Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0026557_Speculative Limits_20230328 DocuSign Envelope ID: BDC1E434-EBAA-40F5-9lC9-592AD82B522B STAT! ROY COOPER Y A Governor ELIZABETH S.BISER Secretary RICHARD E.ROGERS,JR. NORTH CAROLINA Director Environmental Quality March 28, 2023 Regina Mathis, Town Manager Town of Bryson City PO Box 726 Bryson City,NC 28713-0726 Subject: Speculative Effluent Limits NPDES Permit NCO026557 SRP-W-ARP-0150 Bryson City WWTP Swain County Little Tennessee River Basin Dear Permitttee: This letter provides speculative effluent limits for a 1.2 MGD expansion for Bryson City WWTP. McGill Associates, P.A. requested speculative effluent limits on September 16, 2022. Receiving Stream. The Tuckasegee River is located within the Little Tennessee River Basin. The Tuckasegee River has a stream classification of B. The USGS responded to a low flow request from M. Keith Webb, PE, on September 9, 2022, with the following revised flows: the Tuckasegee River has a summer(annual) 7Q10 flow of 358 cfs, a winter 7Q10 flow of 417 cfs, a 30Q2 flow of 417 cfs, and an annual average flow of 1,555 cfs. The Tuckasegee River at Outfall 001 [stream segment 2-79-(40.9)] is not currently listed as an impaired waterbody on the 2022 North Carolina 303(d) Impaired Waters List. There are no specific permitting strategies for French Broad River in the Little Tennessee River Basin Water Quality Plan. Based upon a review of information available from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Online Map Viewer, there are Federally Listed threatened or endangered aquatic species identified within a 5- mile radius of the proposed discharge location (see attached). If there are any identified threatened/endangered species, it is recommended that the applicant discuss the proposed project with the US Fish and Wildlife Service to determine whether the proposed discharge location might impact such species. Speculative Effluent Limits. Based on Division review of receiving stream conditions and specific proposed discharge location, speculative limits for the proposed expansion are provided in Table 1. A complete evaluation of these limits and monitoring requirements for metals and other toxicants, as well as potential instream monitoring requirements, will be addressed as part of the review of the NPDES permit application. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources �A � 512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617 NORTH CtEnW oep.mrinarEnH.anmanrsl0ual\ /� 919.707.9000 DocuSign Envelope ID:BDC1E434-EBAA-40F5-91C9-592AD82B522B Every applicant shall submit documentation of any additional pollutants for which there are certified methods with the permit application if their discharge is anticipated. These pollutants may be found in 40 CFR Part 136, if there are additional pollutants with certified methods to be reported,please submit the Chemical Addendum to NPDES Application(unless this was completed earlier) and, if applicable, list the selected certified analytical method used. Some features of the speculative limit development include the following: TABLE 1. Speculative Limits for Town of Bryson City Main WWTP (Proposed 1.0 MGD WWTP) EFFLUENT EFFLUENT LIMITS CHARACTERISTICS Monthly Weekly Daily Average Average Maximum Flow 1.2 MGD BOD5,200C 30 mg/L 45 mg/L NH3 asN M&R M&R M&R TSS 30 mg/L 45 mg/L TRC 28 µg/L Fecal coliform(geometric mean) 200/100 mL 400/100 mL M&R Total Phosphorus M&R M&R M&R Total Nitrogen M&R M&R M&R Mercury M&R M&R M&R Acute Toxicity,48-hour LC-50 test, Ceriodaphnia 90% M&R=monitor and report • NH3 Limits. In accordance with 15A NCAC 213.0206, the following streamflows are used for dilution considerations for development of WQBELs: 1Q10 streamflow (acute Aquatic Life); 7Q 10 streamflow (chronic Aquatic Life; non-carcinogen HH); 30Q2 streamflow (aesthetics); annual average flow(carcinogen, HH). Limitations for ammonia are based on protection of aquatic life utilizing an Ammonia chronic criterion of 1.0 mg/1 (summer) and 1.8 mg/1 (winter). A Wasteload Allocation (WLA) indicated that the allowable concentration was greater than 35 mg/L. Therefore, no limit for Ammonia will be imposed. • BOD Limits. Limitations for oxygen-consuming waste (e.g., BOD) are generally based on water quality modeling to ensure protection of the instream dissolved oxygen (DO)water quality standard. Secondary TBEL limits (e.g., BOD = 30 mg/1 for Municipals, 40 CFR 133 / 15A NCAC 213 .0406) may be appropriate if deemed more stringent based on dilution and model results. Model results indicated that Secondary TBEL limits were appropriate. Engineering Alternatives Analysis EA& Please note that the Division cannot guarantee that an NPDES permit for a new or expanding discharge will be issued with these speculative limits. Final decisions can only be made after the Division receives and evaluates a formal permit application for the expanded discharge. In accordance with North Carolina Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2H.0105(c), the most environmentally sound alternative should be selected from all reasonably cost-effective options. Therefore, as a component of all NPDES permit applications for new and expanding flow includes a detailed engineering alternatives analysis (EAA) that must be prepared. The EAA must justify the requested design flow and provide an analysis of potential wastewater treatment alternatives. A copy of tc�QEQ North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources .,— 512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1611 NORTH GAROLINA 919.707.9000 DapYbNitl of EmbanngnGl Oual� DocuSign Envelope ID:BDC1E434-EBAA-40F5-91C9-592AD82B522B the Division guidance for preparing EAA documents is attached and/or can be found online at: https:Hfiles.nc.gov/ncdeq/Surface%20Water%2OProtection/NPDES/permits/eaa-guidance-20140501- dwr-swp-npdes_13.pdf State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)EA/EIS Requirements. A SEPA EA/EIS document may be required for projects that: 1) involve $10 Million or more of state funds; or 2)will significantly and permanently impact 10 or more acres of public lands. Please check with the DWR SEPA coordinator (David Wainwright, 919-707-9045) as to whether your project requires SEPA review. For projects that are subject to SEPA, the EAA requirements discussed above will need to be folded into the SEPA document. Details related to SEPA can be found at: https:Hdeq.nc.gov/permits-rules/state- environmental-policy-act-sepa/general-information. If required, a Finding of No Significant Environmental Impact (FONSI)must be issued prior to issuance of the NPDES permit for the expansion. Details related to FONSI can be found on-line at: https:Hdeq.nc.gov/permits- regulations/sepa/review-process and at: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water- infrastructure/documents/cdb gi-fonsiea We understand this expansion project is moving forward rapidly; however, we would expect that any request for NPDES permitting action for the expansion be taken within a five-year period from the date of this letter, or the noted speculative limits in Table 1 would be subject to reassessment and review. Should you have any questions about these speculative limits or NPDES permitting requirements, please feel free to contact Derek Denard at(919) 707-3618 / derek.denard@ncdenr.gov or Doug Dowden at(919) 707-3605 /doug.dowden@ncdenr.gov. Respectfully, DocuSigned by: E l.lf,6.t,(, 16dtk C464531431644FE... Michael Montebello NPDES Program Branch Chief Attachment: Link to EAA Guidance Document,Chemical Addendum Form,and NPDES application information: htWs:Hdeq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-quality_permitting/npdes-wastewater/npdes-permitting- process/npdes-individual-permit-applications cc: NPDES Files[Laserfiche] Town of Bryson City/Regina Mathis,Town Manager[reginamathis@brysoncitync.gov] McGill Associates,P.A./M.Keith Webb,PE[Keith.Webb@mcgillassociates.com] DWR/WQPS Doug Dowden[doug.dowden@ncdenr.gov]; Kristen Litzenberger[kristin.litzenberger@ncdenr.gov]; Derek Denard[derek.denard@ncdenr.gov];John Hennessy Dohn.hennessy@ncdenr.gov]; Charles Weaver[Charles.weaver@ncdenr.gov] ARO/Landon Davidson[landon.davidson@ncdenr.gov];Daniel J Boss[daniel.boss@ncdenr.gov]; Tim Heim[tim.heim@ncdenr.gov] NC WRC/Andrea Leslie[andrea.leslie@ncwildlife.org] US FWS/Sarah McRae [sarah_mcrae@fws.gov]; Sara Ward[sara_ward@fws.gov] DWR Planning Section/Fred Tarver[fred.tarver@ncdenr.gov];Pamela Behm[pamela.behm@ncdenr.gov] QE Q North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources 512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1611 NORTH GAROLINA 919.707.9000 ow.m.m m em�e�vi a�+im