HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0086827_Permit Modification_20040319 0 \NAT. Michael F.Easley,Governor
• co•
Q State of North Carolina
G William G. Ross,Jr.,Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
7 - ♦ y'
O .0 Alan W.Klimek,P.E.,Director
Division of Water Quality
March 19,2004
Mr.Bruce Biehl
Brenntag Southeast,Inc.
2000 East Pettigrew Street
Durham,North Carolina 27702
Subject: NPDES Permit Modification
Permit Number NC0086827
Brenntag Southeast,Inc.
Durham County
Dear Mr.Biehl:
The Division issued NPDES permit NC0086827 to Brenntag Southeast,Inc.on October 31,2001. The
Division has received your January 30,2004 proposal for permit modification at the subject facility.
In your letter,you requested that monitoring for the following parameters be removed as a permit
condition: chloroethane,chloroform,ethyl benzene,isopropyl ether,methylene chloride,methyl isobutyl ketone,
naphthalene,phenol,sec-butylbenzene,tert-butylbenzene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene,and 1,2,4-
trimethylbenzene.This request was based on the fact that these constituents were not found at detectable levels in
the effluent for at least the past twelve months(except for phenol,which was detected once and that was thought to
be a lab en-or). In addition,you requested that the limit and monitoring for bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate be removed
as a permit requirement since it also was not detected in effluent samples for the past year(except for once which
was discounted as a lab error). Finally,you requested that the effluent sample type for chronic toxicity be changed
from composite to grab due to extenuating circumstances at the site that make composite sampling costly,time
consuming,and less accurate in indicating the true toxicity of the effluent.
The Division has examined the effluent data from this discharge and agrees that removal of those
parameters that have not been detected for the past 12 months is appropriate. Therefore,monitoring of the following
twelve parameters will no longer be required:chloroethane,chloroforni,ethyl benzene,isopropyl ether,methylene y
chloride,3methyl isobutyl ketone,naphthalene,;xsec-butylbenzene,tert-butylbenzene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, 1,3,5-
trimethylbenzene,and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene.
The Division also acknowledges that it is possible that the one sampling event which showed detectable
levels of phenol and bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate might have reflected laboratory error rather than actual
contamination of effluent. However,permit requirements cannot be removed based upon the assumption of lab
error,but must be removed based upon accurate data. Therefore,current permit requirements for these parameters
will remain unchanged at this time.
Your request to be permitted to collect a grab sample rather than a composite sample for toxicity testing has
also been approved based upon the demonstration that the discharge,if protected from prolonged exposure to air in
the vicinity of the discharge,does not cause toxicity.
In accordance with your permit modification request and our review,the Division is forwarding herewith a
modification to the subject permit. Enclosed please find the modified permit pages. These pages should be inserted
into your permit and the old ones discarded.This permit modification is issued pursuant to the requirements of
North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994(or as subsequently amended).
Please take notice that this permit is not transferable. This permit does not affect the legal requirement to
obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of
Land Resources,Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local government permit that may be
required.
161 7 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1617-TELEPHONE 91 9-733-5083/FAX 919-733-0719
VISIT US ON THE WEB AT http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/NPDES
f
Permit No. NC0086827
Brenntag Southeast, Inc. Groundwater Remediation
Page 2
If you have any questions concerning this permit,please contact Mrs. Dawn Jeffries at telephone number
(919)733-5083,extension 595.
Sincere y,
Alan W. Klimek,P.E.
Enclosure: Permit Modification
cc: Raleigh Regional Office,Water Quality Section
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Central Files
` 3PDES Permit File I
• Permit NC0086827
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other
lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina
Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as
amended,
Brenntag Southeast, Inc.
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Brenntag Southeast, Inc.
2000 East Pettigrew Street
Durham County
to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Third Fork Creek,
classified C-NSW waters, in the Cape Fear River Basin
in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective March 19, 2004.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on October 30, 2005.
Signed this day March 19, 2004.
4,1Clan W. Klimek P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
r
Permit NC0086827
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility,whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked.
As of this permit issuance,any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective.
Therefore,the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit
conditions, requirements, terms,and provisions included herein.
Brenntag Southeast, Inc. is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate an existing 0.0144 MGD groundwater remediation treatment
system at a facility located at Brenntag Southeast, Inc., 2000 East Pettigrew
Street, Durham, Durham County.
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached
map through outfall 001, into an unnamed tributary to Third Fork Creek, which
is classified C-NSW waters in the Cape Fear River Basin.
Permit NC0086827
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge treated groundwater from outfall(s) 001. Such discharges shall
be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
'' F f tl-EN'T LIMITS mbicrtrOlkiNG REQuiltkMENts
CHARACTERISTICS
Monthly Weekly Daily Measurement Sample Type Sample
Average Average Maximum Frequency I.ocratinul
Flow' 0.0144 MGD Continuous Recording E or I
Total Suspended Solids 30.0 mg/L Monthly Grab E
Oil and Grease2 Monthly Grab E
Iron Monthly Grab E
Manganese Monthly Grab E
Benzene 71.4µg/L Monthly Grab E
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 5.9µg/L Monthly Grab E
1,1 -Dichloroethene / 3.2µg/L Monthly Grab E
Tetrachloroethene 8.85µg/L Monthly Grab E
Trichloroethene 81.0µg/L Monthly Grab E
Toluene 11.0µg/L Monthly Grab E
Carbon disulfide3 Monthly lY Grab E
V Phenol3 Monthly Grab E
Vinyl Chloride _ Monthly Grab E
Xylenes(Total) Monthly Grab E
EPA Method 624/625(Full Suite) Annually Grab E
Total Nitrogen Monthly Grab E
Chronic Toxicity4 Quarterly Grab E
Footnotes:
1. Sample Location: E-Effluent, I- Influent
2. The grab sample for oil and grease should be skimmed from the surface in a quiescent zone, such
as a holding tank, if possible.
3. If after one year of sampling (12 sampling events) this analtye has not been detected above the
quantitation limit, the permittee may request that the Division evaluate removing that parameter
as a condition for the permit.
4. Chronic P/F (Ceriodaphnia) a 90%, January, April, July, and October.
The discharge shall contain no floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts.
[Fwd:Re'[Fwd:Re:brenntag se permit change]]
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: brenntag se permit change]]
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:27:44 -0500
From: Kirk Stafford<kirk.stafford@ncmail.net>
To: Dawn Jeffries <Dawn.Jeffries@ncmail.net>
Hey Dawn,
I am not aware of any concerns the RRO has concerning switching from composite to grab.
-Kirk Stafford-Regional Coordinator for tox testing
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: brenntag se permit change]
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:34:09-0500
From:Randy Jones<randy.jones@ncmail.net>
To: Kirk Stafford<kirk.stafford@ncmail.net>
References: <4056045A.4000409@ncmail.net>
If you do not mind, that would be great.
Thanks, RJ
Kirk Stafford wrote:
This sounds OK to me. Do you want me to contact Dawn?
-Kirk
Original Message
Subject: Re: brenntag se permit change
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 13:58:42 -0500
From:Matt Matthews <matt.matthews@ncmail.net>
To: Kirk Stafford<kirk.stafford@ncmail.net>
References: <4055F79E.2060903@ncmail.net>
Kirk,
If y'all feel that a grab would be representative, then we're fine with
it. Dawn had talked with me last week about it. It's a groundwater
remediation facility that was having problems with contamination of
their sampler from the air.
Call me if you have questions.
Matt
Kirk Stafford wrote:
> Hey Matt,
1 of 2 3/15/2004 3:50 PM
[Fwd:Res[Fwd:Re:brenntag se permit change]]
• , •
> Dawn Jefferies of the central office is asking for the RRO input on
> changing Brenntag's permit (NC0086827) from composite to grab for
> chronic toxicity. I don't remember what your group's opinions was.
> Please help me remember. Thanks.
> -Kirk
Matt Matthews v-(919) 733-2136
NC DENR/Division of Water Quality f-(919) 733-9959
Aquatic Toxicology Unit MailTo:Matt.Matthews@ncmail.net
1621 Mail Service Center http://www.esb.enr.state.nc.us
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
2 of 2 3/15/2004 3:50 PM
. • 17tcc
Jew
F E 9 3 2004 3//s/rif
ARCADIS ARCADIS G&M of North
Carolina,Inc.
801 Corporate Center Drive
Infrastructure, buildings, environment, communications Suite 300
Raleigh,
North Carolina 27607-5073
David A. Goodrich Tel 919 854 1282
Supervisor Fax 919 854 5448
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources www.arcadis-us.com
Division of Water Quality
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Unit ENVIRONMENTAL
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
Subject:
Permit Modification Request for NPDES Permit No.NC0086827 Date:
Brenntag Southeast Facility,Durham,North Carolina 30 January 2004
Contact:
Dear Mr. Goodrich: Jim Shilliday
ARCADIS G&M, Inc. (ARCADIS)has prepared this letter on behalf of Brenntag Extension:
Southeast,Inc. (Brenntag)to request a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination 246
System(NPDES)permit modification for the Brenntag facility located at 2000 East
Pettigrew Street in Durham,North Carolina. The facility currently operates a E-mall:
groundwater treatment system that is authorized to discharge to surface water under jshilliday@arcadis-us.com
NPDES Permit No.NC0086827.
Our ref:
As required by the permit,Brenntag monitors the treated groundwater effluent on a NC000368.0013.00002
monthly basis for a variety of volatile organic, semi-volatile organic,and inorganic
constituents via a grab sample. Brenntag also monitors the effluent on a quarterly
basis for chronic toxicity via a composite sample.
Fourteen of the volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds specified for analysis
in the NPDES Permit are flagged with the notation, "If after one year of sampling
(12 sampling events)this analyte has not been detected above the quantitation limit,
the permittee may request that the Division evaluate removing that parameter as a
condition of the permit." The historical analytical results for the 14 compounds
which may potentially be removed from the required analyte list are summarized in
the attached Table 1. The results summarized on Table 1 include all effluent
samples collected from the groundwater remediation system since it was activated in
June 2001 through December 2003.
As shown in Table 1,none of the 14 noted parameters have been detected in treated
groundwater effluent at the Brenntag facility with the exception of carbon disulfide
(which has been detected twice and is a confirmed contaminant at the site)and
Part of a bigger picture
. .
ARCADIS Mr.Goodrich
30 January 2004
phenol(which was detected once and the detection was thought to be caused by
laboratory contamination as this semi-volatile organic compound is not known to be
a contaminant associated with the groundwater at the site). Based on these data,
Brenntag requests that monitoring of the following parameters be removed as a ()lr ply
permit condition: chloroethane,chloroforth,ethyl benzene, iso• opyl ether,
methylene chloride,methyl isobutyl ketone,naphthal6e4MP sec-butylbenzenee,
tert-butylbenzen, 1,1,1-trichloroethan, 1,3,5-trimethylbenze`ne,:nd 1,2,4-trimetriyl ,
benzene. d ,,tu2 ( (rs t '`rz' 5-)
6 NES
In addition,Brenntag would like to request the removal of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate T�
from the list of required analytes for the monthly effluent samples. This compound
is a know laboratory contaminant and it is not a constituent of concern associated
with groundwater at the site. This constituent has only been detected in one effluent
sample(sample collected on September 14,2003)out of the 32 NPDES sampling
events conducted to date. The detection of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in the effluent
sample collected on September 14, 2003,was discounted as laboratory error or
laboratory contamination as was the detection((phenol during that same sampling 6-
event. - s \ss
•�' ,DO
Brenntag also requests that the DWQ consider amending the permit to allow chronic', 1 os'
toxicity to be analyzed from a grab sample rather than a composite sample. �v �x� •0�
Currently the composite sampling procedure requires that the composite sampling UGt
equipment be placed inside a 55 gallon plastic drum which is then sealed and the air
inside the drum is purged with nitrogen. This sample collection procedure was
developed because the composite sample collection equipment is located near the
acid repackaging area and the air in this area periodically contains elevated
concentrations of ammonia gas. It was determined that the ammonia gas was
coming in contact with the composite sampling equipment over the 24 hour period
that the equipment is sampling the effluent. It is suspected that the ammonia gas was
causing elevated chlorine concentrations in the composite samples and the elevated
chlorine concentrations caused several samples collected in 2002 to fail the chronic
toxicity testing procedure.
A summary of all historical effluent sampling data(including chronic toxicity test
data)since system startup in June 2001 is included in attached Table 2. The effluent
samples have passed each quarterly chronic toxicity test beginning in October 2002
which is the first sampling event to include the equipment containerization process
discussed above. The containerization process is time consuming and costly;
therefore,we would like to eliminate the need for this process by amending the
sampling protocol to allow for collection of grab samples as opposed to composite
samples.
Page:
G:IENMSouthchemWC036E.013WPDES Ltr to DY.VtNPDPES Ltr to DWQ.doc 2/3
ARCADIS Mr.Goodrich
30 January 2004
We look forward to your response regarding this request for permit modification.
Should you have any questions regarding this letter request,please do not hesitate to
contact us.
Sincerely,
ARCADIS G&M of North Carolina, Inc.
ck Bertz,P.E. ames E. Shilliday,
Senior Scientist/Project Engineer Senior Scientist/Proj u •.ger
Brenntag Southeast,Inc.
Bruce Biehl,
Director of Regulatory Affairs
Page:
G.1ENV1Southdrcm\NC0366.0131NPDES Lir to DWQINPDPES Ltr to DWQ.doc 3/3
Page 1 of 1
I
Table 1. Historical Data Summary of Effluent Sampling Results for Select NPDES Parameters,Brenntag Southeast Facility(Former SouthChem Facility),Durham,North Carolina.
V Methyl
Carbon Isopropyl Methylene Isobutyl sec- tort- 1,1,1- 1,3,5- 1,2,4-
Date Disulfide Chloroethane Chloroform Ethylbenzene ether Chloride Ketone Napthalene Phenol Butylbenzene Butylbenzene Trichloroethane Trimethylbenzene Trimethylbenzene
(ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (u8/I-) (ug/L)
6/22/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
7/23/01 46 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <10 <10 <I.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
8/31/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <5.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
9/21/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
10/30/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
11/26/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
12/10/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
1/24/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10 <5.0 <10 <10 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
2/20/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10 10 B <10 <10 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
3/25/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
4/25/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <10 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
5/23/02 <5.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <11.9 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
6/24/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
7/17/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <11.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
8/1/02 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
9/16/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <12.5 <12.5 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
10/21/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
11/20/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <1.0 <11.6 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
12/19/02 21.4 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <11.1 <11.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
1/1/03 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
2/11/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
3/26/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <11.8 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
4/14/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <12.3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
5/29/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
6/16/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
7/21/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
8/19/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <11.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
9/14/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 320 ' <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
9/29/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 .-<10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
10/13/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <10. <10. <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
11/14/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
12/29/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <10.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
NOTES
NS-Not Sampled
Samples were not collected in August 2002 and January 2003 as there was no discharge during those months.
O:1ENVdSouthchem\NC0368.013V1istorical Effluent Sampling Results.xls
Page 1 of 3
Table 2. Historical Data Summary of Effluent Sampling Results for all NPDES Parameters,Brenntag Southeast/Facility(FormerASouthChem Facility),Durham,North Carolina.
Total V , / V ' / / ‘.../.'i V
Suspended Oil and v V \J Bis(2-ethylhexyl) 1,1- V t (/ Carbon
Date Effluent Flow Solids Grease Iron Manganese Benzene phthalate Dichloroethene Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene Toluene Disulfide
MGD (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L)
6/22/01 0.0052 3 <5.56 0.055 1.82 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
7/23/01 0.0013 6.6 <0.9 1.1 1.42 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 46
8/31/01 0.0015 <2.1 <5.21 0.463 0.492 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
9/21/01 0.0029 <2.0 <0.89 4.06 3.31 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
10/30/01 0.0035 <2.0 <5.26 <0.050 0.993 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
11/26/01 0.0034 5.2 <5.43 0.188 2.29 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
12/10/01 0.0030 2.4 <5.26 0.231 0.56 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
1/24/02 0.0040 4.2 <5.68 0.445 2.16 <5.0 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
2/20/02 0.0030 <2.0 <5.43 0.47 2.61 <5.0 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
3/25/02 0.0030 5.2 <5.32 0.371 3.06 <5.0 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
4/25/02 0.0027 <4.0 <5.21 <0.050 0.329 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
5/23/02 0.0023 <2.0 <10.0 0.43 0.455 <1.0 <11.9 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0
6/24/02 0.0028 <2.0 <5.26 0.098 0.239 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
7/17/02 0.0016 <2.0 <5.56 0.162 0.223 <1.0 <11.1 <1.0 <1.0 2 <1.0 <1.0
8/1/02 0 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
9/16/02 0.0029 <3.33 <5.00 0.286 0.17 <1.0 <12.5 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
10/21/02 0.0030 <1.11 <5.38 0.385 0.385 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
11/20/02 0.0029 <2.0 <5.21 0.159 0.93 <1.0 <11.6 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
12/19/02 0.0039 <5.0 <5.32 0.217 7.27 <1.0 <11.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 21.4
1/1/03 0 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
2/11/03 0.0038 <2.0 <5.0 0.07 2.99 1.4 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
3/26/03 0.0023 1.5 <5.21 0.195 2.43 <1.0 <11.8 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
4/14/03 0.0027 <1.03 <5.32 0.359 2.09 <1.0 <12.3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
5/29/03 0.0029 3 <5.43 1.07 1.05 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
6/16/03 0.0027 <2.0 <5.10 0.152 0.532 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
7/21/03 0.0031 <1.02 <5.10 0.134 0.044 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
8/19/03 0.0022 <1.2 31.3 0.403 0.291 <1.0 <11.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
9/14/031 0.0015 12 <5.10 0.778 0.216 <1.0 155 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
9/29/03 0.0015 NS NS NS NS <1.0 �t0: <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
10/13/03 0.0008 2.2 <5.0 0.446 0.213 <1.00 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
11/14/03 0.0025 <2.00 <5.00 0.455 0.851 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
12/29/03 0.0022 1.6 <5.00 0.267 0.617 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
NOTES
NS-Not Sampled
Samples were not collected in August 2002 and January 2003 ae there was no discharge during those months.
9/14/03' Detections of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and phenol were due to laboratory error;a subsequent sample collected on 9/29/03 did not contain detectable concentrations of either compound
G:\ENVISouthchem\NC0368.013Uiistorical Effluent Sampling Resultsxls
•
Page 2 of 3
f
Table 2. Historical Data Summary of Effluent Sampling Results,Brenntag SouthChem,Durham,North Carolina.
Methyl
1,1- 1,2- Isopropyl Methylene Isobutyl sec- tent- 1,1,1-
Date Chloroethane Chloroform Dichloroethane Dichloroethane Ethylbenzene ether Chloride Ketone Napthalene Phenol Butylbenzene Butylbenzene Trichloroethane
(ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (u€/14 (u8/L) (ug/L) (ug/1-) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/1-) (ug/L) (ug/L)
6/22/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
7/23/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
8/31/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <5.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
9/21/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
10/30/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
11/26/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
12/10/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
1/24/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10 <5.0 <10 <10 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
2/20/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10 10 B <10 <10 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
3/25/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
4/25/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <10 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
5/23/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <11.9 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
6/24/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <10.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
7/17/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <11.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
8/1/02 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
9/16/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <12.5 <12.5 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
10/21/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <1.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
11/20/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <1.0 <11.6 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
12/19/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <11.1 <11.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
1/1/03 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS
2/11/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
3/26/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <11.8 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
4/14/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <12.3 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
5/29/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
6/16/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
7/21/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
8/19/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <11.1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
9/14/03' <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 320 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
9/29/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
10/13/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <10. <10. <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
11/14/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
12/29/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <2.5 <5.0 <10.0 <10.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
NOTES
NS-Not Sampled
Samples were not collected in August 2002 and January 2003 as there was no discharge during those months.
9/14/03' Detections of bis(2-cthylbexyl)phthalate and phenol were due to laboratory error;a subsequent sample collected on 9/29/03 did not contain detectable concentrations of either compound
G:1ENVASouthchem\NC0368.013Uiistorical Effluent Sampling Resuhs.xls
Page 3 of 3
Table 2. Historical Data Summary of Effluent Sampling Restt�ts,Brenntag SouthChem,Durham,North Carolina.
1,3,5- 1,2,4- VinylVXylenes Total Chronic
Date Trimethylbenzene Trimethylbenzene Chloride (total) Nitrogen Toxicity
(ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L)
6/22/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.37 NS
7/23/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.53 NS
8/31/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.48 NS
9/21/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.39 PASS
10/30/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.1 FAIL
11/26/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.91 PASS
12/10/01 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.42 PASS
1/24/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 0.44 PASS
2/20/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 0.47 NS
3/25/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 0.55 NS
4/25/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.100 FAIL
5/23/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.100 PASS
6/24/02 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <0.100 FAIL
7/17/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.100 FAIL
8/1/02 NS NS NS NS NS NS
9/16/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.49 PASS
10/21/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.23 PASS
11/20/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.1 NS
12/19/02 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.39 NS
1/1/03 NS NS NS NS NS NS
2/11/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.18 PASS
3/26/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.24 NS
4/14/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.13 PASS
5/29/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.42 NS
6/16/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.100 NS
7/21/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.48 PASS
8/19/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <0.10 NS
9/14/031 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.56 NS
9/29/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NS NS
10/13/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.14 PASS
11/14/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.22 NS
12/29/03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.14 NS
NOTES
NS-Not Sampled
Samples were not collected in August 2002 and January 2003 as there was no discharge during those months.
9/14/03' Detections of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and phenol were due to laboratory error;a subsequent sample collected on 9/29/03 did not contain detectable concentrations of either compound
2 The sample collected on 9/16/02 did not pass the chronic toxicity test,but a second sample collected on 9/24/02 successfully passed
G:\ENVISouthchem1NC0368.013\Historical Effluent Sampling Itesults.xls
Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self-Monitoring Summary February 16,2004
FACILITY REQUIREMENT YEAR JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Boonville WINTP chr lim:81% 2000 Pass - - Pass - - NR/Fail,Pass- - Pass - -
NC0020931/00I Begin:7/I/1999 Frequency Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp Single 2001 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
County:Yadkin Region:WSRO Subbasin:YAD02 2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
PF:0.2 Special 2003 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
1Q10:0.015 1WC(%81.0 2004 Pass
BP Oil Co-Gulf Prods Div/002 24hr LC50 ac monis epic fthd(grab) 2000 - - - - - - >100 - - - - -
NC0036145/002 Begin:9/1/1999 Frequency A NonComp 2001 - - - - - - - - >100 - - -
County:Johnston Region:RRO Subbasin:NEU02 2002 - - - - >100 - - - - - - -
PF:VAR special 2003 _ >100 - - - - - - - - - -
7Q10:0.0. IWC(%100 2004
BP OH Co.-Galt Prods.Div/001 24hr LC50 ac monis epis fthd(grab) 2000 - - - - - - >100 - - - - -
NC0036145/001 Begin:9/l/1999 Frequency A NonComp 2001 - - - - • - - - - >100 - - -
County:Johnston Region:RRO Subbasin:NEU02 2002 - - - - >100 - - - - - - -
PF:VAR special 2003 - >100 - - - - - - - - - -
7Q10:0.0 IWC(%100.0 2004
BP Oil Company chr lim:90%(grab) 2000 Pass Fail Fail Fail H - Pass Fail Fail Fail Pass -
NC0086380/001 Begin:1 I/1/2003 Frequency Q P/F + Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp Single 2001 - Fall Pass - Fail Pass - Pass - - Late Pass
County:Guilford Region:WSRO Subbasin:CPF02 2002 - Pass - - Pass - - NR/Pass - - Fail H
PF:NA Special 2003 - H - - H - H H - - H -
7Q10:0.0 I WC(%;100 2004
Brea.tq Southeast,Inc. chr lim:22%(Grab) 2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
NC0078000/001 Begin:12/I2001 Frequency Q Jan Apr Jui Oct + NonComp Single 2001 Pass - - Pass - - NR/Pass - - Pass - -
County:Guilford Region:WSRO Subbasin:CPF02 2002 Pass - - Pasa,Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
PF:0.216 Special 2003 Pass - - Piss - - Pass - - Pass - -
7Q10:1.2 1 W C(%;21.8 2004
Breautag Southeast,lee. chr lim:90% 2000- - - - - - - - - - - -
NC0086827/001 Begin:12/12000 Frequency Q Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp Single 2001 N - - N - - N - - Fail 94.9 94.9
County:Durham Region:RRO Subbasin:CPF05 2002 Pass - - Fat 92.5 31.9 Fail H' 31.9,02.5 Pass - -
PF:0.0144 special 2003 Late Pass - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
1Q10:0.0 IWC(%;100 2004
B 4 WWTP chr lim:2.4% 7 2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
NC0060534/001 Begin:1/12001 Frequency Q Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp Single 2001 Pass - - Fail >4.8 >4.8 Pass - - Pass - -
County:Transylvania Region:ARO Subbasin:FRB01 2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
PF: 2.5 Special 2003 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
7Q10:161.0 I WC(%;2.4 2004
Bryson City WWTP chr lim:0.25% 2000 Pass - - NR Pass - Pass - - Pass - -
NC0026557/001 Begin:5/1/2003 Frequency Q P/F + Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp Single 2001 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - NR/Pass - -
County:Swain Region:ARO Subbasin:LTN02 2002 NR/Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
PF:0.60 Special 2003 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
7Q10:365.0 I W C(%;0253 2004
Buckeye Lumberton,lac. chr lim:3.1%;if pf 4MGD chr lim 4.9% Y 2000 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
NC0005321/001 Begin:3/12000 Frequency Q Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp Single 2001 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
County:Robeson Region:FRO Subbasin:LUM51 2002 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass -
PF:2.5 Special 2003 - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - H -
1Q10:11828 IWC(%2.3 2004
Bales CreekWWTP 24hrscp/flim:90% 2000 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
NC0030091/001 Begin:5/1/1996 Frequency Q + Jan Apr Jul Oct NonComp Single 2001 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
County:Harnett Region:FRO Subbasin:CPF07 2002 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
PF:0.50 Special 2003 Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - -
7Q10:600 IWC(%;0.13 2004
Buncombe County MSD chr lim:12% 2000 - Fail 33.9 33.9 >48 - - 33.9 - - 33.9 -
NC0024911/001 Begin:2/12001 Frequency Q Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp Single 2001 - 17 - - 33.9 - - 33.9 - - >24 -
County:Buncombe Region:ARO Subbasin:FRB02 2002 - 7.3 17 29.4 29.4 - - 17 - - 16.97 -
PF:40.0 Special 2003 - 10.4 17 7.3 '24 - - >36 - - >36 -
1Q10:466.0 IWC(%:12.0 2004
V Pre 2000 Data Available
LEGEND:
PERM=Permit Requirement LET-Administrative Letter-Target Frequency=Monitoring frequency:Q-Quarterly;M-Monthly;BM-Bimonthly;SA-Semiannually;A-Annually;OWD-Only when discharging;D•Discontinued monitoring requirement
Begin-First month required 1Q10=Receiving stream low flow criterion(cfs +=quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon failure or N Montle that testing must occur-ex.Jan,Apr,Jul.Oct NonComp=Current Compliance Requirement
PF=Permitted flow(MGD) IWC%=Instream waste concentrati P/F=Pass/Fail test AC=Acute CHR-Chronic
Data Notation:f-Fathead Minnow;•-Ceriodaphnia sp.:my-Mysid shrimp:ChV-Chronic value:P-Mortality of stated percentage at highest concentration;at•Performed by DWQ Aquatic Tox Unit;bt-Bad test
Reporting Notation:--•=Data not required:NR-Not reports Facility Activity Status:I-Inactive.N-Newly lssued(To construct);H-Active but not discharging;t-More data available for month in question;• =ORC signature needed
5
•
imap://charles.weaver%40dwq.denr.ncmailnet@cros.ncmail.net:143/f...
Subject:Regarding Permit NC0086827 for the Brenntag Facility in Durham,N C
From: "Jones,Alexandra" <AJonesl@arcadis-us.com>
Date:Tue,9 Sep 2003 14:03:52-0600
To: "'charles.weaver@ncmajl.net"' <charles.weaver@ncmaiLnet>
CC: "Shilliday,Jim" <JShilliday@arcadis-us.com>
Mr. Weaver,
Thank you for returning my call. As you requested, I am sending my
questions to you in this e-mail regarding the NPDES permit for the
groundwater treatment system at the Brenntag Durham facility.
Currently, there are thirteen VOCs and one SVOC listed as monitoring
requirements on this permit that are flagged with this qualification: "If
after one year of sampling, this analyte has not been detected above the
quantitation limit, the permittee may request that the Division evaluate
removing that parameter as a condition of the permit." None of the fourteen
qualified constituents except carbon disulfide, which was detected in
December 2002 and July 2001, have been detected since the groundwater
treatment system was activated in June 2001. We would like to request that
the permit be modified to remove the thirteen constituents from the
conditions of the permit. How should we go about this request process?
Additionally, all analytical parameters for the permit, with the exception
of chronic toxicity, are analyzed from a grab sample. The chronic toxicity
is analyzed from two, 24-hour composite samples. In previous discussions
with Matt Matthews of the DWQ, he has stated that it may be possible to
modify the permit conditions to allow chronic toxicity to be analyzed from a
grab sample rather than a composite if it can be demonstrated that the
composition of the effluent does not vary in toxicity over time. I would
like to discuss this possibility with your further, at your convenience.
Thank you,
E. Alexandra Jones, EIT
ARCADIS - Raleigh NC
919.854.1282 x 150
1 of 1 9/10/2003 9:58 AM
PART III
OTHER REQUIREMENTS
A. Construction
No construction of wastewater treatment facilities or additions to add to the plant's treatment capacity or to
change the type of process utilized at the treatment plant shall be begun until Final Plans and Specifications have
been submitted to the Division of Water Quality and written approval and Authorization to Construct has been
issued.
B. Groundwater Monitoring
The permittee shall, upon written notice from the Director of the Division of Water Quality, conduct
groundwater monitoring as may be required to determine the compliance of this NPDES permitted facility with
the current groundwater standards.
C. Changes in Discharges of Toxic Substances
The permittee shall notify the Permit Issuing Authority as soon as it knows or has reason to believe:
a. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in the discharge, on a routine or frequent
basis, of any toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit,if that discharge will exceed the highest of the
following "notification levels";
(1) One hundred micrograms per liter(100µg/L);
(2) Two hundred micrograms per liter (200 µg/L) for acrolein and acrylonitrile; five hundred micrograms
per liter (500 µg/L) for 2.4-dinitrophenol and for 2-methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol; and one milligram per
liter(1 mg/L) for antimony;
(3) Five (5) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application.
b. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in any discharge, on a non-routine or
infrequent basis, of a toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the
highest of the following"notification levels";
(1) Five hundred micrograms per liter (500.tg/L);
(2) One milligram per liter (1 mg/L) for antimony;
(3) Ten (10) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application.
D. Requirement to Continually Evaluate Alternatives to Wastewater Discharges
The permittee shall continually evaluate all wastewater disposal alternatives and pursue the most environmentally
sound alternative of the reasonably cost effective alternatives. If the facility is in substantial non-compliance with
the terms and conditions of the NPDES permit or governing rules, regulations or laws, the permittee shall
submit a report in such form and detail as required by the Division evaluating these alternatives and a plan of
action within sixty(60) days of notification by the Division.
PART IV
ANNUAL ADMINISTERING AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING FEE
REQUIREMENTS
A. The permittee must pay the annual administering and compliance monitoring fee within 30 (thirty)
days after being billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee in a timely manner in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H .0105(b)(4) may cause this Division to initiate action to revoke the permit.