOT SYSTEM OVERHANG LENGTH: END GUN SPRAY DIAMETER: (EFFECTIVE SPRAY DIAMETER: PER MFR') CENTER PIVOT CONSOLE: C.A.M.S. SELECT CONSOLE (CONTROLS CENTER PIVOT OPTIONS) CENTER PIVOT VOLTAGE: 480V (AMP DRAW = 6.1 AMPS) SUPPLY WIRE: 3 PHASE COPPER WIRE (8-10GA.) CENTER —PIVOT REQUIREMENTS: 1. AUTOMATIC END GUN SHUTOFF — TURNS END GUN ON OR OFF AUTOMATICALLY AT ANY PRESET AREA IN THE FIELD WITH CONTROLS AT CENTER PIVOT CONSOLE. 2. END GUN OVERRIDE — PROVIDES CHECK FOR THE OPERATION OF THE END GUN AT ANY TIME. 3. LOW PRESSURE SHUTOFF — SHUTS THE CENTER PIVOT OFF IF THERE IS A LOSS OF WATER PRESSURE WHILE THE PIVOT IS OPERATING. 4. HIGH VOLTAGE SURGE PROTECTION — HELPS PROVIDE PROTECTION TO THE PIVOT AGAINST LIGHTNING AND VOLTAGE SPIKES. 5. PHASE LOSS PROTECTION — PROVIDES PROTECTION FOR PIVOT COMPONENTS FROM DAMAGE DUE TO THE LOSS OF INCOMING VOLTAGE. 6. RUNNING LIGHT — FLASHING STROBE LIGHT LOCATED AT THE CENTER PIVOT TO MONITOR THE OPERATION OF THE CENTER PIVOT SYSTEM. 7. LOW —VOLTAGE MONITOR — SHUTS THE PIVOT OFF WHEN THE VOLTAGE SUPPLY DROPS, AND PROTECTS THE MOTORS AND THEIR ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS. 8. MOTOR COVERS — SHIELD MOTORS FROM DIRECT WATER APPLICATION FOR EXTENDED MOTOR LIFE. 9. POLY SPAN PIPE — SPANS ARE LINED FOR CORROSION PROTECTION DUE TO INDUSTRIAL WASTE PROPERTIES. 10. HIGH FLOATATION TIRES — 14.9" x 24" TIRES (RIM = 12" x 24"). 11. HDPE DROPS — PROVIDE IMPROVED EFFICIENCY (UNIFORMITY COEFFICIENT) FOR SPRAY NOZZLES. 12. END GUN — END GUN TO OPERATE AT DESIGNATED LOCATIONS IN THE SPRAY FIELD. 13. BOOSTER PUMP — A BOOSTER PUMP MAY OR MAY NOT BE NECESSARY FOR THE OPERATION OF THE END GUN, AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. NOTE: ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS AND EQUIPMENT ABOVE ARE TO BE INSTALLED AS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. CENTER PIVOT SPECIFICATIONS DETAIL 2 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE i.0 O N z zw 0 U) IX ZOO zU �1103t O LL I �0 0 z J CL Q .2- G� SHEET NUMBER WN] 0 0 N N m � J � Z W W Z O U W J C_ O U En SEE SHEET C.4.1 FOR CONTINUATION OF 12" IFM APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT _ APPROXIMATE LOCATION EXISTING PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS LINE, CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND AVOID CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER OR FORCE MAIN PROPOSED FLOW METER INSTALLED ON 12" INFLUENT FORCE MAIN. INSTALL SHALL INCLUDE (1) DOWNSTREAM ISOLATION VALVE, METER BOX/COVER AND CELLULAR TRANSMITTER FOR REMOTE READING. LOCATE AS NEEDED TO AVOID VEHICULAR CONFLICTS AND ALLOWS REQUIRED STRAIGHT PIPE DISTANCE PER MFR. APPROXIMATE LOCATION EXISTING DUKE ENERGY POWER LINE, CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND AVOID CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER AND FORCE MAIN APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING 6" WATER SS _ S CONCRETE PAD S � SS SS SS f; SS SS / APPROXIMATE / LOCATION OF EXISTING GAS EQUIPMENT i co EXISTING CONCRETE LOADING PAD APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING SCREEN SEPARATORS CONNECT EXISTING 8" PVC SCREEN DISCHARGE TO PROPOSED 12" PVC (SDR 35) BY INSERTED 8" TEE, 8"x12" REDUCER AND 8" BALL VALVE ON EACH SPIGOT. MAINTAIN CONNECTION TO EXISTING GRAVITY COLLECTION PIPE TO TOWN SEWER. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING GRAVITY SEWER LATERAL TO TOWN I ' co EXISTING VILLARI BROTHERS FACILITY � SS ss PROPOSED INFLUENT PUMP STATION, LOCATE AS _ SS NEEDED TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING SS SS EQUIPMENT. DISCHARGE MANIFOLD SHALL INCLUDE TEE, VALVE AND BLIND FLANGE FOR ..� FUTURE CAPABILITY TO PUMP TO TOWN WW `S — � CONNECTION, SEE SHEET C.5.1 FOR DETAIL BEFORE YOU DIG! NC ONE CALL (TOLL FREE) � U0 (OR 1-800-632-4949) IT'S THE LAW! SCALE: 1 " = 20' 20' 0 20' SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION. 150 145 140 135 130 125 120 115 Table 2A: Influent Lift Station A (Detail 1/C.S.1) Finished Grade: 139.00 ft Rim: 141.00 ft Invert In: 135.00 ft Bottom of Wet Well: 131.00 ft Depth of Wet Well: 10.00 ft Design Flow: 700 gpm Selected Pump Rate: 540 (each pump) gpm Total Dynamic Head (TDH): 33 ft Pump Horsepower: 10 hp Pump Speed (RPM): 1,760 RPM Electrical Supply: 480 V Electrical Frequency: 60 hz Phase: 30 Impeller Diameter: 8 in. Motor Type: TEFL Selected Pump: GEA Pump Model: 4" High Pressure Shaft Length: 1 10 ft. HIGHEST ELEVATION = 148.00' TOD LAGOON A & B PROPOSED 12" PVC (SDR35) RIM 140.00' RAVITY LINE ® MIN 0.40% SLOPE v BOTTOM 130.00' LEGEND GND = EXISTING GRADE TWL = TOP WATER LEVEL INFLUENT PUMP STATION TO I 150 STORAGE LAGOONS (A,B,C) LAGOON A&B I 145 39.00' IRRIGATION SYSTEM 140 135 130 ' 125 120 115 HYDRAULIC PROFILE DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE .2- i ca ca O 0 co O O O o zwLIJ Qzo�w� �z 0 m �z �0� � QOC, Q W CA- J SHEET NUMBER 101vej 0 0 '— CN z o m co N N � Z � W W U z W a- Q U En Z O Z 0 H U FnQ=) ?C ww� 0 J Ed aWZ s Z_ O ZU 0 O u_ 100—YEAR FLOOD LIMITS (ZONE AE), TYP. / REMOVE AND REPLACE- - EXISTING FENCING TO INSTALL . T INFLUENT FORCE MAIN � b / PROPERTY LINE, TYP. o� — ` 9+00 ��� " ��' x 13+00 t l� f Cl, 1 ► / ��10+00 X� IFj�FJ'/� r I� X l r APP l l / LOC EXIE \ II d,ll MAINTAIN SUITABLE CLE SANITARY SEW RE ANDS FIELD VERIFY ACTUF I + INSTALL APPROX. 2,932 L.F. OF 12" HDPE (DR17) � � INFLUENT FORCEMAIN A / I� x \ VILLARI BROTHERS FOODS I l IIINSTALL INFLUENT PUMP I STATION 1, SEE DETAIL I / w SHEET C.5.1 / % INSTALL APPROX. 158 L.F. OF 8" I ,r \� / '�� o PVC (DR 35) GRAVITY LINE SEE I o SHEET C.4.0, PROFILE THIS SHEET I / ------ CONNECT 8" PVC (DR 35) GRAVITY LINE TO LIQUID / + DISCHARGE OF SCREEN SS SEPARATORS SEE SHEET C.4.0 V. l/ L I — 15+00 ,PPROXIMOCATII ON AOF k TE ' 1 g = N XISTING FENCING )XIMATE x, L/ / \;. ION OF I 1 � qG GAS TANK p I f / le / / \\ N 3 11� ANCE (SEE Gox p %IN �I W EXISTING TER LINES, l / LOCATIONS't< INSTALL 80 LF / HORIZONTAL Nu / DIRECTIONAL DRILL, If l SEE DETAIL SHEET c.5.2 co GO 34 co co BEFORE Y U G! I NC ONE CALL I (TOLL FREE) I le 1 IIIII o SCAL . 1-10o,_,d I _ II 0 10 100 � � lIIle 11 OR 1-80d, 632-4949 I f JI �C ) ALE F MAP MAY VARY ITS TIC LAW! DUE TO M qDS OF REPRODUCTION. INSTALL 12" HDPE (DR17) FITTINGS, AS NEEDED 0 INSTALL APPROX. 1,280 L.F. OF 8" / HDPE (DR17) INFLUENT FORCEMAIN B, SEE SHEET C.4.2 S — vJ % \ / PREVIOUSLY FILLED \ DITCHES, TYP. SCALE: HOR. 1 "=100' VERT. 1 "=10' 155 150 O w w u� � z z z RV w O w U z cn Qzw z z z un O O wO w w O� z 140 z c� c� z w� Q w w J z LL zq 0 z z 2 w Q U aCD� w w H u � 0 w w w a �z Q z z z z w 0 w w O X (n O w O I S S w w130 z O O w > w J O O w z O O O > � w z z U w w O O O O O J z c3 U v JO = z w z 0 Q w 03 z > > z 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 = 30+00 �oo Q w w a- 0. w w J w w w w m LL 12" GRAVITY —1 +00 0+00 1 +00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11 +00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21 +00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 \ ULU UU T FM —A 155 150 Q 3 MIN.. COVER,TY a- z m Q '� 140 � z O w x J Q m z �� � z� J O w� w Z a � � O Q � J 130 z J J O z 155 PVC 0.40% Q J O w� z 155 zw> � �w w °� �n J c� z Q o > � o z= cn � � 150 + + w +� � o owN�� o 0 150 I wz o I> I o�0>0 Q Q U O Q� Q Q � V7 V7 Q UJ w V7 (n � (n w � INSTALL 80 LF 3' MIN. COVER,TYP. HORIZONTAL 140 DIRECTIONAL DRILL � 140 130 �1 130 (DR 35) INSTALL INFLUENT PUMP STATION 1, LINE AT MIN. SEE DETAIL SLOPE 1'fZOMI SEPARATION, YP, 8" MIN. SEPAR TION,TY 1.20 co 0 O Q U LLl (� o � zoo O LL � = I= �- O Lij - Q, — z� �— o oz ��o U m _ �c Q Q �o J QO �0- SHEET NUMBER WINE C) C N N O m N O Q � Z Z W � O U cii Z ,,`, %IIIII ,"I'll" , Ty ZU' uwj ~ �v VL ' '''.. • cn � LV � = O ��z I. z ZOO 00 =rdy, ., `fir �. '•. "goes �. 0 LL zl- o L.F. 280 1 \ INSTALL APPROX. A. 0+00 INSTALL . ,.. » \ 12x8 HDPE TEE / / 1 1 `1 9 ' 9 Z 21 �I OF 8 HDPE (DR17) � . INFLUENT FORCEMAIN B J i x I o e 1 INSTALL 8" HDPE I I \ \ o \ o I INSTALL 8 HDPE �� 1. � I CHECK VALVE\�PLUG VALVE INSTALL RELEASE VALVE 1 \ x x � � I / Q 1 x l L 7',, I x o I � x _. \ r I \' I x I ^�w > o 0;o u m w Jo waz 0 owx Q Lf m Q � om J w J w �ww w <� oQ> Q > w Ei- < w o w o Q wz > �zEl�w000 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 8+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 UUTBT B B SCALE: HOR. 1 "=100' VERT. 1 "=10' X 'w o 0 w J� z> w Q Qw �z o � zo o 00 oz � cn + w a 3' IN. CO ER, TYP. z 1� Q x � 1�0 w cn m J Q� w �o w 1�0 1�0 130 130 SCALE: 1" =100 100 0 100 SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION. BEFORE YOU DIG! NC ONE CALL (TOLL FREE) >0 ,0 �� 1 0 \' ®/' (OR 1-800-632-4949) IT'S THE LAW! n N O N 0 O .2- N ca ca 0 0 �z Li Q If Lj � U W cr- zo—! OHO o �zz Q Q � W � W �O QO �� 0- SHEET NUMBER C. 4.2 O 0 N N Lu m co co � � O Z W Z W w O Q Milt , h zwo Gee,. `. W J 01 � =S(n Z;�?� Q Z 'Y �' O I� Z � p LL ell, IRR—FM3 O o � N 0 INSTALL APPROX. 537 L.F. + OF 12" HDPE (DR 17) IRRIGATION FORCEMAIN 3 / SEE SHEET C.4.4 ' +00 o 1 +0 0 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 0 — IRRI 0 - IRR I - RR I-- IRR IRR +— o CENTER PIVOT ZONE 2 SEE DETAIL SHEET C.4.5? O 0 p I N + INSTALL APPROX. 620 ' 4� L.F. OF 12" HDPE (DR17) /� IRRIGATION OET C0EMAIN 2 SEESHE.4.4 0 It ter. O CE IRR 7 INSTALL AIR RELEASE VALVE AT THE ACTUAL HIGHEST POINT ON THE IRRIGATION MAIN, (TYP.) SEE DETAIL C.5.0 + O z0000 — 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 o 11 +00 12+00o 0 �— IRR IRR IRR IRR + IRR - f�j 2 0 =IRR - O a O O I IRRIGATION LATERAL 3 --"""*t oo 0 SEE SHEET C.4.5 t + - + I �o � t 0 0 N N �_ + + � t� IRRIGATION LATERAL 1 SEE SHEET C.4.5 14+ 0 15+00 16+00 17+C IRR -- IRR IRR — IRR IRRIGATION LATERAL 2 SEE SHEET C.4.5 SCALE: 1 " =100 100 0 100 SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION. INSTALL APPROX. 2,700 L.F. OF 12" (DR17) HDPE IRRIGATION FORCEMAIN 1 ! 27+22 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 — IRR — IRRI —H IRR I - IRR �— IRR -1IRR +— IRR = IRR�— IRR " IRR—FM1 \ I � 1 e �leoe I ( � I A / BEFORE YOU DIG! / NC ONE CALL (TOLL FREE) 0 0 (OR 1-800-632-4949) IT'S THE LAW! I N N w QQz w N�w� 0 LLI Q T)>_ w N LLIN uw �w QQ � =z QJ� o �wU N u�0Q ow 0 00 o > ISO o� o� +z iw U Q ' MIN. OVERT P. 150 un 140 130 &M 1+W 2+00 &M +m &M &M 7+00 sm 9-m 10+00 11+00 12+00 I&M l+m I&M 16+00 17+00 I&M 19-M 20+00 21+00 22+00 2&M 2+M 25+W 25+00 27+w 2e+W a_ LLLLI wN >a o N N� RR TAT RRI FM1 =� o< EL-DoN� w =EL w x� z x o z N� - o N 00 N� X 0"N N N P �w X Q� Q X Xo w Nz —w0 N N� X z N� Q _Xo _N N U N N w N� N �� oQ o + N~ W NN N W SCALE: HOR. 1"=100' N� w o z + o w ~ � VERT. 1 "=10' N �u Q Q �w N cn I� I E9 Z� i N i ca cu O O co c/) O z W O � � Z J O oz cl:�cr QC) �� zo m o� z ct�� w_z Ld J cn o- cr- SHEET NUMBER C.4.3 x- 0 0 N O � N m Z Lo Lo z Q Z W Vd O i ''•, eee � s`e�� C ANP��``� Z IN',`,`III IIIIIIII/II/Aj, Z W �� ee • •i �. W W 1 0W2. = _ OU 0 W 6+ 50 6+00 I / Q, "1 � x - I SCALE: 1 " =100 \ X 100 0 100 \ I \ J � SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION. I I r I� z O <N un > a_L� N O El"Z o �O Q� 010 0 O > +� �z Ou� �z ,� 150 140 130 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 0+00 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 00 03u RR OAT OR RM 2 00uL RR OAT OR FM-3 X W W O 03z0 z� 00za, z o Q O o O O + O W O W Q W = u/ O Q W O O� z O = SCALE: HOR. 1 "=100' VERT. 1 "=10' "Z, cn Q 3' IN. CO ER,TYP. 150 \50 1�0 1�0 130 130 �O cn Qz �z cn Q 3' MIN. COVER, YP. 1 e "� BEFORE YOU DIG! NC ONE CALL (TOLL FREE) ��p (OR 1-800-632-4949) IT'S THE LAW! .� N i ca ca 0 0 co �O cn Qz �z cn Q 3' MIN. COVER, YP. 1 e "� BEFORE YOU DIG! NC ONE CALL (TOLL FREE) ��p (OR 1-800-632-4949) IT'S THE LAW! .� N i ca ca 0 0 co 1 e "� BEFORE YOU DIG! NC ONE CALL (TOLL FREE) ��p (OR 1-800-632-4949) IT'S THE LAW! .� N i ca ca 0 0 co z L: O Q cc W Z J O ��Q Zo ct 00 oz ��z LLJ _1 — O ct 0- n N O N i i 0 SHEET NUMBER C.4.4 O 0 N N m � � O Z W W Z U W O J a U cn Z 0 M pop, 00000 W W. J ZO 3 y• 0 'sY -s C'! ; Z U O LL a x1 - x INSTALL APPROX. 338 L.F. 1 OF 8 HDPE (DR 17) I IRRIGATION LATERAL 3 DITCH IN ZONE 4 PROPOSED CENTER PIVOT IS l TO BE FILLED SUBSEQUENT TO APPROVAL OF \ �� WETLAND DELINEATION AND ISSUANCE OF A LAT—'3' 0+00 / ` I JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD OR AJD) x ( \ \ 4 / — BY THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. A o IRR IRR --F IRR ,. �js,. INSTALL APPROX. 870 L.F. I 3+3 +00 2+00 1 +00 » _ I mew 1 ( r OF 8 (DR 17) HDPE I INSTALL 8 HDPE PLUG ` IRRIGATION LATERAL 1 VALVE AT TEE I INTERSECTION I x L A T— 2 _ o —� IRR R --I IRR I 1 3+5 3+00 2+00 1+00 0 L 1 I 0 00 1+00 2+ 3+00 4+00�;+- 0 1 6+0000 8+00 68(ala aa) J 1 x -I— — \ / l / I INSTALL APPROX. 353 x L.F. OF 8" (DR 17) HDPE IRRIGATION LATERAL 2 \ \ aP INSTALL 8" HDPE PLUG I \ \\\\ \\ \ 1 VALVE AT TEE FORE YOU DIG! C ONE CALL x I INTERSECTION \ \ \ \ I I l J �-- C \\ �\ i I \ TOLL FREE) / J SCALE: 1" =100 I 100 0 100 I I ! SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY I DUE TO METHODS OF EPRODUCTION. \ \ ✓ \ , / J I (OR 1 -800-632-4949) \ � \ I 1 S THE LAW. 150 140 130 120 3' MIN. COVER, YP. Az* RV ww >> wJ mQ > 03o ww w� <<m ww zm> o N=w x w Q x xQo cn > m 0+00 1+00 wLwm Ei-0N �Nw > 0 00Lj_N X w N oL 0w + o 0 0 Q~ �w �w 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 IRRIGATION LAT 1 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 wmm EL�N -� 0 =zLw wL 0 0 X N 0 CNN m 0 0wN N o 0 03ma w Qm cry SCALE: HOR. 1 "=100' VERT. 1 "=10' 150 140 130 �> wJ > co ww w� QQ Cn Lm> o N z U o owQ Qwx 3' MIN. COVER,TYP. xQo cn > m 0+00 1+00 2+00 GGm IRRIGATION RAT-2 oNw > 0 00-N X 00� w ON 0z +W 00 Q 0 n w w 3+00 4+00 wmm ELLLI rr) 0 =zLw wL 00 X N 0 0NN 0 NwN �'oo �oLL w Qm U� 150 140 130 CDw wJ �Q 00o Jw � U o N=w oho owQ Qwx U) Q m 3' MIN. COVER,TYP. 0+00 wLL< Ei-0N-) �Nw 0= 00-o X 00Eh� w ON oz +W 00 Q 0 Un w w 1+00 2+00 RRI GATT OR LAT 2 3+00 4+00 wmQ ELLLI� 0 =zLw wL 00 N Xo CNN Eh:0 nwN 00 EL w Qm U� .2- N cu cu 0 O O W J o ;LU Q J J W 3~ ��(Z z U m O �z (� w z 0 _1 c O SHEET NUMBER C.4.5 O � ~ � N (z) N O N m Lo L O z Q Op Z � W W U Z o Cn < � W � W �W�-•� Q�p'sr z 0(.) IL z 1 LL wn P.� ��III�►�IIIIIII ._ .J�al TEE INTERSECTION 45' BEND DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE HH COVER, LOGO: "IRRIGATION ARV" QUAZITE BOX MODEL:PG2424BB30 OR EQUAL AIR RELEASE VALVE (VALMATIC OR APPROVED EQUAL) a 4" S.S. NIPPLE 4" BALL VALVE 4" S.S. NIPPLE 4" 90' BEND (SEE NOTE 2 BELOW) FITTINGS, VALVES AND PIPE FOR ARV SHALL BE 316 STAINLESS STEEL 12" #57 BEDDING ROCK TO INVERT OF NIPPLE 1. CONCRETE SHALL BE 3000 PSI. 2. CONCRETE SHALL NOT CONTACT BOLTS OR ENDS OF MECHANICAL JOINT FITTINGS. 3. TRENCHES SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD DETAILS AS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET 4. SEE STANDARD THRUST BLOCK QUANTITY TABLE (RIGHT) FOR CONCRETE REQUIRED. 5. ALL BENDS AND INTERSECTIONS SHALL HAVE CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING. I y. al a •: +. THRUST BLOCK AREA ' �' " '' `'' '' ` �'•' 4 C.5.0 90' BEND - VARIES DITCH (WHERE EXISTS) / 4" UNIONMAINTAIN �T POSITIVE 1 M I N SLOPE 1 MOUSEHOLE 4" STAINLESS / FORCEMAIN REACTION BEARING AREAS FOR HORIZONTAL PIPE BENDS BASED ON TEST PRESSURE OF 200 P.S.I. (ALL AREA IN SQUARE FEET) 61 O� �° �l (�� moo^ O 111z,- Oc_ (� ® P J� 00 p0 � �p •� Q� =p. p0 .2p' 00 \V� � V� 00 �� O� �� QO a0 ti0 C9� �Q• O� O �P �O �P �O OJ 00 QO gyp• 6" 11 1 4' 22 1 2• 2,207 1 2 2 1 1 1 3 1 16" 11 1 4' 22 1 2' 45' 30 779 8 16 19 4 4 8 31 4 90' S6 861 15 29 35 8 8 15 57 6 PLUG 1 40,213 1 10 1 21 1 25 1 5 1 5 1 10 1 41 1 5 NOTES: REACTION BEARING AREAS ARE IN SQUARE FEET MEASURED IN A VERTICAL PLANE IN THE TRENCH SIDE AT AN ANGLE OF 90' TO THE THRUST VECTOR. USE 6"-90' BEND VALUE FOR HYDRANTS FOR ADDITIONAL SAFETY FACTOR 4" 90' S.S. BEND 4" S.S. NIPPLE PLUG/GATE VALVE \ BACKFILL WITH #57 WASHED STONE TO SPRING LINE OF PIPE (MIN. 4" BELOW VALVE AND PIPE) GIA�I� Ii?3KiPl�� ALVE BOX SHAFT VALVE BOX BASE 2" FORCEMAIN PROVIDE SOLID CONCRETE BLOCK SUPPORT DIRECTLY UNDER VALVE FLANGE/PIPE FLANGE NOTES: 1. A VALVE BOX SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR EACH VALVE USED IN BURIED SERVICE APPLICATION. VALVE BOXES SHOULD BE INSTALLED SUCH THAT NO LOAD IS TRANSFERRED TO THE VALVE. 2. PREPARE PIPE ENDS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS. INSTALL VALVE PER PROPER METHODS ACCORDING TO END JOINT TYPE. ALL PIPING SHOULD BE PROPERLY SUPPORTED TO AVOID LINE STRESS ON THE VALVE. DO NOT USE THE VALVE AS A JACK TO FORCE A PIPELINE INTO POSITION. SCALE: NOT TO SCALE Q 0 ry Ll_ 0 w c� THRUST ROD SIZE AND QUANTITY PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS STAINLESS STEEL WIDE OR DOUBLE STRAP SERVICE SADDLE WITH I.P.S. THREAD NOTES: 1. ABOVE DETAIL IS BASED ON 4" AIR RELEASE VALVE. CHANGE PIPE AND FITTINGS ACCORDINGLY FOR OTHER VALVE SIZES AND TYPES. VALVE SIZES SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER. 2. THE MINIMUM DIMENSION FROM INVERT TO FINISHED GRADE SHALL BE 24". 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ACTUAL ROW/PROPERTY LINE LOCATION AT ARV LOCATION. WHEN ARV PLACEMENT CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING DITCH, CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT ENGINEER FOR FINAL ARV PLACEMENT. 4. LOOP SUFFICIENT AMOUNT OF TRACER WIRE INTO BOX TO ALLOW EASE OF ACCESS. OFFSET AIR RELEASE VALVE DETAIL r2 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE C.5.0 SEE PLAN PUBLIC RIGHT EXISTING 8„ OF WAY EXISTING GROUND GROUND ti CRUSHED STONE CRUSHED STONE PROVIDE TRANSITION BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT & EXISTING ROAD. PROFILE PLAN NOTES: 1. STONE SIZE - 3-2" COURSE AGGREGATE, CRUSHED STONE MAY BE USED. 2. WHEN NECESSARY, WHEELS SHALL BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE PERFORMED ON A SURFACE STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE, DRAINING INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAP OR SEDIMENT BASIN. ALL SEDIMENT SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM ENTERING ANY STORM DRAIN, DITCH OR WATERCOURSE THROUGH THE USE OF SANDBAGS, GRAVEL, BOARDS OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS. 3. THE ENTRANCE/EXIT SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH PREVENTS THE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR AND/OR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. 4. MINIMUM DIMENSIONS: (ALSO SEE EROSION CONTROL PLANS) LENGTH AS EFFECTIVE BUT NOT LESS THAN 50 FEET. WIDTH NOT LESS THAN FULL WIDTH OF ALL POINTS OF INGRESS OF EGRESS THICKNESS NOT LESS THAN EIGHT (8) INCHES. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT DETAIL 3 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE C.5.0 DIP BELL AND SOCKET HARNESS RESTRAINT (TYP.) MECHANICAL RESTRAINT (TYP) N OTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THRUST BLOCKING AT EACH CHANGE OF DIRECTION. FOR THRUST BLOCKING SEE DETAIL 4/C.5.0 MECHANICAL RESTRAINT SYSTEMS TYP. DETAIL 5 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE C.5.0 PROPOSED FC NATIVE CLAS CLASS III COMF BA EXISTIN EXISTING CLASS II JUILS NOTE: 1. USE FOR PRESSURE PIPE WHEN EXCAVATION OF TRENCH BOTTOM RESULTS IN STABLE CONDITIONS. 2. CLASS II BEDDING REQUIRED WHEN NATIVE ROCK BEDS ENCOUNTERED. 3. USE SUITABLE TAMP RODS TO ENSURE BEDDING IS THOROUGHLY TAMPED UNDER THE PIPE HAUNCHES. 4. Bc = DIAMETER OF PIPE BARREL PIPE BEDDING DETAIL 4 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE C.5.0 6 C.5.0 TEMPORARY RATE SPECIES (LB/AC) DATES RYE (GRAIN) 120 DEC. 1 - APR. 15 KOBE LESPEDEZA 50 DEC. 1 - APR. 15 GERMAN MILLET 40 APR. 15 - AUG.. 15 RYE (GRAIN) 120 AUG. 15. - DEC. 30 SOIL AMENDMENTS FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS OF SOIL TESTS OR APPLY 2,000 LB/ACRE GROUND AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE AND 750 LB/ACRE 10-10-10 FERTILIZER MULCH APPLY 4,000 LB/ACRE STRAW. ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING WITH ASPHALT, NETTING, OR A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL. A DISK WITH BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN BE USED AS A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL. MAINTENANCE IF GROWTH IS LESS THAN FULLY ADEQUATE, REFERTILIZE IN THE SECOND YEAR ACCORDING TO SOIL TESTS OR TOPDRESS WITH 500 LB/ACRE 10-10-10 FERTILIZER. RESEED, REFERTILIZE, AND MULCH AREA IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EROSION OR OTHER DAMAGE. IF SEEDING IN FALL, TOPDRESS WITH 50 LB/ACRE OF NITROGEN IN MARCH. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO EXTEND TEMPORARY COVER BEYOND JUNE 15, OVERSEED WITH 50 LB/ACRE KOBE LESPEDEZA IN LATE FEBRUARY OR EARLY MARCH. N PERMANENT SEEDING AS PER AGRONOMIST RECOMMENDATION TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE DETAIL r7 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE C.5.0 ,STEEL POST syti� (w 0r SOS N/F� T � ST MZ,- N N O S�Ri ��S nq NOTE: BURLAP SHALL NOT BE USED. 12 GAUGE 4"X4" OR 2"X4" WELDED WIRE HOOKED ONTO PREFORMED CHANNELS ON STEEL POST STEEL POST WELDED WIRE MESH- BACKFILL EROSION & SILTATION CONTROL FABRIC WELDED WIRE MESH ALTERNATE: IN LIEU OF BURYING SKIRT, 6" OF NO.5 STONE MAY BE USED TO ANCHOR SKIRT. °RC\NG N °F ARE 411 °�SS\RE�NF°RG\NG M P GROUND LINE 24" MIN. EXTRA DEPTH REQUIRED FOR NON -STABLE SOILS SECTION VIEW SEDIMENT FENCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE MAXIMUM SEDIMENT STORAGE LEVEL. / REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN THIS LEVEL IS REACHED OR AS DIRECTED BY / CONSERVATION INSPECTOR. / ULTRAVIOLET RESISTANT (BLACK) MIRAFI FABRIC OR EQUIVALENT SECURED TO WIRE WITH METAL CLIPS OR WIRE AT 8" OFF CENTER. -NATURAL GRADE CARRY APPROXIMATELY 12" OF FABRIC INTO -TRENCH, COVER WITH SOIL AND TAMP BACKFILL. -CARRY 6" OF WIRE INTO TRENCH. STEEL POSTS AT 10' OFF CENTER MAXIMUM GENERAL NOTES: SEDIMENT FENCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE MAINTENANCE NOTES: 1. FILTER BARRIERS SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. 2. SHOULD THE FABRIC DECOMPOSE OR BECOME INEFFECTIVE PRIOR TO THE END OF THE EXPECTED USABLE LIFE AND THE BARRIER STILL BE NECESSARY, THE FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY. 3. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. THEY MUST BE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS REACH APPROXIMATELY 0.5 FT. IN DEPTH 4. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITS REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT FENCE OR FILTER BARRIER IS NO LONGER REQUIRED SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED AND SEEDED. 5. PROVIDE OUTLETS IN SEDIMENT FENCE AT LOW SPOTS FOR DEWATERING LARGE AREAS (USE CLASS B STONE). TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FENCE DETAIL ,Q SCALE: NOT TO SCALE C.5.0 ELEVATION 1. FENCE FABRIC SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 32" IN WIDTH AND SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 6 LINE WIRES WITH 12" STAY SPACING. 2. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE MIRAFI 100 FABRIC OR EQUIVALENT. BURLAP CANNOT BE USED WHERE SILT FENCE IS TO REMAIN FOR A PERIOD MORE THAN 30 DAYS. 3. STEEL POSTS SHALL BE 1.33 LBS./L.F. HAVE A MIN. LENGTH OF 5' AND BE OF THE SELF -FASTENER ANGLE STEEL TYPE. MENT NO. 5 WASHE STON STONE OUTLET CLASS II RIP -RAP BASE WITH WASHED STONE FACE NOTE: CONTROLLED SEDIMENTATION OUTLETS TO BE PLACED AT LOW SPOTS ALONG SEDIMENT FENCING NOT TO EXCEED 200 L.F. INTERVALS. SCALE: NOT TO SCALE C.5.0 Z� i N t 0 Z J zw� ( lcr 0 W U �z O O cl�z- cl�0� m W U O Lli � ct _ J Qcz V Q W QD _J �- J SHEET NUMBER O O � N ~ o m z � J N J Q � Z � W W U Z Lil ct: O U cii Z Zco CDQ� 07 0 W U) a� Z 0 ~U wZ0� O LL M FROM FACILITY PUMP ATTACHED TO WET WELL WALL WITH MOUNTING BRACKET PROVIDED BY PUMP SUPPLIER HOG PUMP STEEL U—BRACKET 'ONTROL PANEL WARNING LIGHT 4UDIBLE ALARM 1 1/2" FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC GRATING, SUCH AS BEDFORD PRORIGID OR EQUIVALENT (TYP.), INSTALLED BY OWNER HDPE LOW SWEEP 90' BEND (FLxFL) HDPE FLANGE ADAPTOR, TYP. HDPE OR SCH 80 PVC BALL VALVE (FLxFL) FUTURE PUMPED CONNECTION TO TOWN ® SEWER. VALVE TO REMAIN CLOSED UNTIL FUTURE APPLICATION IS INSTALLED BLIND HDPE TEE FLANGE Ia. •' •' .. ,,- .. ;a .. I HDPE TEE L------------------- SAFETY FENCING / RAILING (MIN. 42" HEIGHT) TO BE INSTALLED BY OWNER TENSIONING PLATE SCREW WITH RETAINER NUT S FROM FACILITY WW LATERAL VIA NEW PLAN VIEW NOTE: REDUCER, VALVES, AND PIPE SIZING BASED ON FORCEMAIN SIZE, SEE SITE PLAN HDPE FORCE MAIN REVERSED REDUCER HDPE OR SCH 80 PVC BALL VALVE (FLxFL) HDPE FLANGE HDPE CHECK ADAPTER VALVE FLANGES TO FACILITATE IF PUMP REPAIR AND REMOVAL 7_11ITT-7 ----- T PIPE SUPPORT n� GRAVITY LINE ELASTOMERIC 12" BOOT (TYP.) 6" 12" 6" d. 6" 1 "S a �� Y..4 5.0' 7.0' NOTE: SEE OVERALL SITE PLAN SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SECTION VIEW HDPE 22.5' BEND FLANGES TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE AND CLEAN —OUTS HDPE J HIGH LEVEL ALARM LEAD AND LAG PUMPS ON LEAD PUMP ON (LAG PUMP OFF) MINIMUM LIQUID LEVEL (LEAD PUMP OFF) INFLUENT LIFT STATION DETAIL , SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 2' MIN. PUMP STATION NOTES: 1. REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR PIPE SIZES AND PUMP SIZE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. PUMP MOUNT TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PUMP MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 3. ALL GASKETED JOINTS SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR LEAKS PRIOR TO CONTINUOUS PUMP STATION OPERATION. 4. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN AS APPROXIMATE. EXACT PIPE LENGTHS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 5. ALL INTERIOR WET WELL HARDWARE, INCLUDING ANCHORS AND BOLTS, SHALL BE TYPE 316 STAINLESS STEEL OR BETTER. 6. ALL WET WELL PENETRATIONS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH AN ELASTOMERIC BOOT AND GROUTED WITH TYPE S CONCRETE MORTAR (TYP). 7. ALL CONCRETE, PRE -CAST, OR CAST IN PLACE SHALL YIELD A 28 DAY STRENGTH OF 4000 PSI (MINIMUM). 8. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN AREA OF EXCAVATION TO BE CONFIRMED AND LOCATED BY CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. 9. ALL PRECAST CONCRETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH STEEL RODS AS NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE WIDTH AND DEPTH AND SO INDICATED ON SHOP DRAWINGS SUBMITTED TO ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL. MIN. 3000 PSI CONCRE PROF �° v l g>> O Q >2 MIN 0 z Q o LL_W Q) ANTI -SEEP COLLAR ISOMETRIC VIEW DETAIL 2 L-Lj Q W Q SCALE: NOT TO SCALE C.5.1 z NOTE: MINIMUM THICKNESS FOR CONCRETE ONLY Q m Z :3 _ O i-OCL O 02 W J Q�z NOTE: IRRIGATION SYSTEM VENDOR SHALL SUPPLY AND SHEET NUMBER INSTALL AFLOW METER DOWNSTREAM OF EACH ANCHOR HDPE SYNTHETIC LINER WITH 24"X36" IRRIGATION PUMP. C.5. 1 (WIDTHxDEPTH) KEY WAY TRENCH ALONG THE PERIMETER OF DIGESTER AS PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS. RIM PER PLAN 4• O ' TOP OF DIKE= 0.00' ° —� PIPE SIZE PER PLANS I I I _ I I —III —I o _— I I—_—III—III—IIILu 111-11 I-1 I I —I 1 I —III— W L -2 ° III —I I N FREEBOARD LEVEL = —2.00' _ _ II —II CN CN i-1 I I-1 11— — — — d . Cl N J —III—III � 3, — III —III —II cn W W 8" PUMP ROTATED 90' INSTALL ANTI -SEEP I III— FOR DETAIL CLARITY COLLAR PER DETAIL V --III—III o a o v THIS SHEET I I 1-111-11 ° ..a _—III—I I I —I —III—III ���•° �'� .. " N 16 DR 17 HDPE ® 0% SLOPE BOTTOM ELEV.= REFER TO CIVIL PLANS"file limW 4.4 In V III —III —III —III —III —III —III -,/ ,,\ SEE SITE PLAN FOR PUMP STATION ELEVATIONS ° a d Z M '•' a ,,,", H UJ DETAIL 2 w �_ z;�i'=_M SCALE: NOT TO SCALE C.5.1 W U) = Q�Q Z O U •,�"dy, icy \���. O LL I� „ 8 HDPE IFM I -III —III —III— FREEBOARD LEVEL = —2.00' N - - -III- -- ------------------------------------------- FROM INFLUENT II PUMP STATION CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE ci ° III— TERMINUS OF INLET PIPING o II—_ EXTENDS AT LEAST 2' BELOW _ FREEBOARD LEVEL. N ° ° III -I 3, CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL MIN. 10 CLEARANCE Q ADDITIONAL 45' BENDS AS PROPOSED TOE OF FILL OR AS REQUIRED Z IT -I �1 NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH FOR LAGOON N N CONSTRUCTION (N c III-_ N U) in > �, O —III— LAGOON Lo —III_ cn EXISTING WETLAND co cz —_ BOTTOM ELEV.= REFER TO CIVIL PLANS HDPE SYNTHETIC 60 MIL co) DIGESTER LINER (BY — HDPE INSTALLER) N � a O Q co a ° PROPOSED DOUBLE —ROW SILT N FENCE W/ OUTLETS AS co ° NEEDED Q U INFLUENT HEADERS — PIPE DETAIL DETAIL , SCALE: NOT TO SCALE c.5.2 TYPICAL EROSION CONTROL AT D LOCA'DONS DETAIL 2 � W SCALE: NOT TO SCALE C.5.2 0 (J� J J — LL_Q ( Q O Z c or — I— LL 0 m z woQ CL Q�� o � W 3'MIN. Q wpZ Ld \ \ \ \ \ \ \ DITCH LEVEL \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �J (/) c 3' M l�\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\�� VARIES\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/ Q ANTI —SEEP COLLAR (CONCRETE/ OR HDPE) TO BE PLACED � AROUND HDPE �/�\//\//\//\�3 MIN. // // // // / SHEET NUMBER SEE DETAIL 6/C.5.3\\\i\� RETURN PIPE BURY DEPTH TO ' DIRECTIONAL BORE HDPE PIPE 3' BELOW EXISTING GRADE AT BORE ENTRANCE ANGLE SHALL EXIT ANGLE IN ACCORDANCE NOT EXCEED MANUFACTURER'S WITH MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS HORIZONTAL DIRECIONAL DRILL DITCH CROSSING DETAIL 4 0 ANCHOR HDPE SYNTHETIC LINER WITH 24"X36" SCALE: NOT TO SCALE (WIDTHxDEPTH) KEY WAY TRENCH ALONG THE r7 N O PERIMETER OF DIGESTER; o m Z NOTE: PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF HDPE IN TRENCH, EN L THE TRENCH SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR ANY LOOSE pz' SOIL OR DEBRIS, AND ANY SUCH LOOSE MATERIALS NOTE: REMOVED AND/OR COMPACTED / TOP OF DIKE WIDTH: 10 MIN. ® N W ELEVATIONS SHALL BE AS TOP OF DIKE EL. 0.0' FREEBOARD Q oc SPECIFIED ON PLANS 30 — — — — — 311' ELEV: —2.0' � Q. Q U 1 (n SUITABLE CLAY PLACED IN — — — — — — •••••,,,,,,,'1'1"� \/\/\/\/\//\/\ \ PROPOS�O--------6»MTOXATOEAST9D%IFTS--------- \\\\\\\\\ ;ova ''. \\\\\//\//\/ STANDARD PROCTOR — — — — — — — — — — —:o \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND y v = \\\ WITHIN MOISU3EOCONENOPTIMUM _______________ •,'�aJc EXISTING GR AD E\ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - ���,','',,•,•.....•vP••••••••-• <\ <\ <\ <\ <\ <\ <\ <\ <\ < \, C A �X N, HDPE SYNTHETIC 60 MIL /\ /% /\ /\ / p — •00000, ••` fin''••. _ LINER (BY HDPE INSTALLER) \\\\/\ j/\ j \ j / / / / / �/ Z w ~ •' o NEW LAGOON —SECTION VIEW\�\\/lo—��//�//�//�//� ji,,�' Q W =� �= DETAIL 3 J w 071 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE C.5.2 Z H ''•� �� Pam`••` 0 at-- I- Pressure ' 25.00 50.00 ' Flow 25.00 50.00 75.00 100.00 GPM Villari Wastewater Irrigation System EPANET Model Printout of Influent Pump Station Distribution to each of three storage lagoons IPS-A 4" HIGH PRESSURE 540 GPM @33' (EACH PUMP) 1080 GPM (COMBINED FLOW) tg_B Day1, 1; EPANET 2 Page 1 Page 1 3/17/2023 4:28:11 PM ********************************************************************** * E P A N E T * Hydraulic and Water Quality * Analysis for Pipe Networks * Version 2.2 ********************************************************************** Input File: IPS Villari (2023-3-7).net Villari Wastewater Irrigation System Link - Node Table: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Link Start End Length Diameter ID Node Node ft in ---------------------------------------------------------------------- P1 31 33 25 11.16 P2 32 33 25 11.16 P5-12in 33 34 2932 11.16 P3-8in 34 Lag_C 1279 7.549 P6-12in 34 Lag_B 238 11.16 P4-12in 34 Lag_A 86 11.16 P-1 IPS 31 #N/A #N/A Pump P-2 IPS 32 #N/A #N/A Pump Energy Usage: Usage Avg. Kw-hr Avg. Peak Cost Pump Factor Effic. /Mgal Kw Kw /day ---------------------------------------------------------------------- P-1 100.00 75.00 138.27 4.48 4.48 0.00 P-2 100.00 75.00 138.27 4.48 4.48 0.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Demand Charge: 0.00 Total Cost: 0.00 Node Results: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Node Demand Head Pressure Quality ID ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPM ft psi J1 0.00 163.01 70.63 0.00 32 0.00 163.01 70.63 0.00 33 0.00 162.73 16.78 0.00 34 0.00 148.39 1.47 0.00 IPS -1079.68 130.00 0.00 0.00 Reservoir Lag_C -568.00 161.00 0.00 0.00 Reservoir Lag_A 1044.72 148.00 0.00 0.00 Reservoir Lag_B 602.97 148.00 0.00 0.00 Reservoir T Page 2 Villari Wastewater Irrigation System Link Results: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Link Flow VelocityUnit Headloss Status ID GPM fps ft/Kft ---------------------------------------------------------------------- P1 539.84 1.77 11.07 Open P2 539.84 1.77 11.07 Open P5-12in 1079.68 3.54 4.89 Open P3-8in -568.00 4.07 9.86 Open P6-12in 602.97 1.98 1.64 Open P4-12in 1044.72 3.43 4.54 Open P-1 539.84 0.00 -33.01 Open Pump P-2 539.84 0.00 -33.01 Open Pump Summary Calculations: Irrigation Area Hydraulic and PAN Loading Rates The following table provides a simple evaluation of the combined site loading rates. This table demonstrates that for influent PAN concentrations greater than 50 mg/L (more or less) the wastewater irrigation site will be limited by the Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) concentration, rather than the hydraulic limitation set forth by the soils and as modeled in the Hydrogeologic Report. Implied Facility Flow (gpd) at Specified PAN concentrations (mg/L) in Wastewater 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00 65.00 70.00 75.00 80.00 85.00 90.00 95.00 100.00 105.00 110.00 115.00 120.00 Zone Name Hydraulically Limited PAN Limited 1A 236,730 197,275 169,093 147,956 131,517 118,365 107,605 98,638 91,050 84,546 78,910 73,978 69,627 65,758 62,297 59,183 56,364 53,802 51,463 49,319 1B 89,398 74,498 63,856 55,874 49,665 44,699 40,635 37,249 34,384 31,928 29,799 27,937 26,293 24,833 23,526 22,349 21,285 20,318 19,434 18,625 2 110,088 91,740 78,635 68,805 61,160 55,044 50,040 45,870 42,342 39,317 36,696 34,403 32,379 30,580 28,971 27,522 26,212 25,020 23,932 22,935 3A 82,653 68,878 59,038 51,658 45,918 41,327 37,570 34,439 31,790 29,519 27,551 25,829 24,310 22,959 21,751 20,663 19,679 18,785 17,968 17,219 3B 61,733 51,444 44,095 38,583 34,296 30,866 28,060 25,722 23,743 22,047 20,578 19,291 18,157 17,148 16,245 15,433 14,698 14,030 13,420 12,861 4 67,229 56,024 48,021 42,018 37,350 33,615 30,559 28,012 25,857 24,010 22,410 21,009 19,773 18,675 17,692 16,807 16,007 15,279 14,615 14,006 Totals 647,831 539,859 462,737 404,895 359,906 323,916 294,469 269,930 249,166 231,368 215,944 202,447 190,539 179,953 170,482 161,958 154,246 147,234 140,833 134,965 The modeled PAN concentrations are listed along the top row of the table, listed in mg/L. It is noted the Hydrogeologic Report modeled the maximum hydraulic loading rate for the site as 334,016 gpd without storage and 333,206 gpd with 47.98 Mgal of storage provided. The implied flow (gpd) under each subject PAN concentration, and for each zone, was calculated as follows: where: PAN Rate x Acreage 6 Flow = (PAN Concentration x 8.34 x 365) x 10 Flow = Attributed flow to each zone to achieve the PAN application limit for each zone in gallons per day PAN Rate = PAN Application for each zone in Ibs/ac-yr Acreage = Zone wetted area in acres PAN Concentration = Modeled PAN concentration in mg/L 8.34 = Conversion factor 365 = days per year Example Calculation for Zone 1A at 25 mg/L PAN Concentration: 424 lbs x42.991 Flow = me-yr I X 106 Flow = 236,730 gpd. 25 L x8.34x365 The permittee requests the flexibility to operate in accordance with the more restrictive of the hydraulic limit or the PAN limit Micro Land Group LLC Storage Lagoon Sizing - Lagoon A Top Length: 285 ft Depth ft Area ft' Incr. Vol. (ft) Cumul. Vol. (ft) Cumul. Vol. (gal) Top Width: 808 ft 0.0 140,010 Total Depth: 15 ft 1.0 145,524 142,767 142,767 1,067,897 Freeboard: 2 ft 2,0 151,110 148,317 291,084 2,177,308 Berm Width: 15 ft 3.0 156,768 153,939 445,023 3,328,772 Freeboard Volume: 2,309,463 ft' 4.0 162,498 159,633 604,656 4,522,827 Freeboard Volume: 17,275,983 gal 5.0 168,300 165,399 770,055 5,760,011 6.0 174,174 171,237 941,292 7,040,864 7.0 180,120 177,147 1,118,439 8,365,924 8.0 186,138 183,129 1,301,568 9,735,729 9.0 192,228 189,183 1,490,751 11,150,817 10.0 198,390 195,309 1,686,060 12, 611,729 Design Volume 85,536 CY 11.0 204,624 201,507 1,887,567 14,119,001 Cut -to -Fill Ratio 60% 12.0 210,930 207,777 2,095,344 15,673,173 C-FVolume 51,321 13.0 217,308 214,119 2,309,463 17,274,783 14.0 223,758 220,533 2,529,996 18,924,370 15.0 230,280 227,019 2,757,015 20.,622,472 Am sN = A_, + A_, + A-P, + A_P� Ae pA - A -pc A_pa = Ar pD l Am sN - 2(A_PA )+ 2 (( A_pa 1+ Ab, m [(b,+bzl Aa = h J 2 dz+bz = cz c= az+bz H Z+V z = hz H = M x d V = d h= (M xt?�z+dz As2x (�M xdj +dz'1 + 2z x ��n +n 2))]J [(�M xd+d Yz x Wb �(Lb1+Lb2 s x � +�Lb1x1, 2 2 Trapezoid 'A' Lb= 195.0 ft W= 718.0 ft M= 3.0 d= 15.0 ft H= 45.0 ft V= 15.0 ft Ab,,, ,= 140,010.0 ft2 Bottom Length Bottom Width Side Slope H:V Depth of Water H:V @ Water Elevation Area Basin Bottom Wh= 47.4 ft Sideslope Length from Bottom to Water Elevation Wb1= 718.0 ft Width of Base @ Bottom `Wb2= 808.0 ft Width of Base@ Water Elevation Y-A= 36,192.3 ft` Area. Trapezoid 'A' Trapezoid'B' Lh= 47.4 ft Sideslope Length from Bottom to Water Elevation Lb1= 195.0 ft Length of Base @ Bottom Lb2= 285.0 ft Length of Base @ Water Elevation At, e = 11,384.2 ft` Area Trapezoid'B' Trapezoid 'A' Al,apA= 36,192.3 ft` Area Trapezoid 'A' Trapezoid'B' AtrapB= 11,384.2 ft` Area Trapezoid'B' Trapezoid'C' Atap'c = 36,192.3 ft` Area Trapezoid'C' Trapezoid'D' AvapI.= 11,384.2 ft` Area Trapezoid'D' Basin Bottom Ab,tt, ,= 140,010.0 ff Area Basin Bottom Total Wetted Area 235,162.9 ft2 Micro Land Group LLC Storage Lagoon Sizing - Lagoon B Top Length: 430 ft Depth ft Area ftZ Incr. Vol. (ft') Cumul. Vol. (ft') Cumul. Vol. (gal) Top Width: 560 ft 0.0 159,800 Total Depth: 15 ft 1.0 164,696 162,248 162,248 1,213,615 Freeboard: 2 ft 2.0 169,664 167,180 329,428 2,464,121 Berm Width: 15 ft 3.0 174,704 172,184 501,612 3,752,058 Design Volume: 2,514,512 ft' 4.0 179,816 177,260 678,872 5,077,963 Design Volume: 18,809,856 gal 5.0 185,000 182,408 861,280 6,442,374 Req'd Volume: ft3 6.0 190,256 187,628 1,048,908 7,845,832 Req'd Volume: gal 7.0 195,584 192,920 1,241,828 9,288,873 Design Efficiency: 8.0 200,984 198,284 1,440,112 10,772,038 9.0 206,456 203,720 1,643,832 12,295,863 10.0 212,000 209,228 1,853,060 13,860,889 Design Volume 93,130 CY 11.0 217,616 214,808 2,067,868 15,467,653 Cut -to -Fill Ratio 60% 12.0 223,304 220,460 2,288,328 17,116,693 C-F Volume 55,878 13.0 229,064 226,184 2,514,512 18,808,550 14.0 234,896 231,980 2,746,492 20,543,760 15.0 240,800 237,848 2,984,340 22,322,863 L6B T-pe2old 'D' Vh ~ T-pe._old 'B' � I H At s�o = AtrapA + Atr,pB + Atrapc + AtrapB AtrapA = Atr.Pc Atr�B = Atr� A. , - 2(4. )+ 2 (Atr,, )+ Abopom Atr�(b,+bz� �cd - h 2 a 2 + b 2 = C2 C= i 2 + b Z HZ+V2 = hZ H = M x d V=d h = (M x d Y + d 2 2 (Lb 1 2 Lb 2 AY ,s;o = 2x�((M xd)�+d�x� Wbl+Wb 2 �� + 2x[((M xd)2+d2Yx� �� + (Lb 1xWb1) Trapezoid 'A' Lb= 340.0 ft Bottom Length Wb= 470.0 ft Bottom Width M= 3.0 Side Slope H:V d= 15.0 ft Depth of Water H= 45.0 ft H:V @ Water Elevation V= 15.0 ft Ab--= 159,800.0 ftz Area Basin Bottom Wh= 47.4 ft Sideslope Length from Bottom to Water Elevation Wb1= 470.0 ft Width of Base @ Bottom Wb2= 560.0 ft Width of Base @ Water Elevation atw'A` 24,428.6 ft` Area Trapezoid 'A' Trapezoid'B' Lh= 47.4 ft Sideslope Length from Bottom to Water Elevation Lb1= 340.0 ft Length of Base @ Bottom Lb2= 430.0 ft Length of Base @ Water Elevation Atrap'g= 18,262.2 ft` Area Trapezoid 'B' Trapezoid'A' Atrap'A` 24,428.6 ft` Area Trapezoid 'A' Trapezoid'B' Anap'B` 18,262.2 ft` Area Trapezoid 'B' Trapezoid'C' Anap'c= 24,428.6 ft` Area Trapezoid 'C' Trapezoid'D' Anap'D` 18,262.2 ft` Area Trapezoid 'D' Basin Bottom Abmtom= 159,800.0 ft` Area Basin Bottom Total Wetted Area 245,181.5 ftZ Micro Land Group LLC Storage Lagoon Sizing - Lagoon C 0 Top Length: 285 ft Depth ft Area ftZ Incr. Vol. (ft') Cumul. Vol. (ft') Cumul. Vol. (gal) Top Width: 513 ft 0.0 82,485 Total Depth: 15 ft 1.0 86,229 84,357 84,357 630,990 Freeboard: 2 ft 2.0 90,045 88,137 172,494 1,290,255 Berm Width: 15 ft 3.0 93,933 91,989 264,483 1,978,333 Design Volume: 1,412,073 ft' 4.0 97,893 95,913 360,396 2,695,762 Design Volume: 10,563,040 gal 5.0 101,925 99,909 460,305 3,443,081 Req'd Volume: ft3 6.0 106,029 103,977 564,282 4,220,829 Req'd Volume: gal 7.0 110,205 108,117 672,399 5,029,545 Design Efficiency: 8.0 114,453 112,329 784,728 5,869,765 9.0 118,773 116,613 901,341 6,742,031 10.0 123,165 120,969 1,022,310 7,646,879 Design Volume 52,299 CY 11.0 127,629 125,397 1,147,707 8,584,848 Cut -to -Fill Ratio 60% 12.0 132,165 129,897 1,277,604 9,556,478 C-F Volume 31,379 13.0 136,773 134,469 1,412,073 10,562,306 14.0 141,453 139,113 1,551,186 11, 602,871 15.0 146,205 143,829 1,695,015 12, 678,712 Lh2 T-p-ld T' a O Lbl-�-- wn . T-p-ld B' W bl� Abd in = A&Ip+ AnapB + Af.'Pe + And A'r"' = At.'Pe AtPB = Ao-lpD Aba sin - 2 (A. )+ 2 (A,r,,B �+ Abo�om A o-p- d h1(b +bz� 2 aZ+b2 = C2 c= a z+ b z HZ+Vz=hz H = Al x d V = d h = (M x d Y + d 2 yy ( _ [l� 1z 121+2Wb 2) �1( )z z Iz (Lb 1+2Lb 2���� AbQs;n 2x M xd +d x + 2x M xd +d x + Lb1xWb 1 Trapezoid 'A' Trapezoid'B' Lb= 195.0 ft Bottom Length Wb= 423.0 ft Bottom Width M= 3.0 Side Slope H:V d= 15.0 ft Depth of Water H= 45.0 ft H:V @ Water Elevation V= 15.0 ft Abonom= 82,485.0 ft' Area Basin Bottom Wh= 47.4 ft Sideslope Length from Bottom to Water Elevation Wb1= 423.0 ft Width of Base @ Bottom Wb2= 513.0 ft Width of Base @ Water Elevation atrav'A` 22,199.2 ft` Area Trapezoid 'A' Lh= 47.4 ft Sideslope Length from Bottom to Water Elevation Lb1= 195.0 ft Length of Base @ Bottom Lb2= 285.0 ft Length of Base @ Water Elevation rap'B'= 11,384.2 ft` Area Trapezoid 'B' Trapezoid'A' Atrap'A` 22,199.2 ft` Area Trapezoid 'A' Trapezoid'B' Atrap'B` 11,384.2 ft` Area Trapezoid 'B' Trapezoid'C' Atrap'c= 22,199.2 ft` Area Trapezoid 'C' Trapezoid'D' Atrap'D'= 11,384.2 ft` Area Trapezoid 'D' Basin Bottom Abottom= 82,485.0 ft` Area Basin Bottom Total Wetted Area 149,651.8 ftZ Micro Land Group LLC — Wastewater Irrigation System Operation & Maintenance Plan Table of Contents I. Description of Operation of the Effluent Spray Irrigation System 1) Purpose 2) Equipment 3) Relationship to Other Units 4) Operation 5) Routine and Preventative Maintenance II. Description of Anticipated Maintenance (Normal Operation) 1) Routine Maintenance Instructions 2) Trouble Shooting III. Provisions for Safety Measures Including Restriction of Access 1) Restriction of Access 2) Emergency Contact IV. Spill Control Provisions 1) Contact Information for Plant Personnel, Emergency Responders, and Regulatory Agencies 2) Facility Control Valves OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE O&M - i March 2023 Micro Land Group, LLC I. Description of the Effluent Spray Irrigation System 1.) Purpose The purpose of the center pivot and solid set spray irrigation system is to convey and apply the treated wastewater effluent to the designated disposal site, which consists of six center pivot zones totaling to approximately 122 acres. The application of the wastewater effluent produced by an adjacent meat processing facility shall be limited by the hydraulic loading capacity for the soil and by the amounts of nutrients, specifically Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN), that may be utilized by the receiving crop, as recommended in the Agronomist's recommendations, documented in the report prepared at the time of permitting, and as required by the permit. Regardless of the loading rates specified, the system operators shall limit the application of treated effluent to rates which may be safely applied and do not result in ponding, runoff, or contamination of ground water nor surface waters. 2.) Equipment o Center Pivot Irrigation System, consisting of: Five (5) center pivot systems, as manufactured by Valley (or equivalent) o Associated piping, valves, and appurtenances 3.) Relationship to Other Units The wastewater effluent is pumped through irrigation (pressure) mains from the irrigation pumps to the center pivots to apply the wastewater to the center pivots and solid set zones, irrigating a total area of approximately 122 acres of receiving crops in the spray irrigation fields. 4.) Operation The spray irrigation system will be managed such that all irrigation events will be monitored (flow, pressure, pump operating conditions, irrigation system operating conditions) and certain parameters will be recorded in accordance with the conditions of the permit. With each irrigation event the operator will record the date, volume of wastewater irrigated, zone irrigated, and the length of time the zone is irrigated. The event will be monitored for proper sprinkler operation and any variation from proper operation will be noted. If all sprinklers comprising the center pivot (full circle or portion thereof) within a zone are not operated for equal amounts of time, it shall be noted on the Form NDAR-1 so that application rates listed match actual operation. If this occurs, a sheet indicating the method of how the wetted area was calculated should be attached to the Form NDAR-1. Each zone undergoing irrigation will also be monitored for accumulation of applied wastewater on the ground surface. If surface accumulation (ponding) is observed the application rate will be adjusted or irrigation should be terminated. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE O&M-1 March 2023 Micro Land Group, LLC The irrigation zones will be managed in a manner such that an irrigation event will not occur during inclement weather or if the ground is saturated or frozen. This will prevent wastewater runoff from the wetted area of each zone. No equipment or traffic will be allowed into the wetted area of each zone except for routine maintenance, repairs, or installation. Each zone should have year-round maintained vegetative cover crops as specified by the Agronomist's recommendations. The cover crop should be evaluated at the beginning of the growing season for survival rate and ground coverage (typically expressed as a percentage coverage of the total area). The zones should be limed and fertilized as the recommendations from the soil tests note and an Agronomist. Application of the fertilizer should not exceed the plant available nitrogen rates of all sources of nitrogen that have been applied or is expected to be applied during the crop growing season. The mowing schedule for grass receiving crops should be such that the crop is mowed when the height reaches between 12-15 inches. Each subsequent cut should occur at intervals of four to five weeks or when the height reaches 12-15 inches, whichever occurs first. All clippings should be harvested and removed from the application fields. The overseeding of small grain crop should occur in September or October and is to be concurrent with the dormancy of the primary crop. The small grain crop should be mowed prior to head convergence but no later than the second week of April, whichever occurs first. The Agronomist that performs the crop evaluation, soil test results, and tissue analysis should also provide the optimum pH for the crop and soil type. This pH will be maintained in an effort to maximize growth for the cover crops. Through monitoring the wastewater if it is determined that the wastewater effluent contains a high sodium content, sodium adsorption ratio of five or higher, a North Carolina -licensed Soil Scientist in conjunction with the agronomist should evaluate the results of the soil test to make recommendations about soil amendments or other mechanisms to improve the facility. This will be done to maintain conditions that promote cover crop growth and maintain the integrity of the system for irrigation suitability. Micro Land Group, LLC will execute all recommendations and will maintain written records of all monitoring events which will include portions of the facility covered and the rate at which the soil amendment was applied. 5.) Routine and Preventative Maintenance The zone control valves should be operated, or exercised, on regular basis to ensure the full and intended degree of operation and proper seating/closure. If it is determined that the valves are not operating properly they should be repaired or replaced to maintain proper operation conditions. Pressure gauges, pressure transducers, and flow meters should be checked on an annual basis, and flow meters should be calibrated annually. Manufacturer's specifications should be followed for the calibration of the transducers and any other sensors or meters. Center pivot drop nozzles should be checked once per year for signs of wear. All nozzles which are dented or worn should be replaced in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. It should be noted that center pivot system nozzles vary in diameter from center point to distal OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE O&M - 2 March 2023 Micro Land Group, LLC end. The specific sprinkler and nozzle should be noted to ensure proper replacement and performance. IV. Description of Anticipated Maintenance (Normal Operation) 1). Routine Maintenance Instructions General For optimum operation and maximum irrigation efficiency, daily inspection and regular maintenance is necessary. In addition to the daily inspection, all irrigation system mechanical equipment should be cleaned weekly and lubricated as often as needed and in accordance with the equipment and pump manufacturers recommendations. Daily Maintenance 1. Visually check the pumps and motors, listening for sounds of abnormal wear, vibration, and cavitation. 2. Check the oil level of motors and fill with the proper lubricating oil if necessary. 3. Check the electrical control panel for fuse continuity and signs of damage. 4. Perform sampling and monitoring as prescribed by the applicable permits. 2) Trouble Shooting PROBLEM I POSSIBLE CAUSES I CORRECTIVE ACTION PUMP Insufficient output. Volute clogged /intake clogged Check and clean intake. Check and clean volute. Losing Oil Drive cover vent plugged. Clean out vent. Check output pressure and relief Knocking Excessive pressure. valve and adjust. Out of time or worn impeller. Check impeller and flowrate. MOTOR Check disconnect box and fuses. No power. Check load center circuit breaker. Motor fails to run. Switch from automatic to Hand Off Switch. manual. If manual OK, check control circuit breaker. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE O&M - 3 March 2023 Micro Land Group, LLC Time Clock. Check time clock settings and control circuit breaker. V. Provisions for Safety Measures Including Restriction of Access 1) Restriction of Access — A perimeter fence and gate, which will remain locked while the operator is not on site, will control access to the irrigation zones, fields, pump station, and controls. 2) Emergency Contact - Information will be posted at the gate. VI. Spill Control Provisions 1) Contact Information for Plant Personnel, Emergency Responders, and Regulatory Agencies — Phone numbers for Emergency Responders and Remediation Agency numbers will be posted on the access gate and at the irrigation pump station. 2) Irrigation Control Valves will allow operator to cease effluent flow if a problem occurs. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE O&M-4 N t �S� LNC Alt 723 �••- ��--` I I �719 41 �y�►•• "a - "- -- 775 E B 11i43 1 ' � 706 *00-1011 ���7 Family Ln SrlanCd, ILOT�xn.T OF. • • o� VV AI A VV Li l ,1 Alt .e fr 1 EB1''1°42 ° .i ♦ , 645 • • 0 >? ( _ .EB1140 635 M 7 NORTH CAROLINA FLOODPLAIN NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE f ow FLOOD INSURANCE RATE N � F ` 0 ^^L 1..� r cc 0 0 19 9 L.L CZ 0 117.8 Z NORTH CAROLINA , PANEL 2464 " y`n�4.ye� Oanel Contains: COMMUNITY CID PANEL SUFFIX DUPLIN COUNTY 370083 2454 K WARSAW, TOWN OF 370633 2464 K VERSION NUMBER 2.3.3.2 MAP NUMBER 3720246400K MAP REVISED June 20, 2018 This is an official FIRMette showing a portion of the above -referenced flood map created from the MSC FIRMette Web tool. This map does not reflect changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title block. For additional information about how to make sure the map is current, please see the Flood Hazard Mapping Updates Overview Fact Shee available on the FEMA Flood Map Service Center home page at https://msc.fema.gov. Northing: = 452,920, Easting = 2,274,142 Northing: = 452,920, Easting = 2,277,610 — Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) With BFE or Depth ( Regulatory Floodway i 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard Future Conditions 1%Annual Chance RIENIMAIM Flood Hazard Areas Determined to be Outside the 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard 723 Jurisdiction Boundary FIRM Panel Boundary 4 ` f North Carolina State Plane Projection Feet (Zone 3200) Datum: NAD 1983 (Horizontal), NAVD 1988 (Vertical) r 1 inch = 500 feet 16000 _ + 0 125 250 500 Feet 0 25 50 100 oMeters NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM t - CC FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP Panel(s):9864 a CONTAINS: COMMUNITY CID U TOWN OF WARSAW 370633 C6 {# Notice to User: The Map Number(s) shown below be should used when placing map N orders; the Community Number(s) shown above should be used on insurance applications for the subject community. ` 0 SELECTED PANELS: No Effective panels are included. ' C6 CC �;� al& Northing: = 449,452, Easting = 2,274,142 Page l pf 2 Northing: = 449,452, Easting = 2,277,610 �+ $F �'�ND 5£�J This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. This map incorporates changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title block. For the latest w product information about National Flood Insurance Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.msc.femagov. ` FEMA: National Flood Insurance Program Page 2 of 2 °sq Panel(s):9864 CONTAINS: COMMUNITY CID TOWN OF WARSAW 370633 Notice to User: The Map Number(s) shown below should be used when placing map orders; the Community Number(s) shown above should be used on insurance applications for the subject community. SELECTED PANELS: COMMUNITY CID TOWN OF WARSAW 370633 NOTES TO USERS This is an official FIRMette of a portion of the effective panels listed in the Title Block shown on Page 1. The information represented on this FIRMette was extracted from the effective digital flood hazard data available at http://fris.nc.gov/fris. Base flood elevation data, floodway, nonencroachment widths, information on certain areas no in the Special Flood Hazard Areas protected by flood control structures, and other pertinent data are available in the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) available at http://fris.nc.gov/fris. Users should be aware that flood elevations shown on this FIRMette represent elevations rounded to one tenth of a foot (0.1') and should be utilized in conjunction with data available in the FIS. NOTES TO USERS Base map information and geospatial data used to develop this FIRMette were obtained from various organizations, including the participating local community(ies), state and federal agencies, and/or other sources. The primary base for this FIRM is aerial imagery acquired by the State in 2010. Information and geospatial data supplied by the local community(ies) that met FEMA base map specifications were considered the preferred source for development of the base map. See geospatial metadata for the associated digital FIRMette for additional information about base map preparation. Base map features shown on this FIRMette, such as corporate limits, are based on the most up-to-date data available at the time of publication. Changes in the corporate limits may have occurred since this map was published. Map users should consult the appropriate community official or website to verify current conditions of jurisdictional boundaries and base map features. This map may contain roads that were not considered in the hydraulic analysis of streams where no new hydraulic model was created during the production of this statewide format FIRM. Flood elevations on this map are referenced to either or both the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) or National Geodetic Datum of 1929 (NGVD 29), and are labeled accordingly. These flood elevations must be compared to structure and ground elevations referenced to the same vertical datum. To obtain current elevation, description, and/or location information for bench marks shown on this map, or for information regarding conversion between NGVD 29 and NAVD 88, please contact the Information Services Branch of the National Geodetic Survey at (301) 713-3242, or visit its website at http://vvvvw.ngs.noaa.gov/. MORE INFORMATION Letters of Map Amendment (LOMA) 1-877-336-2627 htt ://msc.fema. ov/ Letters of Map Revision (LOMR) 919-715-5711 www.ncfloodma s.com Flood Insurance Availability North Carolina Division of Emergency Management (NCDEM) 919-715-5711 http://vvww.nccrimecontrol.org/nfip National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) 1-877-638-6620 http://vvww.fema.gov/business/nfip Questions about this FIRMette 1-877-336-2627 http://fema.gov 3/20/23, 1:54 PM about:blank raP.. Critical Habitat Report Area of Interest (AOQ Information Area: 15.73 km2 Mar 20 2023 13:54:13 Eastern Daylight Time t&.u5G 0.25 000 0 U.2 OA 8km Esc umm�n.� n of Nmn u 14w� MCPE Gmmm. 9NKvmn CaoTcnrvpgaa Inc MR�WF54 VSGS The Critical Habitat Report illustrates no critical habitat having been identified withing the proposed project area. about:blank 1/2 3/20/23, 1:54 PM Summary about:blank Name Count Area(km2) Length(m) All Critical Habitat Polyline 0 N/A 0 All Critical Habitat Polygon 0 0 N/A about:blank 2/2 RIM U ��� U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR The National Map U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY US Topo science fora changing world J -78.1250' 35.0000` 763000ME 64 65 66 67 68 3876000mN 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 W PLANK RD / v � \LJ O l PROSPE �• j 24gP a .—COLLEGE,ST O Y Z:; 0 _ - 150 63 34.8750' 63 -78.1250' y aJ�c GE ST % o 50 GEOR as c1 \ Bus o j Qo E Crest Gem .s 3 •� O C 69 70 71 72 n �� o_ •� O a c Devoz 1 J� 'Gardens Cem Bus U� • � • o •� 24 — SDTT R,P CEpUDE � 2 WARSAW SOUTH QUADRANGLE NORTH CAROLINA - DUPLIN COUNTY 7.5-MINUTE SERIES -78.0000' 73 35.0000' 77 I\ J v125 1 CUL Z VANCE PNILLIPSI RD 41- _ � sQ -4�t- Marsh gr- 150 �0 P r GG � N �. . JOHNSO ---------- L 1L s 1' �O, L RyC R Fick O 74Y4OR LN J 7 0 — o � �N� S \ 1-25 i i _ - r —� Mi11'ers G>""— M � 1 S 1CS. KE \ v o �Magnoli [�NR �L �T' S�MPSON N• _ E �� SLEEKER E SANDV O �I _ t — o i 903— o �� ✓V '—` • i ••, O — HUIV 7 .Mu Y s - RPiL H BROWN FARM LN T at 0 D -C 0 ..115 / .• — 0 i 150 . �Y - -411 ���- - SHEFF 1D.� fi 77 O 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 Produced by the United States Geological Survey SCALE 1:24 000 North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83) World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and 1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2 NORTH 1 000-meter grid:Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 17S N CAROLI� This map is not a legal document. Boundaries may be 9°26" 1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000 generalized for this map scale. Private lands within government 168 MILS 1 1°41" 0.5 0 1 reservations may not be shown. Obtain permission before 30 MILS MILES entering private lands. 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000 QUADRANGLE LOCATION Imagery .....................................................NAIP, September 2020 - September 2020 FEET Roads ......................................... U.S. Census Bureau, 2016 Names............................................................................GNIS, 1980 - 2022 UTM GRID AND 2019 MAGNETIC NORTH 1 Faison Hydrography...............................National Hydrography Dataset, 2005 2018 DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET 1 2 3 2 Warsaw North Contours ....................... National Elevation Dataset, 2008 U.S. National Grid CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET 3 Summerlins Crossroads Boundaries ..............Multiple sources; see metadata file 2019 2021 100,000-m Square ID NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 4 Turkey 4 5 Wetlands.................FWS National Wetlands Inventory Not Available QU TD I This ma was roduced to conform with the p p 5 Kenansville 6 Delway 78 National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard. 6 7 g 7 Rose Hill Grid Zone Designation 8 Charity 17S I 18S ADJOINING QUADRANGLES 78°W ;7r EALSOAt. �24 ll �O1NN:O 76 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 5 3864000mN -78.0000' 34.8750' M (0 ROAD CLASSIFICATION LID Expressway Local Connector U) I - Secondary Hwy Local Road 0) �Y Ramp 4WD c� • Interstate Route US Route O State Route c0 X —U) o(D M U) V � Z LL LU Z Q WARSAW SOUTH, NC z Z 2022 L' ECS Southeast,, LLP Geotechnical Engineering Report Vallari Brothers —Storage Ponds 1012 US 117 Warsaw, Duplin County, North Carolina ECS Project No. 22:32527 December 15, 2022 C ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP "Setting the Standard for Service" Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities December 15, 2022 Mr. Sam Vallari Vallari Foods 1015 Ashes Drive Suite 102 Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 ECS Project No. 22:32527 Reference: Geotechnical Engineering Report Vallari Brothers — Storage Ponds 1012 US 117 Warsaw, Duplin County, North Carolina Dear Mr. Vallari: ECS Southeast, LLP (ECS) has completed the subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering analyses for the above -referenced project. Our services were performed in general accordance with our agreed to scope of work. This report presents our understanding of the geotechnical aspects of the project along with the results of the field exploration conducted and our design and construction recommendations. It has been our pleasure to be of service during the design phase of this project. We would appreciate the opportunity to remain involved during the continuation of the design phase, and we would like to provide our services during construction phase operations as well to verify subsurface conditions assumed for this report. Should you have any questions concerning the information contained in this report, or if we can be of further assistance to you, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, ECS Southeast, LLP ,A f Freddie Wescott Senior Project Manager FWescott@ecslimited.com Winslow Goins, PE Principal Engineer WGoins@ecslimited.com 6714 Netherlands Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 T: 910-686-9114 www.ecslimited.com ECS Capitol Services, PLLC • ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC ECS Midwest, LLC ECS Southeast, LLP • ECS Southwest, LLP NC Engineering No. F-1078 • NC Geology No. C-553 • SC Engineering No. 3239 Vallari Brothers —Storage Ponds ECS Project No. 22:32527 TABLE OF CONTENTS December 15, 2022 Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................................1 1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................2 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION.....................................................................................................3 2.1 Project Location/Current Site Use/Past Site Use...................................................................3 2.2 Proposed Construction...........................................................................................................3 3.0 FIELD EXPLORATION...........................................................................................................4 3.1 Subsurface characterization...................................................................................................4 3.2 Groundwater Observations....................................................................................................4 4.0 SITE CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS.........................................................................5 4.1 Earthwork Operations............................................................................................................5 4.2.1 Structural Fill.................................................................................................................5 5.0 CLOSING.............................................................................................................................6 APPENDICES Appendix A — Drawings & Reports • Site Location Diagram • Exploration Location Diagram Appendix B — Field Operations • Reference Notes for CPT Testing • Cone Penetration Test Sounding Logs (S-1 and S-6) Appendix C—Supplemental Report Documents • GBA Document Vallari Brother —Storage Ponds December 15, 2022 ECS Project No. 22:32527 Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following summarizes the main findings of the exploration, particularly those that may have a cost impact on the planned development. Further, our principal foundation recommendations are summarized. Information gleaned from the executive summary should not be utilized in lieu of reading the entire geotechnical report. • The geotechnical exploration performed for the site included six (6) electronic cone penetration test (CPT) soundings drilled to termination depths of approximately 15 feet. • Groundwater was encountered in the soundings at depths ranging from approximately 5.5 feet to 13.5 feet below existing grade. Please note this Executive Summary is an important part of this report and should be considered a "summary" only. The subsequent sections of this report constitute our findings, conclusions, and recommendations in their entirety. Vallari Brother —Storage Ponds December 15, 2022 ECS Project No. 22:32527 Page 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to provide geotechnical information for the design of the proposed new storage ponds located at 1012 US 117 in Warsaw, NC. The recommendations developed for this report are based on project information supplied by Mr. Gus Simmons of Cavanaugh. Our services were provided in accordance with our Proposal No. 22:26865, dated November 9, 2022, as authorized by Mr. Sam Vallari on November 10, 2022, which includes our Terms and Conditions of Service. This report contains the procedures and results of our subsurface exploration programs, review of existing site conditions, engineering analyses, and recommendations for the design and construction of the project. The report includes the following items. • A brief review and description of our field test procedures and the results of testing conducted; • A review of surface topographical features and site conditions; • A review of subsurface soil stratigraphy with pertinent available physical properties; • Site development recommendations; • Suitability of soils for use as fill material; • Site vicinity map; • Exploration location plan; and • CPT sounding logs. Vallari Brother —Storage Ponds ECS Project No. 22:32527 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION/CURRENT SITE USE/PAST SITE USE December 15, 2022 Page 3 The proposed site is located at 1012 US 117 in Warsaw, Duplin County, North Carolina. The site is bounded on the north and west by Carter Best Road, and on the south and east by undeveloped agrarian land. Figure 2.1.1 below shows an image of where the site is located. _ �• � 1` • a�~� - fir. � � - t y� 4St i?3yA Figure 2.1.1 Site Location The site currently consists of the existing agrarian land. Based on our site visit and approximate elevations from Google Earth, topography of the site varies with typical elevations on site ranging from approximate 134 to 151 feet. 2.2 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ECS understands the project consists of the construction of three new effluent storage ponds for a spay irrigation system. Vallari Brother —Storage Ponds December 15, 2022 ECS Project No. 22:32527 Page 4 3.0 FIELD EXPLORATION Our exploration procedures are explained in greater detail in Appendix B including the Reference Notes for Cone Penetration soundings. Our scope of work included performing six (6) CPT soundings. Our approximate CPT sounding locations are shown on the Exploration Location Diagram in Appendix A. 3.1 SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION The subsurface conditions encountered were generally consistent with published geological mapping. The following sections provide generalized characterizations of the soil. Please refer to the CPT sounding logs in Appendix B. The site is located in the Coastal Plain Physiographic Province of North Carolina. The Coastal Plain is composed of seven terraces, each representing a former level of the Atlantic Ocean. Soils in this area generally consist of sedimentary materials transported from other areas by the ocean or rivers. These deposits vary in thickness from a thin veneer along the western edge of the region to more than 10,000 feet near the coast. The sedimentary deposits of the Coastal Plain rest upon consolidated rocks similar to those underlying the Piedmont and Mountain Physiographic Provinces. In general, shallow unconfined groundwater movement within the overlying soils is largely controlled by topographic gradients. Recharge occurs primarily by infiltration along higher elevations and typically discharges into streams or other surface water bodies. The elevation of the shallow water table is transient and can vary greatly with seasonal fluctuations in precipitation. Table 3.1.1 Subsurface Stratigraphy Approximate Stratum Description Ranges of Depth Range E N*-Values(1) blows per foot (bpf) 0 to 0.25 N/A Topsoil was encountered on -site with an observed N/A (Surface cover) thickness of approximately 4 inches. Deeper topsoil or organic laden soils are most likely present in wet, poorly drained areas and potentially unexplored areas of the site. 0.25 to 15 1 Very Loose to Very Dense, Silty, Clayey, Gravely, and 1 to 100 Clean SAND (SM, SC, SP), Very Soft to Very Stiff, Sandy and Clayey SILT (ML), Silty and Lean CLAY (CL). Notes: (1) Equivalent Corrected Standard Penetration Test Resistances 3.2 GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS Water levels were measured in our CPT soundings and are shown in Appendix B. Groundwater depths measured at the time of drilling ranged from 5.5 to 13.5 feet below the ground surface. Variations in the long-term water table may occur as a result of changes in precipitation, evaporation, surface water runoff, construction activities, and other factors. Vallari Brother —Storage Ponds ECS Project No. 22:32527 4.0 SITE CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 EARTHWORK OPERATIONS 4.2.1 Structural Fill December 15, 2022 Page 5 Prior to placement of structural fill, representative bulk samples (about 50 pounds) of on -site and/or off - site borrow should be submitted to ECS for laboratory testing, which will typically include Atterberg limits, natural moisture content, grain -size distribution, and moisture -density relationships (i.e., Proctors) for compaction. Import materials should be tested prior to being hauled to the site to determine if they meet project specifications. Alternatively, Proctor data from other accredited laboratories can be submitted if the test results are within the last 90 days. Satisfactory Structural Fill Materials: Materials satisfactory for use as structural fill should consist of inorganic soils with the following engineering properties and compaction requirements. STRUCTURAL FILL INDEX PROPERTIES Subject Building and Pavement Areas Max. Particle Size Fines Content Max. organic content Property LL < 40, PI<20 4 inches Max. 20 % 5% by dry weight STRUCTURAL FILL COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS Subject Compaction Standard Required Compaction (Upper 1 foot) Required Compaction (Depths greater than 1 foot) Dry Unit Weight Moisture Content Loose Thickness Requirement Standard Proctor, ASTM D698 98% of Max. Dry Density 95% of Max. Dry Density >100 pcf -2 to +2 % points of the soil's optimum value 8 inches prior to compaction On -Site Borrow Suitability: The on -site silty sands (SP, SM) should meet the recommendations for re -use as structural fill and the on -site clayey sands (SC) can possibly be used but are more difficult to moisture condition to optimum moisture levels. The sandy lean and lean clays (CL) are not recommended for re- use as structural fill. The lean clays can be used in non-structural areas. Fill Placement: Fill materials should not be placed on frozen soils, on frost -heaved soils, and/or on excessively wet soils. Borrow fill materials should not contain frozen materials at the time of placement, and frozen or frost -heaved soils should be removed prior to placement of structural fill or other fill soils and aggregates. Excessively wet soils or aggregates should be scarified, aerated, and moisture conditioned. Vallari Brother —Storage Ponds December 15, 2022 ECS Project No. 22:32527 Page 6 5.0 CLOSING ECS has prepared this report to guide the geotechnical-related design and construction aspects of the project. We performed these services in accordance with the standard of care expected of professionals in the industry performing similar services on projects of like size and complexity at this time in the region. No other representation, expressed or implied, and no warranty or guarantee is included or intended in this report. The description of the proposed project is based on information provided to ECS by Mr. Gus Simmons of Cavanaugh. If any of this information is inaccurate or changes, either because of our interpretation of the documents provided or site or design changes that may occur later, ECS should be contacted so we can review our recommendations and provide additional or alternate recommendations that reflect the proposed construction. We recommend that ECS review the project plans and specifications so we can confirm that those plans/specifications are in accordance with the recommendations of this geotechnical report. Field observations and quality assurance testing during earthwork and foundation installation are an extension of, and integral to, the geotechnical design. We recommend that ECS be retained to apply our expertise throughout the geotechnical phases of construction, and to provide consultation and recommendation should issues arise. ECS is not responsible for the conclusions, opinions, or recommendations of others based on the data in this report. APPENDIX A — Diagrams & Reports Site Location Diagram Exploration Location Diagram i (a (C} _entM- Map contributors 0 lit, ' r ,e RAW t I^ a 1: 1000 2,000 Feet Site Location Diagram ER ENGINEER SCALE VILLARI BROTHERS - STORAGE PONDS AS NOTED PROJECT NO. 22:32527 1012 US 117, WARSAW, NORTH CAROLINA SHEET 1 OF 2 VILLARI FOODS � 12/15/2022 Service Layer Credits: Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors } W E APPENDIX B — Field Operations Reference Notes for CPT Soundings Logs Cone Penetration Test Sounding Logs (S-1 through S-6) REFERENCE NOTES FOR CONE PENETRATION TEST (CPT) SOUNDINGS In the CPT sounding procedure (ASTM-D-5778), an electronically instrumented cone penetrometer is hydraulically advanced through soil to measure point resistance (q,), pore water pressure (u2), and sleeve friction (fs). These values are recorded continuously as the cone is pushed to the desired depth. CPT data is corrected for depth and used to estimate soil classifications and intrinsic soil parameters such as angle of internal friction, preconsolidation pressure, and undrained shear strength. The graphs below represent one of the accepted methods of CPT soil behavior classification (Robertson, 1990). ;0uu Wj aS D0 U C U) N ry N 10 C O �� 1 �- 0.1 8 1 10 Friction Ratio, Fr N 1. Sensitive, Fine Grained 2. Organic Soils -Pests 3. Clays; Clay to Silty Clay 4. Clayey Silt to Silty Clay 5. Silty Sand to Sandy Silt 1 Wj U C U) N ry N C O �� -0.4 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 Pore Pressure Ratio, Bq 6. Clean Sands to Silty Sands 7. Gravelly Sand to Sand 8. Very Stiff Sand to Clayey Sand 9. Very Stiff Fine Grained The following table presents a correlation of corrected cone tip resistance (qt) to soil consistency or relative density: SAND SILT/CLAY Corrected Cone Tip Resistance qt is Relative Density Corrected Cone Tip Resistance (qt) (is Relative Density <20 Very Loose <5 Very Soft 20-40 Loose 5-10 Soft 40-120 Medium Dense 10-15 Firm 15-30 Stiff 120-200 Dense 30-45 Very Stiff >200 Very Dense 45-60 Hard >60 1 Very Hard SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION PROCEDURE: CONE PENETRATION TESTING (CPT) ASTM D 5778 In the CPT sounding procedure, an electronically instrumented cone penetrometer is hydraulically advanced through soil to measure point resistance (qc), pore water pressure (U2), and sleeve friction (fs). These values are recorded continuously as the cone is pushed to the desired depth. CPT data is corrected for depth and used to estimate soil classifications and intrinsic soil parameters such as angle of internal friction, pre -consolidation pressure, and undrained shear strength. SOUNDING CUSTOMER: Customer OPERATOR RP/TC CONE ID: DDG1371 LOCATION: Mi— SBT M (Rob. 1990) DW 8 1fl) 15 SOUNDING JOB NUMBER.: HOLE NUMBER: mbe TEST DATE: 311N201 g 10:35:33 AM COMMENT. Auto Enhance On COMMENT Filler On Try Resistame (O )S Fdc Mgle 05t) filar eft) wg) COMMENT GPS (LATLONALTj 0.00,0.00,0.0 LOCATION: W_ LOCATION ff— LOCATION: I.T Sleeve Sfi . Pore Pressure (tst) (Ps1) 1 Sens hie grained 4 — 6- to day 7 Silty sand m sandy sat 10 Gravelly sand I sand 2 O.gm. ma —A 5 Clayey sift to silty day B sand to silty sand 75 Very . fine 9reined " 3 Clays 8 Sandysiltrodayey sdt g Sand 12 S .ff. i yey sand" .S Robcvtwn 19m: 110W nsoWaled o. Cemented: •SBTISFT CORRELATION: UBC-1983 • Involves the direct push of an electronically instrumented cone penetrometer* through the soil • Values are recorded continuously • CPT data is corrected and correlated to soil parameters *CPT Penetrometer Size May Vary ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Drive EE Wilmington, NC 28403 ECS Project # 22-32527 I� I Project: Villari Brothers - Storage Ponds Location: Warsaw, Duplin County, North Carolina 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 aCLi 8 0 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 1 d ie re sistz 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 CL aa) 8 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 Sleeve fricl 50 100 0.5 -esistance (tsf) Friction (ts 1 2 3 4 5 6 w 7 0- 8 9 1 10 1 11 1 12 1 13 )re pressu 5- 5- 7-- 5 9 5 0 5--\ 1 5 z s 3 5 4 5 0 10 Pressure (p CPT: S-1 Total depth: 14.93 ft, Date: 11/30/2022 Cone Type: Uknown Cone Operator: Cory Robison SPT N60 Norm. Soil Behaviour Type o 0.5 1 Sand & silty sand ) 20 30 40 50 N60 (blows/ft) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Q- a� 0 8. 9. 1 10. 1 11. 1 12. 1 13. 1 i Silty sand & sandy s 1 i 3 i L i i &-sdLys i i i 7 - Silty sand &sandy E I i Sand & silty sand 3 Silty sand & sandy E I i Sand & silty sa ld Lty_s)nd & I L 5 Silty s nd & sandy E I Qay & silty cla� 3 j Qay 5 3 Qay & silty clay Qay 5 1 8 12 16 I (Robertson 1990) CPeT-IT v.2.0.1.16 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 12/12/2022, 12:53:26 PM 0 Project file: D:\32527\sounding_files.cpt ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Drive EE Wilmington, NC 28403 ECS Project # 22-32527 I� I Project: Villari Brothers - Storage Ponds Location: Warsaw, Duplin County, North Carolina 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 w 7 7.5 a a� 8 0 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 1 d ie re sistz 50 loc -esistance (tsf) 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 w 7 7.5 a a) 8 6 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 Sleeve fricl .5 1 -riction (ts Pore pressure u 1.5 - 2- 2 2.5 - 3 3 3,5 4 4 4.5 - 5- 5 5.5 -- 6__ 6 6.5 w 7 w 7 7.5 Iz a Su 8-- 8 a 0 9' 9 9.5 10 10 10.5 11 11 11.5 12-12 12.5 13 - 13 13.5 14 14 14.5 15 0 10 Pressure (psi) CPT: S-2 Total depth: 14.93 ft, Date: 11/30/2022 Cone Type: Uknown Cone Operator: Cory Robison SPT N60 Norm. Soil Behaviour Type 0 0.5 Sand & silty sand 1 Silty sand & sandy s It 20 30 40 50 J60 (blows/ft) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. w 7. Q_ a� 0 8. 9. 1 10. 1 11. 1 12. 1 13. 1 ' Very dense/stiff soil ' Silty sand & sandy s 1 3 Sand & silty sand i --Silty sand & sandy E I 1 Very dense/stiff soil i i i Si1 ty sand & sandy E I i i Sand & silty sand 7 i 3 i 3 tty-s d&-sa 1 i Clay & sil ty clay Silty sand & sandy E 1 ' Sand & silty sand 1 Sfty sand & sandy E 1 ay & sil ty clay 7 Silty sand &sandy E 1' 5 ay & sil ty clay 3 Qay 1 Qay & siltyclay 3 5 Silty sand & sandy 1 1 8 12 16 I (Robertson 1990) CPeT-IT v.2.0.1.16 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 12/12/2022, 12:53:58 PM 0 Project file: D:\32527\sounding_files.cpt ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Drive EE Wilmington, NC 28403 ECS Project # 22-32527 I� I Project: Villari Brothers - Storage Ponds Location: Warsaw, Duplin County, North Carolina 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. w 7. a a� 0 8. 9. 1 10. 1 11. 1 12. 1 13. 1 CPT: S-3 Total depth: 14.93 ft, Date: 11/30/2022 Cone Type: Uknown Cone Operator: Cory Robison Cone resistance Sleeve friction Pore pressure u SPIT N60 Norm. Soil Behaviour Type 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 w 7 7.5 CL W 8 6 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 it 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 A14 1 2 3 4 5 6 w 7 0- 8 9 10 11 12 13 5 1 5- 2- 5- 3- 5- 4- 5- 5- 5 8- 5- 9- 5- 0- 5- 5- 2- 5-- 3-- 5-- 4 5 50 0.2 0.4 0 20 40 Tip resistance (tsf) Friction (tsf) Pressure (psi) 1 1 1 1 1 V- 0.5- 1- 1.5- 2- 2.5- 3- 3.5- 4- 4.5- 5- 5.5- 6- 6.5- w 7- 7.5- Q- a� 8 - 0 8.5- 9- 9.5- 10- 10.5- 11- 11.5- 12- 12.5- 13- 13.5- 14- 14.5- 15- ■ ■ ■ ■ 4-1 dy Sand & silty , Silty sand & sandy .. C■ �� •. 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 4 8 12 16 N60 (blows/ft) SBTn (Robertson 1990) CPeT-IT v.2.0.1.16 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 12/12/2022, 12:54:25 PM 0 Project file: D:\32527\sounding_files.cpt ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Drive EE Wilmington, NC 28403 ECS Project # 22-32527 I� I Project: Villari Brothers - Storage Ponds Location: Warsaw, Duplin County, North Carolina 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 w 7 7.5 CL N 8 I� 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 Cone resistance 50 100 Tip resistance (tsf) 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 w 7 7.5 CL N 8 l� 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 it 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 Sleeve friction 1 2 Friction (tsf) w Pore pressure u -4 -2 0 Pressure (psi) w L IZ N I� 1 1 1 1 1 I ! I! SPT N60 N60 (blows/ft) CPT: S-4 Total depth: 14.93 ft, Date: 11/30/2022 Cone Type: Uknown Cone Operator: Cory Robison Norm. Soil Behaviour Type 0- 0.5- 1- 1.5- 2- 2.5 - 3- 3.- 4- 4.5- 5- 5.5- 6- 6.5- w 7- 7.5- Q N $- I� 8.5- 9- 9.5- 10- 10.5- 11- 11.5- 12- 12.5- 13- 13.5- 14- 14.5- 15- .--. Very .� . Silty S' ery Md I- I- I- I- I 0 4 8 12 16 SBTn (Robertson 1990) CPeT-IT v.2.0.1.16 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 12/12/2022, 12:54:49 PM 0 Project file: D:\32527\sounding_files.cpt ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Drive EE Wilmington, NC 28403 ECS Project # 22-32527 I� I Project: Villari Brothers - Storage Ponds Location: Warsaw, Duplin County, North Carolina 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 w 7 7.5 aCLi 8 0 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 Cone resistance 0 20,000 Tip resistance (tsf) 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 w 7 7.5 aCLi 8 0 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 it 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 Sleeve friction 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3,5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 w 7 7.5 aCLi 8 0 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 Pore pressure u ).2 0.4 0.6 0.8 -10 -5 0 Friction (tsf) Pressure (psi) w a a� 0 1 1 1 1 1 I! SPT N60 N60 (blows/ft) CPT: S-5 Total depth: 14.93 ft, Date: 11/30/2022 Cone Type: Uknown Cone Operator: Cory Robison Norm. Soil Behaviour Type 0- 0.5- 1 1.5- 2- 2.5- 3- 3.5- 4- 4.5- 5- 5.5- 6- 6.5- 7- 7.5- 8 0 8.5 9 9.5 10- 10.5- 11- 11 . 51212.51313.51414.5 15 and- silly sa Sand Sand & silty sand Silty sand & sandy Jay silty cla d Q ay lay & sTty c a siFty a ay Qay & silty clay Silty s nd & sandy Sand silty sa d 0 4 8 12T-77 16 SBTn (Robertson 1990) CPeT-IT v.2.0.1.16 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 12/12/2022, 12:55:16 PM 0 Project file: D:\32527\sounding_files.cpt ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Drive EE Wilmington, NC 28403 ECS Project # 22-32527 I� I Project: Villari Brothers - Storage Ponds Location: Warsaw, Duplin County, North Carolina 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. w 7. a a� 0 8. 9. 1 10. 1 11. 1 12. 1 13. 1 14. Cone resistance 100 Tip resistance (tsf) 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 w 7 7.5 CL aa) 8 6 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 it 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 Sleeve friction 0.5 1 1.5 Friction (tsf) w 1 1 1 1 1 Pore pressure u -10 0 Pressure (psi) w a a� 0 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 7 5 I! SPT N60 N60 (blows/ft) CPT: S-6 Total depth: 14.93 ft, Date: 11/30/2022 Cone Type: Uknown Cone Operator: Cory Robison Norm. Soil Behaviour Type 0- 0.5- 1- 1.5- 2- 2.5- 3- 3.5- 4- 4.5- 5- 5.5- 6- 6.5- w 7- 7.5- Q- a� 8 - 0 8.5- 9- 9.5- 10- 10.5- 11- 11.5- 12- 12.5- 13- 13.5- 14- 14.5- 15- r MEN MEME .--. MEME .--. MEME a-Y 8'!I1- 0 4 8 12 16 SBTn (Robertson 1990) CPeT-IT v.2.0.1.16 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 12/12/2022, 12:55:51 PM 0 Project file: D:\32527\sounding_files.cpt APPENDIX C — Supplemental Report Documents GBA Document r- Geotechnical-Engineering Report -) The Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA) has prepared this advisory to help you — assumedly a client representative — interpret and apply this geotechnical-engineering report as effectively as possible. In that way, clients can benefit from a lowered exposure to the subsurface problems that, for decades, have been a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. If you have questions or want more information about any of the issues discussed below, contact your GBA-member geotechnical engineer. Active involvement in the Geoprofessional Business Association exposes geotechnical engineers to a wide array of risk -confrontation techniques that can be of genuine benefit for everyone involved with a construction project. Geotechnical-Engineering Services Are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of their clients. A geotechnical-engineering study conducted for a given civil engineer will not likely meet the needs of a civil - works constructor or even a different civil engineer. Because each geotechnical-engineering study is unique, each geotechnical- engineering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. 7hose who rely on a geotechnical-engineering report prepared for a different client can be seriously misled. No one except authorized client representatives should rely on this geotechnical-engineering report without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one - not even you - should apply this report for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. Read this Report in Full Costly problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical- engineering report did not read it in its entirety. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selected elements only. Read this report in full. You Need to Inform Your Geotechnical Engineer about Change Your geotechnical engineer considered unique, project -specific factors when designing the study behind this report and developing the confirmation -dependent recommendations the report conveys. A few typical factors include: • the clients goals, objectives, budget, schedule, and risk -management preferences; • the general nature of the structure involved, its size, configuration, and performance criteria; the structures location and orientation on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements, such as retaining walls, access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Typical changes that could erode the reliability of this report include those that affect: • the sites size or shape; • the function of the proposed structure, as when it's changed from a parking garage to an office building, or from a light -industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse; • the elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the proposed structure; • the composition of the design team; or • project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project changes - even minor ones - and request an assessment of their impact. The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that arise because the geotechnical engineer was not informed about developments the engineer otherwise would have considered. This Report May Not Be Reliable Do not rely on this report if your geotechnical engineer prepared it: • for a different client; • for a different project; • for a different site (that may or may not include all or a portion of the original site); or • before important events occurred at the site or adjacent to it; e.g., man-made events like construction or environmental remediation, or natural events like floods, droughts, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations. Note, too, that it could be unwise to rely on a geotechnical-engineering report whose reliability may have been affected by the passage of time, because of factors like changed subsurface conditions; new or modified codes, standards, or regulations; or new techniques or tools. If your geotechnical engineer has not indicated an apply -by" date on the report, ask what it should be, and, in general, if you are the least bit uncertain about the continued reliability of this report, contact your geotechnical engineer before applying it. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis - if any is required at all - could prevent major problems. Most of the "Findings" Related in This Report Are Professional Opinions Before construction begins, geotechnical engineers explore a sites subsurface through various sampling and testing procedures. Geotechnical engineers can observe actual subsurface conditions only at those specific locations where sampling and testing were performed. The data derived from that sampling and testing were reviewed by your geotechnical engineer, who then applied professional judgment to form opinions about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual sitewide- subsurface conditions may differ - maybe significantly - from those indicated in this report. Confront that risk by retaining your geotechnical engineer to serve on the design team from project start to project finish, so the individual can provide informed guidance quickly, whenever needed. This Report's Recommendations Are Confirmation -Dependent The recommendations included in this report - including any options or alternatives - are confirmation -dependent. In other words, they are notfinal, because the geotechnical engineer who developed them relied heavily on judgment and opinion to do so. Your geotechnical engineer can finalize the recommendations only after observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. If through observation your geotechnical engineer confirms that the conditions assumed to exist actually do exist, the recommendations can be relied upon, assuming no other changes have occurred. The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot assume responsibility or liability for confirmation - dependent recommendations if you fail to retain that engineer to perform construction observation. This Report Could Be Misinterpreted Other design professionals' misinterpretation of geotechnical- engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Confront that risk by having your geotechnical engineer serve as a full-time member of the design team, to: confer with other design -team members, help develop specifications, review pertinent elements of other design professionals' plans and specifications, and be on hand quickly whenever geotechnical-engineering guidance is needed. You should also confront the risk of constructors misinterpreting this report. Do so by retaining your geotechnical engineer to participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences and to perform construction observation. Give Constructors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can shift unanticipated -subsurface -conditions liability to constructors by limiting the information they provide forbid preparation. To help prevent the costly, contentious problems this practice has caused, include the complete geotechnical-engineering report, along with any attachments or appendices, with your contract documents, but be certain to note conspicuously that you've included the material for informational purposes only. To avoid misunderstanding, you may also want to note that "informational purposes" means constructors have no right to rely on the interpretations, opinions, conclusions, or recommendations in the report, but they may rely on the factual data relative to the specific times, locations, and depths/elevations referenced. Be certain that constructors know they may learn about specific project requirements, including options selected from the report, only from the design drawings and specifications. Remind constructors that they may perform their own studies if they want to, and be sure to allow enough time to permit them to do so. Only then might you be in a position to give constructors the information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Conducting prebid and preconstruction conferences can also be valuable in this respect. Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Some client representatives, design professionals, and constructors do not realize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines. That lack of understanding has nurtured unrealistic expectations that have resulted in disappointments, delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. To confront that risk, geotechnical engineers commonly include explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled "limitations, many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers' responsibilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered The personnel, equipment, and techniques used to perform an environmental study - e.g., a "phase -one' or `phase -two" environmental site assessment - differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical-engineering study. For that reason, a geotechnical- engineering report does not usually relate any environmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated subsurface environmental problems have led to project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own environmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk -management guidance. As a general rule, do not rely on an environmental report prepared for a different client, site, or project, or that is more than six months old. Obtain Professional Assistance to Deal with Moisture Infiltration and Mold While your geotechnical engineer may have addressed groundwater, water infiltration, or similar issues in this report, none of the engineer's services were designed, conducted, or intended to prevent uncontrolled migration of moisture - including water vapor - from the soil through building slabs and walls and into the building interior, where it can cause mold growth and material -performance deficiencies. Accordingly, proper implementation of the geotechnical engineer's recommendations will not of itself be sufficient to prevent moisture infiltration. Confront the risk of moisture infiltration by including building -envelope or mold specialists on the design team. Geotechnical engineers are not building - envelope or mold specialists. DAM GEOPROFESSIONAL BUSINESS saia'AWIM - ASSOCIATION Telephone: 301/565-2733 e-mail: info@geoprofessional.org www.geoprofessional.org Copyright 2016 by Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA). Duplication, reproduction, or copying of this document, in whole or in part, by any means whatsoever, is strictly prohibited, except with GBAs specific written permission. Excerpting, quoting, or otherwise extracting wording from this document is permitted only with the express written permission of GBA, and only for purposes of scholarly research or book review. Only members of GBA may use this document or its wording as a complement to or as an element of a report of any kind. Any other firm, individual, or other entity that so uses this document without being a GBA member could be committing negligent 3/20/23, 10:46 AM North Carolina Secretary of State Search Results • File an Annual Report/Amend an Annual Report • Upload a PDF Filing • Order a Document Online - Add Entity to My Email Notification List • View Filings • Print a Pre -Populated Annual Report form • Print an Amended a Annual Report form Limited Liability Company Legal Name Micro Land Group, LLC Information Sosld: 1164669 Status: Current -Active O Date Formed: 8/24/2010 Citizenship: Domestic Annual Report Due Date: April 15th Currentpnnual Report Status: Registered Agent: Villari, Joseph Addresses Printout of Corporate Information for Micro Land Group, LLC Mailing Principal Office Reg Office 1015 Ashes Drive Suite 102 1015 Ashes Drive Suite 102 1015 Ashes Drive Suite 102 Wilmington, NC 28405 Reg Mailing 1015 Ashes Drive Suite 102 Wilmington, NC 28405 Company Officials Wilmington, NC 28405 Wilmington, NC 28405 All LLCs are managed by their managers pursuant to N.C.G.S. 57D-3-20. Manager Joseph P. Villari 1420 Avenel Dr. Wilmington NC 28411 https://www.sosnc.gov/online_services/search/Business_Registration_ResuIts 1/1 VALLEY V-CHART Valley Dealer BENCHMARK BLDGS. & IRRIG. 165 S Kenansville Bypass PO Box 867 Kenansville, NC 28349-0867 United States Tlaalar -KTn Parent Order No. Sprinkler Order No. Villari Bros 1A 1B 11 Plant GEORGIA DC 11 (ten ctnmar .13 Field Name Specifications for proposed center pivot irrigation system Dealer PO Order Date 02/24/2023 Load Date 02/28/2023 Method Of Shipment UPSG 4 Span Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Machine Flow 700 (GPM) Pivot Pressure 54 (PSI) in Cover Sheet - 02/24/2023 Page 1 Parent Order No Dealer BENCHMARKBLDGS. & UMIG. Sprinkler Order No Villari Bros lA 1B Customer Field Name Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Machine Summary Span and Overhang Pipe Coupler D. U. Model Qty Length O.D. Spacing Qty Profile Tire (ft) (in) (in) 7000 3 204.9 6 108 23 Standard 14.9 x 24 High Float 7000 1 180.0 6 108 20 Standard 14.9 x 24 High Float 7000 1 27.0 6 110 4 Messages Caution: None Dealer: None Sprinkler -- Available Outlets Sprinkler Configuration Range(ft) Valley U-Pipe 6(in) Galvanized 3/4 M NPT x 3/4 F NPT Outlets 4,88,1 Black Hose Drop Variable Length 60(in) Ground Clr 91,93,1 Valley Slip Weight 26(in) 20b) Poly Nelson TR3000 D4 - Green 3/4 M NPT ASSY 461.23 (tt) Total Drop Hose Length Pressure Field Area 59.5 (Ac) Total 48.8 (Ac) Pivot 3600 10.7 (Ac) EG on 80% 822.6 (ft)Machine Length 106.1 (ft) End Gun Radius r-----------------------------------i 54 (PSI) Pivot Pressure j 45 (PSI) = End Pressure 0.0 (ft) Highest Elevation 0.0 (ft) Lowest Elevation L------------------------------------i Flow ----------------------------- 700 (GPM) 11.25 (GPM per Acre) 1 0.60 (in per day) App Rate 0.132 (in) App Depth @ 1000 11 147.7 (GPM) End Gun 1 1 ----------------------------J LRDU Drive Train ------------------------------------------------ 68 RPM Center Drive @60 Hz freq. I 14.9 x 24 High Float ND Tire I 52:1Wheel GB Ratio, LRDU Dist 795.2 (ft) 5.3 Hrs/360° @ 100% 15.76 (Ft per Min) 5.3 Hrs/360° @ 100% ----------------------------------------------- Cover Sheet - 02/24/2023 Page 2 Parent Order No Pressure Loss Dealer BENCHMARKBLDGS. & IRRIG. Sprinkler Order No Villari Bros iA 1B Customer Field Name Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Machine Summary End Gun(s) & Booster Pump Information Pipe Pipe Pipe Loss Length (ft) I.D. (in) Finish C-Factor (PSI) 822.6 5.79 Galvanized 150 7.9 Total = 7.9 Span Flow Span Number Irrigated Area Length (ft) (Ac) Rqd (GPM) Act (GPM) Rqd (GPM per Acre) Act (GPM per Acre) % Deviation 1 181.4 3.0 32.8 40.1 10.90 13.34 22.4 2 204.9 9.1 99.2 99.4 10.90 10.92 0.2 3 204.9 15.2 165.2 164.8 10.90 10.87 -0.2 4 179.8 18.3 199.4 199.9 10.90 10.93 0.3 O/H 27.4 3.2 36.2 35.7 11.30 11.15 -1.3 EG 106.1 10.7 150.8 147.7 11.25 11.02 -2.1 Totals 59.5 687.6 Drain Sprinkler 12.3 12.1 Total Machine Flow 699.7 Primary End Gun Nelson SR100 End Gun 0.9 Nozzle Booster Pump Advanced Options ----------------------------------------- lDrain Sprinkler = Senninger Directional ! !Last Sprinkler Coverage = 1 ft ! !Sprinkler Coverage Length = 823.6 ft ! !Use Last Coupler= YES ! !Minimum Mainline Pressure = 6 PSI ! ----------------------------------------------------------- Shipping Options ----------------------------------------------- ,Ship Drop Hardware ! !Ship Endgun Nozzle ! !Ship Endgun & Hardware ! !Do not ship Endgun Valve / Nozzle Valve Hardware ! !Do not ship Boosterpump Hardware ! ----------------------------------------------------------- Cover Sheet - 02/24/2023 Page 3 Dealer BENCHMARK BLDGS. & IRRIG. Sprinkler Order No Villari Bros lA 1B Customer VALuy V-CHART Field Name Parent Order No Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Percent Timer Data Setup Information - Valley Computer Control Panel Water Application Constants: Minimum Application = 0.132 (in) Hours/360' = 5.3 Based on IN Based on % Timer IN Per Pivot Hours Per 360 degrees o Timer 360 degrees 0.132 100.0 5.3 0.20 65.9 8.0 0.30 43.9 12.1 0.40 32.9 16.1 0.50 26.4 20.1 0.60 22.0 24.1 0.70 18.8 28.2 0.80 16.5 32.1 0.90 14.6 36.3 1.00 13.2 40.2 1.25 10.5 50.5 1.50 8.8 60.2 1.75 7.5 70.7 2.00 6.6 80.3 2.50 5.3 100.0 Pivot IN Per Hours Per o Timer 360 degrees 360 degrees 100.0 0.132 5.3 90.0 0.15 5.9 80.0 0.16 6.6 70.0 0.19 7.6 60.0 0.22 8.8 50.0 0.26 10.6 45.0 0.29 11.8 40.0 0.33 13.3 35.0 0.38 15.1 30.0 0.44 17.7 25.0 0.53 21.2 20.0 0.66 26.5 17.5 0.75 30.3 15.0 0.88 35.3 12.5 1.05 42.4 10.0 1.32 53.0 7.5 1.76 70.7 5.0 2.64 106.0 Field Area Flow Pressure LRDU Drive Train ------------------------------------i r--------------------------------- ir----------------------------------- ir--------------------------------------------- 1 59.5(Ac) Total jj 700 (GPM) ii 54 (PSI) Pivot Pressure ii 68 RPM Center Drive @ 60 Hz freq. 48.8 (Ac) Pivot 360' i i 11.25 (GPM per Acre) i� 45 (PSI)=End Pressure ii 14.9 x 24 High Float ND Tire 10.7 (Ac) EG on 80% 0.60 (in per day) App Rate ii 0.0(ft) Highest Elevation ii 52:lwheel GB Ratio, LRDU Dist 795.2(ft) i 822.6(ft)Machine Length i i 0.132 (in) App Depth @ 100% ii 0.0(ft) Lowest Elevation ii 5.3 Hrs/360° @ 1000 ( 15.76 ) (Ft per Min) 106.1 (ft)End Gun Radius ii i i 147.7 (GPM) End Gun i�----------------------------------i i i -�i 5.3 Hrs/360° @ 1000 � ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------� Disclaimer ---------------------------------' The information presented in the attached Percent Timer Report is based on variables which cannot be totally controlled by Valmont (including, but not limited to; pivot pressure, inside pipeline surface, end gun throw, end gun arc setting, tire slippage, tire pressure, field slopes, soil variations, sprinkler package installation, well capacity, center drive motor voltage, center drive motor frequency, climatic conditions and other elements and circumstances beyond Valmont's reasonable control). Valmont recommends monitoring the machine for at least one pass through field to obtain an accurate rotation time. Percent Timer - 02/24/2023 Page 1 Valley Dealer BENCHMARK BLDGS. & IRRIG. 165 S Kenansville Bypass PO Box 867 Kenansville, NC 28349-0867 United States Tiaa�ar �Tn Parent Order No. Sprinkler Order No. Villari Bros 2 11 Plant GEORGIA DC 11 (ten ctnmar .13 Field Name Dealer PO Order Date 02/24/2023 Load Date 02/28/2023 Method Of Shipment UPSG 3 Span Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Machine Flow 325 (GPM) Pivot Pressure 48 (PSI) in Cover Sheet - 02/24/2023 Page 1 Parent Order No Dealer BENCHMARKBLDGS. & UMIG. Sprinkler Order No Villari Bros 2 Customer Field Name Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Machine Summary Span and Overhang Pipe Coupler D. U. Model Qty Length O.D. Spacing Qty Profile Tire (ft) (in) (in) 7000 2 180.0 6 108 20 Standard 14.9 x 24 High Float 7000 1 160.0 6 108 18 Standard 14.9 x 24 High Float 7000 1 9.0 6 110 2 Messages Caution: None Dealer: None Sprinkler -- Available Outlets Sprinkler Configuration Range(ft) Valley U-Pipe 6(in) Galvanized 3/4 M NPT x 3/4 F NPT Outlets 4,60,1 Black Hose Drop Variable Length 60(in) Ground Clr Valley Slip Weight 26(in) 20b) Poly Nelson TR3000 D4 - Green 3/4 M NPT ASSY 289.92 (tt) Total Drop Hose Length Pressure Field Area 25.8 (Ac) Total 20.2 (Ac) Pivot 3600 5.6 (Ac) EG on 70% 529.6 (ft)Machine Length 95.3 (ft) End Gun Radius r-----------------------------------i 48 (PSI) Pivot Pressure j 45 (PSI) = End Pressure 0.0 (ft) Highest Elevation 0.0 (ft) Lowest Elevation L------------------------------------i Flow ----------------------------- 325 (GPM) 11.54 (GPM per Acre) 1 0.61 (in per day) App Rate 0.089 (in) App Depth @ 1000 11 93.8 (GPM) End Gun 1 1 ----------------------------J LRDU Drive Train ------------------------------------------------ 68 RPM Center Drive @60 Hz freq. I 14.9 x 24 High Float ND Tire I 52:1Wheel GB Ratio, LRDU Dist 520.5 (ft) 3.5 Hrs/360° @ 100% 15.76 (Ft per Min) 3.5 Hrs/360° @ 100% ----------------------------------------------- Cover Sheet - 02/24/2023 Page 2 Parent Order No Pressure Loss Dealer BENCHMARKBLDGS. & IRRIG. Sprinkler Order No Villari Bros 2 Customer Field Name Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Machine Summary End Gun(s) & Booster Pump Information Pipe Pipe Pipe Loss Length (ft) I.D. (in) Finish C-Factor (PSI) 529.6 5.79 Galvanized 150 1.3 Total = 1.3 Span Flow Span Irrigated Area Rqd Act Rqd Act Number Length (ft) (Ac) (GPM) (GPM) (GPM per Acre) (GPM per Acre) % Deviation 1 156.7 2.3 24.8 31.5 10.70 13.62 27.2 2 180.1 7.0 75.3 75.2 10.70 10.70 -0.0 3 159.8 10.2 108.7 108.6 10.70 10.69 -0.1 0/H 9.1 0.7 8.2 8.3 11.89 12.05 1.4 EG 95.3 5.6 91.5 93.8 11.54 11.82 2.4 Totals 25.8 317.4 Drain Sprinkler 7.6 8.1 Total Machine Flow 325.5 Primary End Gun Nelson SR100 End Gun 0.7 Nozzle Booster Pump Advanced Options ----------------------------------------- lDrain Sprinkler = Senninger Directional ! !Last Sprinkler Coverage = 1 ft ! !Sprinkler Coverage Length = 530.6 ft ! !Use Last Coupler= YES ! !Minimum Mainline Pressure = 6 PSI ! ----------------------------------------------------------- Shipping Options ----------------------------------------------- ,Ship Drop Hardware ! !Ship Endgun Nozzle ! !Ship Endgun & Hardware ! !Do not ship Endgun Valve / Nozzle Valve Hardware ! !Do not ship Boosterpump Hardware ! -----------------------• Cover Sheet - 02/24/2023 Page 3 Dealer BENCHMARK BLDGS. & IRRIG. Sprinkler Order No Villari Bros 2 Customer VALuy V-CHART Field Name Parent Order No Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Percent Timer Data Setup Information - Valley Computer Control Panel Water Application Constants: Minimum Application = 0.089 (in) Hours/360' = 3.5 Based on IN Based on % Timer IN Per Pivot Hours Per 360 degrees o Timer 360 degrees 0.089 100.0 3.5 0.10 89.3 3.9 0.20 44.6 7.8 0.30 29.8 11.7 0.40 22.3 15.7 0.50 17.9 19.6 0.60 14.9 23.5 0.70 12.8 27.3 0.80 11.2 31.3 0.90 9.9 35.4 1.00 8.9 39.3 1.25 7.1 49.3 1.50 6.0 58.3 1.75 5.1 68.6 Pivot IN Per Hours Per o Timer 360 degrees 360 degrees 100.0 0.089 3.5 90.0 0.10 3.9 80.0 0.11 4.4 70.0 0.13 5.0 60.0 0.15 5.8 50.0 0.18 7.0 45.0 0.20 7.8 40.0 0.22 8.8 35.0 0.26 10.0 30.0 0.30 11.7 25.0 0.36 14.0 20.0 0.45 17.5 17.5 0.51 20.0 15.0 0.60 23.3 12.5 0.71 28.0 10.0 0.89 35.0 7.5 1.19 46.7 5.0 1.79 70.0 Field Area Flow Pressure LRDU Drive Train ------------------------------------i r--------------------------------- ir----------------------------------- ir--------------------------------------------- 1 25.8(Ac) Total jj 325 (GPM) ii 48 (PSI) Pivot Pressure ii 68 RPM Center Drive @ 60 Hz freq. 20.2 (Ac) Pivot 360' i i 11.54 (GPM per Acre) i� 45 (PSI)=End Pressure ii 14.9 x 24 High Float ND Tire 5.6 (Ac) EG on 70% 0.61 (in per day) App Rate ii 0.0(ft) Highest Elevation ii 52:lwheel GB Ratio, LRDU Dist 520.5(ft) i 529.6(ft)Machine Length i i 0.089 (in) App Depth @ 100% ii 0.0(ft) Lowest Elevation ii 3.5 Hrs/360° @ 1000 ( 15.76 ) (Ft per Min) 95.3 (ft)End Gun Radius ii i i 93.8 (GPM) End Gun iL------------------------------------jii i i 3.5 Hrs/360° @ 1000 � ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------� Disclaimer ---------------------------------' The information presented in the attached Percent Timer Report is based on variables which cannot be totally controlled by Valmont (including, but not limited to; pivot pressure, inside pipeline surface, end gun throw, end gun arc setting, tire slippage, tire pressure, field slopes, soil variations, sprinkler package installation, well capacity, center drive motor voltage, center drive motor frequency, climatic conditions and other elements and circumstances beyond Valmont's reasonable control). Valmont recommends monitoring the machine for at least one pass through field to obtain an accurate rotation time. Percent Timer - 02/24/2023 Page 1 Valley Dealer BENCHMARK BLDGS. & IRRIG. 165 S Kenansville Bypass PO Box 867 Kenansville, NC 28349-0867 United States Tiaa�ar �Tn Parent Order No. Sprinkler Order No. Villari Bros 3A 11 Plant GEORGIA DC 11 (ten ctnmar .13 Field Name Dealer PO Order Date 02/24/2023 Load Date 02/28/2023 Method Of Shipment UPSG 3 Span Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Machine Flow 200 (GPM) Pivot Pressure 42 (PSI) in Cover Sheet - 02/24/2023 Page 1 Parent Order No Dealer BENCHMARKBLDGS. & UMIG. Sprinkler Order No Villari Bros 3A Customer Field Name Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Machine Summary Span and Overhang Pipe Coupler D. U. Model Qty Length O.D. Spacing Qty Profile Tire (ft) (in) (in) 7000 2 204.9 6 108 23 Standard 14.9 x 24 High Float 7000 1 180.0 6 108 20 Standard 14.9 x 24 High Float 7000 1 45.0 6 110 7 Messages Caution: 1. Primary Endgun overwatering by 11.14% Dealer: None Sprinkler -- Available Outlets Sprinkler Configuration Range(ft) Valley U-Pipe 6(in) Galvanized 3/4 M NPT x 3/4 F NPT Outlets 4,72,1 Black Hose Drop Variable Length 60(in) Ground Clr Valley Slip Weight 26(in) 20b) Poly Nelson TR3000 D4 - Green 3/4 M NPT ASSY 356.36 (tt) Total Drop Hose Length Pressure Field Area 17.4 (Ac) Total 14.6 (Ac) Pivot 1800 2.8 (Ac) EG on 75 0 635.8 (ft)Machine Length 76.6 (ft) End Gun Radius r-----------------------------------i 42 (PSI) Pivot Pressure j 40 (PSI) = End Pressure 0.0 (ft) Highest Elevation 0.0 (ft) Lowest Elevation L------------------------------------i Flow ----------------------------- 200 (GPM) 10.93 (GPM per Acre) 1 0.58 (in per day) App Rate 0.048 (in) App Depth @ 1000 11 45.2 (GPM) End Gun 1 1 ----------------------------J LRDU Drive Train ------------------------------------------------ 68 RPM Center Drive @60 Hz freq. I 14.9 x 24 High Float ND Tire I 52:1Wheel GB Ratio, LRDU Dist 590.2 (ft) 2.O Hrs/180° @ 100% 15.76 (Ft per Min) 4 Hrs/360° @ 100% ----------------------------------------------- Cover Sheet - 02/24/2023 Page 2 Parent Order No Pressure Loss Dealer BENCHMARKBLDGS. & IRRIG. Sprinkler Order No Villari Bros 3A Customer Field Name Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Machine Summary End Gun(s) & Booster Pump Information Pipe Pipe Pipe Loss Length (ft) I.D. (in) Finish C-Factor (PSI) 617.7 5.79 Galvanized 150 1.0 18.1 3.79 Galvanized 150 0.1 Total = 1.1 Span Flow Span Irrigated Area Rqd Act Rqd Act Number Length (ft) (Ac) (GPM) (GPM) (GPM per Acre) (GPM per Acre) % Deviation 1 181.4 1.5 13.9 30.6 9.25 20.35 120.0 2 204.9 4.6 42.1 43.0 9.25 9.44 2.1 3 179.8 6.5 60.0 60.0 9.25 9.25 -0.0 0/H 45.5 2.0 19.0 19.0 9.46 9.43 -0.3 EG 76.6 2.8 40.7 45.2 10.93 12.15 11.1 Totals 17.4 197.8 Drain Sprinkler 4.2 4.4 Total Machine Flow 202.2 Primary End Gun Nelson SR100 End Gun 0.5 Nozzle Booster Pump Advanced Options ----------------------------------------- lDrain Sprinkler = Senninger Directional ! !Last Sprinkler Coverage = 1 ft ! !Sprinkler Coverage Length = 636.8 ft ! !Use Last Coupler= YES ! !Minimum Mainline Pressure = 6 PSI ! ----------------------------------------------------------- Shipping Options ----------------------------------------------- ,Ship Drop Hardware ! !Ship Endgun Nozzle ! !Ship Endgun & Hardware ! !Do not ship Endgun Valve / Nozzle Valve Hardware ! !Do not ship Boosterpump Hardware ! -----------------------• Cover Sheet - 02/24/2023 Page 3 Dealer BENCHMARK BLDGS. & IRRIG. Sprinkler Order No Villari Bros 3A Customer VALuy V-CHART Field Name Parent Order No Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Percent Timer Data Setup Information - Valley Computer Control Panel Water Application Constants: Minimum Application = 0.048 (in) Hours/360° = 4 Based on IN Based on % Timer IN Per Pivot Hours Per 180 degrees o Timer 180 degrees 0.048 100.0 2.0 0.10 48.3 4.1 0.20 24.2 8.3 0.30 16.1 12.4 0.40 12.1 16.5 0.50 9.7 20.6 0.60 8.1 24.7 0.70 6.9 29.0 0.80 6.0 33.3 0.90 5.4 37.0 Pivot IN Per Hours Per o Timer 180 degrees 180 degrees 100.0 0.048 2.0 90.0 0.05 2.2 80.0 0.06 2.5 70.0 0.07 2.9 60.0 0.08 3.3 50.0 0.10 4.0 45.0 0.11 4.4 40.0 0.12 5.0 35.0 0.14 5.7 30.0 0.16 6.7 25.0 0.19 8.0 20.0 0.24 10.0 17.5 0.28 11.4 15.0 0.32 13.3 12.5 0.39 16.0 10.0 0.48 20.0 7.5 0.64 26.7 5.0 0.97 40.0 Field Area Flow Pressure LRDU Drive Train ------------------------------------i r--------------------------------- ir----------------------------------- ir--------------------------------------------- 1 17.4(Ac) Total jj 200 (GPM) ii 42 (PSI) Pivot Pressure ii 68 RPM Center Drive @ 60 Hz freq. 14.6 (Ac) Pivot 180' i i 10.93 (GPM per Acre) i� 40 (PSI)=End Pressure ii 14.9 x 24 High Float ND Tire 2.8 (Ac) EG on 75% ii 0.58 (in per day) App Rate ii 0.0(ft) Highest Elevation ii 52:lwheel GB Ratio, LRDU Dist 590.2(ft) i 635.8(ft)Machine Length i i 0.048 (in) App Depth @ 100% ii 0.0(ft) Lowest Elevation ii 2.OHrs/180° @ 1000 ( 15.76 ) (Ft per Min) 76.6 (ft)End Gun Radius ii i i 45.2 (GPM) End Gun i�----------------------------------i i i -�i 4 Hrs/360° @ 1000 � ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------� Disclaimer ---------------------------------' The information presented in the attached Percent Timer Report is based on variables which cannot be totally controlled by Valmont (including, but not limited to; pivot pressure, inside pipeline surface, end gun throw, end gun arc setting, tire slippage, tire pressure, field slopes, soil variations, sprinkler package installation, well capacity, center drive motor voltage, center drive motor frequency, climatic conditions and other elements and circumstances beyond Valmont's reasonable control). Valmont recommends monitoring the machine for at least one pass through field to obtain an accurate rotation time. Percent Timer - 02/24/2023 Page 1 Valley Dealer BENCHMARK BLDGS. & IRRIG. 165 S Kenansville Bypass PO Box 867 Kenansville, NC 28349-0867 United States Tiaa�ar �Tn Parent Order No. Sprinkler Order No. Villari Bros 3B 11 Plant GEORGIA DC 11 (ten ctnmar .13 Field Name Dealer PO Order Date 02/24/2023 Load Date 02/28/2023 Method Of Shipment UPSG 3 Span Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Machine Flow 180 (GPM) Pivot Pressure 42 (PSI) in Cover Sheet - 02/24/2023 Page 1 Parent Order No Dealer BENCHMARKBLDGS. & UMIG. Sprinkler Order No Villari Bros 3B Customer Field Name Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Machine Summary Span and Overhang Pipe Coupler D. U. Model Qty Length O.D. Spacing Qty Profile Tire (ft) (in) (in) 7000 2 184.8 6 108 21 Standard 14.9 x 24 High Float 7000 1 135.2 6 108 15 Standard 14.9 x 24 High Float 7000 1 45.0 6 110 7 Messages Caution: None Dealer: None Sprinkler -- Available Outlets Sprinkler Configuration Range(ft) Valley U-Pipe 6(in) Galvanized 3/4 M NPT x 3/4 F NPT Outlets 4,56,1 Black Hose Drop Variable Length 60(in) Ground Clr 59,63,1 Valley Slip Weight 26(in) 20b) Poly Nelson TR3000 D4 - Green 3/4 M NPT ASSY 298.75 (tt) Total Drop Hose Length Pressure Field Area 12.9 (Ac) Total 10.9 (Ac) Pivot 1800 2.0 (Ac) EG on 60% 550.7 (ft)Machine Length 76.6 (ft) End Gun Radius r-----------------------------------i 42 (PSI) Pivot Pressure j 40 (PSI) = End Pressure 0.0 (ft) Highest Elevation 0.0 (ft) Lowest Elevation L------------------------------------i Flow ----------------------------- 180 (GPM) 12.68 (GPM per Acre) 1 0.67 (in per day) App Rate 0.048 (in) App Depth @ 1000 11 45.3 (GPM) End Gun 1 1 ----------------------------J LRDU Drive Train ------------------------------------------------ 68 RPM Center Drive @60 Hz freq. I 14.9 x 24 High Float ND Tire I 52:1Wheel GB Ratio, LRDU Dist 505.2 (ft) 1.7 Hrs/180° @ 100% 15.76 (Ft per Min) 3.4 Hrs/360° @ 100% ----------------------------------------------- Cover Sheet - 02/24/2023 Page 2 Parent Order No Pressure Loss Dealer BENCHMARKBLDGS. & IRRIG. Sprinkler Order No Villari Bros 3B Customer Field Name Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Machine Summary End Gun(s) & Booster Pump Information Pipe Pipe Pipe Loss Length (ft) I.D. (in) Finish C-Factor (PSI) 532.6 5.79 Galvanized 150 0.8 18.1 3.79 Galvanized 150 0.1 Total = 0.9 Span Flow Span Irrigated Area Rqd Act Rqd Act Number Length (ft) (Ac) (GPM) (GPM) (GPM per Acre) (GPM per Acre) % Deviation 1 161.2 1.2 13.0 27.6 10.68 22.62 111.9 2 184.9 3.7 39.5 39.7 10.68 10.71 0.3 3 134.9 4.3 45.5 45.9 10.68 10.77 0.9 0/H 45.5 1.7 18.9 18.9 10.92 10.88 -0.3 EG 76.6 2.0 41.3 45.3 12.68 13.91 9.7 Totals 12.9 177.4 Drain Sprinkler 4.1 4.4 Total Machine Flow 181.8 Primary End Gun Nelson SR100 End Gun 0.5 Nozzle Booster Pump Advanced Options ----------------------------------------- lDrain Sprinkler = Senninger Directional ! !Last Sprinkler Coverage = 1 ft ! !Sprinkler Coverage Length = 551.7 ft ! !Use Last Coupler= YES ! !Minimum Mainline Pressure = 6 PSI ! ----------------------------------------------------------- Shipping Options ----------------------------------------------- ,Ship Drop Hardware ! !Ship Endgun Nozzle ! !Ship Endgun & Hardware ! !Do not ship Endgun Valve / Nozzle Valve Hardware ! !Do not ship Boosterpump Hardware ! ---------------------------------------------------------- Cover Sheet - 02/24/2023 Page 3 Dealer BENCHMARK BLDGS. & IRRIG. Sprinkler Order No Villari Bros 3B Customer VALuy V-CHART Field Name Parent Order No Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Percent Timer Data Setup Information - Valley Computer Control Panel Water Application Constants: Minimum Application = 0.048 (in) Hours/360° = 3.4 Based on IN Based on % Timer IN Per Pivot Hours Per 180 degrees o Timer 180 degrees 0.048 100.0 1.7 0.10 47.6 3.6 0.20 23.8 7.1 0.30 15.9 10.7 0.40 11.9 14.3 0.50 9.5 17.9 0.60 7.9 21.5 0.70 6.8 25.0 0.80 6.0 28.3 0.90 5.3 32.1 Pivot IN Per Hours Per o Timer 180 degrees 180 degrees 100.0 0.048 1.7 90.0 0.05 1.9 80.0 0.06 2.1 70.0 0.07 2.4 60.0 0.08 2.8 50.0 0.10 3.4 45.0 0.11 3.8 40.0 0.12 4.3 35.0 0.14 4.9 30.0 0.16 5.7 25.0 0.19 6.8 20.0 0.24 8.5 17.5 0.27 9.7 15.0 0.32 11.3 12.5 0.38 13.6 10.0 0.48 17.0 7.5 0.64 22.7 5.0 0.95 34.0 Field Area Flow Pressure LRDU Drive Train ------------------------------------i r--------------------------------- ir----------------------------------- ir--------------------------------------------- 1 12.9(Ac) Total jj 180 (GPM) ii 42 (PSI) Pivot Pressure ii 68 RPM Center Drive @ 60 Hz freq. 10.9 (Ac) Pivot 180' i i 12.68 (GPM per Acre) i� 40 (PSI)=End Pressure ii 14.9 x 24 High Float ND Tire 2.0 (Ac) EG on 60% 0.67 (in per day) App Rate ii 0.0(ft) Highest Elevation ii 52:lwheel GB Ratio, LRDU Dist 505.2(ft) i 550.7(ft)Machine Length i i 0.048 (in) App Depth @ 100% ii 0.0(ft) Lowest Elevation ii 1.7Hrs/180° @ 1000 ( 15.76 ) (Ft per Min) 76.6 (ft)End Gun Radius ii i i 45.3 (GPM) End Gun i�----------------------------------i i i -�i 3.4 Hrs/360° @ 1000 � ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------� Disclaimer ---------------------------------' The information presented in the attached Percent Timer Report is based on variables which cannot be totally controlled by Valmont (including, but not limited to; pivot pressure, inside pipeline surface, end gun throw, end gun arc setting, tire slippage, tire pressure, field slopes, soil variations, sprinkler package installation, well capacity, center drive motor voltage, center drive motor frequency, climatic conditions and other elements and circumstances beyond Valmont's reasonable control). Valmont recommends monitoring the machine for at least one pass through field to obtain an accurate rotation time. Percent Timer - 02/24/2023 Page 1 Valley Dealer BENCHMARK BLDGS. & IRRIG. 165 S Kenansville Bypass PO Box 867 Kenansville, NC 28349-0867 United States Tiaa�ar �Tn Parent Order No. Sprinkler Order No. Villari Bros 4 11 Plant GEORGIA DC 11 (ten ctnmar .13 Field Name Dealer PO Order Date 02/24/2023 Load Date 02/28/2023 Method Of Shipment UPSG 3 Span Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Machine Flow 200 (GPM) Pivot Pressure 42 (PSI) in Cover Sheet - 02/24/2023 Page 1 Parent Order No Dealer BENCHMARKBLDGS. & UMIG. Sprinkler Order No Villari Bros 4 Customer Field Name Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Machine Summary Span and Overhang Pipe Coupler D. U. Model Qty Length O.D. Spacing Qty Profile Tire (ft) (in) (in) 7000 3 204.9 6 108 23 Standard 14.9 x 24 High Float 7000 1 27.0 6 110 4 Messages Caution: 1. Primary Endgun overwatering by 12.24% Dealer: None Sprinkler -- Available Outlets Sprinkler Configuration Range(ft) Valley U-Pipe 6(in) Galvanized 3/4 M NPT x 3/4 F NPT Outlets 4,68,1 Black Hose Drop Variable Length 60(in) Ground Clr 71,73,1 Valley Slip Weight 26(in) 20b) Poly Nelson TR3000 D4 - Green 3/4 M NPT ASSY 358.83 (tt) Total Drop Hose Length Field Area Flow -------------- ---------------- 16.7 (Ac) Total ii 200 (GPM) 14.1 (Ac) Pivot 1700 ii 11.36 (GPM per Acre) II 1 2.7 (Ac) EG on 75% ii 0.60 (in per day) App Rate 642.5 (ft)Machine Length i i 0.048 (in) App Depth @ 10 0 0 76.6 (ft)End Gun Radius ii 45.3 (GPM) End Gun II 1 JI 1 Pressure r----------------------------------- i 42 (PSI) Pivot Pressure j 40 (PSI) = End Pressure 0.0 (ft) Highest Elevation 0.0 (ft) Lowest Elevation L------------------------------------i ------------- L--------------------------------J LRDU Drive Train ------------------------------------------------ 68 RPM Center Drive @60 Hz freq. I 14.9 x 24 High Float ND Tire I 52:1Wheel GB Ratio, LRDU Dist 615.1 (ft) 1.9 Hrs/170° @ 100% 15.76 (Ft per Min) 4 Hrs/360° @ 100% ----------------------------------------------- Cover Sheet - 02/24/2023 Page 2 Parent Order No Pressure Loss Dealer BENCHMARKBLDGS. & IRRIG. Sprinkler Order No Villari Bros 4 Customer Field Name Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Machine Summary End Gun(s) & Booster Pump Information Pipe Pipe Pipe Loss Length (ft) I.D. (in) Finish C-Factor (PSI) 642.5 5.79 Galvanized 150 0.9 Total = 0.9 Span Flow Span Irrigated Area Rqd Act Rqd Act Number Length (ft) (Ac) (GPM) (GPM) (GPM per Acre) (GPM per Acre) % Deviation 1 181.4 1.4 13.6 30.6 9.57 21.55 125.3 2 204.9 4.3 41.1 41.9 9.57 9.74 1.8 3 204.7 7.1 68.4 68.5 9.57 9.58 0.2 0/H 27.4 1.2 11.7 11.5 9.92 9.80 -1.2 EG 76.6 2.7 40.4 45.3 11.36 12.75 12.2 Totals 16.7 197.8 Drain Sprinkler 4.2 4.4 Total Machine Flow 202.2 Primary End Gun Nelson SR100 End Gun 0.5 Nozzle Booster Pump Advanced Options ----------------------------------------- lDrain Sprinkler = Senninger Directional ! !Last Sprinkler Coverage = 1 ft ! !Sprinkler Coverage Length = 643.5 ft ! !Use Last Coupler= YES ! !Minimum Mainline Pressure = 6 PSI ! ----------------------------------------------------------- Shipping Options ----------------------------------------------- ,Ship Drop Hardware ! !Ship Endgun Nozzle ! !Ship Endgun & Hardware ! !Do not ship Endgun Valve / Nozzle Valve Hardware ! !Do not ship Boosterpump Hardware ! -----------------------• Cover Sheet - 02/24/2023 Page 3 Dealer BENCHMARK BLDGS. & IRRIG. Sprinkler Order No Villari Bros 4 Customer VALuy V-CHART Field Name Parent Order No Valley Standard Pivot 7000 Percent Timer Data Setup Information - Valley Computer Control Panel Water Application Constants: Minimum Application = 0.048 (in) Hours/360° = 4 Based on IN Based on % Timer IN Per Pivot Hours Per 170 degrees o Timer 170 degrees 0.048 100.0 1.9 0.10 47.7 4.0 0.20 23.8 8.0 0.30 15.9 11.9 0.40 11.9 16.0 0.50 9.5 20.0 0.60 7.9 24.1 0.70 6.8 27.9 0.80 6.0 31.7 0.90 5.3 35.8 Pivot IN Per Hours Per o Timer 170 degrees 170 degrees 100.0 0.048 1.9 90.0 0.05 2.1 80.0 0.06 2.4 70.0 0.07 2.7 60.0 0.08 3.2 50.0 0.10 3.8 45.0 0.11 4.2 40.0 0.12 4.8 35.0 0.14 5.4 30.0 0.16 6.3 25.0 0.19 7.6 20.0 0.24 9.5 17.5 0.27 10.9 15.0 0.32 12.7 12.5 0.38 15.2 10.0 0.48 19.0 7.5 0.64 25.3 5.0 0.95 38.0 Field Area Flow Pressure LRDU Drive Train ------------------------------------i r--------------------------------- ir----------------------------------- ir--------------------------------------------- 1 16.7(Ac) Total jj 200 (GPM) ii 42 (PSI) Pivot Pressure ii 68 RPM Center Drive @ 60 Hz freq. 14.1 (Ac) Pivot 170' i i 11.36 (GPM per Acre) i� 40 (PSI)=End Pressure ii 14.9 x 24 High Float ND Tire 2.7 (Ac) EG on 75% ii 0.60 (in per day) App Rate ii 0.0(ft) Highest Elevation ii 52:lwheel GB Ratio, LRDU Dist 615.1(ft) i 642.5(ft)Machine Length i i 0.048 (in) App Depth @ 100% ii 0.0(ft) Lowest Elevation ii 1.9 Hrs/170° @ 1000 ( 15.76 ) (Ft per Min) 76.6 (ft)End Gun Radius ii i i 45.3 (GPM) End Gun i�----------------------------------i i i -�i 4 Hrs/360° @ 1000 � ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------� Disclaimer ---------------------------------' The information presented in the attached Percent Timer Report is based on variables which cannot be totally controlled by Valmont (including, but not limited to; pivot pressure, inside pipeline surface, end gun throw, end gun arc setting, tire slippage, tire pressure, field slopes, soil variations, sprinkler package installation, well capacity, center drive motor voltage, center drive motor frequency, climatic conditions and other elements and circumstances beyond Valmont's reasonable control). Valmont recommends monitoring the machine for at least one pass through field to obtain an accurate rotation time. Percent Timer - 02/24/2023 Page 1 Environmental Chemists, Inc. envirochem ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 • 910.392.0223 Lab " 910.392.4424 Fax 710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 • 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax info(a environmentalchemists.com Villari Foods -Warsaw Date of Report: Sep 14, 2022 1012 US Hwy 117 Customer PO #: Warsaw NC 28398 Customer ID: 11110024 Attention: Gerald Matthews Report #: 2022-14950 Project ID: Hwy 117 Facility Wastewater Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 22-36486 Site: Effluent 8/4/2022 9:26 AM Water Client Test Method Results Date Analyzed SAR calculation 76.6 09/14/2022 Copper EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4,1994 0.050 mg/L 08/10/2022 Magnesium EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4, 1994 3.49mg/L 08/10/2022 Sodium EPA 200.7, Rev 4 4, 1994 2000 mg/L 09/13/2022 Zinc EPA 200.7, Rev 4 4, 1994 0.583 mg/L 08/10/2022 Calcium EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4, 1994 45.8 mg/L 08/10/2022 Residue Suspended (TSS) SM 2540 D-2015 947 mg/L 08/09/2022 Hexavalent Chromium SM 3500-Cr-B-2011 <0.10 mg/L 08/05/2022 Reporting limit elevated due to matrix interference. Ammonia Nitrogen SM 4500 NH3 C-2011 75.7 mg/L 08/08/2022 Total Phosphorus SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011 89.5 mg/L 08/17/2022 BOD SM 5210 B-2016 1830 mg/L 08/05/2022 COD SM 5220 D-2011 3360 mg/L 08/05/2022 Chloride SM4500 Cl E-2011 3320 mg/L 08/10/2022 Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 22-36487 Site: Effluent - Field 8/4/2022 9:26 AM Water Client Test Method Results Date Analyzed Temperature SM 2550 B-2010 28.3 C 08/04/2022 pH SM 4500 H B-2011 8.8 units 08/04/2022 Comment: Reviewed by: Report # 2022-14950 Page 1 of 1 Date: - Z jj 6cation . I Facilit< -'%amz: AnaMt. I Permit`:— l� I P.efer r.-etifenap%f4=-))Rr-B ?ufI Calibration lime Cai Bu.[er1_0 s.t Cal Buffer I0.0 s.u. I Check Bu rer 7.0 s.0 Cet>�eats �AT�3`pH check buffel u read n iG' it = 0.1 pH uric oft::e buff is true tialuz. - Z 4s bu cerLa=': Riccz IIZS69Exnllho 7-buuerLot=.'. Riccao _I1_438 E+M.1223 10s=bu f;'erLaDlit=. P.ICCA�112750 �, »- S-rr,,:. l-._ _ � 5�r,leCrllceitcr, � Ssrr,^1c �1• I z ,. - Er .�._� e q, C[Ie-: L'e11e j_U. ._. I C: ,...... eLi 1).: Qe31i{( i I• Pus`. anal}3,s buff^- check is r•- irz :'ne p;-,ani.-,a a, lYs s a: nutti Ali pH aloes is ?{ u- c pie ss-plug l ca:ier_; ace Ee r. - p is (i e., s u) P.e ^ 3 a?I = L the re_res. 0 0 - G.1;`t:,e bsr is true, 1 s_ . a-,e� repot: to t;er,e�: u.1 S.U. �- =e r TotaI Residual Chlorine (TRC) Re,crer:e ttetho.i. SIM 4:D-; CI-G2 1 I. Ha-1- S I6' HP- i ( Piease circle ao lt:-;' Deli: Cnec. Poj: _:yss I I - - I Sa npIC �,_- Simp'.e 5:i ;d=:i Cc;iec,ie.- 1 P.. P r_ �y J -7J L._..-; ,•sa Ti,-_ Ti-.e _ 1 _ I C - ..,_s D 72Q !iEes E. 101 .tilt_ :,_.-.,1da: h[a [Dc:• —1')9792 FTSL;a D�:a Dissolved Oxj-gett 0)0) a'=F-o . a> _ - i al'1e III V alue m_-'L I Sot"'; r.flln perfirrtin_ a tcri cahir ir•,tejd eF — calihr2tinr Sa-_ e Lcca.. , Saa'}�i- DO Tune Time = IGI?1_ CaT.:T. ��Di.a Q' �If[;�—, g --------------- I I I _ -- - e meet rn__: be rezali'Erated a: each sire Ee° re, _ _ - - - - - - era p•st-2:a'_S; ra:i racr. t - _ er='-a.tii rl!S:fe perf7nr d Temperature - -' -_..- -.-- - S :- ! Sample :y, yp,e �-rri P.`.ererce Xfetlhad. Slid: B-L t Its rL rt D. : e Lc-- - CeCe r..:. bra .'s's 1 _ -C Tide Ti ie G,,-.u.:._;;Di a Q I Field Persona.;!! Note- Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94 6602 Windmill Way Wilmington, NC 28405 Sample Receipt Checklist 910.392.0223 CDOC r Report Number. ZO2- Receipt ofsampie: E EM Pickup 13 YES ❑ NO Client Delivery L] UPS ❑ NIA 1. Were custody seals:Present on the tooter? FedEx ❑ Other ❑ I] �'ES Li NO IJ/A 2. If custody seals were present, were they intact/un4roken? Original temperature upon receipt ► Koyv temperature taken: ---oC Correctediemperature upon receipt_ IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N❑19251 657 tare Blank - Against Bottles YES ❑ NO IR Gun Correction Factor `C: 0.0 3- if temperature of cooler exceeded FC, was Project Mgr./QA notifi=d? YES ❑ NO a., Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) folio., ? YES ❑ NO 5, �; • ., ` ; ID , '/er- __ s listed on the COC? % "ed. YES ❑ NO 16. I�s - = listed on sample containers? YES El NO 7. - — YES Li �,n I -_ _°==e and time Iisted on the COC? tYESYES ❑ iV0� a f'J; ,gcondition for each test?YES❑�,,0 -- - — - ❑ I�10 i---- ` .- - v'J!LMe 21/2il2ble?' `--- i 2 l.jj YES I r " -aiVed vithin proper holding time for rea �❑ r'.o ❑ YES I❑ NO s=mples received at a pK of <2? y I❑ YES �❑ NO ��5.=_sreceivedatapH>12? ffo n_n�l received at 2 chlorine residual of <U.5 , ;_. ❑ NO 17. bi, ere S '.'ide -- - ❑ i , �:!:ae received at a chlorine residual of<p,5 m/L? td0 B. VVe-= C, t'loohosphate samples filtered in the field Withi n 15 mina_=s= TDC,/vcla:.lez ere p- c;7eck2= a: t:- _ Bac;�rla samples a'c C�2=.(2n f^ Ol t(;2 Ei,iCr2S11?2�. 2,id recorded on the b� ncr;sneet. Sample Preservation: (11U ssi be co�pfetea foy mplec :trSample(s) (sj incorret)Y preserved or ,w iie-re hea J.i rJa �e� received incorrect, Y Preserved and were ad usLe Dy adding (circle one u reoeserv2tion:KGI�I?OH preser/ati!/=Isne e' ed d, nomples were received with heads^a� u CC<IM IIM 'C G p - N cD CD -a CD CL WCD I =r X (D CCD tD M n '(DCD 0 tD WC p t7 M Q v CD fu c 9 D v O c c v �' m z 0 n m n 0 0 3 0 N 0 d fD 0 (DD CL v 0) � � ch 0 vffin m 3 13 ;a Z � m cn CD CL rn W CD d C �. ,�. N -7 0 0 Ct 0 � 0CL O Z v1 O = vl;l n n CD CO V C 0 co y tD 0 tD lD ,nr O M z z v m �T \ Z v N n x 0 T Sample Type 0 O Z O —JD n X D m r m O C) O n G)n O n G) n G)n G)n G)n G)n Composite or Grab D O�� -q n —I O m > > Z O Z Z G7 D G7 O G)G7 G)T O G7 G7 O Container I1I M :M(P or G) m O = 0 a Chlorine m n 0 �• mglL 3 = Q. v ^ Z ON♦ / O 0 .iT LAB ID 7 0 -n r PJUMBf=i? M C M cc C cn -n iC X NONE � O Cl rYYj) HCL M CCC C O x H2SO4 � p Z V m II w V X HNO3 NAOH C M D = cn •11 Ca 4 01 N to Z 0 O THIO OTHER Z 11 M 3 = Z m O Z m 0 v 3 X Z O o O O N n o v � m� (D C7 z = D] O n Z _ a CL 3 m c. Z W < w (D 03 C) O CD V) to X m 3 con A m o O c ca vi m 3. D m � s � w Z so n N 00 I h O SM ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS Fowl"". Environmental Chemists, Inc. 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 • 910.392.0223 Lab ` 910.392.4424 Fax 710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 ` 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax info (i environmentalchemists.com Villari Foods -Warsaw Date of Report: Sep 14, 2022 1012 US Hwy 117 Customer PO #: Warsaw NC 28398 Customer ID: 11110024 Attention: Gerald Matthews Report #: 2022-15545 Project ID: Hwy 117 Facility Wastewater Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 22-37999 Site: Effluent 8/11/2022 10:00 AM Water Chris House Test Method Results Date Analyzed SAR Calculation 70.0 09/14/2022 Sodium EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4,1994 1920 mg/L 08/30/2022 Calcium EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4,1994 48.4 mg/L 09/13/2022 Copper EPA 200.8, Rev. 5.4, 1994 0.039 mg/L 08/13/2022 Magnesium EPA 200.8, Rev. 5.4, 1994 5.04 mg/L 08/17/2022 Zinc EPA 200.8, Rev. 5.4, 1994 1.07 mg/L 08/16/2022 Residue Suspended (TSS) SM 2540 D-2015 256 mg/L 08/12/2022 Hexavalent Chromium SM 3500-Cr-B-2011 <0.10 mg/L 08/11/2022 Reporting limit elevated due to matrix interference. Ammonia Nitrogen SM 4500 NH3 C-2011 22.8 mg/L 08/12/2022 Total Phosphorus SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011 5.84 mg/L 08/22/2022 BOD SM 5210 B-2016 3310 mg/L 08/11/2022 COD SM 5220 D-2011 5420 mg/L 08/12/2022 Chloride SM4500 CI E-2011 2300 mg/L 08/19/2022 Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 22-38000 Site: Effluent grab 8/11/2022 10:00 AM Water Chris House Test Method Results Date Analyzed Temperature SM 2550 B-2010 28.2 C 08/11/2022 pH SM 4500 H B-2011 8.6 units 08/11/2022 Comment: Reviewed by: l Report #, 2022-15545 Page 1 of 1 Date: Analyst: R. ff .enc Calibration Time I Cal BuL[ r4.0 s.u. Cal Bu$er 10.0 S.U. Oo `pH ch_ buff -et a ust read a"ithm _ 0.1 pH units of Le buffer's true,6 4 5,3 bufierLot=S Ricca 4112969 Exr 11162o 7 s_ buffer Samptc {, c `i r„ I Samplc Collect?or Sar ;ple Anah 7ir•,e� Time♦ ?rcific do _ -- Facilih dame: tl - Permit =: pH Check BLEr'er 7.0 s.u. J pFf Res.t?t J ►post-aaal,Sis Buffer s.0 . Cher: ral• Comments 10 sJ buffer Lot=: RICCA 21 I ND Ex . Sr23 ► Post anah5s buf r check is r ire i e Ail `9 r p rorir_ znai Ses at multiple s=La: ' ,a !,ca'ica; ' ; - pH %aloe: it 1{ u ;is (� e , t - P' z itr, r, - L.I p _.u.}. Re :rd a.l data b L : r,e-.cS:')A I s.0 z d re c•' to t, � mug: � �c uric of t:;e bu ,!-+_ u. ati ile L_ Referen,e Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) JEethod: SM 450G CI-G201 I: Ha:c ; 5- HR: (Pi �e circle a� ttlicable �1etrtod Dail, Chec; I Post-anahsis I I Irs:n.-en:1D. t I:re chCC.� I -' rd_r2 Real: I Check Sid I 5 Samr•:e I Sample .m_L I (::her anal}zina ' d r- I _ �_Lo I Ce!!ecti,❑ s, ' IRC Resul: to:}s �s a _. : mu?ti le sites} I .a,}z_ ! Tim= L° L or m_ I. - - C._ n...-.; P_-. :i Q ;rs c e_ -r - - - -- ^ t"ptch:n LOT = f E&\ 2109; 92 l ;>> - s:ordard:. s - - amp!: di!Llior, or Dissolved Ox)gen (DO) :S\145000 G.-3i1I Irstrnmcn' � 1 1D. _:� c:7:_, ,,_e ., Biro-e-i - ' _ ., - I e . TI r re' a' Ca'culat 3 C, ...,.... I L �"a'.temz L Sar_!e Loca:iar. I Sample Ce!!e: ia -azp?c Ara!}sDr, s O rd Time Tim* 1T t si this rtt: When p;rfnrmin_in•tca! or Ccmmrccs DA.a Q_a!ifiers . r_a?iorl:ed a: each site be`�re a.:<';-,'s or a Post L . - __- pu_ aaa.css ca-ierher, �.r't:iar. mcs: be perorz ed Temperature---- e rce Method S1I255u B ?Olv IID: Sample °>>.,-ple 1 Te .pert^ure rstnrmert Sample Location I CoIIec`ior tea? I isis =C n ! Time Time i Cocmeo'_ Das QualiL`:e;, GLS.c_ 1 I —In_a! e'er f'ca. --,- Field Personae! dote: QmoI Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94 6602 Windmill Way Wilmington, NC 28405 910.392.0223 Sample Receipt Checklist Client:h L, _� Date: Report Number: _ 2022- S5 S Receipt of sample: E HEM Pickup Client Delivery ElUPS ❑ FedEx ❑ Other ❑ ❑ YES ❑ NO N/A 1. Were custody seals present on the cooler? ❑ YES 10 NO gV N/A 12. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken? Original temperature upon receipt 'C o cted temperature upon receipt cc How temperature taken: ❑ Temperature Blagainst Bottles nk A IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 192511657 IR Gun orrection Factor °C: 0.0 10 YES ❑ NO 3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6'C, was Project Mgr./QA notified? YES ❑ NO 4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed? YES l YES ❑ NO ❑ NO 5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC? 6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers? YES ❑ NO 7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC? YES ❑ NO 8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC? YES ❑ NO 9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test? YES ❑ NO 10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test? L7 YES ❑ NO 11. Was adequate sample volume available?' YES ❑ NO 12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests? S tYEY�E ❑ NO 13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2? S ❑ NO 14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12? ❑ YES ❑ NO 115. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9? YES ❑ YES ❑ YES ❑ NO ❑ NO ❑ NO 16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? ** 17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? 18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes? * TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet. ** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet. Sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace) Sample(s) were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly by adding (circle one): H2504 HNO3 HCl NaOH Time of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. Who was notified, date and time: Volatiles Sample(s) were received with headspacp COMMENTS: DOC. QA.002 Rev 1 n -i v CD CL W CD d C m <D CD n CD. CD rL n ZO p CD m m D -O 9 m n1 CD ID CL cD N n » 7 O � X N n v 3 n s � O IV M (D M 3� o �0 c N n (D CL 3 d Sample Type G G) 0 G) n 00 G) 0 G 17 n G) 0� Composite or Grab G) � G) "O G) -U G) -u 17 -0 G) � Container (P or G) v Chlorine �C) mg/L LAB ID NUMBER X X NONE HCL X H2SO4 N m N X HNO3 C (D NAOH :�j Q CL THIO Z W OTHER N (D � / Z W D n a:r Z < s Iv ' o v, � 0 o, v Du 0 =r �, 0 m A � o O c 171 3 cn o CO) M3 D ' CL CD,1711 � Z7: r vFn m -j in C N pC�i O ` cc,) r ^Z X N N D) co N V !v co n M n 'O O Z `m O n 0 --I m m 17 X co N Q � ~ ic =r n. N � A O O O W 4 01 3 = O m R 0 IV Z 0 O _m I yn x O N rn z Z v M �p A Oa :Fenviro -hem ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS Environmental Chemists, Inc. 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 ' 910.392.0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Fax 710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 ' 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 ' 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax info ia environmentalchemists.com Villari Foods -Warsaw Date of Report: Sep 14, 2022 1012 US Hwy 117 Customer PO #: Warsaw NC 28398 Customer ID: 11110024 Attention: Gerald Matthews Report #: 2022-16139 Project ID: Hwy 117 Facility Wastewater Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 22-39489 Site: Effluent 8/18/2022 9:00 AM Water Chris House Test Method Results Date Analyzed SAR Calculation 22.4 09/14/2022 Copper EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4, 1994 0.022 mg/L 08/30/2022 Magnesium EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4,1994 2.78 mg/L 08/30/2022 Sodium EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4,1994 472 mg/L 09/13/2022 Zinc EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4,1994 0.143 mg/L 08/30/2022 Calcium EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994 29.0 mg/L 09/13/2022 Residue Suspended (TSS) SM 2540 D-2015 267 mg/L 08/19/2022 Hexavalent Chromium SM 3500 Cr B <0.10 mg/L 08/18/2022 Reporting limit elevated due to matrix interference. Ammonia Nitrogen SM 4500 NH3 C-2011 6.85 mg/L 08/22/2022 Total Phosphorus SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011 15.7 mg/L 08/26/2022 BOD SM 5210 B-2016 285 mg/L 08/18/2022 COD SM 5220 D-2011 614 mg/L 08/23/2022 Chloride SM4500 Cl E-2011 524 mg/L 08/24/2022 Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 22-39490 Site: Effluent grab 8/18/2022 9:46 AM Water Chris House Test Method Results Date Analyzed Temperature SM 2550 B-2010 22.0 C 08/18/2022 pH SM 4500 H B-2011 7.2 units 08/18/2022 Comment: Reviewed by: Report #: 2022-16139 Page 1 of 1 Date• Analpst: -� PA ,r Certi cation = g Facility dame: Permit -: P._, .ence `.fe ad: S>f-=3� E=B -=.�: i C2Iibr3tion Time Cal Bslfer4.0 s u Cal Buffer 10.0 s u Check Buffer 7.0 s.u. 'FH checl_ buffer must read R ithin - 0.1 pH units cf the buff`r's•true tzlue_ 4 s� bufierLot=': Ricca 411?969 Exu I I/o) 7 su buff;Riccz 2112A33 Exp.I �2� - _ Sample Collcctio, 5= p.e inc_ . I Sample -Analysis p1I Res1l: I ►Post-a.-,al}sis B•r.[er I i,-,ge � I-fi�tet s.❑ Cornmects 0 =� 1 LLL I0 s_ buf er Lo RICCA 2117750 E g,. 5.123 ► Post anal sis buf cr chccl: is required er: p ' r-i�= znairses at tnul'i ' s Ali pH PH � p:esa, l cztiersar r it;,in-0.1 p -p, mu;: e tr P a (i e., _ u ). Re rd all da.a t u-ice o:`i=: buf c the ne_.es_ i .O1 s.u- �:d report to the re - es, 0.! S.U. 's Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) Referen:e Method. S.%14=D CI-G2011: fiach x ! 6- HR: T (Please circle as licz5le �fetrod Ir;; ;-er,• ID. Post-analcsis I Daih, Chet. I I l Im: CfC Re.:1: I Check Sd i `. ! �,__,_ Sapp!-' Sample ! (. 5:a-da-d 7 P.0 Result t_Lc-m_L her.a al}tine [r.".,_c Cc! final}s Re' ` : multi; c sites) :� i i _ 7 Q__.. NIED h; Vat._ Ci,__., S: ndurd trlS:di1 x u_ [ or rr;: I - h. Cur.: ! LOT = _IUE�\ 2109792 _ E .n (!:i 1_2' r_a=cn: 6 a^;;then s ardard:. sam,le d !; - t ,Iu. an�nrPi ��; �1�• ,cprai-_ire,' Dissolied Oxygen (DO) 4500 O G, 2- 1 _ � Ins:n.m _n: ID. 7 i-_ � I � _ � Baru-e.._ i _ �._. __.,:r.._ r. cr.-�-- �• Th_ re. Ca _Tla kW -lc r-_I, I 'Value m?L I - ` I Sarr!eLecz:icr. SampleCn!!e_ :r, 'Sazpie Ana!}sis Tune Time ME L Lszthi;r,nnhtnp:rf rr:in_atcriF:.,ti rin.t_rdel - -- ct( h,aty n CerrTea'sDa•a Q_al, : rs ♦ `,�}r pz-fc r_::-._ ara: s i a'. m1L•'ip!e i �_:iars. L=.e r.,.._r rn_ : b: re_-.. at each s::e he`' re a-' -.-Fs cr _ a post--2_ a met be er_F Temperature -:_a --is R-zf_;ence Method: SM 2;; � - 0 B-_0i Instrument ID: Sample -S,Tele I m TeFeratjre S=rn-'e Lcca , cbl:e�t:_.. A�al:'sis =c Time Tim: I j ' Co,-:meot Das Q_`ali:i:.,- I Field Perscianef Note: p - oil ! Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94 Client: `r 1 �--UCRA Sample Receipt Checklist 6602 Windmill Way Wilmington, NC 28405 910.392.0223 Date: q1 Report Number: _ 2022- 1(9I 3 9- Receipt of sample: ECHEM Pickup 0 Client Delivery ❑ 1UPS ❑ FeclEx ❑ Other ❑ ❑ YES 10 NO Ig N/A 1. Were custody seals present on the cooler? ❑ YES ID NO 14 N/A 12. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken? Original temperature upon receipt °C Corrected temperature upon receipt °C How temperature taken: ❑ Temperature Blank IX Against Bottles IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 192511657 IR Gun Correction Factor 'C: 0.0 [ YES ❑ NO 3. If temperature of cooler exceeded VC, was Project Mgr./QA notified? YES ❑ NO 4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed? 12 YES ❑ NO 5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC? YES ❑ NO 6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers? [$ YES ❑ NO 7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC? IN YES ❑ NO 8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC? 5 YES ❑ NO 9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test? 10 YES ❑ NO 110. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test? N YES ❑ NO Ill. Was adequate sample volume available?' 12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests? IR YES ❑ NO YES ❑ NO 13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2? ❑ YES ❑ NO 14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12? YES ❑ NO 15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >9? YES ❑ NO 16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? ❑ YES ❑ NO 17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? ❑ YES TO NO 18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes? * TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet. ** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet. Sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace) Sample(s) were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly by adding (circle one): H2SO4 HNO3 HCI NaOH Time of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or notify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. Who was notified, date and time: Volatiles Sample(s) were received with headspace COMMENTS: DOC. QA.002 Rev 1 C3 C.. 3 CD Z�FD q fD H m D d 3 m in 0 0 a x x a 0 y ,v 3 CD m Q n ty O O ° O v � � 3 � 0 0 O it N �• 3 c tD 0 M 0 0 c CL d fD c d Sample Type Composite or f: Grab •[ r IT U—) -0 G Container (P or G) Z l7 sv m O I Chlorine II -� mg/L — 3 CD LAB ID vU6i6Ert m X X II m NONE c HCL T 7 X H2SO4 m cn M X M if HNO3 (D NAOH •( O THIO Z if OTHER O ,v ( 3 P to O = r II x Z Z O < W e 0 , CD? �, r 0 CA toif CD n � n ° -I C)� A C 3 Er° _� c m m fD C m 0 CD r 'Z 0 Al co w CD 00 1 M Z Z v nC m zT N 00-0OAO O m O uO x r r n m O 1 0 -i 0 _O -•I O Z Z O Z D � -c> m D Z z° *D v A v `� 2 nv r a i D 0 � v Z t=n v O v = 3 n. N T — i `i to ;a � _ D cn S o O Z cn� i 01 V 4 w V �� CD Z 0 = O m D) 0 Z - Z T O O m ;u 71 X OZ mON m N CL �3 N o. W� m f N y O N C N G w -n 3 b� i 0 O wZ 0 N A A A ca [en7virrochem] ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS Environmental Chemists, Inc. 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 * 910.392.0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Fax 710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 * 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax info(a;environmentalchemists.com Villari Foods -Warsaw Date of Report: Sep 14, 2022 1012 US Hwy 117 Customer PO M Warsaw NC 28398 Customer ID: 11110024 Attention: Report M 2022-16638 Project ID: Hwy 117 Facility Wastewater Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 22-40679 Site: Effluent 8/25/2022 9:00 AM Water Chris House Test Method Results Date Analyzed SAR Calculation 22.1 09/14/2022 Copper EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4, 1994 0.011 mg/L 08/30/2022 Magnesium EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4, 1994 1.04 mg/L 08/30/2022 Sodium EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4, 1994 300 mg/L 08/30/2022 Zinc EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4, 1994 0.175 mg/L 08/30/2022 Calcium EPA 200.7, Rev. 4.4, 1994 12.2 mg/L 09/13/2022 Residue Suspended (TSS) SM 2540 D-2015 222 mg/L 08/26/2022 Hexavalent Chromium SM 3500-Cr-B-2011 <0.10 mg/L 08/25/2022 Reporting limit elevated due to matrix interference. Ammonia Nitrogen SM 4500 NH3 C-2011 8.57 mg/L 08/28/2022 Total Phosphorus SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011 17.4 mg/L 08/31/2022 BOD SM 5210 B-2016 300 mg/L 08/26/2022 COD SM 5220 D-2011 689 mg/L 08/26/2022 Chloride SM4500 CI E-2011 489 mg/L 08/30/2022 Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 22-40680 Site: Effluent grab 8/25/2022 9:20 AM Water Chris House Test Method Results Date Analyzed Temperature SM 2550 B-2010 22.3 C 08/25/2022 pH SM 4500 H B-2011 7.1 units 08/25/2022 Comment: Reviewed by: Report #.. 2022-16638 Page 1 of 1 Date; -k n a 1" st. �15 F Facility .N ce. Permit am PH Ca7 Bzr I O.C. .. . ..... LD. ---------- of L2 LO L: Ricca 16- Rf--CF2112-A39 Ex-, 1,.2, S:71 C117 P FCC 4, 7:50 Ex n. Rl 3 - - - - - - - - - - - 13 n- :777 Rc= 717 7,77 .7,777-7 V TUM—Residual Chlorine (TRC) rl Rcs Cl L-cT , t S- ------------------------- Dissoked Oxi-gell (1) 0) 77777 Cli; a. F:rf - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T. ............................ r ............ L:-.L TL7.L r7:--Ls, re r—e Temperature 5—L B --- Field Personnel %,Ite: Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94 6602 Windmill Way Wilmington, NC 28405 910.392.0223 p� j Sample Receipt Checklist Client: . Il C./-I�-( f `S Date: Z*Z Report Number: _ 2022- sr;ntl,, Client Deliver 1' U Ui'S L�---r:.c,l;: CJ Other l i -- ❑ YES ❑ NO N/A 11. Were custody seals present on the cooler? ❑ YES ❑ NO ❑ N/A 12. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken? Original temperature upon receipt °C Corrected temperature upon receipt °C How temperature taken: ❑ Temperature Blank Against Bottles IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 192511657 IR Gun Correction Factor "C: 0.0 YES TP NO 3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6°C, was Project Mgr./QA notified? YES 10 NO 4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed? YES ❑ NO 5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC? 6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers? YES ❑ NO YES ❑ NO 7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC? YES ❑ NO 8. !Alere tests to be performed listed on the COC? 9_ Did samples arrive in proper containers for each tzst? YES ❑ NO _ YES ❑ t`!U 1,0. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test? YES ❑ NU — 112{ .Vere samples received within proper holding time for requested tests? YES ❑ NO Li',vVere acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2? " ❑ YES ❑ NO 114. V.'ere cyanide samples received at a pH >12? ❑ YES !❑ i ! l _ :; cre st,liide samples received at a pH >9? YES ❑ A!0 16. V/ere NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <<0.=, m/L? ❑ YES ❑ NO 17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? ❑ YES ❑ N,0 1S. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes? TOC/Volatiles are f.,; ci�ec!;_., at time r_-1 analysis and recorded on the benchsheet. ** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet, Sample Preservation: (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace) Sample(s) were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly by adding (circle one): H2SO4 HNO3 HCI NaOH Time of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below Note: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples. Obtain a new sample or notify tie state lab if directed to ar.=-'yzed by the customer. who was notified, date and time: Volatiles Sample(s) were received with headspace COMMENTS: DO". QA.0O2 Re i 1 0 0 3 = 3 CD C� 3 Q N � W N' CO) 3 O ? co CA v r D m � d 3 ° ITi 3V z m CL CO) e CD y y m v CD 3 d p 9 ' _. 0 O CO) rL i D ? m 0 z x N 0 m ' D ° ° c `' v —HE cD 0 0 n N 3 <D fD .may C 0 C S (D rL 3 > c Sample Type O M O x o L -zi m X a G) n G)n G) t7 G) O O O G)n G) n 0 n 00 Composite or CO) 0�- -, Grab O TI n D m 3 z O D O O Gi O O O O Container --1 IT! M (P or G) m G7 = v M D Chlorine mg/L 11 CL 7 V lD C pal 11 LAB ID .CD3. 3 n NUMBER Ir cD '+ x >c NONE II N Q m C HCL -0 � C p x H2SO4 M M o M x HNO3 < NAOH 01 o-1 CLTHIO z 11 3 x o m K Lu' Z OTHER � m 3 D z p N 11 ` Z co D cn O x Iv C7 c 0 Z a np CD 0 U) cn g v n nni �� n' m c - 0 O O n � A to - .� CL ITI CO) lD 3 � > s iD v O � N r 1 if z L m v A 0Z m ;M 0 z 0 z wwq a Zr n O 2 ` / 2 v cn M n m VI D z V) *k V w 4 V N �O 0 llxl7 PLOTS VILLARI BROTHERS FOODS WASTEWATER IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS WARSAW, DUPLIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA OWNER VILLARI BROTHERS FOODS 1012USHWY117 WARSAW, NORTH CAROLINA 28398 PHYSICAL ADDRESS: 135 CARTER BEST ROAD WARSAW, NORTH CAROLINA 28398 (910) 293-2157 CIVIL ENGINEER FINAL DESIGN NOT RELEASED RCONSTRUCTI FOR CONSTRUCTION CAVANAUGH & ASSOCIATES, P.A.ZHcaa PO BOX 11197 WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA 28405 (910) 392-4462 �� s nneeeZf�� SURVEYOR JIM BLANCHARD ASSOCIATES, PC PO BOX 5 KENANSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28349 (910) 296-1921 SOIL SCIENTIST / AGRONOMIST/ HYDROGEOLOGIST EAGLE RESOURCES P.O. BOX 11189 SOUTHPORT, NORTH CAROLINA 28461 SHEET INDEX C.1.1 C.1.2 C.2.1 C.3.1 C.3.2 C.3.3 C.3.4 C.4.0 C.4.1 C.4.2 C.4.3 CAA C.4.5 C.5.0 C.5.1 C.5.2 - COVER & SHEET INDEX - GENERAL NOTES PERMIT APPLICANT MICROLAND GROUP, LLC. 1015 ASHES DRIVE SUITE 102 WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28406 LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED - - PROPERTY LINE / RIGHT OF WAY LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LOD — MAJOR CONTOURS 130 - MINOR CONTOURS IRRIGATION MAIN — IRR — PLUG VALVE IM W MONITORING WELL PROPERTY LINE SETBACK 150' SB RESIDENCE SETBACK 400' SB STREAM SETBACK 100' SB IMPOUNDMENT SETBACK 15' SB 250' COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY — 250' CB 50' COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY — 50' CB — 150' REVIEW BOUNDARY — 125' RB — REVIEW BOUNDARY RB VW — WETLANDS TREE LINE" DITCH FILLED DITCH x FENCE x x oe OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL `�. UTILITY POLE EXISTING SITE PLAN - OVERALL PROPOSED SITE PLAN - OVERALL PROPOSED IRRIGATION AREAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM DETAILS - IRRIGATION NORTH IRRIGATION SYSTEM DETAILS - IRRIGATION SOUTH PROPOSED INFLUENT - PUMP STATION PROPOSED INFLUENT FORCE MAIN A - PLAN AND PROFILE PROPOSED INFLUENT FORCE MAIN B - PLAN AND PROFILE PROPOSED IRRIGATION FORCE MAIN - PLAN AND PROFILE PROPOSED IRRIGATION FORCE MAIN - PLAN AND PROFILE PROPOSED IRRIGATION LATERALS - PLAN AND PROFILE GENERAL SITE DETAILS GENERAL PUMP STATION DETAILS GENERAL LAGOON DETAILS TO N VICINITY MAP SCALE.- NOT TO SCALE PROJECT AREA D UPLIN COUNTY PROJECT SITE BEFORE YOU DIG! CAVANAUGHNC ONE CALL (TOLL FREE) S0�Stewardshi throu h innovation 0 C 12n f-pg (OR 1-800-632-4949) ke DATE: MARCH, 2023 SHEET C. 1. 1 PROJECT N0. BE.22.001 IT'S THE LAW! EXCAVATION SPECIFICATIONS 1. PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT STRUCTURES FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY SETTLEMENT, LATERAL MOVEMENT, UNDERMINING, WASHOUTAND OTHER HAZARDS CREATED BY EARTHWORK OPERATIONS. ANY SETTLEMENT IN BACKFILL, FILL OR IN STRUCTURES BUILT OVER THE BACKFILL OF FILL, WILL BE CONSIDERED TO BE CAUSED BY IMPROPER COMPACTION METHODS AND SHALL BE CORRECTED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S SOLE EXPENSE. ALSO, ANY STRUCTURES DAMAGED BY SETTLEMENT SHALL BE RESTORED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS SOLE EXPENSE. 2. DEWATERING PUMPING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED AND EMPLOYED TO PREVENT RAINFALL AND SURFACE RUNOFF FROM ACCUMULATING OR FLOWING INTO EXCAVATIONS AND FROM FLOODING THE PROJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA. PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN PUMPS, SUMPS, SUCTION AND DISCHARGE LINES, AND OTHER DEWATERING SYSTEM COMPONENTS NECESSARY TO CONVEY WATER AWAY FROM THE EXCAVATIONS. THE DISPOSAL OF CONVEYED WATER SHALL BE DIVERTED IN SUCH A MANNER THAT NATURAL DRAINAGE OF THE AREA SHALL NOT BE DISTURBED. 3. SOIL EROSION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PREVENTION OF SOIL EROSION DURING CONSTRUCTION TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE. 4. STRIPPING ALL VEGETATION SUCH AS BRUSH, HEAVY SODS, HEAVY GROWTH OF GRASS, DECAYED VEGETABLE MATTER, RUBBISH AND ANY OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIAL WITHIN THE EXISTING PROJECT SITE SHALL BE STRIPPED OR OTHERWISE REMOVED PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF EMBANKMENT. 5. EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT FOR SITE FEATURES THE ROUGH EXCAVATION SHALL BE CARRIED TO THE NECESSARY DEPTH AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, TO THE LINES, GRADES AND ELEVATION SHOWN DRAB DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL BE MADE SO THAT THE REQUIREMENTS FOR FORMATION OF EMBANKMENTS CAN BE FOLLOWED. ON EMBANKMENT, THE DEPTH OF SUBGRADE DENSIFICATION SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR, THROUGH NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER FAULT, EXCAVATE BELOW THE DESIGNATED LINES, HE SHALL REPLACE THE EXCAVATION WITH APPROVED MATERIALS, IN AN APPROVED MANNER AND CONDITION, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE. THE ENGINEER SHALL HAVE COMPLETE CONTROL OVER THE EXCAVATION, MOVING, PLACING AND DISPOSITION OF ALL MATERIAL AND SHALL DETERMINE THE SUITABILITY OF MATERIAL TO BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENTS. ALL MATERIAL DETERMINED UNSUITABLE SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN WASTE AREAS DRAB DIRECTED AND SHALL BE REPLACED WITH SELECT MATERIALS DEEMED SUITABLE BY THE ENGINEER. TOPSOIL SHALL NOT BE USED IN SUBGRADES BUT SHALL BE HANDLED AND PLACED AS DIRECTED. SHOULD EXCESS MOISTURE BE ENCOUNTERED DURING EXCAVATION IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREAS, IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM ANY NECESSARY DEWATERING OF THE SITE IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A STABLE EXCAVATED AREA FOR THE PLACEMENT OF EMBANKMENT, THE ENGINEER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS OR REVISIONS IN LINES OR GRADES, IF FOUND NECESSARY, AS THE WORK PROGRESSES DUE TO DISCREPANCIES IN THE PLANS OR TO OBTAIN SATISFACTORY CONSTRUCTION. STONES OR ROCK FRAGMENTS LARGER THAN 2' IN THE GREATEST DIMENSION WILL NOT BE PERMITTED IN THE TOP 5" OF THE SUBGRADE. 6. FORMATION OF EMBANKMENTS EMBANKMENTS SHALL BE FORMED OF SATISFACTORY MATERIALS PLACED IN SUCCESSIVE HORIZONTAL LAYERS OF NOT MORE THAN 6" IN COMPACTED DEPTH FOR THE FULL WIDTH OF THE CROSS SECTION. THE GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED, AND THE VARIOUS SOIL STRATA SHALL BE PLACED, TO PRODUCE A SOIL STRUCTURE AS SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OR AS DIRECTED. ALL MATERIALS ENTERING THE EMBANKMENT SHALL BE REASONABLY FREE OF ORGANIC MATTER SUCH AS LEAVES, GRASS, ROOTS, AND ANY OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL. OPERATIONS ON EARTHWORK SHALL BE SUSPENDED AT ANY TIME WHEN SATISFACTORY RESULTS CANNOT BE OBTAINED BECAUSE OF RAIN, FREEZING WEATHER, OR OTHER UNSATISFACTORY CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DRAG, BLADE OR SLOPE THE EMBANKMENT TO PROVIDE PROPER SURFACE DRAINAGE AT ALL TIMES. THE MATERIAL IN THE LAYERS SHALL BE OF PROPER MOISTURE CONTENT BEFORE ROLLING TO OBTAIN THE PRESCRIBED COMPACTION. WETTING OR DRYING OF THE MATERIAL AND MANIPULATION WHEN NECESSARY TO SECURE A UNIFORM MOISTURE CONTENT THROUGHOUT THE LAYER SHALL BE REQUIRED. SHOULD THE MATERIAL BE TOO WET TO PERMIT PROPER COMPACTION OR ROLLING, ALL WORK ON ALL PORTIONS OF THE EMBANKMENT THUS AFFECTED SHALL BE DELAYED UNTIL THE MATERIAL HAS BEEN DRIED TO THE PROPER MOISTURE CONTENT. SPRINKLING SHALL BE DONE WITH APPROVED EQUIPMENT THAT WILL SUFFICIENTLY DISTRIBUTE THE WATER. SUFFICIENT EQUIPMENT TO FURNISH THE REQUIRED WATER SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES. THE EMBANKMENT SHALL BE COMPACTED TO NOT LESS THAN 95% OF THE MAXIMUM STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE. DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE EMBANKMENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUTE HIS EQUIPMENT AT ALL TIMES, BOTH WHEN LOADED AND WHEN EMPTY, OVER THE LAYERS AS THEY ARE PLACED AND SHALL DISTRIBUTE THE TRAVEL EVENLY OVER THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE EMBANKMENT. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN, HOWEVER, NOT TO OVERLOAD THE EMBANKMENT AREA WITH CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT. IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF EMBANKMENTS, STARTING LAYERS SHALL BE PLACED IN THE DEEPEST PORTION OF THE FILL; AS PLACEMENT PROGRESSES, LAYERS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED APPROXIMATELY PARALLEL TO THE FINISHED PAVEMENT GRADE LINE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STABILITY OF ALL EMBANKMENTS MADE UNDER THE CONTRACT AND SHALL REPLACE ANY PORTION WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER, HAS BECOME DISPLACED DUE TO CARELESSNESS OR NEGLIGENCE ON THE PART OF THE CONTRACTOR. 7. TESTING THE OWNER WILL PROVIDE THE SERVICES OF AN INDEPENDENT SOILS TESTING FIRM FOR PERFORMING TESTS AS ARE REQUIRED TO IDENTIFY MATERIALS, TO DETERMINE COMPACTION CHARACTERISTICS, TO DETERMINE MOISTURE CONTENT, AND TO DETERMINE DENSITY OF FILL IN PLACE. THESE TESTS PERFORMED WILL BE USED TO VERIFY THAT THE FILLS CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS. GENERAL NOTES 1. TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY JIM BLANCHARD ASSOCIATES, PC. INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR GENERAL DESIGN PURPOSES ONLY -NOT FOR RECORDATION. 2. THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NA.V.D. 1988) DETERMINED BY G.P.S. OBSERVATIONS. 3. PROPERTY LINES AS PROVIDED BY JIM BLANCHARD ASSOCIATES, PC. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY UPON DETERMINATION THAT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AS SHOWN MAY RESULT IN THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT(S). THE BEARINGS AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL VALUES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM. 4. THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INDICATED ON THE PLANS ARE FROM ASSUMED INFORMATION MADE AVAILABLE FROM THE OWNER. THIS INFORMATION IS NOT INCLUSIVE OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND CABLES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL WORK WITH THE OWNER TO MINIMIZE CONFLICTS. S. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK THAT MAY AFFECT EXISTING UTILITIES. 7. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE RELOCATION AND/OR ADJUSTMENT OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITH UTILITY OWNER. 8. ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL NCDOT, LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY AND ALL PERCEIVED CONFLICTS THAT MAY ARISE FROM THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 9. SEWER AND STORMWATER PIPES TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 24" SEPARATION, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, FROM BOTTOM OF STORMWATER PIPE AND TOP OF SEWER PIPE. 10. LATERAL SEPARATION OF SEWERS OR WATER MAINS. WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID AT LEAST TEN (10) FEET LATERALLY FROM EXISTING OR PROPOSED SEWERS, UNLESS LOCAL CONDITIONS OR BARRIERS PREVENT ATEN (10) FOOT LATERAL SEPARATION - IN WHICH CASE: (A) THE WATER MAIN IS LAID IN A SEPARATE TRENCH, WITH THE ELEVATION ON THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER MAIN AT LEAST EIGHTEEN (18) INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF SEWER; OR (B) THE WATER MAIN IS LAID IN THE SAME TRENCH AS THE SEWER WITH THE WATER MAIN LOCATED AT ONE SIDE ON A BENCH OF UNDISTURBED EARTH, AND WITH THE ELEVATION OF THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER MAIN AT LEAST EIGHTEEN (18) INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF SEWER. 11. CROSSING A WATER MAIN OVER A SEWER. WHENEVER NECESSARY FOR A WATER MAIN TO CROSS OVER A SEWER THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE LAID AT SUCH AN ELEVATION THAT THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER MAIN IS AT LEAST EIGHTEEN (18) INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER, UNLESS LOCAL CONDITIONS OR BARRIERS PREVENT AN EIGHTEEN (18) INCH SEPARATION - IN WHICH CASE, BOTH THE WATER MAIN AND SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF FERROUS MATERIALS AND WITH JOINTS THAT ARE EQUIVALENT TO WATER MAIN STANDARDS FORA DISTANCE OF TEN (10) FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE CROSSING. 12. CROSSING A WATER MAIN UNDER SEWER. WHENEVER IT IS NECESSARY FORA WATER MAIN TO CROSS UNDER A SEWER, BOTH THE WATER MAIN AND THE SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF FERROUS MATERIALS AND WITH JOINTS EQUIVALENT TO WATER MAIN STANDARDS FOR A DISTANCE OF TEN (10) FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE POINT(S) OF CROSSING. A SECTION OF WATER MAIN PIPE SHALL BE CENTERED AT THE POINT OF CROSSING. 13. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, MAXIMUM SLOPES OF EARTHEN AREAS SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER. 14. CONTROLLED SEDIMENTATION OUTLETS TO BE PLACED AT LOW SPOTS ALONG SEDIMENT FENCING. 15. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED, MULCHED, AND STABILIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEEDING SPECIFICATIONS. 16. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DISPOSAL OF ALL DEMOLITION AND WASTE MATERIALS. 17. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND AMENDMENTS OR SUPPLEMENTS THERETO. PROPER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, SIGNS, ETC., SHALL BE INSTALLED TO ENSURE PUBLIC SAFETY. 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH APPLICABLE ELECTRIC UTILITY REGARDING INSTALLATION OF PIPELINES NEAR UTILITY POLES, INCLUDING ANY REQUIRED COSTS. IF POSSIBLE, CONTRACTOR SHALL ACHIEVE 5' SEPARATION FROM ALL UTILITY POLES. 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SWALES AS NECESSARY TO DIVERT STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM PROPOSED STORAGE LAGOONS. 20. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. GENERAL NOTES (RELATING TO SHEET C.3.1) 1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON AN ASSUMED BENCHMARK ELEVATION AND DO NOT REPRESENT MEAN SEA LEVEL DATUM. 2. ANY HEAVY VEGETATION AND/OR ROOT MATTER SHALL BE STRIPPED FROM PAD AREA PRIOR TO PLACING FILL. ALL OF TOP SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO PLACING FILL. ROOTS IN EXCESS OF 2 INCHES IN DIAMETER WILL NOT BE ALLOWED IN FILL SECTIONS. TOP SOIL SHALL BE STOCKPILED AT PERIMETER OF PAD FOR USE IN FINAL GRADING AND ESTABLISHING VEGETATION. 3. ALL FILL MATERIAL PLACED ON THE BUILDING PAD SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95%OF THE STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY. IT IS REQUIRED THAT COMPACTION BE DONE WITH ASHEEPSFOOT ROLLER. 4. PAD ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN REPRESENT FINISHED SLAB. SEE PAD CROSS SECTIONS FOR GRADE REFERENCE POINT. 5. PAD SIDE SLOPES ARE 3:1 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLAN. 6. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW PAD AND ROAD SHALL MEET ENGINEER'S APPROVAL. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ANY ROADS THAT ARE USED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. 7. FILL FOR CONSTRUCTION AT THIS SITE SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM BORROW AREAS APPROVED BY ENGINEER. 8. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING/REPAIRING ANY DAMAGE TO DITCHLINES DURING CONSTRUCTION. THIS INCLUDES REPAIR TO ANY DISTURBED AREAS 9. WATER SUPPLY WELLS PLACED ON THE SITE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 100' AWAY FROM THE CLOSEST POINT OF ANY SEPTIC AREA OR LAGOON. 10. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ARE REQUIRED TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE SITE. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN ALL SUCH MEASURES THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. 11. ALL PROPERTY LINES, BLUE LINE STREAMS, AND DRINKING WATER WELLS THAT EXIST IN THE LIMITS OF THIS MAP ARE SHOWN. 12. ANY WELLS THAT REQUIRE CLOSING ARE TO BE CLOSED SUBJECT TO STATE REGULATIONS. 13. SECONDARY CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES SHALL BE LOCATED ON SITE SUCH THAT ALL POTENTIAL WASTE WATER FROM RECYCLE OR DISCHARGE PIPES SHALL BE COLLECTED ON SITE. 14. POWER AND/OR PHONE LINES MAY BE WITHIN CONSTRUCTION AREA. THEY SHALL BE LOCATED PRIOR TO EXCAVATION AND REROUTED AS NECESSARY. 15. UPON ENCOUNTERING ANY BURIED UTILITY, DEBRIS, OR UNSUITABLE FILL MATERIAL, THE ENGINEER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL BE CONTACTED IMMEDIATELY. 16. DRAINAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED UPON FIRST OPPORTUNITY TO ENSURE ROAD, PADS, AND NEW CONSTRUCTION AREAS SHED WATER. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE OBTAIN PLAN APPROVALS OF NECESSARY) AND OTHER APPLICABLE PERMITS. FLAG THE WORK LIMITS AND BUFFER AREA FOR PROTECTION. HOLD PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE(S) AT LEAST ONE WEEK PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. ROUGH GRADE SITEWORK AREAS AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL. COMPLETE FINAL GRADING OF GROUNDS, TOPSOIL CRITICAL AREAS, AND PERMANENTLY VEGETATE, LANDSCAPE, AND MULCH. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND WITHIN 24 HRS AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS. NEEDED REPAIRS WILL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. AFTER SITE IS STABILIZED, REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY MEASURES AND INSTALL PERMANENT VEGETATION ON THE DISTURBED AREAS. PERMANENT GROUND COVER TO BE ESTABLISHED WITHIN 15 WORKING DAYS OR 30 CALENDAR DAYS, WHICHEVER IS SHORTER EROSION AND MAINTENANCE CONTROL SCHEDULE 1. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED FOR STABILITY AND OPERATION FOLLOWING EVERY RUNOFF -PRODUCING RAINFALL BUT IN NO CASE LESS THAN ONCE EVERY WEEK. ANY NECESSARY REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN THE INTEGRITY OF ALL SUCH DEVICES. 2. TEMPORARY ENTRANCE STONE SHALL BE CLEANED OR REPLACED WHEN THE SEDIMENT NO LONGER DRAINS. 3. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE SEDIMENT FENCE AND AT THE INLET PROTECTION SEDIMENT FENCE WHEN IT BECOMES APPROXIMATELY 6" DEEP AT THE FENCE. THE SEDIMENT FENCE SHALL BE REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO PRESERVE THE INTEGRITY OF THE FENCE. 4. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE FERTILIZED, RESEEDED AND MULCHED AS NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH A VIGOROUS, DENSE VEGETATIVE COVER. co ZE 0 2 zcn LLJ Q 3 cc 30 Oz mLLI � z W W o Q J_ co SHEET NUMBER C.1.2 O 0 0 cN w cN N O cN co O k � 3 Q cm Z M a ZWCDs LU OWO ? �_ U �° F LLZa 0 GENERAL NOTES: THE SETBACKS FOR THE SPRAY IRRIGATION SITE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: • EACH HABITABLE RESIDENCE OR PLACE OF ASSEMBLY UNDER SEPARATE OWNERSHIP OR NOT TO BE MAINTAINED AS PART OF THE PROJECT SITE: 400 FT (1) TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM NCDOT CONTOUR DATA SUPPLEMENTED BY FIELD SURVEY • EACH HABITABLE RESIDENCE OR PLACE OF ASSEMBLY OWNED BY THE PERMITTEE TO BE MAINTAINED AS PART OF THE PROJECT SITE: 200 FT FROM JIM BLANCHARD ASSOCIATES, PC. INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR ENGINEERING. DESIGN PURPOSES ONLY - EACH PRIVATE OR PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SOURCE: 100 FT NOT FOR RECORDATION. • SURFACE WATERS SUCH AS INTERMITTENT AND PERENNIAL STREAMS, PERENNIAL WATERBODIES, AND WETLANDS: 100 FT 121 WETLAND INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM EAGLE RESOURCES, P.A. GROUNDWATER LOWERING DITCHES WHERE THE BOTTOM OF THE DITCH INTERSECTS THE SHWT: 100 FT (3) CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. SURFACE WATER DIVERSIONS SUCH AS EPHEMERAL STREAMS, WATERWAYS, AND DITCHES: 25 FT (4) ALL WORK TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL NCDOT, LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL STANDARDS EACH WELL WITH EXCEPTION OF MONITORING WELLS: 100 FT AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY AND ALL PERCEIVED • EACH PROPERTY LINE: 150 FT CONFLICTS THAT MAY ARISE FROM THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE CONTRACT • TOP OF SLOPE OF EMBANKMENTS OR CUTS OF TWO FEET OR MORE IN VERTICAL HEIGHT: IS FT DOCUMENTS. • EACH WATER LINE FROM A DISPOSAL SYSTEM: 10 FT 1 (5) UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, MAXIMUM SLOPES OF PROPOSED GRADING AREAS SHALL BE 3: 1--\ , SUBSURFACE GROUNDWATER LOWERING DRAINAGE SYSTEMS: 100 FT OR FLATTER. PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY: 50 FT / (6) CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE RELOCATION AND/OR ADJUSTMENT OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITH UTILITY NITRIFICATION FIELD: 20 FT EACH BUILDING FOUNDATION OR BASEMENT: 15 Ff / OWNER. / } J(7) CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK THAT MAY AFFECT EXISTING UTILITIESMENTATION OUTLETS TO BE PLACED AT LOW SPOTS ALONG SEDIMENT FENCING NOT TO )THE /.HE SETBACKS FOR TREATMENT AND STORAGE UNITS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: '(8) CONTROLLED SEDIEACH HABITABLE RESIDENCE OR PLACE OF ASSEMBLY UNDER SEPARATE OWNERSHIP OR NOT TO BE MAINTAINED AS PART OF THE PROJECT SITE: 100 FT / AA EXCEED UR L.F. INTERVALS. EACH PRIVATE OR PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SOURCE: 100 FT /�/(9) ALL DISTURBED AREAS R BE SEEDED, MULCHED, AND STABILIZED INS OF G ACCORDANCE WITH SEEDING / I I. SPECIFICATIONS AND AGRONOMISTS RECOMMENDATIONS WITHIN 15 DAYS OF GRADING ACTIVITIES. • SURFACEWATERSSUCHEXCEPTION AS INOF MONITORING AND PERENNIAL STREAMS, PERENNIAL WATERBODIES, AND WETLANDS: SO Ff NOW ST FORMERLY EACH WELL WITH EXCEPTION OF MONITORING WEDS: 300 FT OWAJ, S, ALBERT LEGHTJO &HUS (10) CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DISPOSAL OF ALL DEMOLITION AND WASTE MATERIALS. ' ���\ SEARLES, ALBERT JONATHAN (11) DITCH IN ZONE 4 PROPOSED CENTER PIVOT IS TO BE FILLED SUBSEQUENT TO APPROVAL OF WETLAND • EACH PROPERTY LINE: 50 FT _ DUPLIN CO. PIN: 247400972449 \ ~ DB 1946 PG. 792 DELINEATION AND ISSUANCE OF A JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD OR AJD) BY THE ARMY CORPS OF \ I I J 1\\ _— ENGINEERS. _ __ \,A` I\\' \ NOW OR FORMERLY - .T - 1 1 / -\ ` FREEMAN, 2495 B `— \ \ / I / ( ` DUPLIN CO. PIN: SARA 835775 �.� \ NOW OR FORMERLY \ y I �_ NOW OR FORME Y NOW OR FORMERLY QUINN, DOUGLAS RONALD NOW OR FORMERLY _' OWEN, KRYSTLE LEIGH & HUS SUTTON, LEONARD DUPLIN CO. PIN: 247110101212 1 SEARLES, ALBERT G. & WIFE SEARLES, ALBERT JONATHAN DUPLIN CO. PIN: 2 DB 909/PG. 776 • r/ SEARLES, 47 0 DUPUN PIN:247400981424 TDB 1637/PG. 904 // ✓ 1 1- / ' DUPLIN CO. PIN: 2JAN K. 99049 DB CO.. PIN:2G. 149 �� v-ty �i \ DB 1774/PG. 528 1 o / NOW OR FORMERLY / \•,ii ` �T//iT-"'�`�Q�B P \ INOW OR FORMERLY \ QUINN, DOUGLAS RONALD ��-- - ✓~-�/'�/'?y;/ '2 QUINN, DOUGLAS RONALD I J DVPLIN CO. PIN: 248515744703 0%PLO. PIN/P47500627224 I 1 1 DB 860/PG. 187 DB 1248 G 198 700' WETLAND /� TEMPORARY IlI / SETBACK (TYP.) 19"E J DW 1 ff \ MONITORING -- ,2T• 42' �- D WELL NOW OR FORMERLY /5.63 1` i; \\ 7 "` `t tt (TYP.) "\ SUTTON, CO.PIN; FRAN475003IN.28 71 N65* 1 I DUPUN O. PIN: 247500328271 N65 UD' 2. 2 1 r-L 1 7 DB 1837/PG. 913 'ZBO/,g2' 9. '5bE1 / ASTEWATER LIFSTA/ ��.W. FOR To'. OFT TION r WARSAW I - g/j1Fi I _i /`� \ ✓ � � � p , / 0 / �� ,m, ) _ o ��m op 59� NOW OR FORMERLY Z'0I ` \ \ TW-1 MICRO LAND GROUP, LLC�1't� (/ DUPUN CO. PIN. G 435243308 ,I DB 1874/P. 435 INTERIOR 5 / PARCEL 1 / N5' 21'14955 W� / -�� ,-��' .v'' \ -y ONE (TYP.) I EXISTING POWER I / N84' 574 �7 �l` ' J J \ DITCH SLY FILLED / UNE EASEMENT W/ 1 \ � Cl 50' SETBACK i' d � SUBJECT J\ Zs3 C DITCH (TYP.) PROPERTY BOUNDARY NOW OR FORMERLY __ _ %i \ PZ�7 ,/ / 7_l��/ MICRO LAND GROUP, LLC' II > D~� DUPLIN CO. PIN 247500427402 DB 195B/PG. 184 150' PROPERTY LINE \ /= SETBACK (TYP.) /_ �� / 9 I 190�� SWALE (TYP.) \ / 9,�sC oeL' / 6oi �iEB��6� \ xo / NO' 29 WE :m16RV• CP31 P`� o• \ \ FRANKLIN,I JR7�-60400( NOW OR FORMERLY / \MAREADY EDDIE R. ET AILS DBA / MAREADY ENTERPICES LLC DUPUN CO. PIN. 24]500215543 DB 151 O/PG. 568 'o �a NOW OR FORMERLY NASH JOHNSON & SONS FARMS DUPLIN CO. PIN: 246500413579 p�p ( \\ ADJ\ACENT y 1 PROPERTY ( \ BOUNDARY oA \ \l (TW., NOW OR FORMERLY GARDNER, FRED R&MOTHER \\ GARUNER, CATHERIME INE MOSS IRS DUPLIN CO PIN. 24fi500EJOB75 DB 788/PG. 438 \ 41 S83' 58' 13 W wl �, ' OB W 7 \ _ 185 4\7�' \ 220.81' �'N32 5 rrr \/ NOW OR FORMERLYSUTT 52* ! Y am�\ oz N92.2386* 4 �•E / /4 \_ \ DUPLM CO.OPINRD247400487004 1 1 *� `\ 0\ N2' 3T O'W.Y9' N�6' 34' 44'E -/o� DB 1637/PG. 904 p ..., ( �`� aryl I I �' 173.69' 30.20' NOW OR FORMERLY `/ ,` / / / _ NOW CREEK FORMERLY �+ r9�` ALLEN THECO. PIN S. 9 / 1(\ (\\ I ROCK CREEK LIVESTOCK, LLC N7' Oa' 4. 4 /J.l dL NI O 6 "C.. 0 OAS I DUPUN CO. PIN: 247514338649 DUPLIN CO. PIN: 2475003178221 W� I I /y- _44'4O' I NO' 39' 34'W'/ �% \ �,��g�� y DB 10E/PG. 52 _ PQ 1-\%/ / DB 1958/PG. 25fi 0I F \/ \ I J!j 'S\� �0000 �� / NOW OR FORMERLY \ J N1' 12'�40E _ 29.63 Q ' C x �L� •O , \ DAMS, EARL C. &WIFE DAMS, NC HWY 117 ` — _ 1zz.sa' os-o e� ` l o � �N3' �a' 24'E 3 / pd \ ,� Y SYLMA JOY JOHNSON 1 N1' 43' 13'E.. \ F \ 2 5 �54.13' 1 �/ / \_ DUPLIN CO. PIN: G 972723161 82.46' I 400 SETBACK FROM IL / \ ,S}— - - I _ _ _ f/I'/TIk 3 ❑n RESIDENCE (TYP.) GY' /✓ -I / \I1 \(J /f1 K' NOW OR FORMERLY T \\ a \ DI sc Property Owner DUPLIN CO. PIN: DEED: ` �\ 'I \ S/ I / '� "'\ J I NOW OR FORMERLY \ 1 WARSAW PROPERTIES, LLC 24751424734116022852008 / I I \ NICHOLSON, RICKY D. & WIFE N3' 31V S9'W� n /- ,y6\I �I TOWN 0I/WARSAW J J _. __. No• �a' �w"w �� �--1` 1 `� L NICHOLSON, ANTOINETTE M. Oe 2 —SAW PROPERTIES, LLC 24JSG030685916032852008 3 SCHWARZ-R1R, LLC 24750030665J 16499582010 4 GARCIA, ELIDA MAIYRA 247500400538 1857 724 2018 5 KEA, LEON & WIFE VERLEA P KEA 246515549193 11006941994 6 BROWN, STEPHEN& BROWN, MAR—E 24JSG040D430 18508032018 71 ROCK CREEK LIVESTOCK, LLC 2475U0400310 19582562022 8 KORNEGAY, JOHN DANIEL& WIFE KORNEGAY, DORIS ANN S, 2495W9430861467122005 9 FOSTER, CHRISTAINA L 246516844092 14518052004 10 ROCK CREEK LIVESTOCK, LLC 2475DM00103 1958 2562022 1 JIMENEZ, COINTA 2465004368171454072011 12 SOUTHERLAND, SAMUEL ERIC 246500435847 1825 754 2017 13 LEONARD, PA UL L JR., LE 246500435VA 19172012021 14 WILLIFORD, TRACEYA& WIFE WILLIFORD, WANDA L 2474W398569 1174 276 1997 15 ALEN, DAVID CIAYBOURNE 2474003984&T 10646911992 16 AU -EN, THELMA S. 247514237528 10E 52 2011 17 ORTEZ, EDUARDO 247513232542 1552 338 2007 181 ROCK CREEK LIVESTOCK, LLC I 247500402284 1958 2%2022 N76' 38? 18'W� B 5289' ----N23' 25' 40'W�- 60.94' �- --"^N28- 29' 26'W_�- - I\ 61.02' y„ V S ii Il� I III ' DUPLIN CO. PIN:245500725711 O / I PUBLIC WATT DB 1663/PG. 976 a Q 1 SETBACK) ASPHALT - (CO�NE �J R�UtRBAD)— 1 11 (100 — I I I � I I WELL TABLE BEFORE YOU DIG[ NC ONE CALL (TOLL FREE) LWJ40: (OR 1-800-632-4949) ITS THE LAW[ SCALE: 1' =300 300 0 300 SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION. w OZ co u� 04 Ld W cn Q W J c SHEET NUMBER C.2.1 Yd �U �a fff(777711II" murexrMr i i z K Z❑0 ni '�dy' wWU 297 A IxO ?00 LLZO LL n LAGOON A DATA TABLE DESCRIPTION DATA UNITS TOD ELEVATION 148.0 FT FB ELEVATION 146.0 FT BOTTOM ELEVATION 133.0 FT TOE OF SLOPE ELEV. 129.0 FT TOP SURFACE AREA 230,280.0 SQ. FT. FREEBOARD SURFACE AREA 217,308.0 SQ. FT. BOTTOM SURFACE AREA 140,010.0 SQ. FT. TOTAL VOLUME 20,622,472.0 GALLONS 2,757,015.0 CU, FT. FREEBOARD VOLUME 17,275,983 GALLONS 2,309,463 CU. FT. LAGOON B DATA TABLE DESCRIPTION DATA UNITS TOD ELEVATION 148.0: FT FB ELEVATION 146.0 FT BOTTOM ELEVATION 133.0 FT TOE OF SLOPE ELEV. 125.0 FT TOP SURFACE AREA 240,800.0 SQ. FT. FREEBOARD SURFACE AREA 229,064.0 SQ. FT. BOTTOM SURFACE AREA 159,800.0 SQ. FT. TOTAL VOLUME 22.322,863.0 GALLONS 2,984,340.0 CU. FT. FREEBOARD VOLUME 18,809,856.0 GALLONS 2,514,512.0 CU. FT. LAGOON C DATA TABLE DESCRIPTION DATA UNITS TOD ELEVATION 161.0 FT FB ELEVATION 159.0 FT BOTTOM ELEVATION 146.0 FT TOE OF SLOPE ELEV. 148.0 FT TOP SURFACE AREA 146,205.0 SQ. FT. FREEBOARD SURFACE AREA 136,773.0 SQ. FT. BOTTOM SURFACE AREA 82,485.0 SQ. FT. TOTAL VOLUME 12,678,712.0 GALLONS 1,695,015.0 CU. FT. FREEBOARD VOLUME 10,563.040.0 GALLONS 1,412,073.0 CU. FT. /N I `- DITCH IN ZONE 4 PROPOSED CEMER P f // Cti \ �/ / / , I I\t' \ ^ / / / / - \ \ f IS WET -AND FlLLEO NEATON AND SUBSEQUENT TO UAW C /� fV~ // / / r > r ^ �IY'I E ARMY CORPS OF N BY THE ARMY CORPS�gNEE /w\ //� �FLDOD ZONE AE LIMITS 1 J / , (2018) �/ } INSTALL DOUBLE -ROW / FENCE I TEMPORARY 400 LF APPRO% 1,TP. / BE DETAIL �-�-- -- `,ING PROPOBEU ITS, RT1P. INSTALL IRRICATON MCMON PIPE 18 DR21 HOP[ FPLACEI-AG LOW END AT LL ( / 17 BOTTOM OF LAGOON, INSTALL / INSTALL SINGLE -ROW AN COLLAR, SEE DETAIL \ \ \ /✓ �� ` \ \ �(�" v� IEMPORIRY III BEE DETAIL CPS BN (DRP17� HOPED IRRIGATON LATERAL i ACRES ; \� 1 INSTALL UNED STORAGE LACSEE D�TV LAGOON B % - /w- ( ACRES (FBFI3 STORAGE 1 LAGOON E = 18.82 MG) 5.29 ACRES //f I ( \ \ \ \\ \ �1, \ (If '✓--� '. (FB STORAGE _� INSTALL A PRO%. 1/ {vll 17.27 MG) �. LF. OF 1J') IHDPE (DN INSTALL IRRIGATION KAIERAL 3 PUMP STATON 2. / 1)) SEE OEfaIL , - INSTALL APPRO% / NOW OR FORMERLY / \ j 537 MICRO LAND GROUP, LLC / \ / NS ALL A:PPROX 2jJJ2 Yi HDPE (DR 17) P t / DUPLIN CO. PIN: 2475132433DB'v(, /K \ / N LF. OF t2' IDPE ()I RI,) 1 ORI CEMUN 2 DB 1874/PG. 435 Vi ` �' + INFlLE'IT FORCEMAIN A INSTALL APPROX 1.280 �N�`Q INSTAL (vI I LF. OF 8' HOPE (DRI7) /`(a'- INSTALL APPROX. 6BE LF. ZONE 3B OF R" INSTAL`) \ 21) 111L 8'PROXHO N DR t' ^ �� I !p INFLUENT FORCEMNN B (SIC \ OF 12' HDPE (DRI7) 10.95 .\CBEs I L \I I` at \ IRRIGATgJ FORCEMAIN 1 IRRIGa \ 21) gKAMTY UN , 1. ZJNE 1 I SEE SHEEP C.4 ACRES \ i J INSTALL INFLUENT 't Ir A O Q�1 \'-`\ ZONE 3A \ \ PUMP STATION 1 Y �_ _ 11 1` 14.59 ACRES SEE SHEEP GAO Mj( / I�` ` \ � INSTALL IRRIGATION I '� `~ PUMP STATON 1, SEE DETAIL LAG 35 DON C 3.ACRES (FB STORAGE lY = 10.56 MG) `I a POWER \ R UNES AND ROW T. SO. SETBACK �C°x i 4f, 4, I 2kv, ZONE IA 1 `\ ( ,. 1 \ • )r 42.49 ACRE INSTALLAIN R sHUMPFSENSOR ALL AP_PROX 2,7O2 E%ISTNG WOODSLINEOF \ \ 3aTON FORCEMRINDPE / 1 ZDNE 1B \ � ! � I � I15.S4A �S � I (� • t` ' \/ / () I \\�, /�7� fl � ` �iI I ✓ �� � � JS 1 PROPOSED 4' HIGH ( b� RESTRICTIVE 3-STRAND 11 BARBED WRE FENCE END ` Y ♦�I�/ / ✓ \o \�Il( UAT EXISTING W00 LINE) ,fix,/'��� � ✓ � \ �\\��1����(��p o 'PROPOSED 4' HIGH ~ (�L 4,� RESTRICTIVE 3-STRAND BARBED WIRE FENCE Q�� NC HWY 117- 1 _ ASPHALT - 200' R/W (COMBINED W/ RAILROAD) Wetted Area Predominant Soil Series Soil Designation Max Zone Flow Rate AHLR Design Maz PR Zone Name (acres) (GPM) (in/ac-yr) 1A 42.49 Norfolk Group 11 109.21 49.75 16 15.64 Goldsboro Group III 16.73 20.71 2 2S.05 Lynchburg Group lV 39.85 30.79 3A 14.59 Goldsboro Group III 20.71 27.48 3R 10.95 Goldsboro Group III 19.13 33.82 4 13.68 Autryville Group 46.96 66.45 Totals 122.4 1 252.60 BEFORE YOU DIGI NC ONE CALL (TOLL FREE) z (OR632-949) ITS THE LAW. SCALE: 1' =300 300 0 300 SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION. SHEET NUMBER C.3.1 1 LAGOON B 5.53 ACRES (FB STORAGE \ LAGOON A \ \ = 18.82 MG) 5.29 ACRES (FB STORAGE 4 . 17.27 MG) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ' \ \ \ \ \ ZONE LAGOON C 3.35 ACRES (FB STORAGE = 10.56 MG) a ZONE 4 3.68 ACRES \ \ \\\\\\\\ \ \\\\ \\\ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ZONE 10.95 ACRES \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ IV ZONE 14.59 ACRES 7_ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ Wetted Area Predominant Soil Series Soil Designation Max Zone Flow Rate AHLR Design Max PR Zone Name (acres) (GPM) (iri/ac-yr) (in/hr) 1A 42.49 Norfolk Group 11 109.21 49.75 1B 15.64 Goldsboro GroupIII 16.73 20.71 2 25.05 Lynchburg Group IV 39.85 30.79 3A 14.59 Goldsboro Group III 20.71 27.48 3B 10.95 Goldsboro Group III 19.13 33.82 4 13.68 Autryville Group 46.96 66.45 Totals 1 122.4 252.60 Site ID Eastin Northing Ground Elevation Top of Casing Elevation Screeed Depths NAD83 Ft NAD83 Ft NAVD88 Ft NAVD88 Ft Ft TW-1 2,275,956 448,634 148.46 150.26 8.8 - 13.8 TW-2 2,277,130 447,516 133.90 135.90 16.5 - 21.5 PZ-2 2,276,952 447,128 126.60 128.10 9.0 -12.0 PZ-3 2,275,042 450,349 146.35 149.35 1 13.0 - 18.0 PZ-4 2,276,027 449,715 146.50 148.00 13.5 - 16.5 PZ-5 2,275,211 448,338 146.55 150.55 11.0 - 16.0 PZ-6 2,277,146 448,856 141.50 146.00 20.0 - 25.0 TW-3 2,275,092 449,512 149.40 150.40 13.0 - 18.0 PZ-7 2,274,937 450,210 148.40 150.90 12.5 - 17.5 DW-1 2,276,906 448,926 143.90 145.40 25.0.30- BEFORE YOU DIG! NC ONE CALL (TOLL FREE) a (OR 1-800-632-4949) IT'S THE LAW! SCALE: 1' =200 200 0 200 SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION. SHEET NUMBER --i C.3.2 0 0 ~ N Z m N Lo N •. 3 3 Q K 2 W � U lil rxcA�� \ s i LAGOON A\- /TOD 148.0 FB 146.0 / BOT 133.0,: LAGOON B' �TOD 148.0 _ FB 146.0 j OT 133.0 j r- 'PROPOSED ZONE (34.9818,-78.0765 f CENTER PIVOT) R MFR 645' 12"x12"x8" TEE, 8" GATE VALVE AND 8" (DR21) HDPE LATERAL (#1) TO CENTER PIVOT 12"02%8" TEE, B" GATE - - VALVE AND 8" HOPE LATERAL. --igti (#3) TO CENTER PIVOT - 1 FWA 12 x12 x'8'rTEE, 8" GATEVALVE AND AND 8" HDPE \ LATERAV TO CENTER PIVQT- -� \ PROPOSED ZONE 3B (34.9802,-78.0802) \ fdL \ CENTER PIVOT 825 I �J PER MFR (f- -.7 PER MFR �- I O I \ I I A PROPOSED ZONE 2 (34.9831,-78.0815) CENTER PIVOT \ to i \ O� LAGOON C \� TOD 161.0 FB 159.0 J � B0T 146.0 .'! � Itl SCALE: 1" =200 200 0 200 SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION. IRRIGATION RISER HYDRANT ASSEMBLY CONTROL PANEL \ 8" DIP 90• BEND (FLAeGE) SUPPLY LINE CENTER PIVOT Wei 4" MIN. 2,500 PSI YIELD STRENGTH CONCRETE SLAB 8" FEMALE QD x FLANGE ADAPTER CONNECTING HOSE 8" MALE QD x FLANGE ADAPTER 8" PLUG VALVE IRRIGATION DROP (TYP.) ZONE CENTER -PIVOT (PROFILE VIEW) DETAIL 1, 4 SCALE NOT TO SCALE 112Y HIGHEST IRRIGATION DROP ELEVATION = 153.00' 160 160 155 155 150 150 TOE 148.00' RIM 147.00' TWL 146.00' 145 145 140 140 STORAGE LAGOON 135 135 EOT 133.0o' 130 130 IRRIGATION PUMP 125 STATION 2 125 12C LEGEND TOB = TOP OF BERM TWL = TOP WATER LEVEL IRRIGATION SYSTEM 120 115 DETA L IC PROFILE PSJ3 SCALE NOT TO SCALE HIGHEST IRRIGATION DROP ELEVATION = 153.00' TOB 161.00' RIM 162.00' V 160 TWL15900 160 155 155TORAGE T 150 GOON C IRRIGATION 150 AREA 145 145 aar 1as.00' 140 140 IRRIGATION PUMP 135 STATION 1 1355 130 130 LEGEND TOB = TOP OF BERM TWL = TOP WATER LEVEL HYDRAULIC PROFILE PSl1 DETAIL 5 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE C.3.3 LENGTH PER CENTER -PIVOT SPECIRCATKAS MODEL: CENTER PIVOT SYSTEM OVERHANG LENGTH: END GUN SPRAY DIAMETER: (EFFECTIVE SPRAY DIAMETER: PER MFR') CENTER PIVOT CONSOLE: C.A.M.S. SELECT CONSOLE (CONTROLS CENTER PIVOT OPTIONS) E3 CENTER PIVOT VOLTAGE: 480V (AMP DRAW = 6.1 AMPS) SUPPLY WIRE: 3 PHASE COPPER WIRE (8-10GA.) CENTER -PIVOT REQUIREMENTS: 55 8 1. AUTOMATIC END GUN SHUTOFF - TURNS END GUN ON OR OFF AUTOMATICALLY AT ANY PRESET AREA IN THE FIELD WITH CONTROLS AT CENTER PIVOT CONSOLE. J a 2. END GUN OVERRIDE PROVIDES CHECK FOR THE OPERATION OF THE END GUN AT ANY TIME.. L S 3. LOW PRESSURE SHUTOFF - SHUTS THE CENTER PIVOT OFF IF THERE IS A LOSS OF WATER PRESSURE WHILE THE PIVOT IS OPERATING. g 4. HIGH VOLTAGE SURGE PROTECTION -HELPS PROVIDE PROTECTION TO THE PIVOT AGAINST LIGHTNING AND Q` VOLTAGE SPIKES. a 5. PHASE LOSS PROTECTION - PROVIDES PROTECTION FOR PIVOT COMPONENTS FROM DAMAGE DUE TO THE LOSS N OF INCOMING VOLTAGE. c `tl 6. RUNNING LIGHT - FLASHING STROBE LIGHT LOCATED AT THE CENTER PIVOT TO MONITOR THE OPERATION OF THE CENTER PIVOT SYSTEM. 7. LOW MONITOR SHUTS THE PIVOT OFF WHEN THE VOLTAGE SUPPLY DROPS, AND PROTECTS THE g -VOLTAGE - $ MOTORS AND THEIR ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS. 8. MOTOR COVERS - SHIELD MOTORS FROM DIRECT WATER APPLICATION FOR EXTENDED MOTOR LIFE. ' + 9. POLY SPAN PIPE - SPANS ARE LINED FOR CORROSION PROTECTION DUE TO INDUSTRIAL WASTE PROPERTIES. U t 10. HIGH FLOATATION TIRES - 14.9" x 24" TIRES (RIM = 12" x 24"). pT 11. HDPE DROPS - PROVIDE IMPROVED EFFICIENCY (UNIFORMITY COEFFICIENT) FOR SPRAY NOZZLES. PPP 12. END GUN - END GUN TO OPERATE AT DESIGNATED LOCATIONS IN THE SPRAY FIELD. 13, BOOSTER PUMP - A BOOSTER PUMP MAY OR MAY NOT BE NECESSARY FOR THE OPERATION OF THE END GUN, _ AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. G ^ 0 NOTE: ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS AND EQUIPMENT ABOVE ARE TO BE INSTALLED AS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. y e CENTER PIVOT SPECIFICATIONS DETAIL (n SCALE: NOT TO SCALE C.3.3 d 0 � J IRRIGATION FIELD O 2 v) LL = CADMIUM PLATED NUTS, 12" BOLTS, & WASHERS. C/� cr� O cr- :-- ::�i 0 1'-6" /1'-0"/.080 ALUM. NO. 'S o; Q LLI z SWIMMING, FISHING, OR DRINKING SIGN TO READ: 1 11 16 ATTENTION = = 3 0 z "ATTENTION - NON -POTABLE 6" O Z O WATER: NO WADING OR NOWPOTAELE 1 B" O (- 3 DRINKING" WITH IDENTIFICATION WATER: NO SYMBOL. BOLT TO STL. SIGN � z Q P WADING OR �i ? DRINKING � STAND ARD STEEL o Q Q SIGN POST 3" Q fNOTE: 4 PLACE SIGN 3 EVERY 100' ALONG SHEET NUMBER B" CIA. 3000 PSI CONC. BASE ALONG PUBLIC ROADWAY IRRIGATIONFIELDC.3.3 LINE. NON -POTABLE WATER SIGN DETAIL 3 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE O O O N N N •• � 3 R � 2 SPAN g Y LENGTH VARIES (SEE O cti INSTALL DROPS TRUSS —AS PER SUPPORT MANUFACTURER CABLE SPECIFICATIONS SUPPORT E 3.00CENTER PIVOT TOWER CMP (TYP.) HIGH FLOATAT1 ONii TIRE (TYP.) n 14.9" x 24" Df I = ' Z F OU Y rz°o 0 HIGHEST IRRIGATION DROP ELEVATION = 153.00' 160 160 155 155 150 150 To, 148.00' RIM 147.00' TWL 146.00' 145 145 140 140 STORAGE LAGOON 135 135 BOT 131.00' 130 130 IRRIGATION PUMP 125 STATION 2 125 120 LEGEND TOB = TOP OF BERM TWL = TOP WATER LEVEL IRRIGATION SYSTEM 120 115 ZONE 1A 42.49 ACRES 11 A 12 x8" REDUCER, 8" GATE VALVE AND 8" HOPE LATERAL TO CENTER PIIIVOT\ / 1 PER l / \ V 97 6 M L PROPOSED ZONE 1A ZONE iB \ (34.9772,-78.0759)1 15.64 ACRES / \ CENTER PIVOTI / / �- PROPOSED ZONE 1B \\ I (34.9772,-78.0759) I 1 CENTER PIVOT PROPOSED ZONE 3A (34.9799,-78.0799) / - CENTER PIVOT / ZONE 3A 14,59 ACRES- , IRRGATION SOUTH ZONES DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE CENTER -PIVOT FiEOUIFTEM ENTB MODEL: CENTER -PIVOT SYSTEM OVERHANG LENGTH: END GUN SPRAY DIAMETER: (EFFECTIVE SPRAY DIAMETER: PER MFR') CENTER PIVOT CONSOLE: C.A.M.S. SELECT CONSOLE (CONTROLS CENTER PIVOT OPTIONS) CENTER PIVOT VOLTAGE:. 480V (AMP DRAW = 6.1 AMPS) SUPPLY WIRE: 3 PHASE COPPER WIRE (8-10GA.) CENTER -PIVOT REQUIREMENTS: 1. AUTOMATIC END GUN SHUTOFF - TURNS END GUN ON OR. OFF AUTOMATICALLY AT ANY PRESET AREA IN THE FIELD WITH CONTROLS AT CENTER PIVOT CONSOLE. 2. END GUN OVERRIDE - PROVIDES CHECK FOR THE OPERATION OF THE END GUN AT ANY TIME. 3. LOW PRESSURE SHUTOFF - SHUTS THE CENTER PIVOT OFF IF THERE IS A LOSS OF WATER PRESSURE WHILE THE PIVOT IS OPERATING. 4. HIGH VOLTAGE SURGE PROTECTION - HELPS PROVIDE PROTECTION TO THE PIVOT AGAINST LIGHTNING AND VOLTAGE SPIKES. 5. PHASE LOSS PROTECTION - PROVIDES PROTECTION FOR PIVOT COMPONENTS FROM DAMAGE DUE TO THE LOSS OF INCOMING VOLTAGE. 6. RUNNING LIGHT - FLASHING STROBE LIGHT LOCATED AT THE CENTER PIVOT TO MONITOR THE OPERATION OF THE CENTER PIVOT SYSTEM. 7. LOW -VOLTAGE MONITOR - SHUTS THE PIVOT OFF WHEN THE VOLTAGE SUPPLY DROPS, AND PROTECTS THE MOTORS AND THEIR ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS. 8. MOTOR COVERS - SHIELD MOTORS FROM DIRECT WATER APPLICATION FOR EXTENDED MOTOR LIFE. 9. POLY SPAN PIPE - SPANS ARE LINED FOR CORROSION PROTECTION DUE TO INDUSTRIAL WASTE PROPERTIES. 10. HIGH FLOATATION TIRES - 14.9" x 24" TIRES (RIM = 12" x 24"). 11. HOPE DROPS - PROVIDE IMPROVED EFFICIENCY (UNIFORMITY COEFFICIENT) FOR SPRAY NOZZLES. 12. END GUN - END GUN TO OPERATE AT DESIGNATED LOCATIONS IN THE SPRAY FIELD. 13. BOOSTER PUMP - A BOOSTER PUMP MAY OR MAY NOT BE NECESSARY FOR THE OPERATION OF THE END GUN, AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. NOTE ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS AND EQUIPMENT ABOVE ARE TO BE INSTALLED AS PER THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. CENTER PIVOT SPECIFICATIONS DETAIL z SCALE. NOT TO SCALE kC.3.4 wcn o cQ J z �Lu2 o zoo W C' cn m �z �Z— O J � � SHEET NUMBER C.3.4 1 ` o 3 Q K 2 %• l �ti �� SCALE: 1" =200 s ci 200 0 200 CA4� SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION. h Z W 8 u ^ cDy8 �wz Z tlx LL Z of \ if SEE SHEET C.4.1 FOR CONTINUATION OF 12" IFM \ APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF \ �� EXISTING MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT y APPROXIMATE LOCATION EXISTING \ \ !+f PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS LINE, CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION \ AND AVOID CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER OR FORCE MAIN \ �\ Ill II / PROPOSED FLOW METER INSTALLED I FORCE MAIN.INSTALL INCLUDE NCLUDE (1) DOWNSTREAM ISOLATION VALVE, METER BOX/COVER AND CELLULAR TRANSMITTER FOR REMOTE READING. LOCATE AS NEEDED TO AVOID STRAIGHTVEHICULARPIPEN DISTAN EFLICTS NDPERLLA70R. REQUIRED \ \ I APPROXIMATE LOCATION EXISTING DUKE ENERGY \ POWER LINE, CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY Table 2A: Infl ue nt Lift Station LOCATION AND AVOID CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED \ Finished Grade: I I GRAVITY SEWER AND FORCE MAIN Rim: \ I l I I I I \ l InvertIn: APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF Bottom of Wet Well: EXISTING 6" WATER \ / Depthof Wet Well: Design Flow: Selected cted Pump Rate: EXISTING Total Dynamic Head (TDH): LOADING PAD CONCRETE ) / a APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF SS _ CONCRETE PAD SS\ EXISTING SCREEN SEPARATORS SS—ss_ i ss Ss � 5$_s CONNECT EXISTING 8" PVC SCREEN DISCHARGE TO PROPOSED 12" PVC (SDR 35) BY INSERTED B" TEE, B"x12" REDUCER AND 8" BALL VALVE ON EACH SPIGOT. MAINTAIN CONNECTION TO EXISTING GRAVITY COLLECTION PIPE TO TOWN SEWER. APPROXIMATE 'y LOCATION OF EXISTING GAS EQUIPMENT \ \ APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF / I EXISTING GRAVITY SEWER I \ LATERAL TO TOWN . 1 � EXISTING VILLARI BROTHERS FACILITY PROPOSED INFLUENT PUMP STATION, LOCATE AS — — I — — — --- —. _ NEEDED TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING EQUIPMENT. DISCHARGE MANIFOLD SHALL INCLUDE TEE, VALVE AND BLIND FLANGE FOR FUTURE CAPABILITY TO PUMP TO TOWN WW-,_�_-h CONNECTION, SEE SHEET C.5.1 FOR DETAIL — `an / BEFORE YOU DIG( NC ONE CALL �_- (TOLL FREE) uzuow (OR 1-800-632-4949) IYS THE LAW( SCALE: 1" = 20' 20' 0 20' SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION. Electdcal Frequency: 60 hz Phase: 3e Impeller Diameter. Sin. Q In Motor Type: TEFC Q Selected Pump: GEA LL Z Pump Model: 4" High Pressure z W z Shaft Length: loft. S Q Z I— oz �ocn cl:� 3� LLJQ- m HIGHEST ELEVATION = 148.00' ¢ 0 & TOD LAGOON A B p q w CL- 150 15D TO J STORAGE _ LAGOONS LAGOON 145 (A,B,C) A&B 145 PROPOSED 12" PVC (SDR35) A140.001' IRRIGATIONSYSTEMSHEET NUMBER 40 GRAVITY LINE ®MIN 0.409 SLOPE39.00' 14Q I 135 135 C.4.0 I 130 BOTTOM 130-00' 130 I INFLUENT 125 PUMP STATION 125 I 120 120 0 0 I N 115 115 o m w z LEGEND N o 3 3 Q GNO = EXISTING GRADE HYDRAULIC PROFILE z TWL = TOP WATER LEVEL DETAIL , U W SCALE: NOT TO SCALE C.4.0 W l 100-YEAR FLOOD LIMITS .1;7�( (ZONE AE), TYP. _ REMOVE AND REPLACE � SF EXISTING FENCING TO INSTALL r 1 ✓ 1\ \ // ` INFLUENT FORCE MAIN INSTALL APPROX. 90 L.F." . OF 12" HOPE (DR17)` / / INFLUENT FORCEMAIN Ate- � _ r LAGOON A �\ PROPERTY LINE, TYP. I 5.28 ACRES I � {/ � _ �"/^ti-12h0 1 73+00 x 15+00 1s+ 11 /l� 1 - Li +00 APPROXIMATE / 1g+Ga 79+00 I /1 25+00 LOCATION OF EXISTING FENCING �/ >V .l ,r..t "` 1+� 25+0 rp / \ I� APPROXIMATE �, II11 / 11 / \q�\ / / 1 LOCATION OF N 11/IU1 / �11 //I EXISTING GAS TANK N / 111 \ \ f �I / / MAINTAIN SUITABLE CLEARANCE (SEE ",I 1 I / PROFILE/NOTES) BELOW EXISTING / / J-0, / SANITARY SEWER AND WATER LINES, 'I �l `��//��^/ FIELD VERIFY ACTUAL LOCATIONS jjj\III l---_.I (/ INSTALL 2" HOPE 2,932 / 1 J 11�I I L.F. OF 12" HDPE (DR17) I Il II 11J -INSTALL 80 LF \ / 'INFLUENT FORCEMAIN A \ lI1J 1 , 1 llI DIRECTIONAL DRILL, I/ �c+J / / (DR1 ) ` INSTALL 1 A HOPE I 'SEE DETAIL SHEET 1' / \ I FITTINGS, AS NEEDED l C. VILLARI BROTHERS FOODS \ lll" Il INSTALL INFLUENT PUMP �o \ STATION 1, SEE DETAIL 1 1 111 111/ll/I I J l SHEET C,5.1 ' / 111 / I ��llllll I I1 r I INSTALL APPROX. 1,280 L.F. OF 8" / J ALL HOPE (DR17) INFLUENT FORCEMAIN B, / I " IIII/�//BEFORE YYU �G! �. SEE SHEET C.4.2 JINSTALL APPROX. 158 L.F. OF 8" 11 \ I// NC ONE CI ( J� o� PVC (DR 35) GRAVITY LINE SEE ' I (TOLL FREE) j o SHEET C.4.0, PROFILE THIS SHEET I/ CONNECT B" PVC (DR 35) 1`11/ l \ 11j ��-+ • J SC ; 1" =100 iEj/ JJJ GRAVITY LINE TO LIQUID , //III I 10U 100 / �.,•,j / + DISCHARGE OF SCREEN / IIl / SEPARATORS SEE SHEET C.4.0 n �I I1 �f1 / llr-(OR 1-800-632-4949) (I ,( ALE F MAP MAY VARY IYs THE LAW! I DUE TO S OF REPRODUCTION. / l.�P% 1 �s � � t G INSTALL APPROX. 235 L.F. s OF 12" HOPE (DR17) 1 INFLUENT FORCEMAIN A U (NOT PROFILED) N C 1 INSTALL 8" PLUG \ U VALVE, SEE DETAIL • 1 �\v ' S. PREVIOUSLY FILLED J �t DITCHES, TYP. � l t1 r i SCALE: HOR. 1"=100' VERT. 1"= 00' 155 155 150 150 - J J Fww 3 3 MIN. C VER,T � 140 3 - 140 o�a K3 3 130 - lo >oa 3 wo o a 120 120 25+00 28+00 27+00 25+00 29+002 30+00 155 w 155 150 + '+. 150 140 INSTALL HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL BO LF DRILL w z 140 MIN. 'OVER, YP. — - � —It - 130 77 —"' _ _ 130 INSTALL INFLUENT PUMP STATION SEE DETAIL 1, 12" PVC (DR 35) GRAVITY LINE AT MIN. 0.40% SLOPE 11 MI . SEP 1" RATION, YP. 8" MIN. SEPAR TION,TY 120 -1+00 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 0+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 181 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+00 INFLUENT FMA m z Q W O? C J 3 a O o/� Z o LL Q �L 3 U m oZ L'Jzz c �O 0 CL SHEET NUMBER C.4.1 O N O FW- N O m N Z `� 0 3 3 co � z O O U cw K a � Zwr 8n W Z OKZZoo a e LLZCc 0 LL INSTALL B" HOPE CHECK VALVE INSTALL 1.5" AIR cp \ Q it y l l l \� J \ \ \ ( STA. 0+00 INSTALL \ INSTALL APPROX. 1,280 L.F. \ 12x8" HOPE TEE OF B" HOPE (DR17) INFLUENT FORCEMAIN B— _ l a INSTALL B" HOPE PLUG VALVE\ 4 Jc � rem 10+00 9+OD- ` e oo 7+00 6+00 1 5+00 — 4+00 +oil 2+00IFM IFM --+ IFt t4-�+ 1FM I IF'M IFM IFbt---+i IF�1I IFM IFM — I 1 7z I i A SCALE: I' =100 100 0 1Do SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION, ,eo 1O0 zp 72 -u o+z (n I MIN. CO ER, 7YP � 140 140 130 130 0+00 1+00 Mro 3+00 4+00 sm 6+00 7+00 9+00 MOD 10+00 11+00 12O0 13+00 INFLUENT FMB SCALE: HOR. 1"=100' VERT. 1"=10' �I I I I I I BEFORE YOU DIG] NC ONE CALL (TOLL FREE) z ;- (OR 1-800-632-4949) ITS THE LAN cn z a w� OO J 3 ¢ L3 O Q ct�U _ = LL aZ � �JZ U� O J cn O SHEET NUMBER C.4.2 cM� K A 1 IRR — FM 3 INSTALL AIR RELEASE VALVE AT v o THE ACTUAL HIGHEST POINT ON _ 1 , t THE IRRIGATION MAIN, (TYP.) ~� -�,/ r� w SEE DETAIL C.5.0 N 1 / INSTALL APPROX. 2.700 L.F. �. / - IRRIGATION LATERAL 1 OF 12" (DR17)�HDPE 0LIRR INSTALL APPROX. 537 L.F. o SEE SHEET C.4.5 IRRIGATION FORCEMAIN 1 % OF 12' HDPE (DR 17)IRRIGATION FORCEMAIN 3SEE SHEET C.4.427+22 +00 o 1+0 3+00 4+00 5+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 o 11+00 12+00� 0 14+ 15+00 16+00 17+0 18+ 0 19+0ZO2 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00 25+0Q 26+00 27+00 o RRI- IRR I- IRR +— IRR IRR IRR t IPJi �- IRR t IRF; —F- IRR + IRR - 'IRR IRR --- IRR IRR -- IRR -- I —� IRRIRRI IRR �� IRR -I—:IRR 4— 1RR IRR —F— IRR / o / / CENTER PIVOT�7 I f ZONE 2111 IRR—FM1 SEEDETAILC.4.L SHEET C.4.5 1 IRRIGATION LATERAL 3 ----I o w0 SEE SHEET C.4.5 - / 0 + t + r t o N N S EIGSHEOET CATT SRAL 2 I} + INSTALL APPROX. 620 0 + ro L.F. OF 12HDPE (DR17) IRRIGATION C.4.4 .-FORCEMAIN 2 �¢ � SEE SHEET C.4.4+oo I + / BEFORE YOU DIG[ i oo \ I NC ONE CALL (TOLL FREE) I O \ SCALE: 1" =100 . ~ (OR 1-800-632-4949) 100 O100 / 1� Ir5 THE LAW[ SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY r _ DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION. I / a Q Qao �Ja -a �>s wN +wJ w �Qa _ O U t K Q o O 100 O o� ow 10D U 0 ' MIN. COVER,T , 13D O+OD w � 1+00� w w 00 2+0 3+4+00 0+00 /+00 7+0 0+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+0 13+00 14+00 10+00 16+00 17+0 10+00 10+00 90+00 31+00 3Y00 33 ++00 9M00 33+00 3100 +2F+00 1M00 cal '0- - RRIGATION FM—1 =oQ < x �_ xo xo 0 NQ N� x0 ~ oa +� o w W N SCALE: HOR. 1 "=100' +o Q w VERT. 1 u d Q �o z cn W O �w Z QL�w (n =3� o: �oQ- J O � Q u co J U) CL- SHEET NUMBER mlimi O 0 0 N ti N o m Ld y N Z N 3 3 K Z g � w � W O U N z w M N JitZ zov Z 6h �_ LLZOry 0 \I , 87 L 1 1 , \ \ I I 100 SCALE: =100 0 100 ` % I III SCALE OF MAP MAY VARY y 4II DUE TO METHODS OF REPRODUCTION. / I � lid IFM IFM — iFM IFM — IFM — IFM — IFhy --1 IRI —11RA !FM — !FM — I l a �J IRRIGATION FM-200 -IRRIGATION FV-3 aa! }}00 �/ 1 \ yyl '1� sto 4+00 5 INSTALL IRRIGATION PUMP ,J, —!� 2+00 STATION 1, SEE DETAIL — �1� 3+00 �+0 '*�" 3+00 i� 4+p0 I~ 2- \ ° oo 82 1R 6+00 5+{— I 1 l Y 1 INSTALL APPROX. 537 L.F. OF 12" HOPE (DR 17) INSTALL APPROX. 619 ` o ( IRRIGATION FORCEMAIN 3 L.F. OF 12" HOPE (DR17) 1 �.� IRRIGATION FORCEMAIN 2 1 o \� LAGOON C �� 1`� \� \ + 1 rI � � o 0 0 aN o 0 �0 N� aw +a ri w do ww �a - tao toIGO + a d� IN �a 3' IN. CO ER,TYP. 3' MIN, COVER, P. -- - 100 1301JD om 1i00 am &M +w 0400 om 0F00 1+00 2+00 am 4M00 OF00 om RRIGATION FM-2 RRIGATION FM-3 0 ova 0�� � o owe w� aws Qw o� o SCALE: HOR. 1"=100' VERT. 1 "=10' i5) LAGOON B j� INSTALL IRRIGATION PUMP STATION 2, SEE DETAIL 11t �r ,. I I o �I \ 1 LAGOON A //, BEFORE YOU DIG! NC ONE CALL (TOLL FREE) ��s �1 (OR 1-BOD-632-4949) ITS THE LAWI z m w� O Lil z c W R Q�J_ LL 3� zCR 3 S? 6- O - 3 o LL,� LLJo J QO SHEET NUMBER m i i1 Z e~q Zoo 21n �y8 M LU a LU owz s ILz(w a \' 3' MIN. COVER, YP. 1 140 0+00 1+00 "I +w oz � REo N No 2400 3+00 +i00 am sm IRRIGATION LAT-1 —��� it '• �`��\\�\�\\\ �/ i )l� l> � -. INSTALL APPROX. 338 L.F. OF 8" HOPE (DR 17) IRRIGATION LATERAL 3 j _ DITCH IN ZONE 4 PROPOSED CENTER PIVOT ISTO BE 1 I l z --'WETLANDILDELLI DELINEATION LED SUBSEQUENT ISSUANCE OFLAF \ �� LAT—'J' OA0 / I J / 1 1 `, / JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD OR AJD) \ J IRR IRR —� IRR / I ` - _---BY THE ARMY CORD/ OF ENGINEERS. I ` 71 3+ +00 2+00 1+00 / ( INSTALL APPROX. 870 L.F. _ / - OF 8" (DR 17) HDPE - INSTALL 8" HOPE PLUG / IRRIGATION LATERAL 1 I \ � VALVE AT TEE INTERSECTION LAT—'2' IRR R --I IRR o 3+ 3+00 2+0 1+00 0-g8 4LL APPROX. 353� 8" (DR 17) HDPE ATION LATERAL 2 i 7400 am 0+00 Qom N o 0 o W H 0 �w 10+00 SCALE: HOR. 1"=100' VER T. 1 "=10' 1+01 2+ 3+00 Elul + ail �— 1 +0 S+oo 6+00 \7 0+ ©-- 8+00 68, + tlaF---F 'Hal I Elam''+ —I �- I Elul -• I I - r. \ 1\ I 1 \ INSTALL 8" HDPE PLUGVALVE AT 1 )\\\\\\\\\ INTERSECTION E \ \ \ 4\ 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 0+00 1+00 Y100 5+00 00 ++ IRRIGATION LAT-2 Q�m "'om IRRIGATION LAT-3 R�n ao NN oo o`o o � �,N o N o o �w+ 'w+ o U +Qo U +o 0 Qo a Qo a�a �w �w r r FREE) THE LAMA SHEET NUMBER C.4.5 o O N cN ~ O N O w •• 3 3 d pp O U =L 4df C OTEE INTERSECTION II ll'i `I ,III ,. CONCRETE SHALL BE 3000 PSI. 2. CONCRETE SHALL NOT CONTACT BOLTS OR ENDS OF MECHANICAL JOINT FITTINGS. 3. TRENCHES SHALL CONFORM TO STANDARD DETAILS AS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET C SEE STANDARD THRUST BLOCK QUANTITY TABLE (RIGHT) FOR CONCRETE REQUIRED. 5. ALL BENDS AND INTERSECTIONS SHALL HAVE CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING. THRUST BLOCK AREA STANDARD THRUST BLOCKING MEWS AND DFSInN OUAN11TY TABLE DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE G5.0 HH COVER, VARIES LOGO: "IRRIGATION ARV" QUAZITE BOX DITCH (WHERE EXISTS) MODEL:PG2424BB30 OR EQUAL FINISHED GRADE AIR RELEASE VALVE (VALMATIC OR 4" UNION APPROVED EQUAL) 4" S.S. NIPPLE POSITIVAINTAIE �' MI 4" BALL VALVE SLOPE 4" S.S. NIPPLE MOUSEHOLE (SEE NOTE 2 BELOW) 4" STAINLESS STEEL PIPE FITTINGS, VALVES AND PIPE FOR ARV SHALL BE 316 STAINLESS STEEL FDRCEMAIN 12" //57 BEDDING ROCK TO INVERT OF NIPPLE REACTION BEARING AREAS FOR HORIZONTAL PIPE BENDS BASED ON MST PRESSURE OF 200 P.S.I. (ALL AREA IN SQUARE FEET) ®r➢iFFi�f�i)•i)•i�t�f�l1•i� f�T�liiR'.1•i�t�i�i���i���i� fiflZiC[CC�i)•i�i�i���i)•i1•i� RiifBFiP)•�1•t�l•if����t•ii•ifl•i>_ Eb1iFiF�i.F�E1•ifiiLl•t!•S!•tl•�: )•S!_ fiftLli/:T.:�i)•t!•�i•i�i�i)•tl•i� ®Y➢fF?<33�tltl•iE)•i>•i>•S!•iE)•i� �FTdfiClt�iCl•iF!•S!Sltl•l.T�S! �Ffll:'-S�iL1•iF�1•!T•1•tl•t!•iF1•�.T��:?_ 0 0 0 0 4" 90' S.S. BEND 4" S.S. NIPPLE STAINLESS STEEL WIDE OR DOUBLE STRAP SERVICE SADDLE WITH I.P.S. THREAD NOTES: 1. ABOVE DETAIL IS BASED ON 4" AIR RELEASE VALVE. CHANGE PIPE AND FITTINGS ACCORDINGLY FOR OTHER VALVE SIZES AND TYPES. VALVE SIZES SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER. 2. THE MINIMUM DIMENSION FROM INVERT TO FINISHED GRADE SHALL BE 24". 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ACTUAL ROW/PROPERTY LINE LOCATION AT ARV LOCATION. WHEN ARV PLACEMENT CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING DITCH, CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT ENGINEER FOR FINAL ARV PLACEMENT, 4. LOOP SUFFICIENT AMOUNT OF TRACER WIRE INTO BOX TO ALLOW EASE OF ACCESS. KIWI ALVE BOX COVER CONCRETE COLLAR EXISTING GRADE r1--VALVE BOX SHAFT PLUG/GATE VALVE BACKFlLL WITH #57 WASHED STONE TO SPRING LINE OF PIPE (MIN. 4" BELOW VALVE AND PIPE) BOX BASE 2" FORCEMAIN PROVIDE SOLID CONCRETE BLOCK SUPPORT DIRECTLY UNDER VALVE FLANGE/PIPE FLANGE NOTES: NOTE: 1. A VALVE BOX SHOULD BE PROVIDED FOR EACH VALVE USED IN BURIED SERVICE BURLAP '. APPLICATION. VALVE BOXES SHOULD BE INSTALLED SUCH THAT NO LOAD IS BE USED. TRANSFERRED TO THE VALVE. 2. PREPARE PIPE ENDS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS. INSTALL VALVE PER PROPER METHODS ACCORDING TO END JOINT TYPE. ALL PIPING SHOULD BE PROPERLY SUPPORTED TO AVOID LINE STRESS ON THE VALVE. DO NOT USE THE VALVE AS A JACK TO FORCE A PIPELINE INTO POSITION. TYPICAL PWG/GATE VALVE, VALVE QQX- & PROTECTION DETAIL 6 SCALE NOT TO SCALE THRUST ROD SIZE AND QUANTITY PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS DIP BELL AND SOCKET HARNESS RESTRAINT (TYP.) MECHANICAL JOINT RESTRAINT (TYP) NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THRUST BLOCKING AT EACH CHANGE OF DIRECTION. FOR THRUST BLOCKING SEE DETAIL 4/C.5.0 MECHANICAL RESTRAINT SYS— DETAIL 5 SCALE NOT TO SCALE G5.0 PROPOSED FG B C + 1 8" r---] Bc SEE PLAN I\/� SEE PUN EXISTING PUBLIC RIGHT b�WAY EXISTING ... ' CRUSHED STONE-- GROUND 8 GROUND " `"``""• NATIVE CLASS II OR CLASS III COMPACTED RUSHED STONE PROVIDE TRANSITION BETWEEN CONSTRUCTION BACKFlLL ENTRANCE/EXIT & EXISTING ROAD. PROFILE ELAN EXISTING SOIL NOTES 1. STONE SIZE - 3-2" COURSE AGGREGATE, CRUSHED STONE MAY BE USED 2. WHEN NECESSARY, WHEELS SHALL BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE PERFORMED ON A SURFACE STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE, DRAINING INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAP OR SEDIMENT BASIN. ALL SEDIMENT SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM ENTERING ANY STORM DRAIN, DITCH OR WATERCOURSE THROUGH THE USE OF SANDBAGS, GRAVEL, BOARDS OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS. 3. THE ENTRANCE/EXIT SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH PREVENTS THE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR AND/OR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. 4. MINIMUM DIMENSIONS: (ALSO SEE EROSION CONTROL PLANS) LENGTH AS EFFECTIVE BUT NOT LESS THAN 50 FEET. WIDTH NOT LESS THAN FULL WIDTH OF ALL POINTS OF INGRESS OF EGRESS THICKNESS NOT LESS THAN EIGHT (8) INCHES. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT DETAIL 3 SCALE NOT TO SCALE C.5.0 PIPE EXISTING NATIVE CLASS II SOILS 57 7 3' MIN NOTE: 1. USE FOR PRESSURE PIPE WHEN EXCAVATION OF TRENCH BOTTOM RESULTS IN SABLE CONDITIONS. 2. CLASS II BEDDING REQUIRED WHEN NATIVE ROCK BEDS ENCOUNTERED. 3. USE SUITABLE TAMP RODS TO ENSURE BEDDING IS THOROUGHLY TAMPED UNDER THE PIPE HAUNCHES. 4. BC = DIAMETER OF PIPE BARREL PIPE BEDDING DETAIL 4 SCALE NOT TO SCALE TEMPORARY RATE SPECIES (LB/AC) DATES RYE (GRAIN) 120 DEC. 1 - APR. 15 KOBE LESPEDEZA 50 DEC. 1 - APR. 15 GERMAN MILLET 40 APR. 15. - AUG.. 15 RYE (GRAIN) 120 AUG. 15. - DEC. 30 SOIL AMENDMENTS FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS OF SOIL TESTS OR APPLY 2,000 LB/ACRE GROUND AGRICULTURAL LIMESTONE AND 750 LB/ACRE 10-10-10 FERTILIZER MULCH APPLY 4,000 LB/ACRE STRAW. ANCHOR STRAW BY TACKING WITH ASPHALT, NETTING, OR A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL. A DISK WITH BLADES SET NEARLY STRAIGHT CAN BE USED AS A MULCH ANCHORING TOOL. MAINTENANCE IF GROWTH IS LESS THAN FULLY ADEQUATE, REFERTILIZE IN THE SECOND YEAR ACCORDING TO SOIL TESTS OR TOPDRESS WITH 500 LB/ACRE 10-10-10 FERTILIZER. RESEED, REFERTILIZE, AND MULCH AREA IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EROSION OR OTHER DAMAGE. IF SEEDING IN FALL, TOPDRESS WITH 50 LB/ACRE OF NITROGEN IN MARCH. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO EXTEND TEMPORARY COVER BEYOND JUNE 15, OVERSEED WITH 50 LB/ACRE KOBE LESPEDEZA IN LATE FEBRUARY OR EARLY MARCH. PERMANENT SEEDING AS PER AGRONOMIST RECOMMENDATION TEMPORARY SEEDING SCHEDULE DETAIL 7 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE G5.0 12 GAUGE 4"X4" OR 2"X4" WELDED WIRE HOOKED ONTO PREFORMED CHANNELS ON STEEL POST STEEL POST WELDED WIRE MESH BACKFlLL & SILTATION ITROL FABRIC GROUND UNE ARE MESH 24' MIN. EXTRA DEPTH REQUIRED FOR NON -STABLE SOILS FILL SECTION VIEW ALTERNATE: IN LIEU OF BURYING SKIRT, 6" OF N0:5 STONE MAY BE USED TO ANCHOR SKIRT. G AG ONF� M AI WONF�,_ �J �M • I , SEDIMENT FENCE EETNL NOT TO SCALE / MAXIMUM SEDIMENT STORAGE LEVEL REMOVE SEDIMENT WHEN THIS LEVEL IS REACHED OR AS DIRECTED BY CONSERVATION INSPECTOR. / " ! ULTRAVIOLET RESISTANT (BLACK) MIRAFI FABRIC OR EQUIVALENT SECURED TO WIRE WITH METAL CUPS _ OR WIRE AT 8" OFF CENTER. ..... -...._ -NATURAL GRADE CARRY APPROXIMATELY 12" OF FABRIC INTO -TRENCH, COVER WITH SOIL AND TAMP BACKFlLL. " - iv . -CARRY 6' OF WRE INTO TRENCH. POSTS AT 10' OFF CENTER MAXIMUM GENERAL NOTES: SEDIMENT FENCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE MAINTENANCE NOTES: 1, FILTER BARRIERS SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. 2. SHOULD THE FABRIC DECOMPOSE OR BECOME INEFFECTIVE PRIOR TO THE END OF THE EXPECTED USABLE LIFE AND THE BARRIER STILL BE NECESSARY, THE FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY. 3. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. THEY MUST BE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS REACH APPROXIMATELY 0.5 FT. IN DEPTH 4. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITS REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT FENCE OR FILTER BARRIER IS NO LONGER REQUIRED SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED AND SEEDED. 5. PROVIDE OUTLETS IN SEDIMENT FENCE AT LOW SPOTS FOR DEWATERING LARGE AREAS (USE CLASS B STONE). TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FENCE DETAIL Q SCALE: NOT TO SCALE 2 1. FENCE FABRIC SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 32" IN WIDTH AND SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 6 LINE WIRES WITH 12' STAY SPACING. 2. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE MIRAFI 100 FABRIC OR EQUIVALENT. BURLAP CANNOT BE USED WHERE SILT FENCE IS TO REMAIN FOR A PERIOD MORE THAN 30 DAYS. 3. STEEL POSTS SHALL BE 1.33 LBS./LF. HAVE A MIN. LENGTH OF 5' AND BE OF THE SELF -FASTENER ANGLE STEEL TYPE. SEDIMENT NO. 57 WACLASS II " SHED RIP RAP % y STONE JII= IIIII+III ` ELEVATION STONE OUTLET CLASS II SECTION RIP -RAP BASE WITH WASHED STONE FACE I NOTE: CONTROLLED SEDIMENTATION OUTLETS TO BE PLACED AT LOW SPOTS ALONG SEDIMENT FENCING NOT TO EXCEED 200 L.F. INTERVALS. CONTROLLED SEDIMENTA-nON FENCE WTLm DETAIL 1, SCALE: NOT TO SCALE c5.0 SHEET NUMBER C.5.0 O O ~ N o J � K Z W � U lil _ V cm PUMP STATION NOTES: 1. REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR PIPE SIZES AND PUMP SIZE SPECIFICATIONS. T 2. PUMP MOUNT TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PUMP MANUFACTURER'S y SPECIFICATIONS. 3. ALL GASKETED JOINTS SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR LEAKS PRIOR TO CONTINUOUS PUMP STATION OPERATION. 4. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN AS APPROXIMATE. EXACT PIPE LENGTHS SHALL BE Eq $ VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 5. ALL INTERIOR WET WELL HARDWARE, INCLUDING ANCHORS AND BOLTS, SHALL BE TYPE 316 STAINLESS STEEL OR BETTER. 6. ALL WET WELL PENETRATIONS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH AN ELASTOMERIC BOOT AND GROUTED WITH TYPE S CONCRETE MORTAR (TYP), 7. ALL CONCRETE, PRE -CAST, OR CAST IN PLACE SHALL YIELD A 28 DAY STRENGTH OF 4000 PSI (MINIMUM). �J a 8. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN AREA OF EXCAVATION TO BE CONFIRMED AND L t LOCATED BY CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. PANEL 1 1/2" FlBERGLA55 9.ALL PRECAST CONCRETE STRUCTURES SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH STEEL RODSAS NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE WIDTH AND DEPTH AND SO INDICATED ON WARGLIGHT �ONTRCL REINFORCED PLASTIC SUCH AS SHOP DRAWINGS SUBMITTED TO ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL.GRATING, a vi UDIALARM BEDFORD FIR DID OR EQUIVALENT (TYPJ, r -I INSTALLED BY OWNER l LOW �) Hao�BEND Q t (F HOPE FLANGE U . ADAPTOR. TYP. FROM FACILITY _ HOPE OR SCH 80 PVC BALL VALVE (F1xFL) O 3 . MIN. 3000 PSI CONCRETE OR HOPE FUTURE PUMPED CONNECTION TO TOWN C ~ SEWER. VALVE TO REMAIN ® Q B.0' �. CLOSED UNTIL FUTURE APPLICATION IS INSTALLED n PROPOSED PIPING ^ A° _ �l 9JN0 HOPE TEE FLANGE .D.p PUMP ATTACHED TO WET .... .. .. ....... :a. FORCE HDPE TEE MAIN ° g 8 WELL WAIL WITH MOUNTING BRACKET PROVIDED BY L------------------- IIY�\\ PUMP SUPPLIER /^ v w co SAFETY FENCING / RAILING > 1 J ~ (MIN. 42. HEIGHT) TO BE O INSTALLED BY OWN _ W MN Q z Q O PLAN VIEW . ✓l F- o W ANTI COLLAR ISOMIFTRIC VIEW O O NOTE: REDUCER, VALVES AND PIPE -SEEP DETAIL ti SIZE, $EEC wj SIZING BA (IN CEMAN SCALE:OT TO SCALE NOTE: MINIMUM THICKNESS 3 REVERSED REDUCER HOPE OR SCH 80 PVC BALL VALVE (FUFL) FOR CONCRETE ONLY HOG PUMP HOPE CHECK RANGE ADAPTER VALK M W W O CL FLANGES TO FACIUTATE PUMP RWAIR AND REMOVAL _ O � H- HDPE 22.3" BEND pp W RANGES TOEFACI TATE �I LLJ ct CLEAN —OUTS J Q — z c� STEEL U-BRACKET PIPE 2' MIN. NOTE: IRRIGATION SYSTEM SUPPORT HDPE VENDOR SHALL SUPPLY AND SHEET NUMBER - - INSTALLA FLOW METER DOWNSTREAM OF EACH i ANCHOR HDPE SYNTHETIC LINER WITH 24"X36" (WIDTHxDEPTH) KEY WAY TRENCH ALONG THEPERIMETER IRRIGATION PUMP. �'5'1 OF DIGESTER AS PER H MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS. RIM =PER PLAN LEVEL� ALARM i��j� TENSIONING PLATE SCREW WITH RETAINER NUT. TOP OF DIKE- 0.00' PIPEPER n. FSIZNSSIZE —I —III o 0 FREEBOARD LEVEL = —2:00' —III WL 2 FilimE N _III —III —III —III— IIIIIIII III Lo � 3 Q III � _ O ` INSTALL ANTI -SEEP 6" PUMP ROTATED SO' FOR DETAIL cLARm W FROM FACILITY WW LATERAL NA NEW —� •r COLLAR PER DETAIL _—III—III 0 cti of GRAVITY LINE —LEAD\��\\%) THIS SHEET �/ III— , BOTTG(r'P�> LEAD PUMP ON (LAG PUMP OFF) 12• MINIMUM LIQUID LEVEL (LEAD PUMP OFF) —III—III 6^ OB FI 1, BOTTOM ELEV. REFER TO CIVIL PLAN 16" DR 17 HDPE ® 0% SLOPES V Ilk III .III-1 I401 —III—III III � C10" NOTE: SEE OVERALL SEE SITE PLAN FOR PUMP SITE PLAN SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL SECTION VIEW STATION ELEVATIONS O M INFORMATION IRRIGATION PUMP STATIONAUCTION bnct Z w LD INFLUENT LIFT DETAIL STATION 1 DETAIL z ± w F Yi Oi SCALE: NOT TO SCALE SCALE: NOT TO SCALE C.s.1 SCALE: z 0 00 L U ^buu u B" HOPE IFM — — — — FR I I=1 I I 1=1 I I- 4 =1 __________________________FREEBOARD FROM INFLUENT LEVEL__ 2.00'___ � PUMP STATION III— CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE TERMINUS OF INLET PIPING N EXTENDS AT LEAST 2' BELOW rn II I II— FREEBOARD LEVEL. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL BENDS AS MIN. 10' CLEARANCE 1' � 45' NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH PROPOSED TOE OF FILL FOR LAGOON OR AS REQUIRED Z — - CONSTRUCTION C N % ro LAGOON vl`i EXISTING WETLAND n -II-_ Sli II = BOTTOM ELEV.= REFER TO CIVIL PLANS G HOPE SYNTHETIC 60 MIL DIGESTER LINER (BY — _ — — — — — — —_ — — — —_ — 19 HOPE INSTALLER) N O y PROPOSED DOUBLE -ROW SILT rn FENCE W/ OUTLETS AS NEEDED INFLUENT HEADERS - PIPE DETAIL DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE ANTI -SEEP COLLAR (CONCRETE OR HOPE) TO BE PLACED AROUND HOPE SEE DETAIL 6/C.5.3 BORE ENTRANCE ANGLE SHALL NOT EXCEED MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS ANCHOR HOPE SYNTHETIC LINER WITH 24"X36" (WIDTHxDEPTH) KEY WAY TRENCH ALONG THE PERIMETER OF DIGESTER; NOTE: PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF HOPE IN TRENCH, THE TRENCH SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR ANY LOOSE SOIL OR DEBRIS, AND ANY SUCH LOOSE MATERIALS NOTE: REMOVED AND/OR COMPACTED ELEVATIONS SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS 3' HOPE SYNTHETIC 60 MIL � LINER (BY HOPE INSTALLER) 2Ia`;lI_(e TYPICAL EROSION CONTROL AT WE LOCATIONS DETAIL 2 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE DIRECTIONAL BORE HOPE PIPE lelziy(eU lmLIM01114l2L1mpl[llImLlkf401ol:%_*I lIMl 3` MIN. RETURN PIPE BURY DEPTH TO 3' BELOW EXISTING GRADE AT EXIT ANGLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS U) w O c' � Q o Q zoo 3� Q 3� Q CE 30o zJ LQ o�LW Q L W � Q SHEET NUMBER C.5.2 0 0 N ~ a O m y Z N 3 3 Q � o 2 g w 41 i O