The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About400153_Inspection_20230221Division of WatetResources Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency i Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: �j Departure Time: County: Farm Name: (,.C!/iL�tiri+5rl��itz�� A'04� �Ty� Owner Email: cz , Owner Name: Mailing Address: Phone: �`, 2 — %/, % / %� Region: "iLc2i Physical Address: ~fyZ) � 'L Facility Contact: ��(,Q,y_ G, Title: Phone: Onsite Representative: Integrator: Integrator: , Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Latitude: Certification Number: Certification Number: Design Current Design Current Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Layer Non -La er Design Current Dry Pnultry Canacity Pon. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ereevidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? Longitude: Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow .Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes EZ"No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE jl�es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued Facili Number: O - Date of Inspection: Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 0�No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): d 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR Aft- 7. r o any of the structure ne nb? 6 (� ) ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) Ammy part of the waste management system other than the waste structure=� - e -Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE na nan ,enter% Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA EdNE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes RrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. ❑ WUP [:]Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements 2�yes [:]No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes do ❑ Yes `No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA [Z�NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA eNE ❑ NA 56E ❑ Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes R(No ❑ NA ❑ NE �lected, did the fa t n �n ai rn rtljtesk�e`r`s'iaa 'Q eau,io Z�t��ra ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Condnued racili Number: j jDate of Inspection: - 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by thepermit? Ej Yes No ❑NA C2 E 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA i�l the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA VNE 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? , ] e,s [jfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ]�No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA @<E ❑ Yes ❑ Yes I ?Zo ZYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question {t): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of .facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). ��%f1Lu±.� .�C��G��!Gr..J �t/ _ � CAI'_ c�i'1Y�' �PG►lt h�G�i� �� rat 77, Mo Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Phone:�Gi—��'�� Date: 0 511212020