Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0086827_Permit Modification_20040319 0 \NAT. Michael F.Easley,Governor • co• Q State of North Carolina G William G. Ross,Jr.,Secretary Department of Environment and Natural Resources 7 - ♦ y' O .0 Alan W.Klimek,P.E.,Director Division of Water Quality March 19,2004 Mr.Bruce Biehl Brenntag Southeast,Inc. 2000 East Pettigrew Street Durham,North Carolina 27702 Subject: NPDES Permit Modification Permit Number NC0086827 Brenntag Southeast,Inc. Durham County Dear Mr.Biehl: The Division issued NPDES permit NC0086827 to Brenntag Southeast,Inc.on October 31,2001. The Division has received your January 30,2004 proposal for permit modification at the subject facility. In your letter,you requested that monitoring for the following parameters be removed as a permit condition: chloroethane,chloroform,ethyl benzene,isopropyl ether,methylene chloride,methyl isobutyl ketone, naphthalene,phenol,sec-butylbenzene,tert-butylbenzene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene,and 1,2,4- trimethylbenzene.This request was based on the fact that these constituents were not found at detectable levels in the effluent for at least the past twelve months(except for phenol,which was detected once and that was thought to be a lab en-or). In addition,you requested that the limit and monitoring for bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate be removed as a permit requirement since it also was not detected in effluent samples for the past year(except for once which was discounted as a lab error). Finally,you requested that the effluent sample type for chronic toxicity be changed from composite to grab due to extenuating circumstances at the site that make composite sampling costly,time consuming,and less accurate in indicating the true toxicity of the effluent. The Division has examined the effluent data from this discharge and agrees that removal of those parameters that have not been detected for the past 12 months is appropriate. Therefore,monitoring of the following twelve parameters will no longer be required:chloroethane,chloroforni,ethyl benzene,isopropyl ether,methylene y chloride,3methyl isobutyl ketone,naphthalene,;xsec-butylbenzene,tert-butylbenzene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, 1,3,5- trimethylbenzene,and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene. The Division also acknowledges that it is possible that the one sampling event which showed detectable levels of phenol and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate might have reflected laboratory error rather than actual contamination of effluent. However,permit requirements cannot be removed based upon the assumption of lab error,but must be removed based upon accurate data. Therefore,current permit requirements for these parameters will remain unchanged at this time. Your request to be permitted to collect a grab sample rather than a composite sample for toxicity testing has also been approved based upon the demonstration that the discharge,if protected from prolonged exposure to air in the vicinity of the discharge,does not cause toxicity. In accordance with your permit modification request and our review,the Division is forwarding herewith a modification to the subject permit. Enclosed please find the modified permit pages. These pages should be inserted into your permit and the old ones discarded.This permit modification is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994(or as subsequently amended). Please take notice that this permit is not transferable. This permit does not affect the legal requirement to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources,Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local government permit that may be required. 161 7 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617-TELEPHONE 91 9-733-5083/FAX 919-733-0719 VISIT US ON THE WEB AT http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES f Permit No. NC0086827 Brenntag Southeast, Inc. Groundwater Remediation Page 2 If you have any questions concerning this permit,please contact Mrs. Dawn Jeffries at telephone number (919)733-5083,extension 595. Sincere y, Alan W. Klimek,P.E. Enclosure: Permit Modification cc: Raleigh Regional Office,Water Quality Section Aquatic Toxicology Unit Central Files ` 3PDES Permit File I • Permit NC0086827 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, Brenntag Southeast, Inc. is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the Brenntag Southeast, Inc. 2000 East Pettigrew Street Durham County to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Third Fork Creek, classified C-NSW waters, in the Cape Fear River Basin in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof. This permit shall become effective March 19, 2004. This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on October 30, 2005. Signed this day March 19, 2004. 4,1Clan W. Klimek P.E., Director Division of Water Quality By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission r Permit NC0086827 SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility,whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked. As of this permit issuance,any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore,the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements, terms,and provisions included herein. Brenntag Southeast, Inc. is hereby authorized to: 1. Continue to operate an existing 0.0144 MGD groundwater remediation treatment system at a facility located at Brenntag Southeast, Inc., 2000 East Pettigrew Street, Durham, Durham County. 2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map through outfall 001, into an unnamed tributary to Third Fork Creek, which is classified C-NSW waters in the Cape Fear River Basin. Permit NC0086827 A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge treated groundwater from outfall(s) 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below: '' F f tl-EN'T LIMITS mbicrtrOlkiNG REQuiltkMENts CHARACTERISTICS Monthly Weekly Daily Measurement Sample Type Sample Average Average Maximum Frequency I.ocratinul Flow' 0.0144 MGD Continuous Recording E or I Total Suspended Solids 30.0 mg/L Monthly Grab E Oil and Grease2 Monthly Grab E Iron Monthly Grab E Manganese Monthly Grab E Benzene 71.4µg/L Monthly Grab E Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 5.9µg/L Monthly Grab E 1,1 -Dichloroethene / 3.2µg/L Monthly Grab E Tetrachloroethene 8.85µg/L Monthly Grab E Trichloroethene 81.0µg/L Monthly Grab E Toluene 11.0µg/L Monthly Grab E Carbon disulfide3 Monthly lY Grab E V Phenol3 Monthly Grab E Vinyl Chloride _ Monthly Grab E Xylenes(Total) Monthly Grab E EPA Method 624/625(Full Suite) Annually Grab E Total Nitrogen Monthly Grab E Chronic Toxicity4 Quarterly Grab E Footnotes: 1. Sample Location: E-Effluent, I- Influent 2. The grab sample for oil and grease should be skimmed from the surface in a quiescent zone, such as a holding tank, if possible. 3. If after one year of sampling (12 sampling events) this analtye has not been detected above the quantitation limit, the permittee may request that the Division evaluate removing that parameter as a condition for the permit. 4. Chronic P/F (Ceriodaphnia) a 90%, January, April, July, and October. The discharge shall contain no floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts. [Fwd:Re'[Fwd:Re:brenntag se permit change]] Subject: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: brenntag se permit change]] Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:27:44 -0500 From: Kirk Stafford<kirk.stafford@ncmail.net> To: Dawn Jeffries <Dawn.Jeffries@ncmail.net> Hey Dawn, I am not aware of any concerns the RRO has concerning switching from composite to grab. -Kirk Stafford-Regional Coordinator for tox testing Original Message Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: brenntag se permit change] Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:34:09-0500 From:Randy Jones<randy.jones@ncmail.net> To: Kirk Stafford<kirk.stafford@ncmail.net> References: <4056045A.4000409@ncmail.net> If you do not mind, that would be great. Thanks, RJ Kirk Stafford wrote: This sounds OK to me. Do you want me to contact Dawn? -Kirk Original Message Subject: Re: brenntag se permit change Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:58:42 -0500 From:Matt Matthews <matt.matthews@ncmail.net> To: Kirk Stafford<kirk.stafford@ncmail.net> References: <4055F79E.2060903@ncmail.net> Kirk, If y'all feel that a grab would be representative, then we're fine with it. Dawn had talked with me last week about it. It's a groundwater remediation facility that was having problems with contamination of their sampler from the air. Call me if you have questions. Matt Kirk Stafford wrote: > Hey Matt, 1 of 2 3/15/2004 3:50 PM [Fwd:Res[Fwd:Re:brenntag se permit change]] • , • > Dawn Jefferies of the central office is asking for the RRO input on > changing Brenntag's permit (NC0086827) from composite to grab for > chronic toxicity. I don't remember what your group's opinions was. > Please help me remember. Thanks. > -Kirk Matt Matthews v-(919) 733-2136 NC DENR/Division of Water Quality f-(919) 733-9959 Aquatic Toxicology Unit MailTo:Matt.Matthews@ncmail.net 1621 Mail Service Center http://www.esb.enr.state.nc.us Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 2 of 2 3/15/2004 3:50 PM . • 17tcc Jew F E 9 3 2004 3//s/rif ARCADIS ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina,Inc. 801 Corporate Center Drive Infrastructure, buildings, environment, communications Suite 300 Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-5073 David A. Goodrich Tel 919 854 1282 Supervisor Fax 919 854 5448 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources www.arcadis-us.com Division of Water Quality National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Unit ENVIRONMENTAL 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617 Subject: Permit Modification Request for NPDES Permit No.NC0086827 Date: Brenntag Southeast Facility,Durham,North Carolina 30 January 2004 Contact: Dear Mr. Goodrich: Jim Shilliday ARCADIS G&M, Inc. (ARCADIS)has prepared this letter on behalf of Brenntag Extension: Southeast,Inc. (Brenntag)to request a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination 246 System(NPDES)permit modification for the Brenntag facility located at 2000 East Pettigrew Street in Durham,North Carolina. The facility currently operates a E-mall: groundwater treatment system that is authorized to discharge to surface water under jshilliday@arcadis-us.com NPDES Permit No.NC0086827. Our ref: As required by the permit,Brenntag monitors the treated groundwater effluent on a NC000368.0013.00002 monthly basis for a variety of volatile organic, semi-volatile organic,and inorganic constituents via a grab sample. Brenntag also monitors the effluent on a quarterly basis for chronic toxicity via a composite sample. Fourteen of the volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds specified for analysis in the NPDES Permit are flagged with the notation, "If after one year of sampling (12 sampling events)this analyte has not been detected above the quantitation limit, the permittee may request that the Division evaluate removing that parameter as a condition of the permit." The historical analytical results for the 14 compounds which may potentially be removed from the required analyte list are summarized in the attached Table 1. The results summarized on Table 1 include all effluent samples collected from the groundwater remediation system since it was activated in June 2001 through December 2003. As shown in Table 1,none of the 14 noted parameters have been detected in treated groundwater effluent at the Brenntag facility with the exception of carbon disulfide (which has been detected twice and is a confirmed contaminant at the site)and Part of a bigger picture . . ARCADIS Mr.Goodrich 30 January 2004 phenol(which was detected once and the detection was thought to be caused by laboratory contamination as this semi-volatile organic compound is not known to be a contaminant associated with the groundwater at the site). Based on these data, Brenntag requests that monitoring of the following parameters be removed as a ()lr ply permit condition: chloroethane,chloroforth,ethyl benzene, iso• opyl ether, methylene chloride,methyl isobutyl ketone,naphthal6e4MP sec-butylbenzenee, tert-butylbenzen, 1,1,1-trichloroethan, 1,3,5-trimethylbenze`ne,:nd 1,2,4-trimetriyl , benzene. d ,,tu2 ( (rs t '`rz' 5-) 6 NES In addition,Brenntag would like to request the removal of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate T� from the list of required analytes for the monthly effluent samples. This compound is a know laboratory contaminant and it is not a constituent of concern associated with groundwater at the site. This constituent has only been detected in one effluent sample(sample collected on September 14,2003)out of the 32 NPDES sampling events conducted to date. The detection of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in the effluent sample collected on September 14, 2003,was discounted as laboratory error or laboratory contamination as was the detection((phenol during that same sampling 6- event. - s \ss •�' ,DO Brenntag also requests that the DWQ consider amending the permit to allow chronic', 1 os' toxicity to be analyzed from a grab sample rather than a composite sample. �v �x� •0� Currently the composite sampling procedure requires that the composite sampling UGt equipment be placed inside a 55 gallon plastic drum which is then sealed and the air inside the drum is purged with nitrogen. This sample collection procedure was developed because the composite sample collection equipment is located near the acid repackaging area and the air in this area periodically contains elevated concentrations of ammonia gas. It was determined that the ammonia gas was coming in contact with the composite sampling equipment over the 24 hour period that the equipment is sampling the effluent. It is suspected that the ammonia gas was causing elevated chlorine concentrations in the composite samples and the elevated chlorine concentrations caused several samples collected in 2002 to fail the chronic toxicity testing procedure. A summary of all historical effluent sampling data(including chronic toxicity test data)since system startup in June 2001 is included in attached Table 2. The effluent samples have passed each quarterly chronic toxicity test beginning in October 2002 which is the first sampling event to include the equipment containerization process discussed above. The containerization process is time consuming and costly; therefore,we would like to eliminate the need for this process by amending the sampling protocol to allow for collection of grab samples as opposed to composite samples. Page: G:IENMSouthchemWC036E.013WPDES Ltr to DY.VtNPDPES Ltr to DWQ.doc 2/3 ARCADIS Mr.Goodrich 30 January 2004 We look forward to your response regarding this request for permit modification. Should you have any questions regarding this letter request,please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc. ck Bertz,P.E. ames E. Shilliday, Senior Scientist/Project Engineer Senior Scientist/Proj u •.ger Brenntag Southeast,Inc. Bruce Biehl, Director of Regulatory Affairs Page: G.1ENV1Southdrcm\NC0366.0131NPDES Lir to DWQINPDPES Ltr to DWQ.doc 3/3 Page 1 of 1 I Table 1. Historical Data Summary of Effluent Sampling Results for Select NPDES Parameters,Brenntag Southeast Facility(Former SouthChem Facility),Durham,North Carolina. V Methyl Carbon Isopropyl Methylene Isobutyl sec- tort- 1,1,1- 1,3,5- 1,2,4- Date Disulfide Chloroethane Chloroform Ethylbenzene ether Chloride Ketone Napthalene Phenol Butylbenzene Butylbenzene Trichloroethane Trimethylbenzene Trimethylbenzene (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (u8/I-) (ug/L) 6/22/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 7/23/01 46 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <10 <10 <I.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 8/31/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <5.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 9/21/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 10/30/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 11/26/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 12/10/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1/24/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10 <5.0 <10 <10 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 2/20/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10 10 B <10 <10 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 3/25/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 4/25/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <10 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 5/23/02 <5.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <11.9 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 6/24/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 7/17/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <11.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 8/1/02 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 9/16/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <12.5 <12.5 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 10/21/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 11/20/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <1.0 <11.6 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 12/19/02 21.4 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <11.1 <11.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1/1/03 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 2/11/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 3/26/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <11.8 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 4/14/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <12.3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 5/29/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 6/16/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 7/21/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 8/19/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <11.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 9/14/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 320 ' <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 9/29/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 .-<10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 10/13/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <10. <10. <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 11/14/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 12/29/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <10.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NOTES NS-Not Sampled Samples were not collected in August 2002 and January 2003 as there was no discharge during those months. O:1ENVdSouthchem\NC0368.013V1istorical Effluent Sampling Results.xls Page 1 of 3 Table 2. Historical Data Summary of Effluent Sampling Results for all NPDES Parameters,Brenntag Southeast/Facility(FormerASouthChem Facility),Durham,North Carolina. Total V , / V ' / / ‘.../.'i V Suspended Oil and v V \J Bis(2-ethylhexyl) 1,1- V t (/ Carbon Date Effluent Flow Solids Grease Iron Manganese Benzene phthalate Dichloroethene Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene Toluene Disulfide MGD (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) 6/22/01 0.0052 3 <5.56 0.055 1.82 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 7/23/01 0.0013 6.6 <0.9 1.1 1.42 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 46 8/31/01 0.0015 <2.1 <5.21 0.463 0.492 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 9/21/01 0.0029 <2.0 <0.89 4.06 3.31 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 10/30/01 0.0035 <2.0 <5.26 <0.050 0.993 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 11/26/01 0.0034 5.2 <5.43 0.188 2.29 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 12/10/01 0.0030 2.4 <5.26 0.231 0.56 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1/24/02 0.0040 4.2 <5.68 0.445 2.16 <5.0 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 2/20/02 0.0030 <2.0 <5.43 0.47 2.61 <5.0 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 3/25/02 0.0030 5.2 <5.32 0.371 3.06 <5.0 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 4/25/02 0.0027 <4.0 <5.21 <0.050 0.329 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 5/23/02 0.0023 <2.0 <10.0 0.43 0.455 <1.0 <11.9 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 6/24/02 0.0028 <2.0 <5.26 0.098 0.239 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 7/17/02 0.0016 <2.0 <5.56 0.162 0.223 <1.0 <11.1 <1.0 <1.0 2 <1.0 <1.0 8/1/02 0 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 9/16/02 0.0029 <3.33 <5.00 0.286 0.17 <1.0 <12.5 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 10/21/02 0.0030 <1.11 <5.38 0.385 0.385 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 11/20/02 0.0029 <2.0 <5.21 0.159 0.93 <1.0 <11.6 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 12/19/02 0.0039 <5.0 <5.32 0.217 7.27 <1.0 <11.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 21.4 1/1/03 0 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 2/11/03 0.0038 <2.0 <5.0 0.07 2.99 1.4 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 3/26/03 0.0023 1.5 <5.21 0.195 2.43 <1.0 <11.8 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 4/14/03 0.0027 <1.03 <5.32 0.359 2.09 <1.0 <12.3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 5/29/03 0.0029 3 <5.43 1.07 1.05 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 6/16/03 0.0027 <2.0 <5.10 0.152 0.532 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 7/21/03 0.0031 <1.02 <5.10 0.134 0.044 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 8/19/03 0.0022 <1.2 31.3 0.403 0.291 <1.0 <11.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 9/14/031 0.0015 12 <5.10 0.778 0.216 <1.0 155 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 9/29/03 0.0015 NS NS NS NS <1.0 �t0: <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 10/13/03 0.0008 2.2 <5.0 0.446 0.213 <1.00 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 11/14/03 0.0025 <2.00 <5.00 0.455 0.851 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 12/29/03 0.0022 1.6 <5.00 0.267 0.617 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NOTES NS-Not Sampled Samples were not collected in August 2002 and January 2003 ae there was no discharge during those months. 9/14/03' Detections of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and phenol were due to laboratory error;a subsequent sample collected on 9/29/03 did not contain detectable concentrations of either compound G:\ENVISouthchem\NC0368.013Uiistorical Effluent Sampling Resultsxls • Page 2 of 3 f Table 2. Historical Data Summary of Effluent Sampling Results,Brenntag SouthChem,Durham,North Carolina. Methyl 1,1- 1,2- Isopropyl Methylene Isobutyl sec- tent- 1,1,1- Date Chloroethane Chloroform Dichloroethane Dichloroethane Ethylbenzene ether Chloride Ketone Napthalene Phenol Butylbenzene Butylbenzene Trichloroethane (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (u€/14 (u8/L) (ug/L) (ug/1-) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/1-) (ug/L) (ug/L) 6/22/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 7/23/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 8/31/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <5.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 9/21/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 10/30/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 11/26/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 12/10/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1/24/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10 <5.0 <10 <10 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 2/20/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10 10 B <10 <10 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 3/25/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 4/25/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <10 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 5/23/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <11.9 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 6/24/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 7/17/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <11.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 8/1/02 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 9/16/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <12.5 <12.5 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 10/21/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 11/20/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <1.0 <11.6 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 12/19/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <11.1 <11.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1/1/03 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 2/11/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 3/26/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <11.8 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 4/14/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <12.3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 5/29/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 6/16/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 7/21/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 8/19/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <11.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 9/14/03' <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 320 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 9/29/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 10/13/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <10. <10. <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 11/14/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 12/29/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <10.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NOTES NS-Not Sampled Samples were not collected in August 2002 and January 2003 as there was no discharge during those months. 9/14/03' Detections of bis(2-cthylbexyl)phthalate and phenol were due to laboratory error;a subsequent sample collected on 9/29/03 did not contain detectable concentrations of either compound G:1ENVASouthchem\NC0368.013Uiistorical Effluent Sampling Resuhs.xls Page 3 of 3 Table 2. Historical Data Summary of Effluent Sampling Restt�ts,Brenntag SouthChem,Durham,North Carolina. 1,3,5- 1,2,4- VinylVXylenes Total Chronic Date Trimethylbenzene Trimethylbenzene Chloride (total) Nitrogen Toxicity (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) 6/22/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.37 NS 7/23/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.53 NS 8/31/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.48 NS 9/21/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.39 PASS 10/30/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.1 FAIL 11/26/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.91 PASS 12/10/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.42 PASS 1/24/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 0.44 PASS 2/20/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 0.47 NS 3/25/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 0.55 NS 4/25/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.100 FAIL 5/23/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.100 PASS 6/24/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <0.100 FAIL 7/17/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.100 FAIL 8/1/02 NS NS NS NS NS NS 9/16/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.49 PASS 10/21/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.23 PASS 11/20/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.1 NS 12/19/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.39 NS 1/1/03 NS NS NS NS NS NS 2/11/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.18 PASS 3/26/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.24 NS 4/14/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.13 PASS 5/29/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.42 NS 6/16/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.100 NS 7/21/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.48 PASS 8/19/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.10 NS 9/14/031 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.56 NS 9/29/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NS NS 10/13/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.14 PASS 11/14/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.22 NS 12/29/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.14 NS NOTES NS-Not Sampled Samples were not collected in August 2002 and January 2003 as there was no discharge during those months. 9/14/03' Detections of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and phenol were due to laboratory error;a subsequent sample collected on 9/29/03 did not contain detectable concentrations of either compound 2 The sample collected on 9/16/02 did not pass the chronic toxicity test,but a second sample collected on 9/24/02 successfully passed G:\ENVISouthchem1NC0368.013\Historical Effluent Sampling Itesults.xls Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self-Monitoring Summary February 16,2004 FACILITY REQUIREMENT YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Boonville WINTP chr lim:81% 2000 Pass - - Pass - - NR/Fail,Pass- - Pass - - NC0020931/00I Begin:7/I/1999 Frequency Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp Single 2001 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - County:Yadkin Region:WSRO Subbasin:YAD02 2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - PF:0.2 Special 2003 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - 1Q10:0.015 1WC(%81.0 2004 Pass BP Oil Co-Gulf Prods Div/002 24hr LC50 ac monis epic fthd(grab) 2000 - - - - - - >100 - - - - - NC0036145/002 Begin:9/1/1999 Frequency A NonComp 2001 - - - - - - - - >100 - - - County:Johnston Region:RRO Subbasin:NEU02 2002 - - - - >100 - - - - - - - PF:VAR special 2003 _ >100 - - - - - - - - - - 7Q10:0.0. IWC(%100 2004 BP OH Co.-Galt Prods.Div/001 24hr LC50 ac monis epis fthd(grab) 2000 - - - - - - >100 - - - - - NC0036145/001 Begin:9/l/1999 Frequency A NonComp 2001 - - - - • - - - - >100 - - - County:Johnston Region:RRO Subbasin:NEU02 2002 - - - - >100 - - - - - - - PF:VAR special 2003 - >100 - - - - - - - - - - 7Q10:0.0 IWC(%100.0 2004 BP Oil Company chr lim:90%(grab) 2000 Pass Fail Fail Fail H - Pass Fail Fail Fail Pass - NC0086380/001 Begin:1 I/1/2003 Frequency Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp Single 2001 - Fall Pass - Fail Pass - Pass - - Late Pass County:Guilford Region:WSRO Subbasin:CPF02 2002 - Pass - - Pass - - NR/Pass - - Fail H PF:NA Special 2003 - H - - H - H H - - H - 7Q10:0.0 I WC(%;100 2004 Brea.tq Southeast,Inc. chr lim:22%(Grab) 2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - NC0078000/001 Begin:12/I2001 Frequency Q Jan Apr Jui Oct + NonComp Single 2001 Pass - - Pass - - NR/Pass - - Pass - - County:Guilford Region:WSRO Subbasin:CPF02 2002 Pass - - Pasa,Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - PF:0.216 Special 2003 Pass - - Piss - - Pass - - Pass - - 7Q10:1.2 1 W C(%;21.8 2004 Breautag Southeast,lee. chr lim:90% 2000- - - - - - - - - - - - NC0086827/001 Begin:12/12000 Frequency Q Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp Single 2001 N - - N - - N - - Fail 94.9 94.9 County:Durham Region:RRO Subbasin:CPF05 2002 Pass - - Fat 92.5 31.9 Fail H' 31.9,02.5 Pass - - PF:0.0144 special 2003 Late Pass - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - 1Q10:0.0 IWC(%;100 2004 B 4 WWTP chr lim:2.4% 7 2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - NC0060534/001 Begin:1/12001 Frequency Q Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp Single 2001 Pass - - Fail >4.8 >4.8 Pass - - Pass - - County:Transylvania Region:ARO Subbasin:FRB01 2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - PF: 2.5 Special 2003 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - 7Q10:161.0 I WC(%;2.4 2004 Bryson City WWTP chr lim:0.25% 2000 Pass - - NR Pass - Pass - - Pass - - NC0026557/001 Begin:5/1/2003 Frequency Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp Single 2001 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - NR/Pass - - County:Swain Region:ARO Subbasin:LTN02 2002 NR/Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - PF:0.60 Special 2003 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - 7Q10:365.0 I W C(%;0253 2004 Buckeye Lumberton,lac. chr lim:3.1%;if pf 4MGD chr lim 4.9% Y 2000 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - NC0005321/001 Begin:3/12000 Frequency Q Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp Single 2001 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - County:Robeson Region:FRO Subbasin:LUM51 2002 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - PF:2.5 Special 2003 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - H - 1Q10:11828 IWC(%2.3 2004 Bales CreekWWTP 24hrscp/flim:90% 2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - NC0030091/001 Begin:5/1/1996 Frequency Q + Jan Apr Jul Oct NonComp Single 2001 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - County:Harnett Region:FRO Subbasin:CPF07 2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - PF:0.50 Special 2003 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - 7Q10:600 IWC(%;0.13 2004 Buncombe County MSD chr lim:12% 2000 - Fail 33.9 33.9 >48 - - 33.9 - - 33.9 - NC0024911/001 Begin:2/12001 Frequency Q Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp Single 2001 - 17 - - 33.9 - - 33.9 - - >24 - County:Buncombe Region:ARO Subbasin:FRB02 2002 - 7.3 17 29.4 29.4 - - 17 - - 16.97 - PF:40.0 Special 2003 - 10.4 17 7.3 '24 - - >36 - - >36 - 1Q10:466.0 IWC(%:12.0 2004 V Pre 2000 Data Available LEGEND: PERM=Permit Requirement LET-Administrative Letter-Target Frequency=Monitoring frequency:Q-Quarterly;M-Monthly;BM-Bimonthly;SA-Semiannually;A-Annually;OWD-Only when discharging;D•Discontinued monitoring requirement Begin-First month required 1Q10=Receiving stream low flow criterion(cfs +=quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon failure or N Montle that testing must occur-ex.Jan,Apr,Jul.Oct NonComp=Current Compliance Requirement PF=Permitted flow(MGD) IWC%=Instream waste concentrati P/F=Pass/Fail test AC=Acute CHR-Chronic Data Notation:f-Fathead Minnow;•-Ceriodaphnia sp.:my-Mysid shrimp:ChV-Chronic value:P-Mortality of stated percentage at highest concentration;at•Performed by DWQ Aquatic Tox Unit;bt-Bad test Reporting Notation:--•=Data not required:NR-Not reports Facility Activity Status:I-Inactive.N-Newly lssued(To construct);H-Active but not discharging;t-More data available for month in question;• =ORC signature needed 5 • imap://charles.weaver%40dwq.denr.ncmailnet@cros.ncmail.net:143/f... Subject:Regarding Permit NC0086827 for the Brenntag Facility in Durham,N C From: "Jones,Alexandra" <AJonesl@arcadis-us.com> Date:Tue,9 Sep 2003 14:03:52-0600 To: "'charles.weaver@ncmajl.net"' <charles.weaver@ncmaiLnet> CC: "Shilliday,Jim" <JShilliday@arcadis-us.com> Mr. Weaver, Thank you for returning my call. As you requested, I am sending my questions to you in this e-mail regarding the NPDES permit for the groundwater treatment system at the Brenntag Durham facility. Currently, there are thirteen VOCs and one SVOC listed as monitoring requirements on this permit that are flagged with this qualification: "If after one year of sampling, this analyte has not been detected above the quantitation limit, the permittee may request that the Division evaluate removing that parameter as a condition of the permit." None of the fourteen qualified constituents except carbon disulfide, which was detected in December 2002 and July 2001, have been detected since the groundwater treatment system was activated in June 2001. We would like to request that the permit be modified to remove the thirteen constituents from the conditions of the permit. How should we go about this request process? Additionally, all analytical parameters for the permit, with the exception of chronic toxicity, are analyzed from a grab sample. The chronic toxicity is analyzed from two, 24-hour composite samples. In previous discussions with Matt Matthews of the DWQ, he has stated that it may be possible to modify the permit conditions to allow chronic toxicity to be analyzed from a grab sample rather than a composite if it can be demonstrated that the composition of the effluent does not vary in toxicity over time. I would like to discuss this possibility with your further, at your convenience. Thank you, E. Alexandra Jones, EIT ARCADIS - Raleigh NC 919.854.1282 x 150 1 of 1 9/10/2003 9:58 AM PART III OTHER REQUIREMENTS A. Construction No construction of wastewater treatment facilities or additions to add to the plant's treatment capacity or to change the type of process utilized at the treatment plant shall be begun until Final Plans and Specifications have been submitted to the Division of Water Quality and written approval and Authorization to Construct has been issued. B. Groundwater Monitoring The permittee shall, upon written notice from the Director of the Division of Water Quality, conduct groundwater monitoring as may be required to determine the compliance of this NPDES permitted facility with the current groundwater standards. C. Changes in Discharges of Toxic Substances The permittee shall notify the Permit Issuing Authority as soon as it knows or has reason to believe: a. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in the discharge, on a routine or frequent basis, of any toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit,if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels"; (1) One hundred micrograms per liter(100µg/L); (2) Two hundred micrograms per liter (200 µg/L) for acrolein and acrylonitrile; five hundred micrograms per liter (500 µg/L) for 2.4-dinitrophenol and for 2-methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol; and one milligram per liter(1 mg/L) for antimony; (3) Five (5) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application. b. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in any discharge, on a non-routine or infrequent basis, of a toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following"notification levels"; (1) Five hundred micrograms per liter (500.tg/L); (2) One milligram per liter (1 mg/L) for antimony; (3) Ten (10) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application. D. Requirement to Continually Evaluate Alternatives to Wastewater Discharges The permittee shall continually evaluate all wastewater disposal alternatives and pursue the most environmentally sound alternative of the reasonably cost effective alternatives. If the facility is in substantial non-compliance with the terms and conditions of the NPDES permit or governing rules, regulations or laws, the permittee shall submit a report in such form and detail as required by the Division evaluating these alternatives and a plan of action within sixty(60) days of notification by the Division. PART IV ANNUAL ADMINISTERING AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING FEE REQUIREMENTS A. The permittee must pay the annual administering and compliance monitoring fee within 30 (thirty) days after being billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee in a timely manner in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0105(b)(4) may cause this Division to initiate action to revoke the permit.