Appendix-CD-2_Catawba-Wateree_Modeling_Results_

Simulation of CHEOPS Model to determine the
Impacts of Inter Basin Transfer of Water for Concord
Kannapolis from Catawba River Basin

DRAFT COPY

Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 1 -

This page is left blank intentionally

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 2 -
Table of Contents
PURPOSE:................................................................................................................................- 13 -
A. MODEL Background:.......................................................................................................- 13 -
B. Model Description:...........................................................................................................- 14 -
C. Background Data:.............................................................................................................- 14 -
Temporal Data:.....................................................................................................................- 15 -
Inflow:...................................................................................................................................- 16 -
1. Inflow Estimation based on Historical Reservoir Operation....................................- 16 -
2. Adjustments of Inflow Data......................................................................................- 16 -
Evaporation/Rainfall:............................................................................................................- 16 -
Water Withdrawal/Demand and corresponding Return Flows:............................................- 16 -
D. Model Flexibility/Functionality:.......................................................................................- 17 -
E. Model Enhancements:.......................................................................................................- 17 -
Low Inflow Protocol [LIP]:..................................................................................................- 17 -
Mutual Gains:........................................................................................................................- 17 -
F. Modeling Assumptions for the IBT Runs:........................................................................- 18 -
Input Data:............................................................................................................................- 18 -
IBT Quantities and Distributions:.........................................................................................- 19 -
G. Model Results:..................................................................................................................- 20 -
Data Format:.........................................................................................................................- 20 -
Summary of Results:.............................................................................................................- 20 -
4. LIP Summary Plots:..................................................................................................- 21 -
2. LIP Summary Sheets:...............................................................................................- 26 -
3. Annual Duration of Total Outflows..........................................................................- 33 -
4. Annual Duration of Elevations at .............................................................................- 49 -
5. Generation Summary Plot.........................................................................................- 66 -
6. Generation Summary Table......................................................................................- 82 -
7. Performance Measure Sheets Table..........................................................................- 82 -
8. Elevation Condition in Dry Years.............................................................................- 95 -
9. Storage Condition in Dry Years..............................................................................- 111 -
10. Elevation Haze Charts:.......................................................................................- 128 -
11. OUTFLOW HAZE CHARTS:...........................................................................- 170 -
12. Impacts of NEW LIP data set:............................................................................- 211 -
References:..............................................................................................................................- 238 -

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 3 -

List of Tables

Table 1: Drainage Area of the sub basins [in sq-miles]...................................................- 14 -
Table 2: Reservoir Sizes/Capacities ....................................................................................- 15 -
Table 3: IBT Monthly distribution............................................................................................- 19 -
Table 4: Total Monthly Distributions with and without IBT from...........................................- 19 -
Table 5: LIP Summary for Impacts of IBT Quantities for MG 08...........................................- 26 -
Table 6: LIP Summary for Impacts of IBT Quantities for MG 08 CF .....................................- 27 -
Table 7: LIP Summary for Impacts of IBT Quantities for MG 35...........................................- 28 -
Table 8: LIP Summary for Impacts of IBT Quantities for MG 35 CF .....................................- 29 -
Table 9: LIP Summary for Impacts of IBT Locations for MG 35 MI......................................- 30 -
Table 10: LIP Summary for Impacts of Increased Instream Flows for MG 35 NGO ..............- 31 -
Table 11: LIP Summary for Impacts of Increased Instream Flows for MG 35CF NGO .........- 32 -
Table 12 : Bridgewater Performances Sheet.............................................................................- 83 -
Table 13 : Rhodhiss Performances Sheet..................................................................................- 84 -
Table 14: Oxford Performance Sheet .......................................................................................- 85 -
Table 15: Lookout Shoals Performance Sheet..........................................................................- 86 -
Table 16: Cowan Ford [Norman] Performance Sheet ..............................................................- 87 -
Table 17: Mountain Island Performance Sheet.........................................................................- 88 -
Table 18: Wylie Performance Sheet .........................................................................................- 89 -
Table 19: Fishing Creek Performance Sheet ............................................................................- 90 -
Table 20: Great Falls Performance Sheet .................................................................................- 91 -
Table 21: Rocky Creek [Cedar] Performance Sheet.................................................................- 92 -
Table 22: Wateree Performance Sheet......................................................................................- 93 -
Table 23: Catawba Reservoir System Performance Sheet........................................................- 94 -
Table 24 : LIP for MG 35 [old LIP].......................................................................................- 212 -
Table 25: LIP for MG 35 LIP [new LIP]................................................................................- 213 -
Table 26 : LIP for MG 35 CF [old LIP]..................................................................................- 214 -
Table 26: LIP for MG 35 CF LIP [new LIP]..........................................................................- 215 -

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 4 -

List of Figures

Figure 1: The schematic diagram of the river system [used in CHEOPS interface]................- 15 -
Figure 2: LIP Stages for Impacts of All IBT Quantities...........................................................- 21 -
Figure 3: LIP Stages for Impacts of IBT Quantities for Scenario “MG 08”............................- 21 -
Figure 4: LIP Stages for Impacts of IBT Quantities for Scenario “MG 08 CF”......................- 22 -
Figure 5: LIP Stages for Impacts of IBT Quantities for Scenario “MG 35”............................- 22 -
Figure 6: LIP Stages for Impacts of IBT Quantities for Scenario “MG 35 CF”......................- 23 -
Figure 7: LIP Stages for Impacts of IBT Locations for all IBT Locations........................- 23 -
Figure 8: LIP Stages for Impacts of IBT Locations for Scenario “MG 35 MI”.......................- 24 -
Figure 9: LIP Stages for Impacts of Increased Instream Flows with IBT”..............................- 24 -
Figure 10: LIP Stages for Impacts of Increased Instream Flows for Scenario “MG 35 NGO”- 25 -
Figure 11: LIP for Impacts of Increased Instream Flows Stages for Scenario “MG 35 CF NGO”.-
25 -
Figure 12: Outflow Duration plot of BW for Impacts of IBT Quantity ...................................- 33 -
Figure 13: Outflow Duration plot of BW for Impacts of IBT Locations..................................- 33 -
Figure 14: Outflow Duration plot of BW for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 34 -
Figure 15: Outflow Duration plot of RH for Impacts of IBT Quantity ....................................- 34 -
Figure 16: Outflow Duration plot of RH for Impacts of IBT Locations ..................................- 35 -
Figure 17: Outflow Duration plot of RH for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 35 -
Figure 18: Outflow Duration plot of OX for Impacts of IBT Quantity....................................- 36 -
Figure 19: Outflow Duration plot of OX for Impacts of IBT Locations ..................................- 36 -
Figure 20: Outflow Duration plot of OX for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 37 -
Figure 21: Outflow Duration plot of LS for Impacts of IBT Quantity.....................................- 37 -
Figure 22: Outflow Duration plot of LS for Impacts of IBT Locations ...................................- 38 -
Figure 23: Outflow Duration plot of LS for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 38 -
Figure 24: Outflow Duration plot of CF for Impacts of IBT Quantity.....................................- 39 -
Figure 25: Outflow Duration plot of CF for Impacts of IBT Locations...................................- 39 -
Figure 26: Outflow Duration plot of CF for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 40 -
Figure 27: Outflow Duration plot of MI for Impacts of IBT Quantity.....................................- 40 -
Figure 28: Outflow Duration plot of MI for Impacts of IBT Locations...................................- 41 -
Figure 29: Outflow Duration plot of MI for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 41 -
Figure 30: Outflow Duration plot of WY for Impacts of IBT Quantity...................................- 42 -
Figure 31: Outflow Duration plot of WY for Impacts of IBT Locations .................................- 42 -
Figure 32: Outflow Duration plot of WY for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 43 -
Figure 33: Outflow Duration plot of FC for Impacts of IBT Quantity.....................................- 43 -
Figure 34: Outflow Duration plot of FC for Impacts of IBT Locations...................................- 44 -
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 5 -
Figure 35: Outflow Duration plot of FC for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT ....................................................................................................................................- 44 -
Figure 36: Outflow Duration plot of GF for Impacts of IBT Quantity.....................................- 45 -
Figure 37: Outflow Duration plot of GF for Impacts of IBT Locations...................................- 45 -
Figure 38: Outflow Duration plot of GF for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 46 -
Figure 39: Outflow Duration plot of RC for Impacts of IBT Quantity ....................................- 46 -
Figure 40: Outflow Duration plot of RC for Impacts of IBT Locations...................................- 47 -
Figure 41: Outflow Duration plot of RC for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 47 -
Figure 42: Outflow Duration plot of WA for Impacts of IBT Quantity...................................- 48 -
Figure 43: Outflow Duration plot of WA for Impacts of IBT Locations .................................- 48 -
Figure 44: Outflow Duration plot of WA for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 49 -
Figure 45: Elevation Duration plot of BW for Impacts of IBT Quantity .................................- 49 -
Figure 46: Elevation Duration plot of BW for Impacts of IBT Locations................................- 50 -
Figure 47: Elevation Duration plot of BW for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 50 -
Figure 48: Elevation Duration plot of RH for Impacts of IBT Quantity..................................- 51 -
Figure 49: Elevation Duration plot of RH for Impacts of IBT Locations ................................- 51 -
Figure 50: Elevation Duration plot of RH for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 52 -
Figure 51: Elevation Duration plot of OX for Impacts of IBT Quantity..................................- 52 -
Figure 52: Elevation Duration plot of OX for Impacts of IBT Locations ................................- 53 -
Figure 53: Elevation Duration plot of OX for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 53 -
Figure 54: Elevation Duration plot of LS for Impacts of IBT Quantity..................................- 54 -
Figure 55: Elevation Duration plot of LS for Impacts of IBT Locations ................................- 54 -
Figure 56: Elevation Duration plot of LS for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 55 -
Figure 57: Elevation Duration plot of CF for Impacts of IBT Quantity..................................- 55 -
Figure 58: Elevation Duration plot of CF for Impacts of IBT Locations................................- 56 -
Figure 59: Elevation Duration plot of CF for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 56 -
Figure 60: Elevation Duration plot of MI for Impacts of IBT Quantity..................................- 57 -
Figure 61: Elevation Duration plot of MI for Impacts of IBT Locations................................- 57 -
Figure 62: Elevation Duration plot of MI for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 58 -
Figure 63: Elevation Duration plot of WY for Impacts of IBT Quantity................................- 58 -
Figure 64: Elevation Duration plot of WY for Impacts of IBT Locations ..............................- 59 -
Figure 65: Elevation Duration plot of WY for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 59 -
Figure 66: Elevation Duration plot of FC for Impacts of IBT Quantity..................................- 60 -
Figure 67: Elevation Duration plot of FC for Impacts of IBT Locations................................- 60 -
Figure 68: Elevation Duration plot of FC for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 61 -
Figure 69: Elevation Duration plot of GF for Impacts of IBT Quantity..................................- 61 -
Figure 70: Elevation Duration plot of GF for Impacts of IBT Locations................................- 62 -
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 6 -
Figure 71: Elevation Duration plot of GF for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 62 -
Figure 72: Elevation Duration plot of RC for Impacts of IBT Quantity .................................- 63 -
Figure 73: Elevation Duration plot of RC for Impacts of IBT Locations................................- 63 -
Figure 74: Elevation Duration plot of RC for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 64 -
Figure 75: Elevation Duration plot of WA for Impacts of IBT Quantity................................- 64 -
Figure 76: Elevation Duration plot of WA for Impacts of IBT Locations ...............................- 65 -
Figure 77: Elevation Duration plot of WA for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 65 -
Figure 78: Annual Generation Plot of BW for Impacts of IBT Quantity.................................- 66 -
Figure 79: Annual Generation Plot of BW for Impacts of IBT Locations ...............................- 66 -
Figure 80: Annual Generation Plot of BW for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 67 -
Figure 81: Annual Generation Plot of RH for Impacts of IBT Quantity..................................- 67 -
Figure 82: Annual Generation Plot of RH for Impacts of IBT Locations ................................- 68 -
Figure 83: Annual Generation Plot of RH for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 68 -
Figure 84: Annual Generation Plot of OX for Impacts of IBT Quantity..................................- 69 -
Figure 85: Annual Generation Plot of OX for Impacts of IBT Locations................................- 69 -
Figure 86: Annual Generation Plot of OX for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 70 -
Figure 87: Annual Generation Plot of LS for Impacts of IBT Quantity...................................- 70 -
Figure 88: Annual Generation Plot of LS for Impacts of IBT Locations.................................- 71 -
Figure 89: Annual Generation Plot of LS for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 71 -
Figure 90: Annual Generation Plot of CF for Impacts of IBT Quantity...................................- 72 -
Figure 91: Annual Generation Plot of CF for Impacts of IBT Locations.................................- 72 -
Figure 92: Annual Generation Plot of CF for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 73 -
Figure 93: Annual Generation Plot of MI for Impacts of IBT Quantity...................................- 73 -
Figure 94: Annual Generation Plot of MI for Impacts of IBT Locations.................................- 74 -
Figure 95: Annual Generation Plot of MI for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 74 -
Figure 96: Annual Generation Plot of WY for Impacts of IBT Quantity.................................- 75 -
Figure 97: Annual Generation Plot of WY for Impacts of IBT Locations...............................- 75 -
Figure 98: Annual Generation Plot of WY for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 76 -
Figure 99: Annual Generation Plot of FC for Impacts of IBT Quantity...................................- 76 -
Figure 100: Annual Generation Plot of FC for Impacts of IBT Locations...............................- 77 -
Figure 101: Annual Generation Plot of FC for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 77 -
Figure 102: Annual Generation Plot of GF for Impacts of IBT Quantity ................................- 78 -
Figure 103: Annual Generation Plot of GF Impacts of IBT Locations ....................................- 78 -
Figure 104: Annual Generation Plot of GF Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 79 -
Figure 105: Annual Generation Plot of RCfor Impacts of IBT Quantity.................................- 79 -
Figure 106: Annual Generation Plot of RC for Impacts of IBT Locations ..............................- 80 -
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 7 -
Figure 107: Annual Generation Plot of RC for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT ....................................................................................................................................- 80 -
Figure 108: Annual Generation Plot of WA for Impacts of IBT Quantity...............................- 81 -
Figure 109: Annual Generation Plot of WA for Impacts of IBT Locations.............................- 81 -
Figure 110: Annual Generation Plot of WA for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement
with IBT....................................................................................................................................- 82 -
Figure 111: BW Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation ...................................- 95 -
Figure 112: BW Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation .................................- 95 -
Figure 113: BW Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on
Elevation ...................................................................................................................................- 96 -
Figure 114: RH Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation....................................- 96 -
Figure 115: RH Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation ..................................- 97 -
Figure 116: RH Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on
Elevation ...................................................................................................................................- 97 -
Figure 117: OX Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation....................................- 98 -
Figure 118: OX Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation..................................- 98 -
Figure 119: OX Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on
Elevation ...................................................................................................................................- 99 -
Figure 120: LS Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation.....................................- 99 -
Figure 121: LS Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation .................................- 100 -
Figure 122: LS Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on
Elevation .................................................................................................................................- 100 -
Figure 123: CF Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation...................................- 101 -
Figure 124: CF Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation.................................- 101 -
Figure 125: CF Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on
Elevation .................................................................................................................................- 102 -
Figure 126: MI Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation...................................- 102 -
Figure 127: MI Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation.................................- 103 -
Figure 128: MI Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on
Elevation .................................................................................................................................- 103 -
Figure 129: WY Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation.................................- 104 -
Figure 130: WY Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation ...............................- 104 -
Figure 131: WY Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on
Elevation .................................................................................................................................- 105 -
Figure 132: FC Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation...................................- 105 -
Figure 133: FC Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation.................................- 106 -
Figure 134: FC Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on
Elevation .................................................................................................................................- 106 -
Figure 135: GF Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation...................................- 107 -
Figure 136: GF Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation.................................- 107 -
Figure 137: GF Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on
Elevation .................................................................................................................................- 108 -
Figure 138: RC Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation ..................................- 108 -
Figure 139: RC Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation ................................- 109 -
Figure 140: RC Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on
Elevation .................................................................................................................................- 109 -
Figure 141: WA Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation.................................- 110 -
Figure 142: WA Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation ...............................- 110 -
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 8 -
Figure 143: WA Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on
Elevation .................................................................................................................................- 111 -
Figure 144: BW Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity...........................................................- 111 -
Figure 145: BW Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations .........................................................- 112 -
Figure 146: BW Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT....- 112 -
Figure 147: RH Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity............................................................- 113 -
Figure 148: RH Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations ..........................................................- 113 -
Figure 149: RH Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT.....- 114 -
Figure 150: OX Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity............................................................- 114 -
Figure 151: OX Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations..........................................................- 115 -
Figure 152: OX Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT.....- 115 -
Figure 153: LS Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity.............................................................- 116 -
Figure 154: : LS Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations.........................................................- 116 -
Figure 155: : LS Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT....- 117 -
Figure 156: CF Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity.............................................................- 117 -
Figure 157: CF Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations...........................................................- 118 -
Figure 158: CF Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT .....- 118 -
Figure 159: MI Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity.............................................................- 119 -
Figure 160: MI Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations...........................................................- 119 -
Figure 161: MI Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT .....- 120 -
Figure 162: WY Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity...........................................................- 120 -
Figure 163: WY Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations .........................................................- 121 -
Figure 164: WY Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT....- 121 -
Figure 165: FC Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity.............................................................- 122 -
Figure 166: FC Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations...........................................................- 122 -
Figure 167: FC Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT .....- 123 -
Figure 168: GF Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity.............................................................- 123 -
Figure 169: GF Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations...........................................................- 124 -
Figure 170: GF Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT .....- 124 -
Figure 171: RC Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity ............................................................- 125 -
Figure 172: RC Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations...........................................................- 125 -
Figure 173: RC Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT.....- 126 -
Figure 174: WA Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity...........................................................- 126 -
Figure 175: WA Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations .........................................................- 127 -
Figure 176: WA Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT....- 127 -
Figure 177: BW Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08.................................................................- 128 -
Figure 178: BW Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF...........................................................- 128 -
Figure 179 : BW Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35................................................................- 129 -
Figure 180: BW Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF...........................................................- 129 -
Figure 181: BW Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI...........................................................- 130 -
Figure 182: BW Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO .......................................................- 130 -
Figure 183: BW Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO .................................................- 131 -
Figure 184: RH Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08..................................................................- 131 -
Figure 185: RH Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF............................................................- 132 -
Figure 186: RH Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35..................................................................- 132 -
Figure 187: RH Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF...........................................................- 133 -
Figure 188: RH Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI...........................................................- 133 -
Figure 189: RH Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO ........................................................- 134 -
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 9 -
Figure 190: RH Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO ..................................................- 134 -
Figure 191: OX Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08..................................................................- 135 -
Figure 192: OX Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF............................................................- 135 -
Figure 193: OX Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35..................................................................- 136 -
Figure 194: OX Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF............................................................- 136 -
Figure 195: OX Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI............................................................- 137 -
Figure 196: OX Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO........................................................- 137 -
Figure 197: OX Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO..................................................- 138 -
Figure 198: LS Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08...................................................................- 138 -
Figure 199: LS Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF.............................................................- 139 -
Figure 200: LS Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35...................................................................- 139 -
Figure 201: LS Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF.............................................................- 140 -
Figure 202: LS Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI.............................................................- 140 -
Figure 203: LS Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO.........................................................- 141 -
Figure 204: LS Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO ...................................................- 141 -
Figure 205: CF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08...................................................................- 142 -
Figure 206: CF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF.............................................................- 142 -
Figure 207: CF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35...................................................................- 143 -
Figure 208: CF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF.............................................................- 143 -
Figure 209: CF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI.............................................................- 144 -
Figure 210: CF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO.........................................................- 144 -
Figure 211: CF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO...................................................- 145 -
Figure 212: MI Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08...................................................................- 145 -
Figure 213: MI Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF.............................................................- 146 -
Figure 214: MOUNTAIN ISLAND chart for MG 35 ............................................................- 146 -
Figure 215: MOUNTAIN ISLAND chart for MG 35 CF.......................................................- 147 -
Figure 216: MOUNTAIN ISLAND chart for MG 35 MI......................................................- 147 -
Figure 217: MOUNTAIN ISLAND chart for MG 35 NGO...................................................- 148 -
Figure 218: MI Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35...................................................................- 148 -
Figure 219: MI Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF.............................................................- 149 -
Figure 220: MI Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI.............................................................- 149 -
Figure 221: MI Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO.........................................................- 150 -
Figure 222: MI Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO...................................................- 150 -
Figure 223: WY Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08.................................................................- 151 -
Figure 224: WY Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF...........................................................- 151 -
Figure 225: WY Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35.................................................................- 152 -
Figure 226: WY Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF...........................................................- 152 -
Figure 227: WY Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI...........................................................- 153 -
Figure 228: WY Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO.......................................................- 153 -
Figure 229: WY Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO .................................................- 154 -
Figure 230: FC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08...................................................................- 154 -
Figure 231: FC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF.............................................................- 155 -
Figure 232: FISHING CREEK Chart for MG 35...................................................................- 155 -
Figure 233: FISHING CREEK Chart for MG 35CF ..............................................................- 156 -
Figure 234: FISHING CREEK Chart for MG 35 MI.............................................................- 156 -
Figure 235: FISHING CREEK Chart for MG 35 NGO .........................................................- 157 -
Figure 236: FC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35...................................................................- 157 -
Figure 237: FC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35CF..............................................................- 158 -
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 10 -
Figure 238: FC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI.............................................................- 158 -
Figure 239: FC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO.........................................................- 159 -
Figure 240: FC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO...................................................- 159 -
Figure 241: GF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 ..................................................................- 160 -
Figure 242: GF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF ............................................................- 160 -
Figure 243: GF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 ..................................................................- 161 -
Figure 244: GF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF ............................................................- 161 -
Figure 245: GF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI ............................................................- 162 -
Figure 246: GF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO.........................................................- 162 -
Figure 247: GF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO...................................................- 163 -
Figure 248: RC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08..................................................................- 163 -
Figure 249: RC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF............................................................- 164 -
Figure 250: RC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35..................................................................- 164 -
Figure 251: RC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF............................................................- 165 -
Figure 252: RC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI............................................................- 165 -
Figure 253: RC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO ........................................................- 166 -
Figure 254: RC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO...................................................- 166 -
Figure 255: WA Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08.................................................................- 167 -
Figure 256: WA Elevation Haze Chart for MG CF................................................................- 167 -
Figure 257: WA Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35.................................................................- 168 -
Figure 258: WA Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF...........................................................- 168 -
Figure 259: WA Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI...........................................................- 169 -
Figure 260: WA Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO.......................................................- 169 -
Figure 261: WA Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO .................................................- 170 -
Figure 262: BW Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08...................................................................- 170 -
Figure 263: BW Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF.............................................................- 171 -
Figure 264: BRIDGEWATER Chart for 35 ..........................................................................- 171 -
Figure 265: BRIDGEWATER Chart for 35 CF ....................................................................- 172 -
Figure 266: BRIDGEWATER Chart for 35 MI .....................................................................- 172 -
Figure 267: BRIDGEWATER Chart for 35 NGO..................................................................- 173 -
Figure 268: BW Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35...................................................................- 173 -
Figure 269: BW Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF.............................................................- 174 -
Figure 270: BW Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI.............................................................- 174 -
Figure 271: BW Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO .........................................................- 175 -
Figure 272: BW Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO ...................................................- 175 -
Figure 273: RH Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08....................................................................- 176 -
Figure 274: RH Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF..............................................................- 176 -
Figure 275: RH Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35....................................................................- 177 -
Figure 276: RH Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF..............................................................- 177 -
Figure 277: RH Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI..............................................................- 178 -
Figure 278: RH Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO ..........................................................- 178 -
Figure 279: RH Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO ....................................................- 179 -
Figure 280: OX Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08....................................................................- 179 -
Figure 281: OX Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF..............................................................- 180 -
Figure 282: OX Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35....................................................................- 180 -
Figure 283: OX Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF..............................................................- 181 -
Figure 284: OX Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI..............................................................- 181 -
Figure 285: OX Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO..........................................................- 182 -
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 11 -
Figure 286: OX Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO....................................................- 182 -
Figure 287: LS Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08.....................................................................- 183 -
Figure 288: LS Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF...............................................................- 183 -
Figure 289: LS Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35.....................................................................- 184 -
Figure 290: LS Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF...............................................................- 185 -
Figure 291: LS Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI...............................................................- 185 -
Figure 292: LS Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO...........................................................- 185 -
Figure 293: LS Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO ....................................................- 186 -
Figure 294: CF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08.....................................................................- 186 -
Figure 295: CF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF...............................................................- 187 -
Figure 296: CF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35....................................................................- 187 -
Figure 297: CF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF..............................................................- 188 -
Figure 298: CF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI...............................................................- 188 -
Figure 299: CF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO...........................................................- 189 -
Figure 300: CF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO....................................................- 189 -
Figure 301: MI Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08.....................................................................- 190 -
Figure 302: MI Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF...............................................................- 190 -
Figure 303: MI Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35.....................................................................- 191 -
Figure 304: MI Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF..............................................................- 191 -
Figure 305: MI Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI...............................................................- 192 -
Figure 306: MI Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO...........................................................- 192 -
Figure 307: MI Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO.....................................................- 193 -
Figure 308: WY Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08...................................................................- 193 -
Figure 309: WY Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF.............................................................- 194 -
Figure 310: WY Outflow Haze Chart for for MG 35...........................................................- 194 -
Figure 311: WY Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF.............................................................- 195 -
Figure 312: WY Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI.............................................................- 195 -
Figure 313: WY Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO........................................................- 196 -
Figure 314: WY Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO ...................................................- 196 -
Figure 315: FC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08.....................................................................- 197 -
Figure 316: FC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF...............................................................- 197 -
Figure 317: FC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35.....................................................................- 198 -
Figure 318: FC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF...............................................................- 198 -
Figure 319: FC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI...............................................................- 199 -
Figure 320: FC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO...........................................................- 199 -
Figure 321: FC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO.....................................................- 200 -
Figure 322: GF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 ....................................................................- 200 -
Figure 323: GF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF ..............................................................- 201 -
Figure 324: GF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 ....................................................................- 201 -
Figure 325: GF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF ..............................................................- 202 -
Figure 326: GF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI ..............................................................- 202 -
Figure 327: GF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO...........................................................- 203 -
Figure 328: GF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO.....................................................- 203 -
Figure 329: RC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08...................................................................- 204 -
Figure 330: RC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF ..............................................................- 204 -
Figure 331: RC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35....................................................................- 205 -
Figure 332: RC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF ..............................................................- 205 -
Figure 333: RC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI ..............................................................- 206 -
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 12 -
Figure 334: RC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO ..........................................................- 206 -
Figure 335: RC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO.....................................................- 207 -
Figure 336: WA Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08...................................................................- 207 -
Figure 337: WA Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF.............................................................- 208 -
Figure 338: WA Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35...................................................................- 208 -
Figure 339: WA Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF.............................................................- 209 -
Figure 340: WA Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI.............................................................- 209 -
Figure 341: WA Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO.........................................................- 210 -
Figure 342: WA Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO ...................................................- 210 -
Figure 343: LIP Stages for MG 35 and MG 35 LIP ...............................................................- 211 -
Figure 344: Bridgewater Elevations with New LIP ...........................................................- 216 -
Figure 345: Rhodhiss Elevations with New LIP................................................................- 217 -
Figure 346: Oxford Elevations with New LIP.....................................................................- 218 -
Figure 347: Lookout Shoals Elevations with New LIP..........................................................- 219 -
Figure 348: Cowan Ford Elevations with New LIP...........................................................- 220 -
Figure 349: Mountain Island Elevations with New LIP ........................................................- 221 -
Figure 350: Wylie Elevations with New LIP.......................................................................- 222 -
Figure 351: Fishing Creek Elevations with New LIP........................................................- 223 -
Figure 352: Great Falls Elevations with New LIP .............................................................- 224 -
Figure 353: Rocky Creek Elevations with New LIP..........................................................- 225 -
Figure 354: Wateree Elevations with New LIP..................................................................- 226 -
Figure 355: Bridgewater Storage with New LIP................................................................- 227 -
Figure 356: Rhodhiss Storage with New LIP.....................................................................- 228 -
Figure 357: Oxford Storage with New LIP .........................................................................- 229 -
Figure 358: Lookout Shoals Storage with New LIP..........................................................- 230 -
Figure 359: Cowan Ford Storage with New LIP ...............................................................- 231 -
Figure 360: Mountain Island Storage with New LIP.........................................................- 232 -
Figure 361: Wyile Storage with New LIP ...........................................................................- 233 -
Figure 362: Fishing Creek Storage with New LIP.............................................................- 234 -
Figure 363: Great Falls Storage with New LIP..................................................................- 235 -
Figure 364: Rocky Creek Storage with New LIP ..............................................................- 236 -
Figure 366: Wateree Storage with New LIP......................................................................- 237 -

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 13 -

PURPOSE:

A study has been conducted to determine the impacts of Inter Basin Transfer [IBT] of
water from Catawba River basin using a hydropower system simulation model
CHEOPS. A brief description of the model, background input data and results are
discussed in this report.
A. MODEL Background:

Computer Hydro- Electric Operations and Planning Software CHEOPSTM for Catawba
River basin developed for Duke Power during the process of relicensing has been
simulated to see the impacts of the water transferred as IBT from Catawba River basin.
Duke Power contracted Devine Tarbell & Associates, Inc [DTA] to develop the CHEOPS
and the 1st version was released to the stakeholders in January 2005. Since then it has
gone through several major modifications along with addition of more features. The
current version of the model is Catawba-Wateree CHEOPS Interface 8.3 released in
mid October 2005. There is no basin specific model report or user manual for Catawba
-Wateree Cheops released by DTA. A generic report documented by DTA has been
attached to Appendix –CD-2A [CHEOPS Generic Documentation.pdf. ]

The following brief description of the model, data and analyses done for the simulation
with IBT are provided based on the trainings given by Duke/DTA and working
knowledge gathered during the last several months.

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 14 -
B. Model Description:

CHEOPS is designed for long term analysis of the effects of operational and physical
changes made to the modeled hydro-system. It is not designed for real time scheduling.

The model is developed for Catawba – Wateree project. There are 11 hydroelectric
reservoirs along the river in North Carolina and South Carolina operated by Duke
Power. The names of the reservoirs and their project or plant names used in the model
and also in the analysis from upstream to downstream are as follows:

Reservoir Names Project Names
1. Lake James Bridgewater [BW]
2. Lake Rhodhiss Rhodhiss [RH]
3. Lake Hickory Oxford [OX]
4. Lake Lookout Shoals Lookout Shoals [LS]
5. Lake Norman Cowan Ford [CF]
6. Lake Mountain Island Mountain Island [MI]
7. Lake Wylie Wylie [WY]
8. Lake Fishing Creek Fishing Creek [FC]
9. Lake Great Falls/Dearborn Great Falls [GF]
10. Lake Rocky Creek/Cedar Creek Rocky Creek [RC]
11. Lake Wateree Wateree [WA]

C. Background Data:

Table 1: Drainage Area of the sub basins [in sq-miles]

Project Drainage Area
(from ICD)
Bridgewater 380
Rhodhis 1,090
Oxford 1,310
Lookout Shoals 1,450
Cowans Ford 1,790
Mtn. Island 1,860
Wylie 3,020
Fishing Creek 3,810
Great Falls/Dearborn 4,100
Rocky Creek/Cedar Creek 4,360
Wateree 4,750

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 15 -

Figure 1: The schematic diagram of the river system [used in CHEOPS interface].

Table 2: Reservoir Sizes/Capacities

Bridgewater Rhodhiss Oxford Lookout shoals Cowans Ford Mtn Island Wylie Fishing Cr Great Falls Cedar Cr Wateree NUS
Full Pond Storage, ac-ft 280,076 46,357 126,990 25,043 1,067,396 59,618 233,618 39,953 5,025 17,690 256,196
Critical Datum, ft 61 89.4 94 74.9 90 94.3 92.6 95 87.2 80.3 88.5
Full Pond Elevation, ft 1200 995.1 935 838.1 760 647.5 569.4 417.2 355.8 284.4 225.5
Critical Elevation, ft 1161 984.5 929 813 750 641.8 562 412.2 343 264.7 214
Storage @ Critical Elevation, ac-ft 98,789 28,521 103,767 8,274 769,254 44,669 160,707 25,633 1,380 6,197 135,401
Normal Usable Storage (NUS), ac-ft 181,287 17,836 23,223 16,769 298,142 14,949 72,911 14,320 3,645 11,493 120,796 775,370

Temporal Data:
The model simulates for the period from 01/01/1929 to 12/31/2003, 75 yrs of daily
hydrological data. The input for hydrological data are in daily format; however the
outputs are in daily for reservoir/river conditions and 15 min time steps for both
hydro operation and reservoir conditions.

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 16 -
Inflow:
1. Inflow Estimation based on Historical Reservoir Operation
The inflows at the plant locations are not available. Therefore, DTA chose to use
historical hydro generation data to convert to estimate inflows at the plant locations.
See Appendix – CD-2B [example file: 01BW-1-18-05.xls]

2. Adjustments of Inflow Data
The inflows generated as above also generated numerous negative inflows. All
reservoirs Itrib data has been adjusted to remove negatives by using USGS gage,
NC runoff isohyets map and engineering judgments as appropriate with emphasis on
trying to maintain the Mass Volume close to the Inflow Raw value generated in the
1st step. Minimum values to replace negatives were selected based on review of DA
and runoff production based on the cfs/sq mi and using flow duration curves from
unregulated gages. The adjusted Inflows were used as the inflow to the CHEOPS
model to compare to historical Duke Generation numbers for each plant and system
wide. In the next step it was refined based on generation comparison. The details of
the procedure can be found in Appendix – CD-2C [Inflow ComparisonJce March10 Ralph charts.xls]

Evaporation/Rainfall:
In the model, daily evaporation coefficients were used to estimate evaporations from
each reservoir, however rainfall data has not been included.

Water Withdrawal/Demand and corresponding Return Flows:
During the relicensing process a water supply study report was prepared by HDR in
April 2005. In this report future water demand is projected for the next five decades.
Duke’s license will be renewed for the next 50 yrs starting from 2008. Therefore,
2008 water demand or withdrawal data is considered to be current demand.

In the water supply study report, return flows were also estimated and projected for
the same time horizon. Return flows are not necessarily a function of the water
withdrawals from each reservoir or to that specific watershed from where it was
withdrawn. Rather these are the functions of withdrawals from different combinations
of reservoirs. The projected return flow percents to a specific reservoir for different
decades also vary. See Appendix – CD-2G [HDR Withdrawal_Return Flow.xls]

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 17 -
D. Model Flexibility/Functionality:

Model can be run for a varieties of physical, operational and generation settings for
individual plants. The current condition with 2008 demand is called Baseline
scenario. Any change to reflect operational condition proposed by the water user /
interest groups with 2008 demand is called current licensed condition [which is MG
08 in this analysis].

Currently the model is not run with routing options at each node as it takes up
tremendous memory in the hard drive and also takes several days to run for the
entire period of records.

There are options to vary the physical /or operational conditions such as future
sedimentation effect or projected withdrawal effect over the period of records or just
fix the sedimentation to current condition and change the withdrawal to any optional
year of demand.

E. Model Enhancements:
Low Inflow Protocol [LIP]:
This new feature has been added to the model to comply with the established LIP
adopted during the relicensing process to simulate operational constraints
effectively. The purpose of the LIP was to establish procedures for reductions in
water use during periods of low inflow to the Catawba-Wateree reservoir system.
This LIP provides trigger points and procedures for how the Catawba-Wateree
reservoir system will be operated as well as water withdrawal reduction measures
for other water users during periods of low inflow (i.e., periods when there is not
enough water flowing into the reservoirs to meet the normal water demands plus
maintain lake levels within the normal ranges). The LIP was developed on the basis
that all parties with interests in water quantity will share the responsibility to
conserve the limited water supply. To find more details of the LIP report, refer to
Appendix – CD-2D[CWRel Attachement G (LIP) 07-15-05.pdf] ]. The input data for LIP is in
Appendix – CD-2F1 [LIP_Base.xls].

A modification has been added to the LIP data set after this analysis was started in
November. For the purpose of keeping all analyses consistent, the old LIP data set
was used. The new set has been used for the comparison with old set for one model
scenario run. The data for the new LIP is in Appendix – CD-2F2 [New Lip_Base.xls].
Mutual Gains:
To meet the demands needed for municipalities or public use, to maintain
recommended water levels at the reservoirs and rives within the normal ranges for a
safe and sound ecosystem and seasonal public recreational activities, several
scenarios were simulated by DTA to establish a demand schedule where all
interested parties are benefited equally. This scenario is called Mutual Gain
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 18 -
Scenario [MG]. This scenario uses demands for municipal use for the year 2008.
The current licensed condition is MG scenario which also includes operational
constraint LIP. This scenario is modeled as “MG 08” and is the base case for our
comparison. For the details of the MG data refer to Appendix – CD-2E2 [Mututal Gain
Data_9-16-05.PDF]

The NGOs also recommended increased flows for the streams. These increased
flows were also modeled to see the ultimate effect of IBT. The tables for the modified
increase flows recommended by the NGOs are in the Appendix – CD-2E1 [Modified
MG_Increased ISF by NGOs.doc]

F. Modeling Assumptions for the IBT Runs:
Input Data:
The scenario “MG 08” is the base case. It considered all the baseline [current
condition] operational, physical and generation conditions with one exception like
sedimentation.
Sedimentation: No gradual sedimentation over the decades was considered.
LIP: Old LIP data set [version 9/27/2005] was used for all runs.
MG operational constraints [version 9/2005] included
Water Withdrawal: Several scenarios were simulated for water withdrawals
with and without IBT from proposed source.
1. Scenario “MG 08” – MG with 2008 demands.
2. Scenario “MG 08 CF” – MG with 2008 demands considering IBT from
Cowan Ford [Lake Norman].
3. Scenario “MG 35” - MG with increased demands for 2035.
4. Scenario “MG 35 CF” – MG with increased demand for 2035
considering IBT from Cowan Ford [Lake Norman].
5. Scenario “MG 35 MI” – MG with increased demands for 2035
considering IBT from Mountain Island.
6. Scenario “MG 35 NGO” – MG with 2035 demands considering
increased instream flow requirements recommended by NGOs.
7. Scenario “MG 35 CF NGO” – MG with 2035 demands and IBT from
Cowan Ford considering increased instream flow requirements
recommended by NGOs.
8. Scenario “MG 35 LIP” – MG with 2035 demands considering new
modified LIP [version November, 2005].
9. Scenario “MG 35 CF LIP” – MG with 2035 demands and IBT from
Cowan Ford considering new modified LIP [version November,
2005].

Variable transferable IBT quantities were modeled to see the impacts on the
reservoir systems. The purpose was to analyze the impacts of
a. IBT quantities
b. IBT locations
c. IBT with increased instream flow requirements.
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 19 -
IBT Quantities and Distributions:
A maximum of 10 MGD from Cowan Ford in year 2008 was modeled. Then
average 24 MGD from Cowan Ford and Mountain Island in year 2035 were
modeled. The monthly distributions based on 2002 water use are as follows:

Table 3: IBT Monthly distribution

Distribution for
Month MGD AC-FT MGD AC-FT
Jan 21.87 14.18 7.86 5.10
Feb 21.50 13.93 7.73 5.01
Mar 21.59 14.00 7.76 5.03
Apr 24.16 15.66 8.69 5.63
May 25.96 16.83 9.33 6.05
Jun 27.80 18.02 10.00 6.48
Jul 26.36 17.09 9.48 6.15
Aug 26.68 17.30 9.59 6.22
Sep 24.53 15.90 8.82 5.72
Oct 24.61 15.95 8.85 5.74
Nov 21.77 14.11 7.83 5.07
Dec 21.17 13.72 7.61 4.93
Avg 24 15.56 8.63 5.59
2008 IBT 2035 IBT

These monthly IBT amounts were added to 2008 and 2035 demands for scenario
runs with IBT from Cowan Ford [Lake Norman] and Mountain Island and
simulated as “MG 08 CF” and “MG 35CF”, “MG 35 MI”, “MG 35 CF NGO”. The
total monthly distributions of demands/withdrawals with and without IBT are:

Table 4: Total Monthly Distributions with and without IBT from
Cowan Ford and Mountain Island

From
Demand
Condition January February March April May June July August September October November December
2008 101 97 81 109 109 118 117 113 101 99 84 98
2008
With IBT 106 102 86 114 114 123 122 118 106 104 89 103
2035 189 184 169 209 216 233 229 217 195 191 172 183
2035
With IBT 204 198 183 225 233 251 246 235 211 207 186 197
2035 246 238 239 286 333 368 357 337 292 274 246 236
2035
With IBT 260 252 253 302 350 386 374 354 308 290 260 250
Mountain
Island
Withdrawals, ac-ft
Cowan Ford

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 20 -
G. Model Results:
Data Format:
As it was mentioned earlier, the inputs for hydrological data are in daily format.
However the outputs are in daily for system wide reservoir/river conditions and 15
min time steps for both hydro operation and reservoir conditions. In this analysis only
daily data was analyzed for convenience and faster processing.

The output results from the above eight model scenario runs are divided into 6
categories as it was processed to fulfill different purposes.
1. LIP Summary – System wide:
2. Annual Duration of
o Total Outflow - at reservoir levels
o Elevations - at reservoir levels
3. Generation Summary – at reservoir levels
4. Performance Measure Sheets – post processor to produce the performance
criteria set by water user interests groups.
5. Elevation and Storage Conditions during Dry season including yr 2002 – at
reservoirs levels.
6. Haze Charts – of Outflows and Lake Elevation at reservoir levels.

Under these categories, the results are summarized in three different groupings for
comparison purposes to see:

A. The impacts of IBT quantity on the system.
B. The impacts of the IBT locations.
C. The impacts of IBT along with new increased instream flow requirements
recommended by the NGOs.

And finally new set for
D. Impacts of New Modified LIP

Summary of Results:
The output results are summarized in several plots and tables in the following pages:

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 21 -
4. LIP Summary Plots:
A. Impacts of IBT Quantity

Simulated LIP Stages to see the Impacts of IBT Quantities
-1
0
1
2
3
4
01/01/1900
Time
LIP Stages
MG 35 CF MG 35 MG 08 MG 08 CF

Figure 2: LIP Stages for Impacts of All IBT Quantities
Simulated LIP Stages
-1
0
1
2
3
4
Jan-29 Jan-34 Jan-39 Jan-44 Jan-49 Jan-54 Jan-59 Jan-64 Jan-69 Jan-74 Jan-79 Jan-84 Jan-89 Jan-94 Jan-99
Time
LIP Stages
MG 08

Figure 3: LIP Stages for Impacts of IBT Quantities for Scenario “MG 08”

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 22 -

Simulated LIP Stages
-1
0
1
2
3
4
Jan-29 Jan-34 Jan-39 Jan-44 Jan-49 Jan-54 Jan-59 Jan-64 Jan-69 Jan-74 Jan-79 Jan-84 Jan-89 Jan-94 Jan-99
Time
LIP Stages
MG 08 CF

Figure 4: LIP Stages for Impacts of IBT Quantities for Scenario “MG 08 CF”

Simulated LIP Stages
-1
0
1
2
3
4
Jan-29 Jan-34 Jan-39 Jan-44 Jan-49 Jan-54 Jan-59 Jan-64 Jan-69 Jan-74 Jan-79 Jan-84 Jan-89 Jan-94 Jan-99
Time
LIP Stages
MG 35

Figure 5: LIP Stages for Impacts of IBT Quantities for Scenario “MG 35”

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 23 -

Simulated LIP Stages
-1
0
1
2
3
4
Jan-29 Jan-34 Jan-39 Jan-44 Jan-49 Jan-54 Jan-59 Jan-64 Jan-69 Jan-74 Jan-79 Jan-84 Jan-89 Jan-94 Jan-99
Time
LIP Stages
MG 35 CF

Figure 6: LIP Stages for Impacts of IBT Quantities for Scenario “MG 35 CF”

B. Impact of IBT Locations

Simulated LIP Stages to see the Impacts of IBT Locations
-1
0
1
2
3
4
Jan-29 Jan-34 Jan-39 Jan-44 Jan-49 Jan-54 Jan-59 Jan-64 Jan-69 Jan-74 Jan-79 Jan-84 Jan-89 Jan-94 Jan-99
Time
LIP Stages
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 7: LIP Stages for Impacts of IBT Locations for all IBT Locations

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 24 -
Simulated LIP Stages
-1
0
1
2
3
4
Jan-29 Jan-34 Jan-39 Jan-44 Jan-49 Jan-54 Jan-59 Jan-64 Jan-69 Jan-74 Jan-79 Jan-84 Jan-89 Jan-94 Jan-99
Time
LIP Stages
MG 35 MI

Figure 8: LIP Stages for Impacts of IBT Locations for Scenario “MG 35 MI”

C. Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirements

Simulated LIP Stages to see the Impacts of Increased Instream Flows with IBT
-1
0
1
2
3
4
Jan-29 Jan-34 Jan-39 Jan-44 Jan-49 Jan-54 Jan-59 Jan-64 Jan-69 Jan-74 Jan-79 Jan-84 Jan-89 Jan-94 Jan-99
Time
LIP Stages
MG 35 NGO MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 9: LIP Stages for Impacts of Increased Instream Flows with IBT”

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 25 -
Simulated LIP Stages
-1
0
1
2
3
4
Jan-29 Jan-34 Jan-39 Jan-44 Jan-49 Jan-54 Jan-59 Jan-64 Jan-69 Jan-74 Jan-79 Jan-84 Jan-89 Jan-94 Jan-99
Time
LIP Stages
MG 35 NGO

Figure 10: LIP Stages for Impacts of Increased Instream Flows for Scenario “MG 35 NGO”

Simulated LIP Stages
-1
0
1
2
3
4
Jan-29 Jan-34 Jan-39 Jan-44 Jan-49 Jan-54 Jan-59 Jan-64 Jan-69 Jan-74 Jan-79 Jan-84 Jan-89 Jan-94 Jan-99
Time
LIP Stages
MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 11: LIP for Impacts of Increased Instream Flows Stages for Scenario “MG 35 CF NGO”

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 26 -

2. LIP Summary Sheets:

A. Impacts of IBT Quantity

Table 5: LIP Summary for Impacts of IBT Quantities for MG 08

LIP Stage Number of
Occurrences
Percent of
Time
-1 576 64%
0 305 34%
1 14 2%
2 5 1%
3 0 0%
4 0 0%
LIP Stage -1 0 1 2 3 4
Total
Number of
Occurrences 576 305 14 5 0 0
January 42 32 1 0 0 0
February 44 31 0 0 0 0
March 46 29 0 0 0 0
April 48 27 0 0 0 0
May 49 25 1 0 0 0
June 47 25 3 0 0 0
July 49 23 3 0 0 0
August 51 21 2 1 0 0
September 47 26 1 1 0 0
October 52 21 1 1 0 0
November 52 21 1 1 0 0
December 49 24 1 1 0 0
MG 08
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
LIP Stage Summary for
MG 08
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
Monthly LIP Stage Summary for

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 27 -

Table 6: LIP Summary for Impacts of IBT Quantities for MG 08 CF

LIP Stage Number of
Occurrences
Percent of
Time
-1 576 64%
0 305 34%
1 14 2%
2 5 1%
3 0 0%
4 0 0%
LIP Stage -1 0 1 2 3 4
Total
Number of
Occurrences 576 305 14 5 0 0
January 42 32 1 0 0 0
February 44 31 0 0 0 0
March 46 29 0 0 0 0
April 48 27 0 0 0 0
May 49 25 1 0 0 0
June 47 25 3 0 0 0
July 49 23 3 0 0 0
August 51 21 2 1 0 0
September 47 26 1 1 0 0
October 52 21 1 1 0 0
November 52 21 1 1 0 0
December 49 24 1 1 0 0
MG 08 CF
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
LIP Stage Summary for
MG 08 CF
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
Monthly LIP Stage Summary for

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 28 -

Table 7: LIP Summary for Impacts of IBT Quantities for MG 35

LIP Stage Number of
Occurrences
Percent of
Time
-1 573 64%
0 294 33%
1 22 2%
2 7 1%
3 4 0%
4 0 0%
LIP Stage -1 0 1 2 3 4
Total
Number of
Occurrences 573 294 22 7 4 0
January 42 31 1 1 0 0
February 44 29 2 0 0 0
March 45 29 1 0 0 0
April 48 26 1 0 0 0
May 49 23 3 0 0 0
June 47 25 3 0 0 0
July 49 22 3 1 0 0
August 51 20 2 2 0 0
September 47 25 1 1 1 0
October 52 20 1 1 1 0
November 51 20 2 1 1 0
December 48 24 2 0 1 0
MG 35
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
LIP Stage Summary for
MG 35
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
Monthly LIP Stage Summary for

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 29 -

Table 8: LIP Summary for Impacts of IBT Quantities for MG 35 CF

LIP Stage Number of
Occurrences
Percent of
Time
-1 576 64%
0 292 32%
1 13 1%
2 19 2%
3 0 0%
4 0 0%
LIP Stage -1 0 1 2 3 4
Total
Number of
Occurrences 576 292 13 19 0 0
January 42 31 1 1 0 0
February 44 30 0 1 0 0
March 46 28 0 1 0 0
April 48 26 0 1 0 0
May 49 23 2 1 0 0
June 47 25 2 1 0 0
July 49 22 3 1 0 0
August 51 20 2 2 0 0
September 47 25 1 2 0 0
October 52 20 0 3 0 0
November 52 19 1 3 0 0
December 49 23 1 2 0 0
MG 35 CF
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
LIP Stage Summary for
MG 35 CF
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
Monthly LIP Stage Summary for

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 30 -

B. Impacts of IBT Locations

Table 9: LIP Summary for Impacts of IBT Locations for MG 35 MI

LIP Stage Number of
Occurrences
Percent of
Time
-1 576 64%
0 292 32%
1 13 1%
2 19 2%
3 0 0%
4 0 0%
LIP Stage -1 0 1 2 3 4
Total
Number of
Occurrences 576 292 13 19 0 0
January 42 31 1 1 0 0
February 44 30 0 1 0 0
March 46 28 0 1 0 0
April 48 26 0 1 0 0
May 49 23 2 1 0 0
June 47 25 2 1 0 0
July 49 22 3 1 0 0
August 51 20 2 2 0 0
September 47 25 1 2 0 0
October 52 20 0 3 0 0
November 52 19 1 3 0 0
December 49 23 1 2 0 0
MG 35 MI
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
LIP Stage Summary for
MG 35 MI
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
Monthly LIP Stage Summary for

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 31 -

C. Impacts of Increased Instream Flows with IBT

Table 10: LIP Summary for Impacts of Increased Instream Flows for MG 35 NGO

LIP Stage Number of
Occurrences
Percent of
Time
-1 564 63%
0 234 26%
1 91 10%
2 7 1%
3 4 0%
4 0 0%
LIP Stage -1 0 1 2 3 4
Total
Number of
Occurrences 564 234 91 7 4 0
January 42 23 9 1 0 0
February 43 24 8 0 0 0
March 45 22 8 0 0 0
April 48 20 7 0 0 0
May 49 17 9 0 0 0
June 47 21 7 0 0 0
July 47 21 6 1 0 0
August 51 16 6 2 0 0
September 47 19 7 1 1 0
October 50 17 6 1 1 0
November 48 17 8 1 1 0
December 47 17 10 0 1 0
MG 35 NGO
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
LIP Stage Summary for
MG 35 NGO
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
Monthly LIP Stage Summary for

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 32 -

Table 11: LIP Summary for Impacts of Increased Instream Flows for MG 35CF NGO

LIP Stage Number of
Occurrences
Percent of
Time
-1 565 63%
0 232 26%
1 92 10%
2 7 1%
3 4 0%
4 0 0%
LIP Stage -1 0 1 2 3 4
Total
Number of
Occurrences 565 232 92 7 4 0
January 42 23 9 1 0 0
February 43 24 8 0 0 0
March 45 22 8 0 0 0
April 48 19 8 0 0 0
May 49 17 9 0 0 0
June 47 21 7 0 0 0
July 48 20 6 1 0 0
August 51 16 6 2 0 0
September 47 19 7 1 1 0
October 50 17 6 1 1 0
November 48 17 8 1 1 0
December 47 17 10 0 1 0
MG 35 CF NGO
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
LIP Stage Summary for
MG 35 CF NGO
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
Monthly LIP Stage Summary for

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 33 -

3. Annual Duration of Total Outflows
1) Bridgewater
Exceedance Curve of Bridgewater Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT ammount
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 08 CF

Figure 12: Outflow Duration plot of BW for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Exceedance Curve of Bridgewater Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 13: Outflow Duration plot of BW for Impacts of IBT Locations
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 34 -
Exceedance Curve of Bridgewater Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of Increased Stream flows over IBT
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 14: Outflow Duration plot of BW for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

2) Rhodhiss

Exceedance Curve of Rhodhiss Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see Impacts of IBT quantity
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 08 CF

Figure 15: Outflow Duration plot of RH for Impacts of IBT Quantity

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 35 -
Exceedance Curve of Rhodhiss Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see th Impacts of IBT locations
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 16: Outflow Duration plot of RH for Impacts of IBT Locations
Exceedance Curve of Rhodhiss Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of increased stream flows requirements over IBT
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 17: Outflow Duration plot of RH for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 36 -
3) Oxford
Exceedance Curve of Oxford Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see th Impacts of IBT quantity
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 08 CF

Figure 18: Outflow Duration plot of OX for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Exceedance Curve of Oxford Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 19: Outflow Duration plot of OX for Impacts of IBT Locations

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 37 -
Exceedance Curve of Oxford Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of Increased Instream flow Requirements over IBT
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 20: Outflow Duration plot of OX for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

4) Lookout Shoals

Exceedance Curve of Lookout Shoals Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT quantity
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 08 CF

Figure 21: Outflow Duration plot of LS for Impacts of IBT Quantity

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 38 -
Exceedance Curve of Lookout Shoals Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 22: Outflow Duration plot of LS for Impacts of IBT Locations
Exceedance Curve of Lookout Shoals Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of Increased Instream flow Requirements over IBT
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 23: Outflow Duration plot of LS for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 39 -
5) Cowan Ford
Exceedance Curve of Cowan Ford Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT quantity
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 08 CF

Figure 24: Outflow Duration plot of CF for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Exceedance Curve of Cowan Ford Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 25: Outflow Duration plot of CF for Impacts of IBT Locations
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 40 -
Exceedance Curve of Cowan Ford Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of Increase Insteam flow Requorements over IBT
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF
MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 26: Outflow Duration plot of CF for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

6) Mountain Island

Exceedance Curve of Mountain Island Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to se the Impacts of IBT quantity
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 08 CF

Figure 27: Outflow Duration plot of MI for Impacts of IBT Quantity

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 41 -
Exceedance Curve of Mountain Island Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 28: Outflow Duration plot of MI for Impacts of IBT Locations

Exceedance Curve of Mountain Island Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of Increased Instream Flow requirements over IBT
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 29: Outflow Duration plot of MI for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 42 -
7) Wylie

Exceedance Curve of Wylie Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT quantity
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 08 CF

Figure 30: Outflow Duration plot of WY for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Exceedance Curve of Wylie Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 31: Outflow Duration plot of WY for Impacts of IBT Locations

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 43 -
Exceedance Curve of Wylie Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of Increased Instream Flow requirements over IBT
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF
MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 32: Outflow Duration plot of WY for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT
8) Fishing Creek
Exceedance Curve of Fishing Creek Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT quantity
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 08 CF

Figure 33: Outflow Duration plot of FC for Impacts of IBT Quantity
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 44 -
Exceedance Curve of Fishing Creek Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 34: Outflow Duration plot of FC for Impacts of IBT Locations

Exceedance Curve of Fishing Creek Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of Increased Instream Flow requirements over IBT
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 35: Outflow Duration plot of FC for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 45 -
9) Great Falls

Exceedance Curve of Great Falls Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT quantity
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 08 CF

Figure 36: Outflow Duration plot of GF for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Exceedance Curve of Great Falls Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 37: Outflow Duration plot of GF for Impacts of IBT Locations

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 46 -

Exceedance Curve of Great Falls Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of Increased Instream flow requirements over IBT
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF
MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 38: Outflow Duration plot of GF for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

10) Rocky Creek

Exceedance Curve of Rocky Creek Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT Quantities
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 08 CF MG 35 MG 35 CF

Figure 39: Outflow Duration plot of RC for Impacts of IBT Quantity
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 47 -
Exceedance Curve of Rocky Creek Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
To see the Impacts of IBT Locations
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 40: Outflow Duration plot of RC for Impacts of IBT Locations

Exceedance Curve of Rocky Creek Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31 ,2003
To see th Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirements
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF
MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 41: Outflow Duration plot of RC for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 48 -
11) Wateree

Exceedance Curve of Wateree Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT quantity
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 08 CF

Figure 42: Outflow Duration plot of WA for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Exceedance Curve of Wateree Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 43: Outflow Duration plot of WA for Impacts of IBT Locations

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 49 -
Exceedance Curve of Wateree Outflows
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of Increased Instream Flow requirements over IBT
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Flow(cfs)
MG 08 MG 35
MG 35 CF MG 35 NGO
MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 44: Outflow Duration plot of WA for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

4. Annual Duration of Elevations at
1) Bridgewater

Exceedance Curves of Bridgewater Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT quantity
1160
1165
1170
1175
1180
1185
1190
1195
1200
1205
1210
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 08 CF MG 35 MG 35 CF Critical Elevation

Figure 45: Elevation Duration plot of BW for Impacts of IBT Quantity

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 50 -
Exceedance Curves of Bridgewater Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
1160
1165
1170
1175
1180
1185
1190
1195
1200
1205
1210
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI Critical Elevation

Figure 46: Elevation Duration plot of BW for Impacts of IBT Locations
Exceedance Curves of Bridgewater Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of Increased Insteam flow Requirements over IBT
1160
1165
1170
1175
1180
1185
1190
1195
1200
1205
1210
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF
Critical Elevation MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 47: Elevation Duration plot of BW for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 51 -

2) Rhodhiss
Exceedance Curves of Rhodhiss Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT quantity
982
984
986
988
990
992
994
996
998
1000
1002
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 08 CF MG 35 MG 35 CF Critical Elevation

Figure 48: Elevation Duration plot of RH for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Exceedance Curves of Rhodhiss Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
982
984
986
988
990
992
994
996
998
1000
1002
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI Critical Elevation

Figure 49: Elevation Duration plot of RH for Impacts of IBT Locations

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 52 -
Exceedance Curves of Rhodhiss Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of Increased Instream Flow requirements
982
984
986
988
990
992
994
996
998
1000
1002
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF
Critical Elevation MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 50: Elevation Duration plot of RH for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

3) Oxford

Exceedance Curves of Oxford Elevations Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT quantity
924
926
928
930
932
934
936
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 08 CF MG 35 MG 35 CF Crtitical Elevation

Figure 51: Elevation Duration plot of OX for Impacts of IBT Quantity

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 53 -
Exceedance Curves of Oxford Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
924
926
928
930
932
934
936
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI Crtitical Elevation

Figure 52: Elevation Duration plot of OX for Impacts of IBT Locations

Exceedance Curves of Oxford Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of Increased Instream Flow requirements over IBT
924
926
928
930
932
934
936
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF
MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO Crtitical Elevation

Figure 53: Elevation Duration plot of OX for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 54 -
4) Lookout Shoals
Exceedance Curves of Lookout Shoals Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT quantity
810
815
820
825
830
835
840
845
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 08 CF MG 35 MG 35 CF Crtitical Elevation

Figure 54: Elevation Duration plot of LS for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Exceedance Curves of Lookout Shoals Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
810
815
820
825
830
835
840
845
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI Crtitical Elevation

Figure 55: Elevation Duration plot of LS for Impacts of IBT Locations

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 55 -
Exceedance Curves of Lookout Shoals Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of Increased Instream flow requirements over IBT
810
815
820
825
830
835
840
845
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF
Crtitical Elevation MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 56: Elevation Duration plot of LS for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

5) Cowan Ford

Exceedance Curves of Cowan Ford Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT quantity
748
750
752
754
756
758
760
762
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 08 CF MG 35 MG 35 CF Crtitical Elevation

Figure 57: Elevation Duration plot of CF for Impacts of IBT Quantity

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 56 -
Exceedance Curves of Cowan Ford Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
748
750
752
754
756
758
760
762
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI Crtitical Elevation

Figure 58: Elevation Duration plot of CF for Impacts of IBT Locations

Exceedance Curves of Cowan Ford Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of Increased Instream flow reuirements over IBT
748
750
752
754
756
758
760
762
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF
Crtitical Elevation MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 59: Elevation Duration plot of CF for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 57 -
6) Mountain Island
Exceedance Curves of Mountain Island Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT quantity
640
642
644
646
648
650
652
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF Crtitical Elevation MG 08 CF

Figure 60: Elevation Duration plot of MI for Impacts of IBT Quantity
Exceedance Curves of Mountain Island Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
640
642
644
646
648
650
652
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI Crtitical Elevation

Figure 61: Elevation Duration plot of MI for Impacts of IBT Locations

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 58 -
Exceedance Curves of Mountain Island Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of Increased Instream Flow requirements over IBT
640
642
644
646
648
650
652
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF
Crtitical Elevation MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 62: Elevation Duration plot of MI for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT
7) Wylie
Exceedance Curves of WYLIE Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT quantity
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 08 CF MG 35 MG 35 CF Crtitical Elevation

Figure 63: Elevation Duration plot of WY for Impacts of IBT Quantity

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 59 -
Exceedance Curves of WYLIE Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI Crtitical Elevation

Figure 64: Elevation Duration plot of WY for Impacts of IBT Locations
Exceedance Curves of WYLIE Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of increased instream flow requirments over IBT
554
556
558
560
562
564
566
568
570
572
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF
Crtitical Elevation MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 65: Elevation Duration plot of WY for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 60 -
8) Fishing Creek

Exceedance Curves of Fishing Creek Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT quantity
330
340
350
360
370
380
390
400
410
420
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 08 CF MG 35 MG 35 CF Crtitical Elevation

Figure 66: Elevation Duration plot of FC for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Exceedance Curves of Fishing Creek Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
330
340
350
360
370
380
390
400
410
420
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI Crtitical Elevation

Figure 67: Elevation Duration plot of FC for Impacts of IBT Locations
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 61 -
Exceedance Curves of Fishing Creek Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of Increased Instream Flow requirements over IBT
330
340
350
360
370
380
390
400
410
420
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF
Crtitical Elevation MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 68: Elevation Duration plot of FC for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

9) Great Falls
Exceedance Curves of Great Falls Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impact of IBT quantity
315
320
325
330
335
340
345
350
355
360
365
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 08 CF MG 35 MG 35 CF Crtitical Elevation

Figure 69: Elevation Duration plot of GF for Impacts of IBT Quantity

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 62 -
Exceedance Curves of Great Falls Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
325
330
335
340
345
350
355
360
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI Crtitical Elevation

Figure 70: Elevation Duration plot of GF for Impacts of IBT Locations

Exceedance Curves of Great Falls Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts increase instream flow requirements over IBT
320
325
330
335
340
345
350
355
360
365
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF
Crtitical Elevation MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 71: Elevation Duration plot of GF for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 63 -

10) Rocky Creek

Exceedance Curves of Rocky Creek Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT quantity
260
265
270
275
280
285
290
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 08 CF MG 35 CF Crtitical Elevation

Figure 72: Elevation Duration plot of RC for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Exceedance Curves of Rocky Creek Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
260
265
270
275
280
285
290
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI Crtitical Elevation

Figure 73: Elevation Duration plot of RC for Impacts of IBT Locations

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 64 -
Exceedance Curves of Rocky Creek Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003 to see
the Impacts of Increased Instream flow requirements over IBT
260
265
270
275
280
285
290
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF
MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO Crtitical Elevation

Figure 74: Elevation Duration plot of RC for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

11) Wateree

Exceedance Curves of Wateree Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT quantity
210
215
220
225
230
235
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 08 CF MG 35 MG 35 CF Crtitical Elevation

Figure 75: Elevation Duration plot of WA for Impacts of IBT Quantity
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 65 -
Exceedance Curves of Wateree Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of IBT locations
210
215
220
225
230
235
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI Crtitical Elevation

Figure 76: Elevation Duration plot of WA for Impacts of IBT Locations
Exceedance Curves of Wateree Elevations
Between Jan 1,1929 and Dec 31, 2003
to see the Impacts of Increased Instream flow requirments over IBT
210
215
220
225
230
235
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Exceedance
Elevation (ft)
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF
MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO Crtitical Elevation

Figure 77: Elevation Duration plot of WA for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 66 -
5. Generation Summary Plot

1) Bridgewater
Total Generation Plots for Bridgewater
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Quantity
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 08 CF MG 35 CF

Figure 78: Annual Generation Plot of BW for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Total Generation Plots for Bridgewater
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Locations
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 79: Annual Generation Plot of BW for Impacts of IBT Locations

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 67 -
Total Generation Plots for Bridgewater
to Compare the Impacts of Increased Instream Flows
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 80: Annual Generation Plot of BW for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

2) Rhodhiss
Total Generation Plots for Rhodhiss
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Quantity
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 08 CF MG 35 MG 35 CF

Figure 81: Annual Generation Plot of RH for Impacts of IBT Quantity

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 68 -
Total Generation Plots for Rhodhiss
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Locations
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 82: Annual Generation Plot of RH for Impacts of IBT Locations

Total Generation Plots for Rhodhiss
to Compare the Impacts of Increased Instream Flows
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 83: Annual Generation Plot of RH for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 69 -
3) Oxford

Total Generation Plots for Oxford
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Quantity
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35
MG 35 CF MG 08 CF

Figure 84: Annual Generation Plot of OX for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Total Generation Plots for Oxford
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Locations
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35
MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 85: Annual Generation Plot of OX for Impacts of IBT Locations

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 70 -
Total Generation Plots for Oxford
to Compare the Impacts of Increased Instream Flows
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF
MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 86: Annual Generation Plot of OX for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

4) Lookout shoals

Total Generation Plots Lookout Shoals
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Quantity
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35
MG 35 CF MG 08 CF

Figure 87: Annual Generation Plot of LS for Impacts of IBT Quantity

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 71 -
Total Generation Plots Lookout Shoals
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Locations
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 88: Annual Generation Plot of LS for Impacts of IBT Locations

Total Generation Plots Lookout Shoals
to Compare the Impacts of Increased Instream Flows
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35
MG 35 CF MG 35 NGO
MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 89: Annual Generation Plot of LS for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 72 -
5) Cowan Ford

Total Generation Plots for Cowan Ford
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Quan
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 08 CF

Figure 90: Annual Generation Plot of CF for Impacts of IBT Quantity
Total Generation Plots Cowan Ford
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Locations
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 91: Annual Generation Plot of CF for Impacts of IBT Locations

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 73 -
Total Generation Plots Cowan Ford
to Compare the Impacts of Increased Instream Flows
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 92: Annual Generation Plot of CF for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

6) Mountain Island
Total Generation Plots Mountain Island
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Quantity
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 08 CF

Figure 93: Annual Generation Plot of MI for Impacts of IBT Quantity

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 74 -
Total Generation Plots Mountain Island
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Locations
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 94: Annual Generation Plot of MI for Impacts of IBT Locations

Total Generation Plots Mountain Island
to Compare the Impacts of Increased Instream Flows
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 95: Annual Generation Plot of MI for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 75 -
7) Wylie
Total Generation Plots for Wylie
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Quantity
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 08 CF

Figure 96: Annual Generation Plot of WY for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Total Generation Plots for Wylie
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Locations
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 97: Annual Generation Plot of WY for Impacts of IBT Locations

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 76 -
Total Generation Plots for Wylie
to Compare the Impacts of Increased Instream Flow
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 98: Annual Generation Plot of WY for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

8) Fishing Creek

Total Generation Plots for Fishing Creek
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Quantity
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 08 CF

Figure 99: Annual Generation Plot of FC for Impacts of IBT Quantity

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 77 -
Total Generation Plots for Fishing Creek
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Locations
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 100: Annual Generation Plot of FC for Impacts of IBT Locations

Total Generation Plots for Fishing Creek
to Compare the Impacts of Increased Instream Flows
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 101: Annual Generation Plot of FC for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 78 -
9) Great Falls

Total Generation Plots for Great Falls
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Quantity
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 08 CF

Figure 102: Annual Generation Plot of GF for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Total Generation Plots for Great Falls
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Locations
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 103: Annual Generation Plot of GF Impacts of IBT Locations

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 79 -
Total Generation Plots for Great Falls
to Compare the Impacts of Increased Instream Flows
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 104: Annual Generation Plot of GF Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

10) Rocky Creek

Total Generation Plots for Rocky Creek
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Quantity
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF
MG 35 MI MG 08 CF MG 35 NGO
MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 105: Annual Generation Plot of RCfor Impacts of IBT Quantity

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 80 -
Total Generation Plots for Rocky Creek
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Locations
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF
MG 35 MI MG 08 CF MG 35 NGO
MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 106: Annual Generation Plot of RC for Impacts of IBT Locations

Total Generation Plots for Rocky Creek
to Compare the Impacts of Increased Instream Flows
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF
MG 35 MI MG 08 CF MG 35 NGO
MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 107: Annual Generation Plot of RC for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 81 -
11) Wateree

Total Generation Plots for Wateree
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Quantity
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 08 CF

Figure 108: Annual Generation Plot of WA for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Total Generation Plots for Wateree
to Compare the Impacts of IBT Locations
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 MI

Figure 109: Annual Generation Plot of WA for Impacts of IBT Locations
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 82 -
Total Generation Plots for Wateree
to Compare the Impacts of Increased Instream Flows
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
1929 1934 1939 1944 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Year
Generation, MWh
MG 08 MG 35 MG 35 CF MG 35 NGO MG 35 CF NGO

Figure 110: Annual Generation Plot of WA for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

6. Generation Summary Table
Appendix – F [Generation Summary All.xls]

7. Performance Measure Sheets Table
Appendix – G [PMS- IBT.xls] contains the tables of performance measures for all 11
reservoirs and also the summary for the Catawba reservoir system.

The following 12 tables provide the same information for individual reservoirs.

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 83 -
Table 12 : Bridgewater Performances Sheet

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 84 -
Table 13 : Rhodhiss Performances Sheet

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 85 -
Table 14: Oxford Performance Sheet

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 86 -

Table 15: Lookout Shoals Performance Sheet

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 87 -

Table 16: Cowan Ford [Norman] Performance Sheet

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 88 -

Table 17: Mountain Island Performance Sheet

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 89 -
Table 18: Wylie Performance Sheet

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 90 -
Table 19: Fishing Creek Performance Sheet

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 91 -
Table 20: Great Falls Performance Sheet

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 92 -
Table 21: Rocky Creek [Cedar] Performance Sheet

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 93 -
Table 22: Wateree Performance Sheet

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 94 -

Table 23: Catawba Reservoir System Performance Sheet

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 95 -

8. Elevation Condition in Dry Years

1) Bridgewater

Figure 111: BW Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation

Figure 112: BW Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 96 -

Figure 113: BW Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on Elevation

2) Rhodhiss

Figure 114: RH Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 97 -

Figure 115: RH Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation

Figure 116: RH Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on Elevation

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 98 -
3) Oxford

Figure 117: OX Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation

Figure 118: OX Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 99 -

Figure 119: OX Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on Elevation

4) Lookout shoals

Figure 120: LS Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 100 -

Figure 121: LS Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation

Figure 122: LS Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on Elevation

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 101 -
5) Cowan Ford

Figure 123: CF Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation

Figure 124: CF Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 102 -

Figure 125: CF Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on Elevation

6) Mountain Island

Figure 126: MI Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 103 -

Figure 127: MI Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation

Figure 128: MI Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on Elevation

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 104 -

7) Wylie

Figure 129: WY Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation

Figure 130: WY Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 105 -

Figure 131: WY Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on Elevation

8) Fishing Creek

Figure 132: FC Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 106 -

Figure 133: FC Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation

Figure 134: FC Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on Elevation

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 107 -

9) Great Falls

Figure 135: GF Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation

Figure 136: GF Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 108 -

Figure 137: GF Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on Elevation

10) Rocky Creek

Figure 138: RC Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 109 -

Figure 139: RC Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation

Figure 140: RC Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on Elevation

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 110 -

11) Wateree

Figure 141: WA Elevations for Impacts of IBT Quantity on Elevation

Figure 142: WA Elevations for Impacts of IBT Locations on Elevation

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 111 -

Figure 143: WA Elevations for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT on Elevation

9. Storage Condition in Dry Years
1) Bridgewater

Figure 144: BW Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 112 -

Figure 145: BW Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations

Figure 146: BW Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 113 -

2) Rhodhiss

Figure 147: RH Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Figure 148: RH Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 114 -

Figure 149: RH Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT
3) Oxford

Figure 150: OX Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 115 -

Figure 151: OX Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations

Figure 152: OX Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 116 -

4) Lookout shoals

Figure 153: LS Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Figure 154: : LS Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 117 -

Figure 155: : LS Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT
5) Cowan Ford

Figure 156: CF Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 118 -

Figure 157: CF Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations

Figure 158: CF Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 119 -

6) Mountain Island

Figure 159: MI Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Figure 160: MI Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 120 -

Figure 161: MI Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

7) Wylie

Figure 162: WY Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 121 -

Figure 163: WY Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations

Figure 164: WY Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 122 -

8) Fishing Creek

Figure 165: FC Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Figure 166: FC Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 123 -

Figure 167: FC Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

9) Great Falls

Figure 168: GF Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 124 -

Figure 169: GF Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations

Figure 170: GF Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 125 -

10) Rocky Creek

Figure 171: RC Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity

Figure 172: RC Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 126 -

Figure 173: RC Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

11) Wateree

Figure 174: WA Storage for Impacts of IBT Quantity

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 127 -

Figure 175: WA Storage for Impacts of IBT Locations

Figure 176: WA Storage for Impacts of Increased Instream Flow Requirement with IBT

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 128 -

10. Elevation Haze Charts:

1) Bridgewater
Haze Chart of Bridgewater Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
1170
1175
1180
1185
1190
1195
1200
1205
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 177: BW Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08

Haze Chart of Bridgewater Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
1170
1175
1180
1185
1190
1195
1200
1205
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 178: BW Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 129 -

Haze Chart of Bridgewater Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
1160
1165
1170
1175
1180
1185
1190
1195
1200
1205
1210
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 179 : BW Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35

Haze Chart of Bridgewater Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
1165
1170
1175
1180
1185
1190
1195
1200
1205
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 180: BW Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 130 -
Haze Chart of Bridgewater Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
1165
1170
1175
1180
1185
1190
1195
1200
1205
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 181: BW Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

Haze Chart of Bridgewater Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
1160
1165
1170
1175
1180
1185
1190
1195
1200
1205
1210
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 182: BW Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 131 -

Haze Chart of Bridgewater Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
1160
1165
1170
1175
1180
1185
1190
1195
1200
1205
1210
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 183: BW Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

2) Rhodhiss

Haze Chart of Rhodhiss Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
986
988
990
992
994
996
998
1000
1002
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 184: RH Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 132 -

Haze Chart of Rhodhiss Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
986
988
990
992
994
996
998
1000
1002
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 185: RH Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

Haze Chart of Rhodhiss Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
986
988
990
992
994
996
998
1000
1002
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 186: RH Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 133 -

Haze Chart of Rhodhiss Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
986
988
990
992
994
996
998
1000
1002
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 187: RH Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

Haze Chart of Rhodhiss Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
986
988
990
992
994
996
998
1000
1002
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 188: RH Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 134 -

Haze Chart of Rhodhiss Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
986
988
990
992
994
996
998
1000
1002
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 189: RH Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

Haze Chart of Rhodhiss Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
986
988
990
992
994
996
998
1000
1002
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 190: RH Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 135 -
3) Oxford

Haze Chart of Oxford Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 191: OX Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08

Haze Chart of Oxford Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 192: OX Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 136 -
Haze Chart of Oxford Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 193: OX Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35

Haze Chart of Oxford Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 194: OX Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 137 -
Haze Chart of Oxford Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 195: OX Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

Haze Chart of Oxford Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
922
924
926
928
930
932
934
936
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 196: OX Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 138 -

Haze Chart of Oxford Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
922
924
926
928
930
932
934
936
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 197: OX Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

4) Lookout shoals

Haze Chart of Lookout Shoals Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
830
832
834
836
838
840
842
844
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 198: LS Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 139 -
Haze Chart of Lookout Shoals Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
830
832
834
836
838
840
842
844
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 199: LS Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

Haze Chart of Lookout Shoals Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
828
830
832
834
836
838
840
842
844
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 200: LS Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 140 -

Haze Chart of Lookout Shoals Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
828
830
832
834
836
838
840
842
844
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 201: LS Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

Haze Chart of Lookout Shoals Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
828
830
832
834
836
838
840
842
844
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 202: LS Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 141 -

Haze Chart of Lookout Shoals Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
828
830
832
834
836
838
840
842
844
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 203: LS Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

Haze Chart of Lookout Shoals Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
828
830
832
834
836
838
840
842
844
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 204: LS Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 142 -
5) Cowan Ford

Haze Chart of Cowans Ford Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 205: CF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08

Haze Chart of Cowans Ford Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 206: CF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 143 -

Haze Chart of Cowans Ford Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 207: CF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35

Haze Chart of Cowans Ford Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 208: CF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 144 -

Haze Chart of Cowans Ford Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 209: CF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

Haze Chart of Cowans Ford Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 210: CF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 145 -

Haze Chart of Cowans Ford Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 211: CF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

6) Mountain Island

Haze Chart of Mountain Island Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
640
642
644
646
648
650
652
654
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 212: MI Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 146 -

Haze Chart of Mountain Island Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
640
642
644
646
648
650
652
654
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 213: MI Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

Haze Chart of Mountain Island Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
640
642
644
646
648
650
652
654
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 214: MOUNTAIN ISLAND chart for MG 35
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 147 -

Haze Chart of Mountain Island Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
640
642
644
646
648
650
652
654
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 215: MOUNTAIN ISLAND chart for MG 35 CF

Haze Chart of Mountain Island Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
640
642
644
646
648
650
652
654
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 216: MOUNTAIN ISLAND chart for MG 35 MI

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 148 -

Haze Chart of Mountain Island Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
640
642
644
646
648
650
652
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 217: MOUNTAIN ISLAND chart for MG 35 NGO

Haze Chart of Mountain Island Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
640
642
644
646
648
650
652
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 218: MI Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 149 -

Haze Chart of Mountain Island Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
640
642
644
646
648
650
652
654
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 219: MI Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

Haze Chart of Mountain Island Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
640
642
644
646
648
650
652
654
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 220: MI Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 150 -

Haze Chart of Mountain Island Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
640
642
644
646
648
650
652
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 221: MI Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

Haze Chart of Mountain Island Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
640
642
644
646
648
650
652
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 222: MI Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 151 -

7) Wylie

Haze Chart of Wylie Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 223: WY Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08

Haze Chart of Wylie Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 224: WY Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 152 -

Haze Chart of Wylie Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 225: WY Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35

Haze Chart of Wylie Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 226: WY Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 153 -

Haze Chart of Wylie Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 227: WY Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

Haze Chart of Wylie Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
556
558
560
562
564
566
568
570
572
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 228: WY Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 154 -

Haze Chart of Wylie Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
554
556
558
560
562
564
566
568
570
572
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 229: WY Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

8) Fishing Creek

Haze Chart of Fishing Creek Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 230: FC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 155 -

Haze Chart of Fishing Creek Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 231: FC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

Haze Chart of Fishing Creek Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 232: FISHING CREEK Chart for MG 35
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 156 -

Haze Chart of Fishing Creek Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 233: FISHING CREEK Chart for MG 35CF

Haze Chart of Fishing Creek Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 234: FISHING CREEK Chart for MG 35 MI

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 157 -

Haze Chart of Fishing Creek Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 235: FISHING CREEK Chart for MG 35 NGO

Haze Chart of Fishing Creek Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 236: FC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 158 -

Haze Chart of Fishing Creek Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 237: FC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35CF

Haze Chart of Fishing Creek Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 238: FC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 159 -

Haze Chart of Fishing Creek Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 239: FC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

Haze Chart of Fishing Creek Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 240: FC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 160 -

9) Great Falls

Haze Chart of Great Falls - Dearborn Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
325
330
335
340
345
350
355
360
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 241: GF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08

Haze Chart of Great Falls - Dearborn Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
315
320
325
330
335
340
345
350
355
360
365
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 242: GF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 161 -

Haze Chart of Great Falls - Dearborn Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
325
330
335
340
345
350
355
360
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 243: GF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35

Haze Chart of Great Falls - Dearborn Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
325
330
335
340
345
350
355
360
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 244: GF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 162 -

Haze Chart of Great Falls - Dearborn Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
325
330
335
340
345
350
355
360
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 245: GF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

Haze Chart of Great Falls - Dearborn Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
320
325
330
335
340
345
350
355
360
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 246: GF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 163 -

Haze Chart of Great Falls - Dearborn Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
325
330
335
340
345
350
355
360
365
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 247: GF Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

10) Rocky Creek

Haze Chart of Rocky Creek - Cedar Creek Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
274
276
278
280
282
284
286
288
290
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 248: RC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 164 -

Haze Chart of Rocky Creek - Cedar Creek Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
276
278
280
282
284
286
288
290
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 249: RC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

Haze Chart of Rocky Creek - Cedar Creek Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
276
278
280
282
284
286
288
290
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 250: RC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 165 -

Haze Chart of Rocky Creek - Cedar Creek Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
276
278
280
282
284
286
288
290
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 251: RC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

Haze Chart of Rocky Creek - Cedar Creek Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
276
278
280
282
284
286
288
290
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 252: RC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 166 -

Haze Chart of Rocky Creek - Cedar Creek Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
274
276
278
280
282
284
286
288
290
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 253: RC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

Haze Chart of Rocky Creek - Cedar Creek Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
274
276
278
280
282
284
286
288
290
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 254: RC Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 167 -

11) Wateree

Haze Chart of Wateree Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
218
220
222
224
226
228
230
232
234
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 255: WA Elevation Haze Chart for MG 08

Haze Chart of Wateree Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
218
220
222
224
226
228
230
232
234
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 256: WA Elevation Haze Chart for MG CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 168 -

Haze Chart of Wateree Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
216
218
220
222
224
226
228
230
232
234
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 257: WA Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35

Haze Chart of Wateree Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
216
218
220
222
224
226
228
230
232
234
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 258: WA Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 169 -

Haze Chart of Wateree Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
216
218
220
222
224
226
228
230
232
234
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 259: WA Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

Haze Chart of Wateree Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
216
218
220
222
224
226
228
230
232
234
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 260: WA Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 170 -

Haze Chart of Wateree Elevations
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
216
218
220
222
224
226
228
230
232
234
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Elevations (ft)

Figure 261: WA Elevation Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

11. OUTFLOW HAZE CHARTS:
1) Bridgewtaer

Haze Chart of Bridgewater Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 262: BW Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 171 -

Haze Chart of Bridgewater Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 263: BW Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

Haze Chart of Bridgewater Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 264: BRIDGEWATER Chart for 35

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 172 -

Haze Chart of Bridgewater Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 265: BRIDGEWATER Chart for 35 CF

Haze Chart of Bridgewater Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 266: BRIDGEWATER Chart for 35 MI

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 173 -

Haze Chart of Bridgewater Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 267: BRIDGEWATER Chart for 35 NGO

Haze Chart of Bridgewater Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 268: BW Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 174 -

Haze Chart of Bridgewater Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 269: BW Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

Haze Chart of Bridgewater Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 270: BW Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 175 -

Haze Chart of Bridgewater Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 271: BW Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

Haze Chart of Bridgewater Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 272: BW Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 176 -

2) Rhodhiss

Haze Chart of Rhodhiss Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 273: RH Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08

Haze Chart of Rhodhiss Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 274: RH Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 177 -

Haze Chart of Rhodhiss Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 275: RH Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35

Haze Chart of Rhodhiss Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 276: RH Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 178 -

Haze Chart of Rhodhiss Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 277: RH Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

Haze Chart of Rhodhiss Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 278: RH Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 179 -

Haze Chart of Rhodhiss Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 279: RH Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

3) Oxford

Haze Chart of Oxford Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 280: OX Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 180 -

Haze Chart of Oxford Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 281: OX Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

Haze Chart of Oxford Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 282: OX Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 181 -

Haze Chart of Oxford Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 283: OX Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

Haze Chart of Oxford Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 284: OX Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 182 -

Haze Chart of Oxford Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 285: OX Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

Haze Chart of Oxford Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 286: OX Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 183 -
4) Lookout Shoals

Haze Chart of Lookout Shoals Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 287: LS Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08

Haze Chart of Lookout Shoals Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 288: LS Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 184 -

Haze Chart of Lookout Shoals Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 289: LS Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35

Haze Chart of Lookout Shoals Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 185 -
Figure 290: LS Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

Haze Chart of Lookout Shoals Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 291: LS Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

Haze Chart of Lookout Shoals Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 292: LS Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 186 -
Haze Chart of Lookout Shoals Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 293: LS Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

5) Cowan Ford

Haze Chart of Cowans Ford Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 294: CF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 187 -

Haze Chart of Cowans Ford Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 295: CF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

Haze Chart of Cowans Ford Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 296: CF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 188 -
Haze Chart of Cowans Ford Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 297: CF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

Haze Chart of Cowans Ford Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 298: CF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 189 -
Haze Chart of Cowans Ford Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 299: CF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

Haze Chart of Cowans Ford Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 300: CF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 190 -

6) Mountain Island

Haze Chart of Mountain Island Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 301: MI Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08

Haze Chart of Mountain Island Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 302: MI Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 191 -

Haze Chart of Mountain Island Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 303: MI Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35

Haze Chart of Mountain Island Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 304: MI Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 192 -
Haze Chart of Mountain Island Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 305: MI Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

Haze Chart of Mountain Island Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 306: MI Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 193 -
Haze Chart of Mountain Island Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 307: MI Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO
7) Wylie

Haze Chart of Wylie Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 308: WY Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 194 -

Haze Chart of Wylie Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 309: WY Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

Haze Chart of Wylie Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 310: WY Outflow Haze Chart for for MG 35

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 195 -

Haze Chart of Wylie Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 311: WY Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

Haze Chart of Wylie Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 312: WY Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 196 -
Haze Chart of Wylie Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 313: WY Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

Haze Chart of Wylie Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 314: WY Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 197 -

8) Fishing Creek

Haze Chart of Fishing Creek Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 315: FC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08

Haze Chart of Fishing Creek Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 316: FC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 198 -
Haze Chart of Fishing Creek Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 317: FC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35

Haze Chart of Fishing Creek Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 318: FC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 199 -

Haze Chart of Fishing Creek Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 319: FC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

Haze Chart of Fishing Creek Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 320: FC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 200 -
Haze Chart of Fishing Creek Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 321: FC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

9) Great Falls

Haze Chart of Great Falls - Dearborn Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 322: GF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 201 -

Haze Chart of Great Falls - Dearborn Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 323: GF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

Haze Chart of Great Falls - Dearborn Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 324: GF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 202 -

Haze Chart of Great Falls - Dearborn Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 325: GF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

Haze Chart of Great Falls - Dearborn Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 326: GF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 203 -
Haze Chart of Great Falls - Dearborn Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 327: GF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

Haze Chart of Great Falls - Dearborn Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 328: GF Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 204 -

10) Rocky Creek

Haze Chart of Rocky Creek - Cedar Creek Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 329: RC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08

Haze Chart of Rocky Creek - Cedar Creek Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 330: RC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 205 -
Haze Chart of Rocky Creek - Cedar Creek Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 331: RC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35

Haze Chart of Rocky Creek - Cedar Creek Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 332: RC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 206 -

Haze Chart of Rocky Creek - Cedar Creek Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 333: RC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

Haze Chart of Rocky Creek - Cedar Creek Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 334: RC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 207 -

Haze Chart of Rocky Creek - Cedar Creek Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 335: RC Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO

11) Watereee

Haze Chart of Wateree Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 336: WA Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 208 -

Haze Chart of Wateree Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 08 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 337: WA Outflow Haze Chart for MG 08 CF

Haze Chart of Wateree Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 338: WA Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 209 -
Haze Chart of Wateree Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 339: WA Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF

Haze Chart of Wateree Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 MI'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 340: WA Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 MI

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 210 -

Haze Chart of Wateree Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 341: WA Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 NGO

Haze Chart of Wateree Outflows
for Scenario 'MG 35 CF NGO'
for the years of 1929 to 2003
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
1/1 1/31 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31 8/31 9/30 10/31 11/30
Flow (cfs)

Figure 342: WA Outflow Haze Chart for MG 35 CF NGO
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 211 -

12. Impacts of NEW LIP data set:

This set of analyses was done to see the impacts of new LIP data set. The following charts and tables
compare the old LIP vs the new LIP.

1. LIP Stages:

Simulated LIP Stages
-1
0
1
2
3
4
Jan-29 Jan-34 Jan-39 Jan-44 Jan-49 Jan-54 Jan-59 Jan-64 Jan-69 Jan-74 Jan-79 Jan-84 Jan-89 Jan-94 Jan-99
Time
LIP Stages
MG 35-old LIPMG 35 CF- old LIPMG 35 CF LIP-new LIPMG 35 LIP- new LIP

Figure 343: LIP Stages with new and old LIP data

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 212 -

2. LIP Summary:

Table 24 : LIP for MG 35 [old LIP]

LIP Stage Number of
Occurrences
Percent of
Time
-1 573 64%
0 294 33%
1 22 2%
2 7 1%
3 4 0%
4 0 0%
LIP Stage -1 0 1 2 3 4
Total
Number of
Occurrences 573 294 22 7 4 0
January 42 31 1 1 0 0
February 44 29 2 0 0 0
March 45 29 1 0 0 0
April 48 26 1 0 0 0
May 49 23 3 0 0 0
June 47 25 3 0 0 0
July 49 22 3 1 0 0
August 51 20 2 2 0 0
September 47 25 1 1 1 0
October 52 20 1 1 1 0
November 51 20 2 1 1 0
December 48 24 2 0 1 0
MG 35
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
LIP Stage Summary for
MG 35
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
Monthly LIP Stage Summary for

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 213 -

Table 25: LIP for MG 35 LIP [new LIP]

LIP Stage Summary for
MG 35 LIP
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
LIP Stage Number of
Occurrences
Percent of
Time
-1 575 64%
0 292 32%
1 23 3%
2 6 1%
3 4 0%
4 0 0%

Monthly LIP Stage Summary for
MG 35 LIP
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
LIP Stage -1 0 1 2 3 4
Total
Number of
Occurrences 575 292 23 6 4 0
January 42 31 1 1 0 0
February 44 29 2 0 0 0
March 45 29 1 0 0 0
April 48 26 1 0 0 0
May 49 23 3 0 0 0
June 47 25 3 0 0 0
July 49 22 4 0 0 0
August 51 20 2 2 0 0
September 47 25 1 1 1 0
October 52 20 1 1 1 0
November 52 19 2 1 1 0
December 49 23 2 0 1 0

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 214 -

Table 26 : LIP for MG 35 CF [old LIP]

LIP Stage Number of
Occurrences
Percent of
Time
-1 576 64%
0 292 32%
1 13 1%
2 19 2%
3 0 0%
4 0 0%
LIP Stage -1 0 1 2 3 4
Total
Number of
Occurrences 576 292 13 19 0 0
January 42 31 1 1 0 0
February 44 30 0 1 0 0
March 46 28 0 1 0 0
April 48 26 0 1 0 0
May 49 23 2 1 0 0
June 47 25 2 1 0 0
July 49 22 3 1 0 0
August 51 20 2 2 0 0
September 47 25 1 2 0 0
October 52 20 0 3 0 0
November 52 19 1 3 0 0
December 49 23 1 2 0 0
MG 35 CF
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
LIP Stage Summary for
MG 35 CF
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
Monthly LIP Stage Summary for

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 215 -

Table 27: LIP for MG 35 CF LIP [new LIP]

LIP Stage Number of
Occurrences
Percent of
Time
-1 576 64%
0 292 32%
1 14 2%
2 18 2%
3 0 0%
4 0 0%
LIP Stage -1 0 1 2 3 4
Total
Number of
Occurrences 576 292 14 18 0 0
January 42 31 1 1 0 0
February 44 30 0 1 0 0
March 46 28 0 1 0 0
April 48 26 0 1 0 0
May 49 23 2 1 0 0
June 47 25 2 1 0 0
July 49 22 3 1 0 0
August 51 20 2 2 0 0
September 47 25 1 2 0 0
October 52 20 1 2 0 0
November 52 19 1 3 0 0
December 49 23 1 2 0 0
MG 35 CF LIP
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
LIP Stage Summary for
MG 35 CF LIP
1/1/1929 to 12/1/2003
Monthly LIP Stage Summary for

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 216 -

3. Elevation Conditions during Dry Seasons:

Figure 344: Bridgewater Elevations with New LIP

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 217 -

Figure 345: Rhodhiss Elevations with New LIP

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 218 -

Figure 346: Oxford Elevations with New LIP

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 219 -

Figure 347: Lookout Shoals Elevations with New LIP

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 220 -

Figure 348: Cowan Ford Elevations with New LIP
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 221 -

Figure 349: Mountain Island Elevations with New LIP

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 222 -

Figure 350: Wylie Elevations with New LIP

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 223 -

Figure 351: Fishing Creek Elevations with New LIP
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 224 -

Figure 352: Great Falls Elevations with New LIP
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 225 -

Figure 353: Rocky Creek Elevations with New LIP
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 226 -

Figure 354: Wateree Elevations with New LIP

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 227 -
4. Storage Conditions during Dry Seasons:

Figure 355: Bridgewater Storage with New LIP

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 228 -

Figure 356: Rhodhiss Storage with New LIP
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 229 -

Figure 357: Oxford Storage with New LIP
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 230 -

Figure 358: Lookout Shoals Storage with New LIP
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 231 -

Figure 359: Cowan Ford Storage with New LIP
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 232 -

Figure 360: Mountain Island Storage with New LIP
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 233 -

Figure 361: Wyile Storage with New LIP
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 234 -

Figure 362: Fishing Creek Storage with New LIP
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 235 -

Figure 363: Great Falls Storage with New LIP

DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 236 -

Figure 364: Rocky Creek Storage with New LIP
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 237 -

Figure 365: Wateree Storage with New LIP
DRAFT
Revised on February 13, 2006
- 238 -

References:

1. CHEOPS Generic Documentation.pdf by DTA
2. Inflow ComparisonJce March10 Ralph charts.xls received from Chris Ey, DTA
3. CWRel Attachement G (LIP) 07-15-05.pdf received from Duke Power.
4. Water Supply Study Status Report Draft_rev050205.pdf by HDR