Appendix-CD-2F1 - LIP_Base

Appendix – CD-2F1
LIP_Base
LIP Input Sheet Duke Enery Catawba-Wateree CHEOPS Model
Input sheet for LIP criterion to be modeled in the Catawba Wateree CHEOPS Model
Data updated:08/15/2005 09/15/2005 09/27/2005
Intended Scenario:Base Condition, by-plant changes to Minimum Elevations Days of Month to Recalculate LIP Conditions:1 --
Modified By:Brian Krolak Ey Miles
Reservoir Critial Elevations (should be at or below the Minimum Elevation entered in the scenario being run.)
Reservoir Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Critical Reservoir
Elevation (ft, relative
datum)61.0 89.4 94.0 74.9 90.0 94.3 92.6 95.0 87.2 80.3 88.5
Critical Flows (flows from dams per LIP documentation)
Reservoir Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Critical Flow (cfs) Jan 231.0 -231.0 80.0 --916.0 -550.0 -1257.0
Critical Flow (cfs) Feb 289.0 -289.0 80.0 --926.0 -900.0 -1494.0
Critical Flow (cfs) Mar 244.0 -244.0 80.0 --845.0 -845.0 -1320.0
Critical Flow (cfs) Apr 192.0 -192.0 80.0 --800.0 -728.0 -982.0
Critical Flow (cfs) May 139.0 -139.0 80.0 --800.0 -510.0 -800.0
Critical Flow (cfs) Jun 145.0 -145.0 80.0 --800.0 -550.0 -800.0
Critical Flow (cfs) Jul 123.0 -123.0 80.0 --800.0 -452.0 -800.0
Critical Flow (cfs) Aug 137.0 -137.0 80.0 --800.0 -452.0 -800.0
Critical Flow (cfs) Sep 125.0 -125.0 80.0 --800.0 -399.0 -800.0
Critical Flow (cfs) Oct 134.0 -134.0 80.0 --800.0 -434.0 -800.0
Critical Flow (cfs) Nov 128.0 -128.0 80.0 --800.0 -514.0 -800.0Critical Flow (cfs) Dec 140.0 -140.0 80.0 --800.0 -550.0 -800.0
BOM Storage/Target Storage ratio
Ratio less
than or equal
to
Ratio
greater than
6 Month
USGS
Gage
hydrology
sum less
than or
equal to
Stage 0 90%85%
Stage 1 90%75%78%
Stage 2 75%54%65%
Stage 3 54%26%55%Stage 4 26%0%40%
Changed Wateree and
Wylie Critical flows to a low
of 800 cfs based on request
from Duke on 9/13/05.
Modified BOM storage target
ratios for stages 2 to 4 9/14/05
based on deeper dips into Lake
James and Lake Norman in Stage
1
File: LIP_Base.xls, Tab: Data Page 1 of 2 Printed: 06/21/2006, 2:31 PM
LIP Input Sheet Duke Enery Catawba-Wateree CHEOPS Model
Actions to be performed
Licensee Actions Licensee
Delay in
implementing
Actions
(days)
NLPF
Reduction
(%)
Reduction to
difference
between
NLPF and
Critical Flow
Bypass
Reduction
(%)
Reduction
to
difference
between
Bypass and
Critical
Flow
Recreation
Flows
Reduction
(%)
Plant 1
Normal
Minimum
Pond
Elevation
Reduction
(ft,
absolute)
Plant 2
Normal
Minimum
Pond
Elevation
Reduction
(ft,
absolute)
Plant 3
Normal
Minimum
Pond
Elevation
Reduction
(ft,
absolute)
Plant 4
Normal
Minimum
Pond
Elevation
Reduction
(ft,
absolute)
Plant 5
Normal
Minimum
Pond
Elevation
Reduction
(ft,
absolute)
Plant 6
Normal
Minimum
Pond
Elevation
Reduction
(ft,
absolute)
Plant 7
Normal
Minimum
Pond
Elevation
Reduction
(ft,
absolute)
Plant 8
Normal
Minimum
Pond
Elevation
Reduction
(ft,
absolute)
Plant 9
Normal
Minimum
Pond
Elevation
Reduction
(ft,
absolute)
Plant 10
Normal
Minimum
Pond
Elevation
Reduction
(ft,
absolute)
Plant 11
Normal
Minimum
Pond
Elevation
Reduction
(ft,
absolute)
Stage 0 4 0%0%0%0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stage 1 4 60%60%60%5 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Stage 2 4 95%95%100%20 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2
Stage 3 4 100%100%100%29 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3
Stage 4 4 100%100%100%critical critical critical critical critical critical critical critical critical critical critical
Consumptive Withdrawal Reduction (%)
Owners of public and
large water supply
intakes
Owner Delay
in
implementing
Actions
(days)Plant 1 Plant 2 Plant 3 Plant 4 Plant 5 Plant 6 Plant 7 Plant 8 Plant 9 Plant 10 Plant 11
Stage 0 4 0%
Stage 1 4 0.6%3.0%3.0%3.0%1.9%3.0%0.6%3.0%3.0%3.0%0.9%
Stage 2 4 1.3%7.0%7.0%7.0%4.5%6.9%1.4%7.0%7.0%7.0%2.0%
Stage 3 4 2.8%15.0%15.0%15.0%9.6%14.8%3.0%15.0%15.0%15.0%4.3%Stage 4 4 4.6%25.0%25.0%25.0%16.1%24.7%4.9%25.0%25.0%25.0%7.2%
LIP Recovery
Days delayed after storage and hydrology condition recovery for groundwater wells to indicate groundwater levels have recovered
From Stage
4 to Stage 3
From Stage
3 to Stage 2
From Stage
2 to Stage
1
From Stage
1 to Stage
0
Stage 0 to
Normal
Groundwater Monitor 0 0 0 0 0
File: LIP_Base.xls, Tab: Data Page 2 of 2 Printed: 06/21/2006, 2:31 PM