HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCS000574_Correspondence_20160229 Harty x sae►ts
senior vice Prask bM
DUKE
► Heats a say
526 Sw.0 antvM Sbaef
Mal Gods E7lUP
Ch&VVV;MC2M=
(7"382-OW
Electronic Submittal
February 29, 2016
Mr. Bradley Bennett
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Stormwater Permitting
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 276MI612
Subject: Cape Fear Steam Electric Plant
Comments on Draft Industrial Stormwater Permit(No. NCS000574)
Dear Mr. Bennett:
With reference to the February 1, 2015 public notice, Duke Energy offers the following
comments on the subject draft permit
Cover Pane
States'Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC'Is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater...
This should say`Duke Energy Progress LLC'. Is hereby authorized to discharge
stormwater...
Part I Page 2 of 2
The location map Is labelled 'Duke Energy Progress, Inc'. This should be labelled as
"Duke Energy Progress, LLC'.
Part II Pace 4 of 14
Under item 6'Employee Tralning'Duke Energy utilizes computer based training for
SPPP. In this process no signatures are obtained but the records of employee
attendance are kept electronically. It is requested that the option to maintain records of
employee training electronically be allowed instead of keeping signed records of
training.
Page 2 of 3
February 29, 2016
Letter to Mr. Bradley Bennett
Part 11 Pace 7 of 13
Under the footnotes it discusses that SW-001 and SW-008 are not regulated as point
source discharges because of staff observation on the site visit on November 12, 2014.
Duke Energy requests that Outfall SW-008, be removed as a stommwater outfall and be
placed In the facilities NPDES permit when new permit wastewater permit Is Issued.
Part II Pace 8 of 13
Under Table 2 Monitoring Schedule it Is requested that the dates of the monitoring
period be adjusted to reflect the effective date of the permit(e.g, Year 1 —Period 1
begin April 1. 2016). This will allow for any improvement needed to establish access
areas for analytical monitoring.
Part 11 Paae 10 of 14
Under Table 4 some of the benchmark values are very low. For Copper the benchmark
value Is listed as 0.01 mgA. The Silver value Is listed at 0.0003 mgA. Plus for Silver the
practical quantification level listed In the Fact Sheet is 0.001 mgA, which as noted In the
Fact Sheet Is higher than the benchmark level. Could these two values be re-
evaluated? The potential e)dsts that these parameters could be measured in stoma
water run-off from the influence of background soil containing metals, Instead of an
Industrial activity.
Part 11 Pawl of 13
The second sentence of the second paragraph states, °Qualitative monitoring shall be
performed quarterly as specified In Table 2...' It should state the following, °Qualitative
monitoring shall be performed quarterly as specified in Table 5...'
Part 11 Pace 12 of 13
Under Table 5. Monitoring Schedule it Is requested that the dates of the monitoring
period be adjusted to reflect the effective date of the permit(e.g. Year 1 —Period i
begin April 1,2016). This will allow for any improvement needed to establish access
areas for visual monitoring.
FACT SHEET
Pace 1
The fadlity Information lists that facility name as Duke Energy Progress, Inc., Cape Fear
Steam Electric Plant,the facility name should be Duke Energy Progress LLC., Cape
Fear Steam Electric Plant.