20181442 Ver 1_Dugout_SAW-2018-01883_AsBuilt Report_20230310 (2)

fires
March 10, 2023
Todd Tugwell
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite too
Raleigh, NC 27612
Subject: RES Cape Fear 05 UMBI Dugout (SAW- 2018-01883) As -Built Baseline Report Submittal
Mr. Tugwell:
Corporate Headquarters
6575 West Loop South, Suite 300
Bellaire, TX 77401
Main: 713.520.5400
On behalf of Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Resource Environmental Solutions (RES), I
am pleased to submit the RES Cape Fear 05 UMBI Dugout As -Built Baseline Report. Construction and planting for this project
were completed in August and December 2022, respectively.
The site was built to design and guidelines with some adjustments, which are noted and described in the baseline monitoring
report and record drawings.
RES setup cross sections in September 2022, while vegetation plots, wetland gauges, and stream monitoring devices were
installed in January 2023. Monitoring data of the vegetation indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria
of 320 planted stems per acre. Additionally, cross section data closely matches design parameters.
Upon approval of this as -built report, RES is requesting a 15% stream credit release (980.12 SMUs) and a 15% wetland credit
release (0.927 SMUs). A credit breakdown is shown on the following page. Please see enclosed the credit release schedule,
updated credit ledger, and as -built baseline report.
Thank you for all of your time and consideration and we look forward to continuing to work with you all as this Project
progresses. Please contact me at 336-514-0927 or [e-mail] if you have any questions or require any additional
information.
Thank you,
�VZ67'el
Ben Carroll, Engineer
[e-mail] 1 336-514-0927
res.us

Transaction Credits Released Credits Debited I Current
Number To Bank From Bank Credit Balance
980.12
DUGOUT STREAM CREDIT LEDGER (HUC 03030005)
Friday, March 10, 2023
Credits
Reserved Purchaser
Total 980.12 0.00 1 980.12 1 0.0
Credits Released: Task 1
Permit Number Date HUC
9/30/21

Transaction Credits Released Credits Debited I Current
Number To Bank From Bank Credit Balance
1.10
0.59
DUGOUT WETLAND CREDIT LEDGER (HUC 03030005)
Friday, March 10, 2023
Credits
Reserved
Total 1.10 0.59 1 0.51 1 0.0
Purchaser Project
Credits Released: Task 1
Pulte Group Mallory Creek
Permit Number Date HUC
9/30/21
SAW-2013-00173 12/20/22 03030005

Project Name:
Sponsor Name:
USACE Action ID:
NCDWQ Action ID:
Wilmington District Mitigation Bank Credit Release Schedule
Dugout Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project
EBX
SAW-2018-01883
D W R # 20181442
County:
8-Digit HUC:
Year Project Instituted:
Date Prepared:
Total Potential Credits
Non -Forested
Stream Credits
Forested Wetland Credits
Wetland Credits
Credit Classification
Riparian
Cold
Riparian
Warm Wool
ater
C Water
Non-
Non -Riparian
Coastal
Water
Preservation
Preservation
Potential Credits from Mitigation Plan
6534.133
0.172
6.183
Potential Credits from As -Built Survey
Cumberland
3030005
2023
3/10/2023
Current and Future Credit Releases
Credit Release Milestone
Stream Credits
Forested Wetland Credits
Non -Forested Wetland
Credits
Projected
Release Date
Actual Release
Date
Scheduled
Releases
Warm Water
Cool Water
Cold
Water
Scheduled
Releases
Riparian
Riverine
Riparian
Non-Riverine
Non -Riparian
Scheduled
Releases
Coastal
1 (Bank/Site Establishment)l,2
15%
980.120
15%
1.1
15%
9/30/2021
9/30/2021
2 (Year 0/As-Built)
15%
980.120
15%
0.927
15%
5/1/2021
3 (Year 1 Monitoring)
10%
653.413
10%
0.618
10%
4 (Year 2 Monitoring)
10%
653.413
10%
0.618
15%
5 (Year 3 Monitoring)
10%
653.413
15%
0.927
20%
6 (Year 4 Monitoring)
5%
326.707
5%
0.309
10%
7 (Year 5 Monitoring)
10%
653.413
15%
0.927
15%
8 (Year 6 Monitoring)
5%
326.707
5%
0.309
NA
NA
9 (Year 7 Monitoring)
10%
653.413
10%
0.618
NA
NA
Stream Bankfull Standard
10%
653.413
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Varies°
Total Credits Release to Date
980.120
1 1.1
Contingencies (if any):
Signature of Wilmington District Official Approving Credit Release
1- The first credit release milestone is based on the potential credits stated in the approved mitigation plan.
2 - The first credit release shall occur upon establishment of the mitigation bank, which includes the following criteria:
1) Execution of the MBI or UMBI by the Sponsor and the USACE;
2) Approval of the final Mitigation Plan;
3) Mitigation bank site must be secured;
4) Delivery of the financial assurances described in the Mitigation Plan;
5) Recordation of the long-term protection mechanism and title opinion acceptable to the USACE;
6) 404 permit verification for construction of the site, if required.
3 - A 10% reserve of credits to be held back until the bankfull event performance standard has been met.
Date

As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
DUGOUT STREAM AND WETLAND
MITIGATION PROJECT
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
USACE Action ID: SAW-2018-01883 I DWR Project # 20181442
Cape Fear River Basin, HUC 03030005
Provided by:
6)res
Bank Sponsor: Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-770-5573
March 2023

Table of Contents
PROJECT SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................3
1.1 Project Location and Description....................................................................................................3
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives............................................................................................................3
1.3 Project Success Criteria.......................................................................................................................4
1.3.1 Stream Restoration Success Criteria.....................................................................................5
1.3.2 Wetland Success Criteria...........................................................................................................5
1.3.3 Vegetation Success Criteria......................................................................................................6
1.4 Project Components............................................................................................................................6
1.5 Stream and Wetland Design/Approach........................................................................................7
1.5.1 Streams............................................................................................................................................7
1.5.2 Wetlands.......................................................................................................................................10
1.6 Construction and As -Built Conditions.........................................................................................12
1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance(MYO)...................................................................................13
1.7.1 Vegetation...................................................................................................................................
13
1.7.2 Stream Geomorphology.........................................................................................................
14
1.7.3 Stream Hydrology.....................................................................................................................
14
1.7.4 Alternative/Visual Monitoring for TV1-C (Hydrologic Restoration) .......................
14
1.7.5 Wetland Hydrology..................................................................................................................
15
2 METHODS........................................................................................................................................................15
3 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................................................16
Dugout Stream and 1 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site March 2023

Appendix A: Background Information
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts Table
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2 (a-c): Current Conditions Plan View
Vegetation Plot Photos
Monitoring Device Photos
General Photos
Appendix C: Vegetation Plot Data
Table 4: Planted Species Summary
Table 5a: Main Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 5b: Supplemental Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary (Understory)
Table 6a: Main Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Table 6b: Supplemental Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species (Understory)
Appendix D: Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Table 7: Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 8: Cross Section Morphology Data Table
Cross Section Overlay Plots
Appendix E: Hydrology Data
Groundwater Well Soil Profile Characterization Data Forms
Appendix F: As -Built & Record Drawings
Dugout As -Built Survey .^
Dugout Sealed Record Drawings
Dugout Stream and 2 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site March 2023

it PROJECT SUMMARY
m Project Location and Description
The Dugout Stream and Wetland Mitigation Project ("Project") is located within Cumberland
County, approximately 7 miles south of Fayetteville. The Project lies within the Cape Fear River
Basin, North Carolina Department of Water Resources ("NCDWR") sub -basin 03-06-15 and
United States Geological Survey ("USGS") 12-digit hydrologic unit code ("HUC")
030300050102 (Willis Creek Watershed) (Figure 1). The Project is designed to help meet
compensatory mitigation requirements for stream and wetland impacts in the HUC 03030005.
The Project is comprised of a 37.17-acre easement located upstream of the Cape Fear River,
encompassing a portion of the Gray's Creek floodplain. The Project involves Grays Creek, two
of its unnamed tributaries, and riparian wetlands that all ultimately drain a few miles southeast
to the Cape Fear River. The Project restored 5,199 linear feet ("LF") and enhanced 1,671 LF of
stream as well as restored 4.485 acres ("ac"), enhanced 7.395 ac, and preserved 1.720 ac of
wetlands that provides water quality benefits and ecosystem uplift for the Project's 8.31 miz
drainage area.
The aquatic resources associated with the Project have been highly manipulated and degraded
over time due to agriculture and forestry practices. Project streams, especially Grays Creek,
have historically been diverted, straightened, and dredged, leading to unstable channels with
poor hydraulic function and wetlands with decreased hydrology. Also, networks of surface
ditches further alter the natural hydrology of the stream -wetland complex. Additionally, much
of the Project's existing forest was most recently logged approximately nine years ago. Further,
active livestock pasture and row crop fields abut portions of Project streams where riparian
buffers are either very narrow or absent. Therefore, the Project presented a great opportunity
to address the RBRP goal of reducing non -point source pollution, especially fecal coliform,
while also providing tremendous additional uplift to a degraded stream -wetland floodplain
system.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
Through the comprehensive analysis of the Project's maximum functional uplift using the
Stream Functions Pyramid Framework, specific, attainable goals and objectives were realized
by the Project. These goals clearly addressed the degraded water quality and nutrient input
from non -point source pollution in the watershed and promote long-term resilience to the
inevitable, spiking population growth that were identified as major watershed stressors in the
2009 Cape Fear River RBRP. The Project addressed these stressors and supported the RBRP
goals.
The Project goals were:
• Re-establish or improve hydrology to a historical stream -wetland complex that has
been manipulated by agricultural practices for over 70 years.
Dugout Stream and 3 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site March 2023

• Improve water transport from watershed to channels in a non -erosive manner and
improve and maintain a stable water table in riparian floodplain wetlands;
• Improve water quality within the restored and enhanced stream channels and
downstream watercourses by reducing sediment and nutrient loads;
• Improve flood flow attenuation on site and downstream by allowing for overbanks
flows and connection to the active floodplain;
• Create diverse bedforms and stable channels that achieve healthy dynamic equilibrium
and provide suitable habitat for life;
• Improve instream habitat;
• Restore and enhance wetland hydrology and soils;
• Restore, enhance, and preserve native wetland and riparian vegetative communities;
and
• Support the life histories of aquatic and riparian plants and animals through stream
and wetland restoration activities.
The Project objectives that addressed these goals were:
• Design and reconstruct stream channels that will convey bankfull flows while
maintaining stable dimension, profile, and planform based on modeling, watershed
conditions, and reference reach conditions;
• Maintain regular, seasonal flow in restored, intermittent stream reaches;
• Permanently exclude livestock from all stream channels, their associated buffers, and
wetlands;
• Add in -stream structures and bank stabilization measures to improve bedform
diversity and protect restored and enhanced streams;
• Install habitat features such as brush toes, constructed riffles, woody materials, and
pools of varying depths to restored and enhanced streams;
• Reduce bank height ratios and increase entrenchment ratios in restored stream
channels;
• Relocate stream channels back within the low of the existing floodplain, raise stream
bed elevations, and plug and/or fill surface ditches to restore and enhance wetland
hydrology and maintain appropriate hydroperiod for Johnston and Deloss soil series;
• Plant wetland areas and increase forested riparian buffers to at least 50 feet on both
sides of the channel along Project streams with a native, hardwood plant community;
• Treat exotic invasive species; and
• Establish a permanent conservation easement on the Project that will perpetually
protect streams, wetlands, and their associated buffers.
1.3 Project Success Criteria
The success criteria for the Project follows the 2016 USACE Wilmington District Stream and
Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update and subsequent agency guidance. Specific success
criteria components are presented below.
Dugout Stream and 4 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site March 2023

1.3.1 Stream Restoration Success Criteria
Four bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The
bankfull events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue
until four bankfull events have been documented in separate years.
Intermittent stream reaches being restored will be monitored to document intermittent or
seasonal surface flow. This will be accomplished through direct observation and the use of
automatic -logging pressure transducers with data loggers (flow gauge). Reaches must
demonstrate a minimum of 30 consecutive days of flow each year.
There should be little change in as -built cross sections. If changes do take place, they should
be evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for
example down -cutting or erosion) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability
(for example settling, vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in
width/depth ratio). Cross sections shall be classified using the Rosgen stream classification
method, and all monitored cross sections should fall within the quantitative parameters
defined for channels of the design stream type. Bank height ratio shall not exceed 1.2, and the
entrenchment ratio shall be no less than 2.2 within restored riffle cross sections.
Digital images will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank
erosion, success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures.
Longitudinal images should not indicate the development of bars within the channel or an
excessive increase in channel depth. Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or
continuing degradation of the banks over time. A series of images over time should indicate
successional maturation of riparian vegetation.
Because reach TV1-C is not designed as a constructed channel and expected to serve as a
passive hydrologic connection to Grays Creek, it is expected that a stream conveyance via
series of drainages or a braided system will develop through the existing forested wetland.
Therefore, performance standards are intended to qualitatively demonstrate the development
of such a system through direct observation and photography. The development of the system
will be gradual over time; therefore, success will be demonstrated throughout the monitoring
period by documenting the following evidence: Primary flow path(s); scour; sediment
deposition; sediment sorting; ripples; presence of baseflow; litter, debris, and/or wrack; matted
or absent vegetation; lack of leaf litter; formation of bed and bank; sediment shelving; water
staining; change in soil character compared to surrounding area.
1.3.2 Wetland Success Criteria
The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has a current WETS table (1990-2019) for
Cumberland County upon which to base a normal rainfall amount and average growing
season. The closest comparable data station was determined to be the WETS station at
Fayetteville Regional Airport in Grannis Field, NC. This station determines the growing season
to be 259 days long, extending from March 12 to November 26, and is based on a daily
minimum temperature greater than 28 degrees Fahrenheit occurring in five of ten years.
Dugout Stream and 5 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site March 2023

Based upon field observation across the site, the NRCS mapping units show a good correlation
to actual site conditions in areas of the site. Mitigation guidance for soils in the Coastal Plain
suggests a hydroperiod for both the Johnston and Deloss soil series of 12 to 16 percent of the
growing season. Notably, due to the current drainage and permeable soils, it may take at least
a year for the site to become completely saturated and reach the target hydroperiod.
Therefore, hydrology success criterion for the Project is to restore the water table so that it
will remain continuously within 12 inches of the soil surface for at least 10 percent of the
growing season (approximately 26 days) in monitoring years one and two, and 12 percent of
the growing season (approximately 31 days) in monitoring years three, four, five, six, and seven
at each groundwater gauge location.
In addition to the above wetland hydrology performance standard, wetland areas proposed
as Enhancement (Low) will only meet success if the stream restoration bankfull events success
criteria are also met. This will ensure that these wetlands are receiving more frequent floods
post -stream restoration.
1.3.3 Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the
Project will follow IRT Guidance. The interim measures of vegetative success for the Project
will be the survival of at least 320 planted three-year old trees per acre at the end of Year 3,
260 five-year old trees at 7 feet in height at the end of Year 5, and the final vegetative success
criteria will be 210 trees per acre with an average height of 10 feet at the end of Year 7.
Volunteer trees will be counted, identified to species, and included in the yearly monitoring
reports, but will not be counted towards the success criteria of total planted stems. Moreover,
any single species can only account for up to 50 percent of the required number of stems
within any vegetation plot. Any stems in excess of 50 percent will be shown in the monitoring
table but will not be used to demonstrate success.
The supplemental planting zone that encompasses the area around TV1-A, TV5-A, and the
associated portion of WD will adhere to the same success criteria as the rest of the Project (as
detailed above) except that there will not be a height criterion since these planted trees will
mostly be growing in the understory in shade condition. Therefore, this area will demonstrate
survival of at least 320 planted three-year old trees per acre at the end of Year 3, 260 planted
five-year old trees at the end of Year 5, and the final vegetative success criteria will be 210
planted trees per acre at the end of Year 7. Existing, mature trees that were not planted may
be documented and included in the yearly monitoring reports but will not be counted towards
the success criteria of total planted stems.
1.4 Project Components
Through stream restoration and enhancement, the Project presented 6,870 LF of proposed
stream, that generated 5,986.333 base Warm Stream Mitigation Units ("SMU") (Table 1). By
incorporating wider buffers, the total adjusted SMUs for the Project amount to 6,534.133.
Dugout Stream and 6 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site March 2023

Additionally, the Project presented 13.600 acres of wetland re-establishment, enhancement,
and preservation, that generated 6.355 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Units ("WMU") (Table 1).
Table 1: Mitigation Plan Stream Credits
Stream Mitigation
Mitigation.. ..
Restoration 5,199 1:1
5,199.000
Enhancement 1
971 1.5:1
647.333
Enhancement 111
700 5:1
140.000
Total
6,870
5,986.333
Total Adjusted SMUs*
6,534.133
*SMUs are adjusted in accordance with Section XI(C)- "Wilmington District Stream Buffer Credit Calculator",
supplied to Providers in January 2021, from the USACE A detailed description of the methodology and calculations
is described below in Section 6.6 as well as Appendix C and Figure 10.
Mitigation.. ..Riparian
Re-establishment
Wetiand Mitigation
4.485
1:1
4.485
Enhancement (High)
0.167
2:1
0.084
Enhancement (Medium)
1.269
3:1
0.423
Enhancement (Low)
5.959
5:1
1.192
Preservation
1.720
10:1
0.172
Total**
13.600 EF6.355
** Areas generating wetland credit are within the proposed 50-foot stream buffer area or are wholly outside of the
Non-standard buffer width areas generating additional stream credit (> 150 ft.); therefore, additional stream credit
areas and wetland credit areas do not overlap.
1.5 Stream and Wetland Design/Approach
The detailed treatment plan and design approach is as follows:
1.5.1 Streams
Reach GC2
An offline restoration approach was proposed for this reach to address historic channel
realignment, areas of bed instability, and bank erosion and incision. Restoration activities
included:
- Grading a new single thread channel in the existing floodplain,
- Installing log structures to provide grade control and habitat,
- Establishing a riffle -pool sequence throughout the new channel,
- Installing brush toe protection on meander bends,
- Stabilizing banks via live -staking,
- Filling the existing channel,
- Riparian planting,
- Invasive vegetation treatment.
Dugout Stream and 7 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site March 2023

Reach GC1
An off line restoration approach was proposed for this reach to address channelization, channel
diversion, areas of bed instability, bank erosion and incision, and buffer impacts. The proposed
channel was relocated back to the south and through the middle of the valley, starting at the
upstream end of the reach. The existing portion of Grays Creek that flows to the north and
along the eastern edge of an adjacent landowner's property was not abandoned, but partially
filled instead. This section (Swale A, Sheet S15) remains open and was re -graded as a swale
and to redirect flow to the south and into proposed Reach GC3. The construction of the swale
was necessary to prevent hydrologic trespass on the adjacent property regarding stormwater
runoff and to avoid impacts to their septic field located on the west of the proposed
swale/existing Grays Creek.
In addition to Swale A, Swale B was constructed to address an existing ditch that enters the
proposed reach near STA 26+50. The swale involved filling and flattening the ditch such that
flow will be diffused through the floodplain before reaching proposed GC3. An engineered
sediment pack (ESP) and small depression was installed along the swale just inside the
easement. The ESP acts as a stormwater control measure to filter concentrated flows received
from the ditch. Restoration activities included:
- Grading a new single thread channel in the existing floodplain and through a relic
channel between stations 22+25 and 26+50,
- Installing log structures to provide grade control and habitat,
- Establishing a riffle -pool sequence throughout the new channel,
- Installing brush toe protection on meander bends,
- Stabilizing banks via live -staking,
- Filling and plugging the existing channel,
- Livestock exclusion,
- Riparian planting,
- Invasive vegetation treatment.
Reach GC4
An enhancement I approach was proposed for this reach to address areas of bank erosion and
incision, and buffer impacts. Enhancement activities included:
- Cutting a floodplain bench along the left bank for its entire length,
- Cutting a floodplain bench along the right bank to approximately STA 58+30,
- Removing and stockpiling topsoil for placement on floodplain benches,
- Installing habitat structures in the form of brush beds or log sills,
- Stabilizing banks via live -staking,
- Riparian planting,
- Invasive vegetation treatment.
Dugout Stream and 8 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site March 2023

Reach TV1-A
An enhancement III approach was proposed for this reach to limit the extensive amount of
invasive vegetation, especially Chinese privet, and supplement the riparian forest with
desirable tree species. Enhancement III activities included:
- Widening the breach of the drained impoundment to provide floodplain access
through the old dam,
- Treating invasive vegetation,
- Riparian planting, and
- Protecting the reach in a conservation easement.
Reach TV1-B
A mix of off line and inline restoration was proposed for this reach to address a headcut in the
channel and to tie the reach back into the Grays Creek floodplain. Reach TV1-B transitions to
TV1-C (the floodplain of Grays Creek), to mimic other features near the Project and in the
greater coastal region and encourages the formation of the multithread system of TV1-C.
Restoration activities included:
- Grading a new single thread channel in the existing floodplain,
- Establishing a riffle -pool sequence throughout the new channel,
- Installing toe protection on meander bends,
- Stabilizing banks via live -staking,
- Riparian planting,
- Invasive vegetation treatment.
Reach TV1-C
A hydrologic restoration approach was proposed for this reach to encourage the formation of
a natural, multithread stream and wetland complex in the low gradient floodplain of Grays
Creek between TV1-B and GC3. The existing location of Grays Creek in this area being on the
edge of the floodplain, and the existing, large headcut that drops TV1 into the incised Grays
Creek, indicated that TV1 was disconnected from the Grays Creek floodplain and thus
effectively lost a functioning confluence with Grays Creek and the greater stream -wetland
complex. Therefore, through the restoration of TV1-B and Grays Creek, it is anticipated that a
natural, braided stream will result, and the hydrologic connection of these features will be
restored. Hydrologic restoration activities included:
- Spreading out flows from TV1-B in the floodplain of GC3,
- Invasive vegetation treatment.
Notably, due to the nature of this feature, TV1-C was credited as a straight-line length through
a 100-foot corridor and will not be pursued for any additional type of credit. Therefore, the
reach was not included in any additional credit for wider buffers (Figure 2) nor was any
wetland credit generated within the 100-foot corridor.
Dugout Stream and 9 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site March 2023

Reach TV5-A
An enhancement III approach was proposed for this reach to limit the extensive amount of
invasive vegetation, especially Chinese privet, and supplement the riparian forest with
desirable tree species. Enhancement III activities included:
- Treating invasive vegetation,
- Riparian planting,
- Protecting the reach in a conservation easement.
Reach TV5-B
A mix of offline and inline restoration was proposed for this reach to tie the reach to TV1.
Restoration activities included:
- Grading a new single thread channel in the existing floodplain,
- Establishing a riffle -pool sequence throughout the new channel,
- Installing toe protection on meander bends,
- Stabilizing banks via live -staking,
- Filling the existing channel,
- Riparian planting,
- Invasive vegetation treatment.
1.5.2 Wetlands
The Dugout Project offers a total ecosystem restoration opportunity that will revitalize a highly
manipulated floodplain forest community. As such, the wetland restoration and enhancement
were closely tied to the stream restoration. Wetland restoration aims to re-establish hydrology
and hydrophytic vegetation to currently non -wetland areas that exhibit hydric soil indicators
and drained hydrology, while enhancement areas aim to improve hydrology or vegetation in
already jurisdictional wetland areas. The Project attempts to provide functional uplift to
wetlands through a combination of wetland re-establishment, enhancement, and
preservation.
Re-establishment
Wetland re-establishment with a credit ratio of 1:1 occurs in the area east of the pre-existing
jurisdictional wetland boundary of WA. This re-established wetland area is referred to as "WE"
(Wetland E). This area contained hydric soils but lacked sufficient wetland hydrology and a
lowered water table due to an altered landscape and drainage modifications, including the
relocated and incised Grays Creek, presence of highly permeable soils, and the location of
drainage ditches intercepting groundwater discharges onto the floodplain. As mentioned
above, the hydrologic restoration of this area is directly related to the stream restoration
activities. Reconstructing Grays Creek (specifically reach GC3), with an appropriately sized
channel back within the low of the existing floodplain, and plugging and filling the incised,
abandoned channel, will raise the local groundwater elevation that will allow frequent
flooding. Also, plugging and filling nearby ditches will redirect seepage back onto the
floodplain and limit surface drainage. Additionally, the re-established wetland area was
planted with bare root hardwood trees representative of a Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp
community.
Dugout Stream and 10 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site March 2023

There are two additional, small areas of re-establishment within the Project. One area along
reach GC2 consists of a portion of the existing Grays Creek and a large berm associated with
it. For this area, the existing channel was abandoned and backfilled, while the berm material
was be removed to match the surrounding floodplain elevation. This patch of re-establishment
is referred to as "WF" (Wetland F). The other small area of re-establishment occurs near the
start of restoration on TV1-B. Similar to WF, this area consists of a portion of the existing Grays
Creek and berm that was be abandoned, backfilled, and leveled in order to connect the
existing jurisdictional wetlands WD and WA. This patch of re-establishment is referred to as
"WG" (Wetland G). Like the rest of the wetland re-establishment, these areas were planted
with bare root hardwood trees.
Enhancement (High)
Wetland enhancement with a credit ratio of 2:1 is occurs within the pre-existing jurisdictional
wetland WC. This wetland is naturally fed by groundwater; however, the former impoundment
had created unfavorable conditions for regeneration of woody wetland vegetation. Therefore,
the primary approach to enhance this wetland was to plant native bare root trees in order to
establish a wetland hardwood forest community.
Enhancement (Medium)
Wetland enhancement with a credit ratio of 3:1 occurs within the pre-existing jurisdictional
wetland WD that is associated with the enhancement of stream reaches TV1-A and TV5-A.
This riparian wetland area had a degraded vegetative community with a sparse canopy that
lacked diversity and an understory overtaken by Chinese privet. Therefore, in line with the
enhancement activities for stream reaches TV1-A and TV5-A, the primary approach to enhance
this wetland area was to intensively treat the Chinese privet and plant native bare root trees,
while leaving the existing mature canopy trees, in order to improve the structure and diversity
of the wetland hardwood forest community.
Enhancement (Low)
Wetland enhancement with a credit ratio of 5:1 occurs within the pre-existing jurisdictional
wetland WA where stream restoration also occurred. These areas already supported
jurisdictional wetland hydrology and were fully forested; however, the relocation of Grays
Creek away from the natural floodplain position along with its incision had undoubtedly
altered the natural hydrology of the wetland areas. Therefore, by reconstructing Grays Creek
(specifically reach GC2 and GC3), with an appropriately sized channel back within the low of
the existing floodplain, and plugging and filling the incised, abandoned channel, the local
groundwater elevation will rise and more frequent flooding will occur, ultimately improving
hydrology to the entire system. A low, 5:1 credit ratio was proposed because although
restoring Grays Creek will improve wetland hydrology, the wetland was already jurisdictional.
Additionally, all forested areas that were impacted within the stream restoration corridor were
replanted with bare root hardwood trees representative of a Coastal Plain Small Stream
Swamp.
Dugout Stream and 11 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site March 2023

Preservation
Wetland preservation with a credit ratio of 10:1 occurs for the remaining pre-existing
jurisdictional wetland areas within WA that will not be directly enhanced by stream restoration
efforts. These areas will remain forested and protected in perpetuity.
1.6 Construction and As -Built Conditions
Stream construction was completed in August 2022 and planting was completed in December
2022. The Dugout Site was built to design plans and guidelines except for a few changes. Most
notably, the floodplain of reach GC4 (Enhancement 1) was graded much more extensively than
proposed, meaning that there is now a significantly wider floodplain that offers greater flood
prone area and flood storage. During construction, RES required more fill material to properly
fill the old channel, and the most effective area to do so was the area along GC4. Furthermore,
some additional fill was required and so a floodplain pool was excavated east of the ford
crossing along GC3 and is located between the old channel and the restored channel. This
floodplain pool was still planted with trees and provides the opportunity for some habitat
diversity in the otherwise homogenous stream construction corridor. Also, neither of these
additional grading activities impacted any existing, jurisdictional wetlands.
The as -built condition of reach TV1-C (Hydrologic Connection) does not represent the
intended, proposed condition, as the potential for surface flow is minimal in its current state.
During construction of Gray's Creek and TV1-B, the clearing activities removed significant root
mass from the existing forest floor, thereby slightly lowering the floodplain elevations within
the grading corridor as compared to the existing forested area just downstream. Because the
forest was left intact within the 100-foot corridor of TV1-C, the slightly higher ground elevation
blocks surface flow from traveling linearly toward Gray's Creek and is instead ponding and
diffusing into the groundwater. With that said, there is a perceived groundwater connection
through TV1-C that connects TV1-B to Gray's Creek from what appears to be heavy, persistent
groundwater discharge at the "confluence" of Gray's Creek. All things considered, RES plans
adaptive management to do minor grading that will promote surface flow through the 100-ft
corridor. RES will survey the elevations through the corridor and then use a small piece of
equipment to perform minor grading to connect natural low -spots where a channel or
network of drainages can develop. This will involve some clearing of existing brush and
saplings while mature trees will be avoided, grading high -spots, and grading very shallow
paths in the existing ground. Note that this entire area around TV1-C proposed for work is
already permitted for temporary wetland impacts in the Nationwide 27 Permit and physical
access to the area is nearby and easy; therefore, RES believes the proposed work will have
minimal adverse impacts to the Project. Upon IRT approval, RES plans to execute the work
within the 2023 year and before submitting a Year 1 Monitoring Report.
Other minor changes from proposed design were the addition of some very shallow swales in
the Gray's Creek floodplain that were added to promote positive drainage away from certain
areas of the old channel, located along the valley toe -of -slope, and towards Gray's Creek and
its floodplain. The swales are shallow and do not contain rock, and RES expects that they will
Dugout Stream and 12 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site March 2023

quickly vegetate along with the rest of the floodplain. The record drawings are included in
Appendix F.
Planting plan changes are outlined in Appendix C. The proposed tree species were planted
on December 201", 2022. All 11 of the originally proposed species were planted, and
percentages were similar to the planting plan in Final Mitigation Plan. However, the one
significant change to the planting plan was that an additional understory-specific species
composition was added and planted in the Supplemental Planting Zone associated with
reaches TV1-A, TV5-A, and Wetland D. The additional species include American hornbeam
(Carpinus Carolinians), American holly (Ilex opaca), swamp bay (Persea palustris), sweetbay
magnolia (Magnolia virginiana), sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia), and spicebush (Lindera
benzoin). For the supplemental planting zone, the extensive Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense)
was cut and removed from the planting area prior to planting to allow space for planted
understory trees to thrive. The remaining, smaller Chinese privet throughout was chemically
treated.
Minor monitoring device location changes were made during as -built installation; however,
the quantities remained as proposed in the Final Mitigation Plan.
Another deviation from the final mitigation plan is that no fencing was installed at the Project
site. Since the time of the final, approved mitigation plan, the landowner decided to
completely rid his farm of cattle; therefore, cattle no longer exist onsite and fencing by RES
was not necessary.
1.7 Baseline Monitoring Performance (MYo)
The Dugout baseline monitoring activities were performed between September 2022 and
January 2023. All baseline monitoring data is present below and in the appendices. The Project
is on track to meeting vegetation, stream, and wetland interim success criteria.
1.7.1 Vegetation
Setup and monitoring of 14 fixed vegetation plots and seven random vegetation plots was
completed after planting and stream construction on January 19t", 2023. Two of the random
vegetation plots were within the "Supplemental Planting Zone" in accordance with the
alternative monitoring plan and success criteria for that zone. Data from the two random plots
in the "Supplemental Planting Zone" are not included with the data for the rest of the site and
therefore will not affect success of the "Main Planting Zone." Data from the two random plots
for the "Supplemental Planting Zone" will be processed and presented separately and will
exclusively represent the success of the "Supplemental Planting Zone". Vegetation data is in
Appendix C, associated photos are in Appendix B, and plot locations are in Appendix B.
Main Planting Zone
MYO monitoring data indicates that all plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320
planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 567 to 1,295 planted stems per
Dugout Stream and 13 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site March 2023

acre with a mean of 850 planted stems per acre across all plots. A total of 11 planted species
were documented within the plots. Additional volunteer species were noted at baseline
monitoring and are expected to further establish in upcoming years. The average stem height
in the plots was 1.6 feet.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous
vegetation is becoming well established throughout the project.
Supplemental Planting Zone (Understory Plantings)
MYO monitoring data indicates that the two random vegetation plots are exceeding the
interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 890
to 971 planted stems per acre with a mean of 931 planted stems per acre across all plots. A
total of six planted species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species, including
existing, mature trees were noted at baseline monitoring. Planted stem height is not being
considered as a success criteria in this zone.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous
vegetation and existing, native trees remain well established.
1.7.2 Stream Geomorphology
A total of 21 cross sections were installed and geomorphology data collection for MYO was
conducted on September 1st, 2022. Summary tables and cross section plots are in Appendix
D. Overall, the baseline cross sections and profile relatively match the proposed design. The
as -built conditions show that shear stress and velocities have been reduced for the restoration
reach. The reach was designed as a sand bed channel and remain classified as a sand bed
channel post -construction.
Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such
as eroding banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. The channel is transporting
sediment as designed and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and degradation.
1.7.3 Stream Hydrology
Four stage recorders were installed on January 31st, 2023, to document bankfull events along
Grays Creek. Three stage recorders are located on GC3 and one on GC2.
One flow gauge was installed on January 31st, 2023, on TV5-B, to document presence and
persistence of stream flow in the intermittent channel.
Stream hydrology data will be included in the Monitoring Year 1 Report in this section and in
the appendices. The gauge locations can be found on Figure 2 and photos are in Appendix
B.
1.7.4 Alternative/Visual Monitoring for TV1-C (Hydrologic Restoration)
As discussed earlier in Section 1.6, reach TV1-C does not yet indicate signs of an obvious
stream conveyance. However, the proposed adaptive management for this reach should
Dugout Stream and 14 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site March 2023

promote surface flow, and the qualitative indicators outlined in Section 1.3.1 for reach TV1-
C will be documented in the Year 1 Monitoring Report. Photos of the "top" and "bottom" of
TV-C are included in the Dugout General Photos in Appendix B.
1.7.5 Wetland Hydrology
A total of 11 groundwater wells with automatic recording pressure transducers were installed
throughout the wetland areas on January 315t, 2023. Six groundwater wells (GW2, GW4, GWB,
GW9, GW10, and GW11) were installed in wetland re-establishment areas. Three groundwater
wells (GW1, GW6, and GW7) were installed in wetland enhancement areas. Two groundwater
wells (GW3 and GW5) were installed in wetland preservation areas to serve as references. The
groundwater wells record water table levels at a frequency of twice per day. The purpose of
these groundwater wells is to demonstrate maintenance of jurisdictional wetland hydrology.
Wetland hydrology data will be included in the Monitoring Year 1 Report in this section and
in the appendices.
2 METHODS
Stream cross section monitoring was conducted using a Topcon GTS-312 Total Station. Three-
dimensional coordinates associated with cross-section data were collected in the field (NAD83
State Plane feet FIPS 3200). Morphological data were collected at 21 cross -sections. Survey
data were imported into CAD, ArcGIS®, and Microsoft Excel® for data processing and
analysis.
The stage recorders and flow gauges documenting stream hydrology include an automatic
pressure transducer placed in PVC casing in a pool. The elevation of the bed and top of bank
at each stage recorder are used to detect bankfull events.
Vegetation success is being monitored at 14 fixed monitoring plots and seven random
monitoring plots. Vegetation plot monitoring follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for
Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of species
composition and density of planted species. Data are processed using the CVS data entry tool.
In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and
metal conduit at the other corners. Photos of each plot are taken from the origin each
monitoring year. The random plot data are collected in locations where there are no
permanent vegetation plots. Random plots are typically collected in the form of 100 square
meter belt transects with variable dimensions. Tree species and height are recorded for each
planted stem and the transects are mapped, and new locations will be monitored in
subsequent years.
Wetland hydrology is being monitored to document success of wetland restoration areas as
well as conditions of wetland enhancement and preservation areas. This is accomplished with
eleven automatic pressure transducer gauges (located in groundwater wells) that record daily
groundwater levels. Six groundwater wells were installed in wetland re-establishment areas;
three were installed in wetland enhancement areas; and two were installed in wetland
Dugout Stream and 15 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site March 2023

preservation areas to serve as references. One automatic pressure transducer was installed
above ground to record ambient air pressure and is used to correct all other pressure
transducers onsite. Gauges are downloaded quarterly and wetland hydroperiods are
calculated during the growing season. Gauge installation followed current regulatory
guidance. Visual observations of primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators are also
recorded during quarterly site visits. As mentioned earlier, soil was characterized at each
groundwater well. Soil borings were taken at each groundwater well and characterized in
accordance with the Soil Characterization Data Forms provided in the USACE's Technical
Standard for Water -Table Monitoring of Potential Wetland Sites, and includes parameters of
soil horizon depths, texture, colors, redoximorphic features, induration, and roots, as well as a
photo of each soil profile (Appendix E).
3 REFERENCES
Griffith, G.E., J.M.Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H.McNab, D.R.Lenat,
T.F.MacPherson, J.B. Glover, and V.B. Shelburne. (2002). Ecoregions of North Carolina and
South Carolina, (color Poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs):
Reston, Virginia, U.S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,500,000).
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP
Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998), A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274
Resource Environmental Solutions (2021). Dugout Final Mitigation Plan.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
USACE. (2016). Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update.
NC: Interagency Review Team (IRT).
Dugout Stream and 16 Baseline Monitoring Report
Wetland Mitigation Site March 2023

Appendix A
Background Information

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Dugout Mitigation Project
Elapsed Time Since grading complete: 7 months
Elapsed Time Since planting complete: 3 months
Number of reporting Years': 0
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
NA
Apr-21
Final Design — Construction Plans
NA
Apr-22
Stream Construction
NA
Aug-22
Initial bare root and live stake plantings
NA
Dec-22
As -built (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline)
Cross sections Sept-22
Veg plots Jan-23
Mar-23
Year 1 Monitoring
Year 2 Monitoring
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
ear 6 Monitoring
y
ear 7 Monitoring
1 = The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Dugout Mitigation Project
Designer
RES, LLC / 3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27612
Primary project design POC
Frasier Mullen [phone]
Construction Contractor
Wright Contracting, LLC / 453 Silk Hope Liberty Rd., Siler City,
NC 27344
Construction contractor POC
Paul Dunn [phone]
Survey Contractor
Pilot Surveying and Engineering, PC / P.O. Box: 879, Pilot
Mountain, NC 27041
Survey contractor POC
Jonathan Cory George, PLS
Planting Contractor
Shenandoah Habitats
Planting contractor POC
Will Skinner
Seeding Contractor
Wright Contracting, LLC / 453 Silk Hope Liberty Rd., Siler City,
NC 27344
Contractor point of contact
Paul Dunn [phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource [phone]
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Shenandoah Habitats
Monitoring Performers
RES, LLC / 3600 Glenwood Drive, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC
27612
Monitoring POC
Matt DeAngelo [phone]

William R Homes 1
Tom starling Rd She Flow -Rite Plw
,�
/;+;/ & Drain S
9Unity Church
of Fayetteville VomSta�5a9Rd
--F/
Faith Baptist Church 0
Fayetteville Wastev
& Oil Services
House of Prayer
smiu Rd
Tractor Supply CoQ
Gumbcrry Cr
Gray's Creek Mobile
as Home Community /
ngtonpaintingQ © a
Gray's Creek Safe Storage Q o Sherwood
10 Presbyterian Church � a°
o A P� s P`"^murgb 1 uv�°nsr+°n
a
Food Lion A © Drinald's UPrO^Tyson RA uycon7vsO"�
C^
F
1
QCarolina Striping
Ile
s0°`p
zzao
nl9
Rd
Z239
2245
Sentinels
y� \
Y
M°^k
I I . QGamezLandscaping NC
Point Blank Auto Salvage
El
a a
a
n �
a � £-
fir--
Lights'Out Auto Repair
gl
Southern Q
Cleaning mri or
Blossom Rd
John Hyatt
Contractor Services
n
QCape Fear Well & Pum61p
Thrower Rd
f
r
9 87
a
naa �, a��+asi
Dollar General
D i =
n a
Blossom Rd &/o
P
G
Crosse Creek
And Pistol
i
shy' o1...
o"ssorn Rd
Optimum Detailing In
(MOBILE DETAILING)
's Cape Fear
smokycanyonor Proposed Easement
e Cape Fear River Basin -
�` 4 03030005
G�
12-digit HUC - Willis Creek -
030300050102
N
Reference: Project limits are approximate. The
Figure 1 property boundaries depicted on this map
Site Location have not been surveyed and are for prospect p!es
assessment purposes only. This information is
in = 2,000 ft when printed at8.5xl1'not to be used as final legal boundaries.
Dugout Mitigation Project 0 500 1,000 Spatial Reference:1Cumberland County, North Carolina � NAo 1983 StatePlane North Carolina NIPS 3200 res.us
78.8468°W 34.92620N Feet Feet
Cartographer: mdeangelo I POC XXXX I Path: R:Viesgis\entgisVProjectsV100159_DugoutVPROV6_Monitoring MaintenanceAMYOVCCPV MYO.aprx I Layout: Figure -Site Location- Dugout

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

Dugout Mitigation Project
Cumberland County, North Carolina
78.847°W 34.9259°N
= Conservation Easement
Wetland Mitigation Approach
Re-establishment
Enhancement (High)
Enhancement (Medium)
Enhancement (Low)
Preservation
® Pre-existing Wetlands
Fixed Vegetation Plot
>320 stems/acre
Random Vegetation Plot
Cross Section
Stream Mitigation Approach
Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement III
Hydro Restoration
Stream Structures
As -built Top of Bank
—
Pre-existing Top of Bank
Monitoring Devices
®
Stage Recorder
®
Flow Gauge
®
Ambient
®
Wetland Gauge
N 1 in = 400 ft when printed at 11x17"
0 200 400
Feet
Reference: Project limits are approximate. The
property boundaries depicted on this map have not
been surveyed and are for prospect assessment
purposes only. This information is not to be used as
final legal boundaries.
Spatial Reference.
NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina NIPS 3200 Feet
Date Exported.212312023
ores
www.res.us

Dugout Mitigation Project
Cumberland County, North Carolina
78.8508°W 34.926°N
= Conservation Easement
Wetland Mitigation Approach
Re-establishment
Enhancement (High)
Enhancement (Medium)
Enhancement (Low)
Preservation
® Pre-existing Wetlands
Fixed Vegetation Plot
>320 stems/acre
Random Vegetation Plot
Cross Section
Stream Mitigation Approach
Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement III
Hydro Restoration
Stream Structures
As -built Top of Bank
Pre-existing Top of Bank
Monitoring Devices
®
Stage Recorder
®
Flow Gauge
®
Ambient
®
Wetland Gauge
N 1 in = 200 ft when printed at 11x17"
0 100 200
Feet
Reference: Project limits are approximate. The
property boundaries depicted on this map have not
been surveyed and are for prospect assessment
purposes only. This information is not to be used as
final legal boundaries.
Spatial Reference.
NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina NIPS 3200 Feet
Date Exported.212312023
ores
www.res.us

Dugout Mitigation Project
Cumberland County, North Carolina
78.8429°W 34.9258°N
= Conservation Easement
Wetland Mitigation Approach
Re-establishment
Enhancement (High)
Enhancement (Medium)
Enhancement (Low)
Preservation
® Pre-existing Wetlands
Fixed Vegetation Plot
>320 stems/acre
Random Vegetation Plot
Cross Section
Stream Mitigation Approach
Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement III
Hydro Restoration
Stream Structures
As -built Top of Bank
Pre-existing Top of Bank
Monitoring Devices
®
Stage Recorder
®
Flow Gauge
®
Ambient
®
Wetland Gauge
N 1 in = 200 ft when printed at 11x17"
0 100 200
Feet
Reference: Project limits are approximate. The
property boundaries depicted on this map have not
been surveyed and are for prospect assessment
purposes only. This information is not to be used as
final legal boundaries.
Spatial Reference.
NAD 1983 StatePlane North Carolina NIPS 3200 Feet
Date Exported.212312023
ores
www.res.us

Dugout MYO Fixed Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1 (01/18/2023)
Vegetation Plot 3 (01/18/2023)
Vegetation Plot 5 (01/18/2023)
Vegetation Plot 2 (01/18/2023)
Vegetation Plot 4 (01/18/2023)
Vegetation Plot 6 (01/18/2023)

Vegetation Plot 7 (05/04/2022)
Vegetation Plot 9 (05/04/2022)
Vegetation Plot 11 (05/04/2022)
Vegetation Plot 8 (05/04/2022)
Vegetation Plot 10 (05/04/2022)
Vegetation Plot 12 (05/04/2022)

Vegetation Plot 13 (05/04/2022)
Vegetation Plot 14 (05/04/2022)

Dugout MYO Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Random Vegetation Plot 1 (01/19/2023)
Random Vegetation Plot 3 (01/19/2023)
Random Vegetation Plot 5 (01/19/2023)
Random Vegetation Plot 2 (01/19/2023)
Random Vegetation Plot 4 (01/19/2023)
�)uppiementai rianting Lone �unaerstory rianung)
PWRIMP-4.1
Random Vegetation Plot 6 (01/19/2023)

Random Vegetation Plot 7 (01/19/2023)

Dugout Monitoring Device Photos
Wetland Gauges
Groundwater Well 1 (1/19/2023)
Groundwater Well 3 (1/19/2023)
-rd
x
Groundwater Well 5 (1/19/2023)
Groundwater Well 2 (1/19/2023)
Groundwater Well 4 (1/19/2023)
Groundwater Well 6 (1/19/2023)

Groundwater Well 7 (1/19/2023)
Groundwater Well 9 (1/19/2023)
Groundwater Well 11 (1/19/2023)
Groundwater Well 8 (1/19/2023)
Groundwater Well 10 (1/19/2023)

Stream Gauges
Stage Recorder GC2 (1/31/2023)
Stage Recorder GO 2 (Middle) (1/31/2023)
Flow Gauge TV5-13 (1/31/2023)
Stage Recorder GO 1 (Upper) (1/31/2023)
Stage Recorder GO 3 (Lower) (1/31/2023)

Dugout General Photos
Start of GC2 Restoration (US) 1 (8/2/2022)
End ofTV1-B (DS) (12/19/2022)
u R'
w' e9F
,i
'..
----
GO (US) (12/19/2022)
GC2 (DS) (12/19/2022)
TV1-C Hydrology Entering GO Floodplain (US)
GO (DS) (12/19/2022)

GG (US) (12/19/2022)
Large Woody Debris recruitment (12/19/2022)
GC4 (US) (12/19/2022)
Existing Pond Cypress (Taxodium ascendens)
(12/19/2022)
Constructed Floodplain Pool (Prior to Planting)
(12/19/2022)
GC4 (US) (12/19/2022)

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 4. Planted Species Summary
Bare Roots in Main Planting Zone (Spacing: 9X6)
Common Name
Scientific Name
Percent
Composition
QTY
Bald Cypress
Taxodium distichum
10%
1950
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa b flora
10%
1950
Buttonbush
Cephalanthus occidentalis
10%
1950
American sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
10%
1950
River birch
Betula nigra
10%
1950
Laurel oak
Quercus laurifolia
10%
1950
Overcup oak
Quercus lyrata
10%
1950
Swamp chestnut oak
Quercus michauxxi
10%
1950
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
10%
1950
Cherrybark oak
Quercus pagoda
5%
1000
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5%
1000
Bare Roots in Supplemental Planting Zone (Spacing: 9X6)
Common Name
Scientific Name
Percent
Composition
QTY
Americanhombeam
Carpinus caroliniana
11%
150
American Holly
Ilex opaca
11%
150
Swamp Bay
Persea palustris
22%
300
Sweet Bay Magnolia
Magnolia virginiana
18%
250
Sweet Pepperbush
Clethra alnifolia
19%
250
Spice Bush
Lindera benzoin
19%
250

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 5a. Main Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Planted Stem
Height
1
890
283
1174
Yes
1.5
2
567
0
567
Yes
1.6
3
1052
324
1376
Yes
1.7
4
728
0
728
Yes
1.3
5
931
0
931
Yes
1.8
6
688
0
688
Yes
1.5
7
688
0
688
Yes
1.5
8
931
0
931
Yes
1.4
9
728
0
728
Yes
1.4
10
1133
0
1133
Yes
1.7
11
769
0
769
Yes
2.0
12
1295
283
1578
Yes
1.7
13
931
0
931
Yes
1.3
14
850
0
850
Yes
1.8
R1
769
0
769
Yes
1.6
R2
647
0
647
Yes
1.8
R5
890
0
890
Yes
1.9
R6
647
0
647
Yes
1.6
R7
1012
0
1012
Yes
1.8
Project
Avg
850
47
897
Yes
1.6
Table 5b. Supplemental Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary (Understory)
Success
Average
Planted
Volunteer
Total
Plot #
Criteria
Planted Stem
Stems/Acre
Stems/Acre
Stems/Acre
Met?
Height
R3
971
122
1093
Yes
1.5
R4
890
284
1174
Yes
1.2
Project
Avg
931
203
1134
Yes
1.4

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6a. Main Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Dugout
Current Plot Data (MYO 2023)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
100159-01-0001
100159-01-0002
100159-01-0003
100159-01-0004
100159-01-0005
100159-01-0006
100159-01-0007
100159-01-0008
100159-01-0009
100159-01-0010
PnoLS
FP -all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
6
6
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbus
Shrub
4
4
4
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
21
2
2
2
1
1
1
Magnolia virginiana
sweetbay
Tree
5
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
9
9
9
6
6
6
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
41
4
4
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
9
9
4
4
4
1
1
1
7
7
7
4
4
4
6
6
6
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
1
1
1
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
11
4
4
4
1
1
1
1 11
1
11
4
41
4
21
2
2
4
4
4
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
2
2
21
4
41
4
11
1
11
41
4
41
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
41
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
Salix nigra
1blackwillow
Tree
8
Symplocos tinctoria
Icommon sweetleaf
Shrub Tree
Taxodium distichum
lbald cypress
Tree
2
41
411
4
141
141
14
1
1
91
91
9
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
22
22
29
14
141
14
261
261
34
181
181
18
231
231
23
17
17
17
171
171
17
23
23
23
181
181
18
281
28
28
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
7
T1,8901
9
5
5
5
6
6
7
4
4
4
9
9
9
8
8
8Ln
7
7
7
7
6
6
6
9
9
9
891174
567
567
567
1052
1052
1376
728
728
728
931
931
931
688
688
688
688
931
931
931
7281
7281
728
11331
11331
1133
Dugout
Current Plot Data (MYO2023)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
100159-01-0011
100159-01-0012
100159-01-0013
100159-01-0014
R1
R2
R5
R6
R7
MYO(2023)
PnoLS
FP -all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
5
5
5
23
23
23
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
5
17
17
17
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
11
3
3
3
2
2
2
9
9
9
Magnoliavirginiana
sweetbay
Tree
11
1
1
1
1
5
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
5
5
5
1
1
1
4
4
4
31
3
3
7
7
7
381
38
38
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
7
7
7
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
41
41
41
Quercus laurifolia
laurel oak
Tree
1
1
1
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
18
18
18
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
11
5
5
5
2
2
21
2
21
2
2
2
2
5
51
5
1
1
1
25
25
25
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
21
2
51
5
51
4
4
4
2
21
2
11
1
11
31
3
3
29
29
29
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
11
3
3
3
1
1
1
10
10
10
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
21
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
4
4
3
3
3
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
34
34
34
Salix nigra
blackwillow
Tree
1
8
Symplocos tinctoria
common sweetleaf
Shrub Tree
1
7
1
1
1
1
7
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
7
7
7
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
57
57
59
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
19
19
19
32
32
39
23
23
23
21
21
21
19
19
19
16
16
16
22
22
22
16
16
16
25
25
25
399
399
421
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
19
0.02
0.02
0.02
1 0.02
1 0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.47
10
101
10
11
111
12
71
71
71
71
71
71
8
8
8
8
8
8
7
7
7
5
5
5
9
9
9
11
11
14
769
769
769
1295
1295
1578
931
931
931
850
850
850
769
769
769
647
647
647
890
890
890
647
647
647
1012
1012
1012
850
850
897

Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 6b. Supplemental Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species (Understory)
Random Plot 3
#
Species
Height (cm)
1
Persea palustris *
1000
2
Persea palustris
61
3
Carpinus caroliniana
18
4
Ilex opaca
18
5
Magnolia virginiana
60
6
Ilex opaca
17
7
Lindera benzoin
62
8
Magnolia virginiana
63
9
Persea palustris
50
10
Taxodium distichum *
2000
11
Ilex opaca
10
12
Magnolia virginiana
51
13
Persea palustris
64
14
Carpinus caroliniana
66
15
Persea palustris
55
16
Magnolia virginiana
78
17
Carpinus caroliniana
56
18
Magnolia virginiana
38
19
Magnolia virginiana
43
20
Clethra alnifolia
25
21
Lindera benzoin
29
22
Carpinus caroliniana
80
23
Ilex opaca *
230
24
Persea palustris
55
25
Magnolia virginiana
45
26
Persea palustris
30
27
Clethra alnifolia
15
Planted Stems/Acre
971
Total Stems/Acre
1093
Average Planted Height (cm)
45
Average Planted Height (ft)
1.5
Plot Size (m)
25 x 4
* = existing, non -planted tree not included in average height
Random Plot 4
#
Species
Height (cm)
1
Ilex opaca
15
2
Magnolia virginiana
47
3
Clethra alnifolia
18
4
Persea palustris
51
5
Magnolia virginiana
71
6
Taxodium distichum *
1500
7
Taxodium distichum *
1500
8
Clethra alnifolia
51
9
Persea palustris
80
10
Magnolia virginiana
60
11
Persea palustris
38
12
Magnolia virginiana
36
13
Persea palustris *
1000
14
Clethra alnifolia
25
15
Lindera benzoin
10
16
Juniperus virginiana *
400
17
Juniperus virginiana *
320
18
Juniperus virginiana *
500
19
Ilex opaca
20
20
Magnolia virginiana *
1000
21
Persea palustris
25
22
Persea palustris
20
23
Magnolia virginiana
50
24
Magnolia virginiana
50
25
Lindera benzoin
15
26
Ilex opaca
10
27
Clethra alnifolia
20
28
Persea palustris
40
29
Persea palustris
51
Planted Stems/Acre
890
Total Stems/Acre
1174
Average Planted Height (cm)
37
Average Planted Height (ft)
1.2
Plot Size (m)
25 x 4
* = existing, non -planted tree not included in average height

Appendix D
Stream Measurement and
Geomorphology Data

Table 7: Baseline Stream Data Summary
Dugout GC2
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition (applicable)
Design
Monitoring
Baseline (MYO)
Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
15.7
1
21.0
19.5
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
>30
1
>50
>49.9
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.9
1
1.7
---
---
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.6
1
2.4
2.4
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
46.0
1
36.7
29.7
1
Width/Depth Ratio
5.4
1
12.0
---
---
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
1
>2.2
2.6
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.2
1
1.0
1.0
1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
E6
C5
C5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
1.02
1.14
1.14
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
Other

Table 7: Baseline Stream Data Summary
Dugout GO
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition (applicable)
Design
Monitoring
Baseline (MYO)
Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.8
15.2
15.3
18.5
3
21.0
20.2
23.8
6
Floodprone Width (ft)
25.0
28.3
>30
>30
3
>50
>49.7
>50.1
6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.6
2.2
2.2
2.7
3
1.7
---
---
---
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.1
2.8
2.7
3.6
3
2.4
2.3
3.3
6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
29.7
31.8
31.7
34.1
3
36.7
31.4
42.1
6
Width/Depth Ratio
4.4
7.6
6.8
11.6
3
12.0
---
---
---
Entrenchment Ratio
1.6
2.0
>2.2
>2.2
3
>2.2
2.1
2.5
6
Bank Height Ratio
1.2
1.6
1.5
2.2
3
1.0
1.0
1.0
6
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
E6 to G4c/G5c
C5
C5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
1.26
1.14
1.14
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
Other

Table 7: Baseline Stream Data Summary
Dugout GC4
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition (applicable)
Design
Monitoring
Baseline (MYO)
Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.5
20.3
20.3
27.2
2
---
---
18.2
20.8
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
25.2
27.6
27.6
30.0
2
---
---
>49.9
>49.9
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
1.7
1.7
2.5
2
---
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.9
2.7
2.7
3.5
2
---
---
2.6
2.7
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
26.3
30.3
30.3
34.2
2
---
---
26.6
39.0
1
Width/Depth Ratio
5.3
16.7
16.7
28.0
2
---
Entrenchment Ratio
1.1
1.5
1.5
1.9
2
---
---
2.4
2.7
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.3
1.7
1.7
1 2.1
2
---
---
1.0
1.0
1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
F5/F6 to G5c/G6c
---
---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
1.07
---
---
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
Other

Table 7: Baseline Stream Data Summary
Dugout TV1-B
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition (applicable)
Design
Monitoring
Baseline (MYO)
Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.7
1
6.0
6.9
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
>20
1
>50
>49.3
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
1
0.4
---
---
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.6
1
0.6
0.6
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
2.4
1
2.6
2.1
1
Width/Depth Ratio
18.7
1
13.6
---
---
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
1
>2.2
7.2
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.2
1
1.0
1.0
1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
C4/C5
C5
C5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
1.16
1.09
1.09
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
Other

Table 7: Baseline Stream Data Summary
Dugout TV5-B
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition (applicable)
Design
Monitoring Baseline (MYO)
Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.0
1
4.6
5.3
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
>20
1
>20
>32.4
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
1
0.4
---
---
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.4
1
0.5
0.6
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
1.2
1
1.7
1.5
1
Width/Depth Ratio
13.6
1
12.4
---
---
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
1
>2.2
6.2
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1 1
1.0
1 1.0
1
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Rosgen Classification
C51b
C5
C5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Sinuosity (ft)
1.20
1.07
1.07
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
Other

Table 8. - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number: Dugout - SAW-2018-01883
Cross Section 1 (Riffle)
MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
Cross Section 2 (Pool)
MYl MY2 MY3 MY5
M
I
ECross Section 3 (Riffle)
MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
Cross Section 4 (Pool) M
MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
Cross Section 5 (Pool)
MYl MY2 MY3 MY5
MY+
Base
MY+
Base
MY7
MY+
Base
MY+
Base
MY+
Base
MY7
BankfullElevation (ft) -Based on AB-XSA'
98.43
98.37
93.41
93.50
91.95
Bankfull Width (fty
5.3
8.8
6.9
12.2
23.0
Floodprone Width ft'
>32.4
>49.3
Bankfull Max Depth(fty
0.6
1.3
0.6
1.2
3.8
Low Bank Elevation (fr
98.43
98.37
93.41
93.50
91.95
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area fff
1.5
6.4
2.1
4.9
47.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
6.2
--
7.2
--
--
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 6 (Riffle)
Cross Section 7 (Pool)
Cross Section 8 (Riffle)
Cross Section 9 (Pool)
Cross Section 10 (Riffle)
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) -Based on AB-XSA'
91.63
90.22
90.38
89.46
89.36
Bankfull Width (ftY
19.5
20.2
20.7
22.4
20.2
Floodprone Width ft'
>49.9
1
>50.1
1
1
1
1 --
1
1
>49.7
Bankfull Max Depth(ft
2.4
3.5
2.4
3.0
2.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft
91.63
90.22
90.38
89.46
1
89.36
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ff)
29.7
37.0
33.8
40.1
31.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
2.6
2.4
2.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
--
1.0
--
1.0
ross Section 11(Riffle)
Cross Section 12 (Pool)
MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Base
Cross Section 13 (Riffle)
MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
Cross Section 14 (Pool)
MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Cross Section 15 (Riffle)
MYl MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
Base
Bankfull Elevation (ft) -Based on AB-XSAr
87.83
87.90
85.94
85.89
85.06
Bankfull Width ft'
20.4
23.0
20.4
22.0
21.8
Floodprone Width ft'
>49.7
1
1
1
1
1 --
I
1
1
>49.8
>50
Bankfull Max Depth(fty
2.4
3.5
2.4
3.6
3.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft]
87.83
87.90
85.94
85.89
85.06
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft z
33.1
46.1
33.3
44.2
39.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.4
2.4
2.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
14
Cross Section 16 (Pool)
Cross Section 17 (Riffle)
Cross Section 18 (Pool)
Cross Section 19 (Pool) (EI)
Cross Section 20 (Riffle) (EI)
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) -Based on AB-XSA'
84.90
84.20
83.85
79.78
78.83
Bankfull Width(fty
23.4
23.8
22.1
21.6
18.2
Floodprone Width (ft)'
--
>49.7
1
--
>49.9
Bankfull Max Depth(ft
3.8
2.7
3.7
2.7
2.6
Low Bank Elevation (ft]
84.90
84.20
83.85
79.78
78.83
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area fj z
47.9
42.1
42.9
39.3
26.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
--
2.1
--
--
2.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
1.0
Cross
Section
21 (Pool)
(EI)
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) -Based on AB-XSA'
78.70
Bankfull Width (fty
20.8
Floodprone Width (ft)'
>49.9
Bankfull Max Depth(ft
2.7
Low Bank Elevation (fr
78.70
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft z
39.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
2.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Dugout - Reach TV5-13 - Cross Section 1 - Riffle - (Restoration)
103
102
101
i
c
0 100
2
0
w 99
98
- -
- -
- -
- - -
- -
- -
- -
-
- -
-
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
-
97
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2022 — — — Approx. Bankfull Flood prone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 1
(Riffle)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY-3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Hevation (ft) - Based on ABASA
98.43
Bankfull Width ft
1 5.3
Flood rove Width ft
1 >32.4
Bankfull Max Depth ft
z 0.6
Low Bank Flevation (ft)
98.43
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
2 1.5
BanldullFntrenchment Ratios
6.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Dugout - Reach TV5-13 - Cross Section 2 - Pool - (Restoration)
103
102
101
c
° 100
w 99
98
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
-
- -
- -
-
- -
-
- -
-
97
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2022 — — — Appr:.X Bankf.11 3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 2 (Pool)
WO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Flevation (ft) - Based on ABASA
98.37
Bankfull Width ft'
8.8
Flood rove Width ft'
--
Bankfull Max Depth ft a
1.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
98.37
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2 z
6.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
--
BankfullBankHei htRatio'
1 1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

0
1.
f�
Upstream
Downstream
Dugout - Reach TV1-13 - Cross Section 3 - Riffle - (Restoration)
98
97
96
c
°
95
°
W
94
93
92
0 3 6 9 12 15
18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2022 — — • Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 3 (Riffle)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Flevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA
93.41
Bankfull Width ft 1
6.9
Floodprone Width ft1
>49.3
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)2
0.6
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
93.41
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2 2
21
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratios
7.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
sa'
Downstream
98
Dugout - Reach TV1-13 - Cross Section 4 - Pool - (Restoration)
97
96
x
c
°
95
°
W
94
93
- -
- -
- -
- -
-
-
- -
-
- -
- -
- -
- - -
-
92
0 3 6 9 12 15
18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MY02022 — —— Appr°x. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 4 (Pool)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bank full Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA
93.50
Bankfull Width ft
1 12.2
Flood rove Width ft
1
Bankfull Max De th (ft)2
1.2
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
93.50
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
2 4.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
1 -
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
--
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
k
sue,
x4T c4
Downstream
Dugout - Reach GC2 - Cross Section 5 - Pool - (Restoration)
94
93
92
—
—
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
—
— —
— —
— —
— —
—
c
°
91
w
90
89
88
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MY02022 — —— Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 5 (Pool)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY-3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA
91.95
Bankfull Width ft
1 23.0
Floodprone Width ft
1 --
Bankfull MaxDe th ft
2 3.8
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
91.95
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area Ot2
2 47.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1 -
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
95
Dugout - Reach GC2 - Cross Section 6 - Riffle - (Restoration)
94
93
c
°
92
W
91
90
89
0 3 6 9 12 15
18 21 24 27
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2022 — — —Approx. Bankfull
Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 6 (Rife)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA
91.63
Bankfull Width ft 1
19.5
Floodprone Width ft 1
>49.9
Bankfull Max De th ft 2
2.4
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
91.63
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 112 2
29.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1
2.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0 J
I
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

a
Upstream
Downstream
Dugout - Reach GC3 - Cross Section 7 - Pool - (Restoration)
92
91
90
—
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
1
—
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
c
° 89
W 88
87
86
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MY02022 — ——Appr:.X Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 7 (Pool)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA
90.22
Bankfull Width ft 1
20.2
Floodprone Width ft 1
--
Bankfull Max De th (ft)2
3.5
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
90.22
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ 2
37.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

�-x
Upstream
Downstream
Dugout - Reach GC3 - Cross Section 8 - Riffle - (Restoration)
93
92
91
i
c
° 90
w 89
88
87
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2022 — — —Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 8 (Riffle)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA
90.38
Bankfull Width ft 1
20.7
Floodprone Width ft 1
>50.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
2.4
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
90.38
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2 2
33.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratios1
2.4
Bankfull Bank Hei ht Ratio 1
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

k
Upstream
Downstream
Dugout - Reach GC3 - Cross Section 9 - Pool - (Restoration)
92
91
90
c
°
89
M
a)w
88
87
86
0 3 6 9 12 15
18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2022 — — — Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 9 (Pool)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Basedon AB-XSA
89.46
Bankfull Width ft 1
22.4
Flood rove Width ft 1
--
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
3.0
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
89.46
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2 2
40.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
--
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Dugout - Reach GC3 - Cross Section 10 - Riffle - (Restoration)
92
91
90
c
°
89
w
88
87
86
0 3 6 9 12 15
18 21 24 27
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2022 — — —Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 10 (Rife)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Basedon AB-XSA
89.36
Bankfull Width 11 1
20.2
Floodprone Width ft 1
>49.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
2.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
89.36
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 112 2
31.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratios
2.5
Bankfull Bank Hei ht Ratios
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
91
Dugout - Reach GC3 - Cross Section 11 - Riffle - (Restoration)
90
89
x
c
0
88
0
`F`7
7
";s�-
7
7
_
W
87
86
85
0 3 6 9 12 15
18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2022 — — — Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 11 (Riffle)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Basedon AB-XSA
87.83
Bankfull Width ft 1
20.4
Flood rove Width ft 1
>49.7
Bankfull Max Depth ft 2
2.4
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
87.83
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 1122
331
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1
2.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
90
Dugout - Reach GC3 - Cross Section 12 - Pool - (Restoration)
89
88
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
87
W
86
85
84
0 3 6 9 12 15
18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2022 — — — Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 12 (Pool)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA
87.90
Bankfull Width ft 1
23.0
Floodprone Width ft 1
Bankfull MaxDe th (ft)2
3.5
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
87.90
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2
46.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratios
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Left Bank
Dugout - Reach GC3 - Cross Section 13 - Riffle - (Restoration)
89
88
87
c
ru
7
w
854—L
84
I-,
1100OF
83
0 3 6 9 12 15
18 21 24 27
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2022 — — —Approx. Bankfull
Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 13 (Riffle)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA
85.94
Bankfull Width 11 1
20.4
Flood rove Width ft 1
>49.8
Bankfull Max De th ft 2
2.4
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
85.94
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 112 2
333
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1
2.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
88
Dugout - Reach GC3 - Cross Section 14 - Pool - (Restoration)
87
86
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
c
°
85
°
W
84
Oeol
83
82
0 3 6 9 12 15
18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2022 — — — Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 14 (Pool)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Basedon AB-XSA
85.89
Bankfull Width (ft)
22.0
Flood rove Width ft 1
--
Bankfull Max Depth ft a
3.6
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
85.89
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2 2
44.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratios
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
L
f
ANII
l
r
F�
Downstream
Dugout - Reach GC3 - Cross Section 15 - Riffle - (Restoration)
88.5
87.5
86.5
85.5
c
O
84.5
w
83.5
82.5
81.5
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
— MYO 2022 — — — Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 15 (Rife)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA
85.06
Bankfull Width 11 1
21.8
Flood rove Width ft 1
>50
Bankfull Max De th ft 2
3.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
85.06
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2 2
39.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1
2.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
87
Dugout - Reach GC3 - Cross Section 16 - Pool - (Restoration)
86
85
— -
- -
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
i
c
°
84
w
83
82
.00
81
0 3 6 9 12 15
18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MY02022 — —— Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 16 (Pool)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Basedon ABASA
84.90
Bankfull Width ft
1 23.4
Flood rove Width ft
1 --
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
3.8
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
84.90
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
a 47.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratios
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1 -
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

NN
f -
I
e
1
�
z
VIM
s
Upstream
Downstream
Dugout - Reach GC3 - Cross Section 17 - Riffle - (Restoration)
87
86
85
0
84
7—
—
—
—
—
—
— —
—
—
—
W
83
82
81
0 3 6 9 12 15
18 21 24 27
30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
— MYO 2022 — — — Approx. Bankfull
Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 17 (Riffle)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Bas ed on AB-XSA
84.20
Bankfull Width 11 1
23.8
Flood rove Width ft 1
>49.7
Bankfull Max Depth 112
2.7
Low Bank Elevation (11)
84.20
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 112 2
421
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratios
2.1
Bankfull Bank Hei ht Ratio 1
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

4
I
Upstream
Downstream
86
Dugout - Reach GC3 - Cross Section 18 - Pool - (Restoration)
85
84
— -
- —
— -
-
- —
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
c
°
83
w
82
81
80
0 3 6 9 12 15
18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MY02022 — —— Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 18 (Pool)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Basedon ABASA
83.85
Bankfull Width ft
1 22.1
Flood rove Width ft
1 --
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
3.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
83.85
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
a 42.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratios
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1 -
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
83
Dugout - Reach GC4 - Cross Section 19 - Pool - (Enhancement 1)
82
81
c
°
80
m
- -
- -
- -
- -
-
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- _
- -
- -
- -
- -
w
79
78
77
0 3 6 9 12 15
18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO2O22 — —— Approx. Bankfull
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 19 (Pool) (El)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Basedon ABASA
79.78
Bankfull Width (ft)
21.6
Flood rove Width ft
1 --
Bankfull Max Depth ft
a 2.7
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
79.78
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area L
a 39.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratios
,
Bankfull Bank Hei ht Ratio
1 -
i
i
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Dugout - Reach GC4 - Cross Section 20 - Riffle - (Enhancement 1)
82
81
80
iR
c
° 79
w 78
77
76
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
— MYO 2022 — — — Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 20 (Riffle)
(El)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Basedon AB-XSA
78.83
Bankfull Width 11
1 18.2
Flood rove Width ft
1 >49.9
Bankfull Max Depth 112
2.6
Low Bank Elevation (11)
78.83
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area 112
2 26.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratios
2.7
Bankfull Bank Hei ht Ratio
1 1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
82
Dugout - Reach GC4 - Cross Section 21 - Riffle - (Enhancement 1)
81
80
iR
c
°
79
w
78
77
76
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
— MYO 2022 — — — Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 21 (Riffle) (En
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bank ull Elevation t -Based on B-X
78.70
Bankfull Width (ft)'
20.8
Floodprone Width (ft)'
>49.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
2.7
Low Bank Elevation ft
78.70
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)2
39.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
2.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratioll
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Appendix E
Hydrology Data

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name:
Dugout
Date:
January 19, 2023
Personnel:
Matthew DeAn elo
Soil Pit ID:
GW1
Latitude, Longitude
(34.9251464047629,-78.8544876507232)
Horizon Depths
Texture
Matrix
Color (Munsell
Redoximor hic Features
Induration (none,
Roots
(inches)
moist)
Color
Abundance
weak, strong)
0-6
Clay
Gley 1 2.5N
10YR 5/1
50%
None
Few
Texture Modifier: NA
6-30
Clay Loam
Gley 1 2.5/N
None
Common
Texture Modifier: Organic
Comments:
Soil Profile:
NA
Jr,..
'S
1
}
.q ice/
t �y
5y
-t' S
K
Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 Dugout

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name:
Dugout
Date:
January 19, 2023
Personnel:
Matthew DeAn elo
Soil Pit ID:
GW2
Latitude, Longitude
(34.9249365374003,-78.8531887851748)
Horizon Depths
Texture
Matrix Color (Munsell
Redoximor hic Features
Induration (none,
Roots
(inches)
moist)
Color
Abundance
weak, strong)
0-28
Clay Loam
Gley 1 2.5N
None
Common
Texture Modifier: Organic
Comments:
Soil Profile:
NA
091
4I
�
Y
r
r
h
X
Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 Dugout

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name:
Dugout
Date:
January 19, 2023
Personnel:
Matthew DeAn elo
Soil Pit ID:
GW3
Latitude, Longitude
(34.924737037663,-78.8522823496583)
Horizon Depths
Texture
Matrix Color (Munsell
Redoximor hic Features
Induration (none,
Roots
(inches)
moist)
Color
Abundance
weak, strong)
0-12
Loam
10YR2/2
None
Many
Texture Modifier: Organic
12-28
Clay Loam
Gley 1 2.5N
None
Common
Texture Modifier: Organic
Comments:
Soil Profile:
NA
• t 1 41
Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 Dugout

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name:
Dugout
Date:
January 19, 2023
Personnel:
Matthew DeAn elo
Soil Pit ID:
GW4
Latitude, Longitude
(34.9262371575263,-78.8527137313686)
Horizon Depths
Texture
Matrix Color (Munsell
Redoximor hic Features
Induration (none,
Roots
Color
Abundance
(inches)
moist)
weak, strong)
0-28
Clay Loam
Gley 1 2.5/N
Weak
None
Texture Modifier: Organic
Comments:
Soil Profile:
Fill material
,
4 `
f
i
t
1
r�
Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 Dugout

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name:
Dugout
Date:
January 19, 2023
Personnel:
Matthew DeAn elo
Soil Pit ID:
GW5
Latitude, Longitude
(34.9256037302203,-78.8517976005731)
Horizon Depths
Texture
Matrix Color (Munsell
Redoximor hic Features
Induration (none,
Roots
Color
Abundance
(inches)
moist)
weak, strong)
0-15
Loam
Gley 1 2.5N
None
Few
Texture Modifier: Organic
15-21
Clay
Gley 1 2.5N
None
Few
Texture Modifier: Organic
21-28
Loam
Gley 1 2.5N
None
Few
Texture Modifier: Organic
Comments:
Soil Profile:
NA
�
x'r
a
7
5
w
�T
Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 Dugout

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name:
Dugout
Date:
January 19, 2023
Personnel:
Matthew DeAn elo
Soil Pit ID:
GW6
Latitude, Longitude
(34.9251946379301,-78.8511607028035)
Horizon Depths
Texture
Matrix Color (Munsell
Redoximor hic Features
Induration (none,
Roots
(inches)
moist)
Color
Abundance
weak, strong)
0-4
Loam
Gley 1 2.5N
None
Common
Texture Modifier: Organic
2-30
Clay Loam
Gley 1 2.5N
None
Common
Texture Modifier: Organic
Comments:
Soil Profile:
NA
.F JAY-
I
.r
.i
r�rrJJ
�
Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 Dugout

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name:
Dugout
Date:
January 31, 2023
Personnel:
Matthew DeAn elo
Soil Pit ID:
GW7
Latitude, Longitude
(34.9254022924551,-78.847888356152)
Horizon Depths
Texture
Matrix Color (Munsell
Redoximor hic Features
Induration (none,
Roots
Color
Abundance
(inches)
moist)
weak, strong)
0-16
Clay Loam
Gley 1 2.5/N
None
Few
Texture Modifier: Organic
16-25
Sandy -Clay -Loam
10YR 2/1
None
Few
Texture Modifier: Organic
25-32
Loamy Sand
10YR 7/2
None
None
Texture Modifier: NA
Comments:
Soil Profile:
NA
r. i
Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 Dugout

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name:
Dugout
Date:
January 31, 2023
Personnel:
Matthew DeAn elo
Soil Pit ID:
GW8
Latitude, Longitude
(34.9254759675011,-78.84701303151)
Horizon Depths
Texture
Matrix Color (Munsell
Redoximor hic Features
Induration (none,
Roots
(inches)
moist)
Color
Abundance
weak, strong)
0-8
Loam
10YR 3/2
None
Many
Texture Modifier: NA
6-26
Silt Loam
Gley 1 2.5/N
None
Few
Texture Modifier: Organic
26-30
Clay
10YR 2/1
None
None
Texture Modifier: Organic
Comments:
Soil Profile:
NA
yi
�4
Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 Dugout

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name:
Dugout
Date:
January 31, 2023
Personnel:
Matthew DeAn elo
Soil Pit ID:
GW9
Latitude, Longitude
(34.9255090297127,-78.8457513852013)
Horizon Depths
Texture
Matrix Color (Munsell
Redoximor hic Features
Induration (none,
Roots
(inches)
moist)
Color
Abundance
weak, strong)
0-24
Silt Loam
Gley 1 2.5/N
None
Common
Texture Modifier: Organic
24-28
Sand
10YR 7/1
None
None
Texture Modifier: NA
Comments:
Soil Profile:
NA
r -
E
r
*" iL
S
Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 Dugout

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name:
Dugout
Date:
January 31, 2023
Personnel:
Matthew DeAn elo
Soil Pit ID:
GW10
Latitude, Longitude
(34.9256496262455,-78.844362161457)
Horizon Depths
Texture
Matrix Color (Munsell
Redoximor hic Features
Induration (none,
Roots
(inches)
moist)
Color
Abundance
weak, strong)
0-17
Silt Loam
Gley 1 2.5/N
None
Common
Texture Modifier: Organic
17-20
Silty Clay
10YR 5/2
10YR 5/6
10%
None
Few
Texture Modifier: NA
20-22
Sandy Loam
10YR 4/1
10 YR 4/6
5%
None
None
Texture Modifier: NA
22-26
Loamy Sand
10YR 6/2
None
None
Texture Modifier: NA
Comments:
Soil Profile:
NA
{. e
Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 Dugout

Soil Characterization Data Form
Project Name:
Dugout
Date:
January 31, 2023
Personnel:
Matthew DeAn elo
Soil Pit ID:
GW11
Latitude, Longitude
(34.9258825439032,-78.8430257189175)
Horizon Depths
Texture
Matrix Color (Munsell
Redoximor hic Features
Induration (none,
Roots
Color
Abundance
(inches)
moist)
weak, strong)
0-6
Loam
10YR 2/1
None
Few
Texture Modifier: NA
6-16
Clay Loam
10YR 4/1
10YR 5/6
3%
None
Few
Texture Modifier: NA
16-24
Clay
10YR 5/2
10YR 4/6
15%
None
None
Texture Modifier: NA
Comments:
Soil Profile:
NA
5�
Soil Characterization Data Collected using Survey123 Dugout

Appendix F
As -Built & Record Drawings

1
2
3
E
61
101
7
FI DUGOUT STREAM & WETLAND MITIGATION SITE
E
0
C
IQ
0
AS -BUILT TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
for
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
LIMITS OF AS-B
w
Claimay
Wiliams
Vander
es ,C
�/j Village
,
at
Quail Ridge Pezrces Mill
Dogwood Acres
erland
a
Heritage
/"k
a
Heights
59
Fayetteville
Decker
Regional
Airport
Heights
Hope Mills
Ard/1
Grays Creek
/i
i
Colonial Heights
°=
v
PROJECT LOCATION
Raclin _f�
Lena
�
ar
cmilsn
67
Elease
VICINITY MAP
3600 LENWOO AVE, SUITE 100
"LEI H. NC 27612
SURVEYORS le
NCBELS FIRM NO. C-4724
PO BOX: 879, PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 27041
www.pilotse.com 1 336-422-6741
Contact: cony [e-mail]
I, JONATHAN CORY GEORGE, CERTIFY THAT THIS PROJECT WAS COMPLETED UNDER MY DIRECT
AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION; THAT
THIS TOPOGRAPHIC (GROUND) SURVEY WAS PERFORMED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A
TOPOGRAPHIC / PLANIMETRIC SURVEY TO THE ACCURACY OF CLASS A AND VERTICAL
ACCURACY WHEN APPLICABLE TO THE CLASS A STANDARD, AND THAT THE ORIGINAL DATA
WAS OBTAINED ON 09/01-09/02, 09/06-09/08, 10/04/2022, 12/21/2022; THAT THE SURVEY WAS
COMPLETED ON 02/09/2023; THAT CONTOURS SHOWN AS BROKEN LINES MAY NOT MEET THE
STATED STANDARD; AND ALL COORDINATES ARE BASED ON NC - NAD'83, (NSRS 2011), AND ALL
ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NC - NAVD'88.
THE GLOBAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEM (GNSS) WAS USED TO PERFORM A PORTION OF
THIS SURVEY AND THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS USED:
1. CLASS OF SURVEY: CLASS A
2. POSITIONAL ACCURACY: HMRS 0.016'; VRMS 0.030'
3. TYPE OF GPS FIELD PROCEDURE: RTK (BASE / ROVER)
4. DATES OF SURVEY: 09/01/2022
5. DATUM/EPOCH: NAD'83 (2011)
6. PUBLISHED/FIXED CONTROL: VRS
7. GEOID MODEL: GEOID 18 (CONUS)
8. COMBINED GRID FACTOR: 0.99988980
9. UNITS: US SURVEY FEET
THIS PLAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND
SURVEYING IN NORTH CAROLINA (21 NCAC 56.1600). WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL,
THIS 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023.
NOTES:
1. BEARINGS ARE GRID NORTH. NCSPCS NAD'83, US SURVEY FOOT.
2. TIE TO GRID COMPLETED BY RTK GPS (VRS)
3. AREAS COMPUTED BY COORDINATE GEOMETRY.
4. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND DISTANCES.
5. ADJOINING LAND OWNERS WERE IDENTIFIED USING THE CURRENT
ONLINE COUNTY GIS TAX MAPS.
6. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE
REPORT, WHICH MAY REVEAL ADDITIONAL CONVEYANCES, EASEMENTS,
RIGHTS -OF -WAY, OR RESTRICTIONS NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT.
7. NOT ALL UTILITIES OR IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN.
8. PARCEL IS NOT LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA. SEE MAP
NUMBER 3720044200J, EFFECTIVE 01/05/2007.
9. LOCATION S OF WETLAND GAUGES, STREAM GAUGES, "AMBIENT" AND
VEGETATION PLOTS PROVIDED TO PILOTSE BY RES ON 02/02/2023.
10. ALL RIFFLES ON MAIN STEM CONTAINED VARIED AMOUNTS OF WOODY
DEBRIS.
CA
�Q¢ FOSS%O
SEAL
t, L-5051 Q7 Uj_
T. SURD .
N
PILOT SE PROJECT NO. 22-283
Jonathan
Cory
George
Digitally signed by
Jonathan Cory
George
Date: 2023.02.23
12:18:16-05'00'
1 1 2
3
0
5
0
7
0

VP-04
PIA
VANCE TYSON JR
PIN:0442-38-2137
DEED BK: 10068 PG: 0811
I
I
FOUND 1/2"
REBAR WITH CAP
FOUND 5/8" REBAR
EDITH WILLIAMS
PIN: 0442-38-5093
DEED BK: 4886 PG: 0326
�E . 23g �6 MEND
N� 4° 06 2 \ON
GONSER P Pc'ES 5
`\M\�p�K BOO1� ,
c1, LIMITS OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
6+ a 81 � 7+p0
N890 13' 32 E - 65.11'
SET 5/8" REBAR
(TYP.)
VANCE TYSON JR
PIN: 0442-46-1787
DEED BK: 10006-0306
PROPERTY LINE NOT SURVEYED (TYP.)
I
I
I
49\
\ VEGETATION PLOT (TYP.)
93 \ \ a `9r' SAM WAW*
\\ �I*ft ftft
1 �
\\ \ LOG VANE (TYP.) VP-01
` \ \ \ we GW1 9 XS5LP �
`9\ ? GC2
92
\ TOP OF TYP.) TOE OF SL E (TYP.)
` x 92 / p0
\ k
XSwP -
DESIGN ALIGNMENT (TYP.)
N
VANCE TYSON JR � 92 woo
PIN:0442-37-1967saw goo goo
DEED BK: 10068 PG: 0811
FOUND 1" PIPE
S6
S°
�638,
Parcel Line Table
Line #
Length
Direction
L1
19.53
S68° 05' 34"W
L2
20.02
N88° 10' 20"E
MATCHLINE_SEE SHEET 7
HARRY LEE
PIN: 0442-38-8091
DEED BK: 3454 PG: 0039
SWALE (A)
a
XS3LP--93
XS3/4RP
9
!
o
XS P
\ 93 '
y\
'•q� 9� REACH
\� 1
o \
rown now sun
` g2
it
Q 1
o0
�L
I��g2
I /
/ DESIGN ALIGNMENT (TYP.)
I /
1 /
II VANCE TYSON JR
DEED BK: 10009-0887
` O
\ \ 00
L2S820\ \
°60.88' l 34
23
ftft
S8805' 37"E - 55.39' N�1 34?2 \
I REACH GC2/GC3 1
XS6LP
91)
THALWEG (TYP.)
G W2 O
VP-02
18" RCP
INV: 89.10
SET 5/8" REBAR7
\
(TYP.)
� 0 \
\ \� 0*0
XS6RP
rn ��
1
1
1
N87° 08' 42"W - 784.78'
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PLAT BOOK 147, PAGES 58-61
91
FIELD LOCATED
HEAD OF RIFFLE
DESIGN ALIGNMENT (TYP.)
\ (TYP.) /400
FIELD LOCATED
END OF RIFFLE '
(TYP.)
g2 '
000
r
we
O WETLAND GAUGE
Sc
O STREAM GAUGE
BRUSH TOE
88 �—
we
O GW3
FOUND 1/2"
REBAR WITH CAP
Sw
j
�I�\was
N
I~
w
w_
U
w
Iw
U
w
z
J
_
U
Q
Jonathan Digitally signed by
Jonathan Cory
Cory George
Date: 2023.02.23
George 12:19:20-05'00'
'
¢'cN �ARo�''%,
0
SEAL
L-5051 _
w
0,L9 C9
Rv�y�•O�
U\
1'Ill0\\\
SHEET 1
AS BUILT SURVEY
for
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS
3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
GRAYS CREEK TOWNSHIP
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATES SURVEYED: 9/01 - 9/02/2022
DRAWN BY: C. GEORGE
FIELD CREW: AH, JT, CG
PROJECT NO: 22-283
SAND HILL RD
SITE
Nq t'F�ock
ST
wScN pRER
eo
S�P�o�o Z a Y m
0 a o�
U Y W
BLOSSOM RD
VICINITY MAP (NTS)
30 0 15 30 60
SCALE: 1" = 30'
LEGEND
EXISTING IRON MON.
pd
WATER VALVE
®
SET 5/8" REBAR
O
WELL
0
CALCULATED POINT
-0
GUY WIRE
Q
TRAVERSE STATION
BOUNDARY LINE
CONCRETE MONUMENT
LINE NOT SURVEYED
®
PK NAIL
— R/w—
RIGHT OF WAY
R/W MONUMENT
— — —
— EASEMENT
e
R.R. SPIKE
— P —
OVERHEAD ELEC
Q
STONE
— E —
UNDERGRD ELEC
®
WATER METER
— w —
WATER LINE
Q
SEWER CLEANOUT
SS
SEWER LINE
Q
SEWER MANHOLE
— GAS—
GAS LINE
Op
STORM MANHOLE
— SD —
STORM LINE
FIRE HYDRANT
DITCH CNTRLINE
gyp,
UTILITY POLE
x —CHAIN
LNK FNCE
—� SINGLE POLE SIGN

SET 5/8" REBAR �\
___93
GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD
g6�
95
O
03
♦ 93 92 00,2g„E ` 603 88
LOCATION NOTED AS 91
"AMBIENT" FROM RES 92 VP 6 `
o `
N
S"0 g� `
o g0
Q CQ
z
l
VANCE TYSON JR
DEED BK: 10009-0887 '
WG
O GW5 ' 000
'o
94 ` `
ftft
95
94
VANCE TYSON JR
DEED BK: 10009-0887
0 WETLAND GAUGE
0 STREAM GAUGE
BRUSH TOE
►'-� Digitally signed
Jonathan g y g
°`� tlMITS of �o+ �2 by Jonathan
PLAT IVSE
e0Ok 14 P�O/�EgSE �� Cory Cory George
'� s1 GES s8 MENT Date: 2023.02.23
` 61 DAM George 12:20:05-05'00'
♦ ` s0
_ .�N cARo
SET 5/8" REBAR SWALE (B)',
8g�
♦ ¢ SEAL <.
VP-07 L-5051 =
_ DAM R �••' Q-
O I ,, 0
VEGETATION PLOT (TYP.) ` pp
PROPERTY LINE NOT SURVEYED (TYP.)89 \
SHEET 2
I- I AS BUILT SURVEY
$s for
I LIMITS OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY '
� 1 � RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL
g ftft/
SOLUTIONS
'
91� ko
000
r�O�
--�
\
GC3-1
\ \
XS8LP
�
88 \ S7LP
O
\
0
\
\Was
owe
mom
91
XS8RP
`
XS7RPwoo
9
Iw
000
U)
♦
w
■ ��'
w
U)
w
z_
J
U
Q
75
` woo 000
ISO6 3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100
I $ / RALEIGH, NC 27612
GRAYS CREEK TOWNSHIP
DESIGN ALIGNMENT (TYP.) CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
/ DATES SURVEYED: 9/01 - 9/02/2022
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP.) XS10LP $g / DRAWN BY: C. GEORGE
TYP. / � � FIELD CREW: AH, JT, CG
TOP OF BANK
(TYP.) / _ \ \ PROJECT NO: 22-283
87 XS9LP \ 0\
• �22x � � — 8j � / 87 _ �
SAND HILL RD N
SITE
LOG VANE (TYP)
/ I
1& 88
THALWAG (TYP.) I k
XS10RP
/ REACH GC2/GC3 XS9RP w f '. I = I - ' ScN pRER
' U r
90 00
90 �� ► w I 3 ego
S83° 07' 02„W - 871.36
VANCE TYSON JR
PIN: 0442-46-1787
DEED BK: 10006-0306
' � � � � U ROCk �G w o
w VANCE TYSON JR �o cT Z _➢
_ J Ln
PIN: 0442-57-8598 Pia Z -Q N 00
U I DEED BK: 10009-0887 m
Q U 2
I BLOSSOM RD
LIMITS OF CONSERVAPAON GEEASE58 6MENT
K 1
PLAT B0247,
VICINITY MAP (NTS)
PO BOX: 879, PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 27041
www.pilotse.com 1 336-422-6741
30 0 15
30
60
SCALE: 1"
= 30'
LEGEND
EXISTING IRON MON.
pd
WATER VALVE
0
SET 5/8" REBAR
O
WELL
0
CALCULATED POINT
-0
GUY WIRE
Q
TRAVERSE STATION
BOUNDARY LINE
CONCRETE MONUMENT
LINE NOT SURVEYED
®
PK NAIL
RIGHT OF WAY
— R/w—
R/W MONUMENT —
— — —
EASEMENT
e
R.R. SPIKE
— P —
OVERHEAD ELEC
Q
STONE
— E —
UNDERGRD ELEC
®
WATER METER
— w —
WATER LINE
Q
SEWER CLEANOUT
SS
SEWER LINE
Q
SEWER MANHOLE
— GAS—
GAS LINE
0
STORM MANHOLE
— SD —
STORM LINE
FIRE HYDRANT
DITCH CNTRLINE
gyp,
UTILITY POLE
x —CHAIN
LNK FNCE
—� SINGLE POLE SIGN

0
N
M
20
0
Q
z
0"
VANCE TYSON JR
DEED BK: 10009-0887
woo
DAM
rn .
SWALE (B)
DAM
90
`90 \
9-
-89
1 I
i
- ' 86 -�7
` 88
00 ♦ N83° 42' 33 E - 961.70'
LIMITS OF CONSERVAPAGES 58 6n1ENT
' ♦ 000 PLAT BOOK 14
90 / \
/ VP-08
00
VEGETATION PLOT (TY
LIMITS OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY *00
000
S12LP
a was
89 Now Now 00 XS11 LP
ce,
.
THALWAG (TYP.)
DESIGN ALIGNMENT (TYP.) —
89
r �
w I ~ 89 ♦ '
= I '�
I�
w
w
w
z_ I
J_
I� VANCE TYSON JR vAT10N EASEMENT
< PIN: 0442-57-8598 LIMITS OF CONSER PAGES 5g-61
IDEED BK: 10009-0887 PLAT BOOK 147,
I
IFOUND
zoo
O C° I
��o
C m
Lu
I
ap PROPERTY LINE NOT SURVEYED (TYP.)
W I
I
I
I
I
REACH GC2/GC3
89 rgoo to
� I
S81
° 44' 29"\N
VANCE TYSON JR
DEED BK: 10009-0887
LOG LANE (TYP.)
3
y
g5
J
TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
XS12RP
'-0—
XS11RP
O GW7
_ss
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP
saw was as*
woo goo saw SUN
I /I 98 5
.0
00,
VANCE TYSON JR
PIN: 0442-57-8598
DEED BK: 10009-0887
M;.
FOUND R
16
N� .
O WETLAND GAUGE
sc
O STREAM GAUGE
BRUSH TOE
Jonathan Digitally signed by
Jonathan Cory George
Cory George Date: 2023.02.23
1 12:20:55-05'00'
¢'c\A CARo�''%,
o
y.
SEAL
I _ ` L-5051 _
9 0••'��
I G
N O
SHEET 3
C
AS BUILT SURVEY
for
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS
3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
GRAYS CREEK TOWNSHIP
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATES SURVEYED: 9/01 - 9/02/2022
DRAWN BY: C. GEORGE
FIELD CREW: AH, JT, CG
PROJECT NO: 22-283
SAND HILL RD
SITE
Nq t'F�oOk
ST
� ScN pRER
ru
eo
= ROOk OP a
p"fo
OHO Z a =
; m
U Y
BLOSSOM RD
VICINITY MAP (NTS)
I I r1TU+ r
BOX:
8tLS rIT MI UN (IN, N 4
PO BOX: 879, PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 27041
www.pilotse.com 1 336-422-6741
30 0 15 30 60
SCALE: 1" = 30'
LEGEND
EXISTING IRON MON.
pd
WATER VALVE
o
SET 5/8" REBAR
O
WELL
0
CALCULATED POINT
-0
GUY WIRE
Q
TRAVERSE STATION
BOUNDARY LINE
CONCRETE MONUMENT
LINE NOT SURVEYED
®
PK NAIL
— R/w—
RIGHT OF WAY
R/W MONUMENT
— — —
— EASEMENT
e
R.R. SPIKE
— P —
OVERHEAD ELEC
Q
STONE
— E —
UNDERGRD ELEC
®
WATER METER
— w —
WATER LINE
Q
SEWER CLEANOUT
ss
SEWER LINE
Q
SEWER MANHOLE
— cns—
GAS LINE
Op
STORM MANHOLE
— SD —
STORM LINE
FIRE HYDRANT
DITCH CNTRLINE
gyp,
UTILITY POLE
— x —CHAIN
LNK FNCE
—� SINGLE POLE SIGN

0
N
M
0
Q
z
000
am ww� 090 �
63
0
FOUND REBAR
IC?
00 '
400
00
00 an am 000
VANCE TYSON JR ® 0 / g6 '
4e DEED BK: 10009-0887 '
/ / /
86 / /
/
♦00
VANCE TYSON JR
/ // $ / i PIN:0442-77-0886
86 ' 000 i DEED BK: 10009-0887
000 sum
N63 26
NAP $ 61 87—
-\\o
7T" REBAR/ � 88 pFp��I?P�6 Gi I I 87 ` LIMITS OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY �\��,�
\ FOUND 1/2"
302.69ZZ ���
S84° 18' 25"E - d' \ REBAR WITH CAP
' 6'
S840 37' 15„E _ S
\ 123.54
85 \ EEO
\ FOUND 1/2" co
\ REBAR WITH CAP CO
87 C& \
II 8 \ \ REACH GC2/GC3
VEGETATION PLOT (TYP.) 6
O 85 \ XS14LP \ \
�\ \ GW9 \\ \. LOG LANE (TYF
00
00 00
I I \ \ \
0 co \ \ N 0 \
/ �� I N \
XS13LP \\ k83 �� /
/ co co_
N I N \\ 7+00 — TOP OF BANK (TYP.) /
z \ — /8s \ \86
QCO w (9 XS14RP \
L 2 coo \ \ x \ 83 4�t
�
WG GW8 Zw I I QLO
O D w cn 0
F-IL zLu —
VP-09 �_0 88 THALWAG (TYP.co
///
w
00 (f)Y
O z0
U00-
I� 8s Q Um
w IL- Q
IU) O ��
w
Iw
J
w O 88
z
= o
U
Q O
O
FOUND
bb
r ♦
�sum mm..
I FOUND 1/2" FOUND 1/2"
REBAR WITH CAP REBAR WITH CAP
GRAVEL FORD
Z I
i� 83
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP.)
S880 34' 07'VV - 433.07' (0q� �
VANCE TYSON JR
PIN: 0442-57-8598
DEED BK: 10009-0887
86
DESIGN ALIGNMENT (TYP.)
a�
saw �saw
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PLAT BOOK 147, PAGES 58-61
Jonathan Digitally signed by
Jonathan Cory
Cory George
Date: 2023.02.23
George 12:21:40-05'00'
\\\W \11III/////
¢'c\A CARo�''%,
/4,
86 I �co XS16LP
WG
O GW10 I LO
w
w
2
U)
$6 w
U
w
z_
J
2
I�
VIP
r
SEAL
L-5051
� ',2y •tio SUR �y•• 0��:
SHEET 4
AS BUILT SURVEY
for
co RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS
3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
GRAYS CREEK TOWNSHIP
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATES SURVEYED: 9/01 - 9/02/2022
DRAWN BY: C. GEORGE
FIELD CREW: AH, JT, CG
PROJECT NO: 22-283
SAND HILL RD N
SITE
Nq ock
ST
wScN pRER
r \�
90
Ln
S�P�o�o Z a Y m
0 a o�
U Y �
BLOSSOM RD
low
— 87 \
VICINITY MAP (NTS)
bb
a1 � ' \ \ a PILOTSE
SURVEYORS • ENGINEERS
NCBELS FIRM NO. C-4724
PO BOX: 879, PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 27041
\ s63\ www.pilotse.com 1 336-422-6741
\ 30 0 15 30 60
\
\
FOUND 1/2" �\ SCALE: 1" = 30'
REBAR WITH CAP \
PROPERTY LINE NOT SURVEYED (TYP.) \
\ LEGEND
\
\0 EXISTING IRON MON. pd WATER VALVE
\ ® SET 5/8" REBAR O WELL
0 CALCULATED POINT -0 GUY WIRE
Q TRAVERSE STATION BOUNDARY LINE
CONCRETE MONUMENT LINE NOT SURVEYED
® PK NAIL — R/w— RIGHT OF WAY
R/W MONUMENT — — — — EASEMENT
0
e
R.R. SPIKE
— P — OVERHEAD ELEC
Q
STONE
— E — UNDERGRD ELEC
®
WATER METER
— w — WATER LINE
Q
SEWER CLEANOUT
SS SEWER LINE
Q
SEWER MANHOLE
— GAS— GAS LINE
STORM MANHOLE
STORM LINE
-SD-
FIRE HYDRANT DITCH CNTRLINE
gyp, UTILITY POLE x —CHAIN LNK FNCE
—� SINGLE POLE SIGN

' g0
I �
I
too 100
00
861 XS16LP
GC3-3 -\
w
w
2
g6 U)
w
w
U
w
z_
J
U
la
/a6
r- PROPERTY LINE NOT SURVEYED (TYP.)
\
\
\
FOUND 1/2"
REBAR WITH CAP
i 82
XS15LP
/ XS15RI
2m
REACH GC2/GC3
\ A�p\\
- XS16RP \ —83 \
85
- FOUND 1/2"
REBAR WITH CAP
(P
85
S87° 33' 57 E - 410.70'
VANCE TYSON JR
DEED BK: 10009-0887
\ ` LIMITS OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
SET 5/8" REBAR
aI S87° 33' 56"E - 213.84'
85 LIMITS OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PLAT BOOK 147, PAGES 58-61
84
I
IVP-12 \
I
II ` \
� / . GW11 O XS18LP LOG LANE (TYP.)
/ / \ /
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP.) XS17LP
i
82
\\
TOP OF BANK (TYP.) \ 8�
DESIGN ALIGNMENT (TYP.)
8S
S
co
A� worL
4m m 000 ■ oo wo
I �
VANCE TYSON JR
PIN: 0442-77-0886
DEED BK: 10009-0887
XS17RP
THALWAG (TYP.)
XS18RP
84
FOUND 1/2" REBAR ftft
� J
84
83
THALWAG AS LOCATED
+00 ON 12/21/22 (TYP.)
ao
0
LIMITS\OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PL T BOOK 147, PAGES 58161
N 88° 50' 34"W - 918.52'
4 ftft 0
THALWAG AS ORIGINALL
\ LOCATED( �p
c
VP-13
Iw
U)
2
t
■i
VEGETATION PLOT (TYP.) J U
mom _
a5
Mom mom i
O WETLAND GAUGE
SG
O STREAM GAUGE
BRUSH TOE
0
N
M
M
0
Q
z
Jonathan Digitally signed by
Jonathan Cory
Cory George
Date: 2023.02.23
George 12:22:26-05'00'
¢'c\A CARo�''%,
SEAL
L-5051
SHEET 5
AS BUILT SURVEY
for
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS
3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
GRAYS CREEK TOWNSHIP
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATES SURVEYED: 9/01 - 9/02/2022
DRAWN BY: C. GEORGE
FIELD CREW: AH, JT, CG
PROJECT NO: 22-283
SAND HILL RD N
SITE
Nq t'F�ock
ST
wScN pRER
r \�
90
= ROOk CT a
v
OHO Z a _ Ln
00
0J� z ; m
U Y 0 A
BLOSSOM RD
i
VICINITY MAP (NTS)
■ ■ r% T OM% r 1
I \IVI
O11
BOX: 879, PILOT
MOUNTAIN, C
NPO 27041
www.pilotse.com 1 336-422-6741
30 0
15 30
60
SCALE: 1" = 30'
LEGEND
EXISTING IRON MON.
pd
WATER VALVE
®
SET 5/8" REBAR
O
WELL
0
CALCULATED POINT
-0
GUY WIRE
Q
TRAVERSE STATION
BOUNDARY LINE
CONCRETE MONUMENT
LINE NOT SURVEYED
®
PK NAIL
— R/w—
RIGHT OF WAY
R/W MONUMENT
— — — —
EASEMENT
e
R.R. SPIKE
— P —
OVERHEAD ELEC
Q
STONE
— E —
UNDERGRD ELEC
®
WATER METER
— w —
WATER LINE
Q
SEWER CLEANOUT
SS
SEWER LINE
Q
SEWER MANHOLE
— GAS—
GAS LINE
0
STORM MANHOLE
— SD —
STORM LINE
FIRE HYDRANT
DITCH CNTRLINE
gyp,
UTILITY POLE
— x —CHAIN
LNK FNCE
—� SINGLE POLE SIGN

C)
N_
M
00
0
Q
z
VANCE TYSON JR
DEED BK: 10009-0887
'Own loft
LIMITS l LIMITS OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY '
._•I boa '
33"32 .
E_
1.15' 82
� TOP OF BANK (TYP.) N66 �N�
\ '00GONSE1��
BOO, OPT �0co
0�
80 FOUND 1/2
LOG LANE (TYP.) � � EB
_ / 1LP
54+00 80
�— REACH GC4 \
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP.) XS21 RP
.01
TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
06� VEGETATION PLOT (TYP. / �O
FOUND 1/2"
REBAR WITH CAP
S85° 23' 38 E - 95.51'
FOUNDIRON
REBAR
/ FOUND 5/8" REBAR
C° \ — 80
O 56+
w XS19RP
I0 TOE OF SLOPE (TYP.)
— — �� XS20LP THALWAG AS LOCATED VP-14 �p 1
l U) _� ON 12/21 /22 (TYP.) / ! / �� p COG g 5$-6
80
l 80 \ +8@— �� OF GO OS�'\�I PP
l = TOP OF BANK (TYP.) ` +00_ . \ DESIGN ALIGNMENT (TYP
C) OX
THALWAG AS ORIGI ALLY
— LOCATED P.) — —
. \ XS20RP \ 00l 3S� 3g
80 / cv o5 3A f
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP.) 80 00 s6g°
1 /
8q
■woo_ c
FOUND 1/2" N81° 29 ' cP '
REBAR WITH CAP 10 "W 35.73, w
now moo
Now
/ FOUND
/ FOUND 1/2" ROTHCHILD ASSETS LLC
/ REBAR WITH CAP PIN: 0442-85-8250
/ DEED BK: 10540 PG: 0600
VANCE TYSON JR /
PIN: 0442-77-0886 /
DEED BK: 10009-0887 /
/ PROPERTY LINE NOT SURVEYED (TYP.)
CALCULATED
POINT
we
O WETLAND GAUGE
Sr STREAM GAUGE
BRUSH TOE
Jonathan Digitally signed
by Jonathan Cory
Cory George
Date: 2023.02.23
George 12:23:10-05'00'
\\\\111111111///�
¢'c\A CARo�'''%
SEAL
L-5051
O ' .9.f, 1O C9
///11111111\\\
SHEET 6
AS BUILT SURVEY
for
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS
3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
wl
GRAYS CREEK TOWNSHIP
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATES SURVEYED: 9/01 - 9/02/2022
Co DRAWN BY: C. GEORGE
FIELD CREW: AH, JT, CG
PROJECT NO: 22-283
SAND HILL RD
SITE
6 yAI'F�OCk
ST
�1
w3. ScN pRER
r \�
9°
a
S�P�o�o Z a Y m
0 a o�
U Y �
BLOSSOM RD
VICINITY MAP (NTS)
NCBELS FIRM NO. C-4724
PO BOX: 879, PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 27041
www.pilotse.com 1 336-422-6741
30 0 15 30 60
SCALE: 1" = 30'
LEGEND
EXISTING IRON MON.
pd
WATER VALVE
0
SET 5/8" REBAR
O
WELL
0
CALCULATED POINT
-0
GUY WIRE
Q
TRAVERSE STATION
BOUNDARY LINE
CONCRETE MONUMENT
LINE NOT SURVEYED
®
PK NAIL
RIGHT OF WAY
— R/w—
R/W MONUMENT
— — —
— EASEMENT
e
R.R. SPIKE
— P —
OVERHEAD ELEC
Q
STONE
— E —
UNDERGRD ELEC
®
WATER METER
— w —
WATER LINE
Q
SEWER CLEANOUT
ss
SEWER LINE
Q
SEWER MANHOLE
— cns—
GAS LINE
0
STORM MANHOLE
— SD —
STORM LINE
FIRE HYDRANT
DITCH CNTRLINE
gyp,
UTILITY POLE
— x —CHAIN
LNK FNCE
—� SINGLE POLE SIGN

D
FOUND 1/2"
REBAR WITH CAP
NPp '83 120111
HARRY LEE
PIN: 0442-38-8091
DEED BK: 3454 PG: 0039
Parcel Line Table
Line #
Length
Direction
L1
19.53
S68° 05' 34"W
L2
20.02
N88° 10' 20"E
DESIGN ALIGNMENT (TYP.)
SWALE (A)
1 N 110 16' 11 - 339.15'
N
rn
1 TOP OF BANK (TYP.)
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROPERTY LINE NOT SURVEYED (TYP.) �I
Mh
1 1CO
/ o
r
SET 5/8" REBAR (TYP.) I
J
STREAM STRUCTURE
LIMITS OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT
P AT BOOK 147, PAGES 58-61 c�'
LO
m
REACH TV1-B
XS 3/4 RP
XS 4 LP
THALWAG (TYF
QQ
o�x 19�
w 00
DESIGN ALIGNMENT (TYP.)
O�
W
SET 5/8" REBAR (TYP.)
XS 3 LP
I9
I �
I 9�
ir>
I � I I �
I� I I XS 1/2 RP
I I I TV5-B
0
z
co
rn
G4 0-)/•
�4 ice•/ �
LOG LA E (TYP.)
0 'rn
0/ 1
1
1
VEGETATION '
PLOT (TYP.) '
1
94
1
I
FOUND 1/2"
REBAR WITH CAP
I REACH TV5-B I
XS 1 LP
XS 2 LP
' LIMITS OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
WOODY RIFFLE
(�'
ESIGN ALIGNMENT (TYP.)
a
WOODY RIFFLE
e FOUND 1/2"
REBAR WITH CAP
TOE OF SLOPE (TYP.)
` LIMITS OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (TYP.)
1
rn
VANCE TYSON JR
DEED BK: 10009-0887
ti
s90 \\
�9tS,
OIS'
VANCE TYSON JR
DEED BK: 10009-0887
NAPS$ 1
PP PG�S 6
cpo
o Pvp
N10 24, 14 EE 237'221
SEMENT
NSE?'\IpjAG E5$-61
LIMITP�T BOOK 147, PAGES
FOUND 1/2"
REBAR WITH CAP
^o
a
1 `
9
1
1 r—�A
N
11y
c
op6�1
S13 1
1
1
VEGETATION
PLOT (TYP.)
LIMITS OF TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (TYP.)
N
N
1
1
EDGE OF GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD
FOUND 1/2"
REBAR WITH CAP
FOUND 1/2" Jonathan Digitally signed
REBAR WITH CAP by Jonathan
Cory Cory George
Date: 2023.02.23
George 12:23:53-05'00'
wD
O WETLAND GAUGE
O STREAM GAUGE
BRUSH TOE
¢'cN CARo�''%,
O..•�FEssio•.•%%;
SEAL
L-5051
O '•.�4, yo..• C9
SqU�RV�cQ-
A'�/�
NI
SHEET 7
AS BUILT SURVEY
for
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL
SOLUTIONS
3600 GLENWOOD AVE., SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27612
GRAYS CREEK TOWNSHIP
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATES SURVEYED: 9/01 - 9/02/2022
DRAWN BY: C. GEORGE
FIELD CREW: AH, JT, CG
PROJECT NO: 22-283
SAND HILL RD N
SITE
Nq t'F�oOk
sT
w3. ScN pRER
r \�
90
= ROOk OP a
S�P�o�o Z a Y m
U Y �
BLOSSOM RD
VICINITY MAP (NTS)
30 0 15 30 60
SCALE: 1" = 30'
LEGEND
EXISTING IRON MON.
pd
WATER VALVE
o
SET 5/8" REBAR
O
WELL
0
CALCULATED POINT
-0
GUY WIRE
Q
TRAVERSE STATION
BOUNDARY LINE
CONCRETE MONUMENT
LINE NOT SURVEYED
®
PK NAIL
— R/w—
RIGHT OF WAY
R/W MONUMENT
— — —
— EASEMENT
e
R.R. SPIKE
— P —
OVERHEAD ELEC
Q
STONE
— E —
UNDERGRD ELEC
®
WATER METER
— w —
WATER LINE
Q
SEWER CLEANOUT
SS
SEWER LINE
Q
SEWER MANHOLE
— GAS—
GAS LINE
Op
STORM MANHOLE
— SD —
STORM LINE
FIRE HYDRANT
DITCH CNTRLINE
gyp,
UTILITY POLE
— x —CHAIN
LNK FNCE
—� SINGLE POLE SIGN

Reach GC PROFILE
91
90
89
88
87
86
85
84
Reach GC PROFILE
91
90
89
88
87
86
85
84
14
Reach GC PROFILE
90
89
88
87
86
85
84
83
82
22
Reach GC PROFILE
8/
8E
8E
8L
81
82
8
8(
Reach GC PROFILE
K
84
8":
K
8
8C
7�
7E
91
90
89
88
87
86
85
84
91
90
89
88
87
86
85
84
90
89
88
87
86
85
84
83
82
30
87
86
85
84
83
82
81
80
85
84
83
82
81
80
79
78
Jonathan
Cory
George
Digitally signed by
Jonathan Cory
George
Date: 2023.02.23
12:24:33-05'00'
¢'c\A CARo�''%,
o ..�•FEss,o�..%,%%
SEAL
L-5051
uj
SURD
`U
SHEET 8

Reach GC PROFILE
81
80
79
78
77
76
75
74
73
72
54
97
96
95
94
93
92
91
90
89
88
87
86
8:
K
8
8(
7�
7E
77
7E
7E
74
Reach GC PROFILE
83
82
81
80
79
78
77
76
75
74
S-B JILT 3URF7ACE (TY .)
+00 54+50 55+00 55+50 56+00 56+50 57+00 57+50 58+00 58+50 59+00 59+50 60+00 60+50 61+00 61+50 62+00 62+50
Swale A PROFILE
DE IGN LIG ME T
THI AR A
AS BUILT SURFA E (T P.)
0+9s00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 6+8
100
99
98
97
96
95
94
93
92
91
90
89
88
87
86
85
4-
Reach TV1 PROFILE
97
96
95
94
93
92
91
90
89
88
87
86
9
100
99
98
97
96
95
1
Reach TV5 PROFILE
AS-BUILTURF CE TYP )
-9500 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00 7+50 8+00 8+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+'
100
99
98
97
96
95
94
93
92
91
90
89
88
87
86
85
7
100
99
98
97
96
95
9
31
30
79
78
77
76
75
74
73
72
Jonathan
Cory
George
Digitally signed by
Jonathan Cory
George
Date: 2023.02.23
12:25:15-05'00'
¢'cN CARo�''%,
SEAL
L-5051 uj
//IIIII��
SHEET 9

age-
��r 1'ay�ft�e�rilf�
Ftegio�.al
AIrNort
<lfan��
Heritage
Neign4
DUGOUT SITE RECORD DRAWINGS
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
34.9252130 )-78.8550800
CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN: HUC 03030005
PROJECT LOCATION MARCH 2O23
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
y 3600 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
VICINITY MAP
N TS
'1.
PI
0
0
�0
Know what's below.
Call before you dig
NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, DIGGING, OR EXCAVATION THE
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE) THAT MAY EXIST AND CROSS THROUGH
THE AREA(S) OF CONSTRUCTION, WHETHER INDICATED ON THE PLANS
OR NOT. CALL "8 1 1 " A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING OR
EXCAVATING. REPAIRS TO ANY UTILITY DAMAGED RESULTING FROM
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
CONTRACTOR.
PROJECT DIRECTORY
DESIGNED BY:
RESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, LLC
3000 GLENWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27G 1 2
SURVEYED BY:
PILOT SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, PC
OG-D S. DEPOT STREET
PILOT MOUNTAIN, NC 2704 1
USACE ACTION ID #: SAW-20 1 8-0 1 883
AS -BUILT TOPOGRAPHY AND PLANIMETRICS
SURVEY WAS PROVIDED BY PILOT SURVEYING
AND ENGINEERING, PC (NC FIRM LICENSE
NUMBER C-4724, J. COPY GEORGE, NC PLS
L-505 1), DATED SEPTEMBER 02, 2022
RALEIGH, NC 27612
,,ITF NAAP
IV I -�)
Sheet
Li5t Table
Sheet Number
Sheet
Title
--
COVED
51
LEACH
GC2
52
LEACH
GC2
53
LEACH
GC2
54
LEACH
GC2
55
LEACH
GC2
5G
LEACH
GC2
57
LEACH
GC2
56
LEACH
GC2
59
LEACH
GC2
5 1 0
LEACH
GC4
51 1
REACH
TV 1
5 1 2
LEACH
TV5
5 1 3
5WALE (A)
5 14
—F-5WALE
(B)
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, INC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
C A R p
ESS/p�
ZF
= SEAL
_
031435
INV
C3 �23
w
Q
M
N
o
N
O
J �
!1 M
0
z
a
o rY
0
z
LCl
O
cn
U)
w O
>
-1U
LU
Ir
Ir 0-1
PROJECT NUMBER:
100159
PROJECT MANAGER:
AFM
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:

�I j\I LEGEND
I m \V_�C\] N
l �
1 w �� �� -_ _— 1 �— PROPERTY LINE — —
— —� — \_ - \ LIMITS OF PROPOSED
— V_ Z CONSERVATION EASEMENT LCE
Q WETLAND v v v
0 3+ AS -BUILT CONTOUR MAJOR 50
AS -BUILT CONTOUR MINOR 4G
\ - - -
— , — — / e PROPOSED CONTOUR MAJOR 50
+00
PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR 46
g2 � 3 —S6LP / 89 - AS -BUILT TOP OF BANK — — — TB
AS -BUILT BOTTOM OF BANK — BB
k00� �� T 9� REACH GC I , XS5LP / /
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
V/92
9 89
VP�{'— AS -BUILT BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
WG PROPOSED BRUSH TOE PROTECTION
,ail/ ii 1
/� _ S6RP AS -BUILT LOG STRUCTURE
00 / / ,
PROPOSED LOG STRUCTURE
On
Ar
/V AS -BUILT BRUSH BED
V_ _ � —� � � � / PROPOSED BRUSH BED
Z_
J / I ( _ �Z_ AS -BUILT WOODY RIFFLE
0
I �
/ j PROPOSED WOODY RIFFLE
V
V_ GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
V_ AIL � V
)I STAGE RECORDER
FLOW GAUGE
MONITORING CROSS SECTION
105
100
95
90
85
105
VEGETATION MONITORING PLOT VP#
NOTE: ALL SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM
100 THE DESIGN ARE SHOWN IN RED
95
90
85
G+00 G+50 7+00 7+50 5+00 5+50 9+00 9+50 10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00
SCALE: HOR 1 ''=30'; VERT 1 ''=3'
AS-
TOP
UILT
OF ANK
PROPOSE
TOP
OF
D
ANK
CHANNEL
AS -BUILT
BED
P
CHANNEL
OP
5ED
BED
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, INC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
11/11
`k, 1C�A�R0`
SEAL
031435 —
3�
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE`
li.i
Q
0 M
N
O
O
J
!1 co
CD
Z_
OC Q
O tY
0
z
�l..0
O
c�
U
w O
U
>
J
Q
z(D
J
0�
z_
Q
U
0
00
N
z
U
O
CD
�
_
w z
U
W
W O
� U
�
cn p
Z) Q
2 O J
J
ff In�
V
z w
IU 0 m
z
O
tY 0
Q
tY
0- U
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
100159
PROJECT MANAGER:
AFM
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S 1

0
w
Q
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, INC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
1CIA'R0
ESS/0�9'yy''%®
SEAL
031435
FNGINE��
m�in 10�\\\\\ J12
0
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE`
ui
0 M
N
O
O
J �
!1 co
Z
0= Q
0 0-1
0
z
�l..0 o
O
(n
U
W O
U
>
J
0-1
Z
� J
0
Z
Q
U
0
N
� Z
U
O
CD
_
uJ Z
U
DO
W
W
U
cn 0
F--- Z
2 O J
J
z
W
w 0 m
z
o
I 0
Q
Ir
0- U
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
100159
PROJECT MANAGER:
AFM
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S2

0
w
Q
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
1C1A'R0
�FESS/0
SEAL
031435
IN
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE`
li.i
0 M
N
O
O
J �
!1 co
Z
0= Q
0 0-1
0
z
�l..0 o
O
(n
U
W O
U
>
J
0-1
Z
� J
0
Z
Q
U
0
N
� Z
U
O
CD
_
LJ Z
U
DO
W
W
U
cn 0
F--- Z
2 O J
J
z
W
0 m
z
w
Q
o
I 0
Ir
0- U
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
100159
PROJECT MANAGER:
AFM
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S3

0
w
Q
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
1CIA'R0
�FESS/0
SEAL
031435
�'�• FNGINE��
q
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE`
ui
0 M
N
O
O
J �
!1 co
Z
0= Q
0 0-1
0
z
�l..0 o
O
(n
U
W O
U
>
J
0-1
Z
� J
0
Z
Q
U
0
N
� Z
U
O
CD
_
LJ Z
U
DO
W
W
U
cn 0
F--- Z
2 O J
J
z
W
w 0 m
z
o
I 0
Q
Ir
0- U
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
100159
PROJECT MANAGER:
AFM
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S4

0
w
Q
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, INC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
1CIA'R0��'''%
OFESS/0
SEAL
031435
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE`
u.i
0 M
N
O
O
J �
!1 co
Z
0= Q
0 0-1
0
z
Flu o
O
(n
U)
W O
U
>
J
LU
Ir
Ir 0-1
Q
Z
� J
Z �
Q
U
0 �
N
� Z
U
O
CD
_
uJ Z
U
W
WO
U
cn p
F--- Z
2 O J
J
z
W
w 0 m
z
o
I
Q
Ir
0- U
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
100159
PROJECT MANAGER:
AFM
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S5

0
w
Q
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
1C1A'R0��'''%
SEAL
031435
FNGINE�
�\
nu��\\\3 J l
1
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE`
li.i
0 M
N
O
O
J �
!1 co
Z
0= Q
0 0-1
0
z
�l..0 o
O
(n
U
W O
U
>
J
0-1
Z
� J
�
Z
Q
U
0 �
N
� Z
U
O
CD
_
LJ Z
U
W
WO
U
cn p
F--- Z
2 O J
J
z
W
0 m
z
w
Q
o
I
Ir
0- U
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
100159
PROJECT MANAGER:
AFM
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S6

0
w
Q
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
`�x-\ 1C1A'R����''%
oFESSio
SEAL
031435
FNGINE�
MUD-�'�```��\ 13
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE`
li.i
0 M
N
O
O
J �
!1 co
Z
0= Q
0 0-1
0
z
�l..0 o
O
(n
U
W O
U
>
J
LU
Ir
Ir 0-1
Q
Z
� J
�
Z
Q
U
0 �
N
� Z
U
O
CD
_
LJ Z
U
W
WO
U
cn p
Z
2 O J
J
z
W
0 m
z
w
Q
o
I
Ir
0- U
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
100159
PROJECT MANAGER:
AFM
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S7

0
w
Q
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
1CIA'R0
ESS/Gti
®`•\ �OF
SEAL
031435
FNGINO'
�'''•,� F. MUD-�'�```��� �I
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE`
ui
0 M
N
O
O N
J OQ
!1 co
Z
0= Q
0 0-1
0
z
�l..0 o
O
(n
U
W O
U
>
J
0-1
Z
� J
0
Z
Q
U
0
N
� Z
U
O
CD
_
uJ Z
U
DO
W
W
U
cn 0
F--- Z
2 O J
J
z
W
0 m
z
w
Q
o
I 0
Ir
0- U
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
100159
PROJECT MANAGER:
AFM
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S8

0
w
Q
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
1CIA'R0
ESS/Gti
�
SEAL
031435
FNGINE�� `
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE`
u.i
0 M
N
O
O
J �
!1 co
Z
0= Q
0 0-1
0
z
Flu o
O
(n
U)
W O
U
>
J
LU
Ir
Ir 0-1
Q
Z
� J
Z �
Q
U
0 �
N
� Z
U
O
CD
_
LJ Z
U
W
WO
U
cn p
F--- Z
2 O J
J
z
W
0 m
z
w
Q
o
I
Ir
0- U
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
100159
PROJECT MANAGER:
AFM
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S9

0
w
Q
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
1CIA'R0
�FESS/0
SEAL
031435
FNGINE�
`0
/n n i111111 319 `Zn7
C)
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE`
ui
0 M
N
O
O
J �
!1 co
Z
0= Q
0 0-1
0
z
�l..0 o
O
(n
U
W O
U
>
J
0-1
Z
� J
Z �
Q
U
0 �
� Z
U
O
C�
�
_
LU Z
U
W
W
� U
�
cn p
F--- Z
2 O J
J
z
W
D
CD
w 0 m
z
o
I
Q
Ir
0- U
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
100159
PROJECT MANAGER:
AFM
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S10

0
w
Q
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
1C1A'R0
�oFESS/0
SEAL
031435
IN
MO
M I2�
C)
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE`
li.i
0 M
N
O
O
J �
!1 co
Z
0= Q
0 0-1
0
z
�l..0 o
O
(n
U
W O
U
>
J
LU
Ir 0-1
Q
Z
� J
0
Z
Q
U
0
00
O� Z
>
O
_
�
Q
D
w O
w
U
cn 0
F--- Z
2 O J
LU
J
z
W
D
CD
0 m
z
w
Q
o
I 0
Ir
0- U
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
100159
PROJECT MANAGER:
AFM
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S 11

0
w
Q
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, INC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
1CIA'R0
�FESS/0
SEAL
031435
FNGINV
�.
., . Q I
/411111
31
0
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE`
u.i
0 M
N
O
O
J �
!1 co
Z
0= Q
0 0-1
0
z
Flu o
O
(n
U)
W O
U
>
J
LU
Ir
Ir 0-1
Q
Z
� J
Z �
Q
U
0 �
O
>
O
�
_
0
Q
w O
w
�
� U
cn p
F--- Z
2 O J
J
z
W
D
CD
0 m
z
w
Q
o
I
Ir
0- U
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
100159
PROJECT MANAGER:
AFM
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S12

0
w
Q
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
1CIA'R0
®�•`� �OFESS/0�
SEAL
031435
FNGINE��
MOB-�'�`��,•\ 1
/411111„00 319`ti�
(0
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE`
ui
0 M
N
O
O
J �
!1 co
Z
0= Q
0 0-1
0
z
�l..0 o
O
(n
U
W O
U
>
J
LU
Ir 0-1
Q
Z
� J
0
Z
Q
U
0
O
Q
0
w
w z
Q
0� D
3�
w O
cn
U
cn 0
F--- Z
2 O J
J
z
W
D
CD
0 m
z
w
Q
o
I 0
Ir
� U
�
PROJECT NUMBER:
100159
PROJECT MANAGER:
AFM
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S13

0
w
Q
pres
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
Main: 919.829.9909
www.res.us
Engineering Services Provided By:
RES Environmental Operating Company, LLC
License: F-1428
SEAL
1CIA'R0
�FESS/0
SEAL
031435
FNGINE��
/41111110 g
0
FULL SCALE: 1 "=30
0 30 60
2" FULL SCALE
1" = HALF SCALE`
u.i
0 M
N
O
O
J �
!1 co
Z
0= Q
0 0-1
0
z
Flu o
O
(n
U)
W O
U
>
J
LU
Ir
Ir 0-1
Q
Z
� J
Z �
Q
U
0 �
� z
m
w
w z
Q
w O
cn
� U
cn p
F--- Z
2 O J
J
z
W
D
CD
0 m
z
w
Q
0
I
Ir
0- U
0
PROJECT NUMBER:
100159
PROJECT MANAGER:
AFM
DESIGNED:
AFM
DRAWN:
TRS
CHECKED:
BRC
SHEET NUMBER:
S14