Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutKLRWS_IBT_ComplianceMonitoringPlan_Final This document has been prepared in accordance with the Kerr Lake Regional Water System’s 2015 Interbasin Transfer Certificate. Compliance and Monitoring Plan Prepared for Kerr Lake Regional Water System February 2016 CH2M HILL, Inc. 3120 Highwoods Blvd, Ste 214 Raleigh, NC 27604 This page has been intentionally left blank. This document has been prepared in accordance with the Kerr Lake Regional Water System’s 2015 Interbasin Transfer Certificate. Contents Section Page Acronyms and Abbreviations Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Interbasin Transfer Calculation .............................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Definitions ...................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Data Compilation............................................................................................................ 4 2.3 Data Assumptions .......................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Metering ........................................................................................................................ 6 2.5 Interbasin Transfer Calculation ....................................................................................... 7 Reporting Methodologies and Schedules ............................................................................................... 8 3.1 Quarterly Reporting........................................................................................................ 8 3.2 Annual Reporting ........................................................................................................... 8 References ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Tables 1 Interbasin Transfer Annual Statistics – 2015 Example 2 KLRWS Wholesale Water Meters 3 KLRWS Interbasin Transfer Compliance Monitoring and Reporting Figure 1 KLRWS Water Sales KLRWS IBT COMPLIANCE AND MONITORING PLAN Acronyms and Abbreviations EA Environmental Assessment FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact I&I Inflow and infiltration IBT Interbasin transfer Kerr Lake John H. Kerr Reservoir KLRWS Kerr Lake Regional Water System LWSP Local Water Supply Plan mgd million gallons per day MMD average day of a maximum month NCDEQ North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality NCDWR North Carolina Division of Water Resources NC EMC North Carolina Environmental Management Commission SGWSA South Granville Water and Sewer Authority WSRP Water Shortage Response Plan WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant 1 SECTION 1 Introduction On November 5, 2015, the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission (EMC) granted an interbasin transfer (IBT) certificate to the Kerr Lake Regional Water System (KLRWS). Permitted transfers from the Roanoke River basin include: 10.7 mgd to the Tar River basin, 1.7 mgd to the Fishing Creek basin, and 1.8 mgd to the Neuse River basin. The owners of the KLRWS and primary bulk customers served by the system are the City of Henderson, the City of Oxford, and Warren County, known as the “Partners.” Ownership responsibility is 60 percent, 20 percent, and 20 percent, respectively. They also currently sell water to secondary bulk customers including Stovall, Warrenton, Norlina, Vance County, Kittrell, and Franklin County. Future sales will occur from Oxford to South Granville Water and Sewer Authority (SGWSA) for use in Creedmoor’s service area. Franklin County owns the Youngsville water system and also sells water to Bunn and Lake Royale. Water sales are shown in Figure 1. In addition to the permitted transfer, the IBT certificate includes seven conditions (NC EMC, 2015): 1. Water Conservation Plan – Within 90 days of receipt of the IBT certificate, the KLRWS is required to submit a water conservation plan subject to approval by the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) that specifies the water conservation measures that will be implemented by the KLRWS, its Partners and its wholesale customers to ensure the efficient use of the transferred water. 2. Drought Management Plan – Within 90 days of receipt of the IBT certificate, the KLRWS is required to submit a drought management plan subject to approval by the NCDWR that specifies how the transfer will be managed to protect the source river basin (Roanoke River basin) during drought conditions or other water emergencies that occur within the source river basin. 3. Compliance and Monitoring Plan – Within 90 days of receipt of the IBT certificate, the KLRWS is required to submit a quarterly compliance and monitoring plan subject to approval by the NCDWR. 4. EMC Consideration of Alternative Sources – The EMC may reopen and amend the maximum amount of the IBT authorized if it appears that an alternative source of water is available to the Partners of the KLRWS within the receiving basin (Tar River basin, Neuse River basin, and Fishing Creek basin). 5. EMC Consideration of Future Water Demands – The EMC may reopen and amend the certificate if it is determined that the Partners’ actual future water needs are significantly less than the projected water needs at the time the certificate was granted. 6. Resale of Transferred Water – The Partners shall not resell the water that would be transferred pursuant to the IBT certificate to another public water system not listed in the certificate. 7. EMC Consideration of Impacts – The EMC may reopen the certificate and amend existing or require new conditions to ensure detrimental impacts are mitigated if environmental impacts are found to be substantially different from those on which the EMC’s Findings of Fact were based. To meet Condition 3, the following sections of this Compliance and Monitoring Plan include a description of how the KLRWS and its Partners will monitor the amount of IBT, and also as required by the certificate, methodologies, and schedules for reporting the following information:  Monthly average day transfer amounts (calculated)  Compliance with IBT certificate conditions  Reporting – both quarterly and with an annual report 2 SECTION 2 Interbasin Transfer Calculation The combined transfer from the Roanoke River basin and the amount of transfer to each river basin will be calculated on a daily basis and presented as average values for each calendar month. The methodology for calculating the daily IBT amount is consistent with NCDWR guidelines for estimating IBT amounts as part of the local water supply planning process (NCDWR, 2009). The KLRWS is a complex network of water systems and, to calculate IBT, tracking of sales to other parties and wastewater discharges is necessary. Water is transferred (and not returned to the Roanoke River basin) via potable water consumptive use and wastewater discharge. Daily IBT is calculated based on a combination of sales data and assumptions including the percentage of each customer’s service area in each river basin as reported in Local Water Supply Plans (LWSPs). Daily IBT data are then used to calculate the IBT certificate compliance metric – IBT calculated as the daily average of a calendar month. 2.1 Definitions The following definitions are used to assign collected water system data and conduct calculations for IBT compliance and monitoring, as shown in Table 1.  Water Withdrawal is the total volume of water pumped from Kerr Lake by Henderson, Oxford, and Warren County in the Roanoke River basin.  Return to the Roanoke River basin includes: - The amount of water discharged by the KLRWS water treatment plant (WTP) back to Kerr Lake as a result of the treatment process - The amount of treated wastewater discharged back to the Roanoke River basin via the City of Henderson’s wastewater treatment plant  Interbasin Transfer is calculated as the withdrawal from the source basin (Roanoke River Basin) minus the return to the source basin. IBT is then calculated for each of the three receiving basins (Tar River basin, Neuse River basin and Fishing Creek basin). Components of this calculation include: - Sales: The amount of water sold to each Partner and each wholesale customer, as metered at the point of sale. - Consumptive Use: The water used by customers that does not end up in the wastewater collection system; septic systems and irrigation are the most common consumptive uses. - Water Use Discharged as Wastewater: The non-consumptive water use discharged as wastewater in each basin, based on effluent flow meter data. The following utilities discharge in each basin: - Roanoke River Basin  Henderson  Stovall - Tar River Basin  Franklin County  Bunn  Lake Royale  Oxford 3  Granville County - Fishing Creek Basin  Warren County  Warrenton  Norlina - Neuse River Basin  SGWSA (for Creedmoor) 4 Table 1 Interbasin Transfer Annual Statistics - 2015 Example Date Withdrawal Return to Interbasin Transfer to Total IBT Month Year Roanoke Roanoke Tar Fishing Creek Neuse MAXIMUM 2015 10.7 1.7 1.8 14.2 January February March April May June July August September October November 2015 6.1 1.7 3.5 0.8 0.1 4.4 December 2015 5.8 1.2 3.8 0.7 0.1 4.6 Maximum Month Average Day 2015 1.2 3.8 0.7 0.1 4.6 5 2.2 Data Compilation Metered data are used to calculate IBT. The following data are collected and input into the KLRWS’ IBT tracking spreadsheet: - Water Withdrawal, comprising: - Kerr Lake withdrawal from the Roanoke River basin - Water Sales to the Partners and their Wholesale Customers  Henderson sells to:  Kittrell  Vance County  Franklin County. Franklin County sells to:  Bunn  Lake Royale  Oxford sells to:  Stovall  Granville County  SGWSA (future, for Creedmoor)  Warren County sells to:  Warrenton  Norlina - Water Use Discharged as Wastewater, including:  Henderson discharges to Roanoke  Kittrell discharges to the Tar River basin  Franklin County discharges to the Tar River basin  Bunn discharges to the Tar River basin  Lake Royale discharges to the Tar River basin  Oxford discharges to the Tar River basin  Stovall discharges to the Roanoke River basin  Granville County discharges to the Tar River basin  SGWSA (Creedmoor) discharges to the Tar River basin  Warren County discharges to the Fishing Creek subbasin  Warrenton discharges to the Fishing Creek subbasin  Norlina discharges to the Fishing Creek subbasin - Consumptive Use  Consumptive use in Henderson occurs in both the Roanoke and Tar River basins  Consumptive use in Kittrell is wholly in the Tar River basin  Consumptive use in Vance County occurs in both the Roanoke and Tar River basins  Consumptive use in Franklin County occurs in both the Tar and Neuse River basins  Consumptive use in Bunn occurs wholly in the Tar River basin  Consumptive use in Lake Royale occurs wholly in the Tar River basin  Consumptive use in Oxford occurs wholly in the Tar River basin  Consumptive use in Stovall occurs wholly in the Roanoke River basin  Consumptive use in Granville County occurs in both the Roanoke and Tar River basins  Consumptive use in SGWSA is wholly in the Neuse River basin  Consumptive use in Warren County occurs in both the Roanoke River Basin and the Fishing Creek subbasin  Consumptive use in Warrenton is wholly in the Fishing Creek subbasin 6  Consumptive use in Norlina occurs in both the Fishing Creek subbasin and the Roanoke River Basin 2.3 Data Assumptions The calculation of IBT is essentially similar to performing a water balance – estimating how much of the water withdrawn from the source basin ends up in each IBT basin as either treated wastewater discharge or consumptive use. The following assumptions are used to estimate consumptive use and to account for factors such as wastewater system infiltration and inflow (I/I):  The percentages of consumptive use that occurs in the source basin and each IBT receiving basin are estimated based on the percentage of each service area in each IBT basin as reported in LWSPs and the difference between total water use and wastewater discharge.  When wastewater discharge is greater than water used (including consumptive use), it is likely the result of wastewater system I/I during very rainy periods. In these instances, the proportion of water use discharged as wastewater in each IBT basin is assumed to be the same as the proportion of measured wastewater discharged in each basin. 2.4 Metering Some KLRWS wholesale customers are very small utilities with limited resources. As such, meters that track sales from the Partners and Franklin County may need to be read manually and are not currently being read daily. Instead, some meters are read monthly. The average day of a calendar month value, per the meter, will be used in data compilation for the IBT calculation. Should reporting issues arise with any of the monthly readings, the individual water provider will work with both the KLRWS and NCDWR to resolve and remedy those issues from reoccurring. This may include switching to daily readings, as deemed appropriate. Table 2 lists each wholesale customer meter and the frequency with which it is read by the water provider. Table 2 KLRWS Wholesale Water Meters Partner Customer Meter City of Henderson Franklin County daily Bunn monthly Lake Royale monthly Vance County monthly Kittrell monthly City of Oxford Stovall monthly SGWSA (future) Granville County monthly Warren County Warrenton monthly Norlina daily 7 2.5 Interbasin Transfer Calculation Generally, the sequence of the daily IBT calculations is as follows: 1. Calculate consumptive use as the difference between total water use and wastewater discharges: a. Calculate the difference for each entity. b. Calculate consumptive use by basin by using service area statistics from LWSPs. 2. Distribute consumptive use and water use discharged as wastewater by IBT basin: Tar and Neuse River basins and Fishing Creek Subbasin. 3. Calculate the total returned and used in each basin, calculated as the total amount of consumptive use and water use discharged as wastewater within the Roanoke, Tar, and Neuse River basins and the Fishing Creek subbasin. 4. Determine IBT from the Roanoke River basin to the Tar and Neuse River basins and Fishing Creek subbasin based on metered wastewater discharge and calculated consumptive use data. The average day IBT values will be calculated for each month in a calendar year from the daily IBT values developed following the calculation steps outlined herein. 8 SECTION 3 Reporting Methodologies and Schedules Compliance with the permitted IBT limits from the Roanoke River basin to the Neuse River basin, from the Roanoke River basin to the Tar River basin, and from the Roanoke River basin to the Fishing Creek subbasin, is required in the IBT certificate to be reported quarterly. The status of the additional seven conditions that the Partners must meet in order to maintain compliance with the IBT certificate will be reported annually. 3.1 Quarterly Reporting At the end of each quarter, the Partners will calculate the daily average IBT amount for each month in the quarter and submit a brief fact sheet to NCDWR within 30 days after the end of the quarter. The KLRWS will also post this information on its website (http://ci.henderson.nc.us/departments/public- utilties/kerr-lake-regional-water-system/). The schedule for quarterly reporting is as follows:  Quarter 1 (Q1) – report due by April 30 (Q1 includes January, February, and March)  Quarter 2 (Q2) – report due by July 30 (Q2 includes April, May, and June)  Quarter 3 (Q3) – report due by October 30 (Q3 includes July, August, and September)  Quarter 4 (Q4) – report due by January 30 (Q4 includes October, November, and December) 3.2 Annual Reporting By April 1 of the following year, the Partners will submit an Annual IBT Report to NCDWR with the following information: 1. Summary of historical water withdrawals, wastewater discharges, and IBT, beginning with the 2015 award date of this IBT certificate for the 2015 Annual Report and reported for the January to December calendar year thereafter. 2. Table and graph of calculated daily average of a calendar month IBT amounts for the reporting year. 3. Status of compliance with IBT certificate limits and conditions as listed in Table 3. 9 Table 3 KLRWS Interbasin Transfer Compliance Monitoring and Reporting Item Description a Comments IBT Limits (from the Roanoke River Basin) Daily average of a calendar month: - 10.7 mgd to Tar - 1.7 mgd to Fishing Creek - 1.8 mgd to Neuse - 14.2 mgd total Daily IBT is calculated. The average day of the maximum month IBT is thenreported in the Annual IBT Report. IBT calculated as the daily average of a calendar month reported on the KLRWS website quarterly and in the Annual IBT Report. The percentages of water use in each basin, summarized historically, and set for calculating daily IBT for the next year will be reported in the Annual IBT Report. Condition 1 Water Conservation Plan Initial submittal to NCDWR by February 7, 2016, and then revised as needed to obtain NCDWR approval. Water Conservation Plan will always be available on the KLRWS website. Status of the plan will be included in the Annual IBT Report. Condition 2 Drought Management Plan Initial submittal to NCDWR by February 7, 2016, and then revised as needed to obtain NCDWR approval. Updates will be provided to NCDWR as needed. Drought Management Plan will always be available on the KLRWS website. Status of the plan will be included in the Annual IBT Report. Condition 3 Compliance and Monitoring Plan Initial submittal to NCDWR by February 7, 2016, and then revised as needed to obtain NCDWR approval. Compliance and Monitoring Plan will always be available on the KLRWS website. The Annual IBT Report will always be available on the KLRWS website. Status of the plan will be included in the Annual IBT Report. Condition 4 EMC Consideration of Alternative Sources No reporting necessary. Condition 5 EMC Consideration of Future Water Demands No reporting necessary. Condition 6 Resale of Transferred Water Included in the Annual IBT Report. Condition 7 EMC Consideration of Impacts No reporting necessary. a Certificate conditions are described in Section 1. 10 SECTION 4 References North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR). 2009. Regulation of Surface Water Transfers Statutory Guidance. http://www.ncwater.org/files/IBT_guidance_v1.pdf. Accessed April 10, 2015. North Carolina Environmental Management Commission (NC EMC). 2015. Certificate Authorizing the Interbasin Transfer from the Roanoke River basin by the Kerr Lake Regional Water System. http://www.ncwater.org/?page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aleigh Durham Rocky Mount Red Oak Butner Chapel Hill Cary Tarboro Dortches Henderson Cary Wake Forest Durham Morrisville Roxboro Carrboro Oxford Roanoke Rapids Nashville Zebulon Creedmoor Rolesville Weldon Louisburg Gaston Hillsborough Enfield Stovall Stem Youngsville Franklinton Norlina Princeville Momeyer Littleton Spring Hope Elm City Bunn Leggett Castalia Warrenton Garysburg Wake Forest Whitakers Sharpsburg Hillsborough Macon Middleburg Knightdale Zebulon Halifax Seaboard Knightdale Wendell Kittrell Creedmoor Zebulon Centerville Conetoe Rolesville Elm City Weldon Pinetops Elm City WendellKnightdale Elm CityWilson NASH HALIFAX WAKE PERSON DURHAM EDGECOMBE ORANGE NORTHAMPTON CHATHAM WILSON PITTJOHNSTON ¯5 0 52.5 Miles Roanoke Rapids Lake Figure 1KLRWS Water SalesInterbasin Transfer from Roanoke River BasinIBT Compliance and Monitoring Plan LakeGaston KerrLakeMayoReservoir Lake Hyco Louisburg HendersonOxford Youngsville Creedmoor LakeRoyale FallsLake WARREN VANCE GRANVILLE FRANKLIN §¨¦40 §¨¦85 §¨¦95 Legend Interstate Highway Water Body KLRWS Partners Water Customers River Basins Major Road County Border Municipalities Major Hydrography WWTP Discharge#* Fishing Creek (15-2) Contentnea (10-2) Neuse (10-1) Tar (15-1) Roanoke (14-1) This page has been intentionally left blank.