Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Appendix-CD-2F2 - New LIP_Base
Appendix – CD-2F2 New LIP_Base LIP Input Sheet Duke Enery Catawba-Wateree CHEOPS Model Input sheet for LIP criterion to be modeled in the Catawba Wateree CHEOPS Model Data updated:08/15/2005 09/15/2005 09/27/2005 Intended Scenario:Base Condition, by-plant changes to Minimum Elevations Days of Month to Recalculate LIP Conditions:1 -- Modified By:Brian Krolak Ey Miles Reservoir Critial Elevations (should be at or below the Minimum Elevation entered in the scenario being run.) Reservoir Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Critical Reservoir Elevation (ft, relative datum)61.0 89.4 94.0 74.9 90.0 94.3 92.6 95.0 87.2 80.3 92.5 Critical Flows (flows from dams per LIP documentation) Reservoir Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Critical Flow (cfs) Jan 100.0 -100.0 80.0 --700.0 -530.0 -800.0 Critical Flow (cfs) Feb 100.0 -100.0 80.0 --700.0 -530.0 -800.0 Critical Flow (cfs) Mar 100.0 -100.0 80.0 --700.0 -530.0 -800.0 Critical Flow (cfs) Apr 100.0 -100.0 80.0 --700.0 -530.0 -800.0 Critical Flow (cfs) May 100.0 -100.0 80.0 --700.0 -530.0 -800.0 Critical Flow (cfs) Jun 100.0 -100.0 80.0 --700.0 -530.0 -800.0 Critical Flow (cfs) Jul 100.0 -100.0 80.0 --700.0 -530.0 -800.0 Critical Flow (cfs) Aug 100.0 -100.0 80.0 --700.0 -530.0 -800.0 Critical Flow (cfs) Sep 100.0 -100.0 80.0 --700.0 -530.0 -800.0 Critical Flow (cfs) Oct 100.0 -100.0 80.0 --700.0 -530.0 -800.0 Critical Flow (cfs) Nov 100.0 -100.0 80.0 --700.0 -530.0 -800.0Critical Flow (cfs) Dec 100.0 -100.0 80.0 --700.0 -530.0 -800.0 BOM Storage/Target Storage ratio Ratio less than or equal to Ratio greater than 6 Month USGS Gage hydrology sum less than or equal to NS: Changed critical flows and critical elevation by NS on 11-21-05 Stage 0 90%85% Stage 1 90%75%78% Stage 2 75%57%65% Stage 3 57%42%55%Stage 4 42%0%40% Changed Wateree and Wylie Critical flows to a low of 800 cfs based on request from Duke on 9/13/05. Modified BOM storage target ratios for stages 3 to 4 - 11/21/09 File: New LIP_Base.xls, Tab: Data Page 1 of 2 Printed: 06/21/2006, 2:30 PM LIP Input Sheet Duke Enery Catawba-Wateree CHEOPS Model Actions to be performed Licensee Actions Licensee Delay in implementing Actions (days) NLPF Reduction (%) Reduction to difference between NLPF and Critical Flow Bypass Reduction (%) Reduction to difference between Bypass and Critical Flow Recreation Flows Reduction (%) Plant 1 Normal Minimum Pond Elevation Reduction (ft, absolute) Plant 2 Normal Minimum Pond Elevation Reduction (ft, absolute) Plant 3 Normal Minimum Pond Elevation Reduction (ft, absolute) Plant 4 Normal Minimum Pond Elevation Reduction (ft, absolute) Plant 5 Normal Minimum Pond Elevation Reduction (ft, absolute) Plant 6 Normal Minimum Pond Elevation Reduction (ft, absolute) Plant 7 Normal Minimum Pond Elevation Reduction (ft, absolute) Plant 8 Normal Minimum Pond Elevation Reduction (ft, absolute) Plant 9 Normal Minimum Pond Elevation Reduction (ft, absolute) Plant 10 Normal Minimum Pond Elevation Reduction (ft, absolute) Plant 11 Normal Minimum Pond Elevation Reduction (ft, absolute) Stage 0 4 0%0%0%0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stage 1 4 60%60%60%2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 Stage 2 4 95%95%100%3 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 Stage 3 4 100%100%100%10 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 Stage 4 4 100%100%100%critical critical critical critical critical critical critical critical critical critical critical Consumptive Withdrawal Reduction (%) Owners of public and large water supply intakes Owner Delay in implementing Actions (days)Plant 1 Plant 2 Plant 3 Plant 4 Plant 5 Plant 6 Plant 7 Plant 8 Plant 9 Plant 10 Plant 11 Stage 0 4 0% Stage 1 4 0.6%3.0%3.0%3.0%1.9%3.0%0.6%3.0%3.0%3.0%0.9% Stage 2 4 1.3%7.0%7.0%7.0%4.5%6.9%1.4%7.0%7.0%7.0%2.0% Stage 3 4 2.8%15.0%15.0%15.0%9.6%14.8%3.0%15.0%15.0%15.0%4.3%Stage 4 4 4.6%25.0%25.0%25.0%16.1%24.7%4.9%25.0%25.0%25.0%7.2% LIP Recovery Days delayed after storage and hydrology condition recovery for groundwater wells to indicate groundwater levels have recovered From Stage 4 to Stage 3 From Stage 3 to Stage 2 From Stage 2 to Stage 1 From Stage 1 to Stage 0 Stage 0 to Normal Groundwater Monitor 0 0 0 0 0 File: New LIP_Base.xls, Tab: Data Page 2 of 2 Printed: 06/21/2006, 2:30 PM