The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20141224 Ver 1_More Info Received_20150413Homewood, Sue From: Gerald Pottern <gpottern @rjgacarolina.com> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 11:01 AM To: Bailey, David E SAW Cc: Alsmeyer, Eric C SAW; Homewood, Sue; Ellis, John; Bryant, Shari L.; twarren @cityofroxboro.com; Stimpson, Paul Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Roxboro Water Intake, Dan River, Caswell +Person counties; SAW - 2014 -02236 (UNCLASSIFIED) Attachments: PCN Form Roxboro.DanIntake- 3.pdf, PCN Figures 11A- B.Apr2015 revised.Roxbo- Yancey.pdf Dave -- Attached are the latest PCN revsions with section C2 on page 6 revised to include crossings W2 and W3, and the revised Figures 11A and 1113 with wetlands W2 and W3 re- inserted. We're waiting for SHPO and FWS letters. Gerald - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: "Bailey, David E SAW" < David.E.Bailey2 @usace.army.mil> To: "Gerald Pottern" <gpottern @rjgacarolina.com> Cc: " Alsmeyer, Eric C SAW" < Eric .C.Alsmeyer @usace.army.mil >; "Homewood, Sue" <sue.homewood @ncdenr.gov >; "Ellis, John" <john_ellis @fws.gov >; "Bryant, Shari L." <shari.bryant @ncwildlife.org >; < twarren @cityofroxboro.com >; " Stimpson, Paul" <PStimpson @LaBellaPC.com >; "Gledhill - earley, Renee" <renee.gledhill - earley @ncdcr.gov> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 8:59 AM Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Roxboro Water Intake, Dan River, Caswell +Person counties; SAW- 2014 -02236 (UNCLASSIFIED) Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Thanks Gerald. I appreciate you sending the revised information including detailed descriptions. As you allude to I will need SHPO and FWS confirmation correspondence before I can verify the use of NWP 12. In the mean time, I do have a correction to make for the JD which may affect a portion of the PCN: In my notes I did not record having removed wetlands W2 and W3 from Jurisdiction. They are certainly swales between farm fields, but based on my notes and recollection they are Jurisdictional due to meeting the 3 wetland criteria and (based on best available information) connecting (eventually) to a TNW. Please make these corrections on your PCN figures. If this correction changes anything with respect to the PCN please make those changes and email them to me. Thanks again, and please let me know if you have any questions. -Dave Bailey David E. Bailey, PWS Regulatory Project Manager US Army Corps of Engineers CE- SAW -RG -R 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the El Yes [D No ❑Unknown Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? 6. Future Project Plans 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ® preliminary ❑ Final David Bailey, 11 Feb 2015 of determination was made? pumping facilities and raw water line to Yanceyville will be constructed at least 5 to 10 years laters, based on current 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company: Name (if known): Gerald Pottern (consultant) Other: Robert J. Goldstein & Assoc (RJG &A) 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for El Yes [D No ❑Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 2. Wetland Impacts 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. NA. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ® Yes ❑ No 6b. If yes, explain. The intake channel, pump station building pad, and access road is scheduled to be built in 2015. The pumping facilities and raw water line to Yanceyville will be constructed at least 5 to 10 years laters, based on current population growth and water demand projections. The applicant is aware that the permit authorization will likely expire before Phase 2 construction begins, and may need to be re- permitted at that time. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact # Type of Jurisdiction Permanent (P) or Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps, DWQ non -404) Area of impact Temporary T & Figure # if known & Lat -Long coord acres W 1 ®P ❑ T excavate intake floodplain ® Yes ® Corps 36.5332 YG = 0.084 channel, Fig 6. depression E] No E] DWQ 79.2198 W2 ❑ P ® T roadside pipeline linear wetland ❑ Yes ® Corps 36.4942 ditch = 0.008 crossing, Fig 11A. (ditched seep) ® No ❑ DWQ 79.2417 W3 ❑ P ® T roadside pipeline linear wetland ❑ Yes ® Corps 36.4695 ditch = 0.003 crossing, Fig 11B. (ditched seep) ® No ❑ DWQ 79.2607 W 5 [-I P ®T off -road pipeline alluvial wetland E] Yes ® Corps 36.3924 YE = 0.021 crossing, Fig 11D. ® No ❑ DWQ 79.3472 W6 ❑ P ®T off -road pipeline alluvial wetland El Yes ® Corps 36.3938 YF = 0.014 crossing, Fig 11D. ® No ❑ DWQ 79.3421 2g. Total wetland impacts (worst -case, extending 10 ft beyond road ROW and 30 ft wide off -road 0.130 acre construction corridors) = 0.084 acre permanent impact; 0.046 acre temp impact. 2h. Comments: Wetland YD, along NC -62 @ Lat 36.4197 (identified as W4 in the 2006 EA and in the Nov 2014 PCN) will be avoided. Page 6 of 14 PCN Form - Version 1.3, Dec 2008 Figure 11R. USGS National Map, Yancgville raw water line, Intake site Sta 0 +00 to Sta,198 +00. Figure 11 B. USGS National Map, Yancgville raw water line, Sta 198 +00 to Sta, 412 +00. Milton and Leasburg USGS topographic quadrangles. Leasburg and Yancey llle USGS topographic quadrangles.